Sandra Finley

Jan 112012
 

GEORGE LALIBERTE,  LIST OF DOCUMENTS  (with links)

As at January,  2015

RE:  Defamation of Maurice Vellacott during 2006 Federal Election, from Liberal Campaign Office for candidate Chris Axworthy

1.     (This list of documents)

2.     2012-03-23 George Laliberte, Statement of Intent

3.     Summary & Time-Line

4.     2012-01-17   Laliberte: Justice Popescul decision, Court of Queen’s Bench

5.       2012-02-27 Laliberte:  Statement of Facts submitted to Law Society of Sask (re Defamation Vellacott)

6.       2012-03-28 Laliberte:  Law Society reply to Statement of Facts, assigning Complaints Officer John McIntosh, providing Complaints Process

7.       2012-04-02 Tim Froese (McKercher) response to complaint by Laliberte

8.       2012-04-28 Complaints Officer questions, including “Did you ever see (Statement of Defence) before? Did you agree to it?”

9.       Attachment to letter from Complaints Officer.  May 4, 2006 Statement of Defence filed with Court of Queen’s Bench by McKercher “lawyer in charge of file” Joel Hesje

10.     2012-05-09  Laliberte:  Reply to Law Society Complaints Officer (Did you ever see these documents?)

11.      2012-07-20 Laliberte:  Answer to question from Complaints Officer re competency of submissions

12.      2012-08-28 Laliberte:  Decision of the Complaints Officer, sent from the Law Society

13.    2012-12-11 Laliberte: Lawyer Karen Prisciak re Law Society and Tim Froese.  Advises awaiting response from Hesje.  

14.     2012-12-17   Statute of Limitations and potential civil litigation, Laliberte vs McKercher and Laliberte vs Liberal Party

15.     DRAFT  cover letters   to accompany the Statements of Claim that will be filed with Court of Queen’s Bench:

  • Laliberte v. McKercher LLP
  • Laliberte v. Liberal Party of Canada

16.       2013-02-07  Prisciak to Laliberte conveying copy of Hesje response to charges, made Jan 22, 2013.

17.       Record of Laliberte meeting with Prisciak, February,  2013

18.       2013-05-30  Prisciak to Laliberte with copies of charges against Froese and Hesje 

19.       2015-01-18    The decision of the SKCA to which Hesje appealed the finding of unprofessional conduct only:

http://www.lawsociety.sk.ca/media/103076/Hesje2015skca2.pdf

Accessible to the public on the Law Society web-site.

Jan 042012
 

A “challenging” article!

By Joel Achenbach

Spaceship Earth enters 2012 belching smoke, overheating and burning through fuel at a frightening rate. It’s feeling pretty crowded, and the crew is mutinous. No one’s at the helm.

Sure, it’s an antiquated metaphor. It’s also an increasingly apt way to discuss a planet with 7 billion people, a global economy, a World Wide Web, climate change, exotic organisms running amok and all sorts of resource shortages and ecological challenges.

More and more environmentalists and scientists talk about the planet as a complex system, one that human beings must aggressively monitor, manage and sometimes reengineer. Kind of like a spaceship.

This is a sharp departure from traditional “green” philosophy. The more orthodox way of viewing nature is as something that must be protected from human beings — not managed by them. And many environmentalists have reservations about possible unintended consequences of well-meaning efforts. No one wants a world that requires constant intervention to fix problems caused by previous interventions.

At the same time, “we’re in a position where we have to take a more interventionist role and a more managerial role,” says Emma Marris, author of “Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World.” “The easy answer used to be to turn back time and make it look like it used to. Before was always better. Before is no longer an option.”

Although Marris is speaking about restoration ecology — how to manage forests and other natural systems — this interventionist approach can be applied to the planet more broadly. In his book “The God Species: Saving the Planet in the Age of Humans,” environmental activist Mark Lynas writes, “Nature no longer runs the Earth. We do. It is our choice what happens from here.”

The wilderness movements of John Muir in the 19th century and Teddy Roosevelt in the early 20th sought to draw boundaries between civilization and nature. The goal was to protect the biggest mountains, the deepest gorges, the wildest places, according to Douglas Brinkley, author of “The Wilderness Warrior: Theodore Roosevelt’s Crusade for America.”

But after Rachel Carson published “Silent Spring” 50 years ago, detailing the ecological damage from the pesticide DDT, the movement began looking more at industrial pollutants and hazards to human health, Brink­ley says. Then, in the 1990s, climate change began to dominate the discussion.

This is a different planet in key respects than the one Carson was writing about. The fingerprints of humankind are now found on every continent, in every sea. Radiation from atomic tests can be found in sediments across the world, and the chemical signature of the Industrial Revolution, when coal began to power human activity, can be seen in ice cores drilled in Greenland. Earth is warming even as a growing human population is demanding more energy, using more resources, burning more fossil fuels and emitting more greenhouse gases. The challenges have scaled up.

As a result, some influential thinkers argue for a managerial approach to the planet that is short on sentiment and long on science and technology.

Ecologists, for example, have long bemoaned the invasive species that, stowing away amid the human cargo of the global economy, are reworking entire landscapes and overpowering many native species. The old approach would be to try to eradicate the invaders. The new approach argues that “novel landscapes” are here to stay and that humans may have to take direct action to relocate native species to stay ahead of climate changes.

One of the deans of technological environmentalism is Stewart Brand, who in the 1960s ran around with Ken Kesey and the LSD-gobbling Merry Pranksters. In 1968 he published the “Whole Earth Catalog,” which combined hippie sensibility with early computers and nifty gadgets. His catalog had a famous inscription: “We are as gods, and might as well get good at it.”

Brand’s philosophy was pro-technology amid a counterculture movement that often saw technology as an evil — as the source of pollution, industrial-scale warfare and nuclear weapons. Early on, Brand saw the personal computer as a source of individual empowerment and resistance to authority; he sponsored an early convention of computer hackers.

Brand, whose most recent book is “Whole Earth Discipline: An Ecopragmatist Manifesto,” advocates the use of genetically modified organisms and nuclear power, and speaks of “solar radiation management” through cloud-seeding and other forms of “geoengineering” as possible mitigators of climate change.

