Sandra Finley

Feb 132013
 

Let’s help push this AVAAZ petition over the top.   http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?bpPHlab&v=21885

  •  1,000,000 signatures is the goal
  •     974,941 right now.  It’s entirely within reach.

UPDATE, Feb 18:  985,374 have signed.

UPDATE, Mar 03:  992,276 have signed.

 

The New York Times reported in December 2012 that the licensing of GM salmon is likely to go ahead (FDA).

The two-month mandatory public consultations will soon close.   Bless AVAAZ for organizing this massive effort to stop the beginning of the licensing of GM meat.   See appended which includes links to news reports.

(Click on Genetically Modified if you wish to generate a list of related postings.)

 

We first sounded the alarm on genetically-modified fish in 2004 with a documentary film from Germany:

 

I wondereded whether the company behind this latest bid in the U.S. is the same as in 2004?    The answer is “yes”:

  • Excerpt from the above 2004 posting:    “Aqua Bounty”, a Canadian company, is shortly expected to obtain market approval of its sterile, genetically modified giant salmon.
  • Excerpt from 2012-12-21  Engineered Fish Moves a Step Closer to Approval, New York Times:   Ronald Stotish, the chief executive of AquaBounty, . . .   AquaBounty Technologies, the company that developed the salmon, has been trying to win approval for more than a decade. . . .   AquaBounty produces its eggs at a facility in Prince Edward Island, Canada.
  • Excerpt from 2012-12-22 FDA Pushes to Release Genetically Modified Salmon into Environment (Nation of Change):  “AquaAdvantage head Ron Stotish . . .”    (The NY Times clarifies, the company is Aqua Bounty and its GM fish are called AquaAdvantage.

 

The Courts in New Zealand stopped GM animal research in 2009.  It’s good to know there are some sane people!

 

==============================================================

 

THE PETITION

Wow — amazing response! In days, we’ll deliver our petition to the US Food & Drug Administration and create a media storm. Help us reach 1 million by signing and sharing the petition to your right!

Dear friends,

                                                                      The US is about to treat the world to the first genetically modified meat:   a mutant salmon that could wipe out wild salmon populations and   threaten human health. Unless we stop it, this Frankenfish could open   the floodgates for biotech meat around the world. Click below to build 1   million voices to stop it:

    

The US is about to treat the world to the first genetically modified meat: a mutant salmon that could wipe out wild salmon populations and threaten human health — but we can stop it now before our plates are filled with suspicious Frankenfish.

The new fake salmon grows twice as fast as the real one, and not even scientists know its long-term health effects. Yet it’s about to be declared safe for us to eat, based on studies paid for by the company that created the GMO creature! Luckily, the US is legally required to consider public opinion before deciding. A growing coalition of consumers, environmentalists, and fishermen is calling on the government to trash this fishy deal. Let’s urgently build an avalanche of global support to help them win.

The consultation is happening right now and we have a real chance to keep mutant fish off the menu. Sign to stop Frankenfish and share widely — when we reach 1 million, our call will be officially submitted to the public consultation:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?bpPHlab&v=21885

The company that developed the Frankenfish altered the DNA of the salmon to create a fish that would grow at lightning speed, year-round. Not only do we not understand its long term health effects, if a few of them or their eggs reached the wild, these super-salmon could decimate entire wild salmon populations. Worse, once they hit supermarkets, we won’t be able to tell apart Frankenfish and real salmon, so there won’t be a way to avoid it!

The biotech industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars lobbying governments to approve its GM crops. Frankenfish is their next million dollar baby — it could open the floodgates for other transgenic meats. But the US government will consider public opinion before it makes its final decision — if we can stun them with a giant global opposition when they least expect it, we can stop this reckless deal.

Frankenfish is on the verge of being approved — let’s make sure biotech companies don’t decide what we eat. Help build one million voices to stop the mutant fish:

http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?bpPHlab&v=21885

Avaaz members have come together to protect the natural world and our food system from dangerous meddling. In 2010, over 1 million of us spoke out against genetically modified food in Europe. Let’s come together again to stop Frankenfish.

With hope,

Jamie, Nick, Emma, Dalia, Emily, Paul, Ricken, Wen-Hua and the whole Avaaz team

MORE INFORMATION

Engineered Fish Moves a Step Closer to Approval (NY Times)
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/business/gene-altered-fish-moves-closer-to-federal-approval.html

GM salmon: FDA’s assessment of environmental risks (LA Times)
http://www.latimes.com/health/boostershots/la-heb-aquabounty-salmon-fda-assesses-risks-20121224,0,2554480.story

Protect our waters from GE Salmon (Center for Food Safety)
http://ge-fish.org/

Below the Surface: The Dangers of Genetically Engineered Salmon (Food & Water Watch)
http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/factsheet/below-the-surface/

Genetically Engineered Salmon (Ocean Conservancy)
http://www.oceanconservancy.org/our-work/aquaculture/aquaculture-genetically.html

Support   the Avaaz Community!
We’re   entirely funded by donations and receive no money from governments or corporations.   Our dedicated team ensures even the smallest contributions go a long way.     

 



Avaaz.org is a 19-million-person global campaign network
that works to ensure that the views and values of the world’s people shape global decision-making. (“Avaaz” means “voice” or “song” in many languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 18 countries on 6 continents and operates in 17 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz’s biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.

You are getting this message because you signed “Protect Canada’s Climate Law!” on 2007-09-19 using the email address altaylor@sasktel.net.
To ensure that Avaaz messages reach your inbox, please add avaaz@avaaz.org to your address book. To change your email address, language settings, or other personal information, contact us, or simply go here to unsubscribe.

To contact Avaaz, please do not reply to this email. Instead, write to us at www.avaaz.org/en/contact or call us at +1-888-922-8229 (US).

 

Feb 112013
 

Click on the link to watch the video described in the article.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/10/software-tracks-social-media-defence 

 

A multinational security firm has secretly developed software capable of tracking people’s movements and predicting future behaviour by mining data from social networking websites.

A video obtained by the Guardian reveals how an “extreme-scale analytics” system created by Raytheon, the world’s fifth largest defence contractor, can gather vast amounts of information about people from websites including Facebook, Twitter and Foursquare.

Raytheon says it has not sold the software – named Riot, or Rapid Information Overlay Technology – to any clients.

But the Massachusetts-based company has acknowledged the technology was shared with US government and industry as part of a joint research and development effort, in 2010, to help build a national security system capable of analysing “trillions of entities” from cyberspace.

The power of Riot to harness popular websites for surveillance offers a rare insight into controversial techniques that have attracted interest from intelligence and national security agencies, at the same time prompting civil liberties and online privacy concerns.

The sophisticated technology demonstrates how the same social networks that helped propel the Arab Spring revolutions can be transformed into a “Google for spies” and tapped as a means of monitoring and control.

