1,084,283 views Jun 10, 2025 The Joe Rogan Experience
Follow along using the transcript.
From NORTHERN PERSPECTIVES
July 11, 2025
Carney’s financial holdings finally disclosed. (Please share this video if it suits you.)
I was so surprised to see “Stripe”,
after becoming somewhat acquainted with Stripe just a few days ago.
Stripe is mentioned right near the beginning of the video.
INSERT: The information thread on “Stripe” happened this way:
Subject: Re: BREAKING NEWS: SCANDAL – Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s team has stolen another $45,792 from my Stripe account! …
Morning Sandra
What do you know about Stripe? I have never heard of it before . . .
– – – – – —
Sent: Sunday, July 6, 2025 (I declined to become involved.)
Sent To: D
Thanks.
I am going to pass.
“Stripe” is too iffy for me.
/Sandra
From: Sandra
Sent: July 7, 2025
Subject: RE: BREAKING NEWS: SCANDAL – Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s team has stolen another $45,792 from my Stripe account! …
Hi!
Some of the info I found on Stripe and that I still recall (!).
It’s American based.
The Company is “owned” by – – 10% each by a couple dudes. The other 80% by a bunch of different people.
The fees are 2.9% plus $.30 per transaction.
From the internet:
What are the disadvantages of Stripe?
Cons of Stripe
Feb 6, 2025
– – – – – –
I have some (small) familiarity with the Dr.
My impression: he’s on our side, but he’s between a rock and a hard place.
From my perspective, the problem is that his primary interest is technology for cancer treatment (that’s where he stands to make money and he has to do that. He has a family.).
IT DOES NOT MATTER. I SIMPLY DO NOT PUT MONEY INTO DISEASE TREATMENTS. For decades my rule is REMOVAL OF CAUSE.
There are more than enough people to invest in disease treatment. It’s an expensive, very competitive market, but also very lucrative if you’re connected to Big Pharma. If you did not know that before, you certainly know it AFTER covid. Big Pharma wants to invest in a vaccination for cancer. . . . in ANYthing. Under the current situation (no responsibility for death and destruction caused by their products, patents and guaranteed huge markets (Government mandates) they make billions.
I don’t have time to go deeper. but I don’t understand: why would anyone line-up STRIPE for their financial needs? It took me a few minutes to find this on the Internet:
Who cannot use Stripe?
As described in the Restricted Businesses list, Stripe is not able to support many financial services businesses, including investment and credit services, money transmission, bill pay or crowdfunding services, digital wallets, or cryptocurrency-related business (crypto mining equipment, initial coin offerings, or …
I would say YOU ARE ASKING FOR TROUBLE – – the preceding paragraph coupled with who owns Stripe – – MONEY IS GOING TO DISAPPEAR. Seems obvious.
Sandra
CONTINUING:
I watched the video on Carney’s conflicts-of-interest (more than 100) to the end.
All I can say is Holy Shit. (I am not easily shocked. This does it.)
Please share far and wide if you are alarmed. And read Dan’s piece appended.
/Sandra
= = = = = = = = = = = =
APPENDED, With thanks to Dan:
Sent: July 13, 2025
To: Sandra
Subject: Re: Carney’s financial interests finally disclosed
‘Look inside yourself Rosemary.’
(INSERT: this is a reference by Dan to Carney’s words directed at Rosemary Barton from CBC’s Power & Politics. See https://x.com/jonkay/status/1901808488927416569) /Sandra.
– – – – – – – – – –
We are literally ruled by a technocracy now and still Canadian’s don’t see it. Feels like the final stages where the mobsters battle it out to see which cartel gets to run the show.
I’m not even sure anymore what to believe about the relationship Carney has with Trump. Jacob Nordangard has been saying for a while now that Trump was sent to destroy and Carney and his globalist technocrats are here to rebuild.
I have frequently pointed out that the Trump administration appears to have been designated to crash the old order, end the United States position as the leading world power, and prepare ground for the new technocratic world system (probably implemented after a devastating event/war). But the same old gangsters plan to ascend the global throne as “Master of the Universe” and set the rules and regulations for our “sustainable” future in the smart city “gulags”.
Whatever is going on, it’s epic for humanity.
