Sandra Finley

Nov 232013
 

By JIM ROBBINS

ON the first of November, when Mexicans celebrate a holiday called the Day of the Dead, some also celebrate the millions of monarch butterflies that, without fail, fly to the mountainous fir forests of central Mexico on that day. They are believed to be souls of the dead, returned.

This year, for or the first time in memory, the monarch butterflies didn’t come, at least not on the Day of the Dead. They began to straggle in a week later than usual, in record-low numbers. Last year’s low of 60 million now seems great compared with the fewer than three million that have shown up so far this year. Some experts fear that the spectacular migration could be near collapse.

“It does not look good,” said Lincoln P. Brower, a monarch expert at Sweet Briar College.

It is only the latest bad news about the dramatic decline of insect populations.

Another insect in serious trouble is the wild bee, which has thousands of species. Nicotine-based pesticides called neonicotinoids are implicated in their decline, but even if they were no longer used, experts say, bees, monarchs and many other species of insect would still be in serious trouble.

That’s because of another major factor that has not been widely recognized: the precipitous loss of native vegetation across the United States.

“There’s no question that the loss of habitat is huge,” said Douglas Tallamy, a professor of entomology at the University of Delaware, who has long warned of the perils of disappearing insects. “We notice the monarch and bees because they are iconic insects,” he said. “But what do you think is happening to everything else?”

A big part of it is the way the United States farms. As the price of corn has soared in recent years, driven by federal subsidies for biofuels, farmers have expanded their fields. That has meant plowing every scrap of earth that can grow a corn plant, including millions of acres of land once reserved in a federal program for conservation purposes.

Another major cause is farming with Roundup, a herbicide that kills virtually all plants except crops that are genetically modified to survive it.

As a result, millions of acres of native plants, especially milkweed, an important source of nectar for many species, and vital for monarch butterfly larvae, have been wiped out. Onestudy showed that Iowa has lost almost 60 percent of its milkweed, and another found 90 percent was gone. “The agricultural landscape has been sterilized,” said Dr. Brower.

The loss of bugs is no small matter. Insects help stitch together the web of life with essential services, breaking plants down into organic matter, for example, and dispersing seeds. They are a prime source of food for birds. Critically, some 80 percent of our food crops are pollinated by insects, primarily the 4,000 or so species of the flying dust mops called bees. “All of them are in trouble,” said Marla Spivak, a professor of apiculture at the University of Minnesota.

Farm fields are not the only problem. Around the world people have replaced diverse natural habitat with the biological deserts that are roads, parking lots and bluegrass lawns. Meanwhile, the plants people choose for their yards are appealing for showy colors or shapes, not for their ecological role. Studies show that native oak trees in the mid-Atlantic states host as many as 537 species of caterpillars, which are important food for birds and other insects. Willows come in second with 456 species. Ginkgo, on the other hand, which is not native, supports three species, and zelkova, an exotic plant used to replace elm trees that died from disease, supports none. So the shelves are nearly bare for bugs and birds.

Native trees are not only grocery stores, but insect pharmacies as well. Trees and other plants have beneficial chemicals essential to the health of bugs. Some monarchs, when afflicted with parasites, seek out more toxic types of milkweed because they kill the parasites. Bees use medicinal resins from aspen and willow trees that are antifungal, antimicrobial and antiviral, to line their nests and to fight infection and diseases. “Bees scrape off the resins from the leaves, which is kind of awesome, stick them on their back legs and take them home,” said Dr. Spivak.

Besides pesticides and lack of habitat, the other big problem bees face is disease. But these problems are not separate. “Say you have a bee with viruses,” and they are run-down, Dr. Spivak said. “And they are in a food desert and have to fly a long distance, and when you find food it has complicated neurotoxins and the immune system just goes ‘uh-uh.’ Or they become disoriented and can’t find their way home. It’s too many stressors all at once.”

There are numerous organizations and individuals dedicated to rebuilding native plant communities one sterile lawn and farm field at a time. Dr. Tallamy, a longtime evangelizer for native plants, and the author of one of the movement’s manuals, “Bringing Nature Home,” says it’s a cause everyone with a garden or yard can serve. And he says support for it needs to develop quickly to slow down the worsening crisis in biodiversity.

When the Florida Department of Transportation last year mowed down roadside wildflowers where monarch butterflies fed on their epic migratory journey, “there was a huge outcry,” said Eleanor Dietrich, a wildflower activist in Florida. So much so, transportation officials created a new policy that left critical insect habitat un-mowed.

That means reversing the hegemony of chemically green lawns. “If you’ve got just lawn grass, you’ve got nothing,” said Mace Vaughan of the Xerces Society, a leading organization in insect conservation. “But as soon as you create a front yard wildflower meadow you go from an occasional honeybee to a lawn that might be full of 20 or 30 species of bees and butterflies and monarchs.”