Using Riot it is possible to gain an entire snapshot of a person’s life – their friends, the places they visit charted on a map – in little more than a few clicks of a button.

In the video obtained by the Guardian, it is explained by Raytheon’s “principal investigator” Brian Urch that photographs users post on social networks sometimes contain latitude and longitude details – automatically embedded by smartphones within so-called “exif header data.”

Riot pulls out this information, showing not only the photographs posted onto social networks by individuals, but also the location at which the photographs were taken.

“We’re going to track one of our own employees,” Urch says in the video, before bringing up pictures of “Nick,” a Raytheon staff member used as an example target. With information gathered from social networks, Riot quickly reveals Nick frequently visits Washington Nationals Park, where on one occasion he snapped a photograph of himself posing with a blonde haired woman.

“We know where Nick’s going, we know what Nick looks like,” Urch explains, “now we want to try to predict where he may be in the future.”

Riot can display on a spider diagram the associations and relationships between individuals online by looking at who they have communicated with over Twitter. It can also mine data from Facebook and sift GPS location information from Foursquare, a mobile phone app used by more than 25 million people to alert friends of their whereabouts. The Foursquare data can be used to display, in graph form, the top 10 places visited by tracked individuals and the times at which they visited them.

The video shows that Nick, who posts his location regularly on Foursquare, visits a gym frequently at 6am early each week. Urch quips: “So if you ever did want to try to get hold of Nick, or maybe get hold of his laptop, you might want to visit the gym at 6am on a Monday.”

Mining from public websites for law enforcement is considered legal in most countries. In February last year, for instance, the FBI requested help to develop a social-media mining application for monitoring “bad actors or groups”.

However, Ginger McCall, an attorney at the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Centre, said the Raytheon technology raised concerns about how troves of user data could be covertly collected without oversight or regulation.

“Social networking sites are often not transparent about what information is shared and how it is shared,” McCall said. “Users may be posting information that they believe will be viewed only by their friends, but instead, it is being viewed by government officials or pulled in by data collection services like the Riot search.”

Raytheon, which made sales worth an estimated $25bn (£16bn) in 2012, did not want its Riot demonstration video to be revealed on the grounds that it says it shows a “proof of concept” product that has not been sold to any clients.

Jared Adams, a spokesman for Raytheon’s intelligence and information systems department, said in an email: “Riot is a big data analytics system design we are working on with industry, national labs and commercial partners to help turn massive amounts of data into useable information to help meet our nation’s rapidly changing security needs.

“Its innovative privacy features are the most robust that we’re aware of, enabling the sharing and analysis of data without personally identifiable information [such as social security numbers, bank or other financial account information] being disclosed.”

In December, Riot was featured in a newly published patent Raytheon is pursuing for a system designed to gather data on people from social networks, blogs and other sources to identify whether they should be judged a security risk.

In April, Riot was scheduled to be showcased at a US government and industry national security conference for secretive, classified innovations, where it was listed under the category “big data – analytics, algorithms.”

According to records published by the US government’s trade controls department, the technology has been designated an “EAR99” item under export regulations, which means it “can be shipped without a licence to most destinations under most circumstances”.

Feb 072013
 

NOTE:  the “princely administrative leaves” are described in   2013-01-17  University of Saskatchewan pays former senior executives.   MacKinnon, Florizone receive total of $1.3 million

 

By Edward D. Tymchatyn

The University of Saskatchewan’s V-P of human resources and the vice-chair of  the board of governors recently compared the princely administrative leaves  awarded to departed senior U of S executives with sabbaticals awarded to faculty  (SP, Jan. 13).

A former U of S senior executive made the same comparison in a letter to the  editor. The comparison is specious.

The Faculty Association’s collective agreement says sabbatical leave is  granted to faculty member to enhance “their contribution to the university on  their return.” To apply for a sabbatical, a faculty member must have served the  university six years since the last sabbatical.

The application requires the member to outline his/ her sabbatical program  together with the expected benefits to the member and the university. If it’s  judged to be acceptable by the dean (or by the dean’s committee) the leave shall  be awarded.

A sabbatical may be delayed for up to one year if the dean deems the faculty  member to be irreplaceable. That’s the only way faculty members can bank service  toward a subsequent sabbatical.

The faculty member must return to the university after a sabbatical for a  period at least equal to the length of the leave. The person must also file a  report with the dean as to the accomplishments achieved during the leave.

Sabbatical is normally at 90 per cent of regular salary. If the person gets  outside remuneration during the sabbatical, then the university will reduce that  member’s pay so total remuneration is approximately 100 per cent of normal  salary.

When the member leaves the university, any accumulated service toward a  sabbatical dies because a leave at that point would be of no value to the  university.

Edward D. Tymchatyn Professor of Mathematics and Statistics, U of S

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

 

 

Feb 062013
 

SOCIOPATH: lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience.

NOTE:  There are the robocalls

  • from the Federal Elections (awaiting court decision).
  • Now there is this new round of Federal robocalls related to the changing of electoral boundaries in the province of Saskatchewan.

Past postings on robocalls can be found by going to the right-hand sidebar.

= = = = = = = = = = =  = = = = = =

 

Hard to believe:  Harper says they were following the rules; nothing wrong here.

The forensic analysis of voice in the Saskatchewan robocall identifies it as belonging to the owner of RackNine Inc.  The Conservatives are caught with their pants down – – they definitely are behind the Saskatchewan robocalls.  It becomes more difficult for citizens to believe that the Conservatives had no association with the robocalls during previous federal elections – – the players are the same; the tactics and denials of guilt are the same.

Once again I’d like to salute THE SAME TWO JOURNALIST HEROES:   Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher, Ottawa Citizen

 

CONTENTS

  1. Tories now admit they sent Saskatchewan robocalls.   Forensic expert links company behind latest push poll to firm behind Pierre Poutine calls  (Regina Leader Post,  February 5, 2013)
  2. Liberals say CRTC should investigate robocalls over Saskatchewan riding boundaries (Saskatoon Star Phoenix, February 6)   (Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski deserves credit for saying that the robocalls were wrong.)
  3. Saskatchewan ridings robocall ‘followed the rules,’ prime minister says (Ottawa Citizen, February 6, 2013 8:02 PM)
  4. Conservatives deny involvement in Saskatchewan robocall defending “Saskatchewan values”   (Ottawa Citizen), February 1, 2013

 

NOTE: 

The Edmonton Journal coverage of Harper’s denial (http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Libs+CRTC+should+investigate+robocalls+over+Sask+riding/7928613/story.html).

It is different from others.  It lets Harper get away with shifting the debate away from  right and wrong,  to the Commission responsible for the electoral boundaries.

EXCERPT:

The Conservatives admitted being responsible for the so-called “push poll” calls to would-be voters in Saskatchewan, which said some proposed changes to electoral boundaries would undermine provincial values.

The computer-generated calls identified no political party, saying only that they came from a company called Chase Research. That was a mistake, the Conservatives say.

In the face of a barrage of opposition questions Wednesday in the House of Commons, however, Harper insisted the party broke no rules.

“The party followed the rules and our position to the public is very clear on the commission,” he said. “The commission is working to re-draw the electoral boundaries according to the law.”

He said it’s part of the normal effort to produce new electoral boundaries.

“We are simply operating within the process,” he said.

Rae described the calls as nothing short of a Conservative effort to gerrymander Saskatchewan ridings.

But Harper said the commission expects to hear outside comment. “Those commissions accept and expect input from parliamentarians, from political parties and from the general public.”

 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

1.    Tories now admit they sent Saskatchewan robocalls  Forensic expert links company behind latest push poll to firm behind Pierre Poutine calls (Regina Leader Post),  February 5, 2013

http://www.leaderpost.com/news/Tories+admit+they+sent+Saskatchewan+robocall/7922470/story.html

(There’s a picture of RackNine owner, Matt Meier at the link)

By Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher, Ottawa Citizen

 Matt Meier is the owner of Edmonton-based RackNine Inc., the company whose  equipment was used to launch more than 7,000 misleading calls directing voters  in Guelph to the wrong polling station in the 2011 federal election.

OTTAWA — A forensic voice-analysis expert has matched a voice recording from a mysterious company that sent out a robocall “push poll” about Saskatchewan riding boundaries to the firm used to send out the infamous “Pierre Poutine” calls in the last election.

After initially denying any involvement, the Conservatives said Tuesday that they had failed to identify themselves as the source of the voice-broadcast to Saskatchewan residents last week.

The party blamed an “internal miscommunication” for the failure to identify itself and the origin of the call.

Liberal MP Ralph Goodale filed a complaint with the CRTC Tuesday morning, alleging the failure to name the source broke telemarketing rules — the same offence for which Liberal MP Frank Valeriote’s riding association was fined last year.

The pre-recorded message sent to some Saskatchewan residents last Thursday told recipients that proposed changes to the province’s riding boundaries would pit urban areas against rural ones, and offend “Saskatchewan values.”

The robocall was presented as an interactive public-opinion survey — an American tactic called “push polling” — but appeared designed to rally opposition to changes to the ridings that would help opposition parties at the expense of Conservatives.

The originating number of the call, shown on recipients’ call displays, was answered by a generic voice recording saying no one was available to answer.

But on Monday, a recorded male voice on the outgoing message identified the line as belonging to “Chase Research,” a company that does not seem to exist in Saskatchewan.

The voice sounded similar to the voice of Matt Meier, owner of Edmonton-based RackNine Inc., the company whose equipment was used to launch more than 7,000 misleading calls directing voters in Guelph to the wrong polling station in the 2011 federal election.

The same voice and company name, Chase Research, was also heard on another number affiliated with a “push poll” sent out to Alberta residents during last year’s provincial election. That call offered a highly prejudicial poll asking voters which kinds of tax increases proposed by Progressive Conservative Premier Alison Redford they favoured.

The Wildrose Party was suspected by some of involvement in the call but its origin was never confirmed. Meier’s company has worked for Wildrose as well as the federal Conservatives.

After the Citizen made inquiries of Meier, the outgoing messages on the two numbers were replaced by out-of-service messages.

The Citizen and Postmedia News then asked U.S.-based forensic audio expert Ed Primeau to analyze the recordings of the outgoing Chase Research phone message and compare them with the outgoing voice message on Meier’s own phone.

Primeau, who has testified as an expert witness in dozens of cases in American courts and overseas, is a board member of the American Board of Recorded Evidence and a member of the American College for Forensic Examiners International.

He said he is 95-per-cent certain that Meier recorded the outgoing messages used by the mysterious Chase Research.

“He has a distinct style of speaking,” he said. “Everybody has a distinct style. It’s like a fingerprint.”

The cadence of one phrase used in the messages — “and reason for call” — is identical, he said.

A frequency analysis confirms the match, he said. “They’re almost identical in the spectrum,” he said. “I’m looking at these and it’s insane how close they are.”

In an email Saturday, Meier had offered a cryptic response when asked if his voice-broadcasting companies, RackNine and 2call.ca, were involved in the Saskatchewan call.

“Thanks for thinking of me, but your fascination is unwarranted.”

On Tuesday, after the voice analysis, Meier failed to respond to repeated calls and emails to himself, his company and his lawyer, R. Justin Matthews, seeking comment.

Matthews told Postmedia he “has not been retained to respond to your inquiries.”

Saskatchewan Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski told the Regina Leader Post last week that Saskatchewan Tory MPs were not responsible for the calls.

“Certainly polling is not something I’m doing and I’m pretty sure I’d know if any of my colleagues was doing something like that and I haven’t heard a thing. That’s just something I wouldn’t have done anyway.”

Conservative party spokesman Fred DeLorey also originally denied the party was involved, writing in an email Friday, “We are not polling.”

On Tuesday, however, after the Citizen and Postmedia received the forensic analysis, and sent emails to the party and Meier, DeLorey sent a release to the parliamentary press gallery saying that the party did make the calls.

“There was an internal miscommunication on the matter, and the calls should have been identified as coming from the Conservative Party,” said DeLorey.

Throughout the ongoing robocalls investigation, which stems from the May, 2011 federal election, Meier has maintained that he never knew his robcalling service was being misused by a person known to him as “Pierre Jones.” He has co-operated with Elections Canada investigators by providing electronic records to help find the person.

Meier recently settled a defamation claim he had launched against New Democrat MP Pat Martin for comment Martin made about RackNine in the days after the robocalls scandal broke.

Reached Monday, Martin said under the terms of the settlement he can’t discuss any payment, but a source says he is trying to raise $100,000 to help with it. He said he has already received a $10,000 donation from his former carpenters’ union. All the donations will be reported to the ethics commissioner and those over $500 will be publicly disclosed.

An independent commission has proposed boundary changes that would create five entirely urban ridings in Regina and Saskatoon, instead of the mixed rural-urban seats now in place. Conservatives are opposed to the changes, saying they would divide the province and create unfeasibly large rural ridings.

Goodale, the only opposition MP from Saskatchewan, said the prejudicial tone of the push poll was part of what seems to be “abusive anti-democratic behaviour” by the Conservative Party.

“Their political objectives trump every ethical rule and every regulation of the CRTC and decent behaviour,” he said.

 

Ottawa Citizen and Postmedia News

 

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =  = =

2.   Liberals say CRTC should investigate robocalls over Saskatchewan riding boundaries (Saskatoon Star Phoenix, February 6)

By Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher, Postmedia News, with files from The Canadian Press February 6, 2013

(INSERT:   I think Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski deserves credit for saying that the robocalls were wrong.)

 

OTTAWA — Conservative political director Jenni Byrne is ultimately responsible for a “deceptive” push poll conducted in Saskatchewan without the knowledge of Tory MPs, Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski told reporters on Wednesday.

After first denying any involvement, the party acknowledged Tuesday it was behind the poll, blaming it on “internal miscommunication.”

The call was a fake poll seemingly designed to help build opposition to a riding redistribution in the works that Conservatives oppose.

On Wednesday, Lukiwski told a call-in show on CBC Radio that Byrne, the director of political operations for the party, is ultimately responsible.

“I don’t know which party official it would be, but I know that Jenni Byrne, who is the executive director, said, well, ultimately the buck stops with her,” he said. “She would take full responsibility.”

His comments indicate that the “push poll” robocall — an ethically dubious tactic more commonly seen in U.S. politics — originated with the federal party in Ottawa and not with local party officials acting on their own.

Byrne, who keeps a low public profile, is seen in Ottawa as a talented, tough and formidable operative, fiercely loyal to Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Lukiwski said he has told the party that he is not happy with the calls.

“The problem is they were not identified as Conservative party, and that I find, and I’ve expressed this to the party, not only disappointing but I wasn’t very happy with it,” he said. “Let’s put it that way.”

In the face of a barrage of opposition questions Wednesday in the House of Commons, however, Harper insisted the party broke no rules.

“The party followed the rules and our position to the public is very clear on the commission,” he said. “The commission is working to re-draw the electoral boundaries according to the law.”

He said it’s part of the normal effort to produce new electoral boundaries.

“We are simply operating within the process,” he said.

Last week, Lukiwski told reporters that neither he nor his Conservative colleagues from Saskatchewan had anything to do with the calls.

On Tuesday, the Citizen and Postmedia News linked the calls to Conservative voter contact firm RackNine by asking an American forensic audio expert to match voice-mail messages from Matt Meier, the CEO of RackNine, with anonymous voice-mail messages from Chase Research, the company that carried out the push polls.

After the analysis was complete, the Citizen and Postmedia News asked the party and Meier to confirm that they had nothing to do with the calls. Soon afterwards, the party issued a statement acknowledging that it was, in fact, behind the calls.

Meier has not responded to repeated calls or emails requesting comment, but when reached Wednesday, he said, “I appreciate your call, Glen, have a nice day,” then hung up.

A search through the registry of Alberta trade names and corporations failed to turn up any company called Chase Research.

Meier and RackNine first came to public prominence a year ago, when it was revealed that his firm was used to send the “Pierre Poutine” message that sent voters in Guelph to the wrong polling stations in the May 2011 federal election.

He has stated that he had no idea his system was being used for unethical purposes and has helped Elections Canada investigate the calls, providing electronic records that helped investigators link the calls to an Internet IP address.

Saskatchewan’s one opposition MP, Liberal Ralph Goodale, on Tuesday sent a letter to the CRTC asking for an investigation based on his suspicion the call broke telemarketing rules by failing to identify the originator.

Goodale says the robocalls are a deplorable attempt to undermine the work of the federal commission drafting new riding boundaries in the province.

He says the federal telecommunications regulator should investigate the calls.

Since the summer, Conservative MPs have repeatedly responded to questions about the robocalls scandal by pointing out that the only finding of wrongdoing over election calls was against Guelph Liberal MP Frank Valeriote’s riding association.

The association paid a fine for a CRTC violation over an call that attacked the Conservative candidate for his position on abortion, without identifying the Valeriote campaign as the sponsor of the ad.

In question period Wednesday, NDP leader Thomas Mulcair pressed Harper on whether he knew about these “fraudulent” robocalls made using a fake company name.

Harper did not say whether he was aware of the calls.

Conservative MP Brad Trost, whose Saskatoon riding would be cleaved into separate rural and urban sections by the proposed boundary adjustments, said he was unaware of the robocall until after it was sent out. He said people he spoke to are opposed to the changes.

Although he admitted he hadn’t actually heard the push-poll call, he said it has “good and accurate information” and he agrees with it.

“I heard other people describe it,” he said. “One of my colleagues had it at her residence and her husband got it and he said it was fine. I’ll take his word for it.”

The only problem, Trost said, was that the call should have identified the Conservatives as the source.

 

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

= = = = = = = = = = = = =  = = = = = = = = = = =

3.  Saskatchewan ridings robocall ‘followed the rules,’ prime minister says (Ottawa Citizen, February 6, 2013 8:02 PM)

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/business/Responsibility+deceptive+Saskatchewan+robocall+rests+with+Jenni/7927408/story.html

By Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher, Ottawa Citizen

 

OTTAWA — The prime minister said Wednesday that a controversial “push poll” in Saskatchewan followed all the rules, hours after a senior Conservative MP from that province denounced the robocall as “deceptive” and said the party’s political director should be held responsible.

“The party has already explained that it has followed the rules and the law in this situation,” Stephen Harper said.

The telephone poll — which appeared designed to rally opposition to riding-boundary changes the Conservatives oppose — went out last Thursday night. On Friday afternoon, Fred DeLorey, the communications director for the party, told the Citizen the party was not doing the calls.

On Tuesday, after an American forensic audio analyst matched a voice message associated with the robocall to the owner of Conservative call provider RackNine Inc., DeLorey issued a statement for the party taking responsibility for the calls and saying there had been an “internal miscommunication.”

Wednesday, Tom Lukiwski, the government’s deputy House leader, told Saskatoon radio station CKOM the calls were “deceptive” because they didn’t identify that they came from the party. On CBC Radio, he said that the party’s political director, Jenni Byrne, should be held responsible.

But when NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair stood in the House of Commons and accused the party of lying about the call until presented with proof, Harper said it had followed the rules.

DeLorey and Byrne did not respond to calls or emails on Wednesday to explain how the calls complied with CRTC rules — which require that such calls identify the source — or to say why it took the party so long to realize that it had made the calls.

On the CBC phone-in show, Lukiwski said he was unhappy about the calls, and blamed the party.

“I don’t know which party official it would be, but I know that Jenni Byrne, who is the executive director, said, well, ultimately the buck stops with her,” he said. “She would take full responsibility.”

Byrne, who keeps a low public profile, is known as a talented, tough and formidable operative, fiercely loyal to Harper.

Saskatchewan’s one opposition MP, Liberal Ralph Goodale, this week sent a letter to the CRTC asking for an investigation based on his suspicion that the call broke telemarketing rules by failing to identify the originator.

Since the summer, Conservative MPs have repeatedly responded to questions about the robocalls affair by pointing out that the only finding of wrongdoing has been against Guelph Liberal MP Frank Valeriote’s riding association. The association paid a $4,900 fine for a CRTC violation over a late campaign call that attacked the Conservative candidate for his position on abortion, without identifying the Valeriote campaign as the sponsor of the call.

CRTC does not publicly acknowledge investigations until they are concluded. The investigation into the Guelph call took almost five months.

Wednesday, the Conservatives appeared to have lost their appetite for challenging the conclusions of the independent Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for Saskatchewan, which recommends creating five entirely urban seats in Regina and Saskatoon — a redraw thought to disadvantage the Tories in the 2015 election.

Harper told the House of Commons that his party would not try to change the boundaries suggested by the commission when they are formalized through legislation.

“Some years ago, the Liberals tried to bring in partisan legislation to overturn boundary commission recommendations,” he said. “We would never do that.”

The revelation that RackNine appears to be linked to the “deceptive” robocall in Saskatchewan put the Conservatives on the defensive, since RackNine was the company used to make an election day call in Guelph that appears to have been designed to keep opposition supporters away from the polls.

RackNine CEO Matt Meier, who declined to comment this week, has said that he had no idea his firm was used to make the Guelph call, and has been helping the Elections Canada investigation, which has gone on for 22 months.

Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre said on Wednesday that the call in Saskatchewan followed the rules, since the company named in the call, Chase Research, was registered with the CRTC — apparently a reference to the requirement for telemarketers to sign on to the Do-Not-Call-List.

It was not immediately possible to confirm that.

A search through the registry of Alberta trade names and corporations failed to turn up any company called Chase Research.

The party has not said that Meier or RackNine made the Saskatchewan call.

 

Ottawa Citizen and Postmedia News

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen

= = = = = = = = = = = = =  = = = = = = = = = = =

4.   Conservatives deny involvement in Saskatchewan robocall defending “Saskatchewan values”  (Ottawa Citizen), February 1, 2013

 Poll is critical of changes to federal riding boundaries in strongly Tory province

http://www.leaderpost.com/news/canada/Conservatives+deny+involvement+Saskatchewan+robocall+defending/7906921/story.html

 

OTTAWA — A Conservative party spokesman denied the Conservative party is behind a mysterious robocall poll critical of changes to federal ridings that could cut into the Tories’ electoral dominance in Saskatchewan.

By Glen McGregor, Postmedia News February 1, 2013

OTTAWA — A Conservative party spokesman denied the Conservative party is behind a mysterious robocall poll critical of changes to federal ridings that could cut into the Tories’ electoral dominance in Saskatchewan.

Some Saskatchewan residents reported receiving the automated poll calls from an unknown source on Thursday night. The pre-recorded message claimed that proposed changes to the province’s 14 ridings would set urban areas against rural and amount to an attack on “Saskatchewan values.” The call then asked recipients to press the number 1 on their telephone keypads to indicate they are opposed to this attack.

One recipient of telephone poll call said the pre-recorded message claimed to come from a firm called Chase Research. There is no sign of any company in Saskatchewan with that name.

The message also provided a phone number in Regina to call back for more information about boundary changes. That number was answered on Friday by a generic recorded message saying the party was unavailable.

Glen Olauson of Saskatoon, who received the call Thursday night, said if hadn’t known about the boundaries commission already, he would have been left with a negative impression of them.

“It was pretty misleading, the language that it was an attack on Saskatchewan values,” he said.

“I thought it was pretty biased. It was a very leading question.”

Liberal MP Ralph Goodale says he believes Conservatives are behind the calls.

“They should fess up that this is their little gambit,” he said.

Goodale, the only MP in Saskatchewan who is not a Conservative, says some of the language used in the call echoed Conservative talking points on what he says is the party’s desire to gerrymander the riding redraw.

“The tone of it was so blatant, even using phrases that Conservatives had used, talking about destroying Saskatchewan values and fomenting an urban-rural split. It’s real slander job.”

He noted the Tories admitted in they had orchestrated a similar “push poll” in 2011 that erroneously suggested long-time Montreal Liberal MP Irwin Cotler would resign his seat.

Conservative Party spokesman Fred DeLorey denied the party had any involvement.

”We are not polling,” said DeLorey in an email.

Saskatchewan won’t get any of the 30 new federal seats being added across the country for the 2015 election, but an independent boundaries commission has proposed changing the shape of the existing ridings to accommodate a fast-growing urban population.

The current boundaries are thought to favour conservative politicians by combining urban areas with rural areas. Regina and Saskatoon are each divided into four ridings that contain both city blocks and large swaths of rural areas.

That makes it harder for Liberals and New Democrats to win seats, because their stronger support from city dwellers is diluted by mixing in traditionally conservative rural voters.

The Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for Saskatchewan has proposed creating two exclusively urban ridings in Regina and three in Saskatoon but the move doesn’t sit well with some Tories.

This week, Saskatchewan Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski was quoted in the Hill Times newspaper questioning the changes proposed of the boundaries commissions across the country. He said some MPs he spoke to “don’t think the maps really take into account communities of interest” and he pointed to the ridings in some provinces where the geographic size of some rural ridings would increase.

While the decision on boundary changes is left to parliament, it would be highly unusual for MPs to reject the recommendations of the non-partisan boundaries commissions.

 

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen

Feb 052013
 


A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE
…

enough money within her control to move out
and rent a place of her own,
even if she never wants to or needs to…

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE …

something perfect to wear if the employer,
or date of her dreams wants to see her in an hour…

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE

a youth she’s content to leave behind….

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE …

a past juicy enough that she’s looking forward to
retelling it in her old age….

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE …

a set of screwdrivers, a cordless drill, and a black lace bra…

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE …

one friend who always makes her laugh… and one who lets her cry…

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE …

a good piece of furniture not previously owned by anyone else in her family…

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE …

eight matching plates, wine glasses with stems,
and a recipe for a meal,
that will make her guests feel honored…

A WOMAN SHOULD HAVE ….

a feeling of control over her destiny….

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

how to fall in love without losing herself..

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

how to quit a job,
break up with a lover ,
and confront a friend without
ruining the friendship…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

when to try harder… and WHEN TO WALK AWAY…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

that she can’t change the length of her calves,
the width of her hips, or the nature of her parents..

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

that her childhood may not have been perfect…but it’s over…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

what she would and wouldn’t do for love or more…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

how to live alone… even if she doesn’t like it…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW.. ..

whom she can trust,
whom she can’t,
and why she shouldn’t take it personally…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

where to go…
be it to her best friend’s kitchen table…
or a charming inn in the woods…
when her soul needs soothing…

EVERY WOMAN SHOULD KNOW…

what she can and can’t accomplish in a day…
a month…and a year…

Feb 052013
 

(Related:  2013-01-31  U of S appoints new secretary who is “director of legal services in governance for Cameco Corporation”)

 

BACKGROUND, Grant Isaac:

(1)    Information regarding

  • Grant Isaac as a defender of the status quo
  • the difference between “hyped innovation” and “true innovation”
  • in a time when the society is in bad need of finding solutions that involve new ways of viewing the world
  • the role of the University in society

see  2011-06-24 Submission to University of Saskatchewan: what is needed in the new president 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

(2)    Grant Isaac, from the Cameco website:

http://www.cameco.com/about/executive_bios/grant_isaac/  

Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

  • Appointed senior vice-president and chief financial officer July 2011
  • Appointed senior vice-president, corporate services July 2009.
  • Dean of the Edwards School of Business, University of Saskatchewan from 2006 to 2009.
  • Professor at the Edwards School of Business, University of Saskatchewan from 2000 to 2009. Focused on research, development and commercialization of technology products, international trade and regulations and the strategic management of intellectual property.
  • Author of two books on trade and regulations as well as numerous book chapters and research articles appearing in leading academic journals.
  • Received a bachelor of arts (economics) and a master of arts (economics) from the University of Saskatchewan and a PhD from the London School of Economics.
  • Currently serving on the boards of Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce, W. Brett Wilson Centre for Entrepreneurial Excellence, Advisory Committee for the Edwards School of Business.

= = = = = = = = =  = = = =  = =  = =

NEWS, GRANT ISAAC APPOINTED TO THE U OF S BOARD OF GOVERNORS

effective Jan. 17, 2013

http://announcements.usask.ca/news/archive/2013/01/university_of_s_148.html

EXCERPT:

• Grant Isaac, also a graduate of the U of S as well as from the London School of Economics, brings expertise in finance, taxation and business technology services through his work at Cameco as chief financial officer and senior vice-president. He has served as the dean of the U of S Edwards School of Business and on several other boards.

The U of S Board of Governors is responsible for overseeing and directing all matters respecting the management, administration and control of the university’s property, revenues and financial affairs.

Greg Smith, the fifth government appointee, will continue to serve on the board for a second three-year term. A new chair will be chosen by the board at an upcoming meeting.

The board consists of five members appointed by the Government of Saskatchewan, one student member (currently Jared Brown), one faculty member (currently Linda Ferguson), two members appointed by University Senate (currently Susan Milburn and Grit McCreath), and two ex-officio members (the president and chancellor).

Feb 042013
 

From the FAIR website:

(FAIR (American) is the acronymn for  Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting, a 25-year-old organization for holding the press to account)

http://fair.org/take-action/activism-updates/pbs-ombud-nova-disagree-on-drone-disclosure/

PBS ombud Michael Getler (1/31/13) responded to FAIR activists who wrote to him about the recent Nova special on drones (1/23/13) that was underwritten by Lockheed Martin, a major military contractor and drone manufacturer.

FAIR (Action Alert, 1/28/13) pointed out that this connection violates PBS‘s guidelines concerning sponsorship and conflicts of interest.

Getler agreed, explaining that “the Lockheed funding does present a perception and commercial test problem for PBS. My feeling is that this particular program would have been much better off without Lockheed support.”

There was a further lack of disclosure. Getler noted that he

saw no mention of Lockheed when I watched the program online or when I looked at the Nova website. And there was never any mention of Lockheed in the body of the program, even though that huge defense company is heavily involved in drone development, which I didn’t know and I’m sure vast numbers of online viewers–unless they are in the Air Force or CIA–also probably did not know.

That lack of disclosure left Getler feeling “deceived by Nova“–though he noted that “Lockheed Martin was clearly identified on screen” as a funder in the broadcast version of the program.

Getler concluded by writing, “I think Nova handled this situation poorly and did not comply with the spirit, at least, of the guidelines when it came to being upfront with viewers.”

Nova thought otherwise. Its statement began:

WGBH fully adheres to PBS funding guidelines and takes our public trust responsibility very seriously. With regard to Nova “Rise of the Drones,” Lockheed Martin’s sponsorship of Nova is not a violation of the PBS underwriting guidelines.

Nova’s defense is that Lockheed “had no editorial involvement in the program.” But as the PBS guidelines make abundantly clear, this is not a defense at all. The fact that a funder’s interests exist is a problem–not just whether the funder interfered in the editorial content of the program:

When there exists a clear and direct connection between the interests or products or services of a proposed funder and the subject matter of the program, the proposed funding will be deemed unacceptable regardless of the funder’s actual compliance with the editorial control provisions of this policy.

Since it is indisputable that Lockheed manufacturers drones, the guidelines as written say this is “unacceptable.” Since Nova does not believe the underwriting guidelines mean what they say mean, the real issue here is whether PBS itself believes in its rules. As FAIR has pointed out (Press Release, 4/3/02 ), PBS has historically found certain funding arrangements problematic–when the funder is a labor union, or a producer of a film about domestic violence is the leader of a battered women’s support group. Major corporate funders, though, get a pass.

Nova also argues that including a guest who has a business relationship to the funder “has no relevance to the story.” But basic journalistic ethics–for any medium, not just public television–tell you that such disclosures are important.

Nova seemed to prefer that viewers not know Lockheed’s connection to the subject of the program at all. The program’s response to the FAIR alert did mention that they “will include Lockheed Martin in the list of funders on the Nova website for full transparency.”

FAIR thanks the hundreds of activists who wrote to PBS, and to ombud Michael Getler for writing a thoughtful response.

Feb 022013
 

You may want to read the following email thread from the bottom up,  reading my email to DND and then the reply received.

Related posting:  2008-06-19  “Canada First Defence Strategy” – serious.  The American  military-industrial-government-university complex  in Canada.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

RECEIVED:  Wed 17/09/2008 6:25 AM

FROM:   dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca

Dear Ms. Finley:

Thank you for your correspondence of July 3, 2008, regarding the Canada First Defence Strategy. I appreciate the opportunity to address your concerns. Please accept my apology for this delay in responding.

The Canadian Forces must be ready to help counter challenges to Canada’s security and interests, including the threats emerging from failed and fragile states, global terrorism, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. It must also be prepared to help respond to numerous domestic challenges, including those resulting from increased activity in the Arctic. It must also be able to assist other government departments and agencies in ensuring security during important events in Canada, such as the Vancouver 2010 Olympics and Paralympics Games.

Our military helps to defend our security and national sovereignty, and stands ready to support civil authorities respond to crises and emergencies at home, including terrorist attacks. The Canadian Forces also plays a key role in providing humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, and search and rescue services to Canadians.

Furthermore, the Canadian Forces contributes to the defence of North America in collaboration with the United States. Given our common defence and security requirements, it is in Canada’s interest to remain a reliable partner in the defence of the continent. We receive a degree of security in North America that we would be hard pressed to achieve on our own. We also receive valuable training and operational experience, a voice in US defence policy formulation in areas where our security interests are directly involved, and access to defence-related information and technology.

That said, we determine our domestic and international policies independently. Indeed, as two separate and sovereign countries, we do occasionally disagree, whether on the war in Iraq, anti-personnel landmines, or the International Criminal Court. These differences should not obscure the many issues on which we agree and co-operate quite successfully-from the defence of North America to humanitarian assistance and peace support operations abroad, including ongoing operations in Afghanistan.

Indeed, if Canada is to defend its interests and promote its values in the world, it must be prepared to contribute to global security. Many of these efforts are diplomatic in nature, such as our long-standing commitment to nuclear disarmament. The Canadian Forces also contributes to many international non-combat activities in co-operation with other government departments and agencies, such as non-combat evacuation, stabilization and reconstruction, humanitarian support, and disaster relief operations.

We recognize that peace cannot always be achieved through peaceful means, and the use of force is sometimes necessary. Canada is simply not prepared to let others do all the hard work and make the sacrifices that such armed interventions require. The Canadian Forces, therefore, is ready to contribute to whole-of-government operations aimed at bringing stability and security in troubled spots, such as in Afghanistan. Our commitment in Afghanistan is sanctioned by the United Nations and is at the request of the Afghan government; it underscores the Canadian Forces traditional role in contributing to global security.

If the Canadian Forces is to continue to carry out these important missions with success, it will require additional people and resources. As such, the Canada First Defence Strategy provides guidance on our most urgent and fundamental requirements across the four pillars that form the foundation of military capabilities-personnel, equipment, readiness, and infrastructure. Specifically, the Government has committed to replacing the military’s core equipment fleets, expand the Canadian Forces to 70,000 Regular Force and 30,000 Reserve personnel, ensure the continued viability of defence infrastructure, and strengthen the Canadian Forces overall readiness.

You make reference to the benefits to Canadian industry contained in the Strategy. The infusion of long-term, stable funding will provide industry the opportunity to more effectively meet defence procurement requirements and to reach for global excellence. The Government will also take specific measures to enhance its interaction with industry, including fostering transparency, to ensure that the contracting process remains open and fair for all Canadian companies.

Once again, thank you for writing. I trust this information is of assistance.

 

Sincerely,

Peter G. MacKay

Minister of National Defence

MCU2008-05065

—–Original Message—–

From: Sandra Finley

Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 1:22 PM

To: info@gg.ca; +MCU@MCU@Ottawa-Hull

Subject: Absolutely NO to “CANADA FIRST DEFENCE STRATEGY”

TO:  (1)  Right Honourable Michaëlle Jean, Governor General and Commander-in-Chief of Canada Rideau Hall

1 Sussex Drive

Ottawa, ON  K1A 0A1

e-mail: info@gg.ca

Telephone (613) 993-8200 or 1 800 465-6890

(2)  General Walter Natynczyk

Chief of Defense Staff,  Canadian Armed Forces

101 Colonel-By Drive

Ottawa ON  K1A 0K2 tel.

Telephone:  613-992-5054

(3)  Peter MacKay – Minister of National Defence National Defence Headquarters Major-General George R. Pearkes Building

101 Colonel By Drive

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

K1A 0K2

Phone: 613-996-3100

dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca

 

Dear Michaëlle Jean, Walter Natynczyk and Peter MacKay;

 

RE:  “CANADA FIRST DEFENCE STRATEGY”,  posted on about June 19th, 2008

 

I am dismayed and appalled by the direction established through the “CANADA FIRST DEFENCE STRATEGY”.

It is not a strategy of defence.  It is a strategy of war.

I call upon you to reverse the strategy.

Concerning DEFENCE DOCTRINE COMPATIBLE WITH U.S. DOCTRINE:

“.. the two nations’ armed forces will pursue their effective collaboration on operations in North America and abroad. To remain interoperable, we must ensure that key aspects of our equipment and doctrine are compatible.”

The U.S. launches illegal wars.  It creates hatred in the world by appropriating the resources of other people.  It has the atrocities of Abu Ghraib on its record.  George Bush will eventually be tried for War Crimes.  And Canada aspires to compatibility of doctrine with the U.S.?  Are you out of your minds?  That’s about the worst strategy I can think of.

Concerning the CREATION OF A MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN CANADA:

“A Military in Partnership with Canadian Industry The Canada First Defence Strategy will also have significant benefits for Canadian industry. The infusion of long-term stable funding it provides will enable industry to  …”

It is not what it’s made out to be.  The funding goes to Canadian industry through the offset agreements in contracts made with, significantly and for example, Lockheed Martin Corporation.  For all intents and purposes Lockheed Martin IS the American military.  It is the world’s largest war contractor (a.k.a. “defence” contractor).  It makes billions of dollars through the killing of people.  It has a public record of corruption.

The actual flow of money out of the public purse is explained by Peter Mackay in a newspaper interview:  “The purchase contract for 17 C-130J Hercules aircraft is valued at approximately $1.4 billion U.S., with an additional amount to be added in 2009 for at least 20 years of in-service support.

Under the contract, Lockheed Martin Corp. is required to invest in the Canadian economy, dollar for dollar, what the Government of Canada spends in procuring and maintaining the aircraft over the life of the contract.”

Lockheed Martin is already well positioned in Canada.  It is not only becoming the Godfather of Canadian industry.  Through offset agreements it has invested in Dalhousie University (also consistent with the stated intentions of the “CANADA FIRST DEFENCE STRATEGY”).  It can only invest in Dalhousie if it has EXCESS profits.  Its contracts are with the Government of Canada.  Ipso facto, you know that Canadian citizens are paying too much for its contracts, in addition to becoming the enablers of the aggressive American war machinery.

Jean Chretien, I sincerely thank God, kept Canada out of the Iraq war.  We are in Afghanistan.  You are no doubt aware that Canadian troops there will be helping to guard the Central Asian gas pipeline for American interests.

Read the following clause from the “CANADA FIRST DEFENCE STRATEGY” and tell me, when the U.S. declares war on Iran, will Canada be there helping to fire the bullets that are sheathed with Depleted Radioactive Uranium on the people of Iran?:

“These operations will often be conducted under the auspices of the United Nations and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Canada will continue to support and contribute to these key international bodies. In addition, the Canadian Forces will participate, where circumstances dictate, in missions with like-minded states as a responsible member of the international community.”

Given that we are making our military doctrine “compatible” with the U.S., I would say that the U.S. is a “like-minded state”.  I wonder what circumstances will dictate that we help the Americans to launch a killing and destructive war on Iran?   And whose interests will be served by the war?  Will we be on-side with the Americans and off-side with the United Nations?  (as would have happened had we participated in the Iraq “mission”.)

Warnings from Dwight Eisenhower’s 1961 Farewell Speech are instructive:

“… In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.”

There are viable and realistic ALTERNATIVES TO KILLING WARS .  Gandhi brought the British Empire to its knees.  His weapon of choice was non-violent resistance.  In war waged with the use of intelligence and creativity the killing and destruction is minimized and the wars are actually won in a comparatively short period of time.  Nor do they leave a legacy of hatred.

The Canadian Military, through the “CANADA FIRST DEFENCE STRATEGY” exhibits (I am sorry to say) very ineffective, obsolete, stupid and very expensive strategy.  From newspaper reports, “MacKay reveals details of $490-billion defence strategy”.  With the looming monster of inflation (fuelled by enormous U.S. war debt) $490 billion will easily become half a trillion dollars.  Can you imagine what could be done overseas with $500 billion dollars?  It would actually make a significant contribution to peace in the world.   Aaah!  But then the Canadian military-industrial complex along with Lockheed Martin Corporation, their mahnanimous benefactor, would be on the ropes.

“… nonviolent resistance as a political force is still young, its possibilities not yet well enough known, and is thus seldom an incitement to the masses and is seldom encouraged by the media. For all that, those striving for human rights are dependent on our solidarity and the feeling is growing of an ever increasing threat through the power of dictatorships, the armaments race and the immobility of bureaucrats.

Gandhi presented the principles of nonviolent resistance to the world, but the methods – corresponding to the various hierarchies – have to be very different, should they lead to success. Through the multiplicity of nonviolent resistance, so rich in ideas, it can be demonstrated that the most powerful effective opposing forces can be mobilized against every form of violence …”

We have not only the example of Gandhi.  The East Germans brought down a fascist regime by successfully employing the tactics of Gandhi, creatively moulded to their situation and the opportunities-at-hand.  Neither of them had any money.

The Outstanding Public Debt of the United States as of 03 Jul 2008 at 04:41:28 PM GMT is a number so large I don’t know how to read or interpret it: $9,470,470,394,065.00 The estimated population of the United States is 304,288,339

so each citizen’s share of this debt is $31,123.34.   A family of four in the U.S. shoulders responsibility for Government debt of $125,000.   That’s just for today.

The American National Debt has continued to increase an average of  $1.66 billion per day since September 28, 2007.  The debt is the consequence of American Military Strategy.  The numbers are up to where Canada used to be in the neighbourhood of 60% of GDP.  In 1980 the United States had its debt-to-GDP ratio around 40%, or where Canada was in fiscal year 2004-05. But since then American Government debt has taken off – it is now above 60%.

It is a terrible mis-allocation of resources.  Always at the expense of future generations.

The “CANADA FIRST DEFENCE STRATEGY” reflects obsolete thinking.  It is a dangerous document for Canadians and for future Canadians.  If it is not stopped Canada will be a danger to other people in the world, too.  This is not too hard to figure out.

Yours truly,

Sandra Finley

(contact info)

 

Feb 022013
 

Elizabeth Williamson – another transfer of key personnel from Cameco Uranium to the University of Saskatchewan.

(See also 2013-01-17  Grant Isaac, Senior Vice-President Cameco becomes member of the Board of Governors, University of Saskatchewan)

= = = = = = = = = = = = = =  = = =

The University of Saskatchewan has appointed a new secretary.

The senior role, which keeps ceremonies, protocol and university processes on track, will be performed by Elizabeth Williamson come April.

“Elizabeth brings the right combination of skills and experience to the senior position of university secretary,” university president Ilene Busch-Vishniac said in a Thursday press release.

Williamson is now working as the director of legal services in governance for Cameco Corporation.

When she begins work at the university April 8, Williamson will replace current secretary Lea Pennock, who is retiring in March after eight years in the role.

The secretary keeps numerous university bodies and processes ticking along properly, including the board of governors, senate, and university council. The secretary also administers discipline and appeal hearings about student conduct, faculty promotion and tenure, interprets university policies and jurisdiction, oversees the institution’s internal audit, and co-ordinates ceremonies such as convocation.

Feb 012013
 

Gordon Edwards writes:

This is wonderful news.

Congratulations to all our friends in Virginia who have been working so hard to protect their land and water from the ravages of radioactive pollution by upholding the moratorium on uranium exploration and mining that has been in place in the Commonwealth of Virginia for over 30 years!

Bravo, Virginians.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

(Sandra speaking:)

Our network participated, sending information to the American Academy of Scientists who were tasked with recommending whether to lift the uranium moratorium in Virginia.  We have followed recent developments (click on Nuclear).  This is great news!

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

By STEVE SZKOTAK, Associated Press, February 1, 2013

http://tinyurl.com/axteqvt

A proposal to mine uranium in Virginia was abruptly abandoned Thursday in the Legislature, and supporters scrambled to appeal directly to the governor to salvage what would be the first full-scale mining operation of the radioactive ore on the East Coast.

Unable to deliver the votes in the General Assembly, Sen. John Watkins withdrew his legislation to establish state regulations for uranium mining in Southside Virginia, a rural area along the North Carolina state line and home to the largest known deposit of the radioactive ore in the U.S.

Watkins instead asked fellow Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell to use his administrative powers to have state agencies draw up the rules. McDonnell has not taken a position on the divisive issue and his spokesman J. Tucker Martin said the governor was reviewing the request.

Meanwhile, opponents of uranium mining, many of whom had traveled to Richmond for a hearing on the legislation, cheered when Watkins announced his decision.

“This is a resounding a resounding victory,” said Cale Jaffe of the Southern Environmental Law Center.

He credited broad opposition to the proposal, which was pitched by the mining company as a job creator in a hard-hit section of the state.

“This is not just environmentalists,” Jaffe said. “This is small business owners in Southside, it’s farmers, it’s parents of small children, it’s community leaders, it’s physicians all these disparate voices coming together.”

AP

State Sen. John Watkins, R- Powhatan, right,… View Full Caption

The proposal was pushed by Virginia Uranium Inc., a company run by the owners of the so-called Coles Hill deposit, where an estimated 119 million pounds of the ore is located in an area of the state called Southside.

The company immediately embraced Watkins’ request to the governor and a spokesman said the approach would be thorough and transparent.

“Some policymakers have suggested that unanswered questions remain,” said spokesman Patrick Wales. “Sen. Watkins’ suggested course of action would ensure that they have the benefit of all possible information on this issue before casting a vote on lifting the moratorium.”

The General Assembly would still have to vote to accept the regulations, probably in 2014.

Uranium mining has been done almost exclusively in the arid West and critics said Virginia’s exposure to tropical storms and torrential rains made it a bad choice to mine the ore.

They have said they’re primarily concerned about the milling the separation of ore from rock. It creates vast amounts of waste that must be stored for generations.

Opponents fear a breach of containment cells holding the waste would contaminate public drinking water supplies for localities as far away as Virginia Beach, nearly 200 miles from the proposed mine. The tourist city, Virginia’s largest, had taken a public stand against mining.

Environmentalists were joined in their opposition by local grass-root organizers, Virginia’s largest farm lobby, the state’s medical society, municipal and church groups, the NAACP and others.

The company promised the creation of 350 jobs over the 35-year life of the mine but the economics of the mine could not outweigh what critics called the “stigma” of mining the fuel for nuclear reactors.

“It’s a stigma, that cloud hanging over the region that will detract economic development from the region as long as it’s there,” said Sen. Frank Ruff, a Republican whose district is in Southside Virginia. “We need to put it to rest.”