Sandra Finley

Jun 232025
 

There is more to say about mental telepathy,  but later.    /Sandra

In the Eisenstein posting, excerpt below, there is a link Telepathy Tapes.   (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oci3qhC-yzM)

RELATED TO    “The INCREDIBLE TRUE Stories Behind ‘The Telepathy Tapes”
EXCERPT:

There is, however, a deeper level to what is happening through the autism phenomenon. In adapting to their condition, autistic people often develop gifts, both mental and emotional, that society needs right now; for example, the abilities of the Spellers described in the podcast the Telepathy Tapes. More generally, in adapting to the specific challenges of each stage of civilization, human beings develop the capabilities necessary for humanity to move to the next stage.

Each one of us is soul made flesh; Life made human. If a tree grows in rocky soil, shaded by other trees, and it twists and reaches for the light, we do not say it is a bad tree for being misshapen. It is doing what life does. Life wants to live. Life adapts to overcome all difficulties. Life evolves because of its difficulties.

Anyone who thinks that their own virtue and willpower distinguishes them from the obese, the depressed, the addicted, the poor, the lazy, the ignorant, the unjust, or the violent has a humbling lesson in front of them.

When a child is injured by vaccines or other environmental insults, and the life within him takes a form different from the rest of us, this is cause for celebration — life lives! — not shame. Yet that does not justify the injury.

The autistic are not the only ones who’ve suffered injury from the world-destroying life-destroying Machine. The modern way of life, birth, child-rearing, and death, its sundering of ties to community and nature, its entrenched cycles of trauma, its denial of spirit, its relentless artificial scarcity, and its pollution of the body and the environment with toxic chemicals compose the rocky soil and occluded sunlight in which we have all grown. The life in each of us adapts to these conditions as best it can.

We call this basic truth compassion. “But for the grace of God, I too would be autistic. I too would be obese. I too would be addicted.” Or, “I too would be a migrant. I too would be on welfare. I too would drop out of school.” And even, “I too would be a criminal. I too would be greedy. I too would cheat and lie and steal and do others harm.” Not only would I, but surely I have, in some way and form. As Thich Nhat Hanh said, “I am the pirate.” What is in you, is in me, some echo of it, some holographic trace of it. Let he who be without sin cast the first stone.

Those we stone with our insults and shaming and denunciation are ourselves. Understand a person’s backstory, and you will realize, “That could have been me.” None of us are made of better or worse stuff than the rest. We all are life, doing what life does in the circumstances it is in. Yet neither is anyone a helpless victim of circumstance. That’s because life is not static. We grow new capacities in evolving within and against trying conditions, until they no longer imprison us but become the material for creative choice. That is the moment when the truth of “It is not your fault; you are victim of forces beyond your control” gives way to a new truth: “Stop feeling sorry for yourself. You are no longer a prisoner of your past, you the author of your future.” The former had been true, but no longer. From the victim, comes the master. From the illness comes the medicine.

So, when I meet someone profoundly challenged by injury, illness, tragedy, or persecution, I am always curious. What capacities have been forged in the crucible of your suffering? Again and again, I discover generosity among the impoverished, inner freedom among the incarcerated, compassion among the judged, kindness among the brutalized, joy among the bereft. Sometimes it is hard to see, just a glint of something still forming. Sometimes it is radiant like the sun.

It is by those who have grown strong by overcoming the injuries dealt to them by civilization that a new kind of civilization will be born.

 

 

Jun 202025
 

 

June 11, 2025

Pediatric Perspectives: Risking Everything

You can learn a lot by having conversations with people — especially those you may disagree with. Doing this has helped shape the lives of physicians like Paul Thomas, M.D. (retired) and Suzanne Humphries, M.D.

Many have even walked away from their practices, given up their licenses and put just about everything else at risk because of what they were challenged to consider. Covered in this episode of “Pediatric Perspectives” are some of the topics that have arisen from these difficult conversations. It’s a show that you won’t want to miss!

Watch below:

 

 

 

************************************************************************************************************************

Thank you for being a Defender of truth, freedom and children’s health!  If you find value in the work we do at CHD Canada, please consider making a donation.
Jun 182025
 
Our contribution is to get this news circulated;
   Persons in the medical professions, including pharmacies and schools need to know.   I’ll watch for the outcome.
      This is a CRITICAL battle between industry industries and those determined to stop the poisoning of our children,  for profit./Sandra
Agency Capture Big Pharma

After Years of Silence, first since HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tapped eight new ACIP members, just days after removing all 17 former members in what he called a “clean sweep.”

 

After Years of Silence, New CDC Vaccine Panel to Vote on Mercury in Flu Shots

The committee will also vote on RSV vaccines for pregnant mothers, babies and young children at its meeting next week — the first since HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tapped eight new ACIP members, just days after removing all 17 former members in what he called a “clean sweep.”

The CDC’s vaccine advisory committee will vote next week on the mercury-based flu vaccine, according to an Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meeting agenda draft posted today on the ACIP website

The committee will also vote on RSV vaccines for pregnant mothers, babies and young children.

This will be the first meeting since U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tapped eight new ACIP members — just days after removing all 17 former members in what he called a “clean sweep … needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science.”

Before they vote, ACIP members will hear presentations on respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV vaccines, including Merck’s new RSV shot for newborns. Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the new shot, even though clinical trials showed an 11.71% rate of serious adverse events, including death.

Discussions, but no votes, are slated for other vaccines, including COVID-19, Chikungunya, Anthrax and MMRV (Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Varicella).

ACIP decides which vaccines should be recommended to the public, who should take them and how often — recommendations the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) typically rubber stamps and publishes on its immunization schedules.

The committee will meet June 25-26 in Atlanta, Georgia.

ACIP to discuss thimerosal after years of silence

Thimerosal is a mercury-based preservative used in multi-dose vials of the flu vaccine, according to the CDC. Most single-dose vials and pre-filled syringes of the flu shot don’t contain the preservative, as they’re intended for single use.

Over 25 years ago, vaccine industry leaders and public health officials concealed evidence from the CDC’s own database that linked thimerosal to neurodevelopmental disorders in children, including autism, according to transcripts from a meeting in Norcross, Georgia.

The U.S. government has long said thimerosal poses no harm to children. However, in 2001, out of what the agency said was an abundance of caution, the CDC said the ingredient would no longer be used in childhood vaccines.

A recent investigation by journalist Sharyl Attkisson proved both statements untrue.

Thimerosal’s potential to harm kids has been on Kennedy’s radar for over a decade. In 2014, he edited a book on the topic: “Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak: The Evidence Supporting the Immediate Removal of Mercury — a Known Neurotoxin — from Vaccines.”

The CDC webpage for flu shot safety considerations during pregnancy makes no mention of thimerosal, nor does it encourage pregnant women to be sure they get a flu shot from a single-dose vial or prefilled syringe to avoid mercury exposure.

Next week, ACIP members will hear a presentation on thimerosal in vaccines and a presentation on proposed recommendations for flu vaccines that contain thimerosal. The names of the presenters were not listed on the agenda at press time.

The committee will also vote on flu vaccines that don’t contain thimerosal.

Dr. Meryl Nass, who has attended many past ACIP meetings, said, “There is no need for thimerosal, a known neurotoxin, as it is not used in single-dose vials. Its use should be ended.”

Critics weigh in on ACIP agenda

Reactions to the ACIP meeting agenda were mixed. Some said it signaled that the CDC is veering off course, while others called for even more change.

Brian Hooker, Ph.D., Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) chief scientific officer, said that although he was encouraged by Kennedy’s selections for the new ACIP members, he was disappointed in the slate of meeting presenters and moderators.

“It is the same old cast of CDC characters (from the National Center for Infectious and Respiratory Diseases) who present a very biased viewpoint,” Hooker said. “CDC’s culture is vaccinology as a religion, straight up. ACIP committee members desperately need an alternative view that is based on the very stark reality of vaccine ineffectiveness and the extremely high prevalence of vaccine adverse events.”

Dr. Jeremy Faust, editor of Medpage, said in a Substack post critiquing the ACIP meeting agenda that the planned vote on thimerosal “revives and elevates a longstanding anti-vaccine conspiracy theory.”

“Removing the compound will do nothing to improve vaccine safety,” Faust wrote, “but it certainly will undermine confidence in other existing vaccines.”

Faust also criticized the CDC for failing to put a COVID-19 vaccine vote on the meeting agenda, writing that the move will leave “fall policies unclear.”

HHS officials last month removed the COVID-19 shot from the CDC’s recommended list of immunizations for healthy children and pregnant women after the FDA limited its COVID-19 vaccine approvals to high-risk groups and the elderly.

