Sandra Finley

Jun 052012
 

http://thechronicleherald.ca/canada/103704-may-budget-bill-an-outrage

By PAUL McLEOD   Ottawa Bureau

Green leader argues C-38 breaks rules

Green Leader Elizabeth May asked Andrew Scheer, the Speaker of the House of Commons, to rule the Conservatives’ budget bill out of order.  (PETER PARSONS / Staff)

Green Leader Elizabeth May asked Andrew Scheer, the Speaker of the House of Commons, to rule the Conservatives’ budget bill out of order.  (PETER PARSONS / Staff)

The fate of this year’s and all future omnibus budget bills will be placed in the hands of the Speaker of the House of Commons.

Elizabeth May, leader of the Green party, rose Monday in the House on a point of order to argue that the Conservatives’ budget bill is so broad, it breaks parliamentary rules.

She asked Speaker Andrew Scheer to rule the bill out of order, thus sending it back to the government to be chopped into smaller pieces.

“I think there’s nothing less at stake than the future of the respect of the Canadian public for parliamentary democracy,” May said in an interview.

“This bill is an outrage.”

Scheer reserved his decision. The other opposition parties have signalled they want to weigh in before he rules.

May’s lengthy point of order centres on the parliamentary rule that “no bill may be introduced in either blank or imperfect shape.”

Bill C-38, the budget implementation bill, spans 430 pages, but May takes care to stress she is not objecting to its size.

Instead, she argues that much of its contents have no relationship to the budget itself.

May cites extensive rulings by past Speakers that omnibus bills are supposed to tie together pieces of legislation that share a common theme. House rules call for an omnibus bill to have “one basic principle or purpose which ties together all the proposed enactments.”

May says the budget bill has no common theme and was introduced improperly, and thus imperfectly.

She argues that even simply “the budget” cannot be a theme for the bill as many sections of the bill were never mentioned in the budget.

She lists as examples changes to the Fisheries Act and granting new power for governing pipelines to the National Energy Board.

And she says there is no logical “or even illogical” link between the budget and changing the Corrections and Conditional Release Act.

The budget does include a reference to streamlining duplicate environmental reviews, though May argues it is a stretch to link this to the budget bill’s repealing and rewriting of the Environmental Assessment Act.

“To allow C-38 to masquerade as a legitimate omnibus bill will bring our institutions into greater disrepute,” reads the point of order.

The NDP and Liberals expressed some support for May’s charge. Liberal Leader Bob Rae said allowing C-38 to stand would open the door to governments introducing one massive piece of legislation each year containing all of their ideas.

Speaker Scheer’s ruling will likely be precedent-setting. If he sides with May, he will effectively set limits on how wide-ranging future budget bills can be. If he rejects her appeal, he will provide written justification that governments will be able to point to in defending future omnibus bills.

Scheer, who is in his first year as Speaker, is the Conservative MP for Regina-Qu’Appelle. He has so far sided with the government in his most high-profile rulings involving the Vikileaks Twitter account and scurrilous claims made to constituents of Liberal MP Irwin Cotler.

As Speaker, Scheer must act as the independent arbiter of the House. May said she believes her point of order will get fair consideration.

“It is for him to rise above the fact that he was elected (as a Conservative),” she said.

“He’s not a partisan actor in the House of Commons, and I think he will be fair, he will be impartial.”

There is no timetable for Scheer to reach a decision.

(pmcleod  AT  herald.ca)

Jun 042012
 

Closely related:   Very important televised debate: Jeremy Scahill (“The Nation”) says Obama drone strikes constitute murder, and he says it on NBC.  The U.S. “kill list”. 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = =

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2012/05/the-presidents-kill-list.html

The President’s Kill List, The New Yorker, Amy Davidson

What is wrong with the President sitting in a room, looking at lists and  portraits of people—a Somali man, a seventeen-year-old girl, an American  citizen—and deciding whom to kill?

That, according to long and troubling  articles in both the Times and Newsweek, is a job Barack Obama has assigned himself.  His aides, notably John Brennan, his counter-terrorism adviser, portray it as a  matter of taking responsibility—if we are going to assassinate someone, or call  in a drone strike to take out a camp in Yemen, the President should make the  call—as if our only alternative were some sort of rogue operation, with generals  or C.I.A. agents shooting at will.

But responsibility involves accountability,  which is something, in this case, that appears to be badly lacking. Obama has  not taken on a burden, but instead has given the Presidency a novel power.

The “kill list” story is a reminder of how much language matters, and how  dangerous it is when the plain meaning of a word is ignored. Each might include  a mini-glossary: “baseball cards,” for the PowerPoint slides with the  biographies and faces of targets; “Terror Tuesday,” meetings where targets are  sorted out; “nominations” for death-marked finalists; “personality strikes” that  aimed to kill a person, and “signature strikes” that went after a group of  people whose names one didn’t know because of the way they seemed, from pictures  in the sky, to be acting. (From the Times piece, written by Jo Becker  and Scott Shane: “The joke was that when the C.I.A. sees ‘three guys doing  jumping jacks,’ the agency thinks it is a terrorist training camp, said one  senior official.”)

Signature strikes were also known as TADS, for  terrorist-attack-disruption strikes, or just as “crowd kills.” Both articles  explore Obama’s halting efforts to confine signature strikes to Pakistan, rather  than Yemen and Somalia, and how he ultimately didn’t, really. This is the kind  of attack that, in one incident mentioned by Daniel Klaidman in his Newsweek piece, led to “persuasive” reports of dozens of women and  children dying. A lawyer who saw that on “Kill TV,” the feed that let the  military and lawyers watch strikes, said later, “If I were Catholic, I’d have to  go to confession.”

More disturbing than childish names for brutal things are the absurd meanings  ascribed to more sober terms. The key ones are “civilians and combatants,” and “due process.”How do you minimize civilian casualties in a conflict? Ask a military planner  or human-rights organization or just a sensible person and each might come up  with a list of tactics, plans, litmus tests. And there were apparently elements  of that in the White House’s conversations. But ask a sophist or, as it happens,  the C.I.A.,  and you might get this suggestion: change the definition. As the Times described it, Obama

embraced a disputed method for counting civilian casualties that did  little to box him in. It in effect counts all military-age males in a strike  zone as combatants, according to several administration officials, unless there  is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them innocent.

In other words, if we thought that you were someone we should kill, and we  did kill you, and you look to be the right age to be cast as an extra in a spy  movie, you were guilty. Does that mean that, if a house is hit and the bodies of  a father, mother, teen-age boy, and middle-school-aged girl are found entangled  with each other, two are combatants and two are civilians?

These words are important because of the argument that we have to act to  protect ourselves: there is a terrorist on a screen; hit him now. But how are we  deciding who a terrorist is? In some cases, we don’t even know the names of  people we’re killing, in countries where we are not actually at war. In others,  we do know their names, and don’t care who dies with them. (In one strike, in  which the identity of the man was known, according to the Times, Obama  made a deliberate decision to kill his wife and in-laws along with him.)

The method we have built, over a couple of hundred years, for sorting out  questions of guilt and innocence and probable cause, is due process. And that  may be the most degraded phrase of all.

The Obama Administration has sought and killed American citizens, notably  Anwar al-Awlaki. As the Times noted, “The Justice Department’s Office  of Legal Counsel prepared a lengthy memo justifying that extraordinary step,  asserting that while the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of due process applied, it  could be satisfied by internal deliberations in the executive branch.” In other  words, it’s due process if the President thinks about it. One wonders how low  the standard for “internal deliberations” are—if it might be enough if Obama  mulled it over while walking his dog. And if an American whom the President  decides is a threat can be assassinated in Yemen, where Awlaki was hit, why not  in London, or Toronto, or Los Angeles?  (Awlaki’s teen-age son, an American  citizen who had not been accused of anything, died in a separate strike.)

These are not far-fetched concerns. The Times quoted Michael Hayden,  who served as the director of the C.I.A. under George Bush:

“This program rests on the personal legitimacy of the president, and  that’s not sustainable,” Mr. Hayden said. “I have lived the life of someone  taking action on the basis of secret O.L.C. memos, and it ain’t a good life.  Democracies do not make war on the basis of legal memos locked in a D.O.J.  safe.”

As Jane  Mayer has written in The New Yorker, drone strikes, as opposed to  ground troops, bring with them a comforting illusion of distance. Picturing  Obama going through the lists in a bright office in Washington shows where that  daydream leads, and how deceptive it can be. A drone-based conflict may, in the  short run, keep some troops from harm, but it may also take the debate about war  and peace out of the public sphere and into what is, in political terms, a much  darker space.

Brennan and other officials interviewed by the Times and Newsweek said that Obama had enormous faith in himself. It would be  more responsible, though, if he had less—if he thought that he was no better  than any other President we’ve had or ever will.

The point isn’t just the task,  or burden, he takes on, but the machine he has built for his successors to use.  Perhaps, just to suggest a range, he could picture each of the Republican  contenders from this past season being walked through the process, told how it  works, shown some of those video clips with tiny people and big explosions, and  taking it for a test drive.

Never mind whether Obama, in particular, sighs or  loses sleeps or tosses a coin when he chooses a target: What would it mean for a  bad, or craven, or simply carelessly accommodating President to do so? In the  end we are not really being asked to trust Obama, or his niceness, but the  office of the Presidency.  Do we?

Jun 042012
 

Jim from the U.S. writes:  These are the kinds of DEBATES that must be aired and allowed to actually ALTER U.S. POLICIES!

6 min, Jeremy Scahill says it on The Nation:

http://video.msnbc.msn.com/up-with-chris-hayes/47658344#47658344

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

See also:   2012-05-30  The President’s Kill List, The New Yorker, Amy Davidson (Drones).

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/05/what-if-herman-cain-had-a-kill-list/257860/

What If Herman Cain Had a Kill List?
May 31 2012

Atlantic_situation_room_615.jpg
Reuters, Kasia Cieplak-Mayr von Baldegg

Many Democrats trust Obama to order assassinations anywhere on earth based on his judgment. Do they trust whatever Republican next wins?

“What is wrong,” asks Amy Davidson, “with the president sitting in a room, looking at lists and portraits of people — a Somali man, a seventeen-year-old girl, an American citizen — and deciding whom to kill?” If only it were a rhetorical question. In fact, Obama has assigned himself that macabre job, according to reports in the Times and Newsweek that note the enormous faith he has in his own judgment. “It would be more responsible, though, if he had less,” Davidson argues. “If he thought that he was no better than any other president we’ve had or ever will. The point isn’t just the task, or burden, he takes on, but the machine he has built for his successors to use. Perhaps, just to suggest a range, he could picture each of the Republican contenders from this past season being walked through the process, told how it works, shown some of those video clips with tiny people and big explosions, and taking it for a test drive.” Yes, what if that happened?

. . .  (short script for a play of how it might unfold  – – go to the link for the full text)

Yes, it’s very amusing to poke fun at all the dubious figures that run for president. Too bad that Obama hasdecided to aggrandize for every future winner the power to kill anyone on earth, subject only to the whims of whoever happens to be heading the executive branch at the time. If Democrats are uneasy handing that power to Republicans, now is the time to act. They’ve been warned.

Jun 042012
 

Dear Friends,

WE NEED YOUR HELP TO PUBLICIZE THE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY COMPLAINT FILED IN THE WORLDWIDE COURT AT THE HAGUE – CHILDREN’S AMALGAM TRIAL – AN UNETHICAL EXPERIMENT ON CHILDREN

PLEASE FORWARD TO YOUR MAILING LISTS – FRIENDS, DOCTORS, DENTISTS ETC.

International “Crime Against Humanity” Filed At The Hague

 

On Monday, June 4, a press release was sent out via PR Newswire by Dental Amalgam Mercury Solutions (DAMS) to bring worldwide attention to the unethical Children’s Amalgam Trial funded by the U.S. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR).

International Advocate Anita Tibau and Kelly Gallagher, documentary filmmaker, have been in Portugal for over three months working with an investigational reporter and were in part responsible for the filing of the “Crime Against Humanity” complaint at the Hague in the Netherlands.

WE NEED MAJOR MEDIA COVERAGE BOTH IN THE UNITED STATES AND WORLDWIDE.

As a result of the press release the following major media outlets picked up the story, however it crucial for YOU to write comments to each one of these articles in order to expand coverage….the more hits and comments on these sites the more coverage we will gain.

I am also working with an investigational reporter who is the new editor of the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), a nonprofit organization devoted to watchdog reporting.

WE ALL WANT THIS STORY TO MAKE HEADLINES WORLDWIDE.

Thank you,

Freya Koss
publicist
IAOMT, DAMS

 

The Press Release is on REGULAR REUTERS:  http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/04/idUS57023+04-Jun-2012+PRN20120604

Please share/click/comment on the Reuters link, as well as these other high-profile websites:

Jun 042012
 

It is NOT angry and it is NOT violent!   It is quite wonderful.

