Sandra Finley

Nov 192024
 

With thanks to the Easton Standard:

 

by The Honourable A. Brian Peckford

November 15, 2024

If You Are Interested In What Is Happening To Our Constitution  Follow This : My Article , Lawyer Alexander’s Response, My Response, And Alexander Final Response That Closes The Discussion!

More Canadian Court Violation Of Our Freedom Of Speech Rights —Dr. Trozzi Rights Denied By Ontario Court Of Appeal!

This unbelievable , constitution breaking by our Courts !

Rebel News reports today :

“In a sobering decision, three Ontario court justices have upheld an October 2023 tribunal ruling that found Dr. Mark Trozzi guilty of professional misconduct and incompetence, which ultimately led to the revocation of his medical license. The justices determined that while Dr. Trozzi is free to express his views, his unrefuted claims on the COVID-19 science, coined “misinformation,” crossed a line that deserved severe professional consequences.

Dr. Trozzi, a now former emergency room physician, had been under investigation by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) for his vocal opposition to public health measures and his claims about what he refers to as a “Criminal COVID Enterprise.” Despite his legal team’s efforts to defend his right to express his beliefs, the court upheld the tribunals decision in branding him “ungovernable.”

Michael Alexander , Dr. Trozzi’s lawyer exclaims as reported by Rebel News:

“Alexander contends that further legal battles are unlikely to succeed, given that the Court of Appeal appears indifferent to the right to free expression when it challenges politically-favoured narratives, and continues to unquestioningly uphold the “safe and effective” mantra promoted by pharmaceutical interests.

“They have already sent the message that we don’t want these COVID-19 loud mouth professionals messing up our administrative state,” says Alexander.

“If you’re somebody who speaks too politically like Jordan Peterson, the court of appeal is not going to hear whether somebody has trampled on your right to free expression.

If you’ve been discussing COVID science, you’re not going to get a hearing.

If you’re arguing that the college should never have proceeded against you because it didn’t have reasonable and probable grounds for its investigation, the court of appeal is not going to hear you.

We have a crisis of legitimacy in our court system now.”

“Blog Comment :

Alexander is right :  The highest Court in our most populous Province has abused our Charter of Rights and Freedoms , Part 1, Section 2

“Fundamental freedoms

2 Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

  • (a) freedom of conscience and religion;
  • (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
  • (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
  • (d) freedom of association.”

Source : Rebel News

Hi Brian,

Thank you very much for covering the Trozzi case, infra.

I wanted to provide some further information about my overall strategy in the Trozzi case and other physician cases I’ve argued. Please feel free to publish this reply, if you feel your readers might profit from it.

First, I am totally onboard with your own view that section 1 of the Charter was supposed to be reserved for truly extreme situations.

Having said that, my challenge was to find a way to rescue the Charter from section 1 in some measure. And, ironically, I found the way in the case that articulated the four-part section 1 test, R. v. Oakes (1987).

The key to unlocking the value of Oakes is to examine how the Court treated the final part of the four-part test, where a court is required to balance the good achieved by the statutory objective used to justify limiting a fundamental right against the harm done to the individual by the infringement of the right.

Under part four, the government was held to a high evidentiary standard — it had to provide “cogent and persuasive” evidence to succeed. Very clearly, this was a higher standard than the civil standard, which is the balance of probabilities. Setting the higher standard was consistent with the idea that the individual’s fundamental rights should take priority over the government’s objectives in most situations. However, in subsequent cases, the Court re-interpreted the “cogent and persuasive” standard in Oakes and equated it with the balance of probabilities. Under the lower standard, government has succeeded most of the time and the Charter has become, more or less, a worthless document.

Nevertheless, Oakes reveals an entirely different way of approaching section 1.

Oakes dealt with a Criminal Code provision relating to a drug offence, which had the effect of eliminating the presumption of innocence. In effect, the provision created an automatic finding that an individual in possession of drugs under certain circumstances was necessarily trafficking.

The Court ruled that the provision was unconstitutional because, in eliminating the presumption of innocence, it subverted section 11 (d) of the Charter, which guarantees the presumption of innocence, and also subverted the premise upon which the whole criminal law system is based, which, of course, is also the presumption of innocence. Thus, the Court did not weigh the government’s evidence of the good the provision secured against the harm done to the individual’s fundamental right because the provision subverted the core purpose of the right and was, therefore, wrong in itself.

This approach can be applied to a Charter analysis of freedom of expression. There is abundant case law reaching back as far as 1938 (the Alberta Reference case) to the effect that the core purpose of freedom of speech, and later freedom of expression, is the protection of minority and dissenting opinions, particularly in matters of public importance. Thus, any government attempt to censor expression merely because it reflects a minority or dissenting point of view must be wrong in itself and cannot stand. This approach eliminates balancing under section 1 and secures an absolute right to freedom of expression.

I rolled out this argument in the Trozzi case and the Court rejected it on the ground that professional regulation justifies placing limits on a doctor’s right to criticize public health policies and recommendations. This ruling cannot be squared with the fact that the Charter is the “Supreme Law of Canada.” Further, it cannot be reconciled with the fact that public health “policies” and “recommendations” do not have the force of law according to the Ontario Court of Appeal. How can a professional such as Dr. Trozzi be doing anything unlawful when he is merely criticizing instruments that themselves have no legal force or standing?

Michael:

Thanks for your response .

It seems ,however , that the Courts in their dysfunctional state have decided to not just interpret law but make it and go so far as ignoring parts of the Constitution as they see fit.

For example, the opening words of the Charter have been ignored. Almost every single Charter decision has ignored serious consideration of this section , yet it is the framework that the authors established through which Charter decisions are to be considered.

In addition, many recent court decisions in interpreting Section 1 of the Charter have ignored ‘ demonstrably justify’ often using just the word justify or some times  just the word reasonable. This is a complete twisting of the language of the Section .

And this is to say nothing of the intent of Section 1 being completely ignored or twisted.

So , I am not surprised that the Ontario Court of Appeal rejected your use of an argument from the Oakes Decision or ignoring your Supreme Law of Canada argument.

We are up against a judicial system that feels free to ‘manipulate’ the Constitution as it sees fit.

I fear nothing short of like minded people like ourselves being able to re-open the Constitution and change the wording accordingly will real ‘sense ‘ prevail and we know how unlikely that is ———but even if by some miracle that did happen we know that even then if a like judiciary and mind set exists as it does now ( can the mind set be changed?) what is written will be ignored and twisted again.

Brian

And finally Michael replies:

Totally in agreement, Brian. Thanks for your reply. The path forward is political, not legal.

MA

Nov 182024
 

 

 

Please Share this Newsletter

Government-Bayer Collusion

Canadian government regulators colluded with the major biotech and pesticide company Bayer to stop a ban on neonicotinoid pesticides. Journalist Marc Fawcett-Atkinson at Canada’s National Observer has exposed how regulators helped Bayer undermine a study that shows high levels of neonicotinoid contamination in wetlands. The strategy was successful in stopping a proposed ban on three neonicotinoids. Read the full story: “Exclusive: How a federal agency colluded with a pesticide maker to silence a Canadian researcher

This latest revelation of government-corporate collusion to support the sale of dangerous pesticides follows the 2023 exposé that federal GMO regulators worked directly together with the pesticide and biotechnology lobby group CropLife Canada in a “Tiger Team” to remove regulation of many new genetically modified (gene edited) plants. It also comes after the recent exposure of a global corporate public relations campaign that provided corporate and government employees with profiles of critics of pesticides and GMOs – If you missed that story, you can read about it in our last newsletter: Exposed: Global Corporate Operation to Push GMOs & Pesticides.

More Information

Bayer (formerly Monsanto) is the world’s biggest biotechnology company, the biggest seed company, and the second-largest pesticide company. The company controls 23% of the global seed market and 16% of the agrochemicals market.

Neonicotinoids (neonics) are a group of insecticides that are widely used but have serious and often lethal impacts on pollinators and other beneficial insects, as well as songbirds. They are most commonly used in the form of coatings on seeds, and are systemic, which means they are absorbed into the entire plant, exposing insects more broadly. They are also persistent in the environment and soluble in water. The European Union restricts use of the same three neonicotinoids that were proposed for a Canadian ban. (The term “pesticides” includes herbicides, insecticides and fungicides.)

In this case, federal government officials from three departments actively worked to help Bayer undermine the findings of ecologist Christy Morrissey of the University of Saskatchewan. Dr. Morrissey sent her results to the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) at Health Canada but regulators shared her findings with Bayer, without her consent. Bayer then hired a team of researchers who wrote a 27-page report that selectively pared down Dr. Morrissey’s data, excluding “problematic sites” where wetland samples showed dangerous levels of neonicotinoids. In its final decision not to ban the pesticides, the PMRA repeated Bayer’s findings “nearly word-for-word”, concluding that the majority of Dr. Morrissey’s data was “not relevant” to the risk assessment.

In 2023, Dr. Bruce Lanphear, the co-chair of the PMRA Scientific Advisory Committee resigned, saying, “I don’t have confidence because PMRA is relying on obsolete methods. They aren’t being transparent on how they’re regulating chemicals.

Over twenty years ago, a parliamentary committee concluded that, “The PMRA is already a captive of the pesticide industry.” Read more in the articleCanada’s pesticide regulator was ‘captured by industry’ from day one.”

CBAN’s calculations find that herbicide sales in Canada have increased by 244% since GM crops have been introduced. Read our factsheet: Genetically engineered crops have increased herbicide use.

 

Lucy Sharratt, Coordinator

coordinator@cban.ca

www.cban.ca

The Canadian Biotechnology Action Network (CBAN) brings together 15 organizations to research, monitor and raise awareness about issues relating to genetic engineering in food and farming. CBAN members include farmer associations, environmental and social justice organizations, and regional coalitions of grassroots groups. CBAN is a project of MakeWay’s shared platform.

Canadian Biotechnology Action Network (CBAN) 

PO Box 25182, Clayton Park Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3M 4H4

Phone: 902 209 4906 www.cban.ca

Donate >

Having trouble reading this mail? View it in your browser.

Not interested anymore? Unsubscribe instantly.

Nov 182024
 

Clayton, a trucker and business person, does a good job of explaining his actions (and the actions of others like him).

The class action lawsuit he’s involved in,  is limited to people who had their bank accounts frozen.

Alexa does a good job of the interview and write-up.  Thank-you to Rebel News.  Without them, I don’t think I’d hear of this.

I expect or hope that some Canadian organization will do the research on the numbers of protestors who were charged and then had charges stayed, or dropped, or withdrawn or whatever.

Governments in a free country cannot use the police, prosecutors and courts to prevent criticism of Government policies.

/S

= = = = = = = = = =

 

VICTORY! Freedom Convoy protester Clayton McAllister has charges withdrawn

Clayton McAllister, the man famously photographed lying in the snow as police advanced during the Freedom Convoy protests, has spoken out about his experience, sharing how his charges were ultimately dropped after a prolonged legal process.

 

 

Describing his approach during the police crackdown, McAllister recalled, “I wanted to be the first one that they arrested, and I wanted to do it in the most peaceful way possible with the least resistance, and that was to simply just lay on the ground.” His peaceful stance did not spare him from a harsh arrest, however.

McAllister recounted being “jumped on by about five cops,” taken into custody, and placed in a paddy wagon “no bigger than about two by two with a single bench.” There, he said, he endured six hours of confinement in extreme heat, with “no washroom, no food, no nothing.”

 

 

After his release, McAllister faced additional difficulties, as police officers dropped him off at a remote gas station outside Ottawa with a “dead cell phone” and no access to his truck, which had been left on Wellington Street. Stranded and without his bank account access due to a freeze initiated by the government, he managed to contact a friend who eventually came to his aid.

McAllister faced charges including mischief, resisting arrest, and disturbing the peace. Although he was initially offered a plea deal, he declined because it imposed restrictions on his right to gather in groups of more than 25 people. “That’s an absolute charter violation,” he said. Eventually, McAllister accepted a peace bond with no restrictions, which required him to write a 100-word essay explaining the difference between protest and mischief.

 

 

McAllister criticized what he described as excessive government action, noting that his charges were eventually withdrawn. “I feel it was a massive overreach, a massive exaggeration by the government,” he argued, suggesting that the large number of charges brought against protesters like himself amounted to a “power grab.”

His experiences led him to join a class-action lawsuit against the government, the police, and banks for freezing bank accounts. The lawsuit, he explained, includes only claimants affected by the account freezes. “They also froze my family’s bank accounts, which led to mortgages being missed,” he said, emphasizing the impact on family members who were not involved in the protests.

Nov 172024
 

PREVIOUS WAS:     For Your Selection November 1, 2024

– – – – – – – – – – –

For Your Selection NOVEMBER 18, 2024
COVID  (Includes Tyranny)
  1.  2024-11-16 Covid TRAVEL MANDATES LAWSUIT in Toronto on Monday Nov 18. URGENT MESSAGE In-person OR Register for the Court Zoom

2.   2024-11-12 Help us stop the Online Harms Act. (Do not let it get thru Parliament!) From JCCF (Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms). John Carpay

         #2 is closely associated with the info from Reclaim the Net (the next posting).  Online Harms Act is local (Canada).  The Same Legislation, wording the same or slightly altered, is under seige in a number of other countries.  I’d say the Act is part of the Globalist agenda.

3.  2024-11-05 Four Articles from Reclaim the Net 

4.  2024-10-18 HISTORIC WIN: Ontario man, Cullen McDonald, wins appeal for charges related to protesting COVID mandates. Jen Hodgson, Western Standard News.

All charges have been dropped against Cullen McDonald, who faced three criminal charges for peacefully protesting COVID-19 mandates in Ontario . . .  “I was falsely accused of endangering the lives of the public but I refused to plea guilty to something I didn’t do, and today, I stand vindicated.”  (Sandra speaking:  what the Prosecutor had in mind for Cullen was bizarre.  Perhaps the Prosecutor is an angry man.  The good news is The Judge (Blouin)  (a short posting.)

5.  2024-11-17 A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination

The term cardiovascular refers to the heart (cardio) and the blood vessels (vascular). The cardiovascular system includes:

      • Arteries
      • Arterioles
      • Capillaries
      • Heart
      • Venules
Cardiovascular system   Watch this 1-minute video about: Cardiovascular system
The last sentence is “Platelets cause blood to coagulate whenever an injury to a blood vessel occurs“.

The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.

The Systematic Review

Under RESULTS,  Table 1.  Of the deaths:

The cardiovascular system was most frequently implicated (49%),  . . .   (Sandra speaking:  I am reminded of the posting:

2024-05-05 Blood clots are red. White clots are fibrin. Embalmers see them post mortem. Dr Baun sees them in the still alive. Same phenomenon. Treat the clots, don’t end up dead.  Covid is NOT a “clotting disease”.

(It is healthy and NORMAL for the body to produce fibrin (which makes the clots) to stanch extra blood flow, e.g. from a cut.  The mRNA vaccines’ spike protein makes minute perforations in blood vessel walls & other parts of the cardiovascular system.  Tiny, tiny bleeding,  that you can’t see,  but collectively in mass amounts.)  It makes sense that 49% of the deaths are cardiovascular-related.)

6.  2024-11-15 Covid: Judge stays Freedom Convoy charges against Randy Hillier due to court delays. By Jonathan Bradley, Western Standard.

7.  2024-11-15 BC workers’ class action against COVID vax mandate allowed to move forward. by Jen Hodgson, Western Standard.

8.  2024-11-05 COVID ‘Historic’: Federal Court (American) Says AstraZeneca Not Immune From Liability in Case Involving Woman Injured by COVID Vaccine During Clinical Trial. Nevradakis, CHD

9.  2024-10-31 Court rules Alberta business COVID class action has grounds to proceed. By Jen Hodgson, Western Standard News.

10.  2024-11-01 Naomi Wolf Discusses ‘Chilling’ Revelations From Pfizer Documents. New book, The Pfizer Papers. Interviewer Nevradakis, CHD

 

AMERICAN ELECTION

11.  2024-11-14 More than any part of this (American) election …

12.  2024-11- American Secretary of State for Agriculture, Thomas Massie.

Wadda ya think?  Is the chemical rain from Big AgBiotech going to stop?  Who is Thomas Massie?

OTHER

13.  2024-11- A Map of the New Normal, book by Jeff Rubin. Video’d discussion

14.  Desiderata. by Max Ehrmann, 1927.

Nov 172024
 

A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination

  • Nicolas Hulscher *
  • Paul E. Alexander
  • Richard Amerling
  • Heather Gessling
  • Roger Hodkinson
  • William Makis
  • Harvey A. Risch
  • Mark Trozzi
  • Peter A. McCullough

Abstract


Background: The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, Spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction, and carcinogenicity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.

Methods: We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. All autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy studies that included COVID-19 vaccination as an antecedent exposure were included. Because the state of knowledge has advanced since the time of the original publications, three physicians independently reviewed each case and adjudicated whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.

Results: We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one organ-restricted autopsy case (heart). The mean age of death was 70.4 years. The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination, of which the primary causes of death include sudden cardiac death (35%), pulmonary embolism (12.5%), myocardial infarction (12%), VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%), multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%), and cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%).

Conclusions: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine mechanisms of injury and death, coupled with autopsy confirmation by physician adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.

Introduction


As of May 31st, 2023, SARS-CoV-2 has infected an estimated 767,364,883 people globally, resulting in 6,938,353 deaths according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. These official numbers are likely exaggerated due to widespread use of RT-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) with arbitrarily high cycle thresholds as the basis for COVID-19 diagnosis [2]. As a direct response to this worldwide catastrophe, governments adopted a coordinated approach to limit caseloads and mortality utilizing a combination of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and novel gene-based vaccine platforms. The first doses of vaccine were administered less than 11 months after the identification of the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence (in the United States, under the Operation Warp Speed initiative), which represented the fastest vaccine development in history with limited assurances of long-term safety [3]. As of May 31st, 2023, roughly 69% of the global population have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine [1].

Some of the utilized COVID-19 vaccine platforms include inactivated virus (Sinovac – CoronaVac), protein subunit (Novavax – NVX-CoV2373), viral vector (AstraZeneca – ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Johnson & Johnson – Ad26.COV2.S), and messenger RNA (Pfizer-BioNTech – BNT162b2, Moderna – mRNA-1273)[4]. All utilize mechanisms that can cause serious adverse events; most involve the uncontrolled synthesis of the Spike glycoprotein as the basis of the immunological response. Circulating Spike protein is the likely deleterious mechanism through which COVID-19 vaccines produce adverse effects [5-9,12,13]. Spike protein and/or subunits/peptide fragments can trigger ACE2 receptor degradation and destabilization of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), resulting in severe thrombosis [5]. Spike protein activates platelets, causes endothelial damage, and directly promotes thrombosis [6]. Moreover, immune system cells that uptake lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) from COVID-19 vaccines can then systemically distribute Spike protein and microRNAs via exosomes, which may cause severe inflammatory consequences [6]. Further, long term cancer control may be jeopardized in those injected with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines because of interferon regulatory factor (IRF) and tumor suppressor gene dysregulation [6]. Moreover, a possible causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and various diseases has been found, including neurological disorders, myocarditis, blood platelet deficiencies, liver disease, weakened immune adaptability, and cancer development [6]. These findings are supported by the finding that recurrent COVID-19 vaccination with genetic vaccines may trigger unusually high levels of IgG4 antibodies, which may lead to immune system dysregulation, and contribute to the emergence of autoimmune disorders, myocarditis, and cancer growth [7].

Neurotoxic effects of Spike protein may cause or contribute to the post-COVID syndrome, including headache, tinnitus, autonomic dysfunction, and small fiber neuropathy [8]. Specific to the administration of viral vector COVID-19 vaccines (AstraZeneca; Johnson and Johnson), a new clinical syndrome called vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) was identified in 2021 and characterized by the development of thromboses at atypical body sites combined with severe thrombocytopenia after vaccination [10]. The pathogenesis of this life-threatening side effect is currently unknown, though it has been proposed that VITT is caused by post-vaccination antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4) triggering extensive platelet activation [10]. mRNA-based vaccines rarely cause VITT, but they are associated with myocarditis, or inflammation of myocardium [11]. The mechanisms for the development of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination are not clear, but it has been hypothesized that it may be caused by molecular mimicry of Spike protein and self-antigens, immune response to mRNA, and dysregulated cytokine expression [11]. In adolescents and young adults diagnosed with post-mRNA vaccine myocarditis, free Spike protein was detected in the blood while vaccinated controls had no circulating Spike protein [12]. It has been demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 Spike mRNA vaccine sequences can circulate in the blood for up to 28 days after vaccination [13]. However, the authors did not measure for vaccine mRNA past 28 days. These data indicate that adverse events may occur for an unknown period after vaccination, with Spike protein playing an important potential etiological role.

Parry et al. has demonstrated systemic distribution of the LNPs containing mRNA after vaccine administration in rats, concluding that LNPs reached their highest concentration at the injection site, followed by the liver, spleen, adrenal glands, ovaries (females), and bone marrow (femur) over 48 hours [14]. Further, LNPs were detected in the brain, heart, eyes, lungs, kidneys, bladder, small intestine, stomach, testes (males), prostate (males), uterus (females), thyroid, spinal cord, and blood [14]. This biodistribution data suggests that Spike protein may be expressed in cells from many vital organ systems, raising significant concerns regarding the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines. Given the identified vaccination syndromes and their possible mechanisms, the frequency of adverse event reports is expected to be high, especially given the vast number of vaccine doses administered globally.

Through May 31st, 2024, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) contained 1,640,416 adverse event reports associated with COVID-19 vaccines, including 37,647 deaths, 28,445 myocarditis and pericarditis, 21,741 heart attacks, and 9,218 thrombocytopenia reports [15]. If COVID-19 vaccination is indeed a determinant of the alarmingly high number of reported deaths, the implications could be immense, including: the complete withdrawal of all COVID-19 vaccines from the global market, suspension of all remaining COVID-19 vaccine mandates and passports, loss of public trust in government and medical institutions, investigations and inquiries into the censorship, silencing, and persecution of doctors and scientists who raised these concerns, and compensation for those who were harmed as a result of the administration of COVID-19 vaccines. Using VAERS data alone to establish a direct link between COVID-19 vaccination and death, however, is not possible due to many limitations and confounding factors.

In 2021, Walach et al. indicated that every death after COVID-19 vaccination should undergo an autopsy to investigate the mechanisms of harm [16]. Autopsies are one of the most powerful diagnostic tools in medicine to establish cause of death and clarify the pathophysiology of disease [17]. COVID-19 vaccines, with plausible mechanisms of injury to the human body and a substantial number of adverse event reports, represent an exposure that may be causally linked to death in some cases. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using post-mortem analyses, including autopsies.

Methods


Data Sources and Search Strategy

We performed a systematic review of all published autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination through May 18th, 2023. We utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA) Statement [18] to limit study selection bias and ensure transparency and completeness in reporting. The following databases were used: PubMed and ScienceDirect. The following keywords were used: “COVID-19 Vaccine,” “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine,” or “COVID Vaccination,” and “Post-mortem,” or “Autopsy.” All possible keyword combinations were manually searched. The search was not restricted to any language. All selected studies were screened for relevant literature contained in their references.

Eligibility Criteria and Selection Process

All original articles, randomized clinical trials, case reports, and case series that contain autopsy or organ-restricted autopsy (gross and histologic analysis of a single organ) results with COVID-19 vaccines as an antecedent exposure were included. Review articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, papers with no autopsy or organ-restricted autopsy results, non-human studies, and papers with no reported COVID-19 vaccination status were excluded. The authors’ conclusions were not considered for study inclusion to avoid bias. Two authors (NH and PAM) independently screened the full text of all retrieved studies to assess their eligibility for inclusion and removed all ineligible/duplicate studies. Any disagreements for inclusion of an article were resolved by discussion until agreement was reached.

Data Extraction and Analysis

From the selected studies, two authors (NH and PAM) independently extracted the following data into Microsoft Excel: year published, country where the study was conducted, and all available individual case information (age, sex, brand of COVID-19 vaccine, cumulative number of COVID-19 vaccine doses administered, days from last COVID-19 vaccine administration to death, post-mortem findings, and type of post-mortem procedure). Any discrepancies in data were resolved by discussion and re-extraction of the data. Given the presence of some missing data, all available information was used to calculate descriptive statistics. Estimated age (exact age not given) and inferred time from last vaccine administration to death (no definitive time given) were excluded from calculations and figures. Because the state of knowledge regarding COVID-19 vaccine safety has advanced since the time of the original publications, we performed a contemporary review: three physician experts (RH, WM, PAM) with experience in death adjudication and anatomical/clinical pathology independently reviewed the available evidence of each case (Table S1), including demographic information, clinical vignette, vaccination data, gross and histologic autopsy findings, and determined whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to the mechanism of death described. The physicians assessed the temporal relationships, strength of evidence and consistency of findings with reported characteristics and common presentations of COVID-19 vaccine-associated deaths documented in VAERS [15], and other potential etiologies to adjudicate each case. Agreement was reached when two or more physicians adjudicated a case concordantly. For the study by Chaves [23], only cardiovascular and hematological system-related cases were adjudicated as being linked to the vaccine due to a high probability of COVID-19 vaccination contributing to death. This high-probability assessment was supported by evaluating similar cases documented in VAERS, where cardiovascular and hematological adverse events represent a significant portion of serious adverse event reports [15]. Individual case information was missing for other cases, limiting adjudication for non-cardiovascular or hematological outcomes.

Results


A database search yielded 678 studies that had potential to meet our inclusion criterion. 562 duplicates were screened out. Out of the remaining 116 papers, 36 met our specified inclusion criterion. Through further analysis of references, we located 18 additional papers, with 8 of them meeting our inclusion criterion. In total, we found 44 studies that contained autopsy or organ-restricted autopsy reports of COVID-19 vaccinees (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Flow Diagram Detailing the Study Selection Process

Table 1 summarizes the 44 studies [19-62], which includes a total of 325 autopsy cases and 1 organ-restricted autopsy case (heart). The mean age of death was 70.4 years and there were 139 females (42.6%). Most received a Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine (41%), followed by Sinovac (37%), AstraZeneca (13%), Moderna (7%), Johnson & Johnson (1%), and Sinopharm (1%).

Table 1.

Characteristics of Included Autopsy and Organ-Restricted Autopsy Studies Examining Potential COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Deaths

Table 1. Continued

*Cases = Number of deaths examined post-mortem
**Dose = Cumulative number of vaccine doses received
***Period = Time (in days) from most recent vaccine administration to death
~= Inferred Period (Estimated period using all available information, definitive period not given)
Abbreviations: MIS = Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome; SCD = Sudden Cardiac Death; MI = Myocardial Infarction; PE = Pulmonary Embolism; AZ = AstraZeneca; J&J = Johnson and Johnson; VITT = Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia; ADEM = Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis; SCLS = Systemic Capillary Leak Syndrome; GBS = Guillain-Barre Syndrome; TMA = Thrombotic Microangiopathies; VI-ARDS = Vaccine-induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; UIP = Usual Interstitial Pneumonia.

The cardiovascular system was most frequently implicated (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), multiple organ systems (7%), neurological (4%), immunological (4%), and gastrointestinal (1%). In 7% of cases, the cause of death was either unknown, non-natural (drowning, head injury, etc.) or infection (Figure 2). One organ system was affected in 302 cases, two in 3 cases, three in 8 cases, and four or more in 13 cases (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Proportion of Cases by Affected Organ System

Figure 3.

Number of Affected Organ Systems by Cases

Table 2 shows the number and proportion of each reported cause of death. Sudden cardiac death was the most common cause of death (21.2%), followed by myocardial infarction (9.5%), pulmonary embolism (9.5%), ischemic heart disease (6.8%), VITT (5.8%), COVID-19 pneumonia (5.8%), myocarditis/pericarditis (5.5%), cerebral/subarachnoid hemorrhage (2.8%), coronary artery disease (2.5%), respiratory failure (2.5%), and unexplained (2.5%).

Table 2.

Number and Proportion of Reported Causes of Death Among Included Cases

Table 2.

Continued

The number of days from vaccination until death was 14.3 (mean), 3 (median) irrespective of dose; 7.8 (mean), 3 (median) after one dose; 23.2 (mean), 2 (median) after two doses; and 5.7 (mean), 2 (median) after three doses. The distribution of days from last vaccine administration to death is highly right skewed, showing that most of the deaths occurred within a week from last vaccination (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Distribution of Time from Last Vaccine Administration to Death Among Cases

240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated by three physicians to be significantly linked to COVID-19 vaccination (Table S1). Among adjudicators, there was complete independent agreement (all three physicians) of COVID-19 vaccination contributing to death in 203 cases (62.5%). The one organ-restricted autopsy case was judged to be linked to vaccination with complete agreement. Among the 240 deaths that have been adjudicated as being significantly linked to COVID-19 vaccination, most received a Sinovac vaccine (46.3%), followed by Pfizer (30.1%), AstraZeneca (14.6%), Moderna (7.5%), Johnson & Johnson (1.3%), and Sinopharm (0.8%); the mean age of death was 55.8; the number of days from vaccination until death was 11.3 (mean), 3 (median) irrespective of dose; and the primary causes of death include sudden cardiac death (35%), pulmonary embolism (12.5%), myocardial infarction (12%), VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%), multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%), and cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%).

Discussion


Among all published autopsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination, we found by independent adjudication that 73.9% of deaths were attributable to fatal COVID-19 vaccine injury syndromes (Table S1).  The cardiovascular system was by far the most implicated organ system in death, followed by hematological, respiratory, multiple organ systems, neurological, immunological, and gastrointestinal systems (Figure 2), with three or more organ systems affected in 21 cases (Figure 3). Sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction, myocarditis, pericarditis, pulmonary embolism, VITT, brain hemorrhage, multi-organ failure, respiratory failure, and cytokine storm were the reported causes of death in the majority of cases (Table 2). The majority of deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration (Figure 4). These results corroborate known COVID-19 vaccine-induced syndromes and show significant, temporal associations between COVID-19 vaccination and death involving multiple organ systems, with a predominant implication of the cardiovascular and hematological systems.  Criteria of causality from an epidemiological perspective have been met including biological plausibility, temporal association, internal and external validity, coherence, analogy, and reproducibility with each successive case report of death after COVID-19 vaccination combined with population-based studies describing mortality among the vaccinated.

Our findings amplify concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine adverse events and their mechanisms. COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis [11,63,64] and myocardial infarction [65,66] have been significantly well-described in the peer-reviewed literature, explaining the high proportion of cardiovascular deaths seen in our study. Spike protein’s deleterious effects [5-9,14], especially on the heart [12,67], further corroborate these findings. Our results also highlight the involvement of multiple organ systems described as Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS) reported following COVID-19 vaccination in both children [68] and adults [69]. A possible mechanism by which MIS occurs after vaccination could be the systemic distribution of the LNPs containing mRNA after vaccine administration [14] and the consequent systemic Spike protein expression and circulation resulting in system-wide inflammation. A significant proportion of cases were due to hematological system adverse events, which is not surprising given that VITT [70] and pulmonary embolism (PE) [71] have been reported in the literature as serious adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination. Deaths caused by adverse effects to the respiratory system were also relatively common in our review, a finding that is in line with the possibility of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD) after COVID-19 vaccination [72,73]. Although uncommon among cases in this study, immunological [74], neurological [75], and gastrointestinal [76] adverse events can still occur after COVID-19 vaccination and, as with the cardiovascular system, may be directly or indirectly caused by the systemic expression or circulation of Spike protein.  Given the average time (14.3 days) in which cases died after vaccination, a temporal association between COVID-19 vaccination and death among most cases is further supported by the finding that SARS-CoV-2 Spike mRNA vaccine sequences can circulate in the blood for at least 28 days after vaccination [13].  Most of the deployed vaccine platforms are associated with death, suggesting that they share a common feature that causes adverse effects, which is most likely Spike protein.

The large number of COVID-19 vaccine induced deaths evaluated in this review is coherent with multiple papers that report excess mortality after COVID-19 vaccination. Pantazatos and Seligmann found that all-cause mortality increased 0-5 weeks post-injection in most age groups resulting in 146,000 to 187,000 vaccine-associated deaths in the United States between February and August of 2021 [77]. With similar findings, Skidmore estimated that 278,000 people may have died from the COVID-19 vaccine in the United States by December 2021 [78]. These concerning results were further elucidated by Aarstad and Kvitastein, who found that among 31 countries in Europe, a higher population COVID-19 vaccine uptake in 2021 was positively correlated with increased all-cause mortality in the first nine months of 2022 after controlling for alternative variables [79]. Since the initiation of the global COVID-19 vaccination campaign, excess mortality from non-COVID-19 causes has been detected in many countries [80-85], suggesting a common adverse exposure among the global population. Pantazatos estimated that VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20 [77]. If we apply this underreporting factor to the May 5th, 2023, VAERS COVID-19 vaccine death report number of 35,324 [15], the number of deaths becomes an estimated 706,480 in the United States and other countries that utilize VAERS. If this extrapolated number of deaths were true, it would implicate the COVID-19 vaccines as a contributing factor to excess mortality among populations.

There have been several studies that have analyzed the causal relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and death. Maiese et al. [86] and Sessa et al. [87] used the conclusions of their included studies to assess the causal relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and death. In these studies, they found 14 and 15 deaths with a demonstrated causal link to COVID-19 vaccination, respectively. However, the collected conclusion methodology used in these studies is flawed for fully evaluating causal links at this time, specifically with COVID-19 vaccines, because they are novel medical products and new safety data is an inevitability as time advances. The average timeframe for a proper safety and efficacy evaluation for a vaccine is about 10.71 years [88]. Thus, collected conclusion methodology should only be considered for studies that have been published at least a few years after vaccine development to retain valid conclusions. For example, a paper published in 2021 indicates the AstraZeneca vaccines as safe with no links to serious adverse events including VITT [89], however, after more observation time, other researchers found a link between AstraZeneca vaccines and fatal VITT [70, 90] prompting widespread market withdrawal [91]. Pomara et al. [37] used the World Health Organization adverse event following immunization (WHO AEFI) guidelines, which we agree is a great method to assess causality between COVID-19 vaccination and death. In this paper, the researchers concluded that there may exist a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death from VITT. Unfortunately, we could not properly utilize the WHO AEFI methodology and complete the required checklist for our included cases due to missing needed case information. This methodology requires deceased subjects, extensive data, and IRB approval and can’t be utilized in a systematic review. Tan et al. [92] utilized incidence statistics to analyze the relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and death, and found a higher incidence of serious side effects compared to the prelicensing clinical trials. This method is not applicable to our study because the included autopsy reports do not present incidence statistics. Because the aforementioned methodologies were found to be incompatible with our study, we decided to utilize adjudication procedures helmed by medical professionals with relevant expertise to determine possible links between COVID-19 vaccines and death. Independent adjudication methodology was used by Hulscher et al. [93] to evaluate causal links between COVID-19 vaccines and death, where they found a highly probable causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death from myocarditis in 28 autopsy cases.

There have been numerous studies concluding that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective [94-96]. However, many studies have demonstrated the opposite [97-102]. The OpenSAFELY study, which included more than 1 million adolescents and children, has demonstrated extremely limited efficacy and increased harm from COVID-19 vaccination. Myocarditis and pericarditis were documented only in COVID-19 vaccinated groups and not after COVID-19 infection, and accident and emergency attendance, and unplanned hospitalization were higher after first vaccination compared to unvaccinated groups [97]. Moreover, Alessandria et al. found all-cause death risks to be higher for those vaccinated with one and two COVID-19 vaccine doses compared to unvaccinated individuals and that booster doses were ineffective [98]. They also demonstrated a statistically significant loss of life expectancy for those vaccinated with 2 or 3/4 doses. The subjects vaccinated with 2 doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during follow-up [98]. Published reports from the original randomized placebo-controlled trials concluded that COVID-19 vaccination could greatly reduce ambulatory COVID-19 illness [94, 95]. However, Mead et al. pointed out that the trials were short in duration, preventing observation of potential adverse events after the trials were stopped. Post-authorization concerns over trial methods and execution have surfaced, including failure to follow intent-to-treat principles resulting in overestimation of efficacy [99]. Subsequent re-analyses with inclusion of post-marketing surveillance studies indicated significant mRNA-related harms, as reported in Pfizer documents revealing 1.6 million adverse events by August 2022, describing serious injuries and an increased occurrence in cancer [99]. In light of continued emergence of data on the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination, further research is essential. Our study provides a significant forensic contribution to understanding the safety profile of these products.

Our study has all the limitations of bias as it applies to selection of papers and independent adjudication of the case material. Three independent reviewers evaluated the case information to avoid influence from the investigators’ biases or their connections, if any, with COVID-19 vaccination. Our rendered conclusions from the autopsy findings are based on the evolving understanding of COVID-19 vaccines, which differs markedly from when the referenced studies were published, making a bias assessment for those studies inapplicable. We included all cases, regardless of the adjudication outcome, in the figures and tables to effectively summarize the literature regarding all autopsy studies that include COVID-19 vaccines as a previous exposure. The omission of cases we adjudicated as not being linked to vaccination from our tables and figures would introduce significant selection bias as we did not use author-provided conclusions.Our paper has all the limitations of systematic reviews of previously published case reports including selection bias at the level of referral for autopsy and acceptance into the peer reviewed literature.  We believe publication bias could have had a large influence on our findings because of the global push for mass vaccination by governments, medical societies, and academic medical centers coupled with investigator hesitancy to report adverse developments with new genetic products widely recommended for both caregivers and patients. Finally, confounding variables, particularly concomitant illnesses, infection, drug interactions, and other factors not accounted for, could have played roles in the causal pathway to death.

In summary, among the universe of published autopsies performed after COVID-19 vaccination available to date, with a contemporary and independent review, we found that in 73.9% of cases, COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or significantly contributed to death.  The consistency seen among cases in this review with previously reported COVID-19 vaccine serious adverse events, their known fatal mechanisms, coupled with our independent adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death. The implications of our study apply to cases of unanticipated death without antecedent illness among COVID-19 vaccine recipients.  We can infer that in such cases, death may have been caused by COVID-19 vaccination.  Further urgent investigation is required to build upon our results and further elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms of death with the goal of risk stratification and avoidance of death for the large numbers of individuals who have taken or will receive one or more COVID-19 vaccine in the future. Autopsies should be performed on all deceased individuals that have received one or more COVID-19 vaccines. Clinical monitoring of COVID-19 vaccine recipients is indicated for a period of at least one year after vaccination to ensure the absence of serious adverse events that may lead to death.

Acknowledgments


Author Contributions

Nicolas Hulscher: Conceptualization, Investigation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Validation.

Peter A. McCullough: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Validation.

Roger Hodkinson and William Makis: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Investigation.

Richard Amerling and Paul Alexander: Writing – review & editing, Validation.

Heather Gessling, Harvey A. Risch, and Mark Trozzi: Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflicts of Interest

Drs. Alexander, Amerling, Gessling, Hodkinson, Makis, McCullough, Risch, are affiliated with and receive salary support and/or hold equity positions in The Wellness Company, Boca Raton, FL which had no role in funding, analysis, or publication. Nothing to declare for Dr. Trozzi and Mr. Hulscher.

Funding

None.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable as this is a review article containing publicly available research.

Data Availability Statement

All data extracted and analyzed from included studies are publicly available.

Supplementary Files

References


WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard [Internet]. World Health Organization; [cited 2023 May 17]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/

Lyons-Weiler J. The Use of Arbitrary and Generalized Ct Values in COVID-19 Non-Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (nonQ-RT-PCR) Testing Must End. Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2022 Nov 01; v4.2019-2024

Kuter BJ, Offit PA, Poland GA. The development of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States: Why and how so fast? Vaccine. 2021 Apr 28;39(18):2491-2495. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.077. Epub 2021 Mar 26. PMID: 33824043; PMCID: PMC7997594 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.077

Graña C, Ghosn L, Evrenoglou T, Jarde A, Minozzi S, Bergman H, Buckley BS, Probyn K, Villanueva G, Henschke N, Bonnet H, Assi R, Menon S, Marti M, Devane D, Mallon P, Lelievre JD, Askie LM, Kredo T, Ferrand G, Davidson M, Riveros C, Tovey D, Meerpohl JJ, Grasselli G, Rada G, Hróbjartsson A, Ravaud P, Chaimani A, Boutron I. Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):CD015477. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015477. PMID: 36473651; PMCID: PMC9726273. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015477

Trougakos IP, Terpos E, Alexopoulos H, Politou M, Paraskevis D, Scorilas A, Kastritis E, Andreakos E, Dimopoulos MA. Adverse effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: the spike hypothesis. Trends Mol Med. 2022 Jul;28(7):542-554. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2022.04.007. Epub 2022 Apr 21. PMID: 35537987; PMCID: PMC9021367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2022.04.007

Seneff S, Nigh G, Kyriakopoulos AM, McCullough PA. Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs. Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Jun;164:113008. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008. Epub 2022 Apr 15. PMID: 35436552; PMCID: PMC9012513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008

Uversky VN, Redwan EM, Makis W, Rubio-Casillas A. IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. Vaccines (Basel). 2023 May 17;11(5):991. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11050991. PMID: 37243095; PMCID: PMC10222767. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11050991

Theoharides TC. Could SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Be Responsible for Long-COVID Syndrome? Mol Neurobiol. 2022 Mar;59(3):1850-1861. doi: 10.1007/s12035-021-02696-0. Epub 2022 Jan 13. PMID: 35028901; PMCID: PMC8757925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-021-02696-0

Theoharides TC, Conti P. Be aware of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: There is more than meets the eye. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021 May-Jun;35(3):833-838. doi: 10.23812/THEO_EDIT_3_21. PMID: 34100279. https://doi.org/10.23812/THEO_EDIT_3_21

Aleem A, Nadeem AJ. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT). 2022 Oct 3. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan–. PMID: 34033367.

Bozkurt B, Kamat I, Hotez PJ. Myocarditis With COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines. Circulation. 2021 Aug 10;144(6):471-484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056135. Epub 2021 Jul 20. PMID: 34281357; PMCID: PMC8340726. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056135

Yonker LM, Swank Z, Bartsch YC, Burns MD, Kane A, Boribong BP, Davis JP, Loiselle M, Novak T, Senussi Y, Cheng CA, Burgess E, Edlow AG, Chou J, Dionne A, Balaguru D, Lahoud-Rahme M, Arditi M, Julg B, Randolph AG, Alter G, Fasano A, Walt DR. Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis. Circulation. 2023 Mar 14;147(11):867-876. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061025. Epub 2023 Jan 4. PMID: 36597886; PMCID: PMC10010667. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061025

Castruita JAS, Schneider UV, Mollerup S, Leineweber TD, Weis N, Bukh J, Pedersen MS, Westh H. SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccine sequences circulate in blood up to 28 days after COVID-19 vaccination. APMIS. 2023 Mar;131(3):128-132. doi: 10.1111/apm.13294. Epub 2023 Jan 29. PMID: 36647776; PMCID: PMC10107710. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13294

Parry PI, Lefringhausen A, Turni C, et al. ‘Spikeopathy’: COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA. Biomedicines. 2023;11(8):2287. Published 2023 Aug 17. doi:10.3390/biomedicines11082287 https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082287

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) [online]. Available at: https://vaers.hhs.gov.

Harald Walach, Rainer J. Klement, and Wouter Aukema. 2021. The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations – Should We Rethink the Policy? Sci, Publ Health Pol & Law 3:87-99.

Scarl R, Parkinson B, Arole V, Hardy T, Allenby P. The hospital autopsy: the importance in keeping autopsy an option. Autopsy Case Rep. 2022 Feb 17;12:e2021333. doi: 10.4322/acr.2021.333. PMID: 35252044; PMCID: PMC8890781. https://doi.org/10.4322/acr.2021.333

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jul 23. PMID: 19631508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

Hojberg Y, Abdeljaber M, Prahlow JA. Generalized Eosinophilia Following Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Administration: A Case Report. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2023 Mar;13(1):9-15. doi: 10.1177/19253621231157933. Epub 2023 Mar 28. PMID: 37091194; PMCID: PMC10119868. https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621231157933

Nushida H, Ito A, Kurata H, Umemoto H, Tokunaga I, Iseki H, Nishimura A. A case of fatal multi-organ inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2023 Mar 20;63:102244. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2023.102244. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36990036; PMCID: PMC10027302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2023.102244

Jeon YH, Choi S, Park JH, Lee JK, Yeo NS, Lee S, Suh YL. Sudden Death Associated With Possible Flare-Ups of Multiple Sclerosis After COVID-19 Vaccination and Infection: A Case Report and Literature Review. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Mar 13;38(10):e78. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e78. PMID: 36918031; PMCID: PMC10010908. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e78

Esposito M, Cocimano G, Vanaria F, Sessa F, Salerno M. Death from COVID-19 in a Fully Vaccinated Subject: A Complete Autopsy Report. Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 9;11(1):142. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010142. PMID: 36679987; PMCID: PMC9865400. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010142

Chaves JJ, Bonilla JC, Chaves-Cabezas V, Castro A, Polo JF, Mendoza O, Correa-Rodríguez J, Piedrahita AC, Romero-Fandiño IA, Caro MV, González AC, Sánchez LK, Murcia F, Márquez G, Benavides A, Quiroga MDP, López J, Parra-Medina R. A postmortem study of patients vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 in Colombia. Rev Esp Patol. 2023 Jan-Mar;56(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.patol.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Oct 31. PMID: 36599599; PMCID: PMC9618417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patol.2022.09.003

Mörz M. A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 1;10(10):1651. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101651. PMID: 36298516; PMCID: PMC9611676. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101651

Alunni V, Bernardi C, Chevalier N, Cabusat C, Quatrehomme G, Torrents J, Biglia E, Gaillard Y, Drici MD. Postmortem PF4 antibodies confirm a rare case of thrombosis thrombocytopenia syndrome associated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 anti-COVID vaccination. Int J Legal Med. 2023 Mar;137(2):487-492. doi: 10.1007/s00414-022-02910-1. Epub 2022 Oct 27. PMID: 36289074; PMCID: PMC9607767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-022-02910-1

Takahashi M, Kondo T, Yamasaki G, Sugimoto M, Asano M, Ueno Y, Nagasaki Y. An autopsy case report of aortic dissection complicated with histiolymphocytic pericarditis and aortic inflammation after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2022 Nov;59:102154. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2022.102154. Epub 2022 Sep 29. PMID: 36191411; PMCID: PMC9519380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2022.102154

Murata K, Nakao N, Ishiuchi N, Fukui T, Katsuya N, Fukumoto W, Oka H, Yoshikawa N, Nagao T, Namera A, Kakimoto N, Oue N, Awai K, Yoshimoto K, Nagao M. Four cases of cytokine storm after COVID-19 vaccination: Case report. Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 15;13:967226. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.967226. PMID: 36045681; PMCID: PMC9420842. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.967226

Satomi H, Katano H, Kanno H, Kobayashi M, Ohkuma Y, Hashidume N, Usui T, Tsukada S, Ito I. An autopsy case of fulminant myocarditis after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine inoculation. Pathol Int. 2022 Oct;72(10):519-524. doi: 10.1111/pin.13267. Epub 2022 Aug 30. PMID: 36040128; PMCID: PMC9537995. https://doi.org/10.1111/pin.13267

Suzuki H, Ro A, Takada A, Saito K, Hayashi K. Autopsy findings of post-COVID-19 vaccination deaths in Tokyo Metropolis, Japan, 2021. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2022 Nov;59:102134. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2022.102134. Epub 2022 Aug 20. PMID: 36037554; PMCID: PMC9392553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2022.102134

Mele F, Tafuri S, Stefanizzi P, D Amati A, Calvano M, Leonardelli M, Macorano E, Duma S, De Gabriele G, Introna F, De Donno A. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis after COVID-19 vaccination and congenital deficiency of coagulation factors: Is there a correlation? Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(6):2095166. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2095166. Epub 2022 Jul 27. PMID: 35895937; PMCID: PMC9746424. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2022.2095166

Yoshimura Y, Sasaki H, Miyata N, Miyazaki K, Okudela K, Tateishi Y, Hayashi H, Kawana-Tachikawa A, Iwashita H, Maeda K, Ihama Y, Hatayama Y, Ryo A, Tachikawa N. An autopsy case of COVID-19-like acute respiratory distress syndrome after mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;121:98-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.04.057. Epub 2022 Apr 30. PMID: 35500794; PMCID: PMC9054706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.04.057

Roncati L, Manenti A, Corsi L. A Three-Case Series of Thrombotic Deaths in Patients over 50 with Comorbidities Temporally after modRNA COVID-19 Vaccination. Pathogens. 2022 Apr 3;11(4):435. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11040435. PMID: 35456110; PMCID: PMC9032304. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040435

Kang DH, Na JY, Yang JH, Moon SH, Kim SH, Jung JJ, Cha HJ, Ahn JH, Park YW, Cho SY, Yu HK, Lee SH, Park MY, Kim JW, Byun JH. Fulminant Giant Cell Myocarditis following Heterologous Vaccination of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 20;58(3):449. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030449. PMID: 35334625; PMCID: PMC8950462. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030449

Kamura Y, Terao T, Akao S, Kono Y, Honma K, Matsue K. Fatal thrombotic microangiopathy with rhabdomyolysis as an initial symptom after the first dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine: A case report. Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;117:322-325. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.031. Epub 2022 Feb 18. PMID: 35189339; PMCID: PMC8853962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.031

Ishioka Y, Makiguchi T, Itoga M, Tanaka H, Taima K, Goto S, Tasaka S. Acute Exacerbation of Interstitial Lung Disease After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Case Series. Chest. 2022 Dec;162(6):e311-e316. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.2213. PMID: 36494131; PMCID: PMC9723271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.2213

Gill JR, Tashjian R, Duncanson E. Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in 2 Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2022 Aug 1;146(8):925-929. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0435-SA. PMID: 35157759. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2021-0435-SA

Pomara C, Salerno M, Esposito M, Sessa F, Certo F, Tripodo C, Rappa F, Barbagallo GM. Histological and immunohistochemical findings in a fatal case of thrombotic thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccination. Pathol Res Pract. 2022 Mar;231:153796. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2022.153796. Epub 2022 Feb 4. PMID: 35144085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2022.153796

Yeo A, Kuek B, Lau M, Tan SR, Chan S. Post COVID-19 vaccine deaths – Singapore’s early experience. Forensic Sci Int. 2022 Jan 19;332:111199. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111199. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35078041; PMCID: PMC8767909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111199

Ameratunga R, Woon ST, Sheppard MN, Garland J, Ondruschka B, Wong CX, Stewart RAH, Tatley M, Stables SR, Tse RD. First Identified Case of Fatal Fulminant Necrotizing Eosinophilic Myocarditis Following the Initial Dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2, Comirnaty): an Extremely Rare Idiosyncratic Hypersensitivity Reaction. J Clin Immunol. 2022 Apr;42(3):441-447. doi: 10.1007/s10875-021-01187-0. Epub 2022 Jan 3. PMID: 34978002; PMCID: PMC8720536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-021-01187-0

Günther A, Brämer D, Pletz MW, Kamradt T, Baumgart S, Mayer TE, Baier M, Autsch A, Mawrin C, Schönborn L, Greinacher A, Thiele T. Complicated Long Term Vaccine Induced Thrombotic Immune Thrombocytopenia-A Case Report. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Nov 17;9(11):1344. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111344. PMID: 34835275; PMCID: PMC8622649. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111344

Permezel F, Borojevic B, Lau S, de Boer HH. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) following recent Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2022 Mar;18(1):74-79. doi: 10.1007/s12024-021-00440-7. Epub 2021 Nov 4. PMID: 34735684; PMCID: PMC8567127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-021-00440-7

Choi S, Lee S, Seo JW, Kim MJ, Jeon YH, Park JH, Lee JK, Yeo NS. Myocarditis-induced Sudden Death after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Korea: Case Report Focusing on Histopathological Findings. J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Oct 18;36(40):e286. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e286. PMID: 34664804; PMCID: PMC8524235. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e286

Schneider J, Sottmann L, Greinacher A, Hagen M, Kasper HU, Kuhnen C, Schlepper S, Schmidt S, Schulz R, Thiele T, Thomas C, Schmeling A. Postmortem investigation of fatalities following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines. Int J Legal Med. 2021 Nov;135(6):2335-2345. doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02706-9. Epub 2021 Sep 30. PMID: 34591186; PMCID: PMC8482743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02706-9

Schneider J, Sottmann L, Greinacher A, Hagen M, Kasper HU, Kuhnen C, Schlepper S, Schmidt S, Schulz R, Thiele T, Thomas C, Schmeling A. Postmortem investigation of fatalities following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines. Int J Legal Med. 2021 Nov;135(6):2335-2345. doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02706-9. Epub 2021 Sep 30. PMID: 34591186; PMCID: PMC8482743. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2109975

Wiedmann M, Skattør T, Stray-Pedersen A, Romundstad L, Antal EA, Marthinsen PB, Sørvoll IH, Leiknes Ernstsen S, Lund CG, Holme PA, Johansen TO, Brunborg C, Aamodt AH, Schultz NH, Skagen K, Skjelland M. Vaccine Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Causing a Severe Form of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis With High Fatality Rate: A Case Series. Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 30;12:721146. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.721146. PMID: 34393988; PMCID: PMC8363077. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.721146

Pomara C, Sessa F, Ciaccio M, Dieli F, Esposito M, Giammanco GM, Garozzo SF, Giarratano A, Prati D, Rappa F, Salerno M, Tripodo C, Mannucci PM, Zamboni P. COVID-19 Vaccine and Death: Causality Algorithm According to the WHO Eligibility Diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 26;11(6):955. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11060955. PMID: 34073536; PMCID: PMC8229116. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11060955

Althaus K, Möller P, Uzun G, Singh A, Beck A, Bettag M, Bösmüller H, Guthoff M, Dorn F, Petzold GC, Henkes H, Heyne N, Jumaa H, Kreiser K, Limpach C, Luz B, Maschke M, Müller JA, Münch J, Nagel S, Pötzsch B, Müller J, Schlegel C, Viardot A, Bäzner H, Wolf M, Pelzl L, Warm V, Willinek WA, Steiner J, Schneiderhan-Marra N, Vollherbst D, Sachs UJ, Fend F, Bakchoul T. Antibody-mediated procoagulant platelets in SARS-CoV-2-vaccination associated immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Haematologica. 2021 Aug 1;106(8):2170-2179. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279000. PMID: 34011137; PMCID: PMC8327736. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.279000

Edler C, Klein A, Schröder AS, Sperhake JP, Ondruschka B. Deaths associated with newly launched SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (Comirnaty®). Leg Med (Tokyo). 2021 Jul;51:101895. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2021.101895. Epub 2021 Apr 17. PMID: 33895650; PMCID: PMC8052499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2021.101895

Hansen T, Titze U, Kulamadayil-Heidenreich NSA, Glombitza S, Tebbe JJ, Röcken C, Schulz B, Weise M, Wilkens L. First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jun;107:172-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.053. Epub 2021 Apr 16. PMID: 33872783; PMCID: PMC8051011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.053

Baronti A, Gentile F, Manetti AC, Scatena A, Pellegrini S, Pucci A, Franzini M, Castiglione V, Maiese A, Giannoni A, Pistello M, Emdin M, Aquaro GD, Di Paolo M. Myocardial Infarction Following COVID-19 Vaccine Administration: Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc? Viruses. 2022 Jul 27;14(8):1644. doi: 10.3390/v14081644. PMID: 36016266; PMCID: PMC9413746. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081644

Ittiwut C, Mahasirimongkol S, Srisont S, Ittiwut R, Chockjamsai M, Durongkadech P, Sawaengdee W, Khunphon A, Larpadisorn K, Wattanapokayakit S, Wetchaphanphesat S, Arunotong S, Srimahachota S, Pittayawonganon C, Thammawijaya P, Sutdan D, Doungngern P, Khongphatthanayothin A, Kerr SJ, Shotelersuk V. Genetic basis of sudden death after COVID-19 vaccination in Thailand. Heart Rhythm. 2022 Aug 5;19(11):1874–9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.07.019. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35934244; PMCID: PMC9352648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.07.019

Greinacher A, Thiele T, Warkentin TE, Weisser K, Kyrle PA, Eichinger S. Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 Vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 3;384(22):2092-2101. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104840. Epub 2021 Apr 9. PMID: 33835769; PMCID: PMC8095372. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840

Mauriello A, Scimeca M, Amelio I, Massoud R, Novelli A, Di Lorenzo F, Finocchiaro S, Cimino C, Telesca R, Chiocchi M, Sun Q, Wang Y, Shi Y, Novelli G, Melino G. Thromboembolism after COVID-19 vaccine in patients with preexisting thrombocytopenia. Cell Death Dis. 2021 Aug 3;12(8):762. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-04058-z. PMID: 34344867; PMCID: PMC8328816. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-04058-z

Bjørnstad-Tuveng TH, Rudjord A, Anker P. Fatal cerebral haemorrhage after COVID-19 vaccine. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2021 Apr 29;141. English, Norwegian. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.21.0312. PMID: 33928772. https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.21.0312

Scully M, Singh D, Lown R, Poles A, Solomon T, Levi M, Goldblatt D, Kotoucek P, Thomas W, Lester W. Pathologic Antibodies to Platelet Factor 4 after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2202-2211. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2105385. Epub 2021 Apr 16. PMID: 33861525; PMCID: PMC8112532. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2105385

Choi GJ, Baek SH, Kim J, Kim JH, Kwon GY, Kim DK, Jung YH, Kim S. Fatal Systemic Capillary Leak Syndrome after SARS-CoV-2Vaccination in Patient with Multiple Myeloma. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Nov;27(11):2973-2975. doi: 10.3201/eid2711.211723. Epub 2021 Aug 30. PMID: 34459725; PMCID: PMC8544977. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2711.211723

Schwab C, Domke LM, Hartmann L, Stenzinger A, Longerich T, Schirmacher P. Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination. Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Mar;112(3):431-440. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5. Epub 2022 Nov 27. PMID: 36436002; PMCID: PMC9702955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5

Hirschbühl K, Schaller T, Märkl B, Claus R, Sipos E, Rentschler L, Maccagno A, Grosser B, Kling E, Neidig M, Kröncke T, Spring O, Braun G, Bösmüller H, Seidl M, Esposito I, Pablik J, Hilsenbeck J, Boor P, Beer M, Dintner S, Wylezich C. High viral loads: what drives fatal cases of COVID-19 in vaccinees? – an autopsy study. Mod Pathol. 2022 Aug;35(8):1013-1021. doi: 10.1038/s41379-022-01069-9. Epub 2022 Apr 1. PMID: 35365771; PMCID: PMC8974809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-022-01069-9

Hoshino N, Yanase M, Ichiyasu T, Kuwahara K, Kawai H, Muramatsu T, Ishii H, Tsukamoto T, Morimoto SI, Izawa H. An autopsy case report of fulminant myocarditis: Following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. J Cardiol Cases. 2022 Dec;26(6):391-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jul 4. PMID: 35812802; PMCID: PMC9250935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jccase.2022.06.006

Colombo D, Del Nonno F, Marchioni L, Lalle E, Gallì P, Vaia F, Falasca L. Autopsies Revealed Pathological Features of COVID-19 in Unvaccinated vs. Vaccinated Patients. Biomedicines. 2023 Feb 14;11(2):551. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11020551. PMID: 36831087; PMCID: PMC9953314. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020551

Mosna K, Vadkerti P, Papp L, Palkovic M, Janega P, Babal P. Guillain-Barré syndrome with lethal outcome following covid-19 vaccination – case report supported by autopsy examination. The Open Neurology Journal. 2022 Mar 10;16(1). doi:10.2174/1874205x-v16-e2207270 https://doi.org/10.2174/1874205x-v16-e2207270

Kaimori R, Nishida H, Uchida T, Tamura M, Kuroki K, Murata K, Hatakeyama K, Ikeda Y, Amemiya K, Nishizono A, Daa T, Mori S. Histopathologically TMA-like distribution of multiple organ thromboses following the initial dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Comirnaty, Pfizer/BioNTech): an autopsy case report. Thromb J. 2022 Oct 6;20(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12959-022-00418-7. PMID: 36203145; PMCID: PMC9540301. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-022-00418-7

Wong HL, Hu M, Zhou CK, Lloyd PC, Amend KL, Beachler DC, Secora A, McMahill-Walraven CN, Lu Y, Wu Y, Ogilvie RP, Reich C, Djibo DA, Wan Z, Seeger JD, Akhtar S, Jiao Y, Chillarige Y, Do R, Hornberger J, Obidi J, Forshee R, Shoaibi A, Anderson SA. Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis after the COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in the USA: a cohort study in claims databases. Lancet. 2022 Jun 11;399(10342):2191-2199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00791-7. PMID: 35691322; PMCID: PMC9183215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00791-7

Park DY, An S, Kaur A, Malhotra S, Vij A. Myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: A systematic review of case reports and case series. Clin Cardiol. 2022 Jul;45(7):691-700. doi: 10.1002/clc.23828. Epub 2022 Jun 2. PMID: 35652390; PMCID: PMC9286338. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23828

Baqi DH, Kakamad FH, Mahmood ZH, Fattah FH, Ahmed SF, Hassan MN, Hama Amin BJ, Mohammed SH, Mikael TM, Hassan HA, Salh AM. Myocardial infarction following COVID-19 vaccine administration; a systematic review. Heliyon. 2022 Nov 11;8(11):e11385. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11385. PMID: 36406668; PMCID: PMC9650518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11385

Zafar U, Zafar H, Ahmed MS, Khattak M. Link between COVID-19 vaccines and myocardial infarction. World J Clin Cases. 2022 Oct 6;10(28):10109-10119. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i28.10109. PMID: 36246837; PMCID: PMC9561578. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i28.10109

Baumeier C, Aleshcheva G, Harms D, Gross U, Hamm C, Assmus B, Westenfeld R, Kelm M, Rammos S, Wenzel P, Münzel T, Elsässer A, Gailani M, Perings C, Bourakkadi A, Flesch M, Kempf T, Bauersachs J, Escher F, Schultheiss HP. Intramyocardial Inflammation after COVID-19 Vaccination: An Endomyocardial Biopsy-Proven Case Series. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 22;23(13):6940. doi: 10.3390/ijms23136940. PMID: 35805941; PMCID: PMC9266869. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23136940

Wangu Z, Swartz H, Doherty M. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) possibly secondary to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. BMJ Case Rep. 2022 Mar 30;15(3):e247176. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-247176. PMID: 35354564; PMCID: PMC8968554. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2021-247176

