Sandra Finley

Jun 162013
 

NOTE:  There are updates beyond this.  Click on “Green Party” under categories.   In particular, see  (2014-04-14)   Yeeeay! End of six-year battle, unconstitutionality of Election Deposits 

Refund of Election Deposits:

Rosenthal to AG Sask Election Deposits 2012

The following email thread records the effort to obtain a substantive reply from the Attorney General (Sask), Gordon Wyant.

———- Forwarded message ———-

Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:35:42 -0600

From: “McGovern, Darcy JU”

To: Peter Rosenthal

Cc: “Cherkewich, Dawn JU”

Subject: RE: constitutional question for Minister of Justice

Dear Mr. Rosenthal:

Thank you for your e-mail on behalf of your client, the Green Party of Canada.  I have asked for instructions from the Minister of Justice and Attorney General with respect to your inquiry and I am advised that he will be responding to you directly with respect to this matter.

Darcy McGovern

Director, Legislative Services

Ministry of Justice and Attorney General

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This e-mail (and any attachment) was intended for a specific recipient.  It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure.  Any privilege that exists is not waived.

If you are not the intended recipient:

*  do not copy it, distribute it to another person or use it for any other purpose; and

*  please delete it and advise me by return e-mail or telephone.

Thank you.

—–Original Message—–

From: Peter Rosenthal

Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 10:05 AM

To: Cherkewich, Dawn JU

Cc: McGovern, Darcy JU

Subject: RE: consitutional question for Mnister of Justice

Dear Mr. McGovern,

      As per below, I am writing to you with respect to the emails and faxes I sent concerning the deposit provisions of your elections act.  The response I got suggests that my request will be considered but implies that there is no urgency since there will not be an election for a couple of years.

      On the other hand, court proceedings take time. The Green Party doe not wish to face another election with what they regard as the unconstitutional provisions in place.

      Is there a realistic possibility that you will amend the act without the necessity of court proceedings?

      Can you give me an idea of when you will seriously consider the request that you amend the elections act?

      I would greatly appreciate your early reply. Thanks very much.

                  Sincerely,

                  Peter Rosenthal

                  Barrister

On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Cherkewich, Dawn JU wrote:

> Hello Mr. Rosenthal,

> Attached is a copy of the response letter from the Ministry of Justice.  If you have any further questions, please contact Mr. Darcy McGovern, Director, Public Law, Ministry of Justice, at Darcy.McGovern   AT  gov.sk.ca.

>

> Kind Regards,

> Dawn M. Cherkewich

> Senior Assistant to the

> Honourable Gordon S. Wyant, Q.C.

>

> —–Original Message—–

> From: Peter Rosenthal

> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 6:47 AM

> To: Cherkewich, Dawn JU

> Subject: consitutional question for Mnister of Justice

>

> Hi,

>  You kindly acknowledged receipt of the attached fax on September 24, 2012.

> Do you have any idea when I might get a substantive response? I’d appreciate any information. Thanks very much.

>

>                                Peter Rosenthal

>

> ———- Forwarded message ———-

> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 09:17:24 -0400 (EDT)

> From: Peter Rosenthal

> To: minister.justice@gov.sk.ca

> Subject: consitutional question for Mnister of Justice

>

> Hi,

>  Attached please find a fax (including cover sheets) that I faxed to the Minister of Justice yesterday.  I am also emailing this copy, as I want to make sure that it gets to the attention of someone in the Ministry who will properly consider it.

>  I would greatly appreciate your early acknowledgment of receipt of this.

> Thanks very much. Sincerely,

>                        Peter Rosenthal

>                        Barrister and solicitor

Jun 152013
 

There are 45 facebook groups in Canada on the official March Against Monsanto (MAM) blog.

Ontario has the most, 15.

BUT!  Saskatchewan (2 groups) is on the move!   We will report back to you as soon as  SASKATCHEWAN has more MAM groups that any other province.  It won`t take us long!

We challenge you (Ontario) to maintain your lead!

At June 15, 2013  ( http://www.march-against-monsanto.com/p/blog-page.html):

NUMBER OF MAM GROUPS:

  • Alberta (6)
  • B.C. (14)
  • Manitoba (1)
  • New Brunswick (1)
  • Newfoundland & Labrador (2)
  • Nova Scotia (1)
  • Ontario (15)
  • Quebec (3)
  • Saskatchewan (2)
  • Yukon Territories (0)
  • Northwest Territories (0)
  • Nunavut (0)

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

FOR SASKATCHEWAN  (No peeking, if you`re not from Sask!)

Tell all your friends!    Here is what is known:

MAM organizing meetings (9 new ones!) as follows, with more to come.

Don`t wait for MAM to come to you.

If there isn`t one in your community, it`s easy to set one up!

The official MAM blog:

Event and Media Resources for 5/25/13. Find Local Info and Content and Add Info and Content Here

Or contact one of the MAM facebook groups, Or myself (sabest1 AT sasktel.net), Or anyone else – – there`s lots of help.

JUNE

23rd                                     Sunday

3:00 pm              LLOYDMINSTER

LOCATION:  Louis Family Restaurant

4311-44th Street (on 54th and Highway 16 – at the Best Western Hotel)

 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –  –

24th                      Monday

10:00 am            LUSELAND (with people coming from Kerrobert)

Location:  Luseland Museum on Main Street (Grand Ave).

 

2:30 pm           ROSETOWN

Location:  Roosters Coffee Corner, 207 Main St  (Not normally open on Monday. But the proprietor, Lynn, feels MAM is important and wants to open to host us.)

 

7:30 pm            SWIFT CURRENT

Location:  Modern Family Restaurant

49 Central Ave N

 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

 

25th                      Tuesday

2:30 pm            SHAUNAVON

Location:  Historic Shaunavon Hotel, 189 Centre St,  (south end of town)

 

7:00 pm            ASSINIBOIA

Location:   Nash’s Restaurant & Lounge

 401A 1st Avenue West

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

26th                      Wednesday

10:00 am            GRAVELBOURG

Location:  Café Paris, on Main Street.  (Toos, the owner of the Café is a terrific advocate for our community.)

 

2:30 pm            MOOSE JAW

Location:    Moose Jaw Public Library, Herb Taylor Room

461 Langdon Crescent

Directions:  From the corner of Main Street and Athabasca Street East, go one block east on Athabasca Street. The library is in Crescent Park, kitty corner to a stone church and across the street from the funeral home. The entrance faces west.

 

6:00 pm            REGINA

Location:  Atlantis Coffee House

1992 Hamilton St, corner with Victoria

Jun 152013
 

Insights into society and human behaviour.

When time permits I will transcribe some of this.

http://www.cbc.ca/q/blog/2013/06/11/joni-mitchell-portrait-of-an-artist/

(If I wait long enough, maybe someone ELSE will transcribe it and I can just plunk it in here!)

Oh DEAR!    http://www.thestarphoenix.com/travel/Mitchell+pull+collection+from+city/8530348/story.html Mitchell may pull collection from city,  Singer tired of waiting 

By Charles Hamilton, The StarPhoenix June 15, 2013

Jun 142013
 

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/06/14/g8-tax-evasion-stephen-harper_n_3437802.html

The amount of money hidden from Canada’s tax collector has reached a record $170 billion, by one estimate, but critics of the Harper government say the prime minister is doing nothing about tax evasion — and is even blocking international efforts at combating the problem.

Offshore tax havens will be one of the major subjects of the upcoming G8 conference in Northern Ireland, where British Prime Minister David Cameron is spearheading an effort for an international tax evasion agreement.

The proposed deal would allow governments to share “beneficial ownership information” about suspected tax cheats — information that can reveal who the real owners are of offshore accounts and dummy corporations.

Harper is worried about exposing private Canadian tax affairs and fears complications arising from Canada’s federal structure,” The Guardian reported on Thursday.

France, Germany and Italy are reportedly backing the plan, but Canada is not the only G8 member to have doubts about it. Russia is reportedly objecting to the measure, and U.S. President Barack Obama’s position is unclear. (Obama is also under political pressure to back a deal.)

The U.K., France, Germany, Spain and Italy  (Link  no longer valid)  have already signed on to a pilot project to share information related to potential tax evasion.

The Harper government is also reportedly  (Link  no longer valid)  resisting efforts for a deal that would see countries set up tax information exchanges to better track tax cheats across borders, Postmedia News reports.

The proposal would see governments collect data on income from foreign sources, and then report that back to the foreign country in question, so that tax records could be compared.

Harper’s communications director, Andrew MacDougall, said the government is “broadly supportive” of Cameron’s agenda.

“We do support more action,” he said, as quoted at Postmedia.

The opposition NDP criticized the government this week for “becoming an international obstacle to tackling tax havens.”

