Apr 152016
CONTINUING,  Court dismisses charges against London arms fair protesters
The Guardian, The Independent in the U.K.  and Common Dreams,  URLs for three versions of the story:
The Guardian version of the story:

 Police move a protester from the road as a truck tries to make a delivery to the DSEI arms fair in London. Police move a protester from the road as a truck tries to make a delivery to the DSEI arms fair in London. Photograph: Peter Marshall/Demotix/Corbis

A court has dismissed charges against protesters who blocked the road outside a major London arms fair, after they argued that they acted to stop greater crimes being committed using weapons bought in the UK.

District judge Angus Hamilton, sitting at Stratford magistrates court, said the defence had presented clear and credible evidence that illegal activity had been conducted at the Defence Systems and Equipment International (DSEI) arms fair in previous years, and that police arresting the activists had failed to investigate to ensure it was not happening again.

Five men and three women had been charged with wilful obstruction of the highway after attempting to block military vehicles from entering the ExCel centre in Docklands, east London, in September. They said they had acted to stop the sale of weapons to regimes accused of human rights abuses, including Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Israel.

Other non-direct actions, such as writing to MPs, had failed to block arms sales to authoritarian regimes, the defence claimed, with support from expert witnesses from Corruption Watch UK, the Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (Bird), and Amnesty International.

The prosecution lawyer had argued that no arms sales would be blocked by the demonstration and that protesters could have no idea where the arms were going. She said that if the eight were acquitted, protesters could resort to more violent direct actions in the name of stopping the arms trade. This argument was dismissed by the judge.

Defendants and their supporters burst into applause as Hamilton dismissed the charges on Friday against Isa al-Aali, Angela Ditchfield, Lisa Butler, Thomas Franklin, Javier Gárate Neidhardt, Susannah Mengesha, Luis Tinoco Torrejon and Bram Vranken.

Aali, a Bahraini refugee granted asylum in Britain after he was tortured in his home country for taking part in protests against the regime, said he was delighted with the ruling.

“I was unjustifiably imprisoned in Bahrain on an unfair trial and today I have seen a day of justice,” he said. “The fact that the weapons which were used to kill and torture people in Bahrain and Saudi is something that the court has seen to be legitimate, that there are violations committed by these totalitarian regimes. My role in taking direct action was important in circumstances where legal remedies were exhausted.”

Mengesha said the ruling confirmed everything the protesters knew. “We already knew about the illegality at DSEI but it’s great to see it publicly accepted. At the start of the case it was one where they would be trying the defendants; by the end it seemed that we tried Saudi, Turkey, Bahrain and the DSEI arms fair.”

Butler had just returned from Kurdish areas of Turkey, which was an international partner of DSEI 2015, when she was arrested outside the arms fair. “At the time, and even right now, Turkey has been conducting massacres of civilians in Kurdish towns and cities,” she said. “I blockaded DSEI arms fair to try to prevent greater crimes from being committed by the Turkish state.

“Police definitely didn’t take our concerns seriously. Not only is there illegal torture equipment in DSEI, there are also arms that are sold by legal means and then used illegally. With Turkey, the arms companies are complicit; if those arms companies know that Turkey is massacring civilians, then arms companies are complicit in those war crimes.”

Sayed Ahmed, director of advocacy at Bird and one of the expert witnesses called on behalf of the defence, said: “Sending arms to totalitarian regimes which are certainly used to repress the people in their millions and also to cause wars in the Middle East region is not acceptable.

“The direct actions by the activists was clearly needed as legal remedies didn’t find a way to stop the UK government in arming one of the most repressive regimes on earth.”

A spokesperson for DSEI said the fair takes legal compliance seriously and representatives from HMRC, the Department for Business and other government agencies were present in the run up and throughout the 2015 event.

“They had free and totally unrestricted access to all exhibitors to in order to undertake checks that all equipment, services, documentation and any other forms of promotion complied with UK, EU and international law,” the spokesperson said.

“As a result of this close cooperation, and the processes put in place, compliance regulations were not breached at DSEI 2015.”

= =  =  = = =

Court Challenge in Canada to Saudi Arms contract by Constitutional lawyer Daniel Turp

The protests in Canada mount over the $11 billion armaments contract with Saudi Arabia.     – –  see the “Comments” below.

Lyle’s input (Canadian Wheat Board   CWB)

  One Response to “2016-04-15 Vindication: London Protesters Who ‘Put Arms Trade on Trial’ Acquitted (Canada – Saudi Arabia; CWB in Comments)”

  1. From: Lyle

    Sent: Wed, 20 Apr 2016
    Subject: Re: Break-through on Arms Dealers? And connection to Intergenerational Trauma transmitted via DNA

    Hi Sandra, Why not sell Saudis arms? We confiscated Western Canadian farmers’ assets ( the CWB multi story office building in Wpg, 3663 rail hopper cars, equity in two Great Lake freighters, a $145 million contingency fund, a globally recognized brand of quality as well as our single desk coordination of grain movement) and threw in some $400 million of taxpayers money and GAVE it to the Saudis and to Bunge, a Global grain group called G3, all at ZERO cost.

    This country is up for grabs, in fact we’ll pay you to own us and human rights issues and the consequences of total foreign control will not be considered. Only $ to shareholders (where ever they live) count.

    This theft of farmer assets was not an issue in the last Fed. election or even in our Sask. election. Why?

    > On Apr 20, 2016, Sandra Finley wrote:
    > Exciting news: a Judge in the U.K. acquitted protestors who blocked road to London’s Armaments Fair (it’s a big one). Laws are being broken by the weapons dealers; Governments turn a issues clearly. Saudi Arabia comes up more than once.
    > See 2016-04-15 Vindication: Protesters Who ‘Put Arms Trade on Trial’ Acquitted
    > – – – – – — – – – — –
    > The UK news came after a CBC interview (9 minutes) about the Court Challenge in Canada to Saudi Arms contract by Constitutional lawyer Daniel Turp
    > The protests in Canada mount over the $11 billion armaments contract with Saudi Arabia.

    > Mix – Saudi with its record of terrible abuse of human rights and
    > · the destruction that is on-going in the Middle East – –
    > Canada might as well throw some more gasoline on the fire, I guess.
    > I was very surprised to see in one of the reports that the contract is through a Canadian crown corporation.
    > – – – – – — – – – — –
    > If anyone needs incentive to spread the word on the Saudi Arms Deal – – it can be stopped, here’s a good update on inter-generational transfer of trauma.
    > 2016-03-03 Can Trauma be Passed on through our DNA? By Jonathan Davis
    > Cheers!
    > Sandra

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>