This isn’t green orthodoxy, obviously. Albert Borgmann, a professor of philosophy at the University of Montana who has written extensively on technology and the environment, worries about a possible overreliance on technology to fix problems that humans have made.

“It has to be done in a spirit of cautionary respect. There has to be some rueful recognition that the spirit of managing things has gotten us where we are. That same sort of arrogance — we control it all — can’t continue,” Borgmann says.

Beyond the philosophical questions are nuts-and-bolts issues about how people could intelligently manage something as complicated as the natural world. We might not be good at it.

A number of recent events have shown that complex technological systems are vulnerable to rare but consequential failures. The BP oil spill, for example, happened despite elaborate technologies and monitoring systems designed to prevent an oil-well blowout, or at least shut down a runaway well if the initial line of defense failed.

Investigators said that engineering decisions eroded the safety margin in an attempt to cut costs. But the technology wasn’t as robust as engineers thought it was.

Even more humbling was the March 11 earthquake in Japan. The earthquake wasn’t supposed to be possible. The seismic hazard maps showed that the maximum possible earthquake along the Japan Trench — the huge fault line where one plate of the Earth dives beneath another — could generate earthquakes up to magnitude 8.4. But on the afternoon of March 11, the fault broke and generated an earthquake registering 9.0, which was six times stronger than the theoretical maximum.

That misunderstanding of the quake hazard led to a fundamental error in the design of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant built on the seacoast. The plant was protected by a tsunami wall that could handle waves up to 18.7 feet high. The first wave after the earthquake was 13 feet high, and the second was so much bigger that it obliterated the tide gauge used to measure wave height. The biggest wave may have been as high as 49 feet, according to an investigation by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations.

The tsunami knocked out the backup power generators at the plant, which in retrospect were located too low. Without electricity, the Fukushima plant couldn’t cool the nuclear fuel rods and fuel tanks, and a series of explosions and meltdowns released large amounts of radiation into the environment for months.

“The earthquake doesn’t tell us whether we should do nuclear, but the earthquake does tell us that we’re better off, if we’re doing nuclear, to have a good understanding of the world around us,” says Richard B. Alley, a Penn State climate scientist and author of “Earth: The Operator’s Manual.”

Author and activist Bill McKibben published a 2011 book titled “Eaarth,” which he proposes as the name for this fundamentally new planet, one that, in his view, won’t be as pleasant for human beings as the one they used to know and will require a new set of values and aspirations. McKibben’s view is of a world that is more decentralized in political power, energy generation and food production.

“The future should belong, and could belong, to the small and many, not the big and few,” McKibben says. Decentralization would help prevent small problems from expanding into societal catastrophes, he says.

Successful management of global environmental issues would require political leadership that McKibben, Brand and others say hasn’t materialized. Dealing with climate change, for example, “involves a level of global cooperation that has never happened, and the mechanisms for that are not in sight,” Brand says.

Nonetheless, he’s an optimist about human beings in general.

“We’re getting better,” he says. “We are getting far less violent, less cruel and less unjust, steadily for the last millennia, centuries, years and days. It’s a remarkably human accomplishment in basically domesticating ourselves.”

Brand would amend the famous “We are as gods” inscription of his 1968 book:

“The new version of that is, ‘We are as gods and have to get good at it.’ ”

The Washington Post Company

Jan 022012
 
(NOTE:  the link to Physicians for Social Responsibility, L.A. takes you to a very good website.)

 Alaska Collaborative on Health and the Environment Statewide Teleconference Seminar Series

 
Science and Action to Protect Public Health: How Health Care Professionals are Changing Chemicals Policy  
Call Information  About the Call:  
Presenter Dear Sandra,Join executive director of Physicians for Social Responsibility – Los Angeles (PSR-LA), Martha Arguello for a one hour discussion examining our broken chemical safety system and offering solutions to protect our health and the environment. Martha works at the intersections of health, the environment and social justice to advocate for effective policy change.

For the past 32 years, Martha has served in the non-profit sector as an advocate, community organizer, and coalition builder.  She joined Physicians for Social Responsibility- Los Angeles (PSR-LA) in 1998 to launch the environmental health programs, and became Executive Director in November 2007.  While working as a health educator in the 1990s, Martha had an epiphany — she realized that although early detection can prevent death from breast cancer, it does not prevent breast cancer, which has been increasingly linked to the exposure of environmental toxicants.  Since that realization, Martha has dedicated her career to the environmental justice movement, and has lectured nationwide on the use of precautionary principle policies.

To join this call: Email diana@akaction.org to join this free call and receive the dial-up instructions.
Your Year-End Gift to ACAT will help us continue to host CHE-Alaska calls and bring you the latest on environmental health research and policy initiatives in the New Year. Thank you for your support!

 
Resources  
About CHE-AK  
Listen to past CHE-AK calls  
Support CHE-Alaska in the New Year – Donate Now!  
 Call Information:  
Date: Wednesday, January 11, 2012Time: 9 am Alaska Time (10 am Pacific / 1 pm Eastern)

This call will last one hour.

To join this free call and receive the dial-up instructions, please RSVP to Alaska Community Action on Toxics at diana@akaction.org or (907) 222-7714.

 
 
 
 
   
 
 
Resources  
 
About the Collaborative on Health and the Environment – Alaska (CHE-AK)  
The Collaborative on Health and the Environment (CHE) is a national non-partisan partnership of individuals and organizations concerned with the role of the environment in human and ecosystem health. CHE seeks to raise the level of scientific and public dialogue about the role environmental factors play in many of the common diseases, disorders and conditions of our time. ACAT established CHE-AK as a working group of CHE to advance knowledge and effective action to address growing concerns about the links between human health and environmental factors and to foster collaboration around environmental health and justice education and policy efforts that are of concern in Alaska.Learn more about CHE-AK or listen to audio recordings of previous teleconference seminars. We welcome your suggestions and engagement. To suggest a topic or speakers for a future call, please email diana@akaction.org  
Forward this message to a friend  
Alaska Community Action on Toxics | (907) 222-7714  
Jan 022012
 

Japan drops ban on military exports

Rule change will help stretch Tokyo’s defence budget further in response to China’s increased military spending
A submarine of the Japanese navy surfaces
A Japanese navy submarine surfaces. Japan will relax its ban on military exports to make its defence manufacturers more competitive. Photograph: Franck Robichon/EPA
Japan has relaxed its self-imposed decades-old ban on military equipment exports in a move that will open up new markets to its defence contractors and help it squeeze more out of its defence budget.
The rule adopted in 1967 banned sales to communist countries, and those involved in international conflicts or subject to United Nations sanctions. It later became a blanket ban on exports and on the development and production of weapons with countries other than the United States, making it impossible for manufacturers to participate in multinational projects.
The government’s security council agreed to the relaxing of the ban to allow Japan to take part in the joint development and production of arms with other countries and to supply military equipment for humanitarian missions, chief cabinet secretary Osamu Fujimura said.
“The new standards [on weapons exports] are a result of the government considering measures that required attention amid recent changes to the environment surrounding international defence equipment,” Fujimura said, referring to rising arms costs that could put strain on the government, with public debt twice the size of its economy.
The relaxing of the rules does not mean Japan will begin openly selling its military products to the world. Exports will be limited to strategic allies like the US.
It could still allow companies such as Mitsubishi Heavy to join the development of Lockheed Martin’s F-35, which Tokyo picked last week as its next frontline fighter, planning to buy 42 machines at an estimated cost of more than US$7bn.  (emphasis is mine.  This is much less than the cost is to be for Canadians, if the F-35 contracts go through.)
“The regulations on weapons exports are based on the concept that as a pacifist country Japan should aim to avoid fanning international conflicts, and we will keep a close watch on exports,” Fujimura said.
Although Japan is the world’s sixth-biggest military spender, it often pays more than double other nations for the same equipment because local export-restricted manufacturers can only fill small orders at a high cost.
Removing the ban will stretch Japan’s defence purse further as military spending in neighbouring China expands. This year Beijing raised military outlays by 12.7%. That included money for its own stealth fighter, the J-20, which made its maiden flight in January.
In contrast Japan’s defence budget has been shrinking in past years as ballooning costs for social security and servicing its growing debt pile squeeze other spending.
Dec 312011
 

BELOW:  Reuters and Associated Press reports, Washington Post, and then Veterans Today.   I did not find any report in Al Jazeera.

The ones made out to be the villains are those to whom the shipment is going.   The “enemy” is first China, but it seems that the shipments were not bound for China.   The REAL villains, of course, are the people who are selling the missiles in the first place.

The Veterans Today report, to me, points out the utter folly of it all, no matter what the truth of the matter is.  It explains the Lockheed Martin connection.  It may be as with the New York Times report of the census opposition in Canada – – the major American media goes mum when it comes to naming Lockheed Martin. /S

= = = = = = = = = = = = = == 

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/23/us-china-finland-missiles-idUSTRE7BM0D520111223

BEIJING | Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:52am EST

BEIJING (Reuters) – China denied on Friday any link to a batch of 69 Patriot missiles confiscated by Finnish authorities, saying the weapons were destined for South Korea.

“As far as we know these goods were made in Germany and were being sent to South Korea. This is a British ship which left Germany carrying Patriot missiles for South Korea,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Weimin told a daily news briefing.

Some reports have said the missiles were destined for China, but Liu said that was not the case.

“I don’t see what connection this boat has with China. We think it odd that some people always link certain things to China. The facts are all very clear,” he added.

The surface-to-air missiles were found on Wednesday when authorities searched the cargo ship Thor Liberty in Kotka, southern Finland. They also discovered 150 tons of explosive material called nitroguanidine, which was not stowed properly.

Finnish authorities have confiscated the missiles found on the ship and arrested its Ukrainian captain and chief officer on suspicion of trying to transport the missiles via Finland without permission.

Finland requires those seeking to transport defense material via its territory to seek permission. In the past six years there have been 20 cases of defense material being transported without the required documentation with the latest incident appearing to be one of the largest consignments.

The ship was sailing under an Isle of Man flag and had stopped to load anchor cables on board.

China is subject to an arms embargo by the United States and European Union imposed after the bloody crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators around Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in 1989.

= = = = = == = = = = = = == =

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/finland-says-cargo-ship-can-sail-again-but-without-its-69-missiles-or-its-captain/2011/12/26/gIQAlkKgIP_story.html

Finland says cargo ship can sail again, but without its 69 missiles, explosives or captain

By Associated Press, Published: December 26

HELSINKI — A British-registered ship that was held in a Finnish port after authorities discovered 69 surface-to-air missiles and 160 tons of explosives onboard has permission to travel again, but without those materials or its captain, a port official said Monday.

The M/S Thor Liberty was headed to China and had docked in the southern Finnish port of Kotka to pick up anchor chains when police last week discovered and seized the missiles and explosive piric acid on board.

 The Patriot missiles were an official shipment from Germany to South Korea, while Finnish authorities said the explosives were a legitimate shipment for China. But the missiles lacked proper transit documents, and the explosives weren’t safely stored, police said.

The military has destroyed some of the cargo, while other pieces were being repacked in a safer manner, Markku Koskinen, the director of traffic operations at the port of Kotka, told The Associated Press. He said he did not know exactly which pieces had been disposed of.

The ship’s Ukrainian captain and first mate were taken into custody on suspicion of violating weapons export laws, and have not been cleared to leave the country. There were 11 other crew members on the ship.

Koskinen said the vessel’s travel ban was lifted Monday afternoon, but could not say whether the vessel would actually leave without its captain or if it still intends to go to China.

“She can sail, but customs is still holding the cargo and the (detained) crew isn’t allowed to leave Finland,” he said.

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

= = = = = = == = = = = = =

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/finnish-police-detain-ukrainian-captain-officer-in-missile-and-explosive-shipment/2011/12/22/gIQAMWPOBP_story.html

Germany: Patriot missiles impounded in Finland were legit shipment to South Korea

By Associated Press, Published: December 22

HELSINKI — A shipment of 69 surface-to-air missiles impounded by Finnish authorities was a legitimate delivery from Germany to South Korea, a German official said Thursday.

The announcement came after Finnish authorities seized the Patriot missiles and 160 tons of explosives on a British-registered cargo ship and detained two Ukrainian crew members on suspicion of violating weapons export laws. 

Police said the missiles didn’t have the right transit documents and the explosive picric acid wasn’t properly stored on the M/S Thor Liberty, which docked in Kotka, southern Finland, on Dec. 15.

A spokesman for Germany’s Defense Ministry said the missiles were an official shipment that was fully declared and had all necessary clearings from German authorities.

“Those patriot guided missiles are from the Bundeswehr’s stocks and have been shipped to South Korea” according to an intergovernmental treaty, he said, declining to be named in line with government policy.

He said no explosives were part of the shipment and he didn’t have any information on that part of the impounded cargo.

Finnish officials said the explosives were destined for China. Markku Koskinen, the director of traffic operations at the port of Kotka, said they were deficiently packed in wooden boxes on open pallets and would be moved to metal containers in line with rules on the maritime transport of explosives.

“We will do that as soon as the customs inspectors allow us to,” Koskinen told The Associated Press. “Otherwise, the shipment of explosives was legitimate and can continue on its way to China as soon as it’s safely packed.”

The ship sailed from the north German port of Emden on Dec. 13 and was en route to China, Finnish officials said. It docked in Kotka to pick up a cargo of anchor chains and an old paper machine.

Finnish officials impounded the cargo Wednesday and launched an investigation. Detective Superintendent Timo Virtanen said the ship’s captain and first mate were detained.

“The missiles did not have the appropriate transit papers,” Virtanen said. “We are questioning all the other 11 crew members who are also Ukrainians.”

Klaus Kaartinen, spokesman for the National Bureau of Investigation, said Finnish police and customs would continue their investigation into the cargo.

“Even if the missile cargo is a legitimate shipment, from a Finnish point of view the law has probably been broken because it was not properly declared,” Kaartinen said. “Also, the explosives were stored improperly.”

American-made Patriot missiles are used to counter threats, including aircraft, tactical ballistic missiles and cruise missiles. They are part of the U.S. Army’s weaponry and were extensively used during the 1991 Gulf war.

Manufactured by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control in Florida, Patriot missiles have been in service in several countries, including Egypt, Germany, Greece, Israel, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan and South Korea.

___

Associated Press writer Juergen Baetz in Berlin contributed to this report.

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

= = = = = = = = = = = = =

FROM VETERANS TODAY

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/12/23/breaking-patriot-missiles-seized-sold-to-china-by-israel/#.Tvox-3eFnaJ.facebook

Breaking: Patriot Missiles Seized, Sold To China by Israel (Updates)

Iron Dome Defense Missiles Seized by Finland, Labeled “Fireworks”

69 Newest Patriot Missiles Bound For Reds

“…Thorco Shipping representative, Thomas Mikkelsen said he was unaware any such cargo was on board his vessel”…a statement that categorically “debunks” attempts at denial – Editor)

       …by Gordon Duff,  Senior Editor

Latest update from today’s Washington Post:

Finland says cargo ship can sail again, but without its 69 missiles, explosives or it’s Ukrainian captain 

 HELSINKI — “A British-registered ship (editor’s correction, ship is not “British-registered”) that was held in a Finnish port after authorities discovered 69 surface-to-air [Anti-ballistic] missiles and 160 tons of explosives onboard has permission to travel again, but without those materials or its captain, a port official said Monday.

The M/S Thor Liberty was headed to China and had docked in the southern Finnish port of Kotka to pick up anchor chains when police last week discovered and seized the missiles and explosive piric acid on board.”

Finnish authorities have confirmed the seizure of 69 Patriot missiles manufactured by Raytheon Corporation today.

(A popular graphic going viral on the internet, edited to eliminate an inappropriate ethnic reference)

During a routine search of the MS Thor Liberty, a ship flagged by the Isle of Man, at the Finnish port of Kotka, authorities found 69 Patriot missiles of a type capable of intercepting ICBMs, the most modern available and America’s most sensitive military technology.

Update:  The official publication of the shipping industry, The Maritime Executive states:

“Finnish police launched a probe on a ship bound for Shanghai, China, after they discovered 69 surface-to-air Patriot missiles, explosive materials, and propelling charges illegally aboard. “  Note, what had been called by some “chemicals” are now “propelling charges.”  What they propel, of course, are guided missiles from nuclear submarines and plutonium and uranium components into contact to inititate nuclear explosions.

Germany officials have offered to take responsibility for the shipment to China though there is no record of Germany ever having received the missiles in the first place.  There had been a shipment of PAC 2 missiles, 64, several months ago, which had been completed.  No further shipment had been scheduled. 

Germany is responding to a request from Netanyahu to Merkel to save Israel from a potential spy scandal.Similarly, a South Korean paper has published a story about the missiles but at no time has the South Korean embassy in Helsinki, made a statement or made contact with authorities as would be expected.  This one gets more interesting every day. 

Germany has a long history of working with Israel, call it “war guilt” or profiteering.  The centrifuges used to develop nuclear weapons that were distributed by Israel, first to South Africa then by Israeli Johann Meyer to Libya were of Germany origin.  Saddam Hussein received his biological and chemical warfare equipment from Germany, but through Bush family sources, not Israel.   

We are told the missiles heading to China were to be “cloned” for sale along with radar and launch units, already there.  They would be sold worldwide under Israeli branding in competition with the US.  Israel is free to sell to clients the US would be likely to refuse.   

The JA 20 Stealth fighter, built from plans stolen by Bush era White House Israeli “dual-citizens” is only one of dozens of defense projects stolen by Israeli spies and sent to China.  China has every current nuclear weapons design and plans to upgrade its submarine fleet and will be building aircraft carriers eventually.  All will be done with American technology.

Here is the photo of the ship’s ‘very special’ explosives in shrink wrapped cardboard boxes. Do you really think this is how western Allied/NATO countries transport munitions, or would allow hugely expensive anti-ballistic missiles to be put on a ship like this? If there was a detonation device in one of these boxes that could set it off (like with a satellite phone call), it would go up like an A-bomb. No one would have been looking for the 69 Patriot ABM’s listed as rockets or firecrackers. There is one rouge country’s Intelligence service, an American ally, that could do this in it’s sleep because it had extensive practice while building it’s WMD programs, the details of which our America government still holds secret from Americans.

Attempts to represent this as a sale of “second hand” PAC 2 missiles, stories filling the blogosphere, fail to address that these are PAC 3 advanced missiles and labeled for shipment to China, not Korea.

Patriot ICBM Interceptor – PAC3

The next stop for this cargo, valued at over $4 billion even without the associated radar, which may well have been shipped via some other method, was Shanghai, China.

Yet the Chinese government has given an official denial of any knowledge of this transaction.They went even further, they claimed the missiles were heading to South Korea.

However, were China to have given the issue a second’s thought, it would have been advisable to have failed to acknowledge any familiarity with the issue whatsoever.

China walked into a trap, one that uncovered their espionage cooperation agreements that involved, not the receipt of advanced Patriot missile systems but the full plans for the F22 stealth fighter. 

Initial stories from 2009 indicating China has received plans for the F35 though espionage with Israel were false. 

The F22 is a far more advanced aircraft.

 On April 21, 2009, the Department of Defense announced the theft of 1.5 terabytes of data on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the platform meant give the United States and her allies air superiority for the next 40 years.

In a flash, all that was gone, $300 billion dollars of funding down the drain, every system, defense, offense, stealth, everything needed to build one or shoot it down, all gone. Day one, China was accused but it wasn’t China, it wasn’t Iran, it wasn’t Pakistan.

The theft left a clear signature, one identical to the data Wikileaks has been receiving, sources inside the Pentagon repeating the actions of Israeli-Soviet spy, Jonathan Pollard.  As vital as the F-35 is to America’s defense, Pollard’s triumph on behalf of Soviet Russia and Israel dwarfs the current espionage coup. 

Since the 2009 announcement, there has been nothing but silence.

Now we learn the Pentagon story was “cover” and it was the F22 Raptor, not the F35, an “export plane,” that was compromised:

F-22A Raptors – America Top Fighter

The Lockheed Martin/Boeing F-22 Raptor is a single-seat, twin-engine fifth-generation super maneuverable fighter aircraft that uses stealth technology.

It was designed primarily as an air superiority fighter, but has additional capabilities that include ground attack, electronic warfare, and signals intelligence roles.[6]

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics is the prime contractor and is responsible for the majority of the airframe, weapon systems and final assembly of the F-22.

Program partnerBoeing Defense, Space & Security provides the wings, aft fuselage, avionics integration, and training systems.The aircraft was variously designated F-22 and F/A-22 during the years prior to formally entering USAF service in December 2005 as the F-22A.

Despite a protracted and costly development period, the United States Air Force considers the F-22 a critical component of US tactical air power, and claims that the aircraft is unmatched by any known or projected fighter.[7]

While Lockheed Martin claims that the Raptor’s combination of stealth, speed, agility, precision and situational awareness, combined with air-to-air and air-to-ground combat capabilities, makes it the best overall fighter in the world today.[8]

Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston, former Chief of the Australian Defence Force, said in 2004 that the “F-22 will be the most outstanding fighter plane ever built.”[9]

Raptor Formation

The high cost of the aircraft, a lack of clear air-to-air combat missions because of delays in the Russian and Chinese fifth-generation fighter programs, a US ban on Raptor exports, and the ongoing development of the planned cheaper and more versatile F-35 resulted in calls to end F-22 production.[N 1]

In April 2009 the US Department of Defense proposed to cease placing new orders, subject to Congressional approval, for a final procurement tally of 187 Raptors.[11] The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 lacked funding for further F-22 production.

The final F-22 Raptor fighter jet rolled off the assembly line on 13 December 2011 during a ceremony at the Lockheed Martin aircraft plant at Dobbins Air Reserve Base.[2]

China is testing a 5th generation fighter, 20 years earlier than estimated, the JA 20.  It is based on systems from the Raptor and is considered a far superior plane to the F 35.From a January, 2011 Guardianstory suppressed in the United States:

Chinese F22 Raptor Clone, 20 Years Early

 

A photograph of what is reported to be a new Chinese stealth fighter and “carrier-killer” missile has prompted concerns that a tilt in the balance of military power in the western Pacific towards China may come sooner than expected.

The emergence of the hi-tech weaponry – which would make it more difficult for the US navy and air force to project power close to Taiwan and elsewhere on China’s coastline – comes at a politically sensitive time. 

Later this month, President Barack Obama and his Chinese counterpart, Hu Jintao, will hold a summit in Washington aimed at patching up their differences after a niggling year in bilateral relations.

he photograph, of what appears to be a prototype J-20 jet undergoing initial tests, has been circulating on the internet since last week, fueling speculation that China’s fifth-generation fighter may fly ahead of forecast.(Attempts have been made to alter photos of the plane and misrepresent its “lineage.” The only alterations from the F22 seem to be the rear control surfaces.  What has been most telling is the attempt to misconstrue the JA 20 as a “large bodied” interceptor with a weapons bay for anti-ship missiles instead of the air superiority fighter it actually is. )

The defence ministry has yet to comment on the image, which seems to have been shot from long-distance near the Chengdu aircraft design institute. The photographer is also unknown, which has added to the mystery about its origins and authenticity as well as the motive of the distributor. 

But defence analysts believe this is the first glimpse of the twin-engined, chiseled-nosed plane that mixes Russian engine technology with a fuselage design similar to that of the US air force’s F-22 “stealth” fighter, which can avoid detection by radar.

If confirmed, it would be an impressive step forward for the Chinese air force, which until now has largely depended on foreign-made or designed planes. “I’d say these are, indeed, genuine photos of a prototype that will make its maiden flight very soon,” said Peter Felstead, the editor of Jane’s Defence Weekly.

The J20 is likely to be many years from deployment, but the US defence secretary, Robert Gates – who visits Beijing next week – may have to revise an earlier prediction that China will not have a fifth generation aircraft by 2020. 

It is not the only challenge to US superiority in the region. China has refurbished a Ukrainian aircraft carrier and wants to build its own by 2020.

Photo corrected from “stretch” version issued to mislead public

The US and Israel had scheduled an air defense exercise this week but no Patriot missiles were to be shipped to Israel as part of their mission, DOD sources indicate.

This week’s exercise was to use Patriot missiles deployed from American ships in the eastern Mediterranean to test Israeli missile defenses.  Reports indicate that all missiles for this exercise have been accounted for.

” Patriots Away “

These units, the most advanced Patriot system had only been supplied to one nation, Israel.

The 69 Patriot ICBM interceptors are believed to be a highly secret consignment demanded by Israel as protection from any retaliatory strike by Iran were war to break out in the region.

Instead of deploying them, the missiles were apparently  sold to China labeled as “fireworks” according to Interior Minister Paivi Rasanen.

Though the missiles themselves were worth only $4 billion, the technology transfer itself would be worth over $125 billion, and represent a significant loss of defense capability for the United States.

Sources termed it, “An absolute disaster, even if they only received the radar systems alone, much less the missiles.That this would go unreported though the story was broken in Europe 48 hours ago is astounding. 

Nobody in Washington has this although even the BBC report contains more than enough information to bring Washington to a halt. 

DOD sources indicate that it would be unusual for these missiles to be moved without radar and launch facilities to have been moved in advance.   It was also indicated that the Department of Defense denies shipping any such missiles to Germany or anywhere else in Europe, labeled as “fireworks” or anything else.

The owner of the ship of record is Thorco Shipping.  Their representative, Thomas Mikkelsen said he was unaware any such cargo was on board his vessel.

Patriot Command Control Center

Claims were made that the missiles were destined for South Korea but an examination of documentation indicated that there were no South Korean ports scheduled.

Additionally, the likelihood that the US government would ship its most valuable and secret missile technology through Germany mislabeled as “fireworks” rather than on a C 17 under military security supports the Finnish claim.

Finnish police say they opened all 69 units, are recording serial numbers and have been unable to find any documentation indicating the real ownership of the  seized cargo.

And they certainly have found nothing involving the any of the claimed “cover stories” involving Germany or Korea, otherwise, of course, the cargo would never have been seized nor would there have been arrests made. 

Detective Superintendent Timo Virtanen of the Finnish National Bureau of Investigation is in charge of the case.  He has stated:

 ”Actually, in our investigation at the moment, we have got the information that we found 69 Patriot missiles on the ship and around 160 tonnes of explosives.”

The explosives are identified as nitroguandine, a low sensitivity explosive with a very high detonation speed.   These explosives have several uses, among them launching shipboard or submarine launched missiles or in the development and testing of nuclear weapons design.

Finnish authorities indicate the explosives were packed in an “informal” and highly dangerous manner and that the Thor Liberty’s captain and chief officer are under arrest on suspicion of arms trafficking.  Both are citizens of the Ukraine.The government of China has denied all knowledge of the incident although the cargo was destined for their ports.

The head of Finnish Customs CID, Petri Louatmaa said this was not the first such incident but by far the most serious he has ever heard of.Finland has requested “information” from several countries. 

The US Department of Defense has assured all involved that these missiles were not being sent to South Korea and that their presence on a civilian ship either being loaded in Germany or in port in Finland was in now way a part of any exercise nor any accepted methodology for the handling of this type of ultra-high technology weaponry. 

American sources further indicated confusion at the odd number of missiles:

“There are two missiles per launch container.  The containers can’t be easily opened and the missiles can’t be removed for examination without damage to the launch mechanism.They are delivered for mounting to ships or land based mobile launchers.  Thus, the packaging indicated either demonstrates confusion or serious unprofessional tampering.”

Israeli officials have failed to respond to questions about the consignment.Air Force transport command personnel indicate that high tech transfers to Israel are routinely offloaded at Schipol Airport in the Netherlands where Israel maintains secure facilities.

Editing:  Jim W. Dean

Patriot PAC3s Are Shipped in Pairs – Ground to Air Patriots are Shipped With Launchers
Dec 282011
 
A nice little sales job from the Govt of Saskatchewan.

There is no mention of everything that goes along with the Border plan:  drones patrolling the Canada-U.S. border, the American police now operating in Canada, the Troop Exchange Agreement, etc.   Nor any explanation of the relationship between the Pacific NorthWest Economic Region (PNWER) and the SPP.    If time permits, I’ll write a letter-to-editor in response.

By Lyle Stewart, The StarPhoenix

Stewart is the MLA for Thunder Creek, and vice-president, Saskatchewan, for the Pacific NorthWest Economic Region.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and U.S. President Barack Obama met last February to discuss border management and regulatory co-operation.

Both recognized the interdependence of our economies and the need to work together on both trade and security. The process that began in February culminated with the recent announcement that Canada and the United States had agreed on the Beyond the Border Action Plan.

This agreement allows us to start taking concrete steps to make improvements at the border. It makes good sense for Saskatchewan to have Canada working with the Americans to ease bottlenecks at border crossings, jointly assess threats and develop sensible and effective regulations.

Simple regulations sometimes can discourage companies from selling products or making investments across the border – whether they are Canadian firms looking south or American firms looking north. Both countries have different regulations and standards on everything from vehicles to food to consumer products.

In many cases, those rules are meant to accomplish the same safety objectives. However, because they vary, these can slow trade or make it harder to make goods compatible. Making a few co-ordinated changes that do not require a lot of government spending would have an immediate impact.

The action plan sets out ways we can begin to harmonize regulations where it makes sense, and to implement a system for the pre-clearance of goods before they get to the border. We can also expect to see improved service and shortened wait times at border crossings.

Better procedures such as these will benefit Saskatchewan, given our heavy reliance on international trade. Last year, just less than 40 per cent of the value of our provincial economy was a result of exports. This is more than Alberta (33 per cent) and British Columbia (22 per cent).

Saskatchewan’s single largest international trading partner is the United States, with almost two-thirds of our exports heading there. Indeed this action plan on the border is good for our province. By making things easier for our businesses, our economy is strengthened and our goods and services will be more competitive around the world.

The action plan outlines specific steps the United States and Canada are taking to improve trade partnerships, provide better security and improve the flow of legitimate goods and travel between our two countries. It is a beginning, not an end, and will require leadership on both sides to implement innovative solutions that challenge the status quo.

This opportunity also serves as a much needed reminder that we must work collaboratively to build solutions for the future that make all of our businesses more competitive in the global marketplace.

Here in Saskatchewan, we recognize the need to work closely with the U.S. on trade.

In 2008, Saskatchewan became a member of the Pacific NorthWest Economic Region (PNWER) – a non-partisan, cross-border institution that advances the common interests of its members.

Through PNWER, legislators and business leaders from Alberta, B.C., Saskatchewan, and the Yukon and Northwest Territories interact regularly with their counterparts from across five U.S. states – Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington.

By continuing to work through bi-national organizations such as PNWER and with the federal government to implement recommendations contained in the action plan, Saskatchewan can strengthen its trading relationship with the U.S. to secure a prosperous future for Saskatchewan people.

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

Read more: http://www.thestarphoenix.com/business/Border+plan+benefits+Sask/5896376/story.html#ixzz1hsAdktas

Dec 192011
 

(Scroll down to email I sent to journalist re “The Ally from Hell”.)

http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/      Monday: CIA Drone Attacks in Pakistan

A look at how CIA drone attacks in Pakistan’s frontiers strain an already volatile relationship between the U.S. and Pakistan.  (Text appended.)
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
The second half of the programme is an interview with Jeffrey Goldberg, author of article “The Ally from Hell” in the Atlantic magazine.
– – – – — – – – – – —
EMAIL SENT TO JEFFREY GOLDBERG:
SENT:  Mon 12/19/2011 2:18 PM
SUBJECT:   re Interview today with Anna Maria Tremonti  (drones – Pakistan)

Hello Jeffrey Goldberg,

Further to your interview with Anna-Maria Tremonti,  the “drone-ification” of North America should be of great concern to Americans and Canadians alike.

 There are now drones along the Canada-U.S. border, as you may know. 

               Ref:  www.sandrafinley.ca ,  go to the “Search” button in upper right corner.  Search on “drones”.  In particular, see 2011-04-24, 2011-04-22, 2009-02-18, 2007-12-12.

 Lockheed Martin manufactures drones.   LM was instrumental in the decision by Geo Bush to drop bombs on Iraq in an illegal war of aggression.

In my hometown of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan  Lockheed Martin started with the Saskatchewan Indian Institute of Technology (SIIT) to work its way to the point where there is an Aviation Centre going in at the Saskatoon Airport.  It is to be a training facility for Lockheed Martin’s drone technology.  Ref: http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=594 

It makes me angry that our young people will be trained to become part of this terrible technology.  Prior to your part of the CBC programme on the drones used in Pakistan, the excerpts I recall are “bodies scattered  … pieces of flesh”  (people can’t even claim the body) . . . “radicalizing”.

Drones are barbaric behavior, it does not take too much sense to understand that “we” (Canadians and Americans) – – (Canadians now have “compatible doctrine” and “interoperability” with you) – –   are the ones creating the hatred in the world.  One would have to be heavily blinkered not to see it.  It’s what happens when you kill civilians.

What is the drone programme in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (of all places) about? 

 Saskatchewan is the gateway that is being well-oiled for tar sands expansion.  We are next-door to Alberta.  The activists there have been very successful in rallying international attention to stop the destruction.  So the deeds are being done through less-populated Saskatchewan.   Heaven forbid that we, too, become successful in stopping the plans of the military-industrial complex – – the U.S. military is already well-placed here, should there be “problems”.

 There is a two-fold plan:

–        Tar sands development  (appropriation of oil and gas reserves)

–        nuclear reactors to supply the vast amounts of energy needed to heat the tar

The Saskatchewan public said “No” to the nuclear agenda.  The Government and industry are now working through and with the University of Saskatchewan to circumvent the public wish.   It is a story of money and corruption and propaganda.   

I do not know to whom you are referring when you say “the ally from Hell”.   The U.S. military-industrial complex uses extreme propaganda and quislings to take what they want, and war when that doesn’t work. 

Drones are another blight on the world.   It would be helpful if more Americans would join us in fighting the psychopaths.   

 Thankfully, most of us are sufficiently informed to see that it is not everyday American citizens who are behind the atrocities.   Otherwise I would be demonizing them, in the same way as people in other countries are demonized through western propaganda.   I repeatedly remind people who say nasty things about Muslim immigrants:  you bombed the hell out of their country.   Exactly where do you expect them to live now? 

Sandra Finley

Saskatoon 

P.S.  The “President of the Americas” for Lockheed Martin, Ron Covais, told a Maclean’s Magazine (Canadian) reporter that they would not get what they want through legislative channels (democratic government) in Canada.  Hence they will use the bureaucrats and agencies of government to bypass the public will.  Ref:  http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=116 

= = = = = = = = = = = = == = =
APPENDED 

CIA drone attacks & the explosive rift between U.S. & Pakistan

The already hostile friendship between the U.S. and Pakistan is getting more uncomfortable. Tens-of-thousands of Islamists rallied in Peshawar and Lehore yesterday condemning the United States and denouncing a NATO attack. All this as Pakistanis along the Afghan border insist dozens of U.S. drone attacks this year killed civilians, not just combatants as the U.S. insists.


Part Three of The Current

CIA drone attacks and the explosive rift between U.S. and Pakistan

In its war against the Taliban and its allies in rural Pakistan, the U.S. has a terrifying weapon. Death falls from the sky with almost no sound and, usually, with frightening precision.

The remote controlled drones take the war to the front door of America’s enemies, and the U.S. believes it’s killed more than 600 militants with the missiles in the last year. But sometimes, the drones fall on the front doors of allies as well.
It’s not known how many civilians have been killed by the strikes. The estimates vary widely.

But Karim Khan tells us he knows at least two victims: his son and brother. Earlier this year, he filed a lawsuit for murder against the CIA , including its station chief in Pakistan. Karim Khan says his brother and son were killed by a U.S. drone attack on his house, and he is suing the CIA. We heard from him.

Obaidullah Khan’s younger brother Kunar is suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder or PTSD, and is a patient at the Lady Redding Hospital’s psychiatric ward in Peshawar near the Afghan border. We aired a clip.

Dr. Mir Alam Khan works at the psychiatric ward at the Lady Redding Hospital in Peshawar. He says Kunar Khan is not an isolated case. We heard from him.

CIA drone attacks and the explosive rift between U.S. and Pakistan

Rahimullah Yusufzai has lived in the Tribal Areas of Pakistan all his life, and is one of the country’s best known journalists.Rahimullah Yusufzai is the Editor of the Peshawar bureau of The News International. We reached him in Mardam, north of Peshawar, Pakistan.