Hope you are hanging in there! Thanks for the video, excellent work as usual by Northern Perspective. That is quite a list. Noticed Palantir was in there too – so the idea that US and Canada have some sort of sovereign boundaries seems quite fake to me now.
And the whole Epstein bait and switch – everything is a rich man’s trick.
Enjoy your Sunday.
Shovelful by shovelful of words tossed
What do you call the empty hole that awaits the corpse?
The composted words go there.
Civilization upon civilization stacked
Like you can see in the jungles of Central America
Me and everything I produced
The dust, the poop and the words will be in that hole.
Will it matter that Elon Musk doesn’t remember?
Or that I forget?
Will it matter that we are the dust eaten over and over again by bugs?
100 million workers for Canada by the end of the century says Justin Trudeau
Did he say anything about Life Expectancy and Disposal?
The 42-page lawsuit, filed Monday by six medical groups, alleges the changes to the COVID-19 vaccine recommendations are “baseless and uninformed” and place pregnant women and children at “grave and immediate risk.” The lawsuit’s lead plaintiff, the American Academy of Pediatrics, lists Merck, Sanofi and Moderna among its donors.
Six medical organizations are suing Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and several other public health officials and agencies over recent changes to COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for children and pregnant women.
According to the 42-page lawsuit, filed Monday in federal court in Boston, the new recommendations are “baseless and uninformed” and place pregnant women and children at “grave and immediate risk.”
The lawsuit alleges the changes will lead to “decreased rates of vaccination, increased rates of transmission, long-lasting illness, and ultimately deaths among pregnant women, unborn children, and all children.”
The complaint also claims Kennedy violated federal law when he issued an internal directive to change the recommendations instead of following the “longstanding process” for making changes to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) immunization schedules.
Plaintiffs include the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American College of Physicians (ACP), the American Public Health Association, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Massachusetts Public Health Association, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and a physician named in the complaint as “Jane Doe,” who is 20 weeks pregnant and allegedly faces “barriers to access to the vaccine.”
The plaintiffs seek an injunction against the directive, request the restoration of the COVID-19 vaccines to the list of recommended immunizations for pregnant women and healthy children and a court order compelling Kennedy to “announce on X that those immunizations are now reinstated to the CDC immunization schedules.”
Other defendants named in the complaint include the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the CDC and its acting director Matthew Buzzelli, Director of the National Institutes of Health Jay Bhattacharya and Marty Makary, commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Pharma has ‘tremendous financial incentive’ to ‘preserve the status quo’
Attorney Richard Hughes IV, a professorial lecturer in law at George Washington University Law School, who, according to The New York Times, is “leading the effort” to challenge the directive, said Kennedy “aims to destroy vaccines.”
But according to Kim Mack Rosenberg, general counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), “The medical cartel — funded extensively by the pharmaceutical industry — has a tremendous financial incentive to preserve the status quo.”
Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for CHD, noted that the lawsuit “fails to mention that several plaintiffs, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Physicians and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, received millions of dollars from the CDC to promote COVID-19 injections.”
“People who make a lot of money pushing COVID vaccines want to force a recommendation for more COVID vaccines,” Jablonowski said.
The AAP, for instance, lists pharma giants Merck, Sanofi and COVID-19 vaccine manufacturer Moderna among its donors. The organization also closely collaborates with corporations such as Coca-Cola.
Last month, two of the plaintiffs — the AAP and the ACP — signed on to the “Vaccine Integrity Project,” a new initiative seeking to bypass public health authorities through the creation of “a nongovernmental vaccine system” for vaccine recommendations and purchasing.
The group is funded by iAlumbra, a nonprofit founded by Walmart heiress and billionaire philanthropist Christy Walton, known for her anti-Trump advocacy.
Dr. Jane Orient, executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, suggested that the organizations suing Kennedy may be concerned that evidence will come to light questioning the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
Orient said:
“These organizations evidently consider themselves to be the ultimate authorities on all vaccines and seem to feel threatened by the possibility that a government advisory committee might not agree with their position that all ‘approved’ or ‘recommended’ vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ — and necessary.”
Mack Rosenberg said the liability shield that vaccine manufacturers enjoy “allows them to exercise incredible hubris,” adding that “they desperately fear loss of this extraordinary protection.”
