Sandra Finley

Apr 262018
 

Jim Harding’s new book (Jan 2018),  Moving Beyond: Neo-liberalism in Saskatchewan

Jim writes:

See our new website at  QVEA.CA

Also I have a new short book out which looks back at our Saskatchewan political history from a “green” perspective.

You can download at my webpage: crowsnestecology.wordpress.com

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Many thanks to Jim for making his work so easily available.   It downloads quickly – – approximately 60 pages.

Words fall short.  Jim is an extraordinany fellow, on many different levels.

DEDICATION  (Moving Beyond: Neo-liberalism in Saskatchewan)
This publication is dedicated to the memory of peace and environmental
warrior Lynn Hainsworth who recently died after a long struggle with
cancer. Lynn was always there to help move progressive issues forward.
We mourn and celebrate her good life.

 

Apr 252018
 

My appreciation to Grand Council Chief Patrick Madahbee for his patience in the CBC interview of him, and for taking the nuclear waste issue to the United Nations.

http://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/nuclear-waste-disposal-in-canada-is-an-accident-waiting-to-happen-says-indigenous-leader-1.4629258

Nuclear waste disposal in Canada is ‘an accident waiting to happen,’ says Indigenous leader

‘People are gambling with people’s lives,’ says grand council chief of the Anishinabek Nation

 

The following information may be useful to the Chief, and to the CBC. It comes from 3 separate attempts by the industry to obtain community support for transport of high-level radioactive waste to northern Saskatchewan for burial.   (The information applies, regardless of the location and means of “storage”.)

In 2009 the industry’s own estimates for the number of truckloads of accumulated waste that would cross from central Canada to northern Saskatchewan was 20,000.   By the time the repository would be constructed and operational, because of continuing production, there would be 30,000 truckloads of high level radioactive waste to move.

Transport vehicles are transport vehicles, regardless of their cargo, as Chief Madahbee insisted.

There is only one cross-Canada corridor that the waste could be legally transported along, the Trans Canada Highway.  It’s the only roadway along which there is  Emergency Response to Hazardous Waste capability (required).  In Saskatchewan the waste would go north, off the Trans-Canada, passing through Saskatoon.

Selected persons were invited to attend a demonstration by the Saskatoon City Fire Dept., of its response capability.  With hoopla, costumed in bulky Hazardous Waste mask and regalia, they quickly and efficiently attended the pretend location of an accidental spill of high level radioactive waste.  Trusty fire hoses rolled out.   The roadway was cleared with volumes of water that swept the pretend radioactive particles  – – – where?   Down a storm sewer and thereby into the South Saskatchewan River.

In 2011, the National Academy of Science (NAS) (U.S.) came to Saskatchewan to collect information.  The state of Virginia was under petition to lift its 30-year moratorium on uranium/nuclear.  Saskatchewan has a lot of experience the NAS wished to draw upon.

Presentations in Saskatoon, by the industry to the delegation from the NAS, relied on the NAS not knowing:

when you look behind the rhetoric of “rapid response”, “highly-trained emergency teams”, “most heavily regulated industry“, to “the real world” what you find is farcical (washing high-level radioactive waste into any water supply, let alone a River that is the water supply for 40% of the province’s people).

The NAS, similarily would not know, and of course was not told, the reality behind intended “transportation corridors”, especially under winter driving conditions in Canada.  This speaks, with facts, to Chief Madahbee’s “accident waiting to happen” – – remember, 30,000 truckloads:

The highway accidents at ONE place, Nov – Dec 2010 (when the reassurances of safety were being expounded), on the TransCanada Highway, the border crossing between Manitoba and Saskatchewan, where the town of Moosomin is located:

  • November 2010 collision,  6 people dead
  • December 2010, a Moosomin woman killed on the Trans Canada in collision with a semi
  • Saltcoats (nearby) collision killed 3 people.

The news reports are posted at http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=2567.

 

Nuclear waste comes with the building of nuclear reactors. In the period 2007-11, Albertans and Saskatchewanians fought down proposals for reactors in their respective provinces (Peace River, North Saskatchewan River).

Economic arguments, once they become known to citizens, win the day.

  • The reactors are boondoggles, but
  • a few well-placed people in the industry, the Government, selected local government and the University, are enriched
  • The industry is a Ponzi scheme:  the industry’s own estimate in 2009-2011, the cost of building a deep geological repository, was $24 billion (not including the costs of 30,000 transport trucks, to the deep geological repository site, return).

Tell me what bona fide business undertaking can shoulder an existing liability for waste disposal of more than $24 billion? How do they plan to do it?

The last new reactor in Canada went into construction in the mid-eighties, there is a fleet of even older reactors – – all have to be de-commissioned at some point, which will add to the 30,000 truckloads.

I’d say the industry is in desperate need of new customers to create a revenue stream.  To pay for

  • continuance of the multi-million dollar salaries for the “1%”
  • the cost of new reactors   (no investment fund or insurance fund will touch them, if they aren’t in on the Ponzi)
  • disposal of 40-50 years of accumulated radioactive waste  (no investment fund or insurance fund will touch that)
  • de-commissioning of the old reactors and disposal of the associated radioactive waste

In a Ponzi scheme, the last man in, gets left holding the bag.

What happens if the industry can’t find, in Canada, a jurisdiction whose citizens want very expensive electricity?  (  Who wants to be the last man in?

 

The only sane person who would invest in the Industry is one from whom information is withheld.  Or one who is on the inside of the scheme.

How likely is it that the citizens of Canada will agree not to revolt, if they are required to foot the bills, especially for new reactors?   that no Investment or Insurance Company will touch?  That some community of Canadians was irresponsible enough to agree to, because they believed the industry, government and university propaganda that nuclear energy is “green” or cost-effective?

By promoting nuclear as an answer to climate change (which it is not),  the Government and Industry are DELIBERATELY running up even higher, the costs that (realistically speaking) will eventually fall to citizens to pay.   Meanwhile those smart people will continue to collect their multi-million-dollar salaries and perks.

It is all dependent on an uninformed citizenry,  propaganda, and serious corruption – – extinction – –  of the public interest.   It is dependent upon the impotency of Elected Representatives, the existence of a “not-democracy”.

A few years ago, the industry was required to start putting money aside to deal with the accumulating waste. Ask them how much they have in that fund today, to address the estimated total waste liability on their hands.  And what is the current estimate of the liability?

 

I wrote to Environment Minister Catherine McKenna when I heard that Canada is pushing hard for nuclear reactors as part of the answer to climate change, at the Copenhagen Meetings in May.  I tackled the corruption issue in the letter.  You might want to take a look at that.

Please see http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=20712. (2018-03-19  Does Environment Minister McKenna KNOW that Natural Resources Minister Carr is pushing nuclear energy in the climate talks, Copenhagen, May?)

 

ASIDE:  Very troubling:  the industry’s proposed move to “SMRs” – – SMALL, MODULAR, NUCLEAR REACTORS.   Good luck stopping radioactive contamination of land and waterways if nuclear reactors are dispersed to isolated communities and mining locations, which is the intent. Remember the industry’s plans for washing away a large truckload of radioactive waste if an accident occurs in Saskatoon.   Down the storm sewer;  out of sight, out of mind.  Drama – farcical comedy.

Your assistance in moving the information to the right places will be greatly appreciated by everyone.
/Sandra Finley

Apr 232018
 

RE:   Why so few people on Six Nations reserve have clean running water, unlike their neighbours   ( http://www.cbc.ca/radio/outintheopen/why-so-few-people-on-six-nations-reserve-have-clean-running-water-unlike-their-neighbours-1.4618968)

 

EXCERPT from the program:

. . .   communities suffering from disease and death thanks to long-neglected water quality.

Martin-Hill . . . “I think we all know at some level that the environment has a lot to do with this. We just don’t have the data,” she said. “So my goal is ‘Let’s just … see if we can get a clearer picture of what’s happening.'”

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Dear Piya,

Thank-you to you, your team, and to Dawn Martin-Hill  for “Out in the Open“, April 21, specifically for raising the issue of clean water.

(Clarify:  I am not First Nations.)

Monday, 16th April,  I made a presentation to my local Town Council regarding the cases of cholera and norovirus contracted from food harvested from Georgia Strait, offshore the east coast of Vancouver Island.

The association with human sewage is down-played.   However, the reports from the

  • BC Centre for Disease Control and from
  • the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO)

both cite human waste in the marine environment as the likely cause.

 “long-neglected water quality” is absolutely a serious issue, thanks to Dawn Martin-Hill for speaking up.

The cholera in the offshore water came to light after a First Nations (Cowichan Band, Vancouver Island) harvest of herring eggs, a centuries old cultural practice.  Information in the submission to Council describes how cholera spreads.  The symptoms are similar to norovirus – –  severe diarrhea, vomiting, rapid dehydration.

Please see

to Town Council, Cholera cases, originating French Creek and Qualicum Bay. And April 9th report of norovirus. Human sewage a plausible factor in both.

The posting includes an update received after I made the presentation:   40 cases of norovirus is now 126 cases of norovirus.

I have come across no estimate of how many cases of either water-borne illness (cholera or norovirus) go UNreported.

(Aside:  I find it ironic that some people believe Canadians can protect the West Coast from oil spills associated with a seven-fold increase in super-sized tanker traffic, when we can’t even regulate and innovate to stop the entry of sewage into waterways.  It has the look of coming back to bite us in the ass – – very serious diseases.

Dawn Martin-Hill says,  We just don’t have the data.   In my experience with university research  (e.g. Hydrology, Toxicology, Medicine (cancers), Dentistry (mercury poisoning)),  they staunchly do not conduct research that might lead to true prevention of disease (actual removal of cause.   You can live “healthy”, exercise and all that good stuff.   But that won’t save you from the accumulating poisons in water.   If you don’t know we’re in trouble when it gets to cholera, let alone the diseases that Dawn Martin-Hill is addressing, you know the level of subservience by influential people to economic – corporate interests, without doubt.)

 

I hope the information in my presentation to Council may be useful in some way.  Anyone is free to copy and paste.  From my perspective, information and knowledge are part of “The Commons”, upon which we are all dependent for survival.

Best wishes,

Sandra Finley

Apr 142018
 

Re the author   Martyn Brown was former B.C. premier Gordon Campbell’s long-serving chief of staff, the top strategic adviser to three provincial party leaders, and a former deputy minister of tourism, trade, and investment. He also served as the B.C. Liberals’ public campaign director in 2001, 2005, and 2009, and in addition to his other extensive campaign experience, he was the principal author of four election platforms. Contact him via email at bcpundit@gmail.com.

 

I “commented” on a Comment:

Markko Caldo, Re your last para:  

I know that Big Oil pays people to use on-line commentary and social media to attack those who challenge their financial interests. And that fake on-line identities are routinely created – – Big Oil has no scruples. They know that many people are ethical and believe in the goodness of others. Put another way: they believe that citizens can be duped. They know that political parties can be bought. I wonder: which of the attack Comments on this article are bona fide?

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Take advantage of the pictures and video, read the article at, with thanks to straight:   https://www.straight.com/news/1058116/martyn-brown-whats-really-criminal-canadas-kinder-morgan-pipeline-debacle

 

What’s really criminal in Canada’s Kinder Morgan pipeline debacle, back-up copy and,

for those who don’t go to unfamiliar websites:

 

“The commitment to build a pipeline in 2018 when we are in climate crisis is a crime against future generations and I will not be part of it.”

—Green party Leader Elizabeth May, as she was being arrested for civil contempt, in protest of the Kinder Morgan pipeline project.

 

“Trudeau’s Kinder Morgan fiasco is a crime against future generations.”

How eloquently those words sum up the appalling failure in leadership on climate action, ocean protection, Indigenous rights, and national unity that is quickly becoming Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s sorry legacy.

His Trans Mountain pipeline debacle is so much more than a filthy line in the sand that has divided Canadians on both sides of Alberta’s world-reviled tarsands.

It is an ugly scar on the face of our nation; one that threatens to forever mark Canada as a climate outlaw and as a patently dishonest country that has no serious plan to meet its Paris Agreement greenhouse gas reduction commitment to cut its carbon emissions by 30 percent by 2030.

It is an environmental crime against future generations, born of gross negligence, undue risk, scientific ignorance, and willful disregard for the life-ending consequences of heavy oil spills and human-induced global warming.

It is a crime against Aboriginal peoples that now threatens to drive a knife in the heart of Canada’s collective search for a new relationship rooted in mutual respect and reconciliation.

One that is newly alienating First Nations. One that Aboriginal leaders warn may set “Canada up for another catastrophic crisis on the same level as Oka.” One that Trudeau is unwittingly inviting.

This video explains the 1990 Oka crisis in five minutes.

Thousands have marched in solidarity to try to communicate that message, as others have confronted Trudeau in public forums. All for naught. Their concerns have fallen on deaf ears.

His pipeline “strategy” is anything but a climate trade-off for a carbon tax in the national interest. It is a prescription for national schism, for ongoing conflict, and for environmental ruin.

It is a breach of public trust, perpetrated through acts of political duplicity and morally bankrupt processes, in contempt of evidentiary standards and of the prime minister’s own election promise.

Over 200 Canadians felt so strongly about that fact, they chose to make a political statement of defiance, aimed at heightening national awareness. They are otherwise wholly law-abiding citizens from all walks of life — teachers, seniors, community leaders, former employees of Kinder Morgan, students, environmentalists, artists, First Nations leaders, and parents of every demographic and political description.

The courage of their conviction is beyond humbling: it is a testament to their faith in democracy and to the time-honoured tradition of peaceful civil disobedience.

It is a measure of their moral mettle and of their resolve to act in conscientious objection. To right an egregious state-sanctioned wrong. Not out of flagrant disregard for the rule of law, per se. But rather, out of profound reverence for all life on Earth and out of concern for their children, for future generations, and for others besides themselves.

They were not motivated by selfish or pecuniary interest. On the contrary.

They stood their ground when, where, and how they did—not to disparage the rule of law—but to not cede an inch to a project that millions of Canadians also deeply oppose on legal, moral, environmental, economic, and procedural grounds.

They wanted to formally register their deep civic concern and personal commitment to an issue so much bigger than themselves, through a site-specific, time-limited, politically coordinated, democratic testament to the importance they vest in this vital public policy issue.

And for that, Elizabeth May, Burnaby South NDP MP Kennedy Stewart, and so many others may now see their initial charges of civil contempt elevated to criminal contempt, if Crown prosecutors accede to the presiding judge’s request, based on his interpretation of the nature of the acts at issue.

Demonstrators outside Kinder Morgan's tank farm are not motivated by pecuniary interests; they just want to preserve human life on Earth. Demonstrators outside Kinder Morgan’s tank farm are not motivated by pecuniary interests; they just want to preserve human life on Earth.Protect the Inlet

 

If only the courts took as dim a view of the so much more truly harmful conduct that has has been imposed on our nation by those elected leaders in Ottawa and Edmonton who have arguably flouted the law to do the bidding of Big Oil.

They have abused the National Energy Board review process and ignored countless issues and arguments that should have been material to any decision on this environmentally irresponsible project.

They have dismissed the concerns of the cities and citizens who are ardently opposed to turning Metro Vancouver into a major export hub for Canada’s dirtiest, unrefined, heavy crude, with a seven-fold increase in oil tanker traffic through Burrard Inlet.

They bent the laws and rules in ways that discounted Aboriginal rights and title, that ignored British Columbia’s legitimate interests in oil-spill protection, and that will mostly serve to increase the risks of further poisoning our oceans and atmosphere.

All for the love of Big Oil and Big Money. Or if one is stupid enough to take Trudeau at his word, to cut a deal with Alberta, to gain its buy-in to impose a national price on carbon aimed at curbing greenhouse gas emissions— if only by first increasing Canada’s tarsands emissions.

Almost lost in the whole controversy is the massive impact that the Trans Mountain pipeline project will have on Canada’s greenhouse gas reduction targets.

That alone represents a travesty of justice for which Justin Trudeau bears full responsibility.

The Climate Action Tracker website has given Canada a

The Climate Action Tracker website has given Canada a “highly insufficient” rating when it comes to meeting its commitments under the Paris Agreement.Climate Action Tracker

Consider this.

Environment and Climate Change Canada found that the “twinned” Trans Mountain pipeline stands to generate 21 to 26 million tonnes (Mt) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) every year in associated upstream greenhouse gases.

That is a huge problem, considering that Canada’s latest GHG emissions inventory report shows that our country’s total emissions grew by that same amount—21 million tonnes—from 701 Mt in 2010, to 722 Mt in 2015.

