Sandra Finley

Mar 122024
 
       (INSERT:  Let the world know how NOT-great Keele University is.)
Food Additive in Pizza, Pancakes Linked to Lower Sperm Counts

(INSERT:  the “food additive” is a compound of aluminum. widespread use of sodium aluminum phosphate in everyday food products)

Mar 092024
 

Featured Opinions and Columns

by John Carpay – Western Standard

It would take a dozen columns to address properly all of the threats to free expression that are contained in the Online Harms Act (Bill C-63), introduced in the House of Commons on Monday February 26. Here follow some of the worst aspects, in the limited space allotted.

It is a laudable goal to force online platforms to remove revenge porn and other non-consensual sharing of intimate images, content that bullies children, content that sexually victimizes children, content that encourages children to harm themselves, and content that incites violence, terrorism or hatred. However, good intentions do not justify passing additional laws that duplicate what is already prohibited by Canada’s Criminal Code. Perhaps police need more resources to go after people who are committing crimes?

Section 162.1(1) of Canada’s Criminal Code already prohibits online and offline publication of an intimate image without consent. Section 163 already prohibits publication of obscene materials and child pornography. Section 264(1) prohibits criminal harassment, which captures serious bullying. Section 319(1) prohibits the public incitement of hatred towards a group that is identifiable by race, ethnicity, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and other personal characteristics, but not vaccination status in case you were wondering.

Section 59 (1) criminalizes sedition: advocating the use of force to achieve governmental change within Canada. Last but not least, Criminal Code section 22 already prohibits counselling, procuring, soliciting or inciting another person “to be a party to an offence,” with guilt found if the person who received the counsel goes on to commit the offence.

Section 464 takes this a step further, criminalizing counseling an offence even if that offence is not committed.

Those who support the Online Harms Act should explain clearly why they believe that existing legislation is inadequate to address “harmful” online expression.

If passed into law, the Online Harms Act will create a new Digital Safety Commission to enforce compliance with new regulations created by the federal cabinet, without any input from Parliament. Using their new regulatory powers, Mr. Trudeau and his colleagues will be able to control and censor every “social media service” in Canada, setting out what cannot be said, and what must be said.

A new army of Digital Safety Commission bureaucrats will enforce new restrictions on speech, with the federal cabinet having the power to set out what penalties apply to what offences.

The Online Harms Act would add section 810.012 to the Criminal Code, empowering a complainant to assert to a provincial court that they “fear” that someone will promote genocide, hatred or antisemitism. If the judge believes that there are “reasonable grounds” to justify the fear, the court can immediately require the accused citizen to do any or all of the following: wear an ankle bracelet; obey a curfew and stay at home; abstain from alcohol, drugs, or both; provide bodily substances (e.g. blood, urine) to confirm abstinence from drugs or alcohol; refrain from communicating with certain designated persons; not go to certain places; and surrender her or his legally owned and legally required firearms.

In other words: a citizen who has not committed any crime can be subjected to court-ordered restrictions on her liberty, just because someone fears that she might commit a “speech” crime in future. A person’s failure to agree to these restrictions could result in a prison term up to two years.

For the existing Criminal Code offence of advocating for genocide, the Online Harms Act would raise the maximum penalty from five years in jail to life imprisonment.

When pro-Palestinian demonstrators chant “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” are they advocating for the genocide of Jews? Some say yes, others say no. Estonia, Germany, and the Czech Republic have designated this phrase to be criminal speech. The Dutch Supreme Court said the phrase is OK.

A man in Calgary was charged by police for using this phrase, but the charges were later stayed.

Do we really want government to use its coercive powers to decide whether polemical political slogans are actually calls for genocide, and then punish citizens accordingly? Considering the inherent difficulty and subjectivity in determining whether or not a person actually “advocated for genocide,” the punishment of a five-year prison term is already an adequate deterrent for the crime of speaking the wrong words.

The Online Harms Act would give the Canadian Human Rights Commission new powers to prosecute and punish offensive but non-criminal speech by Canadians if, in the subjective opinion of unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats, they deem someone’s statement to be “hateful.”

