Sandra Finley

Oct 202011
 

(From Blake)

A bit of a background brief on who Vancouver Lawyer Gail Davidson is, and what we are protesting today in Surrey. Gail is the co-founder of the group Lawyers Against the War. She has been pursuing the bringing to justice in Canada, of the accused war criminals in the Bush administration, and doing so within parameters of our existing laws & treaty obligations since 2003.

Since that time the accumulation of evidence of war crimes, and specifically torture, including that of Canadians in places like Abu Graib, Guantanamo, and at ‘black sites’ leaves little doubt both written & on video, including major TV news networks, and now published by way of admissions in the memoirs of both Bush & Cheney, that they approved illegal methods of interrogation.

 Since 2009, when George Bush was first admitted to Canada on speaking engagements, Gail has been tirelessly writing letters citing the responsibilities of the Canadian government & the RCMP to act by enforcing our laws under the Immigration Act, Article 35.1, which demand that they be denied entry, or that an admissibility hearing be ordered and that he be detained.  Our various international treaty obligations i.e. the Geneva Conventions on Torture, the Rome Statute (International Criminal Court) and others require that we either refuse entry, or arrest, detain, and either open an investigation into the many registered allegations, or extradite them to jurisdictions that agree to. The US does not qualify, and extradition there is not permitted.

 Gail has been informed recently that the RCMP, as a matter of policy, will only arrest suspected war criminals who are residing within Canada, and that any exceptions are decided by a committee of RCMP brass & politicians. Ultimately the order for the RCMP to act comes from the Attorney General of Canada, Robert Nicholson. This ‘policy’ is in direct violation of our laws, and contravenes our international treaty obligations as ratified in Canada’s parliament.

 On Sept. 23rd NDP Immigration Critic MP Don Davies released a letter to the press in his official capacity challenging Minister of Immigration Jason Kenney to act to bar Dick Cheney as required by the Immigration Act, in a press conference hosted by Gail, Derrick O’Keefe of stopwar.ca, and myself representing the World Federalist Movement – Canada. Since that historic moment the world press has been very attentive, and many other organizations including the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Amnesty International, and human Rights Watch have produced their own dossiers of evidence against Bush, Cheney & others. 

There are dozens of organizations around the world demanding that these men be brought to justice, and the efforts of Gail and her group Lawyers Against the War are well know. Today, several esteemed organizations are supporting four individuals who allege they were tortured during George W. Bush’s tenure as President of the United States, and will lodge a private prosecution in Provincial Court in Surrey. This is in reaction to the Canadian Government’s ongoing illegal provision of safe haven to these accused war criminals.

 For today’s visit to Canada of George W. Bush, the Canadian Border Services have been advised that a suspected war criminal will be attempting entry, the RCMP have been reminded of their duty to arrest him, and of their duty to protect the rights of citizens to protest peacefully. Gail Davison is going to Surrey in advance of the arrival of Bush & Clinton to speak at the Surrey Regional Economic Summit at the Sheraton Hotel, to speak to the RCMP at the Surrey detachment, for the purpose of making a public demand that Canada’s  laws be followed today.

 There is worry among organizers that peaceful protesters could be arrested, and their rights to protest restricted. Of course there are those who would insist that aggression is acceptable in the face of the RCMP’s refusal to arrest Bush, and we hope that the protest will not get out of hand.

World Federalist Movement,  Lawyers Against the War,   Other cool affiliations

Oct 202011
 

http://www.thestarphoenix.com/news/Census+opponent+appeals+conviction/5577944/story.html

Census opponent appeals conviction 

The StarPhoenix October 20, 2011
 

A 61-year-old Saskatoon woman is asking a Queen’s Bench judge to overturn her conviction for refusing to fill out Statistics Canada’s formerly-mandatory long form census in 2006.

Justice Dan Konkin reserved his decision on Sandra Finley’s appeal until an unspecified later date after hearing arguments Wednesday from her lawyer and two federal Crown prosecutors.

A provincial court judge granted Finley an absolute discharge – allowing her to avoid any penalty or criminal record – earlier this year, after convicting her of failing to comply with the census.

Finley was charged before a policy change by the federal government last summer made completion of the long-form census voluntary rather than mandatory, removing the threat of criminal prosecution, fines and jail for failure to answer personal questions.

At her trial last year, and again during her appeal hearing, defence lawyer Steven Sieferling argued the census violated Finley’s constitutional right to privacy.

Finley has said her refusal to complete the census was a form of protest against the federal government conducting business with a Canadian subsidiary of U.S.-based Lockheed Martin, a massive defence contractor, aerospace manufacturer and technology company.

“I will have done more harm than good if the judge’s ‘guilty’ decision is allowed to stand,” she wrote in a statement sent to media outlets before Wednesday’s hearing.

“I see this as part of the Occupy movement that will bring an end to governments/universities that serve the corporate interest. The interests of the military-industrial complex in government and in the universities, with taxpayers footing the bill, needs to be stopped.”

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix
Oct 202011
 

SOURCE:  http://criminalisewar.org/?p=303

On November 19-22, 2011, the trial of George W Bush (former U.S. President) and Anthony L Blair (former British Prime Minister) will be held in Kuala Lumpur. This is the first time that war crimes charges will be heard against the two former heads of state in compliance with proper legal process.

Charges are being brought against the accused by the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission (KLWCC) following the due process of the law. The Commission, having received complaints from war victims in Iraq in 2009, proceeded to conduct a painstaking and an in-depth investigation for close to two years and in 2011, constituted formal charges on war crimes against Bush, Blair and their associates.