She added:
“The irony of the changes to COVID-19 jabs recommendations is that they actually empower physicians to do their jobs and provide individualized medical care to their patients. One has to ask why these entities fear that.”
Directive ‘arbitrary and capricious,’ lawsuit alleges
The complaint extensively references a May 27 video Kennedy posted on X, in which Kennedy, Bhattacharya and Makary announced the removal of the COVID-19 vaccine recommendation for pregnant women and healthy children, citing insufficient data to show that these populations benefited from the vaccine.
The lawsuit calls the directive “arbitrary and capricious” and questions Bhattacharya and Makary’s past opposition to various COVID-19 pandemic-related measures.
The complaint notes that Bhattacharya co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated for herd immunity and targeted measures during the pandemic. The lawsuit characterized this as advocacy in favor of “the uncontrolled spread of an infectious disease to control an epidemic.”
Makary “previously made headlines for his comments during the pandemic, including advocating in favor of natural immunity, questioning the requirement for booster shots in younger people, and opposing vaccine mandates,” the lawsuit claims.
But according to Orient, throughout history, epidemics were controlled by natural immunity and measures such as vector control. “Locking down everybody was the unprecedented action,” she said.
The lawsuit also claims that the COVID-19 vaccines are FDA-approved and that a “wealth of data and peer-reviewed studies” demonstrate their safety and efficacy.
Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine and Moderna’s Spikevax vaccine are fully approved for ages 12 and older. But for children under age 12, the vaccines are administered under emergency use authorization.
Novavax’s Nuvaxovid vaccine is fully approved only for people 65 and older and those between 12 and 64 who have a health condition placing them at increased risk of COVID-19 infection.
Plaintiffs criticize new CDC vaccine advisory committee
Last month, Kennedy dismissed the 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) — the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee. He subsequently named eight new members to the committee.
During the new members’ first meeting, some members questioned CDC claims about the safety of COVID-19 shots and the virus’s threat to children. The committee also said it plans to examine the cumulative effect of the childhood vaccine schedule.
The lawsuit questions the qualifications of seven of ACIP’s new members, claiming they “do not possess the required scientific and medical expertise to serve on ACIP.”
The complaint also questions Kennedy’s claims that the 17 former members of ACIP had conflicts of interest. “None of these accusations are remotely true,” according to the complaint.
Orient disagreed. “It was the ACIP that Kennedy fired that was likely unlawful,” she said.
ACIP also voted last month to no longer recommend flu vaccines that contain thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative linked to neurodevelopmental disorders. The lawsuit cites a statement by the Infectious Diseases Society of America that said the vote was “politically motivated” and “not based on science.”
The complaint differentiates thimerosal, “which breaks down into ethylmercury” from “harmful forms of mercury like methylmercury.” But according to Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer for CHD, this distinction is “absolutely preposterous.”
“This was shown to be wrong in a seminal study by Burbacher et al., which showed that thimerosal exposure resulted in higher amounts of mercury metal essentially locked into the brains of macaque monkeys. The researchers could not determine the half-life of that mercury in the brain because it was longer than the study itself.”
In March, the AAP recommended annual flu shots for all children ages 6 months and older for the next cold and flu season.
The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.
Lawsuit claims ‘wealth’ of studies show COVID shots are safe — but doesn’t cite any
The complaint claims there is a “wealth” of data and studies showing the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 shots for kids and pregnant women, but doesn’t cite any studies.
Several peer-reviewed studies link COVID-19 shots with risks for pregnant women. An animal study published in the journal Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids in March found that mRNA injections cross the placenta and enter the fetus within one hour, where they develop into spike protein and remain in the body after birth.
Another animal study, published in the journal Vaccines in March, found that COVID-19 vaccines decreased the number of primordial follicles in female rats by up to 60%, which may reduce women’s lifelong egg supply.
According to a study of 1.3 million Czech women published last month in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, the rate of successful conception — a pregnancy leading to live birth nine months later — for women who received the COVID-19 vaccine was “substantially lower” than for unvaccinated women.
According to “The Pfizer Papers,” a set of 450,000 documents related to the licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, 72% of recorded adverse events were in women. Babies had to be delivered early, women hemorrhaged during childbirth, and nursing babies of vaccinated women experienced adverse effects.
