Sandra Finley

Feb 282013
 

Some info I collected and don’t want to lose.   Example:

Depleted uranium (DU), the radioactive byproduct of uranium enrichment, is in the headlines as the US recently agreed to send 100 Guided Bomb Unit-28 bunker buster bombs containing DU warheads to Israel for use against targets in Lebanon, as reported by Reuters and others.

There is good information near the bottom re

  • the murderous health effects of DU that last forever in the aftermath of radioactive warfare
  • Canada Pension Plan investment in DU

To generate a list of postings with information about Lockheed Martin’s cluster munitions, enter “CBU” into the “search” box for this blog.  (CBU = Cluster Bomb Unit.)  An example,  Lockheed Martin (Census) in cluster munitions and DU (“Depleted” Uranium). CPP also.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = =  = = = = = =

http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app5/wcmd.html

Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles, Appendix 5:  Guided Bombs, WCMD

Lockheed Martin developed and markets the WCMD (Munitions Dispenser) for use with, among others, CBUs

(CBU = Cluster Bomb Unit)

“Combined Effects Munition (“CEM”) system” means any unguided, air-delivered cluster bomb of the 1000-pound class designated by the United States Department of Defense as CBU-87, including but not limited to CBU-87/B, CBU-87(D-2)/B, CBU-87(T-1)/B, CBU-87(T-2)/B, CBU-87(T-3)/B, CBU-87A/B, CBU-87B/B, and CBU-87C/B. Each CEM system consists of a cluster of 202 anti-armor, anti-personnel and incendiary bomblets that disperse over a discrete area and explode upon impact; a tactical munitions dispenser; a proximity sensor; and a shipping and storage container.

 

Alliant Techsystems Inc. and Aerojet-General Corporation. These defendants have been the only two United States producers of Combined Effects Munition systems.

 

Lockheed Martin website:

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/LongShot/

Thus, Lockheed Martin provides a one-step source for a family of LongShot-equipped standoff weapons – MK82, MK83, LGB, GBU-12, GBU-16, CBU-58, CBU-87, and CBU-97.

 

http://www.janes.com/extracts/extract/jalw/jalw2709.html

Due to the inaccuracy of CBU-87/B when dropped from higher altitudes, the USAF has developed the Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser (WCMD) as an add-on package. Produced by Lockheed Martin, the WCMD kit contains an inertial navigation system and control fins. When modified as a WCMD, a CBU-87/B becomes a CBU-103.

 

http://www.socialfunds.com/news/article.cgi/2067.html

Sustainability Investment News

July 26, 2006

Nuns and Priests File Depleted Uranium Bunker Buster Resolution at Three Weapons Companies

by Bill Baue

The resolution goes to vote next week at Alliant Techsystems, and already received more than double the support needed to re-file next year at Lockheed Martin and Textron.

SocialFunds.com — Depleted uranium (DU), the radioactive byproduct of uranium enrichment, is in the headlines as the US recently agreed to send 100 Guided Bomb Unit-28 bunker buster bombs containing DU warheads to Israel for use against targets in Lebanon, as reported by Reuters and others. Shareowner activists are also placing DU on the corporate agenda by filing a new resolution expressing health and environmental concerns and asking for a report from three companies on their involvement with DU. Concern centers on the pyrophoric properties of DU, which burns and loses much of its mass upon impact, dispersing a fine radioactive dust that can be carried long distances by winds or absorbed by soil and groundwater–not to mention human bodies.

The resolution received 6.4 percent support at Lockheed Martin (ticker: LMT) and 9 percent support at Textron (TXT), according to the EthVest database maintained by the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responibility (ICCR)–both well over the 3 percent threshold required by the SEC for re-filing next year. The proposal goes to vote next week at Alliant Techsystems (ATK), which manufactures 120 mm rounds containing DU for penetrating tanks and light armor vehicles.

“It’s one thing to make a weapon that ‘does the job’ on the battlefield; it’s another to manufacture and use one that destroys not only tanks, armored personnel carriers and underground bunkers but may also leave a potentially poisonous legacy in the bodies of the people who return to those areas after hostilities have ceased,” said John Celichowski, head of the corporate responsibility program for the Province of St. Joseph of the Capuchin Order, which filed the resolution at Alliant along with other ICCR members. “We believe that the choice to use particular weapons in areas that are bound to be inhabited or re-inhabited by civilians raises serious moral questions which need to be addressed by our policy-makers, our armed services, the society they claim to be defending, and the companies that make such weapons.”

“The pyrophoric qualities of these weapons also creates potential risks for our own soldiers,” he told SocialFunds.com.

The resolutions make not only a moral and ethical case, but also a business case against DU.

“The business case against DU centers around the potential liability for human and environmental impacts and damage to the companies’ reputations,” said Valerie Heinonen, a corporate social responsibility consultant to the Sisters of Mercy Regional Community of Detroit Charitable Trust, which filed the resolution at Lockheed. “Rather than seeking a market for radioactive waste, the federal government and corporations should work with NGOs to find solutions for long-term storage.”

PROXY Governance, one of the three major proxy advisory firms, recommends voting for the resolution at Alliant

“PROXY Governance acknowledges that there are serious concerns regarding the health effects of using munitions containing depleted uranium (DU),” states PROXY Governance. “While we are not aware of significant litigation involving the health and safety of workers at DU munitions production facilities at this time, the potential for future such litigation exists.”

In fact, Richard David of the UK filed suit against Honeywell (HON) in 2004 claiming adverse health effects from working at a munitions factory during the first Gulf War where DU was used in manufacturing, according to an article in The Observer.

“And while the World Health Organization and others have stated that there is no conclusive medical evidence linking DU to health problems, reports by the United Nations Commission on Human Rights have suggested that the weapons may well be illegal under The Geneva Conventions, The Hague Conventions and other international law,” continues the PROXY Governance report. “Such a finding could complicate efforts by DU weapons manufacturers to defend themselves against potential future litigation involving health effects or environmental clean-up efforts.”

The Alliant board argues in its proxy statement that the company discloses information regarding its military- and defense-related contracting in its SEC filings, but PROXY Governance notes that these filings do not discuss the specific matters brought up in the resolution.

PROXY Governance also recommended voting for the resolution at Lockheed, but against it at Textron, as the company’s board points out in its proxy statement that the company is not involved in DU production and has no plans to be. Both ISS and Glass Lewis recommend voting against the resolution at all three companies.

“We were in conversation with Textron management following the filing of the resolution, but we did not get satisfactory answers and therefore the lead filer, the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary decided to leave the resolution on the ballot,” Sister Valerie told SocialFunds.com. “The vote at Textron may lead to further, more satisfactory conversation.”

====================

NOTE:  Any research out of “Sandia Laboratories” is unreliable.  ” Lockheed Martin Marietta now owns Sandia Laboratories”  (from http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2004/DU-Trojan-Horse1jul04.htm  )

====================

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=6750&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

CPP Supports Depleted Uranium Weapons Production

Posted by: relysem on http://PEJ.org Thursday, April 26, 2007 – 12:00 PM

CPP Supports Depleted Uranium Weapons Production

PEJ News – While many people are aware that damage is being done overseas, most do not know the extent of it, or the degree to which Canadians and the Canadian Pension Plan are complicit in this damage.

Depleted uranium is a byproduct of nuclear reactions. When it is produced by nuclear power plants, it is considered radioactive waste. The half-life of depleted uranium is 4.46 billion years. It’s useful in war because it can be converted to one of the densest metals that exists, so it can be used as both armor-piercing bullets, and as a material in the production of body and tank armor.

www.PEJ.org

====================

When used as a weapon, in ammunition that is spread indiscriminately over country-sides, this radioactive chemical will be a part of the atmosphere for literally billions of years. It has been estimated that 800 tons of Depleted Uranium has been used in Afghanistan, which is the radioactive equivalent of roughly 83,000 Nagasaki bombs. Rain captures the dust clouds, which then contaminates ground water and food sources, making great swaths of land toxic and uninhabitable.

Studies have shown that people living in these areas — inhaling the substance, drinking contaminated water, and eating food grown in contaminated soil — will quickly reach both acute and chronic exposure levels, which can trigger a vast array of health issues, including mutations, reproductive defects and extremely high cancer rates.

In Iraq, doctors at a hospital in Basra, where depleted uranium weapons were used frequently in the first Gulf War (and are being used again now), have noticed an alarming trend in the health and wellness of the children in the area. Charting incidents of children’s illness between 1990 and 2001 shows an incidence increase of 426 per cent for general malignancies, 366 per cent for leukemias and an over 600 per cent increase in birth defects.

This is not a scorched earth policy; it is a toxic earth policy. Military forces are not only destroying life, but creating an environment that is inhospitable to life for billions of years to come.

There is action that we as individuals can take. But before I can give you that good news, I have to hit you with one large piece of bad news first: Canada, and Canadian taxpayers, are supporting the production of these weapons.

Through the investment of both the Canada Pension Plan and the BC Pension Plan, as well as provincial plans for other provinces, funds are being invested in companies that produce depleted uranium weapons and delivery systems. BC’s investment company alone has almost 200 million sunk just into depleted uranium weapon producers (Lockheed Martin; Texas Instruments; Boeing; Northrup/Grumman; General Dynamics, a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin; and General Electric) and that’s not counting the many other weapons and munitions producers that the public’s money is invested in who are profiting off of and perpetuating this cycle of war and violence.

Now, I know I wasn’t consulted on this use of my money, and none of you were either. The CPP is not an optional program; everyone contributes to this, and these contributions are going to fund corporations that destroy the environment.

Feb 282013
 

http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/02/24/robert-gibbs-i-was-told-not-even-to-acknowledge-the-drone-program/

by Sal Gentile

Former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs revealed in an interview on Up w/ Chris Hayes Sunday that, when he became the Obama administration’s top spokesman, he was told not to discuss the government’s secret drone program or even acknowledge its existence.

“When I went through the process of becoming press secretary, one of the first things they told me was, ‘You’re not even to acknowledge the drone program. You’re not even to discuss that it exists,” said Gibbs, now an MSNBC contributor. That policy of secrecy, Gibbs said, made it difficult to deal with reporters asking about the program. Describing one such notable exchange in 2009 with Major Garrett, then of Fox News, Gibbs said, “I would get a question like that and literally I couldn’t tell you what Major asked, because once I figured out it was about the drone program, I realize I’m not supposed to talk about it.”

Gibbs added: “Here’s what’s inherently crazy about that proposition: you’re being asked a question based on reporting of a program that exists. So you’re the official government spokesperson acting as if the entire program…pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.”

The Obama administration has vastly stepped up the use of drones and targeted killings of suspected terrorists in countries like Pakistan and Yemen over the past four years, even targeting American citizens, a policy that has come under intense criticism from civil liberties advocates. For most of the president’s first term the administration steadfastly refused to acknowledge the program’s existence.

“I think you’ve seen recently the president discuss the need and desire to be more forthcoming,” Gibbs said. “I have not talked to him about this, so I want to be careful, this is my opinion, but I think what the president has seen is, our denial of the existence of the program when it’s obviously happening undermines people’s confidence overall in the decisions that their government makes.”

The Obama administration has continued to withhold information about the program, including the secret memo prepared by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel to justify the program’s legality. But in April 2012, Obama counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan formally acknowledged the program’s existence for the first time, in a speech at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington.

That decision, Gibbs said, may have helped boost public confidence in the drone program.

“In order to bolster that confidence and bolster the belief that we’re making those correct decisions on this policy, you do have to lift the veil some,” Gibbs said, “to both acknowledge that it exists, as he’s done, but also to do it in a way that provides better understanding.”

Additional reporting by Todd Cole.

COMMENTS:

Kate Wykoff

I saw the Gibbs interview. Gibbs also noted that the Bush administration began the drone program. Any responsible journalist would include this fact, whether Gibbs mentioned it or not.
Feb 242013
 

“To tell you the truth, I represent 74 communities, and the consistent message out there is the majority of them don’t agree with nuclear waste management and the safety of it — and I speak on behalf of them,”

– FSIN Vice Chief Bobby Cameron

 

Long-term nuclear waste repository ‘not worth it’: FSIN vice chief

by Alex Di Pietro, Prince Albert Daily Herald, Feb. 22, 2013

http://tinyurl.com/aelyng6

 

Herald photo by Alex Di Pietro Pat Patton, director of aboriginal relations for the NWMO, holds an empty nuclear fuel bundle at an information session regarding nuclear waste management at the Prince Albert Inn on Friday. 

Aboriginal leaders and community members met with representatives from the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) for a session Friday at the Prince Albert Inn to learn more about a plan to potentially store [high level] nuclear waste in northern Saskatchewan.

Sessions were held in Saskatoon and Regina earlier this week to discuss the same topic. The NWMO provided the FSIN with $1 million over three years to fund the nuclear waste sessions.

While Friday’s session was open to First Nations people but closed to the media, participants spoke with the Daily Herald during a break in the day’s agenda.

Bobby Cameron, vice chief of the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations (FSIN), said the purpose of the meetings has always been the same.

“That’s to inform and educate our First Nations people on nuclear waste management, the storage and transportation,” he said. “We have nothing to hide. We invite our First Nation folks to come out and raise their concerns.”

Twenty-one communities in Saskatchewan and Ontario have expressed interest in accepting the NWMO’s plan to build a nuclear waste repository, with those in Saskatchewan currently in the first phase of step three — an 18-month to two-year process.

Cameron clarified that there are far more communities in Ontario that are interested, with only three out of the 21 being in Saskatchewan.

“As I said in my opening comments this morning, there are far more communities interested in Ontario than there are in Saskatchewan. It’s not set in stone that waste is going to be stored here in Saskatchewan,” Cameron added.

The NWMO is in the midst of searching for a site to store millions of used nuclear fuel bundles, which are currently being stored on an interim basis at various facilities around the country.

While Pinehouse, Creighton and English River First Nation are being considered, there has been opposition shown toward the proposal by residents of those communities.

Citing environmental concerns, Cameron said he is aware of the opposition that exists.

“To tell you the truth, I represent 74 communities, and the consistent message out there is the majority of them don’t agree with nuclear waste management and the safety of it — and I speak on behalf of them,” he said.

Used nuclear fuel is created from the generation of electricity in nuclear power plants. One nuclear fuel bundle, which is roughly the shape and size of a fireplace log, can power up to 100 homes a year.

While Cameron conceded that the deep geological repository would bring jobs, he said one must assess the pros and cons of the plan.

“The pros being the jobs, the revenue it’s going to generate and the cons being nothing’s more important than our land [and] nothing is more important than our water,” Cameron said.

“In 40 or 50 years, many of us are going to be dead,” Cameron continued, noting that after speaking to aboriginal communities, the bottom line is that it isn’t worth it.

“Do we want to leave jobs and money or do we want to have a nice clean healthy environment, so our kids can enjoy it every day?” he asked rhetorically.

Cameron shared more of his perspective on the possible environmental effects of a long-term repository.

“You look at the uranium mining here in northern Saskatchewan — the tailing ponds and the pollution that it’s causing our lakes up in the north,” he said. “It’s to a point now where some of our people can’t even eat the fish in some of those lakes up there. The potential is there for sure.”

Regardless of whether they are stored in Saskatchewan, however, the bundles must be stored somewhere.

Pat Patton, director of aboriginal relations for the NWMO, said the selection of the site will depend on both the approval of the community in which it will be built and whether it’s safe to build the site.

“Towards the end of this year, we will begin to narrow down to a smaller number of communities,” she said.  “If they had strong potential they will know and then they will decide if they go to phase two of step three, which would be another two- to three-year process.”

However, Patton said more research must be done to decipher whether the three Saskatchewan communities are geologically suitable for the long-term repository.

“Once we move into phase two, we would have a better understanding, but there are many potentially strong locations in Canada,” she said. “We still need to do a fair amount of study before we would know for sure.”

Patton said 15 of the 18 communities interested in the project in Ontario are currently in step three, with the other three still in step two.

Ashley Marie Wilson, one of many Idle No More Prince Albert organizers, was in attendance for Friday’s session. She expressed sincere discontent over the storage site being potentially built in Saskatchewan.

“I do not stand with this nuclear waste and came here today to get answers to bring to the people, because we need to protect the earth,” she said through tears. “We need to protect the water. It is very important that people know what’s coming if they let this happen and they don’t stand up to do something about it now.

“I encourage everybody to learn as much as they can and put this to a stop.”

alex.dipietro  AT  paherald.sk.ca

===============================================

“The Land is my Chief.

The thoughts I shared today were not mine. 

We have been gently reminded of these ways of knowing by our Elders in each of our Indigenous languages since time immemorial.

What I said was a pitiful and humble effort to remind these people about the Law of Circular Interaction, that the health of the land is also the health of the people, that the waters, the streams, creeks and rivers that give life to all living things, are no different than the veins in our bodies, as we are an embodiment of Mother Earth. 

But, I do not know yet how we can create a tangible understanding of this altruism to a people whose values and beliefs are founded in a language of self-interests and disconnection to the spirit of life, now and the future.

Recently, our people agreed to Peace Treaties, and we promised to live in peace with these landless people. But, we did not promise that we would not defend the land, we did not promise that we would not defend the unborn.

The Land is my Chief.”

Tyrone Tootoosis Sr.

FSIN nuclear waste management information session

February 22, 2013

Prince Albert, Saskatchewan

Feb 242013
 

I am greatly concerned about this issue.  It is happening not only in Canada. (Reference  2011-12-12  Here is the real reason behind the demise of the CWB …)

= = = = = = = = = = = = =

 

Western Producer

Are our pensions retiring the family farm? 

by Matt Gehl

 

Pension funds have started buying up farmland around the world in recent years, seeing it as a safe, long-term investment.

Farmland investment companies such as AgCapita, Assiniboia Capital, Bonnefield Financial and Prairie Merchants are sowing the seeds of speculation across the Prairies.

Saskatchewan, with our low land prices and a farming population averaging 58 years old, is shaping up to be fertile ground for these companies.

Hundreds of thousands of acres of Saskatchewan farmland are already under the management of these investment companies.

Several seek to attract institutional investors such as pension funds and RRSP-eligible mutual funds to finance further land purchases.

AgCapita, which as of 2011 had bought $12.8 million of Saskatchewan farmland, is RRSP eligible.

Two RRSP mutual funds, Golden Opportunities and SaskWorks, have invested in farmland investment funds.

SaskWorks has invested $20 million with Agco Ag Ventures, and Golden Opportunities has funneled $3.5 million into Assiniboia Capital (via ADC Enterprises) as well as another $2.5 million into Input Capital Limited Partnerships, a division of Assiniboia.

Some of the financing for Assiniboia Capital’s acquisition of more than 115,000 acres across Canada has been provided by Farm Credit Canada, which is funded by Ottawa and pays dividends to the federal government.

Retiring farmers, and those suffering under the high debt levels seemingly inherent to modern farming, are targeted by these companies.

They rent the land back to farmers while waiting for the selling price to rise to sufficiently profitable levels.

Usually this is done on a cash rent basis, where all of the day-to-day risk of farming is borne solely by the renting farmer.

This situation has similarities to that in Europe of the 19th century, which is what led many Europeans to uproot their families and escape to settle in Canada.

Retiring farmers are faced with a choice: pass their land onto another family farmer, possibly taking less than the maximum value, or sell to the highest bidder with no concern for the legacy of the land.

Under this new system, retiring farmers should be happy in their twilight years, urban residents with pensions invested in farmland will be happy with the long-term outlook of their retirement money and the land grabbing companies will happily take their cut as land values and rents keep rising.

But how do we expect young Canadians to consider becoming farmers? The reality is that today there are not enough young farmers. Farmers younger than 35 represent only eight percent of the farming population, raising the question of who will work the land in the future? Who will grow our food?

This is where the long-term vision of retirement planning seems to have a blind spot. Speculation around farmland is already putting the cost of land out of reach for many individual farmers looking to either start or expand an operation, leaving investment companies with millions of dollars in capital in an even better position to increase their land holdings.

If more of them are able to generate investment dollars through RRSPs, it will further this cycle.

Policies and tax breaks that encourage Canadians to plan responsibly for their retirements are essential, but there is a clear lack of planning for the next generation of farmers.

Family farms have been the backbone of Canadian agriculture for our entire history and now they are being priced out of the market for the most essential of assets: the land.

Without a plan and policies in place to ensure that the next generation of Canadians can carry on our proud farming tradition, the only future in store for Canadian agriculture is one occupied only by the largest, most corporate farms sparsely scattered over an increasingly empty prairie.

This is not a future that bodes well for Canadian food security and sovereignty, and it certainly does not look promising for family farms.

That is not a future I want to see in Canada.

Feb 202013
 

By Jason Warick, The StarPhoenix

The University of Saskatchewan’s payroll has been trimmed by $2.4 million in  recent weeks after dozens of jobs were eliminated, but a top official is warning  of much deeper cuts in the near future.

The U of S faces an annual $44.5 million operating shortfall by 2016 unless  changes are made.

“Every administrative and academic unit on campus will participate in  workforce planning and most will have to reduce their workforce this year,” U of  S associate vice-president of human resources Barb Daigle wrote in an email to  staff and students last week.

“The university requires immediate savings as well as long-term savings to  meet the current and projected budget challenges.”

In the email, Daigle outlined details of the 50 jobs that have been lost to  this point.

Library staff have been the hardest hit so far, with 12 positions  eliminated.

There were seven jobs lost in consumer services, six in student and enrolment  services, five in the Edwards School of Business, three in the college of law,  and one or two in a number of other areas.

Daigle said university leadership has had to make difficult decisions, and  she encouraged anyone with concerns to contact their manager or her office.

Students and staff interviewed say they’re worried, and some blame university  administrators for the current situation.

Others point to the provincial government. Still others say it’s a  combination of factors that could not have been predicted.

“It’s created a toxic environment here, the worst I’ve seen,” said long-time  anthropology Prof. Sandy Ervin.

Music education student Sarah Suchan and music performance student Gerard  Weber said they are stressed about the quality of their degree.

“What if our program no longer exists? What’s coming?” Weber said. “We’re  really worried.”

Agriculture student Kendall Krepps agreed.

“I’m not sure what’s going on. It was pretty shocking,” Krepps said. “What  are we going to do?”

Provincial government grants provide the bulk of operating funds for the U of  S and most Canadian universities. The U of S had received record annual  increases in recent years.

The provincial government recently informed the U of S increases would now be  in range of two per cent. It’s still more than most Canadian universities are  getting, but less than what U of S officials were expecting.

And that resulting $44.5 million annual shortfall refers to the U of S  operating budget alone. There’s also the capital budget.

Capital debt is expected to double this year to $199.2 million, an amount  that “will far exceed debt compared to peer universities,” says the U of S  2011-12 annual report.

Most of that increase is due to the provincial government’s new position on  financing the ambitious Health Sciences complex.

In 2011, Premier Brad Wall said the government was committed to funding  construction of the $300-million building.

In 2012, however, university officials were informed the government would  instead be contributing roughly $200 million. The U of S was told it would have  to pay the remaining $95 million itself.

There is also no money in place to operate the facility, although both sides  say they’re still in discussions. Campus officials are now considering a  scaled-back project.

David Boehm, assistant deputy minister for the Ministry of Advanced  Education, said the U of S should rightly pay a portion of the health sciences  construction cost and will also need to take more responsibility for future  projects.

Boehm noted the U of S has received record levels of funding to operate its  programs in recent years. He and others said other Canadian universities are  receiving much smaller increases, and in some cases no increases.

Boehm said all post-secondary institutions, not just the U of S, are  important to the provincial government. He noted enrolment in technical colleges  has increased by 30 per cent in recent years, far more than at universities. He  said students are “voting with their feet.”

Advanced Education Minister Don Morgan told reporters last month the  government remains committed to the health sciences project, but stopped short  of promising any new funds.

Simon Enoch of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives said the  government should have enough money to fund projects like this.

“We’re supposedly in a boom. They keep saying it’s the new Saskatchewan and  we’re supposed to be driving innovation,” Enoch said. “I think they’d much  rather have an institution that just churns out employees than educated  citizens.”

U of S faculty association president Doug Chivers said the government needs  to acknowledge the university is the province’s “economic engine” and fund it  accordingly.

There are other dark financial clouds. Deferred maintenance costs have  reached $507 million. The U of S donor endowment fund, which generates interest  to finance programs, sits at $220.7 million, roughly half of the per-student  amount for similar Canadian universities. The U of S also faces a pension fund  shortfall of more than $110 million.

“It’s only going to get worse. The math just isn’t sustainable,” said Bill  Tufts, a Hamilton-based expert on public-sector finances.

The pension issue has been known for several years, said former U of S  vice-president of finances and resources Richard Florizone. He noted the U of S  was honoured with the national CAUBO Quality and Productivity award for a study  identifying the problem. However, no money was set aside to deal with it until  this year. U of S officials have budgeted $10 million, but they also acknowledge  that much more could be required.

“Could we have foreseen all of this? It’s difficult to say,” Florizone  said.

In general terms, Florizone said he’s proud of the work he and MacKinnon did.  MacKinnon declined an interview request.

Colin Craig of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation said it “sounds like they  weren’t taking things seriously. They should have tried to win a national award  for doing something about it.”

Tufts said ignoring the pension deficit for so long was irresponsible. He  said “revolutionary” changes are needed, but doesn’t think that’s going to  happen.

“Everyone’s got their hand in the honey pot at the U of S and the taxpayers  are stuck with the bill,” Tufts said. “More government funding isn’t going to  solve this.”

U of S provost Brett Fairbairn said it’s best to pay off the pension fund by  $10 million per year, rather than setting aside a higher amount. Setting aside  more could result in more devastating cutbacks, “and it wouldn’t be prudent to  do that,” Fairbairn said.

Fairbairn said university officials are adamant they will not increase  tuition to balance the books.

Every job, program and college is being reviewed under the recently announced  TransformUS program. TransformUS is based on a system developed by Colorado  academic Robert Dickeson. It begins with several assumptions, which the U of S  has posted on its website.

Dickeson believes academic programs at universities “have been permitted to  grow and … calcify on the institutional body without critical regard to their  institutional worth.” He said universities are unrealistically trying to be  comprehensive, and should focus on what they do best.

TransformUS will rank programs over the course of the year and shift  resources from weakest to strongest. The cuts will be targeted. Cutting every  department by the same amount will not achieve the transformation they seek, say  officials.

“We are looking at every possible efficiency,” Fairbairn said.

KEY NUMBERS

. In 2011-12, total revenue was $860.8 million. The provincial government  grant ($420 million), tuition and student fees ($111.3 million), sales of  services and products ($94.6 million), and government of Canada contracts  ($86.6) were the biggest contributors.

. For the same period, total expenses were $901.5 million. Salaries ($589  million) make up the majority of costs. Others included operational supplies and  expenses ($118.6 million) and goods sold, equipment maintenance and rentals ($72  million). Source: U of S annual report 2011-12

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

 

Feb 132013
 

Let’s help push this AVAAZ petition over the top.   http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?bpPHlab&v=21885

  •  1,000,000 signatures is the goal
  •     974,941 right now.  It’s entirely within reach.

UPDATE, Feb 18:  985,374 have signed.

UPDATE, Mar 03:  992,276 have signed.

 

The New York Times reported in December 2012 that the licensing of GM salmon is likely to go ahead (FDA).

The two-month mandatory public consultations will soon close.   Bless AVAAZ for organizing this massive effort to stop the beginning of the licensing of GM meat.   See appended which includes links to news reports.

(Click on Genetically Modified if you wish to generate a list of related postings.)

 

We first sounded the alarm on genetically-modified fish in 2004 with a documentary film from Germany:

 

I wondereded whether the company behind this latest bid in the U.S. is the same as in 2004?    The answer is “yes”:

  • Excerpt from the above 2004 posting:    “Aqua Bounty”, a Canadian company, is shortly expected to obtain market approval of its sterile, genetically modified giant salmon.
  • Excerpt from 2012-12-21  Engineered Fish Moves a Step Closer to Approval, New York Times:   Ronald Stotish, the chief executive of AquaBounty, . . .   AquaBounty Technologies, the company that developed the salmon, has been trying to win approval for more than a decade. . . .   AquaBounty produces its eggs at a facility in Prince Edward Island, Canada.
  • Excerpt from 2012-12-22 FDA Pushes to Release Genetically Modified Salmon into Environment (Nation of Change):  “AquaAdvantage head Ron Stotish . . .”    (The NY Times clarifies, the company is Aqua Bounty and its GM fish are called AquaAdvantage.

 

The Courts in New Zealand stopped GM animal research in 2009.  It’s good to know there are some sane people!

 

==============================================================

 

THE PETITION

Wow — amazing response! In days, we’ll deliver our petition to the US Food & Drug Administration and create a media storm. Help us reach 1 million by signing and sharing the petition to your right!

Dear friends,

                                                                      The US is about to treat the world to the first genetically modified meat:   a mutant salmon that could wipe out wild salmon populations and   threaten human health. Unless we stop it, this Frankenfish could open   the floodgates for biotech meat around the world. Click below to build 1   million voices to stop it:

    

The US is about to treat the world to the first genetically modified meat: a mutant salmon that could wipe out wild salmon populations and threaten human health — but we can stop it now before our plates are filled with suspicious Frankenfish.

The new fake salmon grows twice as fast as the real one, and not even scientists know its long-term health effects. Yet it’s about to be declared safe for us to eat, based on studies paid for by the company that created the GMO creature! Luckily, the US is legally required to consider public opinion before deciding. A growing coalition of consumers, environmentalists, and fishermen is calling on the government to trash this fishy deal. Let’s urgently build an avalanche of global support to help them win.

The consultation is happening right now and we have a real chance to keep mutant fish off the menu. Sign to stop Frankenfish and share widely — when we reach 1 million, our call will be officially submitted to the public consultation:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?bpPHlab&v=21885

The company that developed the Frankenfish altered the DNA of the salmon to create a fish that would grow at lightning speed, year-round. Not only do we not understand its long term health effects, if a few of them or their eggs reached the wild, these super-salmon could decimate entire wild salmon populations. Worse, once they hit supermarkets, we won’t be able to tell apart Frankenfish and real salmon, so there won’t be a way to avoid it!

The biotech industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars lobbying governments to approve its GM crops. Frankenfish is their next million dollar baby — it could open the floodgates for other transgenic meats. But the US government will consider public opinion before it makes its final decision — if we can stun them with a giant global opposition when they least expect it, we can stop this reckless deal.

Frankenfish is on the verge of being approved — let’s make sure biotech companies don’t decide what we eat. Help build one million voices to stop the mutant fish:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?bpPHlab&v=21885

Avaaz members have come together to protect the natural world and our food system from dangerous meddling. In 2010, over 1 million of us spoke out against genetically modified food in Europe. Let’s come together again to stop Frankenfish.

With hope,

Jamie, Nick, Emma, Dalia, Emily, Paul, Ricken, Wen-Hua and the whole Avaaz team

MORE INFORMATION

Engineered Fish Moves a Step Closer to Approval (NY Times)
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/business/gene-altered-fish-moves-closer-to-federal-approval.html

GM salmon: FDA’s assessment of environmental risks (LA Times)
http://www.latimes.com/health/boostershots/la-heb-aquabounty-salmon-fda-assesses-risks-20121224,0,2554480.story

Protect our waters from GE Salmon (Center for Food Safety)
http://ge-fish.org/

Below the Surface: The Dangers of Genetically Engineered Salmon (Food & Water Watch)
http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/factsheet/below-the-surface/

Genetically Engineered Salmon (Ocean Conservancy)
http://www.oceanconservancy.org/our-work/aquaculture/aquaculture-genetically.html

Support   the Avaaz Community!
We’re   entirely funded by donations and receive no money from governments or corporations.   Our dedicated team ensures even the smallest contributions go a long way.     

 



Avaaz.org is a 19-million-person global campaign network
that works to ensure that the views and values of the world’s people shape global decision-making. (“Avaaz” means “voice” or “song” in many languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 18 countries on 6 continents and operates in 17 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz’s biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.

You are getting this message because you signed “Protect Canada’s Climate Law!” on 2007-09-19 using the email address altaylor@sasktel.net.
To ensure that Avaaz messages reach your inbox, please add avaaz@avaaz.org to your address book. To change your email address, language settings, or other personal information, contact us, or simply go here to unsubscribe.

To contact Avaaz, please do not reply to this email. Instead, write to us at www.avaaz.org/en/contact or call us at +1-888-922-8229 (US).

 

Feb 112013
 

Click on the link to watch the video described in the article.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/10/software-tracks-social-media-defence 

 

A multinational security firm has secretly developed software capable of tracking people’s movements and predicting future behaviour by mining data from social networking websites.

A video obtained by the Guardian reveals how an “extreme-scale analytics” system created by Raytheon, the world’s fifth largest defence contractor, can gather vast amounts of information about people from websites including Facebook, Twitter and Foursquare.

Raytheon says it has not sold the software – named Riot, or Rapid Information Overlay Technology – to any clients.

But the Massachusetts-based company has acknowledged the technology was shared with US government and industry as part of a joint research and development effort, in 2010, to help build a national security system capable of analysing “trillions of entities” from cyberspace.

The power of Riot to harness popular websites for surveillance offers a rare insight into controversial techniques that have attracted interest from intelligence and national security agencies, at the same time prompting civil liberties and online privacy concerns.

The sophisticated technology demonstrates how the same social networks that helped propel the Arab Spring revolutions can be transformed into a “Google for spies” and tapped as a means of monitoring and control.

Using Riot it is possible to gain an entire snapshot of a person’s life – their friends, the places they visit charted on a map – in little more than a few clicks of a button.

In the video obtained by the Guardian, it is explained by Raytheon’s “principal investigator” Brian Urch that photographs users post on social networks sometimes contain latitude and longitude details – automatically embedded by smartphones within so-called “exif header data.”

Riot pulls out this information, showing not only the photographs posted onto social networks by individuals, but also the location at which the photographs were taken.

“We’re going to track one of our own employees,” Urch says in the video, before bringing up pictures of “Nick,” a Raytheon staff member used as an example target. With information gathered from social networks, Riot quickly reveals Nick frequently visits Washington Nationals Park, where on one occasion he snapped a photograph of himself posing with a blonde haired woman.

“We know where Nick’s going, we know what Nick looks like,” Urch explains, “now we want to try to predict where he may be in the future.”

Riot can display on a spider diagram the associations and relationships between individuals online by looking at who they have communicated with over Twitter. It can also mine data from Facebook and sift GPS location information from Foursquare, a mobile phone app used by more than 25 million people to alert friends of their whereabouts. The Foursquare data can be used to display, in graph form, the top 10 places visited by tracked individuals and the times at which they visited them.

The video shows that Nick, who posts his location regularly on Foursquare, visits a gym frequently at 6am early each week. Urch quips: “So if you ever did want to try to get hold of Nick, or maybe get hold of his laptop, you might want to visit the gym at 6am on a Monday.”

Mining from public websites for law enforcement is considered legal in most countries. In February last year, for instance, the FBI requested help to develop a social-media mining application for monitoring “bad actors or groups”.

However, Ginger McCall, an attorney at the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Centre, said the Raytheon technology raised concerns about how troves of user data could be covertly collected without oversight or regulation.

“Social networking sites are often not transparent about what information is shared and how it is shared,” McCall said. “Users may be posting information that they believe will be viewed only by their friends, but instead, it is being viewed by government officials or pulled in by data collection services like the Riot search.”

Raytheon, which made sales worth an estimated $25bn (£16bn) in 2012, did not want its Riot demonstration video to be revealed on the grounds that it says it shows a “proof of concept” product that has not been sold to any clients.

Jared Adams, a spokesman for Raytheon’s intelligence and information systems department, said in an email: “Riot is a big data analytics system design we are working on with industry, national labs and commercial partners to help turn massive amounts of data into useable information to help meet our nation’s rapidly changing security needs.

“Its innovative privacy features are the most robust that we’re aware of, enabling the sharing and analysis of data without personally identifiable information [such as social security numbers, bank or other financial account information] being disclosed.”

In December, Riot was featured in a newly published patent Raytheon is pursuing for a system designed to gather data on people from social networks, blogs and other sources to identify whether they should be judged a security risk.

In April, Riot was scheduled to be showcased at a US government and industry national security conference for secretive, classified innovations, where it was listed under the category “big data – analytics, algorithms.”

According to records published by the US government’s trade controls department, the technology has been designated an “EAR99” item under export regulations, which means it “can be shipped without a licence to most destinations under most circumstances”.

Feb 072013
 

NOTE:  the “princely administrative leaves” are described in   2013-01-17  University of Saskatchewan pays former senior executives.   MacKinnon, Florizone receive total of $1.3 million

 

By Edward D. Tymchatyn

The University of Saskatchewan’s V-P of human resources and the vice-chair of  the board of governors recently compared the princely administrative leaves  awarded to departed senior U of S executives with sabbaticals awarded to faculty  (SP, Jan. 13).

A former U of S senior executive made the same comparison in a letter to the  editor. The comparison is specious.

The Faculty Association’s collective agreement says sabbatical leave is  granted to faculty member to enhance “their contribution to the university on  their return.” To apply for a sabbatical, a faculty member must have served the  university six years since the last sabbatical.

The application requires the member to outline his/ her sabbatical program  together with the expected benefits to the member and the university. If it’s  judged to be acceptable by the dean (or by the dean’s committee) the leave shall  be awarded.

A sabbatical may be delayed for up to one year if the dean deems the faculty  member to be irreplaceable. That’s the only way faculty members can bank service  toward a subsequent sabbatical.

The faculty member must return to the university after a sabbatical for a  period at least equal to the length of the leave. The person must also file a  report with the dean as to the accomplishments achieved during the leave.

Sabbatical is normally at 90 per cent of regular salary. If the person gets  outside remuneration during the sabbatical, then the university will reduce that  member’s pay so total remuneration is approximately 100 per cent of normal  salary.

When the member leaves the university, any accumulated service toward a  sabbatical dies because a leave at that point would be of no value to the  university.

Edward D. Tymchatyn Professor of Mathematics and Statistics, U of S

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

 

 

Feb 062013
 

SOCIOPATH: lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience.

NOTE:  There are the robocalls

  • from the Federal Elections (awaiting court decision).
  • Now there is this new round of Federal robocalls related to the changing of electoral boundaries in the province of Saskatchewan.

Past postings on robocalls can be found by going to the right-hand sidebar.

= = = = = = = = = = =  = = = = = =

 

Hard to believe:  Harper says they were following the rules; nothing wrong here.

The forensic analysis of voice in the Saskatchewan robocall identifies it as belonging to the owner of RackNine Inc.  The Conservatives are caught with their pants down – – they definitely are behind the Saskatchewan robocalls.  It becomes more difficult for citizens to believe that the Conservatives had no association with the robocalls during previous federal elections – – the players are the same; the tactics and denials of guilt are the same.

Once again I’d like to salute THE SAME TWO JOURNALIST HEROES:   Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher, Ottawa Citizen

 

CONTENTS

  1. Tories now admit they sent Saskatchewan robocalls.   Forensic expert links company behind latest push poll to firm behind Pierre Poutine calls  (Regina Leader Post,  February 5, 2013)
  2. Liberals say CRTC should investigate robocalls over Saskatchewan riding boundaries (Saskatoon Star Phoenix, February 6)   (Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski deserves credit for saying that the robocalls were wrong.)
  3. Saskatchewan ridings robocall ‘followed the rules,’ prime minister says (Ottawa Citizen, February 6, 2013 8:02 PM)
  4. Conservatives deny involvement in Saskatchewan robocall defending “Saskatchewan values”   (Ottawa Citizen), February 1, 2013

 

NOTE: 

The Edmonton Journal coverage of Harper’s denial (http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Libs+CRTC+should+investigate+robocalls+over+Sask+riding/7928613/story.html).

It is different from others.  It lets Harper get away with shifting the debate away from  right and wrong,  to the Commission responsible for the electoral boundaries.

EXCERPT:

The Conservatives admitted being responsible for the so-called “push poll” calls to would-be voters in Saskatchewan, which said some proposed changes to electoral boundaries would undermine provincial values.

The computer-generated calls identified no political party, saying only that they came from a company called Chase Research. That was a mistake, the Conservatives say.

In the face of a barrage of opposition questions Wednesday in the House of Commons, however, Harper insisted the party broke no rules.

“The party followed the rules and our position to the public is very clear on the commission,” he said. “The commission is working to re-draw the electoral boundaries according to the law.”

He said it’s part of the normal effort to produce new electoral boundaries.

“We are simply operating within the process,” he said.

Rae described the calls as nothing short of a Conservative effort to gerrymander Saskatchewan ridings.

But Harper said the commission expects to hear outside comment. “Those commissions accept and expect input from parliamentarians, from political parties and from the general public.”

 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

1.    Tories now admit they sent Saskatchewan robocalls  Forensic expert links company behind latest push poll to firm behind Pierre Poutine calls (Regina Leader Post),  February 5, 2013

http://www.leaderpost.com/news/Tories+admit+they+sent+Saskatchewan+robocall/7922470/story.html

(There’s a picture of RackNine owner, Matt Meier at the link)

By Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher, Ottawa Citizen

 Matt Meier is the owner of Edmonton-based RackNine Inc., the company whose  equipment was used to launch more than 7,000 misleading calls directing voters  in Guelph to the wrong polling station in the 2011 federal election.

OTTAWA — A forensic voice-analysis expert has matched a voice recording from a mysterious company that sent out a robocall “push poll” about Saskatchewan riding boundaries to the firm used to send out the infamous “Pierre Poutine” calls in the last election.

After initially denying any involvement, the Conservatives said Tuesday that they had failed to identify themselves as the source of the voice-broadcast to Saskatchewan residents last week.

The party blamed an “internal miscommunication” for the failure to identify itself and the origin of the call.

Liberal MP Ralph Goodale filed a complaint with the CRTC Tuesday morning, alleging the failure to name the source broke telemarketing rules — the same offence for which Liberal MP Frank Valeriote’s riding association was fined last year.

The pre-recorded message sent to some Saskatchewan residents last Thursday told recipients that proposed changes to the province’s riding boundaries would pit urban areas against rural ones, and offend “Saskatchewan values.”

The robocall was presented as an interactive public-opinion survey — an American tactic called “push polling” — but appeared designed to rally opposition to changes to the ridings that would help opposition parties at the expense of Conservatives.

The originating number of the call, shown on recipients’ call displays, was answered by a generic voice recording saying no one was available to answer.

But on Monday, a recorded male voice on the outgoing message identified the line as belonging to “Chase Research,” a company that does not seem to exist in Saskatchewan.

The voice sounded similar to the voice of Matt Meier, owner of Edmonton-based RackNine Inc., the company whose equipment was used to launch more than 7,000 misleading calls directing voters in Guelph to the wrong polling station in the 2011 federal election.

The same voice and company name, Chase Research, was also heard on another number affiliated with a “push poll” sent out to Alberta residents during last year’s provincial election. That call offered a highly prejudicial poll asking voters which kinds of tax increases proposed by Progressive Conservative Premier Alison Redford they favoured.

The Wildrose Party was suspected by some of involvement in the call but its origin was never confirmed. Meier’s company has worked for Wildrose as well as the federal Conservatives.

After the Citizen made inquiries of Meier, the outgoing messages on the two numbers were replaced by out-of-service messages.

The Citizen and Postmedia News then asked U.S.-based forensic audio expert Ed Primeau to analyze the recordings of the outgoing Chase Research phone message and compare them with the outgoing voice message on Meier’s own phone.

Primeau, who has testified as an expert witness in dozens of cases in American courts and overseas, is a board member of the American Board of Recorded Evidence and a member of the American College for Forensic Examiners International.

He said he is 95-per-cent certain that Meier recorded the outgoing messages used by the mysterious Chase Research.

“He has a distinct style of speaking,” he said. “Everybody has a distinct style. It’s like a fingerprint.”

The cadence of one phrase used in the messages — “and reason for call” — is identical, he said.

A frequency analysis confirms the match, he said. “They’re almost identical in the spectrum,” he said. “I’m looking at these and it’s insane how close they are.”

In an email Saturday, Meier had offered a cryptic response when asked if his voice-broadcasting companies, RackNine and 2call.ca, were involved in the Saskatchewan call.

“Thanks for thinking of me, but your fascination is unwarranted.”

On Tuesday, after the voice analysis, Meier failed to respond to repeated calls and emails to himself, his company and his lawyer, R. Justin Matthews, seeking comment.

Matthews told Postmedia he “has not been retained to respond to your inquiries.”

Saskatchewan Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski told the Regina Leader Post last week that Saskatchewan Tory MPs were not responsible for the calls.

“Certainly polling is not something I’m doing and I’m pretty sure I’d know if any of my colleagues was doing something like that and I haven’t heard a thing. That’s just something I wouldn’t have done anyway.”

Conservative party spokesman Fred DeLorey also originally denied the party was involved, writing in an email Friday, “We are not polling.”

On Tuesday, however, after the Citizen and Postmedia received the forensic analysis, and sent emails to the party and Meier, DeLorey sent a release to the parliamentary press gallery saying that the party did make the calls.

“There was an internal miscommunication on the matter, and the calls should have been identified as coming from the Conservative Party,” said DeLorey.

Throughout the ongoing robocalls investigation, which stems from the May, 2011 federal election, Meier has maintained that he never knew his robcalling service was being misused by a person known to him as “Pierre Jones.” He has co-operated with Elections Canada investigators by providing electronic records to help find the person.

Meier recently settled a defamation claim he had launched against New Democrat MP Pat Martin for comment Martin made about RackNine in the days after the robocalls scandal broke.

Reached Monday, Martin said under the terms of the settlement he can’t discuss any payment, but a source says he is trying to raise $100,000 to help with it. He said he has already received a $10,000 donation from his former carpenters’ union. All the donations will be reported to the ethics commissioner and those over $500 will be publicly disclosed.

An independent commission has proposed boundary changes that would create five entirely urban ridings in Regina and Saskatoon, instead of the mixed rural-urban seats now in place. Conservatives are opposed to the changes, saying they would divide the province and create unfeasibly large rural ridings.

Goodale, the only opposition MP from Saskatchewan, said the prejudicial tone of the push poll was part of what seems to be “abusive anti-democratic behaviour” by the Conservative Party.

“Their political objectives trump every ethical rule and every regulation of the CRTC and decent behaviour,” he said.

 

Ottawa Citizen and Postmedia News

 

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =  = =

2.   Liberals say CRTC should investigate robocalls over Saskatchewan riding boundaries (Saskatoon Star Phoenix, February 6)

By Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher, Postmedia News, with files from The Canadian Press February 6, 2013

(INSERT:   I think Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski deserves credit for saying that the robocalls were wrong.)

 

OTTAWA — Conservative political director Jenni Byrne is ultimately responsible for a “deceptive” push poll conducted in Saskatchewan without the knowledge of Tory MPs, Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski told reporters on Wednesday.

After first denying any involvement, the party acknowledged Tuesday it was behind the poll, blaming it on “internal miscommunication.”

The call was a fake poll seemingly designed to help build opposition to a riding redistribution in the works that Conservatives oppose.

On Wednesday, Lukiwski told a call-in show on CBC Radio that Byrne, the director of political operations for the party, is ultimately responsible.

“I don’t know which party official it would be, but I know that Jenni Byrne, who is the executive director, said, well, ultimately the buck stops with her,” he said. “She would take full responsibility.”

His comments indicate that the “push poll” robocall — an ethically dubious tactic more commonly seen in U.S. politics — originated with the federal party in Ottawa and not with local party officials acting on their own.

Byrne, who keeps a low public profile, is seen in Ottawa as a talented, tough and formidable operative, fiercely loyal to Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Lukiwski said he has told the party that he is not happy with the calls.

“The problem is they were not identified as Conservative party, and that I find, and I’ve expressed this to the party, not only disappointing but I wasn’t very happy with it,” he said. “Let’s put it that way.”

In the face of a barrage of opposition questions Wednesday in the House of Commons, however, Harper insisted the party broke no rules.

“The party followed the rules and our position to the public is very clear on the commission,” he said. “The commission is working to re-draw the electoral boundaries according to the law.”

He said it’s part of the normal effort to produce new electoral boundaries.

“We are simply operating within the process,” he said.

Last week, Lukiwski told reporters that neither he nor his Conservative colleagues from Saskatchewan had anything to do with the calls.

On Tuesday, the Citizen and Postmedia News linked the calls to Conservative voter contact firm RackNine by asking an American forensic audio expert to match voice-mail messages from Matt Meier, the CEO of RackNine, with anonymous voice-mail messages from Chase Research, the company that carried out the push polls.

After the analysis was complete, the Citizen and Postmedia News asked the party and Meier to confirm that they had nothing to do with the calls. Soon afterwards, the party issued a statement acknowledging that it was, in fact, behind the calls.

Meier has not responded to repeated calls or emails requesting comment, but when reached Wednesday, he said, “I appreciate your call, Glen, have a nice day,” then hung up.

A search through the registry of Alberta trade names and corporations failed to turn up any company called Chase Research.

Meier and RackNine first came to public prominence a year ago, when it was revealed that his firm was used to send the “Pierre Poutine” message that sent voters in Guelph to the wrong polling stations in the May 2011 federal election.

He has stated that he had no idea his system was being used for unethical purposes and has helped Elections Canada investigate the calls, providing electronic records that helped investigators link the calls to an Internet IP address.

Saskatchewan’s one opposition MP, Liberal Ralph Goodale, on Tuesday sent a letter to the CRTC asking for an investigation based on his suspicion the call broke telemarketing rules by failing to identify the originator.

Goodale says the robocalls are a deplorable attempt to undermine the work of the federal commission drafting new riding boundaries in the province.

He says the federal telecommunications regulator should investigate the calls.

Since the summer, Conservative MPs have repeatedly responded to questions about the robocalls scandal by pointing out that the only finding of wrongdoing over election calls was against Guelph Liberal MP Frank Valeriote’s riding association.

The association paid a fine for a CRTC violation over an call that attacked the Conservative candidate for his position on abortion, without identifying the Valeriote campaign as the sponsor of the ad.

In question period Wednesday, NDP leader Thomas Mulcair pressed Harper on whether he knew about these “fraudulent” robocalls made using a fake company name.

Harper did not say whether he was aware of the calls.

Conservative MP Brad Trost, whose Saskatoon riding would be cleaved into separate rural and urban sections by the proposed boundary adjustments, said he was unaware of the robocall until after it was sent out. He said people he spoke to are opposed to the changes.

Although he admitted he hadn’t actually heard the push-poll call, he said it has “good and accurate information” and he agrees with it.

“I heard other people describe it,” he said. “One of my colleagues had it at her residence and her husband got it and he said it was fine. I’ll take his word for it.”

The only problem, Trost said, was that the call should have identified the Conservatives as the source.

 

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

= = = = = = = = = = = = =  = = = = = = = = = = =

3.  Saskatchewan ridings robocall ‘followed the rules,’ prime minister says (Ottawa Citizen, February 6, 2013 8:02 PM)

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/business/Responsibility+deceptive+Saskatchewan+robocall+rests+with+Jenni/7927408/story.html

By Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher, Ottawa Citizen

 

OTTAWA — The prime minister said Wednesday that a controversial “push poll” in Saskatchewan followed all the rules, hours after a senior Conservative MP from that province denounced the robocall as “deceptive” and said the party’s political director should be held responsible.

“The party has already explained that it has followed the rules and the law in this situation,” Stephen Harper said.

The telephone poll — which appeared designed to rally opposition to riding-boundary changes the Conservatives oppose — went out last Thursday night. On Friday afternoon, Fred DeLorey, the communications director for the party, told the Citizen the party was not doing the calls.

On Tuesday, after an American forensic audio analyst matched a voice message associated with the robocall to the owner of Conservative call provider RackNine Inc., DeLorey issued a statement for the party taking responsibility for the calls and saying there had been an “internal miscommunication.”

Wednesday, Tom Lukiwski, the government’s deputy House leader, told Saskatoon radio station CKOM the calls were “deceptive” because they didn’t identify that they came from the party. On CBC Radio, he said that the party’s political director, Jenni Byrne, should be held responsible.

But when NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair stood in the House of Commons and accused the party of lying about the call until presented with proof, Harper said it had followed the rules.

DeLorey and Byrne did not respond to calls or emails on Wednesday to explain how the calls complied with CRTC rules — which require that such calls identify the source — or to say why it took the party so long to realize that it had made the calls.

On the CBC phone-in show, Lukiwski said he was unhappy about the calls, and blamed the party.

“I don’t know which party official it would be, but I know that Jenni Byrne, who is the executive director, said, well, ultimately the buck stops with her,” he said. “She would take full responsibility.”

Byrne, who keeps a low public profile, is known as a talented, tough and formidable operative, fiercely loyal to Harper.

Saskatchewan’s one opposition MP, Liberal Ralph Goodale, this week sent a letter to the CRTC asking for an investigation based on his suspicion that the call broke telemarketing rules by failing to identify the originator.

Since the summer, Conservative MPs have repeatedly responded to questions about the robocalls affair by pointing out that the only finding of wrongdoing has been against Guelph Liberal MP Frank Valeriote’s riding association. The association paid a $4,900 fine for a CRTC violation over a late campaign call that attacked the Conservative candidate for his position on abortion, without identifying the Valeriote campaign as the sponsor of the call.

CRTC does not publicly acknowledge investigations until they are concluded. The investigation into the Guelph call took almost five months.

Wednesday, the Conservatives appeared to have lost their appetite for challenging the conclusions of the independent Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for Saskatchewan, which recommends creating five entirely urban seats in Regina and Saskatoon — a redraw thought to disadvantage the Tories in the 2015 election.

Harper told the House of Commons that his party would not try to change the boundaries suggested by the commission when they are formalized through legislation.

“Some years ago, the Liberals tried to bring in partisan legislation to overturn boundary commission recommendations,” he said. “We would never do that.”

The revelation that RackNine appears to be linked to the “deceptive” robocall in Saskatchewan put the Conservatives on the defensive, since RackNine was the company used to make an election day call in Guelph that appears to have been designed to keep opposition supporters away from the polls.

RackNine CEO Matt Meier, who declined to comment this week, has said that he had no idea his firm was used to make the Guelph call, and has been helping the Elections Canada investigation, which has gone on for 22 months.

Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre said on Wednesday that the call in Saskatchewan followed the rules, since the company named in the call, Chase Research, was registered with the CRTC — apparently a reference to the requirement for telemarketers to sign on to the Do-Not-Call-List.

It was not immediately possible to confirm that.

A search through the registry of Alberta trade names and corporations failed to turn up any company called Chase Research.

The party has not said that Meier or RackNine made the Saskatchewan call.

 

Ottawa Citizen and Postmedia News

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen

= = = = = = = = = = = = =  = = = = = = = = = = =

4.   Conservatives deny involvement in Saskatchewan robocall defending “Saskatchewan values”  (Ottawa Citizen), February 1, 2013

 Poll is critical of changes to federal riding boundaries in strongly Tory province

http://www.leaderpost.com/news/canada/Conservatives+deny+involvement+Saskatchewan+robocall+defending/7906921/story.html

 

OTTAWA — A Conservative party spokesman denied the Conservative party is behind a mysterious robocall poll critical of changes to federal ridings that could cut into the Tories’ electoral dominance in Saskatchewan.

By Glen McGregor, Postmedia News February 1, 2013

OTTAWA — A Conservative party spokesman denied the Conservative party is behind a mysterious robocall poll critical of changes to federal ridings that could cut into the Tories’ electoral dominance in Saskatchewan.

Some Saskatchewan residents reported receiving the automated poll calls from an unknown source on Thursday night. The pre-recorded message claimed that proposed changes to the province’s 14 ridings would set urban areas against rural and amount to an attack on “Saskatchewan values.” The call then asked recipients to press the number 1 on their telephone keypads to indicate they are opposed to this attack.

One recipient of telephone poll call said the pre-recorded message claimed to come from a firm called Chase Research. There is no sign of any company in Saskatchewan with that name.

The message also provided a phone number in Regina to call back for more information about boundary changes. That number was answered on Friday by a generic recorded message saying the party was unavailable.

Glen Olauson of Saskatoon, who received the call Thursday night, said if hadn’t known about the boundaries commission already, he would have been left with a negative impression of them.

“It was pretty misleading, the language that it was an attack on Saskatchewan values,” he said.

“I thought it was pretty biased. It was a very leading question.”

Liberal MP Ralph Goodale says he believes Conservatives are behind the calls.

“They should fess up that this is their little gambit,” he said.

Goodale, the only MP in Saskatchewan who is not a Conservative, says some of the language used in the call echoed Conservative talking points on what he says is the party’s desire to gerrymander the riding redraw.

“The tone of it was so blatant, even using phrases that Conservatives had used, talking about destroying Saskatchewan values and fomenting an urban-rural split. It’s real slander job.”

He noted the Tories admitted in they had orchestrated a similar “push poll” in 2011 that erroneously suggested long-time Montreal Liberal MP Irwin Cotler would resign his seat.

Conservative Party spokesman Fred DeLorey denied the party had any involvement.

”We are not polling,” said DeLorey in an email.

Saskatchewan won’t get any of the 30 new federal seats being added across the country for the 2015 election, but an independent boundaries commission has proposed changing the shape of the existing ridings to accommodate a fast-growing urban population.

The current boundaries are thought to favour conservative politicians by combining urban areas with rural areas. Regina and Saskatoon are each divided into four ridings that contain both city blocks and large swaths of rural areas.

That makes it harder for Liberals and New Democrats to win seats, because their stronger support from city dwellers is diluted by mixing in traditionally conservative rural voters.

The Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for Saskatchewan has proposed creating two exclusively urban ridings in Regina and three in Saskatoon but the move doesn’t sit well with some Tories.

This week, Saskatchewan Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski was quoted in the Hill Times newspaper questioning the changes proposed of the boundaries commissions across the country. He said some MPs he spoke to “don’t think the maps really take into account communities of interest” and he pointed to the ridings in some provinces where the geographic size of some rural ridings would increase.

While the decision on boundary changes is left to parliament, it would be highly unusual for MPs to reject the recommendations of the non-partisan boundaries commissions.

 

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen

Feb 052013
 


A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE

enough money within her control to move out
and rent a place of her own,
even if she never wants to or needs to…

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE …

something perfect to wear if the employer,
or date of her dreams wants to see her in an hour…

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE

a youth she’s content to leave behind….

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE

a past juicy enough that she’s looking forward to
retelling it in her old age….

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE …

a set of screwdrivers, a cordless drill, and a black lace bra…

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE …

one friend who always makes her laugh… and one who lets her cry…

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE …

a good piece of furniture not previously owned by anyone else in her family…

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE …

eight matching plates, wine glasses with stems,
and a recipe for a meal,
that will make her guests feel honored…

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE ….

a feeling of control over her destiny….

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

how to fall in love without losing herself..

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

how to quit a job,
break up with a lover ,
and confront a friend without
ruining the friendship…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

when to try harder… and WHEN TO WALK AWAY…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

that she can’t change the length of her calves,
the width of her hips, or the nature of her parents..

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

that her childhood may not have been perfect…but it’s over…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

what she would and wouldn’t do for love or more…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

how to live alone… even if she doesn’t like it…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW.. ..

whom she can trust,
whom she can’t,
and why she shouldn’t take it personally…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

where to go…
be it to her best friend’s kitchen table…
or a charming inn in the woods…
when her soul needs soothing…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

what she can and can’t accomplish in a day…
a month…and a year…