Sandra Finley

2024-05-15 A BIG ONE. HHS suspended all funding for EcoHealth Alliance, the nonprofit that received millions in taxpayer-funded grants, including one involving gain-of-function research conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. From CHD.

Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt) No Responses »

May 162024

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) today suspended all funding for EcoHealth Alliance and proposed barring the organization from future government contracts or funding.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded nonprofit was performing gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology before the COVID-19 outbreak and has been at the center of questions about a possible “lab leak” that may have caused the pandemic.

Ongoing funding will end and the organization will be ineligible to receive any further funding from the U.S. government. The funding suspension will remain in effect until the debarment proceedings are complete.

Debarment is the long-term prohibition of receiving federal funds. It is the primary public mechanism that “protects the federal government from fraud, waste and abuse by using a number of tools to avoid doing business with non-responsible actors,” according to the U.S. General Services Administration.

The move to cut EcoHealth’s funding comes two weeks after a U.S. House of Representatives committee investigating the COVID-19 pandemic called for a criminal investigation into Peter Daszak, Ph.D., president of EcoHealth, and issued a report calling for a permanent end to government funding for the organization, which has ties to the Wuhan Institute.

During the Republican-led House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic May 1 hearing, Republican and Democrat representatives explicitly called for defunding EcoHealth Alliance, which Daszak said receives about $16 million in government grants annually.

“This should have happened years ago, and should be the first step in holding scientists accountable for dangerous NIH-funded virus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” investigative journalist Paul D. Thacker, who has covered this topic extensively, told The Defender.

However, Thacker added, “HHS cannot make Peter Daszak the fall guy, because Anthony Fauci and others enabled his behavior.”

HHS told Daszak in a letter that EcoHealth Alliance “lacks the present responsibility” to participate in federally funded programs.

The letter listed 30 pieces of supporting evidence, including notices of grant awards to EcoHealth, letters between EcoHealth and the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the NIIH, among other documents.

The grant suspension and proposed debarment were effective beginning Tuesday. (Insert: May 14, 2024) If the proposed bar is ultimately imposed, which appears likely, EcoHealth will not be awarded grants, contracts or subcontracts, unless there is a “compelling reason” to do so.

The letter also notes that debarment is generally imposed for two to three years, although the actual duration will be at the agency’s discretion.

“EcoHealth Alliance and Dr. Peter Daszak should never again receive a single penny from the U.S. taxpayer,” Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), who chairs the House committee, said in a statement. “EcoHealth facilitated gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China without proper oversight, willingly violated multiple requirements of its multimillion-dollar National Institutes of Health grant, and apparently made false statements to the NIH.”

“These actions are wholly abhorrent, indefensible, and must be addressed with swift action,” Wenstrup added. “EcoHealth’s immediate funding suspension and future debarment is not only a victory for the U.S. taxpayer but also for American national security and the safety of citizens worldwide.”

In September 2023, HHS announced it had officially barred the Wuhan lab from receiving U.S. funding for the next 10 years.

This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

Please Donate Today

Report and congressional hearing led to the suspension and likely ban

The House committee’s 59-page congressional report detailed the committee’s investigation into U.S. funding and oversight of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, conducted under a grant to EcoHealth from the NIAID.

Fauci was head of the NIAID, a division of the NIH, when EcoHealth received the grant funding for its gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

The report focused on a grant — “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” — which was a collaboration between EcoHealth Alliance, the Wuhan Institute, several other Chinese institutions and a lab run by Ralph Baric, Ph.D., at the University of North Carolina.

The initial grant ran from 2014 to 2019 and was renewed from 2019 to 2026. It was suspended from April to July 2020 over EcoHealth’s ties to the Wuhan lab.

Congressional scrutiny of EcoHealth’s collaboration with the Wuhan Institute revealed the organization failed to monitor risky coronavirus experiments, failed to obtain lab notebooks from the institute and was years late in reporting on the collaboration to HHS.

On May 1, Daszak appeared before the committee to answer questions about his organization’s ties to the institute and allegations of conducting gain-of-function research on coronaviruses.

Daszak also faced questions about his role in covering up the possible lab origins of the virus by orchestrating a 2020 letter in The Lancet that dismissed lab-leak claims as “conspiracy theories.”

In that case, Daszak failed to disclose that he had a competing interest in that he worked on gain-of-function coronavirus research in Wuhan.

The debate over the origin of COVID-19 has been highly partisan. However, during the hearing, Democrats conceded that the SARS-CoV-2 virus could have come from a lab, although several underscored the lack of definitive evidence for the lab-leak theory.

Daszak faced tough questioning from members on both sides of the aisle about his organization’s transparency and handling of taxpayer funds, biosafety standards at the Wuhan lab, efforts to downplay the role of Chinese scientists in his proposals and communications with government officials through private emails.

And during the hearing, Democrats expressed serious concerns with Daszak’s evasiveness and the need for accountability.

In a recent essay on the hearing, David Robertson, Ph.D., laid out the case for holding Daszak accountable for his role in covering up the possible origins of COVID-19.