CIA drone attacks and the explosive rift between U.S. and Pakistan

As we just heard, the US drone attacks in Pakistan’s tribal region have pushed the already volatile relationship between Pakistan and the U.S. to the edge.

Jeffrey Goldberg is a national correspondent for The Atlantic. He is the co-author of The Ally from Hell, an article in the December issue of the magazine, Atlantic.
He joined us from Washington, D.C.

Related Links:

Dec 172011
 

I expect to be attacked after posting  “The Making of Madness” (http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=4114).

Psychotropic drugs are a multi-billion dollar business with a very effective propaganda machine behind them, as the documentary shows.

Regarding my experience with psychotropic drugs (forcibly administered)  and the appeals (denied), below:

  • #1  (Letter to Minister of Justice) tells the story in short form.
  • #’s   2 – 5    contain detailed documentation.
  • #6 –  Dr. Tana Dineen, author of “Manufacturing Victims, What the Psychology Industry Is Doing to People”.
  • #7 –   My email to Dr. Dineen and her reply, re possible citizens’ group.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

  1. http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=41192010-04-23 Democracy: Letter to Minister of Justice. Human Rights legislation and Psychotropic Drugs that cause amnesia. (includes The McGill mind behind ‘soft torture’ )
  2. http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=41362006-04-07  Complaint to College of Physicians and Surgeons, Donna Malcolm re psychotropic drug injection by force and confinement.
  3. http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=41392006-06-01  Reply to College of Physicians & Surgeons: psychotropic drugs lorazepam and haloperidol.  Physician forced, over-dosed, caused amnesia, abuse of human rights.   (Includes Risk Management, Soros questions use of scientific method in matters concerning society, etc.)
  4. http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=4143 2006-06-06   Complaint to Human Rights Tribunal,  Donna Malcolm, forced psychotropic drugs, amnesia, locked up.
  5. http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=41472006-08-16  Complaint, rebuttal to dismissal by Sask Human Rights Commission (Malcolm, psychotropic drugs)
  6. http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=11012009-07-27 This is all about the pharmaceutical, chemical and biotech corporations, and their collaborators in government. All at the expense of our interest in health. Some of it is heart-breaking. Autism, Kennedy, Psych Ward Story. EXCERPT   “. . .  You will understand that I have a special interest in psychotropic drugs.  It pre-dates my direct experience with them.  At the time of the Romanow Commission on Medicare, part of the information I submitted to Romanow was a summary of the work of Dr. Tana Dineen, author of “Manufacturing Victims, What the Psychology Industry Is Doing to People”.   She was a doctor at the University of Saskatchewan.      (UPDATE ON DINEEN:   see her blog,   http://tanadineen.com/)
  7. http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=4288 2006-11-02  Tana Dineen reply to my request re action, Donna Malcolm’s forced injection and confinement in psych ward

 

Dec 162011
 

“THE MARKETING OF MADNESS”

Check out the entire documentary here:  http://youtu.be/fduMpYhv1_M

If only HALF of the message is true, does it not warrant action?

TWO SERIOUS ISSUES NOT RAISED IN “THE MARKETING OF MADNESS”:

  1. ABUSE OF HUMAN RIGHTS.  Explained below.   
  2. EFFECTS ON WATER SUPPLIES.   Billions of pills mean the drugs go by urine into our water supplies, in large quantities.  The work to stop the City from putting the chemical “vaporooter” down the drain to dissolve tree roots illustrated that there are no known protocols for identifying, let alone removing,  some (many?) of the drugs and chemicals we are putting into water supplies.  (Use “Search” on the blog – enter vaporooter – for more info.)  The feminization of fish downstream from water treatment plants, for example, is known . . .  there is no choice in what we drink now because the drugs are pervasive, there is  a failure of professionals to THINK AND ACT.   We know from things like “acid rain” and “2,4-D rain” that water evaporates and carries with it some of the chemicals we’ve put into the environment.  (“Drugs” are nothing more than “chemicals”.)   I do not know what it will take to move us from our stupidity – – it will not be our influential, educated people.   We have been telling them for years.   Maybe Occupy will make the difference.  I hope.

The pharmaceutical industry is intent on discrediting “The Marketing of Madness“.   I therefore add the weight of my story to the evidence.   See http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=4152   2012-12-17   Democracy:  Psychotropic drugs, an issue not raised: abuse of human rights. A known side-effect of lorazepam:  amnesia. 

The documentation of what happened to me confirms:

  • the SUBJECTIVITY of “mental illness”.  
  • there are alternative, less harmful, and less costly approaches.  Not to mention sane and humane.
  • You may not like to believe the “Marketing of Madness” and Big Pharma will do everything it can to sooth and deny your apprehensions.   I received forcibly by injection, drugs that are talked about in this documentary.   My story is bizarre but also very troubling.   No one was ever held accountable.   The appeal process is through the College of Physicians and Surgeons,  they are known to close ranks in support of their fellow doctors.   I am not an isolated example, different in that I can tell the story on behalf of others.
  •  “The Marketing of Madness” should be widely circulated.  As I say, you may not agree with EVERYthing in it.  Doesn’t matter – – even if half of it is true,  we need corrective action. 

– – — – – – – – – – – – – –

PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS – ABUSE OF HUMAN RIGHTS.  SERIOUS ISSUE IN A DEMOCRACY (OR ANYWHERE!)

In 2005  I was forcibly injected with psychotropic drugs, then forced to take more by daily pills, under threat of another injection if I refused.   The injection caused immediate and permanent amnesia for a period of time.

I was locked up for a week in the Royal University Hospital Psychiatric Ward.  

I saw first-hand young people who were drugged up – –  many of them no more in need of forced incarceration and drugging than I was. 

A retired Doctor, Stuart Houston, came to see me and asked what I was doing there?   He volunteered to come to the Appeal Hearing of my being “committed”.   The Appeal was never heard because the psychiatrist,  Donna Malcolm, said I had progressed so well that I was no longer in need of being locked up.   More detail, see  http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=4152.

But check out the documentary, “The Marketing of Madness”  http://youtu.be/fduMpYhv1_M