The Battles

Discussions by Sandra Finley
  • Home
  • About the Network
  • The Work We Do, Battles to protect the Commons
  • WHO are we? (the network)
  • How to use this blog
  • Lockheed Martin, War Economy, StatsCan, Charter Right Privacy, Trial
  • Arrest George Bush. Rule of Law essential to democracy.
  • Heavy metals in vaccinations, Mercury in dental amalgams
  • Why we flounder

Sandra Finley

2025-04-09 8-Year-Old in West Texas Died From Hospital-acquired Pneumonia, Medical Records Show

 Uncategorized  No Responses »
Apr 152025
 

Dr. Pierre Kory provides excellent and instructive assessment of what happened.

 

Watch here:   (Includes more than the article.  Really good content,  but maybe more than you have time for.  Watch as much as you want.)

Related articles in The Defender

      • Texas Reports 8-Year-Old Died of ‘Measles Pulmonary Failure,’ CHD Requests Medical Records
      • ‘Medical Error’ Led to Death of 6-Year-Old Who Developed Pneumonia After Measles Diagnosis
      • Texas Reports Death of Child Who Tested Positive for Measles, But Releases Few Details
      • CHD.TV Exclusive: Parents of Child Who Died During Texas Measles Outbreak Speak Out
      • 4-Year-Old Hospitalized Post Measles Infection Goes Home 36 Hours After Budesonide Treatment

WRITTEN TEXT:

8-Year-Old in West Texas Died From Hospital-acquired Pneumonia, Medical Records Show

Doctors who reviewed 8-year-old Daisy Hildebrand’s medical records disputed the Texas health authorities’ statement that she died from “measles pulmonary failure.” They said medical records show she died from acute respiratory distress “secondary to hospital-acquired pneumonia,” which she likely developed during a previous hospital stay.

by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
April 9, 2025
University Medical Center entrance

Photo credit: Screenshot of UMC Children’s Hospital entrance via UMC Health System YouTube channel.

12366 Pageviews
RSS
35 Comments

Listen to this article

Download
00:00/10:24

An 8-year-old West Texas child died April 3 of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to hospital-acquired pneumonia, according to Dr. Pierre Kory, who analyzed the child’s medical records.

Daisy Hildebrand died at University Medical Center (UMC) Children’s Hospital in Lubbock, Texas, at 1:50 a.m., according to Brian Hooker, Ph.D., Children’s Health Defense (CHD) chief scientific officer, who also reviewed the records.

On April 6, the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) issued a news release calling her death the “second death in [the West Texas] measles outbreak” and attributing the death to “measles pulmonary failure.”

Kory — who has extensive experience in pulmonary and critical care medicine — told The Defender that the child’s medical records showed she died from “ARDS secondary to hospital-acquired pneumonia,” which he said she likely developed during a previous hospital stay.

Kory said:

“The causative organism was a highly antibiotic-resistant E. coli (‘superbug’), which she contracted during the first hospital ICU [intensive care unit] stay.

“This went largely unrecognized and poorly treated during the second hospital stay because they began to ‘tunnel in’ by blaming measles for her worsening pneumonia and repeatedly writing in the chart that she was unvaccinated.

“Of the eight days she spent in the second hospital [visit], the child was given antibiotics for only four days. Not until two days before her death did the thought of a ‘possible hospital-acquired infection’ creep into the records. The bug was utterly resistant to the antibiotics they put her on.”

If the hospital staff had followed the adult hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) guidelines, the child “would have been placed on the correct antibiotic,” Kory said. “She had numerous risk factors for HAP, including previous antibiotics, previous ICU stay, being immunosuppressed and really sick.”

In an email, Kory explained:

“In their [the doctors’] defense, and I was shocked to learn this, THERE ARE NO PEDIATRIC HAP GUIDELINES, so antibiotic choices are not established; thus, technically, they did not veer from any guidelines because there are none for kids.

“The American Academy of Pediatrics should be scolded for this. The first adult guidelines came out in 2005. Here we are 20 years later, and there are no pediatric ones?”

UMC medical records shed light on child’s illness and death

Soon after the child’s death, UMC released her medical records to the family.

In addition to sharing the records with Kory and Hooker, the child’s parents shared them with Dr. Ben Edwards, integrative medicine family practitioner in Lubbock, and Dr. Suzanne Humphries, co-author of “Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History.”

Hooker — who spoke with the child’s parents — pointed out that the child’s illness and treatment history were complicated during the weeks leading up to her death.

For instance, before she was hospitalized at UMC, Daisy was admitted to Covenant Children’s Hospital — the same hospital where a 6-year-old girl died in February after developing pneumonia following a measles diagnosis.

However, the 8-year-old’s medical records all pertain to the care she received at UMC. Kory, Hooker, Edwards and Humphries were not able to review Covenant Children’s Hospital records.

The Defender asked Covenant Health’s Senior Media & Community Relations Manager Meredith Cunningham to comment on the care Daisy received at Covenant Children’s Hospital.

Cunningham said patient privacy laws prevent the hospital from sharing details on patient care.

The Defender also reached out to UMC Health System’s Vice President & Chief Experience Officer Aaron Davis for comment on Daisy’s UMC medical records but did not receive a response by the deadline.

However, in a statement provided to The Washington Post on April 6, Davis confirmed the child died at UMC.

According to Kory and Hooker, Daisy was admitted twice to UMC in March. Her first visit began March 21, when she was admitted to the emergency room (ER) with diagnoses of community-acquired pneumonia, a urinary tract infection and dehydration, Hooker said.

Kory said she was also diagnosed with hypoxia, or low blood oxygen levels.

At admittance to the hospital’s main pediatrics ward, staff noted the child had a prior diagnosis of mononucleosis from a positive test for Epstein-Barr virus that was done before she went to UMC. She also had a prior diagnosis of sepsis at admittance. However, she tested negative for sepsis at UMC.

On March 24, she tested positive for measles using a PCR test. “A rash was noted on the torso and face during this admission, but also oral thrush,” Kory said.

According to the Mayo Clinic, oral thrush occurs when the fungus Candida albicans builds up in the mouth. Kory said the child’s oral thrush was “worrisome because it is a sign of immunosuppression.”

The Mayo Clinic states:

“Although oral thrush can affect anyone, it’s more likely to occur in babies and older adults because they have lower immunity. It’s also more likely to occur in other people with weakened immune systems or certain health conditions or people who take certain medicines.

“Oral thrush is a minor problem if you’re healthy. But if you have a weakened immune system, symptoms may be more serious and harder to control.”

Later, she was transferred to the hospital’s ICU.

The hospital staff gave her antibiotics and oxygen to address her pneumonia and low blood oxygen. She began to improve. On March 24, she was sent home.

Child returns to UMC, put on steroids as antibiotics are halted

Three days later, on March 27, Daisy was readmitted to UMC after her parents brought her to the ER with a cough, fever of up to 104 degrees Fahrenheit and shortness of breath.

“The problems start here,” said Kory, referring to her treatment when she was admitted the second time to UMC.

“The admitting doctor’s diagnosis was ‘pneumonitis,’ and antibiotics were quickly stopped after admission,” Kory said.

The records suggest that the hospital staff assumed her pneumonitis, or lung inflammation, was due to a measles infection, Hooker said. Because measles is a virus, doctors presumably did not immediately consider the possibility that her lung inflammation may have been caused by a bacterial infection.

Kory gave a rundown of what occurred over the days leading up to the child’s death on April 3.

The doctors first put Daisy on “high-dose steroids” without putting her on “anti-infectives.”

According to Drugs.com, anti-infectives is a general term that describes “any medicine that is capable of inhibiting the spread of an infectious organism or by killing the infectious organism outright.”

Kory said the high-dose steroid might have been safe and beneficial if paired with appropriate anti-infectives, but prescribing steroids without anti-infectives was a “lousy idea.”

Kory, Hooker and Humphries all confirmed that the child did not at any point receive budesonide, a steroid used to relieve inflammation affecting the airways that has been successfully used to treat pneumonia following a measles infection.

The child’s father told Hooker the family requested budesonide treatments. Hospital staff told the family that the girl’s doctors were taking a different course of action by giving her intravenous steroids, so she didn’t need budesonide.

On days two, three and four of Daisy’s second stay at UMC, the staff continued to treat her based on the assumption that she had measles-pneumonia, caused by measles — “even though on day four, she decompensated in respiratory status,” Kory said.

On day four, the child’s white blood cell count (WBC) “shot up to 13 from 4.5, and then on day six, it went up to 27,” Kory said.

A classic measles-pneumonia has normal or low white blood cell count, Kory said. “It was wild that they ignored such a high white count. It is possible they dismissed it as a result of the steroids, but for a seasoned ICU doctor, I never attribute WBCs over 20 to steroids.”

‘They tried everything to oxygenate her, but all efforts failed’

On day six, staff intubated the girl and restarted her on antibiotics.

On day seven, staff “somewhat correctly broadened” the kind of antibiotic they were giving the child to include ceftazidime, Kory said. “However, the adult guidelines would have dictated imipenem, which the bug she died from was sensitive to.”

Sadly, the type of bacteria causing her pneumonia was resistant to ceftazidime, Kory said.

According to Kory’s analysis of the records, the child’s attending doctor wrote on the day before her death that she was experiencing “severe pulmonary sequela of measles infection around 3 weeks ago.”

The attending doctor added, “We are concerned that the true extent of her lung injury d/t [due to] measles is unknowable, and it may be an end-stage process given the span of illness and the fact she truly is an outlier.”

On day eight, Daisy died of refractory hypoxemia, meaning her arteries weren’t getting enough oxygen even though she was having oxygen pumped into her from a ventilator.

“They tried everything to oxygenate her, but all efforts failed, and the family asked for no CPR,” Kory said. “She was near death anyway; it was the right call.”

Hospital delayed sputum culture until it was too late

In an interview today on CHD.TV, Kory said it wasn’t until days into the child’s second stay at the hospital that the staff did what’s called a sputum culture to identify the specific bacteria, fungi or other germs in her lungs.

Kory said that waiting so long was a deviation from the standard of care.

“Anytime we admit someone to a hospital and we’re starting them on antibiotics — especially broad ones — you send cultures so that you can identify what the organism is so that you can then narrow and target the exact organism,” Kory said.

Hooker agreed. He told The Defender that while it may be true that the child had some residual viral pneumonia due to her measles infection, the “problem” was the bacterial pneumonia that she likely picked up during her first stay in the ICU.

Hooker criticized UMC staff for an “apparent lack of curiosity” about figuring out early on what types of pneumonia the girl had via a sputum culture.

He noted that the test results showing that the girl had E. coli bacteria in her lungs did not come back until 10 p.m. on April 2.

By that time, she was already on a ventilator. Less than four hours later, she was dead.

– – – – – – – – – –

Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.

Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.

Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D., is a reporter and researcher for The Defender based in Fairfield, Iowa.

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 6:56 PM

2025-04-14 (exclusive) Ethics commissioner won’t rule on Carney’s CBC funding pledge, pre-election rebate. Letter by Preston Manning to Ethics Commissioner. by Walid Tamtam, True North.

 Uncategorized  No Responses »
Apr 152025
 

Former Reform Party leader Preston Manning accused Liberal Leader Mark Carney of offering “unethical bribes” in the form of boosts to CBC’s funding and taxpayer rebates while on the campaign trail.

Walid Tamtam, True North
Apr 14, 2025
∙ Paid
Source: Facebook

In a memo written to Canada’s ethics watchdog, former Reform Party leader Preston Manning accused Liberal Leader Mark Carney of offering “unethical bribes” in the form of boosts to CBC’s funding and taxpayer rebates while on the campaign trail.

Manning wrote to Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner Konrad Von Finckenstein asking for an official opinion on two of Carney’s latest spending promises.

 

The first issue raised was Carney’s pledge to increase CBC’s annual budget by $150 million.

The second concern involved a proposed $4 billion carbon rebate payout to approximately 13 million Canadians, potentially landing in voters’ bank accounts just before the April 28th election.

In his response, the commissioner did not denounce the programs.

“The conflict of interest code for members of the House of Commons does not apply during an election period, as incumbents are no longer considered MPs for the purpose of the Code once Parliament is dissolved.” wrote Von Finckenstein.

“Mr. Carney will be subject to the Code after the election if he is elected as an MP.”

Manning has warned that a failure to address such political tactics could erode public trust in Canada’s democratic institutions.

“Unethical practices are one of the main reasons why citizens are so skeptical about elections, I doubt that the public will be as willing to overlook the unethical nature of the Carney Liberal bribes as the Ethics Commissioner,” Manning told True North.

“What if citizens start setting up Go Bribe Me accounts – will those be overlooked too?”

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 4:14 PM

2025-04-15 The Commission in charge of Federal Debates has long been a problem in Canada. Here it is once again. I am going to help pay for lawyer Chad Williams’ services. These political nincompoops have to abide by Integrity or get booted out.

 Uncategorized  No Responses »
Apr 152025
 

 

Dear Sandra,

I’ve got amazing news. It started out as terrible news. And the moral of the story here is: never trust a Liberal.

Here’s the story:

Remember back in 2019, when Trudeau’s hand-picked Debates Commission banned Rebel News and True North from sending reporters to the election debates? We went to court for an emergency hearing, and the judge said Trudeau had violated our constitutional rights, and ordered him to let us in.

Trudeau’s staff spent the next two years studying that court ruling, scheming up new ways to get around it, to ban our reporters from the 2021 election debates. So we had to go back to court — and this time, it was just us. But a judge once again sided with us, and ordered Trudeau’s people to let us in.

So here’s where the story gets crazy.

It’s 2025 now. There’s another election. But Mark Carney is the PM, not Trudeau. And this time, when we applied for accreditation, they said we were welcome to attend! In fact, they said we could send as many reporters as we liked. Sixteen of us applied, and 16 of us were accredited.

I knew that was a trick. I knew they were lying. And it proves my point about Mark Carney — he’s Trudeau 2.0. Just as evil, but smarter and harder-working. I knew there was something going on that they were hiding from us.

So we had our lawyer Chad Williamson press them on it. Chad is the same lawyer who beat the Debates Commission in court in 2021.

So Chad started interrogating them in a series of letters. And slowly but surely, he discovered their plan to block us. Carney’s Debate Commission said all 16 of us could attend. But they finally confessed their trick to Chad: only one of us would be allowed to ask questions. The other 15 would have to sit in silence.

It was a new rule they made up. It was a secret rule. That applied only to Rebel News. And if we didn’t hire Chad to interrogate them, we would have walked into a trap — and by the time we realized it, it would have been too late to rush to court!

They planned to keep it all a secret until we showed up.

I know you might think I’m exaggerating. I’m not. I’ve posted our entire exchange of letters at LeadersDebate.ca. You’ve got to check it out.

Sixteen Rebels were allowed to attend. But 15 of us couldn’t ask any questions at the press conference. They said the rule was just one reporter per news company. But we know that’s a lie.

The CBC has several reporters for English Canada. And they have several reporters for Quebec. Newspapers have multiple reporters too — for example, Postmedia is one company, but it is permitted to bring reporters for each of its newspapers, for example, the National Post and the Ottawa Citizen and the Calgary Herald.

We pointed this out, and so the Debates Commission changed the rules again. They said the CBC was allowed multiple questions because they had different reporters in French and English. Well so do we — including our star Quebec reporter, Alexa Lavoie!

They said that Postmedia was allowed multiple reporters because they covered different regions. Well, so do we. Drea Humphrey is in B.C., Sheila Gunn Reid is in Alberta, David Menzies is in Ontario, Alexa’s in Quebec and I’m always running around somewhere.

Do you see what I mean? They were making it up on the go — special, secret rules just for us. They tried to trick us into NOT suing them, so that by the time we discovered this, there would be nothing we could do about it.

But we found them out. And just a few days ago, we told them we were done negotiating, and they should get their lawyers ready, because we were going back to court for a third time, for an emergency injunction.

Chad went back and forth with them NINE TIMES. You really have to read all nine letters at LeadersDebate.ca.

They knew we weren’t going to stop fighting.

And that’s when Carney’s staff blinked.

They let us in. They knew that if we took them to court for a third time, and if their tricky rules were shown to the Federal Court of Canada, they would lose for a third time.

So Carney’s people blinked. They wrote back to us, at the last minute, calling off our lawsuit, by agreeing to allow not one, not two, not three, not four, but five Rebels to ask questions — and for each of us to have cameramen, too. Granted, it’s not the full 16 we asked for, but it still makes us the largest group of question-askers at the debates.

Like I say: amazing news. But it started off as terrible news.

There’s a moral to the story here.

Number one: never trust a Liberal — especially Mark Carney.

Number two: always fight for your rights. Sometimes the other side is more scared of you than you are of them. I think our lawyer Chad scared Carney’s lawyers.

Number three: be sure to tune in to the leaders’ debates, both the French one tomorrow night, and the English one, Thursday night. Because we’ll be at both — because it’s the question and answer scrum at the end that we’re interested in.

Number four is where you come in. We told Chad to start preparing the lawsuit last week, and he put his full team on it. We truly thought we were going to court. Only when we had the written letter of surrender from Carney’s people did we stop the lawsuit. But between the lawsuit preparations and the negotiations, we racked up $9,000 in legal bills. That’s in addition to the costs of getting our whole team out there: Drea from B.C., Sheila from Alberta, etc. We’re all going to stay in an Airbnb together, to save money — oh, and we’re also bringing the billboard truck!

It’s going to be huge. We really are going to make it our debate. And that’s only possible because of my last point — we have you to help us level the playing field.

Our ability to attend the debates, and ask the questions you care about, rather than what the regime media like the CBC cares about, is only possible due to your generosity — to help us pay for our lawyers, not just this time, but the huge court victories in 2019 and 2021 that put us in a strong position this year.

It’s insane that it has fallen to us, and the mainstream media hasn’t even mentioned these outrageous attempts at censorship. But then again, they don’t want Rebel News in there either, do they?

Between Chad’s legal wrangling, the half-drafted lawsuit, our travel costs and our Airbnb, I estimate that we need $12,000 to cover our debate costs. Could I ask you for a personal favour to chip in?

It was a David vs. Goliath battle just to get in. And once we’re in, it will be a David vs. Goliath battle to push aside the regime media types who will try to block us from getting to the microphones. And then it will be a third David vs. Goliath battle to actually put questions to Mark Carney and Jagmeet Singh and Pierre Poilievre, too.

But I promise you: we’ll make sure to ask questions that no-one else in the media will.

If you can help, please click here, or go to LeadersDebate.ca — thanks for your support!

Yours truly,

Ezra Levant
Rebel News

P.S. Rebel News and one other independent media outlet were both in court back in 2019 fighting the Debates Commission. By 2021, it was just us by ourselves — but our victory allowed all other independent media to attend. And our victory this time, too, will redound to the benefit of everyone.

In other words, Rebel News fights for our reporters, and our viewers, but the benefits of our fights and the precedents we set benefit every journalist in the country, whether they admit it or not.

P.P.S. Please help me cover the $12,000 in costs here — the $9,000 in legal fees, and the $3,000 to bring our whole team (and the truck) to the debates. Thanks!

P.P.P.S. You can read the full exchange of letters between Chad and Carney’s people at LeadersDebate.ca. And we’ll be posting our videos about the debate there, too!

ABOUT REBEL NEWS
At Rebel News, we tell the other side of the story. We follow the facts wherever they may lead — even if that conflicts with the official narrative of the establishment.
JOIN REBEL NEWS +
Rebel News Plus is our premium subscription service which gives you access to our best content. Get exclusive TV-style shows, an ad-free experience, and participate in our comments section. Learn More
CONTACT
Rebel News Ltd.
PO Box 61056
Eglinton/Dufferin RO
Toronto, Ontario M6E 5B2
Canada
Web:   www.rebelnews.com
Social:

 

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 3:40 PM

2025-04- from Moose on the Loose re Marc Carney’s conflict-of-interests

 Uncategorized  No Responses »
Apr 152025
 

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 2:18 PM

2025-04-07 Insight: Trump’s Digital Concentration Camp with Catherine Austin Fitts

 Uncategorized  No Responses »
Apr 132025
 

 

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 8:33 PM

2025-04-07 Win! Ontario Court of Appeal. Former MPP Randy Hillier wins appeal in Charter challenge to Covid lockdowns, JCCF

 Democracy requirements, deficits, solutions, Freedom of Speech. (Remove some wrong postings from category), Privacy of Personal Information; Charter Right; Surveillance; StatsCan Censuses & Surveys, Rule of Law, Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt)  No Responses »
Apr 122025
 

“It is refreshing to see a court do its job of protecting our Charter freedoms,

by holding government to a high standard. There was no science behind Ontario’s total ban on all outdoor protests.”

 

 

Challenging constitutionality of

Ontario’s public health orders

  • April 7, 2025

Hillier v. Ontario

Former Ontario Member of Provincial Parliament Randy Hillier (Photo credit: Mike Crawley)

Former MPP Randy Hillier faces charges for protesting Covid restrictions

In response to inconsistent and often overblown predictions about Covid, the Government of Ontario first declared a state of emergency on March 17, 2020. Under the pretense of “two weeks to flatten the curve,” the resulting lockdowns devastated small businesses and led to large-scale societal harm in the form of increased unemployment and poverty, cancelled surgeries, the loss of personal liberty, and even death from delayed medical procedures.

On April 8, 2021, former Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) Randy Hillier attended the South Bank Bistro Restaurant in Brockville, Ontario, to peacefully protest Covid lockdown measures and the Ontario government’s Stay-at-Home Order, which came into force on the same date.

On May 1, 2021, after an extension of the Stay-at-Home Order, Mr. Hillier was invited to attend another peaceful protest against lockdowns, which took place in Cornwall, Ontario. Mr. Hillier spoke to a group of protestors, emphasizing the importance of Canadians’ fundamental freedoms as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

As a result of attending these protests, Mr. Hillier was charged under the Reopening Ontario Act for failing to comply with an Order. If found guilty, he could be fined up to $100,000 and spend one year in prison. In addition, Mr. Hillier was charged with hosting/organizing a public event where the number of those in attendance exceeded the number permitted under an Order, for which the minimum penalty was $10,000.