“There is a risk,” Robertson cautioned, “that investigators will be content with laying blame exclusively at the feet of Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance. Making Peter Daszak the fall guy would fail to hold accountable the scientists and institutional funders who enabled his reckless research in Wuhan.”

He added:

“Whatever responsibility Daszak and researchers in Wuhan may bear for the pandemic, some of the most prominent officials and science institutions in biomedical research funded and promoted these experiments.

“Some of those very same officials then consistently misled the public about the possibility that research funded by US agencies may have contributed to the creation of SARS-CoV-2.”

Robertson told The Defender he hopes the ban announced today, “is a sign that investigators are willing to pursue this issue, rather than an indication that they have found an individual/organization they’ll be happy to pin everything on.”

2024-05-14 RFK Jr. and Super PAC Sue Facebook Over Censorship, Election Interference, By Suzanne Burdick, CHD

Freedom of Speech. (Remove some wrong postings from category), Robert F Kennedy Jr No Responses »

May 142024

Lawyers representing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and a political action committee supporting his presidential bid on Monday sued Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, after the company censored a biographical film about Kennedy and his work challenging corporate corruption.

The case alleges Meta “is brazenly censoring speech” by and in support of Kennedy — Children’s Health Defense (CHD) founder and chairman-on-leave — “and lying to the public about it.”

“This case raises important issues about censorship of political candidates by social media giants like Meta,” said Rick Jaffe, the attorney representing Kennedy in the suit, in a press release. “I have no doubt this case will set a precedent as Americans increasingly rely on social media to form their opinions and values.”

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, demands a trial by jury.

Defendants include Meta, Mark Zuckerberg and related entities.

The suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages. It also asks the court to bar Meta from continuing to interfere with the sharing and posting of the film and other messages supporting Kennedy’s campaign.

According to the complaint, Meta censored the 30-minute film, “Who is Bobby Kennedy?” which details Kennedy’s life and why he’s running for president.

Actor Woody Harrelson narrated the film. American Values 2024 — a super PAC endorsing Kennedy for president — bought the film and on May 3 launched it as a YouTube video on a dedicated website.

Super PACs, or “political action committees,” can raise unlimited sums of money to advocate for or against political candidates, according to OpenSecrets.org.

Many Facebook and Instagram users tried to post and share the film. Meta blocked them and restricted their accounts.

A Meta spokesperson on May 5 told The New York Times that the video was “mistakenly blocked” due to being inaccurately flagged as spam and that the issue “was corrected within a few hours.”

However, screenshots included with the complaint showed Meta was still censoring the video on May 7.

The complaint also alleges Meta censored other messages supporting Kennedy’s presidential campaign, including a user’s May 8 post encouraging people to sign a petition to get Kennedy’s name on the Texas ballot.

Meta removed the comment, saying it went against its community guidelines.

‘It all started with CHD’s case against Facebook’

Jaffe told The Defender that RFK Jr. is “the tip of the spear protecting the public’s First Amendment rights.”

“It started with CHD’s case against Facebook,” he said, referring to a lawsuit CHD filed against Facebook in 2020, before Kennedy went on leave to run for president.

The case alleges Facebook, its “independent fact-checkers” and Zuckerberg worked jointly with the Biden administration to censor CHD social media content.

Facebook deplatformed CHD on Aug. 17, 2022, and disabled Kennedy’s personal Instagram account on Feb. 10, 2021.

The 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has yet to rule on the case, said CHD General Counsel Kim Mack Rosenberg.

Meanwhile, “more and more evidence has come to light,” she told The Defender, “concerning social media platforms — including Meta — and the U.S. government censoring those who dared to challenge the prevailing narrative about COVID-19 and many other issues.”

Mack Rosenberg and Jaffe pointed out that Kennedy and CHD have brought other lawsuits alleging social media censorship.

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

Please Donate Today

In Kennedy v. Biden, filed in March 2023, Kennedy and CHD sued President Joe Biden, Dr. Anthony Fauci and other top administration officials and federal agencies, alleging they “waged a systematic, concerted campaign” to compel the nation’s three largest social media companies to censor constitutionally protected speech.

Mack Rosenberg said a key point in these cases is showing that the government and the social media platforms were not interested in promoting truth or dialogue, but only in promoting one position — “regardless of the truth of that position or even how dangerous that narrative is.”

Kennedy v. Biden was consolidated in July 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, with another censorship lawsuit, Murthy v. Missouri. The U.S. Supreme Court in March heard arguments on an injunction related to the case and is expected to rule early this summer.

Jaffe said Kennedy’s latest suit against Meta is “basically the other side” of those consolidated cases, which sued the government. “This case involves the private side partner, Meta.”

Meta did not respond by deadline to The Defender’s request for comment.

The Defender on occasion posts content related to Children’s Health Defense’s nonprofit mission that features Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s views on the issues CHD and The Defender regularly cover. In keeping with Federal Election Commission rules, this content does not represent an endorsement of Mr. Kennedy, who is on leave from CHD and is running as an independent for president of the U.S.

