Sandra Finley

Feb 062019
 

Return to INDEX

Excellent letter!  A request to support the Strathcona Resolution

Offered for use as a Template.

AVICC-Qualicum

Many thanks to Julie:

Here is the letter that has gone out to QB, Parksville council and the RDN (Regional District Nanaimo) board.

If it can be passed onto other jurisdictions encouraging their local government to vote in favour of this resolution, that would be great.

Thanks,

Julie

Letter on behalf of APLUC  (Arrowsmith Parks & Land Use Council).

= = = = = = = =

UPDATE    Feb. 6/19:

JULIE WRITES:

I am getting feedback from some of the councillors/directors that the letter has been sent to.  So far, folks seem supportive.  I think from their perspective they want to know if this is a preventive measure motion or how it might affect operators in their jurisdictions.

I have been emphasizing that this motion speaks solely to operators that export their water internationally ie China, States and would not affect commercial operators that deliver bulk water to mostly local rural customers.  I have also stressed that local agri operators are very interested to see this motion approved.

If other folks send this out to their local reps they could add the above concepts to the letter  or put it in the body of the email that introduces the letter.

Thanks, Julie

– – – – –  – – –

CONVERSATION WITH BRENDA LEIGH:  

  • Local Haulers” deliver bulk water to local people.   The water is from a tap, the municipal water supply.  The Resolution does not apply to local haulers.
  • The BACKGROUND for the Resolution, as submitted to AVICC is changed.  (The Resolution and supporting info is at (no password)  2019-01-24 The Strathcona ResolutionThe posting has the changed BACKGROUND.)

Feb 062019
 

Return to INDEX

 

The list below was started in 2019 during the first round of the battle over the Merville taking of groundwater.  And then stopped when the Union of BC Municipalities took a Resolution to the Provincial Govt – no to the taking of the water.

Please use the “Comments” at the bottom to add locations / information to the list.

We do not have the capacity to distinguish between bottling of groundwater versus surface water.

NESTLE

. . .  see also NESTLE in the main INDEX.   (News reports, etc.)

. . .  see also under LAWS & REGULATIONS in the main INDEX,   under “Ontario”

Aberfoyle, ON   . . .  Nestle,  Canadian headquarters.

Locations named in the article   2016-09-30   A Look into Nestle’s Controversial Water Bottling Business in Canada, from Vice.com

  • Kawkawa Lake, District of Hope, BC   . . .  more details below, under B.C. Locations.
  • Hillsburgh, Ontario  . . .  see below, under Ontario
  • Wellington, Ontario   . . .  same

B.C.,  LOCATIONS OF WATER BOTTLING PLANTS

Fanny Bay  . . .   (we have info,  just haven’t got it posted yet)

Harrison Mills . . .   Fraser Valley Regional District,   Christopher’s Spring Water,  FVRD Board approved in Feb 2015

2015-02-04  Rezoning approved for Harrison Mills water bottling plant, Agassiz Harrison Observer, Fraser Valley Regional District

http://christophersspringwater.com/ 

https://wateroffice.ec.gc.ca/report/data_availability_e.html?type=historical&station=08MF073&parameter_type=Level         

Data starts at 1938.  Last Date modified: 

Hope (Kawkawa Lake),  Nestle 

. . .  2016-09-19 & 2018-04-12 Chilliwack chapter (RE Hope, BC) wants
Nestle to “stop profiting from water; & Water campaigners hold action at Nestlé, the Hope Standard.

drought and forest fires intensified resistance to the taking of water.

TO DO: the URL tells how much water Nestle was taking, at no charge, for years.  Citizens had been protesting.  Government deaf.  Is there documentation to answer the question – – was it the intensification of resistance at Hope that brought about SOME change?     It appears to be very similar to what happened in Ontario.  With the exception that in Ontario a moratorium was implemented.  The moratorium has been extended to the end of 2019.

Merville, B.C., bottling  plant defeated . . .  see in main INDEX, at MERVILLE

Port Alberni . . .  (we have info.  Not yet posted.)

Rosewall Creek  . . .  see Fanny Bay

Strathcona Regional District (SRD)  . . .  passed the “Strathcona resolution” calling on the Province to stop the taking of water.  The Resolution was triggered by an attempt at Merville, outside the SRD.   Created confusion.  There isn’t a water bottling plant in Strathcona RD.    See in main INDEX, at STRATHCONA RESOLUTION.     

Union Bay . . . see Fanny Bay

 

ONTARIO, LOCATIONS OF WATER BOTTLING PLANTS

TO DO:   go to Rob Case ( see Wellington, below) for more info.  Aberfoyle is Nestle headquarters.   I think there is a plant there.   Are Hillsburgh and Wellington two OTHER locations?

Aberfoyle . . .  Nestle

Elora . . .  Nestle  (water group, very good blog.  Under “Organizations”.   Add the link here.)

Hillsburgh, ON . . .  Nestle

Wellington, ON . . .  Nestle

December 2018.  joked with Rob Case of the Wellington Water Watchers:  your wins in Ontario  (extension of the Provincial moratorium) will shift all of the water bottling industry to BC.   We’re set to supply 100% of the water for export!

Rob was very interested in what we are doing.  No surprise, they didn’t know about the role of the Federal Govt in the promotion of water bottling for export.   Information sent.

2018-11-24 Six Nations and Wellington Water Watchers join forces at Nestle protest, Guelph Today

EXCERPT:

“We’re going to greet them with love anyway because our relatives that make bad decisions need to be welcomed into the community that is making the right ones,” said indigenous activist Eryn Wise of Seeding Sovereignty.

“As indigenous peoples, even though we know it’s not our jobs to be emotional support folks for everyone else, we end up doing it because we are caretakers, we are land defenders and we are people that are going to save this planet,” Wise said.

Feb 062019
 
BETTMAN/GETTY IMAGES/courtesy of BERLIN film festival
Charles Ferguson on Nixon: “He was a complicated person, and there were parts of him that were very serious and even idealistic.”

Nine years after winning an Oscar for his financial crisis doc ‘Inside Job,’ documentarian Charles Ferguson lands in Berlin with a four-hour, two-part doc about an “out-of-control president” way before the current commander-in-chief took office.

After making a major splash with 2010’s Oscar-winning documentary Inside Job, tech millionaire turned filmmaker Charles Ferguson appeared to disappear, at least in the eyes of anyone eager to see what was next for the man who had dissected the 2008 global financial crisis with such surgical precision.

He would resurface five years later with the climate-change-focused Time to Choose, which garnered critical acclaim but failed to generate major ripples beyond the festival circuit. Now he returns with Watergate, an impressively epic, exhaustive exploration of Richard Nixon’s notorious scandal, spread over four-plus hours (handily cut into two parts) and undoubtedly among the lengthier titles at this year’s Berlin Film Festival.

But this wasn’t the original plan.

After Inside Job‘s success, it looked like Ferguson would be following the path of many Academy-endorsed doc-makers and shift the focus of his lens to even more ambitious subjects. But he kept hitting walls with the ones he tackled.

First came an HBO narrative feature about Julian Assange, a film that Ferguson says didn’t work — and was never completed — because of “death by a thousand cuts,” with several different versions of the script and nobody involved able to agree.

Then, in late 2012, he was hired by CNN to direct a documentary about Hillary Clinton. Less than a year later he called it off, citing insurmountable resistance from not just the Clintons and the Democratic Party, but the Republicans as well.

“Both sides made extremely aggressive attempts to interfere with the making of the film,” he says.

With Watergate, the first major documentary about the president-toppling scandal (something Ferguson says he finds “a little peculiar”), the director has a top-tier subject whose potential for feather-ruffling ended several decades ago. While the name of Donald Trump isn’t once mentioned in Watergate‘s 260 minutes (although the film’s subtitle, Or How We Learned to Stop an Out-of-Control President, offers a certain hat-tip), it’s nearly impossible to watch it without comparing Nixon’s grandiose, multilayered self-destruction with the current situation in the White House.

This affected Ferguson’s storytelling technique, which he initially had hoped could serve up “more of a political thriller” with “comedic and lighthearted” moments.

“It became clear that this was not going to be appropriate,” he says. “If this was going to be watched in the context of another potential presidential impeachment, then I had to be really careful.”

And in making Watergate while Trump’s presidency was in its chaotic infancy, Ferguson found himself softening somewhat toward Nixon — whose name remains synonymous with conspiracy and corruption. As for Trump, Ferguson is less forgiving.

“[Nixon] was a complicated person, and there were important parts of him that were very serious and even idealistic,” he says. “And he was also — without question — an extremely intelligent and intellectually sophisticated guy, in ways that Mr. Trump shows no sign of being.”

This story first appeared in the Jan. 30 issue of The Hollywood Reporter magazine.

Feb 052019
 

VANCOUVER—The Federal Court has quashed a controversial Fisheries and Oceans Canada policy that allowed fish farms to transfer young salmon into open-net pens without first testing them for a contagious virus that could pose a threat to B.C.’s iconic wild salmon.

In a 199-page decision released Monday, Justice Cecily Strickland wrote that the policy in question “fails to embody and is inconsistent with the precautionary principle, and it fails to take into consideration the health of wild Pacific salmon.”

In her decision, which addressed two separate but related cases, Strickland gave the federal department four months to develop a new policy that considers the threat the virus (piscine reovirus, or PRV) poses to wild salmon and complies with the precautionary approach.

The two cases were brought by biologist Alexandra Morton and the ‘Namgis First Nation against the minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada and two salmon farm companies.

“Getting a win on the PRV part is good news for us and really good news for wild salmon,” said ‘Namgis Chief Don Svanvik, who added that he and his legal team are still reviewing the extensive decision.

As for Morton, she said she felt validated when StarMetro reached her, about an hour after the decision came down.

Morton has launched two lawsuits related to the government’s policy on this virus and with this most recent decision, can say she has won both.

“This is a very significant victory for the health of wild salmon, for Alex, for coastal communities and for the species that rely on a healthy salmon population,” said Ecojustic lawyer Kegan Pepper-Smith, who represented Morton.

At the heart of the cases is the highly contagious virus, which has been shown to cause a sometimes fatal disease — heart and skeletal muscle inflammation, or HSMI — in farmed Atlantic salmon in Norway and other places.

The industry and the B.C. government have argued that the virus has not been proven to cause HSMI in B.C. and is not associated with elevated mortality at B.C. farms, though at least one study has diagnosed the disease based on lesions in the heart and skeletal muscles of salmon at a B.C. farm.

Morton and other groups concerned about the conservation of wild salmon meanwhile, says ocean-based fish farms are breeding grounds for the virus, which can then transfer to wild Pacific salmon populations swimming past.

While more research is needed to fully understand what risks PRV may pose to wild salmon, a recent study co-authored by a Fisheries and Oceans Canada scientist found the virus is associated with jaundice or anemia in farmed Chinook salmon.

What that could mean for wild Chinook salmon is of particular concern because they are the main food source of the critically endangered southern resident killer whales and some southern B.C. populations of the salmon are already considered at risk of being wiped out.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada is currently reviewing the court’s decision, according to statement from Fisheries Minister Jonathan Wilkinson that was provided to StarMetro by his press secretary.

“Our government understands that a strong, science-based approach to regulating the aquaculture industry is essential and that is why we have and will continue to conduct extensive research which informs our policies and regulations,” Wilkinson said in the statement.

He added that the federal government is working with B.C. to “help restore and protect wild Pacific salmon.”

The BC Salmon Farmers Association is also reviewing the court’s decision, according to spokesperson Shawn Hall.

Hall added that the association is looking forward to the seeing the outcome of the Canadian Scientific Advisory Secretariat’s PRV risk assessment that is currently underway.

“Supporting good science into the health of both wild and farm-raised salmon and working closely with First Nations and coastal communities are cornerstones of responsible salmon farming in B.C.,” he said.

In her ruling, Strickland wrote the DFO’s current threshold of acceptable potential harm to B.C.’s wild salmon is too high.

That threshold “essentially permits any transfer of fish having a disease or a disease agent, unless the transfer places genetic diversity, species or conservation units of fish at risk,” she wrote.

In short, the ministry would only halt a fish transfer if it put the entire population and genetic diversity of wild salmon at risk.

“This is not consistent with the Wild Salmon Policy definition of conservation, and it is unreasonable,” said Strickland.

Pepper-Smith said it’s now a matter of waiting to see what the minister does in response to the court’s decision.

As far as Morton’s concerned, she wants to see the federal department screen all farmed salmon for PRV and prohibit the transfer of infected fish into farms.

It’s unclear at this stage what implications the court’s decision will have for the B.C. industry, which has been consistently ranked the world’s fourth-largest producer of farmed Atlantic salmon. In 2016, $757.5 million worth of farmed salmon was harvested in B.C. making it the province’s biggest agri-food export.

 

Wanyee Li is a Vancouver-based reporter covering courts, wildlife conservation and new technology. Follow her on Twitter: @wanyeelii

Ainslie Cruickshank is a Vancouver-based reporter covering the environment. Follow her on Twitter: @ainscruickshank

Feb 042019
 

Return to INDEX

With thanks to Denise:

Have you seen this article on TimberWest and Professional Reliance?  Very sad reveal!  Great to see young people working on this though…

https://vimeo.com/252243072?fbclid=IwAR1HOH2Ie-FTfvmn0cwmZHaB53OCkKgincf1ETV-ewd–dmhAs6lfAa3oF0

Feb 042019
 

CN Radio: Australian Ambassador Tony Kevin’s Plan to Free Julian Assange

Consortium News

Tony Kevin, a former Australian ambassador, defends Julian Assange & WikiLeaks & reveals a plan to get him safely from Ecuador’s London embassy back to Australia. He is interviewed by CN Editor Joe Lauria for Unity4J.

Feb 032019
 

HALIFAX — Dalhousie University’s interim president has written a new book on campus debate and dissent — and it has provoked both at the Halifax school, with some students calling for his dismissal.

Peter MacKinnon, former president of the University of Saskatchewan, took over the helm of Dalhousie in January as it searches for a new top administrator.

But his appointment has proven controversial, after a group of students protested at his welcome reception, issuing a strong rebuke against his recent book, “University Commons Divided: Exploring Debate and Dissent on Campus.”

The students say the book expresses “racist perspectives” and “oppressive rhetoric” on topics such as blackface, and have issued a list of demands — including his immediate removal as interim president.

The controversy appears to have roiled the university, which marked its bicentennial last year with forums and workshops related to the theme Year of Belonging.

“The university has made repeated claims that it’s committed to diversity, equity and inclusion — and then it hires this extremely divisive figure,” says Letitia Meynell, an associate professor of philosophy at Dalhousie.

In an interview, MacKinnon says the impetus for writing the book was a sense that public conversations on difficult issues have become more severe.

“I think they’re becoming more rhetorical, I think they’re becoming more emotive, and I think they’re becoming more inclined to denunciation than illumination,” he says.

The 71-year-old officer of the Order of Canada — short-listed for the Supreme Court of Canada in 2006 — says freedom of expression is a fundamental university value.

But MacKinnon says he’s concerned that issues of high sensitivity are increasingly met with “ritualistic denunciation” on campuses, rather than respectful discussion.

“It is incumbent upon universities to model what debate means, and I think part of that is being open and being engaged on contentious issues and avoiding highly rhetorical and denunciatory responses,” he says.

However, Hayley Zacks, a fourth-year student studying at Dalhousie, says MacKinnon only appears to value freedom of expression and open debate when it supports his own views.

“He doesn’t like dissent when it’s not in his favour, he calls that uncivilized and divisive,” Zacks says.

Meanwhile, Meynell — who’s cross-appointed with Dal’s Gender and Women’s Studies department — took issue with MacKinnon’s position that universities have strayed from a commons in which civility is valued.

“It’s a kind of nostalgia for a time when white men were massively privileged and had control of the university debate,” she says. “He’s basically saying Make Campuses Great Again.”

In his book, MacKinnon discusses contentious topics like blackface Halloween costumes, Dalhousie’s dentistry faculty scandal, Truth and Reconciliation Commission recommendations, and University of Toronto professor Jordan Peterson’s views on gender pronouns.

MacKinnon acknowledges that some of the issues explored in his book have “touched a nerve” and caused distress.

In a report to the university’s senate last week, he addressed some of the concerns, saying that while some of the issues are discussed in depth in his book, others are mentioned for “illustrative purposes.”

The passage in MacKinnon’s book that appears to have garnered the greatest backlash refers to costume parties involving white students in blackface.

The incidents sparked outrage on campuses, but MacKinnon suggests in his book that there was “a lack of proportion in the responses.”

“These were Halloween parties, not cultural misappropriations, Nazi mimicry, or manifestations of disapproval of other peoples,” he wrote. “So describing them risks diminishing real problems of intolerance, discrimination, and racism.”

He added later in the chapter that the reaction to the incidents involved “narrow interpretations of Halloween costumes and overreaction to them.”

MacKinnon told the senate he stands by the discussion of these topics in his book, but he says some have interpreted his comments as condoning blackface.

“I do not condone blackface,” he told the senate. “I regret any interpretation to the contrary, and the distress it has caused.”

MacKinnon has also offered to meet with concerned students, and says he’s “willing to engage in conversation on difficult issues.”

But some students and faculty aren’t backing down from their criticism of the interim leader, and the process undertaken to hire him.

“He’s trying to backtrack. But to me his book still perpetuates blackface and gives words and excuses to students that do blackface,” says Zacks. “That’s a really dangerous narrative … he’s excusing behaviour that’s incredibly harmful.”

Matthew Sears, an associate professor at the University of New Brunswick in Fredericton who is outspoken on social justice issues nationwide, called MacKinnon’s book “wildly out of touch.”

“How many acts of casual or overt racism are we just simply going dismiss as a joke or, ‘Don’t be so sensitive,'” he said. “As someone who has never faced that kind of discrimination based on colour or ethnicity, I don’t think you get to tell people to settle down.”

Sears added: “If you have a group of students at Dalhousie who are already inclined to make fun of these equity-seeking groups, this will be a shot in the arm for them.”

Lianne Xiao, president of the student union at King’s College, a small liberal arts university within the Dalhousie campus, says MacKinnon’s book “is harmful and racist and fuels negative stereotypes on campus.”

Xiao says his comments to the senate, and an email sent to students on the topic, have not alleviated concerns.

Despite vocal opponents to MacKinnon’s interim tenure, others at Dalhousie have welcomed his arrival.

Reagan Seidler, a second year student at Dal’s Schulich School of Law, says MacKinnon is “arguably the most well-respected university leader in the country.”

A former student president at one of the University of Saskatchewan’s colleges during MacKinnon’s tenure, he says it’s difficult to witness his legacy reduced to one passage in his book.

“One reason Peter was so celebrated in Saskatoon is for his leadership on behalf of racialized students, particularly Indigenous students. He has a real track record the protesters surely know nothing about.”

Seidler added: “We’ve asked him to put off retirement for a temporary job across the country at a school in constant turmoil. He’s here because he cares.”

MacKinnon, originally from P.E.I. but who now calls Canmore, Alta., home, says he hopes to contribute to the university during his time — currently expected to be six months, though an extension is possible.

“I want to sustain the incredible momentum of this university,” he said, adding that he hopes to work closely with the school’s agricultural campus in Truro and continue to build on the university’s strength in the ocean sector.

“This is an exciting university. I certainly don’t want to move across the country simply to be a place holder.”

Brett Bundale, The Canadian Press

Feb 022019
 

Return to INDEX

This article from the U.S. offers insights

. . .  said federal and state restrictions on water resources “are painting us into a corner. They call for smart growth and then

we can’t build around towns because of inadequate facilities.”  And finding more water is becoming increasingly difficult.

. . . “We are basically at the end of our limit for drawing water . . .

 

(Link no longer valid)

Fewer new sources slows development; projects moving away from towns

By Mary Gail Hare   Sun reporter

Water shortages and burdened public facilities are deterring development throughout Carroll County, but particularly in areas where officials are trying to encourage growth.

A lack of new water sources is curtailing residential and industrial development in Taneytown. New Windsor and Hampstead cannot add more homes or businesses until they expand wastewater treatment plants. Future development in South Carroll, already the county’s most populous area, depends on the success of several new wells and millions of dollars in upgrades to the Freedom Water Treatment Plant that will take at least two years to complete.

After Mount Airy drilled a dozen test wells and failed to find more water, town officials are considering a developer’s offer to build a reservoir fed by water from the South Branch of the Patapsco River.

The problems are sending growth from established communities into outlying areas, where homes are spread across farmland, on large lots with private wells and septic systems, officials said.

“If developers cannot build in the towns, we are going contrary to what the county’s plan is for growth,” said Edwin Singer, director of the county’s Bureau of Environmental Health. “We want to focus growth around the towns.”

The Health Department reviews building projects in relation to available water capacity and decides whether the supply is adequate. If the supply is deemed insufficient, a town has to look for more water.

“Smart growth and environmental issues are sometimes in conflict,” Singer said.

No jurisdiction can drill a public well or expand the water system without appropriate permits from the Maryland Department of the Environment, an agency that monitors public water and wastewater systems.

Commissioner Dean L. Minnich said federal and state restrictions on water resources “are painting us into a corner. They call for smart growth and then we can’t build around towns because of inadequate facilities.”

And finding more water is becoming increasingly difficult.

In Taneytown, new projects hinge on increasing the water supply. The city of about 6,300 had to agree to repairs to its system, conservation measures and capacity-management programs before the state would allow an increase in the draws from town wells. But even those increases are not enough.

“We are basically at the end of our limit for drawing water,” said James Schumacher, Taneytown city manager. “Our situation is the most dire of the towns, because we are close to reaching maximum allocation.”

In December, the MDE and Taneytown will meet to review the city’s water allocation. Other municipalities in Carroll and elsewhere also are bargaining with the state over their water-use permits and calling for increases in the groundwater allocations, set by the state.

The state and town of Mount Airy will allow CVI Development Group to look into construction of a small reservoir, fed by waters from the South Branch of the Patapsco River.

If the estimated $14.5 million project moves forward, it would be at the developer’s expense.

“Surface water could be a good option for us,” said Mount Airy Mayor James S. Holt. “Without it, we won’t see any more economic development. We are already over our limit with MDE.”

The county commissioners said the reservoir proposal runs counter to Carroll’s master plan, which has long included a large reservoir fed by the Gillis Falls – a plan federal officials have rejected repeatedly.

As long as surface water is available, the county will have difficulty building the Gillis Falls Reservoir, said Commissioner Julia Walsh Gouge.

Even a much smaller reservoir could push the county’s project further into the future.

“This plan goes completely against ours,” Gouge said.

According to the Mount Airy developer’s proposal, water would be pumped from the river and impounded in a reservoir.

In a letter to the MDE, the county commissioners stated their concerns with the project, particularly pollution. The developer’s proposed watershed lies in a substantially urbanized area that includes Interstate 70 and a railroad line, both with relatively direct runoff to the river.

The county has previously rejected the river as a water resource, calling it unreliable for quantity and quality, the letter says.

“Surface water is much more expensive to treat,” Gouge said.

Singer will lead a discussion on water issues at the next meeting early next year of the Carroll County Council of Governments, a forum for the towns and community growth areas. The commissioners will ask the Maryland Association of Counties to consider the problems many areas are facing with lagging water resources.

“We have to put consistency and balance into the development process,”

Minnich said. “We need to get science and all the other players into a discussion so that everybody is on the right track.”

mary.gail.hare@baltsun.com

Copyright © 2005, The Baltimore Sun