 

Randy Hillier challenges Covid lockdowns in Court

On June 6, 2023, Justice Centre lawyers filed a court challenge against Public Health Orders in the Ontario Superior Court on behalf of Mr. Hillier. Read Mr. Hillier’s factum here: Factum of the Applicant.

Although the Stay-at-Home Order and outdoor gathering restrictions are no longer in effect, the consequences of these authoritative measures continue to impact many Ontarians facing fines and potential imprisonment.

 

Ontario Covid lockdowns violate freedom of peaceful assembly

On January 12, 2021, the Ontario government again declared a state of emergency and imposed a Stay-at-Home Order, stating, “We need people to go out only for essential trips to pick up groceries or go to medical appointments. By doing the right thing and staying home, you can stay safe and save lives.”

The Ontario government declared its third state of emergency on April 7, 2021, which was followed by another Stay-at-Home Order issued under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, requiring everyone to remain at home except for essential purposes, such as going to the grocery store or pharmacy, accessing health care services (including getting vaccinated), exercising outdoors, or performing work that could not be performed remotely.

From March 17, 2020, onwards, the Ford government repeatedly declared and extended lockdown orders. The Stay-at-Home Order in response to the third state of emergency, which was extended on May 1, 2021, not only prohibited visiting friends and family and holding small gatherings but also put a complete ban on peaceful protests. It became illegal to exercise the fundamental Charter freedoms of association and peaceful assembly without facing the threat of fines and even jail.

Mr. Hillier’s challenge was heard on July 27 and 28, 2023, before Justice Callaghan at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Toronto. At that hearing, Justice Centre lawyers argued that the Stay-at-Home Order and outdoor gathering restrictions violated Charter-protected rights, such as the freedom of peaceful assembly.

 

Experts highlight harms of Covid measures in Ontario court challenge

Three expert reports were filed on behalf of the Applicant.

Medical anthropologist Dr. Kevin Bardosh set out the harms of lockdown measures and other Covid restrictions in Canada. He examined the social cost of the measures, including increased depression, substance abuse and suicide, along with decreased trust in public institutions.

The report of Dr. Bardosh showed alarming mental health deterioration during the pandemic among Canadians, including psychological distress, insomnia, depression, fatigue, suicide ideation, self-harm, anxiety disorders and deteriorating life satisfaction – caused in no small part by prolonged lockdowns. Many studies show that mental health continued to decline in 2021 compared to 2020. The expert report also provides abundant data about other lockdown harms, including drug overdoses, a rise in obesity, unemployment, and the destruction of small businesses, which were prevented from competing with big-box stores.

Another expert report, prepared by Dr. Joel Kettner, former Chief Medical Officer of Manitoba, discussed the factors governments needed to take into consideration before implementing public health measures. Dr. Kettner stated that public health measures must be measurable, temporary, and demonstrably connected to public health goals. He also noted that lockdown measures should be monitored for any harms they produce.

 

Court dismisses Randy Hillier’s challenge to Ontario Covid lockdowns

On November 22, 2023, the Justice Centre was disappointed to learn that the Ontario Superior Court of Justice had dismissed Mr. Hillier’s constitutional challenge to Ontario’s 2021 Stay-At-Home Order in a decision that limited the Charter right of Canadians to assemble peacefully.

Lawyer Chris Fleury, representing Mr. Hillier in this matter, stated, “Throughout 2021 and 2022, Ontario imposed some of the harshest lockdowns globally. The justification continues to be that Ontario’s healthcare system risked being overburdened. Justice Callaghan’s decision correctly notes that Ontario has the lowest hospital beds per capita of any OECD jurisdiction. It is distressing to think that the government’s severe mismanagement of healthcare over the course of decades can become a justification for the infringement of Charter rights, and the decision to put every single Ontarian on house-arrest-style conditions. Mr. Hillier and I are very disappointed with this outcome and will be reviewing the decision closely to decide whether or not to appeal.”

Justice Centre President John Carpay remarked, “The court has deliberately ignored the abundant evidence of lockdown harms that was put before the court and, therefore, has no rational basis for affirming the government’s severe and prolonged violations of Charter rights and freedoms.”

Mr. Hillier still faces five tickets for participating in peaceful protests against Covid restrictions.

 

Randy Hillier appeals decision upholding Covid gathering restrictions

Mr. Hillier and his legal team chose to appeal the decision. A Notice of Appeal was filed on January 10, 2024. The Appellant’s Factum was filed on February 21, 2024. The government filed their Respondent Factum on May 22, 2024.

The Appeal hearing occurred on September 19, 2024, at the Ontario Court of Appeal in Osgoode Hall, 130 Queen St. W. Toronto, beginning at 10:30 a.m. ET.

Mr. Hillier’s Appeal argued that, among other things, Justice Callaghan erred in applying the Oakes test. As the Notice of Appeal states, Justice Callaghan “fail[ed] to recognize that a complete ban on Charter protected activity is subject to a more onerous test for demonstrable justification at the minimal impairment and proportionality branches of Oakes.” 

Justice Callaghan’s ruling did not reference any evidence of lockdown harms within the expert report of Dr. Kevin Bardosh, and he stated that Dr. Bardosh is “not a public health expert” without explaining this opinion.

Mr. Hillier said, “September 19, 2024, will become an historic day in Canada; either a day to be celebrated or a day to remember with shame. The Ontario Court of Appeal will determine whether Canadians are fundamentally free to gather and peacefully protest government policies as an unalienable right, or if politicians have license to criminalize their political opposition.”

Lawyer Chris Fleury stated, “Ontario’s decision to put every single citizen on a form of house arrest for 55 days was a measure not seen outside of totalitarian states. It was unscientific and overwhelmingly harmful. Most importantly for this appeal, it was not minimally impairing of Mr. Hillier’s right to assemble for peaceful protest.”

 

Randy Hillier wins his appeal

Randy Hillier won his appeal in his Charter challenge to Covid gathering restrictions in Ontario.

The decision was released by the Ontario Court of Appeal on Monday, April 7, 2025.

A Justice of the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled, “I would find that the challenged gathering limits, in effect from April 17, 2021 to May 22, 2021, violated s. 2(c) of the Charter in a manner that cannot be justified under s. 1. Accordingly, I would allow the appeal.”

Justice Centre President John Carpay stated, “It is refreshing to see a court do its job of protecting our Charter freedoms, by holding government to a high standard. There was no science behind Ontario’s total ban on all outdoor protests.”

 

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 8:24 PM

2025-04-11 For Your Selection APRIL

 For your selection (summary list recent postings)  No Responses »
Apr 102025
 

In the year 2025  Easter is for Voting.      Voting starts this Friday,  April 18th.    Rabbit stew for Sunday dinner, maybe?  ha ha

(I do not like that the Government inserts its Presence into ALL aspects of Life.)

Election Day is just Two weeks away.

– – – – – –

re Televised Debates

1.   2025-04-15 The Commission in charge of Federal Debates has long been a problem in Canada. Here it is once again. I am going to help pay for lawyer Chad Williams’ services. These political nincompoops have to abide by INTEGRITY or get booted out.

As for the actual debates:  on my screen just now, notice of a change in start time of tonite’s French debate. I am ignoring it.   There’s too much skulduggery and I’ll never get this out if I stop to verify the info.

– – – – – –

1.a    2025-04-17 Election: The Green Party’s ‘Unprofessional’ ‘Bully’

Alternative media are helping to vet candidates,  regardless of party affiliation.

The Green Party does not currently have the resources required to operate in Canada’s corrupted political world.

Lots of people will not like Western Standard reporting;  lots of people do not like CBC reporting.  I DO NOT KNOW IF  Western Standard exposed the Green Party’s Dr. Anne-Marie Zajdlik who is running in Guelph.   I am aware that they did “out”, for example, a Bully guy who was running in Calgary (I don’t remember for which Party).  He was forced to drop out of the Election.    

Prorogation followed by the replacement of Trudeau by Carney as PrimeMinister, the “snap” election,   leaving the Election System vulnerable – –  would have been seen to work in favor of herding the Liberals back into official CONTROL of Government.  

We’ll see  – – in the meantime,  spread the word  – – it will seep into the Guelph riding.   The information for voters in Guelph is in the posting.   2025-04-17 Election: The Green Party’s ‘Unprofessional’ ‘Bully’

This way of VETTING candidates makes me nervous;  the information has to be rock solid.  But a continuation of Liberal Government makes me even more nervous.  As I see it,  we were betrayed by Bully Liberal Globalists.  With the collaboration of other Parties.

(Note: Former leader of the Green Party, Elizabeth May:  London ON, by-election, 2007  was Elizabeth’s first run at getting elected to Parliament.   She came second.   I went to London to help with the campaign.   I won’t tell you all I learned then, and later as an organizer/ leader of the GP in Saskatchewan. )

Every Canadian should help in an Election Campaign at least once.   Stay a while if you can.  You will learn a lot.  Working locally for Elections Canada during an Election is also good.

– – – – – – –

2.   (coming)   Catherine Austin Fitts (savvy American.  Lots of experience in various realms.  I trust her judgment.) – – there’s an interview I want.   Clear-headed about Trump and Musk.   , , ,  I recall that in the last quarter of the video,  the interviewer asks if Catherine has thoughts about a possible Federal Election win in Canada by Mark Carney (PrimeMinister).   . . .

Her reply was “God help us.”    (I’m almost certain I heard her right.  I also happen to believe she’s right.)

– – – – – –

3.   UPDATE Apr 10 – interview with Lawyer for Detective Helen Grus following the GUILTY decision.  (Mini collection, childhood vaccines: Sudden Infant Death (SIDS); Steve Kirsch and “Jennifer”).

  • About 1 in 6 couples in Canada are infertile.
  • The cost of getting to the pregnant stage  is  $20 to 30 thousand dollars (used to be free and fun).
  • AND THEN,  no one tells the Mother  NOT to get a vaccination if you’re pregnant??
  • AND THEN you are SOOO disempowered that you don’t know how, or don’t want to investigate for yourself?   SIDS (infants just somehow magically die?   There are no known causes?   That is bullshit.  It’s lies.  Go to the link above.  All the info you need is there.

Maybe it’s the guys (the men) who have to roar?   Do they WANT to have children?   . . .   I don’t see women’s groups standing up in solidarity with Detective  Grus.   Hopefully they’re out there, and I just don’t see them.

– – – – – –

4.    2025-04- from Moose on the Loose re Marc Carney’s conflict-of-interests

– – – – – –  –

MEASLES are another case-in-point.    In the beginning, a vaccination shot was for ONE disease.  By the 1990’s  – – the infamous MMR shot (Measles, Mumps and Rubella) was for HOW MANY? – – – THREE diseases.   Three Shots in One.    The reasoning sounds good:

In order to reduce the number of shots a child receives in a doctor’s visit, some vaccines are offered as combination vaccines. A combination vaccine is two or more different vaccines that have been combined into a single shot.  Dec 20, 2024

There are combination-10 vaccines (there is at least one of those “combo” vaccines) that have 10 different vaccines in one.     For your youngster’s good health and your convenience.     If the little ones don’t die.   DO NOT talk about that.  Detective Grus you are GUILTY.

