Sandra Finley

Jan 112025
 

 

Canadian Friends and Colleagues:

 

There is a great documentary film, “Atomic Reaction”, that can be viewed on CBC Gem as of January 10.

It features Gordon Edwards, Robert Del Tredici, Faye More, Peter Van Wyck, Cindy Gilday and other notable Canadians.

 

It tells the story of Canada’s involvement in the development of the world’s first atomic bombs, and the subsequent buildup in nuclear weapons during the Cold War.

 

In particular it focuses on the town of Port Hope, Ontario, where (in the early years of World War II) a radium refinery was converted into a uranium refinery to meet the military needs of the World War II Atomic Bomb Project, called “The Manhattan Project” by the USA and “Tube Alloys” by Great Britain. The radioactive ore was mined on the Eastern end of Great Bear Lake — a place that came to be known as Port Radium — starting in 1931. The ore was carried on the backs of Indigenous men from the Sahtu Dene nation, loaded onto a barge for the eight-hour trip across the Lake to the western end. The Indigenous ore carriers rested on the sacks of radioactive material and then unmopaded the ore from the Lake barge onto a river barge, eventually being shipped over 3000 kilometres to the Eldorado company headquarters at Port Hope on the north shore of Lake Ontario.

 

Atomic Reaction is 89 minutes long.

Atomic Reaction | Films | CBC Gem

 

Unfortunately, CBC Gem is not available to viewers outside of Canada!  (INSERT, sandra:  for political reasons)

 

In the film, the story of the bomb is interspersed with the ongoing radioactive cleanup of the town of Port Hope following massive and widespread radioactive contamination caused by the careless dumping of refinery waste into the Port Hope harbour, the town’s public beach, several deep ravines freely accessible to children and pets, as well as the use of huge quantities of radioactive waste material in the construction of roadways, over 1000 homes, several schools, civic buildings, and municipal dumps such as the one at Port Granby, as well as the Monkey Mountain and Welcome dumps. At a cost of 1.2 billion dollars which has now escalated to more than twice that amount, the federal “cleanup” of Port Hope has recently had its licence extended for another 10 years, as tens of thousands of trees are being cleared to access and remove the arsenic and uranium contamination underneath them.

 

Of course, radioactive waste cannot be destroyed or neutralized by any practical and affordable method known to science, it can only be moved from one place to another and repackaged or consolidated to make it less available to the environment. The end result is two gigantic earthen mounds — one at Port Hope and one at Port Granby — containing most of the township’s radioactive and other toxic waste, in so-called “engineered mounds” that are designed to last for about 500 years. The wastes themselves remain dangerous for much longer periods of time, many millennia. It is acknowledged that the mounds are not a permanent solution. After a few centuries a decision will have to be made as to what should be done next.

 

The documentary does not address the story of the federal government’s Siting Task Force, which spent 8 years and several millions of dollars trying to find a “willing host community” somewhere in Ontario to receive all of Port Hope’s radioactive waste for a more permanent disposal (never clearly specified). This was considered necessary because an Environmental Assessment Panel had determined that the geography and geology of the Port Hope area was not acceptable for permanent storage of long-lived radioactive waste. The search for a willing host community involved many potential candidates, willing to learn more about the concept, including many communities in Northwestern Ontario such as Atikokan.

 

Ultimately, the Siting Task Force came up empty-handed. There was not a single community that was willing to accept the Port Hope wastes, except for the nuclear “bedroom community” of Chalk River/Deep River on the Ottawa River. However, the geology/ geography was not much better than that off Port Hope, and the Chalk River folks drove too hard a bargain that the Siting Task Force found unacceptable. So the “two mounds” solution is really a kind of “booby prize” — a fallback approach because the first plan flopped.

 

Now the two giant radioactive  mounds for the naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) of Port Hope/Port Granby are being used by Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) to build a similar enormous “engineered mound” to house about a million tons of toxic waste, much of it human0-made post-fission radioactive waste, about one kilometre from the Ottawa River. CNL: (which is also in charge of the Port Hope “cleanup”) is owned and run by a consortium of multinational corporations headed by Atkins-Réalis (the latter-day reincarnation of SNC-Lavalin) and two Texas giants, Fluor and Jacibs, that are deeply involved in military nuclear projects as well as intractable radioactive contamination nightmares such as those at Hanford Washington and Sellafiield England. In 2023, the US Government Accounting Office (GAO) estimated the cost off the Hanford Cleanuop to be somewhere between $300 billion and $640 billion! Yet the Canadian Government calls nuclear energy “clean”.

 

But I digress. “Atomic Reaction” is a fine documentaly film that does a great job of breaking the surface of the profound and complex nuclear saga of Port Hope Ontario.

 

To view the film on CBC Gem you have to establish an account on the internet. It’s free.

 

Gordon Edwards.

 

 

 

 

Jan 102025
 
From  Tamara Ugolini,  Rebel News:

This week, I attended a police disciplinary hearing for Helen Grus, who is being investigated for and charged with discreditable conduct for attempting to probe a string of sudden infant deaths after the rollout of the novel COVID-19 mRNA injections.

Grus has faced approximately 30 hearing days, spanning two years, for allegedly accessing the Ottawa Police Service (OPS) database without authorization. If found guilty, it could mean a demotion or termination for the 20-year OPS veteran.

Her case has raised great interest among the policing community, with many retired police officers regularly attending her hearings.

That includes Rob Stocki, who called the entire investigation a “terrible miscarriage of justice.”

Take a look:

Grus had a spotless record and was part of the Child Abuse and Sexual Assault Unit at the OPS — a unit responsible for investigating instances of sudden, unexplained deaths in children under the age of five.

Stocki pointed out that Grus’ investigation fell well within her mandate to look into these questionable deaths. But, she ran afoul of her superiors, who wanted to put a stop to any investigations to do with COVID.

Through it all, Grus has been saddled with the financial burden of this political prosecution while being dragged through the mud by her employer and state-funded media.

I will continue to follow how these hearings progress and will report what I learn at RebelFieldReports.com. If you find value in this coverage, please consider supporting our independent journalism with a donation on that website.

Yours truly,

Tamara Ugolini

P.S. At Rebel News, we don’t take a dime from the government — we rely entirely on our generous viewers to fund our work. If you appreciate reports like this one, where we go into the field to get the other side of the story, you can make a donation at RebelFieldReports.com.

Jan 092025
 
I think this is evidence that Government-supported media is being forced to REPORT what people in a democracy NEED.
BUT:  it takes too long to dig through to confirm that CP received Government support money during the covid years?  Do you know?
LETHBRIDGE, Alta. — One of two men who became the faces of a blockade at a key Alberta border crossing in 2022 offered a public apology Thursday at the end of sentencing arguments.
e58dd2deb5508f40d3ad5b4ae3cc52ca0c26810c9b94d66b09a969b66ee41fb6
A sentencing hearing is to start Thursday for three men convicted of helping co-ordinate the border blockade at Coutts, Alta., in 2022 in protest of COVID-19 rules and restrictions. A truck adorned with Canadian and American flags is shown at the blockade, Wednesday, Feb. 2, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh

LETHBRIDGE, Alta. — One of two men who became the faces of a blockade at a key Alberta border crossing in 2022 offered a public apology Thursday at the end of sentencing arguments.

“As one of the protesters, I understand that our actions, well intended to voice our concerns on important issues, adversely affected the daily lives of many in Milk River and Coutts. For this I am sincerely sorry,” said Gerhard (George) Janzen at the end of the day, reading from a prepared statement.

“I acknowledge that during our protests, laws were broken. This was not in line with our intentions to promote change through peaceful and lawful means.”

Janzen, Marco Van Huigenbos and a third man — Alex Van Herk — were found guilty last year of mischief over $5,000 for their actions at the protest over COVID-19 measures and vaccine mandates.

The sentencing hearing went ahead for Van Huigenbos and Janzen. Lawyer Michael Johnston told court that Van Herk had fired him, and a 30-day delay was granted for Van Herk to obtain new counsel.

The Crown told court that the two men need to do jail time to send a message that actions have consequences.

Prosecutor Steven Johnston said Van Huigenbos and Janzen put themselves front and centre at the illegal blockade, which shut down the Canada-U.S. border at Coutts for two weeks.

Johnston recommended Van Huigenbos be sentenced to nine months and Janzen six months.

He told Justice Keith Yamauchi that Van Huigenbos was more to blame, as he was in a leadership position.

“These two men are not at the same level,” Johnston told the first day of the two-day hearing.

“It is the Crown’s view that, realistically, the most appropriate sentence for these gentlemen is to sentence them to a term of jail — real jail.

“You can’t break the law and not expect to be punished for it.”

Brendan Miller, the lawyer representing Van Huigenbos, told court his client’s underlying motive was political advocacy and the desire to be heard by the government.

He asked for an absolute or conditional discharge, a suspended sentence with probation or community service.

If the court decides jail time is warranted, Miller said, then the sentence should be short or a conditional sentence of 60 days to be served in the community.

“Mr. Van Huigenbos’s right to equality before the law will be violated if he is not put in the same position of the hundreds of … protesters that the RCMP did not charge and the Crown did not prosecute,” Miller said.

“Why should this court send these gentlemen to jail and give them a criminal record when the police decided not to charge the 300 principal offenders. It’s not fair. It’s unequal.”

He said his client didn’t physically participate in the blockade or instruct protesters. Van Huigenbos simply showed up and negotiated with the RCMP on behalf of the main protesters, said Miller.

The Crown said it’s an aggravating factor that the men were motivated by politics.

“Politically motivated crime always is a calculated decision … we don’t change our governments in this country through criminal acts,” Johnston said.

“This was the hostage taking of a highway with the goal of creating political change.”

Alan Honner, who is representing Janzen, said he would also like his client to be given an absolute discharge, a fine or a suspended sentence, saying his client played just a minor role at the blockade.

“You should reject any submissions that Mr. Janzen should be incarcerated,” Honner said.

The courtroom was packed Thursday, and about a dozen police officers on bicycles were outside.

Calgary pastor Artur Pawlowski, who was also convicted of mischief for a speech he gave to protesters at Coutts, said he was praying that Van Huigenbos and Janzen wouldn’t suffer jail time.

Defence lawyers didn’t call evidence during the trial, and Van Huigenbos, Janzen and Van Herk didn’t testify.

Mounties told the jury that, as the protest dragged on, officers increasingly turned to the three men to negotiate. The Crown argued the trio became the faces of the blockade and spoke on behalf of protesters.

In a separate case, protesters Anthony Olienick and Chris Carbert were charged with conspiracy to murder police officers at the blockade.

In September, a jury found them not guilty of that offence but convicted them of possessing a firearm dangerous to the public peace and mischief over $5,000. Olienick was also convicted of possessing a pipe bomb.

They were each sentenced to 6 1/2 years behind bars. Their mischief convictions netted concurrent terms of six months.

Yamauchi said he would deliver his sentence Friday afternoon.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 9, 2025.

Bill Graveland, The Canadian Press

Jan 092025
 

In his announcement this week, Mark Zuckerberg claimed Facebook would end its third-party “fact-checking” program . . .  to “restore free expression” across Facebook, Instagram and Meta platforms.

He admitted Facebook had “gone too far” with its “fact-checking.”

Interesting timing…less than 24 hours after Children’s Health Defense asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear our censorship lawsuit against Facebook.

Most of the censorship we faced had to do with COVID-related posts — posts about vaccine injuries, alternate treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, competing theories about whether COVID originated in nature or leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China.

Facebook silenced the debates. It shut down the “free expression” and exchange of information.

And it did it by kicking CHD — and many of you! — off Facebook and Instagram. To keep us from raising questions and sharing facts.

CHD eagerly awaits action by Mark Zuckerberg to reinstate our censored and banned accounts and those of many others. However, our work doesn’t stop there.

How many lives were lost or forever changed due to the censorship of critical information?

Where is the justice for our children and our loved ones?

Returning our right to free speech is not enough, it’s only the beginning.

We will not stop this fight until justice is served.

 

Mary Holland
CEO
Children’s Health Defense
Dec 242024
 

Thank goodness for the overwhelming number of GOOD people willing to set the record straight.

This is for soon-to-be  MOTHERS AND FATHERS.   Please  circulate it.   I don’t know how else they will be likely to ever know.

 

Agency Capture

‘RFK, Polio Vaccines, the Media and Me’: Lawyer Corrects New York Times Misinformation

Attorney Aaron Siri set the record straight in a Wall Street Journal op-ed after The New York Times and other media outlets falsely implied he had asked the FDA, on behalf of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to revoke the license for the polio vaccine.

new york times website and aaron siri

Listen to this article    Download    00:00/04:22

Editor’s note: This article is part of a series of articles by The Defender responding to the latest media coverage of vaccines, triggered by the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

An attorney associated with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday accused mainstream media of “deliberately stoking fear and outrage about vaccines in an attempt to derail Donald Trump’s nomination” of Kennedy for secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

In an op-ed published in The Wall Street Journal, Aaron Siri said a recent New York Times report mischaracterized three narrow petitions his firm filed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The petitions raised concerns about specific versions of three different vaccines, including one polio vaccine.