2024-05- 09 Catherine Austin Fitts: The U.S. Financial Coup d’Etat: Now Is the Time to Take Action

Uncategorized No Responses »

May 112024

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/the-us-financial-coup-detat-now-is-the-time-to-take-action/?utm_source=luminate&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=chdtv&utm_id=20240511

Is the financial system intentionally designed to create confusion, allow for backdoor deals and promote emotion-driven, fear-based reactions from the public while institutions get the upper hand? Can we truly understand that which underpins our national and international economies, including the people operating it and mechanisms controlling it? What, exactly, is what Catherine Austin Fitts refers to as the ‘financial coup d’etat,’ and why should it matter to the average taxpayer? Learn the past, present and future of the centralized, globalist structures running our banks, managing our transactions and governing our very lives — in this very special episode of ‘Financial Rebellion’ on CHD.TV!

2024-05-08 AstraZeneca pulls shots from global market after blood clot risks confirmed, By Tamara Ugolini, Rebel News

Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt) No Responses »

May 092024

Tamara Ugulini writes:

It looks like the so-called “conspiracy theorists” were right again.

Earlier this week, AstraZeneca, one of the major producers and suppliers of COVID-19 injections withdrew its vaccine from the global market, following court confirmation of blood clot risks.

This follows a string of suspensions in multiple countries, including in Canada, dating back to 2021, just months after its initial release when Trudeau agreed to receive contaminated doses from a subpar manufacturing facility in the United States.

The move comes too little too late for many who were duped into taking this “safe and effective” shot only to be left with debilitating, and sometimes fatal, adverse effects and then dismissed by the very people who promoted it as the way to “end the pandemic” and return life to normal.

Click here for my full report.

= = = = = = = = = = = = =

Tamara’s Report:

The hasty authorization of the AstraZeneca COVID jab based on third-party assessments, despite significant contamination issues and manufacturing concerns, undermines Health Canada’s mandate of quality assurance and safety oversight.

Health Canada’s swift approval of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccines, based on third-party assessments, is being scrutinized as the manufacturer pulls its product from global markets following court confirmation of blood clot risks — something fact checkers said wasn’t true.

This underscores the importance of addressing the serious manufacturing issues overlooked by Health Canada before authorizing millions of AZ doses for use by Canadians, in a deal that saw contaminated shots imported into Canada from the United States.

A mere few weeks into the declared pandemic, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told Canadians there would be no end to the civil liberty infringing purported public health measures until a vaccine was available. By the Spring of 2021, he showcased himself and his now-estranged wife receiving their AZ shots, with the rhetoric being that the safest shot is the first one available to you.

Less than two months later, Trudeau was questioned on his advice after the discovery of clotting issues with AZ, prompting Health Canada to suspend its use in anyone under the age of 55.

The chief public health officer of Canada, Theresa Tam, even went so far as to acknowledge that adverse events won’t be known until the experiment is executed on millions of people.

It turns out that the science was settled — until it wasn’t.

During the last few years, it has become clear Health Canada lacks the oversight necessary to regulate these products — instead, they repeatedly take the pharmaceutical profiteers at their word.

Health Canada said that “AstraZeneca assured the government a contamination event at the Emergent plant that led to a recent FDA inspection had no impact on the 1.5 million doses of its vaccine shipped here.”

By mid-summer 2021 it was reported that the Baltimore facility received Health Canada’s rubber stamp based on European regulatory certification, which determined it complied with “good manufacturing practices” but it was based on a “remote inspection that focused on a part of the facility not actually producing the AstraZeneca shots.”

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration “halted production at the factory three weeks later,” due to “unsanitary conditions and poorly trained staff at the plant.”

Canadian professor and expert in drug regulation Joel Lexchin is quoted as saying that “Health Canada typically relies heavily on foreign regulators.”

Perhaps if Health Canada had done their due diligence, instead of blindly following foreign regulators utilizing remote inspections, they would have recognized the red flags around this factory run by the questionable American multi-national biopharmaceutical company Emergent BioSolutions.

Emergent had documented quality control issues as early as 2011 — and “when inspectors have visited Emergent’s sites, they have found issues more than 90% of the time.”

A report by the House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis in May 2022 showed that Emergent destroyed nearly “400 million doses of coronavirus vaccines as a result of their failure to meet or maintain quality standards” and, “hid evidence of contamination from government inspectors.”

Around the time these shots were rolling out to the general public, provincial health data was showing serious adverse events reports that were upwards of four-fold higher than other manufacturers.

Adverse Events Following Immunization data from Public Health Ontario show that AZ had a total adverse event reporting rate per 100,000 doses administered of 156 with serious adverse events marked at 12 per 100,000.

COVID-counterpart manufacturer Pfizer sat at 12 and 3, respectively.

How many people, such as Kevin Street, who suffered debilitating and life-altering reactions following his dose, were a result of contaminants, subpar bad manufacturing, and reckless quality control?

Despite Health Canada’s assurance of quality, the shadow of potential contamination looms over the countless Canadians who received the AZ vaccine in good faith.

