“It is refreshing to see a court do its job of protecting our Charter freedoms,
by holding government to a high standard. There was no science behind Ontario’s total ban on all outdoor protests.”
In the year 2025 Easter is for Voting. Voting starts this Friday, April 18th. Rabbit stew for Sunday dinner, maybe? ha ha
(I do not like that the Government inserts its Presence into ALL aspects of Life.)
Election Day is just Two weeks away.
– – – – – –
re Televised Debates
As for the actual debates: on my screen just now, notice of a change in start time of tonite’s French debate. I am ignoring it. There’s too much skulduggery and I’ll never get this out if I stop to verify the info.
– – – – – –
1.a 2025-04-17 Election: The Green Party’s ‘Unprofessional’ ‘Bully’
Alternative media are helping to vet candidates, regardless of party affiliation.
The Green Party does not currently have the resources required to operate in Canada’s corrupted political world.
Lots of people will not like Western Standard reporting; lots of people do not like CBC reporting. I DO NOT KNOW IF Western Standard exposed the Green Party’s Dr. Anne-Marie Zajdlik who is running in Guelph. I am aware that they did “out”, for example, a Bully guy who was running in Calgary (I don’t remember for which Party). He was forced to drop out of the Election.
Prorogation followed by the replacement of Trudeau by Carney as PrimeMinister, the “snap” election, leaving the Election System vulnerable – – would have been seen to work in favor of herding the Liberals back into official CONTROL of Government.
We’ll see – – in the meantime, spread the word – – it will seep into the Guelph riding. The information for voters in Guelph is in the posting. 2025-04-17 Election: The Green Party’s ‘Unprofessional’ ‘Bully’
This way of VETTING candidates makes me nervous; the information has to be rock solid. But a continuation of Liberal Government makes me even more nervous. As I see it, we were betrayed by Bully Liberal Globalists. With the collaboration of other Parties.
(Note: Former leader of the Green Party, Elizabeth May: London ON, by-election, 2007 was Elizabeth’s first run at getting elected to Parliament. She came second. I went to London to help with the campaign. I won’t tell you all I learned then, and later as an organizer/ leader of the GP in Saskatchewan. )
Every Canadian should help in an Election Campaign at least once. Stay a while if you can. You will learn a lot. Working locally for Elections Canada during an Election is also good.
– – – – – – –
2. (coming) Catherine Austin Fitts (savvy American. Lots of experience in various realms. I trust her judgment.) – – there’s an interview I want. Clear-headed about Trump and Musk. , , , I recall that in the last quarter of the video, the interviewer asks if Catherine has thoughts about a possible Federal Election win in Canada by Mark Carney (PrimeMinister). . . .
Her reply was “God help us.” (I’m almost certain I heard her right. I also happen to believe she’s right.)
– – – – – –
3. UPDATE Apr 10 – interview with Lawyer for Detective Helen Grus following the GUILTY decision. (Mini collection, childhood vaccines: Sudden Infant Death (SIDS); Steve Kirsch and “Jennifer”).
- About 1 in 6 couples in Canada are infertile.
- The cost of getting to the pregnant stage is $20 to 30 thousand dollars (used to be free and fun).
-
AND THEN, no one tells the Mother NOT to get a vaccination if you’re pregnant??
- AND THEN you are SOOO disempowered that you don’t know how, or don’t want to investigate for yourself? SIDS (infants just somehow magically die? There are no known causes? That is bullshit. It’s lies. Go to the link above. All the info you need is there.
Maybe it’s the guys (the men) who have to roar? Do they WANT to have children? . . . I don’t see women’s groups standing up in solidarity with Detective Grus. Hopefully they’re out there, and I just don’t see them.
– – – – – –
4. 2025-04- from Moose on the Loose re Marc Carney’s conflict-of-interests
– – – – – – –
MEASLES are another case-in-point. In the beginning, a vaccination shot was for ONE disease. By the 1990’s – – the infamous MMR shot (Measles, Mumps and Rubella) was for HOW MANY? – – – THREE diseases. Three Shots in One. The reasoning sounds good:
There are combination-10 vaccines (there is at least one of those “combo” vaccines) that have 10 different vaccines in one. For your youngster’s good health and your convenience. If the little ones don’t die. DO NOT talk about that. Detective Grus you are GUILTY.
(There’s more “combos” on offer; I understate intentionally. It’s easier to defend an obvious understatement.)
In the case of the propaganda around measles, FAMILIES are pitching in to correct the record. Mennonites. They have an advantage of strength and support in community.
Dr, Pierre Kory provides excellent and instructive analysis in the first two of these:
OSTRICHES TO THE RESCUE!
An ostrich farm in Edgewood, BC, is challenging a cull order from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) after avian flu cases in December .
I am interested in this posting about MASS CULLING in the U.S. because of Health Canada (CFIA)’s edict to KILL (cull) a herd of 400 ostriches at a farm outside Kelowna, B.C.. Again, this is about viruses. The video, 2025-02-28 The Big Picture, is excellent background.
9. 2025-02-18 USDA Has Spent $1.25 Billion on Mass Culling for H5N1 Bird Flu – With Disastrous Consequences (The unsanitized word for culling, in English, is KILLING)
The CFIA initially ordered the destruction of the entire remaining flock of approximately 400 ostriches. A temporary court injunction was granted, delaying the cull while the farm argues for a more nuanced approach and the potential for alternative solutions. The farm is also arguing that the CFIA has other options under the Health of Animals Act to address public safety concerns.
A judicial review is probably completed – – it was scheduled for April 15-16 in Vancouver.
I think the OSTRICHES are stepping in, to the rescue! I’ve been saying for a long time: the root problem is the ever-increasing corruption. NOTHING WILL CHANGE if we can’t get that trend into reverse. All the lobbying is great and helpful, BUT IT DOES NOT CHANGE/ stop the corruption. We KNOW that.
Sniff avian flu; they slaughter millions of chickens. The CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency) upholds the world order. Puppets. No curiosity. Only the World Order (USDA Has Spent $1.25 Billion on Mass Culling for H5N1 Bird Flu – With Disastrous Consequences ). The price of eggs runs sky-high (duh). The cost of chicken?
We poor, dumb, blobs cower in quivering skeletons without a clue HOW OUR IMMUNE SYSTEMS WORK, let alone those of fellow creatures. We are so intentionally cullible.
Anyhow, Journalist Drea Humphrey and the The Ostrich Farm did a great UPDATE which I can’t find at the moment.
THE MAJOR BATTLEGROUND (PROPAGANDA) AT THE MOMENT:
- immune systems are inferior
- there is no such thing as an immune system
I will return to this
- From Stop Harper a decade ago, to
- Stop Trudeau and Carney. To
- Stop the CFIA and WEF!
Liberals today – the characteristics of a police and surveillance state, clear disdain for the Rule of Law, knowledge of people who have left Canada because the writing is on the wall (loss of freedoms and rights) (but this is a global battle), records from the covid years and continuing . . .
– – – – – – – –
A VOID I want to address: What about the past? What about CONTEXT?
I am guessing that few Canadians who are younger than 40 will know about the massive mobilizations in the USA in 1999. Thousands of Canadians crossed the border to join them. A film was made about the nation-wide (USA) insurrection, “Battle in Seattle”. Woody Harrelson was one of the actors. The Battle continues today. Non-violent. Global.
18. 2025-03-19 Mark Carney, PrimeMinister-Elect. 3 not-so-flattering videos.
18. a. 2025-04- from Moose on the loose re Marc Carney’s conflict-of-interests
19. 2025-03-24 Kevin O’Leary: Carney is Trudeau 2.0. Interview by Candice Malcolm
NOTE: There is no pay wall at Western Standard during the ELECTION PERIOD. Supporters who wanted “The Western” voice to get beyond the West banded together and approached the W.S.: if they each contributed $1000, would it be financially possible for the W.S. to remove its pay wall for the duration of the Election? Almost overnite there was financial support for that to happen.
https://www.westernstandard.news/
22. 2025-03-20 The simple step of the courageous individual is not to take part in the lie.
THE “PREVIOUS” SELECTION (before April) WAS MARCH 2025-03-20 For Your Selection
The first link in the Selection takes you to a video.
This COMMENT BY @joseerose81 is copied from there:
Great work! This documentary needs to be shared across the country! And this is only ONE of the many damaging Liberal-NDP policies. I simply cannot believe this is what Canada has become. It’s absolutely mind-boggling, not to mention infuriating and heartbreaking. There’s only one way to vote at this next election to even begin to try to fix this.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Please help spread the word. We can change the Government.
If your main information diet is mainstream media, you will not know the amazing people working to reveal “The Emperor has no clothes!”. They put a different, happy look on my face. Sometimes I need the boost.
Easter is a special time. If we are Celebrants of Life, we won’t be such obedient workers! Maybe that’s the plan? ha ha!
/Sandra
This began as a submission to the Commission of Inquiry into the Invocation of the Emergency Act in Canada, in February 2022.
The Act itself requires an Inquiry be held within 60 days. A copy of acknowledgement that the original of my submission was received by the Commission is at the end. I have added more context and made other edits since Feb 2022.
I watched all the proceedings, live-streamed, of the Commission’s proceedings.
WE WILL DO BETTER . . . NEXT TIME say the Police
CONTENTS INCLUDE
2. CHARACTERISTIC A bit about myself
3. INFORMED PUBLIC DISCOURSE IS MISSING IN ACTION
THE VOCABULARY
IF YOU DO NOT KNOW THE VOCABULARY FOR THE DISCOURSE, can you be clear about your decisions?
4. TIPPING POINTS
5. CITIZEN ACTION DOES NOT SPONTANEOUSLY COMBUST OUT OF THIN AIR
Please do not confuse “The Problem” with what is a “PREDICTABLE OUTCOME”.
SO: There will be more and larger mass demonstrations . . . ?
On October 18 and 19th, 2022, the Commission into the Invocation of the Emergency Act in Canada heard from Police: we will do better next time.
On CBC radio the next day (Oct 20), an “authority” pronounced: There will be more and larger mass demonstrations.
– – – – – –
Without some CONTEXT, and without the VOCABULARY for processing the information, it is more likely that YES, there WILL BE more and larger mass demonstrations. And
when the Police “DO BETTER”, it will be WORSE for Canadians and democracy.
If thwarted above ground, aggrieved people go underground (elaboration below under “CONTEXT”).
– – – – – – – – – –
WHAT IS MISSING in the pronouncement by “the authority” (more and larger demonstrations)?
There was no mention of the Unimaginable Numbers of people worldwide who are pitching in to help Canadians (and each other) fight the erasure of Rights.
Are we going to continue the fight against the wrongs that were done during the “covid” years, and that continue to be done? Is the Government going to come to the Table, or are they going to out-source their job to the Police?
The determination that our Rights will not be taken from us is shared around the globe. We stand by each other in this resolve. Today, Feb 18, 2023, I watched footage from Oxford, UK, home of Oxford University, not known to be a hotbed of radicals! The city of Oxford appears to have become that very thing. Masses of people in the streets, sharing information and supporting a united community.
There are much larger masses in other cities, in the UK and elsewhere. I include Oxford because it caught me by surprise.
Another “missing” in the UNIMAGINABLE NUMBERS of protesting people is the Millennials.
Brief Digression:
A. 1992: “SYSTEMS OF SURVIVAL, A Dialogue on the Moral Foundations of Commerce and Politics” by Jane Jacobs, is helpful to the discourse and contains a cautionary note about our conditioned interpretations of “what’s happenin’”; I think of baby-boomer stereotypes of “protestors”, for example.
B. 2023: The science and logic are changed. I am not controlled primarily by genetics; epigenetics play a much greater role in determining the contributions I will make to my world. “Environment” turns on the switches in cells in my body and all their potential.
DR BRUCE LIPTON is one of many scientists in the field of epigenetics. He is good at explaining things in language I can mostly understand. And he is hopeful:
Large numbers of “millennials” have NO “investment” in today’s world, nor in the projected future. They want “a better world”; they are creative; and more than baby boomers, they have “agency”.
LIPTON https://youtu.be/3-rF0OHY7NI (approx. an hour long video)
C. 1923: Kahlil Gibran A sobering dose of reality:
Your children are not your children. their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams!
What good news. – – Death dilutes the influence of the status quo; there is HOPE that a better world CAN be created!
2. CHARACTERISTIC – A BIT ABOUT MYSELF
I am 73-years-old (2022), born 4 years after the end of WW2.
I am from The Prairies (Luseland, SK), small town rural, distant from the city, of a different time. My Grandfathers and Dad were, by the quirks of fate, prevented from going to war. They were not directly exposed to the environment of killing. In my family, there was no broken down drunkenness returned from the war. Women and children are respected.
I have a decades-long interest in the building (and conversely the destruction) of strong, healthy communities.
Which is tied to unending curiosity: how ever could Germany have descended into nazism (fascism)? The standard responses have never been fully satisfying to me. I don’t understand it viscerally. Except now, through the covid experience I begin to see, to observe the process in action.
I am enamoured of freedom with its attendant responsibilities.
I have been twice to the Museum of Non-Violent Resistance at Checkpoint Charlie on the Wall that divided West from East in Berlin, Germany, during the Cold War. The first time was in 1999 on a day when we were busy dropping bombs on Kosovo (not far from Berlin if you measure distance as it is on The Prairies).
I view healthy communities and de-centralized governance as
the best defence against corruption and mass subjugation.
I was an elected member of the University of Saskatchewan Senate for 6 years in the 2000’s. The Senate is the “voice of the community” in the tri-cameral governance structure of Saskatchewan Universities. Activists from south and north got themselves elected to the Senate to challenge the commandeering of a public institution (“theft”) to serve corporate entities and enrichment. At the expense of the public good.
– – – – – – – – – – –
3. INFORMED PUBLIC DISCOURSE IS MISSING IN ACTION
What am I classified as, in the data banks? . . . a protestor? An activist? – – insurrectionist? – – dissident? revolutionary – – subversive – – an insurgent – – or warrior? – – I certainly hope I’m categorized as being against fascism (anti-fa) – – I’m a resistor of tyranny? Yes, I’ll swear to that (I do non-violent resistance) – – A rebel – – an old lady? (yes, I am that!) . . . a disruptor? (Elon Musk is a “disruptor” who challenges the status quo) – – conscientious objector? . . . yes, do not expect me to be complicit or compliant with Lockheed Martin Corporation’s involvement at StatsCan (Lockheed – – the American military-industrial-congressional war profiteers, FVEY surveillance, war-mongering, complete with the cherry on top – – drone warfare). Am I a guerrilla fighter in the tradition of Ché Guevera?
How are YOU categorized?
(The Government said that I am fringe minority, misogynist, racist, . . . It brings me great merriment to think of all the things I am!)
. . it is hard to imagine any insurgency meeting its goals without undermining aspects of the legitimacy or power of the government . . . . subversion includes measures short of violence, which still serve the purposes of insurgents.
Ironically, myself and tonnes of others have worked for a very long time, and still work, to STOP the takeovers of our Governments. We have lost regulatory power. Our sovereignty has been given away. Now we have a frontal attack on Rights.
Citizens do not hear or learn the proper vocabulary for this discussion
because it is seldom used in public, in Canada. Not in reference to ourselves.
The meaning of the vocabulary is dependent on “who controls the cargo”. If you are the Ogoni of the oil-rich Niger Delta (Nigeria) and you wish that your people did not live in poverty while foreign interests corrupt, pollute your nation and make off with the riches – – in the news you are a dirty “insurrectionist”; you get killed. Look around. Better you be on the side of the exploiters – – alive!
The Trucker Convoy and its supporters are freedom fighters, n’est-ce pas?
BUT insurgents are not us, may the Gods forbid! “Insurgents” are foreign and to be feared. They are scary people.
. . . Whereas, in my experience they are the best candidates for political office in Canada because they understand HOW the perversion of governance comes about. It is in their lived experience.
The Trucker relationship with the Police – – with the Police because the Government won’t meet with the Truckers – – will be rocky because the word “protest” and its alternatives have been successfully stigmatized, IF we don’t fiercely exercise our rights to free speech and to assemble. That is our rebellion. In my view, too many Canadians do not understand the vulnerability of our current situation.
I value the conversation I had with an underground “insurgent” from Central America who fought the usurpers of his country, for years. The battle was not won in his time; he managed to escape to Canada as the nets were tightening, before he could be apprehended by Police of the regime. He would not have survived police custody. Death is an ordinary due of freedom fighters. How’s that for deterrence by the Usurpers?
In Canada and internationally we are fighting side-by-side, hard as we can, against corrupted governance – – Big Government working with Big Pharma. Most of my colleagues understand that the definition of fascism is a marriage of Government and Corporate entities.
The refusal of the Government to come to a table to even hear, let alone fix, the WHY’s – – – – WHY would these people travel these thousands of kilometers, and camp outside in Canadian winter – – WHAT is SO important to them that they voluntarily stepped forward to carry a message that was visibly supported by untold numbers in the world, and stifled by propaganda, manipulation, coercion and worse?
If the Governments, Big Pharma and their Collaborators are allowed to remove the autonomy we have over our own bodies, rule our everyday movements, freeze bank accounts & credit cards without independent adjudication, to imprison without charge, . . . if this is not stopped, Canadians will learn soon enough what IS important enough.
The Invocation of the Emergency Act. What is that? . . . How would you classify it, if not as an act of counter-insurgency (by the usurpers) to the Truckers and their Supporters, the insurgency? What else fits? CAN it be discussed fairly and intelligently, if we don’t know the right words for the Government actions?
If the trend of more and larger mass demonstrations cannot be reversed by citizens, i.e. if we are not successful in establishing civil Government, especially in a high-surveillance state, then a police or corporate (fascist) state is ensconced in Canada. The flagrant irrelevance of Rule by Law (think of Jody Wilson-Raybould) is a shout-out warning.
Many have concluded that big business is running the show. Corporatocracy, not democracy is an accurate portrayal. On this one, I don’t care what you call it, so long as the word “democracy” as a stand-alone is not accepted because that’s not what we have. “Remnant democracy” maybe.
If the reality is a corporatized state, there has been a coup d’état by stealth in Canada (and in the U.S.)
“Military historian Edward Luttwak says, “A coup consists of the infiltration of a small, but critical, segment of the state apparatus, which is then used to displace the government from its control of the remainder. . . ”
Quislings in Canada have and continue to play, a significant role in the coup.
Excerpt from the posting: 2010-09-13 RCMP identify coup d’etat as threat to Canada, article, Ottawa Citizen. (posted 13 years ago, but still relevant).
The RCMP have put the risk of a coup d’état on the list of four threats to Canada.
. . . armed force (either military or paramilitary) is not a defining feature of a coup d’état.”
I’d say that coup d’états happen when the powers-that-be want more power and control than they already have. Or, they feel a threat to their power and agenda.
What would threaten them, in today’s world? . . . Why did the RCMP list coup état? . . .
Growing dissatisfaction among growing numbers of “peasants” would be a threat to the powers-that-be. Sufficient dissatisfaction, large enough numbers, intention . . . but that would be called a “revolution”, not a coup d’état.
So let’s see. The RCMP say the threat of a coup d’état exists. Earlier, I and others have said that we have corporatocracy, not democracy in Canada. Which means that the coup d’état has ALREADY TAKEN PLACE (“the infiltration of a small, but critical, segment of the state apparatus, which is then used to displace the government from its control of the remainder”).
What does the RCMP statement mean then? Does it mean that there is a threat of EVEN MORE coup d’état-ing?
To answer that, put yourself into the shoes of the powers-that-be (the ones doing the coups). What do THEY see? . . . I see coup d’état . . . they see revolution. We are viewing the same world, but through a different set of eyes. A power struggle between us and them.
I was astounded to hear “coup d’etat” used in the media (the Ottawa Citizen), quoting the RCMP. . . . But why the surprise? I have been saying that the success of the opposition to the terrible polluting in the tar sands, the success in protection of water, etc., threatens the corporate agenda. That “revolution” threatens the corporate agenda. When I stop to think, as a population moves toward revolution, yes, that is when coup d’états happen. The population wakes up to what has been happening, they stop being sheeple, the powers whose interests are threatened must resort to military/police (violence) to impose their will.
In this network we have documented the growing military/police state in Canada. What is that other than the signs of a coup d’état? But is that the coup d’état that the RCMP are thinking of?
So is there evidence of dissatisfaction and unrest, IN LARGE ENOUGH NUMBERS to trigger pre-emptive (that’s what it would be), MORE coup état-ing by large corporations working with their big government quislings?
Another question: if the RCMP see potential coup d’état, where does that leave THEM?
We’re all in this together. I think we need to understand the situation and share it. Otherwise we, as Canadians, can’t solve it.
Back to Coup d’état / Revolution:
LARGE ENOUGH NUMBERS? .. . . don’t need to address that one. “They” would see large enough numbers, enabled, empowered and connected by the ability to exchange information by email, the net, and phone technology.
This is part of a short series of postings, one of which talks about the movie “Sounds like a Revolution” http://www.soundslikearevolution.com/ . I recommend the movie. It is very helpful to understanding today’s political affairs.
Pinch myself: I wrote the preceding page in 2010!
= = = = = = = = = = = =
INSERT, 2025-03-09 Another pinch: It was 2011 that Brigitte dePape , , ,
HAH! How soon I forget. Young Brigitte dePape, the Senate Page who held up the STOP HARPER sign in the Canadian Senate during the reading of the June 3, 2011 Throne Speech
A major event in Canadian history. “Harper” stickers started appearing on road STOP signs right across Canada.
Turbulent times – – the Conservatives trying to “unite the right” and end Liberal domination of the Government.
- Preston Manning and the Reform Party had come out of the West to Ottawa. Manning was an MP from 1993 until his retirement in 2002. He was well-respected; the son of longest-serving premier Ernest Manning, Social Credit Premier of Alberta for 25 years. In Ottawa, Reform rebranded becoming the Canadian Alliance, which became the Conservatives.
- Stephen Harper became the Federal Conservative leader (2002). The 2004 Election reduced the Liberals to a Minority Government. Harper then attained minority Governments in both the 2006 and 2008 Federal Elections.
- Get a load of this: Harper finally obtained majority-government status in the May 2011 Election. Only to be challenged by Brigitte dePape at the reading of the Throne Speech on June 3rd a month later!
- 2015 October – the next Election, Harper is soundly defeated. The Liberals rebounded from third place in the House of Commons with 36 seats to a strong majority government with 184 of the 338 seats in the expanded Commons. The Liberals picked up 148 seats, easily the biggest numerical increase for a Canadian party since Confederation.
- Harper was pro-war (Iraq and Afghanistan), pro-Israel.
- He laid the foundations for the abuses of democratic functioning that Trudeau runs amok in, today.
- BRIGITTE DE PAPE’S HEROIC ACTIONS remind me that in 2011 I felt despair. What had happened to governance in Canada? How could we reclaim or construct a “clean” system of governance?
- We went from Harper to Trudeau and are now (Sunday, March 9, 2025) in the arms of globalist Mark Carney:
Ex-central banker to replace Trudeau as Canada’s prime minister after winning Liberal Party vote
- We’ve been wrestling with the devil for at least 20 years. Carney has to be defeated.
Back to today:
The tools for reclaiming the levers of Government evolve with the times and technology.
The patient – – Canadian democracy – – may not survive without even greater mobilizations of its defenders. Maybe the “authority” I heard on the radio will be proven right. More and larger mass demonstrations are a necessity?
The characteristics of a police and surveillance state, clear disdain for the Rule of Law, knowledge of people who have left Canada because the writing is on the wall, recorded during the covid years . . . Time will tell.
“Do not go gentle into that good night.”
INSERT: 2008-11-09 Encana Dawson Creek: Reply from RCMP Anti-Terrorist Squad. Rule of law?
Corporatocracy or Democracy or Administrative State or WHAT?, Why we flounder or do not flounder
BACKGROUND:
– An anti-terrorist RCMP squad was sent to Dawson Creek because of “incidents” on the Encana pipeline.
– I emailed the RCMP (2008-11-06 Letter to RCMP anti-terrorism squad): the underlying CAUSES of the incidents at the pipeline need to be addressed. The actions (the “incidents”) on the pipeline draw attention to a problem. They are not the actions of terrorists.
If the underlying causes are not addressed it is predictable that there will be more incidents. They will occur in the Tar Sands, too. The industry is slowly killing local people through the poisons dumped into the environment. One example: locals witness the lethality of “Sour gas” through still-born livestock and the miscarriages of their women.
The Government turns a blind eye. The GOVERNMENT is the creator of the incidents, through its failure to regulate effectively and through its failure to enforce regulations. The Government is the only institution in our society that has this function. If they don’t perform their role, it doesn’t get done.
The RCMP Superintendent, Lloyde, replied to my email. And I am grateful to him; I responded.
INSERT: I continued to send very occasional emails to the Superintendent until his retirement. Maybe the emails were just deleted. I don’t care. It’s important in a democracy to have conversations.
- My letter to the RCMP is at 2008-11-06 Letter to RCMP anti-terrorism squad, with links to the related correspondence.
RELATED: 2009-08-31 Letter to the anti-terrorist squad, RCMP: Government and University are creating the “home-grown” terrorists. Am I one of them?
– – – – – – –
RETURNING TO 2023: “WE WILL DO BETTER . . . NEXT TIME” say the Police
- The discourse isn’t great, if you don’t know the vocabulary for the discussion. It’s like trying to converse in a language you don’t speak.
- THERE IS A VOID IN THE DISCOURSE
-
- The Inquiry into the Invocation of the Emergency Act AND
- The National Citizen’s Inquiry into Covid
BOTH orient the discussion to the present and the future. For example:
Tell us how your ideas might apply in the future. . . How would they apply to different protest activities about other matters?
The VOID I wish to address: What about the past? What about CONTEXT?
I am guessing that few Canadians who are younger than 40 will know about the massive mobilizations in the USA in 1999. Thousands of Canadians crossed the border to join them. A film was made about the nation-wide (USA) insurrection, “Battle in Seattle”. Woody Harrelson was one of the actors.
CITIZEN ACTION DOES NOT SPONTANEOUSLY COMBUST OUT OF THIN AIR
The “Battles to Protect the Commons” are decades-long and arduous. “The Commons” is comprised of components upon which creation and human society are dependent for survival and health. Big Pharma is not on the list of components.
SO – – – – WHAT IS THE CONTEXT, INCLUDING THE PAST, for
THE TRUCKERS CONVOY (A.K.A. THE FREEDOM CONVOY?)
Non-violent Resistance / conscientious objector? to the erasure of Rights
makes the Truckers, Farmers (Coutts, Alberta) and Supporters into protestors or Insurgents (or other words) and
Government response is Counter-Insurgent. (Government goes to any end to be the Dictator – fund state media; roll out the propaganda machine; take political prisoners, trample Rights, freeze people’s money, property; prosecute, fine and put protesters in jail; even solitary confinement for long periods; invoke the Emergency Act; tell lies – lots of them and BIG ones.)
IF THWARTED ABOVE GROUND, AGGRIEVED PEOPLE GO UNDERGROUND.
I did not know to what depth resentment descends. A couple of experiences made it palpable.
https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=19166
- We were 15 years in Nova Scotia. I followed the Acadians from N.S. to Louisiana. There, a new (1999) lovely little Acadian museum describes the “genocide” by the English. The Brits removed the French from N.S.. The memory of injustice is strong enough 250-years later to drive community construction of this place. 250 years later! They want their children to know and remember.
- 150 year memory. Their sons were killed in the U.S. Civil War that started in 1861. On a tour of the historic section of Atlanta, GA, the telling of the stories was truly as though the injustice of dead sons had happened maybe 40 years ago. It was 150 years ago.
- Think of the Middle East, the Balkans, . . .
- Women Who Run With the Wolves, Excerpt below.
(the preceding is from 2002-11-21 (2 of 3), on Non-violent resistance (https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=4804)
The CONTEXT for The Trucker Convoys across Canada, 2022, includes the Battle in Seattle, also MONTEBELLO, 2007.
2008-11-28 Follow-up on Montebello, Police provoke Violence at SPP protest (2007) https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=747
Three police officers from the Quebec Sureté were trained to be provocateurs – – turn peaceful protest violent. The protest was Legitimate – – heads of corporations and top Government officials (the USA, Canada and Mexico) meeting behind closed doors to make policy decisions that belong in the House of Commons.
As I say, Police officers were trained, deployed, disguised as protestors to turn the protest violent. Their Police-issue boots gave them away. Protestors pulled down their bandanas, others video’d their faces. A short documentary was made, with the head of the Quebec Sureté later explaining at a press conference, “The police were doing their job”. The media nor anyone else ever called them to account, in spite of all the attempts by the protestors to make it happen.
In the 15 years since 2007, “the corporate guys” have made great strides. We were looking at 3 countries and numerous big corporations in 2007. In 2022, the covid template was rolled out around the world. 2007 looks like Mary Poppins in comparison.
Violence, the weapon of choice. Don’t fix the problem. Look at CONTEXT – –
- The Oka Crisis (1990)
- Ipperwash (1995)
. . . I don’t see it said that the Stony Plain people had been trying . . . FOR FIFTY YEARS. The blockade at Ipperwash was after 50 years of lawyers and mediators and Government officials getting big salaries and perks to resolve the problem. With ZERO accomplishment. An unarmed Dudley George was shot dead by police, with provocation from Ontario then-Premier Mike Harris.
Justice Linden did not take long to determine that “Ipperwash” belonged to the Chippewa. Something that all those lawyers and politicians and “officials” and mediators could not accomplish in 50 years. It took a dead man AND another two decades after that, for the land to be returned, as set out in the Agreement with the Canadian Armed Forces, that the land would be returned – – it was on temporary loan for use during WW2. Ipperwash is a nice place with a lake; instead of being returned to its owners after the War, it fell into the hands of not-Indian cottagers.
CONTEXT:
- (1980) The Constitution Express (trains with a thousand Indians on-board descend on Ottawa. Ref. “Unsettling Canada”, 2015, by Arthur Manuel. I highly recommend the book,)
- (1999) Battle in Seattle. Canadians part of it.
- (2007) Montebello (Police officers trained, disguised and deployed to be provocateurs.)
- (2007-08) Mainstreet reactions to Wallstreet-induced severe worldwide economic crisis. Canadians did “Occupy”, too.
- (2010) G20 Summit, Toronto
- (2012) Idle No More started in Saskatchewan
- (2013) Black Lives Matter started. Followed by All Lives Matter
- (2022) Trucker’s Convoy cross-Canada
That’s a fraction of the action by Canadian citizens to assert what’s right.
No one was killed during the Freedom Convoys in 2022 and the invocation of the Emergency Act, thanks to the leadership of the Truckers, and some (many) among the Police.
Given what is known, Did the Government WANT the conflict over covid settled?
The announcement by the head of the (World Economic Forum) WEF, Klaus Schwab, that the WEF has “Trudeau and half the Canadian cabinet” in its pocket – – ?
Chrystia Freeland was on the WEF Board for a number of years. (Update Jan. 2024: the WEF website no longer lists Freeland as a board member.)
Freeland entered the Canadian political scene in 2013 under the Liberals. I was alarmed by her connection to Larry Summers, to the point of documenting it in 2017. Bringing that magnitude of corruption into the Canadian political system, as financial advisors no less, will scuttle any ship-of-state. McKinsey also hit the radar screen at that time.
The alarm was warranted. The track record of the Trudeau Jr Government is well-known. Just one egregious example: political interference in the decisions of the office of the Attorney-General of Canada (Jody Wilson-Raybould) to prosecute SNC-Lavalin. Not bad enough, the Cabinet got rid of the AG . . . There’s the Wi Fund-raising scandal; Canadians know the litany. God help us to remember at Election Time.
In my view, CORRUPTION is the single most important threat to peace, order and good governance in Canada. Corruption is the inevitable outcome of public-private-partnerships.
– – –
Women Who Run With the Wolves, 1992 by Clarissa Pinkola Estes
Excerpt from https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=2348
(The “young woman” is the naive in all of us, men and women. Read this as “gender-inclusive”.)
“.. though the young woman attempts to follow the orders of the predator, and agrees to be ignorant about the secret in the cellar, she can only comply for so long. Finally she puts the key, the question, to the door and finds the shocking carnage … And that key, that tiny symbol of her life, suddenly will not cease its bleeding, will not cease to give the cry that something is wrong. A woman may try to hide from the devastations of her life, but the bleeding, the loss of life’s energy, will continue UNTIL SHE RECOGNIZES THE PREDATOR FOR WHAT IT IS and CONTAINS IT.
When (women or men) open the doors of their own lives and survey the carnage there, in those out-of-the way places, they most often find they have BEEN ALLOWING SUMMARY ASSASSINATIONS of their most crucial dreams, goals, and hopes. …
… when such a gruesome discovery is made… we can be sure the natural predator … has been at work methodically destroying a woman’s (or man’s) most cherished desires, concerns, and aspirations.
In fairy tales, the animal groom character is a common motif that can be understood to represent a MALEVOLENT THING DISGUISED AS A BENEVOLENT THING. This or some proximate characterization is always present when a woman/man carries naive presentiments about something or someone. When a woman/man is attempting to avoid the facts of her/his own devastation, her night dreams are likely to shout warnings to her, warnings and exhortations to wake up! or get help! or flee! or go for the kill!”
4. TIPPING POINTS
You say – – but Canada is not East Germany before the fall of the Berlin wall.
Nor is it apartheid South Africa, Robben Island where Nelson Mandela spent 18 of his 27-year imprisonment. I went there, too, to try and figure out a bit of what and how things happen.
My hypothesis: TIPPING POINTS are a factor. In a dynamic system (Governance in this case), given feedback that the system is failing, there has to be a mobilization by citizens to correct their system of governance.
If the system is to be returned to civil government there are two requirements:
- The Mobilization has to be TIMELY (corrections have to be implemented PRIOR TO arrival at a tipping point after which the system is beyond retrieval).
- The corrections have to fix the ACTUAL CAUSES of the failings. Otherwise the system will continue into collapse.
If mainstream Canadian Media was doing its job, Canadians would know that imprisonment without charge, terms of bail that mock democracy, and other outrages are pushing us dangerously and ever closer to a Tipping Point.
- North America has its own monumental struggles. The Truckers Convoy, a.k.a. the Freedom Convoy, was sparked most directly after two years of futile petitioning by citizens. To me the Convoy was a novel, high-risk initiative of very uncertain outcome coming from a place that was predicted by NO ONE. . . . Truckers?!
(From The Museum of Non-Violent Resistance)
“… nonviolent resistance as a political force is still young, its possibilities not yet well enough known, and is thus seldom an incitement to the masses and is seldom encouraged by the media.
For all that, those striving for human rights are dependent on our solidarity and the feeling is growing of an ever increasing threat through the power of dictatorships, the armaments race and the immobility of bureaucrats. (I photographed these words in 1999)
Gandhi presented the principles of nonviolent resistance to the world, but the methods – corresponding to the various hierarchies – have to be very different, should they lead to success.
Through the multiplicity of nonviolent resistance, so rich in ideas, (INSERT: a Convoy of Truckers?!) it can be demonstrated that the most powerful effective opposing forces can be mobilized against every form of violence …“
The following poem, also from the Museum of Non-violent Resistance, describes exactly the happiness and joy I experienced in concert with an estimated 14,000 – 15,000 people, January 29th, 2022 at ONE of the protest locations on Vancouver Island. The mainstream media blacked it out, as we had come to expect would happen. The strategy back-fired. We understood the importance of being responsible for communicating with everyone we knew. January 29th was a day like no other. Exciting and fun while serious and sad.
From the Museum of Non-Violent Resistance, the pen of an unknown East German:
“The red-painted tyranny was not
The worst about our tyrants
The worst thereby were we ourselves
All our cowardice and servility
And that we also were the evil ourselves
Just that is the chance and our luck
You see: It works! We also take back
The everlasting human right ourselves
Now we breathe again, we cry and we laugh
the stale sadness out of the breast
man, we are stronger than rats and dragons
– and had forgotten it and always knew.”
Spread over a number of years,
- coup d’état – corporatocray infiltrates democracy, takes over the reins of government by stealth using money, revolving doors, quislings and other means
- revolution or insurgency – (the words carry innuendo of “bad guys”) Citizens come to see: business interests and values are appropriate in the commercial sphere. They are horribly corrupting in the sphere of governance.
- counter insurgency – corporatocracy wants to hold onto power and control. They mobilize “a counterinsurgency force” against the forces fighting to restore democracy.
In Canada the counter insurgency, some links (you may add your own examples – there are lots more to choose from!):
- 2008-11-28 Follow-up on Montebello, Police provoke Violence at SPP protest (2007) (recorded on video. No doubts.)
- 2012-06-10 G-20 Summit, Toronto. And kettling, a tactic of police.
- 2010-06-24 G20: Canada’s billion-dollar summit mystery, Toronto Star
- Battle in Seattle, WTO, SPP.
The Police tactics at Montebello and the G-20 Summit in Toronto were extensions of the counter insurgency against citizen mobilizations over the World Trade Organization (WTO) which is the Corporatocracy, the SPP, in different garb.
When I try to see what is happening in my own country, it is more difficult because of the built-in bias. But after working with our network for more than 20 years, battle after battle, what becomes obvious is the corporate power behind-the-scenes with the accompanying corruption of governance and values. The values said to be our values are NOT our values. Corporatocracy’s coup d’état over democracy, insurgency and counter insurgency, are the right words to describe the Canadian (and American) situation.
– – – – – – – – – – – –
Our ability to focus on one thing by simultaneously excluding “large-as-life” activity that crosses our field-of-vision. A mind-blowing old video:
Perception, an illustration of our fallibility and our gullibility. Dan Simons. Basketball. https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=6190
– – – – – – – – – – – –
Masks … Masks … Masks A bit of irony!
In October 2011, Blake introduced Private Member’s Bill C-309 in the House of Commons. The bill if passed would make it a new Criminal Code offence to wear a mask or to otherwise conceal one’s identity during a riot or an unlawful assembly. The bill has garnered the support of police chiefs in major Canadian cities, including Calgary, Toronto, Vancouver and Victoria.
Dear Blake Richards, . . .
EVENT: SPP meetings in Montebello, Quebec. Peaceful protest.
DATE: 2007
The only protesters who wore masks were POLICE OFFICERS. They were trained and assigned the role of turning the protest violent.
It is all on video, along with the later statement by the head of Quebec Police (Sureté ) that yes, the “protesters” were actually police officers.
Peaceful protesters (unmasked, no need to hide their identity) tried to stop these “violent protesters” from using rocks against the line of uniformed police officers who were holding shields and wearing riot gear.
An observant person noticed that the “violent protesters” were wearing police boots and shouted it out. The legitimate protesters then reached in and yanked down the masks so that others could catch the revealed faces on video.
Through video footage, the officers were later identified by civilians. The head of the Quebec police was then forced to make a public statement, admitting that the masked “violent” protesters were police officers. He excused their actions. . . . They were doing their job.
Links to the video of the Montebello footage and the Police response are at http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=747
For at least 15 months, demands for a public inquiry went unheeded. An inquiry was eventually announced. As far as I know, it was never held. No one was ever held to account.
It is illegal to incite violence. When it is masked police officers who are doing it, under the direction and blessing of their superiors, then implicitly sanctioned by the Government (no action to correct), we have descended to a police state.
The movie, Battle in Seattle, (huge protests against the WTO) makes it clear that in some cases it is a police (National Guard) strategy to ALLOW violence to get out-of-hand BEFORE they step in with tear gas and rubber bullets. (Violence discredits the protesters AND makes citizens reluctant to protest). Montebello is ample evidence that in some cases it is the police themselves who instigate the violence, who are the provocateurs. Was it provocateurs at work in Seattle?
OFFICIALS LEARN:
Governments and Police officials took lessons from “The Battle in Seattle”. (It took place in the U.S. but remember that Canadian and U.S. military and police are now “integrated” and have “compatible doctrine”. Also note: The WTO, the SPP and the SPP successor organization have a common base: transnational corporate interests.)
It seems to me that the Officials took two things away from Montebello:
- Disguised police officers planted in a crowd must not wear police boots OR, maybe it is safer to CONTRACT OUT such work.
- They can do whatever they want: Canadians are dumb, uninformed and without backbone. Canadians won’t stand up for ANYTHING. The talk about defending what the veterans fought and died for in World War Two (democracy) is meaningless rhetoric.
Another brief point: Media portray “the Quebec protests” as student protests over tuition hikes. They fail to note that the largest protests in Quebec happened on Earth Day and are about the failure of Governments to protect the Environment. http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=5143
Failed protection of the environment, the SPP and its successor organization, corporate influence in Universities, failing democracy, widening income gaps – – the ROOT is the same: large corporate interests being served by Governments and public institutions.
In CONCLUSION:
- Protests will continue to escalate because NOTHING is being done to address the root cause: the Government, Police Officials and Universities have become tools to serve corporate interests.
- Montebello is misleading VIEWED IN ISOLATION. The mistake of “officials” is to add insult upon insult. Growing protest tells me that Canadians know the dangers; they are standing up – with much more to come, unless Government officials start to aggressively defend and serve the public interest.
I think of supporting your call, Blake Richards, to make it illegal to wear masks at protests (unmask the police).
HOWEVER,
- it should also be illegal for officials to contract out their Police work (they will do that if they are “unmasked”).
- there also needs to be extremely strong whistle-blower protection for police officers.
/Sandra Finley
ADDED, 2023-11-24, copied from “For Your Selection, Oct 2023:
. . . I don’t know Rachel Maddow’s political views. I heard an interview about her new book. Given the topic, I expected to hear the name of Thomas Watson at some point. As far as I know, it was never mentioned. 2023-10-17 To CBC, Rachel Maddow’s new book addresses Influential American fascists in lead-up to WW2. Thomas Watson (President of IBM) is not on the list??
Everyone should be catching on by now! Look at Mussolini’s Italy. You put together the STATE plus the WEALTHY INFLUENTIAL BUSINESS PEOPLE, what do you get? It’s called FASCISM or NAZISM. It parades as CORRUPTION. Sometimes I call it CORPORATOCRACY. Today you will see it referred to as ADMINISTRATIVE STATE.
Changing times, change names. But at root they are the same phenomenon?
But oh my God! . . I think that makes me a dreaded supporter of Antifa!
Antifa (/ænˈtiːfə, ˈænti(ˌ)fə/) is a left-wing anti-fascist and anti-racist political movement in the United States. It consists of a highly decentralized array of autonomous groups that use nonviolent direct action, incivility, and violence to achieve their aims.[1][2] Most antifa political activism is nonviolent, involving poster and flyer campaigns, mutual aid, speeches, protest marches, and community organizing.[3][4][5] However, some who identify as antifa also use tactics involving digital activism, doxing, harassment, physical violence, and property damage. Members of antifa aim to combat far-right extremists, including neo-Nazis and white supremacists.[6] (With thanks to Wikipedia)
Sandra Finley
– – – – – – – – – – –
Hannah Arendt explores the institutions and operations of totalitarian movements, focusing on the two genuine forms of totalitarian government in our time—Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia—which she adroitly recognizes were two sides of the same coin, rather than opposing philosophies of Right and Left.
= = = = = = = = = = =
UPDATE: 2024-12-24 Added to Postings
What is a guerrilla fighter? C Guevara, Handbook for revolutionaries, with thanks to American Govt.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT, Submission to Public Inquiry
From: Perspectives (POEC/CEDU) [mailto:Perspectives@poec-cedu.gc.ca]
Sent: December 20, 2022 10:39 AM
To: Sandra Finley <xcorp@shaw.ca>
Subject: RE: Public Order Emergency Commission, Submission, Finley
Good day Ms. Finley,
We have received your detailed submission and we thank you for taking the time to provide us with your comments and observations. Public input is an important part of the Public Order Emergency Commission’s investigation.
If more details are needed from you, the Commission will contact you directly.
Again, thank you,
Twitter: @POECommission
Facebook: Public Order Emergency Commission – Home | Facebook
From: Sandra Finley
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 3:00 AM (3-hour time difference, B.C. – Ottawa. I made the midnite deadline!)
To: Perspectives (POEC/CEDU) <Perspectives@poec-cedu.gc.ca>
Subject: Public Order Emergency Commission, Submission, Finley
October 28, 2022
TO: Public Order Emergency Commission EMAIL: perspectives@poec-cedu.gc.ca
FROM: Sandra Finley
I am in your system
Please accept the attached Submission.
It does not conform to the guidelines. I regret but my mind does not work like (most?) other minds?
It is as though I have been preparing for this for a long time. I did not realize.
I think I have 1 minute before the deadline to submit!
Bless you all.
/Sandra Finley
With a necessary reality check, a UK tribunal has told the government that, no, it cannot hold a secret legal battle against Apple over encryption. The Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), the body meant to oversee the country’s surveillance powers, has dismissed efforts by the Home Office to keep the entire case hidden from public view. And in doing so, it has delivered a quietly important win for press freedom and digital rights. Although, things are far from over.
The case revolves around Apple’s Advanced Data Protection system, or ADP.
It’s a security feature that gives users the option to encrypt their iCloud data in a way that even Apple itself cannot access. Not through a backdoor, not with a master key, not at all. It’s the kind of robust end-to-end encryption that governments around the world have grown increasingly nervous about. The UK, it turns out, is no exception.
The Home Office had tried to argue that even disclosing the existence of the case could jeopardize national security. But the tribunal wasn’t persuaded. In its published ruling, it said: “It would have been a truly extraordinary step to conduct a hearing entirely in secret without any public revelation of the fact that a hearing was taking place.”
The government’s request challenged press freedom, veering into the territory of democracy-by-blindfold. The tribunal concluded that sharing “the bare details of the case” would not, in fact, bring down the roof on national security. We obtained a copy of the judgement for you here.
So now, the legal battle moves into the public eye, where it belongs, and where the dangerous surveillance law can be challenged.
Apple’s stance has been consistent. The company says it has no technical means to access ADP-protected data, and it does not intend to build one. The rationale is simple: once you create a vulnerability in encryption, you’ve weakened the system for everyone. Law enforcement may be the intended user, but malicious actors don’t tend to respect boundaries.
Earlier this year, Apple pulled ADP from UK devices entirely, after pressure from the government. It then filed a legal challenge in March, drawing a firm line in the sand over what it’s willing to compromise.
The Home Office, for its part, insists that it isn’t trying to snoop on the public.
It reiterated that any attempt to access encrypted material requires a warrant, signed off by a court. “There are longstanding and targeted investigatory powers that allow the authorities to investigate terrorists, pedophiles, and the most serious criminals and they are subject to robust safeguards including judicial authorizations and oversight to protect people’s privacy,” it said.
That’s all fine in principle. However, the government’s attempt to keep this particular legal process secret has made its definition of “robust safeguards” look worryingly vague. Transparency, it turns out, is not optional when it comes to decisions that affect the rights of millions of people.
The implications of this case don’t stop at the UK’s borders. As governments around the world weigh stronger surveillance powers in the name of public safety, Apple’s refusal, and the tribunal’s decision to force the case into the open, set a precedent.
Weakening encryption isn’t simply a matter of local law enforcement convenience. It’s a global issue that affects anyone who relies on secure communication.
The IPT has also confirmed it will hear the case brought by Privacy International, Liberty, and two individuals who are challenging the legality of the Home Secretary’s decision to use her powers to secretly compel Apple to compromise its own security systems. |
Interesting doctor from Texas with ‘horror’ story re Covid. Thanks to Ray for sending this:
The Tucker Carlson Show
If you are new to this, I recommend you don’t stop after the UPDATE. (The bottom interview, Steve speaking): My 16-minute interview of Jennifer, a former police detective in a major US city who handled over 250 SIDS investigations over 7 years implicates the childhood vaccines are the major cause of SIDS.
Please send this on. Currently there are people on trial. If word gets to friends of friends of Judges, . . . you never know where and how the information gets to where it needs to go.
UPDATE APRIL 10. Interview of the lawyer for Helen Grus (Bath-sheba van den Berg), following the GUILTY decision.
With many thanks to Tamara Ugulini, Rebel News.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
UPDATE MARCH 25
This outcome is a STUNNER.
(Hearing Officer) Renwick ruled that Detective Grus’ efforts undermined public trust, claiming a “reasonable person” would balk at such – – – inquiries into officials.
The Canadian system leaves me speechless, once again.
https://www.rebelnews.com/lawyer_for_ottawa_cop_punished_for_probing_baby_deaths_explains_similarities_with_pfizer_data?utm_campaign=tu_grusupdate_041025&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus has been found guilty of discreditable conduct after a lengthy hearing.
Grus, a diligent detective renowned for her investigative prowess, was serving in the Sexual Assault and Child Abuse unit when she was charged with discreditable conduct for accessing police records in what was coined an “unauthorized” investigation into suspicious infant deaths following the 2021 COVID-19 vaccine rollout.
Her probe ultimately leaned on a bombshell piece of evidence: Pfizer’s own trial data revealing a staggering 97% infant fatality rate — yet instead of heeding her concerns, the system slammed her for daring to ask questions.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
I (Sandra) need a place where I can find the particular information in this posting, without searching. With many thanks to the authors:
-
- 2025-03-31 (New) Baby Dies After Receiving 6 Shots for 12 Vaccines — Doctors Say ‘Catching Up’ Kids on Vaccines Is Common, and Dangerous. By Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D., CHD
- Steve Kirsch Steve has assembled a valuable collection of information on-line.
Former Omaha police detective reveals 50% of SIDS cases happened within 48 hours post vaccine. (Steve speaking): My 16-minute interview of Jennifer, a former police detective in a major US city who handled over 250 SIDS investigations over 7 years implicates the childhood vaccines are the major cause of SIDS.

Executive summary
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) happens to babies, from 1 month to 1 year in age, but most frequently between 2 and 4 months of age.
Recently I interviewed a former police detective who handled over 250 SIDS cases for a major US city. She revealed her full name and I was able to independently verify her employment at the police department.
In the interview, she revealed that 50% of the SIDS cases happened within 48 hours after a vaccine was given and about 70% of the cases happened within one week of a vaccine.
This can only mean one thing: that the childhood vaccines are the leading cause of SIDS deaths.
There is no other explanation.
Even her pediatrician acknowledged this, but they aren’t allowed to talk about it. She said that the American Academy of Pediatrics trains the pediatricians in how to gaslight parents who seek to blame the vaccine.
This is the first time these statistics have ever been revealed publicly.
All the information is independently verifiable in the police records for any health authority who has any doubts.
Also, I am working with the police department to make these statistics public directly from the police department itself (I cannot compel the production of these records because the FOIA laws in the state exempt these records).
My 16-minute interview

The key points
- 3 to 4 cases per month, so over 250 cases total during her tenure
- 50% of SIDS cases happened within 48 hours of a vaccine administration. Assuming kids are vaccinated every month (which is the most conservative assumption), the chance of this happening by chance is 1.23e-64. This means the cases were caused by the vaccine since there is no other viable hypothesis that can explain the evidence.
- 70% of SIDS cases happened within 1 week of a vaccination.
- Her pediatrician acknowledged this and didn’t argue with the data.
- The American Academy of Pediatrics trains doctors on how to gaslight patients who suspect the vaccine caused their child’s death.
- Jennifer declined to publicly reveal her name or the police department she worked for, but revealed this to me so I could verify everything using independent sources.
- The police department declined to respond to my records count request because it is outside the scope of the state’s FOIA laws since it cannot be accomplished with a straightforward query and “research” would be required. I agree with their interpretation, but I’ve requested they comply anyway as a matter of public benefit. I will update this article when I hear back from them.
Police policy is to “leave no stone unturned.” But even after they made the vaccine connection, the coroner ALWAYS ignored even mentioning the vaccine in the autopsy report!
Jennifer wrote me (Steve):
Standard police policy was to ask about ANY pharmaceuticals. So while no detective is given a script per se, they are trained on ANY death investigation, of any age, to ask about pharmaceuticals so I guess you’d say unwritten policy only because the official training is “leave no stone unturned “ and ask every single thing that person was doing in the moments hours days and weeks leading up to their death (if it was not an obvious cause of death)…so with a baby: “when was the last time he saw a doc? Was he healthy? any meds or shots ? What has he been eating? What kind of soap do you wash him with? Was he ever out of your care? And if so who was with him?” Would be a typical line of questioning. And my husband just reminded me that the coroner who we had to often report to was especially a stickler on everything that went into that kid food and drug wise. So we just by default always asked since odds were we’d have him answering the call and if we didn’t we’d he’d to go back and get the info for him. Now the irony in that of course is even though we got him all the info, vaccines were never the “cause of death” or even mentioned in final death reports.
Jennifer’s SIDS statistics are validated in the peer-reviewed medical literature!
This paper, Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature, states this:
Of all reported SIDS cases post-vaccination, 75 % occurred within 7 days (p < 0.00001).
This almost exactly matches what Jennifer said in my interview (70% within one week). Neither of us was aware of this article at the time we made the video.
This is impossible if the vaccines aren’t causing SIDS. There is simply no other viable explanation for the association. But of course, you won’t get your paper published if you say that. You have to say that the association is interesting.
Paper by CDC authors observes that nearly 80% the child deaths reported in VAERS happened after multiple vaccinations were given on the same day
In Deaths Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, United States, 1997–2013, the CDC authors admit that “for child death reports, 79.4% received >1 vaccine on the same day.”
-__–_——_-_–____—
Jennifer is not the only police detective to figure out the connection; Helen Grus in Ottawa found the same thing
In Canada, if you are a police officer and suspect that vaccines cause SIDS, they will prosecute you. It seems that is illegal in Ottawa to question the safety of the vaccines:

NOTE: You could just scroll down to the video at the bottom.
The nurse who administered the shots said 1-year-old Sa’Niya needed them to catch her up on vaccinations she missed at her 6-month appointment — a common but potentially dangerous recommendation, according to pediatricians interviewed by The Defender.
Listen to this article Download 00:00/10:27
Roughly 12 hours after 1-year-old Sa’Niya was given six shots for 12 vaccines during a wellness visit, the little girl died. Sa’Niya — who had just turned 1 year old on March 11 — received the shots on March 26 at about 4 p.m., at Golisano Children’s Hospital Pediatric Practice in Rochester, New York, according to the baby’s mother, Shanticia Nelson.
The nurse who administered the shots said Sa’Niya needed them to catch her up on vaccinations she missed at her 6-month appointment — a common but potentially dangerous recommendation, according to several pediatricians interviewed by The Defender.
Nelson, her husband Kayon Carter and Sa’Niya’s grandmother Latricia Hanley shared the story of Sa’Niya’s death in an interview with CHD.TV Program Director Polly Tommey.
“Sa’Niya was a happy baby,” Nelson said. “She was happy and she loved her dad. Everything was ‘dada.’”
According to the visit notes, Sa’Niya was given six shots containing 12 vaccines, including: “DTap/Hep B/IPV (Pediarix), HiB/Acthib/Hiberix, Pneumococcal 20-valent Conj vaccine, Varicella (known commonly as Chickenpox), MMR, and Hepatitis A.”
She also received sodium fluoride as a teeth treatment.
Nelson said she told the nurse she was uncomfortable having Sa’Niya receive so many shots at once. According to Hanley, the nurse became angry and told Nelson, “She needs these shots. You got to give her these shots.”
The nurse never explained the 12 different vaccines and never mentioned the vaccines’ possible side effects, such as seizures and death.
Sa’Niya was a generally healthy baby. However, on the day she received the shots, she had a “little cough and runny nose,” Nelson said. According to the medical notes from the visit, Sa’Niya also had some eczema, diaper dermatitis and constipation.
‘I just want my baby back’
Within hours after receiving the shots, Sa’Niya’s eyes rolled back and she began foaming at the mouth. The police “ended up coming,” Nelson said. They told her it looked as if Sa’Niya had had a small seizure but that she was breathing OK.
Nelson recalled the police saying, “You guys don’t have to take her to the hospital, but if you want to take her to the hospital to make sure she’s OK, they you could do that.”
Nelson knew something was seriously wrong with Sa’Niya. “I looked at my baby and I said, ‘No, my baby is not right … this is not my daughter. My daughter is active. As soon she gets picked up, she’s active.’”
But when Nelson picked her up in that moment, Sa’Niya “just laid there … her eyes just wandered. She wasn’t responding to me calling her name how she used to.”
An ambulance took Sa’Niya to Saint Vincent Hospital in Lake Erie, Pennsylvania, where doctors started running tests on her. They told Nelson it appeared Sa’Niya had had four seizures by the time she arrived at the hospital.
Nelson left the hospital room to bring in her husband and two older children.
The parents and older children hadn’t been in the waiting room for more than two minutes when a nurse told Nelson, “I’m sorry but your daughter — she’s very sick … right now she’s in cardiac arrest.”
Nelson was told that Sa’Niya’s heart wasn’t responding to CPR and that her blood sugar level was over 700.
Hospital staff continued CPR for roughly 40 minutes. They said, “We’re going to check for a pulse one more time, and if we don’t have a pulse anymore, she’s gone.”
Nelson said, “They checked and she didn’t have that pulse.”
That happened around 4 a.m. on March 27, Nelson told The Defender. “I just want my baby back,” Nelson said. “No amount of money in this world can replace my baby … I want justice for my baby.”
Nelson, Carter and Hanley said in their CHD.TV interview that they hope what happened to Sa’Niya will never happen to another child.
They encouraged parents to do their own research rather than trusting medical staff to give informed consent for the risks of vaccination.
“Don’t let your kids take the vaccination shots,” Nelson said. “Ask questions. Before they give you anything, ask questions because I promise you they’re not going to tell you everything.”
Multiple shots at 1-year wellness visit not rare
Dr. Liz Mumper, a pediatrician, said it’s “tragic that a healthy baby died soon after receiving multiple vaccines.” But unfortunately, it’s not as rare as people might think.
Historically, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has “encouraged clinicians to take every opportunity to catch babies up on vaccines,” Mumper said.
She disagreed with claims that all babies can handle lots of vaccines given at the same time. She said:
“Specifically, some babies do not have the liver function or detoxification capacity to handle a cumulative aluminum load. Vaccines stress mitochondria — the powerhouses of the cell. Some babies do not have enough mitochondrial reserve to tolerate the oxidative stress of multiple vaccines on the same day.”
As The Defender previously reported, pediatric clinics can receive multiple financial incentives for administering vaccines. For example, insurance companies may offer pediatricians bonus payments for meeting certain benchmarks, such as having around 80% of patients fully vaccinated by age 2.
The AAP did not immediately respond when The Defender asked how common it is for pediatricians to do catch-up vaccinations — such as giving a 1-year-old additional shots because the baby missed its 6-month vaccinations — and whether the AAP continues to encourage the practice.
1-year visit ‘most dangerous visit of all’
Three other pediatricians — Drs. Renata Moon, Paul Thomas and Lawrence Palevsky — also told The Defender that administering multiple vaccines to babies and children to “catch them up” isn’t all that rare.
“The death of any child is an absolute tragedy,” said Moon. She told The Defender:
“Catch-up vaccines are regularly given in most offices. Parents need to clearly understand the risks and benefits of each individual shot and the risks of giving them in different combinations all at one time.
“We need a public health system that we can trust to act only in the best interests of our nation’s children, and not in the best interests of the pocketbooks of big pharmaceutical companies.”
Dr. Paul Thomas, a Dartmouth-trained pediatrician, said that it’s “very common” for pediatricians to attempt to catch babies and children up on vaccines. “This is routinely done at all well visits.”
Most babies are potentially given around nine vaccines at their 1-year wellness visit if the provider is following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule.
Thomas said, “The one-year well visit has become the most dangerous visit of all — especially if pediatricians are giving the COVID jab.”
The CDC schedule recommends 12-month-olds receive: a third dose of the hepatitis B vaccine, a third or fourth dose of the haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) vaccine, a fourth dose of the pneumococcal vaccine, the third dose of the polio vaccine, one or more doses of the COVID-19 vaccine, one or two doses of the influenza vaccine, one dose of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, one dose of the varicella vaccine, and one dose of the hepatitis A vaccine.
Doctors may also choose to give a dose of the RSV vaccine.
Thomas, author of “Vax Facts: What to Consider Before Vaccinating at All Ages & Stages of Life,” said that in the chapter on sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDS, infant deaths are happening right after vaccines with 78.3% (combined data from six studies) dying in the first week after vaccines.
“Vaccines are killing our children,” Thomas continued. “There is data showing that for every vaccine on the childhood schedule, your child is more likely to die from the vaccine than from the disease the vaccine covers.”
He added:
“When you understand that vaccines have never been tested with a proper saline placebo, the safety data is only collected for a few days, weeks or months and they never look at all health outcomes, you begin to understand that parents should think carefully about what they are about to put in their child’s body.
“When injured, you cannot sue anyone or any company. All involved are protected by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.”
‘Few, if any, pediatricians understand that vaccines can cause harm or injury’
Dr. Lawrence Palevsky also said it’s “very common” for pediatricians to do as many catch-up vaccines in one pediatric visit as what Sa’Niya received.
“Few, if any, pediatricians understand that vaccines can cause harm or injury,” he said. “They also don’t know that the safety and efficacy of the administration of multiple vaccines at the same time have, for the most part, never been studied.”
Angela Wulbrecht, a nurse who serves on the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation’s board of directors, pointed out the same thing. “I feel like parents are not given true informed consent that these things can happen.”
Wulbrecht is assisting Sa’Niya’s family in completing a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) report for her death. VAERS is co-managed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the CDC.
Wulbrecht is also working with the family to be sure an independent autopsy of Sa’Niya is completed so her family will have thorough, accurate information about the biological mechanisms that caused her death.
Dr. Jacob Puliyel, head of pediatrics at St. Stephens Hospital Delhi, India, called giving 12 vaccines during one appointment “clearly excessive.”
Puliyel said, “This child was given 12 vaccines, where even five vaccines are associated with sudden deaths.”
In 2018, Puliyel and his colleagues published a peer-reviewed article that suggested a link between SIDS and a pentavalent vaccine. According to the World Health Organization, the pentavalent vaccine protects against five diseases: diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, hepatitis B and Hib.
In 2017, Puliyel and his colleagues also published findings on a link between SIDS and a hexavalent vaccine that targets diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenza type B vaccine.
Puliyel said, “Parents must be made aware of these risks and one hopes the U.S. FDA will investigate these reports and inform the public. Doctors need clear guidance about the dangers.”
Watch the CHD.TV interview here:
Related articles in The Defender
- Police Detective: 50% of Sudden Infant Deaths Happened Within 48 Hours of Vaccination — But No One Is Allowed to Say It
- ‘We Get Paid to Vaccinate Your Children’: Pediatrician Reveals Details of Big Pharma Payola Scheme
- Pediatrician Slams $11.9 Billion Plan to Vaccinate 500 Million Children by 2030
- Police Detective: 50% of Sudden Infant Deaths Happened Within 48 Hours of Vaccination — But No One Is Allowed to Say
Vaccine safety advocates hailed HHS Secretary Kennedy’s plan to create an agency within the CDC focused on vaccine injuries and also long COVID and Lyme disease. In an interview with Chris Cuomo, Kennedy also revealed that when he asked an HHS agency for patient data, he was told he’d have to purchase it.
Listen to this article
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is creating a new sub-agency under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that will focus on vaccine injuries.
During an interview Thursday night with Chris Cuomo on “NewsNation,” HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said:
“We’re incorporating an agency within CDC that is going to specialize in vaccine injuries.
“These are priorities for the American people. More and more people are suffering from these injuries, and we are committed to having gold-standard science to make sure that we can figure out what the treatments are and that we can deliver the best treatments possible to the American people.”
Kennedy said the sub-agency is part of a broader focus on conditions that include long COVID and Lyme disease.
He said the pathway to creating the sub-agency wasn’t easy, elaborating on what he said Thursday, when he announced a major restructuring of HHS and the agencies it oversees, that when he requested data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an HHS agency, he was told HHS would have to purchase it.
Kennedy told Cuomo:
“I tried to get the CMS patient information, which belongs to the American people and belongs to HHS, and the sub-agencies said we have to buy it from them, and it doesn’t make any sense. This is depersonalized data, and we need it to Make America Healthy Again.”
In February, shortly after being confirmed to run HHS, Kennedy promised that under his watch, HHS and CDC would establish a better system for tracking vaccine injuries.
On March 10, Reuters reported that unnamed sources within the CDC leaked that the agency was planning to do a study on the possible link between vaccines and autism. The story triggered an avalanche of negative mainstream news reports claiming the study isn’t needed.
On March 13, President Donald Trump pulled the nomination of Dr. David Weldon, an outspoken advocate for studying the link between autism and vaccines, after it became clear Weldon couldn’t snag the necessary number of votes.
Just this week, The Washington Post, citing anonymous sources, reported that HHS had tapped researcher David Geier — a researcher and expert on the connections between toxic exposures and autism — to lead a study of possible links between vaccines and autism. The Post, followed by other media outlets, used the opportunity to attack Geier and the need for such a study.
‘Critical safety signals may have been buried’
Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer for Children’s Health Defense, welcomed Kennedy’s announcement, describing it as an “excellent” development.
“It is also very sad that agencies within the HHS are ‘selling’ data to other agencies rather than having broad data-sharing both within the HHS, as well as with independent scientists,” Hooker said. “If we are ever going to get to the bottom of the causes of the chronic disease epidemic, independent researchers will need all of the relevant information that our tax dollars have paid for over so many years.”
Research scientist and author James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., called the announcement “a historic and long-overdue shift in public health accountability.”
He added:
“For decades, families of the vaccine-injured have been subjected to silence, stonewalling and denial by the very institutions tasked with ensuring safety. This new development is without question a step in the right direction.”
Biologist Christina Parks, Ph.D., who has studied vaccine injuries, said the new sub-agency “will legitimize the suffering of millions of Americans and people around the world who have suffered the agonizing effects of vaccine injury on their health or the health of a child or loved one.”
“Once the reality of vaccine injury is accepted, it will open the door to working with doctors to set a
standard of care for acute vaccine injuries that has the potential to mitigate the damage caused by these events and speed recovery,” Parks said.
Nebraska chiropractor Ben Tapper, whose public questioning of the COVID-19 vaccines led the Center for Countering Digital Hate to add him — as well as figures like Kennedy — to its “Disinformation Dozen” list of the 12 “leading online anti-vaxxers” in 2021, also welcomed the announcement.
“This news feels like a long-overdue crack in the dam,” Tapper said. “For decades, we’ve been shouting on the rooftops — parents, researchers and victims alike — about the real harm these shots can cause, only to be dismissed as conspiracy nuts or told the science is ‘settled.’”
Tapper said that data on vaccine injuries has long been available — but ignored.
“If you know where to look, the data’s been there: VAERS reports, court payouts from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and countless studies buried or ignored by the mainstream. Now, they can’t pretend it’s not happening anymore.”
VAERS — the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System — is a government-run database of vaccine injury reports. Since the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccines, reports of vaccine-related injuries and deaths submitted to VAERS have significantly increased, while some have accused the government of undercounting reports.
“Vaccine injuries are real,” said Dr. Joel Wallskog, co-chair of React19, an advocacy group for vaccine injury victims. “COVID-19 vaccine injuries are real. There have been more adverse events in VAERS with the COVID-19 vaccines than all other vaccines combined.”
Wallskog added:
“The time has come for our country to stop the polarizing rhetoric about vaccine injuries. Creating a sub-agency to evaluate these injuries in a scientific manner — and not political — has the potential to help thousands, perhaps millions of people.”
Health freedom advocate Sayer Ji, co-founder of Stand for Health Freedom, called Kennedy’s announcement “an admission that the system has failed — and gravely.”
“That HHS departments were selling patient data and operating in silos reveals a cartel, not a public health institution. This is not reform — it’s rupture. And it opens the door to a new era of truth, accountability, and bodily sovereignty,” Ji said.
Lyons-Weiler suggested that critical data about vaccine injuries may have been overlooked as a result of the lack of communication within HHS.
“Critical safety signals may have been buried — not necessarily through conspiracy, but through a disjointed, profit-driven and overly bureaucratic system that prioritized internal control and proprietary access over transparency, accountability, and science,” Lyons-Weiler said.
Kennedy inherited an ‘incomprehensible’ organizational structure at HHS
During Thursday’s interview with Cuomo, Kennedy also addressed criticism over staff reductions at HHS. Kennedy said HHS “is the biggest agency in government, twice the size of the Pentagon” and that the cuts will not affect the agency’s focus on public health.
“We’re not going to cut services. We’re not going to cut Medicaid, we’re not going to cut Medicare. We’re going to continue. We’re going to provide services, but more efficiently,” Kennedy said.
When he took over as HHS secretary, Kennedy said he inherited a department with an “incomprehensible” organizational structure and with “no chain of command, where people [were] operating in all these different silos and fiefdoms.”
“What we’re trying to do now is to streamline the agency, to eliminate the redundancies and to focus the mission so that everybody who is at HHS is going to wake up every morning and say, ‘What am I going to do today to Make America Healthy Again?”
Kennedy also discussed the recently launched “Operation Stork Speed,” which will “improve our capacity to have good, nutritious baby formula for the American public that doesn’t have heavy metals or other poisons in it,” and HHS efforts to eliminate toxic dyes from the food supply.
“We’ve met with the major food processors and told them we want chemical dyes out of all of our foods,” Kennedy said.
Kennedy added that HHS is reforming the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to stop subsidizing the purchase of unhealthy products.
“We’re reforming every part of the agency to make sure that our food supply is good and that we have the healthiest kids in the world, which we had when I was a kid,” Kennedy said.
Watch the interview here
Related articles in The Defender
- RFK Jr. Overhauls HHS, Launches Administration for a Healthy America
- ‘We Will Do That Right Away’: RFK Jr. Promises Better Vaccine Injury Tracking, as White House Launches MAHA Commission
- Government Pays $2.5 Million to Person Injured by COVID Vaccine — But 98% of Claims Are Denied
- Their Vaccine Injury Reports Disappeared From VAERS — So They Developed a Tool Anyone Can Use to Track Their Own Reports
- Number of Children Who Died After COVID Shots Much Higher Than VAERS Reports Indicate, Analyst Says
- New York Times Investigation Finds People Injured by COVID Vaccines Are Being ‘Ignored’