(There’s more “combos” on offer; I understate intentionally.   It’s easier to defend an obvious understatement.)

In the case of the propaganda around measles,  FAMILIES are pitching in to correct the record.  Mennonites.  They have an advantage of strength and support in community.

Dr, Pierre Kory provides excellent and instructive analysis in the first two of these:

5.  2025-03-20 Two doctors, with access to the Hospital’s medical records: the 6-year-old girl in Texas did NOT die from measles, as claimed.

6.  2025-04-09 8-Year-Old in West Texas Died From Hospital-acquired Pneumonia, Not Measles.  Medical Records Show

7.   2025-04-08 The Media Playbook for Measles Looks a Lot Like Its COVID Playbook — This Time, Kids Are the Pawns. With thanks to Mary Holland from CHD.

8.   2025-02-19 Latest Measles Outbreaks a Result of Failed Vaccines — Not Failure to Vaccinate. By Sayer Ji, on CHD

NOTE:   If you say “the people responsible for these tragedies” WILL be held to account” – – –  I’ve been doing this for long enough to know it will not happen unless you dare to speak to at least one person.   People have given their lives to stop the stupidity, using kindness, reason and unadulterated science.  We are (they are) at The Point of the Most Potential, they’ve climbed high on the mountain side, sharing what they know.  Will it win the day?   No.
The cullers are fighting for their lives/livelihoods/ status and wealth.    Collateral damage is well,  it’s normal.
OSTRICHES TO THE RESCUE!

An ostrich farm in Edgewood, BC, is challenging a cull order from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) after avian flu cases in December .

I am interested in this posting about MASS CULLING in the U.S. because of Health Canada (CFIA)’s  edict to KILL (cull)  a herd of 400 ostriches at a farm outside Kelowna, B.C..   Again,  this is about viruses.  The video,  2025-02-28   The Big Picture,  is excellent background.

9.   2025-02-18  USDA Has Spent $1.25 Billion on Mass Culling for H5N1 Bird Flu – With Disastrous Consequences         (The unsanitized word for culling, in English,  is KILLING)

The CFIA initially ordered the destruction of the entire remaining flock of approximately 400 ostriches. A temporary court injunction was granted, delaying the cull while the farm argues for a more nuanced approach and the potential for alternative solutions. The farm is also arguing that the CFIA has other options under the Health of Animals Act to address public safety concerns.

A judicial review is probably completed – – it was scheduled for April 15-16 in Vancouver.

 

I think the OSTRICHES are stepping in, to the rescue!   I’ve been saying for a long time:  the root problem is the ever-increasing corruption.  NOTHING WILL CHANGE if we can’t get that trend into reverse.    All the lobbying is great and helpful,  BUT IT DOES NOT CHANGE/ stop the corruption.   We KNOW that.

Sniff  avian flu;  they slaughter millions of chickens.  The  CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency) upholds the world order.  Puppets.  No curiosity.  Only the World Order (USDA Has Spent $1.25 Billion on Mass Culling for H5N1 Bird Flu – With Disastrous Consequences ).   The price of eggs runs sky-high (duh).  The cost of chicken?

We poor, dumb, blobs cower in quivering skeletons without a clue HOW OUR IMMUNE SYSTEMS WORK, let alone those of fellow creatures.  We are so intentionally cullible.

Anyhow,  Journalist Drea Humphrey and the The Ostrich Farm did a great UPDATE which I can’t find at the moment.

 

THE MAJOR BATTLEGROUND (PROPAGANDA) AT THE MOMENT:

  • immune systems are inferior
  • there is no such thing as an immune system

I will return to this   

– – – –  –
England swings like a pendulum do
Bobbies on bicycles, two by two
Canada swings too!
  • From Stop Harper a decade ago, to
  • Stop Trudeau and Carney.   To
  • Stop the CFIA and WEF!
10.    2011-03 Brigitte de Pape, young Canadian Hero. Senate Page displays “Stop Harper” Sign during Reading of the Throne Speech.  That was 2011.  Today we need “Stop Trudeau and Stop Carney”.  All the way to “Stop the WEF” and “Stop the CFIA”.   Kick-boxing the Puppet Masters. Power to the Ostriches!

Liberals today – the characteristics of a police and surveillance state, clear disdain for the Rule of Law, knowledge of people who have left Canada because the writing is on the wall (loss of freedoms and rights)  (but this is a global battle), records from the covid years and continuing . . .

– – – – – – – –

A VOID I want to address:   What about the past?  What about CONTEXT?  

I am guessing that few Canadians who are younger than 40 will know about the massive mobilizations in the USA in 1999.   Thousands of Canadians crossed the border to join them.    A film was made about the nation-wide (USA) insurrection, “Battle in Seattle”.  Woody Harrelson was one of the actors.  The Battle continues today.  Non-violent.  Global.

11.    2025-04-07 UK Tribunal Blocks Government’s Attempt to Keep Apple Surveillance Case Secret. Reclaim the Net.

12.   2025-04-02 Be patient. Sit back; the video should start. Dr Mary Talley Bowden: How vaccines got politicized and the medical industry lost all credibility. Interview by Tucker Carlson. Informative.

13.   2025-03-31 Baby Dies After Receiving 6 Shots for 12 Vaccines — Doctors Say ‘Catching Up’ Kids on Vaccines Is Common, and Dangerous.  By Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D., CHD

14.   2025-03-28 ‘Long-overdue Crack in the Dam’: RFK Jr. to Create CDC Sub-agency Focused on Vaccine Injuries. by Michael Nevradakis, CHD.

15.   2025-03-24 Schools Can’t ‘Forcibly Vaccinate’ Kids Without Parents’ Consent, North Carolina Supreme Court Rules (The PREP ACT does not preempt State Law). By Michael Nevradakis, CHD.

16.   2025-03-08 NCI Hearings. Coerced Pfizer Covid Vaccine, 24 year-old health-care worker, Red Deer AB. Cancer took 6 weeks to kill.

17.   2025-03-26 Aaron Gunn part 3 of his expose into the fentanyl trade in Canada  (repeat from March Listing)

18.   2025-03-19 Mark Carney, PrimeMinister-Elect.    3 not-so-flattering videos.

18. a.   2025-04- from Moose on the loose re Marc Carney’s conflict-of-interests

19.   2025-03-24 Kevin O’Leary: Carney is Trudeau 2.0. Interview by Candice Malcolm

20.   2025-03-22 CMHC awards $30 million in bonuses despite housing crisis. Thanks to Canadian Tax Payers & Western Standard.

NOTE:   There is no pay wall  at Western Standard during the ELECTION PERIOD.  Supporters who wanted  “The Western” voice to get beyond the West  banded together and approached the W.S.:   if they each contributed $1000,  would it be financially possible for the W.S. to remove its pay wall for the duration of the Election?    Almost overnite there was financial support for that to happen.    

https://www.westernstandard.news/

21.    2025-03-21 Group asks Ontario AG to have independent special prosecutor review evidence for prosecution of Trudeau for SNC-Lavalin scandal. From Democracy Watch

22.   2025-03-20 The simple step of the courageous individual is not to take part in the lie.

23.   2025-03-20 Iowa Bill Would Strip Vaccine Makers of Some Liability Protection for Injuries, by Brenda Baletti, CHD

24.   2025-03-20    After 3 Children Died Within 24 Hours of Routine Vaccines, Japanese Researchers Sound Alarm

25.   2025-04-11 U.S. Supreme Court Judge Amy Coney Barrett and Elon Musk. Does anyone know where to find a source document? The issue is important.  I don’t know the  value of an  AI Generated version of what happened?

 

THE “PREVIOUS” SELECTION (before April)  WAS   MARCH  2025-03-20 For Your Selection

The first link in the Selection takes you to a video.

This COMMENT  BY  @joseerose81   is copied from there:

Great work! This documentary needs to be shared across the country! And this is only ONE of the many damaging Liberal-NDP policies. I simply cannot believe this is what Canada has become. It’s absolutely mind-boggling, not to mention infuriating and heartbreaking. There’s only one way to vote at this next election to even begin to try to fix this.

– –  – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Please help spread the word.  We can change the Government.

If your main information diet is mainstream media,   you will not know the amazing people working to reveal “The Emperor has no clothes!”.   They put a different, happy look on my face.  Sometimes I need the boost.

Easter is a special time.    If we are Celebrants of Life,  we won’t be such obedient workers!  Maybe that’s the plan?  ha ha!

/Sandra

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 7:08 PM

2022-02-28 Covid protests, Vocabulary and Context. WE WILL DO BETTER . . .  NEXT TIME! say the Police. Linguistics. Definition of antifa.

 Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt)  No Responses »
Apr 092025
 

This began as a submission to the Commission of Inquiry into the Invocation of the Emergency Act in Canada, in February 2022.

The Act itself requires an Inquiry be held within 60 days.  A copy of acknowledgement that the original of my submission was received by the Commission is at the end.   I have added more context and made other edits since Feb 2022.

I watched all the proceedings, live-streamed, of the Commission’s proceedings.

 

WE WILL DO BETTER . . .  NEXT TIME  say the Police

CONTENTS INCLUDE

2.  CHARACTERISTIC    A bit about myself 

3.   INFORMED PUBLIC DISCOURSE IS MISSING IN ACTION

THE VOCABULARY

IF YOU DO NOT KNOW THE VOCABULARY FOR THE DISCOURSE, can you be clear about your decisions? 

4.  TIPPING POINTS

5.  CITIZEN ACTION DOES NOT SPONTANEOUSLY COMBUST OUT OF THIN AIR

 

Please do not confuse “The Problem” with what is a “PREDICTABLE OUTCOME”. 

 

                                        SO:  There will be more and larger mass demonstrations . . . ?

 

On October 18 and 19th, 2022, the Commission into the Invocation of the Emergency Act in Canada heard from Police:   we will do better next time.   

On CBC radio the next day (Oct 20), an “authority” pronounced:  There will be more and larger mass demonstrations.

– – – – – –

Without some CONTEXT, and without the VOCABULARY for processing the information, it is more likely that YES, there WILL BE more and larger mass demonstrations.   And

when the Police  “DO BETTER”, it will be WORSE for Canadians and democracy.

If thwarted above ground, aggrieved people go underground (elaboration below under “CONTEXT”).

– – – – – – – – – –

WHAT IS MISSING in the pronouncement by “the authority” (more and larger demonstrations)?   

There was no mention of the Unimaginable Numbers of people worldwide who are pitching in to help Canadians (and each other) fight the erasure of Rights.

Are we going to continue the fight against the wrongs that were done during the “covid” years, and that continue to be done?  Is the Government going to come to the Table, or are they going to out-source their job to the Police?

The determination that our Rights will not be taken from us is shared around the globe.  We stand by each other in this resolve.  Today, Feb 18, 2023, I watched footage from Oxford, UK, home of Oxford University, not known to be a hotbed of radicals!   The city of Oxford appears to have become that very thing.  Masses of people in the streets, sharing information and supporting a united community.

There are much larger masses in other cities, in the UK and elsewhere.  I include Oxford because it caught me by surprise.

Another “missing” in the UNIMAGINABLE NUMBERS  of protesting people is the Millennials.

Brief Digression:

A.   1992:  “SYSTEMS OF SURVIVAL, A Dialogue on the Moral Foundations of Commerce and Politics” by Jane Jacobs, is helpful to the discourse and contains a cautionary note about our conditioned interpretations of “what’s happenin’”; I think of baby-boomer stereotypes of “protestors”, for example.

B.   2023:  The science and logic are changed.  I am not controlled primarily by genetics; epigenetics play a much greater role in determining the contributions I will make to my world.  “Environment” turns on the switches in cells in my body and all their potential.

DR BRUCE LIPTON is one of many scientists in the field of epigenetics.  He is good at explaining things in language I can mostly understand.   And he is hopeful:

Large numbers of “millennials” have NO “investment” in today’s world, nor in the projected future.  They want “a better world”; they are creative; and more than baby boomers, they have “agency”.

   LIPTON  https://youtu.be/3-rF0OHY7NI  (approx. an hour long video)

C.   1923:   Kahlil Gibran   A sobering dose of reality:

Your children are not your children.    their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams!

What good news.  – –   Death dilutes the influence of the status quo;  there is HOPE that a better world CAN be created!

 

2.    CHARACTERISTIC – A BIT ABOUT MYSELF

I am 73-years-old (2022), born 4 years after the end of WW2.

I am from The Prairies (Luseland, SK), small town rural, distant from the city, of a different time.  My Grandfathers and Dad were, by the quirks of fate, prevented from going to war.  They were not directly exposed to the environment of killing.  In my family, there was no broken down drunkenness returned from the war.  Women and children are respected.

I have a decades-long interest in the building (and conversely the destruction) of strong, healthy communities.

Which is tied to unending curiosity:  how ever could Germany have descended into nazism (fascism)?  The standard responses have never been fully satisfying to me.  I don’t understand it viscerally.  Except now, through the covid experience I begin to see, to observe the process in action.

I am enamoured of freedom with its attendant responsibilities.

I have been twice to the Museum of Non-Violent Resistance at Checkpoint Charlie on the Wall that divided West from East in Berlin, Germany, during the Cold War.  The first time was in 1999 on a day when we were busy dropping bombs on Kosovo (not far from Berlin if you measure distance as it is on The Prairies).

I view healthy communities and de-centralized governance as

the best defence against corruption and mass subjugation. 

I was an elected member of the University of Saskatchewan Senate for 6 years in the 2000’s.  The Senate is the “voice of the community” in the tri-cameral governance structure of Saskatchewan Universities.  Activists from south and north got themselves elected to the Senate to challenge the commandeering of a public institution (“theft”) to serve corporate entities and enrichment.   At the expense of the public good.

– – – – – – – – – – –

 

3.   INFORMED PUBLIC DISCOURSE IS MISSING IN ACTION

What am I classified as, in the data banks? . . .    a protestor?  An activist?  – – insurrectionist?  – – dissident?   revolutionary – – subversive – – an insurgent – – or warrior? – –  I certainly hope I’m categorized as being against fascism (anti-fa) – – I’m  a resistor of tyranny?   Yes, I’ll swear to that (I do non-violent resistance) – – A rebel – – an old lady?  (yes, I am that!) . . .  a disruptor?  (Elon Musk is a “disruptor” who challenges the status quo)  – – conscientious objector?  . . .  yes,  do not expect me to be complicit or compliant with Lockheed Martin Corporation’s  involvement at StatsCan (Lockheed – – the American military-industrial-congressional war profiteers, FVEY surveillance, war-mongering, complete with the cherry on top – – drone warfare).    Am I a guerrilla fighter in the tradition of Ché Guevera?

How are YOU categorized?

(The Government said that I am fringe minority, misogynist, racist,  . . .  It brings me great merriment to think of all the things I am!)

. .  it is hard to imagine any insurgency meeting its goals without undermining aspects of the legitimacy or power of the government . . . . subversion includes measures short of violence, which still serve the purposes of insurgents.

Ironically, myself and tonnes of others have worked for a very long time, and still work, to STOP the takeovers of our Governments.   We have lost regulatory power.    Our sovereignty has been given away.  Now we have a frontal attack on Rights.

Citizens do not hear or learn the proper vocabulary for this discussion

because it is seldom used in public, in Canada.  Not in reference to ourselves.

 

The meaning of the vocabulary is dependent on “who controls the cargo”.   If you are the Ogoni of the oil-rich Niger Delta (Nigeria) and you wish that your people did not live in poverty  while foreign interests corrupt, pollute your nation and make off with the riches – –  in the news you are a dirty “insurrectionist”;  you get killed.  Look around.  Better you be on the side of the exploiters – –  alive!

The Trucker Convoy and its supporters are freedom fighters, n’est-ce pas?

 

BUT insurgents are not us, may the Gods forbid!   “Insurgents”  are foreign and to be feared.  They are scary people.

. . . Whereas, in my experience they are the best candidates for political office in Canada because they understand HOW the perversion of governance comes about.  It is in their lived experience.

The Trucker relationship with the Police  – – with the Police because the Government won’t meet with the Truckers – – will be rocky because the word “protest” and its alternatives have been successfully stigmatized,  IF we don’t fiercely exercise our rights to free speech and to assemble.  That is our rebellion.  In my view,  too many Canadians do not understand the vulnerability of our current situation.

I value the conversation I had with an underground “insurgent” from Central America who fought the usurpers of his country, for years.  The battle was not won in his time; he managed to escape to Canada as the nets were tightening, before he could be apprehended by Police of the regime.  He would not have survived police custody.  Death is an ordinary due of freedom fighters.  How’s that for deterrence by the Usurpers?

In Canada and internationally we are fighting side-by-side, hard as we can, against corrupted governance – – Big Government working with Big Pharma. Most of my colleagues understand that the definition of fascism is a marriage of Government and Corporate entities.

The refusal of the Government to come to a table to even hear, let alone fix, the WHY’s – –   – –  WHY would these people travel these thousands of kilometers, and camp outside in Canadian winter – – WHAT is SO important to them that they voluntarily stepped forward  to carry a message that was visibly supported by untold numbers in the world, and stifled by propaganda, manipulation, coercion and worse?

If the Governments, Big Pharma and their Collaborators are allowed to remove the autonomy we have over our own bodies, rule our everyday movements, freeze bank accounts & credit cards without independent adjudication, to imprison without charge,  . . .  if this is not stopped, Canadians will learn soon enough what IS important enough.

The Invocation of the Emergency Act.  What is that?  . . . How would you classify it, if not as an act of counter-insurgency (by the usurpers) to the Truckers and their Supporters, the insurgency?  What else fits?  CAN it be discussed fairly and intelligently, if we don’t know the right words for the Government actions?

If the trend of more and larger mass demonstrations cannot be reversed by citizens, i.e. if we are not successful in establishing civil Government, especially in a high-surveillance state, then a police or corporate (fascist) state is ensconced in Canada.  The flagrant irrelevance of Rule by Law (think of Jody Wilson-Raybould)  is a shout-out warning.

Many have concluded that big business is running the show.  Corporatocracy, not democracy is an accurate portrayal.  On this one, I don’t care what you call it, so long as the word “democracy” as a stand-alone is not accepted because that’s not what we have.   “Remnant democracy” maybe.

 

If the reality is a corporatized state, there has been a coup d’état by stealth in Canada (and in the U.S.)

“Military historian Edward Luttwak says, “A coup consists of the infiltration of a small, but critical, segment of the state apparatus, which is then used to displace the government from its control of the remainder. . . ”   

Quislings in Canada have and continue to play, a significant role in the coup.

 

Excerpt from the posting:  2010-09-13   RCMP identify coup d’etat as threat to Canada, article, Ottawa Citizen.   (posted 13 years ago,  but still relevant).

The RCMP have put the risk of a coup d’état on the list of four threats to Canada.

. . .  armed force (either military or paramilitary) is not a defining feature of a coup d’état.”

I’d say that coup d’états happen when the powers-that-be want more power and control than they already have.  Or, they feel a threat to their power and agenda.

What would threaten them, in today’s world?  . . .  Why did the RCMP list coup état?  . . .

Growing dissatisfaction among growing numbers of “peasants” would be a threat to the powers-that-be.   Sufficient dissatisfaction, large enough numbers, intention . . . but that would be called a “revolution”, not a coup d’état.

So let’s see.  The RCMP say the threat of a coup d’état exists.  Earlier,  I and others have said that we have corporatocracy, not democracy in Canada.   Which means that the coup d’état has ALREADY TAKEN PLACE   (“the infiltration of a small, but critical, segment of the state apparatus, which is then used to displace the government from its control of the remainder”).

What does the RCMP statement mean then?  Does it mean that there is a threat of EVEN MORE coup d’état-ing?

To answer that, put yourself into the shoes of the powers-that-be (the ones doing the coups).  What do THEY see?  . . .   I see coup d’état . . .  they see revolution.   We are viewing the same world, but through a different set of eyes.   A power struggle between us and them.

I was astounded to hear “coup d’etat” used in the media (the Ottawa Citizen), quoting the RCMP.  . . .  But why the surprise?  I have been saying that the success of the opposition to the terrible polluting in the tar sands, the success in protection of water,  etc., threatens the corporate agenda.  That “revolution” threatens the corporate agenda.  When I stop to think, as a population moves toward revolution, yes, that is when coup d’états happen.   The population wakes up to what has been happening, they stop being sheeple, the powers whose interests are threatened must resort to military/police (violence) to impose their will.

In this network we have documented the growing military/police state in Canada.   What is that other than the signs of a coup d’état?   But is that the coup d’état that the RCMP are thinking of?

So is there evidence of dissatisfaction and unrest,  IN LARGE ENOUGH NUMBERS to trigger pre-emptive (that’s what it would be), MORE coup état-ing by large corporations working with their big government quislings?

Another question:  if the RCMP see potential coup d’état, where does that leave THEM?

We’re all in this together.  I think we need to understand the situation and share it.  Otherwise we, as Canadians, can’t solve it.

Back to Coup d’état / Revolution:
LARGE ENOUGH NUMBERS?   .. . .  don’t need to address that one.  “They” would see large enough numbers, enabled, empowered and connected by the ability to exchange information by email, the net, and phone technology.

 

This is part of a short series of postings, one of which talks about the movie “Sounds like a Revolution” http://www.soundslikearevolution.com/ .  I recommend the movie.  It is very helpful to understanding today’s political affairs.

Pinch myself:  I wrote the preceding page in 2010!

= = = = = = = = = = = =

INSERT, 2025-03-09  Another pinch:   It was 2011 that Brigitte dePape , , ,

HAH!    How soon I forget.   Young Brigitte dePape, the Senate Page who held up the STOP HARPER sign in the Canadian Senate during the reading of the June 3, 2011 Throne Speech

A major event in Canadian history.  “Harper” stickers started appearing on road STOP signs right across Canada.

