Sandra Finley

Sep 282024
 

RELATED:  (Canadian Amish)

2024-08-16 Ontario’s Amish community faces unprecedented fines ($400,000) and legal hurdles, because of the ArriveCan App. They don’t use phones, let alone smartphones; “Apps” are unknown. By Rebel News.

With thanks to Dan for sending.  With thanks to Tracy Thurman and to the Brownstone Institute for publishing.

Re:  American Amish

Technofeudalism

Life in the United States has changed drastically in the last several decades. Technology, pharmaceutical and medical interventions, dietary shifts, educational policies, and social trends have radically altered our way of life. Over the same time period, Americans have become fatter, sicker, and less happy. Chronic disease has skyrocketed, and our children suffer ill health at unprecedented levels.

Yet there is one group that has not experienced many of these same changes: The Amish and other Plain Sect churches. By opting out of a host of our modern social ills, they have avoided many of the negative outcomes impacting the rest of America, particularly our children.

When I speak of the Amish, I am primarily referring to the Older Order Amish but much applies to Old Order Mennonites and other plain sect communities as well.

The Amish entered the American Experiment in the Colonial era after fleeing violent religious persecution in Europe. Their community customs are dictated by the Ordnung, a set of church rules designed to encourage a simple, modest life, prevent social decay, and bind the community together. Members are pacifists who eschew cars for horses and buggies and reject current fashions for modest homemade dresses and bonnets or black pants, shirts, and hats. They forgo screen-based entertainment of all kinds.

The faithful live in tight-knit but decentralized church districts, with each district making most of its own decisions. Liberal churches allow battery-operated lights, indoor plumbing, and phones or computers in the workshop, while conservative congregations use gas lamps, build outhouses, and require members to walk to public payphone booths scattered throughout the neighborhood. Even if it’s allowed in a business setting, technology is forbidden in the home.

Because the Amish have rejected modern life, they have unwittingly become a control group for many of the social ills that began to plague the rest of us over the past few decades – particularly the trends associated with Big Tech, Big Education, dissolution of the family, Big Food, Big Pharma, and corporatized medicine.

Big Education

The Amish decision to opt out of public education changed schooling in America forever and gave Americans a right that many other countries’ citizens do not have: the right to homeschool. From early childhood on, plain sect children learn to work alongside their parents and siblings. Chores are standard, and every member of the household contributes.

The Amish believe in formal education in their own one-room schoolhouses through the eighth grade, after which their children become adults and take on full-time work responsibilities. Beginning in 1921 with Ohio’s Bing Act which mandated school attendance through the age of 18, the Amish became a target of government officials looking to force church members into compliance. Over the next thirty years, hundreds of Amish fathers faced fines and imprisonment for refusing to subject their children to compulsory education.

Eventually, outsiders, recognizing the grave threat to religious liberty in America, founded The National Committee for Amish Religious Freedom and did what the Amish were not allowed to do for themselves: they fought back. In the landmark Supreme Court case Wisconsin v. Yoder, the Supreme Court held that the state cannot force individuals to attend school when it infringes on their First Amendment rights.

American families can homeschool their children to this day because of the stand taken by the Amish and the Americans who fought to protect them. Today, Amish children still attend one-room schoolhouses through eighth grade and continue with apprenticeships thereafter, and by opting out of Big Education, they show other Americans that one can become a fully functional, prosperous, contributing member of society without the burden of hundreds of thousands in college debt.

The Welfare State

The Amish believe that God and the church community should provide for members who are in need. As a result, they opt out of the welfare system and prove that a tight-knit community can form an adequate safety net. They refuse government handouts of any kind. The Amish I know used their Covid stimulus checks as fire starters rather than taking them to the bank. Most are exempted from paying into Social Security and all refuse to accept the program’s benefits. Some of them refuse to get Social Security numbers and birth certificates.

Churches and midwives keep handwritten records instead which are never entered into government databases. The Amish do not put their elderly family members or the disabled into nursing facilities – rather, the extended family provides care in the home, showing Americans that life without a welfare state is still possible.

Big Pharma, Corporatized Medicine, and the Health Insurance Cartel

One in five American children suffers from a chronic illness that has continued for more than a year. One in 36 of our youth have autism. One of every nine kids is diagnosed with ADHD. Americans take pills at a higher rate than almost any other country in the world – two-thirds of adults are taking prescription drugs. More than one in four American teenagers is on at least one prescription drug – often to treat anxiety and depression.

By contrast, among the Amish, use of prescription drugs is the exception rather than the rule, and few children take one at all. Most Amish are suspicious of modern medicine. Because they reject the idea of insurance and pay cash for all services, they are not bound into a system where care is limited to modalities an insurance carrier approves. Herbal remedies, midwives, chiropractors, and functional medicine practitioners come first, with hospitals reserved for emergency scenarios.

The community maintains a charitable fund to assist members facing large hospital bills related to surgery or accident. Charitable auctions are often held to raise the needed funds. Most children are born at home with the assistance of lay midwives. The Amish community has protected this option for other Americans: whenever states with a strong Amish presence have tried to mandate hospital births or doctor oversight, they face tens of thousands of Amish who refuse to comply. Larger Amish communities have their own private clinics staffed by trusted functional medicine doctors, chiropractors, herbalists, and physical therapists who respect their way of life.

The rejection of Big Pharma is particularly striking: Twenty years ago, a small percentage of Amish parents gave their children a few vaccines such as MMR and TdaP, but today that rate is likely in the single digits. Of course, there are no vaccine mandates for attending Amish schools. Autism, ADHD, and autoimmune diseases are almost unheard of in this population.

I was speaking recently at an Amish festival and asked the 400 Amish folk in the audience if any of them knew any unvaccinated Amish children with these diseases. The attendees easily knew 5,000 children in total, probably many more. Not one person knew an Amish child diagnosed with ADHD. Three audience members responded that they knew of an Amish child with autism, but upon further questioning, one of the children in question had received the MMR vaccine, and the two others were unsure of the vaccine status of the children.

Given the prevalence of these afflictions in wider society, it is startling to encounter a community that has been almost completely spared. Many Americans are starting to notice and are asking questions about this phenomenon – questions that pharmaceutical companies would rather we did not ask.

The Covid Control Group

The Amish response to Covid also served as a useful data point in the madness of 2020. When Pennsylvania issued stay-at-home orders and strongly encouraged churches to end in-person services in late March, some Amish congregations initially complied. However, their semi-annual communion service, scheduled in early May, brought the issue to a head. Each church district made its own decision, but nearly all chose to gather and mark this sacred occasion, fully aware that they might experience an outbreak.

Because their Ordnung forbids the consumption of alcohol, grape juice is used instead, passed down the rows in a pitcher out of which each adult drinks. Over the following two weeks, many did become ill with flu-like symptoms. Most opted for home-based care. The few who were hospitalized did poorly, suffering the remdesivir-and-ventilator fate. Those who stayed home used herbal remedies or ivermectin and most recovered fully and quickly.

By the end of June, the nearly 50,000 Amish in central Pennsylvania had achieved herd immunity with little excess death and continued life as normal. Next to none of them took the Covid shot – I have not heard of a single person who did. I have also heard of no myocarditis, increased infertility, increases in sudden deaths, or disability as we have seen throughout the rest of this country. Pfizer may have eliminated the control group in their clinical trials, but this one continues to show us what could have been if Americans had not lined up for an experimental injection.

Big Tech

When it comes to the effects of Big Tech, American children and teens are in crisis. As documented in numerous studies and in the book The Anxious Generation by Professor Jonathan Haidt, screen time rewires children’s brains in very harmful ways, yet most parents of four-year-olds report that their child already has their own tablet, with early childhood screen time increasing tenfold from 2020 to 2022. American teenagers spend more than 8 hours per day staring at screens. Major depression has increased by 150% among teenagers since 2010, and emergency room visits for self-harm and suicide attempts by girls aged 10-14 have increased by 188%. Suicide rates for boys aged 10-14 have almost doubled, and for girls have almost tripled.

For the Amish, meanwhile, life continues much as it did a century ago: Phones are stationary objects that might be shared by multiple families. There are no televisions, no tablets, no radios, and no internet except for work computers among the most progressive groups. The effect on their children compared to the current generation of American offspring is stark: Amish youngsters go to a one-room schoolhouse, walk home, and help their parents with chores until dinner rather than communing with the digital world in their rooms.

Teenagers work full-time, apprenticed to Amish craftsmen, farmers, or homemakers, and master valuable life skills while their secular peers are still high school freshmen. Most kids walk barefoot, healthily grubby, to care for the horses or the other household animals. They get plenty of sun, socialization, and family time. Teens join youth groups where they sing, play volleyball, and meet their potential spouses. Depression and anxiety are rare. Medications are even rarer. Self-harm is nearly unheard of. Mentioning gender dysphoria will bring you blank looks – there’s no transgender epidemic among the Amish. Clearly, the Big Tech gulag is another cultural ill that the Amish have largely avoided, at least until now.

But that may change if the US government has its way. Already, Amish are being excluded from basic activities because of their religious objection to photo IDs. The ATF now insists that Amish cannot buy or sell hunting rifles to each other without a federal firearms license, which requires a photo ID – something the Amish cannot acquire for religious reasons. The ATF has set up undercover operations to catch and prosecute Amish farmers for doing just that.

