Sandra Finley

Dec 122023
 

(NOTE: My history with StatsCan began in 2003-04 when Quakers (a.k.a. Society of Friends) in Nova Scotia alerted Canadians to the plans for Lockheed Martin Corporation’s participation at StatsCan.   It was also my introduction to “good” journalism turned bad through edits made by the publishers.  (NYT in the particular example.)   And Government officials who lied through their teeth under oath in a court of law.

A new Canadian government report reveals a 300% rise in “unspecified causes” of death from 2019-2022 as unknown causes climbed to the fifth leading cause of death in Canada. Some health experts said the stark increase should trigger an investigation into whether the deaths are linked to COVID-19 vaccines.

bronchitis, emphysema, asthma, diabetes, influenza and pneumonia, chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, Alzheimer’s and suicide as causes of death.

Statistics Canada, also known as StatCan, released the report on Nov. 27 in The Daily, the agency’s online news bulletin.

The report generated a slew of nearly identical headlines — provided by Canada’s national news service — in Canada’s leading newspapers along the lines of this one in the Toronto Sun: “Life expectancy for Canadians fell for third straight year in 2022, StatCan says,” followed by the subhead: “More people died of COVID-19 in 2022 than in any other year since the pandemic began, report says.”

Andre Picard, health columnist at The Globe and Mail in Toronto, Canada’s newspaper of record, called the life expectancy drop — to 81.3 years in 2022 from 82.3 years in 2019 — “a big deal.”

“It’s only the second time this sharp a drop has happened in Canada in the past century,” Picard said. “In fact, life expectancy has been climbing steadily for decades: 71 in 1960, 75 in 1980, 79 in 2000 and 82.3 in 2019.”

COVID-19 deaths in Canada decreased to 14,466 in 2021 from 16,313 in 2020, the report shows. Canada is on track for about 7,000 COVID-19 deaths in 2023, Picard said.

COVID-19 deaths can’t account for Canada’s 7.3 % increase in total deaths in 2022 compared with 2021 — or for the country’s 17% increase in total deaths over the historic norm of 2019, or the historic drop in life expectancy in Canada and worldwide, Picard said.

Like many mainstream journalists and public health officials in the U.S. examining the U.S. drop in life expectancy, Picard blamed chronic diseases, drug overdoses, opioid deaths, smoking, unhealthy diets and “indifference” for the decline in Canada. “There are virtually no mitigation measures like masking any more, and vaccination rates have fallen sharply,” he wrote.

But Drs. Pierre Kory and Peter McCullough told The Defender they believe the most important and startling fact contained in the report is the 300% increase from 2019 to 2022 in “unspecified causes” of death in Canada.

McCullough, a highly published cardiologist who developed a widely used early treatment protocol for COVID-19, said the dramatic rise in deaths from “unspecified causes” in Canada represents a seismic and disturbing shift in Western medicine.

“Prior to the pandemic, death in Western countries was well understood,” McCullough said, with 40% due to known cardiovascular, 40% due to terminal neoplastic disease (cancer) and 20% due to other known causes such as homicide, suicide, drug overdoses and accidents.”

He added:

“Since the roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccines, we have witnessed unprecedented deaths without antecedent disease. A large autopsy series published by Hulscher et al, found that 73.9% of the deaths after COVID-19 vaccination were due to problems caused by the shots.”

McCullough cited the hundreds of studies examining post-vaccine, spike-protein-related injuries and deaths and the millions of deaths and injuries reported by citizens in the U.S. and Europe to their governments following mRNA vaccination.

“All deaths should be categorized according to the doses and dates of COVID-19 vaccination,” McCullough said. “Unless proven otherwise, ‘unspecified death’ should be attributed to a fatal COVID-19 vaccine injury syndrome,” McCullough said.

Kory, the former University of Wisconsin professor of medicine and president of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, told The Defender the evidence is overwhelming that the COVID-19 mRNA shots caused more deaths and injuries across the Western world than any prior drug or vaccine in history.

“The answer as to why ‘unspecified causes’ are now a leading cause of death is plain and simple,” Kory said. “That cause is the one medical intervention that the world’s governments and media have championed since the start [of the pandemic]. … The mRNA platform technology is and has been a colossal failure in both efficacy and safety.”

Kory and journalist Mary Beth Pfeiffer on Tuesday published an opinion piece in The Hill calling on governments and public health officials to study and address the problem of a global historic rise in mortality thus far not recognized by officials and not reported by mainstream journalists.

On Dec. 13, the essay was trending as the first or second most popular story on The Hill’s website, which claims 32.5 million monthly unique visitors.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Robert Califf on Nov. 30 published an extraordinary thread of posts on X (formerly Twitter) calling for a society-wide “all hands on deck” approach to solve the problem of the “catastrophic” decline in U.S. life expectancy.

“JAMA Internal Medicine published earlier this month that our overall life expectancy has dropped to 76 years, and remarkably, that male life expectancy in the U.S. has dropped to 73 years,” Califf wrote.

But Kory said the FDA commissioner’s post, “which hit on smoking, diet, chronic illness and healthcare, ignored the obvious: People are dying in abnormally high numbers even now and long since COVID waned. Yet public health agencies and medical societies are silent.”

The FDA and mainstream media are ignoring the fact that life insurers have been “sounding the alarm over these unexpected or, ‘excess,’ deaths, which claimed 158,000 more Americans in the first nine months of 2023 than in the same period in 2019,” Kory wrote.

“That exceeds America’s combined losses from every war since Vietnam. Congress should urgently work with insurance experts to investigate this troubling trend.”

Amy Kelly, COO of DailyClout and the program director of the Pfizer Documents Analysis Project, said that for an autopsy to reach a proper diagnosis of an mRNA-vaccine-caused death, “histopathological examination of tissues from all over the body is necessary. Most of the time, even if an autopsy is performed, the histopathological examination of tissues is not.”

She cited an interview with Dr. Arne Burkhardt, who describes the types of testing the coroners must perform but seldom do.

Dr. Robert Chandler, a Los Angeles orthopedic surgeon who taught at the University of Southern California medical school, identified “entire new disease categories” he calls “CoVax Diseases” in his study of Pfizer’s 450,000 pages of COVID-19 vaccine documents, documents the FDA was forced to release via a court order, Kelly said.

“It makes sense that the unspecified causes of death have increased so much,” Kelly said. “When a patient dies with either multiple diseases all at one time or with a previously unseen disease state, both of which happen with ‘CoVax Diseases’ Dr. Chandler has identified, I would imagine many doctors and/or coroners don’t know how to categorize those causes of death. That would lead to ‘cause unknown’ categorization of deaths.”

According to Naomi Wolf, author of “Facing the Beast: Courage, Faith and Resistance in a New Dark Age,” “In the preindustrial world, people died mysteriously. But in the modern Western world, there are no mystery deaths. Every death has a death certificate which by law must identify a cause of death.”

“A minor rise in unattributed deaths is a problem that needs investigation,” Wolf said. “A major rise, such as you’ve identified, does not indicate a mass mystery to doctors and coroners, but rather it is evidence of a problem with state record-keeping — some bureaucratic malfeasance at a grand scale.”

Dec 102023
 

TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre announces that the Ontario Civilian Police Commission will hear the appeal of Constable Michael Brisco today, who is challenging his conviction and penalty for donating to the Ottawa Freedom Convoy in early 2022. This case raises questions about the Charter’s protection for freedom of expression, the right of police officers to support political causes while off duty, and the privacy rights of all Canadians.

Constable Michael Brisco of the Windsor Police Service is a highly trained and respected police officer with no prior disciplinary record. He made a $50 donation to the peaceful Freedom Convoy protest through the GiveSendGo fundraising platform on February 8, 2022 – one day after an Ontario Superior Court Judge held that people could continue to engage in “peaceful, lawful and safe protest” in Ottawa so long as honking ceased. When making his donation, Constable Brisco did not identify himself as a police officer and did not contribute to the protest in his capacity as a police officer.

Days later, the GiveSendGo donor list was hacked. The Ontario Provincial Police Service acquired the list and forwarded a set of names to the Windsor Police Service, who discovered that Constable Brisco had donated to the protest.

The Windsor Police Service then chose to charge Constable Brisco for “discreditable conduct.”

After a six-day hearing before an Ontario Provincial Police Adjudicator, Constable Brisco was found guilty of discreditable conduct by a Tribunal on March 24, 2023. Two months later, on May 18, 2023, the Tribunal ordered that Constable Brisco should forfeit pay for 80 hours of work as a penalty.

With the support of the Justice Centre, on June 14, 2023, Constable Brisco filed a Notice of Appeal with Ontario Civilian Police Commission, challenging his conviction and the imposed penalty.