The Iraq invasion in 2003 and its occupation had resulted in the death of 1.4 million Iraqis. Countless others had endured torture and untold hardship. The cries of these victims have thus far gone unheeded by the international community. The fundamental human right to be heard has been denied to them.

As a result, the KLWCC had been established in 2008 to fill this void and act as a peoples’ initiative to provide an avenue for such victims to file their complaints and let them have their day in a court of law.

The first charge against George W Bush and Anthony L Blair is for Crimes Against Peace wherein:

The Accused persons had committed Crimes against Peace, in that the Accused persons planned, prepared and invaded the sovereign state of Iraq on 19 March 2003 in violation of the United Nations Charter and international law.

The second charge is for Crime of Torture and War Crimes against eight citizens of the United States and they are namely George W Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Alberto Gonzales, David Addington, William Haynes, Jay Bybee and John Yoo. wherein:

The Accused persons had committed the Crime of Torture and War Crimes, in that: The Accused persons had wilfully participated in the formulation of executive orders and directives to exclude the applicability of all international conventions and laws, namely the Convention against Torture 1984, Geneva Convention III 1949, Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Charter in relation to the war launched by the U.S. and others in Afghanistan (in 2001) and in Iraq (in March 2003); Additionally, and/or on the basis and in furtherance thereof, the Accused persons authorised, or connived in, the commission of acts of torture and cruel, degrading and inhuman treatment against victims in violation of international law, treaties and conventions including the Convention against Torture 1984 and the Geneva Conventions, including Geneva Convention III 1949.

The trial will be held before the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, which is constituted of imminent persons with legal qualifications.

The judges of the Tribunal, which is headed by retired Malaysian Federal Court judge Dato’ Abdul Kadir Sulaiman, also include other notable names such as Mr Alfred Lambremont Webre, a Yale graduate, who authored several books on politics, Dato’ Zakaria Yatim, retired Malaysian Federal Court judge, Tunku Sofiah Jewa, practising lawyer and author of numerous publications on International Law, Prof Salleh Buang, former Federal Counsel in the Attorney-General Chambers and prominent author, Prof Niloufer Bhagwat, an expert in Constitutional Law, Administrative Law and International Law, and Prof Emeritus Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi, prominent academic and professor of law.

The Tribunal will adjudicate and evaluate the evidence presented as in any court of law. The judges of the Tribunal must be satisfied that the charges are proven beyond reasonable doubt and deliver a reasoned judgement.

In the event the tribunal convicts any of the accused, the only sanction is that the name of the guilty person will be entered in the Commission’s Register of War Criminals and publicised worldwide. The tribunal is a tribunal of conscience and a peoples’ initiative.

The prosecution for the trial will be lead by Prof Gurdial S Nijar, prominent law professor and author of several law publications and Prof Francis Boyle, leading American professor, practitioner and advocate of international law, and assisted by a team of lawyers.

The trial will be held in an open court on November 19-22, 2011 at the headquarters of the Al- Bukhary Foundation at Jalan Perdana, Kuala Lumpur.

Oct 192011
 

http://rabble.ca/news/2011/10/torture-victims-initiate-private-prosecution-against-george-w-bush-his-arrival-canada

press release

Torture victims to initiate private prosecution against George W. Bush in Canada

By The Canadian Centre for International Justice and Center for Constitutional Rights | October 19, 2011

Prominent Individuals and Organizations Sign on in Support

October 19, 2011, Surrey, BC – On Oct. 20, four individuals who allege they were tortured during George W. Bush’s tenure as president of the United States will lodge a private prosecution in Provincial Court in Surrey, British Columbia, against the former president, who is due to visit Canada for a paid speaking engagement at the Surrey Regional Economic Summit on the same day. The four men will take this step after repeated calls to the Canadian attorney general to open a torture investigation of George Bush went unanswered. Human rights groups and prominent individuals will sign on in support of the effort.

The four men — Hassan bin Attash, Sami el-Hajj, Muhammed Khan Tumani and Murat Kurnaz — each endured years of inhumane treatment including beatings, chaining to cell walls, being hung from walls or ceilings while handcuffed, lack of access to toilets, sleep, food and water-deprivation, exposure to extreme temperatures, sensory overload and deprivation, and other horrific and illegal treatment while in U.S. custody at military bases in Afghanistan and/or at the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay. While three of the plaintiffs have since been released without ever facing charges, Hassan Bin Attash still remains in detention at Guantánamo Bay, though he too has not been formally charged with any wrongdoing.

“I lost my family, my father, my health, my education because of George Bush. Although I was completely innocent, I lost nearly 10 years of my life,” said former Guantánamo detainee and torture survivor Muhammed Khan Tumani. “I suffered greatly while detained at Guantánamo, and continue to suffer. I have restrictions on my travel and cannot travel to see my father who is ill. George Bush must face justice and be held accountable for his actions, which continue to cause me and so many harm.”

On Sept. 29, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) and the Canadian Centre for International Justice (CCIJ) submitted a 69-page page draft indictment to Attorney General Robert Nicholson, along with more than 4,000 pages of supporting material, setting forth the case against Bush for torture. The indictment, incorporated into the criminal information lodged Wednesday, contends that by Bush’s own admission he sanctioned and authorized acts that constitute torture under the Canadian criminal code and the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

Katherine Gallagher, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) who is assisting the plaintiffs, said, “George Bush’s brazen admission to authorizing torture techniques and unlawful detentions, including enforced disappearances, must not be met with indifference. His years of impunity must come to an end. Even if the United States has failed to meet its obligations to hold torturers accountable, Canada has an opportunity and a legal obligation to position itself on the right side of history and the law.”

Matt Eisenbrandt, legal director of the Canadian Centre for International Justice (CCIJ), who will submit the filing on men’s behalf, added, “Canadian law could not be clearer. If an alleged torturer is present in Canada, the government has the power to prosecute. As a signatory of the Convention Against Torture, Canada has an obligation to initiate an investigation when Mr. Bush sets foot in this country.”

Advertising

More than 50 human rights organizations from around the world and prominent individuals signed on to support the call for George W. Bush’s prosecution, including former UN Special Rapporteurs on Torture, Theo van Boven and Manfred Nowak, the International Federation for Human Rights, and the Canadian-based International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group. A number of the human rights organizations which signed on are facing the on-going harms of the “counterterrorism” policies advanced under the Bush administration and then adopted or employed in their own countries.

Former UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, Manfred Nowak, said: “The main aim of the UN Convention Against Torture was to eradicate safe havens for persons who commit, order, or participate in acts of torture worldwide. States parties to the Convention, including Canada, have a legal obligation to arrest all persons suspected of torture with the aim of bringing them to justice. There is plenty of evidence that President Bush authorized enhanced interrogation methods against suspected terrorists, some of which clearly amount to torture, such as waterboarding.”

Last February, the Center for Constitutional Rights, along with other human rights organizations, attempted to initiate criminal proceedings against Bush during a private speaking engagement in Geneva, but he canceled after news of the planned prosecution came to light. Following the cancellation, CCR and the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights released the “Bush Torture Indictment,” which can serve as the basis for country-specific indictments against Bush in any of the 147 countries that have ratified the UN Convention Against Torture or have universal jurisdiction laws for torture.

Prior to the filing of this case, CCR and the CCIJ twice (on Sept. 29, 2011 and Oct. 14, 2011) petitioned Canadian Minister of Justice and Attorney General Robert Nicholson by letter to launch a criminal investigation against Bush during his Oct. 20 visit to Canada, but received no response. George Bush and former U.S. vice president Dick Cheney both recently made trips to Canada, without any legal consequence.

A copy of the filing can be viewed in full here. The Letter of Support is available in English and French.

The Canadian Centre for International Justice works with survivors of genocide, torture and other atrocities to seek redress and bring perpetrators to justice. The CCIJ seeks to ensure that individuals present in Canada who are accused of responsibility for serious human rights violations are held accountable and their victims recognized, supported and compensated. For more information visit our website. www.ccij.ca

The Center for Constitutional Rights, in addition to filing the first cases representing men detained at Guantánamo, has filed universal jurisdiction cases seeking accountability for torture by Bush administration officials in Germany, France and submitted expert opinions and other documentation to ongoing cases in Spain in collaboration with ECCHR. The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is a non-profit legal and educational organization committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change. Further details regarding the Center for Constitutional Rights’ Bush Torture Indictment can be viewed here. Visit our website. Follow @theCCR on Twitter.

Oct 192011
 

Come out and meet Gail Davidson & Brigette DePape tomorrow evening, October 20th in Vancouver!

Authority to Grant Immunity

“Neither Parliament nor the Attorney General of Canada possess the authority to grant any person immunity from prosecution for war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide or to suppress investigations and prosecutions by virtue of being the head of a foreign state or otherwise.”

Friends, I am hosting a meeting tomorrow evening at 7:30 with colleagues, in the beautiful 300 person capacity ‘Sanctuary’ of the Unitarian Church at 49th & Oak St. in Vancouver.

Our keynote speaker is Gail Davidson, co-founder of Lawyers Against the War, with special guest Brigette DePape. For those of you who can’t make it to the ‘ARREST GEORGE W. BUSH’ Surrey protest during the day, this is your chance to meet these two fine women in an informal setting, listen to presentations, and participate in a moderated Q&A. The event will be video recorded by Tom Childs for rebroadcast on cable TV networks. The meeting topic is ‘Canada as Safe Haven: Jurisdictional & Treaty Obligations Regarding War Crimes’.

Historic Challenges – Since NDP MP Don Davies released his letter to the press on Sept. 23rd challenging Immigration Minister Jason Kenney to act in advance of Dick Cheney’s arrival last month, every week one or two new challenges have been issued to the Canadian Government from prominent organizations in the US and Canada.

The world press is covering events as they unfold.

Breaking News – It is clear that Canada’s Conservative government is committed to providing safe haven for “some” war criminals, so now, on the eve of the arrival of GW Bush to Surrey, civil society is preparing a case against Mr. Bush to circumvent the Canadian Government.

On Thursday, October 20th (tomorrow), four individuals who allege they were tortured during George W. Bush’s tenure as president of the United States will lodge a private prosecution in Provincial Court in Surrey, British Columbia against the former president (letter posted).

 Brigette DePape – will be at our meeting a bit later to talk about her work, and participate in the Q&A afterward. I will have a few copies of her booklet ‘Thinking Outside The Ballot Box’ on hand for your perusal, and it can be downloaded here. http://canadians.org/democracy/documents/OTBB-0911.pdf

Brigette is on a cross Canada tour of #Occupy sites as well, so expect to see her downtown! I hope to see y’all there…there will be lots of room for everyone, and the church pews are comfy.

Blake MacLeod

Board Member: World Federalist Movement – Canada, Vancouver Branch Member: Lawyers Against the War Other cool affiliations too.

Oct 192011
 
October 19, 2011
To: Robert Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Re: Letter in Support of Private Prosecutions Filed Against George W. Bush for Torture

 
We, the undersigned human rights non-governmental organizations and individuals, are writing this statement in full support of the private prosecutions against George W. Bush, former President of the United States, being lodged on behalf of three former Guantánamo detainees, and one current detainee, who allege that they were tortured by U.S. officials, and seek a criminal investigation and prosecution against Mr. Bush upon arrival in Canada, for substantive breaches of the Canadian Criminal Code and United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT).
The criminal cases submitted under sections 504, 269.1, 21 and 22 of the Canadian Criminal Code, and the Indictment with an appendix of supporting material attached thereto, (collectively, the “Bush Dossiers”) set forth reasonable and probable grounds to believe that a person who is scheduled to be present on Canadian territory has committed an act of torture.

 

The Case Against George W. Bush
  
The Bush Dossiers allege that George W. Bush, in his capacity of former president of the United States, bears individual responsibility for acts of torture and/or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment committed against detainees held in U.S. custody or rendered to other countries by the U.S., in that he ordered, authorized, condoned, planned or otherwise aided and abetted such acts, or failed to prevent or punish subordinates for the commission of such acts.
As set forth in detail in the Bush Dossiers, including through documentary evidence in the form of inter alia official memoranda issued by Mr. Bush or subordinates in his chain
of command, U.S. government reports (including the Central Intelligence Agency Inspector General Report), and reports by the International Committee of the Red Cross and the United Nations, including those of the Special Rapporteur on Torture, there are reasonable and probable grounds to believe that Mr. Bush has committed acts of torture, including:
  • Bush authorized the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency to capture suspected terrorists, and detain them in secret detention sites, where they would be subjected to so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques”
  • Bush issued a directive authorizing the transfer of suspects to the custody of foreign nations, including nations that are notorious for torturing detainees
  • Bush authorized “enhanced interrogation techniques,” such as waterboarding, stress positions, sleep deprivation, and manipulation of food and temperature, which have been found to amount to torture
  • Bush authorized the detention of suspected terrorists at Guantánamo Bay, without access to counsel or courts, and subjected them to treatment and interrogation techniques that have been found to amount to torture
  • Bush authorized the detention of individuals in U.S.-run detention facilities outside the United States, including in Afghanistan, where detainees were deprived of the protections of the Geneva Conventions and were subjected to acts which constitute torture under international law

Notably, the case presented against Mr. Bush by the complaints is also supported by statements made by George W. Bush himself, acknowledging his role in the creation of the CIA secret detention program and the approval of interrogation techniques that have been found to constitute torture. Indeed, Mr. Bush recounted in his memoir that when he was asked in 2002 if it was permissible to waterboard a detainee held in secret CIA custody outside the United States, he answered “damn right.”

The Plaintiffs
Hassan bin Attash
is a Yemeni born in Saudi Arabia who is currently detained at  Guantánamo, and one of 22 juveniles the United States has held there in violation of international law. Pakistani police captured Hassan in Karachi in September 2002, when he was about 16. The Pakistanis turned the youth over to the U.S., which flew him to the infamous CIA detention in Afghanistan facility known as the “Dark Prison.”  Prisoners there, including Hassan, were held in total darkness, chained to their cell walls, deprived of food, water, and sleep, and continuously subjected to loud heavy-metal or rap music.
Before interrogations, Hassan alleges he would be suspended by his wrists from a hook above his head, his toes barely reaching the floor. Prevented from using a toilet, he urinated and defecated on himself.  Hassan alleges that he would then be interrogated naked, his arms chained behind his back to a metal ring on the wall, and periodically doused with cold water. After several days, the U.S. rendered Hassan to Jordan, where he alleges that he suffered even more sadistic tortures for 16 months. Among the most painful, Hassan’s keepers would lay him on his back, raise his feet above his head, thrash the soles of his feet until they were raw, and then pour hot salt water on his tattered feet.
Hassan alleges that his keepers would then force him to run barefoot across the courtyard, his feet covered with blood, beating him as he ran.  In January 2004, the U.S. brought Hassan back to the Dark Prison, where he alleges that he was subjected to further sensory overload and deprivation. The U.S. then took him to yet another interrogation facility at Bagram, and in September 2004, brought him to Guantánamo, where he alleges that he was further tortured and suffered more physical and psychological abuse, including beatings, solitary confinement, extremes of heat and cold, and sleep deprivation. Long isolated from the general detainee population, Hassan bears scars of his horrific tortures.

Sami el-Hajj  is a Sudanese national and journalist correspondent for Al-Jazeera who was arrested in Pakistan in December 2001. Thereafter, Sami el-Hajj was detained and alleges he was subjected to torture in U.S. facilities in Bagram and Kandahar, Afghanistan before being transferred to Guantánamo Bay in 2002, where he was held without charge until his release in May 2008. He was subjected to repeated mistreatment and numerous interrogation techniques – including sleep deprivation, cuffing and shackling in stress positions, hooding, beatings, subjection to extremes of heat and cold and deprivation of food and/or liquids – during his detention in U.S. facilities at Guantánamo and Afghanistan.

Muhammed Khan Tumani, a citizen of Syria, came into U.S. custody when he was age 17. He and his father were seized in Pakistan after local villagers turned them over to Pakistani authorities, who in turn handed them over to the United States, during a time in which the United States was offering large bounties for the capture of Arab men.  Muhammed and his father were detained first in Pakistan, where Muhammed alleges interrogators beat him, broke his nose, fractured his hand, shocked him with electric cables, threatened him with rendition to torture in Egypt and Jordan, and told him that they would kill, or had killed his family members. Both men were then transferred to a U.S.-run prison in Kandahar, Afghanistan, and then to the U.S. Naval Base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, where Muhammed was detained without charge for seven and a half years. At Guantánamo, Muhammed alleges that he continued to undergo abusive interrogations and was held in solitary confinement in Camp 6 for several years, and apart from his father for the duration of his detention. He attempted suicide and selfdestructive acts on several occasions, which the military characterized as manipulative behavior and a personality disorder, and for which he was punished with continued isolation. Muhammed was eventually cleared to leave Guantánamo by a government task force under the Obama Administration and resettled in Portugal in August 2009.  Muhammed was never charged with any crime. His father was cleared and resettled in Cape Verde a year later. Because of restrictions on their ability to travel, father and son have yet to be reunified or permitted a visit.

Murat Kurnaz, a Turkish national who was born in and resided in Germany, was arrested at the age of 19 by Pakistani officials on December 1, 2001, while on his way to the airport in Peshawar. He was detained for several days by the Pakistani security services and was relocated to three different prisons. He was banned from making contact with the outside world and was interrogated. For an alleged fee of $3000, Murat was handed over to the U.S. and brought to a military camp in Kandahar, Afghanistan, where he was physically abused and tortured by the US Soldiers, including through regular beatings, the use of electronic shocks, being submerged in a bucket of water while being punched in the stomach, and being suspended from hooks, while handcuffed, for days. In early February 2002, Murat was transferred to Guantánamo, where he was first detained in a cage. At Guantánamo, Murat alleges that he was subjected to beatings, including intense beatings by the Emergency Reaction Force, and was exposed to extreme heat and cold, deprived of sleep and oxygen, and kept in solitary confinement for several weeks. He was released without charge in August 2006.

Hassan bin Attash, Sami el-Hajj, Muhammed Khan Tumani and Murat Kurnaz were subjected to severe mistreatment, unlawful conditions of confinement and interrogation techniques, which amount to torture, in violation of international law. The complaints set out that these techniques had been approved at the highest level of the chain of command, by Mr. Bush, and implemented by officials acting on his behalf. We submit that such techniques – as deployed against each of the plaintiffs in this matter and outlined in their respective complaints – constitute torture.ECISION POINTS, Mr. Bush states unequivocally that he authorized the torture, including waterboarding, of individuals held in U.S. custody. He further admits and acknowledges his role in selecting and approving the interrogation techniques.

 

Accordingly, evidence exists to establish a reasonable basis for concluding that while in U.S. custody,

***

On February 7, 2002, Mr. Bush determined that the Geneva Conventions did not apply to the conflict with al Qaeda, and that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, prohibiting inhumane treatment and acts of torture, did not apply to either al Qaeda or Taliban detainees. As was officially acknowledged by a bipartisan U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee report, Mr. Bush’s memorandum paved the way for the abuse of detainees held in the context of the so-called “war on terror” and the use of techniques such as waterboarding and stress positions.

Mr. Bush played a central role in the creation of CIA secret detention program, which he personally authorized through a September 17, 2001 Presidential directive. Under this program, the disappeared detainees were subjected to a regime now widely acknowledged to amount to torture. It is further recalled that prolonged disappearance or prolonged incommunicado detention has been found to constitute torture by various U.N. bodies, as set forth in the Indictment.

The CIA Inspector General Report from 2004 confirms that Mr. Bush was fully briefed on the specific “enhanced interrogation techniques” used by the CIA – techniques which the United Nations, the International Committee of the Red Cross, and the Council of Europe, amongst others, have all found to amount to torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.

Mr. Bush’s personal responsibility for these techniques is not a question: in his memoir, D

We therefore urge the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada to act in accordance with Canada’s obligations under domestic and international law by detaining George W. Bush while he is present in Canada, and opening a preliminary investigation into the allegations brought against him.

SIGNED

Theo van Boven, former UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Forms of Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (2001-2004)

Manfred Nowak, former UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Forms of Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (2004-2010) and Professor of Constitutional Law and Human Rights, University of Vienna

Sister Dianna Ortiz

Luis Guillermo Pérez, Secretary General of the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)

Michael Ellman, Ex-Chair, Solicitors International Human Rights Group and former FIDH Board Member Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos (APRODEH), Peru

Bill of Rights Defense Committee, United States

Center for Peace and Democracy Development, Serbia

Centre for Research on Globalization, Canada

Centro de Capacitacion Social de Panamá (CCS), Panama

Centro Nicaraguense de Derechos Humanos (CENIDH), Nicaragua

Citizens against Corruption (CAC), Kirghizistan

Colectivo de Abogados José Alvear Restrepo (CAJAR), Colombia

Comisión de Derechos Humanos de Guatemala (CDHG), Guatemala

Comision Ecumenica de Derechos Humanos (CEDHU), Ecuador

Comité de Acción Juridica (CAJ), Argentina

Corporación de Promoción y Defensa de los Derechos del Pueblo (CODEPU), Chile

Defending Dissent Foundation, United States

Desis Rising Up & Moving, United States

European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, Germany

Finnish League for Human Rights, Finland

Fundación Regional de Asesoría en Derechos Humanos (INREDH), Ecuador

Global Justice Center, United States

Human Rights Association, Turkey

Human Rights Center (HRIDC), Georgia

Human Rights Monitoring Institute (HRMI), Lithuania

Instituto Latinoamericano de Servicios Legales Alternativos (ILSA), Colombia

International Association of Democratic Lawyers (IADL)

International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, Canada

International Commission for Jurists (ICJ), Switzerland

International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), France

International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT), Denmark

Internationale Liga für Menschenrechte, Germany

Iranian League for the Defence of Human Rights (LDDHI), France

Justiça Global, Brazil

Lawyers Against the War, Canada

Liga Argentina por los Derechos del Hombre (LADH), Argentina

Liga Mexicana por la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos, Mexico

Ligue des Droits et Libertés (LDL), Canada

National Lawyers Guild, United States

No More Guantánamos, United States

Observatorio Ciudadano, Chile

Organización Femenina Popular, Colombia

Organisation Marocaine des Droits de l’Homme (OMDH), Morocco

Pax Christi USA, United States

Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates (PAHRA), Phillipines

Physicians for Human Rights, United States

REDRESS, United Kingdom

Reprieve, United Kingdom

Torture Abolition and Survivors Support Coalition International, United States

Union for Civil Liberty, Thailand

Victoria Coalition for the Survivors of Torture, Canada

War Criminals Watch, United States

Witness Against Torture, United States

World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), Switzerland

Oct 192011
 

The 99% march in Occupy Saskatoon

by on October 19, 2011 in News

Protestors demonstrate their solidarity with a global movement as they walk the streets of Saskatoon. (More pictures below.)

More than 400 protesters in Saskatoon marched from the University Bridge to Friendship Park in a show of solidarity with the Occupy Wall Street movement on Oct. 15.

This “Day of Global Action” saw groups in 1,445 cities around the world join the movement that began in New York City on Sept. 17.

Protesters in Saskatoon chanted, “We are the 99 per cent,” and “Whose streets? Our streets!”

Their signs were evidence of the diversity and tone of the protest. While “We are the 99%” is a feature of Occupy protests around the world, others addressed more local issues.

One said, “Saskatchewan is not for sale!” While others read, “Stop the Tar Sands,” and, “I care about you! No Nuclear Waste.”

The evening’s open mic gave a platform to a singer-songwriter, the Committee for Future Generations, stopgormley.ca, Saskatoon Anti-Poverty Coalition, the Postal Workers’ Union and farmers expressing concern over the dissolution of the Canadian Wheat Board.

With a kitchen, porta-potties and tents, about 60 protesters came equipped to spend the night in Friendship Park. And as of now, the plan is to occupy the park indefinitely.

The Occupy movement has been criticized for having no focused message, but it is this same feature that allows the conversation to continue.

“A lot of protests are anti-something or trying to shut something down,” said occupier Barb Fornssler. “This is trying to grow something. But what we’re growing, I think, will be emergent to each local context.”

The most recurrent message across the movement — now its slogan — is “We are the 99 per cent.” This refers to the growing economic gap between the richest one per cent and the rest.

It also points to the populist nature of the movement. It suggests the movement’s desire to represent the concerns of the majority of the population.

Organizer Jeh Custerra called the movement an example of “direct democracy.”

While the 99 per cent slogan connects Occupy Saskatoon to the global phenomenon, there are specific local issues being discussed in Friendship Park.

Mary Jean Hande is an occupier concerned with the corporate influence at the University of Saskatchewan.

The Day of Global Action coincided with a meeting of the University Senate. Some of the Occupy protesters attended the meeting before the march.

Hande is an elected senator and member of the group USSWORD.

Hande presented three motions at Saturday’s Senate meeting. One alleged a conflict of interest for Nancy Hopkins, chair of the Board of Governors and board member of Cameco Corporation.

She said she was disappointed with the defeat of her motions.

“The Senate is supposed to be the opportunity for the University to reach out into the community and for the community to provide input,” she said. “But the amount of intimidation that we’ve received even for discussing these things really discourages people from asking these questions.”

Asked how the Senate meeting relates to the Occupy movement, Hande responded, “One of our local actions is to restore democracy to these types of institutions.”

Each of the occupiers expressed concern over having the movement misrepresented by the media. No individual purports to speak for the entire group.

Group statements, arrived at by consensus, can be found on Occupy Saskatoon’s Facebook page, where they also post daily events.

Occupiers hope the movement will continue to grow and that Saskatonians will visit Friendship Park and add to the ongoing conversation. The general assembly occurs daily at 5:30 p.m.

Occupy Wall Street glossary: 

99 Percent: A reference to growing income inequality between 99 percent of the population and the top 1 percent of earners, who have amassed approximately one-third of national wealth in the United States. It has become the slogan of the Occupy movement, and originates in a tumblr blog of the same name. In Canada, the top one per cent earn about 14 per cent of national income.

Mic Check: What speakers at general assemblies say to announce that they want to start speaking and have their words repeated throughout a crowd.

Twinkling: Wiggling one’s fingers to signal agreement with what’s being said. It moves along conversation without drowning out the speaker with applause.

Oct 182011
 

I ended up in Court because, starting in 2003,  I joined others to stop the out-sourcing of Canadian census work to Lockheed Martin Corporation (the American military).  

Tomorrow morning (Oct 19), the Court (Queen’s Bench, Saskatoon) will hear the appeal of the “guilty” decision in   R vs Sandra Finley.   

The trial has been on-going since April 2008.  In January 2011,  I was found guilty. 

Sentencing was an absolute discharge – no punishment imposed – BUT! the “guilty” decision still stands.

 I will have done more harm than good if the Judge’s “guilty” decision is allowed to stand. 

The  “guilty” decision means:

–         our Charter protection against the Government, a basic Right in modern democracies, the Charter Right to Privacy of personal information – –  is lost.   

The Charter Right says that the Government cannot force citizens to hand over “a biographical core of personal information”.    StatsCan continues to use the threat of prosecution to force citizens to give up their Charter Right.  

If you have any doubt about the role of census data bases in a police state, read  “IBM and the Holocaust”.   

 If you have any doubts about Lockheed Martin Corporation,  watch the video, an interview with William Hartung, author of “Prophets of War, Lockheed Martin and the Making of the Military Industrial Complex“, book launched in January 2011.

It was the foresight and wisdom of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau that gave us the Charter Right.  It falls to us to defend it, or lose it. 

I see this as part of the OCCUPY movement that will bring an end to Governments/Universities that serve the corporate interest.   The interests of the military-industrial complex in Government and in the Universities, with tax-payers footing the bill, needs to be stopped.   (All of this is explained in various postings accessible at Lockheed Martin, Census, Trial, War Economy.)

Persons in our network have collaboratively created a comprehensive file that shows the extent of the increasing militarization in Canada.  It (and Lockheed Martin in particular) is a serious threat to democracy and to security.  

NEWCOMERS:   For background info,  click on Lockheed Martin, Census, Trial, War Economy.     (Topics such as:

  •  integration of American and Canadian military / police / border services
  •  drones deployed along the Canada-U.S. border
  •  the Troop Exchange Agreement with the U.S.
  •  armoured vehicles being rolled out by police forces across Canada
  •  the plans of the American “Security” forces, working with quislings in Canadian Government, to put the records on ALL Canadians (not just the trouble-makers) at the disposal of the American Government
  • Lockheed Martin heavily involved in the new Aviation Centre at the Saskatoon Airport which will likely be training young people in drone technology.  Tax-payers are still the major funders / enablers.  
  • etc. etc.)

(In preface to the following re OCCUPY:  Nancy Hopkins is on the Board of the Saskatoon Airport Authority (Lockheed Martin is a funder of the new Aviation Centre there), she is on the Cameco Board, and chairs the University Board of Governors (reference recent postings).  Dave Sutherland is on the University Board of Governors with Nancy, and is also on the SPP Initiative and Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE) along with Suncor, Monsanto, etc.  The “President of the Americas” for Lockheed Martin is a key player in the SPP, North American Union, “harmonization”, “integration”, anti-democracy, greed, corrupting, consuming, destructive, Big Corporate agenda.    (It is, of course, not ALL corporations – but a significant enough number of them.)

The links between the University, the Governments (transferring tax-payer money), and the Nuke/Tar Sands industries (Brad Wall the “co-spearhead of the largest on the planet Canada-U.S. Western Energy Corridor” which is all about Nuke and Tar Sands, (and related to water scarcity, resource depletion in the U.S.)) is at  http://ussword.blogspot.com/p/infographic.html   (The Radioactive Trinity). )

FROM DARKNESS INTO LIGHT,  The OCCUPY MOVEMENT. 

Two weeks ago  I continued to worry a lot about the looming dark day of descent – – rising levels of propaganda, injustice, inequality, abuse of power, corruption, failing institutions (education for example, Wall Street, etc.), and so on into the hands of the American “security” forces / Lockheed Martin surveillance and police state.

My World-view has changed!   The OCCUPY MOVEMENT  is real and stunning.   I almost have an email ready to send;  but what is current one day is out-of-date the next, the events are tumbling into a cascade I have no hope of keeping up with.

OCCUPY  (of which I and many of you are part)  will see how their work and this is aligned.   Booting Lockheed Martin Corporation out of the Canadian Government and Canada opens up the space for us to re-OCCUPY what is ours.  

REQUEST:    Please help spread the word!  

 WEDNESDAY, Oct 19

10:00am 

Court of Queen’s Bench

Saskatoon 

 ISSUE: 

The Government (Statistics Canada and Public Works) out-sourced work on the Canadian census to Lockheed Martin Corporation (the American military).

I refuse to be complicit.

LEGAL DEFENCE: 

Charter Right to Privacy of personal information:     

 “In fostering the underlying values of dignity, integrity and autonomy, it is fitting that s. 8 of the Charter should seek to protect a biographical core of personal information which individuals in a free and democratic society would wish to maintain and control from dissemination to the state.”

IN APPRECIATION AND GRATITUDE:

 I am incredibly fortunate to have a body of informed and active people working with me.  I am humbled.   

I have great confidence in the young lawyer, Steve Seiferling, who will be presenting the argument to the Court.  His explanation of the ways in which the Judge erred in her decision make perfect sense to me!   

We are sometimes placed in situations that call on us to stand.   The wonderful thing about it?  . . .  Everything is possible because we are connected!   I am just a body and some fingers that can type.  Your energy, the larger energy, flows through us all.    Synchronistic timing:  back in Court when the OCCUPY MOVEMENT is in full throttle – – it is really kind of neat!

Oct 182011
 

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-wallstreet-protests-social-idUSTRE79G6E420111018

Occupy Wall Street protesters meditate while a sign bearing their twitter handle hangs from a railing in Zuccotti Park in New York October 1, 2011. REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi

Occupy Wall Street protesters meditate while a sign bearing their twitter handle hangs from a railing in Zuccotti Park in New York October 1, 2011. REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi

 

It all started innocuously enough with a July 13 blog post urging people to #OccupyWallStreet, as though such a thing (Twitter hashtag and all) were possible.

