Sandra Finley

Oct 222015
 

From: Sandra Finley  Sent: October 21, 2016 3:35 PM To: Andrew G. MacCorquodale Cc: ‘pwagner@mcdougallgauley.com’ <–@mcdougallgauley.com>Subject: Conversation with Dispute Resolution Officer, Tim Nickel (Ashu Solo)

Hi Andrew,

I have cc’d Paul.  Am thinking the junior lawyer who will represent you at Mediation might benefit from:

  1. notes on my conversation with the mediator.     Which I made in case they would be helpful to you.
  2. brief understanding of the crux of Ashu’s motivations.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

  1. I had a productive and lengthy conversation with Tim Nickel yesterday, the mediator assigned to this case.   I found him to be professional;  he came across as being very competent.

I expect to be able to work comfortably with him.

Today I did a quick search on him,  2 items appended.   A photo at 2nd one.

He identified at the beginning that this case is different from others.

I was able to sketch out background on what Ashu has been doing over the years, with Start point for me being  the complaint from the 26-year old woman who he (age 42) had been cyber-bullying for a year.  With serious effects on her.

INSERT  #2, for benefit of Jr Lawyer,  Ashu’s motivation

The root of his attacks on me that eventually came to include attacks on LFC:

He was (likely still is) unemployed.  He wants to get elected to public office and figured (or was manipulated into believing)  he could do it through the Green Party.   Because he was using Green Party social media to broaden the scope of his cyber-bullying  I forwarded the complaint of the young woman to the Ethics Committee in Ottawa.   Independent, 3rd party adjudication – – fair.

In his mind I am the reason why he has been prevented from running as a candidate for the Federal or the Provincial Party.

LFC enters the picture:   I posted under password, Ashu’s attempts to discredit me, his coercive attacks on others.   I could see potential need for “proof” and didn’t want to lose evidence in the jumble on my computer.

Ashu is highly motivated to prevent some documents from becoming public.  One example:

An email thread between Ashu and John Gormley, the Rawlco talk show host, lawyer by training.    John gave the thread to the young woman for use as a defence against Ashu, if John’s words did not make Ashu stop his cyber-bullying of the young woman and two other young women.   Basically, John will expose Ashu’s lies (specified ones)  through officials he will have on the show if Ashu doesn’t stop.

When LFC did not capitulate to Ashu’s demands to take down my blog, he began attacks on my domain name registrar demanding that they de-register the name.   That company is in BC;  their way of shutting the door on Ashu – – I had to employ a lawyer to whom they could refer his demands.

I don’t know how he will handle the Mediation.   Trials are public,  he knows that.   He might be able to guess how many good people he has harassed and threatened and bullied and put fear into.  If this goes to trial,  some of them intend to attend.

Continuing  with NOTES ON CONVERSATION WITH TIM NICKEL:

Covered main issues from my point-of-view.

At one point he offered, genuinely I think, an apology for the imperfections of the justice system!  I had not been complaining about that,  so he gave me a good chuckle inside.  We moved on.

I told him why I would not respond to the cross-claim (the system creates adversarial relationships where none exist;  I can choose not to cooperate with that).

And I told him that LFC was acting upon my request when you did not accept to settle at the price of $5000  offered by Ashu.   (It would come out of my pocket, go into Ashu’s;  I would be paying HIS legal bills, too!)

I made it clear that I am a journalist and have been for more than 15 years.  I am not about to relinquish for myself and for others, the charter right to freedom of speech.

One thing I did not spell out to him, but will:   it is recorded in the communications from the young Vancouver lawyer:  – –   Ashu was requested more than once to just tell us the specific items in the blogged material that are defamatory.   They could be addressed if he would identify them.   That offer still stands.

I expressed concern over the fact that Ashu will need something by which to save face.  (Seems like I’m demanding everything and have nothing with which to buy compromise).  Tim replied (words to effect) that he would be looking at that aspect.  I took it to mean:  that’s his job.

I can’t or won’t back-down on Charter Rights.   Tim knows that.

I did not discuss:

I think that means that I need to secure a Judge’s order saying that the material is not defamatory,  that I can remove password protection, and that Ashu may not interfere with business contracts I have entered into;  let alone interfere in my life in other ways.

 

I think Tim understands:     I will seek (even if the chances are almost zero) to have my expenses reimbursed and even if there is little chance of actually recovering the money.

I am not presently able to envision what I can do to assist in the “save face” need.

I do not have a reliable memory of whether or not I told him that the Sk Law Reform Commission considered, at its Sept meeting,  a submission I made about the need for legislation that prevents “SLAPP suits” (use of the justice system as a tool of coercion, which this is;  also the need for legislation to address cyber-violence which the UN has asked countries to do – – it is a very large problem.   They replied;  there is already work underway by the Uniform Law Commission of Canada.  I have inquired about contacting them.   Their next meeting is in Regina, according to website.

I understood Tim to have concluded that I know the material well and can competently defend myself.   He offered that I should phone him if I have more questions.

I will call him early next week and let you know what he has to say:    I am thinking there will be 3 separate rooms.  To start, LFC and Paul’s Jr in one.  Ashu and Tyler in another.  Me in the third.    With Tim going back-and-forth between the rooms.    During Mediation, would it be at Tim’s discretion to advise me of your positions and progress?

WHAT IS ASHU’S CURRENT STATE-OF-MIND?

Recent renewed activity leads me to think Ashu is plenty worried. (A pattern in his behavior –  stressful developments cause him to go into a frenzy of activity.)  The date got set; no one has backed down.   In the last few days he has started a second (crazy) campaign at the U of S to discredit, through my role of elected member of University Senate (I have recently completed the maximum two terms).    Some of the other Senators and the University Secretary have received missives claiming that a group of Senators (that included me)  have defamed him.  And they had better do  X, Y or Z.   OR ELSE!    The emails were forwarded to me.   I replied with an update:  Mediation Nov 22.    And the usual suggestion/request:  best not to engage with him.

Cheers!

Sandra Finley

APPENDED

(1)   Nickel, Timothy J.,

  1. Ed., Reg. Psych.

1110 –14th Street East

Saskatoon, SK S7H 0A3

Phone: 306-203-9142

E-Mail: tim.nickel10  AT  gmail.com

Place of Employment: Private Practice; Contract with Dispute Resolution Office

 

Education: M. Ed –U of S

Mediation Training: Justice Institute of B. C. (210 hrs.);

Organizational Diagnosis;

Community at Work (Sam Kaner); TJA Conferencing; Circles and Restorative Processes

Mediation Experience: 18 years

Areas of Competence:

Organizational Development and Workplace Mediation; Civil

Litigation and Business Disputes; SGI Personal Injury Claims;

Multi -Party and Public Policy Development; Board Governance

 

Fees Charged:

$150.00 per hr. ($120.00 per hr – Prov. Gov’t.)

 

Professional Affiliations:

Conflict Resolution Saskatchewan Inc.; FMC; SKCP

– – – – – – – – —

(2)     PHOTO  and other  info at   https://ca.achievecentre.com/trainer/tim-nickel/

Oct 222015
 

ALPHABETICAL INDEX   Originally published Oct 2015   

Not all entries in the Index are Links to postings on my blog.  Some are cross-references or words that would be used to search under.

The Index is not comprehensive.  It’s what I have used to keep track of where I placed information.  Some of it is quite old.

X1B  Postings are additions to documentation after Junce 2014.   X1B  postings have always been under password.

UPDATE:  All passwords were removed 2022-12-12, in preparation for attendance at Court on 2022-12-13.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 

Anti-SLAPP LAW,  DEFAMATION LAW, TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS.  All related.  The charges brought against me by Ashu Solo and his behaviors led me to make Submissions (I like remedies!):

2016-08-18  Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan (LRCS) . SLAPP tactics used by individuals. Anti-SLAPP legislation. Submissions to Law Reform

2017-04-04 Uniform Law Conference of Canada (ULCC), Submission.  Cyberviolence, Anti-SLAPP legislation and Defamation Law, Tragedy of the Commons  (all related)

2021-08-17 Complaint to Law Society of Saskatchewam. Lawyer complicit with use of Justice system to coerce, intimidate

Click on   Category  X1C 

CLAIMS MADE BY ASHU SOLO ABOUT ME    Ashu Solo claims I lie, from Complaint to Police. My name is used 20 times.

COMPLAINT (ethics),  ASHU TO GREEN PARTY BC ABOUT ME,  SEPT 16, 2014   (aside:  if something is not true, it is a lie.  Why do we shy away from using the word?)

Says of me (Sandra Finley):   Green Party of Saskatchewan member and Green Party of Canada member, but both parties won’t allow her back due to her criminal and unethical conduct against me (Ashu Solo).

Which is not true.  My reply to the Green Party of BC  is included.  (Ashu also filing complaints with GP BC about me.)

COMPLAINTS TO POLICE ABOUT ASHU SOLO  – –   see under POLICE

CONTINGENT RELATIONSHIP,  CASES AGAINST CO-DEFENDANTS

If I am found not guilty of defamation,  then neither is co-defendant blog-host  Loosefoot Consulting  (LFC)?

(The real issue is the use of a co-defendant is related to coercion, increased costs.  See my letter to Tyler Dahl 2016-12.

CORRESPONDENCE

LAWYERS

Scharfstein Aug 10-11, 2016

LFC note you for default Cross-claim

Tragedy of the Commons

overtures to the Sask Law Reform Commission & to Deputy Minister Justice (Sask). 

Potential on-line funding for pursuit of legislation

 Scharfstein Aug 3, 8, 2016  

Can defend myself.  Plaintiff, inveterate liar.  3 examples

Plus defence of why I would not make LFC into an adversary by defending against the cross-claim.  Justice system problem.

COST OF LITIGATION

Actual,  to-date

Potential, on-line funding?   to obtain Legislation (fix the problem). (To Scharfstein & LFC)

LRCS   Submission to Law Reform Commission of Sask Aug 18, 2016  (Anti-SLAPP and CyberViolence)

COURT CASE, main documents

2015  January  The Plaintiff is harassing my Domain Name Registrar (province of BC).   Dictate:  I have to get a lawyer to deal with his lawyer or my blog will go down.

The above link contains copies of the email exchanges, etc.

      • Feb 15  Sandra to Daniel:

If I was a lawyer communicating with another lawyer on behalf of my client, I would be embarrassed to be sending a document that does not even attempt to define the legal issue(s).

Out of self-respect, I would not expect the other lawyer to be doing my work for me.

Daniel – – I will not be paying for you to do the work that Ashu’s lawyer should be doing. And I will not be wasting my time reading through the tripe submitted by Tyler. He is responsible for what he sent to you.

      • May 1  Statement of Claim received by my lawyer.    This first Claim (date filed with Court, 2015-04-17,  I think is irrelevant given the Amended Claim.  So I didn’t post it.) (Note to self:  it’s in May 4 email from Lawyer to me.)   The Amended Claim:  scroll down to 06-24.

 

      •  2015-05-16  My lawyer sets out, in detail for the Plaintiff’s lawyer,  what the legal requirements are.    

to_tyler_dahl-detailed-failure-to-meet-legal-criteria.    

Excerpt:  As we have discussed, it is my position that a proper claim in defamation or for a breach of privacy must include the allegedly defamatory words.  The importance of pleadings in actions for defamation is well known.  . . .  (followed by the comprehensive documentation)

(In my view, the Claim against me should be viewed in the context of everything that has happened (delays, etc.)  and not in isolation.)

      • 2015-08-31   My lawyer (now a Saskatchewan lawyer) : 

Request-for-particulars- filed with Court

See also (below)       TIMELINE   which has more details.

See also   POLICE  (info re Complaints and question of how they are handled)

CHARTER RIGHT, FREE SPEECH

  • Lawyers propose that the defendants settle.  I respond   No,  Defend The CommonsSettlement would be short term fix.  Plus you have mothers, daughters.  The Young women from Australia who fought and succeeded.   They don’t ask for gratitude.  They expect that when the ball lands in our court, we will do our part.
  • Submission to Law Reform Commission of Sask Aug 18, 2016  LRCS   (Anti-SLAPP and CyberViolence).  Considered at their Sept meeting.   Their reply:   Uniform Law Conference of Canada already has it on their agenda.
  • Serious issue in Mediation      Excerpt  From: Sandra Finley Sent: December 10, 2016 11:53 AM To: ‘Tyler Dahl’ <tdahl@cuelenaere.com> Subject: RE: Solo v. Finley, QB 500 of 2015. CHANGE

The rule-makers would not construct Rules that have no application.  I just have to figure out how the Rule, procedurally, is brought to bear.

5-3(1) The Court may modify or waive any right or power pursuant to a rule in this Part or make any order warranted in the circumstances if:a person acts . . .  in a manner that is vexatious, evasive, abusive, oppressive, improper or tediously lengthy; 

I respect the intelligence of your client.  His actions on November 22 (Mediation) were effective.  Numerous times he has claimed knowledge of the law (I can provide those statements).  But you don’t actually need to be conversant with the intricacies to know that if you do what he did,  the Mediation would be drawn to a close, which is exactly what happened.

My turn to speak was taken away because of actions specifically described in 5-3(1).

You will of course know that under the Constitution Act, Section 2,  I have the Right to express myself.   Where could that be more critical than in legal proceedings?

CROSS-CLAIM, LFC

I am reluctant to file defence (“the system” would create an adversarial relationship where none exists.)    Scharfstein Aug 3, 8, 2016  

Instruction to Scharfstein, request: note me for default

COULD I NOT, in June 2014, HAVE GIVEN THE PASSWORD TO ASHU INSTEAD OF REMOVING THE PASSWORD?

Defamation law (Canada) is noncompliant with international law, OCLU

DEFAMATORY

2013  Repeated Requests from my lawyer, beginning in Feb:  please specify what is defamatory.  Culminates in Court filing Aug 31.  So took 8 months to obtain (rec’d Sept 08).  Could not file Statement of Defence without it.

DEMANDS FOR INFORMATION ON ME

2016-03-31 Demands for information on me

ETHICS COMMITTEE GPC, OMBUDS  REPORT, COMPLAINT ASHU SOLO V. SANDRA FINLEY   (My membership was never revoked, as claimed by Ashu)    July 28-29, 2014

Draft Report from Ombudsperson

My input to correct the facts leads to different conclusion

Enough, Pat, Jan 2014:    Ashu, you chose to quit the party rather than have this matter (INSERT:  the complaint brought against him by the young woman.)  dealt with through the ethics committee.

FEAR OF WHAT ASHU MIGHT DO

Plus, I’m scared for my safety and my family’s because I don’t know him well enough to know his mental state and his Facebook profile picture holding a gun gives me concern about the potential of how far he would go.

Dec 31, 2013.   Plus  Other explanations

GREEN PARTY OF SASKATCHEWAN   Exchange with John Murney, Jan 23, 2014  re Ashu.  Follows Ashu coming to Airport at 6:00AM  and my complaint to GPC and to GPS (Contingent).

HAWKE, GERRY

2017-03-13 Finley affidavit for Gerry Hawke, Court file #1730-2016, Ashu Solo v. Robert Gerald Hawke et al.     2017-07-27 Update from Gerry Hawke (defendant)

Hawke’s story of what has happened at the hands of Ashu Solo leads me to the question:  “What in hell is going on in the Justice system?”.  Gerry has experienced at least one Judge who dealt with Ashu.

I’d also recommend a tactic Gerry used:  Motion to Strike.

Please get in touch if you’d like more info re the Hawke case.

INFORMATION THAT I HATE TO WASTE!

Details, might be helpful for the Defence   start statmt defnc

LAW REFORM arising out of Solo v. Finley

Scharfstein Aug 10-11, 2016

2021-08-17   Complaint to Law Society of Saskatchewam. Lawyer complicit with use of Justice system to coerce, intimidate

LAWSUIT against ASHU SOLO  – – see  WORLDCOMP

LIES

MEDIATION

Report, to LFC & lawyer, Conversation #1     Oct 21, 2016

Conversation #2, draft    Oct 25  Contingent position of LFC

Points Made and To-be-Made

What happened at Mediation  (confidential)

PASSWORD

 

POLICE  WON’T OR CAN’T DO ANYTHING

RESUMé, (Ashu’s) – – see under Tonia Zimmerman

SETTLEMENT 

STRATEGY,  DISCUSSION, HOW TO HANDLE

  • strat man Jan07 bryngo     Jan 7, 2014  with Zimmerman.  Details re discussion with Bryn, John Gormley’s producer.  Would I go on-air?  etc.

THREATENS USE OF LEGAL SYSTEM,  COERCION

Reply to Ashu’s 2016-03-09 Request for particulars: harassment, threats & coercion of others

(Draft Response I did for “Request for Particulars”)

 

TIME LINE    (“clock”)

 

TONIA ZIMMERMAN,  EVIDENCE, WHAT ASHU WAS DOING TO HER

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=11416

Driven off social media and out of Saskatoon   (original, to Hawke & Hunter “miz”)

Protected: mizreduced     (preceding “reduced” to only the material from Zimmerman)

 

TONIA ZIMMERMAN IS NOT REAL  (ASHU SOLO NOW CLAIMS)

Evidence that she is an actual person, from Ashu himself.   http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=17877

Includes evidence that Ashu is the one who creates the fake on-line identities

 

TONIA  ZIMMERMAN   (is this in the original documentation?  By date, I would think I posted it at that time?)

 resume  Thread starting Dec 28, 2013    http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=16459  (Password c3b3)

me to Tonia re Airport

Tonia re she contacted Ashu’s Father

Tonia re Gormley and Gormley’s action

it would be helpful if I could say that I have not given the password to any other person.  (decline request for it)

strat man Jan07 bryngo     Jan 7, 2014  with Zimmerman.  Details re discussion with Bryn, John Gormley’s producer.  Would I go on-air?  etc.

 

TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS

Scharfstein Aug 10-11, 2016

 

UPDATES ON ASHU SOLO CASE SENT TO GPC  (affected people, Saskatoon and Ottawa)

2016

9 apr debra

WORLDCOMP

LAWSUITS

WEBSITES PUT UP BY ASHU, USING THE PERSON’S NAME AS THE WEB ADDRESS,  AND “NEWS”.

Web sites   April  2016   http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=16488

input from Daeran Gal with screen capture of  web site put up by Ashu using Daeran’s name, etc.

The word for fear, different languages. Is Jonathan Biship an alias of Ashu Solo?

Crocels “news” report re Tonia Zimmerman.  (You can purchase placement of a news article.)

Jonathan Bishop  – – some of this is in the X1A postings

 

2016-07-29    ‘What law am I breaking?’  How a Facebook troll came undone

 

ZIMMERMAN  – – see Tonia Zimmerman

 

 

Oct 212015
 

http://www.examiner.com/article/monsanto-sued-los-angeles-county-for-false-advertising

Exhibit #1

Exhibit #1

Today a class action lawsuit (Case No: BC 578 942) was filed in Los Angeles County, California against the Monsanto corporation. The suit alleges that Monsanto is guilty of false advertising by claiming that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, targets an enzyme only found in plants and not in humans or animals. Monsanto makes this claim to support the contention that glyphosate is harmless to humans.

In the lawsuit, the argument is made that the targeted enzyme, EPSP synthase, is found in the microbiota which reside in our intestines and therefore this enzyme is found in humans and animals. It is further stated in the lawsuit that there are many human and animal health problems associated with the disruption of our intestinal microbes.

“Because it kills-off our gut bacteria, glyphosate is linked to stomach and bowel problems, indigestion, ulcers, colitis, gluten intolerance, sleeplessness, lethargy, depression, Crohn’s Disease, Celiac Disease, allergies, obesity, diabetes, infertility, liver disease, renal failure, autism, Alzheimer’s, endocrine disruption, and the W.H.O. recently announced glyphosate is ‘probably carcinogenic’.”

The International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the World Health Organization (WHO), last month declared that glyphosate is Group 2A carcinogen. The American Cancer Society quickly followed suit, also listing glyphosate as a Group 2A carcinogen.

An Environmental Protection Agency memo dated October 30, 1991 states that the EPA classified glyphsate as a possible carcinogen in 1985. In this 1991 memo, without any justification, this classification was changed to Not Carcinogenic. Three scientists refused to sign, two of whom wrote beside their name: Do Not Concur. This document contains data that clearly shows a statistically significant increase in tumors in laboratory animals treated with glyphosate. But because there weren’t more tumors in the group of animals who received a higher dose of glyphosate than there were in the group that received a lower dose, Monsanto made the claim that the tumors could not be related to glyphosate.

Today’s lawsuit may be the beginning of an avalanche. Earlier this month, Beijing resident Yang Xiao-lu filed a lawsuit against the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture requesting information disclosure of the toxicology report submitted to the Chinese government for glyphosate pesticide registration in China. The case has been accepted and the collegiate panel of the court has informed the plaintiff that, considering that Monsanto is a stakeholder to the case, they have added Monsanto as an involved party to the case. Chinese citizens had previously petitioned the Ministry of Agriculture for this toxicology report but were denied. The Ministry cited “trade secrets” as the reason for denial. It is difficult to comprehend how a toxicology report would contain trade secrets since trade secrets generally constitute ingredients or a recipe for a compound or manufacturing procedure.

In today’s lawsuit, Monsanto is accused of deliberate falsification to conceal the fact that glyphosate is harmful to humans and animals. “Defendant intentionally misleads consumers by misrepresenting and concealing the true and correct facts concerning glyphosate…” Attorney T. Matthew Phillips says, “We are not trying to prove that Roundup is harmful or carcinogenic, we are merely pointing out that Monsanto is lying about the enzymes that Roundup targets. Roundup kills the weeds in your backyard and the weeds in your stomach.”

Judgment is sought against Monsanto to prohibit the company from continuing to make the claim that glyphosate targets an enzyme not found in humans and for compensation to the plaintiffs, including attorney fees.

Residents of California can become members of the class in this action by contacting T. Matthew Phillips at tmatthewphillips@aol.com. Phillips has indicated that he hopes other attorneys in other states will follow suit [pun intended].

4/22/2015: Case number was added.

4/23/2015: The lawsuit can be downloaded from http://www.monsantoclassaction.org/

Residents of California can add their names to the class. Plaintiffs are soliciting funds to help cover litigation costs: http://www.gofundme.com/monsantolawsuit

4/25/2015: T. Matthew Phillips will ask the court to compel the Defendant to reimburse donors, with interest.

Oct 192015
 

PAST:

  • guerrilla warfare in 3rd world countries against brutal exploitation.
  • while Americans are propagandized to see themselves as a gifted and benevolent leader among nations.
A DIFFERENT STORY  EMERGES 

(further to Assange, Manning, Snowden, Greenwald, etc.)

John Perkins, former economic hitman, explains how the American NSA, CIA bring the resources of other countries under control.   Subterfuge to further American corporate interests.  The countries become impoverished.

Chris Hedges explains from his perspective as a decades-long journalist covering uprisings in poor countries.

John Perkins  (author, Confessions of an Economic Hitman).   Interview Democracy Now:   Hit Men, Jackals, and the Truth about Global Corruption.

Chris Hedges interview by Abby Martin: War, Propaganda & the Enemy Within

WHAT IS THE REMEDY? . . .  MAKE THEM SCARED

Citizens in many countries are rebelling against the free trade deals, which benefit corporate interests.   The propaganda promoting the deals as beneficial to citizens isn’t working.   It seems to me that many governments risk overthrow if they ratify the trade (& “investment”) deals.   Just one example.

2015-10-10 Hundreds of thousands shut down Berlin to protest “Trojan Horse” – – Monsanto’s dream trade deal.  The Guardian

An estimated 311,000 people rallied in New York City on Sept 21, 2014 to motivate American legislators to take action on climate change.

In the years following the  December 2009 Copenhagen Talks,  the amount of NSA spying on the delegations of other countries, the U.S. manipulation of the Talks, became known.  Google for details.  Groups are working to stop the Fossil Fuels industry from participating in the upcoming round of Climate Talks, December, in Paris.

How many protestors were there, around the world, for the Climate Talks, December 2009, Copenhagen?   I haven’t found a combined number – just some individual ones, e.g. 50,000 in Australia.  I expect that this December the numbers will be significantly higher.

4.   Naomi Klein,  This Changes Everything   I saw the film last night.  Naomi and Avi Lewis pull things together.   From locations around the world, they build from

what’s happening, to

the hopeless efforts of individual local people to prevent the destruction of their land, to

people banding together and fighting, to

communities putting the run on Police with weapons (not without loss of life).

The movie (and book)  importantly unite people around the Planet.   It doesn’t matter whether you are in a poor country, or a rich.   We are together in a battle against the forces bent on extreme exploitation of Nature,  putting us all in peril.

Klein/Lewis do not spare Canadians.  In case you think we are “different”,  I suggest you watch the film!

There happened recently to be a PBS special on the tactics and then the eviction of the British Empire from India.   I imagine that the Brits in the time of the Empire were largely ignorant to the effects of their imperialism.  The same as the Americans have been propagandized into unawareness of the brutality of their Empire.

The British Empire disintegrated.   I don’t see how the American Empire can withstand the revelations of its role in the world.   Especially not now, as Americans find themselves in an increasingly unequal and violent society.

Oct 182015
 

A protest of the TTIP in Berlin drew hundreds of thousands of people. PHOTO: EFE/EPA/KAY NIETFELD

The TTIP protest in Berlin this past weekend drew hundreds of thousands. PHOTO: EFE/EPA/KAY NIETFELD

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/10/berlin-anti-ttip-trade-deal-rally-hundreds-thousands-protesters#_=_

Hundreds of thousands of people marched in Berlin on Saturday to oppose a planned free trade deal between the European Union and the United States that is claimed to be anti-democratic and to threaten food safety and environmental standards.

The environmental groups, charities and opposition parties that organised the protest claimed 250,000 people took part, while a police spokesman said 100,000 attended. Smaller protests were also held in other cities, including Amsterdam, with a rally due to be held in London on Saturday night at which shadow chancellor John McDonnell is scheduled to speak.

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) would create the world’s largest free-trade zone, encompassing some 800 million consumers, and harmonise regulation between the EU and North America in areas ranging from food safety law to environmental rules and banking regulations. It would mean that cars made in Britain could be sold in the US, for example, but opponents say it would water down important EU regulations

Protesters gather to demonstrate against the TTIP trade agreement in Berlin on Saturday.

 Protesters gather to demonstrate against the TTIP trade agreement in Berlin on Saturday. Photograph: Axel Schmidt/Getty Images

The European commission reckons that the TTIP could boost the size of the EU economy by €120bn (£85bn) – equal to 0.5% of GDP – and the US economy by €95bn, or 0.4% of GDP, while the UK could be £10bn better off.

However, opposition has escalated over the past year in Germany and other European countries, with critics pointing out that the deal will give too much power to multinational companies at the expense of consumers and workers.

The British government argues that the TTIP would boost trade and create jobs. Of the 3 million people who have signed an online petition calling on the European commission to abandon the deal, some 500,000 are from Britain.

Protesters against the TTIP trade deal carry banners and balloons in Berlin on Saturday. Photograph: Wolfram Steinberg/EPA     Keep scrolling for all the text – – there are big white spots in this posting.
Nick Dearden, director of Global Justice Now, said the petition showed that the EU did not have a public mandate for the agreement: “Everything that we know about this secretive trade deal shows that it is very little about trade and very much about enshrining a massive corporate power-grab.”
The level of resistance in Germany has surprised chancellor Angela Merkel’s government, with Saturday’s rally underlining the challenge it faces to win public support for the deal.
In a full-page letter published in several German newspapers on Saturday, the economy minister, Sigmar Gabriel, warned against scaremongering. “We have the chance to set new and goods standards for growing global trade, with ambitious standards for the environment and consumers, and with fair conditions for investment and workers. This must be our aim,” he wrote.
Protesters attend a rally against the proposed US-EU free trade pact in Berlin.
Protesters attend a rally against the proposed US-EU free trade pact in Berlin. Photograph: Gregor Fischer/AFP/Getty Images

An agreement was announced this week on another trade deal, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which involves 12 countries including the US, Japan and Australia. It has attracted criticism from the likes of US presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.

Wikileaks has released what it claims is the full intellectual property chapter of the TPP. Both the TTIP and TPP deals are still being negotiated.

ttip22

Oct 162015
 

UPDATE:   see  2016-04-02 NAFTA Chapter 11: Tribunal rules against Texas oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens in lawsuit over Ontario wind farms

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

(Note:  Should you wish, New York Times, October 15 – a bit more detailed version of the Huff Post Canadian version below is at  http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/16/business/dealbook/for-pickens-wind-claim-may-be-last-power-play.html?_r=0 )

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –  – – – – – – – – – – –

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/10/16/t-boone-pickens-ontario-lawsuit-nafta_n_8313942.html

By

T BOONE PICKENS

Founder and Chairman of BP Capital Management T. Boone Pickens participates in a discussion during a ‘birthday bash’ to celebrate his birthday at the 2015 Southern Republican Leadership Conference May 22, 2015 in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Pickens has been suing the Liberal government in Ontario under NAFTA, arguing he has been the victim of “unfair” backroom deals involving the province’s green energy program. | Alex Wong via Getty Images

For the past four years, Texas oil billionaire and corporate raider T. Boone Pickens has been suing the Liberal government in Ontario under NAFTA, arguing he has been the victim of “unfair” backroom deals involving the province’s green energy program.

A NAFTA tribunal is expected to rule on Pickens’ $700-million lawsuit this month, The New York Times reported Friday, describing the dispute as the 87-year-old tycoon’s “last big battle.”

The case is one of many that has some social activists concerned that foreign businesses enjoy too much influence over policy under NAFTA’s chapter 11, which allows foreign investors to sue Canadian governments to protect their investments, without first going through Canadian courts.

A recent study from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives said 70 per cent of claims under NAFTA’s chapter 11 were targeted against Canada, making it the most-sued country under the trade agreement.

Pickens’ lawsuit alleges “abuse of power” and “undue political interference” in the handing out of contracts for wind power in Ontario, part of the province’s multi-billion-dollar green energy plan, launched in 2009.

The lawsuit, filed in 2011, claims that Pickens’ renewable energy company, Mesa Power, lost out on wind power contracts to Florida-based NextEra Energy because NextEra donated $18,600 to the governing Liberal Party before the 2011 provincial election. The suit says this gave NextEra exclusive access to government officials.

The lawsuit notes that NextEra’s chief lobbyist at the time, Bob Lopinski, was a former advisor to then-Premier Dalton McGuinty.

The New York Times reports:

A review of documents and emails between NextEra executives, lobbyists and government officials show that NextEra met and held calls with high-level officials at the Ontario Ministry of Energy, the premier’s office and the power authority, even as Mesa Power executives were told they could not speak to officials until contracts were awarded. When NextEra lobbyists requested more information, officials sometimes responded within hours.

Ontario granted NextEra $3.8 billion in energy contracts, the Times reports, adding that Pickens had hoped those contracts would be the cornerstone of the renewable energy company he founded in 2007.

The suit also claims the Ontario government imposed a variety of “prohibited” buy-local rules, which the suit says violates NAFTA rules.

The Ontario government rejects Pickens’ claims.

“The Ontario Power Authority (OPA) runs an open, fair, and transparent process to award clean energy contracts under the feed-in-tariff program, “ Brad Duguid, then the province’s energy minister, told the Globe and Mail in 2011.

“All companies are treated equally with the same opportunities to participate, regardless of whether they are Ontario-based or internationally-based.”

An OPA official told the Times that Mesa Power didn’t submit its applications properly.

“In my view, many of Mesa Power’s failures were caused by its sloppiness and lack of care in preparing its application, and the consequent failure to satisfy clearly defined criteria,” procurement manager Richard Duffy said.

The Times notes that Mesa and NextEra are actually often on the same side of policy and political issues — both Pickens and NextEra have backed Jeb Bush’s bid for the White House.

Pickens recently donated $100,000 to the Bush campaign, in the hopes that a Bush victory would lead to a green light for the Keystone XL pipeline.

Pickens is a big fan of the oilsands, arguing that full exploitation of the resource could make the U.S. independent of Middle Eastern oil.

In a letter published in the Calgary Herald earlier this year, Pickens apologized to the people of Canada for President Barack Obama’s decision to veto a bill that would have allowed Keystone XL to go forward.

 

 

Oct 162015
 

By Jason Warick

The University of Saskatchewan logo can be seen in this StarPhoenix file photo

 

The University of Saskatchewan logo can be seen in this StarPhoenix file photo

Photograph by: Greg Pender , the StarPhoenix

 

A University of Saskatchewan professor is one of several prominent North American academics under fire for undeclared connections to agri-business giant Monsanto.

At Monsanto’s request, the scientists wrote papers supporting the global use of genetically modified crops, which were then disseminated widely by a marketing company hired by Monsanto.

Peter W.B. Phillips, graduate chair at the U of S Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, said there was no need to declare his connections because he was not paid and Monsanto did not ask him to alter his research.

Others disagree.

“Monsanto says ‘Jump’ and these scientists said ‘How high?'” said Gary Ruskin, co-director for US Right to Know, an advocacy group funded by American organic farm groups.

 

“This is not how publicly funded scientists should behave.”

According to documents obtained by U.S. Right to Know, Phillips and several other top agriculture experts were solicited to write articles by a senior Monsanto executive in 2013. They were asked to write pieces to correct the overwhelming amount of negative information about geneticallymodified organisms (GMOs) in the public sphere, according to the email.

“The key to success is participation by all of you – recognized leaders with the knowledge, reputation and communication experience needed to communicate authoritatively with the target groups,” the Monsanto email stated.

Monsanto suggested topics and headlines for each scientist. Once they agreed, a Monsanto-hired public relations firm informed them of their deadlines and how their papers would be “merchandised” and promoted widely.

In the end, the papers closely mirrored the pitch by Monsanto, Ruskin said.

Phillips was asked to write about the “burdensome regulations” that “stifle innovation” in the biotech industry.

“Critics might lead you to believe that genetically engineered crops are not tested or regulated. That is wrong,” read the opening line of the finished article by Phillips.

In his conclusion, Phillips stated: “Increased regulatory costs and an expanding approval process stifle innovation – the innovation that is needed to secure an adequate supply and, appropriate quality of food at affordable prices.”

A public relations firm hired by Monsanto emailed Phillips and the others to give them proposed deadlines and inform them of efforts to disseminate the papers.

Phillips’ eventual article, entitled Economic Consequences of Regulations of GM Crops, was published on agri-food and biotechnology websites. Phillips’ titles at the University of Saskatchewan and Johnson-Shoyama are mentioned at the top of the article, but there is no mention of Monsanto’s involvement.

Phillips said the information gathered in the paper is serving as the basis for a paper he’s submitted to an academic journal.

Phillips, holder of appointments to several other schools and departments at the U of S, said there was no need to declare his collaboration with Monsanto. In an interview, Phillips said he was not paid and works with a host of corporations, governments and non-governmental agencies.

“That’s part of my job,” he said. “The research world has changed.”

Ruskin, whose group accessed thousands of pages of emails and other documents linking the scientists and Monsanto, said North Americans should be able to trust their top university scientists, and that’s not possible when significant connections to corporations such as Monsanto are not disclosed.

The University of Saskatchewan was one of several universities, including Harvard, the University of Florida and Penn State, with undisclosed links to Monsanto revealed in the documents.

“I think it shows how universities are increasingly corporately controlled, and how science is under increasing corporate control,” Ruskin said.

Phillips admitted there is tension within universities and among academics about their role. Some believe research should not be affected at all by outside organizations, governments or the public. Phillips said he believes academics should be responsive to the needs of stakeholders. He said Monsanto holds the dominant market share in its industry, so it would be foolish to not communicate with the company.

Phillips said he was free to submit whatever he concluded, and that there was “pushback” by the academics to the suggested topics. When asked to provide any emails or names of other academics who disputed the topics, Phillips replied, “It’s not worth my effort to cover my back here.”

Ernie Barber, vice-president academic at the U of S, said researchers should definitely declare financial interests and it would be unethical to let outside officials or corporations dictate any research content. However, U of S researchers are expected to “share” their research widely, he said, adding he did not know all of the details of the Phillips case, since the details have only come out relatively recently.

“There should be no attempt whatsoever to mislead the public,” Barber said.

Monsanto Canada spokesperson Trish Jordan said the company partners with community groups, academics and others. She said Monsanto often works with academics, but “We don’t have any control over their message.”

 

Oct 152015
 

UNIVERSITY SENATE    Oct 2015

PROPOSAL, NEW ECONOMICS

 

Submitted by Sandra Finley, Senate Member-At-Large

 

CLIMATE CHANGE is a most pressing issue.   The world needs to do everything that can be done, and urgently.   Individuals, especially leaders, need to be innovative and step up.

Economics that do not account for resource depletion and degradation are a major impediment to progress on climate change.

 

PROPOSE:   Senators assist the University in identifying and replacing obsolete economic pedagogy with teaching and research on the new economics.

Economic indicators, the monitors by which we measure progress, give us feedback that we are doing just fine. But we know we are destroying the supports required by human beings to live on this Earth.

The holy grail of economic growth, measured by GDP, is leading us to a place no rational person would want to go. Our flawed indicators of success (GDP, economic development) measure the consumption of resources and attendant production of waste.

The mindless pursuit of a goal rooted in destruction has drastic consequences for those who come behind us, Our Children.

 

Oct 1- 4 CANUSSEE Conference, Canada U.S. International Society for Ecological Economics in Vancouver.   I attended.

Ecological-economics is ONE part of the “new economics”.   Through ecological-economics Senators can make a needed contribution while others travel The Road to Paris (the Paris Climate Talks in December).

MAY:   Pope Francis’ encyclical on climate change

“Every effort to protect and improve our world entails profound changes in lifestyles, models of production and consumption, and the established structures of power which today govern societies.”

JULY:   the Dutch Government was Ordered to Cut Carbon Emissions in Landmark Ruling

“This ruling is of enormous significance, and beyond our expectations,” he told the Guardian. “We had thought the legal system would not want to interfere in the political debate. But the scientific case is so strong, and the dangers so high that the court has ruled that the state is failing to adequately protect its citizens from the effects of climate change.”   The judges ordered the Dutch government to pay all of Urgenda’s costs.

AUGUST: American Youths File Landmark Climate Lawsuit Against President Obama & U.S. Government NASA climate scientist Dr. James Hansen and his grand-daughter are part of Our Children’s Trust that filed the lawsuit.

 

What can the U of S Senate do?  Be informed and find innovative ways to advocate.

Research presented at CANUSSEE tells that economics textbooks for introductory courses at Canadian Universities largely continue the curriculum taught when I attended the U of S College of Commerce 1967 – 71, almost half-a-century ago!

The teaching of mythology has a place, but not in economics.

Students should receive value for their money.

Three youtubes cover the ground on ecological economics very well. UBC is represented (Bill Rees) and the University of Vermont (Jon Erickson):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d05jEprJxtE     “CRASH COURSE” in Ecological Economics (Jon Erickson)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhHH5meSLZI     Nate Hagens // From Wall St. to Ecological Economics // Part 1 ]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxfGcwfYlAg     Interview, William Rees – The Dangerous Disconnect Between Economics and Ecology.  Institute for New Economic Thinking

It behooves us to determine what is being taught in the various economics classes, whether through Arts & Science, Ag Econ or Business Econ.   Is the pedagogy sound?

Roy Romanow, former Premier of Saskatchewan, June 2012 Star Phoenix:

“The preoccupation with the GDP, which has become the all-encompassing surrogate for everything with respect to well-being, is wrong,” he said.

GDP does nothing to measure things like whether the quality of education meets current requirements, whether the environment matters or whether people  are so busy they can’t spend time with their families, he said.

 

Taking an example close to home, the South Saskatchewan River:   I noticed when the volume of water measured at Saskatoon was 20% of a hundred years ago. A small number of years later it was 16%. Today’s actions ensure that it will hit 10%, after which comes 5%.  All because we do not have any economic measurements or goals that require the volume of water in the River to stabilize. All we have is mindless language around “economic development”, MORE withdrawals and demands. Always MORE is progress. The pervasive economic mythology assumes unlimited resources, even for example, when climate change is a known reality, even when the American West is running out of water. Even when the South Saskatchewan River is rated as the most endangered River in Canada.

Mobilizations are at the community level, you can see that in Saskatchewan in the Committee for Future Generations, in Idle No More, in the March Against Monsanto, in the Blue Dot movement.

Senate can help mobilize the University community to make an important contribution through changing our economic models of production and consumption.

 

Excerpt from World Happiness Report:

We live in an age of stark contradictions. The world enjoys technologies of unimaginable sophistication; yet has at least one billion people without enough to eat each day. The world economy is propelled to soaring new heights of productivity through ongoing technological and organizational advance; yet is relentlessly destroying the natural environment in the process. Countries achieve great progress in economic development as conventionally measured; yet along the way succumb to new crises of obesity, smoking, diabetes, depression, and other ills of modern life.

These contradictions would not come as a shock to the greatest sages of humanity, including Aristotle and the Buddha. The sages taught humanity, time and again, that material gain alone will not fulfill our deepest needs. Material life must be harnessed to meet these human needs, most importantly to promote the end of suffering, social justice, and the attainment of happiness. The challenge is real for all parts of the world.

. . .   The realities of poverty, anxiety, environmental degradation, and unhappiness in the midst of great plenty should not be regarded as mere curiosities. They require our urgent attention, and especially so at this juncture in human history. If we continue mindlessly along the current economic trajectory, we risk undermining the Earth’s life support systems – food supplies, clean water, and stable climate – necessary for human health and even survival in some places. On the other hand, if we act wisely, we can protect the Earth while raising quality of life broadly around the world. We can do this by adopting lifestyles and technologies that improve happiness (or life satisfaction) while reducing human damage to the environment. “Sustainable Development” is the term given to the combination of human well-being, social inclusion, and environmental sustainability. We can say that the quest for happiness is intimately linked to the quest for sustainable development.”

Prince Charles . . . said: “The grim reality is that our planet has reached a point of crisis. The time for us to act is rapidly running out. We are facing what could be described as a ‘perfect storm’: the combination of pollution and over-consumption of finite natural resources; the very real risk of catastrophic climate change; unprecedented levels of financial indebtedness, and a population of seven billion that is rising fast.”

 

There is a pressing need to change our economic indicators. We have economic measurements that do

not provide the feedback we need in order to make intelligent decisions. These false indicators allow us to blissfully destroy the things we are dependent upon for life. They tell us we are making “progress”, which is anything but the truth.

Another example: The economic activity generated by a child with cancer or asthma involves drugs, radiation treatment, inhalers, nurses and doctors’ salaries, hotel accommodations for family and parents whose child is in hospital, ambulance rides, funerals – – altogether a lot of economic activity. The way in which we measure the economic activity generated by treating the 25% increase in childhood cancers and 40% increase in asthma in children tells us that we are doing just great! We have a thriving economy! We turn a blind eye to the poisons that are going into the environment to create the 25% increase in cancers and 40% increase in asthma in children (figures from the Canadian Institute of Child Health in about 1992). . . . And we simultaneously congratulate ourselves on the quality of our educational institutions.   No thinking person would TEACH these economic indicators. They’d work hard with other people to make sure that we stopped deluding ourselves.

What looms ahead for your children is a much-degraded and more violent world if we are incapable of change.

The university is our knowledge base, it is responsible for helping the society to find solutions. If it does not help to address the fundamental problems of our society, the University is a significant part of the problem.

I propose that senators, working with faculty, students, governors and administrators make it a priority of the University to adopt, as expeditiously as possible, the new economics.

 

Respectfully submitted,

Sandra Finley

Oct 142015
 

http://www.alternet.org/environment/dutch-government-ordered-cut-carbon-emissions-landmark-ruling

 

Dutch court orders state to reduce emissions by 25% within five years to protect its citizens from climate change in world’s first climate liability suit.

Oct 142015
 

http://www.alternet.org/environment/american-youths-file-landmark-climate-lawsuit-against-president-obama-us-government

The plaintiffs claim that the government violated their constitutional rights by promoting the development of fossil fuels.