CIVITAS 

1. The body of citizens who make up a state, especially a city state, commonwealth, or the like.
2. Citizenship, especially as imparting shared responsibility, a common purpose and sense of community.

 

UPDATE:    Geez!  These guys (Tedros from the W.H.O. in this case) are slithery snakes!  “My reply” to Tedros is below.  Just in case there’s anyone still standing who thinks that the Director-General of the W.H.O is to be believed.

2024-01-08 Watch: ‘A Terrible Truth’: COVID Response Was About Profits and Power, Bret Weinstein with Tucker Carlson. With many thanks to CHD.

(  [00:36:25]  is for locating the Tedros words in the video)

Re:  Tedros [00:36:25]   (Director-General of the World Health Organization since 2017) . . . The claim that the accord will cede power to W.H.O. is quite simply false. It’s fake news. Countries will decide what the accord says and countries alone and countries will implement the accord in line with their own national laws. No country will cede any sovereignty to W.H.O.

MY REPLY:   The Legislation is already in place!  We’re fighting hard to get it repealed, in  B.C., Canada.

In November 2022 the Provincial Government of British Columbia enacted the Health Professions and Occupations Act (HPOA), a.k.a. Bill 36.

Do the health care providers in my community know what’s going on, that affects them

• at the LEGISLATURE?

• In the COURTS?

If YOU sometimes USE healthcare services,  do you have any clue about the Legislation that is enacted (has Royal Assent) in B.C, and how much CHOICE you have, if the Government decides to start issuing orders?  . . .  read on.

HPOA  does this, unbelievably.  Item #8 is what Tedros denies

1. All BC practitioners must now follow health guidelines set by political appointees for their patients or risk penalties including loss of license to practice. 2. Non–compliance with Ministry therapeutic guidelines may result in fines up to $200,000 or $500,000 (corporations) and incarceration up to 6 months or 2 years.1 3. Anonymous complaints to the Colleges can result in summary suspension of licensure to practice before the complaint is investigated.2,3 4. Appointees chosen by politicians may now enter a healthcare practice, seize patient records and restrict access to that facility without a warrant or court order.4 5. Refusal to accept all Ministry mandated vaccines and therapies will likely result in delicensure.5 6. College advisory boards will now consist of government appointees only.6 7. All “self–regulatory” healthcare professions in BC will be governed entirely by politicians and their agents, using appointees selected by the Ministry of Health.7 8. The Cabinet and the Minister of Health can adopt as law in BC any regulations, codes, standards or rules enacted in foreign jurisdictions or international bodies.8 Tedros:  “The claim that the accord will cede power to W.H.O. is quite simply false. It’s fake news. Countries will decide . . .  “ Bill 36, the Health Professions and Occupations Act (HPOA),  is already in place in B.C.   There are many questions and contradictions in the story of its creation.  . . .  read on.

The Health Professions & Occupations Act

Bill 36 was one of the largest bills ever passed in British Columbia, consisting of 645 sections and 276 pages, . . . read more at The Canadian Society for Science & Ethics in Medicine      https://www.cssem.org/about-us.

STATUS OF BILL 36, B.C. Health Professions & Occupations Act.

The Act was passed in November, 2022.  It received Royal Assent, meaning it’s fully operational.

Doctors’ insights on case against Bonnie Henry’s two-year vaccine mandate for healthcare workers

Youtube coverage at the Legislature, Drea Humphrey from Rebel News. Hear what very reasonable Doctors have to say: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hh9p4u4fJhM&list=PL2HWRRSziC_FxsJ40Y3ZFiWPmSQxzjtxJ&index=7

 

The Canadian Society for Science & Ethics in Medicine      https://www.cssem.org/about-us

The counsel for the group of doctors bringing the case against the two-year mandate for healthcare workers used public health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry’s contradictory statements to argue the case.

                                                                                                                              

1. CSSEM –  The Canadian Society for Science & Ethics in Medicine   Who are they?

A comprehensive source of information and resources for Bill 36.

See https://www.cssem.org/_files/ugd/80db6e_9ff1aa4a5b9d40339da613e48afa4dbb.pdf

Also,  see “Our (CSSEM) Members”   – –   https://www.cssem.org/about-us

      2.   A legal Analysis of Bill 36 by Vancouver lawyer Gail Davidson, found thru the CSSEM website

https://rumble.com/v3tyogq-bc-physicians-and-health-professionals-meeting-re-bill-36-october-26-2023.html  

A not-uncommon reaction to the Legislation is “Nah. That can’t be true.”

– – – – – –

2023-11-15 Doctors warn British Columbians about the province’s tyrannical health care act. I think You will want to see this.  (Bill 36)

The take-away from the interviews:  Few Doctors and other healthcare workers KNOW ABOUT BILL 36, and what the legislation does.

 

2023-11-29 B.C.: Bonnie Henry (B.C. Chief Medical Health Officer) named as defendant in class-action lawsuit over her role in COVID-19 vaccine mandate

 

ONTARIO COURT CASES AGAINST DOCTORS   (Regulating and reporting is by Province. )

2023-02-19   Ontario Doctors who Dissented from Covid-19 Doctrines Fight for their Professional Lives. by Jason Unrau. C2C Journal.

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: February 9, 2024
To: Tony Doob
Subject: Solitary Confinement Alberta

Dear Professor Doob,

I lifted a copy of your participation in the Proulx Roundtable 2022 and posted it on my website . . .  I hope that’s okay with you. . . .

2022-06-17  Can solitary confinement be reformed or abolished in Canada?   with thanks to McGill University’s Faculty of Law

The unveilings of February 6^th, 2024 at the Lethbridge Court House lend urgency to the need for public awareness.  There has to be a thunderous call for ACCOUNTABILITY.

Jerry Morin of the Coutts Four was in solitary confinement for 74 days. 

When Marco saw the two in the court room on the 6^th February, 2024,  he saw “broken men”.  Strong young family men, broken.  Broken by the legal system.

I write in regard to the Coutts border crossing incidents and fall-out.  I am not an Albertan;  I have long been concerned about the legal system in Canada.  I live in B.C.

If your information source for what happened in 2022 February at Coutts, and subsequently in the Lethbridge Court House, Calgary Remand Centre,  and other Alberta prisons  – – if your info comes from mainstream media you will be ill-informed.

I have traveled to Lethbridge Provincial Court 3 times, so I could see first-hand what’s going on.  My first impression only gets reinforced:  ineptitude is the kindest word I can use.  An accurate description is “what one would expect in a police state”.

The BEAUTIFUL COMPETENCE is in using the legal system as a tool to silence unwanted voices and thwart justice.  It is a system of violence.

I kind of know Marco Van Huigenbos, and have respect for him – –

Marco attended the PLEA BARGAIN hearing, Court of Kings Bench, Lethbridge on Feb 6^th;  he reported on it in a comprehensive podcast (Jason Lavigne’s podcast).

2024-02-06 Marco van Huigenbos describes the situation: two of the Coutts 4 are now free, after 223 days in remand (jail) in Alberta.

Marco is solid.  He is level-headed, explains the proceedings and answers questions competently.  Some may remember him from the Rouleau Commission hearings.

I encountered Marco in person more than a year ago.  I wanted to help with his legal bills.  Marco insisted that the money go to help the guys who were locked up in remand.  Marco is charged but not jailed – – so “free”.  The Coutts 4 were prevented from working to support their families.  The terms of their incarceration prevented them from seeing their wives, etc.   The circumstances of their arrests looked sketchy to me (and still do).  The Plea Bargain reinforces the perception.

Marco is a natural leader, in his early thirties, originally from the Netherlands, has a young family, is a Town Councillor for Fort McLeod, not too far from Coutts.   He faces charges laid 2 years ago,  still waiting to be heard.   I won’t go into the outstanding cases on the Lethbridge docket, and abuses, not in this communication.

UPDATE TODAY:  2024-02-09 This is the most accurate written coverage I’ve read on this subject: Conspiracy Charges Dropped, Chris Lysak, Jerry Morin Released after Agreeing to Plea Deals

It is difficult NOT to draw conclusions about an intention to use Coutts as theatre to create fear.

The photo of the “weapons” laid out on a table in front of an RCMP cruiser is proving, now with public awareness, to have been staged.  (Marco speaks to this in the podcast.)

The partner of one of the Plea Deals, Jaclyn Martin, was also charged back then, 2 years ago.  I believe that Jaclyn and Jerry have 3 children.  Jaclyn wasn’t jailed;  what I know about her situation is god-awful, and very sketchy, too.  I think she is a straight-shooter.  Not making up anything – – she’s originally from a rural New Brunswick family that likes hunting.  She fell for this Albertan guy.   When the guys aren’t working, they socialize with other couples in the area who have young families, they like the out-of-doors, have friends who sit around campfires.  They happen to like skeet-shooting.  Skeet-shooters have guns.  Nothing illegal about that.

I am from the rural west.  My Dad had a shooting range in the basement of his store (sounds unlikely but it was a large cement basement that had water seepage problems.  During the winter months with minus 20 and 30 degree temperatures outside,  friends of my Dad sometimes got together to target shoot in the store basement.  I tagged along more than once.

(INSERT:  I added the following paragraph in an edit of the original.  It helped me overcome the sadness of what’s been done at Coutts.)

My Dad was a hunter;  we ate wild geese and ducks, partridge, which evolved to catching wild, wounded birds when the hunters from central Canada and the U.S. left after hunting season.  The birds were kept in a hen house, watered and fed over winter.  Some recuperated and joined the flocks migrating north in the spring.  Others were put out on the dugout until winter freeze.

The offspring of maimed birds that mated on the dugout joined the migrations going south in the fall.  Some returned to the area in the spring, nested and continued the cycle.  They visited their maimed parents on the dugout.

Many hunters from the city were undiscerning “shooters”.  Dad was able to catch and house a wounded swan, mistaken for a snow goose.  You aren’t allowed to shoot swans.  A wounded bufflehead was taxidermied after he died and is still “with our family”.  And so on.  When I was in grade 4, by my Dad’s invitation I skipped school to join him and my brothers.  We went “hunting” in the South Saskatchewan River Valley on a beautiful fall day.  We tramped through the hills and ravines, didn’t actually shoot anything!  Just had a grand time in the out-of-doors.

Jerry Morin of the Coutts Four was in solitary confinement for 74 days.

When Marco saw the two in the court room on the 6^th February he used the word “broken”.  They have been broken by the legal system.   

Marco presses for Accountability – – there has to be an Inquiry.

Covid – – everything is so connected.  (I am currently reading RFK’s “Wuhan Cover-Up”.  And repeat – –  everything is so connected.)

Professor Doob,  I hope your voice is strong.  It is needed.   Maybe my letter to you can be helpful in some way.

Best wishes,

Sandra Finley

www.sandrafinley.ca (an old blog)

250-594-9898

Court to hear challenge to Saskatchewan’s Covid gathering limits

Posted On: February 5, 2024  Thanks to JCCF.

SASKATOON, SK: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal will hear the appeal of Jasmin Grandel and Darrell Mills on Tuesday, February 6, 2024, at 10 AM CT, at 520 Spadina Crescent East, in Saskatoon. Ms. Grandel and Mr. Mills challenge Saskatchewan’s former ban on outdoor gatherings of more than 10 persons as an unjustified violation of their Charter freedom of peaceful assembly and other Charter rights and freedoms.

From March 17, 2020, until July 11, 2021, Saskatchewan imposed various prohibitions on outdoor gatherings, including limiting them to only 10 people. At the same time, Saskatchewan allowed more than 10 people to meet indoors. Jasmin Grandel and Darrell Mills attended various peaceful outdoor protests in 2020 and 2021, resulting in hefty fines for violating Public Health Orders.

At the time, Jasmin Grandel was a kinesiology student at the University of Regina, with a young son in kindergarten. She was concerned with the inconsistency of the Public Health Orders and with their detrimental psychological and economic effects. She feared that the Orders would negatively impact small businesses, leading to unemployment and poverty for families.

Darrell Mills, who also participated in peaceful outdoor protests, is a resident of Saskatoon with 30 years of experience in mechanical construction. He is certified in Mask Fit Testing and trained in supplied air breathing systems. He was concerned about the negative health impacts of improper mask use.

While outdoor gatherings were restricted to a maximum of 10 persons for certain periods, the province permitted numerous public indoor gatherings that far exceeded 10 persons. At the same time, Saskatchewan Chief Medical Health Officer Dr. Saqib Shahab stated that “outdoor gatherings while observing physical distancing are better than indoor gatherings.” 

On June 5, 2020, then-Regina Police Chief Evan Bray, along with many other officers, attended a large Black Lives Matter rally in Regina with hundreds of people, thereby violating existing public health orders and garnering significant media attention. At the time, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe said, “…my assumption is that the law enforcement officials have used their judgment with respect to this particular rally…” Dr. Shahab called it a “special event,” and no one was charged with breaching public health orders. Six months later, numerous Saskatchewan residents were charged and prosecuted for violating public health orders because they, like participants in the Black Lives Matter rally, had peacefully protested outdoors.

In April 2021, lawyers provided by the Justice Centre filed a constitutional challenge to the restrictions on outdoor gatherings, on behalf of Ms. Grandel and Mr. Mills. The Originating Application challenges these restrictions for violating the Charter freedoms of thought, belief, opinion and expression, association and peaceful assembly. The Application also suggests that pro-freedom protests against government lockdown policies have been especially targeted by law enforcement.

At trial, an eminent infectious disease specialist provided expert evidence that outdoor transmission of Covid was negligible, where physical distancing could be practiced and where single-day gatherings with no indoor component could take place. The government did not present evidence that Covid was transmitted at outdoor gatherings. Instead, they relied on the ‘precautionary principle’ put forward by its public health expert that lockdown measures should be taken even if “cause and effect” had not been fully established scientifically.

“It appears that lockdown harms were not considered by the government or by the court, when applying this ‘precautionary’ principle. Neither the Saskatchewan government nor the lower court wanted to take precautions against the physical, mental, social, financial and economic harms that lockdowns inflicted on people,” stated John Carpay, president of the Justice Centre. 

On September 20, 2022, Justice D. B. Konkin of the Court of King’s Bench of Saskatchewan upheld the government’s restrictions on outdoor gatherings as justified violations of Charter freedoms. Justice Konkin assessed only the breach to freedom of expression, representing only one of the various Charter rights alleged to be breached by the Applicants. In his decision, he wrote, “In a state of public health emergency wreaking severe havoc on the health of Saskatchewan residents, Sask [sic] was burdened with the immense task of balancing multiple interests.”

Andre Memauri, lawyer for Ms. Grandel and Mr. Mills, stated, “Our infectious disease specialist made it clear at the lower court that the outdoor transmission of Covid-19 was negligible, much like every other respiratory illness in history. There was no compelling basis for the Saskatchewan government to impose such extreme restrictions on people’s rights to assemble, express themselves and associate outdoors. The rule of law means that laws should be enforced equally, but the Saskatchewan Government encouraged and supported Black Lives Matter protests outdoors in large numbers while ticketing people who six months later protested the violations of their Charter freedoms.”