Dec 012015

How ISIL Gets Its Money – Donations, Oil Smuggling, Kidnapping, Extortion

The growing influence of the Islamic State encouraged Russia this week to submit a draft resolution to the UN Security Council, to divert or stop the flow of money flow to IS.

MOSCOW (Sputnik), Alexander Mosesov — The economy of the notorious Islamic State (IS) extremist group is being nourished by funding in the form of charity donations, oil smuggling, and kidnapping and extortion of government-paid wages, experts told Sputnik on Friday.

The Islamic State currently poses a great danger not only to both Iraq and Syria, but also to stability in the entire Middle East. The increasing influence of the Islamist group could be expressed using the ancient Roman saying attributed to statesman Marcus Tullius Cicero: “the sinews of war are infinite money.”

This very reason encouraged Russia this week to submit a draft resolution to the UN Security Council, to divert or stop the flow of money flow to IS. However, exact steps to cut the sinews out of the IS economy have not been clearly identified.


“Wealthy private donors continue to wire funds to IS. It was recently reported that these funds actually go through the United States on occasion,” Renad Mansour, former adviser to Iraqi Kurdistan’s regional government told Sputnik, adding that Lebanon and Jordan are also used as ‘in-between’ countries.

Lina Khatib, the director of the Carnegie Middle East Center, said that the Islamic State receives sums from non-state actors “mainly from the Gulf.” She also added that the system of funding is necessarily complex and involves legal devices using so-called dummy charities.

The extremists also purchase oil from middlemen and resell it to Syria and Turkey through retaining anonymity by using brokerages. This aspect of the IS economy has been affected by the recent change on the commodities market.

“Middlemen are finding it more difficult to smuggle the oil, which has fallen in price. There is no doubt, then, that the oil income has decreased (probably by half),” Mansour said.

At the same time, Khatib assured Sputnik that “the price of IS-produced oil on the black market has not been affected by the global oil price drop.”


On Friday, a 26-year-old female aid worker from the United States was reportedly killed in an unconfirmed Jordanian airstrike. She was held hostage for 18 months with a $6 million ransom demand. A number of British, Japanese, US, Iraqi, Syrian and other nationals have also been kidnapped through the existence of the terrorist group.

“Some countries have paid for the release of hostages,” Mansour said, while Khatib noted that ransoms for hostages help “generate significant income.”

The wages extortion is a less well known source of income than the above-mentioned three. Renad Mansour explained that Iraq pays “the salaries of its civil servants from the national budget, and many of these civil servants live in under Islamic State control. As such, they continue to receive wages (and even retirement for some).”

The expert added that the money could “end up going towards IS.”


The world’s most notorious global Islamist organization before the appearance of the Islamic State was Al-Qaeda. Despite seemingly similar goals and ideology these two differ greatly, particularly in funding.

“Under the mindset of being a state, IS is trying to become economically independent. This is why an emphasis is put on exporting oil, taxation, extortion, and kidnappings – generally, avenues of income that are not dependent on another party,” Mansour told Sputnik.

Khatib agreed with the expert, saying that IS makes donor funding “only supplementary to its core income.”


“Closer monitoring of the activities of international charitable and aid organizations as well as stricter procedures related to money laundering in the Middle East are needed to try to halt IS’s financial transactions,” the Carnegie Middle East Center director said.

She underlined that donor funding only accounts for a small part of IS funding and that prosecuting money laundering activities would “[…] have a limited impact” on the terrorist group.

The former adviser to Iraq’s Kurdistan regional government outlined two major steps to choke the IS economy. The first step would be to monitor and crack down “on money laundered to the IS” and finding “the origins of such payments.”

The second step, according to Mansour, has to do with oil smuggling networks as “they remain key to IS’s unofficial economy.”

Given that no particularly successful advancements have been made since June 2014, when IS proclaimed a caliphate on the captured territories, these steps are not simple to execute.

  3 Responses to “2015-02-07 Russia leads initiative at UN to stop the flow of money to ISIS”

  1. I believe that the sale of armaments by countries, [ including Canada] to countries or interests where these weapons could be used to invade other countries, should be considered a criminal act.. Manufacturers who do so, should have the U.N. declare worldwide sanctions on those countries and their manufacturers. If we truly want a peaceful planet, it will not happen if we use bombs and bullets to convince those that are breaking the peace.

  2. It is unfortunate that weapons have a very high profit margin.

    Leo – – there is a bit of a pattern? Corporations made money more independently of Government at one time. By today, many companies understand that it’s way easier to make lotsa money, if the purchaser is you and me through the public purse (i.e. Governments pay for the goods). We buy all the weapons. The weapons manufacturers make big profits. There is a push for more mandatory vaccinations (public funded). We already pay for lots of drugs through the medicare system.

  3. This is a test case.
    Over and over, no messages that mention the fact, not the science fiction, that corporations so want to rule the world, that they will use Echelon and many corporate entities as outsourcing to control the flow of the damned ‘boy scout’ citizens, ( a pergorative, or unfriendly term to them) commenting on the elephant in the room, that MUST NOT BE NAMED, like corporate rule of the planet.
    Mention such things, (in ‘polite’ company) in Canada or the U.S. and watch the walls go up, apparently because they are deathly afraid that we will piss off those that run the show.
    After all, isn’t war a profitable venture to those in the stock market that don’t watch, and an expense to the tax-payers that don’t watch.

    Rene Moreau (416-489-8347)
    I would love to know if this is getting through the filters. It sure does’t get to the papers. Telephone please, and yes, it is monitored.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>