‘This could mark a turning point’

James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D. is president and CEO of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge, an advocacy group that pushes for accuracy and integrity in science and for biomedical researchers to put people’s health before profits. He said the ACIP meeting agenda suggested that the CDC was making progress in “structure, balance, and transparency.”

“If public comment is taken seriously and if safety data are rigorously and honestly evaluated — then this could mark a turning point,” Lyons-Weiler said.

Lyons-Weiler said it’s also important that the CDC be “fully open” about its Evidence to Recommendations framework.

When ACIP makes a vaccine recommendation, it’s accompanied by what’s called an Evidence to Recommendations framework that describes the information the committee used in making its decision.

In the past, the CDC took shortcuts in showing this evidence, Lyons-Weiler said. He said he hopes the next ACIP meeting shows that the CDC is moving forward “with the full light of science, skepticism, and civic trust.”

This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.    Please Donate Today

 

ACIP guidelines don’t address full scope of possible vaccine injuries

Historically, states use ACIP recommendations to help shape vaccine policy and doctors use them in making decisions.

Some states consider the ACIP’s “General Best Practice Guidelines for Immunization,” which lists examples of contraindications and precautions for each vaccine, as the only acceptable authority when deciding whether to grant a child’s medical exemption request to a school-required vaccine.

However, ACIP’s list of contraindications isn’t exhaustive, according to attorney Sujata Gibson, who said:

“Right now, states like New York and California are overruling treating physicians and rejecting medical exemptions when they don’t see the condition listed in the ACIP best practices guideline as a contraindication or a precaution.

“But the guideline doesn’t provide an exhaustive list of all the reasons a child may be at risk of serious harm…. The way that New York, California and other states are treating these guidelines is reckless and dangerous, and children are being severely harmed as a result.”

In other words, it doesn’t matter how many doctors confirm that a particular child will likely be harmed by a certain vaccine, states like New York and California give medical exemptions only for conditions specified in ACIP’s guidelines.

The Defender reached out to the CDC to ask if the new ACIP committee will clarify that its guidance is not a substitute for clinical decision-making and should not be used as a standard for clinicians or schools in deciding whether to grant medical exemptions. The CDC did not respond by the deadline.

Related articles in The Defender:

Jun 182025
 

Manufacturing the Threat”   – –   What a widely-appropriate title!

= = = = = = = = = = = = = =

APPENDED #1     (Appended #2 is below – – chronology)

UNSENT EMAIL, 2023     RE:COUTTS

Hello Donald  Best,

My sincere appreciation to you and to Jason for all the energy and intelligence you bring to the issues that face Canadians right now.   Most importantly,  my appreciation for your humanity.

This film, “”Manufacturing The Threat“, is a gift for

Jaclyne Martin,  Jerry Morin, Chris Carbert, Anthony Olienick, and Christopher Lysak.  (Defendants at the Lethbridge Court House,  charges related to Coutts (Freedom Convoy).

The film is in the early stages of release.   With heart-depth gratitude to Amy Miller.

     2023-09-09  Manufacturing The Threat, Amy Miller filmmaker

Shining a light into the murky world of police infiltration, incitement, and agent provocateurs, Manufacturing The Threat shows how Canada’s policing and national security agencies, granted additional powers after 9/11, routinely break laws with little to no accountability or oversight.

For the first time ever, a feature-length documentary examines the issue of agent provocateurs and entrapment in Canada’s national security apparatus. Manufacturing the Threat is a thrilling and emotional film, which examines a deeply disturbing episode in Canadian history, when an impoverished couple was coerced by undercover law enforcement agents into carrying out a (INSERT / S:  an attempted – fake) terrorist bombing. Further, viewers learn that this case is far from unique in the context of Canadian intelligence.

When a young Muslim couple was arrested on Canada Day 2013, caught red-handed planting bombs at the Parliament buildings in Victoria, BC, the news was celebrated as a tour de force for Canada’s national security agencies. Citing the rising threat of Islamic terrorism, the Harper government went on to pass Bill C-51, the Anti-terrorism Act.

However, media and government were relatively silent when the case against the Canada Day bombers fell apart. After the young couple, Omar Nuttall and Ana Korody, had spent three years in prison, they learned that they had been deceived by an elaborate agent provocateur operation managed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS).

‘Project Souvenir’ involved over 240 security service operatives, and culminated in their decision to plant fake bombs, constructed with the help of undercover agents, on the BC Parliament Grounds. The Canada Day Bombers had their charges thrown out, and their imprisonment was referred to as a “travesty of justice” by Judge Elizabeth Bennett.

