Sandra Finley

Dec 152012
 

Return to Anchor

 

See also:   Complaints to the Police re Ashu Solo   (a collection of actual complaints.  No evidence that the Police did anything more than talk to Ashu.)

 

TITLE:  The Police can’t help

January 9th & 10th:

1.  Zimmerman:

I learned the hard way that harassment through social media is not taken seriously by local police, so I’m really not worried about it.  I went to the police with all of the harassment that Solo has thrown at me, and they said there’s no way to prove it was really Ashu Solo who said and did these things.  (Even tracking IPs is dicey now, given all the IP rerouting software there is online–which is why before I deleted my social media accounts, I would routinely use HotSpot Shield, so that Solo would be unable to triangulate my home address).

 

2.  Conversation with Gormley’s producer, Bryn.  

We discussed the matter of the Police (Ashu’s laying of complaint against me).  I phoned the Police to give them my contact information.  I really want them to be able to track me down, if they are investigating the complaint.

Bryn:  In the end, the Police will not deal with the complaints about Ashu.

 

3.  I was contacted by Saskatoon City Police in late winter 2014.  I gave them the password to this on-line documentation regarding the cyber-bullying by Ashu.

 

4.  I told the jailer woman about this character we are dealing with.  Invited her opinion.  She started with what Tonia identified:  the justice system (police) won’t be able to do anything about it.   I suspect that Ashu knows that, too.   He tries to scare people by threatening to go to the Police.

Return to Anchor

Dec 142012
 

Return to Anchor

TITLE:  Ashu and the Omnipotence factor, the Jailer Woman

I spoke with a woman who worked for 25 years in the jail system.  Asked her what she had learned about human beings from those 25 years.   Early in her response she referred to ones who, even in their incarceration, have this attitude of “omnipotence”.

It seems to me that is an element at play here.  Ashu thinks he can’t be taken down, in spite of all his lies and bullying.  He thinks that we are powerless against him.

I told the jailer woman about this character we are dealing with.  Invited her opinion.   She started with:  the justice system (police) won’t be able to do anything about it.

I think Ashu knows that.

But the community is creative.

 

 Return to Anchor

Dec 142012
 
TITLE:  DECEMBER 16, 2013; 07:29:17 PM    (“trailblazer” in current use)
DECEMBER 16, 2013; 07:29:17 PM    My email keeps bouncing I believe. 
(Re Ashu’s CV & business associations. Note that he uses the Trail Blazers email address, which indicates currency.)

Subject:Response to Daeran/Sandra

From”Ashu M. G Solo” amgsolo@trailblazerintsys.com

Subject:  Response to Daeran/Sandra

Sent date:   12/16/2013 07:29:17 PM

To:  DaeranGall;  Sandra Finley; Victor Lau; Larry Waldinger; Patricia Farnese; Kaitlyn Harvey; Vicki Strelioff;  Marlene Wells;  Mark Bigland-Pritchard / Low Energy Design Ltd;  amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us

 

My email keeps bouncing I believe, so I’m resending this. Sorry if you received this multiple times.

http://toniazimmerman.wordpress.com/ What the hell is this? I see an empty blog.  . . .  (remainder is same as in following email thread …. )

Dec 142012
 

Return to Anchor

TITLE:  Light in the darkness

 

Last nite I started reading The Self Illusion.   Not far enuf into it yet – but it’s about what is being discovered about the human mind through modern neuro-science.

This morning I was doing an errand; a book came into hand:  PostSecret.  (There’s a blog on it – – I haven’t gone to it yet.)

The preface to the book is very interesting, related to The Self Illusion in the therapeutic context.

We are at a loss for explanations of some human behavior.  Or, the alternative explanation falls into the re-incarnation- karma field, as the retired School Superintendent mused.

Between the two books, I am thinking that modern science and art may be pointing in another direction.

As mentioned before, I think it is important that we, as a community of people, figure out ways to deal with destructive forces.

A light shines in the distance:  maybe “removal” isn’t the only answer.  Perhaps Ashu will find his way toward that light.  And use his talents to help build our understanding of an alternative.  If he wants.

At a later date I hope to return to this posting, able to elaborate on the content of the two books, The Self Illusion and PostSecret.

