Sandra Finley

Oct 192011
 

Come out and meet Gail Davidson & Brigette DePape tomorrow evening, October 20th in Vancouver!

Authority to Grant Immunity

Neither Parliament nor the Attorney General of Canada possess the authority to grant any person immunity from prosecution for war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide or to suppress investigations and prosecutions by virtue of being the head of a foreign state or otherwise.”

Friends, I am hosting a meeting tomorrow evening at 7:30 with colleagues, in the beautiful 300 person capacity ‘Sanctuary’ of the Unitarian Church at 49th & Oak St. in Vancouver.

Our keynote speaker is Gail Davidson, co-founder of Lawyers Against the War, with special guest Brigette DePape. For those of you who can’t make it to the ‘ARREST GEORGE W. BUSH’ Surrey protest during the day, this is your chance to meet these two fine women in an informal setting, listen to presentations, and participate in a moderated Q&A. The event will be video recorded by Tom Childs for rebroadcast on cable TV networks. The meeting topic is ‘Canada as Safe Haven: Jurisdictional & Treaty Obligations Regarding War Crimes’.

Historic Challenges – Since NDP MP Don Davies released his letter to the press on Sept. 23rd challenging Immigration Minister Jason Kenney to act in advance of Dick Cheney’s arrival last month, every week one or two new challenges have been issued to the Canadian Government from prominent organizations in the US and Canada.

The world press is covering events as they unfold.

Breaking News – It is clear that Canada’s Conservative government is committed to providing safe haven for “some” war criminals, so now, on the eve of the arrival of GW Bush to Surrey, civil society is preparing a case against Mr. Bush to circumvent the Canadian Government.

On Thursday, October 20th (tomorrow), four individuals who allege they were tortured during George W. Bush’s tenure as president of the United States will lodge a private prosecution in Provincial Court in Surrey, British Columbia against the former president (letter posted).

 Brigette DePape – will be at our meeting a bit later to talk about her work, and participate in the Q&A afterward. I will have a few copies of her booklet ‘Thinking Outside The Ballot Box’ on hand for your perusal, and it can be downloaded here. http://canadians.org/democracy/documents/OTBB-0911.pdf

Brigette is on a cross Canada tour of #Occupy sites as well, so expect to see her downtown! I hope to see y’all there…there will be lots of room for everyone, and the church pews are comfy.

Blake MacLeod

Board Member: World Federalist Movement – Canada, Vancouver Branch Member: Lawyers Against the War Other cool affiliations too.

Oct 192011
 
October 19, 2011
To: Robert Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Re: Letter in Support of Private Prosecutions Filed Against George W. Bush for Torture

 
We, the undersigned human rights non-governmental organizations and individuals, are writing this statement in full support of the private prosecutions against George W. Bush, former President of the United States, being lodged on behalf of three former Guantánamo detainees, and one current detainee, who allege that they were tortured by U.S. officials, and seek a criminal investigation and prosecution against Mr. Bush upon arrival in Canada, for substantive breaches of the Canadian Criminal Code and United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT).
The criminal cases submitted under sections 504, 269.1, 21 and 22 of the Canadian Criminal Code, and the Indictment with an appendix of supporting material attached thereto, (collectively, the “Bush Dossiers”) set forth reasonable and probable grounds to believe that a person who is scheduled to be present on Canadian territory has committed an act of torture.

 

The Case Against George W. Bush
  
The Bush Dossiers allege that George W. Bush, in his capacity of former president of the United States, bears individual responsibility for acts of torture and/or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment committed against detainees held in U.S. custody or rendered to other countries by the U.S., in that he ordered, authorized, condoned, planned or otherwise aided and abetted such acts, or failed to prevent or punish subordinates for the commission of such acts.
As set forth in detail in the Bush Dossiers, including through documentary evidence in the form of inter alia official memoranda issued by Mr. Bush or subordinates in his chain
of command, U.S. government reports (including the Central Intelligence Agency Inspector General Report), and reports by the International Committee of the Red Cross and the United Nations, including those of the Special Rapporteur on Torture, there are reasonable and probable grounds to believe that Mr. Bush has committed acts of torture, including:
  • Bush authorized the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency to capture suspected terrorists, and detain them in secret detention sites, where they would be subjected to so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques”
  • Bush issued a directive authorizing the transfer of suspects to the custody of foreign nations, including nations that are notorious for torturing detainees
  • Bush authorized “enhanced interrogation techniques,” such as waterboarding, stress positions, sleep deprivation, and manipulation of food and temperature, which have been found to amount to torture
  • Bush authorized the detention of suspected terrorists at Guantánamo Bay, without access to counsel or courts, and subjected them to treatment and interrogation techniques that have been found to amount to torture
  • Bush authorized the detention of individuals in U.S.-run detention facilities outside the United States, including in Afghanistan, where detainees were deprived of the protections of the Geneva Conventions and were subjected to acts which constitute torture under international law

Notably, the case presented against Mr. Bush by the complaints is also supported by statements made by George W. Bush himself, acknowledging his role in the creation of the CIA secret detention program and the approval of interrogation techniques that have been found to constitute torture. Indeed, Mr. Bush recounted in his memoir that when he was asked in 2002 if it was permissible to waterboard a detainee held in secret CIA custody outside the United States, he answered “damn right.”