Pregnant women also experienced side effects. Pfizer lost the records of 234 pregnant women who participated in the clinical trials for the vaccine, but for the 36 pregnant women whose records survived, over 80% lost their babies.
Last month, some of the plaintiffs signed a letter to insurers, urging them to continue covering COVID-19 shots for pregnant women despite the new recommendations.
Other recent studies have linked COVID-19 vaccines to health risks in children. According to a study published in the journal Pediatric Rheumatology in May, children and adolescents who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine had a 23% higher risk of developing autoimmune disease compared to unvaccinated children.
A preprint study published in May 2024 of 1.7 million children in England found cases of myocarditis or pericarditis only in those children who received the COVID-19 shots. No cases were identified in children who didn’t receive the vaccine.
Citing rising maternal mortality and “the sickest generation of American children in history,” Laura Bono, vice-president emerita of CHD and mother of a vaccine-injured child, said the plaintiffs should use their resources to solve these public health issues instead of on this lawsuit.
“Rather than spending money on a lawsuit to preserve the status quo, these associations should support their missions by looking for answers to address the declining health of mothers and children,” Bono said.
Related articles in The Defender
This article was corrected to indicate that Richard Hughes IV is affiliated with George Washington University.
Richard Henry Hughes IV, a former vice president at Moderna, is the lead lawyer representing the plaintiffs suing Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and several other public health officials and agencies over recent changes to COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for children and pregnant women.
The lead lawyer in a lawsuit against Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over recent changes to COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for children and pregnant women previously worked for Moderna and Merck.
Richard Henry Hughes IV was vice president of public policy at Moderna from 2020-2022, when the vaccine maker developed and marketed the Spikevax COVID-19 vaccine, which has netted the company billions of dollars over the last four years.
Before winning approval of its COVID-19 vaccine, Moderna had never successfully brought a product to market. Investigative journalist Whitney Webb reported that without that authorization and the subsequent approval of the vaccine and boosters, Moderna would have likely crumbled.
Hughes guided Moderna’s policy from the time it won initial emergency use authorization for its mRNA vaccine through the shot’s full approval in 2022.
Now, he’s representing plaintiffs like the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in a lawsuit that seeks to restore COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for pregnant women and children — a move that likely would result in more sales and profits for Moderna and other COVID-19 vaccine makers.
In May, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) changed its COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for children on the Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule.
The update followed an announcement by Kennedy that the COVID-19 vaccine would no longer be recommended for healthy children and pregnant women. The announcement sparked confusion, as the changes weren’t yet visible on the CDC website.
The agency subsequently changed what previously was a universal recommendation that all children ages 6 months and older receive the COVID-19 shots, to a recommendation of “shared clinical decision-making” between parents and providers for children ages 6 months to 17 years who are not moderately immunocompromised.
On Monday, Hughes said at a news conference that the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against Kennedy are “asking the court to order the secretary to announce on X that those immunization recommendations are now reinstated to the CDC immunization schedules.”
The plaintiffs also seek an injunction against the directive that triggered the changes in recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines.
In addition to the AAP, original plaintiffs in the suit include the American College of Physicians, the American Public Health Association, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Massachusetts Public Health Association, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and a physician named in the complaint as “Jane Doe,” who is 20 weeks pregnant and allegedly faces “barriers to access to the vaccine.”
The Infectious Diseases Society of America announced Tuesday that it had also joined the lawsuit.
A long career of serving Big Pharma
Since leaving Moderna, Hughes has been a partner at Epstein Becker Green, the law firm representing the plaintiffs, where he builds “comprehensive market strategies” for life science companies to support their product development and growth.
His career has been dedicated to counseling biopharmaceutical companies, investors and industry trade associations.
He is a member of the board of directors of Vaccinate Your Family, a vaccine advocacy group funded by vaccine makers AstraZeneca, CLS Seqirus, Pfizer, Moderna, Novavax, Merck, Sanofi, and the CDC.
Hughes teaches vaccine law at George Washington University. Before joining Moderna, he was vice president at Avalere Health, a healthcare industry consulting firm.
He was also the region policy executive at Merck from 2010-2014.
Merck is the maker of the Gardasil vaccine, first licensed in 2006. The product is designed to protect against human papillomavirus (HPV). In 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a new version of that vaccine, the nine-valent Gardasil, which effectively drove GSK’s bivalent Cervarix HPV vaccine from the U.S. market.