Canada COVID-19 COVID Vaccines No More Shots News Analysis the_wellness_company_redirect The Wellness Company

2024-05-09 Covid/WHO: We did it!!! 22 Attorneys-General in the US have told Joe Biden that the WHO will not be making public policy in their states! From merylnass.substack.com

Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt) No Responses »

May 092024

Many thanks to Dan. He writes:

Canada is still blindly going down this road, but great news to see powerful countries

fighting against the unprecedented power grab of the WHO. Looks like UK won’t sign on either.

From: merylnass.substack.com

We did it!!! 22 Attorneys-General in the US have told Joe Biden that the WHO will not be making public policy in their states!

For the thousands of people who have been making calls and writing letters–you are the best!

Global governance will not be starting in the US!

🔗 https://merylnass.substack.com/p/we-did-it-22-attorneys-general-in

2024-05-03 Covid: Crown withdraws another ArriveCan ticket after TDF files legal challenge. From The Democracy Fund.

Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt) No Responses »

May 092024

The Democracy Fund writes:

Our client faced a $6,255 ArriveCan ticket upon return to Canada.

TORONTO: Upon returning to Canada from the US in 2022 after a long stay abroad, our client was told by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) that he must complete the ArriveCan app and answer questions about his vaccination status.

He had his passport taken and was interrogated by a PHAC officer and police officer. It appeared that, though he was initially advised that he was not being detained, he was, in fact, subsequently detained. He was then charged with an offence under the Quarantine Act and issued a ticket for $6,255.

The TDF legal team filed both a Stinchcombe application for failure to produce police body camera footage and an application for a stay of proceedings on the basis that the client’s s.8 Charter rights were breached during an unlawful search & seizure.

TDF argued that the seizure of the client’s personal information was not reasonable because it was not “authorized by law:” the Minister of Health did not properly specify ArriveCan as the electronic means contemplated by the Quarantine Act.

Although counsel for TDF was prepared to proceed with the hearing, the Crown, just prior to the trial, advised the court that it was withdrawing the charge.

Mark Joseph, counsel with TDF, expressed satisfaction: “It is our legal opinion that the government did not properly specify ArriveCan as the electronic means for collecting travellers’ health information: Canadians should be able to know the law prior to being accused of breaking it. We are prepared to argue this in court. So far, however, the government does not seem willing to refute our arguments on this issue. In any case, we’re pleased that the Crown saw no public interest in pursuing this ticket.”

To support our work, please consider making a tax-deductible donation on this page.

About The Democracy Fund:

Founded in 2021, The Democracy Fund (TDF) is a Canadian charity dedicated to constitutional rights, advancing education, and relieving poverty. TDF promotes constitutional rights through litigation and public education and supports access to justice initiatives for Canadians whose civil liberties have been infringed by government lockdowns and other public policy responses to the pandemic.

2024-05-09 Trials arising out of Coutts: Legal argument filed in Pawlowski appeal. Scheduled for hearing September 10, 2024. From The Democracy Fund.

Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt) No Responses »

May 092024

NEWS RELEASE

Legal argument filed in Pawlowski appeal

Lawyers argue prosecution was about policing words and opinion.

CALGARY: Lawyers for Artur Pawlowski have filed a written legal argument with Alberta’s Court of Appeal last week. The appeal seeks to overturn Pawlowski’s conviction for inciting mischief in relation to a speech he gave to protesters in Coutts, Alberta, in February 2022. According to a provincial court judge, the speech was intended to incite protesters to continue the blockade of the highway which led to the U.S. border.

The lawyers, who are funded by The Democracy Fund (TDF), have characterized Pawlowski’s prosecution as a “policing of words, opinion and language.” They argue that Pawlowski did not specifically encourage anyone to blockade the highway and that the trial judge’s finding was based on speculation and implication. That is not enough to meet the high threshold required for a criminal conviction. The lawyers further argue that other interpretations are better supported by the text of the speech, including the interpretation that Pawlowski encouraged protestors to imitate Poland’s solidarity movement by walking out of their jobs, thereby expressing solidarity with the truckers and “paralyzing the system” through a legal means akin to a labour strike.

Even if the Court of Appeal is satisfied that Pawlowski actively induced mischief, the lawyers argue in their written materials that the trial judge nevertheless failed to properly consider statutory defences that act as safeguards against government overreach. These safeguards prevent a person from being convicted of mischief if they are only communicating information or if they act with legal excuse or justification. In this case, Pawlowski’s justification was the constitutional exercise of free expression.

Pawlowski received a 60-day jail sentence for delivering the speech, which he served in pretrial custody. While a successful appeal cannot restore lost time to Pawlowski, it can expunge his criminal record. More importantly, it can overturn a troubling precedent that puts a chill on freedom of expression.

The appeal is scheduled to be argued on September 10, 2024.

You Make a Difference – Support Change Today

You can help fund this appeal, please consider making a tax-deductible donation below.

DONATE NOW

2024-05-06 Another chip at the censorship dam. Quebec. Quebec Superior Court judge grants authorization for class action lawsuit against YouTube over COVID-19 censorship on its platform. The Canadian Independent.

Censorship, Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt) No Responses »

May 072024

With thanks to Dan. He writes:

In 2021, I put up a video of Dr. Ryan Cole testifying in front of Idaho lawmakers around lock downs and vaccine side effects. Everything he said in the video has been corroborated and is now widely accepted as fact. He is an expert pathologist widely used by media as a spokesperson. At least he ‘was’ until he was censored.

YouTube deleted my video within 15 minutes of my posting it. I hope that this lawsuit gains traction, especially since the NYT article two days ago where censorship was recognised as a ‘mistake’ by authorities that resulted in injured people not receiving treatment. Support groups of injured people had their groups removed from Twitter and Facebook which was shameful.

In a greater sense, I hope that society is finally willing to talk about what happened over the last four years without fear of censorship, vilification and penalty of losing careers.

https://x.com/canindependent/status/1787551830450348425

Conversation

The Canadian Independent

@canindependent

Quebec Superior Court judge grants authorization for class action lawsuit against YouTube over COVID-19 censorship on its platform.

Éloïse Boies, pictured below, is a YouTuber with the channel ‘Élo Wants to Know.’ She has been granted authorization to proceed with a class-action lawsuit against YouTube.

The lawsuit alleges that the platform has been censoring content related to the pandemic, vaccines, and the Covid-19 virus that it disagrees with, citing it as medical misinformation.

The plaintiff, Éloïse Boies, who is legally represented by William Desrochers, alleges that YouTube, owned by Google LLC, censored three of her videos. YouTube cited a violation of its platform policy, stating that Boies spread “incorrect medical information contradicting that of local health authorities or the World Health Organization (WHO) regarding COVID-19.”

The class action includes “Any person, natural or legal, who has used or visited YouTube since March 15, 2020, and who has seen their videos directly or indirectly linked to the Covid-19 pandemic, censored or who, having wanted to do so, was unable to read or access these videos while residing in Quebec or having an establishment there.”

According to court documents, the three videos Boies alleges were taken down and censored by YouTube are as follows:

“On or around January 5, 2021, YouTube removed the video titled ‘Censorship.’ In this video, Boies argues that large companies like Amazon, Facebook, and YouTube, along with the government, censor information. She mentions government engagement in propaganda, a doctor’s claim of being pressured to identify COVID-19 as the cause of death, prohibition of all debate, and stigmatization of opponents of the dominant discourse with degrading labels such as ‘anti-vaccines’ or ‘conspiracists.'”

2. “On or around August 29, 2021, YouTube removed the video titled ‘Why Refuse Vaccines?’. In this video, Boies argues that several scientific experts, including Dr. Robert Malone, oppose COVID-19 vaccination but encounter censorship. She mentions the absence of thorough analysis regarding the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine, insufficient testing, emerging concerns like fertility issues, censorship of credible individuals, suspicions of a hidden government agenda tied to vaccination passports, and multiple medical and political reasons for vaccine refusal.”

3. “In November 2022, YouTube removed the interview video featuring Dr. Louis Fouché, a French doctor and spokesperson for the Réinfo Covid Collective. Dr. Fouché criticizes the falsehoods propagated by authorities, such as portraying the pandemic as a deadly epidemic with no solutions besides isolation, distancing, mask-wearing, and vaccination. He argues that the virus is benign for most individuals, there are identifiable vulnerable groups, curative treatments exist but are impeded by authorities, most health measures are ineffective and cause significant collateral damage, and vaccines are neither universally effective nor safe for all age groups. Dr. Fouché also accuses the system of corruption, manipulation of scientific studies and data, and employing social engineering techniques and mass media to shape public perception.”

The plaintiff primarily argues that YouTube’s content control related to the COVID-19 pandemic is an unlawful, an intentional infringement on freedom of expression, which is protected by the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms.

Google contends that it hasn’t breached the Charter since it’s not obliged to offer a space for sharing videos regardless of their content. Additionally, it asserts that its platform is private and can be managed according to its own rules and preferences.

Superior Court Judge Lukasz Granosik mentions in his judgement that “Freedom of expression does not only mean freedom of speech, but also freedom of publication and freedom of creation. Granosik then quotes from the Supreme Court of Canada saying, “it is difficult to imagine a guaranteed freedom which is more important than freedom of expression in a democratic society.”

Judge Granosik concluded after reviewing all the facts in the case that, “If Google manages and controls the content found on the YouTube platform and therefore takes actions in this direction, it cannot immediately deny all responsibility. If it carries out censorship by preventing certain people from posting videos and prevents other people from viewing these same videos, it thus hinders the free circulation of ideas and exposes itself to having to defend its ways of doing things.”

Google is ordered to “pay the plaintiff and each member of the group who published content on YouTube related to the COVID-19 pandemic and was censored,’ the sum of $1,000 as compensatory damages, and $1,000 in punitive damages with interest at the legal rate, along with additional compensation provided for by law since the filing of the request for authorization to take collective action, as per the court’s decision.”

