Aug 232018
 

Canadians have reason

To be Grateful, for all the work that has gone into net neutrality (SO FAR, we MIGHT still have it in Canada).

OpenMedia  is our excellent leader (since 2008) on internet/communication issues.

Telephone service (the ability to communicate) is fundamental to health and security.  Communications are a service, like schools and roads, that citizens joined hands, decades ago, to provide through their government.

The airwaves are a component of The Commons – – they belong to us ALL.   If we lose net neutrality, it will be our own doing.

RELATED:   2017-08-07   Further concentration in the Communications industry

Canadians have reason

To be On guard  (our American friends HAD net neutrality, and then LOST it, with the consequence below for firefighters in California).

 

The battle to maintain open access to the Internet without preferential categories (“Net Neutrality”)  has been hard fought, with people in many countries pitching in (think of AVAAZ).  The battle was underway before 2009, when I first actively engaged.  It has not ended:

  • 2015 Celebrate!   the FCC (U.S.) voted protection for the Internet, after huge protests.
  • Later,  under a Trump appointee, the protection was reversed.
  • Today, California . . .  you can’t get your data through, you have wildfires to put out?   We’re sorry, we made a mistake!

RELATED POSTINGS:

The Obama-era protections had widespread public support but were scrapped last year (2017) by Trump’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC), with the former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai at the helm. At the time, Pai argued that ISPs should self-regulate instead as government regulation would stifle innovation in the industry. He also said that the net neutrality rules were established on  “hypothetical harms and hysterical prophecies of doom”.

So, the Americans had net neutrality, and then lost it, thanks to Trump.  Today, in California, they experienced the throttling of the firefighters’ phones.

Canadians fought – – people from outside Canada helped us.  We were successful.

We may have won, (maybe, maybe not) but beware.   Big Money is not about public service.  They know how much money can be made when they get hold of a public good; and they know the importance of the Internet to our successes.  They got the U.S.   They will be determined to take Canada, if they haven’t already finessed it.   Can we keep the CRTC honest (“In the Public Interest”)?

This is not a call to action.   Pre-existing awareness is very helpful when help is needed.   I just sent a cheque to OpenMedia (207 W Hastings St, Vancouver, BC V6B 1H7).

= = = = = = = =  = = = =

With thanks to David:

Verizon under fire for ‘throttling’ firefighters’ data in California blaze

The incident was not the first time Verizon has squeezed the firefighters data connection. Photograph: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images

 

Lawsuit argues the impaired emergency efforts show how loss of net neutrality protections can be deadly

Olivia Solon in San Francisco

The incident was not the first time Verizon has squeezed the firefighters data connection. Photograph: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images
California firefighters’ ability to battle a huge wildfire was impeded by Verizon Wireless throttling their internet connection, in a moment advocates say demonstrates the high stakes of the battle over net neutrality.

Santa Clara county fire department had paid for what Verizon described as an “unlimited” data plan for various internet-connected devices, but the data flow was throttled to about 1/200th of the typical speed – unusably slow for any meaningful data transfer.

Californians watch wildfires burn their houses via home security cameras

Read more

This restriction created problems for a command and control communications vehicle called OES 5262 as firefighters battled the Mendocino Complex fire, the largest wildfire in California’s history, in late July. The vehicle – essentially a fire engine that is fitted with computers and communications equipment – gets internet access via a device that uses a Verizon sim card. It is used as a hub to “track, organize and prioritize routing of resources around the state and country to the sites where they are needed the most”, according to the Santa Clara county fire chief, Anthony Bowden, in a lawsuit over net neutrality protections, first reported by Ars Technica.

“This throttling has had a significant impact on our ability to provide emergency services,” said Bowden. “Verizon imposed these limitations despite being informed that throttling was actively impeding County Fire’s ability to provide crisis-response and essential emergency services.”

Obama-era protections would have given the fire department the recourse to bring a complaint to the FCC, which could have taken action against Verizon.

The July incident wasn’t the first time Verizon had throttled the firefighters’ data connection.

They had previously contacted Verizon in June when they were dealing with the Pawnee fire and December 2017 when they were battling a grass fire near Prado regional park.

According to emails included in court filings, in June 2018, the fire captain Justin Stockman contacted Verizon requesting that the data connection for a critical piece of communications equipment was unthrottled. A Verizon account manager responded by trying to upsell the fire department from a $37.99 plan to a $39.99 plan.

“In light of our experience, County Fire believes it is likely that Verizon will continue to use the exigent nature of public safety emergencies and catastrophic events to coerce public agencies into higher-cost plans, ultimately paying significantly more for mission-critical service – even if that means risking harm to public safety during negotiations,” Bowden wrote in a written declaration.

Internet service providers (ISPs) are entitled to throttle people who use excessive amounts of data, depending on the terms of the individual plan. However, Verizon has a policy to remove restrictions if contacted in an emergency situations.

“We have done that many times, including for emergency personnel responding to these tragic fires. In this situation, we should have lifted the speed restriction when our customer reached out to us. This was a customer support mistake,” said the company in a statement published on Tuesday.

Harold Feld, from Public Knowledge, one of the organisations bringing the suit, said: “Companies need to be liable for their actions,” adding: “Verizon’s response of ‘I’m terribly sorry your state is burning down, let me sell you this new package’ is not good enough. We need rules to prevent it from happening in the first place.”

The Observer view on net neutrality

Read more

The Santa Clara fire department’s complaint forms part of a large lawsuit against the Federal Communications Commission seeking to overturn the repeal of net neutrality rules that prevent internet service providers from blocking, throttling and paid prioritisation.

The Obama-era protections had widespread public support but were scrapped last year by Trump’s Federal Communications Commission, with the former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai at the helm. At the time, Pai argued that ISPs should self-regulate instead as government regulation would stifle innovation in the industry. He also said that the net neutrality rules were established on “hypothetical harms and hysterical prophecies of doom”.

“This should be a warning to lawmakers of what happens when there aren’t protections in place,” said Mark Stanley from digital rights group Demand Progress. “ISPs simply can’t be trusted to police themselves.”

“If Verizon was willing to do this to a fire department during the state’s largest wildfire, when public safety should have been paramount, it’s easy to imagine what they are willing to do to everyday consumers,” he added.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/22/verizon-data-throttling-wildfires-california-lawsuit?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=GU+Today+USA+-+Collections+2017&utm_term=284128&subid=19904009&CMP=GT_US_collection

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)