Sandra Finley

Sep 172013
 

My last email was about spying on citizens by the National Security Agency (NSA) in the U.S.,  information leaked by Edward Snowden.  (The POwer of Fun.  Fun in the streets.)

It’s a serious issue – privacy of personal information.

Hear what Phil Zimmermann has to say – – very worthwhile interview (20 minutes):  You have even less privacy than you think.  Phil Zimmermann interviewed on CBC, Q.

I followed one of the links.  Gulp!  and Geez guys.  This is pretty damn serious!  Take a look:  NSA surveillance scandal: Major legal site shuts down over spying

This is all happening at a time when  – –  (update R v. Finley,  Do Canadians have a Charter Right to privacy of personal information, or not?) – –   we filed the papers seeking leave-to-appeal the lower court decisions (guilty) to the Supreme Court.   Their decision to hear the case or not, should be known by the end of October.

(Background (the case arose because of Lockheed Martin’s involvement in the Canadian census), click on:  Lockheed Martin, War Economy, StatsCan, Census, Surveys, Charter Right Privacy, On Trial)

 Meanwhile, a Vancouver activist faces charges over the 2011 census.  Stanley Cup riot hero faces charge for crumpling, colouring and burning census form to prevent ‘data mining’, National Post

 

I think I will try to contact Phil Zimmermann.

He knows the situation in the U.S.;  does he know the situation in Canada ?

  • the ramifications of the Patriot Act for security of Canadian data bases
  • the building of files on citizens through StatsCan (through the Census Bureau in the U.S.)
  • “harmonization” and “integration” of Canadian military with American
  • the involvement of Lockheed Martin Corp in the Canadian and American data bases
  • and so on.

 

 

Sep 162013
 

http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/09/05/stanley-cup-riot-hero-faces-charge-for-crumpling-burning-and-colouring-census-form-in-protest/

By Sarah Boesveld

Vancouver-area activist Bert Easterbrook, who earned a police commendation for curbing violence during the Stanley Cup riot in June 2011, has been charged under the Statistics Act for failing to turn in a valid census.

He crumpled up his 2011 census form, burned holes in it and wrote comments in at least four different colours of marker, mocking the questions Statistics Canada asked about his household.

Now, Vancouver-area activist Bert Easterbrook, who earned a police commendation for curbing violence during the Stanley Cup riot in June 2011, has been charged under the Statistics Act for failing to turn in a valid census, something other Canadian protesters have done to express their discontent with the gathering of their data.

Why is it that I have to risk three months in jail because they’re not willing to get off their butts and actually do the paperwork?

The 35-year-old, who has worked as a photographer for Cannabis Culture magazine and is a familiar face among Vancouver activists, says he plans to fight the charge of committing an offence to furnish false, unlawful or incomplete information contrary to section 31B Statistics Act, which carries a maximum $500 fine or, worst-case scenario, three months in jail.

“Considering that all the federal Canadian institutions already have all my pertinent information, why is it that I have to risk three months in jail because they’re not willing to get off their butts and actually do the paperwork themselves?” he told the National Post Wednesday.

Mr. Easterbook also objects to the fact Statistics Canada paid U.S. company Lockheed Martin, the world’s largest weapons manufacturer, $81-million for “optic recognition” software used to process Canadian census forms — an issue that first galvanized liberal activists during the 2006 census.

He is concerned his personal information will be used by foreign governments for “data mining.”

The New Westminster, B.C. resident deliberately mangled his census questionnaire so it could not be read by Lockheed Martin scanners in the U.S. and a Canadian would have to be paid to decode his responses, he said. Then, he sent it in.

About a month later, Statistics Canada officials arrived at his apartment, asking if he remembered completing the form. He said he did, and refused to complete it properly as they requested. Last Wednesday, he received a summons to appear in a British Columbia court Oct. 2. He plans to attend.

“And even if I do go to jail, I’m just going to laugh. Pretty much I’ll take an extra two weeks of contempt of court if I got to,” he said. “I’ll mock that justice of the peace, I absolutely will.”

For the 2011 Census of Population, Statistics Canada referred 54 cases to the Public Prosecution Service of Canada, which decides how to proceed. That is down from 64 cases in 2006, the year news about Lockheed Martin’s involvement in the census circulated widely.

According to its 2011-12 annual report, the prosecutors handled 227 files involving census offences. Sixteen charges were laid against people who refused to answer questions on the 2011 Census of Population.