(Check out the facebook page.  The film is showing in Victoria(?), etc.. 

And will be available for download from a documentary film site for $3 or $4.   This film is important.

Manufacturing the Threat

APPENDED #2    CHRONOLOGY   Some notes of mine

2025-06-16    Same happens with web page address as happened (below)    Dec 2018.  (valid link, BUT had to wait – – at first it showed as not good.)

Oct 24.  Amy sent video that she and Boban did.  On refugee problem in Ukraine.

Sept 2023.  I phoned & LeftMessage after receiving a facebook messenger message. (I use social media very little.)

Dec 2018.   Amy unsubscribed from my network.  I left a msg on her answering machine, to thank her for her work.

May 2009  I phoned and talked with Amy.


(Amy writing)

I self defended against 8 criminal charges stemming from political actions back in 2002-2004 and won and offered to help out.

I had also sent you information regarding my documentary and the 9 week cross Canada tour I was on with it, ‘Myths for Profit: Canada’s Role In Industries of War and Peace’ as I had hoped you would let people know about it on your listserve. I returned to Montreal late last night but I am obviously hoping that more people learn about the documentary. There is a 10 minute trailer on the website to give people a taste of it.
Hope you enjoy it and will consider passing on the word to people across Canada about this important critical documentary.
Thanks
Amy

 

Myths for Profit: Canada’s role in industries of War & Peace   (link IS valid)

Source: www.wideopenexposure…   (valid link, BUT had to wait – – at first it showed as not good.  Dec 2018)

We are pleased to announce the release of our first feature film documentary ‘Myths for Profit: Canada’s Role in Industries of War and Peace’.

Thu 11/09/2008

Best of luck to you at the court date tomorrow. I would like to be informed and know how to plug in with support and outreach.
In solidarity and struggle,
amy

= = = == = = =

(TO:  Donald Best Online –  Jason Lavigne podcast)     Related to   Documentary  “Manufacturing The Threat”  (by Amy Miller)

I tried contacting Amy Miller today (2025-06-16).  A message on her phone says the phone only takes texts.   (I don’t have a cell phone.)

 

Amy’s company is  “Wide Open Exposures Productions”   http://www.wideopenexposure.com/M4P.php

IMPORTANT:  the link takes you to “the page doesn’t exist”.   BUT IT DOES EXIST!

I noticed a thin line at top of page.   Through that I got to the main headings of the website.   Then to more.    While I was preparing this email, still more downloaded.   (INCLUDING HER VARIOUS PRODUCTIONS.)

I had been worried that Amy was unable to continue her work.   I think she is still going.   When you see the extent of her work,  you will know.

It is getting evermore difficult to run my network and blog;  I decided long ago (before Ed Snowden) to continue as I had always been doing, in order to know what was the experience of the bulk of the population.  Also,  if it was possible to adapt, to find ways to adapt to the technology.

Thank-you for your defence of Helen Grus and all that you do.  God bless you!  You bless us all. /    Sandra Finley www.sandrafinley.ca

= = = = =

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: June 16, 2025
Subject: RE: Documentary “Manufacturing The Threat”

 

On the same theme:

2012-05-19 TO: MP Blake Richards re his private member’s bill to make it a crime to wear a mask at protests. Remember Montebello, it was the police who wore the masks.

https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=5392

 

/Sandra

Jun 182025
 

Reclaim the Net is from the UK.   I have followed them for years, because of their great work  .  .  .

you value free speech and privacy. Each issue we publish is a commitment to defend these critical rights, providing insights and actionable information to protect and promote liberty in the digital age

Please sign up for their newsletter, if you are interested.  This   is  what I received via email for June 18, 2025.   I do not know how long I can continue what I’m doing.   Your best defense  to receiving their reports is to add your email address to their listserv.  It’s free.   Thanks.   /   Sandra

 

At Reclaim The Net, we don’t rely on invasive advertising that compromises our values. Instead, we’re powered by those who believe in a freer internet — people like you. If you stand for free speech and the fight to reclaim privacy and civil liberties, join us. Become a supporter today. Gain exclusive access to extra content, tutorials, and guides as a thanks for your support.
NEW RESTRICTIONS

IDF Mandates Pre-Approval for Reporting Missile Strikes, Including on Social Media and Online Platforms

A new set of censorship rules issued by the Israel Defense Forces is raising alarms over media freedom and public transparency.

Brigadier-General Kobi Mandelblit, Israel’s chief censor, declared on Wednesday a mandate requiring prior approval for any reporting on where missiles or drones have struck, no matter the platform or location of publication.

According to the statement, “any person who prints or publishes printed matter or a publication regarding the location of a strike or hit by enemy war materiel, including missiles of any kind and UAVs, in the media or online (including social media, blogs and chats, etc.)” must now submit that material to the military censor for approval before it is released.

This directive applies to both domestic and international reporting, online and offline.

Mandelblit emphasized that he is also banning “the printing or publishing of any publication that has not been submitted to the Censor, or which has been submitted to him and his instructions have yet to be received or have been received and not adhered to.”

Framing the move as a matter of national security, he stated that violating the order is “liable to severely harm the security of the state,” and warned that offenders will be charged, the Jerusalem Post reported.

The sweeping nature of the restrictions, especially in a digital era where information spreads rapidly across borders, places significant power in the hands of military authorities to control narratives and limit the public’s access to real-time facts.

The breadth of the order effectively criminalizes independent reporting on attacks unless pre-approved by the state.

 Reclaim The Net needs your help

You subscribe to Reclaim The Net because you value free speech and privacy. Each issue we publish is a commitment to defend these critical rights, providing insights and actionable information to protect and promote liberty in the digital age.

Despite our wide readership, less than 0.2% of our readers contribute financially. With your support, we can do more than just continue; we can amplify voices that are often suppressed and spread the word about the urgent issues of censorship and surveillance.

Consider becoming a supporter today. Your contribution will empower us to reach more people, educate them about these pressing issues, and engage them in our collective cause.

Thank you for considering becoming a supporter. Each membership not only supports our operations but also strengthens our efforts to challenge injustices and advocate for those who cannot speak out.

Thank you.    Become a Supporter Today

NEW HEARING

FOIA Lawsuit Challenges FBI Over Withheld Records on Secret Twitter Meetings

A hearing took place today, before US District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan, in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch against the Department of Justice.

The case seeks records related to the “Twitter Files,” particularly those involving Hunter Biden’s laptop and allegations of censorship.

The only matter still pending is the FBI’s withholding of records detailing two meetings between agency officials and Twitter representatives from the Biden administration.

Judicial Watch initiated the lawsuit in April 2023, targeting the DOJ, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

The legal action followed the FBI’s failure to respond to a December 2022 FOIA request for communications between FBI personnel and key Twitter figures; including Yoel RothVijaya Gadde, and Jim Baker, from June 2020 to December 2022.

These individuals were involved in discussions about suppressing the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story, as disclosed in journalist Matt Taibbi’s December 2022 “Twitter Files.”

Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, expressed strong disappointment: “It is frustrating beyond belief for Judicial Watch to have to go to federal court for basic information on Biden’s abuse of the FBI, using Twitter to censor and monitor Americans.”

Through a mix of FOIA requests and legal action, Judicial Watch continues to document extensive censorship efforts that affected tens of millions of Americans.

In November 2024, it obtained DHS records showing a widespread campaign, by both government and private groups, to police and suppress social media posts concerning election fraud in 2020.

Additional records from June 2024, released through Judicial Watch litigation, revealed that just before and after the 2020 election, state officials flagged alleged misinformation and sent it to entities like the Center for Internet Security, CISA, and the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP); a DHS-backed nonprofit known for targeting online election discourse.

In December 2023, DHS documents exposed coordination between CISA and the EIP to conduct “real-time narrative tracking” on major social media platforms in the run-up to the 2020 vote.

Similar records surfaced in November 2023, showing EIP’s influence over platforms such as Google, Twitter, Facebook, TikTok, Pinterest, and Reddit to suppress “disinformation.”

FREE SPEECH WIN

Federal Judge Orders UO to Pay $191K to PSU Professor Blocked for “All Men Are Created Equal” Comment

The University of Oregon is facing the financial consequences of an unconstitutional attempt to suppress speech after a federal judge ordered it to pay $191,000 in legal fees to Portland State University professor Bruce Gilley.

The order, issued by US District Judge John V. Acosta, follows a settlement reached in March 2025 in which the university acknowledged Gilley’s comments should not have been censored and agreed to implement major policy reforms.

The legal fees, which will be covered by UO’s insurer United Educators, include $147,070 awarded to the Institute for Free Speech (IFS) and $43,930 to the Angus Lee Law Firm.

These payments, combined with more than $533,000 that the university had already spent on its own legal representation by late 2024, push the cost of defending its actions to at least $724,000.

That figure excludes further expenses accrued since November.

These high costs are directly tied to UO’s decision to support its DEI officials after they blocked Gilley for replying “all men are created equal” to a university post on X.

This fee award reflects the substantial resources required to vindicate fundamental constitutional rights in the digital age, as well as the vigor with which the University of Oregon chose to defend unconstitutional policies,” said Del Kolde, IFS Senior Attorney.

“The university made a costly decision to prioritize DEI principles over constitutional principles, aggressively litigating this case for nearly three years rather than acknowledging the obvious, that blocking someone for quoting the Declaration of Independence violates the First Amendment.”

The conflict began in June 2022, when Gilley reposted a UO “racism interrupter” message and added the phrase from the Declaration of Independence.

After UO’s Division of Equity and Inclusion blocked him, Gilley challenged the move in court. A July 2024 preliminary injunction restricted the university from blocking or muting its posts, and the legal proceedings culminated in a settlement requiring the university to overhaul its social media practices.

Under the agreement, UO must now end viewpoint-based censorship, establish an appeals process for blocked users, provide annual First Amendment training to social media staff, and operate under court oversight for 180 days to ensure compliance.

POOR SECURITY

UK Fines 23andMe $3.1M Over Major Genetic Data Breach

A landmark £2.31 million ($3.1 million) fine has been issued against 23andMe by the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), responding to a security failure that compromised the genetic and personal profiles of more than 155,000 UK users.

This penalty follows a separate settlement of $30 million reached in the United States after a broader data breach impacted millions more.

The breach stemmed from a credential stuffing attack in 2023, where cyber intruders used login details previously leaked in unrelated data breaches to infiltrate 23andMe’s systems.

Once inside, attackers accessed a wide array of intimate data, ranging from names and locations to racial background, health reports, and genealogical connections.

This method of attack has become increasingly widespread, exacerbated by lax password reuse and the rise of automated credential testing tools.

A joint probe by the UK and Canadian privacy authorities uncovered a troubling pattern of negligence.

Despite growing industry consensus around multi-factor authentication (MFA) as a baseline standard, 23andMe had not implemented it.

Investigators also flagged the company’s slow reaction to a massive login attempt targeting one million accounts in a single day during July 2023, a missed red flag that could have limited the scope of the breach.

UK Information Commissioner John Edwards criticized the firm’s lack of preventative action, stressing the uniquely permanent nature of genetic data. “The exposed information was profoundly damaging,” he said. “Unlike passwords or credit card numbers, this type of personal data cannot be changed or reissued once compromised.”

The ICO’s decision to impose the maximum allowable fine reflects the seriousness of 23andMe’s security lapses.

It also signals a broader shift in regulatory posture, as UK data authorities bolster oversight of biometric and genetic data.

Reclaim The Net is funded by the community. Keep us going and get extra benefits by becoming a supporter today. Thank you.
Become a Supporter

 

Thanks for reading,

Reclaim The Net

Jun 162025
 

ICE =  U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

The interview is on Dr Phil’s website:

1,285,894 views Premiered Jun 9, 2025 UNITED STATES

Dr. Phil sits down with Tom Homan to break down a major ICE-led operation in Los Angeles that led to 41 arrests. With agencies like the FBI, IRS, and DEA involved, the raid uncovered possible forced labor, hidden workers, and financial crimes. What really happened—and what does it mean for immigration enforcement nationwide?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zs4nDycNhI

= = = = = = = = = =

WHO IS TOM HOMAN?  . . . I found this:

Press Release

White House ‘Border Czar’ Thomas Homan Visits USAO-DC

For Immediate Release

U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Columbia

WASHINGTON – U.S. Attorney Edward R. Martin Jr. welcomed White House Executive Associate Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations Thomas Homan, on April 16, 2025, to the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia.

           “The U.S. Attorney’s Office was honored to welcome Executive Associate Director Homan to our space,” said U.S. Attorney Martin. “We had a productive conversation, he had the opportunity to brief our staff and take their questions, and it was great to have him here.”

Executive Associate Director Homan met today with members of the U.S. Attorney’s Office to discuss immigration issues, crime, and President Donald J. Trump’s “Make D.C. Safe and Beautiful” initiative.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia handles a wide variety of federal crimes that include those committed by members of violent transnational criminal enterprises. For more information on the office and its work, go to https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc.