May 162024
Some countries have already said “NO WAY” to the WHO, they aren’t signing the legal documents for
- an international Pandemic Treaty, nor for
-
International Health Regulations (IHR)
(which are THE SAME THING, with one difference, as I understand the Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse. The International Health Regulations automatically become Law. Anything that happens in debate and ratification procedures under the Treaty are thereby rendered irrelevant.)
(I’ve watched Tedros lie through his teeth. My cynical understanding of the Two Legal Documents: you put people through the tedium of #1. It’s a trap. When the debate and procedures are finished, you place Document #2 in front of any delegates who might still be in the room. They look, see that the wording is the same as for Doc #1, and sign on. They miss one critical clause: Doc #2 becomes Law without further adieu.
In B.C. Canada, the NDP Govt of David Eby passed Bill 36:
Bill 36 the Health Professions & Occupations Act (HPOA). First class tyranny.
-
-
-
-
- The Cabinet and the Minister of Health can adopt as law in BC any regulations, codes, standards or rules enacted in foreign jurisdictions or international bodies.8
-
-
-
Tedros (WHO): “The claim that the accord will cede power to W.H.O. is quite simply false. It’s fake news. Countries will decide . . . “
Bill 36, the Health Professions and Occupations Act (HPOA), is already in place in B.C.
Four of the American States have passed legislation: “NO WAY“
The easiest way for Canada to sign on is if we keep our mouths shut.
= = = = = = = = = = = =
CLICK ON this link, and scroll down to the video of Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse: Show more
Kruse does an excellent job of identifying the issues; he is clear.
= = = = = = = = = = = =
The following is to capture a bit of the written record, from X.
IT IS VERY IMPORTANT AND VERY CONCERNING.
Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse at the European Parliament for the ECI citizens initiative challenges the WHO on their pandemic treaty
(Dr. Campbell shared this video from Health and Democracy Conference during 13th of September, 2023 at the EU Parliament in Strasbourg featuring Philipp Kruse’s speech outlining the concerning power consolidation for a global health dictatorship)
May 12, 2024:
15 days to the beginning of the WHO World Health Assembly. Negotiations for the pandemic treaty and amendments to IHR continue and yes they are a danger to our national sovereignty.
@ImMeme0
Here is more so people can actually understand what is at stake.
Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse at the European Parliament for the ECI citizens initiative challenges the WHO on their pandemic treaty – opposing the imposition of a global dictatorship of WEF and Gates
The video highlights the WHO’s (an organization influenced by the egos of the WEF and Bill Gates)
corruption, lack of accountability, incompetence, insufficient qualifications, and limited experience
“We’re here today because we are all concerned by the WHO’s strong pressure to extend its powers—its structural and its financial capacities—with a permanent effect over the sovereignty of the countries and over the self-determination of the people.
In May 2024, the 194 member states of the WHO will have their final vote on both of these international agreements. This process takes place behind closed doors and at a tremendous speed. It is not reported nor discussed in our newspapers, in our national parliaments, universities, nor in society.
There is no mechanism foreseen that will allow the people or the member states to challenge the assessment of the WHO whether it is the WHO’s assessment about a public health emergency or their assessment with respect to certain measures or when it comes to the imposing of a regime for what they call vaccination as experimental as it might be.
There will be simply no stop button for none of the member states and not of course not for us the citizens.
So now, if we just look at it as a whole, this right of WHO to self declare, to auto-authorize itself, to claim a Public Health Emergency of international concern and to maintain it for as long as it wants.
# 2, to issue so-called recommendations that will be legally binding and that will be subject to a system of surveillance of the people – surveillance of the member states – then the total control and monopoly on information including the right of censorship and then the fact that there is no mechanism of control and of correction.
What do we have as a result? It is very simple to say without the possibility of open debate, without the possibility of having different opinions, different hypothesis, different methods to be discussed on and at the table there will be no science and there will be ultimately no democracy and there will be no legal Court proceedings and no justice if the result is already predefined by one sole authority on this planet.
# 3 : It’s a basic principle not only of international law, not only of national constitutional law that we have – as human beings – the right to know what we consent to. So if we ask ourselves have we been asked, have you been informed, about this process that is about to become reality the answer is “NO”! And there is one important distinction to be made between these two legal instruments.
The new pandemic treaty will be considered by WHO itself as a treaty and thereby shall be subject to a national process of debate and ratification but not so for the International Health Regulations (IHR)
(INSERT: The Treaty and the IHRs have precisely the same content. EXCEPT that the IHRs automatically become Law. Anything that happens in debate and ratification procedures under the Treaty are thereby rendered irrelevant.)
The international Health Regulations by definition of WHO’s own writing when you read the International Health Regulations. And what does that mean as a consequence? There will be an automatic coming into force right after the vote in 2024, so far it is still 24 months but these 24 months have been reduced to 12 months only. So that means that at the end after May 2025 the international Health Regulations will become law automatically so we will not be asked.”
Continuation: post below Source: Dr. John Campbell on YouTube