Feb 202013
 

By Jason Warick, The StarPhoenix

The University of Saskatchewan’s payroll has been trimmed by $2.4 million in  recent weeks after dozens of jobs were eliminated, but a top official is warning  of much deeper cuts in the near future.

The U of S faces an annual $44.5 million operating shortfall by 2016 unless  changes are made.

“Every administrative and academic unit on campus will participate in  workforce planning and most will have to reduce their workforce this year,” U of  S associate vice-president of human resources Barb Daigle wrote in an email to  staff and students last week.

“The university requires immediate savings as well as long-term savings to  meet the current and projected budget challenges.”

In the email, Daigle outlined details of the 50 jobs that have been lost to  this point.

Library staff have been the hardest hit so far, with 12 positions  eliminated.

There were seven jobs lost in consumer services, six in student and enrolment  services, five in the Edwards School of Business, three in the college of law,  and one or two in a number of other areas.

Daigle said university leadership has had to make difficult decisions, and  she encouraged anyone with concerns to contact their manager or her office.

Students and staff interviewed say they’re worried, and some blame university  administrators for the current situation.

Others point to the provincial government. Still others say it’s a  combination of factors that could not have been predicted.

“It’s created a toxic environment here, the worst I’ve seen,” said long-time  anthropology Prof. Sandy Ervin.

Music education student Sarah Suchan and music performance student Gerard  Weber said they are stressed about the quality of their degree.

“What if our program no longer exists? What’s coming?” Weber said. “We’re  really worried.”

Agriculture student Kendall Krepps agreed.

“I’m not sure what’s going on. It was pretty shocking,” Krepps said. “What  are we going to do?”

Provincial government grants provide the bulk of operating funds for the U of  S and most Canadian universities. The U of S had received record annual  increases in recent years.

The provincial government recently informed the U of S increases would now be  in range of two per cent. It’s still more than most Canadian universities are  getting, but less than what U of S officials were expecting.

And that resulting $44.5 million annual shortfall refers to the U of S  operating budget alone. There’s also the capital budget.

Capital debt is expected to double this year to $199.2 million, an amount  that “will far exceed debt compared to peer universities,” says the U of S  2011-12 annual report.

Most of that increase is due to the provincial government’s new position on  financing the ambitious Health Sciences complex.

In 2011, Premier Brad Wall said the government was committed to funding  construction of the $300-million building.

In 2012, however, university officials were informed the government would  instead be contributing roughly $200 million. The U of S was told it would have  to pay the remaining $95 million itself.

There is also no money in place to operate the facility, although both sides  say they’re still in discussions. Campus officials are now considering a  scaled-back project.

David Boehm, assistant deputy minister for the Ministry of Advanced  Education, said the U of S should rightly pay a portion of the health sciences  construction cost and will also need to take more responsibility for future  projects.

Boehm noted the U of S has received record levels of funding to operate its  programs in recent years. He and others said other Canadian universities are  receiving much smaller increases, and in some cases no increases.

Boehm said all post-secondary institutions, not just the U of S, are  important to the provincial government. He noted enrolment in technical colleges  has increased by 30 per cent in recent years, far more than at universities. He  said students are “voting with their feet.”

Advanced Education Minister Don Morgan told reporters last month the  government remains committed to the health sciences project, but stopped short  of promising any new funds.

Simon Enoch of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives said the  government should have enough money to fund projects like this.

“We’re supposedly in a boom. They keep saying it’s the new Saskatchewan and  we’re supposed to be driving innovation,” Enoch said. “I think they’d much  rather have an institution that just churns out employees than educated  citizens.”

U of S faculty association president Doug Chivers said the government needs  to acknowledge the university is the province’s “economic engine” and fund it  accordingly.

There are other dark financial clouds. Deferred maintenance costs have  reached $507 million. The U of S donor endowment fund, which generates interest  to finance programs, sits at $220.7 million, roughly half of the per-student  amount for similar Canadian universities. The U of S also faces a pension fund  shortfall of more than $110 million.

“It’s only going to get worse. The math just isn’t sustainable,” said Bill  Tufts, a Hamilton-based expert on public-sector finances.

The pension issue has been known for several years, said former U of S  vice-president of finances and resources Richard Florizone. He noted the U of S  was honoured with the national CAUBO Quality and Productivity award for a study  identifying the problem. However, no money was set aside to deal with it until  this year. U of S officials have budgeted $10 million, but they also acknowledge  that much more could be required.

“Could we have foreseen all of this? It’s difficult to say,” Florizone  said.

In general terms, Florizone said he’s proud of the work he and MacKinnon did.  MacKinnon declined an interview request.

Colin Craig of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation said it “sounds like they  weren’t taking things seriously. They should have tried to win a national award  for doing something about it.”

Tufts said ignoring the pension deficit for so long was irresponsible. He  said “revolutionary” changes are needed, but doesn’t think that’s going to  happen.

“Everyone’s got their hand in the honey pot at the U of S and the taxpayers  are stuck with the bill,” Tufts said. “More government funding isn’t going to  solve this.”

U of S provost Brett Fairbairn said it’s best to pay off the pension fund by  $10 million per year, rather than setting aside a higher amount. Setting aside  more could result in more devastating cutbacks, “and it wouldn’t be prudent to  do that,” Fairbairn said.

Fairbairn said university officials are adamant they will not increase  tuition to balance the books.

Every job, program and college is being reviewed under the recently announced  TransformUS program. TransformUS is based on a system developed by Colorado  academic Robert Dickeson. It begins with several assumptions, which the U of S  has posted on its website.

Dickeson believes academic programs at universities “have been permitted to  grow and … calcify on the institutional body without critical regard to their  institutional worth.” He said universities are unrealistically trying to be  comprehensive, and should focus on what they do best.

TransformUS will rank programs over the course of the year and shift  resources from weakest to strongest. The cuts will be targeted. Cutting every  department by the same amount will not achieve the transformation they seek, say  officials.

“We are looking at every possible efficiency,” Fairbairn said.

KEY NUMBERS

. In 2011-12, total revenue was $860.8 million. The provincial government  grant ($420 million), tuition and student fees ($111.3 million), sales of  services and products ($94.6 million), and government of Canada contracts  ($86.6) were the biggest contributors.

. For the same period, total expenses were $901.5 million. Salaries ($589  million) make up the majority of costs. Others included operational supplies and  expenses ($118.6 million) and goods sold, equipment maintenance and rentals ($72  million). Source: U of S annual report 2011-12

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

 

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)