Saskatoon community activist Sandra Finley is perhaps the highest-profile person charged — she said filling out a census form infringed her right under the Charter of Human Rights & Freedoms to privacy.

A provincial court found her guilty in January 2011 of violating Canada’s census law, a decision that was upheld by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in May.

Richard Marjan file

Richard Marjan file  Former leader of the Green Party of Saskatchewan, Sandra Finley.

“Over the history of the census, I don’t think anybody has gone to prison,” said Don Rogers, the Kingston, Ont. based founder of the CountMeOut Project, which encourages “minimum participation” on the census.

“Where there have been convictions, the penalties have ranged anywhere from an absolute discharge to, I think, a $300 fine. We’re not even aware of anyone getting the maximum $500 fine.”

“Why have this threat of jail when it really hasn’t been used?” he asked.

Micheal Vonn, a policy director at the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, asks the same question, though she acknowledges a serious stake in gathering information that will shape governmental decisions.

“Here we are always banging the table for evidence-based policy and decision-making and data’s a key part of that,” she said.

“That said, the notion that we should be putting people in jail if they don’t fill out a form is disproportionate.”

However, she added the charges are “extremely rare.”

Mr. Easterbrook said many of his friends, who also refused to fill out their forms or manipulated them in some way, have not received summons or at least not yet.

As for his turn as a hero, that came when he helped stop rioters from burning a truck.

Then, he had to protect himself as the crowds, who were enraged by the Vancouver Canucks’ loss to the Boston Bruins in the Stanley Cup finals, turned on him. The exchange was caught on video and posted on YouTube.

 

National Post

 

 

Sep 162013
 

I highly recommend listening to the podcast (20 minutes) at this link.  Phil Zimmermann interviewed by Jian Ghomeshi:

http://www.cbc.ca/q/blog/2013/09/02/you-have-even-less-privacy-than-you-think-says-internet-pioneer/

– – – – – – – – – –

(Who is Zimmermann?  See https://www.philzimmermann.com/EN/background/index.html)

– – – – – – – – – –

This, about the CBC interview:

In the wake of the Snowden affair and revelations about Gmail privacy (or lack thereof),  internet pioneer and cryptography expert Phil Zimmermann  joins Jian to  discuss the future of online privacy and why he fears the spread of  government surveillance.  

Zimmermann is the inventor of Pretty Good Privacy, and one of the founders of  Silent Circle, which offers a variety of secure communications services. But the company recently shut down its email service, and deleted all its clients’ data, over concerns they couldn’t guarantee its security. 

Zimmermann explains just how easy it is to collect data from popular  email services, why he believes everyone has  something to hide, and why he doesn’t buy the justifications for  widespread snooping.

“The problem is that the way things are going now with surveillance, the government doesn’t distinguish between criminals and the rest of us,” he said.

“When you feel resigned, that is exactly where they want you to be.”

Are you concerned about governments and corporations scanning your email? How far would you go to protect your privacy?

Aug 262013
 

A trickle of thoughts led me to:   there is a LOT of power in FUN!

Which makes me want to tell you . . .

 

Ha! Ha!  I don’t have to write it out.  Someone else (Jo Confino) has already done it!

A cool sequence led me to this:  Sustainability and joy: the power of fun can transform . . .  

 

HERE IS HOW THE SEQUENCE WENT

Thinking about our collective “wins”.  We don’t even realize they’ve happened. 

George Bush and Dick Cheney   didn’t get arrested for war crimes when they came to Canada, but have you noticed that they stopped coming?!  

They can’t even travel to Vermont in their own country now, for fear of arrest.

 

Which made me think of the fun the protesters in Vancouver  had.

Cheney couldn’t leave the building for a reported 7 hours!   It doesn’t compare with getting locked up in Guantanamo for years without a trial, but still, there is satisfaction in creating some consequences for war criminals when the justice system won’t  (so far).

Then came thoughts of another “collective win”, related to  Chelsea (Bradley) Manning, Julian Assange,  Edward Snowden.

Definitely NOT fun for them,   But did you know, for example:

(1)    Efforts to get Chelsea Manning a Nobel Peace Prize  (See http://manningnobel.org/)

 I experienced a “Yeee-es!”   moment when I added my name to the petition.    Can you imagine the fun the organizers had when they went to Oslo and delivered the petition to the Norwegian Nobel Committee?

Aug 26, 2013:  There are 111,354 signatures.

The 2013 Peace Prize will be announced on Oct. 11.

 

(2)   Another win generated by this trio  (Manning, Assange, Snowden)

(WE are critical players in creating the “collective wins” – –  if no one knows about the efforts of Manning, Assange and Snowden, their trials bear little fruit.  We are the communication lines to fellow citizens.)

Did you know?

President Obama could not deny the role Edward Snowden’s leaks to reporters eight weeks ago played in his administration’s plans to reform and increase the transparency of the National Security Agency. …

A win, right?   Read this analysis    Julian Assange: Obama Surveillance Reform ‘A Victory Of Sorts For Edward Snowden’, Huffington Post

Obama’s statement about Snowden generated this terrific response:    Snowden’s Father, Lawyer, Challenge Obama’s Claims

 

But!  Continuing the chain of thoughts that led to Sustainability and joy: the power of fun can transform . . .

 

I started musing about the fun personally for me:

I had fun at the May 25th March Against Monsanto.

Then Penny and I had a great time going to 9 rural communities in Saskatchewan to help organize more Marches.

 

That’s when I wanted to write. . . What’s it about?   Hmmm . . . it seems to me . . . there is great power in fun?! 

I wonder if Gandhi had fun in his March to the Sea, mixed with the pain of bringing down the British Empire in India?

 

I googled “power fun”.

And laughed.  It has been written about already!   And very well.    Oddly, in the corporate context, please see:  Sustainability and joy: the power of fun can transform the corporate world

In case you don’t have time to read it all,  Excerpt:

. . .   therein lies a question we could all do with asking; are we having fun and does it matter?

My own feeling is that the adrenaline of making money and beating the competition can seem fun for a while, but like any drug it wears off over time and then people need a bigger dose to try to recapture the original thrill. At its worst, this pattern can end in naked greed and disaster, as we have seen in the financial markets.

By contrast, the ability to have fun is a gift of nature that is like a perfect dynamo. It keeps replenishing itself and never diminishes in its intensity.

More than that, while competition for its own sake is always a great taker, joy is a generous giver and people find it infectious, as long as they are not threatened by it.

. . .   At its heart, joyous people help to create a feeling of trust. They tend to be better collaborators because they like nothing better than finding common solutions, and don’t feel they have to go into personal sacrifice to achieve them.

. . .  One member of parliament said that political parties thrived on being competitive and in opposition and asked Thay, as he is known, about the Buddhist view of competition. Thay looked at him and asked the simplest of questions: “Does it make you happy?” The ensuing silence spoke volumes. . . 

 

NOTE: the full text (Sustainability and joy: the power of fun can transform the corporate world)  includes a link to a second, related article on the “power of epiphanies”, by the same author.  Both articles are thought-provoking and explain the Power of Fun better than I can.

 

I hope you are having fun, and enjoying the summer!

It’s soon time to start revving up for the next March Against Monsanto (Oct 12).  We follow in the footsteps of Gandhi.  Empires come down.  We evolve.  The power of non-violent resistance is becoming the power of fun.

Aug 262013
 

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/16294-snowden-s-father-lawyer-challenge-obama-s-claims

By Jack Kenny

Edward J. Snowden’s father Lon (shown INSERT:  go to the URL) and the Snowden family lawyer said Sunday that they will soon be going to Moscow to see the fugitive whistleblower and his Russian attorney. Lon Snowden also said he would urge his son to come home and face trial if the American system of justice “is going to be applied correctly.”

 

“I believe that the truth will shine through,” Lon Snowden said in an exclusive interview with George Stephanopoulos on the ABC program This Week. The father of the 30-year-old systems analyst who revealed the vast data collection of private communications by the National Security Agency bluntly challenged comments President Obama made in his news conference last Friday — including most emphatically that the younger Snowden was not a patriot in leaking classified documents to The Guardian of London and the Washington Post. The elder Snowden countered by quoting a definition of patriotism by one of the intellectual leaders of colonial America’s struggle for independence.

 

“It was the voice of the American Revolution, Thomas Paine, who said it was someone who saves his country from his government,” Snowden said.

 

Snowden appeared alongside constitutional and international law attorney Bruce Fein, but Snowden did most of the talking, even in defending his son on points of law. He rebuked Stephanopoulos rather sharply when the This Week host stated matter of factly that “It does appear that [Edward Snowden] broke the law.”

 

“That’s simply irresponsible to suggest before a trial someone broke the law,” Snowden said, adding that it “may well be that what he disclosed is protected by the First Amendment.”

 

Federal prosecutors in June charged Edward Snowden with theft of government property, and with two counts of violating the Espionage Act of 1917 — “unauthorized communication of national defense information” and willfully disclosing classified communications intelligence “to an unauthorized person.” Fein said he is seeking additional legal help for the defense in the person of someone with experience in espionage cases. Such lawyers are rare because there have been very few espionage cases brought since the Espionage Act was passed during World War I. Fein also said he had been in touch with Edward Snowden’s Russian attorney and has been assured that the U.S. fugitive is safe there.

 

The Moscow government recently granted Snowden a one-year asylum on the condition that he reveal no further information about the NSA program. Obama, who had been pressuring Russia for the forced return of Snowden to the United States, responded by canceling a planned summit meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin. Snowden fled from his home in Hawaii to Hong Kong after leaking the documents and landed in Moscow on June 23, remaining in living quarters at the airport facility until the temporary asylum was granted. His current location is not known, and Fein said the exact date of his and the elder Snowden’s trip to Russia would not be made public because of the “media frenzy” surrounding the case.

 

Fein also said he proposed conditions for Snowden’s return in a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder. The conditions would include an agreement regarding pre-trial detention, no gag order, and “a venue that was impartial,” Fein said, because of the history of the federal court in eastern Virginia as a “graveyard for defendants.” Fein stressed that the conditions he proposed to the attorney general are not ultimatums, but rather “subjects for discussion.”

 

Snowden also expressed concern about the effect of the publicity surrounding the case on the ability of his son to receive a fair trail. Statements by leaders in Congress, he said, have been “irresponsible and inconsistent with our system of justice. They have poisoned the well in terms of a jury pool.” Snowden said that his son told the truth and that claims that his son’s revelations about the NSA program have damaged national security or jeopardized the lives of Americans are false. He compared his son’s case to that of Bradley Manning, the Army PFC who was recently convicted at court martial for turning hundreds of thousands of government classified documents over to the website WikiLeaks.

 

“At the damage phase, the United States conceded no one person has been injured or impaired because of what he disclosed,” Snowden said.

 

Both Fein and Lon Snowden disputed the claim the president made at his new conference that Edward Snowden could have brought his concerns to the House and Senate oversight committees instead of leaking the NSA documents to the press. Snowden suggested his son would have encountered a hostile audience, citing a public statement by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, that Edward Snowden is guilty of treason.

 

“They knew for seven years what was going on and refused to disclose it to the American people,” Fein said of Feinstein and other members of the congressional intelligence committees. “Edward Snowden was supposed to go to them?” The reaction in Congress to publication of the documents indicates the kind of reception Snowden would have received if he had flown to Washington and brought his concerns about domestic surveillance to the nation’s legislative leaders.

 

“We have seen how they reacted; they spin the truth,” Fein said. Snowden “would have been buried and we would have never known the truth.”

 

Lon Snowden also challenged the president’s contention that whistleblower laws already in place would have protected his son if he had gone through authorized channels. The claim is “absolutely untrue,” he said.

 

“Either the President is being misled by his advisors or he is intentionally misleading the American people,” Snowden said. Acknowledging the president is in “a tough position,” Snowden nonetheless took aim at Obama’s statement that his son was not a patriot in leaking the documents and at Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) for labeling the younger Snowden a traitor.

 

“He sacrificed more than the president of the United States or Peter King ever have in their careers or in their American lives,” Snowden said.

Aug 262013
 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/10/julian-assange-obama_n_3736933.html

By Paige Lavender

 

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange weighed in on President Barack Obama’s proposed surveillance reforms Saturday, calling the new measures “a victory of sorts for Edward Snowden.”

 

“As Snowden has stated, his biggest concern was if he blew the whistle and change did not occur,” Assange said in a statement. “Well reforms are taking shape, and for that, the President and people of the United States and around the world owe Edward Snowden a debt of gratitude.”

 

On Friday, Obama proposed the first of several steps “to help restore public confidence” following revelations in June that the federal government was secretly mining millions of Americans’ phone and electronic communications. HuffPost’s Sabrina Siddiqui reported earlier:

 

The president’s proposed measures focused on reforming Section 215 of the Patriot Act and Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act, under which the NSA’s surveillance programs are considered lawful. The reforms would focus on creating more oversight and greater transparency, particularly through modifications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which currently authorizes the surveillance through highly classified opinions.

 Obama specifically discussed creating a special advocate who could challenge the court on the basis of privacy and constitutional concerns. He also expressed support for making more information public, and upon his directive, the Department of Justice released the legal rationale for the government’s collection activities under Section 215 of the Patriot Act.

 

 

Obama also shared his thoughts on Snowden during the remarks, making it clear his embrace of reform did not mean he was justifying the whistleblower’s actions.

 

“No, I don’t think Mr. Snowden was a patriot,” Obama said. “The fact is, Mr. Snowden has been charged with three felonies.”

 

Assange’s full statement below:

 

Today the President of the United States validated Edward Snowden’s role as a whistleblower by announcing plans to reform America’s global surveillance program. But rather than thank Edward Snowden, the President laughably attempted to criticize him while claiming that there was a plan all along, “before Edward Snowden.” The simple fact is that without Snowden’s disclosures, no one would know about the programs and no reforms could take place. As Thomas Jefferson so eloquently once stated, “All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.” Luckily for the citizens of the world, Edward Snowden is one of those “people of good conscience” who did not “remain silent”, just as Pfc Bradley Manning and Daniel Ellsberg refused to remain silent.

Ironically, the Department of Justice is betraying two key principles that President Obama championed when he ran for office ­ transparency and protection for whistleblowers. During his 2008 campaign, the President supported Whistleblowers, claiming their “acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled.” Yet his administration has prosecuted twice as many whistleblowers than all other administrations combined

Moreover, the US government’s hypocrisy over Snowden’s right to seek asylum has been stunning. America offers asylum to dissidents, whistleblowers and political refugees without regard to other governments opposition all the time. For example, the US has accepted 3,103 of their own asylees, 1,222 from Russia and 1,762 from Venezuela – http://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2011/ois_yb_2011.pdf.

Today was a victory of sorts for Edward Snowden and his many supporters. As Snowden has stated, his biggest concern was if he blew the whistle and change did not occur. Well reforms are taking shape, and for that, the President and people of the United States and around the world owe Edward Snowden a debt of gratitude.

 

Aug 242013
 

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/08/22-2

by Sonali Kolhatkar

 

When I first met Reverend Rick Hoyt he said, “You don’t have to call me Reverend – just Rick is fine.”The First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles has taken a stand against the NSA surveillance program. (Photo via Uprising Radio)

The bespectacled and youthful pastor sporting a salt-and-pepper beard, certainly didn’t look like a conventional “man-of-God.” In fact, the Unitarian Universalist church to which Rick belongs is known for defying Christian theological convention. And, Rick’s home at the First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles also has a history of defying political convention.

The church, according to Hoyt, has been a “fierce advocate for personal liberties.” Even before Edward Snowden became a house-hold name, the First Unitarian Church of LA became a named plaintiff in a major lawsuit against the National Security Agency (NSA) over privacy violations.

Nineteen organizations have joined Hoyt’s church in an unusual coalition that includes the Marijuana legalization group, NORML, and gun rights groups like the California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees.

Hoyt admits that some of the groups are those his church doesn’t normally work with and “aren’t necessarily politically sympathetic with.” But the right to personal privacy is a libertarian position deeply held by both ends of the political spectrum.

The coalition also includes Human Rights Watch, Greenpeace, Free Press, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations. And while they may have some strange bedfellows particularly with the gun-rights organizations, the groups have found common ground in what they see as an attack by the US government and the NSA on Americans’ First Amendment Right to Assemble.

The lawsuit is based on the NSA’s indiscriminate telephone tapping program, about which suspicions have existed long before recent leaks of classified documents. Rev. Hoyt fears that NSA surveillance aimed at political groups impacts the right of people to freely assemble in those groups: “People need to feel that they have the freedom to join an organization …and use the power of a group to amplify their voices.”

His suspicion that the government is likely spying on his church is not unfounded. Hoyt cited the church’s long arc of political activism, going as far back as the late 1800s when people like Caroline Severence, the prominent suffragist, joined the Unitarian Church. Unitarians also historically embraced abolitionism and later the Civil Rights and modern feminist movements.

More relevant to today’s suit is the position the church took in the 1950s against the McCarthy-era anti-communist witch hunts, coming to the defense of the black-listed “Hollywood Ten” writers and actors in Los Angeles.

That stance provoked a very real FBI surveillance program against the church. Plainclothes agents attended worship services and caused anxiety among the congregation. Hoyt says the church responded at the time by refusing to publish its membership directory in order to protect its congregants, and told me, “[w]e’re very familiar with the kind of chilling effect that these government actions can have on the individual person’s right to come together into churches and social and political groups to do the kind of work that we want to do as people of faith.”

Reverend Rick Hoyt went further, saying it was incumbent on his church to take a strong position against government abuse of power: “[i]t is one of the foundational principles of our faith that individuals have power to affect change in the world and that we have a responsibility as people of faith to bring our values into the public sphere and to make change in this world.”

Watch my recent and complete interview with Rev. Hoyt:

(Please go to the URL:  http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/08/22-2 )

The church remains politically active today strongly engaged in issues like marriage equality. Mass government surveillance, argues Hoyt, could scare off potential congregants from politically active organizations like the First Unitarian Church. And that, according to him and his fellow plaintiffs, violates the First Amendment.

The lawsuit – First Unitarian Church Vs. The NSA – was filed in mid-July of this year by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a group that has been around for almost as long as the internet. After months of laying the groundwork for the suit, the EFF’s timing could not have been better, with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden’s explosive revelations coincidentally sparking a heated global debate over the US government’s unchecked powers.

Snowden’s documents, doggedly disseminated almost daily by Glenn Greenwald and his fellow reporters at the Guardian newspaper of London, have only served to strengthen the suit. Hoyt says the revelations underscore some of the very arguments made by the plaintiffs and now, thanks to Snowden, “we actually have some factual basis to say ‘yes, what we suspected is actually happening.'”

While he hesitated to call Edward Snowden a “patriot,” the Unitarian pastor credits Snowden with “speeding up the process,” and helping to “ignite this public discussion.” He added, “[a]nybody whose actions bring this kind of program to light and encourages national discussion is to be applauded.”

When I asked Reverend Rick Hoyt if he mentioned the lawsuit during his church service, his eyes lit up and he enthused, “Oh yes, I have! We’ve actually been very excited about the lawsuit!” He is hopeful that his church, which he says is a “small group,” and “not a particularly powerful group,” in attempting to defend against mass government surveillance, may now, thanks especially to Snowden’s revelations, stand a decent chance of preserving the First Amendment and people’s right to privacy.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Aug 242013
 

See also:   The POwer of Fun. Fun in the streets. 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/sustainability-joy-power-of-fun

A healthy dose of joy could transform the corporate sector and put it on a more sustainable footing.

By  Jo Confino

 

Do you ever have the feeling that we spend our lives trying to learn the same lessons over and over again? We hope always to find answers but perhaps a better approach is to ask more profound questions.

I mention this because of a story told to me at a meeting of 300 CEOs and senior executives at the Brainstorm Green conference in Laguna Niguel, California.

It was not a story about energy efficiency, nor was it a story about how to convince your chief financial officer to invest in greener technology. Instead it was about a chief executive who did not know how to incorporate fun into his work.

It goes like this. The businessman was having an interview for a senior position and told the CEO he had three main criteria for taking any post: it had to have a purpose, it had to be fairly paid and it had to be fun.

The feedback he received was that the CEO was comfortable with the first two but just could not get his head around what the third one meant. Quite understandably, the gentleman in question did not take the job, and learnt a year later that the CEO had died at the age of 58.

Are we having fun?

And therein lies a question we could all do with asking; are we having fun and does it matter?

My own feeling is that the adrenaline of making money and beating the competition can seem fun for a while, but like any drug it wears off over time and then people need a bigger dose to try to recapture the original thrill. At its worst, this pattern can end in naked greed and disaster, as we have seen in the financial markets.

By contrast, the ability to have fun is a gift of nature that is like a perfect dynamo. It keeps replenishing itself and never diminishes in its intensity.

More than that, while competition for its own sake is always a great taker, joy is a generous giver and people find it infectious, as long as they are not threatened by it.

This is all obvious when we take a moment to stop and think, but in the hurly burly of life, we forget it. Go into a meeting that includes one person who is sour and negative and the energy of the meeting sinks like a soufflé taken out of the oven before its time. Go into the same meeting where someone is emanating the spirit of joy, and everyone benefits, with the result that space and possibilities open up.

Integrating a sense of joy

I have to say that the sustainability practitioners I meet who are taking the most risks and doing the most to transform their businesses are people who are able to integrate that sense of joy into their work. In fact it is the very feeling of joy that allows them to wake up every day with the knowledge of impending environmental and social catastrophe and still come to work with a cheerful demeanour.

I remember many, many years ago being shocked when an executive coach told me that business leaders become increasingly isolated and lonely as they move up the corporate ladder. No wonder they find it difficult to think deeply beyond shareholder value to the role of business in society. Because they feel trussed up in the straitjacket of their work lives, some love nothing more than bringing in outsiders who are able to inspire and challenge them in new ways.

I have written before about the power of epiphanies

(INSERT:  I found the link worthwhile, and the link at the bottom of that page (The full filmed interview with Lynda Gratton can be viewed here.)  also worthy.   Gratton is a professor of management practice at the London Business School.)

to create radical change, because those who experience them first hand are freed, even if only for a moment, from the constraints they falsely believed were holding them down like a ball and chain. Second best, however, is being in the company of people who are able to represent that.

At Brainstorm Green, a few people suggested I meet Jib Ellison, who helped to create the Blu Skye consultancy, which concentrates on systems change. He was a prime mover in Walmart’s journey towards being a more sustainable company. What I was told was not that Ellison had the sharpest mind or the greatest ideas, which may or may not be the case, but that CEOs enjoyed his company.

At its heart, joyous people help to create a feeling of trust. They tend to be better collaborators because they like nothing better than finding common solutions, and don’t feel they have to go into personal sacrifice to achieve them.

Collaboration and competition

There may be lots of people who dismiss what I am writing as naïve. In fact, several people have said to me in recent weeks that collaborating is all well and good, but competition is what really drives innovation and technological advances. But those critics are looking to mark a spot on a spectrum that we have already moved beyond.

Collaboration and competition can be happy bedfellows, if you feel comfortable with both. Those people who bring joy to their work do not see them as polar opposites.

A couple of years ago I attended a meeting at the Houses of Parliament between the Zen Buddhist master Thich Nhat Hanh and a group of MPs, members of the House of Lords and others. One member of parliament said that political parties thrived on being competitive and in opposition and asked Thay, as he is known, about the Buddhist view of competition. Thay looked at him and asked the simplest of questions: “Does it make you happy?” The ensuing silence spoke volumes.

One of the more popular stories on the Guardian last year was about a palliative nurse who asked all those dying in her hospice what their greatest regrets were. The top five included: “I spent too much time in the office” and “I wish that I had let myself be happier,” which translated into the fact that they had pretended to be content “when deep within, they longed to laugh properly and have silliness in their life again”.

There was one, however, which particularly caught my eye because it had a certain subtlety, which made it all the more potent. “I wish I’d had the courage to live a life true to myself, not the life others expected of me”.

One of the reasons society gets itself into a mess is because certain ideas or thoughts become so embedded in a culture that those who come along later feel they have no choice but to fit in, for fear of being marginalised.

So may I humbly suggest taking a small chunk out of your work day, sitting quietly and asking yourself a question; “How well am I doing at bringing more joy into my life?” Better now than on your deathbed.

– – – – –

From the “Comments” on the Guardian website,  Jo Confino  . . .  love without action does not work, neither action without love.

Aug 202013
 

http://front.kinja.com/nsa-surveillance-scandal-feds-shut-down-snowdens-secu-511588927

By Ken Lane

A legal website used by attorneys to privately discuss case law is shutting down after 10 years because the owner no longer feels the site’s users are protected from government spying. After federal threats led to the closure of several secure email providers, the publisher of Groklaw closed her own operation last night, saying she could no longer promise security to the lawyers who had used the forum to openly discuss legal situations with other users. It’s the latest repercussion from former NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden’s revelations about the massive illegal spying operations American intelligence and law enforcement agencies have engaged in since the 9/11 terror attacks.

The fallout from Snowden’s secrets is now affecting the reporter who first brought this summer’s NSA spying scandal to the world, Guardian reporter Glenn Greenwald—his partner was detained by British intelligence agents for nine hours at London’s Heathrow Airport, not because of any suspicion of wrongdoing but simply because he lives with Greenwald.