The judgment further orders that Google must “cease any form of censorship or classification of publications having the effect of preventing YouTube users from propagating and receiving messages or information contradicting those of health authorities, governments, and the World Health Organization, or any other similar body.”

In addressing the concerns regarding viewers and visitors to the YouTube platform who may have been ‘deprived of viewing prohibited content,’ Judge Granosik chose not to rule on an amount for compensatory and punitive damages at this time. Instead, he deferred this decision to be addressed collectively at a subsequent hearing.

The Canadian Independent @canindependent

11:35 AM · May 6, 2024

58K

Views

Sandra Finley

2024-05-05 Blood clots are red. White clots are fibrin. Embalmers see them post mortem. Dr Baun sees them in the still alive. Same phenomenon. Treat clots, don’t end up dead. It is NOT a “clotting disease”.

Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt) No Responses »

May 052024

TOPIC: Blood clots are red. White clots are fibrin. Embalmers see them post mortem. Dr Baun treats the living.

Same phenomenon.

IF IF IF there are SYMPTOMS, treat the clots, don’t end up dead.

HAVE NO FEAR. It is NOT a “clotting disease”. A healthy body is functioning as it is designed to do. (https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=29185)

May 07, 2024. www.sandrafinley.ca 250-594-9898

CONTENTS

BLOOD CLOTS ARE RED. WHITE CLOTS ARE FIBRIN, BY INFERENCE

CLOTS, FIBRIN – – A NORMAL, HEALTHY, SYSTEM RESPONSE TO LOSS OF BLOOD
WHAT’S THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE BLEEDING?
GOOD NEWS! – – IT IS POSSIBLE TO RECOVER FROM THE BLOOD CLOTS IF THEY CAN BE IDENTIFIED BEFORE THEY KILL THE PERSON.
BLOOD CLOTS FROM THE EMBALMERS’ POINT-OF-VIEW
POSTINGS ON MY BLOG THAT CONTAIN THE WORD “CLOTS”. Look at the dates. (6A, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E, 6F)

= = = = = = = = = = = =

BLOOD CLOTS ARE RED. WHITE CLOTS ARE FIBRIN, BY INFERENCE

Covid Clots. Fibrin and what causes an “oversupply” of fibrin?

Our bodies are amazing! (Including the bodies of fellow creatures.)

Biochemistry fi·brin /ˈfībrən/ noun

an insoluble protein formed from fibrinogen during the clotting of blood. It forms a fibrous mesh that impedes the flow of blood.

The March postings provided the connection between the Covid Clots as experienced by Embalmers whose work is to prepare corpses for coffins. And the symptoms of Covid Clots as experienced by people still alive (Dr. Baun’s work).

An intro for lay persons to Clotting comes through Dr. Charles Hoffe – – his testimony to the NCI (National Citizens Inquiry. Canada). (see “For Your Selection” April #1, item #3)

Somewhere in all that is the word “fibrin”. Imagine that! Our bodies know to put “mesh” in a bleeding wound to stanch the flow of blood (pronounced “stawnch” – – a word my generation may know). The fibrin is the white casting that the Embalmers pull out of corpses (or leave in because it’s time-consuming and ghoulish work, unknown pre-covid) – – the fibrin looks like the blood clots (red castings of the blood vessels), but it’s white and stronger. You need a tool like scissors to cut it. As noted, it’s WHITE, rubbery, but otherwise looks like the red blood clots being found in cadavers. They are “castings” – – they take the form of the blood vessels with their branches that become smaller as they carry blood further from the main flow to the extremities, through smaller capillaries.

A CUT that BLEEDS forms a SCAB in a healthy body. Until I heard the word “fibrin” (what’s that?!) I thought a SCAB was blood that coagulated as it dried out. Well no, it’s blood with fibrin poured into it. .

Spike proteins bounce along in the blood vessels, making minuscule cuts. Cuts bleed. Fibrin is produced. Millions upon millions — – or is it trillions? – – of tiny perforations in the blood vessels produce an “over-supply” of fibrin (labelled as such, but see the next paragraph). Seems logical to me. I did a quick look on the Internet. There’s some info on the “over-supply”. I’ll have to look harder. I didn’t see anything about body-wide internal bleeding caused by the spike protein.

CLOTS, FIBRIN – – A NORMAL, HEALTHY, SYSTEM RESPONSE TO LOSS OF BLOOD

There isn’t REALLLY an “over-supply” of fibrin. It’s the body’s normal response to bleeding – – bleeding that isn’t detectable by diagnostic equipment because the cuts are minute. Cumulatively, the huge NUMBER of lacerations bleeds out enough blood, to trigger the immune system’s normal, healthy, response to loss of blood.

The abnormality is described as “a clotting disease“. NO, there is nothing wrong with the clotting function in the body. It’s working exactly as it is supposed to work.

The “disease” is not different from the actions of a criminal who uses a knife on the EXTERIOR of a body to slowly or quickly kill a person by bleeding out the blood. The difference is the DETECTABILITY of the blood-letting.

WHAT’S THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE BLEEDING?

The “disease” that slowly plugs up the body’s ability to deliver oxygen to cells in the body is a social disease characterized by words such as greed, psychopathic, hubris, willful ignorance. Why A SOCIAL DISEASE? Follow the trail . . .

The “research” that created injectable spike protein is a product of collaborators at the Wuhan lab.

- - The U.S. has a significant financial interest in Wuhan accompanied by personnel.
  - Canada has connections through the Winnipeg lab.
  - And, of course, China has an extremely large presence!

It is “off-shored” research because gain-of-function or dual-purpose (whatever the phrase used to disguise it) is ILLEGAL IN THE USA.

A parallel is off-shored torture (Gitmo, Abu Ghraib …) because torture is illegal in the USA.

The injectable spike protein is an experimental product. The off-shored labs do research to benefit the Military: germ warfare (gain-of-function), bio-weaponry.

Follow the scientists from Germany and Japan who were “bought” by the Americans, brought to the USA, rescued from prosecution (and execution) by the “Doctor” trials, a subset of the Nuremberg trials following WW2. German and Japanese scientists became EMPLOYED once again – – RESPECTABLE in the USA, continuing with research work.

The American military wanted the EXPERIENCE and KNOWLEDGE that thousands of scientists from Germany and Japan had, as a consequence of the meticulous scientific experimentation done on living human beings in WW2. Not ALL of the “scientific” experimentation was done inside the secrecy of a death camp. Not ALL the scientists knew with what they were collaborating “all for the Motherland”. A service to humanity. Most/Many of the scientists in Germany were co-opted to be working on the projects – – e.g. collecting and submitting data.

How many scientists/doctors did NOT collaborate in some way with the Covid Mandates? Wittingly, unwittingly, or lazily – – “the banality” as Hannah Arendt understood it.

It is known and not new in the USA – – I can’t find on my blog . . . the story of the experimentation done on kids from orphanages, poor kids, black kids, no families. Pre WW2? Post? Maybe it’s in “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks”, by Skloot? I found on the Internet a web-site that cleverly casts doubt on the integrity of various research studies done in the USA that clearly qualify as unethical.

GOOD NEWS! – – IT IS POSSIBLE TO RECOVER FROM THE BLOOD CLOTS (internal bleeding) IF THE SYMPTOMS CAN BE IDENTIFIED IN TIME.

2023 – 2024 The Covid Clots. Dr Jordan Baun (Alabama) and from Patients who recovered under his care (the embalmers’ experiences are with corpses – people already dead from the clots), cells robbed of oxygen. Full Measure Town Hall with Sharyl Attkisson.

1 hour video.

BLOOD CLOTS FROM THE EMBALMERS’ POINT-OF-VIEW

I have only seen Canadian documentation from embalmers, that of Laura Jeffery and others. The same stories are coming from other countries, too. Here’s Laura’s testimony, excellent:

Laura Jeffery, embalmer, testimony to the NCI. (You will understand why the NCI and others say: stop the vaccines NOW!). An interview with Dr. Ryan Cole on the science of the “blood clots” encountered by embalmers is included.

POSTINGS ON MY BLOG THAT CONTAIN THE WORD “CLOTS”. Look at the dates.

I must have done this to shock myself once again. The persistence of the Government messaging to “get your covid shots” is absolutely stunning in the face of the excellent information provided to them through the years by dedicated, qualified, experienced people. I don’t know what word in English is appropriate other than “murderous” to describe the persisting denial and stone-walling AND continuing promotion of the covid shots.

POSTINGS THAT CONTAIN THE WORD “CLOTS”.

6A. Pediatrician Eric Payne made a detailed, foot-noted submission to the Alberta College of Physicians & Surgeons that challenges mandated vaccination. 2021-09-15 Vaccination, forced compliance: Dr Eric Payne, paediatric neurologist, Submission to Alberta College of Physicians & Surgeons.

Some person who doesn’t like healthy children, tampered with Dr. Payne’s submission. I happened, through networks, to receive BOTH the tampered and the actual submission.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

NOTE: the attenuants and adjuvants used in vaccine manufacture (boric acid just one example) are not widely known, SEE: 2020-06-10 If I am making a choice about a vaccine, I want to know THIS.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

6B. 2021-09-21 Dr Vila, Letter to AHS, vaccine mandate

Pediatrician Michael Vila detailed his concerns with the vaccine in a submission to Alberta Health Services (AHS) in 2021.

Excerpt from the posting: I STRONGLY RECOMMEND, AT MINIMUM, SCROLL DOWN TO READ DR VILA’S CONCLUSIONS

6C. 2021-10-17 NY Doctor Zelenko Proved Everyone Wrong About Hydroxychloroquine. Very good. Addresses more than HCQ.

Blood clots are mentioned. But really, the significance of this posting is the extensive research and passion of networking doctors to solve medical problems on behalf of their patients. Dr. Zelenko’s story is similar to Dr. Baun’s with the blood clots – – determination to find answers.

Zelenko figured out and documented to help others, from the day the first covid case walked through his door until his death on June 30, 2022. He wrote:

“I see the world now with such clarity … It’s no longer confusing. It’s a binary choice. It’s very clear who’s on what side. And here are the teams: There are those who want to live a life of God, conscious … Our lives have sanctity. They’re priceless and they should be preserved at all costs. And no one has the right to enslave another human being. That’s one approach.

The other is [internment] … an attempt to enslave, psychologically, and even more so physically, the world population. Do you want to know what’s coming? Look at Justin Trudeau statements. Justin Trudeau, the prime minister of Canada, just announced that anyone who tests positive will be quarantined in a government-run facility, until the government deems you safe to return back to society.”

6D. 2023-02-19 Ontario Doctors who Dissented from Covid-19 Doctrines Fight for their Professional Lives. by Jason Unrau. C2C Journal.

Scroll down in the Ontario Doctors who Dissented to bolded print in pink:

Canada’s public health agency counted more than 5,800 Canadians who suffered from vaccine injuries of ‘special interest’. Among these are 55 cardiac arrests, 87 ‘spontaneous abortions,’ nearly 1,150 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis, 287 strokes, 144 heart attacks, 519 pulmonary embolisms, 327 blood clots and 185 cases of Bell’s Palsy.

6E. 2023-03-21 The case of JACKSON REIMER. Manitoba family files lawsuit against AstraZeneca.

There are photographs on the posting.

The Government’s response to the destruction of Jackson Reimer’s life at age 21, and the consequences for his family is offensive. In the face of what is known, I do not believe the Gov’t response to be true. From the CBC news report that I added to the posting:

The same day as that email, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the shot was safe and Canadians should have no concern about getting it, after roughly a dozen European countries suspended its use over concerns about blood clots.

Two weeks later, Canada’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommended pausing use of the vaccine in people under age 55 because of safety concerns.

That change came following reports out of Europe of ( very rare I don’t believe) instances of blood clots in some immunized patients, notably among younger women.

From the news report (I added the emphasis):

According to the Government of Canada, blood clots with low levels of blood platelets that occur after vaccination with viral vector vaccines (AstraZeneca Vaxzevria/COVISHIELD and Janssen Jcovden) are rare but serious. It says these serious side effects have been reported to begin up to about a month after vaccination. According to the government’s website, quick diagnosis and treatment are critical to reducing the risk of negative outcomes.

Excerpt, a local Manitoba news report about Jackson Reimer. (Jackson was healthy, working at Whistler, BC. His employer required him to get vaccinated. His family is from Manitoba.):

Since March 2021, Reimer has been unable to hold gainful employment, advance his university education or carry out many activities of daily living, the court filing says. . .

He’s now legally blind and has other symptoms related to mental focus and concentration, memory loss, mental impairment and obsessive compulsive disorder tendencies, according to the claim.

Reimer also has physical symptoms including brain seizures, excessive weight gain, and impaired bowel function and control, the lawsuit says.

His symptoms, which are expected to continue indefinitely, are so severe that Reimer is unable to live alone and requires ongoing assistance with daily activities, the claim alleges. It also says his parents have been unable to work their regular hours due to their son’s care demands.
The family is seeking damages for Reimer’s injuries, loss of income and costs of care. (Jason Reimer and his family are far from being the only ones with such experiences.

6F. 2023-11-29 B.C.: Chief Medical Health Officer Bonnie Henry named as defendant in class-action lawsuit over her role in COVID-19 vaccine mandate

. . . The suit counters that claim, suggesting the COVID vaccine monographs are ‘misleading,’ while referencing the risk of sustaining an adverse side-effect from the jab, including blood clots. The plaintiffs seek damages for the alleged contract breach, “misfeasance” in public office, and the suit’s certification.

(Sandra speaking): It takes a lot of experience and time (preparation) to get to the point where a class-action lawsuit is launched in court. B.C. is not the only Province in which class-action lawsuits are in process.

Please help build awareness by talking about the blood clot information. From the embalmers view-point the victims are dead. From Dr. Baun’s viewpoint, they can be helped before they take the exit at the pearly gates.

I don’t think the word “clots” is in these two postings:

/Sandra Finley

Create awareness
There’s a BC Provincial Election in 2024, scheduled for October 19.

Do you know about BC TOWN HALLS? https://bctownhalls2024.ca/bc-map-townhalls-2024/

I support their work. They are Citizen funded and Non Partisan. This information from me is NOT FROM THEM.

I attended their meeting in Campbell River to observe and learn. I was impressed. The presentations were great. Approx 500 people either came in person, were turned away (overflow), or watched the live streaming. Not counting the subsequent viewers of the on-line posting / access.

I will attend more of the Town Halls to judge if Campbell River is representative. I will arrive around 6:30. Don’t want to risk the drive and then being turned away. Which was ALMOST my experience in Campbell River!

https://bctownhalls2024.ca/bc-map-townhalls-2024/

Past Campbell River

Wed, May 8, Pt Alberni, 4065 6^th Ave, 6:30 Doors open – 9:00

Thur, May 9, Courtenay, 231 6^th Street, 6:30 Doors open – 9:00

Fri, May 10, Nanaimo,