May 072012
 
  1. LETTER TO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS (May 7)
  2. REPLY RECEIVED (July 11, 2012)

 

= = = = = = = = = = = = =  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

    1.   LETTER TO THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS (May 7)

May 7, 2012

TO:

Members of the Board of Governors

University of Saskatchewan

(Peter MacKinnon, Vera Pezer, Art Dumont, Nancy Hopkins, Greg Smith, Garry Standing, David Sutherland, Grit McCreath, Susan Milburn, Linda Ferguson, Scott Hitchings, Lea Pennock)

FROM:

Sandra Finley

University Senator (Elected)

656 Saskatchewan Cres East

Saskatoon,  SK  S7N 0L1

306-373-8078

Dear Members of the Board of Governors,

Speaking on behalf of the citizens of Saskatchewan who are the owners of the University of Saskatchewan, and for whom I am one of the elected representatives (“voices of the community (owners)”):

I am very concerned about the vulnerabilities created by the deteriorating financial situation at the University.

The finances, roughly:

  • $95 million debt
  • Borrowing capacity maxed out
  • A $10 million shortfall in the current operating budget
  • $15.5 million deficit for 2012-13
  • a potential shortfall of $20 million to $40 million annually by 2016
  • $600 million needed for repair and maintenance of the existing buildings
  • No money to finish the interior of some of the new buildings

The vulnerability:

  • Corporate take-over of the University, as a way to deal with the deficits and debt.

Who is responsible?

In any system of democratic governance, it is the role of elected representatives to hold administrators to account.  I see where the University Governors are mostly by appointment.  So it seems that I am supposed to ask the hard questions.

QUESTION 1:

Who is responsible for the current financial situation of the University?   (It is not “we are all responsible and hence no one is responsible.”)  Big salaries are being paid, who is the responsible person?   Is that person being held to account, and if so, how?

QUESTION 2:

What are the numbers for cuts to quantity, salaries, benefits and frills of Administrators?  (At Senate Meeting on April 21, the Dean of Law defended back-to-back 16% tuition increases for students in law.  There was no discussion regarding cuts in Administration costs.)

QUESTION 3:

Lockheed Martin Corporation is courting the University with money.  Who is responsible for the decision to accept money from Lockheed Martin?   (At Senate Meeting Ernie Barber, Dean of Engineering, defended collaboration with Lockheed Martin.  You will find a copy of the “Collaboration Topics” in the posting http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=5103.)

QUESTION 4:

Are you aware that a main focus of the unrest in the world today is corporate behaviour?  (witness the “Occupy” movement which started on WALL STREET).  Lockheed Martin’s recruiting on campus was during exams so there was little mobilization.  I spoke with two different Muslim professors from two different faculties (U of S, Medicine, Engineering).  I doubt I need to describe their reaction to you.  Lockheed Martin had a large influence in the decision of the Americans to launch a war of aggression on Iraq.  They used lies to justify it. Muslim people have been killed in large numbers and driven from their homes.  It seems to me that the U of S is making a large mistake in taking any money from Lockheed Martin, not only on moral and legal grounds, but also in terms of setting itself up for targeting.

Thank-you in advance for your responses to these questions.

Sincerely,

Sandra Finley

= = = = = = = ==

FYI

1.  SCIENCE UNDER SIEGE

An ill wind is gusting through the halls of science these days: faked research, suppression of unwelcome results, corruption of science advisory panels, university research falling under the influence of corporate sponsors, and many other conflicts of interest.  It’s as if science were under siege. . . .    (The full article is at 2005-08-05)

2.  THINKERS OF THE DAY ON: PARTNERSHIPS BETWEEN GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS AND BUSINESS, please see: http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=5312

3.  Earlier correspondence with the Board of Governors is posted at:  http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=5309

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

2.   REPLY RECEIVED (July 11, 2012)

Click on:   IMG_0001

Jun 142012
 

(PPP’s = Public Private Partnerships)

Richard Florizone was Vice-President of Finance at the University of Saskatchewan during a period of unprecedented over-spending.

2012-05-07 Letter to U of S, Board of Governors.  Who is responsible for Debt situation?

EXCERPT:  The finances, roughly:

  • $95 million debt
  • Borrowing capacity maxed out
  • A $10 million shortfall in the current operating budget, upgraded to $12 million
  • $15.5 million deficit for 2012-13
  • a potential shortfall of $20 million to $40 million annually by 2016.  Upgraded two weeks later to $44.5 million.
  • $600 million needed for repair and maintenance of the existing buildings
  • No money to finish the interior of some of the new buildings

Prior to looking at how Florizone is rewarded, also consider this excerpt from the posting  2009-10-10 Corporations at the Universities. Selling Out. Richard Florizone and UDP. Nuclear at the University.

Excerpt from item #4:

I observed the loss of integrity again, repeatedly, through the Uranium Partnership Development (UDP or “NUKE”) Panel struck by the Government of Saskatchewan and chaired by Richard Florizone, Vice-President of Finance of the University of Saskatchewan.

More than 2,000 citizens heard the lie from Florizone that the acid rain problem in Canada has been solved.

The public meetings were about nuclear reactors.  Why was Florizone even mentioning acid rain?

Understand the relationship between the tar sands (acid rain production) and “small” nuclear reactors which are to be developed under the “Uranium Development Partnership”.  (Actually, the “small” reactors have already been developed in the U.S., in Japan and elsewhere.  Whatever is done in Saskatchewan will build on that. The University is a vehicle through which to get the “small” reactors up and running.)

Huge amounts of electricity are needed for the large electrical diodes that will heat the far underground to get the tar to the point where it will flow.  It is projected to take more than 3 years of 24-hour heating just to get the first tar on the Saskatchewan side of the border flowing.

Imagine the vast quantities of electricity (heat) needed by the tar sands producers.

The increase in acid rain from tar sands processing continues , and will continue, unabated.  Since it was first identified that some areas  of northern Saskatchewan (downwind) are already past critical load limits (CCME Report, 2005) there has only been EXPANSION of the tar sands.  The Government is sitting on the updates on how bad the acid rain problem now is.

It is very convenient for the industry to have the Vice-President of the University tell us all that the acid rain problem in Canada is no longer a problem because we are so smart we fixed it.  It’s about the use of lies (propaganda)to remove obstacles. to tar sands expansion.

Further, Florizone led the public to believe that we were being consulted about the whole uranium/nuclear question, including whether or not there would be a nuclear studies centre of excellence at the U of S.

While he was doing that, he had to know that the Canadian Centre of Nuclear Studies at the University was already  established.  In the “On Campus News”, July 17, 2009 the Vice-President of Research, Karen Chad was interviewed.  She said that the Centre has been in operation for more than a year.  (Link no longer valid http://www.usask.ca/communications/ocn/09-july-17/2.php.)  The decision had been made and implemented.

The mandate of the Canadian Centre of Nuclear Studies at the U of S includes research into “power production” and radioactive waste disposal (“safe storage” as she calls it).

Call a spade a spade.  Richard Florizone is not the kind of role model acceptable at the University.  We pay his salary so that our children have a centre of learning, where people search for truth.  They should not be taught that lies and deception are just part of the way we do business.

– – – – – –

A brief bio of Florizone is at  2011-04  The University:  Are We Living in a Brave New Academy?   The Conditioning Centre. See  item 10.  NOTICE OF MEETING CONTAINS BIOGRAPHY OF FLORIZONE

= = = = = = = = = = = = =

Richard Florizone rewarded?

The StarPhoenix June 14, 2012

University of Saskatchewan vice-president Richard Florizone will be seconded to World Bank Group’s International Finance Corp. for six months, beginning July 1.

The agreement was signed between IFC, a member of the World Bank Group, and the university.

“Creating this unprecedented partnership with this leading global institution advances our growing prominence as a globally engaged university and enhances our capacity in public policy areas – finding new ways to finance infrastructure development – areas of critical importance to both Saskatchewan and developing countries,” university president Peter MacKinnon said in a news release Wednesday.

Florizone, the VP of finance and resources at the university, will act as a senior adviser to IFC Advisory Services in Public-Private Partnerships in Washington, D.C.

The prestigious secondment is the first undertaken by the World Bank Group with a Canadian university.

The World Bank Group is an international organization of 188 member nations that fights poverty by offering developmental assistance to middle-income and low-income countries.

Florizone’s work will focus on a study of past public-private partnership transactions, as well as providing support for several IFC projects in developing countries.

“With a growing need for infrastructure construction and renewal around the world, effective ways of financing these critical public works is increasingly important,” Florizone said.

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix