Sandra Finley

Jun 062016
 

Not mentioned in this article about confidential UK Government letters released by Privacy International:

  • the similarities to alarms sounded in the UK, Canada, Australia and the U.S. over intelligence services and surveillance.   A few examples:

2014-09-26 Journalists and whistleblowers will go to jail under new national security laws, Australia, The Guardian. (Includes info on Five Eyes (FVEY)

2015-02-25 The public debate on Bill C-51 (Secret Police) should include context, the comprehensive SURVEILLANCE that is already in place

2015-03-17 Bill C-51, Elephant in the Room, the U.S.A. (includes info re “Five Eyes”, FVEY)

2015-03-25 Bill C-51, Secret police in a world of corporate domination. Ouch!

15-03-23 C-51   Secret Police. Major wake-up call for Canadians. Canada Spying.  Communication Security Establishment’s (CSE), CBC

  • Relevant to the article below, but not mentioned:  Lockheed Martin (intelligence operations) in the UK census raises the Privacy issue,  too.

Note:   The UK Census is every 10 years, with the next one in 2021.    The UK Office for National Statistics (ONS)  at  https://www.ons.gov.uk/census  has links to a possible “Annual” data collection on individuals from Administrative Records. 

I would say that, without consultation,  Canada has embarked on step 1 in the use of Administrative Records.   For the 2016 Census, it was announced that StatsCan would be getting the financial information for individuals directly from the CRA  (their Income Tax files).

That the same issues exist in the UK, Canada, Australia, and the USA will be related to Lockheed Martin’s role in the Corporatocracy.   New Zealand is the other country in the “Five Eyes”  – – we should seek out information to determine whether they are fighting the same surveillance operations and enabling laws as citizens in other democracies are fighting.

RELATED:    The surprising reason you should care about privacy, TED Talk, Greenwald

I sent an email to Privacy International, see APPENDED.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

 Official correspondence reveals lack of scrutiny of MI5’s data collection   (on individuals)

Privacy International releases letters that it says show ‘cosy’ relationship between watchdog and intelligence operations

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jun/06/letters-lack-scrutiny-privacy-mi5-data-collection?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=GU+Today+main+NEW+H+categories&utm_term=175831&subid=8093198&CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2

 

Man using a mobile phone
The correspondence sheds light on official thinking about the legal distinction between anonymised bulk data collection and matching material to individuals. Photograph: Felix Clay for the Guardian

The watchdog that monitors interception of emails and phone calls by the intelligence services allowed MI5 to escape regular scrutiny of its bulk collection of communications data, according to newly released confidential correspondence.

A highly revealing exchange of letters from 2004 has been published by Privacy International (PI) before Monday’s parliamentary debate on the investigatory powers bill, sometimes called the snooper’s charter.

Video Duration Time 1:23.  Click on:    The snooper’s charter is back

The campaign group argues that the letters demonstrate the relationship between government agencies and the independent organisation that is supposed to oversee and regulate their activities has been too “cosy”.

The correspondence has been disclosed in the course of legal action between PI and the government at the investigatory powers tribunal (IPT) which is due to be heard in full this year. The IPT deals with complaints about the intelligence services and surveillance by public bodies. GCHQ is alleged to be illegally collecting “bulk personal datasets” from the phone and internet records of millions of people who have no ties to terrorism and are not suspected of any crime.

The letters were sent by Home Office legal advisers, GCHQ and Sir Swinton Thomas, who was the interception of communications commissioner. The organisation is now called the Interception of Communications Commissioner’s Office (IOCCO).

In May 2004, a Home Office legal adviser wrote to Thomas backing an MI5 proposal that collecting bulk data from communication service providers for its “database project” be authorised under section 94 of the 1984 Telecommunications Act because, at that stage, there were no human rights implications or breach of privacy concerns. Using that act would not require a notice to be put before parliament because it could be used secretively on the grounds that “disclosure of the direction would be against the interests of national security”.

Thomas wrote back the following month, expressing reservations about such clandestine authorisation. He proposed that it would be better to use the more modern and exacting Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (Ripa), which involves more open legal procedures and safeguards.

The Home Office responded, saying that, although Ripa might be engaged, it did not think that meant it must be used. The letter continued: “The only practical difference between the two sets of provisions is if [Ripa] were used, a new notice would need to be issued every month … involving a fresh consideration of the necessity and proportionality issues. This would not be the case under section 94 [of the Telecommunications Act].”

Thomas backed down, replying that, “on reconsideration”, use of Ripa was not mandatory. He added: “I am also impressed by the considerable and, if possible to be avoided, inconvenience in following the [Ripa] procedure in the database procedures.”

GCHQ wrote to Thomas in October that year after he had visited its Cheltenham headquarters. “Huges volumes of data are acquired (about 40m bits of data a day),” it informed him. “In the interests of security and commercial confidentiality, GCHQ prefers to keep all the telephony material together in one database … to disguise its source, as the origin of some of the material is extremely sensitive.”

GCHQ also asked whether access to communications data for its databases would be lawful under the Telecommunications Act rather than the more burdensome Ripa.

Thomas said it was not a straightforward problem but eventually acquiesced, saying: “I have, therefore, reached the conclusion, not without some difficulty, that the present system for retrieval [under the Telecommunications Act] is lawful. As you say, adhering to the spirit of the legislation is important.”

The debate goes some way to explain official thinking on the legal distinction between anonymised bulk data collection and a second stage of interception where material may be matched to individuals.

The latest revelation follows an earlier release of confidential documents by PI last month that showed how GCHQ, MI5 and MI6 obtain personal data from public and private organisations, including financial institutions, the NHS, electronic petitions record databases and others.

Privacy International said the letters exemplified the “total failure” of oversight.

Caroline Wilson Palow, the organisation’s general counsel, said: “The documents demonstrate the government’s troubling history of over-reaching in order to expand its surveillance powers while minimising safeguards.

“This discussion, between lawyers for MI5 and GCHQ and the interception of communications commissioner, is also an illuminating example of how oversight can go wrong when it lacks sufficient transparency, resources and advocates for the individuals whose privacy may be violated.

“We think the commissioner’s conclusions were incorrect, permitting GCHQ to acquire communications data in bulk under a broad and secret interpretation of a power to which few safeguards attach. Indeed, the commissioner even agrees with GCHQ and MI5 that collecting our communications data from service providers would not be an interference with our privacy – a position that would likely come as a surprise to most of us and is in direct conflict with recent court decisions.”

Sir Stanley Burnton, the interception commissioner at IOCCO, said: “We have recently concluded our comprehensive review of section 94 [Telecommunications Act] directions which have been issued by secretaries of state from various government departments since the late 1990s, after taking this additional oversight on at the request of the prime minister in 2015.

“Our review has been very challenging because all the section 94 directions are subject to statutory secrecy provisions which limit severely what we are able to say publicly about them. Nevertheless, our review report sets out an extensive series of recommendations which must be implemented in order to clarify and bring consistency to the procedures in place, remedy the lack of record-keeping requirements and codified processes and ensure that we are able to undertake this additional oversight and audit of the giving and use of section 94 directions properly. Our report is due to be published at the end of June or early July.”

“We welcome and support Privacy International’s proposal for oversight bodies to be supported by public interest advocates and their calls for further transparency in these matters.”

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

APPENDED, EMAIL SENT TO PRIVACY INTERNATIONAL:

From: Sandra Finley     Sent: June 6, 2016 3:11 PM

To: press  at   privacyinternational.org     Subject: re Official correspondence reveals lack of scrutiny of MI5’s data collection

Hello Privacy International,

Thank-you for the work you do.

There is a connection not mentioned in the article, “Official correspondence reveals lack of scrutiny of MI5’s data collection”.  You may know it, but  just in case you don’t!

The issue of surveillance enabled by collection of personal data through censuses and continuously on-going surveys is

additional to what is happening through “Security” forces and legislation regarding police powers.

The involvement of Lockheed Martin Corp in the data base at UK Office for National Statistics is a vehicle for loss of Privacy of personal information (surveillance), if the UK situation is similar to the Canadian.

I am from Canada and have followed Lockheed Martin’s role in the Statistics Agency (data collection)  in Canada, the UK and in the US (where it is the “Census Bureau”).   I was in and out of Court for 5 years because I would not be complicit with Lockheed Martin’s involvement.   The Court battle was fought on the Canadian Charter Right to Privacy of Personal Information;  but the original motivation of thousands of Canadians has been the enrichment of a corrupt, lawless, and destructive corporation like Lockheed Martin through Government contracts.

I was first alerted to the collaboration between what is referred to as the “Five Eyes” (FVEY) countries in 2008.   The head of the Census operations for Canada was brought in as a witness at my trial.

Lockheed Martin’s international “steerage” role  is succinctly evidenced by Expense Claims submitted in 2009-2010 by the Assistant Chief Statistician for Canada (appended).

The leaks by Edward Snowden through Glenn Greenwald confirmed what we already knew by piecing together various news stories.

Perhaps the following articles can be helpful to you.

Best wishes,   . . .

= == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

EXPENSE CLAIMS TELL A STORY

From  http://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/about/expense/petermorrison/2010

Morrison, Peter, Assistant Chief Statistician

Travel expenses – 2010

Date Purpose Cost
January 28, 2010 ARCHIVED – Lockheed Martin Steering Committee Meeting $909.88
September 22, 2010 ARCHIVED – Corporate Business Architecture presentation to Regional Offices $1,523.32
October 11, 2010 ARCHIVED – Participate at the 2010 Meeting of the International Census Forum and Lockheed Martin Senior Management Steering Committee Meeting $2,062.94
October 21, 2010 ARCHIVED – Corporate Business Architecture presentation to Central Regional Office and visit to Regional Census Centre $1,128.14

From  http://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/about/expense/petermorrison/2009

Morrison, Peter, Assistant Chief Statistician

Travel expenses – 2009

Date Purpose Cost
June 17, 2009 ARCHIVED – To visit the Regional Offices in Vancouver and Edmonton $1,478.68
June 22, 2009 ARCHIVED – To attend the Steering Committee Meeting with Lockheed Martin and visit the United States Data Processing Centre (DPC) site $1,262.61
August 10, 2009 ARCHIVED – EX interviews $684.78
September 7, 2009 ARCHIVED – International Census Forum 2009 $4,369.27

= == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

URLs OF POTENTIAL INTEREST:

EARLIER INFO RE UK, IRELAND AND US

(Note that one of the main protestors against Lockheed Martin’s role in UK Census is now deceased.)

UK Census (also Lockheed Martin)

Click on http://www.youtube.com/ .  Then “search” on ”  UK Census Lockheed “.  You’ll find lots of videos, generated by Lockheed’s involvement, with words like

  • Don’t comply, here’s why
  • Don’t fill it in
  • Boycott
  • Census burning

Irish Census

  • http://irishcensusscandal.org/

American Census

  • There’s information on my blog included in the articles under Categories / Peace or War / Lockheed Martin   (righthand sidebar).

Americans are much more in the dark about Lockheed Martin’s involvement in their Census Bureau.

Understandable, given my experience with the NY Times reporting of the resistance in Canada.  They clearly and deliberately edited out the name “Lockheed Martin”  (I was interviewed and supplied the information to the Reporter.) >>

a small number of people refused to fill out (the Canadian)  census forms.  But they were protesting the use of an American technology contractor.”

 

 

A GOOGLE SEARCH ON “CENSUS, UK, LOCKHEED”  YIELDS:

 

Census Systems · Lockheed Martin

www.lockheedmartin.ca/us/products/census-systems.html

 

Our Census successes include the 2000 and 2010 census for the United States Census Bureau, the 2001 and 2011 census for the United Kingdom, and the …

 

Boycott the UK census over links to Lockheed Martin, protesters say …

www.theguardian.com › World › UK News › Census

 

Feb 19, 2011 – People are being urged to boycott next month’s UK’s census because the US arms manufacturer responsible for Trident is involved in gathering …

 

Man fined for refusing census over Lockheed Martin link | UK news …

www.theguardian.com › World › UK News › Census

 

Jan 17, 2012 – Derek Shields tells court he ‘wouldn’t get into bed with an arms dealer’ and says he will not pay £75 fine.

 

Jun 032016
 

An inspirational and sensible young lady!

Jamila Raqib,  (under 14 minutes)  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJodZcGfTVE&list=PLRGCiRF7-x7rY9JfK66FS2PinoenXUgiW&index=13

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Jamila’s mentor,  Dr. Gene Sharp 

(update:  Wynogene “GeneSharp, 80, died Sunday, May 15, 2016, in Mesa, Ariz. – – since the making of this film.)  

Jun 022016
 

Please note that StatsCan “Surveys” are not the same as the Census.   Surveys are being conducted all the time.   The Census is once every 5 years.

Excerpt from Reddit posting (full text below):

I ended up contacting a lawyer and advised Stats Can that we were seeking legal action
Stats Can sent us a letter a couple of weeks later confirming that the Labour Force Survey is voluntary . . .  

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

UPDATE:     2016-07-01 StatsCan Website: Surveys are Mandatory,  then Voluntary,  then Mandatory. Timeline with Reddit info.         The Law still says that Surveys are voluntary  This Update,  with the Timeline also contains the full  argument – – what does the law say?   A couple of points have been added to the main arguments presented earlier.   Hopefully it is water-tight.

The effect of the StatsCan letter (reported on Reddit), accompanied by a change to their website to say “all surveys are voluntary”, meant that the legal action was stopped.

But maybe as late as June 2nd, 2016  the website was changed back.   See the above URL (StatsCan Website: Surveys are . . . )

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

THE REDDIT POSTING:    Oct 28, 2015
Has anyone successfully sued Stats Can for harassment?

 

Statistics Canada has been harassing us to fill out a survey, calling several times per day and refusing to stop even though we have requested them to stop calling several times now.

This is not a census, which people are legally required to complete (or face jail time or fines as a consequence). The agent on the phone is insisting the survey is mandatory, but it even states on the documentation itself that the survey is voluntary (and all we need to do to opt out is send them a letter explaining why we don’t want to take part, which is still a way of gaining information and is a waste of our time).

The harassment is escalating and beginning to aggravate my coworker, the person who is being harassed.

How do I stop Stats Canada from harassing my coworker in the most polite, succinct, legal way possible? Short of hiring a lawyer to sue them for harassment? (which my coworker is not above doing, but.. we’d prefer to avoid that, obv).

I’ve searched online for others in the same situation and while the harassment is completely illegal on the part of Stats Canada, most people seem to cave in to the harassment once it reaches a rate of 5 or more calls per day (5 calls per day! not even telemarketers are allowed to do that) or worse, actual visits from Stats Canada employees harassing them at their workplaces and residences.

Stats Can should be ashamed of themselves.

How do I stop the madness?

Thanks!

edit: I just spoke to a Stats Can agent and asked them to go over the Statistical Act with me and they were unable to prove that surveys are mandatory, including the Labour Force Survey.

According to Section 8 of the Statistical Act:

  1. The Minister may, by order, authorize the obtaining, for a particular purpose, of information, other than information for a census of population or agriculture, on a voluntary basis, but where such information is requested section 31 does not apply in respect of a refusal or neglect to furnish the information.

Section 31 deals with sanctions and fines for refusing to participate or for furnishing false information regarding a mandatory CENSUS and as Section 8 states above, does not apply to voluntary surveys (unless you deliberately provide false information, I suppose, which I have no intent of doing).

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/S-19/FullText.html 

EDIT UPDATE:   I ended up contacting a lawyer and advised Stats Can that we were seeking legal action and Stats Can sent us a letter a couple of weeks later confirming that the Labour Force Survey is voluntary and have since stopped harassing us on the phone. Which seems to have resolved the problem for us, at least.

26 comments

UPDATE, please see:     2016-07-01 StatsCan Website: Surveys are Mandatory then Voluntary then Mandatory again.  Timeline with Reddit info.    Includes full argument, surveys are voluntary under the Law.

 

May 242016
 

Our democracy can be a powerful dynamic force for justice and equality but it can also

When people’s fallibility takes precedence over their goodness then

horrific things are done in the name of democracy

 

Serendipity.   I was answering Brad’s question about the viability of StatsCan.    2016-05-20  Was there at any point an historical Statistics Canada that would work today? (Lockheed Martin, Privacy of Personal Info)

And tackled the question of why I think it is that academics, politicians and media advocate strenuously for detailed files on citizens (StatsCan, mandatory long form Census).   Simultaneously, they are advocating to take away the Charter Right to Privacy of Personal Information, a constitutional right, without going through the process prescribed by Constitutional Law to remove a Charter Right (the Oakes Test for a “Section One Override” of the Right).   At a time when the worst war and surveillance corporation on the planet has the “steerage” role in the census operations of at least five countries, one being Canada.  Astoundingly backward steps.

I then happened to hear an interview that inspires on the point I was making – – our fallibility.

 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

 

Near the end of this CBC interview on the program “Q”,  George Takei recounts what his Father explained to him about democracy.

http://www.cbc.ca/radio/q/schedule-for-tuesday-may-24-2016-1.3597178/george-takei-dares-hollywood-to-explore-wider-galaxy-of-talent-1.3597184

” . . .  Takei reflects on how his childhood in an (American) internment camp (World War Two)  marked him forever, how democracies progress and regress at the same time, and why “horrific things happen” when people’s fallibility overrides their goodness.. . . ” 

Partial transcription below.

 

 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

SEE ALSO:   2015-09-25 1940’s “U.S. Census was used to round up hundreds of thousands of patriotic American citizens at gunpoint”

“. . .  it wasn’t just the Nazis who used census data to round up “enemies” in their midst.   The Americans did the same ( but not to quite the same end!).   And what about Canadians? . . .   “

SEE ALSO:  2011-12-23 The Banality of Evil, Hannah Arendt. Freedom. “The new” versus certainty (action versus behaviour).

  – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

PARTIAL TRANSCRIPTION

GEORGE TAKEI

. . .  Well, I was incarcerated as a child …. And I have memories of it, but they’re a child’s memories. I really didn’t understand it.

But when I became a teenager and I read civics books about the shining ideals of our American democracy,   I couldn’t quite reconcile that with what I knew to be my childhood imprisonment

And so I sat down with my Father after dinner many, many times.

Had some passionate and sometimes heated discussions on our imprisonment and

I learned about American democracy, its strength and its nobility from my Father, a man who lost everything in the middle of his life and

Started from scratch and taught me about American democracy

He said our democracy is a people’s democracy

And it has the potential to be as great as the founding fathers were

But it’s also as fallible as human beings are, and as the founding fathers were; the people who articulated those ideals kept other human beings as slaves

Women were not part of “All men are created equal”

They were women and

They had no rights

But from that time on those people who cared about the ideals and actively engaged in the process of democracy

Have struggled

The slaves struggled through generations, through the Jim Crow period and the Civil Rights period

Where now we have an Afro-American as the President of the United States

 

With women who had no rights

They couldn’t vote

They had no property rights

They didn’t have rights over their own children

And yet because they struggled together with fair-minded men

That today we have three women as justices on the Supreme Court of the U.S.

And a very strong probability that the next President of the U.S. will be a woman

 

So you know, we make progress

One Sunday afternoon he took me downtown to the Adlai Stevenson for President headquarters

And he introduced me to electoral politics

And I saw how this works

It takes people that were passionate, in that case

dedicated to getting Governor Stevenson of Illinois elected President of the U.S.

 

We weren’t successful then

But he said

In a democracy keep on keeping on

And we do make progress

 

Last year the Supreme Court of the U.S. ruled that

Marriage equality is the rule of the land from coast to coast and from border to border

And yet this year we have the backlash to that

People trying to use religion as a rationale for discrimination or

Hyped-up fear of pedophiles in girl’s bathrooms; you know

the battlefield is the bathroom now, of all places!

 

Our democracy can be a powerful dynamic force for justice and equality but it can also

When people’s fallibility takes precedence over their goodness then

horrific things are done in the name of democracy

 

(Shad, interviewer)  But your Father convinced you of the value of that process and the historical argument for it

 

(George):    And active engagement in the democratic process

I’ve been actively engaged in many, many political campaigns as well as social justice campaigns

I marched with Dr Martin Luther King

I shook his hand, chatted with him

During the Viet Nam War – – –

I was a teenager then but I must say I felt a sense of power being exchanged between his hand and mine

And his very measured cadence in his speech was

An incredible and inspiring experience

  – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Segment leading up to the preceding:

(8:27)

. . .   A chapter of American history that most people still to this day don’t know . . . the imprisonment of Japanese Americans . . .   simply because we happened to look like the people that bombed Pearl Harbour.

Donald Trump, a candidate for the presidency of the U.S. displays that same kind of fear-mongering that went on during the early part of the 1940s when we were seen as the people that bombed Pearl Harbour.

It was my grandparents at the turn of the last century that immigrated to this country. My Mother was born in Sacramento; my Father was a San Franciscan; my siblings and I were born in Los Angeles, here.

And yet because we happened to be of Japanese ancestry we were assumed to be just like them.

120,000 Japanese-Americans were summarily rounded up and put in barbed wire prison camps.

That’s what we dramatized in “Allegiance” (musical) on the Broadway stage.

Ushers have told me that during the intermission there were people in the lobby asking

Is this story true?

Did this actually happen in the United States?

Because we don’t know that history we have people like Donald Trump or mayors of some cities that echoed him and used the imprisonment of Japanese-Americans as a rationale – –

President Franklin D Roosevelt did it, so we must do it now with Muslims.

(10:00) When in fact there are millions and millions of Muslims who are not terrorists. Yes, the terrorists had been Muslims, but Muslims are not terrorists.

Those terrorists are a small miniscule fraction of the multi-million people on this planet who are Muslims.

 

So, you know, Politicians play on people’s ignorance and instill fear in them and urge them to do things that are not only unjust but are horrifically damaging to the lives of the people that are targeted.

(Shad, interviewer)    And we unfortunately don’t learn the lessons from history because we don’t know the history.

 

Exactly. That’s another one of my missions to work in that chapter of American history in our educational systems.

We founded a museum called the Japanese-American National Museum.

To institutionalize that story

I’m the last of the generation that experienced the internment

I was five years old then

We don’t want that story to die out with my generation.

And so we did this musical on Broadway on that subject, the Museum

And we’ve been working with boards of education . . .

We’ve been working with Little Rock

(We were incarcerated in Arkansas)

Barb wire prison camps, two of them in Arkansas   . . .

We have a programme to bring school teachers, about a dozen school teachers from Little Rock to the Museum every summer for a month

Their job is to work in that part of Arkansas history that imprisoned innocent Americans simply because of our ancestry   …

 

 

May 212016
 

EXCERPTED from:   2010-03-10 Propaganda, Democracy: Imagining “the other”. Ralston Saul. The Cellist of Sarajevo.  

The guiding light expressed is useful in a number of contexts, not only 9/11, terrorism and torture.   Consider the Census, Charter Right to Privacy of Personal Information and the involvement of Lockheed Martin Corporation.

– – – – –  – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Einstein:  “A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem.”

 

Page 320 from John Ralston Saul’s “On Equilibrium”:

Philosophy is a commentary on the nature of our existence and so on the qualities all of us share in some way.  How useful is that?  Well, that nature and those qualities

(INSERT:  the qualities are

  • common sense
  • ethics
  • imagination
  • intuition
  • memory and
  • reason)

exist whether we recognize them or not.  What remains in our power is how conscious we are willing to be of our humanness.  By conscious, I mean how much we wish to exercise our qualities and to do so one in concert with the other.  To be conscious of them is to be more confident in our use of them.

What was disturbing on that day (INSERT:  9/11) and in the days that followed was how many (of the leaders) . . . concentrated exclusively on a narrow, linear approach towards terrorism.  They talked of eradication, punishment, in effect, of revenge.

We have some 130 years of experience with modern terrorism.  Concrete action is always necessary.  Guilty individuals must be dealt with appropriately.  We know that there will always be a minute percentage among us ready to kill others for a variety of reasons.  We also know that part of the problem is not so much generated as made possible by instability, disquiet, confusion somewhere.  The soft terrain from which terrorism has always operated can range from generalized poverty and suffering to directionless comfort and self-indulgence.  Conscious civilizations – those which use their qualities in concert – know that they must deal with the causes of that instability and loss of direction in order to shrink that context from which terrorism feeds.

To use our qualities is to be conscious of our actions.  A dynamic equilibrium implies an integrated sense of reality’s complexity.  For forty years now the West has led a rush to balance its trade figures by aggressively selling its armaments abroad.  The world is awash in weaponry.  You can trace the parallel rising lines of unstable areas slipping into violence as the quantity of weapons on the market increases.  To act as if our actions do not have consequences is to pretend that we are without qualities and are naturally passive factors when faced by the actions of others.  It is to reduce ourselves to forms of reaction.  ….

(p. 327-8)  “The rhetoric of global forces, whether economic, technological or military, leaves us as individuals with the demeaning and irrelevant pleasures of self-fulfilment, providing we can afford them.  I sense little satisfaction among people with this enforced holiday from the ability to shape their own destinies and the shared destiny of their society.  In fact, I sense growing discomfort and anger.  They see their lives, their families, their streets, let us say their friendships, as reality.  And this reality is the basis from which larger realities must be shaped.

“… Here friendship is the ability to imagine the other.   It is not easy.  It is the beginnings of tolerance.  It is, as Conrad said, “more difficult for some than heroism.  More difficult than compassion”.  Friendship is a relationship filled with uncertainty.  It is the primary territory upon which we test our dynamic equilibrium – our use of our interwoven qualities.  … 

 

(Sandra speaking:)   We should strategize as much as the General who tells the video-war-games-kid who sits in Nevada running the joy-stick that guides the image of an unmanned drone to its destination in Afghanistan, who pushes the “enter” key on the keyboard at the precise moment to release the bombs.

 

Einstein:  “We must be prepared to make the same heroic sacrifices for the cause of peace that we make ungrudgingly for the cause of war.”

Another email in this series is the now-public record on the torture done by the Allied forces in World War Two.  Which brings us full circle back to propaganda.  Our Government propagandizes just as much as “the enemy”, thanks for pointing that out.  Which brings us to “Afghan detainees”.

UPDATES:   see also

 

We must be well informed and engaged.  We CANNOT leave the decisions about the world to others.  Not any more than I can leave a decision about my life to someone else to make.  In that process I lose myself.

 

May 212016
 

Canadians continue to arrive on this blog with questions about the Census and StatsCan Surveys.

Thanks to the student Brad.  The Q&A with him is helpful to others.  My Reply follows his question:

(February)

The crux of the problem is this; we do have a centralized statistical agency and a large part of academia states that this system is more efficient and produces higher quality data. Without faith in the reliability of census material, the agency turned to administrative data (records of other governmental agencies) and used the macro-level data to verify if their surveys are correct.

In other words, without the census they found another way to create the same type of data, albeit one that was less successful.  With a centralized statistical system, there will always be this black box of ‘how is the data handled’.  We know that the agency has some practices to ensure that profiles are not created from the questions, the collection stage is the only one that is at risk for profiling.

Personally, I think that any subcontracting of any stage of data collection and dissemination is a violation of not only the charter, but also the mandate of the statistics act.  At one point, Statistics Canada had the budget and the mandate to ensure that it protected Canadians’ information and now it does not.

I favour the recommendation for an independent statistical agency, so that the government cannot force the agency to create profiles or hand over personal information. Nonetheless, there is a significant voice to those who state that it does not matter, no agency should have this power in the first place.

I will probably have to clarify a few things in this blurb, but my follow up question would be; was there at any point a historical Statistics Canada that would work?  Or do you prefer the proposition?

(Brad’s other good questions are at:   Replies to student research for Philosophy Class.  Census, Lockheed Martin & Charter Right.)

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

MY REPLY: 

The world changes and continues to change.  You cannot go backwards in time.  Among the reasons that the Census worked historically: 

  • technology was much less sophisticated than it is today.  The capabilities that exist today did not exist in the past.  The names of citizens were not directly on their record in the StatsCan data base, which they are today.   The appetite for comprehensive data on individual citizens was less developed.  

The threat posed by detailed files on citizens coupled with technological CAPACITY, coupled with the DRIVE to create the data files – – the convergence of these factors did not exist.   There wasn’t the same basis for citizen resistance, as exists today.  So the Census “worked”.

  • Canada was a more sovereign and democratic nation.  