Return to Anchor

Dec 142012
 

Return to Anchor

December 8th –  I forwarded the complaint from Tonia Zimmerman

January 9th – I added my own complaint after almost a month of  disparaging emails from Ashu, and then his tracking me down at the Airport at 6:00 – 6:30 AM on December 28th.

 

THE SECOND COMPLAINT:

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: January-09-14 8:00 PM
To: VictorGRN Lau; PatriciaGRN Farnese
Cc: Valerie Finley; Marlene Wells
Subject: Further to the complaint I sent to you on December 8, re Ashu Solo

TO:

  • Patricia Farnese in her role of GPC Rep for Sask
  • Victor Lau, in his role of leader, GPS

 

Dear Victor and Patricia,

 

As you know, the complaint process of the GPC was not engaged regarding the complaint I submitted on behalf of Tonia Zimmerman, on December 8th because Ashu Solo discontinued membership in the GPC.

 

I am submitting this further information to you in case at some time, his membership in the GPC is renewed.

And also because Ashu’s participation in the GPS needs to be dealt with.

 

I am now adding my own complaint to Tonia’s:

My Mother asked (again!) today if I had done anything regarding Ashu’s actions on December 28th.  She continues to feel badly that, when awakened by a 5:30 AM phone call, she gave him the time of my departure from Saskatoon, from which he showed up at the airport, making unfounded accusations.

The long and short of it:

–          He telephoned senior citizens in Saskatoon and in Luseland at 5:00 o’clock in the morning, one of them my Mother who is 85 years old.

–          At that hour of the morning people are alarmed that something bad has happened to a family member.

–          He then lied about who was calling (gave a false name – “Mike from the Green Party”).

–          And proceeded to the Airport in Saskatoon to make false allegations against me.  This was when I was leaving Saskatoon, standing in the line-up with my daughter, between 6:00 and 6:30 AM.

–          He left the Airport when the Westjet attendant started to call Airport Security.

 

Ashu would have obtained the day of my departure from Larry.

 

But he didn’t know the flight time.  He phoned people with a “Finley” surname in Saskatoon, I do not know how many, saying he needed my phone number.

 

One helpful senior relative, awakened, advised Ashu to phone my Mother in Luseland, told him that she would know my phone number.

 

Awakened from sleep, still half-asleep, Ashu asked her,  “At what time does Sandra’s flight leave?”.  She replied that she didn’t know, but she knew I was going to arrive at the airport around 6:00 AM.  Becoming more awake, she asked, “Who is this?”.   Ashu at first declined to give his name.   Later, when pressed further, he said “Mike, from the Green Party”.

 

At the Airport, people in the vicinity of Kelly and I in the line-up, of course witnessed  Ashu’s actions.  One gentleman said he would remove Ashu out the door. I said I should call the police or the security people.  Ashu left the terminal when a Westjet attendant stepped in and started to call Security.

 

He came to the airport (6:00 to 6:30 am) as described, and made accusations, “You gave my Father’s name to Tonia Zimmerman”. I replied, “I don’t know what you are talking about.”  Which I didn’t.  I have not given Ashu’s father’s name to Tonia Zimmerman.  (But I now know how it came to her, if that matters – it’s not hard to find his Father’s name.  All you have to do is to google Ashu Solo and name changes (there are two).)

 

He repeated the accusation, later moving to another theme – – “You lied. You do not have a copy of the exchanges between me and Tonia Zimmerman”.   Which in fact I do have (but which I did not have and didn’t know about on Dec 28):  I replied, “I do not make statements that are not true”.

 

I discovered on December 31st that it was John Gormley who gave Ashu’s Father’s name to Tonia Zimmerman (actually, I am not clear on that specific point – she may have found it herself).   What Gormley DEFINITELY did:  he provided information to Zimmerman so that she could defend herself against Ashu’s attacks, should they resume after Gormley sent an email to Ashu, telling him that if he heard of another attack on Zimmerman, or on two other women, Gormley would have a member of the Military on his show who would testify that the military titles Ashu claims are fictional – –  they don’t exist.  John also threatened exposure of an assault made by Ashu (I believe it happened when Ashu was much younger).  He sent the email thread to Tonia, with Ashu’s accusations and insults against Gormley and the culmination – – Gormley’s threat to expose Ashu.    The thread is in the period Nov 29 to Dec 04.  I communicated with Gormley and his staff for the purpose of authentication;  the email thread IS from John Gormley.

 

Ashu turned off his attack on Zimmerman after Gormley’s intervention (Dec 4);  he later turned it on myself and then on Daeran Gall – – anyone who stands up to him.

 

It was Tonia who phoned Ashu’s Father, to implore him to talk some sense into Ashu, make him stop the onslaught.   Which might be why the attacks on her were renewed by Ashu after Christmas, and why he came after me at the airport.

 

Zimmerman’s story checks out.  My experience with Ashu Solo is a repeat performance.   In my case he has not put up blogs that disparage me.  A little hard to do because I have an existing web presence that would help override what he might put up.

 

His innocent assertion, “All I see is an empty blog” (other people are putting up the disparaging Zimmerman blog, claiming it’s him) are easily refuted, especially since he put the blogs back up after Christmas with the renewed attacks on Zimmerman.   There is a November Archive on the blog – it’s easy to see that he put it up, then took it down (“all I see is an empty blog”) and then put it back up after Christmas.  I did screen-capture.

 

Should you desire further proof, for example of the email assault on me,  I have a complete file.  I started counting – there are well over a hundred in the period December 10 to January 3rd.    False allegations, lies, threats, name-calling.

 

If he was innocent, he would have welcomed an arms’ length investigation by the GPC regarding the Zimmerman complaint.   Zimmerman was ready to proceed, without hesitation.  And she put the documentation related to Ashu up on a password-protected blog of her own, immediately, in preparation for the investigation that did not happen because Ashu would not participate.

 

I was told by the Gormley people that Ashu is relentless in his emails to Saskatoon media.  They are exasperated.

 

He is giving the Green Party a bad name, in addition to putting people in fear for their safety.  If you live in Saskatoon, if you say anything that questions him, if he gets your phone number and your address, you will worry.

 

Please add this complaint to your file, for action in the case of possible membership renewal by Ashu Solo.

 

I also request that this be tabled at an Executive Meeting of the GPS for assessment and action.

 

Thank-you for your consideration.

 

Sandra Finley

 

 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =  =

 

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: December-08-13 10:35 AM
To: PatriciaGRN Farnese; VictorGRN Lau
Cc: Marlene Wells; LarryGRN Waldinger; MarkGRN Bigland-Pritchard; VickiGRN Strelioff
Subject: Complaint received, serious, re Ashu Solo

 

TO:

–          Patricia Farnese in her role of GPC Rep for Sask

–          Victor Lau, in his role of leader, GPS

 

 

A young woman who I do not know contacted me via facebook.  She is a dedicated Green, and concerned about Ashu’s role in the Green Parties.  I presume she approached me because my association with the Greens in Sask. is known.

 

More seriously:    she submitted email exchanges.  My quick interpretation  is a case of cyber bullying to the point where the woman is fearful of what Ashu can do to her by what he is posting, including and up to material on a blog – – she says the material Ashu is posting about her is unfounded.

 

My interpretation of her handling of the situation is that she is intimidated to the point of inaction because she is powerless in the face of the attacks – – afraid that if she takes more steps, Ashu will make it worse for her.  (You would have to be savvy with internet technology, and have a whole lot of time to spare, to be able to launch a defence against the attacks.)

 

In making an initial determination of whether her fears are justified, I did a search on her name:  the web presence that has been created is such that everything that comes up is the (false and defaming) statements by Ashu, about her.

 

IT suggests to me that this is a serious allegation, demanding of our attention and speedy resolution.

 

There are some steps that should be taken ASAP.  I think that control of the Green Party facebook pages should be put into secure hands pending the outcome of investigations.

 

I invite your input.

 

Sandra

Return to Anchor

Dec 142012
 

Return to Anchor, or

Return to The list of EMAILS SENT BY ASHU SOLO

 

TITLE:  January 11 2014, 2:16 PM;  Ashu concocts a lie about the Airport.  He knows how to work “she said” / “he said”.

 

In follow-up to Ashu Solo tracking me down at the Airport at 6:00 – 6:30 AM on December 28th,

I submitted  Complaint #2 against him on January 9th.  It included an excerpt from the John Gormley email to him.

By January 11th Ashu knew that the complaint had been laid.  He responded with a lie:

 

JANUARY 11th:

From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us] Sent: January-11-14 2:16 PM

To: Sandra Finley

Subject: Airport

I heard you’re pretending that I didn’t serve  you with the attached demand letter at the airport.  You obviously want to deny having been served and instead pretend that I was there to harm you, which is ridiculous.

Ashu Demand Letter Jan 11

= = = = = = =  = =  = = = = = =

If Ashu had wanted to present me with another demand letter, he would have emailed me another demand letter right after the Airport incident.   (Scroll down through January 18   –  He DID send me his “demand letter”, but much earlier than December 28 when he came to the airport.)

It’s pretty obvious to me that once he was advised about January 9th Complaint #2, he needed a lie about the Airport, to try and get off the hook.

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Sandra Finley wrote:

So sorry this is dragging on this way, and still eating up everyone’s time.

As with every other email from Ashu, I did not respond.

He knows how to put people in a “she said”, “he said” dilemma, creating doubt in the minds of others.

I heard you’re pretending that I didn’t serve  you with the attached demand letter at the airport.  You obviously want to deny having been served and instead pretend that I was there to harm you, which is ridiculous.

There was no demand letter, or even mention of one, at the airport.   I reported what happened.  But, my word against his.  Doesn’t matter – – there’s plenty of other material by which he condemns himself.

(Still blows me away that he can just make these utterly untrue statements;  the guy is devoid of conscience.)

= = = = = = = = = = = =

On 2014:01:12 19:13, Sandra Finley wrote:

We are dealing with a destructive force, on top of all the wasted time.

Let’s keep our cool.  And take careful steps.

Don’t underestimate Ashu’s ability to lie straight in people’s face.

He MAKES UP lies, easily and routinely.

You are then relatively powerless, EXCEPT in relation to people who know how he operates.

Which is not a lot of people.

Use this example:

Did Lynn say to Ashu, as Ashu has stated, to “shut up and leave”?

No, but how does someone who wasn’t there, know?  … Are YOU, if you weren’t near the vicinity going to phone Lynn to check it out?

I am in the same situation with his statement asking why I didn’t disclose that he gave me a “demand letter” at the airport.   The seed of doubt is planted  – – and I have no witnesses.

Do you then defend yourself?    Which only gets things going again.

Rest assured – – if Ashu is being conciliatory and is willing to meet  – – it’s because he intends to use it to his advantage.   It will NOT be because he is actually interested in changing his ways.

He can (will) turn things back on you,  even if you don’t give him ONE THING to work with.  He will simply say that you said XYZ.   He does not have a conscience.

Unfortunately, this is what happens – – – we start arguing amongst ourselves, as a consequence of the destructor.

So, let calm prevail.

Return to Anchor, or

Return to The list of EMAILS SENT BY ASHU SOLO

Dec 132012
 

Return to Anchor

(The stream of emails Ashu sent in the hours leading up to his confrontation of me at the Airport, see   http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=11427.)

 

December-28-13  Ashu came to the Airport 

Ashu came to the Airport between 6:00 and 6:30 am, when I was departing Saskatoon with my daughter.   People adjacent to me in the line-up heard the exchange, Ashu making allegations.

One gentleman said he would remove Ashu out the door.  I said I would need to call the police or the security people.

A Westjet attendant stepped forward, taking control of the situation and saying “I am calling Security.”  She started to dial.  Ashu left the terminal.   This was on December 28th.

(On January 9th I laid Complaint #2 , regarding Ashu’s actions.

On January 11 Ashu concocted    a lie    about the Airport. He knows how to work “she said” / “he said”.)

 

But back to the Airport:

Sequence of events  (I found out some of this later): Ashu phoned people with the surname “Finley” in Saskatoon at 5:00 – 5:30 AM today.  He wanted my phone number.   One of the people he reached is the cousin of my Father, a man in his late seventies with an unwell wife.   At 5 o’clock in the morning people think there is an emergency.

He told Ashu that my Mother (in her mid-eighties) in rural Sask would have my phone number.  Ashu phoned her around 5:30 am and asked when I was leaving Saskatoon.  She told him my departure time, before figuring out who he was and what was going on.

In the beginning he did not/would not provide a name.

Later, when pressed he said he was “Mike” from the Green Party.

He came to the airport (6:00 to 6:30 am) and made accusations,   “You gave my Father’s name to Tonia Zimmnerman”.   I replied, “I don’t know what you are talking about.”

He repeated the accusation, later moving to (words to effect, a theme repeated from the email exchanges)  – – you lied.  You do not have a copy of the (exchanges between Ashu and Tonia Zimmerman).   I replied that I do not make statements which are not true.

People in the line-up near my daughter and me were, of course, watching and listening.

As mentioned, a man stepped forward saying, words to effect: “I’ll show this guy the door (of the Terminal)”.

I replied that I needed to call the Police or Security.  A Westjet attendant then stepped forward, taking control of the situation and saying, “I am calling Security“.  She started to dial.  Ashu left.

Ashu called my Mother again, around 10:00 AM.   She declined to provide my phone number to him, and asked whether there was a message she could pass along to me.  He replied along the lines,  Tell Sandra to stop spreading lies about me.

– – – – – – – – –

This is in the same time-frame as the renewed attacks against Tonia Zimmerman.

It appears that the possibility that his Father’s name will emerge is a real button-pusher for Ashu.   It was the first thing out his mouth.  The accusations at the airport and the messages today demonstrate a kind of panic that that is what has happened.

The other serious threat to him appears to be that Tonia Zimmerman disclosed material he authored, to me.    Calling people at 5:00 in the morning, coming to the Airport at 6:00 – 6:30 to make allegations of which I could make no sense, is extreme.

 

NOTE:  At the time of writing, I did not have the information to understand more specifically WHY Ashu was desperate to the point of tracking me down at the Airport.   See:   There’s a reason.

 Return to Anchor

Dec 132012
 

Return to Anchor, or

Return to The list of EMAILS SENT BY ASHU SOLO

TITLE:  Ashu Solo, emails sent December 19 – 22

 

These emails follow the sequence listed at: THE EMAILS SENT BY ASHU SOLO

 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

 

December 20, 2013 12:57 AM Was it worth picking

 

From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]

Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 12:57 AM

To: Sandra Finley

Cc: Daeran Gall

Subject: RE: Demand Letter for Sandra Finley

 

Was it worth picking a fight with me? You never seem to learn. Other people might take your harassment, bullying, and lies, but I don’t. I lawfully, ethically, morally, and truthfully fight back. This civil claim should teach you a lesson you need to learn.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

 

December 21, 2013 9:00 / 7:00 AM If either of you make

 

From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]

Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 9:00 AM

To: Sandra Finley; Daeran Gall

Subject: GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT

If either of you make any libelous statements about me again to an ethics committee or anyone else, I will add that to my civil claim against you, get more damages from my civil claim against you, and vigorously defend myself.

Defending myself involves lawfully, ethically, and truthfully attacking you.

Get a new pastime, Finley, instead of repeatedly causing trouble. Now you’ve caused trouble with the wrong person, so you’re about to be sued for a helluva lot of money. It’s more important for you to worry about how you’re gonna afford to take care of yourself and your daughter after paying damages to me than it is for you to try to cause more damages for me. Get your priorities straight.

—–Original Message—–

(thread containing the emails of December 20, 2013 12:57 AM and December 18, 2013 11:57 PM)

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =  = = = =

 

December-21-13 11:48 AM YOU’VE BOTH RUINED

 

From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]
Sent: December-21-13 11:48 AM
To: Sandra Finley; Daeran Gall
Subject: FW: THESE 10 EMAILS CONTAIN MY DETAILED RESPONSE TO SANDRA’S LIES.

YOU’VE BOTH RUINED YOUR REPUTATIONS BY MAKING LIBELOUS STATEMENTS.

THE 10 EMAILS BELOW CONTAIN MY DETAILED RESPONSE TO SANDRA’S LIES.

(the emails appended is the thread going back to Dec 8)

 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

 

December 22, 2013 4:12 AM YOU TWO ARE REALLY

 

From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]

Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2013 4:12 AM

To: Sandra Finley

Subject: RE: GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT

YOU TWO ARE REALLY A COUPLE OF SLIMEBAGS. IT’S SO FRICKIN’ OBVIOUS THAT ZIMMERMAN IS LYING, BUT YOU SPREAD HER LIES TO EVERYONE YOU COULD. YOU SPREAD LIES ABOUT VICTOR. YOU SAID HE’D GET DIVORCED IF HE BECAME LEADER.

YOU’RE THE ONE WHO IS TWICE DIVORCED BECAUSE YOU’RE A SLIMEBAG. LOOK IN THE MIRROR.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = =  = = = = = = = =  ==

 

December 22, 2013 4:14 AM THE SHERIFF IS

 

From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]

Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2013 4:14 AM

To: Sandra Finley

Subject: RE: RE: GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT

THE SHERIFF IS GONNA SEIZE YOUR HOUSE AND CAR AFTER I FINISH SUING YOU.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

 

December-22-13 12:43 PM   AND WHAT REALLY SHOWS

 

From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us] Sent: December-22-13 12:43 PM To: Sandra Finley Subject: RE: RE: RE: GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT

AND WHAT REALLY SHOWS YOU’RE A SLIMEBAG IS YOU’RE STILL FACEBOOK FRIENDS WITH ZIMMERMAN AFTER I TOLD YOU SHE’S SPREADING MALICIOUS LIES ABOUT ME AND AFTER I POINTED OUT THAT SHE STILL HAS SO MANY OBVIOUS LIES ABOUT ME ON HER FACEBOOK TIMELINE. I GUESS YOU AND ZIMMERMAN ARE TWO PEAS IN A POD WHEN IT COMES TO SPREADING LIES ABOUT PEOPLE.

= = = = = = = =  = = = = = = = = = = =

 

December 22, 2013 2:58 PM  I DON’T KNOW HOW

 

From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]

Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2013 2:58 PM

To: Sandra Finley    Subject: AUDACITY

I DON’T KNOW HOW YOU TWO COULD HAVE THE AUDACITY OR STUPIDITY TO SEND PEOPLE AN EMAIL SUGGESTING THAT I STARTED HARASSING ZIMMERMAN. LOOK AT HER FRICKIN’ TIMELINE FOR SAKE. IT MAKES IT CLEAR SHE’S BEEN HARASSING ME FOR A YEAR. WHY THE HELL WOULD I START HARASSING A BRAINLESS LOSER AND CONSERVATIVE RELIGIOUS BIGOT I DON’T EVEN KNOW. GRAB A BRAIN.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

 

December-22-13 10:35 PM WITH OTHER PEOPLE

 

From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]

Sent: December-22-13 10:35 PM

To: Sandra Finley

Subject: RE: AUDACITY

WITH OTHER PEOPLE, YOU MIGHT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO PLAY THESE GAMES OF SPREADING LIES ABOUT PEOPLE AND USING UNDERHANDED TACTICS AGAINST PEOPLE. I KNOW ALL ABOUT HOW YOU’VE DONE THIS AGAINST MANY PEOPLE. BUT I’M NOT LIKE OTHER PEOPLE. I DON’T TOLERATE THAT. I LAWFULLY, ETHICALLY, AND TRUTHFULLY ATTACK BACK.

Return to Anchor, or

Return to The list of EMAILS SENT BY ASHU SOLO

Dec 132012
 

Supporters of Bradley Manning

Supporters of Bradley Manning protest during his scheduled motion hearing, outside the gates of Fort Meade, Maryland. Photograph: Jose Luis Magana/Reuters

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/13/bradley-manning-wikileaks-whistleblower

History will judge harshly the US military’s mistreatment of the alleged WikiLeaks whistleblower, who turns 25 this week

Pfc Bradley Manning was finally allowed to speak publicly, in his own defense, in a preliminary hearing of his court martial.   (INSERT:  a news report of the hearing is at  2012-12-11  Bradley Manning: pre-trial hearing ends as case goes to military judge.  The Guardian)   Manning is the alleged source of the largest intelligence leak in US history. He was an intelligence analyst in the US army, with top secret clearance, deployed in Iraq. In April 2010, the whistleblower website WikiLeaks released a US military video of an Apache helicopter in Baghdad killing a dozen civilians below, including two Reuters employees, a videographer and his driver.

One month after the video was released, Manning was arrested in Iraq, charged with leaking the video and hundreds of thousands more documents. Thus began his ordeal of cruel, degrading imprisonment in solitary confinement that many claim was torture, from his detention in Kuwait to months in the military brig in Quantico, Virginia. Facing global condemnation, the US military transferred Manning to less abusive detention at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

As he now faces 22 counts in a court martial that could land him in prison for the rest of his life, his lawyer argued in court that the case should be thrown out, based on his unlawful pre-trial punishment.

Veteran constitutional attorney Michael Ratner was in the courtroom at Fort Meade, Maryland, that day Manning took the stand. He described the scene:

“It was one of the most dramatic courtroom scenes I’ve ever been in … When Bradley opened his mouth, he was not nervous. The testimony was incredibly moving, an emotional rollercoaster for all of us, but particularly, obviously, for Bradley and what he went through. But it was so horrible what happened to him over a two-year period. He described it in great detail in a way that was articulate, smart, self-aware.”

Ratner said Manning described being kept in a cage in Kuwait:

“There were two cages. He said they were like animal cages. They were in a tent alone, just these two cages, side by side. One of them had whatever possessions he may have had; one of them, he was in, with a little bed for a rack and a toilet, dark, in this cage for almost two months.”

Ratner quoted Manning from his testimony, recalling his words:

“For me, I stopped keeping track. I didn’t know whether night was day or day was night. And my world became very, very small. It became these cages.”

Ratner added: “It almost destroyed him.”

After Kuwait, Manning was shipped to a brig in Quantico. Manning’s civilian defense attorney, David Coombs, said earlier this month:

“Brad’s treatment at Quantico will forever be etched, I believe, in our nation’s history, as a disgraceful moment in time. Not only was it stupid and counterproductive. It was criminal.”

The United Nations special rapporteur on torture, Juan Mendez, attempted to visit Manning, but then refused when the military said it could surveil and record the visit. He reported:

“Solitary confinement is a harsh measure which may cause serious psychological and physiological adverse effects on individuals regardless of their specific conditions.”

Manning’s cruel treatment was described by officials as necessary, as he was a suicide risk. Yet navy Capt William Hocter, a forensic psychiatrist at Quantico, said he was no such risk, but was ignored. Hocter testified:

“I had been a senior medical officer for 24 years at the time, and I had never experienced anything like this. It was clear to me they had made up their mind on a certain cause of action, and my recommendations had no impact.”

This first phase of the court martial, which Coombs calls “the unlawful pretrial punishment motion phase”, considered a defense motion to throw out the entire case. While that is unlikely, observers say, the defense asked, as an alternative, that the court consider crediting Manning with 10 days’ reduction from any eventual sentence for each day he spent suffering cruel and degrading punishment in Kuwait and Quantico, which could, in theory, trim six years from his prison time.

Bradley Manning is charged with releasing the WikiLeaks trove of documents, which included the Baghdad massacre video, two separate, massive tranches of documents relating to US military records from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and, perhaps most importantly, the huge release of more than 250,000 US State Department cables, dubbed “Cablegate”. In an August 2010 assessment, then Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said the document release “has not revealed any sensitive intelligence sources and methods compromised by the disclosure.”

Manning has offered to plead guilty to releasing the documents, but not to the more serious charges of espionage or aiding the enemy.

Manning turns 25, in prison, 17 December, which is also the second anniversary of the day a young Tunisian set himself on fire in protest of his country’s corrupt government, sparking the Arab Spring.

A year ago, as Time magazine named the protester as the “Person of the Year”, legendary Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg offered praise that rings true today: “The Time magazine cover gives protester, an anonymous protester, as ‘Person of the Year,’ but it is possible to put a face and a name to that picture of ‘Person of the Year.’ And the American face I would put on that is Private Bradley Manning.”

• Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.

© 2012 Amy Goodman; distributed by King Features Syndicate

Dec 132012
 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/11/bradley-manning-military-suicide-watch

After two weeks of revelatory testimony, prosecution concedes some treatment soldier faced at Quantico was overly rigorous

Ed Pilkington in New York

Manning has been accused of ‘aiding the enemy’ by passing hundreds of thousands of confidential US documents to WikiLeaks.

The epic courtroom battle between the WikiLeaks suspect Bradley Manning and the US government over his alleged pre-trial punishment has drawn to a close, with the soldier’s lawyer accusing the military of treating him like a zoo animal and the prosecution countering that in its view he was entitled to have just seven days removed from any eventual sentence.

The two-week hearing at Fort Meade, Maryland, lasted far longer than intended and turned into a dramatic spectacle in which Manning effectively turned his court-martial on its head and put the US military on trial. In his closing argument, the soldier’s main civilian lawyer, David Coombs, said that the most amazing element of his nine-month solitary confinement under suicide-prevention restrictions at the marine brig in Quantico, Virginia, was that his spirit had remained unbroken.

“Being watched or viewed almost as a zoo animal for that period of time has to weigh on somebody’s psyche,” Coombs told the court.

Over 10 days of intense legal proceedings, lasting for up to eight hours every day, a clear picture emerged within the courtroom of how Manning, 24, had been trapped in a Kafkaesque paradox. Whatever he did – or didn’t do – was taken by his military captors as proof of his suicidal tendencies.

The court heard from psychiatrists who had reported virtually every week that Manning was in good mental health and no risk to himself. Yet every week they were overruled by military officers at the brig.

Manning was made to strip naked at night and to stand to attention in the nude in front of his military superiors at morning call. For weeks he was held in his 8×6 ft cell for 23 hours and 40 minutes every day.

In his summing up, Coombs suggested that the military had been more concerned to protect itself from media criticism than it was about following its own guidelines and treating Manning properly. “They were more concerned with how it would look if something happened to Pfc Manning than they were about whether Pfc Manning was actually at risk. Their approach was: ‘Let’s not have anything happen on our watch. Let’s not let anything happen that’s going to make us look bad.'”

Coombs added that correct military procedures had suffered a “complete breakdown … All logic by anyone who could affect change for Pfc Manning was checked at the door.”

Manning has been charged with “aiding the enemy” – in effect al-Qaida – by passing hundreds of thousands of confidential US documents to the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks. He has effectively admitted passing government information to the site but has not accepted that by doing so he acted as a traitor.

In its closing argument, the US government made some concession to the defence claim that he was subjected to overly rigorous suicide-prevention controls. It conceded that the inmate should have been taken off suicide watch – the most stringent regime possible – more swiftly, in line with the advice from brig psychiatrists.

But the prosecutors only accepted that Manning had been subjected to seven days of unwarranted suicide watch, and called the judge to award a 1:1 reduction in the soldier’s eventual sentence. That would mean that Manning would be entitled to just seven days of credit in recognition of what he went through in Quantico, a reduction that would come off a maximum possible sentence of life in custody with no chance of parole.

The offer outraged Manning supporters. Nathan Fuller of the Bradley Manning support network, tweeted: “So the U.S. government argues that Bradley Manning should be sentenced to the rest of his life in prison…minus seven days.”

Manning supporters were also outraged by a comment made in closing argument by Major Ashden Fein, the chief government prosecutor. “When brig officials saw someone who was not like others, they tried to figure it out to the best of their abilities on a daily basis.”

In earlier testimony the court, the judge has heard that at the time he transferred government information to WikiLeaks Manning was struggling with deep emotional conflicts including his desire to have gender re-alignment.

The burden of proof lies with the US government to show that the maximum security status and suicide-prevention measures it imposed throughout the nine months in Quantico were justified. The unprecedented length of time Manning spent in solitary confinement supposedly because he was a risk to himself prompted the UN rapporteur on torture to denounce it as a form of torture.

The judge presiding over Manning’s court-martial, Colonel Denise Lind, now has a mountain of transcripts and admitted evidence to wade through before she can issue her ruling on the defence motion. The earliest she is likely to do so would be in the next pre-trial hearing scheduled for 8 January.