Sandra Finley

Dec 232012
 

Return to Anchor

Anyone who wants to can, if they want, determine Ashu Solo’s original name.   Two name changes (1999 and 2001) are recorded for Ashu in the Saskatchewan Gazette, public information on-line.

My personal decision to post the information here arises from the belief that Ashu Solo needs to be stopped.  He lives in fear of two things, as far as I understand:

  1. Other people knowing his family name.  He is putting the family’s reputation at risk.
  2. Other people having access to the information held by Tonia Zimmerman, which includes the email thread between Ashu and John Gormley.

If those two things can stop him from going after people the way he does, then so be it.  It is not right that people should live in fear of him.

Ashu’s claim is that there are “millions” of people out to get him; disclosure of his family name puts his family at risk.

RESPONSE:  There are not millions of people out to get him.  And people know that he is not his Father.  The only person who is putting Ashu Solo at risk is he, himself.

Further, this statement says it well:

I have come around to openly stating Ashu’s (family) name, whether that’s on air, or on your website, or both.  The fact is, he hides behind his ‘anonymity’, and might not be so brazen with his personal attacks (like the ones he administered against me) if people also knew his real name and identity.  

As you and I don’t hide our identities, we are left vulnerable to his harassment and attacks.  He doesn’t even use a current photograph of himself!  So in the interest of stopping Ashu from continuing his destructive behaviour, it might be best if, moving forward, he were truly held accountable for his actions, and I think people knowing who they’re really dealing with is a way of doing that.  

A very important point: ignoring Ashu hasn’t worked.  In fact it seems to have only driven him to more and more destructive tactics, ones he has so far wielded with a sense of impunity.  

There is a consequence, good and bad, to our actions, and that applies to everyone.  Ashu has been given many chances to stop what he is doing without being exposed.  He has chosen to keep doing what he is doing.  So be it.

– – – – – – – – – – – – –  – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Empathy?  Does he never consider what he is doing to the families of other people?

End of August 2013

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: August-28-13 2:50 PM
Subject: co-authored research paper

The co-authored paper (2009) is by Madan Gupta, Prof of Engineering at U of S and Ashu Solo.

Madan will be Ashu’s father.  (INSERT:  given Ashu’s name changes and his references to his Father, the Engineering Prof.)

– – – –

The Co-Authored paper:

http://catalog.iyte.edu.tr/client/tr_TR/default_tr/search/detailnonmodal;jsessionid=C162C8599578D6892BB366E5E161CFBB?qu=Mathematics&qf=SUBJECT%09Subject%09Science.%09Science.&rm=THESIS0%7C%7C%7C1%7C%7C%7C3%7C%7C%7Ctrue&d=ent%3A%2F%2FSD_ILS%2F316%2FSD_ILS%3A316082~ILS~0~57&te=ILS&ps=300

Proceedings of the First Interdisciplinary CHESS Interactions Conference, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, 17-20 August 2009

Author:  Interdisciplinary CHESS Interactions Conference (1st : 2009 : Saskatoon, Sask.)

ISBN:  9789814295895

. . .   Madan M. Gupta, Ashu M.G. Solo — The consilient epistemology : structuring evolution of our logical thinking

– – – – – – – –

http://homepage.usask.ca/~mmg864/

 

Madan M. GuptaPh.D. (U. of Warwick); D.Sc. (U. of Saskatchewan)(IEEE-Life Fellow; SPIE-Fellow; IFSA-Fellow)Professor (Emeritus) & Distinguished Research Chair

Director
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS RESEARCH LABORATORY
AND
CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE (IRIS) ON NEURO-VISION RESEARCH

University   Address

Home Address

Intelligent   Systems Research Laboratory
College of Engineering
University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Canada, S7N 5A9

101 Capilano   Court
Saskatoon
Saskatchewan
Canada, S7K 4B9

Phone(Office):

(306)   966-5451

Phone(Home):

(306)   933-0663

Fax:

(306)   966-5427

E-mail:

madan.gupta@usask.ca

website:

http://www.engr.usask.ca/faculty/Gupta_Madan.php
http://www.usask.ca/~madan.gupta

 


Dr.   Madan M. Gupta is a professor (Emeritus) and is holding the Distinguished   Research Chair in the College of Engineering at the University of   Saskatchewan. Also, he is the director of the Intelligent Systems Research   Laboratory.

Dr. Gupta’s current research interests are in the areas of neuro-vision   systems, neuro-control systems, stability & robust control of nonlinear   timevarying systems, integration of fuzzy-neural systems, neuronal morphology   of biological vision, intelligent and cognitive robotic systems, cognitive   information, new paradigms in information processing, chaos in neural   systems, and fuzzy-neural logic in decision making processes such as in the   court of law. He is also developing some new architecture of computational   neural networks and computational fuzzy neural networks for application to   advanced robotics, aerospace, medical, and industrial processes. He has also   developed some new algorithms, the Theta-Invariant Signature Algorithm   (TISA), and the Phase-Invariant Signature Algorithm (PISA), for   the detection, diagnosis, localization, and prognosis of incipient failures   in cyclic machines (such as turbines), and for ischemic heart disease   respectively. His interest also lies in signal and image processing for   applications to medical systems.

Dr. Gupta has authored or co-authored over 900 research papers. He has   recently co-authored the seminal book entitled “Static and Dynamic   Neural Networks: From Fundamentals to Advanced Theory”. Dr. Gupta   has previously co-authored “Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory   and Applications” (the first book on fuzzy arithmetic) and “Fuzzy   Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science”. Both of   these books have been translated into Japanese. Also, Dr. Gupta has edited or   co-edited about 25 other books as well as conference proceedings and journals   in the fields of his research interests such as adaptive control systems,   fuzzy computing, neuro-computing, neuro-vision systems, and neuro-control   systems.

Dr. Gupta received his B.E. (Hons.) and M.E. degrees in   electronics-communications engineering and control systems from the Birla   Engineering College (now the Birla Institute of Technology & Science),   Pilani, India, in 1961 and 1962, respectively. He was a Commonwealth Research   Fellow, studying in the field of parameter perturbation processes and   adaptive control systems, first at the Queen’s University of Belfast, N.   Ireland (1964 ~ 65), and then at the University of Warwick, Coventry, England   (1965 ~ 67), where he received his Ph.D. degree in 1967. In the fall of 1998,   for his seminal contributions to the field dynamic neural networks and   fuzzy logic systems with applications to neuro-control and neuro-vision   systems; and incipient failure detection in cyclic machines (TISA) and   diagnosis and prognosis of ischemic heart diseases (PISA). Dr. Gupta was   awarded an earned Doctor of science (D.Sc.) degree by the University   of Saskatchewan.

Dr. Gupta was elected fellow of the Institute of Electrical and   Electronics Engineers (IEEE) for his contributions to the theory of fuzzy   sets and adaptive control systems and for the advancement on the diagnosis of   cardiovascular disease. He was elected fellow of the International Society   for Optical Engineering (SPIE) for his contributions to the field of   neuro-control and neuro-fuzzy systems. Also, he was elected fellow of the International   Fuzzy Systems Association (IFSA) for his contributions to fuzzy-neural   computing systems.

In 1998, Dr. Gupta was honored by the III- Kaufmann Prize and Gold Medal for   his research in the field of fuzzy logic. This Gold Medal was presented by   the Foundation FEGI (Fundacio per a l’Estudi de la Gestio en la Incertesa:   Fuzzy Management Research Foundation) and SIGEF (Sociedad Internacional de   Gestion Economia: Fuzzy, International Association for Fuzzy Set Management   and Economy) in Reus, Spain. In 1991, Dr. Gupta was the co-recipient of the   Institute of Electrical Engineering Kelvin Premium. He was elected as a   visiting professor and a special advisor in the area of high technology to   the European Centre for Peace and Development (ECPD), University for Peace,   which was established by the United Nations. In 1991, he was invited by the   ECPD to visit and lecture at about five industrial and research centers in   India.

Dr. Gupta is or has been on the editorial board of over fifteen journals in   the field of fuzzy- neural and intelligent systems. Also, he has participated   in the initiation of some of these journals. He has also served as a founding   member of some of the international societies such as International Fuzzy   Systems Association (IFSA), North American Fuzzy Information Processing   Society (NAFIPS) and Canadian Fuzzy Information and Neural Society   (CAN-FINS).

Return to Anchor

Dec 232012
 

I am highly motivated, this hits close

  • to my home (explained in a later posting), and
  • to the international efforts in the wake of Fukushima.

QUESTION:  What eventually happened to the moratorium on uranium development in Virginia?  (We participated in June 2011, item #4 below).

RESPONSE:

  • Lieutenant Governor Bill Bolling took up the cause (#2 below)
  • Which may spell the end of his political career  (#3 below).

 

Can a scattered but empowered people (our networks!) make a difference?

If we can, it will help push back the corruption by the industry, not just for Virginia, but for Saskatchewan, Japan and elsewhere.

 

CONTENTS

  1. COMEDY:  MOVIE, THE CAMPAIGN
  2. REAL-LIFEVirginia Lieutenant Governor Bolling speaks out against uranium mining (Maybe he watched The Campaign?!)
  3. CONSEQUENCES:  Washington Post:  Bill Bolling may have be out of the 2013 Virginia governor’s race . . .
    Bolling shocked Capitol Square last week by announcing his opposition to uranium mining in Virginia, a venture that represents billions of dollars in profits for some of the state’s most well-connected investors
  4. BACKGROUND: JUNE 2011, OUR PARTICIPATION IN THE URANIUM MORATORIUM IN VIRGINIA
  5. GENERAL BACKGROUND, BRIEF, ON THE MORATORIUM IN VIRGINIA, THANKS TO GORDON EDWARDS
  6. PARALLEL: VIRGINIA AND SASKATCHEWAN  (in a later posting).

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

  1. COMEDY:  MOVIE, THE CAMPAIGN

First, the movie offends some sensibilities.

Second, it is currently free for Sasktel customers with “Max” service. The movie is 85 minutes.

Story – the rivalry between two contenders for a seat in the US Congress.

Trailer at  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7yC0iiK7a4

Number of views of the trailer: 2,968,185 as at Dec 23, 2012, 4:41 pm Sask time.  Tells me that Americans care about the corruption of democracy.

Comedy, a contribution to the rising tide against what is happening to governance in North America.

The Koch brothers are lampooned (Glenn Motch is played by John Lithgow).

In one scene a vote-counting machine is upended to show the manufacturer’s name, alias Motch Industries (Koch Industries).  Election fraud lampooned.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

 

2. REAL-LIFE: Virginia Lieutenant Governor Bolling speaks out against uranium mining (Maybe he watched The Campaign?!)

2012-12-14   Virginia Lieutenant Governor Bolling speaks out against uranium mining. Uranium development is also opposed by County Chamber of Commerce.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

3. CONSEQUENCES: Washington Post: Bill Bolling may have be out of the 2013 Virginia governor’s race .
. .  Bolling shocked Capitol Square last week by announcing his opposition to uranium mining in Virginia, a venture that represents billions of dollars in profits for some of the state’s most well-connected investors

2012-12-23  Though out of race, spurned Lt. Gov. Bolling to share marquee in the 2013 governor’s race.  Washington Post

(Hard to imagine that this represents sound journalism.  “Though out of the race . . “,  “spurned”,  and as you’ll see at the link, Bolling is described as “lame-duck”, with nothing to back the statement.)

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

4. BACKGROUND: JUNE 2011, OUR PARTICIPATION IN THE URANIUM MORATORIUM IN VIRGINIA

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

5. GENERAL BACKGROUND, BRIEF, ON THE MORATORIUM IN VIRGINIA, THANKS TO GORDON EDWARDS

(Written prior to today’s Washington Post article on the now precarious nature of Lieutenant-Governor of Virginia Bill Bolling’s political career.)

The Commonwealth of Virginia has had a moratorium on uranium mining since 1982.  For the last few years, there has been enormous industry pressure to LIFT the moratorium and allow the mining of a very large uranium deposit near Coles Hill, Pittsylvania County, in Southern Virginia.

The U.S. National Academy of Sciences was asked by the Virginia State Government to carry out a study on the  environmental impacts of uranium mining in Virginia.  That report noted that Virginia did not presently have the regulatory  muscle needed to oversee such an undertaking safely.

Yesterday’s announcement by the Lieutenant Governor of Virginia that he is opposed to lifting the moratorium comes as great news to all the dedicated citizens who have fought so hard to keep the Virginia uranium moratorium in force.

Gordon Edwards

Dec 232012
 

Bolling is referred to as “lame-duck”  . . .  journalistic integrity?

TWO OTHER EXCERPTS FROM THE WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE BELOW:

1.  After three years as the governor’s economic development czar, Bolling shocked Capitol Square last week by announcing his opposition to uranium mining in Virginia, a venture that represents billions of dollars in profits for some of the state’s most well-connected investors.

Bolling’s tie-breaking vote in a final year presiding over the Virginia Senate ensures his relevance on the looming uranium mining battle and other meaty legislative issues. And he has pointedly refused to rule out an independent candidacy that could split the GOP vote and doom Cuccinelli next fall.

2.  He didn’t disguise his disappointment that conservatives loyal to Cuccinelli quietly took over the state Republican Party’s rulemaking central committee and changed the nomination method from a primary, where Bolling was competitive, to a closed convention certain to be dominated by pro-Cuccinelli conservatives.

= = = = = = =

Bolling’s well-stated reasons for not wanting the moratorium on uranium development lifted: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c7cQteYTSk

= = = = = = = = = = = = =

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/though-out-of-race-spurned-lt-gov-bolling-to-share-marquee-in-the-2013-governors-race/2012/12/23/6fd91cec-4d18-11e2-835b-02f92c0daa43_story.html

WASHINGTON POST

By Associated Press

RICHMOND, Va. — Bill Bolling may have be out of the 2013 Virginia governor’s race, at least as a Republican, but that doesn’t mean he’s off the stage and finished making news.

The lame-duck lieutenant governor feels he was squeezed out of the Republican gubernatorial contest by his party’s social conservatives and is among The Associated Press’s 2013 Virginia newsmakers to watch in elections for three statewide offices and all 100 House seats.

Top billing is shared by the likely nominees to be Virginia’s 72nd governor.

There’s Democrat Terry McAuliffe, a savvy businessman with the subtlety of a carnival sideshow barker and an inner-circle confidante to Bill and Hillary Clinton. He’s unchallenged for his party’s nomination in his second try and is likely to stay that way after progressive former U.S. Rep. Tom Perriello decided in November to defer his plans for statewide office.

And there’s McAuliffe’s likely Republican adversary, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, who has endeared himself to Virginia’s tea party movement by using his office the past 3½ years to take on such left-of-center bogeymen as Obamacare, the Environmental Protection Agency’s clean air standards, a former University of Virginia climate researcher and college presidents who wanted to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Cuccinelli will mine a rich trove of McAuliffe’s past business ventures — some successful, others less so — and his tactics in raising money for the Clintons’ presidential quests. McAuliffe hopes to define Cuccinelli early as a right-wing extremist by highlighting the attorney general’s activism on such emotional issues as reproductive rights, immigration, gay rights and the environment.

At least it will be entertaining. Political professionals on both sides already roll their eyes and snicker, pondering a free-wheeling and unpredictable off-year melodrama of a race that already smacks of reality TV.

Cuccinelli’s rival for the GOP nomination, to be formalized at a June state convention in Richmond, is Tariq Salahi. In 2009, he and his then-wife, Michaele Salahi, gained fame for crashing a White House state dinner. They were featured in “The Real Housewives of D.C.” before the Bravo cable network canceled it in April 2011 after eight months. The Salahis split after Michaele left Tariq in September 2011 for Neal Schon, lead guitarist for the rock band Journey.

Add a calliope and a dancing bear and it’s a circus.

The wild card is Bolling, whose conservative legislative record is indistinguishable from Cuccinelli’s positions on those issues.

Bolling did not exit the race cheerfully. He didn’t disguise his disappointment that conservatives loyal to Cuccinelli quietly took over the state Republican Party’s rulemaking central committee and changed the nomination method from a primary, where Bolling was competitive, to a closed convention certain to be dominated by pro-Cuccinelli conservatives.

The lieutenant governor said he will exercise newfound independence in politics and policy and has already begun to demonstrate this. After three years as the governor’s economic development czar, Bolling shocked Capitol Square last week by announcing his opposition to uranium mining in Virginia, a venture that represents billions of dollars in profits for some of the state’s most well-connected investors.

Bolling’s tie-breaking vote in a final year presiding over the Virginia Senate ensures his relevance on the looming uranium mining battle and other meaty legislative issues. And he has pointedly refused to rule out an independent candidacy that could split the GOP vote and doom Cuccinelli next fall.

Gov. Bob McDonnell enters the fourth and final year of the single, nonrenewable term that Virginia allows its governors, and he is still hunting for a legacy as he explores his presidential potential heading toward 2016. He hopes two reform initiatives he will place before the GOP-ruled 2013 General Assembly will secure that legacy.

In December, McDonnell debuted part of his education reform package that conditions state funding for a 2 percent pay raise for teachers, principals, librarians and teachers’ aides on passage of legislation that makes it easier for school districts to fire underperforming teachers.

The Republican governor also promises to unveil legislation before the session convenes Jan. 9 to reform state transportation financing. He hopes to generate at least $500 million a year in new money for upkeep and repair of state roads and bridges as burgeoning maintenance costs — which have first claim on state transportation revenue — threaten to consume money for new highway construction.

The overarching story of 2013, one way or another, will be money and the damage to Virginia’s economy from Washington’s actions — or lack of them. For anything to happen in Congress, the House has to act, and at the heart of every legislative battle is U.S. Rep. Eric Cantor of Richmond, leader of the still-formidable House GOP majority.

In 2011, Cantor relished his role as President Barack Obama’s designated foil when the government came within hours of exhausting its ability to borrow money to pay its bills and defaulting on its debts for the first time in U.S. history. In 2012, Cantor has been much more subdued with House Speaker John Boehner taking the lead in talks with Obama as the White House and Congress struggle to reach another deficit reduction deal and avert a New Year’s Day plunge over the “fiscal cliff.”

A likely result is that Congress and the White House agree to a stopgap measure, avoiding the January deadline and deferring decisive action later into 2013. If so, which Cantor will we see: the combative one who visibly angered the president on at least one occasion, or the low-profile one?

Finally, there’s U.S. Rep. J. Randy Forbes of Chesapeake, the reserved Republican who is on a collision course with McDonnell over the governor’s plans to impose $4 tolls plus $2 on-ramp and off-ramp fees on Interstate 95 near the North Carolina border. Forbes vehemently opposes the tolls on the interstate that bisects his 4th District, one of the poorest and most rural in Virginia. Even so, he’s not ready to support higher taxes to fund transportation, either.

___

Bob Lewis has covered government and politics for The Associated Press since 2000.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Dec 232012
 

Read below, and/or listen to Bolling speaking to the issue.  The arguments are very well stated (13 minutes): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c7cQteYTSk

BY TIFFANY HOLLAND, Danville Register and Bee, December 14 2012

http://tinyurl.com/cxpa3tk

Uranium mining opponents gained a useful ally Friday.

Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling visited Danville and publicly declared his opposition to lifting Virginia’s uranium mining moratorium.

“After considering all the information that has come before me, I have decided and today I am announcing my opposition to any legislative proposals to lift the current ban on uranium mining in Virginia,” said Bolling to a room of applause at the Institute for Advanced Learning and Research.

Bolling’s opinion is significant as the state’s Chief Jobs Creation Officer and as lieutenant governor he casts a tie-breaking vote in the Virginia Senate.

Behind Bolling stood several local elected officials and community leaders, including Delegate Danny Marshall, R-Danville, and Delegate Don Merricks, R-Pittsyvlania County.

Bolling called uranium mining a “tough issue” with compelling arguments from both sides, which he said he listened to extensively. He said he came to this decision because of three primary concerns — the effects a mine would have on economic development, the unanswered environmental impact on the region, and the negative response he received about mining from people he talked to in Southside.

He said he was concerned the uranium mine, which could provide hundreds of new jobs to the region, could actually be a hindrance to economic development in the region. Many business leaders he spoke with believe lifting the ban would make it harder for their business to grow and bringing more business to the area.

“You can’t just consider the potential short-term benefits of a uranium mining operation,” said Bolling. “We also have to consider the potential long-term ramifications of business climate and economic development efforts.”

He also was concerned with the questionable environmental impact a mine could have on the region if something were to go wrong. After reading the reports, especially from the National Academy of Sciences, he said it was still hard to quantify the risks of something going wrong — and even if the chance of a mishap is small, it could be “catastrophic, not just for this region, but for many other regions throughout our state.” Bolling referred to himself as a “pro-business guy” and he did not take the decision lightly, especially after his many visits to Southside — where he has often been the face for the McDonnell administration — to bring more jobs to an area in desperate need of them.

However, he said he was persuaded by many of the people he talked to when he would visit the area. None of the local legislators were supportive of lifting the ban. And Bolling cited the Danville Pittsylvania County Chamber of Commerce’s decision Tuesday to oppose lifting the ban — which he called an “unusual” stance for an organization like the chamber — as an example of business leaders not wanting uranium mining in the region.  “At the end of the day, if the business leaders and the community leaders of Southern Virginia don’t support lifting the ban then I don’t think a bunch of politicians in Richmond should vote to remove the ban against the wishes of the people from the region impacted most positively or negatively by the proposal,” Bolling said.

Bolling wanted to stress that his position is not the position of Gov. Bob McDonnell or his administration. He said the governor is still reviewing the information and may or may not choose to take a side.

Merricks said Bolling’s decision was “refreshing” to hear since it was a “balanced, rational and reasonable” approach to the controversial and complicated issue.

However, Patrick Wales, a geologist and spokesman for Virginia Uranium Inc., said in an email for the past five years Bolling has “repeatedly refused” invitations to tour Coles Hill, where the mining would take place and the company’s attempts over the past year to brief him on the different aspects of the mining project.

“We took Lt. Gov. Bolling at his word, when he claimed to support the expansion of Virginia’s nuclear power sector and an ‘all of the above’ approach to energy policy,” said Wales. “Unfortunately, by dismissing the Coles Hill project, the single largest energy resource in Virginia, Lt. Gov. Bolling is clearly pursuing a ‘some of the above’ energy policy that is the antithesis of free-enterprise and free-markets.”

Bolling was running for the Republican nomination for governor in 2013 until recently when suspended his campaign. While he may run as an independent, Bolling laughed off questions about his political future and said Friday was just about uranium.

Holland reports for the Danville Register & Bee.

Dec 222012
 

(The New York Times article follows the Huffington Post (first) article.)

 

June:  University of Virginia President Teresa Sullivan was sacked by the Board of Governors (Board of “Visitors”) (Huffington Post article).

Sullivan was later re-instated (New York Times report).

I WONDER:

  • UVA is a public university.
  • (NY Times)  “in 1990, the state government provided about a quarter of the university’s budget. . . . 20 years later, the proportion had dwindled to less than 7 percent.”
  • neither of the articles discusses this point.
  • WHY aren’t citizens demanding that Governments provide adequate funding of education?   Corporate-financed education is not education in the public interest.  It is a foundation upon which to build a corporatized society which is a fascist society.  Surely we know that from history.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/24/uva-teresa-sullivan-ouster-_n_1619261.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009&fb_source=message

Updated: 06/25/2012

zach.carter@huffingtonpost.com

jason@huffingtonpost.com

For more than two weeks, the University of Virginia has been in an uproar over the abrupt resignation of school President Teresa Sullivan. Sullivan stepped down after just two years in office, citing “philosophical differences” with the institution’s governing Board of Visitors.

The June 10 announcement shocked students and faculty, who had just finished graduation festivities and had begun settling in for a hot, quiet summer surrounded by the Charlottesville school’s neoclassical columns and red brick architecture. Sullivan is highly regarded within the academic community, and her supporters have rallied to her defense, rocking the campus with massive protests demanding her reinstatement.

“She is an extraordinary academic leader, with superb administrative abilities, the heart of a faculty member, and evident strength of character,” the school’s top faculty wrote in a letter to the board on June 11.

While the school was stunned by Sullivan’s ouster, a plot to force her out had been building in secret for months, according to emails released by UVA at the request of the Cavalier Daily, the student newspaper.

Members of the board, steeped in a culture of corporate jargon and buzzy management theories, wanted the school to institute austerity measures and re-engineer its academic offerings around inexpensive, online education, the emails reveal. Led by Rector Helen Dragas, a real estate developer appointed six years ago, the board shared a guiding vision that the university could, and indeed should, be run like a Fortune 500 company.

The controversy, which threatens to seriously damage one of the country’s oldest and most prestigious public universities, has implications beyond its own idyllic, academic refuge. For some, it is emblematic of how the cult of corporate expertise and private-sector savvy has corralled the upper reaches of university life, at the expense of academic freedom and “unprofitable” areas of study.

“There is this sort of shift in the zeitgeist,” says Tal Brewer, chair of UVA’s Philosophy Department. Brewer sees a new, heightened cultural “adoration of the business mind as capable of bringing clarity, organization and efficiency to any kind of institution…I just think that’s a deep mistake.”

In an era in which the best and the brightest financiers laid the groundwork for the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and the Supreme Court allowed corporate sponsors and wealthy donors to upend the political system with unlimited campaign contributions, Brewer says he sees the upheaval in Charlottesville as more of the same.

“What’s happening at other kinds of institutions around the country is now coming home to roost in higher education,” Brewer says.

‘WE CAN’T AFFORD TO WAIT’

Sullivan spent most of her career rising through the ranks at the University of Texas and was a deeply respected provost at the University of Michigan before coming to the University of Virginia in 2010. As the first female president at a school that did not even admit women until 1971, Sullivan’s appointment was a significant milestone.

Outwardly, her first two years appeared congenial and uncontroversial. Sullivan undertook initiatives to bolster the faculty’s ability to teach more intimately, cede greater budget discretion to the academic departments, and attempted to close what many acknowledge to be a “reputation gap” with graduate programs. Pushing for more budget control and better quality programs won Sullivan strong allies within the student body and faculty, according to faculty members interviewed by HuffPost.

“I think she’s done a terrific job,” Brewer says.

But as the Washington Post has detailed, Dragas had long held reservations about Sullivan and questioned whether she was willing to make cost-saving cuts to certain departments and programs — including Classics and German.

The board never formally evaluated Sullivan’s performance. But the emails obtained by the the Cavalier Daily demonstrate that Dragas worked closely with her vice rector, Mark Kington, planning Sullivan’s ouster — while shielding their machinations from students and professors.

The rationale for the leadership change is as strange as the secrecy. Dragas and Kington appear to have built their case against Sullivan from just a few media articles that offer vague praise for the use of Internet technology in higher education, according to the emails.

Dragas displayed particular esteem for a David Brooks column in an email to Kington, in which the New York Times columnist touts the sort of online education initiatives undertaken by the for-profit University of Phoenix. “What happened to the newspaper and magazine business is about to happen to higher education: a rescrambling around the Web,” Brooks wrote.

“Don’t dismiss the for-profit colleges and universities, either,” proclaimed John Chubb and Terry Moe in a Wall Street Journal editorial. “Institutions such as the University of Phoenix — and it is hardly alone — have embraced technology aggressively.”

Dragas, who sent this article to Kington, included a reminder in one of the emails obtained by the Cavalier that this was, apparently, “Why we can’t afford to wait.”

This emphasis on the for-profit education sector has been particularly dismaying to UVA faculty, especially within the context of the budget cuts Dragas reportedly sought in programs including the Classics and German departments. For-profit schools are not well-regarded in the academic community, and have been embroiled in scandals in the past few years for exploitive practices that include recruiting students eligible for federal loans and grants, but graduating fewer than half the enrollees.

A Chronicle of Higher Education article, which Dragas also sent Kington, characterized the traditional pursuit of academic excellence as something that “strangled” innovation, and argued that “the pace of change is stuck somewhere between sluggish and glacial.”

“College leaders need to move beyond talking about transformation before it’s too late,” the article urged.

“Good article,” Dragas commented to Kington in her email.

None of the emails between Dragas and Kington suggest that either read serious studies on technological opportunities in the classroom, or considered how UVA’s current programs could be adapted to new Internet-based techniques. They did not appoint a commission to make recommendations or conduct a study of their own.

“Reading a few op-eds and articles in the Times, Wall Street Journal, and the Chronicle of Higher Ed does not qualify you to make definitive judgments about hugely complex issues such as the promise and perils of online learning,” says John Arras, director of the UVA Bioethics Program. “We are dealing here for the most part with a bunch of amateurs who think they know everything, but really know very little about the academic culture and what makes us tick.”

The board never held a formal vote on ousting Sullivan. Instead, according to the Washington Post, Dragas and Kington told Sullivan they had rounded up the votes necessary to remove her, and told her to resign or face being formally fired. Sullivan’s resignation was announced two days later.

“The board believes this environment calls for a much faster pace of change in administrative structure, in governance, in financial resource development and in resource prioritization and allocation,” Dragas told a meeting of university vice presidents and deans on June 10. “We do not believe we can even maintain our current standard under a model of incremental, marginal change. The world is simply moving too fast.”

Dragas, Kington, and Sullivan did not respond to requests for comment.

The university rebelled against the coup fiercely and swiftly. Provost John Simon threatened to resign, the Faculty Senate passed a vote of no confidence in the board, and the school’s student-run honor committee accused the board of compromising the school’s “community of trust.” The Cavalier Daily ran an editorial calling for the resignation of every member of the Board of Visitors. Kington stepped down on June 19.

Despite her affection for cost-cutting, Dragas hired Hill+Knowlton Strategies, a crisis management public relations firm. According to The Hook, a Charlottesville weekly magazine, the bill for those services will run from $50,000 to $100,000, and will be paid by the University of Virginia Foundation, a non-profit corporation that administers the school’s economic assets.

But the pricey PR has failed to quell the uproar. Much of the furor has been fueled by the board’s continued refusal to publicly explain why its members felt Sullivan had fallen short.

I have “not been presented with evidence that I believe merits asking for her resignation,” said Heywood Fralin, one member of the Board of Visitors who made his opposition to Sullivan’s ouster publicly known.

Calls for Sullivan to be reinstated have reached a fever pitch. A board-appointed interim president from the undergraduate business school, Carl Zeithaml, wrote an email to faculty members on Friday morning saying he would step aside, given the “enormous groundswell of support” for Sullivan.

Zeithaml’s refusal to accept the office puts the board in a difficult position, making it hard to see who, if anyone would be willing to replace Sullivan amid the turmoil.

‘STRATEGIC DYNAMISM’

Dragas’ obsession with rapid change is part of a corporate management philosophy called “strategic dynamism” also advocated by some of her top allies.

After Sullivan’s resignation was announced, Peter Kiernan, a former Goldman Sachs partner and wealthy hedge fund manager, sent an email to his colleagues on the board of UVA’s acclaimed Darden School of business supporting the ouster.

“Several weeks ago I was contacted by two important Virginia alums about working with Helen Dragas on this project, particularly from the standpoint of the search process and the strategic dynamism effort,” Kiernan wrote, according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

“The decision of the Board of Visitors to move in another direction stems from their concern that the governance of the university was not sufficiently tuned to the dramatic changes we all face: funding, Internet, technology advances, the new economic model,” Kiernan wrote, according to Siva Vaidhyanathan, a UVA professor and writer for Slate, who obtained a copy of the email. “These are matters for strategic dynamism rather than strategic planning.

“You should be comforted by the fact that both the Rector and Vice Rector, Helen Dragas and Mark Kington, are Darden alums,” Kiernan wrote. “Trust me, Helen has things well in hand.”

Kiernan denies having any direct role in Sullivan’s ouster and told HuffPost he resigned from the Darden board after his email became public, “out of love for the school.”

Strategy dynamics essentially means moving very quickly, shifting short-term goals at a moment’s notice when the business environment changes.

Protesters pushing back against the board have bonded in mutual mockery over this term, featuring the slogan disparagingly on signs, passing around satires of the philosophy, comparing it to narcissism.

And that’s the core of the crisis at UVA. The board is not simply more attuned to corporate interests and ideas than those of higher education professionals — the board quite literally is a cadre of corporate elites.

The 16-member UVA Board of Visitors is appointed by the governor. Former Gov. Tim Kaine (D) named half the current members, and Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) brought on the other half. In addition to Dragas, board members include a coal company magnate, a Wall Street professional, a top lawyer for General Electric, a nursing home executive, a beer distribution entrepreneur, the son of conservative televangelist Pat Robertson and other business elites.

Many are UVA alumni, but only a few have any professional experience in higher education. The UVA board differs sharply in that respect from some other top-notch schools, private and public. Harvard, for instance, features 10 academics.

What Dragas and her supporters do have is money. After accumulating fortunes in the private sector, Dragas and her 15 colleagues showered politicians with cash.

The current slate of board members have given over $2.1 million to Republican and Democratic political endeavors in recent years, according to a HuffPost analysis of data from the Center for Responsive Politics and the Virginia Public Access Project. The donations cover every corner of the political spectrum, from obscure House races to the presidency to the Karl Rove-linked super PAC American Crossroads. They include roughly $1.2  million given to political action committees run by Kaine and McDonnell. Companies owned by board members or that employ board members have given still more.

Only one member of the board, non-voting student representative Hillary Hurd, has not given money to political campaigns.

This heavy preference for politically connected elites over academic professionals in Virginia public higher education is a relatively recent phenomenon, according to John Casteen III, who served as president of UVA for the 20 years prior to Sullivan. As the state secretary of education from 1982 until 1985, Casteen was involved in selecting UVA board members.

“Political contributions to our governors have become more important factors in the selection of our board members,” Casteen told HuffPost. “The question of whether or not people who are political allies and are identified popularly as having been donors to campaigns, that issue never came up back when I was serving on the governor’s staff.”

Casteen’s dissatisfaction with the UVA board is especially noteworthy in light of his own professional background. He served on the board of Wachovia Bank while he was president of UVA and joined the board of tobacco giant Altria after leaving the university.

Virginia’s governor offered a cautious defense of the board in a statement last week, celebrating its members’ financial wherewithal.

“The members of the Board of Visitors are almost all alumni,” Gov. McDonnell said. “They are people who are highly successful and deeply committed and have great love for the University of Virginia. Many have given sacrificially of their money and their time over the years.”

Fetishizing corporate expertise has become a common in politics. Mitt Romney has made his business experience a tenet of his presidential campaign. Republicans on Capitol Hill recite the mantra about private-sector “job creators” being the keys to economic growth.

The belief in the universal prowess of corporate elites is not limited to Republicans. Democrats — including former President Bill Clinton, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick and Newark, N.J., Mayor Cory Booker — also have attacked President Barack Obama’s efforts to portray Romney and the private equity industry as disconnected from the concerns of everyday citizens.

With bipartisan support for the idea that the accumulation of piles of money connotes expertise, analysts say they now fear that universities will become beholden to the same mindset.

“I don’t think necessarily the Boards of Visitors in the Virginia public institutions are the worst example,” says Robert Kreiser of the American Association of University Professors. “Texas is the place where this has gone to the extreme, where first [George] Bush and now [Rick] Perry have been filling the boards with political appointees who are favorably disposed to a view of higher education, which is very corporatist and not understanding of what the academic mission should be about.”

The professors’ group has called for Sullivan’s reinstatement and Dragas’ resignation.

“The performance of the UVA Board was less than what we need from governing boards in American higher education,” says Richard Legon, president of the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. “The UVA board missed a sensitivity to the broader community and engaged in what I call top-down management, which they have the authority to do, but which is not consistent with an inclusive approach valued in higher education.”

The crisis is now reaching what may be its most critical moment. In the face of heavy criticism over his handling of the situation, McDonnell wrote a sternly worded letter to the board, warning that he would request the resignations of every member if the situation is not resolved by Tuesday’s board meeting. Dragas responded with similar aggression.

“We alone are appointed to make these decisions on behalf of the university, free of influence from outside political, personal or media pressure,” Dragas said in a statement.

The school’s faculty continues to challenge the legal legitimacy of Sullivan’s dismissal, on the grounds that faculty members were excluded from the decision. On Wednesday, faculty members participated in the second of two major rallies for Sullivan on UVA’s Lawn. Another protest is scheduled for Sunday afternoon.

“Making a lot of money does not demonstrate that you are very smart,” says Arras, the Bioethics Program professor. “And even if you are very clever, there are different types of intelligence. A successful real estate empire is not at all like a university. These people are talking about cutting classics — Greeks and Romans, the foundations of Western thought — because it’s not profitable enough.”

= = = = = = = = = = =  = = = = = = = = = = = =

WHAT HAPPENED TO TERESA SULLIVAN?

ANATOMY OF A CAMPUS COUP, NEW YORK TIMES, SEPT 11, 2012

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/16/magazine/teresa-sullivan-uva-ouster.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

The Education Issue:   Anatomy of a Campus Coup

By ANDREW RICE     Published: September 11, 2012

On a languorous Sunday in June, low season on the campus of the University of Virginia, Prof. Larry Sabato opened a perplexing e-mail. “My instant reaction,” he said, “was that I thought we’d been hacked.” The message, sent to the entire university, announced the resignation of the university’s president, Teresa Sullivan, obliquely citing a “philosophical difference of opinion” with the institution’s governing board. Sullivan had held the job for just two years, without any scandal, and Sabato couldn’t believe she had been pushed aside with so little evident justification. “I said that if this was true,” he recalled, “this was going to be a P.R. disaster of national proportions.”

Sabato is accustomed to offering predictions — a prodigiously quotable political scientist, he maintains a Web site called Sabato’s Crystal Ball. And his opinions carry serious weight around UVA, an institution he has been immersed in since his undergraduate days in the 1970s, when he served as president of the Student Council. Sabato called around and discovered that the school’s deans had learned of the resignation just that morning at a meeting in which Helen Dragas, the real estate developer who led UVA’s board, warned that the university faced an “existential threat.”

The professional educators who ran UVA were well aware that public universities everywhere were enduring a crisis. State governments have been slashing funding, driving per-student spending to historic lows, forcing schools to raise tuition, while controlling costs through salary freezes and other austerity measures. Founded and designed by Thomas Jefferson and renowned as one of the country’s finest state institutions, the University of Virginia is better off than most of its counterparts: it fears mediocrity, not insolvency. But along with other elite public universities, it is struggling to figure out how to continue providing a premium education with less government support.

If anyone appeared equipped to manage the situation, it was Sullivan: she had come to Virginia after excelling in administrative positions at the University of Texas and the University of Michigan. “Everybody had the same reaction,” Sabato told me. “First, shock, and then a sneaking suspicion that there had to be something else.” That afternoon, in the 90-degree heat, Sabato looked on as Dragas gave an outdoor news conference. She promised to replace Sullivan with “a bold, strategic, visionary leader” but refused to answer when asked for the reasons behind Sullivan’s departure.

Hours later, Sabato reached Dragas by phone. She justified the board’s drastic action by arguing that Virginia was falling behind competitors, like Harvard and Stanford, especially in the development of online courses, a potentially transformative innovation. The conversation was agreeable, but privately, Sabato still wasn’t convinced that the move was warranted. That evening, he crossed Jefferson’s magnificent central lawn to join a dispirited group on the balcony of a university official’s home. Sullivan was there, along with her husband, a law professor. Everyone was dumbfounded. Sullivan said she had no warning her job was in jeopardy.

(Article continued below the graphic.)




TOP ROW, FROM LEFT: SABRINA SCHAEFFER/AP; ANDREW SHURTLEFF/CORBIS; DAN ADDISON/UVA; PETER FOLEY/BLOOMBERG NEWS. BOTTOM ROW, FROM LEFT: COLE GEDDY/UVA; DAN ADDISON/UVA; AMANDA GORDON/BLOOMBERG NEWS; JUSTIN LANE/EPA.

Over the course of many drinks, the mood shifted from bafflement to outrage and finally to talk of rebellion. Someone raised the question: Could the board’s decision be overturned? “We went around the group,” Sabato says, “and every single one of us said, ‘Nah, it’s a done deal.’ ”

On this occasion, though, Sabato’s crystal ball was wrong. Over the course of the next two weeks, the slumbering college town of Charlottesville awoke in protests, as students and faculty condemned what they saw as a coup. “This moment of terror came across everyone at UVA,” said one professor, who underscored the point by requesting anonymity. “If they can do it to the president, they can do it to anybody.”

Conspiracy theories abounded: that Sullivan was deposed by a Republican governor, or good ol’ boy alumni, or a cabal of Wall Street donors. Vandals spray-painted the six columns of the school’s neoclassical Rotunda with the letters “G-R-E-E-E-D.” The national news media seized onto the story, which seemed to dramatize a broader conflict between big money and public education. The conservative editorial page of The Wall Street Journal accused the protesting faculty of trying to create “an academic Green Zone separated from economic reality,” while liberal publications held up Sullivan as a symbol of a beleaguered egalitarian ideal.

 

Dec 222012
 

Article image

http://www.nationofchange.org/fda-pushes-release-genetically-modified-salmon-environment-1356193056

(from Nation of Change)

by Anthony Gucciardi

The very genetic coding of the planet is no longer held sacred, according to the United States Food and Drug Administration. The agency is now pushing for the release of genetically modified salmon called ‘frankenfish’ to be unleashed across the globe, threatening the genetic integrity of the entire animal kingdom.

Mutated by scientists to grow twice as fast as a normal salmon through the manipulation of the animal’s genetic code, the genetically modified salmon created by the company AquAdvantage was actually blocked for approval by Congress back in 2011 due to serious health concerns. In the report regarding the ban on the approval of the genetically modified salmon by Huffington Post, it is quite clearly spelled out how the FDA-backed mega company AquaAdvantage only cares about losing investors and profits — not the serious public health concerns.

Health Not a Priority: Genetically Modified Salmon Maker ‘Frustrated‘ Salmon Not Yet Unleashed Due to ‘Loss of Investors’

As the report details, AquaAdvantage head Ron Stotish had this to say about being blocked due to serious health concerns:

“He said, he is frustrated by the delay and has lost investors in his business…”

Poor Ron Stotish! This chief executive has lost investors! Never mind the fact that the GM salmon could proverbially ‘muddy’ the genetic ‘waters’ of nature, or cause unknown health issues in humans. No, that isn’t important. What’s important to Mr. Stotish is the loss of profits. Since 1991, AquaAdvantage pumped in over $67 million to develop this fish, and they are not going to stop fighting until it’s on your dinner plate.

Thankfully, Stotish has the FDA to proclaim how great genetically modified food is as usual. Ignoring the 37 diseases that Roundup is associated with and discounting all of the information linking GMOs to health concerns is ‘scientific’, after all. Even mild critics of the ‘frankenfish’ salmon argue that it could at the very least cause allergies in humans, let alone be unleashed into the wild and disrupt the genetic coding of fish for all future generations.

The genetically modified salmon contains both a gene from the Pacific Chinook salmon that causes the fish to produce growth hormone 24/7, as well as a gene derived from an eel-like fish that triggers the hormone production. This causes the fish to reach around 6.6 pounds instead of the average 2.8 pounds. It also reaches 24 inches instead of 13.

FDA Says GMOs Safe, Natural Foods Dangerous

The fact of the matter is that numerous heads of the FDA have a deep (or even current) history with biotech giants like Monsanto. People like Michael R. Taylor, the current Deputy Commissioner for Foods at the FDA, was actually a Vice President at Monsanto. This is the same man that led an assault and subsequent shutdown of the largest organic peanut butter factory. Meanwhile, tumor-linked GMOs roam free.

And so will this genetically modified salmon unless activism prevails against the FDA and AquaAdvantage.

But in the event that these GM salmon are unleashed, how will you know if you’re eating GM salmon? After all, US citizens eat more than 650 million pounds of salmon each year. As you may have guessed, the FDA says that the genetically modified salmon does not need to labeled as it’s the ‘same’ as regular salmon.

The fact of the matter is that this criminal organization must be stopped before the genetic coding of plants and animals worldwide is irreversibly contaminated. As biotech corporations with billions in funding begin to alter animals after already manipulating 80 plus percent of just about every staple crop, the fight for genetic preservation will continue.

Dec 212012
 

By

Government regulators moved a big step closer on Friday to allowing the first genetically engineered animal — a fast-growing salmon — to enter the nation’s food supply.

The Food and Drug Administration said it had concluded that the salmon would have “no significant impact” on the environment. The agency also said the salmon was “as safe as food from conventional Atlantic salmon.” While the agency’s draft environmental assessment will be open to public comment for 60 days, it seems likely that the salmon will be approved, though that could still be months away.

The environmental assessment is dated May 4. It is unclear why it took until now for it to be released, but supporters of the salmon say they believe it is because the Obama administration was afraid of an unfavorable consumer reaction before the election in November.

Environmental and consumer groups quickly criticized the federal agency’s conclusions.

“The G.E. salmon has no socially redeeming value,” Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the Center for Food Safety, a Washington advocacy group opposed to farm biotechnology, said in a statement. “It’s bad for the consumer, bad for the salmon industry and bad for the environment. F.D.A.’s decision is premature and misguided.”

But the decision was long in coming. AquaBounty Technologies, the company that developed the salmon, has been trying to win approval for more than a decade.

“We’re encouraged by this,” Ronald Stotish, the chief executive of AquaBounty, said on Friday. However, he added, “We’re not so foolish as to be wildly enthusiastic” that Friday’s action will definitely lead to approval. Among other things, some members of Congress have tried to block the agency from approving the fish.

The AquAdvantage salmon, as it is called, is an Atlantic salmon that contains a growth hormone gene from the Chinook salmon and a genetic switch from the ocean pout, an eel-like creature. The switch keeps the gene on so that the salmon produces growth hormone year round, rather than only during warm weather. The fish reach market weight in about 18 months instead of three years.

The F.D.A. tentatively concluded in September 2010 that the salmon would be safe to eat and for the environment. A committee of outside advisers, while finding some shortcomings in the analysis, did not contradict those conclusions in general.

The agency then embarked on a more detailed environmental analysis that has now come to the same conclusions.

The main concern addressed was whether the genetically engineered salmon could escape and establish themselves in the wild, with detrimental environmental consequences. The larger salmon, for instance, could conceivably outcompete wild Atlantic salmon for food or mates.

The agency said the chance this would happen was “extremely remote.” It said the salmon would be raised in inland tanks with multiple barriers to escape. Even if some fish did escape, the nearby bodies of water would be too hot or salty for their survival. And reproduction would be unlikely because the fish would be sterilized, though the sterilization technique is not foolproof.

The agency also said that approval of the salmon would have no effect on endangered species, including wild Atlantic salmon. The National Marine Fisheries Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service did not disagree.

AquaBounty produces its eggs at a facility in Prince Edward Island, Canada. The eggs are shipped to the highlands of Panama, where the fish are grown to market weight.

The federal agency said that other facilities for growing the salmon would require separate approvals. It also noted that it did not assess how the salmon would affect the environment in Panama and Canada, only in the United States.

Opponents said that the agency should do a more complete environmental impact statement. They also said that not enough samples were studied to conclude that the fish would be safe to eat.

Scientists and companies working on animal biotechnology had complained that the failure to approve the salmon was discouraging investment in the industry.

An article in Slate earlier this week said the White House had been delaying release of the environmental assessment for political reasons, violating the Obama administration’s pledge to make decisions based on science. The environmental assessment was released soon afterward.

An agency spokesman declined to comment on the delay. He said it was not possible to predict when a final decision on the salmon would be made.

The F.D.A. is likely to take weeks or months to analyze the comments it receives. Even if it then affirms the conclusions released Friday, that would be a decision that a bigger environmental impact statement is not needed. The agency would still have to take a separate step to approve the salmon for introduction into the food supply, although it is thought there are no other important issues outstanding.

Mr. Stotish of AquaBounty said that if the approval came early next year, some salmon could reach American dinner plates late next year. But quantities would be limited by the small capacity in Panama. AquaBounty hopes to sell eggs to other fish farms that would grow larger quantities of salmon, but that is likely to take a few more years.

AquaBounty has argued that the faster growth of its fish makes it feasible to rear them in inland tanks rather than ocean pens, reducing the environmental impact. “That allows us not to disturb the oceans whatsoever,” said Elliot Entis, the founder of AquaBounty.

Mr. Entis, who no longer works for the company, has formed a new company to rear the salmon in the United States.

AquaBounty, which is based in Maynard, Mass., nearly ran out of money waiting for the salmon to be approved.

Kakha Bendukidze, an investor from the nation of Georgia who owned nearly half the company’s stock, sold his holdings in October to Intrexon, an American company. Intrexon, which is offering to buy the rest of AquaBounty, is providing it with a $500,000 loan.

Intrexon is working on synthetic biology, which is sort of a souped-up form of genetic engineering. It is not clear yet how it plans to apply that technology to AquaBounty’s fish.

Dec 212012
 

Return to Anchor

TITLE:   Ethics Committee.  Ashu Solo discontinued his membership.  Complaint can’t proceed through this route.

 – – – – – – – – –  – – – – – – – – – – – – –

On Dec 8, 2013, at 12:34 PM, “Sandra Finley” wrote:

TO:

– Patricia Farnese in her role of GPC Rep for Sask

– Victor Lau, in his role of leader, GPS

 

A young woman who I do not know contacted me via facebook. She is a dedicated Green, and concerned about Ashu’s role in the Green Parties. I presume she approached me because my association with the Greens in Sask. is known.

More seriously: she submitted email exchanges. My quick interpretation is a case of cyber bullying to the point where the woman is fearful of what Ashu can do to her by what he is posting, including and up to material on a blog – – she says the material Ashu is posting about her is unfounded.

My interpretation of her handling of the situation is that she is intimidated to the point of inaction because she is powerless in the face of the attacks – – afraid that if she takes more steps, Ashu will make it worse for her. (You would have to be savvy with internet technology, and have a whole lot of time to spare, to be able to launch a defence against the attacks.)

In making an initial determination of whether her fears are justified, I did a search on her name: the web presence that has been created is such that everything that comes up is the (false and defaming) statements by Ashu, about her.

IT suggests to me that this is a serious allegation, demanding of our attention and speedy resolution.

There are some steps that should be taken ASAP. I think that control of the Green Party facebook pages should be put into secure hands pending the outcome of investigations.

I invite your input.

Sandra

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

From: Patricia Farnese
Sent: December-08-13 2:06 PM
To: Sandra Finley
Subject: Re: Complaint received, serious, re Ashu Solo

 

If its tonnia Zimmerman, we’ve been in contact. I will be presenting what she sent me to the chair of ethics this week. IPf

Sent from my iPhone

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: December-09-13 10:24 PM
To: Marlene Wells; PatriciaGRN Farnese
Subject: RE: Message sent to Complainant re Ashu Solo

 

Hi Marlene and Patricia,

 

My reply to Tonia may have been unnecessary, in light of fact that Patricia is taking the complaint to Ethics Committee.

Prior to knowing that, I messaged Tonia – – she should be a decision-maker in how (whether) things proceed.

/Sandra

APPENDED

Hi Tonia,

There is no problem maintaining a written record. It is a good way to proceed.

I approach this as a complaint; the Green Party has procedures to follow, which should ensure a fair and just outcome. It is also the best insurance against the thing you have identified: “conversations misrepresented”.

I think my role is to act as a facilitator in this case, to forward the complaint to the right people.

It will not be beneficial to you if I intervene in any other way; I believe that Ashu Solo would claim it as evidence that I have a vendetta against him, which is not true.

If you wish to proceed with a complaint, which I would encourage you to do, I will see that it is put into confidential and competent hands in the Green Party of Canada.

Please advise me whether you wish to proceed. If you do, the documentation should be forwarded as soon as possible, in time for the meeting agenda.

– – — – – – – – – – – – – — – –

From: Larry Waldinger
Sent: December-09-13 11:31 AM
To: Sandra Finley
Subject: Re: Complaint received, serious, re Ashu Solo

Sandra:

I bet you are talking about Tonia Zimmerman. I would tend to believe what Ashu says about her rather than what she has to say about Ashu. Tonia made similar complaints to Patricia Farnese.

I have read literally hundreds of blistering comments online about Ashu coming from so called Christians, so I am not surprised to hear about lies spread about him. I have seen racist comments online from my fellow bus drivers in response to Ashu’s complaint about the Merry Christmas signs on buses. I received my own threat too simply for openly agreeing with Ashu at work. Even though the coverage and backlash I have received is a tiny fraction of what Ashu is receiving I felt very uncomfortable about it.

Here is something Ashu wrote about Tonia recently in an email to Patricia Farnese:

“Tonia Zimmerman is harassing the hell out of me. She was following me
around in different Facebook groups and saying how ugly I am and posting
lies in different news articles about me saying I threatened her and
sent sexual messages to her. The StarPhoenix deleted most of her lies.
Why would I send sexual messages to someone I hate? I’m not a pervert.
If I threatened her, she should go to the cops.”

If it is not Tonia you are talking about, Sandra I would still be skeptical. Many people have spread lies about Ashu, and he has been physically assaulted too. If Ashu is encouraging a critic to report him to the police it would appear that he has nothing to hide.

I did not tell Ashu about this email or your concern over this complaint you received. Perhaps you should forward the complaints you are receiving to the authorities. Supposedly cyber-bullying is taken more seriously now by law enforcement. (It appears that cyber-bullying legislation has been used to strengthen police powers and only give the appearance that the Conservative government cares about the issue.) I don’t think Ashu has any fear of being investigated. I believe he is the victim of bullying.

I just had a look at Tonia’s Facebook page, and here is something she wrote about Ashu on March 15: “Bald? Check. Fat? Check. Virgin? Probably.” That doesn’t sound like the words of an innocent victim.

Regards,

Larry

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: December-09-13 1:13 PM
To: ‘Larry Waldinger’
Subject: RE: Complaint received, serious, re Ashu Solo

 

Thanks Larry.

I think your advice is sound.

I would like to just turn it over to the authorities for them to investigate.

But I think we need to do an initial screening, to determine whether it should be turned over.

Maybe establish a committee of 3 people to look into it, and then make a recommendation?

Anyhow – thanks for your input.

Will look at other input, too and then get back to people.

Sandra

– – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – –

From: Mark Bigland-Pritchard / Low Energy Design Ltd

Sent: December-10-13 6:39 AM

To: Victor Lau; Sandra Finley

Cc: PatriciaGRN Farnese; Marlene Wells; LarryGRN Waldinger; VickiGRN Strelioff

Subject: Re: Complaint received, serious, re Ashu Solo

 

I agree that both Tonia Zimmermann’s allegations against Ashu and Ashu’s counter-allegations need to be thoroughly investigated.

I expect that I will have no further substantive comment until such investigations are complete.

mark

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

From: Vicki Strelioff

Sent: December-10-13 6:01 AM

To: Marlene Wells; Farnese, Patricia; Sandra Finley

Subject: Zimmerman vs Solo Complaint

 

I received a phonecall last night from Ashu regarding his complaint that he is being slandered.

As I have not actually read any of the alleged slanderous emails and posted comments on Facebook and Twitter written by Tonia Zimmerman or Ashu, I don’t have anything on which to judge. As I have a lack of evidence, it is to me just a “He said, she said” argument (unless I see something to the contrary). Therefore, I told Ashu that I don’t know very much about it and I really don’t have any interest in this business as I have my mom and family as my top priority at this time.

I understand that the complaint has been sent to the GPC ethics committee and hopefully we will get some official direction on the matter.

As I have not had time on my computer at home to have Facebook access (as well as not being Facebook savvy), I haven’t looked into taking away Ashu’s access to administering the Facebook page until this matter is resolved (whether temporarily or permanently). I may have some time on Thursday evening or Friday to look into how to do this.

In the meantime, I believe we need to tread very carefully so that both complaints are treated fairly and equally. Is there enough evidence to have either complaint considered “cyberbullying” to hand over to the RCMP to perhaps do a electronic forensic audit to find the evidence that I have been told has been taken down from social media as well as tracing any relevant emails?

For those dealing with this, I appreciate your time in sifting through it and please do keep me in the loop as you can as I do read my emails.

Vicki

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

From: Sandra Finley

Sent: December-10-13 10:30 AM

To: ‘Vicki Strelioff’

Subject: RE: Zimmerman vs Solo Complaint

Noted. Thanks Vicki

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: December-10-13 11:49 AM
To: PatriciaGRN Farnese; Marlene Wells
Subject: FW RE Ashu Solo: the complainant wishes to proceed

 

For your documentation.

 

From: Facebook
Sent: December-10-13 10:20 AM
To: Sandra Finley
Subject: New messages from Tonia Zimmerman

Tonia Zimmerman

9:27am Dec 10

Hello Sandra,

This seems like the wisest course of action. I absolutely want to proceed. Thank you.

Tonia

 

Tonia Zimmerman

9:49am Dec 10

So should I forward the documentation to you? Or is there a form to fill out?

 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

On 2013:12:10 Victor Lau wrote:

Hello Sandra,

These allegations are of quite a serious nature and should be thoroughly investigated.

Please forward to me the contact info of this woman so that I can get in touch with her.

Thank you so much for alerting me to this situation.

 

Sincerely, vic lau.

PS- You mention that the woman who is being threatened is a dedicated Green, is she a federal Green Party member? GPS Member? Or both?

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

On 2013-12-10, at 2:09 PM, “Sandra Finley” wrote:

Hi Victor,

In reply to your questions:

1. The woman prefers that the matter be handled in writing, no phone calls. For two reasons:

– It provides an accurate record of what has been communicated (we all tend to have faulty memories!).

– She feels that her verbal communications at the beginning have been misrepresented.

 

2. I presumed that the woman is a “Green”, supportive federally and provincially. Some of the exchange took place on the GPS (Green Party of Sask) F/B group. I did not ask her the question directly (it is not relevant to the allegation).

 

3. RE your thought should be thoroughly investigated: As it turns out, the ethics committee of the GPC meets this weekend. It is their responsibility to deal with matters such as this one. The committee is arms’ length from the people involved (they don’t know the complainant or the accused).

 

I communicated to the complainant:

the Green Party has procedures to follow, which should ensure a fair and just outcome. It is also the best insurance against the thing you have identified: “conversations misrepresented”.

I think my role is to act as a facilitator in this case, to forward the complaint to the right people.

Please advise me whether you wish to proceed. If you do, the documentation should be forwarded as soon as possible, in time for the (INSERT: ethics) meeting agenda.

UPDATE: The complainant responded this morning (Dec 10): This seems like the wisest course of action. I absolutely want to proceed. Thank you.

 

I have just now forwarded that input (a woman wishes to file a complaint) to the GPC. The committee will not have had time to advise Ashu about the complaint and the process for resolution. The process will afford Ashu ample opportunity to present his view of events, if the committee decision is that sufficient evidence exists to call for further investigation (i.e. the complaint is not frivolous).

In the interests of

– “due process” (a process to achieve fair and just outcome), and

– especially in a situation where the accused has a presence (relationships) locally in the Green Parties,

the matter should proceed more or less as outlined. And the appropriate people will be informed, as the process moves forward.

As always, your (everyone’s) further thoughts are welcome.

Note: I dropped Mark from the “reply to all”, in accordance with his input.

 

Best to all,

Sandra

– – – – – – – – – – –

From: Patricia Farnese

Sent: December-10-13 12:15 PM

To: Sandra Finley

Cc: Victor Lau; Marlene Wells; LarryGRN Waldinger; VickiGRN Strelioff

Subject: Re: Response to Victor re Complaint received, serious, re Ashu Solo

 

Sorry Sandra I omitted you on an earlier email. She is not a GPC member, so our ethics procedures don’t really apply. The ethics committee is not meeting this weekend. Federal Council is meeting. I am going to speak with the chair of the ethics committee to determine how best to proceed and will solicit the advice of the executive director and other federal council members. Pf

Sent from my iPhone

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

On 2013-12-11, at 12:37 AM, “Sandra Finley” wrote:

Patricia – –

Is the question whether Ashu is a GPC member?

Sandra

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

From: Patricia Farnese

Sent: December-11-13 5:01 AM

To: Sandra Finley

Subject: Re: Response to Victor re Complaint received, serious, re Ashu Solo

No. Tonia isn’t

Sent from my iPhone

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

On 2013-12-11, at 11:46 AM, “Sandra Finley” wrote:

What I am questioning:

– Does Tonia’s status in the party (member or non-member) matter?

– The allegations are against Ashu, in his capacity of being a member of the GPC/GPS. Whether disciplinary action is taken would depend on HIS status, not hers??

Sandra

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

From: Patricia Farnese

Sent: December-11-13 11:04 AM

To: Sandra Finley

Subject: Re: I am not questioning Tonia’s status, rather . . .

 

No our ethics procedure covers issues between members and employees. We don’t have a policy that covers a complaint against a member. We do for candidates. That’s why I’m trying to figure out how to proceed.

Sent from my iPhone

– – – – – – – – –  – – – – – –  – – – – – – — – — – –

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: December-11-13 2:31 PM
To: ‘Patricia Farnese’
Cc: Marlene Wells; VickiGRN Strelioff
Subject: RE: PROCEDURE for dealing with the complaint against Ashu Solo

 

Patricia – – would it be helpful to forward the following, in accordance with your suggestion: ?

I am going to speak with the chair of the ethics committee to determine how best to proceed and will solicit the advice of the executive director and other federal council members. Pf

 

Ashu Solo is acting as though he is a legitimate representative of the Green Party, federally and provincially.  The allegations against him are serious.  The matter needs to be dealt with expeditiously.

REQUEST:

  1. A determination whether the complaint is actionable by the ethics committee
  2. If actionable,  at the earliest convenience, notice be sent to Ashu Solo that there is a complaint against him, along with a description of the process that will be followed for resolution.
  3. The same communication be sent to the complainant.
  4. At the earliest possible convenience, the complainant be told a contact person / email address she should communicate through (access to the information she has posted)  (which I have not seen, and do not want to see – – this matter needs to be heard by people who are arms’ length.)

NOTE:  There was a mix-up via which I incorrectly advised the complainant that the ethics committee will meet this weekend.

(See the appended)  I advised her:

the Green Party has procedures to follow, which should ensure a fair and just outcome. 

Sorry to table these matters that are only a drain on our energy and time.

Thank-you for your consideration.

Sandra Finley

 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

From: Patricia Farnese

Sent: December-11-13 4:46 PM

To: Sandra Finley

Subject: Re: I am not questioning Tonia’s status, rather . . .

Sorry. Are you dealing with this or am I? I don’t care either way, but think we shouldn’t be duplicating out efforts.

Sent from my iPhone

– – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – –

On 2013-12-11, at 7:20 PM, “Sandra Finley” wrote:

I am happy to have you dealing with it, Patricia.

When I responded to this person (INSERT: Tonia Zimmerman), I did not know that you had been involved.

Are you connected with her on facebook? If not, how about if I draw my involvement to a close, through a message that goes to you both via F/b?

Sandra

 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

From: Patricia Farnese

Sent: December-12-13 3:15 AM

To: Sandra Finley

Subject: Re: I am not questioning Tonia’s status, rather . . .

Sounds good.

Sent from my iPhone

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

From: Sandra Finley

Sent: December-12-13 12:42 PM

To: ‘Patricia Farnese’

Subject: RE: FYI Ashu

 

This is just FYI, Patricia.

My reading of Ashu’s actions yesterday and today: he is scared of what will come out of a fair hearing process.

I am not responding to anything I receive from him.

Larry phoned yesterday to ask if he could give my phone number to Ashu (Ashu asked him for it). I told Larry “no”.

Today Ashu sent the predictable email of threats to me.

Sandra

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

On 2013-12-17, at 9:31 PM,

Thanks Patricia,

I will follow through and contact ethics. Thanks for the direction.

I see where Ashu is now claiming that he is no longer a member of the �gpc.

Sandra

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:21:43 -0600

From: Patricia Farnese

Reply-To: Patricia Farnese

Subject: Re: Ashu

To: Sandra Finley

I have confirmed he is no longer a member of the GPC. I’d just ignore him. There is not much we can do at this point. Pf

Sent from my iPhone

  Return to Anchor

Dec 212012
 

Return to Anchor

TITLE:   Here’s what to expect if Ashu Solo attacks you

Based on my personal experience.

But exactly the same tactics, and in many cases the same wording, are used by Ashu Solo in his assaults on other people.   See, for example,     John Gormley     email exchange with Ashu Solo.

So, what to expect ?!  ….

CREATES THE ILLUSION THAT THERE’S A BATTLE BETWEEN YOU AND HIM

HOW? . . .

through a relentless stream of communications, mostly all from him.

You don’t have to participate.  But others who receive the messages, probably glance at them, are left with the impression that there is a battle of personalities going on.

Social media users refer to it as:  FLAMING

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flaming_(Internet)

Flaming, also known as bashing, is hostile and insulting interaction between Internet users, often involving the use of profanity.

Flaming usually occurs in the social context of an Internet forum, … , by e-mail, ….

Deliberate flaming, as opposed to flaming as a result of emotional discussions, is carried out by individuals known as flamers, who are specifically motivated to incite flaming. These users specialize in flaming and target specific aspects of a controversial conversation.   . . . 

EXAMPLES FROM MY EXPERIENCE

    • The relentless stream   (there’s something around a hundred emails from Ashu)
    • Creation of the illusion
      • AND WHAT REALLY SHOWS YOU’RE A SLIMEBAG IS . . .
      • Subject: Get a Life      All you try to do is cause trouble.  . . .
      • Sandra Finley, stop harassing me and spreading lies about me. I   won’t tolerate your bullying.

As mentioned, the reality is that I did not send any communications to Ashu Solo.

Ask him to produce EVEN ONE example of the harassment, lies and bullying that he claims.

He provides a fairly accurate description of himself, through his accusations of what OTHER people are doing.

 

CREATES THE ILLUSION THAT HE KNOWS THE LAW AND HOW TO USE IT.  INTIMIDATION TACTIC.

John Gormley , a lawyer by training,  said it succintly:

I am tiring of your incessant bullying of anyone with whom you disagree, from your misunderstanding of civil litigation to even trying to intimidate me with your fictional story about Zellers.

Gormley had information from Zimmerman and two other women.  He also had this from the emails sent to him by Ashu Solo:

Once I win my civil claim against the guy in the U.S. spreading lies about our conference, we will send out a media advisory on that and I want you to retweet that and Rawlco to report it. Then I probably won’t sue you and Rawlco Radio.

EXAMPLES FROM MY EXPERIENCE

Again, there are many.

Scroll down through   December 18   for examples related to the “demand letter” he likes to use.

There’s this from December 12:

I am preparing civil claims for $1 million against Zimmerman and you.  Don’t think that you can get away with making libelous statements against me because I’m not a lawyer.  I’m smarter than any lawyer.  When I get a judgment against you in court, the deputy sheriff will seize any assets and property that you own.  Cease and desist lying about me or it will increase the amount of judgment that I get against you.

There’s his Complaint to the Saskatoon Police against myself and also against Daeran Gall, also threatened against others.

And so on.  Many to choose from.

BOLD-FACED LIES, I DON’T KNOW WHERE HE GETS THEM FROM!

Lies, manufactured on demand:

Ashu has to discredit you.

1.    This not-serious example is a funny curiosity to me:

I am not “twice-divorced”, as Ashu has circulated.  It is a statement that he thinks degrades me.  Doesn’t have to be true.  Just has to be degrading.  (But never mind if I DID happen to be twice-divorced.)

His attacks on women lead me to wonder    . . .  There is a very good TED Talk (January 2014)  about the changed-from-the-tenth-century Muslim relationship to sexuality.   Even if Ashu is not of Muslim background, you may find it interesting and worthwhile:

Shereen El Feki: A little-told tale of sex and sensuality. TED Talk

2.   I am coming to a serious example of manufactured lies, but here’s another small one first.

Ashu calims that I refused to let a fellow (Tory McGregor) run as a candidate simply because Tory was a member of the military. And ipso facto, my dislike of the military is the reason I am opposed to Ashu.

Fact: in order for any member of the military to run for public office, they have to obtain a letter from their Commanding Officer that grants them permission to run.

As a first step, I explained the requirement to Tory McGregor, in plenty of time for him to obtain the letter.  He never did get the letter, and so no, he was not able to seek the candidacy.  That was Tory’s doing, not mine.

Ashu has a consistent pattern.

3.      Here is one example of a lie, manufactured by Ashu to create an alibi.  This one is serious.

The setting:  But WHY did Ashu come after me as he did, at the Airport at 6:00 o’clock in the morning, December 28th?  There’s a reason.

Which leads to    another lie   (January 11th).

This lie, that he came to the Airport to give me a “demand letter”:

He DID email me his “demand letter”, but that was on December 18,  as mentioned above.

4.      When Ashu became afraid that the John Gormley information might be in my hands,  another line of attack was along the line of how “creepy” it was for me to be collecting information . . .

Earlier it had been how deranged I was to have been collecting information on him, his conferences, military connections, and business associations back in August.

Both generated many assault emails.

FACT:  Ashu Solo wanted to run for public office (Green Party candidate).   It is routine for political parties to conduct background checks on potential candidates.   See the private conversation  Ashu Solo: The vetting .

 

You now have a small sampling of what to expect if Ashu Solo comes after you.

In the case of Tonia Zimmerman,  the attacks have been on-going for more than a year.

AND his tactics included the use of two blogs dedicated to creating a false reputation – – see   (LINK NEEDED)

WHAT IS THE BEST WAY TO HANDLE AN ATTACK BY ASHU SOLO?

(put this on a separate page, linked.  SAme one as at bottom of ANCHOR.)

Return to Anchor