NDP Foreign Affairs critic Paul Dewar accused the Harper government of “choos[ing] to protect those who use international tax havens to evade paying their taxes.”

The move “fits a pattern of behavior from a Conservative government that has repeatedly undermined efforts to reach a multilateral consensus on important issues facing the world,” he added, as quoted at iPolitics.

Instead of focusing on exposing tax havens and catching tax cheats, the Conservatives have slashed the Canada Revenue Agency’s investigative resources and staff,” NDP National Revenue critic Murray Rankin said in a statement.

The Harper government eliminated hundreds of jobs and slashed $250 million from the budget of the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) over the next few years as part of its most recent budget.

A series of investigative reports from the CBC this week alleged that the CRA missed out on an opportunity to pursue Canadians listed in the world’s biggest leak of tax cheat data, and has been artificially inflating its numbers on prosecution of people using offshore tax havens.

A  (Link  no longer valid)  leak of tax data last April reportedly included the names of 450 Canadians using offshore tax havens, but months before the leak the CRA was given the opportunity to obtain the names, sources told the CBC. The CRA refused because of a policy not to pay for information.

According to activist group Canadians for Tax Fairness, offshore tax havens are costing Canada some $7.8 billion in revenue annually, money that has to be made up for with higher tax rates for those who do pay.

Canadians for Tax Fairness has partnered with Oxfam Canada and Avaaz.org to pressure Harper to sign on to the tax proposals.

“These two measures are key to lifting the veil of secrecy that allows wealthy individuals and corporate tax evaders and criminal organizations to hide their wealth offshore,” the group said in a statement this week.

A study last year estimated that there is between $21 trillion and $32 trillion stashed away in offshore tax havens.

Jun 132013
 

Record of Laliberte meeting with Prisciak, February,  2013 

Karen Prisciak: 

The Law Society (L.S.) should be on its way doing their job.

Don’t know where they will be going.  Three options:

  1. Might just let it go
  2. Go to disciplinary action
  3. Send it to a higher level

Karen will call George by the end of March (one of the L.S. team working on this is on holiday).

George Laliberte (306-979-9315) told Karen:

He expected the kind of answer made by Hesje.

Is glad that Hesje assumed responsibility.

But everything is as before.

 

George told Karen his belief that people in the justice system know how to cover each other up.  He has no faith in the justice system.

 

“If I had been there, I don’t think it would have gone the way it did.  I was not there to represent myself.”

They said they couldn’t contact me.

They didn’t WANT to contact me.  Didn’t want me there.

The Star Phoenix was able to contact me with no problem.

 

Re  Hesje’s answer:  he is forgetting what this is all about.  He says I was their client but I was not.

 

After the meeting with Vellacott I did not hear anything from Hesje.

I thought it was Done, gone, done with.

They were not representing me.

(George had never hired the services of McKercher.  The Liberal Party was “looking after it”.)

Six years later I hear about a judgment against me.

George asked Karen if he needed a lawyer (regarding the L.S.).

Karen:

No, I am representing you.

The L.S. has taken charge.

I am working for  them.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

(George, a question concerning  “Doesn’t address Liberals.”  (Hesje’s answer)  do you recall, was that something that you mentioned in your conversation with Karen?  Not sure.)

Jun 132013
 

Please go to the URL.  http://www.organicconsumers.org/   I don’t have time to fix the formatting in the copy that follows the large blank space:

                                                                                                                                                                                            

ESSAY OF THE WEEK

Consumer Alert: Secret Trade Agreements Threaten Food Safety,         Subvert Democracy

If you think the         U.S. government is doing a sub-par job of keeping your food safe, brace         yourself. You could soon be eating imported chicken, beef and seafood         products that don’t meet even basic U.S. standards for food safety. The         Obama Administration is allowing corporations like Dow AgroSciences,         Cargill and DuPont, and industry trade groups like the Pork Producers         Council and Tobacco Associates, Inc. – 600 of them in all – to weigh in         on negotiations on two of the largest free trade agreements in world         history.

Who doesn’t get a         seat at the table? Consumers, farmers, even members of Congress. In         fact, the President wants to “fast-track” the two agreements. That         means Congress will be forced to vote on them, after they’ve already         been finalized and signed, without benefit of the normal democratic         checks and balances that include debate and the ability to introduce         amendments.

