Oct 222024
 

Important to watch AND forward to others.  /S

A new class-action lawsuit is providing Albertans injured by the “safe and effective” COVID shots with renewed hope for justice.

Marking the legacy of the so-called pandemic was the widespread suspension of our civil liberties and the establishment of a bio-security nanny state that forcefully pushed mass vaccinations on every man, woman and child to the benefit of Big Pharma and their bureaucratic accomplices inside all levels of government.

The fevered push to get shots into arms saw the government change regulatory due process and rush these novel products to market. As a result, an untold number of people were left injured or dead and entirely forgotten by the system.

At the heart of this lawsuit is Carrie Sakamoto, a young mother from Lethbridge whose personal $10.5 million vaccine injury lawsuit pivoted into a class action, representing potentially thousands of Albertans facing debilitating, long-term effects from the widely promoted but highly controversial COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

Lawyers Jeff Rath and Eva Chipiuk from the firm Rath and Co. are the lawyers behind this massive lawsuit. They recently joined me for an interview to explain how the Alberta government took part in “unlawful, negligent, inadequate, improper, unfair, and deceptive practices” to convince people to put their health, safety, and employment on the line under the guise of the greater good.

Click here to watch.

Rath pointed out that the government of Alberta, including Health Officer Deena Hinshaw, ignored important safety data before the rollout of these shots:

“[Pfizer] clearly demonstrated that if you put these shots into the arms of children, that the vaccines themselves would kill more children than COVID.”

This lawsuit is more than just a legal battle — it’s an urgent call for accountability and a potential precedent for future public health responses. As legal action unfolds, will this be Canadians’ only hope for the government to take responsibility for the widespread harm caused by their hasty vaccine rollout?

You can find updates on this lawsuit and our other facts-based reports on this issue at NoMoreShots.ca.

On that website, we’ve also set up a petition you can sign demanding our government immediately revoke market authorization for these shots.

Yours truly,

Tamara Ugolini

P.S. In response to the government’s “safe and effective” narrative, we’ve launched a campaign at NoMoreShots.ca where you can find credible and well-researched reports on the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines and sign our petition to revoke market authorization of these shots before more people are hurt.

  2 Responses to “2024-10-16 Covid – VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU WATCH. Could a new class-action lawsuit offer justice for COVID-19 vaccine victims? (Carrie Sakamoto case) Tamara Ugolini, Rebel News”

  1. I am disappointed to see you promoting this misleading narrative, Sandra. There is a great need for underdogs to be supported in our world. This is not one of them.

  2. Hi Larry,

    I am not sure which narrative you refer to.
    I find Tamara Ugolini’s work consistently good and needed; without her reporting, developments that are important to me would be unknown by me (I am not a big fan of some of the reporters that make up Rebel News if that’s the narrative you refer to.)
    I think you know that I am greatly opposed to the steady undermining of the rule of law.

    As I view it, all the work through the years, the battles to get synthetic chemicals out of land, water, and air; for non-GMO food, for enforcement of regulations, to stop industry infiltration of our educational institutions, etc etc. – – all the work is dependent upon a properly functioning system of justice.

    If a population cannot hold perpetrators of injustice to account, all the things we’ve fought for, will only continue to worsen. /Sandra

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)