RE: feedback following on whether you perceive this to be more conducive towards the inclusivity suggested by a circular arrangement.
Interesting – I had not thought of the circular arrangement in terms of “inclusivity”. I think of it in terms of being non-hierarchical. We are equals coming together in discussions around governance. In First Nations tradition.
Conventional European-style seating messages a power relationship. A good example is the physical structure of Court proceedings. The Judge sits on high and addresses the accused. It is an arrangement meant to be intimidating. And it is. Look at the title of the position – – “Judge”. Titles sometimes confer unwarranted influence and dictatorial powers. (Community-based systems of justice are better at delivering justice, I would argue.)
The placement of people “at the front” addressing “the others” implies an unequal relationship. I have understood circular seating arrangements to be about respectful relationships that recognize the value of everyone’s experience and input. When we come together “in council” it is for the purpose of pooling, through discussion and dialogue, our combined perspectives and knowledge (hopefully) for the purpose of making more fully informed, therefore better, decisions. (Two heads are always better than one.)
The University embraces and places a high priority on relationships with First Nations. This is positive. The First Nations have many things to teach us. If we are willing to learn.
For your consideration,
Sandra
From: Calver, Sandra Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:27 AM
Subject: circular seating for Senate meetings
Dear Sandra,
Norma McBain forwarded on your suggestion to consider adopting circular seating for Senate meetings, in the tradition of First Nations governance bodies. We had a similar request earlier from another senator to consider adopting a “meeting-in-the-round” format. At our Senate executive meeting in March, we discussed this suggestion and members responded favourably. However, we do have limitations related to the room size, consideration of presentations, and placement of windows that do not permit seating in a full circle. What we have arranged for is a room setting, which will place all members closer to the podium with tables slanted to achieve a half-circle. I would be interested in your feedback following on whether you perceive this to be more conducive towards the inclusivity suggested by a circular arrangement.
Regards,
Sandy
Sandra Calver
Acting University Secretary