The Trans-Atlantic         Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and Trans-Pacific Partnership         (TPP) pose direct threats to consumer safety. They will weaken U.S. and         world food safety standards, threaten domestic and international food         sovereignty laws, and allow transnational corporations to sue         governments for alleged future lost profits unless the corporations are         allowed to freely peddle their unproven, unsafe goods with reckless         regard for existing food safety laws.

Read the essay

Read the press release

TAKE ACTION: Tell President Obama and Interim U.S. Trade         Rep. Miriam Sapiro: Trade Agreements Shouldn’t Be Secret!

GMO LEGISLATION UPDATE

Winning! Connecticut and Maine Make History, Pass GMO Labeling Laws

It’s Monsanto’s         worst nightmare come true. One by one, states are passing GMO labeling         laws, despite Monsanto’s best efforts – and deep pockets – to prevent         them. Will the Biotech Bully follow through on its threats to sue? We         say: Bring it on!

Kudos to the         hard-working, take-no-prisoners, not-takin’-no-for-an-answer activists         in Connecticut for scoring the first GMO labeling law in the country.         And a tip of the hat to Connecticut Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, who has         promised to sign the Connecticut bill, lawsuit threats and all. The         Connecticut bill received bipartisan support, passing the Senate         unanimously and winning a 134-3 vote in the House. Maine followed         Connecticut’s lead, with the House passing LD 718 yesterday, June 12,         also by an overwhelming majority vote 141-4.

Neither bill is perfect. Connecticut’s requires four other states,         including one that borders the Constitution State, to pass GMO labeling         laws before it kicks in. Maine contains a similar trigger, but requires         five other states to pass GMO labeling laws, before LD 718 can take         effect. But it just could turn out that the trigger clauses prompt         other nearby states, including Vermont whose bill H.112 will be taken         up in January, to follow suit.

Next it’s on to Washington State, where voters will cast their ballots         on Nov. 5, to decide on I-522, a citizens’ ballot initiative to require         mandatory GMO labeling there.

More on the Connecticut win

More on the Maine win

SUPPORT THE OCA & OCF

Usual Suspects Strike Again

We knew they’d         show up, sooner or later, with their bulging wallets. Can their fake         science, sleazy ads and bogus voter guides be far behind?

This week, the         money started flowing in to the campaign to defeat I-522, Washington         State’s ballot initiative to label genetically modified organisms         (GMOs). If history is our guide, this is just the beginning. A mere         trickle compared with the flood that’s sure to follow.

The Grocery Manufacturers Association is leading the way, with its         first donation, $472.5k. Monsanto has plunked down $242.2k so far, a         mere pittance compared to the nearly $8 million the biotech giant         forked out last year to defeat Proposition 37, California’s GMO         labeling initiative. The other usual suspects include DuPont Pioneer,         Bayer CropScience, Dow AgroSciences – you know, the guys who make all         those nasty pesticides, and don’t want you to know they’re putting them         in your food.

Experts tell us         that neither side in the I-522 fight will need to spend as much as they         spent in California. We can reach far more voters, with far fewer ads,         in Washington. The opposition could spend the same amount it spent in         California, nearly $46 million, to try to defeat I-522, but you can         only saturate a market so much before you put off voters. That said, we         know these early donations will be followed by many more, much larger         ones.

The biotech         industry will pull out all the stops to defeat I-522, especially in         light of the recent GMO labeling law wins in Connecticut and Maine. We         don’t have any huge corporations on our side in this fight. But we have         you. Hundreds of thousands of individual donors who, together, can make         a huge difference. Please make a generous donation today. Thank you!

Donate to the Organic Consumers Fund         (non-tax-deductible,         but necessary for our legislative efforts in Washington, Vermont and         other states)

If you need your         donation to be tax-deductible, you can donate to the Organic Consumers Association         (tax-deductible,         helps support our work on behalf of organic standards, fair trade and public         education)

TRAITOR BOYCOTT

Dear Traitor Brands: We’re Waiting

It’s been more         than six months since consumers began boycotting the “Traitor” brands:         the organic and natural brands of the parent companies that spent millions         to defeat Proposition 37, the California Right to Know GMO labeling         initiative. When we launched the boycott, we explained that we’d be         happy to start buying brands like R.W. Knudsen, Naked Juice, Odwalla         and others again – just as soon as the decision-makers at those brands         guaranteed us that their parent companies wouldn’t pour money into         defeating future state labeling campaigns, but would instead pitch in         to support those campaigns.