Turbulent times – – the Conservatives trying to “unite the right” and end Liberal domination of the Government.

  •  Preston Manning and the Reform Party had come out of the West to Ottawa.  Manning was an MP from 1993 until his retirement in 2002.   He was well-respected; the son of  longest-serving premier Ernest Manning, Social Credit Premier of Alberta for 25 years.  In Ottawa, Reform rebranded becoming the Canadian Alliance,  which became the Conservatives.   
  •  Stephen Harper became the Federal Conservative leader (2002).   The 2004 Election reduced the Liberals to a Minority Government.  Harper then attained minority Governments in both the 2006 and 2008 Federal Elections.
  • Get a load of this:  Harper finally obtained majority-government status in the May 2011 Election.  Only to be challenged by Brigitte dePape at the reading of the Throne Speech on June 3rd a month later!
  • 2015 October – the next Election,  Harper is soundly defeated.  The Liberals rebounded from third place in the House of Commons with 36 seats to a strong majority government with 184 of the 338 seats in the expanded Commons. The Liberals picked up 148 seats, easily the biggest numerical increase for a Canadian party since Confederation.
  • Harper was pro-war (Iraq and Afghanistan), pro-Israel.
  • He laid the foundations for the abuses of democratic functioning that Trudeau runs amok in, today.
  • BRIGITTE DE PAPE’S HEROIC ACTIONS remind me that in 2011 I felt despair.  What had happened to governance in Canada?  How could we reclaim or construct a “clean” system of governance?
  • We went from Harper to Trudeau  and are now (Sunday, March 9, 2025)   in the arms of globalist Mark Carney:

    Ex-central banker to replace Trudeau as Canada’s prime minister after winning Liberal Party vote

  • We’ve been wrestling with the devil for at least 20 years.   Carney has to be defeated.

 

Back to today:

The tools for reclaiming the levers of Government evolve with the times and technology. 

The patient – –  Canadian democracy – – may not survive without even greater mobilizations of its defenders.  Maybe the “authority” I heard on the radio will be proven right.  More and larger mass demonstrations are a necessity?

The characteristics of a police and surveillance state, clear disdain for the Rule of Law, knowledge of people who have left Canada because the writing is on the wall, recorded during the covid years . . . Time will tell.

“Do not go gentle into that good night.”

INSERT:  2008-11-09 Encana Dawson Creek: Reply from RCMP Anti-Terrorist Squad. Rule of law?

Corporatocracy or Democracy or Administrative State or WHAT?, Why we flounder or do not flounder

BACKGROUND:

– An anti-terrorist RCMP squad was sent to Dawson Creek  because of “incidents” on the Encana pipeline.

– I emailed the RCMP (2008-11-06  Letter to RCMP anti-terrorism squad):  the underlying CAUSES of the incidents at the pipeline need to be addressed.  The actions (the “incidents”) on the pipeline draw attention to a problem. They are not the actions of terrorists.

If the underlying causes are not addressed it is predictable that there will be more incidents.  They will occur in the Tar Sands, too.  The industry is slowly killing local people through the poisons dumped into the environment.  One example:  locals witness the lethality of “Sour gas” through still-born livestock and the miscarriages of their women.

The Government turns a blind eye.  The GOVERNMENT is the creator of the incidents, through its failure to regulate effectively and through its failure to enforce regulations. The Government is the only institution in our society that has this function.  If they don’t perform their role, it doesn’t get done.

The RCMP Superintendent, Lloyde, replied to my email.  And I am grateful to him; I responded.

INSERT:  I continued to send very occasional emails to the Superintendent until his retirement.  Maybe the emails were just deleted.  I don’t care.  It’s important in a democracy to have conversations.

  • My letter to the RCMP is at   2008-11-06  Letter to RCMP anti-terrorism squad,  with links to the related correspondence.

RELATED:  2009-08-31   Letter  to the anti-terrorist squad, RCMP:   Government and University are creating the “home-grown” terrorists.   Am I one of them?  

– – – – – – –

RETURNING TO 2023:   “WE WILL DO BETTER . . .  NEXT TIME”   say the Police

  1. The discourse isn’t great, if you don’t know the vocabulary for the discussion.  It’s like trying to converse in a language you don’t speak.
  2. THERE IS A VOID IN THE DISCOURSE
    • The Inquiry into the Invocation of the Emergency Act AND
    • The National Citizen’s Inquiry into Covid

BOTH orient the discussion to the present and the future. For example:

Tell us how your ideas might apply in the future. . . How would they apply to different protest activities about other matters?

 The VOID I wish to address:   What about the past?  What about CONTEXT?  

I am guessing that few Canadians who are younger than 40 will know about the massive mobilizations in the USA in 1999.   Thousands of Canadians crossed the border to join them.    A film was made about the nation-wide (USA) insurrection, “Battle in Seattle”.  Woody Harrelson was one of the actors.

 

CITIZEN ACTION DOES NOT SPONTANEOUSLY COMBUST OUT OF THIN AIR

The “Battles to Protect the Commons” are decades-long and arduous.  “The Commons” is comprised of components upon which creation and human society are dependent for survival and health.   Big Pharma is not on the list of components.

 

SO  – – – – WHAT IS THE CONTEXT, INCLUDING THE PAST, for

THE TRUCKERS CONVOY   (A.K.A. THE FREEDOM CONVOY?)

Non-violent Resistance / conscientious objector?   to the erasure of Rights

makes the Truckers, Farmers (Coutts, Alberta) and Supporters into protestors or Insurgents (or other words)   and

Government response is Counter-Insurgent.  (Government goes to any end to be the Dictator – fund state media; roll out the propaganda machine; take political prisoners, trample Rights, freeze people’s money, property; prosecute, fine and put protesters in jail; even solitary confinement for long periods; invoke the Emergency Act; tell lies – lots of them and BIG ones.)

IF THWARTED ABOVE GROUND, AGGRIEVED PEOPLE GO UNDERGROUND.    

I did not know to what depth resentment descends.  A couple of experiences made it palpable.    

https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=19166

  • We were 15 years in Nova Scotia. I followed the Acadians from N.S. to Louisiana.  There, a new (1999) lovely little Acadian museum describes the “genocide” by the English.  The Brits removed the French from N.S.. The memory of injustice is strong enough 250-years later to drive community construction of this place.  250 years later! They want their children to know and remember.
  • 150 year memory. Their sons were killed in the U.S. Civil War that started in 1861.  On a tour of the historic section of Atlanta, GA, the telling of the stories was truly as though the injustice of dead sons had happened maybe 40 years ago.  It was 150 years ago.
  • Think of the Middle East, the Balkans, . . .
  • Women Who Run With the Wolves, Excerpt below.

(the preceding is from  2002-11-21 (2 of 3), on Non-violent resistance      (https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=4804)

 

The CONTEXT for The Trucker Convoys across Canada, 2022, includes the Battle in Seattle, also MONTEBELLO, 2007.

2008-11-28 Follow-up on Montebello, Police provoke Violence at SPP protest (2007)     https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=747 

Three police officers from the Quebec Sureté  were trained to be provocateurs – – turn peaceful protest violent.  The protest was Legitimate – – heads of corporations and top Government officials (the USA, Canada and Mexico) meeting behind closed doors to make policy decisions that belong in the House of Commons.

As I say, Police officers were trained, deployed, disguised as protestors to turn the protest violent.  Their Police-issue boots gave them away.  Protestors pulled down their bandanas, others video’d their faces.  A short documentary was made, with the head of the Quebec Sureté  later explaining at a press conference, “The police were doing their job”.    The media nor anyone else ever called them to account, in spite of all the attempts by the protestors to make it happen.

In the 15 years since 2007, “the corporate guys” have made great strides.  We were looking at 3 countries and numerous big corporations in 2007.  In 2022,  the covid template was rolled out around the world.  2007 looks like Mary Poppins in comparison.     

 

Violence, the weapon of choice.  Don’t fix the problem.  Look at CONTEXT – –

  • The Oka Crisis (1990)
  • Ipperwash (1995)
    • 2020-02-20 Blockades. The lesson from Ipperwash cost Dudley George his life.

. . .   I don’t see it said that the Stony Plain people had been trying . . . FOR FIFTY YEARS.  The blockade at Ipperwash was after 50 years of lawyers and mediators and Government officials getting big salaries and perks to resolve the problem. With ZERO accomplishment. An unarmed Dudley George was shot dead by police, with provocation from Ontario then-Premier Mike Harris.

Justice Linden did not take long to determine that “Ipperwash” belonged to the Chippewa. Something that all those lawyers and politicians and “officials” and mediators could not accomplish in 50 years.  It took a dead man AND another two decades after that, for the land to be returned, as set out in the Agreement with the Canadian Armed Forces, that the land would be returned – – it was on temporary loan for use during WW2.  Ipperwash is a nice place with a lake; instead of being returned to its owners after the War, it fell into the hands of not-Indian cottagers.

CONTEXT:

  • (1980)   The Constitution Express (trains with a thousand Indians on-board descend on Ottawa.  Ref. “Unsettling Canada”, 2015, by Arthur Manuel.  I highly recommend the book,)
  • (1999)   Battle in Seattle.  Canadians part of it.
  • (2007)   Montebello  (Police officers trained, disguised and deployed to be provocateurs.)
  • (2007-08)  Mainstreet reactions to Wallstreet-induced severe worldwide economic crisis.  Canadians did “Occupy”, too.
  • (2010)   G20 Summit, Toronto
  • (2012)   Idle No More  started in Saskatchewan
  • (2013)   Black Lives Matter started.  Followed by All Lives Matter
  • (2022)   Trucker’s Convoy cross-Canada

That’s a fraction of the action by Canadian citizens to assert what’s right.

No one was killed during the Freedom Convoys in 2022 and the invocation of the Emergency Act, thanks to the leadership of the Truckers, and some (many) among the Police.

Given what is known, Did the Government WANT the conflict over covid settled?

The announcement by the head of the (World Economic Forum) WEF, Klaus Schwab, that the WEF has “Trudeau and half the Canadian cabinet” in its pocket – – ?

Chrystia Freeland was on the WEF Board for a number of years. (Update Jan. 2024: the WEF website no longer lists Freeland as a board member.)

Freeland entered the Canadian political scene in 2013 under the Liberals. I was alarmed by her connection to Larry Summers, to the point of documenting it in 2017.  Bringing that magnitude of corruption into the Canadian political system, as financial advisors no less, will scuttle any ship-of-state.  McKinsey also hit the radar screen at that time.

2017-05-25 Chrystia Freeland – Larry Summers – Dominic Barton connection. “Inclusive Capitalism Initiative” as “re-branding”. Summers bad news (corrupt) (Wall Street vrs Main Street  2007-08 fiasco), Canadian financial matters, advisors to Liberals.

The alarm was warranted. The track record of the Trudeau Jr Government is well-known.  Just one egregious example:  political interference in the decisions of the office of the Attorney-General of Canada (Jody Wilson-Raybould) to prosecute SNC-Lavalin.  Not bad enough, the Cabinet got rid of the AG  . . . There’s the Wi Fund-raising scandal; Canadians know the litany.  God help us to remember at Election Time.

In my view, CORRUPTION is the single most important threat to peace, order and good governance in Canada.  Corruption is the inevitable outcome of public-private-partnerships.

Reference:  2006-04-12 Real-life experience. PPP’s and corruption in action. Government-University-Chemical Biotech.

– – –

Women Who Run With the Wolves, 1992 by Clarissa Pinkola Estes 

Excerpt from  https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=2348 

(The “young woman” is the naive in all of us, men and women.  Read this as “gender-inclusive”.)

“.. though the young woman attempts to follow the orders of the predator, and agrees to be ignorant about the secret in the cellar, she can only comply for so long.  Finally she puts the key, the question, to the door and finds the shocking carnage …  And that key, that tiny symbol of her life, suddenly will not cease its bleeding, will not cease to give the cry that something is wrong.  A woman may try to hide from the devastations of her life, but the bleeding, the loss of life’s energy, will continue UNTIL SHE RECOGNIZES THE PREDATOR FOR WHAT IT IS and CONTAINS IT.

When (women or men) open the doors of their own lives and survey the carnage there, in those out-of-the way places, they most often find they have BEEN ALLOWING SUMMARY ASSASSINATIONS of their most crucial dreams, goals, and hopes. …    

… when such a gruesome discovery is made… we can be sure the natural predator … has been at work methodically destroying a woman’s (or man’s) most cherished desires, concerns, and aspirations.

In fairy tales, the animal groom character is a common motif that can be understood to represent a MALEVOLENT THING DISGUISED AS A BENEVOLENT THING.  This or some proximate characterization is always present when a woman/man  carries naive presentiments about something or someone.  When a woman/man is attempting to avoid the facts of her/his own devastation, her night dreams are likely to shout warnings to her, warnings and exhortations to wake up! or get help! or flee! or go for the kill!”

 

4.   TIPPING POINTS

You say – – but Canada is not East Germany before the fall of the Berlin wall.

Nor is it apartheid South Africa, Robben Island where Nelson Mandela spent 18 of his 27-year imprisonment.  I went there, too, to try and figure out a bit of what and how things happen.

My hypothesis:   TIPPING POINTS are a factor.   In a dynamic system (Governance in this case), given feedback that the system is failing, there has to be a mobilization by citizens to correct their system of governance.

If the system is to be returned to civil government there are two requirements:

  1. The Mobilization has to be TIMELY (corrections have to be implemented PRIOR TO arrival at a tipping point after which the system is beyond retrieval).
  1. The corrections have to fix the ACTUAL CAUSES of the failings. Otherwise the system will continue into collapse.

If mainstream Canadian Media was doing its job, Canadians would know that imprisonment without charge, terms of bail that mock democracy, and other outrages are pushing us dangerously and ever closer to a Tipping Point.

 

  • North America has its own monumental struggles.  The Truckers Convoy, a.k.a. the Freedom Convoy, was sparked most directly after two years of futile petitioning by citizens. To me the Convoy was a novel, high-risk initiative of very uncertain outcome coming from a place that was predicted by NO ONE. . . . Truckers?!

(From The Museum of Non-Violent Resistance)

“… nonviolent resistance as a political force is still young, its possibilities not yet well enough known, and is thus seldom an incitement to the masses and is seldom encouraged by the media.  

For all that, those striving for human rights are dependent on our solidarity and the feeling is growing of an ever increasing threat through the power of dictatorships, the armaments race and the immobility of bureaucrats.    (I photographed these words in 1999)

Gandhi presented the principles of nonviolent resistance to the world, but the methods – corresponding to the various hierarchies – have to be very different, should they lead to success.  

Through the multiplicity of nonviolent resistance, so rich in ideas,  (INSERT: a Convoy of Truckers?!)   it can be demonstrated that the most powerful effective opposing forces can be mobilized against every form of violence …“

The following poem, also from the Museum of Non-violent Resistance, describes exactly the happiness and joy I experienced in concert with an estimated 14,000 – 15,000 people, January 29th, 2022 at ONE of the protest locations on Vancouver Island.   The mainstream media blacked it out, as we had come to expect would happen.  The strategy back-fired.  We understood the importance of being responsible for communicating with everyone we knew.  January 29th was a day like no other.  Exciting and fun while serious and sad.

From the Museum of Non-Violent Resistance, the pen of an unknown East German:

“The red-painted tyranny was not

The worst about our tyrants

The worst thereby were we ourselves

All our cowardice and servility

And that we also were the evil ourselves

Just that is the chance and our luck

You see: It works! We also take back

The everlasting human right ourselves

Now we breathe again, we cry and we laugh

the stale sadness out of the breast

man, we are stronger than rats and dragons

– and had forgotten it and always knew.”

 

Spread over a number of years,

  • coup d’état  –  corporatocray infiltrates democracy, takes over the reins of government by stealth using money, revolving doors, quislings and other means
  • revolution or insurgency  –  (the words carry innuendo of “bad guys”)   Citizens come to see: business interests and values are appropriate in the commercial sphere.  They are horribly corrupting in the sphere of governance.
  • counter insurgency  –   corporatocracy wants to hold onto power and control.   They mobilize  “a counterinsurgency force” against the forces fighting to restore democracy.

 

In Canada the counter insurgency, some links  (you may add your own examples – there are lots more to choose from!):

  • 2008-11-28   Follow-up on Montebello, Police provoke Violence at SPP protest (2007) (recorded on video.  No doubts.)
  • 2012-06-10   G-20 Summit, Toronto. And kettling, a tactic of police.
  • 2010-06-24  G20: Canada’s billion-dollar summit mystery, Toronto Star
  •  Battle in Seattle, WTO, SPP.

The Police tactics at Montebello and the G-20 Summit in Toronto were extensions of the counter insurgency against citizen mobilizations over the  World Trade Organization (WTO) which is the Corporatocracy,  the SPP,  in different garb.

When I try to see what is happening in my own country,  it is more difficult because of the built-in bias.   But after working with our network for more than 20 years, battle after battle, what becomes obvious is the corporate power behind-the-scenes with the accompanying corruption of governance and values.  The values said to be our values are NOT our values.    Corporatocracy’s coup d’état over democracy, insurgency and counter insurgency, are the right words to describe the Canadian (and American) situation.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

Our ability to focus on one thing by simultaneously excluding “large-as-life” activity that crosses our field-of-vision.  A mind-blowing old video:

Perception, an illustration of our fallibility and our gullibility. Dan Simons. Basketball.     https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=6190

– – – – – – – – – – – –

     Masks … Masks …  Masks    A bit of irony!

2012-05-19 TO: MP Blake Richards re his private member’s bill to make it a crime to wear a mask at protests. Remember Montebello, it was the police who wore the masks.

In October 2011, Blake introduced Private Member’s Bill C-309 in the House of Commons. The bill if passed would make it a new Criminal Code offence to wear a mask or to otherwise conceal one’s identity during a riot or an unlawful assembly. The bill has garnered the support of police chiefs in major Canadian cities, including Calgary, Toronto, Vancouver and Victoria.

Dear Blake Richards,  . . .

EVENT:   SPP meetings in Montebello, Quebec.  Peaceful protest.

DATE:  2007

The only protesters who wore masks were POLICE OFFICERS.  They were trained and assigned the role of turning the protest violent.

It is all on video, along with the later statement by the head of Quebec Police (Sureté ) that yes, the “protesters” were actually police officers.

Peaceful protesters (unmasked, no need to hide their identity)  tried to stop these “violent protesters” from using rocks against the line of uniformed police officers who were holding shields and wearing riot gear.

An observant person noticed that the “violent protesters” were wearing police boots and shouted it out.   The legitimate protesters then reached in and yanked down the masks so that others could catch the revealed faces on video.

Through video footage, the officers were later identified by civilians.  The head of the Quebec police was then forced to make a public statement, admitting that the masked “violent” protesters were police officers.  He excused their actions. . . .  They were doing their job.

Links to the video of the Montebello footage and the Police response are at   http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=747

For at least 15 months, demands for a public inquiry went unheeded.   An inquiry was eventually announced.  As far as I know, it was never held.  No one was ever held to account.

It is illegal to incite violence.  When it is masked police officers who are doing it, under the direction and blessing of their superiors, then implicitly sanctioned by the Government (no action to correct), we have descended to a police state.

The movie, Battle in Seattle, (huge protests against the WTO) makes it clear that in some cases it is a police (National Guard) strategy to ALLOW violence to get out-of-hand BEFORE they step in with tear gas and rubber bullets.  (Violence discredits the protesters AND makes citizens reluctant to protest).  Montebello is ample evidence that in some cases it is the police themselves who instigate the violence, who are the provocateurs. Was it provocateurs at work in Seattle?

OFFICIALS LEARN:

Governments and Police officials took lessons from “The Battle in Seattle”.   (It took place in the U.S. but remember that Canadian and U.S. military and police are now “integrated” and have “compatible doctrine”.  Also note:  The WTO, the SPP and the SPP successor organization have a common base:  transnational corporate interests.)

It seems to me that the Officials took two things away from Montebello:

  1. Disguised police officers planted in a crowd must not wear police boots  OR,  maybe it is safer to CONTRACT OUT such work.
  2. They can do whatever they want:  Canadians are dumb, uninformed and without backbone.  Canadians won’t stand up for ANYTHING.  The talk about defending what the veterans fought and died for in World War Two (democracy) is meaningless rhetoric.

Another brief point:   Media portray “the Quebec protests” as student protests over tuition hikes.  They fail to note that the largest protests in Quebec happened on Earth Day and are about the failure of Governments to protect the Environment.   http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=5143

Failed protection of the environment, the SPP and its successor organization, corporate influence in Universities, failing democracy, widening income gaps – – the ROOT is the same:  large corporate interests being served by Governments and public institutions.

In CONCLUSION:

  • Protests will continue to escalate because NOTHING is being done to address the root cause:   the Government, Police Officials and Universities have become tools to serve corporate interests.
  • Montebello is misleading VIEWED IN ISOLATION.  The mistake of “officials” is to add insult upon insult. Growing protest tells me that Canadians know the dangers;  they are standing up – with much more to come, unless Government officials start to aggressively defend and serve the public interest.

I think of supporting your call, Blake Richards, to make it illegal to wear masks at protests (unmask the police).

HOWEVER,

  • it should also be illegal for officials to contract out their Police work (they will do that if they are “unmasked”).
  • there also needs to be extremely strong whistle-blower protection for police officers.

/Sandra Finley

 

ADDED, 2023-11-24, copied from “For Your Selection, Oct 2023:

  . . . I don’t know Rachel Maddow’s political views.  I heard an interview about her new book.  Given the topic, I expected to hear the name of Thomas Watson at some point.  As far as I know, it was never mentioned.    2023-10-17 To CBC, Rachel Maddow’s new book addresses Influential American fascists in lead-up to WW2. Thomas Watson (President of IBM) is not on the list??   

Reference:  2008-12-06 MIGHT BE THE MOST IMPORTANT PAGE ON MY BLOG: The role of mechanized census data in Nazi Europe, Edwin Black, IBM and the Holocaust. Why we have a Charter Right to privacy of personal information in Canada.

 

Everyone should be catching on by now!   Look at Mussolini’s Italy.  You put together the STATE  plus  the WEALTHY INFLUENTIAL BUSINESS PEOPLE,  what do you get?   It’s called FASCISM  or NAZISM.  It parades as CORRUPTION.   Sometimes I call it CORPORATOCRACY.   Today you will see it referred to as ADMINISTRATIVE STATE.

Changing times, change names.   But at root they are the same phenomenon?

But oh my God! . . I think that makes me a dreaded supporter of Antifa!

Antifa (/ænˈtiːfə, ˈænti(ˌ)fə/) is a left-wing    anti-fascist and anti-racist    political movement   in the United States. It consists of a highly decentralized array of autonomous groups that use nonviolent direct action, incivility, and violence to achieve their aims.[1][2] Most antifa political activism is nonviolent, involving poster and flyer campaigns, mutual aid, speeches, protest marches, and community organizing.[3][4][5] However, some who identify as antifa also use tactics involving digital activism, doxing, harassment, physical violence, and property damage. Members of antifa aim to combat far-right extremists, including neo-Nazis and white supremacists.[6]     (With thanks to Wikipedia)

Sandra Finley

www.sandrafinley.ca

– – – – – – – – – – –

Hannah Arendt explores the institutions and operations of totalitarian movements, focusing on the two genuine forms of totalitarian government in our time—Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia—which she adroitly recognizes were two sides of the same coin, rather than opposing philosophies of Right and Left.

= = = = = = = =  = = =

UPDATE:  2024-12-24   Added to Postings

What is a guerrilla fighter? C Guevara, Handbook for revolutionaries, with thanks to American Govt.

= = = = = = = = = = = = =  =

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT, Submission to Public Inquiry

From: Perspectives (POEC/CEDU) [mailto:Perspectives@poec-cedu.gc.ca]
Sent: December 20, 2022 10:39 AM
To: Sandra Finley <xcorp@shaw.ca>
Subject: RE: Public Order Emergency Commission, Submission, Finley

Good day Ms. Finley,

We have received your detailed submission and we thank you for taking the time to provide us with your comments and observations. Public input is an important part of the Public Order Emergency Commission’s investigation.

If more details are needed from you, the Commission will contact you directly.

Again, thank you,

Twitter: @POECommission

Facebook:  Public Order Emergency Commission – Home | Facebook

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 3:00 AM   (3-hour time difference, B.C. – Ottawa.  I made the midnite deadline!)

To: Perspectives (POEC/CEDU) <Perspectives@poec-cedu.gc.ca>
Subject: Public Order Emergency Commission, Submission, Finley

October  28,  2022

TO:  Public Order Emergency Commission      EMAIL:  perspectives@poec-cedu.gc.ca

FROM:  Sandra Finley

I am in your system

Please accept the attached Submission.

It does not conform to the guidelines.  I regret but my mind does not work like (most?) other minds?

It is as though I have been preparing for this for a long time.  I did not realize.

I think I have 1 minute before the deadline to submit!

Bless you all.

/Sandra Finley

 

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 11:30 AM

2025-04-07 UK Tribunal Blocks Government’s Attempt to Keep Apple Surveillance Case Secret. Reclaim the Net.

 Uncategorized  No Responses »
Apr 082025
 
With a necessary reality check, a UK tribunal has told the government that, no, it cannot hold a secret legal battle against Apple over encryption. The Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), the body meant to oversee the country’s surveillance powers, has dismissed efforts by the Home Office to keep the entire case hidden from public view. And in doing so, it has delivered a quietly important win for press freedom and digital rights. Although, things are far from over.

 

The case revolves around Apple’s Advanced Data Protection system, or ADP.

 

It’s a security feature that gives users the option to encrypt their iCloud data in a way that even Apple itself cannot access. Not through a backdoor, not with a master key, not at all. It’s the kind of robust end-to-end encryption that governments around the world have grown increasingly nervous about.

The UK, it turns out, is no exception.

 

More: UK’s iCloud Encryption Crackdown Explained: Your Questions Answered on Apple’s Decision and How it Affects You

 

The Home Office had tried to argue that even disclosing the existence of the case could jeopardize national security. But the tribunal wasn’t persuaded. In its published ruling, it said: “It would have been a truly extraordinary step to conduct a hearing entirely in secret without any public revelation of the fact that a hearing was taking place.”

 

The government’s request challenged press freedom, veering into the territory of democracy-by-blindfold. The tribunal concluded that sharing “the bare details of the case” would not, in fact, bring down the roof on national security.

We obtained a copy of the judgement for you here.

 

So now, the legal battle moves into the public eye, where it belongs, and where the dangerous surveillance law can be challenged.

 

Apple’s stance has been consistent. The company says it has no technical means to access ADP-protected data, and it does not intend to build one. The rationale is simple: once you create a vulnerability in encryption, you’ve weakened the system for everyone. Law enforcement may be the intended user, but malicious actors don’t tend to respect boundaries.

 

Earlier this year, Apple pulled ADP from UK devices entirely, after pressure from the government. It then filed a legal challenge in March, drawing a firm line in the sand over what it’s willing to compromise.

 

The Home Office, for its part, insists that it isn’t trying to snoop on the public.

 

It reiterated that any attempt to access encrypted material requires a warrant, signed off by a court. “There are longstanding and targeted investigatory powers that allow the authorities to investigate terrorists, pedophiles, and the most serious criminals and they are subject to robust safeguards including judicial authorizations and oversight to protect people’s privacy,” it said.

 

That’s all fine in principle. However, the government’s attempt to keep this particular legal process secret has made its definition of “robust safeguards” look worryingly vague. Transparency, it turns out, is not optional when it comes to decisions that affect the rights of millions of people.

 

The implications of this case don’t stop at the UK’s borders. As governments around the world weigh stronger surveillance powers in the name of public safety, Apple’s refusal, and the tribunal’s decision to force the case into the open, set a precedent.

 

Weakening encryption isn’t simply a matter of local law enforcement convenience. It’s a global issue that affects anyone who relies on secure communication.

 

The IPT has also confirmed it will hear the case brought by Privacy International, Liberty, and two individuals who are challenging the legality of the Home Secretary’s decision to use her powers to secretly compel Apple to compromise its own security systems.

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 7:21 PM

2025-04-02 Be patient. Sit back; the video should start. Dr Mary Talley Bowden: How vaccines got politicized and the medical industry lost all credibility. Interview by Tucker Carlson. Informative..

 Uncategorized  No Responses »
Apr 032025
 

Interesting doctor from Texas with ‘horror’ story re Covid.   Thanks to Ray for sending this:

https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-bowden?utm_campaign=20250402_apr2dailybriefnonsubs&utm_medium=email&utm_source=iterable&utm_content=marytalleybowden

The Tucker Carlson Show

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 6:36 PM
 Older Entries  Newer Entries

Facebook & Twitter

 

Postings by date

Categories

  • Change (44)
  • Climate (118)
  • Corporatocracy or Democracy or Administrative State or WHAT? (1,137)
    • Administrative State (12)
    • Bank of Canada vs Canada Infrastructure Bk, Banksters, Privatization & Trade Deals, COMER (42)
      • Index page, Banksters & Fraudsters (2)
    • Bill C-51 Anti-Terrorism, Secret Police (44)
    • Democracy requirements, deficits, solutions (16)
    • Freedom of Speech. (Remove some wrong postings from category) (529)
    • Non-Violent Resistance (31)
    • Occupy Movement (54)
    • Robocalls & Vote moving, Election Fraud (57)
      • Electronic voting (18)
    • Trade Deals, PPPs, Integration Canada-U.S. (81)
  • Culture and Ethics (130)
  • Economy / Political Economy (94)
    • Economic Indicators (19)
  • Empowerment (109)
  • Energy (230)
    • Nuclear (138)
      • Radioactive waste (33)
    • Oil & Gas (23)
  • Food (158)
    • Salmon & Fish (25)
  • For your selection (summary list recent postings) (61)
  • Genetically Modified (195)
  • GOVERNMENT (4)
  • Green Party (49)
  • Health (966)
    • Chemical poisoning (63)
      • March Against Bayer-Monsanto (53)
    • Detoxification after removal of mercury (3)
    • Epigenetics (11)
    • Fluoride (17)
    • Mercury poisoning, dental amalgams. See also Vaccinations. (107)
    • Tuberculosis (14)
    • Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt) (637)
  • Knowledge Base (382)
    • Censorship (13)
    • Copyright Law (1)
    • Freedom of Information, Privacy (7)
    • Media, public interest (10)
    • Perception, fallibility, Linguistics (17)
    • Propaganda (89)
      • Orwell (15)
    • Take back the University (230)
  • Leadership (16)
  • Peace or Violence (635)
    • George Bush war criminal (103)
    • Lockheed Martin, War Economy (includes Cdn Census & Trials) (378)
      • Drones (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles / UAVs) (34)
    • Resource depletion (water in USA) (32)
  • Personal (11)
  • PHILOSOPHY (3)
  • Rule of Law (352)
    • Anti-SLAPP & SLAPP, Corporate & Individual manipulation of Justice system (16)
    • Corruption (129)
    • Privacy of Personal Information; Charter Right; Surveillance; StatsCan Censuses & Surveys (119)
    • Surveillance (9)
  • Solidarity with the Warriors (301)
    • AVAAZ (16)
    • Baltasar Garzon (12)
    • Chris Hedges (18)
    • Daniel Ellsberg (13)
    • Edward Snowden, Glenn Greenwald, Ladar Levison (38)
    • First Nations activists (2)
    • Gordon Edwards (5)
    • John Perkins (13)
    • Julian Assange, Wikileaks, Chelsea (Bradley) Manning, Arjen Kamphuis (151)
    • Maude Barlow (1)
    • Robert F Kennedy Jr (36)
    • Rocco Galati (7)
    • The Yes Men (5)
  • Sustainability (131)
  • Technology (39)
  • Uncategorized (139)
  • Voting System (Proportional Representation vs Winner Take All/FPTP) (7)
  • Water (194)
    • Bottled, For-Profit Extraction, Export, Commodification (60)
      • Index (1)
      • Water Merville (Strathcona, Campbell River, Comox) (14)
    • Salish Sea (33)
      • Water Bowser BC Sewage Treatment Plant (14)
    • Water Hydro-electricity (1)
    • Water Quality (2)
  • Why we flounder or do not flounder (25)
  • X Ball (1)
  • X Ballantyne (18)
  • X1 The Story (2012-11) (1)
  • X10 Alphabetical Index (1)
  • X1A Listing of emails sent by A.S. 2012-04-01 to 2012-12-30) (53)
  • X1B Postings (42)
  • X1C Related Cyber-bullying, Anti-SLAPP (9)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Home
  • About the Network
  • The Work We Do, Battles to protect the Commons
  • WHO are we? (the network)
  • How to use this blog
  • Lockheed Martin, War Economy, StatsCan, Charter Right Privacy, Trial
  • Arrest George Bush. Rule of Law essential to democracy.
  • Heavy metals in vaccinations, Mercury in dental amalgams
  • Why we flounder
© 2015 The Battles Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha