Oct 112006

I sent out:  (2006-10-11)   Where to go? & Alta, Sask officials discuss cross-boundary oilsands pollution (Sask lakes dying)

Which prompted:

—–Original Message—–

From: Herman Boerma

Sent: October 11, 2006 10:08 PM

To: Sandra Finley

Subject: acid rain in N sask


fyi — this was all predicted by saskatchewan scientists approx 25 years ago

 . . . . .  continued below


A short series of emails:

2006-07-10   Wow. Peter Lougheed speaks out, Tar Sands; plus LA Times & Globe & Mail on pipeline

2006-09-12   Response from Govt to Saskatchewan Lakes dying from tarsands emissions?

2006-09-13   continued re Tar Sands and SO2 emissions, Sask lakes dying

2006-10-11   Where to go?  &  Alta, Sask officials discuss cross-boundary oilsands pollution (Sask lakes dying)

2006-10-11   re Acid rain in Northern Saskatchewan (Alberta tar sands)


continuing ….

Sandra Finley wrote:


Thanks, Herman. I didn’t know.

There are other examples, too.

Good scientists and no one pays attention.

Sad.  Worse than sad – tragic, really.


– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

From: Herman Boerma  Sent: October 12, 2006   To: Sandra Finley Subject: Re: acid rain in N sask


Don’t despair.   Things will change.



= = = = = = = = = = =

Government plans climate change law  (UK)

· Controls expected to tackle CO2 emissions
· Ministers acknowledge consensus for action

The government signalled yesterday that it is planning legislation to tackle climate change, with a bill possibly to appear in next month’s Queen’s Speech, as it acknowledges the formidable political consensus emerging over the need for action.

The new law, likely to introduce controls on carbon dioxide emissions and an independent system to gauge progress in reducing greenhouse gases, was welcomed by opposition parties and environmental groups, though it is not expected to include binding annual targets. The environment secretary, David Miliband, told the Commons yesterday that the issue for the government “is not whether to legislate, but what form legislation should take and how it could be organised”.

He said: “We are looking carefully at the merits of introducing a carbon budget as a means of helping to deliver our goals. The only issue for the government is whether the legislation would help in the battle against climate change, support the efforts to join individual activity with business and government leadership, and link domestic and international action.

“Legislating for targets is not the same as legislating the means to achieve them, and it is the means to achieve them on which we will all be judged.”

Mr Miliband said that the facts on climate change were “more alarming … than previously thought”.

Tony Juniper, director of Friends of the Earth, said it was delighted by the news. “Tony Blair must build on the political consensus that now exists for tackling this crisis, and ensure that the UK’s contribution to climate change falls every year.”

According to FoE, 397 MPs have backed their “Big Ask” campaign, which calls for the government to commit itself to cutting the UK’s carbon dioxide emissions by at least 3% year on year.

Nasa scientists said last month that the world was the warmest it had been in the last 12,000 years, due to rapid changes in the past three decades. Their report warned that pollution caused by humans was pushing the world towards dangerous levels of climate change.

Peter Ainsworth, the shadow environment secretary, welcomed the news, adding: “We need rolling annual carbon reduction targets … an independent body to assess the science and make recommendations as that science evolves; and an annual report to Parliament to ensure that ministers and civil servants are accountable.”






 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>