We’re still         waiting. So far, there’s been no sign of donations from companies like         Pepsi, Coca-Cola, ConAgra, etc. to the NO campaign for I-522, a         citizens’ initiative to label GMOs in Washington State. That’s         encouraging. But there haven’t been any donations from those companies         to the YES campaign, either. Even though we know a lot of these Big         Food companies have signaled that they now support GMO labeling         laws, at least at the federal level.

If         you’re missing your Honest Tea or Boca Burgers or Hunts Organic, now         would be a good time to visit the facebook pages of all the Traitor Brands and post a little reminder:         You’ll become a loyal fan again, as soon as their parent companies         promise to support I-522. Until then, you’ll make do         with their competitors’ brands.
Download your wallet-sized boycott guide

Download a poster-sized boycott guide

Sign the boycott pledge

Order printed copies of the boycott guide or poster

FARM BILL UPDATE

Senator Promises Monsanto Protection Act Won’t Be Renewed without a         Vote

It pays to         complain. Thanks to your calls and letters to your U.S. Senators, the         movement to repeal the Monsanto Protection Act has scored a         preliminary victory: The much-maligned rider, slipped into the Farm         Bill without debate, will not be renewed without a vote. Sen. Debbie         Stabenow (D-Mich., pictured), chairwoman of the Agriculture Committee, pledged to oppose the extension beyond its         September 30 expiration date. Sen. Stabenow made the promise to Sen.         Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who had pushed unsuccessfully for a vote on his         own amendment to repeal the Monsanto rider. Sen. Stabenow’s promise         represented a compromise.

Great news, but we         have to keep up the pressure to make sure Sen. Stabenow honors her         pledge. Please call and email your Senators and ask them to         pledge to vote against the Monsanto Protection Act if Sen. Blunt         proposes it again.

What’s next for         the Farm Bill? The Senate completed its work on June 10, passing the         legislation without voting on many of the other amendments we asked consumers to         support. The bill now moves to the House, where floor debates and votes         on amendments are scheduled for the week of June 17. The House version         of Farm Bill contains an amendment proposed by Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa)         that would rob states of the right to regulate factory farms. That’s         bad enough, but the King Amendment is so broadly written that it could         also overturn hundreds of state laws regulating agricultural products,         including laws like the one Connecticut just passed, and many other         states are considering, that would require mandatory labeling of         genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

There’s         still time to make your voice heard on the King Amendment, and other         key amendments that will have an impact on food, environment and         climate change policies. Let Congress know where you stand!

Learn the fate of the Senate Farm Bill amendments and         find out what amendments will come up for a vote in the House

TAKE ACTION: Don’t Let Congress Stomp Out States’         Rights. Stop the King Amendment!

Love a Parade? March with Moms Across America on July 4!

The timing         couldn’t be more perfect. Just as we kicked off our plan to “out” the Senators who voted         against states’ rights to label GMOs, Moms Across America has organized         hundreds of marches in July 4 parades, to draw attention to kids’         health and GMOs. What better way to protest your Senators’ votes, than         by marching in a parade with thousands of moms fighting for their kids’         health?

The California         State Grange and LabelGMOs.org have teamed up with moms who have seen         their kids’ health improve by going GMO free. Together they’ve launched         the first Moms Across America campaign. Moms Across America is urging         everyone who supports “the freedom to choose our food” to         march in the hundreds of July 4 parades scheduled for the summer’s         biggest holiday. So far, activists in 147 towns have heeded the call.

Fourth of July         parades draw politicians and decision-makers of all stripes, and the 71 U.S. Senators who recently voted against         states’ rights to label GMOs are certain to be at an Independence Day         event somewhere in the their home state. Let’s make them and their         voting public aware that the nine out of 10 citizens who support GMO         labels aren’t happy with their votes against our right to know.

Find out if your Senators voted against your right to         know

Join Moms Across America on July 4

VIDEO OF THE WEEK

Cookin’ up Opposition to GMOs

“Its’ not about taste.         For me, it’s not even about the science. It’s about freedom.” Craft         Restaurants founder Tom Colicchio, known also for his work as the head         judge on Bravo’s hit competition show Top Chef, discusses what it means to         be a food activist.

Watch the video

LITTLE BYTES

Essential Reading for the Week

McDonald’s Cruelty: Creating Mentally Broken &         Physically Destroyed Animals

Why Are Children’s Foods Packed with Toxic Chemicals?