Counsel for Constable Brisco argue that the prosecution against him lacks sufficient evidence. The claim that the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa was an unlawful protest rested entirely on claims made in newspaper articles by various officials, including the Prime Minister and the Premier of Ontario. No credible video, photographic, or other evidence on this point was filed against Constable Brisco. Further, counsel for Constable Brisco argue that the evidence against him – a hacked list that ought to have remained private and confidential – was obtained illegally. Counting the donor list as evidence against Constable Brisco amounts to an abuse of process, counsel argue.

Brisco’s legal counsel further argue that his conviction and penalty rested on a claim that Mr. Brisco’s donation was a demonstration of support for the Ambassador Bridge blockade in Windsor, Ontario; Mr. Brisco argues that there is no evidence of a link between the Ottawa protest and the Windsor blockade, and he denied any support for the blockade during his hearing.

Finally, Constable Brisco argues that the Tribunal’s decisions to convict and discipline him fail to acknowledge or proportionately balance their impact on his Charter-protected right to freedom of expression. While a police officer’s right to free expression is limited during the performance of their duties as officers, Constable Brisco did not donate to the Freedom Convoy in his capacity as a police officer. He also expected the donation to be confidential, and he did not seek to advertise his giving. The expression of off-duty police officers is protected by the Charter to the same degree as the expression of any other citizen.

Darren Leung, one of the lawyers for Constable Brisco, stated, “Freedom of expression is a right that is guaranteed to all Canadians. Police officers are also entitled to express their political beliefs, so long as they do it without identifying themselves as police. Furthermore, it is an injustice that Constable Brisco was investigated on the basis of illegally obtained information. Instead of investigating who was responsible for the hack, the Windsor Police Service have dedicated their resources in prosecuting Constable Brisco.”

“Every Canadian, including police and also including doctors, nurses, teachers and other regulated professionals, has a right to donate to the cause of her or his choice, and to do so privately and confidentially. No Canadian should face disciplinary proceedings at the hands of her or his professional association for expressing support for a cause or movement,” stated John Carpay, President of the Justice Centre.

Dec 062023
 

Repeal Bill 36,  the Health Professions & Occupations Act.   First class tyranny.

Do the health care providers in my community know what’s going on, that affects them:

  • at the LEGISLATURE?
  • In the COURTS?

I will deliver the following to as many local healthcare providers as I can.  I want them and us to talk to the local MLA.   There’s a self-interest .   . . .

The Health Professions & Occupations Act does this, unbelievably: 

1. All BC practitioners must now follow health guidelines set by political appointees for their
patients or risk penalties including loss of license to practice.


2.
Noncompliance with Ministry therapeutic guidelines may result in fines up to $200,000 or
$500,000 (corporations) and incarceration up to 6 months or 2 years.1


3.
Anonymous complaints to the Colleges can result in summary suspension of licensure to
practice before the complaint is investigated.2,3


4.
Appointees chosen by politicians may now enter a healthcare practice, seize patient records
and restrict access to that facility without a warrant or court order.4


5.
Refusal to accept all Ministry mandated vaccines and therapies will likely result in
delicensure.5


6.
College advisory boards will now consist of government appointees only.6


7.
All selfregulatory healthcare professions in BC will be governed entirely by politicians and
their agents, using appointees selected by the Ministry of Health.7


8.
The Cabinet and the Minister of Health can adopt as law in BC any regulations, codes,
standards or rules enacted in foreign jurisdictions or international bodies.8

Bill 36 was one of the largest bills ever passed in British Columbia, consisting of 645 sections and 276 pages, . . . read more at The Canadian Society for Science & Ethics in Medicine      https://www.cssem.org/about-us.

 STATUS OF BILL 36, B.C. Health Professions & Occupations Act, as at Dec 7, 2023.  (I phoned the Legislature AND I had a conversation at my MLA’s office to confirm):

The Act was passed a year ago.  HOWEVER, not all the provisions have yet been translated into Regulations.  There is time to drop into the office of MLA Adam Walker on 2nd Ave in Qualicum Beach.  They want you to phone ahead and book an appointment.  But the matter is urgent.  I’d suggest that you jot a note and drop in.  Time is short to get Bill 36 repealed.  I have found the staff in Adam Walker’s office to be receptive.  Just be normal and courteous.  Ask questions – – like is this true?  – –  Or, as you wish. – –   Have your friends go to the MLA’s office.  He needs to know that WE ARE SERIOUS about getting the legislation repealed.

Doctors’ insights on case against Bonnie Henry’s two-year vaccine mandate for healthcare workers

Youtube coverage at the Legislature, Drea Humphrey from Rebel News. Hear what very reasonable Doctors have to say: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hh9p4u4fJhM&list=PL2HWRRSziC_FxsJ40Y3ZFiWPmSQxzjtxJ&index=7

 The Canadian Society for Science & Ethics in Medicine      https://www.cssem.org/about-us

A comprehensive source of information and resources for Bill 36. https://www.cssem.org/_files/ugd/80db6e_9ff1aa4a5b9d40339da613e48afa4dbb.pdf

There is a legal analysis of the Bill by Gail Davidson, etc.

The counsel for the group of doctors bringing the case against the two-year mandate for healthcare workers used public health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry’s contradictory statements to argue the case.

 

(Doc #2 in support)   2023-11-15 Doctors warn British Columbians about the province’s tyrannical health care act. I think You will want to see this.  (Bill 36)

The take-away from the interviews:  Few Doctors and other healthcare workers KNOW ABOUT THIS BILL, and what it does.

(Doc #4 in support)   2023-11-29 B.C.:   Bonnie Henry named as defendant in class-action lawsuit over her role in COVID-19 vaccine mandate

(Doc #3 in support)   ONTARIO COURT CASES AGAINST DOCTORS   (Regulating and reporting is by Province.  I found these reports, don’t have time to do more.)

2023-02-19   Ontario Doctors who Dissented from Covid-19 Doctrines Fight for their Professional Lives. by Jason Unrau. C2C Journal.

 

 

Dec 062023
 

RELATED:   (2 of 2) Next Evidentiary Video: Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

I was condemned by a Board, without notice, and without an opportunity to respond to the charges.

It’s not how it works in this country.

No one of us can afford NOT to respond:

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023

Hi (name removed),

I expect to be able to present my side before I am condemned.  I expect not to be tried in absentia.

The email I sent is below.  PLEASE scroll down to the high-lighted text.  Did anyone READ it?   It’s an attack on the AMERICAN WEAPONS MANUFACTURERS, the American War Machine.

It’s about a War Crimes TribunalThe DEFENDANTS are Weapons Manufacturers.

The Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal will hold accountable — through testimony of witnesses — U.S. Weapons manufacturers who knowingly produce and sell products which attack and kill non-combatants. These manufacturers may have committed Crimes Against Humanity as well as violated U.S. Federal criminal laws. The Tribunal will hear the evidence and render a verdict.

I see how (Persons) reacted as they did.  However,  I forwarded the email as a solace to them, to let them know that people around the world are trying to stop the killing.

The email is as much about Afghanistan, Iraq, the bombing of Syria, the bombing of Libya, – –  the on-going wars that have bankrupted the Americans – – as it is about the Middle East.

The War Crimes Tribunal against the Weapons Manufacturers is an American-led action.  (The American federal public debt is currently $33 TRILLION thanks to their war economy.)     Lots of people in lots of countries pitch in to help the Americans stop the American role in creating the wars.

I thought it would be comforting for (Persons) to know that  people in the world work hard to get at the ROOT CAUSES of the insanity.   The email is a contribution to PEACE – – STOP the BLOODY KILLING.

I am condemned for forwarding an email that might bring solace?  I have no right to speak?

There is NO DIALOGUE?  What?  Do people think that we have no responsibility for what happens in the world?  May God or Allah or Yahweh or the Great Spirit help us all.

At the very bottom of this email  I appended  The Powerful Origin of Mother’s Day, 1870

Best wishes,   Sandra

NOTE:  the matter was resolved.  And I hope that the tenets of Canadian democracy were instilled.

= = =  = = = = =  = =

INFORMATION ON THE WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL, Lockheed Martin, Boeing and RTX (Raytheon) . . .

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: November 8
Subject: FW: Thanks for registering for the Tribunal!

Hi (Persons),

You might like to know about this.

Sorry – – if I try to clean it up,  everything is removed.

As you know, I don’t do zoom so I won’t be fully participating.   But usually the material is available afterwards on the organization’s website.  There are very good people involved.

I hope all is well with you and your family.

Sandra

From: Gail
Sent: November 8, 2023
To: Sandra Finley
Subject: Fwd: Thanks for registering for the Tribunal!