Ehikhametalor K, Deans-Minott J, Duncan JP. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults (MIS-A) After COVID-19 Infection and Recent Vaccination with Recombinant Adenoviral Vector Encoding the Spike Protein Antigen of SARS-CoV-2 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Vaxzevria). J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):232-237. doi: 10.1177/08850666221121589. Epub 2022 Aug 17. PMID: 35979616; PMCID: PMC9389272. https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666221121589

Zidan A, Noureldin A, Kumar SA, Elsebaie A, Othman M. COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Immune Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia (VITT): Diagnostic Discrepancies and Global Implications. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2023 Feb;49(1):9-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759684. Epub 2023 Jan 5. PMID: 36603593. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759684

Ifeanyi N, Chinenye N, Oladiran O, David E, Mmonu C, Ogbonna-Nwosu C. Isolated pulmonary embolism following COVID vaccination: 2 case reports and a review of post-acute pulmonary embolism complications and follow-up. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021 Nov 15;11(6):877-879. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1990825. PMID: 34804412; PMCID: PMC8604520. https://doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2021.1990825

Abraham B, Mohammed Saeed H, Azeez Pasha SA. Acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine administration in a pregnant woman: A case report. Qatar Med J. 2022 Aug 9;2022(3):40. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2022.40. PMID: 35974885; PMCID: PMC9372495. https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2022.40

Yoshifuji A, Ishioka K, Masuzawa Y, Suda S, Murata S, Uwamino Y, Fujino M, Miyahara H, Hasegawa N, Ryuzaki M, Hoshino H, Sekine K. COVID-19 vaccine induced interstitial lung disease. J Infect Chemother. 2022 Jan;28(1):95-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Sep 20. PMID: 34580010; PMCID: PMC8450284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2021.09.010

Chen Y, Xu Z, Wang P, Li XM, Shuai ZW, Ye DQ, Pan HF. New-onset autoimmune phenomena post-COVID-19 vaccination. Immunology. 2022 Apr;165(4):386-401. doi: 10.1111/imm.13443. Epub 2022 Jan 7. PMID: 34957554. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.13443

Hosseini R, Askari N. A review of neurological side effects of COVID-19 vaccination. Eur J Med Res. 2023 Feb 25;28(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-00992-0. PMID: 36841774; PMCID: PMC9959958. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-00992-0

Ajmera K, Bansal R, Wilkinson H, Goyal L. Gastrointestinal Complications of COVID-19 Vaccines. Cureus. 2022 Apr 12;14(4):e24070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24070. PMID: 35573556; PMCID: PMC9097558. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24070

Pantazatos S, Seligmann H. COVID vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk. Research Gate 2021 Oct 26. Epub Oct 26. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28257.43366. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28257.43366

Skidmore, M. 2023. COVID-19 Illness and Vaccination Experiences in Social Circles Affect COVID-19 Vaccination Decisions. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law 4:208-226.

Aarstad, J.; Kvitastein, O.A. Is there a Link between the 2021 COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake in Europe and 2022 Excess All-Cause Mortality?. Preprints.org 2023, 2023020350. doi:10.20944/preprints202302.0350.v1. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202302.0350.v1

Beesoon S, Bakal JA, Youngson E, Williams KP, Berzins SA, Brindle ME, Joffe AM. Excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alberta, Canada. IJID Reg. 2022 Dec;5:62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Aug 30. PMID: 36060856; PMCID: PMC9424127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2022.08.011

Todd M, Scheeres A. Excess Mortality From Non-COVID-19 Causes During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2020-2021. Am J Public Health. 2022 Dec;112(12):1800-1803. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307096. PMID: 36383938; PMCID: PMC9670212. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307096

Karlinsky A, Kobak D. The World Mortality Dataset: Tracking excess mortality across countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2021 Jun 4:2021.01.27.21250604. doi: 10.1101/2021.01.27.21250604. Update in: Elife. 2021 Jun 30;10: PMID: 33532789; PMCID: PMC7852240. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.27.21250604

COVID-19 Excess Mortality Collaborators. Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020-21. Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1513-1536. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02796-3. Epub 2022 Mar 10. Erratum in: Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1468. PMID: 35279232; PMCID: PMC8912932. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02796-3

Msemburi W, Karlinsky A, Knutson V, Aleshin-Guendel S, Chatterji S, Wakefield J. The WHO estimates of excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7942):130-137. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05522-2. Epub 2022 Dec 14. PMID: 36517599; PMCID: PMC9812776. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05522-2

Shang W, Wang Y, Yuan J, Guo Z, Liu J, Liu M. Global Excess Mortality during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 12;10(10):1702. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101702. PMID: 36298567; PMCID: PMC9607451. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101702

Maiese A, Baronti A, Manetti AC, Di Paolo M, Turillazzi E, Frati P, Fineschi V. Death after the Administration of COVID-19 Vaccines Approved by EMA: Has a Causal Relationship Been Demonstrated? Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Feb 16;10(2):308. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020308. PMID: 35214765; PMCID: PMC8875435. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020308

Sessa F, Salerno M, Esposito M, Di Nunno N, Zamboni P, Pomara C. Autopsy Findings and Causality Relationship between Death and COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 15;10(24):5876. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245876. PMID: 34945172; PMCID: PMC8709364. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245876

Pronker ES, Weenen TC, Commandeur H, Claassen EH, Osterhaus AD. Risk in vaccine research and development quantified. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057755. Epub 2013 Mar 20. PMID: 23526951; PMCID: PMC3603987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057755

Falsey AR, Sobieszczyk ME, Hirsch I, Sproule S, Robb ML, Corey L, Neuzil KM, Hahn W, Hunt J, Mulligan MJ, McEvoy C, DeJesus E, Hassman M, Little SJ, Pahud BA, Durbin A, Pickrell P, Daar ES, Bush L, Solis J, Carr QO, Oyedele T, Buchbinder S, Cowden J, Vargas SL, Guerreros Benavides A, Call R, Keefer MC, Kirkpatrick BD, Pullman J, Tong T, Brewinski Isaacs M, Benkeser D, Janes HE, Nason MC, Green JA, Kelly EJ, Maaske J, Mueller N, Shoemaker K, Takas T, Marshall RP, Pangalos MN, Villafana T, Gonzalez-Lopez A; AstraZeneca AZD1222 Clinical Study Group. Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):2348-2360. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2105290. Epub 2021 Sep 29. PMID: 34587382; PMCID: PMC8522798. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2105290

Matar RH, Than CA, Nakanishi H, Daniel RS, Smayra K, Sim BL, Beran A, Danoun OA. Outcomes of patients with thromboembolic events following coronavirus disease 2019 AstraZeneca vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2022 Mar 1;33(2):90-112. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000001113. PMID: 34980833; PMCID: PMC8815637. https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000001113

Jain V, Lorgelly P. The impact of pausing the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine on uptake in Europe: a difference-in-differences analysis. Eur J Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;32(4):648-654. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac039. PMID: 35394507; PMCID: PMC9341841. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac039

Tan LJ, Koh CP, Lai SK, Poh WC, Othman MS, Hussin H. A systemic review and recommendation for an autopsy approach to death followed the COVID 19 vaccination. Forensic Sci Int. 2022 Nov;340:111469. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111469. Epub 2022 Sep 20. PMID: 36162300; PMCID: PMC9487151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111469

Hulscher N, Hodkinson R, Makis W, McCullough PA. Autopsy findings in cases of fatal COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis. ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Jan 14. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14680. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38221509. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14680

Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577

Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, et al. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(5):403-416. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389

Beladiya J, Kumar A, Vasava Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials. Rev Med Virol. 2024;34(1):e2507. doi:10.1002/rmv.2507. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2507

97. Andrews CD, Parker EPK, Horne E, Walker V, Palmer T, Schaffer AL, et al. OpenSAFELY: Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents. medRxiv. 2024; Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/20/2024.05.20.24306810

Alessandria M, Malatesta GM, Berrino F, Donzelli A. A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(7):1343. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12071343. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071343

Mead M, Seneff S, Wolfinger R, et al. COVID-19 Modified mRNA “Vaccines” Part 1: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials, Mass Vaccination, and the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex. Vaccine Theory Prac & Res. 2024;3(1):1112-1178. doi:10.56098/fdrasy50. https://doi.org/10.56098/fdrasy50

Suzumura Y. Analysis of the Association Between BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination and Deaths Within 10 Days After Vaccination Using the Sex Ratio in Japan. Cureus. 2023;15(12):e50144. Published 2023 Dec 7. doi:10.7759/cureus.50144. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50144

Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Bruno R. Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 2023;171:111015. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2023.111015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2023.111015

Igyártó BZ, Qin Z. The mRNA-LNP vaccines – the good, the bad and the ugly?. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1336906. Published 2024 Feb 8. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1336906. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1336906

Share this content

Subscribe to SciPublHealth


Science-based knowledge, not narrative-dictated knowledge, is the goal of WSES, and we will work to make sure that only objective knowledge is used in the formation of medical standards of care and public health policies.

Nov 162024
 

Freedom and Justice .ca  is another Canadian organization (small)  that is intent on taking back what the Governments are taking away.   Their call to action for the Lawsuit in Toronto (below) begins with:

We need a MASSIVE turnout online to send a clear message to the court and the government that there is SUBSTANTIAL public interest in this case. We had close to 20K members of the public register to attend our appeal hearing via Zoom, the most people to attend a Federal Court hearing ever in Canadian history.

BACKGROUND

Rupa Subramanya  wrote up excellent background (August 2, 2022). Click on his name to read it.  It’s another of those  “I can’t believe this is happening”.   Canadians are SO fortunate to have people who are in there, fighting.

Court Documents Reveal Canada’s Travel Ban Had No Scientific Basis

In the days leading up to the mandate, transportation officials were frantically looking for a rationale for it.  They  came up short.

 

= = = = = = =  = = = = =

TRAVEL MANDATES LAWSUIT: URGENT MESSAGE

 

**REGISTER FOR THE COURT ZOOM**

 
Due to the overwhelming amount of e-mails they’ve received from the public requesting to attend our motion hearing via Zoom and in person on Monday November 18th, the (Canadian) Federal Court has now set up the hearing as a webinar to accommodate a much larger number of attendees.
We need a MASSIVE turnout online to send a clear message to the court and the government that there is SUBSTANTIAL public interest in this case. We had close to 20K members of the public register to attend our appeal hearing via Zoom, the most people to attend a Federal Court hearing ever in Canadian history.
 
**After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar
 
In person attendance: Federal Court – Courtroom 4A 180 Queen St W, Toronto, ON M5V 1Z4
 
All donations to our legal fund are much needed and greatly appreciated.
Thank you all once again for your continued support.

Travel Mandates Case

On August 13, 2021, the Canadian government announced that anyone who hadn’t been vaccinated against Covid would soon be barred from planes and trains inside Canada or out of Canada (the “Travel Ban”). The Travel Ban took effect on October 30, 2021. As a result, roughly six million unvaccinated Canadians were barred from visiting loved ones, working or otherwise traveling.

Karl Harrison and Shaun Rickard launched a judicial review that challenged the basis of Travel Ban. Throughout the summer of 2022, parties underwent extensive cross-examination to assess the strength of the evidence that supported the Travel Ban. On June 14, 2022, and in the middle of the 1.5 month cross-examination, the Canadian government announced – out-of-the blue – that they were suspending the Travel Ban. Thousands of pages of evidence was amassed notably that the agents that enacted the Travel Ban had no formal education in public health, that likely a senior official directed that the Travel Ban must be imposed and that days before implementing the Travel Ban transportation officials were seeking rational to support the Travel Ban. Within days, lawyers for the Canadian government filed a motion to shut down the Travel Ban Case on grounds that the case was moot.

View the Examination Transcripts.

In September 2022 the parties went before Associate Chief Justice Gagne challenging the Canadian governments motion that the Travel Ban Case is moot.

On October 20, 2022, Justice Gagne decided (Gagne decision) in favour of the Canadian Government and stated:
these Applications will be struck as moot. The air and rail passenger vaccine mandates were repealed, as have other related public health measures. The Applicants have substantially received the remedies sought and as such, there is no live controversy to adjudicate.
There is no important public interest or inconsistency in the law that would justify allocating significant judicial resources to hear these moot Applications.
Finally, it is not the role of the Court to dictate or prevent future government actions.

Harrison and Rickard have appealed Justice Gagne’s decision (Notice of Appeal) (Memorandum of Fact) arguing that the principle of mootness in the Canadian courts needs to be reviewed and that it is squarely the role of the courts in Canada to hear cases that challenge government policies on the basis of whether they are found to be unconstitutional, discriminatory and egregious. The Attorney General filed the following response to the appeal on May 29, 2023 (AG response)

= = = = = = = = = =

There are 477 Comments on Rupa Subramanya ‘s  article (substack).   The first two:

Aug 2, 2022·edited Aug 2, 2022

What should frighten people today, isn’t the authoritarian governments of China and Russia, but the authoritarians in our midsts. It is terrifying that such a retrograde philosophy has taken root amongst so many western leaders…including among the Democrats in the US.

They know these policies (like the travel ban in Canada) will have no discernible effect, but that isn’t the point. The point is control…do what we say you little plebs or we will crush you.

This is only possible because of a largely compliant media…which is why I am so thankful for places like Common Sense which give alternative (non-government) narratives a voice.

PS – if you’re interested in my writings on freedom and other important topics…check out my substack

https://gordoncomstock.substack.com/

Reply
Share

Thank you to these two men for standing up to tyranny. And thanks Rupa for your reporting. I’ve been enjoying watching your interviews.

Two things that I believe need to change in regards to government overreach in the US, in Canada, etc.:

1. Typically US courts don’t decide the merits of a policy, but rather if an official or agency has the authority to make that policy. So political leaders can just say they are following the science, without having to support their arguments with actual science. But in murder cases or civil cases, there is typically a battle of the experts. Denying freedoms should be the absolute last type of public policy / law and if the science is unequivocal, then political leaders should be able to defend it in court.

2. And actually more important, when implementing policies to deny freedoms granted in the US Constitution or the Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms, political leaders should have to defend their position in court BEFORE the restrictions are implemented. Citizens shouldn’t have to sue to get their freedoms back. Freedoms shouldn’t be denied without a just and defensible cause. Otherwise, our governments are stealing our freedoms and our most precious time, time that we can never get back. And I submit that they do not have that right.

 

Nov 162024
 

Agriculture, Food and Health are, of course,  closely related.

So who is the Secretary for Agriculture in the Trump Administration?

If you want the short of it:  slide on down to the bottom of this posting for the link to “Off the Grid with Thomas Massie”.

 

RELATED TO:   2024-09-23 Roundtable Discussion on American Health and Nutrition: A Second Opinion

I found this:

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/11/07/could-rep-thomas-massie-be-the-next-secretary-of-agriculture/76109588007/

Kimberly Gale     @KimberlyGale5

 

Massie for the win @ Agriculture – so much winning !

From cincinnati.com    4:17 AM · Nov 15, 2024

 

Thomas Massie     @RepThomasMassie

If you liked the second half of my conversation with   @TuckerCarlson,

you might enjoy this short movie about my farm and house. It’s “Off the Grid with Thomas Massie” produced by  @freethepeople

https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1799406403498480063?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1799406403498480063%7Ctwgr%5Ecb524ba68d1b45d062c67c0c9a866115f8b846f4%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cincinnati.com%2Fstory%2Fnews%2Fpolitics%2Felections%2F2024%2F11%2F07%2Fcould-rep-thomas-massie-be-the-next-secretary-of-agriculture%2F76109588007%2F

Nov 162024
 
Randy Hillier
Randy Hillier Courtesy No More Lockdowns Canada | Randy Hillier    Article by   Jonathan Bradley   

 

Former Ontario Independent MPP Randy Hillier (Lanark-Frontenac-Kingston) is free at last.

After careful consideration and deliberation, Ontario Court of Justice (OCJ) Justice Heather Perkins-McVey agreed the Crown attorney failed to act properly in prosecuting charges from the Freedom Convoy against Hillier and had violated his rights, including by not having the case prosecuted within 30 months.

“All criminal charges against me have been stayed and all bail conditions extinguished by Justice Perkins-McVey on November 14th, 2024,” said Hillier in a Friday blog post.

“I have begun reviewing the 32-month record with the great team of volunteers to determine and evaluate the conduct and actions of the Ottawa Crown, Ottawa Police and other elected and administrative bodies that may have conducted this prosecution contrary to their legal obligations and determine if there are grounds for civil remedies.”

For 32 months, Hillier had been prohibited by the OCJ from posting or commenting on the Freedom Convoy.

He had been accused of nine criminal charges by Ottawa Police Service (OPS) Det. Akiva Geller. In 2022, the Crown sought a three-and-a-half year prison sentence to punish him for engaging in civil disobedience to protest against the Canadian government’s COVID-19 restrictions.

The OCJ had imposed financial sureties on his family and restricted his freedom of expression and peaceful assembly and mobility rights as conditions for release in 2022. He alleged the actions by the Crown and OPS “were motivated by a political agenda that began two years earlier, in March of 2020, as I became the first elected Parliamentarian in Canada to oppose the foundational corruption of the ‘Pandemic.’”

Hillier concluded by saying he wanted “to thank the many wonderful people who have prayed, supported me, and contributed to my defence and have been stalwart in defending our faith, freedom, and families during this dark period of corruption in Canada.”

“God Bless you all!” he said.

Perkins-McVey had said the case had been ongoing for 1,061 days, but certain delays would not be counted to the total.

“This brings the total net delay to 31 months and 13 days,” she said.

“The remaining delay is over the 30-month Jordan ceiling.”

As a result, the application against Hillier’s charges was granted. Therefore, they were stayed.

Hillier had been slapped with nine criminal charges and surrendered to the OPS in 2022.

READ MORE
SELICK: Randy Hillier gets bail – but also gets silenced
Randy Hillier

He had been accumulating provincial charges for various No More Lockdowns protests he had organized and attended across Ontario, but sources have said many of them were being delayed and dropped by Crown attorneys who did not want to face a Charter challenge. However, criminal charges by the OPS were a different kettle of fish.

The charges he faced were two counts of mischief/obstruct property exceeding $5,000, three counts of counselling to commit an indictable offence, three counts of obstructing/resisting a person aiding a peace officer, and one count of assault on a peace or public officer.

Nov 162024
 

RELATED:

2023-11-29 B.C.: Bonnie Henry named as defendant in class-action lawsuit over her role in COVID-19 vaccine mandates

 

A lawsuit launched by a British Columbia public servant against COVID-19 vaccination mandates last year is allowed to proceed, with the case to be heard in court next year.

The BCPS Employees for Freedom, a non-profit organization that helps public service employees in BC, announced on Friday the class action, filed October 30, 2023, has been certified by the court.

Plaintiff Jason Baldwin’s lawsuit includes “all unionized BC public servants harmed by the BC government’s proof of COVID-19 vaccination mandate” — thereby potentially including tens of thousands of public servants.

BCPS says some 38,000 public servants were impacted by the BC government’s “coercive and unjustifiable proof of COVID-19 vaccination mandate” that caused “untold suffering and harm.”

As the Western Standard earlier reported, Baldwin filed the lawsuit last year, arguing the compelled injections and requirement of proof of vaccination violated bodily autonomy and medical privacy and contradicted the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The Baldwin class action has since merged with a separate class action claim by United Health Care Workers of BC. The two parties will present arguments over five days of hearings beginning April 7, 2025.

Each of the class actions argue the mandate violates the Charter by “imposing new terms and conditions of employment on existing and freely negotiated employment agreements absent collective bargaining, consideration, or consent,” said BCPS.

The lawsuits also claim the mandates “breached employees’ common law and statutory privacy rights, as well as misfeasance in public office by BC’s Public Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry.”

According to court submissions, at least 314 employees were fired for not complying with the vaccine policy, and 175 workers were put on an unpaid leave. An untold  number were coerced to take the vaccine and accepted the injection for fear of losing their job.

BCPS in a post on social media called for unionized BC public servants and healthcare workers harmed by the provincial government’s COVID-19 vaccination mandates to join.

From “X”:

BCPS Employees for Freedom   @bcpsef
CLASS ACTION UPDATE We are pleased to announce that arguments for certification of the class action lawsuit filed October 30, 2023, on behalf of all unionized B.C. public servants harmed by the B.C. government’s proof of COVID-19 vaccination mandate, will be heard in April 2025.… Show more
BCPS Employees for Freedom    @bcpsef
CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT FILED Two years ago, the Province of B.C. violated the employment and constitutional rights, #medicalprivacy and #bodilyautonomy, of 38,000 B.C. public servants with its coercive and unjustifiable proof of COVID-19 vaccination mandate, leading to untold…

 

Nov 142024
 

With thanks to Dan who writes>

More than any part of this election …

… this is a dream come true. I still can’t believe it.

It will be fun watching all the Liberal cries of outrage that someone wanting to hold the big pharma / big food industrial complex accountable for poisoning america is placed in this position of power.

Haha

RE: Official Notice of Bobby Kennedy’s appointment to position of American Secretary of State for Health and Human Services

(Sandra>  I’m having trouble getting the info uploaded.  Will try some more later)