Modern Fruits and Vegetables Are Less Nutritious

Evidence of GMO Harm in Pig Study

If Dr. Offit Had His Way, Vitamins Would Be Treated as         Drugs

Hey, Non-GMO Activist: Monsanto’s CEO Thinks You’re an         Elitist

MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSORS

Dr. Bronner’s Magic Pure Castile Classic Soaps

Unlike any you’ve ever used. A combination of organic extra virgin         coconut, olive, jojoba and hemp oils, together with pure essential         oils, creates a unique soap that cleans effectively without being         aggressive and produces a velvety-lather that leaves the skin         silky-smooth and refreshed.

Now available in         two new Magic liquid fragrances: Rose and Citrus Orange

 follow on         Twitter | friend on         Facebook | OCA on         Pinterest  | Donate

Please         forward this publication to family and friends, place it on web sites,
print it, duplicate it and post it freely. Knowledge is power!

Organic Bytes         is a publication of Organic Consumers Association

6771 South Silver Hill Drive – Finland, MN 55603 – Phone: 218-226-4164         – Fax: 218-353-7652

 

 

Jun 122013
 

The Canadian Press update on CETA appears below.

What can we do about it?  is at the very bottom.

BACKGROUND, click on:

2011-02-08  CETA, plus Harper signs new security perimeter deal without consultation

CETA / GMO connection:  Scroll down (in preceding link) to heading  WHAT”S IT ALL ABOUT?  in order to understand that CETA is also about GMO food, through what it will do for “intellectual property rights”  (patented GMO seed).

         EXCERPTS, otherwise:

(CETA)   “not a trade agreement”, but as a “template to alter governance”.   

It is an “enclosure of what Government can do.”  They “no longer act for citizens.  Their function is to provide services for corporations.” 

European corporations are “interested in penetrating Canadian society down to the municipal level.”  (In CETA language,  “sub-national governments”).  All sub-national governments will be bound by CETA.  . . . “European corporations are interested in opening up Government procurement.”  They want access to hospitals, universities, etc.  Local suppliers cannot be favored.

 

If that’s not enough:

–        Whatever is given to Europeans in this trade agreement (CETA), is given also to the U.S. and Mexico (NAFTA).

–        The Government is simultaneously working on several trade agreements with various countries.

–        I wonder what will be left to give away to big money interests?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =  =

 

Canada ready to raise threshold on foreign takeovers to $1.5B for Europe

 

The Canadian Press
Published Tuesday, June 11, 2013 1:57PM CST

 

OTTAWA — The Harper government has agreed to smooth the way for more takeovers of Canadian companies by European firms in one of several concessions during free-trade talks, sources tell The Canadian Press.

 

With Prime Minister Stephen Harper still hoping to sign a deal in principle while in Europe over the next several days, sources say Canadian negotiators have agreed to a provision to raise the threshold for reviewing foreign acquisitions from Europe to $1.5 billion.

 

All acquisitions under that value would not be subject to a government assessment about whether they create a net benefit for Canada.

 

The proposed change comes just after the House of Commons passed the budget implementation bill that raises the threshold for automatic review from the current $334 million to $1 billion over the next four years.

 

Intense talks, especially over the last few weeks, have brought the two sides together on several issues, the sources say.

 

Canada has significantly moved to appease European demands for opening up provincial energy utilities, particularly in Ontario and Quebec, for procurement of foreign goods and services.

 

On autos, rules-of-origin concerns have been resolved to Europe’s satisfaction.

 

As well, Canada is prepared to give Europeans more market access in protected sectors such as telecommunications, which has restrictions on foreign ownership, as well as uranium mining, postal services and insurance.

 

Overall, the two sides say they will completely eliminate all industrial tariffs within seven years, a measure that will save Canadian exporters $213 million annually — and European exporters $635 million — at current exchange rates.

 

While negotiations have closed the gaps on some issues, sources say they remain apart on several others, particularly agriculture and urban transit project procurement.

Jun 112013
 

People are generally incredulous when they discover what the “fluoride” they put into the water supply, actually is.   There’s a pretty good explanation at Fluoridation – At Any Cost, Dr. Hardy Limeback.

But please see:  2013-06-05  Hamilton City Council, NZ, voted 7-1 to remove Hydrofluosilicic Acid (fluoride) from water supply.

I wish I had time to help the effort in my City to stop fluoridation.   The evidence is indisputable for anyone who will just take the time to do a little research, if they’re in doubt.

We’ve followed a few of the developments: