Sandra Finley

Reply to Ashu’s 2016-03-09 Request for particulars: harassment, threats & coercion of others

 X1B Postings  No Responses »
Oct 232015
 

THREATENS TO TAKE TO COURT,  COERCION.  People feel harassed.  Etc.(REPLY TO MARCH 9, 2016 REQUEST FOR PARTICULARS)

MY DRAFT MATERIAL

= = = = = = = =

Court File Number   QB No. 500 of 2015

 

In Reply to “Request for Particulars”, March 9, 2016, the Plaintiff Ashu Solo demands

particulars of the “other individuals” that the Plaintiff is alleged to have targeted, threatened, or intimidated, as claimed at paragraphs 17 and 18 of the Statement of Defence.

 “17. … Finley was advised that Solo’s conduct included some or all of: …

  1. Numerous emails to the person which included some of all of the following characteristics: … 
  1. threatening legal action

Particulars:

  1. December 18, 2013, Ashu Solo to Daeran Gall:

I am writing to notify you of my intention to take you, Sandra Finley, Tonia Zimmerman, and Elvin Lau to Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench. In order to avoid a Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench action against you for libel and slander, I demand payment of $500,000 within 20 days of the date of this letter.   (Etc.)

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

2.  Tue, December 03, 2013 12:04 pm, Ashu Solo to John Gormley

Once I win my civil claim against the guy in the U.S. spreading lies about our conference, we will send out a media advisory on that and I want you to retweet that and Rawlco to report it. Then I probably won’t sue you and Rawlco Radio.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

3.  Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Ashu Solo to Lois Mitchell:

. . .   I am going to sue you and track you down to serve you with civil claim documents.  I’m gonna get your house after I get a court judgment against you.  Your homeless buddies can teach you how to live on the streets in your old age.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
4.   Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:22:15 -0600, Ashu Solo re Tonia Zimmerman:

My counterattacks against Zimmerman will be lawful and through the courts and through the police. That is, I’m suing her and making a criminal complaint against her.

3:23pm Apr 4   (to Zimmerman)

If you think I’m bluffing about you being   criminally investigated, phone up Sgt. Gulka and see at 975-8321 in   Saskatoon. If you think I’m bluffing about you being sued, show up at Court   of Queen’s Bench in Saskatoon on Apr. 9 at 9:00 AM. I’m looking forward to   seeing you in court, Zimmerman. Bring your boyfriend.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

5.   Ashu Solo to Daeran Gall, threatening to sue:

From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]

To: Sandra Finley; Daeran GallSubject:

YOU NOW HAVE 15 DAYS FINLEY AND GALL,

YOU NOW HAVE 15 DAYS TO COME UP WITH $500,000, AS PER THE ATTACHED DEMAND LETTERS, OR YOU’RE GONNA HAVE TO ANSWER TO YOUR LIES IN COURT.  ASHU M. G. SOLO

I SUGGEST THAT YOU LOOK AT YOUR FUTURES AND ACCEPT THIS OFFER. FINLEY HAS TO LOOK AFTER HERSELF AND HER DAUGHTER AND DOESN’T WANT HER MONEY AND ASSETS SEIZED AND HER INCOME PERMAMENTLY GARNISHED. GALL HAS TO LOOK AFTER HIIMSELF AND WHOEVER AND DOESN’T WANT HIS MONEY AND ASSETS SEIZED AND HIS INCOME PERMAMENTLY GARNISHED.ASHU SOLO

– – – – – – – – – – – – – — – –

6.   Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 10:51 PM

December-23-13 (11:09 pm)   THINK I’M BLUFFINGFrom: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]Sent: December-23-13 9:09 PM (INSERT: 2 hr time diff = 11:09)To: Sandra Finley; Daeran GallSubject: RE: YOU NOW HAVE 15 DAYSTHINK I’M BLUFFING ABOUT SUING YOU? WAIT AND SEE. YOU’RE GONNA BE FORCED INTO BANKRUPTCY AND LOSE ALL OF YOUR MONEY AND ASSETS FOR SPREADING LIES ABOUT ME.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – — – –

December-25-13 1:53 AM   YOU SPREAD LIES ABOUT VICTORFrom: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]Sent: December-25-13 1:53 AMTo: Sandra FinleySubject: RE: YOU NOW HAVE 15 DAYSYOU SPREAD LIES ABOUT VICTOR. YOU SPREAD LIES ABOUT ME. YOU MADE UP LIES ABOUT ME. YOU DISCRIMINATED AGAINST VETERANS. YOU DISCRIMINATED AGAINST GUYS. YOU’RE REALLY A DESPICABLE PERSON. LOOK IN THE MIRROR. I’M FINISHING UP MY ETHICS COMPLAINTS ABOUT YOU, SO YOU CAN BE REMOVED FROM ALL OF THE GREEN PARTIES. AND I’M GONNA SUE YOU AND GET ALL OF YOUR MONEY AND ASSETS SEIZED BY THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE AND GET YOUR INCOME GARNISHED FOREVER

– – – – – – – – – – – – – — – –

December-25-13 11:49 PM   WITHOUT PREJUDICEFrom: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]Sent: December-25-13 11:49 PMTo: Sandra Finley; Daeran GallCc: Larry WaldingerSubject: DEAL OF THE LIFETIME FOR FINLEY AND GALLWITHOUT PREJUDICESANDRA FINLEY AND DAERAN GALL,BECAUSE I’M A NICE GUY, I’M OFFERING YOU TWO THE DEAL OF A LIFETIME:I WON’T SUE BOTH OF YOU IF EITHER OF YOU IS SUCCESSFUL IN IMMEDIATELY CONVINCING TONIA ZIMMERMAN TO PERMANENTLY CEASE AND DESIST POSTING AND SPREADING LIES ABOUT ME, CEASE AND DESIST CONTACTING PEOPLE ABOUT ME, DELETE ANYTHING SHE HAS ALREADY POSTED ABOUT ME INCLUDING ON STARPHOENIX, TWITTER, ANAD HER FACEBOOK TIMELINE, AND STOP BOTHERING ME IN ANY WAY.IF YOU HAD ANY MORALS, YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE THIS IN THE FIRST PLACE BEFORE I LAWFULLY ATTACKED YOU BACK WHEN YOU SAW WHAT SHE WAS DOING INSTEAD OF SPREADING LIES ABOUT ME AND MAKING UP LIES ABOUT ME. I SAW THERE WAS EVEN A LIE POSTED IN RESPONSE TO FINLEY’S COMMENT THAT FINLEY HAD THE ABILITY TO DELETE, BUT SHE DIDN’T BECAUSE SHE WANTED TO SMEAR ME. GALL WAS MORE CONCERNED ABOUT ME SAYING ZIMMERMAN WAS SPREADING LIES THAN ZIMMERMAN SPREADING LIES.LET ME KNOW IF YOU’RE TAKING UP THIS OFFER. IF EITHER OF YOU ACCEPTS THIS DEAL AND IS SUCCESSFUL IN CONVINCING TONIA ZIMMERMAN TO DO THE ABOVE, THEN I WON’T SUE BOTH OF YOU. YOU HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 27, 2013 AT 12:00 PM SASKATCHEWAN TIME TO ACCEPT THIS DEAL AND UNTIL DECEMBER 30, 2013 AT 12:00 PM SASKATCHEWAN TIME TO SUCCESSFULLY CONVINCE TONIA ZIMMERMAN TO DO THE ABOVE. AFTER DECEMBER 27, 2013 AT 12:00 PM SASKATCHEWAN TIME, I AM WITHDRAWING THIS OFFER.ASHU SOLO

 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

 

  1. From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us] Sent: January-19-14 10:22 AM To: Sandra Finley Subject: RE: Army pictures of me

. . .   MONEY THAT COULD BE GOING TO YOUR DAUGHTER WILL NOW BE GOING TO ME AFTER I’M DONE SUING YOU.

 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

 

  1. From: Ashu M. G. Solo [mailto:amgsolo@mavericktechnologies.us]

Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 9:00 AM

To: Sandra Finley; Daeran Gall

Subject: GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT

. . .   Now you’ve caused trouble with the wrong person, so you’re about to be sued for a helluva lot of money. It’s more important for you to worry about how you’re gonna afford to take care of yourself and your daughter after paying damages to me than it is for you to try to cause more damages for me.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

You’re (i.e. Daeran is)  despised in the provincial Green Party for being a bootlicker to Finley and for promulgating lies about me You called Finley a “powerful woman.”  She doesn’t look so powerful now that she’s paying a lawyer $300 per hour to defend herself. You’re the biggest hypocrite and idiot ever . . .

 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

 

  1. … Finley was advised that Solo’s conduct included some or all of: …

AND

  1. Finley was advised by individuals targeted by Solo that they felt intimidated, harassed, and powerless in the face of his barrage of communications and threats.

 

Particulars:

  1. From: Sent: July 28, 2014 3:29 PM To: Sandra Finley <sabest1@sasktel.net> Subject: Re: My visit to RCMP this morning

Sandra,   I spoke with Sgt. Gulka this afternoon.  He has advised me to reply to Ashu if he does email me again, asking him to not contact me by phone, text, email or in person, and if he continues that I will be moving further with the complaint I have filed.  He believes this would be enough to stop him, but if not, then I would have to go down to the station to complete a video statement, and then the police would either move to charges if they feel it is warranted or a restraining order.

 

2.   From: “John Gormley Live”To: “Ashu M. G. Solo”   (some of this scrambled when I pasted it,  but the full thread is under the X1A category.

Hey — Now that I’m back in Saskatoon, have been reading back in the show email timeline, your increasingly odd emails re my RT’ing (re-tweeting) of Tonia Zimmerman’s tweet.

Subject: Re: I’ll keep my mouth shut about the batteries incident

Date: Tue, December 03, 2013 8:53 am talk with several women who have saved FB screencaps of your comments and threats toward them; and discuss your “Gupta” background and your Dad’s profound discomfort at your antics.

Until now, your dread fear of privacy is something that I have respected only for concern of your family; I’m under no legal obligation not to disclose details about your business, personal and academic life.

Your treatment, in recent days, of Ms. Zimmerman has gone too far.

And, with respect to me, looking at your various emails on this “Zellers batteries incident” you’ve either gotten the wrong person or become completely delusional. I was last in a Zellers in 1980!  Is there even still a Zellers around?

I’m concerned for your mental health; the next move is yours, my friend; tear down your spam sites, particularly of Ms. Zimmerman and all this ends.  If not, you will be very uncomfortable in the coming days.

J.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

3.    From: Sent: June 8, 2015 5:55 PM To: Sandra Finley <sabest1@sasktel.net>; Penny Swartz <pswartz@myaccess.ca>; Andrea Oldham <andrea.oldham@greenparty.ca> Cc: Kaitlyn Harvey <harvey.kaitlyn@gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: RE: RE: CIVIL CLAIM AGAINST FINLEY AND GPC: BULLYING OF ME IN GPC Ashu Solo

Pots and kettles, eh? I’ve received the 3 emails below from Ashu Solo over the last few days.  I think it only fair that you be aware of their content, but I am sending them to you confidentially – I am not prepared to be sucked into Ashu’s vortex.  So it’s important to me that Ashu not find out that I have passed them on.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

4.   From: Daniel Reid [mailto:dreid@harpergrey.com]
       Daniel J. Reid Associate| Harper Grey LLP T  604.895.2877 | F  604.669.9385

. . . .   Earlier today I spoke with Tyler Dahl.

He advised he was unaware of his client’s emails to me and communications to DomainPeople, and that he would tell his client to cut it out.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

5.   From: Sent: April 4, 2014 7:38 PM To: Sandra Finley <sabest1@sasktel.net>

Subject: Fwd: YOU NEED TO KNOW THIS: DAMAGES TO LARRY, ME, AND OTHERS FROM SANDRA FINLEY’S CRIMES, LIES, AND ATTACKS

Sandra, I think you need to forward this email to Sgt. Gulka so that he is aware of the depth of Ashu’s delusions.  He may become dangerous.  He has also made negative comments about Lois so he may work on harassing her and making up more stories to feed his almost obvious mental illness.  I am concerned about him possibly going after others and hope he doesn’t become violent.  I wish the police could do something about him but until he actually does act violently, they cannot do anything–and after the fact it’s too late if someone is hurt or killed.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

6.    From: Mark Bigland-Pritchard / LED [mailto:mark@lowenergydesign.com] Sent: July 8, 2015 10:59 AM To: Sandra Finley <sabest1@sasktel.net> Subject: Fwd: Finley’s human rights complaint

Now he’s dragging this up. Sorry you have to go through this crap. Between his attacks on you and now his online assaults on Vicki and Daeran, I’m not sure I see an end to this without turning the law against him.  I don’t know if there is enough evidence to sue him for defamation, but I think it’s worth exploring.  If it is a credible prospect, you would have my full support after October 19th.     m

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

7.   From: Sent: July 19, 2014 9:44 AM To: Mark Bigland-Pritchard <mark@lowenergydesign.com>; Penny Swartz, CFP <pswartz@myaccess.ca>; Kaitlyn H <harvey.kaitlyn@gmail.com>; Lawrence, Bonnie <blawrence@sasktel.net>; Daeran Gall <daerangall@gmail.com>; Lois Mitchell <grammalo.mitchell6@gmail.com>; Sandra Finley <sabest1@sasktel.net> Subject: The path I’m taking

Sandra,

I’m truly sorry that this is all happening.  It is unfortunate that so many people have been negatively effected by one person.  I have personally decided not to give an audience to hate, and so I am going to try to figure out how to block his emails from coming through (etc.)

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

8.   From: Sent: February 9, 2015 7:21 AM To: Patricia Farnese <patricia.farnese@gmail.com>; Sandra Finley <sabest1@sasktel.net> Cc: Vicki Strelioff <vstrelioff@gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Fwd: More on Finley Ethics Complaint Ashu Solo

Patricia – as promised in previous email. Sandra – in case you aren’t aware of this…

——– Forwarded Message ——–

Subject:

Fwd: More on Finley Ethics Complaint

Date:

Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:55:28 -0600

From:

To:

Meggan Hougham <think37@gmail.com>, Andrea Oldham <andrea.oldham@greenparty.ca>

Meggan, Andrea – . . .   Ashu Solo, a man whose abusive behaviour wasted the time of Saskatoon GPC people for far too long. This continued vendetta against Sandra Finley seems to me to be a waste of your time and that of Federal Council.  I advise Federal Council to disregard it totally. …   I am not prepared to have the sort of intense and continuous harassment which Ashu Solo has demonstrated himself capable of perpetrating.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

9.    From: Patricia Farnese [mailto:patricia.farnese@usask.ca] Sent: August 24, 2015 2:49 PM To: Sandra Finley <sabest1@sasktel.net> Subject: Re: Ashu Solo.

I have to consult the GPC as I am a director of the GPC fund and we have been given advice to ignore Ashu. . . . I wish to try to stop the emails we are repeatedly being sent. Thanks.  Sent from my iPhone

2015 Repeated requests, require the SPECIFICS of what is defamatory

 X1B Postings  No Responses »
Oct 232015
 

Subject:    Repeated Requests:  please specify what is defamatory.  Culminates in Court filing.  Took 8 months to obtain specifics.  Could not file Statement of Defence without it.

A Court Document “Request for Particulars”   was filed on August 31, 2015  after months of attempting to obtain from the Plaintiff:  “please specify what is defamatory”.   It was, of course, expected that legal criteria for defamation would be met.

The documentation below:

From my first lawyer,  Daniel Reid (Harper Grey, Vancouver)  to Ashu’s lawyer,  Tyler Dahl (Cuelenaere, Saskatoon).  First half of 2015.  At least 6 emails and not counting phone calls, beginning Feb 12.

Aug 31,  Saskatoon lawyer Samuel Edmondson filed a document with the Court in order to obtain the particulars.

The Requested Details were received September 8 from Ashu’s lawyer

We could file a Statement of Defence.

 

REPEATED REQUESTS

PLEASE SUPPLY THE SPECIFICS OF WHAT IS DEFAMATORY

2015

—– Original Message —–

From: “Daniel Reid”

Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 3:29:10 PM

Subject: Solo v. Finley

February 12, 2015

VIA EMAIL

Good afternoon Sandra,

Earlier today I spoke with Tyler Dahl.  He advised he was unaware of his client’s emails to me and communications to DomainPeople, and that he would tell his client to cut it out.

He will be sending me a list of the specific posts Mr. Solo has issues with later this week or early next week. He was very frank in stating that his client’s instructions were to send the list but that he recognized many of the things on the list likely were not actionable (i.e. you are permitted to post), and not to interpret the list as being his position with respect to the law.

Once I receive the letter from Mr. Dahl we should set up a time to discuss an appropriate response.

Kind Regards,

Daniel J. Reid

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

—–Original Message—–

From: SANDRA FINLEY

Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 4:19 PM

To: Daniel Reid

Subject: Re: Solo v. Finley   (INSERT:  I was able to read before Daniel.)

If I was a lawyer communicating with another lawyer on behalf of my client, I would be embarassed to be sending a document that does not even attempt to define the legal issue(s).

Out of self-respect, I would not expect the other lawyer to be doing my work for me.

Daniel – – I will not be paying for you to do the work that Ashu’s lawyer should be doing. And I will not be wasting my time reading through the tripe submitted by Tyler. He is responsible for what he sent to you.

/Sandra

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

—–Original Message—– From: Daniel Reid    Sent: February 16, 2015 11:27 AM To: ‘SANDRA FINLEY’  Subject: RE: Solo v. Finley

February 16, 2015

VIA EMAIL

Good morning Sandra,

I have not read the attachment, as on first glance it does not properly set out the legal objections to the various posts you have authored. Are you free to discuss at 3pm today?

Regards,

Daniel J. Reid

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

From: Daniel Reid   Sent: May 4, 2015 11:07 AM To: ‘Sandra Finley’  Subject: RE: Billing, Solo v Finley

May 4, 2015 

VIA EMAIL 

Good morning Sandra,

My apologies, I had this in my “to respond” pile and overlooked getting back to you.  . . .

since you wrote to me there has been a troubling development.  On Friday afternoon I received the attached fax, which purports to be a statement of claim filed in Saskatchewan naming you as a defendant in a defamation action.

The attached claim suffers from the same defect I repeatedly advised Mr. Dahl of – it does not set out, with any of the required details, the specific statements that Mr. Solo is alleging are defamatory. 

I am quite puzzled by this – I repeatedly made it clear to Mr. Dahl that you could not properly respond to demands that did not contain the statements that are at issue and why they are actionable.

Please let me know if you are free to discuss this matter tomorrow or Wednesday.

Kind Regards, 

Daniel J. Reid

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

  • May 1  Statement of Claim received by my lawyer.    This first Claim (date filed with Court, 2015-04-17,  I think is irrelevant given the Amended Claim.) (Note to self:  it’s in May 4 email from Lawyer to me.)

 

As we have discussed, it is my position that a proper claim in defamation or for a breach of privacy must include the allegedly defamatory words.  The importance of pleadings in actions for defamation is well known.  . . .  (followed by the comprehensive documentation)

(In my view, the First Claim should be viewed in the context of everything that has happened and not in isolation.)

—–Original Message—– From: Sandra Finley

Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:16 AM To: Daniel Reid Subject: Ashu Solo, letter to Tyler re missed deadline

Is it possible to get a short letter to Tyler?  . . .

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

From: Daniel Reid

Sent: June 18, 2015 10:08 AM To: ‘Sandra Finley’ Subject: RE: Ashu Solo, letter to Tyler re missed deadline

June 18, 2015

VIA EMAIL

Thank you – I confirm I have heard nothing further from Mr. Dahl.

I will provide you with a draft letter later today – . . . .

Daniel J. Reid

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

File Number:  132048
June 18, 2015
Cuelenaere, Kendall, Katzman & Watson Barristers, Solicitors and Mediators 500, 128 – 4th Ave South Saskatoon, SK S7K1M8
Attention: Tyler M. Dahl

Dear Sirs/Mesdames:

Re: Solo v. Finley et al

I write further to my letter of May 7, 2015, in which I set out my position that the notice of civil claim provided to my office failed to particularize the statements your client alleges are defamatory or are in breach of his privacy, and was therefore deficient.

As stated in my earlier letter, Ms. Finley was willing to make her blog password protected, in order to permit you time to prepare an amended notice of civil claim that properly sets out the statements that are allegedly defamatory or comprise a violation of your client’s privacy.

As you may be aware, following my letter, the entire blog was made password protected and no longer generally available.  Ms. Finley has been very reasonable in attempting to resolve this matter quickly, efficiently, and without needless litigation.

Despite the additional time, the deadline of June 15, 2015 has passed.  I remain at a loss as to what specific passages of the blog Mr. Solo alleges are defamatory or in breach of his privacy.

As Ms. Finley has instructed me to advise, if an amended notice of civil claim is not received on or before Wednesday, June 24, 2015, she may remove the password protection from her blog.

Page 2
132048/2919157.1
I look forward to hearing from you on or before June 24, 2015.

Yours truly,

HARPER GREY LLP

Per: Daniel J. Reid
DJR

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

—–Original Message—– From: Daniel Reid [mailto:dreid@harpergrey.com]

Sent: June 23, 2015 5:54 PM

To: ‘Sandra Finley’    Subject: RE: Today’s missive from Ashu SOlo, (June 23) Ashu Solo,

Thanks. I have heard nothing from Solo’s lawyer – I will try calling tomorrow, as I find the failure to respond to my letter quite unusual.

Regards,

Daniel J. Reid

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

2015-06-24   Amended Claim received.  Posting includes my reaction, sent to my lawyer, Daniel.

= = = =  = = = = = = = = =  = =

From: Sandra Finley [mailto:sabest1@sasktel.net] Sent: June 24, 2015 5:24 PM

To: ‘Daniel Reid’

Cc: Andrew G. MacCorquodale

Subject: RE: Solo v. Finley

CC:  LFC Web Hosting  (Jeff and Andrew), LFC named as co-defendant in the Statement of Claim

(Jeff & Andrew:  do you have contact info for Fishnet?  I would like to let them know that the situation is under control and regret that Ashu Solo is attempting to draw them into this.  /S)

– – – – – –  – – – – – – –

Thank-you Daniel (my lawyer),

Re inclusion of web hosting services (LFC and Fishnet) in the Statement of Claim,  . . .    And Fishnet is in Russia – – Ashu’s lawyer (Tyler) would know that the Court has no jurisdiction there?

Re the claim itself:  I read the first part and stopped.   It is, as are earlier communications,  a twisted version of information.

Furthermore and as before,  it is full of examples that do not meet the legal criteria for defamation;  you can tell just by the wording.   Really, it is a continuation of what has been received to date.  We repeatedly requested that they provide claims that meet criteria.

It has the appearance of being a document prepared by Ashu and given to the lawyer, Tyler, to submit.

I am thinking there are two options:

  1. A counter-claim, as we discussed earlier.   . . .
  2. I can go item-by-item and refute these claims (an odious waste of my time).   Unless a counter-claim were to shut him down.

I will leave password protection in place for the time being.

/Sandra

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

While I think you have a counterclaim for defamation and potentially for intentional interference with economic relations

Accordingly, if at all possible I would strongly recommend Saskatchewan counsel drafting a response and counterclaim, even if the response is not provided to Mr. Dahl until August.  (INSERT:  holiday time)  Defamation is an area of the law that can be very technical.  It would be most unfortunate if Ashu was able to use the technical rules governing pleadings to obtain an advantage.

Kind Regards, 

Daniel J. Reid Associate| Harper Grey LLP

– – – – – – – – –

Jul 6   Sandra to Daniel.   re the work on transferring the file to a lawyer in Saskatoon.   (Daniel would have to take out a Sask license plus I’d have more travel expenses to cover.)

– – – – – – – – –

  • 2015-08-31   My lawyer (now Saskatoon lawyer Samuel Edmondson)  files with Court: 

Request-for-particulars filed with Court

 

 

2015-10 defence, points to make

 X1B Postings  No Responses »
Oct 222015
 

POINTS MADE AND TO BE MADE:

___   MY MOTIVATION.   Peace, order and good governance in my community.    

Ashu is putting fear of what he might do into people.  They no longer feel secure.   The Police are unable to act;  the Justice system is too expensive to use.  The means available to the community to protect itself is through publication of information.

I would like to secure a Judge’s ruling on specifically what information is defamatory.  I have a Charter Right to free speech;  furthermore I am a journalist.

I need a court order saying that Ashu may not interfere with business contracts I have entered into; and he may not interfere in my life, or the lives of my acquaintances in other ways.

___   ASHU’S MOTIVATION:   Prevent documents such as the John Gormley email thread from becoming public.

___  Ashu’s motivations:

He was (likely still is) unemployed.  He wants to get elected to public office and figured (or was manipulated into believing)  he could do it through the Green Party.   Because he was using Green Party social media to broaden the scope of his cyber-bullying  I forwarded the complaint of the young woman to the Ethics Committee in Ottawa.   Independent, 3rd party adjudication – – fair.

In his mind I am the reason why he has been prevented from running as a candidate for the Federal or the Provincial Party.

LFC enters the picture:   I posted under password, Ashu’s attempts to discredit me, his coercive attacks on others.   I could see potential need for “proof” and didn’t want to lose evidence in the jumble on my computer.

Ashu is highly motivated to prevent some documents from becoming public.  One example:

An email thread between Ashu and John Gormley, the Rawlco talk show host, lawyer by training.    John gave the thread to the young woman for use as a defence against Ashu, if John’s words did not make Ashu stop his cyber-bullying of the young woman and two other young women.   Basically, John will expose Ashu’s lies (specified ones)  through officials he will have on the show if Ashu doesn’t stop.

When LFC did not capitulate to Ashu’s demands to take down my blog, he began attacks on my domain name registrar demanding that they de-register the name.   That company is in BC;  their way of shutting the door on Ashu – – I had to employ a lawyer to whom they could refer his harassing communications.

I don’t know how he will handle the Mediation.   Trials are public,  he knows that.   He might be able to guess how many good people he has harassed and threatened and bullied and put fear into.  If this goes to trial,  some of them intend to attend.

_✓_   Start point for me being  the complaint from the 26-year old woman who he (age 42) had been cyber-bullying for a year.  With serious effects on her.

_✓_  I told Tim Nickel why I would not respond to the cross-claim (the system creates adversarial relationships where none exist;  I can choose not to cooperate with that).

_✓_  I told Tim Nickel that LFC was acting upon my request when LFC did not accept to settle at the price of $5000  offered by Ashu.   (It would come out of my pocket, go into Ashu’s;  I would be paying HIS legal bills, too!)

_✓_    made clear to Tim that I am a journalist and have been for more than 15 years.  I am not about to relinquish for myself and for others, the charter right to freedom of speech.

___  One thing I did not spell out to him, but will:   it is recorded in the communications from the young Vancouver lawyer:  – –   Ashu was requested more than once to just tell us the specific items in the blogged material that are defamatory.   They could be addressed if he would identify them.   That offer still stands.

 

___ I expressed concern over the fact that Ashu will need something by which to save face.  (Seems like I’m demanding everything and have nothing with which to buy compromise).  Tim replied (words to effect) that he would be looking at that aspect.  I took it to mean:  that’s his job.  I am not presently able to envision what I can do to assist in the “save face” need.

 

___  I can’t or won’t back-down on Charter Rights.   Tim knows that.

 

I did not discuss:

___

 

___  I think Tim understands:     I will seek (even if the chances are almost zero) to have my expenses reimbursed and even if there is little chance of actually recovering the money.

 

 

___  I am not presently able to envision what I can do to assist in the “save face” need. I do not have a reliable memory of whether or not I told him that the Sk Law Reform Commission considered, at its Sept meeting,  a submission I made about the need for legislation that prevents “SLAPP suits” (use of the justice system as a tool of coercion, which this is;  also the need for legislation to address cyber-violence which the UN has asked countries to do – – it is a very large problem.   They replied;  there is already work underway by the Uniform Law Commission of Canada.  I have inquired about contacting them.   Their next meeting is in Regina, according to website.

 

I will call him early next week and let you know what he has to say:    I am thinking there will be 3 separate rooms.  To start, LFC and Paul’s Jr in one.  Ashu and Tyler in another.  Me in the third.    With Tim going back-and-forth between the rooms.    During Mediation, would it be at Tim’s discretion to advise me of your positions and progress?

 

 

WHAT IS ASHU’S CURRENT STATE-OF-MIND?

Recent renewed activity leads me to think Ashu is plenty worried. (A pattern in his behavior –  stressful developments cause him to go into a frenzy of activity.)  The date got set; no one has backed down.   In the last few days he has started a second (crazy) campaign at the U of S to discredit, through my role of elected member of University Senate (I have recently completed the maximum two terms).    Some of the other Senators and the University Secretary have received missives claiming that a group of Senators (that included me)  have defamed him.  And they had better do  X, Y or Z.   OR ELSE!    The emails were forwarded to me.   I replied with an update:  Mediation Nov 22.    And the usual suggestion/request:  best not to engage with him.

 

Cheers!

Sandra Finley

250-594-9898

 

 

APPENDED

 

(1)   Nickel, Timothy J.,

  1. Ed., Reg. Psych.

1110 –14th Street East

Saskatoon, SK S7H 0A3

Phone: 306-203-9142

E-Mail: tim.nickel10@gmail.com

Place of Employment: Private Practice; Contract with Dispute Resolution Office

 

Education: M. Ed –U of S

Mediation Training: Justice Institute of B. C. (210 hrs.);

Organizational Diagnosis;

Community at Work (Sam Kaner); TJA Conferencing; Circles and Restorative Processes

Mediation Experience: 18 years

Areas of Competence:

Organizational Development and Workplace Mediation; Civil

Litigation and Business Disputes; SGI Personal Injury Claims;

Multi -Party and Public Policy Development; Board Governance

 

Fees Charged:

$150.00 per hr. ($120.00 per hr – Prov. Gov’t.)

 

Professional Affiliations:

Conflict Resolution Saskatchewan Inc.; FMC; SKCP

  • – – – – – – – – —

 

(2)     PHOTO  and other  info at   https://ca.achievecentre.com/trainer/tim-nickel/

2015-10-22 Canada’s pullout from F-35 program will boost costs for other nations

 Lockheed Martin, War Economy (includes Cdn Census & Trials)  No Responses »
Oct 222015
 

http://www.canada.com/news/canada/canada+pullout+from+program+will+boost+aircraft+costs+other/11460218/story.html

By David Pugliese, Ottawa Citizen

As the Pentagon prepares for Canada’s withdrawal from the F-35 jet program, lawmakers in Washington are raising concerns that the U.S. too will have to cut its numbers of stealth fighters because of increasing costs.

Prime minister-designate Justin Trudeau has promised to withdraw Canada from the F-35 program, saying it has become too costly. When that will happen is still unclear, as the Liberals won’t unveil the cabinet until Nov. 4.

A Liberal government would hold a competition to replace the current fleet of CF-18s and select a cheaper alternative to the F-35.

Canada’s withdrawal from the program will see the cost of the F-35 go up between 0.7 per cent and one per cent for other countries – or about $1 million US per plane, said Lt.-Gen. Chris Bogdan, head of the F-35 Joint Program Office.

The Conservatives committed in 2010 to buy 65 of the aircraft but put that on hold because of the increased costs of the jet and allegations that the procurement process was not properly handled.

Before they were defeated in the election, the Conservatives said no decision on the F-35 had been made. But Bogdan told U.S. lawmakers on Wednesday that Canada was scheduled to buy the planes starting in 2017-18.

The one-per-cent increase in the cost of the F-35 because of Canada’s decision to pull out of the program appears to be the least of the concerns for supporters of the aircraft.

The program is currently $200 billion over budget. It will cost an estimated $400 billion for the U.S. to buy the 2,443 aircraft it has determined it needs.

Some U.S. lawmakers are now questioning whether the Pentagon can afford to buy all of those.

John McCain, the Republican senator and chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said this week he expects the U.S. will have to cut its number of F-35s because of costs.

Bogdan said it is still unclear what will happen to Canadian firms who are currently building parts for the stealth fighter. “We do not have a set rule as to what happens to that industrial participation if a partner reduces airplanes, adds airplanes or leaves the program,” said Bogdan.

“But it is my opinion that the remaining partners and our industry partners are going to have a discussion about what to do with all of the industry in Canada that is building parts for the airplane.”

Officials with Lockheed Martin have told the Citizen they could drop Canadian suppliers if Canada doesn’t buy the plane.

Alan Williams, the former procurement chief at the Department of National Defence, said that might happen but Lockheed could find it difficult to acquire replacement systems as production of the planes is now underway.

Trudeau said holding a competition for a new fighter jet would ensure Canadian firms receive work. Under the F-35 program, there were no guarantees Canadian companies would be entitled to a specific amount of work when Canada purchased the aircraft.

The F-35 became a major political headache several years ago for the Conservatives. Although the Liberal government originally signed on to a research and development program for the plane, the Conservatives significantly expanded commitment and later agreed to the purchase 65 of the planes.

An independent audit on Canada’s proposed F-35 project found the purchase of the aircraft would cost $44 billion over the 42-year life of the plane. That figure included everything from maintenance to fuel.

dpugliese@ottawacitizen.com

Twitter.com/davidpugliese

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen

 

 

2016-10-21 Report #1, conversation with Mediator

 X1B Postings  No Responses »
Oct 222015
 

From: Sandra Finley  Sent: October 21, 2016 3:35 PM To: Andrew G. MacCorquodale Cc: ‘pwagner@mcdougallgauley.com’ <–@mcdougallgauley.com>Subject: Conversation with Dispute Resolution Officer, Tim Nickel (Ashu Solo)

Hi Andrew,

I have cc’d Paul.  Am thinking the junior lawyer who will represent you at Mediation might benefit from:

  1. notes on my conversation with the mediator.     Which I made in case they would be helpful to you.
  2. brief understanding of the crux of Ashu’s motivations.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

  1. I had a productive and lengthy conversation with Tim Nickel yesterday, the mediator assigned to this case.   I found him to be professional;  he came across as being very competent.

I expect to be able to work comfortably with him.

Today I did a quick search on him,  2 items appended.   A photo at 2nd one.

He identified at the beginning that this case is different from others.

I was able to sketch out background on what Ashu has been doing over the years, with Start point for me being  the complaint from the 26-year old woman who he (age 42) had been cyber-bullying for a year.  With serious effects on her.

INSERT  #2, for benefit of Jr Lawyer,  Ashu’s motivation

The root of his attacks on me that eventually came to include attacks on LFC:

He was (likely still is) unemployed.  He wants to get elected to public office and figured (or was manipulated into believing)  he could do it through the Green Party.   Because he was using Green Party social media to broaden the scope of his cyber-bullying  I forwarded the complaint of the young woman to the Ethics Committee in Ottawa.   Independent, 3rd party adjudication – – fair.

In his mind I am the reason why he has been prevented from running as a candidate for the Federal or the Provincial Party.

LFC enters the picture:   I posted under password, Ashu’s attempts to discredit me, his coercive attacks on others.   I could see potential need for “proof” and didn’t want to lose evidence in the jumble on my computer.

Ashu is highly motivated to prevent some documents from becoming public.  One example:

An email thread between Ashu and John Gormley, the Rawlco talk show host, lawyer by training.    John gave the thread to the young woman for use as a defence against Ashu, if John’s words did not make Ashu stop his cyber-bullying of the young woman and two other young women.   Basically, John will expose Ashu’s lies (specified ones)  through officials he will have on the show if Ashu doesn’t stop.

When LFC did not capitulate to Ashu’s demands to take down my blog, he began attacks on my domain name registrar demanding that they de-register the name.   That company is in BC;  their way of shutting the door on Ashu – – I had to employ a lawyer to whom they could refer his demands.

I don’t know how he will handle the Mediation.   Trials are public,  he knows that.   He might be able to guess how many good people he has harassed and threatened and bullied and put fear into.  If this goes to trial,  some of them intend to attend.

Continuing  with NOTES ON CONVERSATION WITH TIM NICKEL:

Covered main issues from my point-of-view.

At one point he offered, genuinely I think, an apology for the imperfections of the justice system!  I had not been complaining about that,  so he gave me a good chuckle inside.  We moved on.

I told him why I would not respond to the cross-claim (the system creates adversarial relationships where none exist;  I can choose not to cooperate with that).

And I told him that LFC was acting upon my request when you did not accept to settle at the price of $5000  offered by Ashu.   (It would come out of my pocket, go into Ashu’s;  I would be paying HIS legal bills, too!)

I made it clear that I am a journalist and have been for more than 15 years.  I am not about to relinquish for myself and for others, the charter right to freedom of speech.

One thing I did not spell out to him, but will:   it is recorded in the communications from the young Vancouver lawyer:  – –   Ashu was requested more than once to just tell us the specific items in the blogged material that are defamatory.   They could be addressed if he would identify them.   That offer still stands.

I expressed concern over the fact that Ashu will need something by which to save face.  (Seems like I’m demanding everything and have nothing with which to buy compromise).  Tim replied (words to effect) that he would be looking at that aspect.  I took it to mean:  that’s his job.

I can’t or won’t back-down on Charter Rights.   Tim knows that.

I did not discuss:

I think that means that I need to secure a Judge’s order saying that the material is not defamatory,  that I can remove password protection, and that Ashu may not interfere with business contracts I have entered into;  let alone interfere in my life in other ways.

 

I think Tim understands:     I will seek (even if the chances are almost zero) to have my expenses reimbursed and even if there is little chance of actually recovering the money.

I am not presently able to envision what I can do to assist in the “save face” need.

I do not have a reliable memory of whether or not I told him that the Sk Law Reform Commission considered, at its Sept meeting,  a submission I made about the need for legislation that prevents “SLAPP suits” (use of the justice system as a tool of coercion, which this is;  also the need for legislation to address cyber-violence which the UN has asked countries to do – – it is a very large problem.   They replied;  there is already work underway by the Uniform Law Commission of Canada.  I have inquired about contacting them.   Their next meeting is in Regina, according to website.

I understood Tim to have concluded that I know the material well and can competently defend myself.   He offered that I should phone him if I have more questions.

I will call him early next week and let you know what he has to say:    I am thinking there will be 3 separate rooms.  To start, LFC and Paul’s Jr in one.  Ashu and Tyler in another.  Me in the third.    With Tim going back-and-forth between the rooms.    During Mediation, would it be at Tim’s discretion to advise me of your positions and progress?

WHAT IS ASHU’S CURRENT STATE-OF-MIND?

Recent renewed activity leads me to think Ashu is plenty worried. (A pattern in his behavior –  stressful developments cause him to go into a frenzy of activity.)  The date got set; no one has backed down.   In the last few days he has started a second (crazy) campaign at the U of S to discredit, through my role of elected member of University Senate (I have recently completed the maximum two terms).    Some of the other Senators and the University Secretary have received missives claiming that a group of Senators (that included me)  have defamed him.  And they had better do  X, Y or Z.   OR ELSE!    The emails were forwarded to me.   I replied with an update:  Mediation Nov 22.    And the usual suggestion/request:  best not to engage with him.

Cheers!

Sandra Finley

APPENDED

(1)   Nickel, Timothy J.,

  1. Ed., Reg. Psych.

1110 –14th Street East

Saskatoon, SK S7H 0A3

Phone: 306-203-9142

E-Mail: tim.nickel10  AT  gmail.com

Place of Employment: Private Practice; Contract with Dispute Resolution Office

 

Education: M. Ed –U of S

Mediation Training: Justice Institute of B. C. (210 hrs.);

Organizational Diagnosis;

Community at Work (Sam Kaner); TJA Conferencing; Circles and Restorative Processes

Mediation Experience: 18 years

Areas of Competence:

Organizational Development and Workplace Mediation; Civil

Litigation and Business Disputes; SGI Personal Injury Claims;

Multi -Party and Public Policy Development; Board Governance

 

Fees Charged:

$150.00 per hr. ($120.00 per hr – Prov. Gov’t.)

 

Professional Affiliations:

Conflict Resolution Saskatchewan Inc.; FMC; SKCP

– – – – – – – – —

(2)     PHOTO  and other  info at   https://ca.achievecentre.com/trainer/tim-nickel/

X1 Alpha Index

 X1 Alpha Index  X10 Alphabetical Index  No Responses »
Oct 222015
 

ALPHABETICAL INDEX   Originally published Oct 2015   

Not all entries in the Index are Links to postings on my blog.  Some are cross-references or words that would be used to search under.

The Index is not comprehensive.  It’s what I have used to keep track of where I placed information.  Some of it is quite old.

X1B  Postings are additions to documentation after Junce 2014.   X1B  postings have always been under password.

UPDATE:  All passwords were removed 2022-12-12, in preparation for attendance at Court on 2022-12-13.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 

Anti-SLAPP LAW,  DEFAMATION LAW, TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS.  All related.  The charges brought against me by Ashu Solo and his behaviors led me to make Submissions (I like remedies!):

2016-08-18  Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan (LRCS) . SLAPP tactics used by individuals. Anti-SLAPP legislation. Submissions to Law Reform

2017-04-04 Uniform Law Conference of Canada (ULCC), Submission.  Cyberviolence, Anti-SLAPP legislation and Defamation Law, Tragedy of the Commons  (all related)

2021-08-17 Complaint to Law Society of Saskatchewam. Lawyer complicit with use of Justice system to coerce, intimidate

Click on   Category  X1C 

CLAIMS MADE BY ASHU SOLO ABOUT ME    Ashu Solo claims I lie, from Complaint to Police. My name is used 20 times.

COMPLAINT (ethics),  ASHU TO GREEN PARTY BC ABOUT ME,  SEPT 16, 2014   (aside:  if something is not true, it is a lie.  Why do we shy away from using the word?)

Says of me (Sandra Finley):   Green Party of Saskatchewan member and Green Party of Canada member, but both parties won’t allow her back due to her criminal and unethical conduct against me (Ashu Solo).

Which is not true.  My reply to the Green Party of BC  is included.  (Ashu also filing complaints with GP BC about me.)

COMPLAINTS TO POLICE ABOUT ASHU SOLO  – –   see under POLICE

CONTINGENT RELATIONSHIP,  CASES AGAINST CO-DEFENDANTS

If I am found not guilty of defamation,  then neither is co-defendant blog-host  Loosefoot Consulting  (LFC)?

(The real issue is the use of a co-defendant is related to coercion, increased costs.  See my letter to Tyler Dahl 2016-12.

CORRESPONDENCE

LAWYERS

Scharfstein Aug 10-11, 2016

LFC note you for default Cross-claim

Tragedy of the Commons

overtures to the Sask Law Reform Commission & to Deputy Minister Justice (Sask). 

Potential on-line funding for pursuit of legislation

 Scharfstein Aug 3, 8, 2016  

Can defend myself.  Plaintiff, inveterate liar.  3 examples

Plus defence of why I would not make LFC into an adversary by defending against the cross-claim.  Justice system problem.

COST OF LITIGATION

Actual,  to-date

Potential, on-line funding?   to obtain Legislation (fix the problem). (To Scharfstein & LFC)

LRCS   Submission to Law Reform Commission of Sask Aug 18, 2016  (Anti-SLAPP and CyberViolence)

COURT CASE, main documents

2015  January  The Plaintiff is harassing my Domain Name Registrar (province of BC).   Dictate:  I have to get a lawyer to deal with his lawyer or my blog will go down.

The above link contains copies of the email exchanges, etc.

      • Feb 15  Sandra to Daniel:

If I was a lawyer communicating with another lawyer on behalf of my client, I would be embarrassed to be sending a document that does not even attempt to define the legal issue(s).

Out of self-respect, I would not expect the other lawyer to be doing my work for me.

Daniel – – I will not be paying for you to do the work that Ashu’s lawyer should be doing. And I will not be wasting my time reading through the tripe submitted by Tyler. He is responsible for what he sent to you.

      • May 1  Statement of Claim received by my lawyer.    This first Claim (date filed with Court, 2015-04-17,  I think is irrelevant given the Amended Claim.  So I didn’t post it.) (Note to self:  it’s in May 4 email from Lawyer to me.)   The Amended Claim:  scroll down to 06-24.

 

      •  2015-05-16  My lawyer sets out, in detail for the Plaintiff’s lawyer,  what the legal requirements are.    

to_tyler_dahl-detailed-failure-to-meet-legal-criteria.    

Excerpt:  As we have discussed, it is my position that a proper claim in defamation or for a breach of privacy must include the allegedly defamatory words.  The importance of pleadings in actions for defamation is well known.  . . .  (followed by the comprehensive documentation)

(In my view, the Claim against me should be viewed in the context of everything that has happened (delays, etc.)  and not in isolation.)

      • 2015-08-31   My lawyer (now a Saskatchewan lawyer) : 

Request-for-particulars- filed with Court

See also (below)       TIMELINE   which has more details.

See also   POLICE  (info re Complaints and question of how they are handled)

CHARTER RIGHT, FREE SPEECH

  • Lawyers propose that the defendants settle.  I respond   No,  Defend The Commons.  Settlement would be short term fix.  Plus you have mothers, daughters.  The Young women from Australia who fought and succeeded.   They don’t ask for gratitude.  They expect that when the ball lands in our court, we will do our part.
  • Submission to Law Reform Commission of Sask Aug 18, 2016  LRCS   (Anti-SLAPP and CyberViolence).  Considered at their Sept meeting.   Their reply:   Uniform Law Conference of Canada already has it on their agenda.
  • Serious issue in Mediation      Excerpt  From: Sandra Finley Sent: December 10, 2016 11:53 AM To: ‘Tyler Dahl’ <tdahl@cuelenaere.com> Subject: RE: Solo v. Finley, QB 500 of 2015. CHANGE

The rule-makers would not construct Rules that have no application.  I just have to figure out how the Rule, procedurally, is brought to bear.

5-3(1) The Court may modify or waive any right or power pursuant to a rule in this Part or make any order warranted in the circumstances if:a person acts . . .  in a manner that is vexatious, evasive, abusive, oppressive, improper or tediously lengthy; 

I respect the intelligence of your client.  His actions on November 22 (Mediation) were effective.  Numerous times he has claimed knowledge of the law (I can provide those statements).  But you don’t actually need to be conversant with the intricacies to know that if you do what he did,  the Mediation would be drawn to a close, which is exactly what happened.

My turn to speak was taken away because of actions specifically described in 5-3(1).

You will of course know that under the Constitution Act, Section 2,  I have the Right to express myself.   Where could that be more critical than in legal proceedings?

CROSS-CLAIM, LFC

I am reluctant to file defence (“the system” would create an adversarial relationship where none exists.)    Scharfstein Aug 3, 8, 2016  

Instruction to Scharfstein, request: note me for default

COULD I NOT, in June 2014, HAVE GIVEN THE PASSWORD TO ASHU INSTEAD OF REMOVING THE PASSWORD?

Defamation law (Canada) is noncompliant with international law, OCLU

DEFAMATORY

2013  Repeated Requests from my lawyer, beginning in Feb:  please specify what is defamatory.  Culminates in Court filing Aug 31.  So took 8 months to obtain (rec’d Sept 08).  Could not file Statement of Defence without it.

DEMANDS FOR INFORMATION ON ME

2016-03-31 Demands for information on me

ETHICS COMMITTEE GPC, OMBUDS  REPORT, COMPLAINT ASHU SOLO V. SANDRA FINLEY   (My membership was never revoked, as claimed by Ashu)    July 28-29, 2014

Draft Report from Ombudsperson

My input to correct the facts leads to different conclusion

Enough, Pat, Jan 2014:    Ashu, you chose to quit the party rather than have this matter (INSERT:  the complaint brought against him by the young woman.)  dealt with through the ethics committee.

FEAR OF WHAT ASHU MIGHT DO

Plus, I’m scared for my safety and my family’s because I don’t know him well enough to know his mental state and his Facebook profile picture holding a gun gives me concern about the potential of how far he would go.

Dec 31, 2013.   Plus  Other explanations

GREEN PARTY OF SASKATCHEWAN   Exchange with John Murney, Jan 23, 2014  re Ashu.  Follows Ashu coming to Airport at 6:00AM  and my complaint to GPC and to GPS (Contingent).

HAWKE, GERRY

2017-03-13 Finley affidavit for Gerry Hawke, Court file #1730-2016, Ashu Solo v. Robert Gerald Hawke et al.     2017-07-27 Update from Gerry Hawke (defendant)

Hawke’s story of what has happened at the hands of Ashu Solo leads me to the question:  “What in hell is going on in the Justice system?”.  Gerry has experienced at least one Judge who dealt with Ashu.

I’d also recommend a tactic Gerry used:  Motion to Strike.

Please get in touch if you’d like more info re the Hawke case.

INFORMATION THAT I HATE TO WASTE!

Details, might be helpful for the Defence   start statmt defnc

LAW REFORM arising out of Solo v. Finley

Scharfstein Aug 10-11, 2016

2021-08-17   Complaint to Law Society of Saskatchewam. Lawyer complicit with use of Justice system to coerce, intimidate

LAWSUIT against ASHU SOLO  – – see  WORLDCOMP

LIES

MEDIATION

Report, to LFC & lawyer, Conversation #1     Oct 21, 2016

Conversation #2, draft    Oct 25  Contingent position of LFC

Points Made and To-be-Made

What happened at Mediation  (confidential)

PASSWORD

 

POLICE  WON’T OR CAN’T DO ANYTHING

RESUMé, (Ashu’s) – – see under Tonia Zimmerman

SETTLEMENT 

STRATEGY,  DISCUSSION, HOW TO HANDLE

  • strat man Jan07 bryngo     Jan 7, 2014  with Zimmerman.  Details re discussion with Bryn, John Gormley’s producer.  Would I go on-air?  etc.

THREATENS USE OF LEGAL SYSTEM,  COERCION

Reply to Ashu’s 2016-03-09 Request for particulars: harassment, threats & coercion of others

(Draft Response I did for “Request for Particulars”)

 

TIME LINE    (“clock”)

 

TONIA ZIMMERMAN,  EVIDENCE, WHAT ASHU WAS DOING TO HER

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=11416

Driven off social media and out of Saskatoon   (original, to Hawke & Hunter “miz”)

Protected: mizreduced     (preceding “reduced” to only the material from Zimmerman)

 

TONIA ZIMMERMAN IS NOT REAL  (ASHU SOLO NOW CLAIMS)

Evidence that she is an actual person, from Ashu himself.   http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=17877

Includes evidence that Ashu is the one who creates the fake on-line identities

 

TONIA  ZIMMERMAN   (is this in the original documentation?  By date, I would think I posted it at that time?)

 resume  Thread starting Dec 28, 2013    http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=16459  (Password c3b3)

me to Tonia re Airport

Tonia re she contacted Ashu’s Father

Tonia re Gormley and Gormley’s action

it would be helpful if I could say that I have not given the password to any other person.  (decline request for it)

strat man Jan07 bryngo     Jan 7, 2014  with Zimmerman.  Details re discussion with Bryn, John Gormley’s producer.  Would I go on-air?  etc.

 

TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS

Scharfstein Aug 10-11, 2016

 

UPDATES ON ASHU SOLO CASE SENT TO GPC  (affected people, Saskatoon and Ottawa)

2016

9 apr debra

WORLDCOMP

LAWSUITS

WEBSITES PUT UP BY ASHU, USING THE PERSON’S NAME AS THE WEB ADDRESS,  AND “NEWS”.

Web sites   April  2016   http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=16488

input from Daeran Gal with screen capture of  web site put up by Ashu using Daeran’s name, etc.

The word for fear, different languages. Is Jonathan Biship an alias of Ashu Solo?

Crocels “news” report re Tonia Zimmerman.  (You can purchase placement of a news article.)

Jonathan Bishop  – – some of this is in the X1A postings

 

2016-07-29    ‘What law am I breaking?’  How a Facebook troll came undone

 

ZIMMERMAN  – – see Tonia Zimmerman

 

 

2015-04-21 Class Action LawSuits Against Monsanto (false advertising, glyphosate)

 Genetically Modified, Health, Propaganda  No Responses »
Oct 212015
 

http://www.examiner.com/article/monsanto-sued-los-angeles-county-for-false-advertising

Exhibit #1

Exhibit #1

Today a class action lawsuit (Case No: BC 578 942) was filed in Los Angeles County, California against the Monsanto corporation. The suit alleges that Monsanto is guilty of false advertising by claiming that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, targets an enzyme only found in plants and not in humans or animals. Monsanto makes this claim to support the contention that glyphosate is harmless to humans.

In the lawsuit, the argument is made that the targeted enzyme, EPSP synthase, is found in the microbiota which reside in our intestines and therefore this enzyme is found in humans and animals. It is further stated in the lawsuit that there are many human and animal health problems associated with the disruption of our intestinal microbes.

“Because it kills-off our gut bacteria, glyphosate is linked to stomach and bowel problems, indigestion, ulcers, colitis, gluten intolerance, sleeplessness, lethargy, depression, Crohn’s Disease, Celiac Disease, allergies, obesity, diabetes, infertility, liver disease, renal failure, autism, Alzheimer’s, endocrine disruption, and the W.H.O. recently announced glyphosate is ‘probably carcinogenic’.”

The International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the World Health Organization (WHO), last month declared that glyphosate is Group 2A carcinogen. The American Cancer Society quickly followed suit, also listing glyphosate as a Group 2A carcinogen.

An Environmental Protection Agency memo dated October 30, 1991 states that the EPA classified glyphsate as a possible carcinogen in 1985. In this 1991 memo, without any justification, this classification was changed to Not Carcinogenic. Three scientists refused to sign, two of whom wrote beside their name: Do Not Concur. This document contains data that clearly shows a statistically significant increase in tumors in laboratory animals treated with glyphosate. But because there weren’t more tumors in the group of animals who received a higher dose of glyphosate than there were in the group that received a lower dose, Monsanto made the claim that the tumors could not be related to glyphosate.

Today’s lawsuit may be the beginning of an avalanche. Earlier this month, Beijing resident Yang Xiao-lu filed a lawsuit against the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture requesting information disclosure of the toxicology report submitted to the Chinese government for glyphosate pesticide registration in China. The case has been accepted and the collegiate panel of the court has informed the plaintiff that, considering that Monsanto is a stakeholder to the case, they have added Monsanto as an involved party to the case. Chinese citizens had previously petitioned the Ministry of Agriculture for this toxicology report but were denied. The Ministry cited “trade secrets” as the reason for denial. It is difficult to comprehend how a toxicology report would contain trade secrets since trade secrets generally constitute ingredients or a recipe for a compound or manufacturing procedure.

In today’s lawsuit, Monsanto is accused of deliberate falsification to conceal the fact that glyphosate is harmful to humans and animals. “Defendant intentionally misleads consumers by misrepresenting and concealing the true and correct facts concerning glyphosate…” Attorney T. Matthew Phillips says, “We are not trying to prove that Roundup is harmful or carcinogenic, we are merely pointing out that Monsanto is lying about the enzymes that Roundup targets. Roundup kills the weeds in your backyard and the weeds in your stomach.”

Judgment is sought against Monsanto to prohibit the company from continuing to make the claim that glyphosate targets an enzyme not found in humans and for compensation to the plaintiffs, including attorney fees.

Residents of California can become members of the class in this action by contacting T. Matthew Phillips at tmatthewphillips@aol.com. Phillips has indicated that he hopes other attorneys in other states will follow suit [pun intended].

4/22/2015: Case number was added.

4/23/2015: The lawsuit can be downloaded from http://www.monsantoclassaction.org/

Residents of California can add their names to the class. Plaintiffs are soliciting funds to help cover litigation costs: http://www.gofundme.com/monsantolawsuit

4/25/2015: T. Matthew Phillips will ask the court to compel the Defendant to reimburse donors, with interest.

Suggested Links

2015-10-xy I doubt the Empire can withstand this

 Climate, Empowerment, Energy, Freedom of Speech. (Remove some wrong postings from category), Genetically Modified, John Perkins, Lockheed Martin, War Economy (includes Cdn Census & Trials)  No Responses »
Oct 192015
 

PAST:

  • guerrilla warfare in 3rd world countries against brutal exploitation.
  • while Americans are propagandized to see themselves as a gifted and benevolent leader among nations.
A DIFFERENT STORY  EMERGES 

(further to Assange, Manning, Snowden, Greenwald, etc.)

John Perkins, former economic hitman, explains how the American NSA, CIA bring the resources of other countries under control.   Subterfuge to further American corporate interests.  The countries become impoverished.

Chris Hedges explains from his perspective as a decades-long journalist covering uprisings in poor countries.

John Perkins  (author, Confessions of an Economic Hitman).   Interview Democracy Now:   Hit Men, Jackals, and the Truth about Global Corruption.

Chris Hedges interview by Abby Martin: War, Propaganda & the Enemy Within

WHAT IS THE REMEDY? . . .  MAKE THEM SCARED

Citizens in many countries are rebelling against the free trade deals, which benefit corporate interests.   The propaganda promoting the deals as beneficial to citizens isn’t working.   It seems to me that many governments risk overthrow if they ratify the trade (& “investment”) deals.   Just one example.

2015-10-10 Hundreds of thousands shut down Berlin to protest “Trojan Horse” – – Monsanto’s dream trade deal.  The Guardian

An estimated 311,000 people rallied in New York City on Sept 21, 2014 to motivate American legislators to take action on climate change.

In the years following the  December 2009 Copenhagen Talks,  the amount of NSA spying on the delegations of other countries, the U.S. manipulation of the Talks, became known.  Google for details.  Groups are working to stop the Fossil Fuels industry from participating in the upcoming round of Climate Talks, December, in Paris.

How many protestors were there, around the world, for the Climate Talks, December 2009, Copenhagen?   I haven’t found a combined number – just some individual ones, e.g. 50,000 in Australia.  I expect that this December the numbers will be significantly higher.

4.   Naomi Klein,  This Changes Everything   I saw the film last night.  Naomi and Avi Lewis pull things together.   From locations around the world, they build from

what’s happening, to

the hopeless efforts of individual local people to prevent the destruction of their land, to

people banding together and fighting, to

communities putting the run on Police with weapons (not without loss of life).

The movie (and book)  importantly unite people around the Planet.   It doesn’t matter whether you are in a poor country, or a rich.   We are together in a battle against the forces bent on extreme exploitation of Nature,  putting us all in peril.

Klein/Lewis do not spare Canadians.  In case you think we are “different”,  I suggest you watch the film!

There happened recently to be a PBS special on the tactics and then the eviction of the British Empire from India.   I imagine that the Brits in the time of the Empire were largely ignorant to the effects of their imperialism.  The same as the Americans have been propagandized into unawareness of the brutality of their Empire.

The British Empire disintegrated.   I don’t see how the American Empire can withstand the revelations of its role in the world.   Especially not now, as Americans find themselves in an increasingly unequal and violent society.

2015-10-10 Hundreds of thousands shut down Berlin to protest “Trojan Horse” – – Monsanto’s dream trade deal. The Guardian

 Empowerment, Genetically Modified, Trade Deals, PPPs, Integration Canada-U.S.  No Responses »
Oct 182015
 

A protest of the TTIP in Berlin drew hundreds of thousands of people. PHOTO: EFE/EPA/KAY NIETFELD

The TTIP protest in Berlin this past weekend drew hundreds of thousands. PHOTO: EFE/EPA/KAY NIETFELD

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/10/berlin-anti-ttip-trade-deal-rally-hundreds-thousands-protesters#_=_

Hundreds of thousands of people marched in Berlin on Saturday to oppose a planned free trade deal between the European Union and the United States that is claimed to be anti-democratic and to threaten food safety and environmental standards.

The environmental groups, charities and opposition parties that organised the protest claimed 250,000 people took part, while a police spokesman said 100,000 attended. Smaller protests were also held in other cities, including Amsterdam, with a rally due to be held in London on Saturday night at which shadow chancellor John McDonnell is scheduled to speak.

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) would create the world’s largest free-trade zone, encompassing some 800 million consumers, and harmonise regulation between the EU and North America in areas ranging from food safety law to environmental rules and banking regulations. It would mean that cars made in Britain could be sold in the US, for example, but opponents say it would water down important EU regulations

Protesters gather to demonstrate against the TTIP trade agreement in Berlin on Saturday.

 Protesters gather to demonstrate against the TTIP trade agreement in Berlin on Saturday. Photograph: Axel Schmidt/Getty Images

The European commission reckons that the TTIP could boost the size of the EU economy by €120bn (£85bn) – equal to 0.5% of GDP – and the US economy by €95bn, or 0.4% of GDP, while the UK could be £10bn better off.

However, opposition has escalated over the past year in Germany and other European countries, with critics pointing out that the deal will give too much power to multinational companies at the expense of consumers and workers.

The British government argues that the TTIP would boost trade and create jobs. Of the 3 million people who have signed an online petition calling on the European commission to abandon the deal, some 500,000 are from Britain.

Protesters against the TTIP trade deal carry banners and balloons in Berlin on Saturday. Photograph: Wolfram Steinberg/EPA     Keep scrolling for all the text – – there are big white spots in this posting.
Nick Dearden, director of Global Justice Now, said the petition showed that the EU did not have a public mandate for the agreement: “Everything that we know about this secretive trade deal shows that it is very little about trade and very much about enshrining a massive corporate power-grab.”
The level of resistance in Germany has surprised chancellor Angela Merkel’s government, with Saturday’s rally underlining the challenge it faces to win public support for the deal.
In a full-page letter published in several German newspapers on Saturday, the economy minister, Sigmar Gabriel, warned against scaremongering. “We have the chance to set new and goods standards for growing global trade, with ambitious standards for the environment and consumers, and with fair conditions for investment and workers. This must be our aim,” he wrote.
Protesters attend a rally against the proposed US-EU free trade pact in Berlin.
Protesters attend a rally against the proposed US-EU free trade pact in Berlin. Photograph: Gregor Fischer/AFP/Getty Images

An agreement was announced this week on another trade deal, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which involves 12 countries including the US, Japan and Australia. It has attracted criticism from the likes of US presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.

Wikileaks has released what it claims is the full intellectual property chapter of the TPP. Both the TTIP and TPP deals are still being negotiated.

ttip22

 Older Entries  Newer Entries