Despite all the ballyhooed “climate action” measures undertaken by Canada in recent years, its total carbon emissions only fell by a third of that amount—a mere 7 Mt—since 2013.

Yet the new pipeline would itself account for an additional 13 to 15 million tonnes of added yearly emissions.

And those amounts do not even include related indirect upstream emissions, such as those created through land-use changes and generated during the production of “purchased inputs”, such as equipment, electricity, and external fuels.

Nor do they include the estimated one million tonnes in CO2e from the pipeline’s construction, which the National Energy Board (NEB) required must be offset.

Nor do they include the further 407,000 tonnes per year of CO2e in direct emissions that new pipeline would generate, excluding those additional upstream and downstream emissions.

Nor do they include the estimated 100 million tonnes of annual downstream emissions that would result from shipping, refining, and burning that exported tar sands oil around the world.

Worse, those downstream emissions will be so much greater than need be.

In his “wisdom”, Trudeau opted not to insist on at least refining that heavy crude at home, with all the jobs that would have entailed, instead of shipping that unrefined product to Asian importers.

Even now, he could choose to go that route, rather than partnering with Alberta to invest in the Trans Mountain pipeline, in a bid to reduce its shareholders’ investment risks or to let that company unload that “white elephant”, if that is its real plan and/or preference.

Trudeau opted not to invest in enhancing Canada’s rapidly diminishing refining capacity, or to avoid the untenable risks of diluted bitumen spills by processing that heavy crude in Canada, instead of shipping it abroad to be refined by countries with much lower environmental standards.

Photographer Edward Burtynsky's <em>Alberta Oil Sands #1</em> shows the magnitude of bitumen extraction taking place.
Photographer Edward Burtynsky’s Alberta Oil Sands #1 shows the magnitude of bitumen extraction taking place.

 

The federal government itself notes that “emissions of GHGs from the oil and gas sector have increased 76 per cent, from 108 Mt CO2e in 1990 to 189 Mt CO2e in 2015.

This increase is mostly attributable to the increased production of crude oil and the expansion of the oil sands industry.” [Emphasis added.]

Under its laughable “climate action” emissions “cap”, Alberta’s NDP government actually plans to grow those tar sands emissions by more than 42 percent—from 70 Mt annually to a new maximum of 100 Mt a year.

That increase of 30 million tonnes of annual carbon emissions is equivalent to 6.4 million passenger vehicles driven for a year, or nearly 3.4 billion gallons of gasoline consumed.

The estimated 100 million tonnes of added annual downstream emissions that will result from the expanded Trans Mountain pipeline alone is even greater.

As that heavy oil is refined and burned in Asia’s already polluted cities, it will generate the equivalent of another 21.4 million cars on the road, or almost 42.8 billion litres of gasoline consumed per year.

All of that diluted tar sands “bitumen” and synthetic crude is especially dirty.

A study by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory found that gasoline and diesel refined from those products have a significantly higher carbon impact than fuels derived from conventional domestic crude sources.

That is indeed a climate crime against future generations.

 

Vancouver filmmaker Charles Wilkinson's <em>Oil Sands Karaoke</em> featured truck driver Brandy Williams (above) speaking about how her job made her feel conflicted. Vancouver filmmaker Charles Wilkinson’s Oil Sands Karaoke featured truck driver Brandy Williams (above) speaking about how her job made her feel conflicted.

 

While other jurisdictions are actually suing Big Oil companies for their harmful impacts on human health and the environment, our Canadian governments are going the opposite way, and actually subsidizing their efforts to profit from their pollution.

Are protestors desperate about that fact? You bet. And rightly so.

Consider these facts, culled and quoted below from the International Energy Agency’s just-released Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2017:

Global energy-related CO2 emissions rose by 1.4 percent in 2017, an increase of 460 million tonnes (Mt), and reached a historic high of 32.5 gigatonnes (Gt).

Last year’s growth came after three years of flat emissions and contrasts with the sharp reduction needed to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement on climate change.

The increase in carbon emissions, equivalent to the emissions of 170 million additional cars, was the result of robust global economic growth of 3.7 percent, lower fossil-fuel prices, and weaker energy efficiency efforts.

The growth in energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in 2017 is a strong warning for global efforts to combat climate change, and demonstrates that current efforts are insufficient to meet the objectives of the Paris Agreement.

Global energy intensity … in 2017 fell by only 1.7 percent, much less than the 2.3 percent registered on average over the last three years, and half of what is required to remain on track with the Paris Agreement.

 

The IEA’s Sustainable Development Scenario charts a path toward meeting long-term climate goals. Under this scenario, global emissions need to peak soon and decline steeply to 2020; this decline will now need to be even greater given the increase in emissions in 2017.

Global energy demand grew by 2.1 percent in 2017, according to IEA preliminary estimates, more than twice the growth rate in 2016. Global energy demand in 2017 reached an estimated 14,050 million tonnes of oil equivalent (Mtoe), compared with 10,035 Mtoe in 2000.

Fossil-fuels met 70 percent of the growth in energy demand around the world.

The overall share of fossil fuels in global energy demand in 2017 remained at 81 percent, a level that has stayed stable for more than three decades despite strong growth in renewables.

That is not “sustainable” in any way, shape, or form.

Yet it is a problem that Trudeau and his Liberal lickspittles all want to compound for the world, even as they dishonestly claim they have a plan to reduce Canada’s carbon emissions by first massively increasing its oil sand emissions.

That is what his tarsands pipeline vision is really all about: digging and steaming more tar out of the ground, to wish that filthy fossil fuel on a world that is already choking itself to death.

 

Justin Trudeau has defined himself in the eyes of many B.C. voters through his handling of the Kinder Morgan controversy. Justin Trudeau has defined himself in the eyes of many B.C. voters through his handling of the Kinder Morgan controversy.

Why?

To command higher prices and larger profits for Big Oil.

To expedite that enterprise, in contempt of Aboriginal rights and title, and in contempt of the wishes of British Columbia and of that pipeline’s most directly impacted “host” communities.

To flow that diluted bitumen from Alberta to the Salish Sea and across the Pacific, threatening the species and their life-supporting terrestrial and marine ecosystems along the way.

This Sunday, Trudeau will be ganging up in Ottawa with Alberta premier Rachel Notley to read the riot act to B.C. premier John Horgan.

What is Horgan’s supposed “crime” that is supposedly frustrating Kinder Morgan’s project and has now brought that company to the brink of walking away on its risky investment?

In a word, it is that Horgan is using the law to try to protect British Columbia’s environment, coastal communities, and Aboriginal rights. That and nothing more.

His government has joined with all those First Nations and environmental organizations that have legally challenged the abysmal National Energy Board review process in court.

It joined the City of Burnaby in trying to uphold that municipality’s right to enforce its bylaws. An unsuccessful endeavour on first attempt, but one that may yet be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Horgan government is also intent on seeking direction from the courts through a reference on the constitutional limits of the province’s shared jurisdiction over environmental protection. Specifically, in respect of oil spills and the transportation of heavy oil products through its territory.

Outrageous. A crime against our economy. Sabotage. Unconstitutional. An attack on Canada’s “national interest”.

That is, according to Canada’s corporate and political apologists for Big Oil.

Such recourse to the courts must be punished, in their view.

Nothing should be allowed to further delay a pipeline that its American-based owners now command must be provided unprecedented legal, regulatory, and political certainty. And all by May 31, if Alberta’s most beloved pet project is not to die the immediate death it deserves.

I will admit, Horgan may not be quite as motivated as I would hope he would be by that project’s impact on carbon emissions, hypocritical as he surely is in also hoping to develop B.C.’s highly subsidized natural gas industry.

But he is fighting for what is right in standing up for B.C.’s constitutional rights.

He is fighting for what is right in trying to protect the health of the Salish Sea and its already endangered species, and in trying to protect our province and its economy from the very real threat of heavy oil spills that the Trans Mountain pipeline poses.

He is standing up for First Nations who have once again been relegated to second-class citizens in how their constitutional rights and interests have been subordinated to the monied wishes of Big Oil and their handmaidens in the Alberta legislature.

Premier John Horgan recently welcomed former U.S. vice president and Nobel Prize-winning climate-change educator Al Gore to Vancouver. Premier John Horgan recently welcomed former U.S. vice president and Nobel Prize-winning climate-change educator Al Gore to Vancouver.John Horgan

 

He is fighting for due process, within the law indeed, through the courts—to also stand up for all those whose voices have been silenced or ignored by Canada’s feckless prime minister.

A faux climate warrior and phony environmental champion, who sold out his supposed “home” province of British Columbia by approving a pipeline that was predicated on a review process he vowed to redo and reprocess before making any decisions.

How dare the Trudeau government threaten British Columbians as it is now doing, with all of the speculated “sanctions” that are now supposedly “all on the table”.

How dare he suggest that Horgan has anything whatsoever for which to apologize, relent, or abandon.

How dare he try to bully B.C. into pushing through a pipeline that its current owners might well abandon as uneconomic without massive new injections of risk capital from Canadian taxpayers.

How dare he even intimate that British Columbians might face sanctions from Ottawa, be it reduced transfer payments or withheld federal investments. Or worse, the unthinkable use of constitutional and military thuggery, perhaps even invoking the Emergencies Act, to ram through a pipeline that is being duly challenged in court.

Trudeau would never do that to Quebec or Ontario. Never in a million years. To even consider any of those measures is a disgrace that only proves he is as shallow and untrusworthty as most Canadians suspect.

As he said, when Quebec’s opposition to the Energy East pipeline led to that project’s well-deserved demise, “governments grant permits, communities grant permission.”

B.C.’s most directly impacted communities do not grant that permission.

They insist on the same standard of consideration and respect for due process and provincial autonomy that has been repeatedly accorded to the people of Quebec, including in respect of the Energy East project.

If Trudeau’s and Notley’s unpardonable threats against B.C. on this issue don’t set off the separatists’ alarm bells in Quebec, they will certainly make the topic of separatism a newly burning live issue in British Columbia.

If the federal government acts like an outright enemy of B.C., aided and abetted by an Alberta government that threatens unconscionable trade sanctions to terrorize its western neighbour, many British Columbians will soon come to see both governments in that light.

It will deeply rip at the fabric of Confederation in prolonged and unpredictable ways that no one should want, least of all Canada’s sitting prime minister.

The actions that Alberta is promising—restricting the flow of gasoline through the very same pipeline that it asserts B.C. should have no capacity whatsoever to environmentally regulate—are hypocritical in the extreme.

They will also be challenged in court, as violations of section 92(a) of the Canadian constitution. That will only prolong the uncertainty that those trade-terrorist-tactics are ostensibly aimed at minimizing, however much Notley imagines that it will serve her province’s interests to mimic Donald Trump.

The coercive actions that the federal government is said to be contemplating to bring B.C. to “heel” are even more reprehensible.

They, too, will be challenged in court by B.C. as unlawful measures—perhaps joined by Quebec and other provinces, as intervenors that wish to preserve their own provincial autonomy.

All of that could be avoided if the Trudeau and Notley governments only had the good sense to accept Horgan’s offer for a joint reference to the Supreme Court of Canada on the jurisdictional questions that B.C. is rightly looking to legally clarify.

It is a sensible recourse that federal NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh has also advocated, better late than never.

All Canadians should know, we are on a one-way track to more turmoil, new trade wars, more protracted legal battles, and very likely, the real prospect of physical violence on the front lines of physical resistance, led by First Nations leaders.

They should be under no delusion, the course Trudeau seems bound and determined to follow is a train wreck of incalculable proportions.

Carrying on that course would be the ultimate crime against future generations.

Especially for an oil pipeline that is only intended to deepen Canada’s dependency on fossil-fueled growth, to reap higher prices and greater global demand for carbon-intensive products that are rapidly killing our planet.

Not that we will hear or read a word to that effect from Canada’s mainstream media.  It is lock, stock, and barrel captured by that very same industry that pays its bills and pads its pockets.

Sadly, what’s really criminal in Canada’s Kinder Morgan pipeline debacle is all that Canada’s innately conflicted fourth estate has promulgated in defence of the oil sands industry.

It is the crime of subverting lawful actions that are responsibly undertaken in the public interest, to support a false narrative of lawlessness that needs to be “punished” by bullies in Ottawa and Edmonton.

It is the crime of undermining the national public interest in its own namesake, for the sake of political expediency, short-term economic benefits, and above all, corporate greed.

It is the crime against future generations that must be stopped and that its proponents are so determined to impose, come climate hell and high water.

2018-04-16 Verbal version of Water, Submission to Town Council, Cholera cases, originating French Creek and Qualicum Bay. And April 9th report of norovirus. Human sewage a plausible factor in both.

 Health, Water Bowser BC Sewage Treatment Plant  Comments Off on 2018-04-16 Verbal version of Water, Submission to Town Council, Cholera cases, originating French Creek and Qualicum Bay. And April 9th report of norovirus. Human sewage a plausible factor in both.
Apr 122018
 

TO:   Town Council          FOR:    Council Meeting, April 16th, 2018
(Written version submitted April 11th)

SPEAKER:   Sandra Finley, resident

SUBJECT:   Cholera cases, originating French Creek and Qualicum Bay.  And April 9th report of norovirus.  Human sewage a plausible factor in both.

 

Thank-you for the opportunity to share information in support of my request.  I am requesting the establishment of a local working group on the issue of cholera, norovirus and human sewage in our offshore water.

These are serious matters.

I will present critical pieces of information, and not the detail that is in my written submission to you.

 

  1. VIHA (the Vancouver Island Health Authority) and the First Nations Health Authority jointly issued an update 10 days ago. On April 6th.  (#1 appended).  It is confirmed:

the cholera bacteria was found

  • in the water samples, and
  • in the herring eggs
  1. Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) online information related to the cholera cases (URL), tells that the herring eggs are
  • not safe for eating (you can get cholera) if harvested from the environment at French Creek and Qualicum Bay.
  • it IS safe to eat roe taken directly from the herring

In other words,

  1. the herring eggs picked up the cholera from the water or rocks or beach. 
  1. From the DFO report, March 23, 2018, quote (#2 appended):

marine water sampling results from March 6 (show) elevated fecal coliform levels in this area.

  1. A week ago, Monday April 9th, we received news that two oyster farms have been closed after a norovirus outbreak associated with  Deep Bay and Denman Island.     From the CBC Report:

. . .  human sewage in the marine environment is currently believed to be the most plausible cause of shellfish contamination, according to BCCDC epidemiologist Marsha Taylor.

(BCCDC is the BC Centre for Disease Control.)     2018-04-09   2 B.C. oyster farms closed after norovirus outbreak, CBC

Pre-covid,  norovirus outbreaks were routine in the area;  the outbreaks were happening earlier and earlier in the season.

  1. There is another factor, I suspect. I have not found it anywhere in the recent discussions;  Cruise Ships – Marine Vessels are another source of human sewage in Georgia Strait (the Salish Sea).  Quote (#6 appended)

. . .    the ship’s owners admitted fouling Canadian waters three times. The infractions cost Celebrity Cruises $100,000 in fines in Washington. In Canada, it paid nothing.

Beware,  that information is dated (2007). 

(UPDATE:  I have not posted a report from a couple months ago that compares the American regulation of cruise ships in comparison with the Canadian (a joke;  Toadies).  Enforcement is another matter.

There is the question of how many people who ply the waters employ “marine disposal” of their waste,  the funding and strength of enforcement of regulations.

  1. My experience is consistent with what DFO and the BC Centre for Disease Control are saying:

A couple of years ago, swimming with a friend parallel to the QB shoreline, going in the direction of French Creek, we encountered serious sewage contamination.  The vegetation growth and condition of the water indicated to both of us that we were in long term effects, not a one-time accidental release.   We beat a hasty and frightened retreat to our respective homes, for a hot bath with disinfectant. 

Those are pieces of information that will be of concern to all of us.

8.  UPDATE   The morning after I made the presentation to Council, a news update: 126 cases of norovirus in 3 provinces (BC, Alberta, Ontario)  linked to BC oysters  – –   see below, under NOROVIRUS.

Moving on:   historical information on cholera in Canada,  quote:   (#5 appended)   

The annual number of reported cases of cholera in Canada during 1995 to 2004 ranged from 1 to 8.  Most cases in Canada result from international travel to an affected region. 

Analysis of the outbreak of CHOLERA in Haiti after the hurricane in 2010 (#4 appended) is helpful for understanding the disease.