First and foremost, said Dr. Tallamy, a home for bugs is a matter of food security. “If the bees were to truly disappear, we would lose 80 percent of the plants,” he said. “That is not an option. That’s a huge problem for mankind.”

<nyt_author_id>Jim Robbins is a frequent contributor to The New York Times and the author of “The Man Who Planted Trees.”

Nov 232013
 

Donald Sutherlandhttp://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-politics-hunger-games-catching-fire-20131123,0,4092143.story#axzz2lVTIdyuf

By Rebecca Keegan

(INSERT:  The remarks by Donald Sutherland are very good. I flagged them below.  /S)

Like any good dystopia, “The Hunger Games” depicts a frightening world that resonates with the anxieties of contemporary audiences — a futuristic version of North America blighted by income inequality, government overreach and sadistic entertainment.

With the release of the box-office juggernaut “Hunger Games: Catching Fire” this weekend, the debate over the political interpretations of author Suzanne Collins’ bestselling trilogy is heating up, with thinkers on the left and the right both seeing their views reflected in it.

The new movie, which is based on the second book in the series, finds its rugged heroine Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) and Peeta (Josh Hutcherson) back in their impoverished District 12 after winning the 74th Hunger Games, a fight to the death among children designed to intimidate a beleaguered public from dissenting.

As they’re about to depart for a victory tour, the despotic President Snow (Donald Sutherland) visits Katniss and explains that when she defied the rules of the Capitol so that she and Peeta could both survive the “Hunger Games,” she inspired rebellion and unrest.

When it comes to 2013 political interpretations, that rebellion might represent 99 percenters speaking up against the wealthy elite or Tea Partiers rising up against an oppressive government.

On the conservative website Big Hollywood, writer Christian Toto drew parallels between Snow’s fictional authoritarian government and the “age of Obama,” citing the NSA and IRS scandals and Obamacare, Democrats’ move in the Senate this week to abolish the filibuster and the Obama administration’s relationship with the press.

“Snow’s willingness to do whatever it takes to get his way certainly recalls this week’s ‘nuclear’ decision by Senate Democrats,” Toto wrote. “It’s also alarming to consider how Fire’s fearsome government manipulates the images broadcast to the huddled masses when the Obama administration is strong-arming the press to make sure its best side is constantly shown.”

On the website GoLocalProv.com, Rhode Island Republican Travis Rowley echoed some of those views, seeing in Snow’s government a “highly imaginable tyranny. Soft, at first. Then, much more ruthless … Right up this Tea Partier’s alley.”

But Sutherland, who plays Snow, is a lifelong leftist who told Britain’s Guardian newspaper that he hopes the movies inspire young people to the kind of activism he took part in the in 1960s as a protester against the war in Vietnam.

“Hopefully they will see this film and the next film and the next film and then maybe organize,” Sutherland said. “Stand up. They might create a third party. They might change the electoral process, they might be able to take over the government, change the tax system.”

In an interview with the website Screen Rant, Sutherland said that the notion of a heroic character provoking civil unrest against an unjust government was part of what made him interested in taking a role in the “Hunger Games” in the first place.

He said the movie series “could be another Battle of Algiers,” a reference to the 1966 film about the organization of a guerrilla movement during that Algerian War that has been a source of inspiration for insurgent groups.

Jeffrey Wright, the actor who plays Beetee, a “Hunger Games” participant gifted in the use of electronics, said the genius of the series is in its varying possible interpretations.

“It’s welcoming of the entire political spectrum,” Wright told the website Hypable. “Some people look at these stories and take a 1% versus the 99% perspective, which can be read something as a left-leaning perspective. I think others look at this and they view it from a more right-leaning perspective as a condemnation of government. Others may look at is as a validation of a need for strong allegiance to the 2nd Amendment. So it’s nondiscriminatory, it’s nonpartisan.”

Nov 232013
 

All I needed to assess the need for this petition was the link to the CBC Report, from the Footnotes for the Petition:

Inside Canada’s top-secret billion-dollar spy palace, CBC News  (http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=11133)

 

This is very serious.   But we can fight it.

Please sign on, and alert your friends:

https://openmedia.ca/ourprivacy 

NEW: The government has just announced a shameful plan to use bullied kids as a front to ram through an unpopular online spying plan.1 Send a message to Justice Minister Peter MacKay now —>

Government dragnet collection of our sensitive private information is secretive, expensive, and out of control

  • SECRETIVE: The sensitive private data of law-abiding Canadians could be caught up in spying efforts by CSEC, an unaccountable and highly secretive government spy agency.2
  • EXPENSIVE: The government is about to spend $4-billion of our tax dollars to house new spying operations.3
  • OUT OF CONTROL: In recent years there have been over 3,000 breaches of sensitive citizen data, affecting approximately 725,000 of us.4

Online spying initiatives threaten to provide a range of authorities with access to your private data, at anytime, without a warrant.5

A broad-based Protect Our Privacy Coalition of citizens, experts, organizations, and businesses have come together to defend our right to privacy based on a common statement of principle.

Join us by signing on to this statement now

https://openmedia.ca/ourprivacy

Nov 232013
 

(Eve’s trial date is set for March, 2014.)

http://www.prpeak.com/articles/2013/10/08/news/doc52549d6ab8326766927680.txt

From:  Powell River Peak

By Chris Bolster  (email reporter at   prpeak.com )

A Lund resident is facing federal charges after telling Statistics Canada to count her out.

Yoga teacher Eve Stegenga is one of 54 Canadians being charged under the Statistics Act for not completing the 2011 mandatory short form Canadian census.

“I chose not to fill it out as an act of civil disobedience,” said Stegenga, who objected to having her personal information handled by a software subsidiary of the American weapons giant Lockheed Martin.

“I like to live with an aspect of integrity in my life, so when [the enumerator] came to my door, I said ‘No, because I know what the government is doing and I don’t approve.’”

doc52549d6ab8326766927680

What she knew was that in the late 1990s Lockheed Martin had branched out into information systems and developed optical recognition software to be used in scanning census forms. The company was first contracted on the 2000 United States census and then in the United Kingdom in 2001. According to media reports from 2011, the Canadian government paid Lockheed Martin $61 million for its software that would automate the 2006 Canadian census and then another $19.7 million for updates on the 2011 census.

“All the information that they need on the census they can get from my income taxes, which I file each year,” she added. “Why are we going to an American arms company to process our personal census information and laying off a bunch of Canadians?”

Stegenga said she was visited by census workers a couple of times and received a phone call from the census workers’ supervisors and a warning letter.

“I don’t know why they’re coming after me, but I feel it’s because I was really honest with them,” she said.

Stegenga said that at the time she did not realize that it was a criminal offence to not complete the short form, though census staff informed her that it was an offence.

In the letter she received from Statistics Canada she was told she “could possibly be charged.”

In the letter she received from Statistics Canada she was told she “could possibly be charged.”

“But I didn’t actually take that threat to be serious,” she said, adding that she felt it was just “intimidation” to pressure her to comply.

She believes there are a lot more than 54 people in the country who did not fill out the form.

A spokesperson from Statistics Canada said the agency would not comment on Stegenga’s case as it was currently before the courts.

“While the vast majority of Canadians promptly returned their completed 2011 census, a small number of individuals refused to comply,” said Gabrielle Beaudoin, director general of Statistics Canada’s communications division. “Charging any individual with failing to complete a census of population form is the last step in a lengthy process that ensures that the person has been given every opportunity to participate.”

Stegenga is scheduled for a court date today, Wednesday, October 9. If convicted, she could face, under the Statistics Act, a fine of up to $500, up to three months in jail or both.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
LATER COVERAGE:

2013-10-29  Census (Lockheed Martin) protestor enters not guilty plea.  Eve Stegenga, Powell River, BC

http://www.prpeak.com/articles/2013/10/29/news/doc52705b83ba25a141861993.txt

Court date to be set

by Chris Bolster

Eve Stegenga, yoga teacher and census refusenik, pleaded not guilty in court to federal charges stemming from her not filling out her Canadian census in 2011.

Stegenga is one of 54 Canadians who has been charged under the Statistics Act for not filling out the mandatory short-form census. In 2011, StatsCan received 13 million completed census forms, a 98 per cent response rate.

“I plead not guilty because this is a ludicrous charge,” said Stegenga.  She chose to not fill out the form as a protest against the federal government’s contract with a software subsidiary of Lockheed-Martin, the American weapons giant.When the census enumerator visited her Lund home, Stegenga told her that she wouldn’t complete the form and why.

Despite consulting a lawyer, Stegenga has chosen to represent herself in court and because of the nature of the charges is not entitled to legal aid representation, she said.

Gregory Reif, who is giving Stegenga legal counsel but not representing her, said that while census protestors like Audrey Tobias, an 89-year-old peace activist and WWII veteran, have made charter arguments in their defence, none have yet succeeded. Tobias was acquitted after the Crown prosecutor failed to prove her intentions beyond a reasonable doubt.

Stegenga was given until November 6 to file arraignment papers about the specifics of her case and how many witnesses she will call. Once those papers are filed a court date can be set.

Under the Statistics Act, if convicted, she could face a fine of up to $500, up to three months in jail or both.

 

Nov 232013
 

I received the email,

 Muslims @ Michigan State, based on an email written by a prof at the University.   The email – – scroll down to item #4.

The attempt behind the email has a Parallel:

  • Nazi manipulation to turn the Polish people into animals, to make them into an enemy, to make it possible for the Germans to invade Poland and kill and take.
  • Today, the War Machine Bullies in the West must have “enemies”  >>  we need Muslims to be bad people.  Or the Russians, or whoever.

The email (item #4) has the look of another hoax aimed at Muslims to stir up hate instead of dialogue  (maybe there isn’t a professor who sent the email?)  . . . . so I checked it out on Snopes (Urban Myths).

MY REPLY TO THE PERSON WHO SENT THE EMAIL TO ME:

Hi – – -,

People should receive the part of the Snopes report that was deleted by the originators of this.

I think the deletion is deliberate.  It changes the picture.

I have appended a couple of related items which I hope will be helpful.

/Sandra

(I forgot to say:  PLEASE!  understand the role of propaganda in bringing down democracy.  When the propaganda is circulated by us, ourselves, WE are the ones bringing down our own democracy! (Explanation,  item #3).)   Which is why I always take the time to respond to these hate-stirring emails.)

APPENDED

  1. THE PART THAT WAS DELETED FROM MUSLIMS @ MICHIGAN STATE
  2. FREE SPEECH EXCUSE IS LAME, PROF ABUSES POWER , by Andrew March, assistant professor
  3.  (Excerpt)   Ego – its role in putting democracy to rest.  (Hoax:  A German’s view on Islam)
  4. THE OFFENDING EMAIL  – – you might want to scroll down and read this first.

= = = = = = = = =

1.       THIS IS THE PART THAT WAS DELETED FROM “MUSLIMS @ MICHIGAN STATE”:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/wichman.asp

Origins: On 28 February 2006, Professor Indrek Wichman, a tenured professor of mechanical engineering at Michigan State University (MSU), sent the e-mail . . .. (insert:  item #4) to the Muslim Students’ Association of Michigan State University. The message was a response to the Muslim group’s having handed out free cocoa during a public awareness event about controversial cartoons that depicted the Prophet Muhammad as a terrorist. Wichman’s letter prompted the Muslim Students’ Association and twelve other student and advocacy groups to call upon the university to officially reprimand the professor.

MSU officials have declined to issue a reprimand, saying Wichman’s comments constitute free speech. Terry Denbow, spokesman for MSU, said while Wichman’s views in no way represent the university’s views, they do not violate the university’s antidiscrimination policy. However, Denbow noted, Wichman “was cautioned that any additional commentary … could constitute the creation of a hostile environment, and that could … form the basis of a complaint” under the school’s antidiscrimination policy.

Wichman told the Detroit News the letter had been intended for a one particular person, not the entirety of the Muslim Students’ Association; he had believed the e-mail address he used was that one student’s inbox. However, students who lead the association said the e-mail address was part of the group’s official Web site.

The professor expressed in interviews that he had regrets about the e-mail: “I used strong language in a private communication that I would certainly not have used if this communication would have gone public. … For the record, I thought it was a private communication and it was written in haste. I think a very minor thing has been blown completely out of proportion. I wrote it in 60 seconds. It was not like I sat and pondered over this thing for days. It was like you talking one night to your wife or your kids.”

– – – – – – – – –

2.       FREE SPEECH EXCUSE IS LAME, PROF ABUSES POWER

By Andrew March
assistant professor

http://statenews.com/article/2006/05/free_speech_excuse_is_lame_prof_abuses_power

05/16/06 12:00am | Updated 08/28/09 6:22pm

Professor Indrek Wichman obviously does not get it. In his letter “Prof explains reasons for offensive e-mail,” (SN 4/28), he seeks to portray his infamous e-mail as a free speech matter. It is not, and portraying it as such is self-pitying and disingenuous.

If he was interested in airing his views on free speech, Islam and the Middle East, he should have written a public letter, such as to The State News. Instead, he wrote a private e-mail directed personally at students. And during this incident he has, in fact, appealed to the “privacy” of that e-mail as an excuse.

The crux of this matter is the faculty/student boundary. In his e-mail, he referred to himself as an MSU professor, and proceeded to write abusive, harassing comments to students, some of whom could potentially be in his classes.

For me, the core question is one of abuse of power and position and violating the responsibility professors have toward students.

To address students in the second person and as “dissatisfied, aggressive, brutal, and uncivilized slave-trading Moslems,” to tell, I presume, mostly U.S.-born Muslims that they are “free to leave” and to write that it is his hope to God that they return to where they came from is a clear act of aggression, abuse and hostility toward students.

That is the crux of the matter — not free speech, not terrorism, not Danish cartoons and not the Muslim Students’ Association protests.

Could a professor get away with writing a single e-mail of a sexual nature toward a student or group of students? No, and for good reason. That, for me, is the proper analogy.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =  

3.   Ego – its role in putting democracy to rest. (Hoax: A German’s view on Islam)

Earlier I posted this other email I received (A German’s view on Islam) – – the same issue as  MUSLIMS @ MICHIGAN STATE,  but portraying us as the “silent majority”.

EXCERPT:

MY REPLY TO A German’s view on Islam (changed my thinking)

. . . . . BUT HERE IS THE THING that becomes evident through A German’s view on Islam

By looking OUTSIDE, and assigning blame (creating enemies, The Muslim Fanatics), we unwittingly BECOME the ‘silent majority’ in our own country, who SHOULD have spoken up about our own situation, but didn’t. 

If people were not so busy shaking the stick and bombs at “others”, they might be able to see what is happening right here.

If democracy falls, it will be because of the blindness caused by ego. Ego wants “us” (our country) to be seen as “good” .   (We’re good.  The Muslims are bad.)   Ego also diverts us to other “ego identifications” – – possessions, social status, physical appearance, family history – we are so caught up in all that,  we don’t see the invaders coming.

We can’t even see the Corporate Force when it turns and is now directed at the soul of our own country.

A definition of “ego” is helpful:

The most common ego identifications have to do with possessions, the work you do, social status and recognition, knowledge and education, physical appearance, special abilities, relationships, person and family history, belief systems, and often nationalistic, racial, religious, and other collective identifications.   / Eckhart Tolle

So in Ego .. Hoax: A German’s view on Islam  (and in this second example, Muslims at Michigan State):  it is not so much a ‘silent majority’, as a majority who are blinded to what is happening in their own country, through the role of ego with its nationalistic, racial, religious, . . . identifications.

Attack Muslims because they are Muslim? . . . but WHO is launching illegal wars? WHO is dropping bombs from drones? WHO is using radioactive, “depleted” uranium in (chemical) weapons? WHO is breaking the International Laws against torture?

If you want to stop what is happening, you have to JOIN WITH “the peaceful majority”, be they (quoting from the email)  Muslim, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Rwandans, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians.

The thing that is CHANGED since WW2: it IS possible to join forces with peaceful Muslims. And create a critical mass that will stop the war-profiteering that will poison us all with chemical & nuclear weapons. If climate change doesn’t do us in, first.

 

With most people unbelief in one thing is founded on blind belief in another. –  Lichtenberg

 

The ego and its identification with nation, race and religion does not see the very thing that it accuses “the other” of being. The “terrorists” (or fanatics, or killers – – whatever you want to call them) are us, ourselves.  Doesn’t matter what country we live in.

As Pogo said, “I have seen the enemy and he is us.”

If you fail to recognize the role of our own “fanatics” we are going to find ourselves in a police state right here in Canada.  All the signs are there, and the machinery has been put in place, step-by-step. It is deliberate and progressing nicely.

By-The-Way: to rally support for arresting Cheney when he comes to Canada on Oct 31, I joined every Peace, including every Muslim peace group I could find on Facebook. (Justice is PREREQUISITE to peace.)

I searched on the word “peace”. Not one group came up that had the name “peace” and “Christian”. Not saying that there aren’t any – – just that none came up. I will look further.

/Sandra

P.S. Don’t get me wrong, I am not saying that terrorists do not exist in other countries and that a strategy is not required. John Ralston Saul spells it out better than I ever could. Please see

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

4.       THE OFFENDING EMAIL:  Muslims @ Michigan State

This is the email I received and responded to.  I believe that it, and other emails circulating in networks are designed to fuel hatred targeted at Muslims.

I am grateful to the tireless efforts of the Ecumenical groups in many North American cities that bring various religious denominations together, Muslim, Christian and other, to discover that we all share common values and objectives.  We are after all, all human beings.   Our ancestors are the same people.

The portion of the following report deleted from the mass email distributions is in Item #1.  I found it through curiousity that maybe the whole thing about Michigan State University and the professor’s email to the Muslim Student Association might have been a hoax.  It isn’t, but part of the full report, another point-of-view,  was deleted.   /S

Sent: November-23-13 10:18 PM
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Subject: Fw: Muslims @ Michigan State

About time someone stood up for our rights.

GO,  MICHIGAN STATE  !

Very interesting — the University is standing by their professor and not bowing down to special interest groups!

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/wichman.asp

Professor Wichman E-mail

Claim:   A Michigan professor sent an e-mail telling Muslim students to leave the country.

Status:   True.

The story begins at  Michigan State University with a mechanical engineering professor named Indred Wichman.

Wichman sent an e-mail to the Muslim Student’s Association.

The e-mail was in response to the students’ protest of the Danish cartoons that portrayed the Prophet Muhammad as a terrorist.

The group had complained the cartoons were ‘hate speech.’

============

Enter Professor Wichman.

==========================================

In his e-mail, he said the following:

===============================

Dear Muslim Association,

As a professor of Mechanical Engineering here at MSU I intend to protest your protest.

I am offended not by cartoons, but by more mundane things like beheadings of civilians, cowardly attacks on public buildings, suicide murders, murders of Catholic priests (the latest in Turkey), burnings of Christian churches, the continued persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt, the imposition of Sharia law on non-Muslims, the rapes of Scandinavian girls and women (called ‘whores’ in your culture), the murder of film directors in Holland, and the rioting and looting in Paris France.

This is what offends me, a soft-spoken person and academic, and many, many of my colleagues. I counsel you dissatisfied, aggressive, brutal, and uncivilized slave-trading Muslims to be very aware of this as you proceed with your infantile ‘protests.’

If you do not like the values of the West – see the First Amendment – you are free to leave. I hope for God’s sake that most of you choose that option.

Please return to your ancestral homelands and build them up yourselves instead of troubling Americans.

Cordially,

I. S. Wichman

Professor of Mechanical Engineering

=============================

As you can imagine,

The Muslim group at the university didn’t like this too well.

They’re demanding that Wichman be reprimanded, that the university impose mandatory diversity training for faculty,

And mandate a seminar on hate and discrimination for all freshmen.

Now, the local chapter of CAIR has jumped into the fray.

CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, apparently doesn’t believe that the good professor

Had the right to express his opinion.

==========

For its part, the university is standing its ground in support of Professor Wichman,

Saying the e-mail was private, and they don’t intend to publicly condemn his remarks.

============================================================

Send this to your friends, and ask them to do the same.

Tell them to keep passing it around until the whole country gets it.

We are in a war.

This political correctness crap is getting old and killing us.

==================

If you agree with this,  Please send it to all your friends,

If not, simply delete it.

GO, MICHIGAN STATE  !

Nov 222013
 

(In court at Toronto’s Old City Hall)

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/janet-churnin-retired-social-worker-in-court-over-census-protest-1.2435776

Excerpts from the CBC Report, followed by Toronto Star coverage:

. . .   Her lawyer, Peter Rosenthal, said their defence will be built around Churnin’s charter rights to protection against unreasonable search and seizure — rights he will argue are threatened by StatsCan’s “negligent” reliance on the U.S. company’s software.

“By allowing Lockheed Martin to have access to that data, it could end up being used for U.S. government purposes, which becomes a violation,’ he said.

. . .  Despite her lawyer’s apprehension, Churnin remains upbeat and says she is prepared to accept the sentence if she is convicted.

“If they put me in jail for not signing a form and they don’t put [Mayor] Ford in jail for smoking cocaine, well we’ve got a funny justice system,” she said.

http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2013/11/22/trial_for_toronto_census_resister_janet_churnin_79_gets_off_to_slow_start.html

 

By:     GTA, Published on Fri Nov 22 2013

Friday was an exhausting day for a 79-year-old census resister.

Janet Churnin’s trial for refusing to fill out the 2011 short form census ran several hours behind as a witness from Statistics Canada was in a plane, en route from Ottawa, that couldn’t land at the island airport. So it went back to the capital and then returned later.

“Today was so boring,” Churnin said after court. “It was two guys talking about computers and networks, not the real issue about why I did what I did.”

She refused to fill out the short-form census to protest the loss of the long-form census and for StatsCan’s use of software to process census data provided by the American arms manufacturer Lockheed Martin. Churnin faces a criminal charge for contravening the Statistics Act that carries with it a potential fine of $500 and/or up three months in jail.

 “Jail would be more fun,” Churnin said, laughing.

The trial began around noon when Yves Beland , the director of census operations for StatsCan arrived and took the stand.

He told court that the census data is completely secure and “isolated” from the rest of the world. Later he admitted that it wasn’t isolated because it had one entry point from the online world.

Churnin’s defence lawyer, Peter Rosenthal, called Arcady Genkin, a computer scientist who deals with security issues at the University of Toronto, who told court there is no such thing as a completely secure network. He also said a company like Lockheed could build a “back door” into the software it provided StatsCan that could allow them access to that data.

It was déjà vu all over again as the testimony was nearly identical to Audrey Tobias’ case, the 89-year-old who won on a technicality in October.

Rosenthal is arguing that StatsCan’s use of Lockheed Martin’s software to process data will violate her freedom of expression and conscience and an unreasonable seizure of information.

Churnin will take the stand on Dec. 11.

Nov 212013
 

. . .  to develop a new implant that can track, and respond to, brain signals in real time.

I get a little nervous when it’s the War Industry doing this.

We’re talking about a whole systems approach to the brain, . . .

The high-lighted (pink) paragraph below explains the “why”.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

http://rt.com/usa/darpa-pentagon-reading-brain-860/

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is investing $70 million to develop a new implant that can track, and respond to, brain signals in real time.

The goal of the new project, dubbed “Systems-Based  Neurotechnology for Emerging Therapies” (SUBNETS), is to gather  new information via more advanced brain implants in order to  reach the next level of effective neuropsychological treatment.  DARPA is hoping to have the new implant developed within five  years.

Already, roughly 100,000 people worldwide live with a Deep Brain  Stimulation implant, a device that helps patients cope with  Parkinsons disease. While scientists are currently studying the  possibility of using these devices to combat other diseases, the  problem is current technology can only treat symptoms, not record  the brain’s signals or analyze the effectiveness of any  administered treatment.

“There is no technology that can acquire signals that can tell  [scientists] precisely what is going on with the brain,”Justin Sanchez, DARPA’s program manager, told the New York Times.

The SUBNETS  program intends to change the current landscape  significantly. Not only does DARPA want to map out exactly how  diseases establish themselves in an individuals brain, the agency  also wants its implant to be able to record the signs of illness  in real time, deliver treatments, and monitor the treatment’s  effectiveness.

  Considering the toll that mental illnesses are taking on military  veterans, there’s a new level of urgency surrounding the  ambitious initiative. Ten percent of service members receiving  treatment from the Veteran’s Health Administration are being  treated for mental health conditions or substance abuse, and  mental disorders are now the primary reason for hospital bed  stays.

“If SUBNETS is successful, it will advance neuropsychiatry  beyond the realm of dialogue-driven observations and resultant  trial and error into the real of therapy driven by quantifiable  characteristic of neural state,” Sanchez said on DARPA’s  website. “SUBNETS is a push toward innovative, informed and  precise neurotechnological therapy to produce major improvements  in quality of life for servicemembers and veterans who have very  few options with existing therapies.”

The new project is part of President Obama’s BRAIN initiative,  which sets aside $100 million in its first year to develop new  innovations in neuroscience. DARPA is collaborating with the  National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation  on SUBNETS, and it is currently soliciting proposals from various  research teams.

Whether the agency can actually achieve its goal in five years is  a question mark – one neuroscientist told the New York Times  that, like nearly all DARPA projects, it’s “overambitious” – but  new discoveries concerning how the brain functions are expected  regardless. Whether the implant itself becomes a reality or not,  Sanchez said that new medical devices will be developed as a  result.

“We’re talking about a whole systems approach to the brain,  not a disease-by-disease examination of a single process or a  subset of processes,” Sanchez said. “SUBNETS is going to  be a cross-disciplinary, expansive team effort and the program  will integrate and build upon historical DARPA research  investments.”

Nov 212013
 

Activist and journalist Elsa Rassbach explains the situation with the German
government and their move to acquire weaponized drones. There is currently a strong opposition to Germany’s drone acquiring that is making progress in their work. Rassbach also talks about the reaction in Germany to the NSA spying revelations and the protests for Obama’s visit that the media did not cover.

Elsa Rassbach is US citizen, filmmaker and journalist, who often lives and
works in Berlin, Germany. She heads the “GIs & US Bases” working
group in DFG-VK (the German affiliate of War Resisters International,
WRI) and is active in Code Pink, No to NATO, and the anti-drone campaign in Germany.  Her film short “We Were Soldiers in the ‘War on Terror'” has been released in the U.S., and “The Killing Floor,”  her award-winning film set in the Chicago Stockyards, will be re-released soon.

http://youtu.be/NMakNfUGatQ

Nov 202013
 

There must be collaborating angels in StatsCan and the Justice Dept.  Else, why on Earth would they lay Census charges against ANOTHER Wise Old Woman, a WOW! as I like to call them?

Canadians are a conscientitious lot,  inside AND outside Government?!

Anyway – – bless the WOW’s !

October

  • 89-years-life-experience AUDREY TOBIAS

2013-10-04  89 years old, didn’t fill in census (Lockheed Martin); she’s in Court?! Audrey Tobias

November

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

PLEASE BEAR WITH ME:  EXPERIMENT TO TEST WHY EMAILS ARE NOT BEING DELIVERED

I have to change the way I send out emails.  Too many are now returned, undelivered.  I don’t have time to deal with them.  Have tried different remedies.  Problem still crops up.

TEST:  Send out emails with maximum one URL in them.  (Sounds like a corny remedy.  The “why” is below.)

If emails stop being returned – – I will continue the practice.

I appreciate your patience while I try this out.

Cheers!

Sandra

 

  • Sometimes large numbers come back, undelivered.  They “do not meet required standards“.  (No further explanation.)
  • I have broken distribution lists down into smaller and smaller groups.  That seemed to work.  But no longer and now, I have had some returned that were only sent to one person. (does not meet required standard)
  • I stopped putting my contact info on signature line at bottom.  It had included my blog URL, etc.  Seemed that fewer emails were rejected.
  • I consulted with a person who is knowledgeable.
  • I don’t know:  in the recesses of my mind one of the “required standards” might be related to the number of URLs in the email.

Maybe it’s a signal that I am circulating links to copyrighted material?

  • The latter doesn’t seem to make sense because I receive newsletters that are a list of headlines/thumbnail info, with URLs — a whole list of them.
  • Tech Support puts me on hold.  (Sasktel used to have excellent Tech Support.  When I call the number today, it is “Bell Tech Support”.)

I have to find a solution, experimentation required.

Nov 202013
 

(Quotes Avrin Lazar)

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/canada-s-climate-change-stance-de-motivating-1.2433224

Anyone wondering why Canada, with its minuscule global carbon footprint, attracts so much international ire from environmentalists these days should listen to Avrim Lazar.

 

The former forest industry executive and one-time Environment Canada policy lead was part of a biodiversity seminar Tuesday at the University of Ottawa, where policy talk inevitably meandered over to climate change.

 

‘It’s not the people that say there is no problem who are standing in the way of solutions. It’s the people who are saying there is no solution.’- Avrim Lazar

 

Lazar said a feeling of powerlessness is sapping motivation and he believes the problem lies in getting everyone in the global commons to contribute.

 

“It’s not the people that say there is no problem who are standing in the way of solutions,” Lazar told the assembled business, government, academic and student representatives.

 

“It’s the people who are saying there is no solution. That basically sucks the energy out of the necessary human action and initiative.”

 

A United Nations conference in Warsaw, Poland, is currently struggling to find an international consensus on a post-2020 framework for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

 

Canada’s low-key Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq carried exceedingly low expectations to Warsaw this week, and indications are they’re being met.

 

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon urged delegates at the conference Tuesday to “set the bar higher” as they work toward a 2015 summit in Paris where it is hoped the 2020 framework can be nailed down.

 

“Current pledges are simply inadequate,” the secretary general admonished the conference.

 

The Conservative government formally abandoned Canada’s commitments under the old Kyoto Protocol and Environment Canada confirmed last month that Canada is not close to being on track to meet its 2020 emissions target under the subsequent Copenhagen Accord. Aglukkaq has not indicated what Canada’s immediate post-2020 emissions targets might look like.

 

Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver was in London on Tuesday, where he continued to question a European Union fuel directive that paints Alberta’s oilsands bitumen as much more highly polluting than conventional sources.

 

Canada’s carbon footprint not the point, critic says

 

Government officials have repeatedly noted that Canada contributes less than two per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions; Oliver told reporters Tuesday in London that the “oilsands, which have become a symbol for some opponents, represent 0.1 per cent of global emissions.”

 

Back in Ottawa, Lazar suggested in an interview the statistic misses the point.

 

“Those who are furious with Canada’s performance, it’s not because they need our two per cent (of global GHG emissions),” he said. “The government’s quite right saying we’re only two per cent of the problem.”

 

 

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon urged delegates at the conference Tuesday to “set the bar higher” as they work toward a 2015 summit in Paris where it is hoped the 2020 framework can be nailed down. (The Associated Press)

 

The anger comes from Canada “reducing the global collectivity’s belief that if they act, others will act. It’s de-motivating. That’s the reason for the fury.”

 

“Each time someone says ‘I’m not going to step up,’ everyone else thinks there’s no point to my stepping up,” said Lazar.

 

His comments were not a political attack on the government. The university forum was devoid of partisan posturing and focused entirely on efforts to advance environmental policy.

 

A recurring theme was that industry is often out in front of government in seeking a regulatory regime or market signals that allow it to plan accordingly while being responsible environmental stewards.

 

Governments aren’t looking far enough ahead, said Stewart Elgie, an environmental law expert at the University of Ottawa.

 

“It’s not that they don’t want to do anything, it’s that governments are paralyzed by thinking that doing these things will ultimately hurt the economy and cost them votes,” said Elgie.

 

He called it backward thinking in a world where scarce environmental resources — water, climate, biodiversity — will be the drivers of business success in future.

 

Industry says it needs government direction

 

Sandra Schwartz, vice-president of the Canadian Electricity Association, told the forum that her industry needs government direction — rules it can follow — in order to plan and operate.

 

Lazar put the issue in stark terms.

 

“Let’s not beat around the bush,” he told the forum.

 

“Do you think that Canada’s oilsands and pipeline industry would be meeting the degree of universal opposition they’re now meeting if people trusted government to regulate?”

 

Lazar was part of a movement that turned around the reputation of Canada’s forest industry as a international pariah in the 1990s by working with environmental groups and by highlighting government regulation.

 

“We used government regulation as a way of reassuring people who were skeptical of us,” he said. “You can’t do that with any great effect in the oil industry.”

 

“So yes, industry depends upon government doing its job. And when government doesn’t do it’s job, it’s not just the environmental community that’s disadvantaged.”

 

© The Canadian Press, 2013