The Plaintiffs
Hassan bin Attash
is a Yemeni born in Saudi Arabia who is currently detained at  Guantánamo, and one of 22 juveniles the United States has held there in violation of international law. Pakistani police captured Hassan in Karachi in September 2002, when he was about 16. The Pakistanis turned the youth over to the U.S., which flew him to the infamous CIA detention in Afghanistan facility known as the “Dark Prison.”  Prisoners there, including Hassan, were held in total darkness, chained to their cell walls, deprived of food, water, and sleep, and continuously subjected to loud heavy-metal or rap music.
Before interrogations, Hassan alleges he would be suspended by his wrists from a hook above his head, his toes barely reaching the floor. Prevented from using a toilet, he urinated and defecated on himself.  Hassan alleges that he would then be interrogated naked, his arms chained behind his back to a metal ring on the wall, and periodically doused with cold water. After several days, the U.S. rendered Hassan to Jordan, where he alleges that he suffered even more sadistic tortures for 16 months. Among the most painful, Hassan’s keepers would lay him on his back, raise his feet above his head, thrash the soles of his feet until they were raw, and then pour hot salt water on his tattered feet.
Hassan alleges that his keepers would then force him to run barefoot across the courtyard, his feet covered with blood, beating him as he ran.  In January 2004, the U.S. brought Hassan back to the Dark Prison, where he alleges that he was subjected to further sensory overload and deprivation. The U.S. then took him to yet another interrogation facility at Bagram, and in September 2004, brought him to Guantánamo, where he alleges that he was further tortured and suffered more physical and psychological abuse, including beatings, solitary confinement, extremes of heat and cold, and sleep deprivation. Long isolated from the general detainee population, Hassan bears scars of his horrific tortures.

Sami el-Hajj  is a Sudanese national and journalist correspondent for Al-Jazeera who was arrested in Pakistan in December 2001. Thereafter, Sami el-Hajj was detained and alleges he was subjected to torture in U.S. facilities in Bagram and Kandahar, Afghanistan before being transferred to Guantánamo Bay in 2002, where he was held without charge until his release in May 2008. He was subjected to repeated mistreatment and numerous interrogation techniques – including sleep deprivation, cuffing and shackling in stress positions, hooding, beatings, subjection to extremes of heat and cold and deprivation of food and/or liquids – during his detention in U.S. facilities at Guantánamo and Afghanistan.

Muhammed Khan Tumani, a citizen of Syria, came into U.S. custody when he was age 17. He and his father were seized in Pakistan after local villagers turned them over to Pakistani authorities, who in turn handed them over to the United States, during a time in which the United States was offering large bounties for the capture of Arab men.  Muhammed and his father were detained first in Pakistan, where Muhammed alleges interrogators beat him, broke his nose, fractured his hand, shocked him with electric cables, threatened him with rendition to torture in Egypt and Jordan, and told him that they would kill, or had killed his family members. Both men were then transferred to a U.S.-run prison in Kandahar, Afghanistan, and then to the U.S. Naval Base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, where Muhammed was detained without charge for seven and a half years. At Guantánamo, Muhammed alleges that he continued to undergo abusive interrogations and was held in solitary confinement in Camp 6 for several years, and apart from his father for the duration of his detention. He attempted suicide and selfdestructive acts on several occasions, which the military characterized as manipulative behavior and a personality disorder, and for which he was punished with continued isolation. Muhammed was eventually cleared to leave Guantánamo by a government task force under the Obama Administration and resettled in Portugal in August 2009.  Muhammed was never charged with any crime. His father was cleared and resettled in Cape Verde a year later. Because of restrictions on their ability to travel, father and son have yet to be reunified or permitted a visit.

Murat Kurnaz, a Turkish national who was born in and resided in Germany, was arrested at the age of 19 by Pakistani officials on December 1, 2001, while on his way to the airport in Peshawar. He was detained for several days by the Pakistani security services and was relocated to three different prisons. He was banned from making contact with the outside world and was interrogated. For an alleged fee of $3000, Murat was handed over to the U.S. and brought to a military camp in Kandahar, Afghanistan, where he was physically abused and tortured by the US Soldiers, including through regular beatings, the use of electronic shocks, being submerged in a bucket of water while being punched in the stomach, and being suspended from hooks, while handcuffed, for days. In early February 2002, Murat was transferred to Guantánamo, where he was first detained in a cage. At Guantánamo, Murat alleges that he was subjected to beatings, including intense beatings by the Emergency Reaction Force, and was exposed to extreme heat and cold, deprived of sleep and oxygen, and kept in solitary confinement for several weeks. He was released without charge in August 2006.

Hassan bin Attash, Sami el-Hajj, Muhammed Khan Tumani and Murat Kurnaz were subjected to severe mistreatment, unlawful conditions of confinement and interrogation techniques, which amount to torture, in violation of international law. The complaints set out that these techniques had been approved at the highest level of the chain of command, by Mr. Bush, and implemented by officials acting on his behalf. We submit that such techniques – as deployed against each of the plaintiffs in this matter and outlined in their respective complaints – constitute torture.ECISION POINTS, Mr. Bush states unequivocally that he authorized the torture, including waterboarding, of individuals held in U.S. custody. He further admits and acknowledges his role in selecting and approving the interrogation techniques.

 

Accordingly, evidence exists to establish a reasonable basis for concluding that while in U.S. custody,

***

On February 7, 2002, Mr. Bush determined that the Geneva Conventions did not apply to the conflict with al Qaeda, and that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, prohibiting inhumane treatment and acts of torture, did not apply to either al Qaeda or Taliban detainees. As was officially acknowledged by a bipartisan U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee report, Mr. Bush’s memorandum paved the way for the abuse of detainees held in the context of the so-called “war on terror” and the use of techniques such as waterboarding and stress positions.

Mr. Bush played a central role in the creation of CIA secret detention program, which he personally authorized through a September 17, 2001 Presidential directive. Under this program, the disappeared detainees were subjected to a regime now widely acknowledged to amount to torture. It is further recalled that prolonged disappearance or prolonged incommunicado detention has been found to constitute torture by various U.N. bodies, as set forth in the Indictment.

The CIA Inspector General Report from 2004 confirms that Mr. Bush was fully briefed on the specific “enhanced interrogation techniques” used by the CIA – techniques which the United Nations, the International Committee of the Red Cross, and the Council of Europe, amongst others, have all found to amount to torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.

Mr. Bush’s personal responsibility for these techniques is not a question: in his memoir, D

We therefore urge the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada to act in accordance with Canada’s obligations under domestic and international law by detaining George W. Bush while he is present in Canada, and opening a preliminary investigation into the allegations brought against him.

SIGNED

Theo van Boven, former UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Forms of Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (2001-2004)

Manfred Nowak, former UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Forms of Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (2004-2010) and Professor of Constitutional Law and Human Rights, University of Vienna

Sister Dianna Ortiz

Luis Guillermo Pérez, Secretary General of the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)

Michael Ellman, Ex-Chair, Solicitors International Human Rights Group and former FIDH Board Member Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos (APRODEH), Peru

Bill of Rights Defense Committee, United States

Center for Peace and Democracy Development, Serbia

Centre for Research on Globalization, Canada

Centro de Capacitacion Social de Panamá (CCS), Panama

Centro Nicaraguense de Derechos Humanos (CENIDH), Nicaragua

Citizens against Corruption (CAC), Kirghizistan

Colectivo de Abogados José Alvear Restrepo (CAJAR), Colombia

Comisión de Derechos Humanos de Guatemala (CDHG), Guatemala

Comision Ecumenica de Derechos Humanos (CEDHU), Ecuador

Comité de Acción Juridica (CAJ), Argentina

Corporación de Promoción y Defensa de los Derechos del Pueblo (CODEPU), Chile

Defending Dissent Foundation, United States

Desis Rising Up & Moving, United States

European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, Germany

Finnish League for Human Rights, Finland

Fundación Regional de Asesoría en Derechos Humanos (INREDH), Ecuador

Global Justice Center, United States

Human Rights Association, Turkey

Human Rights Center (HRIDC), Georgia

Human Rights Monitoring Institute (HRMI), Lithuania

Instituto Latinoamericano de Servicios Legales Alternativos (ILSA), Colombia

International Association of Democratic Lawyers (IADL)

International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, Canada

International Commission for Jurists (ICJ), Switzerland

International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), France

International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT), Denmark

Internationale Liga für Menschenrechte, Germany

Iranian League for the Defence of Human Rights (LDDHI), France

Justiça Global, Brazil

Lawyers Against the War, Canada

Liga Argentina por los Derechos del Hombre (LADH), Argentina

Liga Mexicana por la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos, Mexico

Ligue des Droits et Libertés (LDL), Canada

National Lawyers Guild, United States

No More Guantánamos, United States

Observatorio Ciudadano, Chile

Organización Femenina Popular, Colombia

Organisation Marocaine des Droits de l’Homme (OMDH), Morocco

Pax Christi USA, United States

Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates (PAHRA), Phillipines

Physicians for Human Rights, United States

REDRESS, United Kingdom

Reprieve, United Kingdom

Torture Abolition and Survivors Support Coalition International, United States

Union for Civil Liberty, Thailand

Victoria Coalition for the Survivors of Torture, Canada

War Criminals Watch, United States

Witness Against Torture, United States

World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), Switzerland

Oct 192011
 

The 99% march in Occupy Saskatoon

by on October 19, 2011 in News

Protestors demonstrate their solidarity with a global movement as they walk the streets of Saskatoon. (More pictures below.)

More than 400 protesters in Saskatoon marched from the University Bridge to Friendship Park in a show of solidarity with the Occupy Wall Street movement on Oct. 15.

This “Day of Global Action” saw groups in 1,445 cities around the world join the movement that began in New York City on Sept. 17.

Protesters in Saskatoon chanted, “We are the 99 per cent,” and “Whose streets? Our streets!”

Their signs were evidence of the diversity and tone of the protest. While “We are the 99%” is a feature of Occupy protests around the world, others addressed more local issues.

One said, “Saskatchewan is not for sale!” While others read, “Stop the Tar Sands,” and, “I care about you! No Nuclear Waste.”

The evening’s open mic gave a platform to a singer-songwriter, the Committee for Future Generations, stopgormley.ca, Saskatoon Anti-Poverty Coalition, the Postal Workers’ Union and farmers expressing concern over the dissolution of the Canadian Wheat Board.

With a kitchen, porta-potties and tents, about 60 protesters came equipped to spend the night in Friendship Park. And as of now, the plan is to occupy the park indefinitely.

The Occupy movement has been criticized for having no focused message, but it is this same feature that allows the conversation to continue.

“A lot of protests are anti-something or trying to shut something down,” said occupier Barb Fornssler. “This is trying to grow something. But what we’re growing, I think, will be emergent to each local context.”

The most recurrent message across the movement — now its slogan — is “We are the 99 per cent.” This refers to the growing economic gap between the richest one per cent and the rest.

It also points to the populist nature of the movement. It suggests the movement’s desire to represent the concerns of the majority of the population.

Organizer Jeh Custerra called the movement an example of “direct democracy.”

While the 99 per cent slogan connects Occupy Saskatoon to the global phenomenon, there are specific local issues being discussed in Friendship Park.

Mary Jean Hande is an occupier concerned with the corporate influence at the University of Saskatchewan.

The Day of Global Action coincided with a meeting of the University Senate. Some of the Occupy protesters attended the meeting before the march.

Hande is an elected senator and member of the group USSWORD.

Hande presented three motions at Saturday’s Senate meeting. One alleged a conflict of interest for Nancy Hopkins, chair of the Board of Governors and board member of Cameco Corporation.

She said she was disappointed with the defeat of her motions.

“The Senate is supposed to be the opportunity for the University to reach out into the community and for the community to provide input,” she said. “But the amount of intimidation that we’ve received even for discussing these things really discourages people from asking these questions.”

Asked how the Senate meeting relates to the Occupy movement, Hande responded, “One of our local actions is to restore democracy to these types of institutions.”

Each of the occupiers expressed concern over having the movement misrepresented by the media. No individual purports to speak for the entire group.

Group statements, arrived at by consensus, can be found on Occupy Saskatoon’s Facebook page, where they also post daily events.

Occupiers hope the movement will continue to grow and that Saskatonians will visit Friendship Park and add to the ongoing conversation. The general assembly occurs daily at 5:30 p.m.

Occupy Wall Street glossary: 

99 Percent: A reference to growing income inequality between 99 percent of the population and the top 1 percent of earners, who have amassed approximately one-third of national wealth in the United States. It has become the slogan of the Occupy movement, and originates in a tumblr blog of the same name. In Canada, the top one per cent earn about 14 per cent of national income.

Mic Check: What speakers at general assemblies say to announce that they want to start speaking and have their words repeated throughout a crowd.

Twinkling: Wiggling one’s fingers to signal agreement with what’s being said. It moves along conversation without drowning out the speaker with applause.

Oct 182011
 

I ended up in Court because, starting in 2003,  I joined others to stop the out-sourcing of Canadian census work to Lockheed Martin Corporation (the American military).  

Tomorrow morning (Oct 19), the Court (Queen’s Bench, Saskatoon) will hear the appeal of the “guilty” decision in   R vs Sandra Finley.   

The trial has been on-going since April 2008.  In January 2011,  I was found guilty. 

Sentencing was an absolute discharge – no punishment imposed – BUT! the “guilty” decision still stands.

 I will have done more harm than good if the Judge’s “guilty” decision is allowed to stand

The  “guilty” decision means:

–         our Charter protection against the Government, a basic Right in modern democracies, the Charter Right to Privacy of personal information – –  is lost.   

The Charter Right says that the Government cannot force citizens to hand over “a biographical core of personal information”.    StatsCan continues to use the threat of prosecution to force citizens to give up their Charter Right.  

If you have any doubt about the role of census data bases in a police state, read  “IBM and the Holocaust”.   

 If you have any doubts about Lockheed Martin Corporation,  watch the video, an interview with William Hartung, author of “Prophets of War, Lockheed Martin and the Making of the Military Industrial Complex“, book launched in January 2011.

It was the foresight and wisdom of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau that gave us the Charter Right.  It falls to us to defend it, or lose it. 

I see this as part of the OCCUPY movement that will bring an end to Governments/Universities that serve the corporate interest.   The interests of the military-industrial complex in Government and in the Universities, with tax-payers footing the bill, needs to be stopped.   (All of this is explained in various postings accessible at Lockheed Martin, Census, Trial, War Economy.)

Persons in our network have collaboratively created a comprehensive file that shows the extent of the increasing militarization in Canada.  It (and Lockheed Martin in particular) is a serious threat to democracy and to security.  

NEWCOMERS:   For background info,  click on Lockheed Martin, Census, Trial, War Economy.     (Topics such as:

  •  integration of American and Canadian military / police / border services
  •  drones deployed along the Canada-U.S. border
  •  the Troop Exchange Agreement with the U.S.
  •  armoured vehicles being rolled out by police forces across Canada
  •  the plans of the American “Security” forces, working with quislings in Canadian Government, to put the records on ALL Canadians (not just the trouble-makers) at the disposal of the American Government
  • Lockheed Martin heavily involved in the new Aviation Centre at the Saskatoon Airport which will likely be training young people in drone technology.  Tax-payers are still the major funders / enablers.  
  • etc. etc.)

(In preface to the following re OCCUPY:  Nancy Hopkins is on the Board of the Saskatoon Airport Authority (Lockheed Martin is a funder of the new Aviation Centre there), she is on the Cameco Board, and chairs the University Board of Governors (reference recent postings).  Dave Sutherland is on the University Board of Governors with Nancy, and is also on the SPP Initiative and Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE) along with Suncor, Monsanto, etc.  The “President of the Americas” for Lockheed Martin is a key player in the SPP, North American Union, “harmonization”, “integration”, anti-democracy, greed, corrupting, consuming, destructive, Big Corporate agenda.    (It is, of course, not ALL corporations – but a significant enough number of them.)

The links between the University, the Governments (transferring tax-payer money), and the Nuke/Tar Sands industries (Brad Wall the “co-spearhead of the largest on the planet Canada-U.S. Western Energy Corridor” which is all about Nuke and Tar Sands, (and related to water scarcity, resource depletion in the U.S.)) is at  http://ussword.blogspot.com/p/infographic.html   (The Radioactive Trinity). )

FROM DARKNESS INTO LIGHT,  The OCCUPY MOVEMENT. 

Two weeks ago  I continued to worry a lot about the looming dark day of descent – – rising levels of propaganda, injustice, inequality, abuse of power, corruption, failing institutions (education for example, Wall Street, etc.), and so on into the hands of the American “security” forces / Lockheed Martin surveillance and police state.

My World-view has changed!   The OCCUPY MOVEMENT  is real and stunning.   I almost have an email ready to send;  but what is current one day is out-of-date the next, the events are tumbling into a cascade I have no hope of keeping up with.

OCCUPY  (of which I and many of you are part)  will see how their work and this is aligned.   Booting Lockheed Martin Corporation out of the Canadian Government and Canada opens up the space for us to re-OCCUPY what is ours.  

REQUEST:    Please help spread the word!  

 WEDNESDAY, Oct 19

10:00am 

Court of Queen’s Bench

Saskatoon 

 ISSUE: 

The Government (Statistics Canada and Public Works) out-sourced work on the Canadian census to Lockheed Martin Corporation (the American military).

I refuse to be complicit.

LEGAL DEFENCE: 

Charter Right to Privacy of personal information:     

 “In fostering the underlying values of dignity, integrity and autonomy, it is fitting that s. 8 of the Charter should seek to protect a biographical core of personal information which individuals in a free and democratic society would wish to maintain and control from dissemination to the state.”

IN APPRECIATION AND GRATITUDE:

 I am incredibly fortunate to have a body of informed and active people working with me.  I am humbled.   

I have great confidence in the young lawyer, Steve Seiferling, who will be presenting the argument to the Court.  His explanation of the ways in which the Judge erred in her decision make perfect sense to me!   

We are sometimes placed in situations that call on us to stand.   The wonderful thing about it?  . . .  Everything is possible because we are connected!   I am just a body and some fingers that can type.  Your energy, the larger energy, flows through us all.    Synchronistic timing:  back in Court when the OCCUPY MOVEMENT is in full throttle – – it is really kind of neat!

Oct 182011
 

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-wallstreet-protests-social-idUSTRE79G6E420111018

Occupy Wall Street protesters meditate while a sign bearing their twitter handle hangs from a railing in Zuccotti Park in New York October 1, 2011. REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi

Occupy Wall Street protesters meditate while a sign bearing their twitter handle hangs from a railing in Zuccotti Park in New York October 1, 2011. REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi

 

It all started innocuously enough with a July 13 blog post urging people to #OccupyWallStreet, as though such a thing (Twitter hashtag and all) were possible.

It turns out, with enough momentum and a keen sense of how to use social media, it actually is.

The Occupy movement, decentralized and leaderless, has mobilized thousands of people around the world almost exclusively via the Internet. To a large degree through Twitter, and also with platforms like Facebook and Meetup, crowds have connected and gathered.

As with any movement, a spark is needed to start word spreading. SocialFlow, a social media marketing company, did an analysis for Reuters of the history of the Occupy hashtag on Twitter and the ways it spread and took root.

The first apparent mention was that July 13 blog post by activist group Adbusters (r.reuters.com/suc54s) but the idea was slow to get traction.

The next Twitter mention was on July 20 (r.reuters.com/tuc54s) from a Costa Rican film producer named Francisco Guerrero, linking to a blog post on a site called Wake Up from Your Slumber that reiterated the Adbusters call to action (r.reuters.com/vuc54s).

The site, founded in 2006 “to expose America’s fraudulent monetary system and the evil of charging interest on money loaned,” is a reference to the biblical verse Romans 13:11 that reads in part: “The hour has come for you to wake up from your slumber, because our salvation is nearer now than when we first believed.”

Guerrero’s post was retweeted once and then there was silence until two July 23 tweets — one from the Spanish user Gurzbo (r.reuters.com/wuc54s) and one from a retired high school chemistry teacher in Long Island, New York named Cindy tweeting as gemswinc. (r.reuters.com/xuc54s)

Gurzbo’s post was not passed along by anyone but Cindy’s was, by eight people, including a Delaware-based opponent of the Federal Reserve, a vegan information rights supporter, a Washington-based environmentalist and an Alabama-based progressive blogger.

Again, there was relative silence for nearly two weeks, until LazyBookworm tweeted the Occupy hashtag again on August 5. (r.reuters.com/zuc54s) That got seven retweets, largely from a crowd of organic food supporters and poets.

HASHTAG REVOLT

The notion of Occupy Wall Street was out there but it was not gaining much attention — until, of course, it did, suddenly and with force.

Social media experts trace the expansion to hyper-local tweeters, people who cover the pulse of communities at a level of detail not even local papers can match.

In New York, credit goes to the Twitter account of Newyorkist, whose more than 11,000 tweets chronicle the city in block-by-block detail. His was one of the first well-followed accounts to mention the protests in mid-September.

Trendistic, which tracks hashtag trends on Twitter, shows that OccupyWallStreet first showed up in any volume around 11 p.m. on September 16, the evening before the occupation of lower Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park began. Within 24 hours, the tag represented nearly 1 of every 500 uses of a hashtag.

The first two weeks of the movement were slow, media coverage was slim and little happened beyond the taking of the concrete park itself. But then a demonstration on the Brooklyn Bridge prompted hundreds of arrests and the spark was ignited.

On October 1, #OccupyBoston started to show up on Twitter. Within a couple of weeks, #OccupyDenver and #OccupySD and others appeared.

The Occupy Wall Street page on Facebook started on September 19 with a YouTube video of the early protests. By September 22, it reached critical mass.

“Newcomers today, welcome! Feel free to post. Advertise your own pages of resistance. Network until it works,” read one posting meant to inspire protests elsewhere.

For young activists around the world, who grew up with the Internet and the smartphone, Facebook and Twitter have become crucial in expanding the movement.

They are pioneering platforms like Vibe that lets people anonymously share text, photos and video over short distances for brief periods of time — perfect for use at rallies.

“No one owns a (Twitter) hashtag, it has no leadership, it has no organization, it has no creed but it’s quite appropriate to the architecture of the net. This is a distributed revolt,” said Jeff Jarvis, a journalism professor at City University of New York and author of the well-known blog BuzzMachine.

Some reports say the protesters have raised as much as $300,000 in donations to cover everything from pizza to video equipment but others put the figure much lower.

The Alliance for Global Justice, which calls itself “the fiscal sponsor for Occupy Wall Street,” has raised $23,200 via WePay.com.

OCCUPY EVERYWHERE

As of Monday afternoon, Facebook listed no fewer than 125 Occupy-related pages, from New York to Tulsa and all points in between. Roughly 1 in every 500 hashtags used on Twitter on Monday, all around the world, was the movement’s own #OWS.

The websites keep proliferating — We Are the 99 Percent, Parents for Occupy Wall Street and Occupy Together, even the parody Occupy Sesame Street (concerned mostly with the plight of monsters living in garbage cans).

Online streaming video has also been a huge resource for the protesters, using cheap cameras and high-speed wireless Internet access.

Supporters, opponents and the merely curious got the chance last Saturday to watch the Occupy Wall Street protesters decide whether to occupy a major public park, Washington Square Park, in the Greenwich Village area.

They saw warnings the police were about to arrive in riot gear and with horses, vans and buses to take away protesters if there were mass arrests. Local media reported about 10 arrests among the 3,000 or so people in the park.

As the seconds to a possible confrontation ticked down, the tension led to various reactions from those watching online.

“Anyone arrested is a political prisoner,” said one.

“Here comes Czar Bloomberg’s Cossacks,” said another, in reference to New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg and the appearance of the mounted police.

There were “we are watching” messages of support from cities across the United States and some who found it the best entertainment going on a Saturday night.

“So much more exciting than a TV show” was one comment.

(Reporting by Ben Berkowitz; Additional reporting by Martin Howell and Anthony DeRosa in New York; Editing by John O’Callaghan)

 

Oct 172011
 
 By Rory MacLean, The StarPhoenix October 17, 2011
 Competing visions of democracy and education clashed at a lively University of Saskatchewan senate meeting Saturday.

The meeting was attended by a group of protesters affiliated with the Occupy Saskatoon movement who are critical of the corporate ties among the university’s leadership, particularly those relating to the nuclear industry.

“Do I think their concerns are something that can be identified at the University of Saskatchewan? I don’t. But nevertheless they were invited by a group of senators … they came and they’re welcome,” said U of S president Peter MacKinnon.

MacKinnon said he wasn’t exactly clear on the purpose of Occupy Saskatoon.

“Perhaps their interpretation of it is that the university should respond more to the politics of the street than to the politics of its governing bodies. I don’t know. Is their view of majority, or at least of democracy, simply that if you can rally a big enough protest, the protest should be obeyed? I don’t know.”

Protesters were invited by University Senators in Saskatchewan Working to Revive Democracy (USS-WORD), a group calling for more public input into university decision-making.

In his address to the senate, MacKinnon responded to the formation of USS-WORD, which earlier this year called for board of governors chair Nancy Hopkins to resign because of an alleged conflict of interest arising from her involvement with Cameco Corp.

“Some members of this body have developed their own organization to, as they put it, restore democracy to the University of Saskatchewan. Note there is a conclusion implicit in the purpose,” he said.

MacKinnon rejected the notion there was anything undemocratic about the way the university managed its affairs.

“The authority in my office is not any that’s claimed by me in some sort of unilateral suggestion. This body, the council and the board of governors do not claim any authority other than that which is granted to them by the University of Saskatchewan Act, duly passed by the government of this province.”

Ron Schriml, senator for Unity/Duck Lake/Watrous, contested MacKinnon’s view of democracy, saying it was manifested more in grassroots political action.

“Are your remarks based on naivete or is there some ideological argument you can make for holding that particular narrow view?”

MacKinnon responded that he didn’t think orderly governance was incompatible with democracy.

“On the contrary. I think to give sensible, effective voice to democratic instincts we need to have the structure and capacity to do that. Good governance is a fundamentally important part democracy itself and that’s what we try to practise here at the University of Saskatchewan.

“Votes are taken on matters requiring decisions. Majority votes prevail. Democracy is, I believe, alive and well in the deliberations and decision making of its governing bodies … I leave it up to others to judge who makes the more compelling case.”

There was some back and forth among senators about the university’s ties to the mining and nuclear industries. USS-WORD and its supporters say these relationships compromise the university’s autonomy and filters funds away from the arts and humanities.

“I think people take that for granted that it’s business as usual at the University of Saskatchewan. I reject the notion that this is something that always has been and always should be,” said USS-WORD member Mary-Jean Hande in an interview after the meeting.

A number of senators rose to say those corporate ties are essential to the provincial economy and keep much-needed research dollars flowing into the university.

USS-WORD also tabled a motion at the meeting relating to its campaign to oust Hopkins, which was defeated.

Most of the protesters had left to join the Occupy Saskatoon march by the time the motion came to vote.

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix
Oct 142011
 

World News on Bush Visit

http://www.imemc.org/article/62263

Amnesty asks Canada to apprehend Bush-(International Middle East)

http://genevalunch.com/blog/2011/10/14/canadian-response-lukewarm-to-amnestys-call-to-arrest-george-bush/

Canadian response luke warm to Amnesty’s call to arrest George Bush (Switzerland)

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/111012/amnesty-international-arrest-george-w-bush-canada

Amnesty International asks Canada to arrest George Bush (Egypt)

http://rt.com/news/bush-us-canada-torture-749/

Arrest Bush! Canadians call for Presidential scalp (Russia Times)

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27076

Request that George Bush be barred from Canada (Montreal)

http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Amnesty+wants+Tories+arrest+Bush+during+visit/5541852/story.html

Amnesty wants Tories to arrest Bush during visit(montreal)

http://www.businessreviewcanada.ca/business_leaders/amnesty-international-urges-canada-to-prosecute-george-w-bush

AI urges Canada to prosecute George Bush (Business review Canada)

http://www.bdnews24.com/details.php?id=208849&cid=1

Arrest Bush (Bangladesh)

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/10/13/58667076.html

No amnesty for Bush (The Voice of Russia)

http://blogs.cfr.org/abrams/2011/10/12/human-rights-organizations-off-the-deep-end/

Council on Foreign Relations on Bush visit

http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2011/10/amnesty-urges-canada-to-arrest-g-w-bush/

Amnesty urges Canada to arrest George Bush (Pakistan)

http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/10/12/canada-don-t-let-bush-get-away-torture

Don’t let Bush get away with torture (Human Rights Watch)

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10758695

Amnesty to Canada: arrest George Bush (New Zealand)

http://jurist.org/paperchase/2011/10/rights-groups-urge-canada-to-arrest-ex-us-president-bush-ahead-of-visit.php

Jurist-Rights group urge Canada to arrest Bush ahead of visit

http://www.tucsonsentinel.com/nationworld/report/101211_canada_bush_arrest/amnesty-intl-wants-canada-arrest-george-w-bush/

AI wants Canada to arrest Bush-(Tucson Sentinel)

http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/80723/

AI calls on Canada to arrest Bush (PanArmenian)

http://www.japantoday.com/category/world/view/amnesty-calls-on-canada-to-arrest-george-w-bush-for-authroizing-torture

Amnesty calls on Canada to arrest Bush for torure (Japan)

http://www.rnw.nl/international-justice/article/amnesty-calls-canada-arrest-bush

(Radio Netherlands)

http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2011/10/14/canada-critically-responds-amnesty-international-call-arrest-bush-war-crimes

(Asian Tribune)

http://lankanewspapers.com/news/2011/10/71536_space.html

(Sri Lanka)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44878403/ns/world_news/t/arrest-bush-rights-abuse-amnesty-tells-canada/

(MSNBC)

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-10-12/us/30270735_1_amnesty-international-waterboarding-torture

(Times of India)

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/breaking-news/arrest-bush-amnesty-asks-canada/story-fn3dxity-1226165421728

(The Australian)

Oct 132011
 

(Peace Action,  http://www.peace-action.org/about-us. )

From: Kevin Martin, Peace Action <peaceact __AT__mail.democracyinaction.org>

It was a non-binding resolution that would have put the County Council of Montgomery County, MD on record in support of a “different military strategy and an end to the wars abroad [that] would free up hundreds of billions of dollars.”

Montgomery County is home to the national headquarters of the largest peace group in the U.S. – that’s us – and the largest military contractor in the world – Lockheed Martin (over $29 billion a year in military contracts).

Like our local chapter, Peace Action Montgomery, Peace Action chapters across the country have been pushing their city and town councils to pass similar resolutions as part of our national “Move the Money” campaign. We are building support from local elected officials for a change in national spending priorities to “move the money” from decades-long Pentagon spending to our local communities where it’s needed.

We had strong support on the Council, but then Council Members began receiving the calls.  Calls to Council Members came from Lockheed Martin and their friends in the State Legislature urging the council to pull the resolution. Hello, campaign contributions!

Fearing the resolution would drive Lockheed Martin to relocate its national headquarters to Virginia, taking thousands of jobs and tax revenues with it, County Executive Ike Leggett likened the resolution to “a dagger pointed directly at the heart of Montgomery County.”

Really?!?  A non-binding resolution expressing what poll after poll proves is a majority view in America is, in fact, a dagger…but who exactly is pointing it at the County’s heart?

Lockheed Martin and other supporters of runaway military spending have launched a massive lobbying campaign, dubbed “Second to None,” urging people to oppose cuts to the military budget.  Funded with our tax dollars, they’ll spend millions to protect their billions.

We certainly can’t match that, but I think the Occupy Wall Street movement is demonstrating we don’t need to.  And, the reaction of Lockheed Martin to our resolution shows we’re hitting the right notes.

Help us keep the band together!

We need your generous contribution to our Move the Money campaign to continue expanding our coalition of labor and economic and racial justice groups, to get our message to millions more and to turn up the heat on our elected representatives who need to start listening to their constituents and
stop chasing campaign contributions.

Humbly for Peace,
Kevin Martin
Executive Director
Peace Action

Lockheed Martin couldn’t take it.

Oct 132011
 

http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/amnesty-canada-required-to-arrest-george-w-bush?xg_source=activity

Amnesty: Canada ‘required’ to arrest George W. Bush

NewsCanadaInternetScience & HealthU.S.World

Eric Draper/The White House/Reuters

Eric Draper/The White House/Reuters

U.S. President George W. Bush calls current and former world leaders from the Oval Office during his final full day in office at the White House in Washington January 19, 2009

Agence France-Presse  Oct 12, 2011 – 11:57 AM ET | Last Updated: Oct 12, 2011 1:01 PM ET

By Michel Comte

OTTAWA — Amnesty International called on Canadian authorities Wednesday to arrest and prosecute George W. Bush, saying the former U.S. president authorized “torture” when he directed the U.S.-led war on terror.

Bush is expected to attend an economic summit in Surrey in Canada’s westernmost British Columbia province on October 20.

 The London-based group charged that Bush has legal responsibility for a series of human rights violations in a memorandum submitted last month to Canada’s attorney general but only now released to the media.

“Canada is required by its international obligations to arrest and prosecute former president Bush given his responsibility for crimes under international law including torture,” Amnesty’s Susan Lee said in a statement.

“As the U.S. authorities have, so far, failed to bring former president Bush to justice, the international community must step in. A failure by Canada to take action during his visit would violate the UN Convention Against Torture and demonstrate contempt for fundamental human rights,” Lee said.

A spokesman for the Canadian government was not immediately available for comment.

Bush cancelled a visit to Switzerland in February, after facing similar public calls for his arrest.

Alex Neve, secretary general of Amnesty International’s Canadian branch, told a press conference the rights group will pursue its case against the former U.S. president with the governments of other countries he might visit.

“Torturers must face justice and their crimes are so egregious that the responsibility for ensuring justice is shared by all nations,” Neve said.

“Friend or foe, extraordinary or very ordinary times, most or least powerful nation, faced with concerns about terrorism or any other threat, torture must be stopped.

“Bringing to justice the people responsible for torture is central to that goal. It is the law… And no one, including the man who served as president of the world’s most powerful nation for eight years can be allowed to stand above that law.”

Amnesty, backed by the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, claims Bush authorized the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” and “waterboarding” on detainees held in secret by the Central Intelligence Agency between 2002 and 2009.

The detention program included “torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment [such as being forced to stay for hours in painful positions and sleep deprivation], and enforced disappearances,” it alleged.

Amnesty’s case, outlined in its 1,000-page memorandum, relies on the public record, U.S. documents obtained through access to information requests, Bush’s own memoir and a Red Cross report critical of the U.S.’s war on terror policies.

Amnesty cites several instances of alleged torture of detainees at the Guantanamo Bay naval facility, in Afghanistan and in Iraq, by the US military.

They include that of Zayn al Abidin Muhammed Husayn (known as Abu Zubaydah) and 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, both arrested in Pakistan. The two men were waterboarded 266 times between them from 2002 to 2003, according to the CIA inspector general, cited by Amnesty.

Posted in: CanadaNewsU.S.  Tags: Amnesty InternationalGeorge W. BushHuman RightsKhalid Shaikh MohammedTortureUnited Nations Convention Against Torture

(Google to find a number of reports on Amnesty International’s call to arrest Bush.  Jason Kenney, Minister Responsible,  typically attacks the messenger in lieu of offering a reasoned explanation.    Does the newspaper have to print statements that don’t contribute to the argument?!   Kenney:  “Amnesty International cherry picks cases to publicize based on ideology. This kind of stunt helps explain why so many respected human rights advocates have abandoned Amnesty International.”)