If society’s managers get their way and succeed in introducing central bank digital currencies and phasing out cash, it will cause significant issues for the Amish, most of whom will not use a credit card and many of whom even object to debit cards. Smartphones, digital IDs, and digital wallets would be entirely forbidden for most Amish congregations, so this church stands as a roadblock to mandating these policies. To make these tools of totalitarianism universal, the Amish way of life would have to be destroyed.

The Agricultural Cartel and Raw Milk

Finally, the Amish provide many Americans with the ability to opt out of Big Food with direct-to-consumer sales at their local farms.

Not all Amish eat a healthy diet by any means. Many have fallen for the processed junk food diet embraced by the rest of America. However, a growing number of them are turning to nutrient-dense, farm-fresh foods to improve their health.

In the 1600s, religious persecution in Europe forced the Amish and Mennonites into areas of inhospitable land where few crops would grow. They became renowned for devising methods of enriching soil and growing nutritious crops from challenging terrain. Today, on a per capita basis, they hold more farming knowledge than any other United States ethnic group and are among the few who still know how to grow crops without fossil fuels, as they continue to use mules rather than tractors for farm work.

For those who want to opt out of the Big Food paradigm, the best option is buying direct from a farmer – known as the direct-to-consumer market. Amish and Mennonite farmers provide regeneratively grown produce, meats, and dairy to more than a million Americans who choose to buy directly from these farmers and feed many millions more through middlemen. Notably, a large percentage of the raw milk products sold in this country come from Amish and Mennonite farms. Raw milk is hated by public health bureaucrats and loved by freedom-minded health health-conscious people everywhere. It’s not a coincidence that many of the producers targeted for raw milk harassment over the last decade have been Amish farms.

While working on the case of Amos Miller – an Amish farmer targeted for selling raw milk products in Pennsylvania – I had the privilege of reviewing hundreds of sworn affidavits from his customers detailing how his products have healed or managed chronic autoimmune conditions. The most common ailments were Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, and other digestive disabilities. Many succeeded in weaning off their prescription medications thanks to consuming raw butter, cream, and fermented products like kefir – all of which are banned in Miller’s home state even with a raw milk permit. He refuses to get a permit because doing so would obligate him to stop making the very products on which his customers depend.

The federal government framed Miller for a listeria illness and a listeria death, both of which his legal team has now fully debunked using the CDC’s own data. Miller is far from alone – there are many Amish farms facing harassment by bureaucrats based on dubious test results. Meat farmers are experiencing similar fates if they dare to process their own meat and provide it to their neighbors. These policies threaten to bankrupt the small farms who supply the best real, nutritious, toxin-free food our nation has to offer.

Eliminating the Control Group

Fifty years ago, most Amish men were farmers. Twenty-five years ago, it was down to about half. Today, only a small minority continue to farm, and that number continues to shrink. The rest become carpenters or tradesmen, and some are forced to adopt technology in order to survive. Inevitably, their young men bring home influences from the modern world which impact their families. The culture also depends on sons working alongside their fathers, learning work ethic and mastering manhood. Because of child labor laws, carpenters and tradesmen cannot bring their sons to work with them the way farmers can – and it’s having a significant impact on the next generation.

I’ve discussed this issue with hundreds of members of the Amish community, and there is a grave consensus: If they keep losing their farms, they will lose their way of life forever. Their churches may still meet, the people will still exist, and the name may not change, but Amish culture as we know it will be a thing of the past, and the control group for Big Tech, Big Pharma, Big Medicine, and Big Education and the welfare state will be gone, along with one of the best sources of real food in our nation.

I believe there are powerful interests that would love such an outcome, because the Amish way of life is drawing far more attention now than it ever has, and is inspiring others to look for ways to escape the control grid. Many Americans have begun to notice that by opting out of the Great Reset policies, the Amish are healthier, happier, and have stronger communities. This social control group shows us that you don’t need 16 or 20 years of educational indoctrination from government schools in order to be a productive member of society.

They demonstrate the benefits of choosing not to be slaves to our technology. We see that children thrive without screen time, have superior mental health as a result, and fare better when they roam outdoors, get sun exposure, get dirty, and learn to work alongside their family. Amish health outcomes indicate that kids who are not subjected to dozens of injections have far lower levels of ADHD and autism, and few allergies or autoimmune diseases either. We can observe that nutrient-dense, farm-fresh foods can help prevent obesity, heal disease, and cut dependence on Big Pharma.

The Amish show us all these truths, and the would-be controllers of our society don’t like this. When one runs a society-wide experiment of technological addiction, of social fragmentation, of scaring people out of having children, of government school indoctrination, of universal vaccination, digital ID, digital wallets, and vaccine passports, it’s a problem if the human lab rats in the experiment can look outside the cage and see that another life is possible.

Join the Control Group

Americans are not just noticing, they are following suit. At Amish homesteading festivals a decade ago, one would only see a handful of outsiders, but now thousands flock to such events to learn how to return to a simpler, freer way of life.

No culture is perfect, the Amish included, but we would be fools not to protect this control group.

Join our Amish friends in opting out. Take action now to protect yourself and your family and exit the control pen before the gate closes. Resist mandatory vaccination, digital IDs, digital currency, smartphone dependency, and media addiction. Get outdoors, and get your kids outdoors working with you. Exit government schools if at all possible, and explore the homeschooling rights that the Amish have protected for you. Build a local community of like-minded people, and create new pockets of resistance. Grow your own food if you can, and if not, find yourself a farmer, develop a close relationship with them, and support them as if your life depends on it – because ultimately, it does.

As our governments rush headlong towards technocracy, it can feel like time is running out to halt their agenda. But if we act now and follow the example of the Amish, we can reclaim the wisdom of prior generations and find that a life outside dystopia is still possible.

Author

Tracy Thurman

Tracy Thurman is an advocate for regenerative farming, food sovereignty, decentralized food systems, and medical freedom. She works with the Barnes Law Firm’s public interest division to safeguard the right to purchase food directly from farmers without government interference.

 

 

 

Sep 262024
 

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/roundtable-discussion-on-american-health-and-nutrition-a-second-opinion/roundtable-discussion-american-health-nutrition-second-opinion/?utm_source=luminate&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=chdtv&utm_id=20240925

“Sen. Ron Johnson (USA) and a panel of experts provide a foundational and historical understanding of the changes that have occurred over the last century within public sanitation, agriculture, food processing, and healthcare industries which impact the current state of national health.”

Panelists:

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
  • Jillian Michaels
  • Jordan Peterson
  • Max Lugavere
  • Vani Hari
  • Calley Means
  • Marty Makary, M.D., MPH
  • Brigham Buhler
  • Joe Holder
  • Mikhaila Fuller
  • Dr. Chris Palmer
  • Jason Karp
  • Courtney Swan
  • Grace Price
  • Alex Clark
Sep 242024
 

BREAKING: Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announces province will amend Bill of Rights to include vaccine refusal. Legislation will be tabled in the coming weeks.

With thanks to Dan – –

2024-09-24 1:52 p.m.:

Subject:  We may move to Alberta yet!

Especially if the BC NDP remain in power this election.

1) the right over vaccinations and all medical decisions,

2) the right to not be deprived of property and

3) the right of individuals to acquire, keep and use firearms.

https://x.com/westcdnfirst/status/1838634795854966951

 

 

 

 

Sep 232024
 

PREVIOUS WAS:   For Your Selection, end of August, 2024

For Your Selection SEPTEMBER 2024

BREAKING: 

2024-09-24   Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announces province will amend Bill of Rights to include vaccine refusal. Legislation will be tabled in the coming weeks. Video’d press conference. Hallelujah!

 

NOTE:  There’s a lot of exciting news.   I’m sending this out;  not all the postings are polished up.  The 3rd posting below, Monica Smit  – – – don’t miss it.

2024-09 Covid trial concludes. Tamara Lich, Freedom Convoy. Interview of Lawyer Lawrence Greenspon. Levant, Rebel News.

2024-09- Covid: Senator Rand Paul interviewed by RFK Jr

2024-09-22 Monica Smit ordered to pay $250K after WINNING unlawful Covid arrest case. Australia. Think we can’t win? Monica will change your mind.  (URL:   https://www.rebelnews.com/the_price_of_freedom_monica_smit_speaks_out)

Andrew Bridgen on Starmer, Trump & War with Russia (URL  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQx3AARRXEs4558^tucQpx^)

Bridgen is excellent.  Among other things he talks about “the illusion of choice” in political parties. “it’s happening all around the world” . . . “corporations with more power than nations, and that’s very, very dangerous . . .”

Posted earlier re Bridgen:   2024-04-18 Covid: Another important day, the U.K. Parliament

2024-09-14 TO: Jordan Peterson & John Rustad, Small Modular Nuclear Reactors.

2024-09-12 UN ‘Pact for the Future’: Digital IDs, Vaccine Passports, Massive Censorship. Michael Nevradakis, CHD

2024-09-11 Their Vaccine Injury Reports Disappeared From VAERS — So They Developed a Tool Anyone Can Use to Track Their Own Reports. Baletti, CHD

2024-09-14 CARPAY: COVID-19 in Italy, what actually happened? “Nothing statistically significant, actually”. Western Standard

2024-09-05 Covid Apocalypse and the triumph of fear over facts, JCCF

2024-09-13 The UK and US Plot Global Speech Crackdown

2024-09-10 Reclaim the Net: strong on fighting censorship

2024-08-30 Why Did Zuckerberg Choose Now to Confess? By Jeffrey Tucker, Brownstone Institute

2024-09-11 Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) orders all COVID vaccines destroyed. By Tamara Ugolini, Rebel News.

2024-09-09 STIFF SENTENCES: Jail terms handed down to Coutts 2, Carbert and Olienick six-and-half years apiece. PLUS Packed gallery, disappointing outcome in Coutts sentencing. Both by By Jen Hodgson, Western Standard

2024-09- Important interview, lawyer Lisa Miron with Tamara Ugolini, Rebel News. Bill C-293.

2024-09-07 Tamara Lich’s lawyer, Lawrence Greenspon, They’ve nothing on Tamara, as far as her actual involvement on the streets.

2024-09-10 Jordan Peterson faces five new complaints from woke censors, by Alex Dhaliwal, Rebel News. (I battle for principles of Free Speech.)

2024-09-09 1 Million March for Children gaining momentum as second event looms. By Linda Slobodian. Western Standard.

2024-08-28 In the beginning (#1 in a series to wind down to something different)

Sep 232024
 

My God!  these young women are good – – AND they’re EVERYWHERE, around the Planet!   Spectacular messaging.  Have a listen to Monica.  (No fund-raising.  No donations being sought.)

Freedom activist Monica Smit has won her case against Victoria Police for false arrests but still faces up to $250,000 in court costs.

With thanks to (Rebel News) – –

Anti-lockdown campaigner Monica Smit has secured a legal victory against Victoria Police, with a court ruling that two out of three of her arrests during Melbourne’s brutal Covid lockdowns were unlawful.

However, despite this, the founder of Reignite Democracy Australia now faces the potential burden of paying up to $250,000 in legal fees.

Smit, who represented herself during the trial, stood firm against a team of taxpayer funded lawyers, stating that her motivation was public vindication rather than financial compensation.

 

“I got exactly what I wanted, which was public vindication,” she said, after the County Court of Victoria awarded her just $4,000 in damages for the unlawful arrests.

She revealed that she had been offered a settlement of $15,000 before the trial but turned it down as it lacked accountability.

“It wasn’t about the money; I wanted a public apology,” she said. However, due to the court awarding a lower amount, Smit now faces paying the legal costs for Victoria Police, which could exceed $250,000.

 

Last Thursday 12th September, I won a 13-day trial against the government self-represented. The next day the court then ordered me to pay the loser’s legal expenses of over $240,000. Yes, it’s insane I know but don’t worry it’s not over.
1. I will NOT be running a fundraiser BUT you can help by buying my audiobook 🙂 monicasmit.com/shop
2. Don’t let the cost order be the thing you remember…remember that I won…WE WON! They want to scare you into not pursuing justice…don’t fall for it.
4. Don’t feel bad for me…this isn’t over. I will not be paying any large bills to them without negotiating and getting clear explanations.
3. This won’t stop us, this will just make us stronger. My next case will be way better and I’ve learned a lot that I can apply to that.
16.9K   Views

Smit voiced concern about the message this outcome sends to others seeking justice.

“It sends a really dangerous message that even if you win, you can still lose in the end,” she remarked, adding that she plans to appeal the decision to protect others from facing similar consequences.

Despite the financial setback, Smit remains resolute:

“I still won,” she declared, calling out Victoria Police for their unlawful actions and holding them to account in the courts.

Monica Smit / Reignite Democracy Australia
@reignitedemaust
This isn’t the end…maybe it’s only the beginning 

Image

17.6K  Views
 
Sep 152024
 
 Censorship/Surveillance

World leaders will convene later this month in New York to discuss proposals that critics believe will enshrine global digital ID and online censorship and give the U.N. secretary-general unprecedented emergency powers.

head controlling the globe with UN logo inside head

 

World leaders will convene later this month in New York to discuss proposals that critics believe will enshrine global digital ID and online censorship and give the United Nations (U.N.) secretary-general unprecedented emergency powers.

Proposals to be discussed at the 79th U.N. General Assembly include the Pact for the Future, described by the U.N. as an “opportunity to create international mechanisms that better reflect the realities of the 21st century and can respond to today’s and tomorrow’s challenges and opportunities.”

The proposed Pact for the Future encompasses 11 policy proposals. These include proposals for the establishment of a U.N. “Emergency Platform” and a “Global Digital Compact,” and policy proposals on “Information Integrity” and “Transforming Education.”

Also among the U.N.’s proposals is the “Declaration on Future Generations.”

Under these proposals, the secretary-general would have “standing authority” to declare “an Emergency Platform in the event of a future complex global shock of sufficient scale, severity and reach.”

Discussions for the Pact for the Future will take place under the auspices of the Summit of the Future, described as “a high-level event, bringing world leaders together to forge a new international consensus on how we deliver a better present and safeguard the future.”

The proposals are part of “Our Common Agenda,” an initiative described as “the Secretary-General’s vision for the future of global cooperation.”

 

Coming to a​​theater near youSeptember 2024
Get Tickets

 

‘Lack of checks and balances is very worrying’

Critics of the proposals warned The Defender that they threaten personal and health freedom, will grant the U.N. unprecedented powers and may lead to an internationally binding treaty.

Dutch attorney Meike Terhorst said the U.N. is attempting to attain “more executive power.”

Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., professor of international law at the University of Illinois, told The Defender, “What the secretary-general is trying to do is an end run around the United Nations charter and delegate to himself all the powers he can possibly assume.”

“The lack of checks and balances is very worrying. The member states will have very little or no power,” Terhorst said, noting that these proposals are drawing increasing opposition as they threaten national sovereignty.

The emergency powers and other proposals contained in the pact may have ominous consequences for humanity, Boyle warned.

“The most pernicious [outcomes] would certainly be extremely dangerous vaccines that probably would violate the Nuremberg Code on medical experimentation, such as these mRNA vaccines, and then also censorship, outright censorship for anyone who dissents,” Boyle said.

Other experts warned the U.N. is not being fully transparent.

According to independent journalist James Roguski, “The U.N. is not being fully transparent about the process leading up to the Summit of the Future. At this time, a consensus agreement has not been reached and the status of the three documents has not been honestly presented to the general public.”

Roguski noted that a fourth revision of the Global Digital Compact was drafted Aug. 27 but “has not been made publicly available on the U.N. website.”

And according to Dr. Meryl Nass, founder of Door to Freedom, the pact “puts the U.N. ‘at the center’ of international affairs, giving the U.N. unspecified powers.” It contains no definitions for the terms used, “allowing it to be interpreted later in ways citizens may not like.”

A means of ‘turbocharging’ the ‘Great Reset’?

Critics also connected the U.N.’s proposals to the agendas of other international organizations, such as the World Economic Forum (WEF), which promoted the “Great Reset” and “Fourth Industrial Revolution.”

“In spirit, the Summit and Pact for the Future is a relaunch of the Great Reset,” said Tim Hinchliffe, publisher of The Sociable. “Both talk about reshaping our world, which includes a desire to transform the financial system and to implement global governance surrounding issues such as climate change, healthcare and all things related to the SDGs” (Sustainable Development Goals).

“While the WEF has no direct, authoritative or legislative power to carry out its agendas, the Pact for the Future would be signed by member states whose governments wield actual executive and legislative powers,” Hinchliffe said.

“What they are trying to do is to take the WEF agenda … and turn it into solid international law and from there into solid domestic law,” Boyle said.

According to Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D., author of “The Great Reset and the Struggle for Liberty: Unraveling the Global Agenda,” the U.N.’s proposals “have been written in support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the ‘global governance’ regime that it aims to establish.”

Rectenwald said the proposals involve “accelerating the achievement of the SDGs” and represent the U.N.’s continued “attempt to establish a global socialist world system that is ‘inclusive’ and ‘equitable.’”

“‘Inclusion’ is achieved through such technological means as closing the ‘digital divide,’ which depends on the universal adoption of a digital identity system. Digital identity is the means by which one is ‘included’ and without which one essentially does not exist. Thus, there is to be nothing outside the system — i.e., totalitarian governance,” Rectenwald said.

 

Gavel and money vaccines

Did DOJ Lawyers Commit Fraud in the Omnibus Autism Proceeding?
Learn More

 

Global Digital Compact calls for digital IDs, vaccine passports

Accompanying the Pact for the Future is a proposal for “A Global Digital Compact — an Open, Free and Secure Digital Future for All.”

Published May 2023, the proposed compact sets out “principles, objectives and actions for advancing an open, free, secure and human-centred digital future, one that is anchored in universal human rights and that enables the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals.”

However, the compact contains proposals for the introduction of digital ID, “digital public goods” and “digital product passports,” and calls for “addressing disinformation” and preventing the “misuse” of online tools.

“With digital ID, it is easier for governments to censor and threaten voices with a different opinion,” Terhorst said. “In the U.N. proposals, suppressing ‘disinformation’ or ‘hateful speech’ is mentioned. Who is to decide what information is right and what is wrong?”

Information Integrity on Digital Platforms” policy brief goes further, specifically addressing “threats to information integrity,” such as so-called “misinformation” and “disinformation.” It also calls for “empirically-backed consensus around facts, science and knowledge,” but does not clarify how this “consensus” would be determined.

Similarly, a policy brief on “Transforming Education,” proposes “incorporating practices that strengthen the ability of learners and teachers to navigate the increasing flow of false and fake information.”

The compact also proposes “Novel platform-based vaccine technologies and smart vaccine manufacturing techniques … to produce greater numbers of higher-quality vaccines.”

Terhorst said the goal of digital ID is to introduce global vaccine passports that would “overrule the right of everyone to say no to a vaccination.”

Hinchliffe noted that the U.N. has “established principles for a ‘Code of Conduct‘ that calls on not just member states, but private groups such as stakeholders, digital platforms, advertisers, and news media to crush narratives that go against the U.N. and the SDGs.”

 

Secretary-general ‘trying to set himself up as the UN dictator’

According to Boyle, the U.N. secretary-general is “supposed to function as a secretary in charge of the secretariat,” but these proposals are trying to “set himself up as the U.N. dictator.” He noted that the U.N. is composed of six independent organs, but said these proposals may usurp their independence.

“He would have authority over them and arguably could exert authority over U.N. specialized agencies like the World Health Organization. That ties in with the International Health Regulations and the Pandemic Treaty,” Boyle said.

Boyle argued that by specifically referring to the Pact for the Future as a “pact,” the U.N. is intentionally “trying to turn this into an international treaty that is binding” under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

“If you call it a pact … that would clearly fall within the terms of the Vienna Convention,” Boyle said.

“We’re in the fight of our lives here. The world has to be alerted to the dangers of this pact.”

Sep 152024
 

After a group of people injured by the COVID-19 vaccine asked the FDA for an external audit of VAERS, they never heard from the agency again. Now they’re developing a system to audit vaccine injury reports in a continuing struggle to hold public health officials accountable.

vaers logo and covid-19 vaccine syringe

A team of researchers is developing a tool to track reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), so vaccine-injured people can follow what happens to the reports they submit.

As part of a broader effort to hold public health agencies accountable, the tool will also make it possible to audit the VAERS system by identifying what types of reports are deleted, insufficiently updated or contain errors.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which jointly oversee VAERS, have refused to do this work despite multiple appeals by advocates for the vaccine-injured, according to React19, the group leading the initiative.

React19, founded by a small group of medical professionals injured by COVID-19 vaccines, works with institutions and providers to increase understanding and awareness of patients experiencing lasting effects following COVID-19 and/or COVID-19 vaccines.

The group is teaming up with computer programmer Liz Willner, founder of OpenVAERS — a website that provides tools for more easily accessing and searching VAERS data — and Children’s Health Defense (CHD) to develop the tool.

Coming to a​​theater near youSeptember 2024
Get Tickets

The idea for developing the automatic VAERS report tracking tool came out of a VAERS audit the group conducted in 2022 to assess how the FDA and CDC were following up on COVID-19 vaccine injury reports.

React19 worked with outside experts to review a sample of 126 VAERS reports filed by some of its members who wanted to know what happened to their reports.

After tracking down each person’s reports and following them through the VAERS system, they “were kind of shocked at how bad it is,” members of React19 told The Defender.

They found that only 61% of the reports filed were correctly logged and published in VAERS. Twenty-two percent of the reports were never issued a permanent ID and are therefore not publicly visible, 12% were deleted and in 5% of the cases, a report couldn’t be filed or their report number remains unknown due to system errors.

That means more than 1 in 3 reports searched couldn’t be found in a database that is meant to be publicly accessible and transparent. It also suggests that problems of “omission of data and underreporting may be even greater than estimated,” according to the audit report.

The group also found that the medical status of the deleted reports, “by and large, had a worse outcome than the ones that were still in the system,” they said. For example, they said, in the public-facing VAERS system, 23% of reports were for permanent disabilities — but in the deleted reports, 53% were for permanent disability.

“One of the more alarming things we found out was that not all death reports are investigated,” Brianne Dressen, React19 founder, told The Defender.

The group brought this to the attention of public health officials in their meetings, sharing examples of reports that had been updated by people’s families when they died, but didn’t show up on the public system.

They also found that many follow-up reports containing updates on worsening symptoms were gone from the system.

At the time, the group was meeting regularly with top officials, including Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, to discuss vaccine injuries and why the agencies were doing nothing to address them.

In those meetings, according to Dressen and React19 member Dr. Joel Wallskog, when they raised the issue that the agencies weren’t following up on VAERS reports, the FDA told them VAERS wasn’t a reliable indicator for vaccine injuries, because anyone could file an injury complaint, including “Mickey Mouse or Michael Jackson.”

“We told them we know thousands of people that have not had any follow-up on their VAERS reports that are not Mickey Mouse, and they’re suffering it every single day waiting for you guys to get back to them to investigate what happened to them,” Dressen said.

“And of course then they never did anything. So we were like, OK, fine. If they’re not going to generate the evidence, then we will ourselves.”

The group submitted their findings to Marks during a meeting with him and his team. Based on their findings they also requested an external audit of the entire VAERS system and posed a series of questions listed on their audit report webpage.

They never heard from the agencies again.

“We were like, really?” Dressen said. “We were having these regular meetings with them every one month or every two months, and then after that, they wouldn’t meet with us anymore.”

Dressen, who was injured in the AstraZeneca clinical trials and whose diagnosis of post-vaccine neuropathy and other vaccine-related disorders was confirmed by the National Institutes of Health, said her own VAERS report is not visible to the public. The agencies haven’t told her why.

More recently, still hoping for accountability from the public health agencies, React19 submitted its audit and complaint to the Office of Inspector General at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The only response they received was an autoresponse confirming receipt of the complaint.

Gavel and money vaccines

Did DOJ Lawyers Commit Fraud in the Omnibus Autism Proceeding?
Learn More

Attempt to ‘bring power back to the people’

In its small pilot audit, React19 found the VAERS system is “obviously broken from top to bottom.” According to Dressen, “One thing we can easily conclude is that the FDA and CDC have no interest in addressing these issues.”

Now, the group is scaling up the project to do a larger audit with more data.

With help from OpenVAERS and CHD, the team built a backend, automated administrative tracking system that eliminates the need to manually search for each report and its journey through VAERS — something the analysts had to do for the first iteration of their audit.

Participants will register on the React19 website and will be invited — if they are interested — to share their stories as part of the organization’s project to collect and publish vaccine injury testimonials.

Users can share any information they have about their VAERS report — their ID number if they have one, or if not, details about their case. Then they will receive a monthly email with the status of their report.

For example, someone who has a user ID and a public-facing report will be informed if their report disappears. In the case of those people who filed a VAERS complaint but never got an ID number, the system will search each month for the record and try to find the ID.

“We’ll be able to track these reports through the system and figure out what happens to them,” Willner said. “Do they disappear? Do they appear and the person doesn’t get notified? Do they appear incorrectly?”

“So people will be able to track their own reports with less effort and React19 will be able to audit a much larger user base than they initially did.”

Willner said auditing VAERS in this way also reveals details about how the agencies are “either lying or deliberately obfuscating the process.” In the first audit, it was clear there was no systematic or automated way that, for example, reports were deleted.

The tracker and the audit will provide valuable data that no one else has. Rather than having only the stories, Willner said, they will have the data backing up those stories. “Now we have a group of injured people that are all talking with one voice.”

“Without more pressure and more discovery,” Wallskog said, “I don’t think we’re ever going to get the truth out. Ultimately, we want to get this information to the masses of people that just don’t know what’s happening, particularly with this data, and that we’ve all been duped.”

Dressen said the project is an attempt to “bring the power back to the people.”

The COVID-19 vaccine produced a large swath of vaccine injuries all at the same time, she said. Auditing the COVID-19 entries in VAERS will provide an opportunity “to show through massive numbers where those problems are, not just with the systems that are supposed to be monitoring vaccine safety, but also the actual harms themselves and what those are, but the government’s not doing their job on that.”

This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

Please Donate Today

The two faces of VAERS and the problem of accountability

Willner said Dressen’s injury report, sitting in VAERS limbo, spoke to one of the major issues around claims of transparency in the database — that there are two versions of VAERS, a public-facing database and a private one.

The BMJ reported last year that it investigated the VAERS database and found that the public facing database contains only initial reports. And “a private, back end system containing all updates and corrections — such as a formal diagnosis, recovery, or death.”

The CDC told The BMJ that this was part of patient confidentiality, but the publication found that in the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System, they do update the database — “raising the question of why VAERS can’t do the same.”

And during the React19 audit, the group found that VAERS was sometimes deleting people’s legitimate reports or the more detailed updated reports that some people were submitting.

Another problem, Willner noted, is that a lot of key information — such as race, pregnancy and report provider — is unnecessarily withheld from public VAERS reports. She also said the agencies sometimes leave reports on there that are clearly false or jokes, which then discredits the database in the public’s eyes.

On the CDC website, Willner said, “you’re basically looking at a doctored set of books.”

Wallskog said the agencies “try to live on both sides of the fence” with VAERS, presenting it as a key tool for monitoring vaccine injuries. But when it shows a safety signal or an issue with vaccines, they discredit it as a problematic surveillance system with a lot of limitations that can’t be trusted.

“It’s incredibly frustrating for injured people,” he said.

The team working on the new VAERS tracking system and audit said they hope it will raise public awareness and force the public health agencies to take responsibility for the vaccine injuries.

Rochelle Walensky said the CDC is charged with finding legitimate vaccine injuries and reporting them,” Willner said. She added:

“If that’s the case, where is that? We don’t have access to the actual database to figure it out so we want to know where is the report from the CDC on the people that were actually injured by the COVID vaccine that the government accepts were legitimately injured? That report doesn’t exist.”