Contrary to the Times headline, “Kennedy’s Lawyer Has Asked the F.D.A. to Revoke Approval of the Polio Vaccine,” the petitions did not ask the FDA to revoke the polio or any other vaccine.

The Times also wrongly implied that Siri filed the petitions on behalf of Kennedy.

“The attempts to stoke fear are based on legal work I did for a different client, which I never discussed with Mr. Kennedy,” Siri wrote.

Although Siri said he has worked for Kennedy, including representing Kennedy’s presidential campaign, he filed the FDA petitions on behalf of another client — Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN).

Siri explained that one of the petitions he filed on behalf of ICAN related to IPOL, one of six polio-containing vaccines currently licensed by the FDA. The drug protects people from severe symptoms but does not stop transmission.

Citing FDA documents, Siri wrote that IPOL was licensed for children based on a clinical trial with no control group and only three days of safety review after injection. That is “patently insufficient” to determine possible effects on growing children, he said. Most drugs go through multiyear placebo-controlled trials.

ICAN’s petition asked the FDA to require a proper trial for IPOL, especially given that under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 IPOL’s manufacturer, Sanofi, is protected from liability for injuries caused by the vaccine.

Siri wrote:

“No one, least of all our client, wants anyone to have polio. The goal is simply to ensure that vaccines are subject to proper testing for safety and efficacy. The media’s outrage should be directed at the FDA, which licensed a novel vaccine after collecting so little data.”

ICAN filed a second petition with the FDA pertaining to the use of two hepatitis B vaccines for infants and toddlers. The FDA licensed the vaccines based on trials with no control group and monitored the trial participants for side effects for a period of only five or fewer days after vaccination.

“The media again ignored this serious safety gap while making it appear that our client sought to eliminate all hepatitis B vaccines, which isn’t anywhere close to being true,” Siri wrote.

ICAN filed the third petition in response to a peer-reviewed study that found the amount of aluminum adjuvant — a cytotoxic and neurotoxic vaccine ingredient added to generate a stronger immune response — in 13 vaccines did not match the amount listed on the FDA-approved label.

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

Please Donate Today

The petition asked the FDA to confirm that the vaccines were accurately labeled or to pause their distribution until it could do so.

Siri wrote:

“This shouldn’t have been a controversial request. Everyone should agree that the label on a product that is injected into babies should reflect what is in the vial. It is hard to see how anyone can read these petitions and not share these concerns.”

Since Congress passed the 1986 act, the number of vaccines the CDC recommends for children during their first year of life has jumped from three to 29, Siri wrote.

During that time rates of chronic diseases among children have skyrocketed.

Siri concluded:

“We must be able to raise valid questions about vaccines without fear that anyone who deviates from the accepted orthodoxy will be smeared as a radical. There are many issues that divide Americans, but drug and vaccine safety should unite us.

“The media should take a second look at what vaccine-safety advocates are actually saying. Then we can have a scientifically informed national conversation about how to ensure that the medications we give our children are safe.”

Dec 222024
 

A good interview.  The details of the situation are important.

Scarlett Martyn, a Toronto paramedic with 23 years of experience, is the spokeswoman for a class-action lawsuit on behalf of United Health Care Workers of Ontario (UHCWO) against the Victorian Order of Nurses, His Majesty the King in Right of Ontario, and Dr. Kieran Michael Moore, Ontario’s chief medical officer of health.  . . .

The claim names Chief Medical Officer of Health Kieran Moore, seeking damages for wrongful dismissal, breach of contract, aggravated and punitive damages, misfeasance in office, and other violations related to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

https://www.rebelnews.com/ousted_healthcare_workers_file_class_action_against_ontario_s_vaccine_mandate?utm_campaign=rrup_122024&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel

Dec 212024
 

Just scroll down to the Abstract  (in capital letters)

American Government website:

https://search.worldcat.org/search?q=ti%3AGUERRILLA%20WARFARE

 NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.

Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

GUERRILLA WARFARE

NCJ Number

63667

Author(s)

C GUEVARA

Date Published

1961

Length

127 pages

Annotation

A HANDBOOK OF PRINCIPLES OF GUERRILLA WARFARE OUTLINES ORGANIZATION, STRATEGY, AND TACTICS FOR A SUCCESSFUL INSURGENCY.