Hughes recently criticized the new members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the CDC on vaccine recommendations.
Hughes’ criticism focused largely on Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D., whom he accused of having a conflict of interest. He cited Kulldorff’s “adverse position to a major vaccine manufacturer,” demonstrated by his expert witness testimony in a lawsuit against Merck for allegedly misleading consumers about the safety of its Gardasil vaccine.
Hughes told The New York Times that Kennedy has been on a “decades-long mission” to undermine vaccines and to portray them as more dangerous than the illnesses they are designed to prevent.
“The secretary’s intentions are clear,” Hughes said. “He aims to destroy vaccines.”
Hughes has also said there has been a “weaponization of the courts against vaccines.”
The lawsuit against Kennedy and other public health officials and agencies seeks to use the courts to reverse the vaccine policy set by the public health agencies under Kennedy’s leadership.
According to the Times, the lawsuit focuses only on the COVID-19 vaccine recommendations, but more vaccine decisions may be added.
A correction to the Times’ article about the lawsuit indicated that Hughes mischaracterized the complaint made by Jane Doe in the lawsuit. He told the Times she was denied a vaccine, but the complaint indicates that she only feared she might not be able to get one.
The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.
Many of the organizations that are plaintiffs in the lawsuit are themselves funded by the pharmaceutical industry. Some also received millions of dollars from the CDC to promote the COVID-19 shots.
The AAP, for instance, lists pharma giants Merck, Sanofi and COVID-19 vaccine manufacturer Moderna among its donors.
Last month, two of the plaintiffs — the AAP and the American College of Physicians — signed on to the “Vaccine Integrity Project,” a new initiative seeking to bypass public health authorities through the creation of “a nongovernmental vaccine system” for vaccine recommendations and purchasing.
The group is funded by iAlumbra, a nonprofit founded by Walmart heiress and billionaire philanthropist Christy Walton, known for her anti-Trump advocacy.
Related articles in The Defender
https://www.jccf.ca/education/corrupted-by-fear/
#1 Bestseller on Amazon
As Canadians, we depend on our courts to protect us when the government violates our Charter rights and freedoms. After extensive Covid lockdowns and vaccine mandates, many are left wondering how such violations could go unchecked.
How is it that we still don’t have clear explanations as to why judges preferred the evidence of the government over the evidence of citizens fighting for their Charter freedoms?
All Canadians, regardless of their views on the pandemic, should be concerned about courts repeating media narratives in their judgments, seemingly turning a blind eye to the violations of human rights, and failing to consider the real harms suffered by people.
Corrupted by Fear reviews, through the eyes of constitutional lawyer John Carpay, the evidence before courts in Charter challenges to Covid lockdowns. Carpay explains how harsh measures that turned our world upside down were not subjected to proper scrutiny. He explores crucial lessons Canadians can learn from history, particularly the collapse of democracy and human rights into fascism in Europe in the 1930s.
Read Chapter 16: The Fascist elements of the lockdown regime
The Last Selection was: 2025-06-24 For Your Selection June #4 2025
Posting #6 is a break-through. GLOBAL NEWS is mainstream media. They did original research and reporting on covid deaths and injuries!
(I didn’t post about the CBC journalist who was pushed out. I can do it later when the story is better developed. Candice Malcolm (Juno News) interviewed the defense lawyer. The more you hear, the more momentum is being developed to cut the CBC loose from Govt funding. Immeasurable harm to the democracy is done by a corrupted state broadcaster. “Peace, Order, and Good Governance” are replaced by thuggery.)
Posting #8 is a (USA) break-through – – the Washington Post.
Postings #2 and #3 make my heart thump at the possibilities. Evan Blackman stood up to the Prosecutors. Evan wants to know who and how it was decided that his bank accounts would be frozen. When you hear his story, you may want to know, too. The Judge in his case – – now there’s another judge I can relate to!
I am encouraged.
Many thanks to John Carpay of the JCCF. He is the interviewee in 3 of the first postings. I think his book will be especially helpful “in these times”! I will get it.
(I didn’t want to post anything about Theresa Tam being awarded the Order of Canada.) /Sandra
important INSERT NEW: 2025-07-11 About “Stripe”, Carney, Lockheed Martin, Nuclear Energy, . . .
– – – – – – – – – – –
– – – – – – – –
– – – – – – – – –
5. 2025-07-08 Corrupted by Fear, book by John Carpay
7. 2025-07-02 Carney wants to spy on all Canadians. Junonews.com/
– – – – – – – –
SHOW-DOWN Continues in the U.S.
8. 2025-06-24 Washington Post Reports on ‘Plan to Vaccinate All Americans, Despite RFK Jr.’
10. 2025-07-09 Lawyer Leading Lawsuit Against RFK Jr. Over COVID Vaccines Used to Work for Moderna
13. 2025-07-01 The Plot to Get RFK, By James Lyons-Weiler, published on Dr. Malone’s substack.
15. 2025-05-15 The mRNA Drug Industry Strikes Back, by Dr. Robert Malone.
2025-06-03 Covid. Senator Ron Johnson interviewed on podcast of Bret Weinstein (DarkHorse)
– – – – – – – –
10. 2025-07 Druthers (July issue) is out!
– – – – – – – – – – – – –
– – – – – – – – – – – – –
13. 2025-04-19 Lymphatic System / Lymph Treatment
IMHO, we have been divorced from KNOWING our amazing Immune Systems.
I thought I’d start with some stories about the Lymphatic System. It should be interesting to go from there to the wider Immune System. I will try, at any rate. If I fail, maybe it will spur you to clarify your thinking (and mine)!
– – – – – – – – – – – – –
VACCINES – – SOME POSTINGS FROM MY BLOG.
2020-06-10 If I am making a choice about a vaccine, I want to know this (WHAT ARE THE INGREDIENTS OF VACCINES?.) https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=25074
2025-04-09 8-Year-Old in West Texas Died From Hospital-acquired Pneumonia, Medical Records Show https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=31342
2025-05-23 I’ve been waiting for years for this – – a film that tells the Simpsonwood story https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=31536
Hugh Faulkner – – This is a good interview. Please send it further. /S
Mark Carney’s border bill C-2 will give the federal government unprecedented surveillance measures over Canadians if passed. Constitutional lawyer John Carpay joins me (Hugh Faulkner) to outline the dark side of Bill C-2 and urges Canadians to speak to their MPs and get them to vote against this bill.
Read John Capay’s latest book: https://www.amazon.ca/Corrupted-Fear-…
A very important initiative, IMHO.
BACKGROUND: 2024-05-03 Crown appeal against acquitted peaceful protestor Evan Blackman back in court June 19. JCCF
UPDATE:
Rebel News (Ezra Levant) Interview of John Carpay:
Go to:
As 2025 progresses, revelations about the COVID era emerge.
Global News, once a propagandist, now reports on vaccine injury bureaucracy’s lax behavior, signaling a shift in critical thinking, albeit belatedly. This comes as good news for figures like John Carpay of the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms.
Carpay discusses the case of Evan Blackman, wrongfully arrested during the 2022 Freedom Convoy protest in Ottawa.
Blackman, acquitted despite drone footage showing him peacefully de-escalating a situation and singing “O Canada” on his knees, faces an abusive Crown appeal in Ontario. Carpay criticizes Ontario’s prosecutors for pursuing such cases while more serious crimes go unaddressed due to resource limitations.
The Calgary-based lawyer then reveals a recent judicial order: the RCMP and TD Bank must turn over documents related to the freezing of Blackman’s bank accounts.
This unprecedented order seeks to understand the rationale behind the freeze and its connection to the criminal prosecution. This marks a potential turning point, moving away from the “madness” of 2021-2022 when judges made questionable rulings.
According to figures obtained through an access-to-information request by Blacklock’s, an estimated $7.8 million in holdings belonging to convoy supporters had been seized by 267 bank accounts and 170 bitcoin wallets in 2022.
Ezra anticipates TD Bank or RCMP appealing the subpoena to conceal “dirty deeds.” He speculates that if the subpoena holds, the prosecution might drop the appeal or even charges against Blackman to prevent exposure of potentially “dark” internal communications.
Ezra draws a parallel to the “ArriveCan” app cases, where the government avoided constitutional challenges by withdrawing charges, preventing a public examination of their lack of scientific and medical basis for lockdown policies.