The Online Harms Act will provide endless opportunities for a new army of deeply offended busybodies to file thousands of complaints, including anonymous complaints, against their ideological opponents or other fellow citizens. Those found guilty by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal can be required to pay as much as $50,000 to the government, plus up to $20,000 to the person designated as the victim of the speech crime. The victim need not demonstrate having suffered any loss or damage, other than feeling offended by the alleged “hate.”

All of the above will have a massive chilling effect on free expression by Canadians. Many citizens will self- censor to avoid being prosecuted by the Canadian Human Rights Commission. Canadians who practice courage by continuing to exercise their Charter-protected freedom of expression will see many of their opinions removed from the internet by the operators of social media websites and platforms, as these operators will seek to avoid running afoul of Mr. Trudeau’s new regulations, which will be enforced by the Digital Safety Commission.

Let’s hope that enough Canadians choose freedom over fear, to get us through this present darkness.

John Carpay, B.A., LL.B. is President of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (jccf.ca).

Mar 092024
 

Lawyers from Rath and Company have launched a class action lawsuit against both the federal government and province of Alberta on behalf of those harmed by COVID-19 vaccines, alleging misinformation, negligence and malfeasance of office.

In early 2020, the government championed unprecedented lockdowns and societal shuttering while hailing vaccines as the only escape from the pandemic’s grip, repeatedly emphasizing “The New Normal.” Once available, the vaccine was hailed as “safe and effective.”

But as vaccine-related casualties mount, one Canadian law firm has launched a class action lawsuit against the very authorities that regurgitated the “safe and effective” mantra.

The novel COVID-19 vaccines were expedited through an interim order granting them emergency use authorization in December 2020 and are now responsible for almost 500 deaths and nearly 60,000 adverse events across Canada.

 

 

In one such case, the government is on the hook for $10.5 million in damages for injured Albertan Carrie Sakamoto, whose lawyers have now filed a class action lawsuit against the federal government and Alberta’s provincial government on behalf of those harmed by COVID-19 vaccines.

Lawyers Jeffrey Rath and Eva Chipiuk from Rath and Company have based their claim around “unlawful, negligent, inadequate, improper, unfair and deceptive practices by the government in relation to the warning, marketing, promotion, and distribution of the COVID vaccines.”

 

 

From the onset, Rath was convinced the data presented in Pfizer’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application hinted at a looming class action lawsuit, especially Table 14 which outlined adverse events.

The lack of discontinuation of a product shown to cause harm is part of the lawsuit claim, but Rath and Chipiuk are also disturbed by the lack of disclosure of vaccine contracts by the government to the public at large, something discussed by Liberal MP Anthony Housefather in a standing committee on public accounts in early 2023.

 

 

Rath says law firm intends to make an application to have these contracts disclosed in the name of public interest.

“I think it would be highly relevant to the population at large to know that the vaccine manufacturers would not warrant these products for safety,” Rath details. “That’s a major piece of information that the government of Canada has been withholding from the public and instead hiding behind this bogus safe and effective narrative.”

A big part of this entire process was the interim order used to authorize these novel products in an expedited manner and their subsequent injection into the arms of millions of Canadians without adequate informed consent.

 

 

Chipiuk highlights the subjective nature of Canada’s regulatory review process throughout the interim order, empasizing the lack of objective testing to determine if benefits outweighed risks or harms.

Rath also points out the shifting goalposts from the onset of the COVID hysteria, noting that when the shots did not live up to their efficacious claims (that is, to prevent infection or spread), the new narrative became how the jabs prevented hospitalization or death.

Well now we know that was not true. The whole way through we’ve been told one lie after another by these so called public health officials and now they’re terrified about a measles outbreak because parents don’t trust them anymore and don’t want to get their kids vaccinated. Surprise, surprise! Nobody trusts these people anymore.

Roth explains the importance of naming those involved with the safe and effective mantra in the public record, while Chipiuk stresses the psychological factor that happened alongside the physical injuries suffered by countless Canadians.

 

 

“I think we all know it’s there,” she says, “but it just hasn’t had enough attention. The damage from the fear and the coercion and the enticing individuals to take a shot and tell on your neighbours, this was all that transpired and will all be part of the claim.”

Rath wants to remind Canadians how the government’s vaccine injury and otherwise numbers are very likely to be grossly underestimated, as acknowledged by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, that “adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with less than one percent reported to the Food and Drug Administration.”

I’ve seen material from doctors that have tried to file vaccine injury reports and the reports are routinely rejected. [Doctors] have to fight tooth and nail to have the reports accepted. The entire system in Canada, unlike the very system in the United States where people report and they take the data as a signal, the system in Canada is designed to prevent doctors from making reports.

What kind of doctor has the time to sit down and fill out an hour long application form to apply to have one of those patients considered to be vaccinated, let alone have to fight after it’s rejected as if he’s involved in some sort of court proceeding?

The system is deliberately designed to protect the government from claims and to protect politicians and public health officials from being held accountable for some of the most negligent decision-making that’s been made in the history of Canadian public health.

 

 

Rath urges citizens to get involved by writing their elected officials while stressing the importance of figuring out how to compensate people for the way that Alberta’s former chief medical officer of health, Deena Hinshaw, misled the public.

“They need to figure out how they’re going to pay for all of the horrible things that Hinshaw and all of the other vaccine cultists visited upon the citizens of Alberta through all of the coercion programs that they implemented, through all of the misinformation that they promulgated.”

While legal action cannot undue the suffering caused by COVID-19 vaccine injuries, it is essential for the justice system to hold accountable those responsible for such misleading claims, and prevent similar injustices in the future.

Mar 052024
 

From: Sydney Fizzard, Rebel News [mailto:info@rebelnews.com]
Sent: February 10, 2023 2:10 PM
To: Sandra Finley <sabest1@sasktel.net>
Subject: SHOCKING CLAIM: Coutts local accuses RCMP of placing evidence during blockade arrests

 

Joanne claims she has proof of police impropriety and evidence that they placed weapons in her home. Could it be true?

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

 

 

Dear Sandra,

During a recent event in Lethbridge, Alberta, commemorating the first anniversary of the Coutts Blockade, a local named Joanne Person took to the microphone to share a shocking allegation.

That blockade took place alongside the Freedom Convoy to Ottawa, bringing cross-border traffic in the region to a standstill and catalyzing a series of events leading to the end of COVID mandates in the province and the resignation of former premier Jason Kenney.

The demonstration came to an abrupt end when police announced that multiple weapons were seized and arrests were made on conspiracy charges nearby. Demonstrators stood firmly that this was a peaceful movement, and ended the Coutts demonstrations entirely so that the world would know they were non-violent.

Joanne was one of the people arrested and charged with possession of a weapon for dangerous purpose and mischief over $5,000.

But Joanne claims she has proof of police impropriety and evidence that they placed weapons in her home.

Could it be true?

Click here to watch the speech she gave at the event.

To be clear: Rebel News is not suggesting that the RCMP planted evidence at the home of Joanne Person. We haven’t seen or heard any of Joanne’s evidence yet. We’re reporting these allegations because she has made a newsworthy claim.

Although it’s hard to believe, this wouldn’t be the first time the RCMP have been embroiled in a scandal relating to their enforcement tactics in Coutts.

Around this time last year, I reported on an operation conducted by RCMP officers to sabotage heavy equipment on private land near the blockade. Officials confirmed the machines were damaged to prevent their use at the border.

We will continue to stay on the story as it develops — I’ll have more to report on it once more information becomes available, and the alleged audio recordings are released.

In the meantime, we’re crowdfunding the legal fees for three peaceful protesters facing potential prison time for their involvement in the Coutts blockade. To find out more about their charges and how you can help, visit www.TruckerDefenceFund.com.

Yours truly,

Sydney Fizzard

P.S. The RCMP has laid charges on Marco Van Huigenbos, Alex Van Herk, and George Janzen, which includes up to 10 years in prison for allegedly being “key participants” in the blockade. Rebel News has hired three legal eagles to represent the men in court, but this battle will likely cost hundreds of thousands of dollars — please help crowdfund their legal defence at www.TruckerDefenceFund.com.

 

Rebel News Network Ltd.
PO Box 61056, Eglinton/Dufferin RO, Toronto, ON M6E 5B2, Canada
Unsubscribe

 

 

Mar 042024
 

 

From loss to lawsuit: Ontario dad’s emotional rollercoaster as government offers deal after son dies suddenly

Dan Hartman has made it his life’s mission to get justice for his teenage son Sean, who died suddenly at the hands of the ‘safe and effective’ COVID-19 vaccine narrative.

The government has offered compensation, in a roundabout way, to an Ontario father who is still mourning the loss of his teenage son, Sean, who died suddenly at the hands of the safe and effective narrative in 2021.

Dan Hartman is an Ontario father turned rigorous advocate who has made it his life’s mission to get answers for the tragic and untimely death of Sean following his Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA injection.

“Four days after his very first shot of Pfizer, he was taken to emergency by his mother,” Hartman explains before breaking into tears.

“He had brown circles around his eyes, a rash, vomiting, extremely sore shoulder, opposite to his injection shoulder, which could be heart damage because the pain could travel to the other side of the body. The doctor there did not do any blood work whatsoever. He didn’t do a D-dimer test. He didn’t do a troponin test. He just gave him a pain reliever for his shoulder and sent him home. And then 33 days after Sean’s first shot, he was found dead on the floor beside his bed.”

After this horrific incident, Hartman took to a Toronto Board of Health hearing in an attempt to seek answers on behalf of his departed son, who then censored his testimony.

At that time, independent data analyst and concerned citizen Kelly Brown was working tirelessly to dissect and share Public Health Ontario’s data showing concerning rates of myocarditis post-COVID-19 vaccination in young males.

 

 

Since then, Hartman sought assistance from the pandemic-born Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP), which was denied within a month of filing based on a lack of evidence. Hartman has since appealed that decision citing new evidence obtained by pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole showing vaccine-derived spike in Sean’s tissue samples. VISP has yet to respond to this appeal.

While the original pathologist who did Sean’s autopsy said his cause of death was unascertained, Hartman says they did find a “slightly enlarged heart,” but this finding was dismissed as being typical of athletes.

“They said that it’s perfectly normal for an athlete to have a slightly enlarged heart,” detailed Hartman, “but Sean had to take a whole year off hockey. So he was anything but an athlete. He was sitting on his bed playing video games.”

The forced isolation was part of Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s Stay-At-Home orders and the various states of emergency declared throughout 2020 and 2021.

“He never would have stopped hockey if he didn’t have to,” Hartman shared.

Then, once indoor sports resumed, Sean had to become “fully vaccinated” according to the Ontario Minor Hockey Association’s vaccine mandate if he wanted to partake. As a result of this policy, Sean will never play hockey again.

Hartman has since obtained additional evidence as to what he says caused his son’s tragic and untimely death, from pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole who found vaccine-derived spike protein in his adrenal glands.

“It shouldn’t have been there,” explains Hartman. “The adrenal glands control your blood pressure. Likely what happened is Sean’s blood pressure crashed in the middle of the night and he died. He might have went into a seizure trying to get out of his bed because something was wrong and he fell to the floor and died. It was caused from the vaccine. Sean didn’t have COVID.”

Armed with these answers and a fire to advocate on behalf of others too, Hartman has pivoted from simply seeking answers for Sean, to providing Justice for Sean, which is why he has filed two different lawsuits with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

The first lawsuit names the Attorney General of Canada, the Department of Health Canada and former Minister of Health Patty Hajdu who was responsible for issuing the interim order that authorized the novel shots for emergency use.

The claim is seeking tens of millions of dollars in damages for loss of care, guidance and companionship, shock, malfeasance in public office, deceit and fraud, negligence, punitive damages, and more.

The second lawsuit is against Pfizer Canada, Pfizer Inc and the BioNTech Manufacturing facility in Germany. Claims for damages are similar, but also include product liability and more.

The Ontario regional office for the Department of Justice Canada has since responded to the claim, requesting a discontinuance. This would mean a full withdrawal of Hartman’s claim in exchange for waiving the costs associated with their intent to file a motion to strike. Pfizer responded that they plan to respond further.

 

 

Hartman said absolutely not, and shares that this is about more than Sean’s senseless death.

“I want justice for my son and arguably for every other Canadian that’s been adversely affected by this narrative. I’m doing it for everybody who’s been affected. There’s nothing I can do to help Sean now, but if I can help other people and save some lives, then [it] makes this all worthwhile,” Hartman says.

Those who want to support Hartman in this journey can purchase hoodies and t-shirts, which he says can’t be censored, or fund his crowdfunding efforts here.

NOTE  From Sandra, March 4, 2024:  the  here. link takes me to:

503 Service Unavailable

No server is available to handle this request. 

I’ll try again.

Mar 022024
 
Senator Ron Johnson
@SenRonJohnson
For those who can’t spend 4 hours watching the full roundtable event – Federal Health Agencies and the COVID Cartel: What Are They Hiding – here is a 14-minute edited version that captures many important points.
774.1K

Views

Mar 022024
 

Full Measure Town Hall with Sharyl Attkisson.

NOTE:  I can’t get rid of the message Health Canada somehow  inflicts on the above, “Covid-19 vaccine – Get the latest information from Health Canada.”

Good news! – – It is POSSIBLE to RECOVER from the blood clots IF they can be identified before they kill a person.

1 hour video.   The Covid Clots  – – Dr Jordan Baun (Alabama) and Patients who recovered under his care.

This is the opposite of the embalmers’ experiences.  The embalmers are necessarily describing what they see in people (corpses) who have died from the clots.  Dr Braun’s patients are still alive, and mostly recovered.

Blood Clots, From the Embalmers’ point-of-view.  I have only seen Canadian documentation from embalmers, that of Laura Jeffery and others.  Here’s Laura’s testimony:

Laura Jeffery, embalmer, testimony to the NCI. (You will understand why the NCI and others say: stop the vaccines NOW!).  An interview with Dr. Ryan Cole on the science of the “blood clots” encountered by embalmers is included.

 

RELATED:  I searched my blog for postings containing the word “clots“.

I must have done it to shock myself once again.   The persistence of the Government messaging to “get your covid shots” is absolutely stunning in the face of the excellent information provided to them through the years  by dedicated, qualified, experienced people.   I don’t know what word in English is appropriate other than “murderous” to describe the persisting denial and stone-walling AND continuing promotion of the covid shots.

 

POSTINGS THAT CONTAIN THE WORD “CLOTS”.  look at the dates.

A.   2021-09-22 The submissions of now TWO ALBERTA PEDIATRICIANS challenge the mandated covid vaccination

  1. Pediatrician Eric Payne made a detailed, foot-noted submission to the Alberta College of Physicians & Surgeons that challenges mandated vaccination.

2021-09-15    Vaccination, forced compliance: Dr Eric Payne, paediatric neurologist Submission to Alberta College of Physicians & Surgeons.

Note:  some person who doesn’t like healthy children, tampered with Dr. Payne’s submission.  I happened, through networks, to receive both the tampered and the actual submission.

NOTE:  the attenuants and adjuvants used in vaccine manufacture (boric acid just one example) are not widely known:

2020-06-10  If I am making a choice about a vaccine, I want to know this.

2.   AND NOW, with thanks to Lyle for sending Dr. Vila’s submission.

Excerpt

I STRONGLY RECOMMEND, AT MINIMUM,  SCROLL DOWN TO READ DR VILA’S CONCLUSIONS

Pediatrician Michael Vila detailed his concerns with the vaccine in a submission to Alberta Health Services (AHS).

2021-09-21 Dr Vila Letter to AHS vaccine mandate

 

B,   2021-10-17 NY Doctor Zelenko Proved Everyone Wrong About Hydroxychloroquine. Very good. Addresses more than HCQ.

Blood clots are mentioned.   But really, the significance of this posting is the extensive research and passion of networking doctors to solve medical problems on behalf of their patients.   Dr. Zelenko’s story is similar to Dr. Baun’s with the blood clots – – determination to find answers.

Look at what Zelenko figured out and documented to help others,  from the day the first covid case walked through his door until his death on June 30, 2022.  He wrote:

I see the world now with such clarity … It’s no longer confusing. It’s a binary choice. It’s very clear who’s on what side. And here are the teams: There are those who want to live a life of God, conscious … Our lives have sanctity. They’re priceless and they should be preserved at all costs. And no one has the right to enslave another human being. That’s one approach.

The other is [internment] … an attempt to enslave, psychologically, and even more so physically, the world population. Do you want to know what’s coming? Look at Justin Trudeau statements. Justin Trudeau, the prime minister of Canada, just announced that anyone who tests positive will be quarantined in a government-run facility, until the government deems you safe to return back to society.

 

C.   2023-02-19  Ontario Doctors who Dissented from Covid-19 Doctrines Fight for their Professional Lives. by Jason Unrau. C2C Journal.

 Scroll down in the Ontario Doctors who Dissented to bolded print in pink:

Canada’s public health agency counted more than 5,800 Canadians who suffered from vaccine injuries of ‘special interest’. Among these are 55 cardiac arrests, 87 ‘spontaneous abortions,’ nearly 1,150 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis, 287 strokes, 144 heart attacks, 519 pulmonary embolisms, 327 blood clots and 185 cases of Bell’s Palsy.

D.    2023-03-21 Manitoba family files lawsuit against AstraZeneca 

The Government’s response to the destruction of Jackson Reimer’s life at age 21, and the consequences for his family is offensive.  In the face of what is known,  I do not believe it to be true.  From the CBC news report that I added to the posting:

The same day as that email, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the shot was safe and Canadians should have no concern about getting it, after roughly a dozen European countries suspended its use over concerns about blood clots.

Two weeks later, Canada’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommended pausing use of the vaccine in people under age 55 because of safety concerns.

That change came following reports out of Europe of very rare instances of blood clots in some immunized patients, notably among younger women.

 

From the news report (I added the emphasis):

According to the Government of Canada, blood clots with low levels of blood platelets that occur after vaccination with viral vector vaccines (AstraZeneca Vaxzevria/COVISHIELD and Janssen Jcovden) are rare but serious. It says these serious side effects have been reported to begin up to about a month after vaccination. According to the government’s website, quick diagnosis and treatment are critical to reducing the risk of negative outcomes.

Since March 2021, Reimer has been unable to hold gainful employment, advance his university education or carry out many activities of daily living, the court filing says. . .

He’s now legally blind and has other symptoms related to mental focus and concentration, memory loss, mental impairment and obsessive compulsive disorder tendencies, according to the claim.

Reimer also has physical symptoms including brain seizures, excessive weight gain, and impaired bowel function and control, the lawsuit says.
His symptoms, which are expected to continue indefinitely, are so severe that Reimer is unable to live alone and requires ongoing assistance with daily activities, the claim alleges. It also says his parents have been unable to work their regular hours due to their son’s care demands.
The family is seeking damages for Reimer’s injuries, loss of income and costs of care.

And then there’s the case of  JACKSON REIMER.

 

 

E.   2023-11-29 B.C.: Bonnie Henry named as defendant in class-action lawsuit over her role in COVID-19 vaccine mandate

Excerpt:  Nov 29, 2023:

The suit counters that claim, suggesting the COVID vaccine monographs are ‘misleading,’ while referencing the risk of sustaining an adverse side-effect from the jab, including blood clots.  The plaintiffs seek damages for the alleged contract breach, “misfeasance” in public office, and the suit’s certification.

It takes a lot of experience and time to arrive at the point where class-action lawsuits are being launched.  B.C. is not the only Province in which class-action lawsuits are in process.

Please help build awareness by talking about the blood clot information.  From the embalmers view-point the victims are dead.  From Dr. Baun’s viewpoint,  they can be helped before they take the exit to the pearly gates.