Sandra Finley

Feb 082019
 

Return to INDEX

https://www.change.org/p/stop-belfast-water-bottling

Cloud Ocean Water has bought land for a proposed second bottling plant, close to its current operations in Belfast.

The China-owned company could be eyeing up billions more litres of water from beneath Christchurch to bottle and sell overseas as part of a major expansion of its operations in Belfast, The Press reported.

At least eight bores with permission to take drinking water are on or next to the new site, and If the bottling company gains consent to use them, it could have access to another 7.5 billion litres of the city’s water – five times what it can already take – for export each year.

Cloud Ocean already has permission to take 1.57 billion litres annually from two bores at the old Kaputone wool scour site on Station Road, Belfast.

Whether water bottling actually occurs is uncertain, because the issue is at the centre of a High Court action over the ability of firms to rely on old industrial use consents.

Representatives of Cloud Ocean confirmed it had bought the new site at 55 Belfast Rd and has applied to the council for permission to build a neq facility.

The community of Christchurch has had no say in the decision-making process, which could in future, affect the City Council’s ability to supply drinking water to the public.

Cloud Ocean bought the land for its second site from Belfast Business Park and submitted a resource consent application to the city council to develop it just before Christmas.

The firm wants to build a 22,000-square-metre bottling plant and distribution centre, where it would also produce plastic bottles.

Cloud Ocean already owns a resource consent, currently inactive, for a 27m bore on the site, allowing it to extract 200 million litres a year.

One, which is active, allows almost 2.1 billion litres of water to be taken annually from three 120m bores. A second inactive consent allows 5.1 billion litres to be taken from four bores between 26m and 34m deep.

Cloud Ocean is currently turning the former wool scour on its current site, into a 22,000sqm bottling and production plant, with warehousing alongside it.

Aside from the cost of the Station Rd scour property and an adjacent old tannery, Cloud Ocean paid $2277 for its 1.57 billion litre annual water take.

Using a 20-year-old permit originally granted to the land’s former owner, Kaputone, Cloud Ocean is currently consented to take massive quantities of water, for next to no cost.

Rapaki Natural Resources, which owns the adjacent property, also plans to bottle water on its site.

Combined, these companies are set to uptake more than 24 million litres of water per day – every day, for bottling. And this is without taking into account, any expansions to operations.

Aquifer water is a precious resource.

Bottliing aquifer water is also a gross waste of such a vital resource – water is already limited within the Canterbury area.

As a nation, we need to care for, and conserve our water supplies as much as we can, not give it away. And with our oceans becoming more choked in plastic, aquifers are one of our remaining, reliable water resources.

This petition is to urge this government, to revoke these historic permits from the current land-occupiers, and alter the law accordingly.

Upholding these permits would not be acting in the best interest of the land, assets, or our people.

Water permits should be non-transferable.

New permits should only be granted as a strict case-by-case basis, with peer reviews in place to protect these resources, and should be publicly notifiable – with room for open, public debate.

Aotearoa Water Action is currently challenging these consents by High Court hearing.

Please help by donating to their costs.

Aotearoa Water Action Inc: 38 9019 053 0141 00

Feb 062019
 

Return to INDEX

Excellent letter!  A request to support the Strathcona Resolution

Offered for use as a Template.

AVICC-Qualicum

Many thanks to Julie:

Here is the letter that has gone out to QB, Parksville council and the RDN (Regional District Nanaimo) board.

If it can be passed onto other jurisdictions encouraging their local government to vote in favour of this resolution, that would be great.

Thanks,

Julie

Letter on behalf of APLUC  (Arrowsmith Parks & Land Use Council).

= = = = = = = =

UPDATE    Feb. 6/19:

JULIE WRITES:

I am getting feedback from some of the councillors/directors that the letter has been sent to.  So far, folks seem supportive.  I think from their perspective they want to know if this is a preventive measure motion or how it might affect operators in their jurisdictions.

I have been emphasizing that this motion speaks solely to operators that export their water internationally ie China, States and would not affect commercial operators that deliver bulk water to mostly local rural customers.  I have also stressed that local agri operators are very interested to see this motion approved.

If other folks send this out to their local reps they could add the above concepts to the letter  or put it in the body of the email that introduces the letter.

Thanks, Julie

– – – – –  – – –

CONVERSATION WITH BRENDA LEIGH:  

  • Local Haulers” deliver bulk water to local people.   The water is from a tap, the municipal water supply.  The Resolution does not apply to local haulers.
  • The BACKGROUND for the Resolution, as submitted to AVICC is changed.  (The Resolution and supporting info is at (no password)  2019-01-24 The Strathcona ResolutionThe posting has the changed BACKGROUND.)