Hello Sandra;

I am registered for this and thought you also might like to attend. gail
——– Forwarded Message ——–

Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023
From: Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal
Dear Gail ,

Thank you for registering to participate in the Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal which will be launched on November 12th at 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The first episode will focus on Israel’s aerial bombardment against the people in Gaza, an historically monumental atrocity that could not happen at this time without the aircraft, missiles and bombs produced by three of the four defendants on trial before the Tribunal – Lockheed Martin, Boeing and RTX (Raytheon).

Weapon makers project obscene profits from U.S. funding for war. Last week, over 100 activists held a die-in protest blocking the main entrance of Raytheon’s office in Tucson, condemning Raytheon’s complicity in the genocide of Palestinians by supplying missiles, bombs and weapons systems to Israel.

Here is a list of action-oriented outdoor protests being planned in cities around the world.

Following the senseless “industrialized slaughter” of World War I, antiwar protesters vowed never again to tolerate merchants of death dragging them into horrific wars. Over 1,000 people have joined you in registering for the Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal. Please encourage more people to register by sharing this link: https://actionnetwork.org/events/us-weapons-makers-to-be-tried-by-war-crimes-tribunal-beginning-november-12-2023?clear_id=true

Kathy Kelly
Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal Organizer & World BEYOND War Board President

The Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal will hold accountable — through testimony of witnesses — U.S. Weapons manufacturers who knowingly produce and sell products which attack and kill non-combatants. These manufacturers may have committed Crimes Against Humanity as well as violated U.S. Federal criminal laws. The Tribunal will hear the evidence and render a verdict.
Donate to support the Tribunal.

Should giant war-profiteering corporations decide what emails you don’t want to read? We don’t think so either. So, please stop our emails from going into “junk” or “spam” by “white listing,” marking as “safe,” or filtering to “never send to spam.”

= = = = = = = =

I find it too sad – – the origin of Mother’s Day  is largely unknown:

The Powerful Origin of Mother’s Day, 1870

THE ORIGINAL MOTHER’S DAY PROCLAMATION, 1870, BY JULIA WARD HOWE

In the aftermath of the American Civil War (1861-65):

“Arise then, women of this day!  Arise all women who have hearts, whether your baptism be of water or of tears! 

“Say firmly”:  ‘We will not have questions decided by irrelevant agencies.  Our husbands shall not come to us reeking of carnage for caresses and applause.  Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn all that we have been able to teach them of charity, mercy, and patience.  We women of one country will be too tender to those of another country to allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs.  From the bosom of a devastated Earth a voice goes up with our own, it says “Disarm! Disarm!” The sword of murder is not the balance of justice.  Blood does not wipe out dishonor, nor violence indicate possession.’

“As men have forsaken the plow and the anvil at the summons of war, let women now leave all that may be left of home for a great and earnest day of counsel.  Let them meet first as women, to bewail and commemorate the dead.

Let them solemnly take counsel with each other as to the means whereby the great human family can live in peace. 

“In the name of womanhood and humanity, I earnestly ask that a general congress of women without limit of nationality be appointed to promote the alliance of the different nationalities, the amicable settlement of international questions, the great and general interests of peace.” 

By Julia Ward Howe.

(who went on to work internationally (in Africa and elsewhere) at uniting women, implementing the ideals of The Mothers Day Proclamation.

–   so much hard work and accomplishment.  And look!  It’s submerged.  Let’s re-float it!)

Sandra Finley

 

Dec 062023
 

(1 of 2) is Notice of the War Crimes Tribunal investigation into Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing. And I am condemned without notice.

= = = = =  = = =

 

These weapons manufacturers may have committed Crimes Against Humanity as well as violated U.S. Federal criminal laws. The Tribunal will hear the evidence and render a verdict.

Retired Col. Lawrence Wilkerson (U.S. Army) was Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell. In dramatic testimony,  . . .

EXCERPT:

Col. Wilkerson’s testimony is explicit and among the most compelling this Tribunal has collected. The link to watch this video evidence is here: https://rumble.com/v3zfbx7-empire-of-war-interview-with-col.-lawrence-wilkerson.html

(Sandra speaking)   The video is not for everyone.  I tend to think strategically.  I think it has to be circulated.  It’s the best chance we have for stopping what’ s happening.  I would say that Lawrence Wilkerson is a marked man because of his testimony.  If he can do what he has done, I have to pass this along to as many people as I can.  His testimony points to actions we can take.  I choose action over fear.

From: Merchants of Death War Crimes
Sent: December 5, 2023
Subject: Evidentiary Video: Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

Hello,

This new video evidentiary episode of the Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal provides what may be the most dramatic and damning testimony ever given by a United States military official.

Retired Col. Lawrence Wilkerson (U.S. Army) was Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell. In dramatic testimony, Col. Wilkerson exposes the corruption of the Military Industrial Complex and how it has hijacked U.S. foreign policy to create Endless War, huge profits for weapons makers, and caused the United States to be far less safe and secure in the world.

Col. Wilkerson’s testimony is explicit and among the most compelling this Tribunal has collected. The link to watch this video evidence is here: https://rumble.com/v3zfbx7-empire-of-war-interview-with-col.-lawrence-wilkerson.html

Please share this video link with friends and colleagues. Form discussion groups around all video evidence of the Tribunal. The link for previous video episodes of the Tribunal is here: https://rumble.com/user/merchantsofdeath

Encourage friends to sign up to receive future video segments of evidence here: https://actionnetwork.org/forms/sign-up-for-emails-from-the-merchants-of-death-war-crimes-tribunal?clear_id=true

You can watch the meetup discussion of December 3 where nonviolent action items to take in your community were discussed as well as a review of the evidence. That recording can be found here: https://rumble.com/v3zjbam-action-and-evidence-meetup-december-3-2023.html. And here is the chat from the December 3 meetup.

Lastly, do not forget to place on your calendar the next meetup session of the Tribunal scheduled for Saturday, December 30 at 2:00pm Eastern Time to discuss the evidence and share thoughts about action plans. You can register for the meetup here: https://actionnetwork.org/events/december-30-meetup?clear_id=true

We look forward to seeing you on Saturday, December 30 at 2 PM Eastern Time.

Brad Wolf, Kathy Kelly, and Nick Mottern
Organizers
Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal

The Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal will hold accountable — through testimony of witnesses — U.S. Weapons manufacturers who knowingly produce and sell products which attack and kill non-combatants. These manufacturers may have committed Crimes Against Humanity as well as violated U.S. Federal criminal laws. The Tribunal will hear the evidence and render a verdict.
Donate to support the Tribunal.

Should giant war-profiteering corporations decide what emails you don’t want to read? We don’t think so either. So, please stop our emails from going into “junk” or “spam” by “white listing,” marking as “safe,” or filtering to “never send to spam.”

Dec 042023
 

UPDATE:  see  2024-06-14, the second day of the trial against Henry (in Chilliwack).

Sandra speaking:     The last paragraph below catches much of the problem.

For my part:  I cannot comprehend How a doctor (Bonnie Henry) can live in the country of Canada and think that her modus operandi is acceptable?

JOHN KOOPMAN HAS COURAGE.  I stand in support of him for doggedly staying the course.  Koopman is a pastor;  which has nothing to do with the issue of, for example, Bonnie Henry giving  permission to select groups in the society, while denying the same permissions to other groups.  Who does she think she is?    . . .  And once again,  bless all the Canadians who have chipped in money to make these defenses against our own Governments possible.  I shudder to think where we’d be without every one of us pitching in, in small ways, to stop present-day tyranny in its many forms.  We will prevail.

John Koopman fights for all of us.  Please use these grievances  – – talk about them,  especially with people you know in the policing and judicial systems.   Make sure they know what’s happening.  This has to be stopped.   Silence will not do.  The mainstream media is not covering these cases.

= = = = = =  = =

BC pastor seeks Court order for the BC Attorney General and Provincial Health Officer to disclose records of exemptions provided after some records show that Dr. Bonnie Henry unfairly favoured some faith groups.

ABBOTSFORD, BC: The Justice Centre announces that Pastor John Koopman is challenging the prosecution against him after discovering that BC’s Provincial Health Officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry, granted preferential treatment to some faith groups over others. Pastor Koopman was charged with violating Covid gathering restrictions for hosting in-person worship services even while Dr. Henry allowed some Orthodox synagogues to gather for outdoor and even indoor services.

In a hearing running December 4-7, 2023, at the Abbotsford Law Courts, Pastor Koopman will be seeking records of the accommodation requests the Provincial Health Officer received and how she handled them, and records of communications she received from BC politicians about prohibiting in-person worship services.

The hearing will begin at 9:30 a.m. in courtroom 402 at Abbotsford Law Courts, 32203 South Fraser Way.

John Koopman is the Pastor of the Free Reformed Church in Chilliwack, British Columbia. In November 2020, Dr. Bonnie Henry prohibited in-person worship services while allowing bars, restaurants, gyms, and salons to remain open for in-person service.

Based on its religious convictions to gather for worship in-person, the Free Reformed Church re-opened its doors in 2020 and 2021 while simultaneously complying with health orders regarding face masks, hand washing, social distancing, etc. In January 2021, the Free Reformed Church, along with two other churches, filed a constitutional challenge to the prohibition on in-person worship services. After filing the challenge, Pastor Koopman and others submitted an accommodation request to gather for in-person worship services, but their request received no response for several weeks. At the same time, Dr. Henry had been responding promptly (within one or two days) to accommodation requests from Orthodox synagogues, granting them permission to meet in-person.

Two business days before the Court was to hear the constitutional challenge, Dr. Henry finally granted the Free Reformed Church and the two other churches limited permission to gather outdoors, while refusing permission to gather indoors, claiming this to be too risky. However, earlier that same week, Dr. Henry had granted all Orthodox synagogues in the province permission to gather indoors.

On March 18, 2021, BC Supreme Court Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson dismissed the Free Reformed Church’s challenge, in part because Dr. Henry had granted permission to meet outdoors. The BC Court of Appeal upheld Chief Justice Hinkson’s decision, and the Supreme Court of Canada subsequently denied leave to appeal.

Meanwhile, Pastor Koopman and other churches and pastors have been prosecuted by the Crown in the BC Provincial Courts. On November 8, 2022, Pastor Koopman was found guilty of hosting an in-person worship service on December 6, 2020.

On April 14, 2023, Pastor Koopman submitted an Application to the Provincial Court of British Columbia, alleging that the discriminatory actions of the Provincial Health Officer had made the continuation of his prosecution offensive to societal notions of fair play and decency and had brought the administration of justice into disrepute. In response, on May 10, the Crown argued that the abuse of process application should not proceed to an evidentiary hearing, and that Dr. Henry and Deputy Provincial Health Officer Dr. Brian Emerson should not be subpoenaed as witnesses in the case.

From May 15–18, 2023, Judge Andrea Ormiston heard arguments on whether the abuse of process Application could proceed to an evidentiary hearing. On September 6, 2023, Judge Ormiston denied the Crown’s Application to summarily dismiss Pastor Koopman’s abuse of process Application because she found that there was “some evidence that the PHO preferred some faith groups over others.” Judge Ormiston found that, under the circumstances, it was not “manifestly frivolous” to think that the continued prosecution of Pastor Koopman “risks undermining the integrity of the judicial process.”  Judge Ormiston did decline to allow Dr. Henry or Dr. Emerson to be subpoenaed in the matter.

The December 4–7 evidentiary hearing at the Provincial Court of British Columbia in Abbotsford will address whether the Attorney General of British Columbia and/or Dr. Bonnie Henry are required to:

  • Provide records of the accommodation requests Dr. Henry received and how she handled them;
  • Provide records of communications between Dr. Henry and the British Columbia Premier, Health Minister, and/or other elected officials and/or their staff in relation to restricting or prohibiting in-person worship gatherings.
Lawyer Marty Moore stated, “The actions of the Provincial Health Officer toward people of faith in British Columbia during Covid were frankly shameful. She categorically prohibited in-person gatherings for worship, indoor or outdoors, and even brought an injunction application seeking to have pastors and parishioners arrested for gathering for worship. At that same time, she was providing permission to select groups to meet for worship, both outdoors and, in some cases, indoors, while ignoring, from what we can tell, all other requests from other religious groups to meet. In this context, we believe that the prosecution of Pastors in BC for violating the PHO’s Orders ‘offend societal notions of fair play and decency and bring the administration of justice into disrepute,’ and that, consequently, these prosecutions should be stayed. The Court, and the public, deserve to see the evidence Pastor Koopman is seeking from the PHO on whether accommodation requests were granted based on science or other factors, and the extent to which politics played a role.”
Dec 022023
 

Robert F Kennedy Jr is a man of monumental stature.  Read the REVIEWS of his book below.

Interview:  25 minutes long.   Click, then scroll down a little.

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/the-wuhan-coverup-exclusive-interview-with-robert-f-kennedy-jr/  

== = = = = = = = =

 

The Wuhan Cover-Up
  • 600 Pages
  • December 5, 2023
  • ISBN: 9781510773981
  • Series: Children’s Health Defense
  • Imprint: Skyhorse Publishing
  • Trim Size: 6in x 9in x 0in

“RFK Jr. exposes the decades of lies.”—Luc Montagnier, Nobel laureate

From the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and Publishers Weekly bestselling author of The Real Anthony Fauci comes an explosive exposé of the cover-up behind the true origins of COVID-19.

“Gain-of-function” experiments are often conducted to deliberately develop highly virulent, easily transmissible pathogens for the stated purpose of developing preemptive vaccines for animal viruses before they jump to humans. More insidious is the “dual use” nature of this research, specifically directed toward bioweapons development.

The Wuhan Cover-Up pulls back the curtain on how the US government’s increase in biosecurity spending after the 2001 terror attacks set in motion a plan to transform the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), under the direction of Dr. Anthony Fauci, into a de facto Defense Department agency.

While Dr. Fauci zealously funded and pursued gain-of-function research, concern grew among some scientists and government officials about the potential for accidental or deliberate release of weaponized viruses from labs that might trigger worldwide pandemics. A moratorium was placed on this research, but true to form, Dr. Fauci found ways to continue unperturbed—outsourcing some of the most controversial experiments offshore to China and providing federal funding to Wuhan Institute of Virology’s (WIV’s) leading researchers for gain-of-function studies in partnership with the Chinese military and the Chinese Communist Party.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s meticulously researched and rigorously sourced analysis leads readers on a staggering journey to learn about:

  • the key enablers and henchmen pushing for gain-of-function research
  • the economic motives behind gain-of-function research
  • successfully engineered “chimeric viruses” that can infect and kill humans
  • the coordinated effort to silence speculation of COVID-19’s laboratory genesis
  • the complicity of scientific journals to hide the origins of COVID-19
  • the role of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China’s biowarfare/biodefense program
  • the relationships between US health, military, and intelligence bureaucracies and scientists and their Chinese counterparts
  • the roles of Bill Gates and Sir Jeremy Farrar in orchestrating a global cover-up

The Wuhan Cover-Up unveils a global conspiracy of epic proportion and lethal consequence.

= = = = = = =
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is the founder, chairman of the board (on leave), and chief litigation counsel (on leave) for Children’s Health Defense. He is an esteemed author, with a long list of published books including New York Times bestsellers The Real Anthony Fauci and Crimes Against Nature, as well as American Values: Lessons I Learned from My Family and Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak. Kennedy is the founder of Waterkeeper Alliance, and he was named one of Time magazine’s “Heroes for the Planet” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River. His reputation as a resolute defender of the environment and children’s health stems from a litany of successful legal actions. He received recognition for his role in the landmark victory against Monsanto, as well as in the DuPont case that inspired the movie Dark Waters (2019).

= = = = = = = = = = =

“RFK Jr. has done it again. The Wuhan Cover-Up is not only an indispensable history of the rise of the global threat of bioweaponry, it is also an oh-so-timely deep dive into how a viral pandemic was unleashed upon the world via the deceit, greed, and foolishness of bad actors at the highest levels of our own government. A stunning sequel to The Real Anthony Fauci, and an historic publication that answers the core national security—and existential—questions of our time.”
—Naomi Wolf, bestselling author of The Beauty Myth and The Bodies of Others“This’ll scare the hell out of you. The scariest part is it’s true. Thank God for Bobby Kennedy Jr.”
—Tucker CarlsonThe Wuhan Cover-Up will blow out of the water the international disinformation campaign by US and Chinese government officials and their bribed scientists that COVID-19 somehow magically jumped out of the Wuhan wet market. Kennedy’s book will provide the ammunition needed for us lawyers to hold them all legally accountable for this Nuremberg Crime against Humanity.”
—Professor Francis A. Boyle, author of the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989“Bioweapons are a forbidden fruit but an irresistible one because the criminal is rarely identified. Were coronavirus weapons so seductive that they blurred the line between friend and enemy? Bobby Kennedy lays out the facts in a book you won’t put down.”
—Meryl Nass, MD, biological warfare epidemiologist and anthrax expert“The title of US presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy’s new book, The Wuhan Cover-Up, does not really represent the scope and nature of this seminal work. This book is the most comprehensive historic summary and indictment of the history of the United States’ biowarfare/biodefense program ever written. Summarizing an amazing sweep of untold censored history, The Wuhan Cover-Up offers a case study demonstrating the consequences of the situational ethical slide which often occurs when a massive administrative bureaucracy fuses with an ‘intelligence community.’”
—Robert W. Malone, MD, MS, virologist, immunologist, clinical research and regulatory affairs expert, and author of Lies My Gov’t Told Me

“RFK Jr.’s painstaking research reveals facts that anyone can confirm, but few can accept. Bioweapons research and production has a dark history many people would want to wish away. Kennedy’s compelling book makes that impossible.”
—Gavin de Becker, bestselling author of The Gift of Fear

“An extraordinary elucidation of a singularly dark and terrible enterprise. The Wuhan Cover-Up is a meticulous work of scholarship that reads like a thrilling crime story. Written by a current candidate for president of the United States, the book is destined to be one of the most significant in history.”
—Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, author of The Courage to Face COVID-19

“If you found Bobby Kennedy’s bestselling book, The Real Anthony Fauci, to be engaging and thought-provoking, then The Wuhan Cover-Up is a must-read for you. This compelling book can be considered the next installment in the series, delving into the intriguing history of the bioweapons-industrial complex and its clandestine utilization against humanity. Prepare to be captivated by the well-researched content that unveils the hidden truths behind bioweapons and their potential impact on us all.”
—Dr. Joseph Mercola, founder of Mercola.com, the most visited natural health site

“Robert Kennedy’s meticulously documented and powerful exposé in The Real Anthony Fauci alerted me to his stature as one of the most learned and courageous truth-tellers of our times. His new book on the history of bioweapons research, the incredible dangers it poses for mankind, and the almost unimaginable corruption in which it is enmeshed is a blockbuster of the same caliber. It reminds us not only that it is time we put this malefic ‘research’ to an end, but also rescue our government from the Washington cabals and special interest lobbies that control both political parties, thereby enabling a return to policies that support the middle class and make it possible for millions to once again experience the American Dream.”
—David Stockman, former US Representative (R-MI)

“I’ll never forget RFK Jr. telling me on a hiking trail in February 2023 that when you expose Big Pharma, you’re up against the Department of Defense. I’ll also never forget the Pfizer executive telling my undercover journalist, ‘You have to promise you won’t tell anyone . . . I suspect the virus started in Wuhan. Makes no sense the virus popped out of nowhere.’ Power hates sunlight, coercion relies upon deception, and informed consent requires a veil to be lifted. That’s what this book, The Wuhan Cover-Up does so effectively, much like its predecessor, The Real Anthony Fauci.”
—James O’Keefe, founder of Project Veritas and author of American Muckraker

“The greatest tragedy in human history has unfolded before our own eyes. I was not surprised to learn that a deadly virus, SARS-CoV2, had leaked out of a laboratory in Wuhan, China in the late summer of 2019. In retrospect, I was shocked that the US government did not notify and alert the public of the global spread of COVID in the fall of 2019. In fact, the US government did something far worse. Bobby’s book succinctly elucidates how and why the opaque nexus of the US military and intelligence community leveraged corrupt and morally deficient scientists and bureaucrats to execute what was the largest and most sophisticated psychological operation in world history. The three goals were simple: to obfuscate the true origin of a jointly created biological weapon by the US and China; to bring an untested mRNA-based medical countermeasure rapidly to market for civilian use; and, to instill fear into the population for dominance and control. Bobby’s book concisely and eloquently exposes these horrendous inconvenient truths.”
—Andrew G. Huff, PhD, author of The Truth About Wuhan

“Whenever I read, listen to, or debate Bobby, I learn something new and change my mind on at least one or two issues, while vehemently disagreeing with many others. Both the agreements and disagreements stimulate my thinking and emotions, even when they make me angry or concerned. Read him and make up your own minds.”
—Alan Dershowitz

The Real Anthony Fauci provided the ‘receipts’ on Fauci’s criminality. The Wuhan Cover-Up provides the act itself—an event that will live in infamy.”
—Steve Bannon

Praise for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and The Real Anthony Fauci
“Dr. Joseph Goebbels wrote that ‘A lie told once remains a lie, but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth.’ Tragically for humanity, there are many, many untruths emanating from Fauci and his minions. RFK Jr exposes the decades of lies.”
—Luc Montagnier, Nobel laureate“Bobby Kennedy is one of the bravest and most uncompromisingly honest people I’ve ever met. Someday he’ll get credit for it. In the meantime, read this book.”
&
“Despite all the lying, or maybe in reaction to it, Bobby is becoming a legitimate folk hero. I hear it all the time.”
—Tucker Carlson“As a trial lawyer, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has taken on the world’s most powerful corporations and held them accountable for harming people and the environment. Those companies denied any wrongdoing—but time and again, judges and juries were persuaded that Kennedy’s position was the right one. Kennedy’s information should always be considered, and agree or disagree, we all learn from listening.”
—Tony Robbins, New York Times bestselling author“Bobby Kennedy and I famously disagree about many aspects of the current debates surrounding Covid and vaccines. We also disagree about Dr Fauci. But I always learn when I read or hear Bobby’s take. So read this book and challenge its conclusions.”
—Alan Dershowitz, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School; author of The Case for Vaccine Mandates“If you have any interest in doing a deep dive into the more than 100-year history of what led up to the COVID-19 pandemic, then The Real Anthony Fauci is an absolute must-read. In addition to exposing Fauci, the book reveals the complex web of connections between Gates and Big Pharma and many of the most important players that were responsible for seeking to implement global tyranny and profit enormously from the propaganda behind the COVID injections, masks, and lockdowns.”
—Dr. Joseph Mercola, founder of Mercola.com

“Bobby Kennedy’s book on The Real Anthony Fauci speaks truth in times when health care becomes health harm, untruth rules through anti-science and fake news.”
—Dr. Vandana Shiva, director of Navdanya and author of Oneness vs. the 1%

“I deeply respect [Bobby], and I think if there’s anyone that deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, he is the one.”
&
“I thought I understood what was going on from an insider POV. But this is mind-blowing. Anthony Fauci is playing precisely the strategy that he developed and tested during the HIV days. Bobby is on fire in this manuscript. The depth of information and facts, all carefully cited, is mind-blowing. It is a must-read. I think it will really help clarify what has been going down here. Thanks to the consistently dysfunctional COVID-19 response by Fauci and USG/HHS (US Government Health and Human Services Department), we have all become familiar with the terms “regulatory capture” and “Noble Lie.” The personal opinion and bias of Dr. Fauci has been repeatedly substituted for evidence-based medicine, and we are all living with the consequences. But beyond this mundane incompetence, what this book clearly documents are the deeper forces and systemic, pervasive governmental corruption, which have led us to this point. Not since the reign of former FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, have we seen such empire building by a corrupt, longstanding federal employee who is long past retirement age. Dr. Fauci’s apparent need to bolster a fragile ego has led to the almost complete systemic corruption of not only US HHS, but the entire world public health system. The consequences will be lasting damage to the reputation of the United States of America, US FDA, and US CDC as honest, independent guardians of public health, which has been carefully nurtured over many decades. The world is now able to clearly see that the US HHS has been captured and compromised by commercial interests. One unintended consequence of allowing and enabling this tragedy will be further erosion in domestic trust in the Public Health System, and in particular, in the entire vaccine enterprise. Global impacts are likely to include accelerating loss of trust in US and western pharmaceutical companies and regulators, and more rapid rise of Asian, Indian, and Middle Eastern pharmaceutical competitors.”
—Robert W. Malone, MD, virologist, immunologist, molecular biologist

“Standing as a pivotal work for the history of science and medicine, this book unveils the astonishing, twisted truth about a man (Fauci) and a corrupt institution (NIH) that have betrayed humanity at every turn in order to achieve profits and power. If the American people knew the truth that’s documented here, they would be marching by the millions, demanding criminal prosecutions of all those who are complicit in these outrageous betrayals of humanity. RFK Jr’s book closes the loop on one of the most disastrous and truly evil schemes in the history of medicine and science. If humanity does not now demand investigations and prosecutions across this vast landscape of science fraud and pathological ‘authority,’ we are truly beyond hope.”
—Mike Adams, a.k.a. the “Health Ranger,” founder of NaturalNews.com

“If you’ve ever wondered why so many good scientists and doctors have been silenced for discoveries that don’t fit the mainstream Big Pharma narrative, look no further than Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s tour de force exposé of Anthony Fauci. This book reads like a John Grisham legal thriller. Except that it is not fiction. Read it with your eyes wide open. It’s time the world woke up to the truth.”
—Christiane Northrup, MD, former assistant clinical professor of Ob/Gyn, University of Vermont College of Medicine; New York Times bestselling author of Women’s Bodies, Women’s Wisdom

“Robert F. Kennedy Jr. did a great job. I don’t agree with everything, but his case is well laid out and copiously documented. The most disturbing things are the unbelievable financial entanglements, the shoddy treatment of patients in clinical trials, and the culture of intimidation. Overall a very good book and a call to overhaul the CDC/NIH.”
—Dr. Thomas B. Hakes

“To give great responsibility and power to those with no accountability is a recipe for disaster.”
—K Paul Stoller, MD, FACHM, Hyperbaric & Integrative Medicine

“Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
—Mahin Khatami, PhD

“Kennedy’s book proves beyond a shadow of doubt what many Americans have come to learn about Fauci: that he has stifled open debate to the point of utter stagnation of biomedical science. Fauci issues knowledge by decree. This most uninquisitive Fauci is far more concerned with being right and with making sure that the solutions adopted to problems come from his circle rather than in discovering fundamental truths, regardless of the completely externalized cost of his ‘solutions.’ The evidence shows plainly that Fauci has been wrong on matters of life and death far more than he has been right. Fauci’s resulting body count is such that he should have a statue erected with him posing and hanging his head in eternal shame. Thanks to this book, historians will mark Fauci down as the most dangerous threat to global public health in the 20th and 21st Centuries.”
—James Lyons-Weiler, biomedical research scientist

“RFK Jr.’s story of Fauci’s failure as the government’s AIDS coordinator is a highly disturbing prologue to his COVID mandate as head of NIAID. So, who is Dr. Fauci in the end? Has American medicine truly become a ‘racket,’ as corrupt as a mafia organization? Does everything in our country turn on the size of the money involved? How can we begin to solve this? The Real Anthony Fauci is a fascinating starting point. RFK Jr. has written a strong, strong book.”
—Oliver Stone, award-winning director, producer, and screenwriter

“As I read Bobby Kennedy Jr.’s book I thought a discreet and thorough criminal investigation into Fauci should occur. Having observed Fauci’s flip-flops on his statements on the COVID pandemic, coupled with the book’s descriptions by former coworkers as ‘neither a competent manager . . . nor skilled or devoted scientist . . . with a domineering nature toward subordinates and rivals that discouraged dissent, a foundation for an investigation exists. The conduct cited, involving the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices approval of a vaccine and how Fauci and his Pharma partners use their PIs to control the key FDA and CDC panels that license and ‘recommend’ new vaccines, is a red flag that warrants this investigation. The book cites an approval of a vaccine, whereby there was no testing of a vaccine against a placebo in pre-approval trials that is a standard scientific process to ‘predict’ and/or determine risks if the vaccines would avert more injuries than they would cause—and the vaccine was approved. This appears to be similar to what happened with the Covid vaccines. The Covid clinical trials were not in accordance with prescribed regulations. It brought back memories of criminal bid-rigging schemes conducted by Organized Crime in New York City. If an investigation identified intentional rampant fraud, vaccine deaths could be considered murders and the federal forfeitures would be billions of dollars.”
Mike Campi, former FBI agent and retired coordinator of the Organized Crime branch of the New York Division

“Who—or what—is the real Anthony Fauci? That may be the most important question facing us today, as We the People struggle to survive the lethal care of ‘America’s Doctor.’ This essential book reveals—at last!—that Dr. Fauci is, on the one hand, a severely twisted person, in his fiendish cunning, vindictiveness, and ruthlessness, a covert blend of Stalin and Iago; and yet, far more importantly, the story of Dr. Fauci’s rise and reign is really all about the absolute corruption of our major institutions—government, medicine, academia, and (above all) the press—by Big Pharma (and the Gates Foundation). Those of us who really do believe in science and democracy, now have this book to help us break his fatal spell on everybody else, and start to rid the world of that corruption.”
—Mark Crispin Miller, professor of media studies at New York University; editor, News from Underground

“RFK Jr is a tireless champion of Americans’ rights to be informed about their medical choices and has been way out front in warning us of the dangers of an out-of-control pharmaceutical industry. In his new book, The Real Anthony Fauci, he turns the same relentless insider scrutiny on an out-of-control bureaucracy.”
—Naomi Wolf, bestselling author of The Beauty Myth, Give Me Liberty, and Outrages

“Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has written the Rosetta Stone that will help the public finally understand the machinations of Dr. Anthony Fauci, and how he has acted as the puppet master of science for the last half-century—pulling the strings of public health and Big Pharma influence and causing both sides of the political aisle to dance to his tune. A must-read to understand the fake news about medicine and therapies, bought and paid for by corporations with billions of dollars at stake.”
—Kent Heckenlively, attorney, science teacher, and New York Times bestselling author

“Throughout history, fear has been used to manipulate and control populations. In a democracy, we have the privilege and responsibility to question the things we are encouraged to fear. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. provides something denied to most Americans in recent years: the opportunity to hear more than one perspective. You can accept or reject the new information in this book—but at least listen.”
—Gavin de Becker, bestselling author of The Gift of Fear

“If you want to understand the role Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Big Pharma, the CDC, WHO, intelligence agencies and others played in planning, launching, and profiting from the COVID pandemic, drop what you’re doing and read this powerful and meticulously researched book! Your future, your family’s future, and the future of our democracy are at stake.”
—Ralph Pezzullo, bestselling author of Jawbreaker, Zero Footprint and other books

“At the beginning of the COVID pandemic, a leader rose to the stage, and his soft voice and welcoming smile drew us in, and we trusted him emphatically. After reading Bobby Kennedy’s earth-shattering book, The Real Anthony Fauci, it is clear that our trusted COVID leader shouldn’t be on a pedestal and should instead be on trial. This book is a must-read for anyone wondering why the United States of America refused to mandate wellness and instead pushed a problematic vaccine.”
—Rachael Ross, MD, PhD

 

Dec 012023
 

With thanks to CHD:

A Canadian citizen-led pandemic inquiry published a comprehensive report asserting that government and unelected administrative bodies severely violated rights by coercive and unchecked pandemic measures, and calling for investigations into vaccine approval processes and the judiciary’s questionable handling of COVID-19 court cases.

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.

After months of hearings in nearly every province, Canada’s National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) on Tuesday released its final 643-page report on the country’s COVID-19 response, addressing the societal impacts of lockdowns, school closures, mask and vaccine mandates and other measures.

The report, compiled by four independent commissioners, included nearly 5,000 additional pages of testimony from hundreds of people who experienced adverse vaccine reactions, destruction of their livelihoods and education, diminished mental health, damaged reputations, professional discipline and/or censorship, according to True North.

The report contained over 80 pages of recommendations for lawmakers, public institutions and citizens, and called for the establishment of a National Crisis Oversight Council that would serve as an “independent, multidisciplinary body tasked with monitoring, policing and investigating government actions during crises,” including pandemics.

 

In an online press conference announcing the report, NCI commissioners and others discussed the division and suffering the pandemic measures caused, the failure of institutions to serve citizens and the overreach of government authority that violated rights and freedoms.

They emphasized the importance of unity, open dialogue, accountability and active democratic participation to heal as a nation.

In his opening comments, NCI Commissioner Ken Drysdale, an expert in forensic engineering and investigations, said, “Our lips may be bloodied, and we may be shamed. But we cannot turn away from the horrors of the past three years. We cannot allow this to happen to our children and grandchildren.”

Commissioner Bernard Massie, Ph.D., author of 138 peer-reviewed papers and owner of 12 patents, said, “One of the greatest dangers to democracy is the tyranny of the majority that has forgotten the primordial importance of truth and liberty grounded in the individual responsibility that cannot and should not be outsourced to the administrative state.”

 

NCI administrator Ches Crosbie, former leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador, called out Health Canada for approving the COVID-19 vaccines without determining they were safe and effective.

“The expression ‘safe and effective’ is a marketing slogan and a deceptive one,” Crosbie said, adding, “Beyond dispute is that [the] vaccines are adulterated … by the presence of foreign DNA fragments and a sequence from a monkey virus called SV40, suspected of causing cancer.”

Denis Rancourt, Ph.D., co-director of CORRELATION Research in the Public Interest in Canada, told The Defender the NCI report “is a masterful in-depth examination of the COVID response in Canada and the world.”

“Through hundreds of testimonies and thousands of exhibits, the picture that emerges could not be more clear,” he said, adding:

“The entire COVID campaign — from CIAmilitary planning, to initial Wuhan false flag, to the WHO [World Health Organization] declaration of a ‘pandemic,’ to medical institutional responses, to general lockdowns and impositions on personal behavior, to unprecedented censorship and media alignment, to mandatory vaccination accompanied by dismissals from workplaces, to delicensing medical and legal professionals, to completely biased court rulings, to covering up vaccine harm and deaths, to egregious isolation and mistreatment of vulnerable populations, to shredding of constitutional protections, to criminalizing dissent and demonstrations, to locking away political prisoners, and on and on, in a total blanket of actual totalitarianism in Canada and many countries — has been an outright unjustified vicious assault against people, freedom and democracy.”

A citizen-organized, citizen-run, citizen-funded initiative

The NCI — “funded and staffed by volunteers who believe in a better Canada,” said Crosbie — was established in response to the government’s actions during the COVID-19 pandemic and because “no Canadian government has shown an appetite for a fulsome review of the measures implemented,” according to the report.

Hearings took place over 24 days between March and May in eight cities, from British Columbia to Nova Scotia. More than 300 sworn testimonies from both experts and citizens were collected.

NCI heard expert testimony from doctors, scientists, lawyers, economists, teachers, psychologists, morticians, risk management analysts and experts in public policy, emergency management, occupational health and safety, aviation safety, pharmacy, policing and journalism, according to True North.

Among the 147 experts testifying were Rancourt, known for his analysis of all-cause mortality during the pandemic; Dr. Peter McCullough; Dr. Jay Bhattacharya; Dr. Jessica Rose; Dr. Didier Raoult, the French doctor who promoted early treatment with hydroxychloroquine at the beginning of the pandemic; Dr. Sabine Hazan; Michel Chossudovsky of Global Research; Catherine Austin Fitts; James Corbett; Dr. William Makis; Dr. Charles Hoffe; Edward Dowd; J. Jay Couey, Ph.D., staff scientist for Children’s Health Defense; Jeffrey Tucker of the Brownstone Institute; Steve Kirsch, founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation; and Dr. Jordan Peterson.

The commissioners invited testimony from representatives of all provincial/territorial and federal levels of government across Canada — including “sixty-three members of government, regulators, and authorities” — but none accepted or testified.

 

However, NCI was able to obtain records of government positions from court proceedings, policy statements, press conferences and other evidence of their actions, and incorporate these into their hearings and findings.

NCI considered testimony on pharmaceutical interventions (use of drugs, vaccines and other treatments) and non-pharmaceutical interventions (masking, lockdowns, closures of public facilities and quarantines), and analyzed their impacts in the following categories:

  1. Social — including restricted public meetings, movement and ability to interact and meet with other people.
  2. Civil — the abridgment of rights and freedoms, the imposition of restrictions and forced mandates, assessed at the personal, institutional and organizational levels.
  3. Economic — the shutdown of businesses and the characterization of “nonessential” businesses, restrictions to employment and overall impacts.
  4. Health — forced medical procedures, lack of access to patients due to mandates, doctors treating virtually; injuries resulting from forced medical procedures and isolation.

“These testimonies provide irrefutable evidence that an unprecedented assault has been waged against the citizens of Canada. Not since World War II has the nation experienced such a devastating attack on its people,” Drysdale told True North.

Commissioner Janice Kaikkonen, an educator and public policy researcher, said at the press conference that her experience with NCI had been “quite the journey,” and that “the picture being painted was much deeper, all more devastating and divisive, and the response from our public institutions on every Canadian far more destructive” than she expected.

Kaikkonen said society still needs to address “the impact on … children of being isolated from their friends and their social networks and their structures being taken from them.”

“The juncture Canadians face in moving forward must include exposing the forces that willingly subscribed to destroying our beloved country from the inside out,” she said.

Breakdown of legal system

NCI heard extensive evidence that Canadian courts failed to uphold the rule of law during the pandemic, leading to “a breakdown in confidence and an erosion of trust in a Canadian legal system,” according to the report.

None of the legal experts who testified or consulted with NCI reported success in any court across the country against the measures or mandates.

Similar to the U.S., the Canadian system of government is comprised of executive, legislative and judicial branches. However, during the pandemic, “much of the rule-making power in Canada coalesced into the executive, which resulted in unelected public health offices across the country ruling as petty tyrants, without accountability or oversight,” the report stated.

The report attributed this in part to the “overgrowth of the administrative state,” resulting in “Canadian courts … pay[ing] more and more deference to the powers of unelected administrative bodies,” leading to “a perfect storm” where unelected officials who are “not subject to oversight through an election” have “powers over Canadians” that are “largely unchallengeable in court.”

The most obvious example of administrative overreach — enforced by professional bodies that regulate various health professions — was the public health orders, the report stated, which “subvert[ed] rights on the premise of ‘protecting the greater good.’”

Commissioner Heather DiGregorio, senior partner in an Alberta law firm, said during Tuesday’s press conference that her position as a lawyer made her pay particular attention to the testimony about the Canadian legal system, the Canadian Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

“By guaranteeing that the government cannot tread on my neighbor’s rights, we guarantee our own,” she said. “This is never more important than when things are difficult in times of fear and uncertainty.”

The evidence gathered from the NCI hearings “all points one way: to a significant breakdown of Canadian institutions,” DiGregorio said.

 

scales of justice

Your support helps fund this work, and CHD’s related advocacy, education and scientific research.
Donate Now

 

She cited such undesirable pandemic outcomes: “The division of our society. Neighbors pitted against neighbors. Families torn apart. Individuals suffering grievous injuries that their own doctors won’t acknowledge. Feelings of isolation. Depression. Suicides. Pain and grief.”

“Canadians have been left with a feeling that there is no person to protect them from government overreach,” the report stated. “This is worrisome evidence of a breakdown of the rule of law.”

Despite the grievous lapses in the legal system during the pandemic, DeGregorio said, “Seeing the strength of ordinary Canadians, even in the darkest times of their lives, gave me renewed hope.”

Proposals, outlook going forward

In addition to the establishment of a National Crisis Oversight Council — which the report said should include enforceable subpoena powers — the NCI report called for a full judicial investigation of the COVID-19 vaccination authorization process in Canada, leaving open the possibility of criminal liability under existing Canadian law.

It also called for an in-depth review of how Canadian courts handled all pandemic-related cases to “rebuild public confidence in the justice system.”

Citing the need to ensure “proper checks and balances,” the report recommended examining and reforming the extent of executive authority during emergencies and establishing laws that require administrative bodies “to demonstrate their expertise and rationale for decisions, particularly when those decisions infringe on individual rights.”

Regarding healthcare, the report called for establishing a clear framework for oversight of public health authorities’ decision-making processes during emergencies, and an “independent, multidisciplinary inquiry into the governance of professional colleges, especially those governing medical professionals,” to ensure transparency,  accountability and adherence to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

During the press conference, DiGregorio called for “accountability for the actions of others,” but said we also need to “look at our own actions and take accountability for the part that each of us have played.”

Kaikkonen called for “Each and every one of us saying we’ve had enough, this is not going to happen again, and we’re going to stand with people who say no, who have that strength,” and with “people who are being shamed publicly or abused or trodden over.”

Voicing his hopes for the report, Drysdale said, “In the end, it is not the report itself that wields the power of transformation. … It remains just a tool, lying dormant on a shelf … until thousands or millions of people choose to wield that tool.”

Massie said it’s going to take time before things change, but that “it’s not going to take the majority of people to wake up to make a difference. … You just need a critical mass of people … to move [on the] political front, provincial, federal, [and in] court.”

Rancourt told The Defender:

“Canadians may have produced the most comprehensive report, which is an historic landmark. Now, will there be accountability? To what degree, and what form will it take?

“Every citizen’s awakening is one unit of the needed accounting, and this report has been a process that catalyzed more awareness.”

Dec 012023
 

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Thursday sued Pfizer alleging the drugmaker misrepresented the effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine and attempted to censor public discussion of the product. Experts claim the suit may succeed in sidestepping the PREP (Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness) Act’s liability shield.

from CHD,  by John-Michael Dumais

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Thursday sued Pfizer alleging the drugmaker made “false, misleading and deceptive claims” about its COVID-19 vaccine and tried to intimidate and censor critics who questioned those claims or cited facts that countered them.

According to the lawsuit, Pfizer’s marketing claims about the efficacy, duration of protection and ability of its COVID-19 vaccine to prevent transmission violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

The lawsuit also alleges Pfizer cited misleading statistics, concealed negative data and made unsupported statements about efficacy against variants like Delta.

“We are pursuing justice for the people of Texas, many of whom were coerced by tyrannical vaccine mandates to take a defective product sold by lies,” Paxton said in a press release. “The facts are clear. Pfizer did not tell the truth about their COVID-19 vaccines.”

When the failure of its product became apparent, “Pfizer then pivoted to silencing truth-tellers.”

The suit cites complaints made by former U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official Scott Gottlieb on X (formerly Twitter) about vaccine skeptics.

Paxton is seeking over $10 million in civil penalties, plus injunctive relief barring Pfizer from making claims about vaccine efficacy similar to those challenged in the lawsuit.

 

Pfizer denied the allegations, telling Forbes it believed the “state’s case has no merit.” Defending its claims about the vaccine as “accurate and science-based,” Pfizer said its vaccine “demonstrated a favorable safety profile in all age groups, and helped protect against severe COVID-19 outcomes, including hospitalization and death,” according to Reuters.

“Pfizer has so far escaped accountability about the potential health problems like myocarditis, thanks to sweeping liability protections granted to pharmaceutical companies” by the PREP (Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness) Act, wrote The Federalist, which argued Paxton’s legal strategy of “fraudulent activity” may succeed because it “falls outside the scope of legal immunity.”

Ray Flores, senior outside counsel to Children’s Health Defense, told The Defender Paxton’s investigation of vaccine manufacturers announced in May “evidently bore fruit.”

“In my opinion and consistent with existing case law, this suit correctly pleads that state laws such as the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act are not barred by the PREP Act,” Flores said.

“I believe that other suits, including other consumer fraud and shareholder derivative suits, as well as other law and motion pleadings, will greatly benefit from the complaint’s details,” he said. “Depositions and other discovery will produce even more gems.”

Flores said his greatest hope is that information in the Texas suit will prompt the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or the U.S. Attorney General “to finally initiate an enforcement action against the vaccine manufacturers for not being completely forthright with the FDA on the safety and efficacy of the vaccines.”

Under the PREP Act, plaintiffs are prevented from suing vaccine manufacturers unless an enforcement action has been completed, Flores said.

Terri Burke, executive director of The Immunization Partnership in Houston, told the Texas Tribune the lawsuit is “just another attempt to erode confidence in all vaccines.”

The Texas Tribune said some experts argued the lawsuit’s assertion “that vaccinated people were more likely to die from COVID-19” was “completely unsubstantiated,” and framed its coverage of the suit as the attorney general trying to hold Pfizer to blame because “the pandemic did not end soon enough.”

RFK Jr. Wuhan Cover Up Cover

“The Wuhan Cover-Up” by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Order Now

Syring into Vials

Pfizer’s marketing ‘bore no resemblance to reality’

The suit alleges Pfizer’s claim its vaccine was 95% effective against infection was “highly misleading from day one” because it represented only the “relative risk reduction” instead of the “absolute risk reduction.”

In its calculation of relative risk reduction, Pfizer compared only the small subsets of the vaccine and placebo groups who developed COVID-19 systems during the trial — 8 versus 162 people, respectively — instead of considering the entire cohort of nearly 35,000 trial participants, according to the petition.

Using Pfizer’s Phase 2/3 data, the absolute risk reduction calculation “is performed by subtracting the post-treatment risk rate of 0.04% (8/17,411 persons) found in the vaccine group from the baseline risk rate of 0.9% (162/17,511 persons) found in the placebo group, which after rounding yields 0.85%,” the petition states.

A vaccine recipient’s absolute risk reduction is the “FDA’s preferred efficacy metric,” the petition states.

“According to Pfizer’s own data, preventing one COVID-19 case required vaccinating 119” people, the petition states, “But Pfizer’s fusillade of public representations bore no resemblance to reality.”

The petition outlines three main areas of deception related to the “95% effective” representation:

  1. The FDA had only two months of Pfizer’s data before it authorized the vaccine, stating it was “‘not possible’ to know how effective the vaccine would remain beyond” that time.
  2. When the FDA told Pizer it needed additional information to determine whether the vaccine protected against transmission, Pfizer engaged in a “fear-mongering campaign, exploiting intense public fears by insinuating that vaccination was necessary … to protect their loved ones from contracting COVID-19.”
  3. Pfizer made false and unsupported claims about vaccine effectiveness against variants, specifically the Delta variant, when its own data showed otherwise.

The complaint also states that by late 2021, “a greater percentage of vaccinated persons contracted, and even died from, COVID-19 than unvaccinated.”

As a result of Pfizer’s deceptive conduct, the suit alleges, the vaccine maker was able to sell hundreds of millions of doses to the U.S. government “and its vaccine quickly penetrated the market through widespread public adoption.”

Dr. Naomi Wolf, whose organization Daily Clout has performed detailed analyses of the Pfizer documents, told Steve Bannon that Pfizer’s own documents show they knew, “within two months of rollout, that the vaccine did not work … and that the third most common side effect was COVID[-19].”

 

Pfizer’s campaign of censorship, intimidation

When it became apparent that its vaccine was failing, Pfizer responded “by intimidating those spreading the truth, and by conspiring to censor the vaccine critics” by coercing social media platforms to silence them, the lawsuit alleges.

The FDA authorization, according to the petition, “did not afford Pfizer with a blank check to seriously disseminate misrepresentations … to enrich itself at the expense of a frightened public.”

Gottlieb, who led Pfizer’s regulatory and compliance committee, more than once contacted Twitter over “perceived violations of Twitter policy,” the suit states. In one case, Gottlieb discussed journalist Alex Berenson’s tweets, where he stated the vaccine did not stop infection or transmission and had a limited window of efficacy.

“These were indisputably true statements based on the scientific record at that time, including data from Pfizer’s own studies, as well as FDA’s own findings,” according to the suit.

On multiple occasions Pfizer employed methods “with the intent to provoke and ultimately cause censorship on social media platforms of content adverse to sales or consumption of its vaccine,” including through a front group called the “Public Good Projects,” the suit alleges.

The petition also calls out Pfizer CEO Alfred Bourla for saying on Nov. 9, 2021, that persons who spread so-called “misinformation” about the vaccines were “criminals” who have “literally cost millions of lives.”

The same day, Pfizer posted the claim of “misinformation” on its Twitter account, according to the suit:

 

‘An artificial and flawed consideration’ of benefits and risks

The complaint goes into considerable detail discussing the difference between normal drug and vaccine approval versus Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA.

Because EUA products “will likely have inferior guarantees of safety and efficacy,” the complaint states, Congress mandated that the FDA inform healthcare professionals administering EUA products of any “significant known and potential benefits and risks” to ensure that “individuals receiving the product obtain the same information.”

FDA advice states patients are “are unduly influenced when risk information is presented using a relative risk approach,” and that such information results in “suboptimal decisions,” according to the petition.

Noting the FDA’s review of Pfizer’s formal application concluded that “FDA and CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] identified serious risks for myocarditis and pericarditis following administration” of its vaccine, the suit alleges Pfizer’s misrepresentations resulted in “the public engaging in an artificial and flawed consideration and balancing of … benefits and risks.”

Without Pfizer’s deceptive marketing practices and its coercive attempts to silence true information about the efficacy and dangers of the vaccine, a “substantial portion would likely have opted for an alternative or foregone inoculation altogether,” the suit alleges.

“The complaint seeks $10 million in damages plus costs of investigation and attorney fees,” Flores said, adding, “Unfortunately, that is just a drop in the bucket for Pfizer. Nonetheless, it is a giant step forward towards accountability.”

RFK Jr. and Brian Hooker Vax-Unvax

RFK Jr. and Brian Hooker’s New Book: “Vax-Unvax”
Order Now

Second Texas lawsuit against Pfizer in under 2 weeks

This is the second time in under two weeks that Texas has sued Pfizer. On Nov. 20, Paxton unveiled a lawsuit against the vaccine maker and its drug manufacturer, Tris Pharma, alleging the companies sold medication to children even though they knew the drug was ineffective and potentially unsafe.

The suit, filed in the Harrison County District Court, alleges Pfizer knowingly distributed a drug used for treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to children on Medicaid — despite the drug’s pattern of failing quality control tests.

The drug, Quillivant XR, is a stimulant that affects brain and nerve chemicals involved in hyperactivity and impulse control.

From 2012-2018, “Pfizer and Tris continually manipulated Quillivant testing to hide poor manufacturing practices and defraud the Texas Medicaid program,” according to a press release.

During those years, many families complained that the medication failed to work. According to the complaint:

“At no point did Defendants warn Texas Medicaid providers or decision-makers that Quillivant had known manufacturing issues affecting its efficacy, thereby depriving the Medicaid program of the crucial information it relies on. … As a result, thousands of Texas children received an adulterated Schedule II Controlled Dangerous Substance.”

Dec 012023
 

I am extremely grateful to Laura Jeffery for her courage in giving testimony to the NCI.

A year or so ago, I saw videos that were coming from funeral homes, from morticians, and embalmers.  The fibrous masses that were coming out of the circulatory systems of deceased people who were being prepared for embalming were disconcerting and graphic; they remain vivid in my memory.

Laura was asked about what the fibrous masses are.  She deferred to “the scientists”, which she is not.  Specifically mentioned is Dr. Ryan Cole, a pathologist.   An interview with him is appended.    But listen to the lived experience of Laura Jeffery:

Laura Jeffery – Mar 31, 2023 – Toronto, Ontario

 

Laura Jeffery refers to the work of

DR. RYAN COLE

The discussion of CLOTTING starts around 22 minutes.

Covid – a clotting disease and an epithileal disease.

Definition:  the inner lining of blood vessels is made up of epithelial tissue. Epithelial tissue is the tissue which forms the inner line covering of various organs, not only blood vessels.