Important factors:

  • It is thought that this was the first-ever cholera in Haiti.
  • By 2018 it is pretty well accepted that the cholera was introduced by UN Peace-keeping Troops who went to Haiti to help.
  • As with many disease organisms, people can carry the bug and be unaware. They are “asymptomatic”.  If their feces enters a water supply, or a food supply by way of the water, it can be equally devastating.
  • Originally, the cholera was attributed to peacekeepers who had been in Nepal. But DNA analysis of the bacteria established that there were strains of cholera from other countries where cholera is also endemic, where UN workers had also been.
  • The UN military base was on a tributary that fed into a main River. Proper sanitation was not practiced.  Outhouses were placed close to the tributary.  The sewage was not properly controlled.
  • By 2017-18, ten thousand Haitians are dead from the introduced cholera. That does not include the numbers of people who became very sick but survived.  The cholera spread to the adjacent Dominican Republic, and to Cuba.  20 Venezuelans who visited the Dominican Republic then transported the vibrio cholerae bacteria to Venezuela.

It will be interesting to know the DNA of the cholera from the water and herring eggs, French Creek and Qualicum Bay.   From where did this local cholera originate?

In general, transmission of cholera is rarely from person-to-person.  It is typically introduced from the feces of an infected person.  As mentioned, some people are host to the bacteria without knowing (asymptomatic).

The BC CDC can test the DNA of the cholera, the same as they did in Haiti, in order to determine origin).   But it doesn’t matter.  The money would be better spent Maybe it doesn’t matter – – the cholera was in human sewage that entered the Salish Sea, was subsequently transferred to humans from oysters or herring roe,  harvested from the Sea.

NOROVIRUS

Regarding the 40 cases of norovirus from contaminated oysters during the past month:  the symptoms of cholera and of norovirus are very similar, diarrhea and vomiting, rapid dehydration.

As noted earlier, the BCCDC attributed human sewage as plausible cause of the recent norovirus outbreak.   The CBC Report on the outbreak (URL),

In late 2016 and early 2017, more than 400 norovirus cases associated with raw or undercooked B.C. oysters led to the closure of 13 farms.

That outbreak was declared over in April 2017. Human sewage was also suspected as the cause.

“Is there a solution? Yes, we need to pay more attention to what we are putting into the ocean,” said Pocock.

UPDATE:

Investigation into norovirus outbreak linked to raw BC oysters expands to three provinces

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

A local resident with 20 years of sailing in local coastal waters records her observations, including

No doubt the French Creek outflow has a lot to do with it but the government will blame private septic tanks.  This is simply not true with few exceptions.  There are sufficient regulations that government could use, if this was really the problem.

In September 2017 I sent a copy to Town Council, of the submission I made to Provincial Government officials re  The proposed Bowser Sewage Treatment Plant, submission to the BC Government  (2017-09-12).   I will skip the details, you have them.

I explained the steps in Sequencing Batch Reactor Sewage Treatment with UV radiation, tertiary filtering, and marine disposal of liquid effluent.    And why none of the steps do, or can, remove many of the poisons that are in liquid effluent.  Nor does the process remove plastic microfibers that enter our water sources from the millions of washing machines (laundered clothing) that discharge “waste water” into sewage lines.

INSERT:   The presentation (April 16th) was time limited.  I did not make the points, hoping that Staff, Mayor and Councillors would read my full submission:  

  • building a sewage treatment plant at one location, Bowser, is not going to address all the various sources of human sewage going into the marine environment (Salish Sea).
  • The economic analysis for the Bowser Plant is quite funny and simultaneously illuminating.  (Tax-payers will pay HOW MUCH money, for a plant for a community of HOW MANY people?!   And HOW MANY such communities are there in Canada, in bad need of sewage plants?  HOW MUCH money would it all cost?   When there are new, much less expensive alternatives that do not involved “marine disposal” of effluent?   See  The proposed Bowser Sewage Treatment Plant, submission to the BC Government

Continuing – – – the end of my presentation to Council  . . .

The question I ask is:  what strategy is most likely to open people’s minds, so that they can hear, contemplate, and do actual problem-solving?   Denial, reassurances, don’t cut it.   . . . I am sure that, citizens and officials alike, take the situation seriously.   So then I think we must diverge on how to address the problem.   I see “more of the same” as the reason that the hole we’re in, is deep.

Thomas describes the current strategy as:  Close the water and food source down, hope nobody else gets sick.

I am requesting that the Town establish a Working Group to bring our community together in creative problem-solving on the serious feedback, cholera and norovirus, both related to human sewage in the water;  French Creek, Qualicum Bay, Deep Bay, Denman Island; repeated annual occurrences of the norovirus.

Thank-you for your consideration,  (truthfully speaking, I am swearing under my breath.   Our level of group stupidity is frightening.)

Sandra Finley

APPENDED

  1. April 6, 2018 Update from Health Authorities.  (FNHA and VIHA)

The First Nations Health Authority and Island Health would like to confirm that Vibrio cholerae bacteria has been found in both herring eggs and water samples collected in the French Creek area and Qualicum Bay closure areas.

http://www.fnha.ca/about/news-and-events/news/illness-associated-with-herring-eggs-vancouver-island  

  1. Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) report, March 23:

This closure is in effect based on advice received from Vancouver Island Health Authority regarding concern for human health with multiple reports of diarrheal illness associated with herring egg consumption from product harvested on substrate in this area.  

There are three lab confirmed cases of diarrheal illness after herring egg consumption for Vibrio cholera, an unusual organism not normally found in water in this region or country. 

There are a number of existing sanitary closures for shellfish harvest in these areas and 

marine water sampling results from March 6, 2018 showing elevated fecal coliform levels in this area.  

Primary harvest is First Nations Food, Social and Ceremonial harvest, however recreational harvest could occur as well. 

. . .  Illness may include mild to severe nausea, vomiting, and very severe watery diarrhea.  Some people don’t become ill and don’t know they have been infected.

http://notices.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/fns-sap/index-eng.cfm?pg=view_notice&DOC_ID=206365&ID=all

  1. Vibrio cholerae bacteria: symptoms, how acquired, how it spreads (Wikipedia, excerpts)

cholerae was first isolated as the cause of cholera in 1854.

During infection, V. cholerae secretes cholera toxin, a protein that causes profuse, watery diarrhea (known as “rice-water stool”). . . .  V. cholerae can cause syndromes ranging from asymptomatic to cholera gravis.[4] In endemic areas, 75% of cases are asymptomatic, 20% are mild to moderate, and 2-5% are severe forms such as cholera gravis.[4] Symptoms include abrupt onset of watery diarrhea (a grey and cloudy liquid), occasional vomiting, and abdominal cramps.[1][4] Dehydration ensues, with symptoms and signs such as thirst, dry mucous membranes, decreased skin turgor, sunken eyes, hypotension, weak or absent radial pulse, tachycardia, tachypnea, hoarse voice, oliguria, cramps, renal failure, seizures, somnolence, coma, and death.[1] Death due to dehydration can occur in a few hours to days in untreated children. The disease is also particularly dangerous for pregnant women and their fetuses during late pregnancy, as it may cause premature labor and fetal death.[4][5][6] In cases of cholera gravis involving severe dehydration, up to 60% of patients can die; however, less than 1% of cases treated with rehydration therapy are fatal. The disease typically lasts 4–6 days.[4][7] Worldwide, diarrhoeal disease, caused by cholera and many other pathogens, is the second-leading cause of death for children under the age of 5 and at least 120,000 deaths are estimated to be caused by cholera each year.[8][9] In 2002, the WHO deemed that the case fatality ratio for cholera was about 3.95%.[4]

When visiting areas with epidemic cholera, the following precautions should be observed: drink and use bottled water; frequently wash hands with soap and safe water; use chemical toilets or bury feces if no restroom is available; do not defecate in any body of water and cook food thoroughly. . . .

The main reservoirs of V. cholerae are people and aquatic sources such as brackish water and estuaries, often in association with copepods or other zooplankton, shellfish, and aquatic plants.[14]

Cholera infections are most commonly acquired from drinking water in which V. cholerae is found naturally or into which it has been introduced from the feces of an infected person. Other common vehicles include contaminated fish and shellfish, produce, or leftover cooked grains that have not been properly reheated. Transmission from person to person, even to health care workers during epidemics, is rarely documented. V. cholerae thrives in an aquatic environment, particularly in surface water. The primary connection between humans and pathogenic strains is through water, particularly in economically reduced areas that do not have good water purification systems.[9]

 

  1. The 2010-2017 Haitian cholera outbreak. excerpts 

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s_Haiti_cholera_outbreak) was the first modern large scale outbreak of cholera, once considered a beaten back disease with a preventative vaccine, yet now resurgent, having spread across Haiti from October 2010 to May 2017, waxing and waning with eradication effort and climate variability. The outbreak has connections to the political and sanitary conditions post-quake as well as UN peacekeeping. In terms of total infections, the outbreak since been surpassed by the war-fueled 2016–17 Yemen cholera outbreak, although the Haiti outbreak is still the most deadly modern outbreak.[5]

By March 2017, it had killed 9,985 Haitians and others and sickened several hundred thousand persons while spreading to the neighboring countries of the Dominican Republic and Cuba.[6]

. . .   Before the outbreak, Haiti suffered from relatively poor public health and sanitation infrastructure. As of 2008, 37% of Haiti’s population lacked access to adequate drinking water, and 83% lacked improved sanitation facilities.[18] This made Haiti particularly vulnerable to an outbreak of waterborne disease. In January, 2010, a massive earthquake hit Haiti, killing over 100,000 people and further disrupting healthcare and sanitation infrastructure in the country.[19][20] In the aftermath of the earthquake, international workers from many countries arrived in Haiti to assist in the rebuilding effort, including a number of workers from countries where cholera was endemic. This presented an opportunity for cholera to spread to Haiti.[21] Furthermore, Haiti had likely never suffered an outbreak of cholera previously; as such the population of Haiti had little to no immunity to cholera.[22]

. . .  In late January 2011, more than 20 Venezuelans were reported to have been taken to hospital after contracting cholera after visiting the Dominican Republic.[39][40

 

  1. The Canadian Encyclopedia offers a history of cholera in Canada. Excerpt  (http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/cholera/ )

Cholera first reached Canada in 1832, brought by immigrants from Britain.  . . .  Cholera was fairly common around the world prior to the advent of modern sanitation methods developed in the 20th century. Familiarity with the disease reduced the fear in later epidemics and a better understanding of how it spreads has made more effective prevention possible.

In the modern world cholera becomes endemic due to a lack of infrastructure and weak health care systems that lower the effectiveness of sanitation and contribute to conditions that allow the bacteria to thrive. The disease is common in refugee camps because of crowded and unsanitary conditions. South America had outbreaks of cholera in the 1990s and outbreaks continue to occur sporadically in southern Africa. Cholera is endemic in Malawi, Zambia and Mozambique. In Zimbabwe, deteriorating political conditions have also affected the social system and cholera is becoming endemic even in the nation’s capital, Harare, where modern sanitation formerly helped prevent cholera. Medical professionals are attempting to improve public education about cholera prevention in regions prone to it, but without government investment in sanitation infrastructure, only limited success can be achieved.

The annual number of reported cases of cholera in Canada during 1995 to 2004 ranged from 1 to 8. Most cases in Canada result from international travel to an affected region. Cholera is considered a “reportable disease,” which means that local, national and international health authorities must be notified upon discovery. Reporting diseases is an important practice for epidemiology, which allows for disease monitoring and establishes patterns of occurrence around the globe.

 

  1. Sewage from Cruise Ships   (and other marine craft)

Excerpt from   2017-08-16   Water: Bowser votes on sewage treatment. ($11 million for 188 population? What am I missing?)

RAW SEWAGE, WEST COAST WATERS  (a couple of examples):

  • Cruise on down to our dumping ground   (Be Aware of the date of this article:  April 18, 2007, Straight)

UPDATE:   At close of meeting, I was approached by a person from whom I am to receive a link to on-line current info re this issue.   I will post it when I have it.   /Sandra

https://www.straight.com/article-86446/cruise-on-down-to-our-dumping-ground

. . .    the ship’s owners admitted fouling Canadian waters three times. The infractions cost Celebrity Cruises $100,000 in fines in Washington. In Canada, it paid nothing.

“The excuse was, ‘We’ll pay the fine in Washington but we won’t pay the fine in Canada because Canada doesn’t care,’” said Ross Klein, a social-work professor at Memorial University in St. John’s, Newfoundland, and a leading critic of the cruise industry. “Even if you’re brain-dead, it’s obvious if you’ve got to follow regulations in California, Washington, and Alaska, and you don’t in Canada, what are you going to do in Canada? That in itself speaks volumes.”

The Mercury’s inconsistent treatment is indicative of how the cruise industry has evolved on the Pacific coast, with each jurisdiction applying its own standards to the ships. At one end of the run is Alaska, which, thanks to an August 2006 referendum, has by far the toughest laws. At the other end is Washington state, which has a memorandum of understanding with the industry that is at least strong enough to allow the state to fine ships like the Mercury when they dump in Washington waters.

In the middle is B.C., which depends on its federal government to protect the coast. Canada has never fined a cruise ship for a violation and is unlikely to do so under current guidelines. “It’s a green light to empty your holding tank between Washington state and Alaska,” Klein said. Canada’s weak guidelines and lack of enforcement send a clear message to cruise-ship owners about how they are to regard B.C., he said. “It means it’s the toilet bowl.”

THE MERCURY IS JUST one of 33 Vancouver-based cruise ships that will be churning through B.C. on the Alaska run this summer, which actually kicked off on April 8 with the arrival of the Zaandam. Altogether, they will make about 300 trips and carry an estimated 930,000 passengers, each paying an average of $1,500, up the coast and back. Many of the ships carry more than 2,000 people, making them the equivalent of floating cities, with all the consumer needs and wastes you would expect from a luxury resort of that size. (The next generation of ships, the first of which will be ready in 2009, will carry more than 8,000 passengers. Besides the liquid waste, each person on a cruise produces 3.5 kilograms of garbage per day, Klein said, much more than they would in their land-based lives.) Much of the ships’ time in the province will be in the confined waters of Hecate Strait, the Inside Passage, and between Vancouver Island and the mainland.

“There is a great concern that Canada could become a dumping ground,” said Fred Felleman, a Seattle-based researcher who consults on cruise-ship issues for the Bluewater Network, a national organization fighting marine pollution. With the relatively contained waters and vulnerable whale populations, he said, that’s a worry. “I don’t believe there’s any place we should be dumping sewage sludges, but if you have to dump sludges, you don’t want to do it in the Inside Passage.”

But the current rules are likely making it more and more attractive for the cruise companies to do just that. “It’s going to be Haro Strait, Georgia Strait, or Queen Charlotte Sound, would be my guess.”

 

Apr 102018
 

Please scroll down to heading  With thanks to Dianne (the local resident).

NOTE:

  • the Comment from Thomas Gates (bottom of posting) from local group SOS Bowser  http://sosbowser.ca.
  • Both the cholera and norovirus outbreaks are plausibly related to sewage  (#1 and #2 quotes, just below).
  • Not mentioned:   marine vessels as a source of human sewage.

 

  1.   Re late March, 2018, cases of cholera on the east coast of Vancouver Island, BC,

From Dept of Fisheries and Oceans Report, March 23, 2018:

marine water sampling results from March 6, 2018 (show) elevated fecal coliform levels in this area.

2.   Re April 9th, 2018, closure of 2 oyster farms after norovirus outbreak, 40 cases (URL below),

. . .  human sewage in the marine environment is currently believed to be the most plausible cause of shellfish contamination, according to BCCDC epidemiologist Marsha Taylor.

(BCCDC is the BC Centre for Disease Control.)

UPDATE:  126 cases of norovirus.   I add updates (source) to:

as presented verbally to Town Council, Cholera cases, originating French Creek and Qualicum Bay. And April 9th report of norovirus. Human sewage a plausible factor in both.

My personal experience a couple of years ago, swimming parallel to the shoreline, approaching the French Creek area, sent me in hasty and frightened retreat to a hot bath with disinfectant.  Sewage contamination, long term, was evident in the water.

Please see Dianne’s input below, which includes:

No doubt the French Creek outflow has a lot to do with it but the government will blame private septic tanks.  This is simply not true with few exceptions.  There are sufficient regulations that government could use if this was really the problem.

RELATED TO:

 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

With thanks to Dianne from BC:

. . .   There appears to be no science regarding this outbreak nor is there a significant effort in why this outbreak happened.  No doubt the French Creek outflow has a lot to do with it but the government will blame private septic tanks.  This is simply not true with few exceptions.  There are sufficient regulations that government could use if this was really the problem.

 

We have been sailors in this area for more than two decades.  What I find appalling is how opaque the water has become with vegetative growth by June/July along our coastal area from Deep Bay to well below French Creek.  There is also surface growth of a slimy algae found nowhere else to the extent seen  in our area to well south of French Creek.  We have sailed throughout the inland waters from Port McNeil to Victoria.  Our local waters only ossolate waters from the tides with very little thru-put toward Victoria.   The poop waste is building up and the backwaters along shallow shelves flow north, not south.  Consequently all of our beaches are polluted both north and south of the French Creek pipe.  This must be stopped.  I was amazed at the contamination in relatively cold waters this early in the season. It will only get worse as the weather warms.

We cannot be apathetic.

 

Apr 102018
 

With thanks to Janet, BC.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/oysters-norovirus-1.4611419

40 cases of gastrointestinal disease linked to eating the shellfish raw

The consumption of raw oysters has once again been linked to an outbreak of norovirus in B.C. (Elaine Thompson/Associated Press)

 

Two B.C. Vancouver Island oyster farms have been closed following an outbreak of norovirus associated with eating the raw shellfish.

The B.C. Centre for Disease Control says about 40 cases of acute gastrointestinal illness have been connected to the consumption of raw oysters since March. Testing has confirmed some of the cases were norovirus.

Federal officials with Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) confirmed the affected farms are located on the east coast of Vancouver Island at Deep Bay and Denman Island.

While the two farms are no longer harvesting oysters for consumption, no recall of oysters has been issued by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.

Human sewage suspected

While the precise sources of contamination have not been identified, human sewage in the marine environment is currently believed to be the most plausible cause of shellfish contamination, according to BCCDC epidemiologist Marsha Taylor.

Anyone who falls ill with diarrhea and vomiting after eating shellfish should call B.C. HealthLink at 811 where qualified personnel can help you evaluate your symptoms, said Taylor. Most people recover from norovirus on their own with proper hydration and rest, but in some cases dehydration can be severe and require medical attention.

In order to kill norovirus and other pathogens, the BCCDC recommends consumers cook oysters thoroughly, to an internal temperature of 90 C for 90 seconds. Consumption of raw oysters is not encouraged.

 

Widespread impact

The president of the B.C. Shellfish Growers Association noted that while only two farms were closed, the entire industry will likely be hit by the impact.

“The problem with these general advisories is, rather than target the farm that may have a problem, a lot of industry has to suffer the consequences from a depressed market,” he said.

In late 2016 and early 2017, more than 400 norovirus cases associated with raw or undercooked B.C. oysters led to the closure of 13 farms.

That outbreak was declared over in April 2017. Human sewage was also suspected as the cause.

“Is there a solution? Yes, we need to pay more attention to what we are putting into the ocean,” said Pocock.

Apr 102018
 

Countries spending billions on ‘third revolution in warfare’ as UN debates regulation of AI-powered weapons

Russia’s Armata T-14 battle tank can autonomously fire on targets and is expected to be fully autonomous in the near future.
Russia’s Armata T-14 battle tank can autonomously fire on targets and is expected to be fully autonomous in the near future. Photograph: Grigory Dukor/Reuters

 

They will be “weapons of terror, used by terrorists and rogue states against civilian populations. Unlike human soldiers, they will follow any orders however evil,” says Toby Walsh, professor of artificial intelligence at the University of New South Wales, Australia.

“These will be weapons of mass destruction. One programmer and a 3D printer can do what previously took an army of people. They will industrialise war, changing the speed and duration of how we can fight. They will be able to kill 24-7 and they will kill faster than humans can act to defend themselves.”

Governments are meeting at the UN in Geneva on Monday for the fifth time to discuss whether and how to regulate lethal autonomous weapons systems (Laws). Also known as killer robots, these AI-powered ships, tanks, planes and guns could fight the wars of the future without any human intervention.

The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots, backed by Tesla’s Elon Musk and Alphabet’s Mustafa Suleyman, is calling for a preemptive ban on Laws, since the window of opportunity for credible preventative action is fast closing and an arms race is already in full swing.

 

“In 2015, we warned that there would be an arms race to develop lethal autonomous weapons,” says Walsh. “We can see that race has started. In every theatre of war – in the air, on the sea, under the sea and on the land – there are prototype autonomous weapons under development.”

Ahead of the meeting, the US has argued that rather than trying to “stigmatise or ban” Laws, innovation should be encouraged, and that use of the technology could actually reduce the risk of civilian casualties in war. Experts, however, fear the systems will not be able to distinguish between combatants and civilians and act proportionally to the threat.

France and Germany have been accused of shying away from tough rules by activists who say Europe should be leading the charge for a ban. A group of non-aligned states, led by Venezuela, is calling for the negotiation of a new international law to regulate or ban killer robots. The group seeks general agreement from states that “all weapons, including those with autonomous functions, must remain under the direct control and supervision of humans at all times”.

The new global arms race

The US launched an autonomous ship, Sea Hunter, on 7 April 2016.
The US launched an autonomous ship, Sea Hunter, on 7 April 2016. Photograph: Steve Dipaola/Reuters

Fully autonomous weapons do not yet exist, but high-ranking military officials have said the use of robots will be widespread in warfare in a matter of years. At least 381 partly autonomous weapon and military robotics systems have been deployed or are under development in 12 states, including China, France, Israel, the UK and the US.

Automatic systems, such as Israel’s Iron Dome and mechanised sentries in the Korean demilitarised zone, have already been deployed but cannot act fully autonomously. Research by the International Data Corporation suggests global spending on robotics will double from $91.5bn in 2016 to $188bn in 2020, bringing full autonomy closer to realisation.

The US, the frontrunner in the research and development of Laws, has cited autonomy as a cornerstone of its plan to modernise its army and ensure its strategic superiority across the globe. This has caused other major military powers to increase their investment in AI and robotics, as well as in autonomy, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

“We very much acknowledge that we’re in a competition with countries like China and Russia,” says Steven Walker, director of the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which develops emerging technologies and whose 2018 budget was increased by 27% last year.

The US X-47B unmanned autonomous aircraft.
The US X-47B unmanned autonomous aircraft. Photograph: Rex Features

The US is currently working on the prototype for a tail-less, unmanned X-47B aircraft, which will be able to land and take off in extreme weather conditions and refuel in mid-air. The country has also completed testing of an autonomous anti-submarine vessel, Sea Hunter, that can stay at sea for months without a single person onboard and is able to sink other submarines and ships. A 6,000kg autonomous tank, Crusher, is capable of navigating incredibly difficult terrain and is advertised as being able to “tackle almost any mission imaginable”.

The UK is developing its own unmanned vehicles, which could be weaponised in the future. Taranis, an unmanned aerial combat vehicle drone named after the Celtic god of thunder, can avoid radar detection and fly in autonomous mode.

Russia, meanwhile, is amassing an arsenal of unmanned vehicles, both in the air and on the ground; commentators say the country sees this as a way to compensate for its conventional military inferiority compared with the US. “Whoever leads in AI will rule the world,” said Vladimir Putin, the recently re-elected Russian president, last year. “Artificial intelligence is the future, not only for Russia, but for all humankind.”

Russia’s Armata T-14 battle tank.
Russia’s Armata T-14 battle tank. Photograph: Mikhail Metzel/Tass/PA Images

Russia has developed a robot tank, Nerehta, which can be fitted with a machine gun or a grenade launcher, while its semi-autonomous tank, the T-14, will soon be fully autonomous. Kalashnikov, the Russian arms manufacturer, has developed a fully automated, high-calibre gun that uses artificial neural networks to choose targets.

China has various similar semi-autonomous tanks and is developing aircraft and seaborne swarms, but information on these projects is tightly guarded. “As people are still preparing for a high-tech war, the old and new are becoming intertwined to become a new form of hidden complex ‘hybrid war’,” wrote Wang Weixing, a Chinese military research director, last year.

“Unmanned combat is gradually emerging. While people have their heads buried in the sand trying to close the gap with the world’s military powers in terms of traditional weapons, technology-driven ‘light warfare’ is about to take the stage.”

Pandora’s box

According to the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots, these systems threaten to become the “third revolution in warfare”, after the invention of gunpowder and nuclear bombs, and once the Pandora’s box is opened it will be difficult to close.

“Inanimate machines cannot understand or respect the value of life, yet they would have the power to determine when to take it away,” says Mary Wareham, the campaign coordinator. “Our campaign believes that machines should never be permitted to take human life on the battlefield or in policing, border control, or any circumstances.”

Supporters of a ban say fully autonomous weapons are unlikely to be able to fully comply with the complex and subjective rules of international humanitarian and human rights law, which require human understanding and judgment as well as compassion.

Pointing to the 1997 ban on landmines, now one of the most widely accepted treaties in international law, and the ban on cluster munitions, which has 120 signatories, Wareham says: “History shows how responsible governments have found it necessary in the past to supplement the limits already provided in the international legal framework due to the significant threat posed to civilians.”

It is believed that the weaponisation of artificial intelligence could bring the world closer to apocalypse than ever before. “Imagine swarms of autonomous tanks and jet fighters meeting on a border and one of them fires in error or because it has been hacked,” says Noel Sharkey, professor of artificial intelligence and robots at the University of Sheffield, who first wrote about the reality of robot war in 2007.

“This could automatically invoke a battle that no human could understand or untangle. It is not even possible for us to know how the systems would interact in conflict. It could all be over in minutes with mass devastation and loss of life.”

Apr 092018
 

My letter to officials appears below this reply from the Medical Health Officer:

 

From: Hasselback, Paul
Sent: March 26, 2018 7:03 AM
To:  Sandra Finley
Cc: Waters, Shannon (Dr)  ((Vancouver Island Health Authority)
Subject: FW: re Cholera cases from herring eggs, Qualicum Beach area

 

Ms. Finley:

 

As the Medical Health Officer for the Qualicum area your inquiry was forwarded to me.  I am very aware of the ongoing details of the current cluster of Vibrio cholera illness associated with herring egg consumption.

 

While you may wish to use this situation as an example for not supporting a specific proposed sewage treatment facility or treatment process, that would not be consistent with the information arising from the cluster of illnesses.

I reviewed your submission on the proposed Bowser facility, and short of diverting all effluent from any water return, the facility would actually reduce the likelihood human caused bacterial contamination. If anything, the recent events would enhance the arguments for improvements to the Bowser facility(and to other direct marine discharging waste returns).

 

We remain concerned about untreated sewage from residences and communities and marine sewage disposal, although this event may not be related it is a hypothesis, and has been implicated in recent shellfish related illness.

 

There may also be  other causes which are not related to human wastes.

 

As such, while you may wish to use the information as you wish, it would appear that it does not strengthen your arguments and may actually weaken them.

 

Thanks for sharing your perspective.  I wish you the best in your advocacy endeavours.

 

 

Paul Hasselback MD MSc FRCPC

Medical Health Officer

Central Vancouver Island (Nanaimo, Oceanside, Alberni, West Coast)

250  739   6304

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

MY LETTER TO OFFICIALS RE CHOLERA CASES TRACED TO HERRING ROE (EGGS)

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: March 25, 2018 5:47 PM
Subject: Bowser Sewage Treatment Plant and Cholera traced to herring eggs harvested in vicinity of Qualicum Beach

 

TO:

 

RE:   Bowser Sewage Treatment Plant and Cholera traced to herring eggs harvested in vicinity of Qualicum Beach

 

In the end I suspect the Cholera won’t be such a mystery at all.

 

The Vancouver Sun describes  “The harvest in the area where the infections took place — a stretch of coastal waters from French Creek to Qualicum Beach . . .”.  

 

I describe my experience swimming in that same water, in  Submission to BC Govt officials, re the proposed Bowser Sewage Treatment Plant   (2017-09-12).  (Qualicum Beach is flanked on either side by French Creek and Bowser, as you will know.)

 

You may (not?!) recall the submission.   it is based on and includes experience with water on the Atlantic Coast (Halifax),  and Saskatoon (the South Saskatchewan River).

 

It does not matter how fancy the name applied to the Sewage Treatment Plant (Sequencing Batch Reactor with UV radiation and Tertiary Filtration), the plants do not and cannot remove many of the most problematic components,  as explained in my Submission sent to you last September.  (copy at the above URL).

 

I have submitted a request to make a verbal presentation to Qualicum Beach Council.  I will make the case for withdrawal of the endorsement of the Bowser Sewage Treatment Plant.  It’s an easy case to make, but in my experience Councils (human) are most often very status quo.

 

A critical mass of informed people, or crisis (Cholera?) is required, before change will happen.

 

If the cases of Cholera do not make the case for stopping the “marine disposal” of sewage treatment plant effluent,  there is no hope for the human race!

Please, somehow, activate the machinery of officialdom to bring an end to the practice.

 

Thank-you, and

 

Best wishes,

Sandra Finley

Apr 082018
 
Researchers develop device that can ‘hear’ your internal voice

New headset can listen to internal vocalisation and speak to the wearer while appearing silent to the outside world

by Samuel Gibbs

MIT’s AlterEgo headset can ‘hear’ internalised voices and speak to the user through a bone-conduction system.

MIT’s AlterEgo headset can ‘hear’ internalised voices and speak to the user through a bone-conduction system. Photograph: Lorrie Lejeune/MIT

Researchers have created a wearable device that can read people’s minds when they use an internal voice, allowing them to control devices and ask queries without speaking.

The device, called AlterEgo, can transcribe words that wearers verbalise internally but do not say out loud, using electrodes attached to the skin.

“Our idea was: could we have a computing platform that’s more internal, that melds human and machine in some ways and that feels like an internal extension of our own cognition?” said Arnav Kapur, who led the development of the system at MIT’s Media Lab.

Kapur describes the headset as an “intelligence-augmentation” or IA device, and was presented at the Association for Computing Machinery’s Intelligent User Interface conference in Tokyo. It is worn around the jaw and chin, clipped over the top of the ear to hold it in place. Four electrodes under the white plastic device make contact with the skin and pick up the subtle neuromuscular signals that are triggered when a person verbalises internally. When someone says words inside their head, artificial intelligence within the device can match particular signals to particular words, feeding them into a computer.

1:22
Watch the AlterEgo being demonstrated – video

The computer can then respond through the device using a bone conduction speaker that plays sound into the ear without the need for an earphone to be inserted, leaving the wearer free to hear the rest of the world at the same time. The idea is to create a outwardly silent computer interface that only the wearer of the AlterEgo device can speak to and hear.

“We basically can’t live without our cellphones, our digital devices. But at the moment, the use of those devices is very disruptive,” said Pattie Maes, a professor of media arts and sciences at MIT. “If I want to look something up that’s relevant to a conversation I’m having, I have to find my phone and type in the passcode and open an app and type in some search keyword, and the whole thing requires that I completely shift attention from my environment and the people that I’m with to the phone itself.”

Maes and her students, including Kapur, have been experimenting with new form factors and interfaces to provide the knowledge and services of smartphones without the intrusive disruption they currently cause to daily life.

The AlterEgo device managed an average of 92% transcription accuracy in a 10-person trial with about 15 minutes of customising to each person. That’s several percentage points below the 95%-plus accuracy rate that Google’s voice transcription service is capable of using a traditional microphone, but Kapur says the system will improve in accuracy over time. The human threshold for voice word accuracy is thought to be around 95%.

Kapur and team are currently working on collecting data to improve recognition and widen the number of words AlterEgo can detect. It can already be used to control a basic user interface such as the Roku streaming system, moving and selecting content, and can recognise numbers, play chess and perform other basic tasks.

The eventual goal is to make interfacing with AI assistants such as Google’s Assistant, Amazon’s Alexa or Apple’s Siri less embarrassing and more intimate, allowing people to communicate with them in a manner that appears to be silent to the outside world – a system that sounds like science fiction but appears entirely possible.

The only downside is that users will have to wear a device strapped to their face, a barrier smart glasses such as Google Glass failed to overcome. But experts think the technology has much potential, not only in the consumer space for activities such as dictation but also in industry.

“Wouldn’t it be great to communicate with voice in an environment where you normally wouldn’t be able to?” said Thad Starner, a computing professor at Georgia Tech. “You can imagine all these situations where you have a high-noise environment, like the flight deck of an aircraft carrier, or even places with a lot of machinery, like a power plant or a printing press.”

Starner also sees application in the military and for those with conditions that inhibit normal speech.