A war and surveillance corporation from a foreign imperialist Government with documented disregard for the Rule of Law and protocol did not receive contracts for work at Statistics Canada (documented elsewhere on this blog).     I don’t think there is any doubt about the “steerage” role of Lockheed Martin in the “compatible” Census data bases in the “5 Eyes” countries  – –   see   2016-03-18   Does Lockheed Martin Corp have a role in the 2016 Census? 

  • A higher degree of sovereignty in a healthier democracy meant that the VALUES of its people had a greater chance of guiding the nation. 

The Census had a greater chance of working historically because the operations at Statistics Canada did not fly full in the face of values. 

It is well-known that Canadians in general do not see war (personified by Lockheed Martin and wars like the Iraq War) as a means for

  • economic growth
  • enrichment, or as
  • a way to help improve the lot of the world’s people. 
  • Or as a way to spend their tax dollars.  There are more intelligent and beneficial alternatives.  

We embrace sitting down at the table, the use of our full range of human capacities, as opposed to the use of stupid brute force.  I would like to think that in the latter half of the last century, had Canadians sent thousands of letters to its Government protesting against the Lockheed Martin contracts, that the Government would have responded to the values articulated.   There would have been no contracts.   

Former Prime Minister Jean Chretien understood – – he did not take Canada into the 2003 American/UK War on Iraq.  Those Canadian values were solidified before him, under former Prime Minister Lester Pearson.  They became part of our identity.   Former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau worked at creating relationships and dialogue with other countries – Cuba is an obvious example. 

With sovereignty came the ability to set our own course.   We were not lap dogs to very destructive American foreign and economic policy.   Nor had the Corporatocracy supplanted democracy to the same degree.

RE:  Do I prefer the proposition for an “independent statistical agency”?   

No.  A hammer sees every nail as something to be hit.  Statisticians have been trained/conditioned to think along the same lines as their professors, superiors and colleagues, regardless of the organizational structure. 

Also,  the “President of the Americas” for Lockheed Martin spelt out to Maclean’s Magazine that they work through the agencies and bureaucracy of Government because they know they can’t get what they want through the democratic channels of Govt. (transparency and public debate).   Ref:   2006-09-13 Maclean’s Magazine interview, President of the Americas for Lockheed Martin Ron Covais, Meet NAFTA 2.0.    The corporatocracy is too heavily infiltrated into the Government for the proposition (an independent statistical agency) to work.

John Ralston Saul correctly argues (in my opinion) that our rational faculty is the most fragile of our faculties.  We routinely rationalize our actions,  we can rationalize almost anything.  It is subject to corruption.  And yet we exalt the rational, to the exclusion of our other faculties.  

QUESTION:  How do I understand this situation in which academics, statisticians and media can loudly proclaim the absolute necessity of a mandatory long form census, detailed data files on citizens,  in spite of the historical record, and the extinction of a Charter Right that protects citizens against the abuses?  

  • FORGETFULNESS  –  failure to use the human faculty of MEMORY.

REF (new):  2016-05-24 This is why the war corporations (Lockheed Martin) will be gone from Canada.  Democracy is as fallible as human beings. But we make progress. Interview of George Takei, Japanese-American interned at age 5.

  • COMPARTMENTALIZATION   – removing the ETHICAL consideration from our actions.  (Using tax-payer dollars to enrich people who promoted an illegal war, the consequences of which fester and ooze in the Middle East years later, who were the Number One Contract “Interrogator” in the illegal, truly depraved and unproductive Torture carried out in American offshore prisons, …

 

  • CONDITIONING – an educational system that fails to EMPOWER, that has little comprehension of our INTUITIVE faculty, that does not reward critical thinking.

 

  • LACK OF COMMON SENSE   – some inhabitants of the Ivory Tower don’t know what the man in the street knows.  The building of detailed files of personal information on citizens by the Government is the signature of a police state.   Intuitively we know that parts of our lives, or the lives of fellow citizens, are private.
  • MARGINALIZATION OF IMAGINATION  – little ability to envision other ways and means, ones that reinforce, instead of undermine, our Values and the Rights of Citizens.

 

  • STIFLING OF CREATIVE CAPABILITY – academics in general are the staunch defenders of the status quo, constrained by boxes.  Simultaneously, creativity is essential for CHANGE.

 

  • FAILURE IN LEADERSHIP  – leadership should help guide us out of a model that makes the world a worse place.   We can’t get to a better place by giving our tax money (investing in) the machinery of the war corporations, forces of destruction.

 

  • A ONE-DIMENSIONAL LINEAR POINT-OF-VIEW –  in a world that is multi-dimensional.

 

  • INABILITY TO INTEGRATE THE HUMAN QUALITIES WE POSSESS –  you end up with a fractured humanity.   Our rational faculty with a false sense of superiority, obliterating what is ethical, intuitive, the experience in family histories;  at odds with common sense, and with little creative capacity.   It is a recipe for fallibility;  the same recipe that has been used in the past (and present) with disastrous consequences.

REF (new):   2016-05-24 This is why the war corporations (Lockheed Martin) will be gone from Canada. Democracy is as fallible as human beings. But we make progress. Interview of George Takei, Japanese-American interned at age 5.

  • TOO MANY DISEMPOWERED, DIRECTIONLESS, OR IRRESPONSIBLE AND PROPAGANDIZED CITIZENS  – a few factors at play.   But basically, we know it is wrong to be complicit; we fail to take a stand which is our responsibility as citizens.  

 

In my view,  the answer to the StatsCan debacle lies in the raising of consciousness coupled with ferocious defence of our values and Charter Rights.   Please see

2016-05-21  I lose myself.  “A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem.”

. . .   These qualities (memory, intuition, common sense, imagination . . ) exist whether we recognize them or not.  What remains in our power is how conscious we are willing to be of our humanness.  By conscious, I mean how much we wish to exercise our qualities and to do so one in concert with the other.  To be conscious of them is to be more confident in our use of them.           – –   John Ralston Saul

 

May 122016
 

QUESTION:  from kari da

I would like to hear about what other ‘refuseniks’ in Canada are doing, and get updates on organizing and legal challenges for the 2016 census.

= = = = = = = = = = = = =

REPLY:

Hi Kari,

Don Rogers’ blog, Count Me Out,  is strong on ‘refusenik’ strategy;  I don’t try to duplicate it.   But I will add:

There is a continuum of resistance.  All the strategies contribute to the effort.   Different people are comfortable with different actions, from:

  • Start as many conversations about the Census as you can.  Too many citizens still don’t have a clue about the involvement of Lockheed Martin in the Census operations.  (Creation of AWARENESS.)   Ref:  2016-03-18   Does Lockheed Martin Corp have a role in the 2016 Census?
  • If you are contacted directly by a StatsCan worker, try to engage them in conversation.   “Lockheed Martin Corporation is involved in the Canadian Census.  Do you know who they are and what they do in the world?”  (Everything from International Surveillance to Number One Contract Interrogator for the Offshore American prisons (Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib, etc.)  – – the authors of depravity (torture that is illegal under International Law).   Manufacturers of Land Mines and Cluster Munitions that are illegal under Canadian and International Law.  Authors of the dropping of bombs from drones (another form of terrorism).   Instrumental in the decision by the Americans to start the Iraq War, a decision based on outright lies, the agonies of which spread and live on in the Middle East today.   Lobbyists and corrupters of democratic governance.   We are complicit if we sit by while our tax dollars enable these monsters.   They are dependent upon access to the public purse.   They are proficient at over-charging.  They have been convicted many times of breach of arms export control laws.   They sell weapons and it doesn’t matter to whom.
  • I have found letters-to-the-editor that go back to 2006 and 2011 to still be very helpful today.   They alert people to aspects of the Census of which they are unaware.  But maybe more importantly,  they help form a bond of solidarity.   You help move thoughts that others have thought into the open.  They can say somewhat anonymously to friends and colleagues,  “Did you happen to read that letter-to-the-editor about the Census?”
  • Moving into the question of how you as an individual handle the Census.   There is no limit to the creativity of citizens.  Have some fun with it!   (Maybe it wasn’t a joke? . . .  Thousands of Canadians have identified their religion as “Jedi Warrior”.)   Many have apparently been named after cartoon characters.  . . .  Personally, I think it is important to get the message across that the involvement of Lockheed Martin Corp will not be tolerated.   Some people have received an actual paper copy of the Census, which is easiest.   A large “No Lockheed Martin” across the first page gets the message across.  If you received the code to access the on-line copy,  you might request a paper copy (I don’t know if the e-copy allows you to register your feedback to StatsCan).
  • If you happen to receive the Long Form Census,  you have the opportunity to stand in solidarity with others in defence of our Charter Right to Privacy of Personal Information.  In a democracy you simply do not allow the Government to build detailed files of personal information on individuals, which is what is happening through the Census Long Form, the National Household Survey and other Surveys that are on-going through StatsCan.   Do not answer questions that you judge to be personal in nature.
  • I was going to say, “Have no fear”.   But somehow Kari,  I don’t think you need that piece of advice!
  • Resistance – – is a process that happens over a period of time.  Do what you have to do.  And be patient.  In the past the Dept of Justice did not issue summons to court until near the end of the two years after which the Statute of Limitations kicks in.   You may never hear from them, only a small number do (65 out of thousands).

RE  Legal Challenges:   People end up in Court if they are selected for prosecution because of non-compliance with the Census (the 65 / thousands).  Citizens have not been the initiators.  Our network has helped some people defend themselves.   We remain alert to news of refuseniks and contact them if possible, to see if they want or need support.   If StatsCan and the Justice Dept don’t change their process,  as mentioned, there will be no word of people being prosecuted (summons to court) until at least a year-and-a-half from now.

 

May 082016
 

Looking for information on the 2016 Census?    The one-pager below might be helpful.

We’ve followed the issue since 2003.   So there is more information on this blog than you will ever want to see!

For links to census topics not addressed in the following, see  Lockheed Martin, War Economy, StatsCan, Charter Right Privacy, Trial

 

= = = = = = = = = = = =

Sent to CBC Sunday Edition (Host Michael Enright), 2016-04-03

 

RE:  Your Interview of Wayne Smith, Canada’s Chief Statistician

I am happy to hear that StatsCan no longer charges for its products.

Canadians could not know whether to be happy about other questions around StatsCan because you, Michael, did not ask the hard questions!  Uncharacteristic of you.   Nor did Wayne Smith offer the information.   Silence.

I trust you will find the following helpful  (please ask if you would like more source references):

  1. The question of whether Lockheed Martin Corp has a role in the 2016 Census  (see APPENDED).

2.   StatsCan is required to operate WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE LAW.

StatsCan claims that the Statistics Act gives them authority to take away citizens’ Charter Right to Privacy of Personal Information.

(The Right:   “In fostering the underlying values of dignity, integrity and autonomy, it is fitting that s. 8 of the Charter should seek to protect a biographical core of personal information which individuals in a free and democratic society would wish to maintain and control from dissemination to the state.”)

Most people know that Rights provided under Constitutional Law cannot be taken away by a regular act of Parliament.  Under Constitutional Law, in order for the Government to take away a Charter Right it has to meet the criteria set out in the Oakes Test.

As far as I know,  StatsCan / the Justice Dept have not applied to the Courts to see if they can meet the criteria, so the Charter Right stands.  StatsCan’s assertions to citizens that the Statistics Act gives them authority to take away Charter Rights is bogus.

In summary, the personal information of citizens is protected by a Charter Right;  StatsCan has not gone through the process prescribed by Constitutional Law to take away the Charter Right. Therefore the Charter Right stands.

Charter Rights are deadly important and purposeful in a democracy.  The only people who will defend against the erosion of them are citizens.   When push comes to shove, the only people who will insist on the Rule of Law are citizens.

3.   Wayne Smith’s statement that the National Household Survey is voluntary is contradicted by the text of StatsCan’s pamphlets provided to householders “It is the law – – – ”.

Many Canadians have been, and continue to be threatened with prosecution if they don’t answer the survey questions.  (Last I knew, the amount of information demanded had increased from just over 50 questions in the mandatory long form Census (2006) to more than 80 in the National Household Survey – – and note that censuses and surveys both feed information into the same data base.)

4.Wayne Smith, Chief Statistician, in response to your question provided examples of the good that arises from the data collected by StatsCan.  The examples he cited would not require citizens to provide detailed personal information to StatsCan.

5.   There is a potential unsavoury underbelly:  Wayne Smith described the targeting by StatsCan of individuals in indigenous communities (the StatsCan program aimed at First Nations has been on-going for almost a decade as learned in the aftermath of media reports (2006 Census) that 35,000 First Nations people did not fill in their census form.).

Canadians need the number of people in different communities, age distribution and so on.  Some band councils have insisted that consistent with self-government, they will provide aggregate numbers to StatsCan, which is what StatsCan will tell you it deals in anyway.

There is a particular difficulty for many indigenous communities:  they wish to protect their lands.  Lockheed Martin (“Senior Management Steering Committee” for censuses, see Appended) can be seen as the “enforcer” for corporate interests, especially American resource extraction companies.  Surveillance is one of Lockheed Martin’s specialties, they have contracts with the NSA; detailed files on citizens are very helpful if RESISTANCE to the destruction of lands (ability to feed oneself and one’s family) is a factor.

The conflict between resource extraction by large corporations and the interests of local people have historically been settled by removal, one way or another, of the leadership of the populist movements that threaten the hegemony of the exploiters.

In the Canadian context I am reminded of the “incidents” on the Encana pipeline out in the bush in the vicinity of Dawson Creek (2008).  There is a history in the area of the oil and gas industry’s role in the poisoning of livestock and people by “sour gas” which is highly toxic;  remember Wiebo Ludwig and his family?   the role of propaganda in diminishing Wiebo and his attempts to resolve the sour gas poisoning through the channels offered by the Government?

The anti-terrorist squad of the RCMP was assigned to deal with the “incidents” on the pipeline near Dawson Creek.   Tom’s Lake is a First Nations community near Dawson.  In the name of finding the “terrorists”,  any rights they may have had were eliminated.  The unlawful entry into homes and interrogation of families by the RCMP (frightening to the subjects) were for the benefit of Encana.

Beneficial to citizens would have been actions to stop the poisoning of the land and its inhabitants – – the enforcement of regulations.  I am not suggesting that anyone in Tom’s Lake had anything to do with the “incidents” when I say that an existing profile of each resident of the community would have been helpful to the “anti-terrorist” squad.   They did not find the “terrorists”;  they might have found them in corporate offices in Calgary where they did not conduct any searches.

 

In summary,  consistent with the lessons of history and of police states, there is a reason why, in a democracy,  you simply do not allow the build-up of detailed personal files on citizens.

The next time you interview Wayne Smith, Chief Statistician, I suggest you review the role of “census bureaux” and detailed files on citizens beforehand – – ask him more questions that matter.   You may find Edwin Black’s book “IBM and the Holocaust” helpful.  Central to the ability of the Nazis to exterminate certain populations was the collection of large amounts of personal information and the mechanization of that (census) data through Hollerith machines and punch cards.

Best wishes,

Sandra Finley

(contact info)

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

ASIDE:  The building of detailed files on citizens is a wrong response to “terrorism”:

2016-03-22 There are two sides to the story. Why do we hear only one?  (Terrorists & Context: CIA – examples Mossadegh, Lumumba, Arbenz, Guevera, Allende)

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

APPENDED,  Excerpt from   2016-03-18   Does Lockheed Martin Corp have a role in the 2016 Census?

  1. What has StatsCan announced to the Canadian public?

StatsCan has NOT made a statement to the public to say that Lockheed Martin’s involvement at StatsCan has ended.

Such a decision would have been made at least a couple years prior, so by 2013 – 2014.

Given the significance of the issue (the three trials, Audrey Tobias, Janet Churnin, Eve Stegenga related to 2011 Census alone;  and non-compliance rates)  IF a decision was made to end Lockheed Martin’s participation at StatsCan, surely it was StatsCan’s duty to report that to the Canadian public.

I double-checked the StatsCan website.  A search on “Lockheed” shows “0 results”.   If you search “All” records, there are “4 results” two of which (appended) are Expense claims from Peter Morrison related to meetings with Lockheed Martin in 2010 and 2009.   I say with confidence that StatsCan has not made a statement to the public.

HOWEVER

 

  1. One “BUT”, leads to another “BUT”

The transcript for the Audrey Tobias trial contains a statement that Lockheed Martin is out.

If true, it would represent a huge victory for Canadians against the Military-Industrial complex.

BUT,  as evidenced by the expense claims of Peter Morrison  StatsCan is enmeshed in collaborative censuses (U.S., U.K., Australia, New Zealand, Canada  AND Lockheed Martin).  You have to be realistic in assessing the evidence given by Yves Beland (StatsCan) at the Tobias Trial.

THE TOBIAS TRANSCRIPT, LOCKHEED MARTIN IS “OUT”

See    2014-07-17 Transcript, Tobias trial establishes Lockheed Martin is OUT

The testimony of the StatsCan witness Yves Beland, Director of Census Operations Division, tells

  1. StatsCan was getting resistance to Lockheed Martin’s involvement from the beginning (2004) during the development period.
  2. StatsCan reacted by “scaling back” substantially on the Lockheed contract for the 2006 Census.
  3. StatsCan cut again, down to $20 million for the 2011 Census.
  4. Resistance continued   and so
  5. Lockheed will be completely out of it by the next census (2016).

The only source I know for “Lockheed Martin is “out””  is this transcript of the Tobias trial which ONLY A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE have seen.

So, from the transcript of the testimony by Yves Beland, StatsCan had made a decision before the Tobias trial (Oct 2013)   IN SPITE OF WHICH   StatsCan and the Justice Dept proceeded with the prosecutions of Audrey Tobias, Janet Churnin and Eve Stegenga all of whom were on trial because they objected to Lockheed Martin’s involvement in the 2011 Census.

The administration of Justice is brought into disrepute.

 

  1. StatsCan’s record on truthfulness

You have to address the StatsCan CREDIBILITY GAP in arriving at any conclusions about

Lockheed Martin’s current (2016) involvement in the  StatsCan Data Base on Canadians.

You also have to be very careful about word-smithing, as noted in the posting about Lockheed Martin is “out”.

StatsCan CREDIBILITY GAP

  • Edward Snowden and Glenn Greenwald did a good job of explaining that under the auspices of the NSA, backdoor entry to data bases is established if American “security” forces cannot obtain legal front door access.  Lockheed Martin is a contractor to the NSA. Both entities are surveillance specialists; both see themselves as being outside the rule of law.  The data base at StatsCan will contain the on-going collection of data through censuses AND surveys. Your name is on your file.  All in all, EVEN IF Lockheed Martin is “out”, a backdoor entry to the data base will be in place.

[The interest of the Americans in obtaining access to information on ALL Canadians is known through mainstream media report (Ottawa Citizen 2008).   The “President of the Americas for Lockheed Martin” is quoted in Maclean’s Magazine Sept 2006.  Lockheed’s position at StatsCan was in place by then.  Ron Covais was speaking in general when he said, The Ministers have told us, Tell us what you want, we’ll see that you get it.  This was how things were to work because as he said, they (corporates) knew they couldn’t get what they wanted through normal democratic channels; they would get it this way, working through the bureaucracy and agencies of Government.]

  • StatsCan claims that the Statistics Act gives them authority to take away citizens’ Charter Right to Privacy of Personal Information.  Most people know that Rights provided under Constitutional Law cannot be taken away by a regular act of Parliament.  Under Constitutional Law, in order for the Government to take away a Charter Right it has to meet the criteria set out in the Oakes Test.  As far as I know,  StatsCan / the Justice Dept has not applied to the Courts to see if they can meet the criteria, so the Charter Right stands. StatsCan’s assertions to citizens that the Statistics Act gives them authority to take away Charter Rights is bogus.
  • StatsCan proceeded with prosecution of 3 women AFTER the claimed decision (Lockheed Martin is “out”) was made – why would they do that if Lockheed Martin was indeed “out”?  The reason for dissent by all 3 women was Lockheed Martin’s involvement.
  • StatsCan continues to tell citizens “it is the Law”, you have to fill in (for example) the National Household Survey (formerly known as the long-form Census) when the Statistics Act says that participation in surveys is NOT mandatory (the sanctions for census non-compliance do not apply).   StatsCan uses a serious lie to intimidate and coerce citizens into providing information protected by the Charter Right.
  • They always report to the media that Census non-compliance is 2% when the figures they supplied under oath at the Tobias trial compute to 11% non-compliance.

= = = = =  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

So there we are, Matthew.  Is Lockheed Martin part of the 2016 Census?   I would say yes.  StatsCan has never made a statement to the public to say that the StatsCan contracts with Lockheed Martin have ended.   StatsCan’s credibility provides no basis for believing what they say.  So you have to figure it out.

To me, the CLINCHER is this:  Lockheed Martin is a component of the 5 Eyes partnership which commits Canada to collaboration and conformity with other nations in Census operations.

If people do not understand that this is about surveillance, they need to  read  (related to Bill C-51)   2014-09-26  Journalists and whistleblowers will go to jail under new national security laws, Australia, The Guardian. (Includes info on Five Eyes (FVEY)

= = = = =  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

APPENDED

EXCERPTS

From  http://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/about/expense/petermorrison/2010

Morrison, Peter, Assistant Chief Statistician

Travel expenses – 2010

Date Purpose Cost
January 28, 2010 ARCHIVED – Lockheed Martin Steering Committee Meeting $909.88
September 22, 2010 ARCHIVED – Corporate Business Architecture presentation to Regional Offices $1,523.32
October 11, 2010 ARCHIVED – Participate at the 2010 Meeting of the International Census Forum and Lockheed Martin Senior Management Steering Committee Meeting $2,062.94
October 21, 2010 ARCHIVED – Corporate Business Architecture presentation to Central Regional Office and visit to Regional Census Centre $1,128.14

 

From  http://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/about/expense/petermorrison/2009

Morrison, Peter, Assistant Chief Statistician

Travel expenses – 2009

Date Purpose Cost
June 17, 2009 ARCHIVED – To visit the Regional Offices in Vancouver and Edmonton $1,478.68
June 22, 2009 ARCHIVED – To attend the Steering Committee Meeting with Lockheed Martin and visit the United States Data Processing Centre (DPC) site $1,262.61
August 10, 2009 ARCHIVED – EX interviews $684.78
September 7, 2009 ARCHIVED – International Census Forum 2009 $4,369.27

 

 

 

May 062016
 

From articles appended:

  • Added to the lawsuits related to depression and suicide brought on by Accutane,  ones on bowel disease.

These are just a few of the 7,000-plus lawsuits that have been filed against Roche over the debilitating side effects of Accutane.

  • Accutane is now a generic drug sold under various names.
  • annual Accutane sales at  their peak, in 2000, were up to $759.4 million   (Appended article,  What is Accutane …?)

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

The recent CBC article on harm to fetus omits:

  • the high level of suicides associated with Accutane/Isotretinoin.   Scroll down to last article, Congressional Committee finds . . .

 

  • Accutane causes birth defects because it interferes with the body’s endocrine system.  Well,  MALES happen to have endocrine systems, not only females.  The difference is that deformed babies can be directly and easily linked to the taking of the capsules.   Uh oh – – lawsuits.

The nailing of responsibility  (cause & effect) is otherwise difficult and expensive to prove.

That said,  Accutane is known to artificially shut down the epiphyseal growth plates in bones

The largest market for acne “cures” (Accutane) is adolescent males and females.  Coincidentally this is also the time when bone growth is remarkably robust.

Statural growth can occur as long as the epiphyseal growth plates persist.  The gonadal steroids (estrogen, testosterone) cause closure of the epiphyseal growth plates in late adolescence.  The cartilage becomes entirely replaced with bone, and statural growth ceases.    (ref https://courses.washington.edu/conj/bess/growth/growth.html)

 

More than a decade ago when I questioned the Health Canada scientist responsible for the registration of Accutane, I was told that the premature shut-down of the epiphyseal caused by Accutane only happens in a small number of cases.

How would she know:

  • adverse drug effects are not well reported
  • Doctors (e.g. a sports medicine doctor) who see a patient because of skeletal pains know nothing about the side effects of a drug taken for acne.   And the patient is unlikely to associate the two.

Is anyone investigating to see what happens to the developing skeleton when a drug brings about an abrupt halt to bone growth, before it is complete?   Do we have any idea of what the longterm consequences are?

Accutane and its generic offspring are very poorly researched and regulated.  The harm done to teenagers is a sea upon which floats the harm to fetuses.

ACTION:    I sent the Accutane information to Doctors Henry and Humphrey, named in this CBC article.  And will tweet Robyn Sheremeta.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/acne-accutane-pregnancy-1.3551549

Doctors stress that a powerful drug prescribed to fight acne needs to be taken under strict guidelines to prevent serious harm to a fetus, as a new study commissioned by Health Canada points to many failures in preventing pregnancy.

Isotretinoin was commonly sold as Accutane when it entered the market in Canada in 1983 to treat severe acne, which can cause scarring such as pockmarks. The medication is now available as Accutane Roche and in several generic forms. It’s also prescribed for more moderate cases.

Since the drug can cause damage to the head, face, heart, central nervous system and limbs of a fetus, the prescribing information in Canada requires written consent from the patient, two negative pregnancy tests before treatment and the use of two reliable methods of birth control. These conditions apply to prescriptions dispensed to women of child-bearing age.

The study, published in Monday’s issue of the Canadian Medical Association Journal, suggests the pregnancy prevention program is not effective, with between 30 per cent to 50 per cent of women taking the drug not complying.

“The program is probably half as effective as it should be,” said the study’s lead author, Dr. David Henry, a senior scientist at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and a professor at the University of Toronto.

Henry and his team used hospital and vital statistical data to study 59,271 female patients aged 12 to 48 in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario for about 15 years. Over that time, nearly 1,473 pregnancies, about 100 a year, occurred during the vulnerable period during and after treatment with isotretinoin. The risky period includes any time during the 42 weeks of a pregnancy.

Pregnancy losses

Of these pregnancies, 1,331 or 90 per cent weren’t completed. The majority, 70 per cent, were medically terminated because the patient and health-care provider were worried about the risk to the fetus or had ultrasounds showing abnormalities. Another 20 per cent of the pregnancies were lost spontaneously.

Of the remaining 10 per cent of live births, a total of 11 babies or nine per cent were born with abnormalities, which amounts to one or two children each year. Researchers don’t know the severity of the abnormalities or if use of the acne drug directly caused the congenital abnormalities.

Henry said he believes greater familiarity with the effective drug, which is generally well tolerated, has led to its use in less severe cases of acne.

Robyn Sheremeta

Robyn Sheremeta says there was ‘zero monitoring’ after she was prescribed isotretinoin for her acne. (CBC)

“It should be reserved for more severe cases [of acne] because that just cuts down the number of women of childbearing age who are going to be exposed to the drug,” Henry recommended.

It’s estimated the average age of isotretinoin users in Canada is 24.

“Conjecture is that physicians who are coming through these days didn’t get the same scary messages that we did,” Henry said.

Dr. Shannon Humphrey is a dermatologist in Vancouver and a professor in the dermatology department at the University of British Columbia. She is a spokeswoman for the Acne and Rosacea Society of Canada and wasn’t involved in the study.

Humphrey said for many of her patients, the benefits of isotretinoin outweigh the risks.

“As physicians, we should not become complacent,” Humphrey said. “There are absolutely patients who have moderate acne, who’ve tried other alternatives and who are suffering, who have anxiety or depression or are not engaging in their daily life because of the stigma of acne. And for that patient, as long as they can understand the side-effect profile, as long as they can engage with the pregnancy prevention recommendations very stringently, that may very well be an ideal candidate for this medication.”

Outside of birth defects, the majority of side-effects from the drug include dry skin and sensitivity, she said. Doctors also monitor blood work to check cholesterol levels and liver function after prescribing the drug, which is generally taken for three to four months.

Dr. Shannon Humphrey

Dermatologist Dr. Shannon Humphrey says that for many of her patients, the benefits of the acne-fighting drug isotretinoin outweigh the risks. (CBC)

Now that isotretinoin is generic, there’s less emphasis on education about it for specialists, said Humphrey, who welcomes greater awareness.

Henry stressed that physicians need to be reminded of their obligations to comply with the prescribing guidance for the drug.

Robyn Sheremeta is a university student in Toronto who describes her acne as moderate and persistent. More than a year ago when she was 22, Sheremeta booked an appointment with a dermatologist at her family’s hometown in Edmonton. She thought she’d be prescribed antibiotics or another oral drug to “dull the acne.”

Sheremeta was already taking birth control pills. The dermatologist prescribed her a year’s supply of a different kind of birth control pill and mentioned using a second method when having sex, she said.

“There was zero monitoring,”  Sheremeta recalled. “I didn’t do a single pregnancy test, no blood work. I was given a four-month set of [isotretinoin] pills.”

Sheremeta completed the treatment, the acne disappeared and she now feels it is back to mild to moderate.

Both Henry and Humphrey also said pharmacists can act as a second line of defence when dispensing the drug.

One of the limitations of the study was it only captured prescriptions, including for birth control, from provincial drug benefit insurance programs.

About one-quarter to one-third of women in the study filled birth control prescriptions, which was about the same as before they started the acne treatment.

Studies in Europe also suggest that changing contraceptive behaviour among isotretinoin users is difficult, the researchers said.

A spokesman for Health Canada said pregnancy rates for women taking the drug in other international jurisdictions are similar to those reported in Canada. The department is reviewing the results of the study.

Physicians are expected to follow a manufacturer’s risk management program if one is in place, as recommended by Health Canada, said a spokeswoman for the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

Doctors are expected to practise competently and to maintain the applicable standard of practice when prescribing drugs, including when prescribing isotretinoin products, the college said.

The study was conducted by the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies, or CNODES, which is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

https://www.drugwatch.com/accutane/

http://www.accutaneaction.com/   (I don’t know if these people are still active)

We have over 2000 members who have suffered severe physical and psychiatric side effects. We are also working with similar groups in the US, Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Norway, Sweden, Italy and South Africa.

 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/roches-accutane-suit-over-death-of-congressmans-son-nixed/

By Jim Edwards MoneyWatch June 11, 2009, 4:21 PM

Roche’s Accutane: Suit Over Death of Congressman’s Son Nixed

Last Updated Jun 11, 2009 4:21 PM EDT

Roche has won a ruling insulating it from allegations that its Accutane acne drug caused the suicide of U.S. Rep. Bart Stupak‘s son. B.J. Stupak started taking Accutane in 1999. In May 2000, at age 17, he shot himself in the head. The ruling states:

Laurie Stupak [B.J.’s mother] claimed that Roche was liable under negligence and strict liability for failing to warn that its prescription acne medication Accutane could cause suicide without premonitory [warning] symptoms.

The package of Accutane that B.J. Stupak was taking warned only of “changes in mood,” although the Physician’s Desk Reference said:

… may cause depression, psychosis and, rarely, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and suicide.

The court ruled that because Roche did not know at the time that patients on Accutane could experience a desire to kill themselves without any warning signs, that the Stupaks could not sue the company:

Because Stupak has failed to identify any evidence in the record that Roche knew or should have known that Accutane could cause suicide without premonitory symptoms, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

Stupak, D-Mich., has been a critic of Accutane for years — both his sons took it. He told his story to a Congressional hearing in 2002. The Drug and Device Law blog notes that the ruling, from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals is unpublished but may nonetheless influence the trial judge to turn down other cases.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.

 

= = = = = =

 

https://www.drugwatch.com/accutane/

Last modified: October 5, 2015

What Is Accutane? Its Uses and Interactions

Accutane (isotretinoin) is a popular drug for severe acne created by Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc. The drug is linked to severe bowel disease and other side effects.

Accutane, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1982, proved to be a miracle for some, offering blemish-free skin to those who had given up after trying many other treatments.

The drug works for severe (cystic) acne, providing long-lasting and sometimes complete reduction of acne for 80 percent of patients. However, clear skin may be accompanied by serious side effects like Crohn’s disease.

Following numerous reports of adverse events – and after doctors noted potential dangers with the drug and the FDA issued a black-box warning, Roche stopped manufacturing Accutane in 2009. Generic brands of the medication — Amnesteen, Claravis and Sotret — are still available.

Uses of Accutane

Accutane is part of a class of medications called retinoids and originally was marketed as a chemotherapy drug. It is known for its ability to treat acne that has not responded to antibiotics. The medication is a derivative of vitamin A and works by controlling the oil in the sebaceous glands. The acne it treats consists of nodules with a diameter or 5 mm or greater. Having this type of acne can be socially debilitating, so the potential of a cure can be life-changing.

Undergoing Accutane treatment is a commitment of time and energy. It can take months to be effective, and patients often must deal with side effects like dry eyes and headaches. In addition, acne may worsen during the beginning stages of treatment before it starts to clear up.

Doses of Accutane range from 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg body weight per day, with a cumulative dose of greater than 100 to 120 mg/kg. Accutane comes in capsules of 10, 20 and 40 mg, and should be taken with food. Most patients take the medication for 15 to 20 weeks, and may repeat the treatment course if acne returns. Due to the risk of serious birth defects, women of child-bearing age must commit to programs aimed at preventing pregnancies during treatment.

Doctor Warnings

The first prescriptions of Accutane were written in 1982, and a year later came the first report of a baby born with malformations after Accutane was taken during pregnancy. In 1983, there were two “Dear Doctor letters” — special communications the FDA requires drug manufacturers to send out if the drug label is not complete in covering the extent and severity of side effects — sent out, alerting physicians of the possibility of birth defects. From 1984 to 1988, seven more of the letters went out.

The FDA was not alone in noting the dangers of Accutane. Dr. Frank Yoder, one of the scientists involved in the discovery of Accutane, wrote a letter to the Journal of American Medicine in 1983, informing the public of the possibility that Roche was not clear in alerting users of the toxicity associated with Accutane.

That same year, a nonprofit health advocacy group, Public Citizen, petitioned the FDA to add warnings of birth defects to Accutane labels. The FDA took action in 1985, when a black-box warning, indicating that Accutane can cause fetal deformities and possibly fetal death, was added to the medication.

By 1988, a pregnancy prevention program had been put into place, with the goal of decreasing the number of woman getting pregnant while taking the drug. The program was eventually effective in decreasing the percentage of woman getting pregnant while taking the drug, from 4 women per every 1,000 a year to less than 2 for every 1,000. However the number of prescriptions given out also increased, keeping the number of affected pregnant women taking Accutane high.

Other countries had even stricter rules about Accutane use by women of childbearing age. For example, in Britain, prior to receiving the medication, women were required to agree to have an abortion if they became pregnant during treatment.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) played a role in affirming the danger of Accutane by publishing information on the fetal toxicity of the drug, conducting a study of Accutane-exposed pregnancies to raise awareness, and sending a letter to the FDA in 1998 recommending that the drug not be sold due to these dangers. Also, the CDC division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities  received reports of infant death following maternal exposure to Accutane.

In June 2009, as the number of adverse events reported to the FDA and lawsuits from patients continued to grow, Roche stopped manufacturing Accutane. The company said it was an economic decision based on generic brands of the medication taking over the market. Accutane was recalled in 11 other countries.

Milder Side Effects of Accutane

Most people experience some measure of common side effects with Accutane use and should not be concerned unless these conditions worsen or become extremely painful. With more serious side effects, however, a doctor should be consulted immediately.

Common side effects include:
Diminished night vision Increased bone injuries due to thickened or weakened bones
Increased reaction to UV exposure Red, cracked or sore lips
Nosebleeds Changes in nails
Peeling skin Unusual hair growth or loss
Bleeding or swollen gums Fatigue
Voice changes Headache
Slow healing of cuts or sores Cold symptoms
Dry skin and eyes Muscle aches
Birth Defects Related to Accutane

The FDA gave Accutane a pregnancy rating of X, which means it should not be taken during pregnancy because there is evidence of fetal abnormalities when it is used during pregnancy. The FDA reported that infants whose mothers took Accutane were born with both internal and external abnormalities such as cleft palate, missing ears, facial dysmorphism and central nervous system malformations.

In fact, among Accutane-exposed pregnancies, 42 percent of infants suffer from birth defects.

Because of the high risk of miscarriage and deformities, the FDA worked with Roche to create programs to ensure that Accutane users were not and would not become pregnant. The first program was put into place in 2002 and was called SMART (System to Manage Accutane Related Teratogenicity).  SMART required qualification stickers on prescriptions, signed consent forms, patient education videos and information guides. In addition, doctors and pharmacists were required to read literature on the risks.

In 2006, a stricter system was put in place, called the i-PLEDGE program. The computer-based system required registration by pharmacies, doctors and patients. Within the system, negative pregnancy tests from approved labs were periodically required before medication was dispensed, prescriptions only covered 30 days at a time, and users were required to utilize two types of birth control.

According to a 2007 study funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and published in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, the rate of elective abortions for patients who got pregnant during Accutane use was 84 percent. This rate was based on 90 women, out of 8,609, who became pregnant while taking Accutane. Of the remaining pregnant women, three had spontaneous abortions, two had delivery trauma that resulted in neonatal death, and nine infants survived. One of the nine was born with face and neck abnormalities.

Gastrointestinal Disorders

Women of child-bearing age are not the only ones who have suffered after taking Accutane. Adults of all ages, as well as teenagers, have had their lives interrupted with other serious side effects, which may include inflammatory bowel disease and suicidal behavior.

Roche maintains that it was not aware of side effects relating to inflammatory bowel disease, however, early animal trials of Accutane by Roche showed evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding in dogs. Another early study by Roche of 523 patients found that 21 percent experienced gastrointestinal disorders.

Since Accutane’s release, many patients have sued after developing gastrointestinal conditions, mainly consisting of inflammatory bowel diseases that come in two forms. One is ulcerative colitis, associated with inflammation of the digestive tract and ulcers in the large intestine and rectum. The other is Crohn’s disease, which may develop anywhere in the intestinal tract and can cause fistulas and bowel obstructions. Both conditions can be devastating, causing patients to suffer for years from symptoms like vomiting, rectal bleeding and diarrhea. In addition, patients may require surgery to remove parts of the bowel.

Suicide

Psychiatric problems have also been linked to Accutane use. From 1982 to May 2000, the FDA received hundreds of reports linking isotretinoin use to depression, including 37 suicides, 110 hospitalizations for depression or suicidal behavior, and 284 cases of non-hospitalized depression. Roche responded to the reports of depression and suicide in 1998 by adding a warning to the medication’s label stating that Accutane could cause psychiatric disorders.

According to a study in the book Drug Injury: Liability, Analysis and Prevention, Drs. Donald Marks and Tzarina Middlekoop found that the number of formal adverse reaction reports, from national and international health agencies, of suicide and suicidal behavior associated with Accutane use reached 500, making it the fourth highest number of adverse reactions in the United States prior to 2005. The mechanism of action that makes Accutane cause psychiatric events is not fully understood, nor has a link between depression and Accutane been proven. However, the high number of reports of depression in people without a psychiatric history suggests there is a link.

Accutane Lawsuits

Kamie Kendall, a New Jersey Accutane user who was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, won a verdict of $10.5 million in 2008. That verdict was later vacated.

In 2010, another bowel disease case involving Accutane was decided in Atlantic City, N.J., when Andrew McCarrell – who required five surgeries and the removal of his colon— was awarded $25.16 million. Roche is appealing.

In 2012, also in Atlantic City, two more claimants who developed bowel disease, Kathleen Rossitto and Riley Wilkinson, were awarded $9 million each for damages. Roche is also appealing these verdicts.

These are just a few of the 7,000-plus lawsuits that have been filed against Roche over the debilitating side effects of Accutane.

While some claimants receive millions — for damages and medical expenses — the numbers do not compare to the company’s revenue from selling the dangerous drug. For example, annual Accutane sales at  their peak, in 2000, were up to $759.4 million.

Lawsuits against Roche are not limited to bowel disease. They also come from patients and families of patients who have experienced side effects such as birth defects, depression and suicide attempts. Because warnings were added slowly between the time Accutane was released in 1982 and the time it was discontinued in 2009, some cases hinge on the dates that the medication was prescribed, when health concerns were diagnosed, and when warnings were publicized.

 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = =

http://www.rense.com/general32/scu.htm

(copied, a UPI article)

Congressional Committee Finds Accutane Causes Suicide

By Steve Mitchell

UPI Medical Correspondent

12-12-2   (2002)

WASHINGTON (UPI) — A congressional oversight committee’s two-year investigation released Wednesday has found the acne drug Accutane frequently has been associated with suicide.

The investigation also made public an internal FDA memo from 1998 recommending the drug be taken off the market due to its potential to cause birth defects.

Staffers on the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on oversight and investigations spent hundreds of hours culling internal memos, reports and e-mails obtained from the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as from Accutane’s manufacturer, Roche U.S. Pharmaceuticals, part of Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., of Nutley, N.J.

More than 200 people have taken their lives while taking Accutane — and perhaps many more — but neither the FDA nor Roche has ever publicly admitted the suicides were due to the drug.

“This investigation leads to one conclusion: In some cases … Accutane results in severe cases of depression, suicide ideation, suicide attempts and suicide,” said Bart Stupak, R-Mich. Stupak’s son, B.J., died in 2000 from a self-inflicted gunshot wound while taking Accutane.

“If the FDA cannot or will not regulate Accutane, … then it is imperative for the U.S. Congress to act to protect the American public,” Stupak said.

Committee members grilled representatives from FDA and Roche on the findings of their investigation, charging both have failed to protect the public from the known risks of Accutane. Both denied the suicide link and said a new plan instituted earlier this year will lower the incidence of birth defects.

Accutane, first approved in 1982, is intended to be used as a last resort to treat severe forms of acne that cause scarring and cysts. It often works miracles, as patients have attested, because it can clear up their skin in a matter of months. However, the drug carries serious side effects. It is known to cause birth defects and an unknown percentage of people using the drug have developed depression and committed suicide.

The FDA and Roche maintained there is no scientific proof the drug caused the depression or suicide cases — although the labeling on the drug specifically warns of both possibilities. The FDA has confirmed 167 cases of suicide in people taking Accutane. Stupak said his office sent 37 more cases to the agency last week. He said, however, internal FDA documents suggested this was less than 1 percent of the total number of suicides by people on Accutane, indicating the real number could range from 2,000 to as high as 20,000.

Stupak also cited a 1994 FDA memo discussing a teleconference call with Roche. It said Roche concurred with the agency that there does appear to be a problem with Accutane and depression and suicide.

Roche’s president and CEO George Abercrombie said he was not familiar with the memo or the teleconference call.

Accutane also is known to cause birth defects, such as ear deformities — including a lack of an inner and outer ear — fatal heart defects and mental retardation. The committee obtained internal memos from the CDC and FDA that said risk of birth defects is so dangerous the drug should not be allowed to be sold. A CDC official wrote in a 1998 letter to the FDA that Accutane is just as serious a cause of birth defects as the cancer and leprosy drug thalidomide, and “we simply need to remove the drug from the market.”

Another FDA internal memo, written in 1998, said, “Accutane poses a significant public health threat and as such should be withdrawn from the market.”

The memos notwithstanding, the FDA has attempted to put provisions in place to inform women of this risk and warn them not to become pregnant while taking the drug. Despite these efforts, and warnings to physicians to prescribe the drug only for the most serious form of acne, the investigation found 90 percent of women who received the drug suffered only mild acne and nearly half of all prescriptions went to teens with mild cases of acne.

Pressed by committee members on this, FDA’s Janet Woodcock, director of the agency’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said, “A proportion of people treated with this drug in the last decade had mild acne and should’ve been treated with other drugs.”

Roche’s Abercrombie disagreed, saying, “we believe the vast majority of use is” appropriate and in people who have severe acne.

The FDA has no control over how a drug is prescribed and physicians are essentially left to their own discretion to decide whether to limit a drug to the use for which it is approved.

Stupak noted although thalidomide is not used by women likely to have children, it is tightly controlled and regulated with a system that requires the physician, the pharmacist and the patient to be registered. “Yet, Accutane is not tightly controlled like thalidomide, and Accutane is marketed to women of child-bearing years despite its horrendous record of causing birth defects,” he said.

The FDA estimated about 2,000 pregnancies per year occur in women taking Accutane. Roche disputed that number, saying only about 2,300 pregnancies have occurred, in total, since the drug first became available 20 years ago.

“Roche isn’t telling the truth on that,” Stupak told United Press Interational. During the hearing, he cited a 1999 report from Roche that mentioned 93 pregnancies affected and 42 abortions in women taking the drug during only one-quarter of that year.

The FDA has worked with Roche to develop a new plan called the System to Manage Accutane Related Teratogenicity, or SMART, that began in April. This requires women to get a pregnancy test each month, receive repeat counseling about birth defects, and agree to use two forms of contraception while on Accutane. This new program will help curtail pregnancies in women on the drug and, therefore, birth defects, Woodcock said.

However, Lynn Martinez of the birth defects program at the Organization of Teratology Information Services, a national group that tracks prenatal exposures, said her organization is still getting calls from women who have become pregnant while taking Accutane even after the SMART program has gone into effect.

Many experts testifying before the subcommittee called for a mandatory registration similar to the thalidomide system. They urged that doctors, pharmacists and individuals taking the drug be required to register. This has been employed in Europe for Accutane and there are nearly no birth defects associated with the drug in that region, Stupak said.

FDA’s Woodcock said such requirements would violate patient confidentiality and, by making the drug harder to get, would only create a black market. Pressed on this by the subcommittee, she admitted there was no evidence tighter restrictions would lead to a black market.

The investigation also found Accutane is being purchased in Mexico and brought illegally into the United States, and it is available on approximately 40 Internet Web sites, where individuals can order it without a prescription or being informed of the risks, Stupak said.

Roche could help crack down on these illegally sold products simply by purchasing some of them and using the tracking codes on packaging to determine where they originated, Stupak told UPI. He noted Pfizer did something similar with its drug Viagra to curtail illicit sales.

Roche relies on regulatory and law enforcement agencies to control the illegal sales of Accutane, Abercrombie said. “As soon as we are made aware of illegal distribution, … we immediately turn that information over to the appropriate authorities,” he said.

The committee also faulted Roche for its ads targeting consumers, given the serious consequences that can result from the drug and the assumption by the medical community that patients should be strictly warned of the side effects.

Although the ads do not mention Accutane specifically, the purpose of the ads was to make consumers aware there were treatments for severe acne, Abercrombie said.

“What you just said is not a truthful statement,” said Peter Deutsch, D-Fla. He held up a Roche ad depicting a teenage male who did not appear to have acne. “You’re beyond the straight-face test, I’m sorry,” he added.

If FDA fails to regulate Accutane adequately, Congress could pass legislation regulating Internet sales of pharmaceuticals, requiring the FDA to more closely monitor people taking this drug and requiring the FDA to do a better job of controlling illegal importation of drugs, Stupak told UPI.

In response to the committee’s investigation, the FDA announced this week that it was placing importation restrictions on Accutane and warned consumers not to buy it over the Internet.

To add to the list of problems associated with Accutane, the FDA recently made the decision to include the risk of violent and aggressive behavior on the list of warnings on labeling.

 

Copyright © 2002 United Press International. All rights reserved.