Shot & edited by Ian MacKenzie,   ianmack.com

Inspired by Jeremie Battaglia’s gorgeous Montreal film, Vancouver answers the Quebec student movement with a pots and pans revolt of our own.  There is a beauty that emerges when we learn and inspire each other, just as Quebec has done for the rest of Canada.  When we speak to each other instead of through governments or the mainstream media.   Here in Vancouver, we discovered what it means to make music together in the streets,  in the rain, and you can see it on our faces.  It is magic.

André Bourgoin explains:  This one is in Québec city’s Quartier Limoilou (kind of like Riversdale in Saskatoon).  Note that with bill 78 in effect, a gathering of more than 50 people is illegal anywhere in the province of Québec unless the police have been notified 8 hours before it happens.  The police, however, have been tolerant towards most casseroles events, since they are peaceful.  At the end of the video the crowd is chanting “Usons les trottoirs, jusqu’à la victoire” (Let’s beat the sidewalks until we win).

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

What is a “casseroles”? . . .  a form of protest that started in Latin American countries, Chile, Argentina.

A pot and a wooden spoon.  Get out in the Streets, connect and become empowered – Our revolution of love, hope and community.  The best remedy ever for depression!

On Wednesday, (June 6 and every Wednesday) bang for 15 minutes starting at 8:00pm.   The list of communities in Canada doing it is too long to copy here.  (Unfortunately, the organizing is all through facebook  National Facebook event – not everyone can access it.  Gotta change Facebook!)

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

HOW are the protests in Canada being reported in other countries?  . . .   Russia

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Is Canadian media reporting on what’s happening outside Canada?

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

It is not all fun and games!  It’s very hard and creative work for a very good cause – to change the way we’re going!

  • The kids in Quebec set up an office where they’re translating from French into English as fast as they can, so other Canadians can get an accurate report on what’s happening.   Let’s give them a hand – pass this email along!  (And bang your pot with your friends at 8:00 pm every Wednesday!
  • Occupy Wall Street (OWS) ‘Summer Disobedience School’

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

The banging is about to get much louder.  Harper is not going to get away with Bill C-38, the omnibus budget bill that undoes what Canada is all about.  To boot, the American police would have the right to operate in Canada, under American laws.

More about that later.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

INSPIRATION (EXCERPT, text from Rabble.ca,  the first link at the top of this page –
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/ethan-cox/2012/05/it-starts-quebec-our-revolution-love-hope-and-community)

It starts in Quebec: Our revolution of love, hope and community

This movement may yet fail. It may be co-opted, or lose track of its goals. But there can be no denying that something extraordinary is happening in Quebec. If we, as a society, as a people, are to make a stand against the governments which cut taxes on the rich and corporations and then plead poverty as they dismantle our society, our communities, it will be here. Call me an idealist, call me a dreamer, call me anything you like. But this is a moment in time we will tell our children about. Together, we can start something here that spreads like wildfire across this continent. What happens next is up to us.    . . .

If you do not live here, I wish I could properly convey to you what it feels like . . . It is magic. It starts quietly, a suggestion here and there, and it builds. Everybody on the street begins to smile. I get there, and we all — young and old, children and students and couples and retirees and workers and weird misfits and dogs and, well, neighbours –we all grin the widest grins you have ever seen while dancing around and making as much noise as possible. We are almost ecstatic with the joy of letting loose like this, of voicing our resistance to a government that seeks to silence us, and of being together like this. I have lived in my neighbourhoods for five years now, and this is the most I have ever felt a part of the community; the lasting impact that these protests will have on how people relate to each other in the city is deep and incredible.

Jun 032012
 

“Tens of thousands marching everyday…”

3 min

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4YRcLwQ0aM&feature=player_embedded

This news broadcast by Russia Today originated in the U.S. with this note:

The people of North America need to revoke the Broadcast Licenses of all the North American Media who continue to fail to report in full on every demonstration in this land. We can only get our demonstrations covered by either Iran or Russia or some other foriegn jounalists . . .

Jun 032012
 

In almost every report on the social movement now sweeping Quebec, including my own, words like conflict, crisis and stand-off figure prominently. Anger is omnipresent. The anger of protesters, the anger of government, the anger of those supposedly inconvenienced. Pundits scream about mob rule, anarchy in the streets and the dissolution of society as we know it.

Don’t get me wrong, there is anger, present of course. But that is not what you see if you take to the streets, or watch CUTV’s live stream. Pundits can’t stop bemoaning the inconvenience to “ordinary” Montrealers posed by these protests. But I wonder, are there any “ordinary” Montrealers left to inconvenience?

As I write these words there are demonstrations going on in every neighborhood of Montreal. “Casseroles,” where people leave their houses to bang pots in the street every night at 8:00 p.m., have led to marches everywhere. The police cannot keep up. Far flung suburbs like Vaudreuil and Île Perrot, the anglophone West Island and NDG, South Shore suburbs, Québec City, Sherbrooke, Gatineau, Rimouski, Trois Rivières and the list goes on. Some of these places have never seen a demonstration, certainly not since the days of the quiet revolution. Now their streets swell with hundreds, thousands.

The prevailing question in the media is, how do we end this? Supporters and opponents alike seek a “solution” to put an end to the “crisis”. And we need one, those on the streets need to be heard. Actions need to be taken to address the demands of the masses. But what exactly is so bad about what is happening? Why do we need it to end so urgently?

As this movement goes on, and grows by leaps and bounds, it is increasingly clear that it is not a movement of anger, of rage or of hate. It is a movement of love, of community and of hope. People who would be alone in their houses watching TV take to the streets and march with neighbours they never knew they had. Back when we had real communities, they were driven by the coming together of neighbours each night. Instead of watching TV, we met in the street, we exchanged details of our day and we made plans for our future. Just as the “casseroles” cause us to do now.

Perhaps the most lasting effect of this movement will be to build stronger, more connected communities. Every day that it goes on, more of us meet in the street, build relationships and talk about what kind of a society we want.

This is what Charest is afraid of. This is what keeps the powerful awake at night. If we talk, if we exchange ideas and debate the future of our society, we will want to change it. And nothing terrifies the powerful more than a change to the system which gives them their power.

The most honest reason which can be given for why people are in the street is the simplest. We do not see ourselves reflected in our government. But we see ourselves, our concerns, our hope, our love and our aspirations, reflected in every smiling face we see on the street. For the first time in a long time we are having a real conversation about what kind of society we want. We’re having it with each other, every night when we meet in the streets. And slowly, but surely, we are realizing that we have the power to make our dreams a reality.

Over at Translating the Printemps Erable, a superb volunteer collective dedicated to translating French articles about the movement into English, the administrator recently posted an Open Letter to the Mainstream English Media. It is perhaps the best description of this incredible phenomenon I have yet seen. In it they bemoaned the coverage which focuses on anger, when what we see in the streets is love. They describe the nightly “casseroles” like this:

If you do not live here, I wish I could properly convey to you what it feels like . . . It is magic. It starts quietly, a suggestion here and there, and it builds. Everybody on the street begins to smile. I get there, and we all — young and old, children and students and couples and retirees and workers and weird misfits and dogs and, well, neighbours –we all grin the widest grins you have ever seen while dancing around and making as much noise as possible. We are almost ecstatic with the joy of letting loose like this, of voicing our resistance to a government that seeks to silence us, and of being together like this. I have lived in my neighbourhoods for five years now, and this is the most I have ever felt a part of the community; the lasting impact that these protests will have on how people relate to each other in the city is deep and incredible.

The video is a simple, black and white video of one night in the life of nos casseroles, but it has gone viral, encapsulating as it does the joy and togetherness of our movement.

We walk past each other every day, but we do not smile. We do not stop to talk, we do not connect. In these protests, in the breast of this movement, we are remembering what it is to work together to make our world a better place. We used to know, in some far distant past, but we have forgotten.

Many in this movement are mad at the media. But in many ways it is not the fault of the journalists, or the pundits who cling to the status quo like a drowning man grasps a life raft.

If you try to understand this movement through the lens of politics as usual, you are doomed to failure. This is a spontaneous, joyful uprising. It is not Astro Turfed, it does not depend on the media or the political parties, or even the unions or student groups for oxygen. It is a fire which has slumbered in our bellies for so long, silent and nearly forgotten.

What the critics and the pundits do not understand is that they are no longer in control. People will no longer nod and agree with their paper or their TV. They can diminish it, can under-report our numbers and exaggerate our violence, but it doesn’t matter. Their words and their barbs cannot defeat the solidarity and love which flows through our streets each night.

