Sandra Finley

Feb 262025
 
CFIA and Universal Ostrich expecting a federal court date over soon
250227-vms-ostrich
Karen Espersen with the birds that CFIA wants killed at Universal Ostrich.

Listen to this article

00:01:54

The owners of a 400-herd ostrich farm continue to fight for the birds’ lives against an order to cull them.

An expedited hearing for a federal court judicial review is expected to take place sometime over the next 10 days, according to Universal Ostrich owners Karen Esperson and Dave Bilinski.

The Edgewood farm owners said on Feb. 20, that they are waiting for an exact date for the hearing.

The federal court issued a stay order Jan. 31, meaning the culling, ordered by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is paused until the court reviews the case.

CFIA issued a notice Dec. 31, 2024, to Universal Ostrich to destroy all its birds after a small number tested positive for avian influenza.

Universal Ostrich challenged the decision Jan. 30, 2025 pointing to a healthy herd of birds.

“Last week CFIA denied us testing saying that even if they all test negative they are getting killed,” the owners said.

“Let’s not allow this to not be another mistake that the government makes. Help us protect the science that can help protect natural immunity and in turn, help human survival in this world.”

The unique resilience of the ostriches and the antibodies they have to fight the disease are being studied by the farm in its pursuit of finding a cure for other birds.

Universal Ostrich is prepared to fight CFIA but is looking for financial support to finance the legal battle.

A GoFundMe has already raised more than $32,000, at https://gofund.me/7da0c3ea.

“More than 300 of them have not even shown one symptom,” said Alyson Turnbull, who is organizing the fund for her aunt Karen.

– – – – – –    Dan writes:

You made me think of Miss Bizz, the gangly ostrichy bird on Mr. Dressup! 🪶

I wonder about the ostrich/chicken bird-flu culling frenzy. Should we not be culling all birds if this is really about a dangerous disease? Or am I missing something?

Miss Bizz could have utilized her feather boa when dealing with the enforcers!

Stay light and open to all possibilities!

Regards, Dan

On Sunday, February 23rd, 2025 Sandra Finley wrote:

Drea did good coverage. Thanks Dan. And . . . 🥁 🎆  🎷 . . .

The local PQB News ran the ostrich story. Wow! That’s progress.

https://www.pqbnews.com/news/fate-of-bc-ostriches-looms-with-federal-court-hearing-7836400

Could it be ?? MAYBE the Ostriches will lead the way to freedom? Running down the bad guys?! Ostriches have a mean kick to boot!

How ‘bout we all get ostrich masks? And wrap really long necks around the Enforcers. What fun!

Maybe we will not put up with the killing of the ostriches? Isn’t that a fine thought? Maybe that Judge will hold the line?

I live in anticipation of great things!

/Sandra

Feb 262025
 

The push to kill the ostriches was once again blocked, as Justice Michael Battista reaffirmed an injunction — but the battle to save the exotic flock is far from over.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) has failed in its latest attempt to bypass a court order temporarily protecting 400 ostriches at Universal Ostrich Farms, from the agency’s culling orders.

On February 17, Justice Michael Battista dismissed CFIA’s request for clarification of his earlier injunction, after the agency argued that while the injunction temporarily relieved the farmers of their responsibility to cull the flock, it did not prevent another entity from doing so.

Battista reaffirmed that the culling order remains paused until a judicial review is completed. However, he did agree to expedite the review process, meaning a decision could come sooner than expected.

 

“We anticipate a review taking place in early March” confirmed Kari Simpson, an advocate for the farmers. Justice Battista has assigned a case management judge to establish a schedule, meanwhile, CFIA’s appeal of the original Jan. 31 injunction has not yet been scheduled.

CFIA’s request for clarification centered on whether the agency could still use its authority under the Health of Animals Act to proceed with the culling, despite the injunction. Justice Battista rejected this argument outright, stating in his ruling: “There is no ambiguity in the Stay Order. It clearly stayed the operation of the Respondent’s Notice dated December 31, 2024, until a decision was rendered in the underlying application for judicial review.”

Katie Pasitney, one of the farmers fighting to save the ostriches, remains frustrated by the CFIA’s relentless push to destroy the animals despite their continued health.

“The CFIA wants all of the healthy ostriches still killed without allowing any further testing,” she said in a statement to Rebel News. “They emailed us stating even if we tested negative, they want the ostriches destroyed.”

Pasitney also described the mounting legal burden, now intensified by the expedited judicial review. “We are in a huge battle to save our animals that in turn can save your animals. Let’s not allow this to not be another mistake that the government makes.”

As the judicial review approaches, all eyes are on the courts to determine whether these 400 ostriches will be spared — or if CFIA will ultimately get its way.

The farmers, however, remain resolute.

“They picked the wrong farm,” Pasitney said. “We’re in it till the end,” Pasitney previously stated in an interview with Rebel News.

Drea Humphrey

B.C. Bureau Chief

Based in British Columbia, Drea Humphrey reports on Western Canada for Rebel News. Drea’s reporting is not afraid to challenge political correctness, or ask the tough questions that mainstream media tends to avoid.

Feb 262025
 

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. issued a 90-day stop-work order on a contract with a biotech company until HHS determines whether it is “prudent and safe” to continue. The order came just as the next phase of the company’s clinical trial, involving 10,000 participants, was set to start on Monday.

woman taking pill and covid spike proteins

Listen to this article

00:00/08:06

Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. put the brakes on a multi-million contract with the American biotech company Vaxart to create a new COVID-19 vaccine, Fox News Digital reported.

Kennedy on Feb. 21 issued a 90-day stop-work order on the contract until HHS determines whether it is “prudent and safe” to continue. The order came just as the next phase of the company’s clinical trial, involving 10,000 participants, was set to start on Monday.

In this phase of the trial, the company is planning to test the efficacy of its vaccine against existing mRNA vaccines, bypassing a placebo-controlled assessment.

“While it is crucial that the Department [of] Health and Human Services (HHS) support pandemic preparedness, four years of the Biden administration’s failed oversight have made it necessary to review agreements for vaccine production, including Vaxart’s,” Kennedy told Fox News Digital.

“I look forward to working with Vaxart and medical experts to ensure this work produces safe, effective, and fiscal-minded vaccine technology,” he said.

Fox News Digital reported that the trial is only paused, not terminated. HHS will decide whether to resume development of the vaccine within the next 90 days.

The development of Vaxart’s new COVID-19 vaccine was part of the Biden administration’s $4.7 billion Project NextGen initiative, launched in 2023 to develop innovative vaccines — like oral pills and nasal sprays — that are easier to administer and provide improved protection against the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Project NextGen is the successor to the Trump administration’s “Operation Warp Speed,” launched in March 2020 to expedite the development of COVID-19 vaccines.

Similar to Operation Warp Speed, Project NextGen — with funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation — encourages public-private partnerships.

Vaxart announced in June 2024 that it had been awarded up to $453 million to fund the Phase 2b trials of its pill vaccine under a contract from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). BARDA operates under the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR), a department of HHS.

The company was developing a COVID-19 vaccine that can be taken orally. The paused trial was designed to compare the efficacy of Vaxart’s oral vaccine to an approved mRNA vaccine.

Of the $453 million approved, $240 million had already been authorized for the preliminary study, according to Fox Digital. The company had been recently authorized to bill the remaining balance of the contract for the clinical trials, but that billing is now on hold.

Vaxart can still bill the federal government for the costs of monitoring those people who participated in earlier phases of the trial.

The company said in an email statement to The Defender that it did not know the nature of the stop work order, but was informed it would be in effect for 90 days. The spokesperson said the trial hadn’t had any impediments to date and they “remain excited” to move forward.

“We recognize and appreciate the importance of oversight, transparency, and fiscal responsibility in government-funded biomedical research, and we are committed to working collaboratively with Secretary Kennedy, HHS, BARDA and other members of President Trump’s administration as they evaluate the data supporting the 10,000-participant portion of the Phase 2b study and determine how the study should move forward,” the spokesperson said.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Senior Research Scientist Karl Jablonowski said taxpayers have paid more than enough to vaccine makers, who don’t have the public’s best interests in mind.

He said:

“The U.S. taxpayers have already paid for our pandemic. Big Pharma has made out like bandits. They are using the Biden administration’s $4.7 billion Project NextGen initiative funds to expand their patent portfolio — for the betterment of profit.

“They are not beholden to the 340 million Americans footing the bill, they are beholden to the 227 million publicly traded shares of their company.”

The pause comes less than two weeks after Kennedy was sworn in as HHS secretary. During the nomination process, he came under fire from mainstream media and Democratic politicians for his so-called “anti-vaccine views.”

Kennedy and the organization he founded, CHD, were vocal critics of the COVID-19 vaccine and were censored on social media for dissenting views.

The Center for Countering Digital Hate targeted him for censorship as one of the “Disinformation Dozen” who raised questions about the government’s COVID-19 vaccine narrative.

Kennedy has repeatedly said he is not “anti-vaccine,” but wants vaccines to be subjected to rigorous safety testing and pledged to investigate the childhood immunization schedule as part of his work at HHS.

In 2023, the CDC added COVID-19 vaccines to the childhood immunization schedule, even though they were shown to provide little or no benefit to children.

Biden administration was funding new nasal and oral COVID vaccines

When BARDA funded Vaxart, it also granted funding to CyanVac’s (up to $40 million) and Castlevax’s ($34 million) intranasal vaccines.

Each company’s Phase 2b trials were set to recruit 10,000 volunteers to compare the safety and efficacy of the investigational vaccine against the existing mRNA vaccines.

ASPR Assistant Secretary Dawn O’Connell said in a news release at the time that the new vaccines “may … be easier to administer through intranasal or oral delivery.” The announcement suggests the delivery methods have the “potential to improve vaccine access.”

Jablonowski said oral vaccines, like the one being developed by Vaxart, “have generally not been terribly effective in creating and sustaining an immune response,” with the exception of the oral polio vaccine. That vaccine, which is a liquid, not a pill, has been plagued with safety issues, causing polio outbreaks in many countries.rate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

 

When the funding was awarded, Vaxart CEO Steven Lo celebrated it in a press release. “Vaccine delivery has relied primarily on injection for more than 150 years. This funding from BARDA will assist us in determining whether we can bring a transformational, next-generation approach to global vaccination.”

Vaxart’s pill, VXA-CoV2-1, uses an adenovirus vector to infect epithelial cells in the lower small intestine. The vaccine delivers the genetic material to create the spike protein. The company boasts that a special coating allows the oral pill to survive the low pH in the stomach.

Adenovirus vaccines reportedly cannot make you sick, and cannot replicate or be integrated into the host body’s DNA.

However, Jablonowski said, “Two adenovirus-based COVID vaccines have already been pulled from the market because they were remarkably unsafe, yet passed initial — and clearly insufficient — safety standards.”

Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) and AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccines also used adenovirus vectors.

The use of J&J’s vaccine was paused in April 2021 after reports of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), a severe blood clotting disorder. In July 2021, the FDA warned about the risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome with the J&J vaccine, after approximately 100 cases were reported among 12.5 million vaccine recipients.

With existing doses of the J&J vaccine having expired in May 2023, the vaccine is no longer in use.

The AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine also caused blood clots, resulting in temporary pauses in its use in several countries. It was removed from the market in May 2024.

In addition to its COVID-19 vaccine, Vaxart is also developing oral vaccines for norovirus and bird flu, with initial trials for the norovirus vaccine beginning this year.

Feb 252025
 

www.sandrafinley.ca

For Your Selection END  of  FEBRUARY, 2025

I think you will be happy you watched this:    1.    2025-02-28  The Big Picture: Life Inside The Control Grid, from CHD Covid

– – – – – – – –

  1. I see  A PRETTY STRAIGHT LINE FROM GENETIC ENGINEERING CIRCA 2000,  to TODAY.

The links,  #1 to #9 (start – page 3 last para),   are about genetic engineering:  2004, 2005, 2006, 2011, 2012,  2024.   I’m not asking you to read the postings!  just the titles of some links.

This film (free viewing, 1 hour) tells what you might like to glean from the postings:    2004    We are TIPPED OFF!   SUPERB documentary re-done in English, Bertram Verhaag, Life Running Out of Control.

If everyone knew some basics, we’d have better dialogue:

A.   I  am an animal.   The names of a couple other animals appear in the list of links (#1 to #9).

B.   The biotechnology industries of which I am aware are in:

    •  Agriculture (crops, like canola, corn, soy, rice, sugarbeets . . . )
    •  Pharmaceuticals / drugs  / vaccines  (Covid,  HPV – Gardasil) . . .
    •  Horticulture
    •  Forestry
    •  insects, . . .  umm,  mammals, fish, viruses . . .  well, in fact,  ??  It seems to me that Every Living thing is fair game to the industry, including YOU!   And The Industry no longer requires licensing to pursue its interests.
    •  Warfare (vaccinations).  “Gain of function” is genetic engineering to make viruses more virulent – it ended up mostly in China (Wuhan Lab)  because gain-of-function research was outlawed for a time in the U.S. (thanks to President Obama*).   The covid vaccine comes to us through military RESEARCH in weapons for biological warfare.

*OBAMA TRIED.   GAIN-OF-FUNCTION;  gain-of-function falls under – – it IS genetic engineering.  That’s what covid vaccinations, mRNA are.)   The list  (#1 to #9 that follows these A, B, C’s)  is from the work our network did, beginning in the early 2000’s.   The covid vaccinations are a CONTINUATION  of that science, applied now in many more ways.   EVER-EXPANDING.

There is nothing conspiratorial about it.  The biotech industry was up-front, with lobbying and propaganda – chemicals, pharmaceuticals, – – – under the names  “Life Sciences” and Bio-technology and whatever else can be dreamed up.   You may remember that it was Bayer (as in Bayer aspirin), that bought up Monsanto’s products after Mothers in Utah put an international movement (March Against Monsanto) in motion.   Bobby Kennedy, of course,  landed the knock-out punch as lead legal counsel in the California Court battle that laid to rest

what Monsanto knew about its products (they cause disease and DEATH).

What Big Pharma knew” about the effects of their covid vaccinations BEFORE the promotional campaigns even began – – –  YE GODS.  I’m not going to reiterate the documentation here  – – it’s well-known.

 

OBAMA PLAYED A POSITIVE ROLE

*Oct 17, 2014.    “Science” (https://www.science.org/content/article/us-halts-funding-new-risky-virus-studies-calls-voluntary-moratorium)

U.S. halts funding for new risky virus studies, calls for voluntary moratorium
No grants for flu, SARS, or MERS while government pursues 1-year risk analysis

 By Jocelyn Kaiser, David Malakoff

The White House (Obama) today stepped into an ongoing debate about controversial virus experiments with a startling announcement: It is halting all federal funding for so-called gain-of-function (GOF) studies

that alter a pathogen to make it more transmissible or deadly

so that experts can work out a U.S. government-wide policy for weighing the risks. Federal officials are also asking the handful of researchers doing ongoing work in this area to agree to a voluntary moratorium.

The “pause on funding,” a White House blog states,    applies to “any new studies …

that may be reasonably anticipated to confer attributes to influenza, MERS, or SARS viruses such that the virus would have enhanced pathogenicity and/or transmissibility in mammals via the respiratory route.”

The government also “encourages those currently conducting this type of work—whether federally funded or not—to voluntarily pause their research while risks and benefits are being reassessed.” Research and testing of naturally occurring forms of these pathogens will continue

– – – – – – – – –

C.      The Patenting (ownership) of genetically-engineered organisms was the original intention.

D.      The outcome of industry products is to DISEMPOWER us.   We become DEPENDENT beings in many and insidious ways.

E.      Definitions are often slippery.    mRNA falls in the stable of genetic engineering technologies.  In the list (#1 to #9)  you see nice little things like   “Terminator Technology”.  In today’s world (think of covid vaccinations)  you see nice little things like “Self-Replicating”.

That is,  self-replicating  INSIDE YOUR BODY.  That would be just like GMO crops – – once they are released into the environment,  there is no way to take them out.   (Unless you use “Terminator Technology”.   It all gets kind of messy.)

F.   Consumers in North America fought like hell for years to have genetically-engineered products labelled, as they were/are in Europe.   Big Corporates and Big Government used corruption to triumph over the public interest in Canada and the U.S.  In general you can’t tell the difference (can’t see it, can’t smell it) between what is genetically-engineered and what is not.    Do genetically-engineered products inflict harms?   . . .  You bet they do. Even death.   It’s well documented on my blog and even better elsewhere.

G.    Between Propaganda, Censorship, and treason you are prevented from knowing the full picture.  There are armies of “Communications Specialists” to ensure we remain in the dark.

H.   Genetic engineering since its introduction to corporatized-Universities has been about “takeover”.  Control.   Control the Food Supply for example by controlling the crops that are grown.  Teach the students how to Genetically-engineer.  The University produces successive crops of students trained to work in biotechnology, in silos that indoctrinate brains. Normalize what isn’t normal.

I.   Know no bounds.  Make money.   The Mother Lode was in covid vaccinations.

J.   HEALTH CANADA is, and has long been a captured agency.

 

What we knew ??

– – – – – – – – – –

2025-03-04 Theresa Tam’s emails reveal unethical experiment on Inuit infants   (Tamara Ugolini, Rebel News

2025-03-04 from the U.S. Govt Oversight Committee: “For example, the Biden-Harris Administration spent $2.5 million taxpayer dollars to study the fertility of transgender mice.”

2025-03-04 Informed skepticism, with thanks to Lyle

Very short and very powerful  (added on March 04.)

– – – – – –

INSERT:  I am interested in this posting about MASS CULLING in the U.S. because of Health Canada (CFIA)’s  edict to KILL (cull)  a herd of 400 ostriches at a farm outside Kelowna, B.C..   Again,  this is about viruses.  The video,  2025-02-28   The Big Picture,  is excellent background.

2025-02-18  USDA Has Spent $1.25 Billion on Mass Culling for H5N1 Bird Flu – With Disastrous Consequences         (The unsanitized word for culling, in English,  is KILLING)

– – – – – –

(Bottom of Page 3)  Links #1 to #9

Okay,  here are THE LINKS FOR THE STRAIGHT LINE from about year 2000, for  the genetic engineering that brings us to genetically-engineered vaccinations:  2004, 2005, 2006, 2011, 2012,  2024.   I’m not asking you to read the postings!  just the titles of some links.

  1. 2004-06-14 RR Wheat: Another big hit – $112 million pay out over Contamination of Corn (Aventis StarLink corn)
  2. 2004-11-13 Genetically modified: documentary by Bertram Verhaag “LIFE RUNNING OUT OF CONTROL; Gene Food and Designer Babies.” GM fish and pigs.
  3. 2005-02-07 Genetically modified: “Life Running Out of Control” DEBUT
  4. 2005-12-22 Government Directive on Regulating, Dept of Fisheries and Oceans, and “Life Running Out of Control”
  5. 2006-03-15 Terminator Technology will not solve the problem it is intended to address
  6. 2011-01-05 Updates: GMO’s, Monsanto, chemicals (roundup / glyphosate), genetically modified pigs
  7. 2011-01-10 Enviro-Pig = pig genes + E. coli genes + mouse DNA. Seriously. Coming to your favourite restaurant and you will never know the difference!     ( Related to covid vaccinations:  similar contaminates )
  8. 2012-03-03 Things are cookin`! (frankenfish) Update on Giant Genetically-Modified Salmon. Includes 2 new films from Germany.
  9. 2024-10-02 FOOD: I love you Lucy! GM Salmon Shut Down

 

Beside the Powerful   (tongue in cheek)  Mark Carney  and the CFIA Operation Chief Command Officer – – KILL the ostriches!   THE TRAGEDY & THE COMEDY.

– – – – – – –

mRNA technology is a continuation of what Big Government, Big Corporations and Mad Scientists have been doing since before the turn of the century.    With Terminator Technology (#5)  you’d end up with seeds that don’t have a “germ”.  No more wheat germ, oat germ.  No more reproductive capacity.  But Hallelujah! say the Mad Scientists:  even if Genetically-engineered seeds over -run the country side,  they can’t reproduce! So! Terminator Technology IS THE ANSWER!  These guys don’t have common sense –they truly do not know what happens in the real world – the repercussions of their work.  At our peril.)

And the ostriches?  what’s that about?  More of the same . . . the CFIA (Health Canada)  CONTROL.    Mark Carney, leadership-hopeful for the Liberals.  . . .  Listen to the recent short clip of him in Kelowna.

2025-02-17 Mark Carney, hopeful to be prime minister. All the Power he sees.  Sedition.

I’d just like to STOP the ** . . . Globalists    (but not our Globalist Activist friends – – I’m all for them!)

– – – – – – – –  Continuing “The Selection” of postings:

  1. 2025-02-25 WHO DECIDES THE FUTURE? Dire consequences of secretive biotech regulation: Response to Asilomar. From CBAN. Related to Ostriches and Health Canada (CFIA).
  2. 2025-02-21 Fate of B.C. ostriches looms with federal court hearing. Yeeeay! Local newspapers carrying the story! Thank-you Jennifer Smith.
  3. 2004 We are TIPPED OFF! SUPERB documentary re-done in English, Bertram Verhaag, Life Running Out of Control.   No, I think it’s human beings running out of control.
  4. 2025-02-16 Words that reach the heart from Tamara Lich to Canadians.  Beside the Powerful Mark Carney and the CFIA Operation Chief Command Officer – – KILL the ostriches! The tragedy and comedy.
  5. 2025-01-31 UPDATE: CFIA (Cdn Food Inspection Agency) directive to “Cull the Ostriches” is not going to happen as directed by Cortnie Fotheringham – Operation Chief Command Officer

 

We appear to have BOTH armed forces AND  a Government well-staffed with  COMMAND OFFICERS.

– – – – – – –

  1. 2025-02-21 Judge blocks federal bid to bypass court order halting ostrich culling

Drea did good coverage (above link).  Thanks for sending it Dan.    And  . . .

The local PQB News ran the ostrich story.   Wow!  That’s progress.  Main stream media reporting!

https://www.pqbnews.com/news/fate-of-bc-ostriches-looms-with-federal-court-hearing-7836400

Could it be ?    MAYBE the Ostriches will lead the way to freedom?  Running down the bad guys?!   Ostriches have a mean kick to boot!

How ‘bout we all get ostrich masks?   And wrap really long necks around the Enforcers.    What fun!

Maybe we will not put up with the killing of the ostriches?  Isn’t that a fine thought?  Maybe that Judge will hold the line?

I live in anticipation of great things,

/Sandra

 

Personally,  I agree with the views and recommendations in  2025-02-28   The Big Picture

I bless the participants.  I am grateful for them  and for the Millions of you and me’s.

Please Circulate The Big Picture as far and wide as you can.

– – – – – – – – – – –

Covid vaccines are genetic-engineering in action.   We have learned over the last 25 years:    the biotechnology industry CORRUPTS,   and it LIES, and it PROPAGANDIZES.    It is part of the bad-guy-Globalists’ agenda.  I think this is war??

 

Feb 252025
 

We are fast hitting a turning point.

Biotechnology is big at the University of Saskatchewan.  Not only in the Dept of Agriculture.

The National Research Council (NRC) at the U of S also does biotechnology.   https://www.canada.ca/en/government/dept.html

In 2007 at a meeting on-campus I spoke with a whipper snapper who was excited by his field of study.  It was just so cool and fun what you can do in biotechnology!   I have no words to challenge the hubris and ignorance.

2004 We are TIPPED OFF! SUPERB documentary re-done in English, Bertram Verhaag, Life Running Out of Control. No, I think it’s human beings running out of control.

The warning below from CBAN and groups from around the world is helpful.  And then, on to “Related to Ostriches and Health Canada (CFIA)” in another posting.   I try to make light, but without us,  it looks pretty dark.

Share this Newsletter

Who Decides the Future?

Today, CBAN and groups from around the world are issuing a warning about the serious consequences of scientists determining the future of biotechnology and regulating their own research. Our warning comes as hundreds of scientist-entrepreneurs gather in California to mark the 50th anniversary of the 1975 Asilomar conference. The concern underlying today’s Global Civil Society Statement is that, under the false guise of open discussion, this week’s “The Spirit of Asilomar and the Future of Biotechnology” conference will be used to give a green light to unfettered biotech research.

In the joint statement, groups are rejecting this closed-door event of screened participants, arguing that the meeting is geared towards those who stand to gain from biotechnology.

The outcome of the original Asilomar conference was a conclusion that scientists should guide the future of biotechnology. The conference 50 years ago was, largely, a meeting of molecular biologists, sparked by the possibility that their dangerous genetic research would trigger a demand for government regulation. The meeting was invitation-only and held behind closed doors, and it deliberately excluded broader ethical discussions and public participation. The conference reinforced the idea that scientists should be the primary arbiters of their own research boundaries and concluded that they could oversee their own research. The legacy of Asilomar is a dangerous system of self-regulation. Read more analysis and history from A Bigger Conversation.

Today’s statement of protest calls for true democratic control over biotechnology: “We are at a point in human history when technological developments, including genetic engineering, bioweapons, virological research, synthetic biology and other technologies, carry existential threats to health, the environment, the economy and human society. Questions about how to regulate, restrict, or prohibit, these technologies to reduce risk require broad-based, open, transparent and honest debate involving all sectors of society.”

The statement warns that “enormous harms can derive from biotechnology and these can arise by many routes, both directly and indirectly and from commercial products or laboratory experiments equally” and that, “irrespective of a technology’s specifics, whoever controls it inevitably determines whether good or ill ultimately results.”

The statement also says that, “biotechnologists have shown, for example through hostility to the precautionary principle, cultural unwillingness to study or learn from past mistakes.”

While the groups stress the need for public regulation of biotechnology, they argue that current regulation and regulatory culture is woefully inadequate to the task: “regulation of biotechnology should ultimately be by governments acting in the best interests of society as a whole and using the precautionary principle; but this requires the regulator to have: the necessary political authority, financial independence and clearly defined responsibilities. Regulators who become cheerleaders for a technology, as commonly happens, have lost their way.” Recent decisions by the Canadian government departments to remove government safety assessments for most gene-edited plants and foods provide a dangerous example that needs to be reversed.

Our statement ends with the warning that, if society does not regulate biotechnology, biotechnology is regulating society. Read the full statement here.

Let us celebrate this 50th anniversary of Asilomar by relegating it to the past where it belongs and embracing the hard task of democratic renewal that lies before us.” – Prof Ben Hurlbut from the School of Life Sciences at Arizona State University and co-director of the Global Observatory on Genome Editing. Read more in his article in Science magazine, Taking responsibility: Asilomar and its legacy – A reappraisal of the constitutional position of science in American democracy is needed.

 

Lucy Sharratt, Coordinator

coordinator@cban.ca

www.cban.ca

The Canadian Biotechnology Action Network (CBAN) brings together 15 organizations to research, monitor and raise awareness about issues relating to genetic engineering in food and farming. CBAN members include farmer associations, environmental and social justice organizations, and regional coalitions of grassroots groups. CBAN is a project of MakeWay’s shared platform.

Canadian Biotechnology Action Network (CBAN) 

PO Box 25182, Clayton Park Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3M 4H4

Phone: 902 209 4906 www.cban.ca

Donate >

Having trouble reading this mail? View it in your browser.

Not interested anymore? Unsubscribe instantly.

Feb 242025
 

Many industrial processes create toxic waste by-products.   Getting rid of the toxic wastes can bankrupt the enterprise.  Better to invent a new use.  Re-brand and Spread the poison.  The fluoride example.

Remember the controversial promotion of ethanol as an alternative fuel?

1.    Watch: How Pesticides Destroyed a Small Town  (short)

. . .  the consequences of a system that failed them?    Or . . . as Pogo says,

Incommunion We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Us – Incommunion     Some things can’t be fixed after the fact, not in my lifetime.  Not in the lifetime of the farmer in the video.  Mobilizations in the U.S. are thankfully fighting hard to change the path we’re on.  I hope we Canadians are fighting as hard with the Americans and People around the Earth who will make “better” happen.

The documentary is co-published with FERN (The Food and Environment Reporting Network).

“Farm to Fuel,” a short documentary exposes how neonicotinoid pesticides generated by an ethanol plant poisoned Mead, Nebraska’s soil, water and air — and how the town is still fighting for justice.

runoff from chemicals with neonicotinoide sign on top

For decades, Mead, Nebraska, was a peaceful rural town — until toxins generated by the area ethanol plant poisoned Mead’s land, water and air.

Farm to Fuel,” a short documentary, builds on investigative reporting by The New Lede, co-published with The Guardian, which exposed how the plant’s reckless disposal of pesticide-laced waste created an environmental disaster.

At the heart of the crisis are neonicotinoid pesticides, still widely used across the U.S. despite mounting evidence of their harm.

The New Lede’s Alex Hinton traveled to Mead, where he met with farmer Stan Keiser and his family, who shared their story of environmental devastation, previously reported by The New Lede.

Hinton spoke with Judy Wu-Smart, Ph.D., of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, whose groundbreaking research has been crucial in exposing the dangers of neonicotinoid pesticides, and former state Sen. Carol Blood, who has been leading the fight for stronger regulations to prevent tragedies like this from happening again.

 

Mead’s fight for justice is far from over. Despite the plant’s shutdown, its toxic legacy lingers, raising urgent questions about corporate negligence, environmental responsibility and the safety of rural communities across America.

Meanwhile, neonicotinoids continue to be used on millions of acres of farmland, seeping into ecosystems and threatening pollinators, wildlife and human health.

Today, the residents of Mead are still demanding answers, still seeking accountability and still living with the consequences of a system that failed them.

with the consequences of a system that failed them.

 

The documentary is co-published with FERN (The Food and Environment Reporting Network).

Originally published by The New Lede.

= = = = = = = = =

2.    State approved the use of pesticide-coated seed corn for ethanol plant a decade ago   

(why am I posting this?  . . . to remind ourselves how much we lose when we let things go.  Gotta stay on top of what’s happening.  It doesn’t matter whether it’s in North Dakota or across the border in Canada. )   

Critics of slow cleanup at AltEn plant express surprise that it was called a ‘minor’ change

By: – February 8, 2022

https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2022/02/08/state-approved-use-of-pesticide-coated-seed-corn-for-ethanol-plant-a-decade-ago/ 

(“how did it happen?”   –  It should not have.)

Feb 242025
 

Click on the small text above, the Category “Fluoride”.  A list of thumbnail sketches will be generated.  You can scroll down through them.   And then click on any titles you might want to investigate further.

If Gov. Spencer Cox signs a bill passed late last week, the state will end community water fluoridation. The new law also will give pharmacists new authority to prescribe fluoride supplement pills.

utah sign and child drinking water

Utah lawmakers last week voted to pass the first U.S. statewide ban on adding fluoride to public water systems. The Utah Senate voted 18-8 in favor of the measure after it passed in the House.

If Gov. Spencer Cox signs the bill into law, it will end community water fluoridation. The new law also will give pharmacists new authority to prescribe fluoride supplement pills. Typically, such pills can be prescribed only by a dentist or physician.

Rep. Stephanie Gricius, who sponsored the bill, told The Defender she was thrilled the legislature voted to pass the bill. “Utah leads the nation in so many things and this is just one more example.”

Gricius emphasized that the law allows people to make their own decisions about whether and how to take supplemental fluoride.

“I am a firm believer that the proper role of government is to provide safe, clean drinking water, not medicate the public on a mass scale,” Gricius said. “Because I also believe in medical freedom, I wanted fluoride to remain available to anyone who wanted it for either themselves or their children — which is why we made the prescription easier to obtain through a pharmacy.”

The bill’s Senate sponsor, Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore, said during his presentation on the Senate floor that the bill is “about protecting our water, reducing unnecessary costs, and ensuring people have the right to decide what they consume.”

Rick North, board member of the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), one of the plaintiffs who last year won a landmark lawsuit over water fluoridation against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said, “Utah’s fluoridation ban bill enjoyed wide support in both the House and Senate, reflecting both concerns over health risks and the firm opposition to adding any drug to drinking water, taking away people’s right to informed consent.”

North added, “If the governor signs the bill, it would be historic, and could be a catalyst for other states and cities doing the same.”

Opposition to water fluoridation has been growing across the country, particularly since a California federal judge ruled in the case brought by FAN, Mothers Against Fluoridation and others against the EPA that water fluoridation at current U.S. levels poses an “unreasonable risk” to children’s health and that the agency must regulate it.

Judge Edward Chen’s 80-page decision outlined the overwhelming scientific evidence that exposure to fluoride is linked to reduced IQ in children. The EPA recently announced it plans to appeal the ruling.

Chen’s ruling followed the publication in August of a key report by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ National Toxicology Program (NTP) that concluded higher levels of fluoride exposure in drinking water are consistently linked to lower IQ in kids.

Other studies making similar findings have also been published in major scientific journals this year.

  

Fluoride a byproduct of phosphate fertilizer production

Gricius started working on the issue last year after a resident approached her about “having individual choice when it comes to what prescriptions she and her children took.”

Local water conservancy districts also reached out to Cullimore to ask the state to ban water fluoridation citing claims of employee safety and the decision in the landmark case against the EPA, Gricius said.

Proponents of water fluoridation argue it protects children’s oral health. However, in October, an updated Cochrane Review concluded that adding fluoride to drinking water provides very limited, if any, dental benefits, especially compared with 50 years ago.

Proponents also underscore that fluoride is a naturally occurring chemical in water, earth and rocks. It can occur naturally in drinking water supplies, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions.

But most surface water contains very low levels of fluoride and roughly three-quarters of Americans have fluoride added to their drinking water. The fluoride added to water systems, typically in the form of fluorosilicic acid, is a byproduct of phosphate fertilizer production — as documents from the fluoride lawsuit confirmed.

Cullimore also emphasized that many Utah citizens don’t want the chemical added to their water. “This bill does not prohibit anybody from taking fluoride in whatever fashion they want,” he said. It just disallows people who do not want fluoride from having to consume fluoride in their water.”

Cullimore’s district includes the city of Sandy, where a malfunctioning pump in the water fluoridation system released undiluted hydrofluorosilicic acid into the water in 2019, affecting 1,500 households, institutions and businesses and sickening over 200 people.

An investigation revealed that officials failed to notify the public for 10 days and that fluoride was detected in the drinking water at 40 times the recommended levels.

The 18-8 vote to pass the bill in the Republican-dominated Utah Senate on Friday was largely along party lines, with two Republican senators voting against it and one Democratic senator voting for it.

If signed, the bill is set to take effect on May 7. The governor’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether Cox plans to sign it.

 

‘We’re watching water fluoridation unravel globally in real time’

Since the September court ruling, many U.S. cities and towns have moved to pause or stop fluoridating their water, signaling that the long-term and largely unquestioned practice in the U.S. is facing heightened scrutiny by the public.

FAN Executive Director Stuart Cooper said the Utah vote is a marker of how significantly public opinion is shifting.

Cooper said:

“This is another significant victory for the public, who didn’t sign up to have a developmental neurotoxin and endocrine disruptor to their drinking water. The NIH-funded science showing neurotoxicity, the NTP report confirming that neurotoxicity and the federal ruling that fluoridation poses an unreasonable risk to human health have all pushed this topic over the tipping point. We’re watching water fluoridation unravel globally in real time.”

Cooper pointed out that 95% of the world and 98% of Europe do not fluoridate, and many countries passed resolutions banning the practice decades ago.

He said states and towns that continue to add fluoridation chemicals to the public water supply “are the extreme outliers and radicals in this situation.”

Florida Surgeon General Joseph A. Ladapo in December advised governments across the state to stop adding fluoride to their water. Ladapo cited the neuropsychiatric risks — particularly for pregnant women and children — associated with the practice.

Lawmakers in at least three other states have also introduced legislation that would outlaw adding fluoride to community water systems, and four other states are considering bills to make fluoride optional or limit its concentration.

In addition to Utah, lawmakers in North Dakota, New Hampshire and Tennessee are seeking a ban on the practice. Bills in Arkansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Nebraska, and South Dakota would either repeal statewide fluoridation programs or set limits on the amount of fluoride added to water, Bloomberg Law reported.

Last week, Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller also called on Gov. Greg Abbott and the state lawmakers to institute a statewide ban on water fluoridation.

Hawaii is the only state that does not offer water fluoridation for most residents. However, the military bases there are mandated by the federal government to fluoridate their water.

Bucking national trends, Democratic senators in Connecticut are introducing legislation to make the current levels of 0.7 milligrams of fluoride per liter, recommended by the public health agencies, state law. They are drafting a bill, Senate Bill No. 7, that would continue water fluoridation at current levels in the state even if federal policy were to change.

The state senate democratic webpage reports they are drafting the bill out of concerns that Robert F. Kennedy Jr., recently confirmed as secretary of Health and Human Services, suggested on social media that the Trump administration would advise all American water systems to remove it from drinking water.

Related stories in The Defender

Feb 202025
 

As measles outbreaks continue to surface, the mainstream media is pointing the blame at HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s “anti-vaccine rhetoric.” But measles outbreaks have repeatedly occurred in communities exceeding 95% vaccine coverage, proving the vaccine itself does not provide durable immunity.

measles on a person's back in the shape of the US map and bottle of MMR vaccine

As measles outbreaks continue to surface, the mainstream media is now using them as a political weapon, attempting to blame our new U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for so-called “anti-vaccine rhetoric.”

The Wall Street Journal recently ran an opinion piece insinuating that his advocacy for vaccine safety is responsible for rising measles cases.

This narrative is not only baseless but ignores decades of documented measles vaccine failures — failures that have occurred in highly vaccinated populations all over the world.

Read the CNN article here.

The real issue is not a failure to vaccinate but a failing vaccine. As this article will demonstrate, measles outbreaks have repeatedly occurred in communities with exceeding 95% vaccine coverage, proving that the vaccine itself does not provide durable immunity.

The ongoing effort to scapegoat RFK Jr. is simply a distraction from the deeper scientific and historical evidence that challenges the mainstream vaccine narrative.

A long history of measles vaccine failures

For over 25 years, outbreaks have been reported in populations with vaccination rates exceeding 95%, undermining the mainstream assumption that vaccines are the singular solution to measles control. Here is a documented historical record of such vaccine failures:

  • 1985, Texas, U.S.: A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987 analyzed a measles outbreak in Corpus Christi, Texas, where 99% of students were vaccinated and more than 95% were immune. The researchers concluded: “Outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.”
  • 1985, Montana, U.S.: An article in the American Journal of Epidemiology examined an outbreak of 137 measles cases in Montana, despite a 98.7% vaccination rate. The researchers stated: “This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy.”
  • 1988, Colorado, U.S.: A measles outbreak at a Colorado college infected 84 students, even though over 98% had documented immunity due to strict vaccination policies. Researchers concluded that “measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations.”
  • 1989, Quebec, Canada: Initially blamed on low vaccine coverage, a study published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health concluded: “Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.”
  • 1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: A study published in the Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical found that 76.4% of measles cases in this outbreak had been vaccinated before their first birthday.
  • 1992, Cape Town, South Africa: A study in the South African Medical Journal documented an outbreak where 91% of children were vaccinated, and vaccine efficacy was only 79%. The researchers concluded that primary and secondary vaccine failure contributed to the outbreak.

These are just a handful of examples from an extensive body of literature documenting measles outbreaks occurring in highly vaccinated populations — clear evidence that vaccine-induced immunity is neither lifelong nor consistently effective.

Ignoring history won’t make vaccine failures disappear

Public health officials continue to ignore these well-documented failures while insisting that stricter vaccine mandates are the only way to prevent measles. However, history shows that vaccination does not equal immunization.

The widespread belief that vaccines alone can eliminate measles is more faith-based than evidence-based, as seen in the knee-jerk blame placed on the unvaccinated whenever outbreaks occur.

Ironically, those who highlight peer-reviewed evidence of vaccine failures are dismissed as “anti-vaccine,” even though they are merely pro-truth and pro-vaccine awareness.

The global health agenda, led by organizations such as UNICEF and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, continues to push mass vaccination campaigns while ignoring the real issues: poor sanitation, malnutrition and compromised immune health.

The media’s attempt to pin measles outbreaks on RFK Jr. is not based on science but on political opportunism. RFK Jr. has consistently advocated for vaccine safety and medical choice — principles that are far from “anti-vaccine.”

If anything, his warnings about vaccine-induced injuries and failures are validated by the very outbreaks being reported today.

Measles: A disease with real risks — and real benefits

Measles is a real disease, and while it can have serious complications, it is largely determined by an individual’s immune status. Before widespread vaccination campaigns, measles was a common childhood illness that conferred lifelong immunity.

Now, due to waning vaccine-induced immunity, adults — who are at higher risk for complications — are increasingly affected by outbreaks.

However, what mainstream medicine rarely acknowledges is that measles is not just a disease to be feared — it also has long-documented health benefits.

Emerging research shows that natural measles infection plays a critical role in immune system development and may help protect against chronic diseases, certain cancers and autoimmune disorders.

Additionally, while the measles vaccine is heavily promoted as safe, a growing body of evidence reveals dozens of serious adverse events associated with the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.

According to adverse event data compiled on GreenMedInfo, these include:

  • Encephalitis (brain inflammation)
  • Seizures and febrile convulsions
  • Autoimmune disorders such as Guillain-Barré syndrome
  • Chronic arthritis and joint pain
  • Thrombocytopenia (low platelet count leading to bleeding disorders)
  • Anaphylactic shock and severe allergic reactions
  • Increased risk of Type 1 diabetes

These well-documented risks raise critical questions about the one-size-fits-all vaccination policy being enforced through mandates.

The notion that every child must be vaccinated without consideration for individual risk factors ignores the reality that vaccines — like any medical intervention — carry risks that must be weighed against their benefits.

Instead of blindly pursuing a strategy of endless boosters and mandates, public health should take an honest, science-based approach that considers both the risks and benefits of natural measles infection.

Learn about the underreported downside of vaccination

If history teaches us anything, it is that the measles vaccine alone is not the solution. To explore the scientific literature on the unintended, adverse effects of vaccinations, visit our Vaccine Research Database.

Join the discussion on X.

Originally published on Sayer Ji’s Substack page.