Sandra Finley

Jun 032012
 
    Two excellent videos:

  1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dhFWprsFqs Casseroles night in Montreal, May 30.
  2. http://vimeo.com/42848523 This video of Casseroles in Montreal, in black-and-white, May 24 gets rave reviews.
(I’m set up wrong somehow – the 2nd video accesses in frustrating short, interrupted blocks.  Most people have no problem viewing it.)
Jun 032012
 

Article image

Last Saturday saw the kickoff of Occupy Wall Street’s Summer Disobedience School (OWSDS), described in its “Curriculum” as a “twelve-week training program that will empower us to map, target, and disrupt sites of capitalist injustice across the city with a wide range of creative tactics accessible to people with all levels of experience.” The program, developed by the Direct Action Working Group, is divided into four three-week quarters, with each quarter taking a different city park as a staging-ground: Bryant Park, Central Park, Washington Square Park and, ultimately, Liberty Plaza. While focused primarily on tactical training, OWSDS is also a long-term strategic platform for the summer in advance of the one-year anniversary of OWS on September 17 — a date that is already looming large in the imagination of the movement under the sign of “Black Monday.”

The inaugural proceedings last Saturday at Bryant Park showed a theatrical display of school spirit. Around 60 Occupiers — observed at a cautious distance by a dozen or so police officers — gathered in a semicircle, and a large banner resembling a chalkboard was unfurled to create an impromptu stage. To the sound of Alice Cooper’s “School’s Out,” a troupe of flag-bearing cheerleaders popped out from behind the banner, performing a kind of pep rally that concluded with the cry, “School is now in session!” and a “Pledge of Disobedience” spoken through the people’s mic that appropriated the ritual cadence and democratic claims of its patriotic source-text:

We pledge disobedienceto the power of Wall Streetand the government of the 1 percentOne NoMany YesesAnother world is possiblewith liberty and justice for all.

This was followed by brief orientation remarks by a headmasterly Amin Husain. Citing the core principles of OWSDS — education, empowerment, imagination, action — Husain emphasized the importance of creating space for everyone to “step up” in the planning and execution of direct actions, rather than relying on the same familiar faces to lead.

Next up, a group of facilitators ran through several “invisible theater” scenarios for disrupting business as usual in a bank lobby — ranging from slowdowns with the teller, to a group “melting” into a die-in on the floor, to going “civilian” by instantly snapping out of collective activity and disappearing as individuals into the normal flow of urban life.

The latter tactic was critical to the next step of the OWSDS program at Bryant Park. The large assembled group broke into four action-teams consisting of 15 to 20 people, with each team responsible for filling necessary roles like scouting, communications, flyering and documentation. But there was a twist: The precise location of the targets for the actions were not revealed to the teams until the very last moment, and, rather than approach the targets with a raucous march that would draw an immediate confrontation with police, the teams were to make their way in civilian mode to their targets, where they would re-converge for the planned disruption.

 

One action, for instance, was at a branch of Wells Fargo, a major recipient of bailout money and a key investor in the private prison industry. Protesters gathered there one by one, with a few police officers unsuccessfully attempting to follow them as they made their circuitous way to the target; around a dozen went inside and began to speak loudly on their cellphones about the illegitimate practices of the company, gradually escalating into a disruptive cacophony, while others moved the lobby furniture around the space. Meanwhile, some members of the team documented the action, while around 10 more picketed and flyered outside. Employees and customers of the bank were variously curious and flummoxed, and before any confrontation could take place or police could be called to the scene, the exercise was over. 

Twenty minutes later, all the action groups made their way in civilian mode to Times Square; there, marking a first for Occupy Wall Street, demonstrators were able to position themselves on the steps of the red amphitheater, where they unfurled banners and performed “The People’s Alarm,” a reiteration of the People’s Gong, but addressed to specific site of Times Square (which they called the “Fantasy Factory of Wall Street.”) From Times Square, the entire group marched together back to Bryant Park, where a debriefing was held and the planning process for the subsequent week was handed off to a new, self-selecting group of volunteers with varying levels of experience. Participating in the meeting — but stepping back considerably — were the organizers from the previous week. As the debriefing and planning meeting unfolded, a primary principle of OWSDS became clear: The success of these introductory training exercises would be judged not so much on whether they achieved any immediately measurable political result but, rather, on how effectively people were able to plug into the overall process of learning, organizing and confidence-building.

While the action-planning group met, Occupy University held two classes (“Poetry and Political Feeling,” “Radical Economics”), and the National Lawyers Guild facilitated a know-your-rights training. All in all, by late afternoon, around 200 occupiers had gently taken over the corner of the Bryant Park lawn in a total of four simultaneous assemblies, with many others casually mingling and lounging among other users of the park.

Festive displays, small-scale disruptions, temporary pop-up classrooms in recreational spaces — from this account, OWSDS might sound surprisingly “soft” for a movement that a month ago was calling for citywide general strike. But OWSDS speaks to the core radicalism of the movement with its emphasis on empowerment, skill-sharing and horizontal pedagogy. A major challenge of OWSDS will be to remain accessible with a wide spectrum of entry points, while nonetheless fostering an ethos of militant courage. Indeed, students are encouraged to develop “personal escalation calendars” tracking their progress in over the course of the summer.

Citing a quotation from Henry David Thoreau — “Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty” — the educational rubric of OWSDS echoes the rich history of activist counter-institutions such as Freedom Schools of the 1960s and the Boot Camps of the Ruckus Society. Most immediately, though, the Summer Disobedience School is an extension of the movement’s own weekly Spring Training exercises in the financial district during the build-up to May Day.

Spring Training had a dual function. It both provided a set of tactics capable of being replicated in concrete actions, while also providing to its participants an embodied cultural narrative of being nonviolent warriors in the coming spring offensive. Just as that offensive culminated in May Day, the Summer Disobedience School looks toward September 17 as its “Graduation.”

The emphasis that the OWSDS Curriculum places on empowering small action teams is a response to the relative dearth of disruptive actions on May Day, despite the care that went into zoning out the city into “red” (likely risking arrest) and “green” action areas in concert with coalition partners. Direct Action member Sandra Nurse notes that the movement as a whole is still undergoing a learning process: “If we want to have thousands of people doing smaller actions that create a larger disruption, we need to build that culture,” she says. “Ideally, every single person should show up to a mobilization and feel empowered to do an action, train others for an action or facilitate an action team. We need base lines of communication, a common framework, a simple platform from which we can leap.”

Influenced by the example of ACT UP affinity groups, OWSDS organizers envision its small-scale model spreading to fill the whole city. “Just a few folks acting with precision can blockade an intersection, shut down a bank, even occupy a building,” explains Direct Action member Mark Adams. “Imagine that scaled up to entire sectors of the city.”

The lessons of May Day will likely be major points of reference as OWS begins the planning process for September 17. Organizers are anxious not to let institutional coalition partners pull Occupiers’ energy away from more radical disruptions. But while there can be real tensions between affinity-group actions and broad-based, May Day-like coalitions with other organizations, they are not mutually exclusive. OWSDS could function as a platform for developing new creative tactics for people in existing campaigns wishing to move into more disruptive territory than usual — perhaps building on the connections forged around the 99 Picket Lines project, for example.

In what was perhaps a strategic move to protect September 17 from being preemptively branded by Occupy’s allies on the institutional left, a short but dramatic call went out in mid-May for all Occupys to converge on New York for a “Black Monday” shut-down of the financial and commercial hubs of Manhattan. This is a task well-suited to OWSDS, given its geographical diversification beyond the Financial District, based on the recognition that “Wall Street is everywhere.” The name “Black Monday” strikes a dark note of crisis and uncertainty, yet it is also compelling in its deliberate emptiness, its sense of an imaginary void waiting to be filled by an unforeseeable diversity of actions and voices.

Whoever or whatever it involves — debt-slavery is well-poised to become a major connective issue between students and other sectors, for instance — Black Monday will be above all an occasion to celebrate the revolutionary crack in the system that the movement has effected, and the other worlds that it is in the process of building through the principles embodied by the Summer Disobedience School. Seen in this light, Black Monday is less an all-or-nothing messianic endgame than just one more in an ongoing series of teachable moments. In these, any opposition between means and ends, tactics and strategy, and internal culture and outward-facing movement-building breaks down, creating a continuous fabric of education and liberation.

Get Email Alerts from NationofChange




ABOUT Yates McKee

Yates McKee is an art critic working in Occupy Wall Street; his work has appeared in venues including October, The Nation and Tidal: Occupy Theory, Occupy Strategy.





Top Stories

1 comments on “OWS ‘Summer Disobedience School’ Prepares for Black Monday”

Rebel with a Cause

June 03, 2012 2:22pm

Makes me want to go back to school! 😉

Jun 032012
 

Somehow we have to help more Canadians “get it”.

Talk to our neighbours.   Understand WHY Canadians are protesting – get out and help them.

This brief note drives the point home.

 

BY ELIZABETH MAY

It always struck me as a bit odd, from when I first heard it heralded in the 2011 Speech from the Throne, that Canada was to have a major celebration for the 200th anniversary of the War of 1812. It got more intriguing when the detail was unveiled that we were to spend $28 million in such celebrations, in a year when the budget was described as working toward deficit reduction. Many commentators have noticed Stephen Harper’s tendency to wrap himself in the flag – to adopt a jingoism and patriotic voice more often associated with a southern accent.

I am very comfortable with language about valuing Canada. I love Canada. No doubt about it. I consider myself a patriot. In fact, ever since receiving the honour of being made an Officer of the Order of Canada, I have taken the words of “O Canada” very seriously indeed. “We stand on guard for thee” is personal. And I tend to see it in terms of standing on guard for wilderness and ecosystems and future generations, which means standing on guard for environmental science and laws and policy.

But not until the details of 420 pages of C-38 came to light did I realize that Stephen Harper is doing something extraordinary for the 200th Anniversary of the War of 1812. That flag he has wrapped himself in is a white flag. He is surrendering.

How else to explain that 200 years after protecting the sovereignty of the land that is now Canada and ensuring it was not subsumed by our southern neighbour, we are passing legislation to allow US law enforcement agents onto Canadian territory to enforce US laws. What would Laura Secord have made of that plot? Had she discovered it with her wandering cow, would she have turned Stephen Harper in?

http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/elizabeth-may/2012/06/war-1812-and-surrender-2012

May 312012
 

Franke James’ work gives me such a high, I think I must be on drugs!

Try this:   What is Harper Afraid of?

– – – – – – – – –  – – – – – – –

When I read that Harper put a stop to Franke’s European tour last year, I was going to phone her to verify – I thought it could not be true.

I went to her blog instead.  It IS true and unsettling . . .  But!  Franke simply capitalized on it, in a Wow! sort-of-way.

Click on the video at http://www.frankejames.com/debate/?p=9033 (About getting on Harper’s Blacklist)

– – – – – – – – –  – – – – – – –

Note:

  • Our first contact with Franke James:   2008-09-30 Dear Prime Minister, Will our children inherit a Canada where polar bears can only be found on Toonies?
  • See also: 2008-09-22 Dear Prime Minister: Why are you making us choose between the economy and the environment?

P.S.   It is REALLY important that Canadians know what’s going on!  If you can forward Franke’s work to others, please do.  Thanks.  /S

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

I called Franke just because I couldn’t contain my exuberance, generated by her creativity.  She was out, so I conveyed my congratulations to and through her husband.

They are releasing a youtube, hopefully tomorrow (June 1) with Franke’s voice and music to accompany “What is Harper Afraid of?” (as I  understand).

Check back here:  I’ll add it to this post.

Over and out!

Sandra

May 302012
 

(For a listing of the Assange postings, click on  Julian Assange, Wikileaks, and scroll down.)

 

Is there a bigger “David versus Goliath” story than

  • Julian Assange (Wikileaks)  versus
  • the American military-industrial-congressional complex?!

What a cliff-hanger, and for democracy!

May 30, 2012:  The UK Supreme Court says . .  oops! see  Assange gets surprise chance to fight another day

= = = = = = = = = = = = =  = = = = = = = = = = =

Amy Goodman says (Democracy Now, 2011 interview with Julian Assange (Wikileaks) and Slavoj Žižek):

“ Information is a matter of life and death. We’ve learned that through these remarkable trove of documents (INSERT: documents leaked through Wikileaks) that have been released in the last year. The Iraq War Logs, the Afghanistan War Logs, and what’s been called Cablegate, the U.S. State Department documents that are continuing to be released.   Why does it matter so much? . . . “

Why DOES it matter so much?  – –  For Assange’s understanding of the political world:  click on  WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange & Philosopher Slavoj Žižek, interview by Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. It’s worth your time – it’s there in transcript, or in video (Amy Goodman handles Žižek’s mannerisms with aplomb!).

Assange asserts that freedom of speech is not the jewel, so much as the freedom to communicate our ideas with each other.

He talks about the importance of an accurate societal record of what’s happening, a driving force for him.

Slavoj Žižek introduces the idea of “public reason”, the independent space of communication and debate.  I think of it in relation to our ability to make intelligent decisions for the society in which we live.  If public reason is not carried out in an independent space (free of undue influence), we will make lousy decisions, or lousy decisions will be made for us!

 

But again, Why does it matter? . . .

What if no one knew, because the mainstream media did not do a good job of recording “what’s happening”?  Try these two examples:

  1. 2012-05-11 Historic judgment: (Charge #2)  Bush & Associates found Guilty of torture, Kuala Lumpur.

Would some people act differently if they didn’t know that even a former U.S. President will be held accountable for war crimes?

It’s not only the small players like Bosnian Serb general, Ratko Mladic, or al-Bashir from Sudan, or a general from Sierra Leone that will be put on trial.  It is also George Bush and his pals, eventually.

What if we didn’t know WHO is doing it?

One of the major forces behind the efforts to bring Bush and Company to justice is “part of an initiative by former Malaysian premier Mahathir Mohamad” who stated simply

“Unlawful use of force threatens the world to return to a state of lawlessness.

The acts of the accused (INSERT:  Bush and Co.) were unlawful.”

It’s a group of international people, with leadership in Kuala Lumpur, who decided that they had to play their part to defend justice for all.  Their position is well documented:   2012-05-11 Historic judgment: (Charge #2)  Bush & Associates found Guilty of torture, Kuala Lumpur.

Actually, there’s a long list of people working to ensure the arrest of Bush – see Arrest George Bush. Rule of Law essential to democracy.

Another point made in the Amy Goodman interview with Assange and Žižek:  the ordinariness of people who just decide to do something.

 

2.    Click on this  short video:  Julia Bacha: Pay attention to nonviolence (from TED.com – Ideas worth spreading)

“. . I believe that what’s mostly missing for non-violence to grow is not for Palestinians to START adopting non-violence, but for us to start paying attention to those who already are . . “.

(I relate this to Julian Assange’s statement of society’s need to record and communicate what is happening in the real world.  If we don’t know . . . !)

Slavoj Žižek in the interview with Goodman says:

(the “he” referred to is Sgt Bradley Manning who is alleged to have leaked the documents to Wikileaks),

“ . . There are many examples that I know of ordinary people who are not anything special, they are not saints. But all of a sudden, they see something, like probably he, if he is the one, saw all these documents, and something told him, “Sorry, I will not be pushed more. I have to do something here.”

This is so precious today, because it also goes against a note which is in a way true, but it’s exploited by our enemies, this idea ideology today is cynical, people are totally duped, and so on. No, they are not. I prefer her to play a little bit of simple moralism.

From time to time, there are ethical miracles. There are people who still care, and so on and so on. This is very important because, you know, like, let’s not leave this domain of a care for simple, dignified, ethical acts to agencies like Catholic Church and so on. Who are they to talk about it? We . . . should rehabilitate this-I know it doesn’t sound very postmodern or cynical-this idea that there are out there quite ordinary guys, nothing special, but who all of a sudden, as if in a miracle, do something wonderful. That’s almost, I would say, our only hope today.”

Julia Bacha is a quite ordinary guy (maybe!) who did something wonderful!  What if the villagers’ story wasn’t told in their communities?

= = = = = = = =  = = = = = = = = = = = ==

The two examples (there are tonnes of others) find Canadians looking at Malaysia and Palestine.  Maybe our stereotypes are challenged, because “what’s happening” hasn’t been communicated to us.

TURN THE TABLES:

What are Malayians and Palestinians being told about what’s going on in Canada?

Indeed, what are we being told about what’s going on in Canada?   . . .

I want to join the Occupy “Walk on Ottawa” that left Vancouver Island on May 1st, following the Trans Canada Highway.  I want to help get people out to walk for a while with them.  When I checked last week they had gotten as far as Osoyoos, expecting to get to Regina by end of June.  I’ll get an update out later.

I think there’s lots of really good stuff going on in Canada.  We just have to communicate it!  Democracy Now!

May 302012
 

Assange is a citizen of Australia.  He has been fighting extradiction to Sweden from the U.K.

The last paragraphs of the article below provide reason why Assange believes if he ends up in Sweden, the Swedes will simply hand him over to the Americans to face charges of espionage.

The article is from the Christian Science Monitor, a reasonably good account, as far as mainstream media reporting goes.

I would add:

  • Actual CHARGES by the Swedish Government against Assange have never been laid, not in the time since December 2010 when Assange was taken into custody in the U.K.
  • Assange is to be extradited in order to be INVESTIGATED for charges of sexual assault.
  • I can’t swear to authenticity, but the report is consistent with CIA behaviour:  See item Number 5 titled  ASSANGE ACCUSER WORKED WITH US-FUNDED, CIA-TIED ANTI-CASTRO GROUP,  in the posting  2010-12-14 Why I’m posting bail money for Julian Assange, Michael Moore, and other updates on Assange case.
  • You may remember:  earlier, the UK Court set bail at 240,000 pounds ($378,480) (http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=50).  But celebrities like Michael Moore put up bail money.  Assange was then released into the hands of a wealthy supporter in the U.K., has a curfew and wears an electronic tracking device on his ankle – he is under “house arrest”.

I wonder if what has happened to Sgt Bradley Manning (terrible) in U.S. prisons, would have happened to Julian Assange, had good people not promptly paid the bail money?

  • What is not said in mainstream reports:  and rats!  I’ve lost the URL.  As I understand, the UK Supreme Court normally distributes decisions with a bit of lead-time in order for the lawyers to prepare their response.  In the Assange case, they waited until 8:30 am on the set day (May 30) to release the decision.

Ms Rose, Assange’s lawyer, had to respond to the judgment on the fly.  She picked out that the judgment significantly relied on law that had not been presented at trial.

This is the Supreme Court of the land.  If anyone should know, they should know that the Court is not supposed to do that.  Rose called them on it, and that’s how  “Assange gets surprise chance to fight another day”.  The Court gave Rose the opportunity to re-open the case, to wipe the egg off their face, I would say.

Background information on Assange and some reports on what was actually leaked:

  • From our network, click on  Julian Assange, Wikileaks OR
  • Click on the article below –  there are embedded links in it, to more information.

 

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2012/0530/Assange-gets-surprise-chance-to-fight-another-day-video

Julian Assange’s lawyer won a two-week reprieve to review today’s decision by Britain’s Supreme Court to deport the WikiLeaks boss to Sweden.

Britain’s Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that Wikileaks founder Julian Assange should be deported to Sweden to face questioning on sex-crime allegations, but Mr. Assange’s lawyer then won a surprise 14-day reprieve that has sent the legal fight into uncharted territory.

Assange shot to international notoriety in 2010 when his website published hundreds of thousands of classified US documents, including sensitive diplomatic cables. As he rose in prominence that year, two Swedish women alleged he sexually molested them. Swedish authorities want to question Assange, who maintains the sex was consensual and alleges the allegations are politically motivated.

In a 5-2 decision, the British court dealt a blow to Assange’s nearly two-year legal effort to stave off extradition to Sweden. But after the verdict was delivered, Assange’s lawyer Dinah Rose asked for two weeks to review the decision, arguing that it hinged on a legal point not addressed by either side in a February court hearing.

The court granted the unusual request, giving Assange’s team the chance to apply to reopen the case. Such a turn of events has only occurred once before at the top of the British court system, and for different reasons, meaning the effort to move Assange to Sweden just got more uncertain and protracted.

Uncharted legal waters

“We’ve never been here before. In a sense we are all guessing,” says Carl Gardner, a British legal expert in London who blogs at HeadofLegal.com. “It could be that this is shut down relatively quickly… [but] there’s potential for this to spiral.”

Assange’s team is now expected to file an application within two weeks to reopen the case. What the court would do with the application is uncertain.

Today’s ruling indicated that at least three judges viewed as decisive a legal point from the 1969 Vienna convention on the law of treaties – a point the lawyers did not have a chance to debate in an earlier hearing, writes legal analyst Joshua Rozenberg in the Guardian. “[G]iven two weeks to prepare her case, Rose could well come up with other arguments. In the meantime, Assange can stay in the UK,” writes Mr. Rozenberg, summing up that “he lives to fight another day.”

The quickest resolution, says Mr. Gardner, would be for the Supreme Court to reopen the case, hear the arguments on the Vienna convention, and then decide it made no difference. “That would probably take a few weeks.”

Extradition still likely

In that case, Assange still has two other appeal options, neither of which are likely to halt his extradition to Sweden, says Gardner.

In Sweden, Assange could face prosecution and eventual imprisonment. His supporters have expressed concern that the US would try to extradite him from Sweden.

“WikiLeaks is under serious threat,” read a statement from WikiLeaks. “The US, UK, Swedish and Australian governments are engaging in a coordinated effort to extradite its editor in chief Julian Assange to the United States, to face espionage charges for journalistic activities.”

The US government has not publicly tipped its hand about any plans to request Assange’s extradition from England or Sweden. But a diplomatic cable from Australia’s embassy in Washington obtained by the Sydney Morning Herald reportedly said that “a broad range of possible charges are under consideration, including espionage and conspiracy.”

A confidential email obtained by WikiLeaks from the Texas-based intelligence firm Stratfor indicated that the US has a sealed indictment on Assange.

But Gardner sees no advantage in the US waiting for Assange to reach Sweden before trying to extradite him. He notes that under the European arrest warrant system, if Britain hands over Assange to Sweden he cannot then be moved elsewhere without British consent.

“Actually sending him to Sweden creates an extra block on sending him to America that doesn’t exist here [in England],” says Gardner.

= = = = = = = = =

WHAT ARE THEY SAYING IN THE AUSTRALIAN PRESS?

Video of newscast from Australia:   http://video.theaustralian.com.au/2240768906/Court-to-revisit-Assange-appeal-lawyer

= = = = = = =  = ==  = == = = =

What’s behind Assange’s current legal battle?

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2012/0202/Extradition-fight-Who-is-Julian-Assange-why-is-Sweden-seeking-him/What-is-behind-Assange-s-current-legal-battle

EXCERPT:

The legal battle taking place in London is over whether or not a public prosecutor, as opposed to a judicial authority, is legally permitted to sign arrest warrants as laid out in the Extradition Act of 2003, legislation that applies to European warrants.

Assange was arrested by British police on a European warrant issued by Sweden in Dec. 2010. He was granted bail in London, but the court’s decision was appealed by Swedish prosecutors. London’s High Court heard the appeal and again granted Assange bail. However, in November 2011, Britian’s High Court decided Assange should be extradited to Sweden, a ruling Assange is appealing in British court today.

There are currently no legal charges against Assange in the US related to his role in publishing hundreds of thousands of pages of State Department cables and US military reports via WikiLeaks. However, a federal grand jury in Virginia has been collecting evidence against Assange and his associates for months, and the US Justice Department has been investigating Assange’s work as well, reports Reuters.

May 302012
 

Bowling for Columbine [Part 3 of 12]  (10 minutes)   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=865Onxt9H2M

I remember leaving the theatre shaking my head.  No one should be surprised by the massacre of students at Columbine High School in 1999.  Michael Moore does a very good job of showing the conditioning to violence in the American culture.   In this excerpt he focuses on Lockheed Martin.

  • There is a detailed description of the movie on wikipedia:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowling_for_Columbine
  • A shorter description, Written by rAjOo (gunwanti@hotmail.com):  Filmmaker Michael Moore sets out to explore the reasons behind the massacre of 12 students and a teacher at Columbine High School on April 20, 1999. He documents how two students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, easily acquired four firearms, despite having a history of arrests, juvenile detention, counseling sessions, and drug dependencies. He documents how the U.S. has ended up as a country with the highest number of gun-related killings on Earth. With interviews with people like Charlton Heston, former President of the National Rifle Association, who lives in a fortified mansion, Moore shows how easy it is to acquire guns and munitions – with examples of a bank giving a free gun just for opening a bank account, and of one particular municipality that makes gun-ownership mandatory. Moore then links the involvement of the U.S. with tyrants and terrorists such as Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden for its own narrow gains – resulting in the deaths of millions of civilians from 1953 through to 2001 – and its refusal to review and change it’s now notorious ‘Foreign Policy’. (gunwanti@hotmail.com)
May 282012
 

Click on short video:  http://www.ted.com/talks/julia_bacha.html

Thanks to TED – Ideas worth spreading.

Julia Bacha:  “. .  I believe that what’s mostly missing for non-violence to grow is not for Palestinians to START adopting non-violence, but for us to start paying attention to those who already are . . “.  (I relate this to Julian Assange’s statement of need to record and communicate what is happening in the real world (as compared with the mainstream media construction.)

Julia Bacha, an ordinary person if there is such a being,  does an outstanding job!

May 272012
 
By Agence France-Presse
Friday, May 4, 2012 21:00 EDT

F-22 Raptors via Wikimedia Commons

WASHINGTON — Two F-22 pilots say they have stopped flying the US Air Force’s most advanced fighter jet because of safety fears over the aircraft’s oxygen system, according to a CBS television “60 Minutes” report.

The F-22 Raptor was grounded last year after a spate of incidents with pilots suffering dizzy spells and blackouts in the air. The plane was cleared for flying in September 2011 but engineers are still trying to solve what appears to be a problem with the jet’s oxygen supply.

The pilots, Major Jeremy Gordon and Captain Josh Wilson, told the “60 Minutes” program they stopped flying in January, citing safety concerns over a lack of oxygen.

Asked if he believes the jet is safe, Gordon said: “I’m not comfortable answering that question. I’m not comfortable flying in the F-22 right now,” according to excerpts from the interview, due to be aired on Sunday.

“The onset of (hypoxia) is insidious. Some pilots will go the entire mission, land and not know anything went wrong,” Gordon is quoted as saying.

The two pilots, who both served in the Iraq war, have sought legal protection as “whistleblowers” from a Republican lawmaker from Illinois, Adam Kinzinger.

The pilots were from the Air National Guard, officials said.

The airmen’s dismay over safety will add to the controversy surrounding the aircraft, as some lawmakers and analysts have long questioned the costly plane’s value.

The Air Force declined to comment on the television report but a spokesman said it views safety as a top priority.

“While the F-22 program has encountered challenges, the Air Force remains committed not only to their resolution but also to unparalleled dedication to flight safety,” Lieutenant Colonel John Dorrian told AFP.

After the plane was grounded in May last year, a scientific inquiry could not trace the problem to an engineering fault, he said.

But the Air Force has taken precautions, including adjusting a backup system, “to minimize crew risk,” he said.

The F-22 jet, the most expensive warplane ever built by the Pentagon, is designed mainly for dogfights against rival fighters. The radar-evading planes were never used in the NATO-led air campaign over Libya or the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Air Force has more than 160 F-22 Raptors in its fleet and plans to build a total of 187.

Copyright © 2012 AFP. All rights reserved.

U.S. Air Force photo/Tech. Sgt. Ben Bloker [Public domain], via Wikimedia CommonsAgence France-Presse