Feb 062019
 

Return to INDEX

 

The list below was started in 2019 during the first round of the battle over the Merville taking of groundwater.  And then stopped when the Union of BC Municipalities took a Resolution to the Provincial Govt – no to the taking of the water.

Please use the “Comments” at the bottom to add locations / information to the list.

We do not have the capacity to distinguish between bottling of groundwater versus surface water.

NESTLE

. . .  see also NESTLE in the main INDEX.   (News reports, etc.)

. . .  see also under LAWS & REGULATIONS in the main INDEX,   under “Ontario”

Aberfoyle, ON   . . .  Nestle,  Canadian headquarters.

Locations named in the article   2016-09-30   A Look into Nestle’s Controversial Water Bottling Business in Canada, from Vice.com

  • Kawkawa Lake, District of Hope, BC   . . .  more details below, under B.C. Locations.
  • Hillsburgh, Ontario  . . .  see below, under Ontario
  • Wellington, Ontario   . . .  same

B.C.,  LOCATIONS OF WATER BOTTLING PLANTS

Fanny Bay  . . .   (we have info,  just haven’t got it posted yet)

Harrison Mills . . .   Fraser Valley Regional District,   Christopher’s Spring Water,  FVRD Board approved in Feb 2015

2015-02-04  Rezoning approved for Harrison Mills water bottling plant, Agassiz Harrison Observer, Fraser Valley Regional District

http://christophersspringwater.com/ 

https://wateroffice.ec.gc.ca/report/data_availability_e.html?type=historical&station=08MF073&parameter_type=Level         

Data starts at 1938.  Last Date modified: 

Hope (Kawkawa Lake),  Nestle 

. . .  2016-09-19 & 2018-04-12 Chilliwack chapter (RE Hope, BC) wants
Nestle to “stop profiting from water; & Water campaigners hold action at Nestlé, the Hope Standard.

drought and forest fires intensified resistance to the taking of water.

TO DO: the URL tells how much water Nestle was taking, at no charge, for years.  Citizens had been protesting.  Government deaf.  Is there documentation to answer the question – – was it the intensification of resistance at Hope that brought about SOME change?     It appears to be very similar to what happened in Ontario.  With the exception that in Ontario a moratorium was implemented.  The moratorium has been extended to the end of 2019.

Merville, B.C., bottling  plant defeated . . .  see in main INDEX, at MERVILLE

Port Alberni . . .  (we have info.  Not yet posted.)

Rosewall Creek  . . .  see Fanny Bay

Strathcona Regional District (SRD)  . . .  passed the “Strathcona resolution” calling on the Province to stop the taking of water.  The Resolution was triggered by an attempt at Merville, outside the SRD.   Created confusion.  There isn’t a water bottling plant in Strathcona RD.    See in main INDEX, at STRATHCONA RESOLUTION.     

Union Bay . . . see Fanny Bay

 

ONTARIO, LOCATIONS OF WATER BOTTLING PLANTS

TO DO:   go to Rob Case ( see Wellington, below) for more info.  Aberfoyle is Nestle headquarters.   I think there is a plant there.   Are Hillsburgh and Wellington two OTHER locations?

Aberfoyle . . .  Nestle

Elora . . .  Nestle  (water group, very good blog.  Under “Organizations”.   Add the link here.)

Hillsburgh, ON . . .  Nestle

Wellington, ON . . .  Nestle

December 2018.  joked with Rob Case of the Wellington Water Watchers:  your wins in Ontario  (extension of the Provincial moratorium) will shift all of the water bottling industry to BC.   We’re set to supply 100% of the water for export!

Rob was very interested in what we are doing.  No surprise, they didn’t know about the role of the Federal Govt in the promotion of water bottling for export.   Information sent.

2018-11-24 Six Nations and Wellington Water Watchers join forces at Nestle protest, Guelph Today

EXCERPT:

“We’re going to greet them with love anyway because our relatives that make bad decisions need to be welcomed into the community that is making the right ones,” said indigenous activist Eryn Wise of Seeding Sovereignty.

“As indigenous peoples, even though we know it’s not our jobs to be emotional support folks for everyone else, we end up doing it because we are caretakers, we are land defenders and we are people that are going to save this planet,” Wise said.

Feb 062019
 
BETTMAN/GETTY IMAGES/courtesy of BERLIN film festival
Charles Ferguson on Nixon: “He was a complicated person, and there were parts of him that were very serious and even idealistic.”

Nine years after winning an Oscar for his financial crisis doc ‘Inside Job,’ documentarian Charles Ferguson lands in Berlin with a four-hour, two-part doc about an “out-of-control president” way before the current commander-in-chief took office.