Abstract

THIS HANDBOOK FOR REVOLUTIONARIES STRESSES THE NEED FOR HIGH MORALE, DISCIPLINE, EXCEPTIONAL LEADERSHIP, AND FAITH IN FINAL VICTORY IF GUERRILLAS ARE TO LEAD THE PEOPLE TO REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE. IN DISCUSSING THE FORMATION OF THE NUCLEUS OF A REVOLUTIONARY BAND, THE VOLUME PRESENTS PRACTICAL ADVICE ABOUT THE IDEAL NUMBER IN THE BAND, KIND OF PERSONS NEEDED, ADEQUATE PREPARATION, STRICT SECRECY, LIFE AS ASCETICS, USE AND CARE OF FIREARMS, CAREFUL PHYSICAL TRAINING, AND SECURE HOUSING. THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF GUERRILLA WARFARE ARE DESCRIBED WITH DETAILED DISCUSSION OF THE CUBAN EXPERIENCE, OF THE ESSENCE OF GUERRILLA WARFARE AND OF THE COROLLARY LAWS NEEDED TO CARRY IT FORWARD, REASONS THE GUERRILLA FIGHTS, LOCATION OF THE FIGHT ON FAVORABLE AND UNFAVORABLE GROUND, AND SUBURBAN WARFARE. THE GUERRILLA FIGHTER IS A SOCIAL REFORMER. THE DISCUSSION OF THE FIGHTER HIMSELF INCLUDES MOTIVES AND METHODS, ORGANIZATION INTO BANDS, AND THE COURSE OF A GUERRILLA WAR. ORGANIZATION OF THE GUERRILLA FRONT INVOLVES SUPPLY, PARTICULARLY FROM SOURCES IMMEDIATELY AT HAND, THE CIVIL ORGANIZATION ROLE OF WOMEN, MEDICAL PROBLEMS, SABOTAGE AS ONE OF THE INVALUABLE WEAPONS OF A PEOPLE WHO FIGHT IN GUERRILLA FORM, WAR INDUSTRY, PARTICULARLY PROVIDING SHOES FOR THE GUERRILLAS, PROPAGANDA, INTELLIGENCE, TRAINING AND INDOCTRINATION. AN ORDER OF BATTLE, AND METHODS OF DISCIPLINARY PUNISHMENT CONCLUDE ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS. AN EPILOGUE ANALYZES THE CUBAN SITUATION AND ITS FUTURE (1961). ILLUSTRATIONS ACCOMPANY THE TEXT. (RFC)

Corporate Author

Monthly Review Press

Address

122 West 27th Street, New York, NY 10001, United States

Publication Format

Book (Hardbound)

Language

English

Country

United States of America

Note

BOOK OUT OF PRINT.

 

 

Dec 202024
 

Arkansas lawmakers are weighing legislation that could pierce the pharmaceutical industry’s federal liability shield for vaccine injuries by holding corporate executives criminally liable for “vaccine harms” if they concealed evidence of risks associated with a vaccine that subsequently seriously injured or killed the recipient.

arkansas flag, vaccine bottle and word "liability"

Listen to this article    Download    00:00/07:10

Arkansas lawmakers are weighing legislation that could pierce the pharmaceutical industry’s federal liability shield for vaccine injuries by holding corporate executives criminally liable for “vaccine harms” if they concealed evidence of risks associated with a vaccine that subsequently seriously injured or killed the recipient.

Under Senate Bill 6, introduced by Republican State Sen. Bryan King, an executive officer of a pharmaceutical company that “knowingly hides, conceals, omits, or otherwise withholds evidence, documentation, or information that the vaccine has dangerous effects,” would be found guilty of a felony and face a prison sentence of one year to life.

The bill is pending before the Arkansas Senate. King also introduced Senate Bill 5, to hold Pharma executives criminally liable for “prescription drug harm.”

Previous versions of both bills unanimously passed last year in the Arkansas Senate but died in the Arkansas House.

Ray Flores, senior outside counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), welcomed the proposed legislation. He told The Defender:

“Regarding vaccines and other health-related issues, the public is increasingly frustrated with the impervious protection current law and corporate structure afford. The time is ripe to single out those ultimate decision-makers who benefit the most.

“This is an attempt, done properly through legislation, to address that powerlessness currently radiating throughout society.”

California-based healthcare attorney Rick Jaffe called the proposed legislation “an excellent jumping-off point for the serious discussion the country needs to have about vaccines.”

King’s office did not respond to The Defender’s request for comment by press time.

 

Federal liability shield may not protect against criminal charges

Two federal laws provide civil immunity to vaccine manufacturers.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 grants manufacturers broad protection from civil liability for injuries resulting from vaccines listed on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s childhood immunization schedule.

Under the 1986 act, people injured by these vaccines can file a claim under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

Vaccines like the COVID-19 shots, introduced as an “emergency countermeasure” to address a public health emergency, are covered under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act).

Under the PREP Act, manufacturers and other “covered persons” — including doctors, nurses and pharmacists who administer the vaccines — are exempt from liability. Vaccine injury claims for this category of vaccines are filed with the federal Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program.

In an analysis for TrialSite News, attorney Steven O’Connor suggested the proposed Arkansas bill could bypass the federal civil liability shields for vaccine makers.

“While Pharma execs and their firms face sturdy protections against civil liability for vaccine issues, there is no comparable protection for criminal liability,” O’Connor wrote.

“With much of the nation concerned about inadequate safety and efficacy research for our COVID-19 vaccines, Arkansas may be leading the way in a societal shift which will put more onus” on Big Pharma “to act in a transparent, and non-misleading, fashion,” O’Connor added.

O’Connor noted that corporations can be charged with crimes and their executives can, in many instances, also “face charges for actions of the business as a whole.” He cited a March report by Public Citizen that showed an “uptick” in corporate prosecutions since 2022.

O’Connor cited recent U.S. Department of Justice charges against “a swath of defendants relating to distribution of almost 70 million opioid pills” as an example of how Pharma executives can be held criminally liable. Five Pharma distributor executives are among the defendants facing federal charges.

“If criminal activity occurred during the development, manufacturing, distribution and post-administration surveillance of vaccines, the corporate leaders should be held criminally responsible,” said Dr. Joel Wallskog, a Wisconsin orthopedic surgeon who no longer practices due to injuries he sustained from the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. “If there is evidence that they committed criminal acts and put profits before people, they should serve time in prison.”

Wallskog, co-chairman of React19, a nonprofit representing vaccine injury victims, said the key is to get some of these cases into court, where they may uncover evidence implicating the government and federal regulatory bodies in addition to pharmaceutical company executives.

“The discovery process would be very interesting, to know who in government and Pharma knew what and when about the failure of the vaccines to prevent infection and transmission, and the alarming incidence of adverse events,” Wallskog said.

Wallskog said the Arkansas legislation would serve as “a way for those Americans injured by the COVID-19 shots to seek some financial remedy.”

This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

Please Donate Today

Law could face obstacles

Arkansas’s proposed bill could face obstacles, said Kim Mack Rosenberg, general counsel for CHD.

“The acts introduced in Arkansas are interesting but also, in my reading, somewhat vague and they leave open many questions and terms — such as what it means to introduce a product to market — that are not defined.”

Rosenberg also noted that the bills will have a limited duration, as they would expire at the end of 2026.

Dr. Meryl Nass, founder of Door to Freedom, told The Defender she “salutes Sen. King for creating this new class of crime” but also pointed out that the proposed legislation “does not involve financial penalties.”

“Should there not be a civil crime of vaccine harm in which injured civilians could receive monetary benefits from the pharmaceutical company officers or the company itself?” Nass asked.

Jaffe said the Arkansas bill “aims unnecessarily high” by exclusively targeting executives.

“I’m not sure how many presidents of Pharma companies know about the specifics of the clinical trials, so they could be exonerated on the knowledge requirement,” Jaffe said. “I think the law should be broadened out to make sure it can target the division heads and people who actually know about the adverse effects and may have hidden them from their superiors.”

And Flores suggested that, at least for vaccines covered under the PREP Act, federal law might supersede Arkansas state law. “The PREP Act’s blanket protection … would most likely extend to those who commit such crimes concerning COVID-19 vaccines since a covered person is immune from suit and liability.”

Jaffe called the proposed laws positive, despite their flaws. “I’d like to see more states propose the same kind of law,” Jaffe said. “If enough states do that, maybe Congress will get involved for national legislation.”

Rosenberg agreed:

“Τhe larger questions these acts raise certainly need to be addressed and, I think, represent a growing recognition by Americans that there are serious and potentially criminal actions taken by pharmaceutical interests and others in the health/medical field and that, for example, what happened with opioids may not be as exceptional, unfortunately, as many people thought.

“The population’s distrust is growing and the lack of transparency and liability in many instances only fuels that distrust.”