People don’t need the media to tell them what is happening outside their door. They can hear it. They can feel it. The genie cannot go back in the bottle. We are awake, truly awake for the first time in a long time. We will not go back to sleep.

I started to notice after the passage of Bill 78, and the mass demonstration of May 22, a change. Not only in the streets, but online. As the “casseroles” spread, so did their footprint on the social networks through which we express ourselves. Friends who had always hated protests, right wingers, misanthropes, apolitical types and everyone in between began to post pictures of themselves with pots and pans outside their house.

My Facebook feed, which is normally full of cute pictures and a hodge podge of random posts, unified. It coalesced in a way I had never seen before. I now notice, and am surprised, if I see a single post unrelated to this movement.

Twitter, which had largely been ignored by Francophone Quebeckers, is now swollen with tweets about the protests. The way we come together in the streets has spread to our online presence. We share and comment and talk. We come together as citizens of a community, galvanized by a common cause.

This movement may yet fail. It may be co-opted, or lose track of its goals. It may fizzle or be beaten, as so many other movements have been. But there can be no denying that something extraordinary is happening in Quebec.

If we, as a society, as a people, are to make a stand against the governments which cut taxes on the rich and corporations and then plead poverty as they dismantle our society, our communities, it will be here.

If a line in the sand will be drawn, it is here, in the streets of Quebec. The battle for a better world starts in this city, this glorious, madcap city whose joie de vivre flows through the veins of each and every one of us like a river.

Join us, speak your solidarity from the rooftops, call out our name. Because here in these streets, a revolution has started. A fire which burns for a better world.

Call me an idealist, call me a dreamer, call me anything you like. But this is a moment in time we will tell our children about. Together, we can start something here that spreads like wildfire across this continent. What happens next is up to us.

To paraphrase Robert Frost: Two roads diverged in the woods, and we — we took the one less traveled on, and that has made all the difference.

_____________________________

Casseroles Night in Canada:

Wednesday night a huge “casseroles” demonstration has been called for people across Canada to show solidarity with the Quebec movement. At 8:00 p.m., wherever you are, go outside with a pot and a metal implement and make some noise. Bonus points for meeting up with neighbours while doing it.

UPDATE: Almost 20 cities have now organized rallies, with more popping up constantly. Thousands have confirmed their participation on the Facebook event and many mainstream media outlets are covering it.

Please click the Facebook link below and confirm that, wherever you are, you’ll make some noise for Quebec at 8PM Wednesday. Invite all your friends and spread this as widely as possible.

Twitter hashtag: #CasserolesNightinCanada

National Facebook event (details of meet ups, submit yours!)

Oh, and follow me on twitter for regualr updates: @EthanCoxMTL

Jun 032012
 
CBC News

Last Updated:  May 30, 2012  10:31 PM CST

Protestors in Saskatoon make their way along Broadway Avenue. Protestors in Saskatoon make their way along Broadway Avenue. (Devin Heroux/CBC)Several hundred people, including many students, in Regina and Saskatoon took to the streets to bang pots and pans in show of support for students in Quebec, who have been protesting increases in the cost of post-secondary education.

Casserole rallies — or cacerolazos — originated in Latin American countries as a form of popular protest where people bang pots and pans. The Saskatchewan rallies were among several organized in cities across Canada.

The Regina rally marched along 13th Avenue. In Saskatoon, people marched along Broadway Avenue and gathered at Rotary Park.

“The problems that are being faced by Quebec students are the problems that are being faced by students across the country,” James Ford, a rally organizer in Saskatoon, told CBC News Wednesday night. “Tuition is just too high.”

Students in Quebec have been engaged in various forms of protest, some violent, for more than 100 days.

The Saskatchewan students said they are also concerned about rising costs for education.

“If we want to have a well educated work force, if we want to have a healthy society, we really have to start focusing on making sure that post-secondary education is accessible,” Kent Peterson, from the Canadian Federation of Students, said during the protest in Regina.

About 60 people took part in the Regina casserole.

About 200 were involved in Saskatoon.

The Quebec protests began initially in response to proposed tuition fee hikes, but they have since evolved to decry legislation that calls for heavy fines for students and their federations, and strict regulations governing demonstrations.

With files from CBC’s Joana Draghici and Devin Heroux