After making a major splash with 2010’s Oscar-winning documentary Inside Job, tech millionaire turned filmmaker Charles Ferguson appeared to disappear, at least in the eyes of anyone eager to see what was next for the man who had dissected the 2008 global financial crisis with such surgical precision.

He would resurface five years later with the climate-change-focused Time to Choose, which garnered critical acclaim but failed to generate major ripples beyond the festival circuit. Now he returns with Watergate, an impressively epic, exhaustive exploration of Richard Nixon’s notorious scandal, spread over four-plus hours (handily cut into two parts) and undoubtedly among the lengthier titles at this year’s Berlin Film Festival.

But this wasn’t the original plan.

After Inside Job‘s success, it looked like Ferguson would be following the path of many Academy-endorsed doc-makers and shift the focus of his lens to even more ambitious subjects. But he kept hitting walls with the ones he tackled.

First came an HBO narrative feature about Julian Assange, a film that Ferguson says didn’t work — and was never completed — because of “death by a thousand cuts,” with several different versions of the script and nobody involved able to agree.

Then, in late 2012, he was hired by CNN to direct a documentary about Hillary Clinton. Less than a year later he called it off, citing insurmountable resistance from not just the Clintons and the Democratic Party, but the Republicans as well.

“Both sides made extremely aggressive attempts to interfere with the making of the film,” he says.

With Watergate, the first major documentary about the president-toppling scandal (something Ferguson says he finds “a little peculiar”), the director has a top-tier subject whose potential for feather-ruffling ended several decades ago. While the name of Donald Trump isn’t once mentioned in Watergate‘s 260 minutes (although the film’s subtitle, Or How We Learned to Stop an Out-of-Control President, offers a certain hat-tip), it’s nearly impossible to watch it without comparing Nixon’s grandiose, multilayered self-destruction with the current situation in the White House.

This affected Ferguson’s storytelling technique, which he initially had hoped could serve up “more of a political thriller” with “comedic and lighthearted” moments.

“It became clear that this was not going to be appropriate,” he says. “If this was going to be watched in the context of another potential presidential impeachment, then I had to be really careful.”

And in making Watergate while Trump’s presidency was in its chaotic infancy, Ferguson found himself softening somewhat toward Nixon — whose name remains synonymous with conspiracy and corruption. As for Trump, Ferguson is less forgiving.

“[Nixon] was a complicated person, and there were important parts of him that were very serious and even idealistic,” he says. “And he was also — without question — an extremely intelligent and intellectually sophisticated guy, in ways that Mr. Trump shows no sign of being.”

This story first appeared in the Jan. 30 issue of The Hollywood Reporter magazine.

Feb 052019
 

VANCOUVER—The Federal Court has quashed a controversial Fisheries and Oceans Canada policy that allowed fish farms to transfer young salmon into open-net pens without first testing them for a contagious virus that could pose a threat to B.C.’s iconic wild salmon.

In a 199-page decision released Monday, Justice Cecily Strickland wrote that the policy in question “fails to embody and is inconsistent with the precautionary principle, and it fails to take into consideration the health of wild Pacific salmon.”

In her decision, which addressed two separate but related cases, Strickland gave the federal department four months to develop a new policy that considers the threat the virus (piscine reovirus, or PRV) poses to wild salmon and complies with the precautionary approach.

The two cases were brought by biologist Alexandra Morton and the ‘Namgis First Nation against the minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada and two salmon farm companies.

“Getting a win on the PRV part is good news for us and really good news for wild salmon,” said ‘Namgis Chief Don Svanvik, who added that he and his legal team are still reviewing the extensive decision.

As for Morton, she said she felt validated when StarMetro reached her, about an hour after the decision came down.

Morton has launched two lawsuits related to the government’s policy on this virus and with this most recent decision, can say she has won both.

“This is a very significant victory for the health of wild salmon, for Alex, for coastal communities and for the species that rely on a healthy salmon population,” said Ecojustic lawyer Kegan Pepper-Smith, who represented Morton.

At the heart of the cases is the highly contagious virus, which has been shown to cause a sometimes fatal disease — heart and skeletal muscle inflammation, or HSMI — in farmed Atlantic salmon in Norway and other places.

The industry and the B.C. government have argued that the virus has not been proven to cause HSMI in B.C. and is not associated with elevated mortality at B.C. farms, though at least one study has diagnosed the disease based on lesions in the heart and skeletal muscles of salmon at a B.C. farm.

Morton and other groups concerned about the conservation of wild salmon meanwhile, says ocean-based fish farms are breeding grounds for the virus, which can then transfer to wild Pacific salmon populations swimming past.

While more research is needed to fully understand what risks PRV may pose to wild salmon, a recent study co-authored by a Fisheries and Oceans Canada scientist found the virus is associated with jaundice or anemia in farmed Chinook salmon.

What that could mean for wild Chinook salmon is of particular concern because they are the main food source of the critically endangered southern resident killer whales and some southern B.C. populations of the salmon are already considered at risk of being wiped out.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada is currently reviewing the court’s decision, according to statement from Fisheries Minister Jonathan Wilkinson that was provided to StarMetro by his press secretary.

“Our government understands that a strong, science-based approach to regulating the aquaculture industry is essential and that is why we have and will continue to conduct extensive research which informs our policies and regulations,” Wilkinson said in the statement.

He added that the federal government is working with B.C. to “help restore and protect wild Pacific salmon.”

The BC Salmon Farmers Association is also reviewing the court’s decision, according to spokesperson Shawn Hall.

Hall added that the association is looking forward to the seeing the outcome of the Canadian Scientific Advisory Secretariat’s PRV risk assessment that is currently underway.

“Supporting good science into the health of both wild and farm-raised salmon and working closely with First Nations and coastal communities are cornerstones of responsible salmon farming in B.C.,” he said.

In her ruling, Strickland wrote the DFO’s current threshold of acceptable potential harm to B.C.’s wild salmon is too high.

That threshold “essentially permits any transfer of fish having a disease or a disease agent, unless the transfer places genetic diversity, species or conservation units of fish at risk,” she wrote.

In short, the ministry would only halt a fish transfer if it put the entire population and genetic diversity of wild salmon at risk.

“This is not consistent with the Wild Salmon Policy definition of conservation, and it is unreasonable,” said Strickland.

Pepper-Smith said it’s now a matter of waiting to see what the minister does in response to the court’s decision.

As far as Morton’s concerned, she wants to see the federal department screen all farmed salmon for PRV and prohibit the transfer of infected fish into farms.

It’s unclear at this stage what implications the court’s decision will have for the B.C. industry, which has been consistently ranked the world’s fourth-largest producer of farmed Atlantic salmon. In 2016, $757.5 million worth of farmed salmon was harvested in B.C. making it the province’s biggest agri-food export.

 

Wanyee Li is a Vancouver-based reporter covering courts, wildlife conservation and new technology. Follow her on Twitter: @wanyeelii

Ainslie Cruickshank is a Vancouver-based reporter covering the environment. Follow her on Twitter: @ainscruickshank

Feb 042019
 

Return to INDEX

With thanks to Denise:

Have you seen this article on TimberWest and Professional Reliance?  Very sad reveal!  Great to see young people working on this though…

https://vimeo.com/252243072?fbclid=IwAR1HOH2Ie-FTfvmn0cwmZHaB53OCkKgincf1ETV-ewd–dmhAs6lfAa3oF0

Feb 042019
 

CN Radio: Australian Ambassador Tony Kevin’s Plan to Free Julian Assange

Consortium News

Tony Kevin, a former Australian ambassador, defends Julian Assange & WikiLeaks & reveals a plan to get him safely from Ecuador’s London embassy back to Australia. He is interviewed by CN Editor Joe Lauria for Unity4J.

Feb 032019
 

HALIFAX — Dalhousie University’s interim president has written a new book on campus debate and dissent — and it has provoked both at the Halifax school, with some students calling for his dismissal.

Peter MacKinnon, former president of the University of Saskatchewan, took over the helm of Dalhousie in January as it searches for a new top administrator.

But his appointment has proven controversial, after a group of students protested at his welcome reception, issuing a strong rebuke against his recent book, “University Commons Divided: Exploring Debate and Dissent on Campus.”

The students say the book expresses “racist perspectives” and “oppressive rhetoric” on topics such as blackface, and have issued a list of demands — including his immediate removal as interim president.

The controversy appears to have roiled the university, which marked its bicentennial last year with forums and workshops related to the theme Year of Belonging.

“The university has made repeated claims that it’s committed to diversity, equity and inclusion — and then it hires this extremely divisive figure,” says Letitia Meynell, an associate professor of philosophy at Dalhousie.

In an interview, MacKinnon says the impetus for writing the book was a sense that public conversations on difficult issues have become more severe.

“I think they’re becoming more rhetorical, I think they’re becoming more emotive, and I think they’re becoming more inclined to denunciation than illumination,” he says.

The 71-year-old officer of the Order of Canada — short-listed for the Supreme Court of Canada in 2006 — says freedom of expression is a fundamental university value.

But MacKinnon says he’s concerned that issues of high sensitivity are increasingly met with “ritualistic denunciation” on campuses, rather than respectful discussion.

“It is incumbent upon universities to model what debate means, and I think part of that is being open and being engaged on contentious issues and avoiding highly rhetorical and denunciatory responses,” he says.

However, Hayley Zacks, a fourth-year student studying at Dalhousie, says MacKinnon only appears to value freedom of expression and open debate when it supports his own views.

“He doesn’t like dissent when it’s not in his favour, he calls that uncivilized and divisive,” Zacks says.

Meanwhile, Meynell — who’s cross-appointed with Dal’s Gender and Women’s Studies department — took issue with MacKinnon’s position that universities have strayed from a commons in which civility is valued.

“It’s a kind of nostalgia for a time when white men were massively privileged and had control of the university debate,” she says. “He’s basically saying Make Campuses Great Again.”

In his book, MacKinnon discusses contentious topics like blackface Halloween costumes, Dalhousie’s dentistry faculty scandal, Truth and Reconciliation Commission recommendations, and University of Toronto professor Jordan Peterson’s views on gender pronouns.

MacKinnon acknowledges that some of the issues explored in his book have “touched a nerve” and caused distress.

In a report to the university’s senate last week, he addressed some of the concerns, saying that while some of the issues are discussed in depth in his book, others are mentioned for “illustrative purposes.”

The passage in MacKinnon’s book that appears to have garnered the greatest backlash refers to costume parties involving white students in blackface.

The incidents sparked outrage on campuses, but MacKinnon suggests in his book that there was “a lack of proportion in the responses.”

“These were Halloween parties, not cultural misappropriations, Nazi mimicry, or manifestations of disapproval of other peoples,” he wrote. “So describing them risks diminishing real problems of intolerance, discrimination, and racism.”

He added later in the chapter that the reaction to the incidents involved “narrow interpretations of Halloween costumes and overreaction to them.”

MacKinnon told the senate he stands by the discussion of these topics in his book, but he says some have interpreted his comments as condoning blackface.

“I do not condone blackface,” he told the senate. “I regret any interpretation to the contrary, and the distress it has caused.”

MacKinnon has also offered to meet with concerned students, and says he’s “willing to engage in conversation on difficult issues.”

But some students and faculty aren’t backing down from their criticism of the interim leader, and the process undertaken to hire him.

“He’s trying to backtrack. But to me his book still perpetuates blackface and gives words and excuses to students that do blackface,” says Zacks. “That’s a really dangerous narrative … he’s excusing behaviour that’s incredibly harmful.”

Matthew Sears, an associate professor at the University of New Brunswick in Fredericton who is outspoken on social justice issues nationwide, called MacKinnon’s book “wildly out of touch.”

“How many acts of casual or overt racism are we just simply going dismiss as a joke or, ‘Don’t be so sensitive,'” he said. “As someone who has never faced that kind of discrimination based on colour or ethnicity, I don’t think you get to tell people to settle down.”

Sears added: “If you have a group of students at Dalhousie who are already inclined to make fun of these equity-seeking groups, this will be a shot in the arm for them.”

Lianne Xiao, president of the student union at King’s College, a small liberal arts university within the Dalhousie campus, says MacKinnon’s book “is harmful and racist and fuels negative stereotypes on campus.”

Xiao says his comments to the senate, and an email sent to students on the topic, have not alleviated concerns.

Despite vocal opponents to MacKinnon’s interim tenure, others at Dalhousie have welcomed his arrival.

Reagan Seidler, a second year student at Dal’s Schulich School of Law, says MacKinnon is “arguably the most well-respected university leader in the country.”

A former student president at one of the University of Saskatchewan’s colleges during MacKinnon’s tenure, he says it’s difficult to witness his legacy reduced to one passage in his book.

“One reason Peter was so celebrated in Saskatoon is for his leadership on behalf of racialized students, particularly Indigenous students. He has a real track record the protesters surely know nothing about.”

Seidler added: “We’ve asked him to put off retirement for a temporary job across the country at a school in constant turmoil. He’s here because he cares.”

MacKinnon, originally from P.E.I. but who now calls Canmore, Alta., home, says he hopes to contribute to the university during his time — currently expected to be six months, though an extension is possible.

“I want to sustain the incredible momentum of this university,” he said, adding that he hopes to work closely with the school’s agricultural campus in Truro and continue to build on the university’s strength in the ocean sector.

“This is an exciting university. I certainly don’t want to move across the country simply to be a place holder.”

Brett Bundale, The Canadian Press