It turns out, with enough momentum and a keen sense of how to use social media, it actually is.

The Occupy movement, decentralized and leaderless, has mobilized thousands of people around the world almost exclusively via the Internet. To a large degree through Twitter, and also with platforms like Facebook and Meetup, crowds have connected and gathered.

As with any movement, a spark is needed to start word spreading. SocialFlow, a social media marketing company, did an analysis for Reuters of the history of the Occupy hashtag on Twitter and the ways it spread and took root.

The first apparent mention was that July 13 blog post by activist group Adbusters (r.reuters.com/suc54s) but the idea was slow to get traction.

The next Twitter mention was on July 20 (r.reuters.com/tuc54s) from a Costa Rican film producer named Francisco Guerrero, linking to a blog post on a site called Wake Up from Your Slumber that reiterated the Adbusters call to action (r.reuters.com/vuc54s).

The site, founded in 2006 “to expose America’s fraudulent monetary system and the evil of charging interest on money loaned,” is a reference to the biblical verse Romans 13:11 that reads in part: “The hour has come for you to wake up from your slumber, because our salvation is nearer now than when we first believed.”

Guerrero’s post was retweeted once and then there was silence until two July 23 tweets — one from the Spanish user Gurzbo (r.reuters.com/wuc54s) and one from a retired high school chemistry teacher in Long Island, New York named Cindy tweeting as gemswinc. (r.reuters.com/xuc54s)

Gurzbo’s post was not passed along by anyone but Cindy’s was, by eight people, including a Delaware-based opponent of the Federal Reserve, a vegan information rights supporter, a Washington-based environmentalist and an Alabama-based progressive blogger.

Again, there was relative silence for nearly two weeks, until LazyBookworm tweeted the Occupy hashtag again on August 5. (r.reuters.com/zuc54s) That got seven retweets, largely from a crowd of organic food supporters and poets.

HASHTAG REVOLT

The notion of Occupy Wall Street was out there but it was not gaining much attention — until, of course, it did, suddenly and with force.

Social media experts trace the expansion to hyper-local tweeters, people who cover the pulse of communities at a level of detail not even local papers can match.

In New York, credit goes to the Twitter account of Newyorkist, whose more than 11,000 tweets chronicle the city in block-by-block detail. His was one of the first well-followed accounts to mention the protests in mid-September.

Trendistic, which tracks hashtag trends on Twitter, shows that OccupyWallStreet first showed up in any volume around 11 p.m. on September 16, the evening before the occupation of lower Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park began. Within 24 hours, the tag represented nearly 1 of every 500 uses of a hashtag.

The first two weeks of the movement were slow, media coverage was slim and little happened beyond the taking of the concrete park itself. But then a demonstration on the Brooklyn Bridge prompted hundreds of arrests and the spark was ignited.

On October 1, #OccupyBoston started to show up on Twitter. Within a couple of weeks, #OccupyDenver and #OccupySD and others appeared.

The Occupy Wall Street page on Facebook started on September 19 with a YouTube video of the early protests. By September 22, it reached critical mass.

“Newcomers today, welcome! Feel free to post. Advertise your own pages of resistance. Network until it works,” read one posting meant to inspire protests elsewhere.

For young activists around the world, who grew up with the Internet and the smartphone, Facebook and Twitter have become crucial in expanding the movement.

They are pioneering platforms like Vibe that lets people anonymously share text, photos and video over short distances for brief periods of time — perfect for use at rallies.

“No one owns a (Twitter) hashtag, it has no leadership, it has no organization, it has no creed but it’s quite appropriate to the architecture of the net. This is a distributed revolt,” said Jeff Jarvis, a journalism professor at City University of New York and author of the well-known blog BuzzMachine.

Some reports say the protesters have raised as much as $300,000 in donations to cover everything from pizza to video equipment but others put the figure much lower.

The Alliance for Global Justice, which calls itself “the fiscal sponsor for Occupy Wall Street,” has raised $23,200 via WePay.com.

OCCUPY EVERYWHERE

As of Monday afternoon, Facebook listed no fewer than 125 Occupy-related pages, from New York to Tulsa and all points in between. Roughly 1 in every 500 hashtags used on Twitter on Monday, all around the world, was the movement’s own #OWS.

The websites keep proliferating — We Are the 99 Percent, Parents for Occupy Wall Street and Occupy Together, even the parody Occupy Sesame Street (concerned mostly with the plight of monsters living in garbage cans).

Online streaming video has also been a huge resource for the protesters, using cheap cameras and high-speed wireless Internet access.

Supporters, opponents and the merely curious got the chance last Saturday to watch the Occupy Wall Street protesters decide whether to occupy a major public park, Washington Square Park, in the Greenwich Village area.

They saw warnings the police were about to arrive in riot gear and with horses, vans and buses to take away protesters if there were mass arrests. Local media reported about 10 arrests among the 3,000 or so people in the park.

As the seconds to a possible confrontation ticked down, the tension led to various reactions from those watching online.

“Anyone arrested is a political prisoner,” said one.

“Here comes Czar Bloomberg’s Cossacks,” said another, in reference to New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg and the appearance of the mounted police.

There were “we are watching” messages of support from cities across the United States and some who found it the best entertainment going on a Saturday night.

“So much more exciting than a TV show” was one comment.

(Reporting by Ben Berkowitz; Additional reporting by Martin Howell and Anthony DeRosa in New York; Editing by John O’Callaghan)