Sandra Finley

Nov 272013
 

Things that did not make sense suddenly become clear as day.

  • why is the Government proceeding with the registration of GMO salmon?
  • why the closure of fisheries labs on the West Coast?
  • why can’t the Government tolerate scientists?
  • for how little will people sell their souls?

I highly recommend the video “Salmon Confidential” and bless the people who made it:

  • Alexandra Morton – the scientist
  • Twyla Roscovich – the filmmaker

See  http://www.salmonconfidential.ca/watch-salmon-confidential-documentary/

69 min

(A back-up copy (film only, without the blog info) is at www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4XpuaZ6WK8.)

 

Closely related posting:  Dr. David Wallinga . . . antibiotics in animal feed.

    • Wallinga explains what happens when you put animals into closely confined quarters.
    • “Salmon Confidential” adds more insights, but based on fish.
    • The same happens when you overcrowd human beings.  We are all forms of LIFE.

Diane writes:

The following “Canadian Approval” (of GMO salmon) should not be happening and if you have any doubts please watch “Salmon Confidential“. 

Salmon Confidential is a new film on the government cover up of what is killing BC’s wild salmon.

IMPORTANT ACTION:

Canadian Approval Puts ‘Frankenfish’ One Step Closer to Dinner Plate  (a petition to sign)  http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/11/26-3

Nov 262013
 

TODAY, IF YOU HAVE TIME FOR ONE THING ONLY:

2013-11-23  SIGN STATEMENT:  Protect our Privacy!  (IMPORTANT)

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

We are in a huge race.

The Corporatocracy is coming down fast:

 

 

 

Simultaneously, Citizens are engaged in two necessary realms:

  • DECONSTRUCTION:  standing up and mobilizing
  • RECONSTRUCTION: developing the alternatives to what we have now.  (There’s a huge amount of work that has been on-gong for 20+ years.  Updates, in later postings.)

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Standing up and mobilizing

There are LOTS more stories, of course.  The Lockheed Martin “refuseniks” are important because they’re drawing attention to the presence of the US military at a time when the Government is investing heavily in spying and the military.

 

Audrey Tobias will be attending Janet’s next court appearance in Toronto’s old City Hall, Dec 11, 2013.  In solidarity.  I expect that the Court Room will be as packed as Audrey’s trial.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

WHY DO WE MOBILIZE?

 

 

 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

IF YOU UNDERSTAND

  • PROPAGANDA
  • THE CREATION OF “ENEMIES”  and
  • HOW EGO WORKS

YOU WILL SEE AN EASY WAY FOR EACH OF US to pitch in:

2013-11-24  Propaganda:  Not the Whole Story, “Muslims @ Michigan State”   (Counter the manipulation.  We cannot make enemies out of other ordinary people.  It only makes it easier for the corporatocracy.)

 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

ARE WE SUCCEEDING?   . . .  YOU BET!  

But as noted, we are in a huge race.  It will be us or the Corporatocracy.   

. . .   Important wins . . .   for a later posting.

 

Nov 262013
 

Hi Kimberly,

Many thanks for the film Unacceptable Levels.  (Trailer at http://www.unacceptablelevels.com/)

You address an issue near and dear to my heart.

I can tell from the trailer that it covers the bases.  I’m looking forward to viewing the film.

You help empower people by presenting the film.  They will help spread the word.

For my part:  I’ll post your web page link to the F/B groups on the “List..” (explanation follows).    They are active, passionate people’   They’ll welcome your film, I’m sure.  Will also spread the word into my email networks.

(I received notice of the film (appended) from the Sask Eco Network.

Many thanks and best wishes,

Sandra Finley

British Columbia, Canada

= = = = = = = = = = =

 

EXPLANATION OF THE LIST ( A “suggestion” for you)  ALLY GROUPS:

Suggestion, based on people making the link from CHEMICAL companies to the biotech (GMO) companies.  They are, of course, one and the same corporations.

“Monsanto” is the metaphor that encompasses chemical poisoning of the environment, the food supply and big-time corruption of Government.

It is difficult to obtain change, because of the influence they (the chem/biotech corporations) purchase with their $$$$$$.

An act of empowerment, after people see Unacceptable Levels:   join the March Against Monsanto (MAM).   It struck a chord and has taken off.

The next (and third) big global day of action is May 24th, 2014.   Each March brings out more people.   If there isn’t a March in your community, they are easy to organize via facebook.  Or however people want to do it.  Put something up now, so that like-minded people in a community can find each other.

Monsanto is one of the biggest chemical companies.

There has been great mobilization (the March Against Monsanto) because of the GMO food – – Mother’s who are frustrated by the GMO contamination of the food supply.   They are learning about the simultaneous increased chemical load on the environment that comes with GMO food.   And so on.

This page from my blog emphasizes the MAM’s in Canada (the organizers, Tami Canal from Utah, may have been hit with a tsunami of interest – – people here were having trouble finding Canadian groups, so this is a tool to assist Tami’s work.  But the main contact points for the March outside Canada are provided, too).

List of March Against Monsanto (MAM), No to GMO, & GE Free Groups, emphasis on Canada   

As mentioned, I’ll post the link to your film trailer to the F/B groups on this “List..”.

= = = = = = = = = =  = = = = = = =

I learned of Unacceptable Levels from this notice, Dec 2 screening: 

 Premiere Screening in Saskatoon!

Dec 2nd at 8:00pm at the Broadway Theatre in Saskatoon.

Don’t miss this hugely important screening of UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS on Dec 2nd at 8:00pm at the Broadway Theatre to be followed by panel discussion.

Over 82,000 chemicals are now being used in a variety of industrial processes and are making their ways into our bodies through the food we eat, air we breathes and the products that we use. Unacceptable levels takes us on a journey to discover where these chemicals are coming from and how they are entering our bodies and how they are affecting our health. Check out the trailer here: http://www.unacceptablelevels.com/

Panelists

Jennifer Sass – Saskatoon’s very own Jennifer Sass, is now a senior scientist at the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) in Washington, DC. For years, she’s been studying the myriad effects of certain pesticides and plastics on the environment (and thus ourselves). She has been interviewed on CNN and in the New York Times, and has even been called to testify in front of Congress about her findings.

Jennie Weselowsky – Jennie has a passion for healthy people, a healthy environment, and ways to reduce toxic exposure. She currently works at Dad’s Organic Market as a Natural Living Consultant specializing in body care and supplements and is active with the Saskatchewan Environmental Society as their fundraising coordinator.

Peter Prebble – Peter Prebble is Director of Environmental Policy with the Saskatchewan Environmental Society.  He served as an MLA in the Saskatchewan Legislature for 16 years, and is author of several recent publications on climate change and energy policy.

Dr. Louise Gagne – Louise Gagné is a family physician at the Saskatoon Community Clinic.  In addition to her medical practice, she teaches integrative medicine and nutrition at the University of Saskatchewan’s College of Medicine.

 

Cost is based on Broadway theatre pricing. For Broadway members it is $7 for adults and seniors and $5 for 12 years and under. For Non-members it is $10 for adults and seniors and $5 for 12 years and under.

This is an important film and we are lucky to have these amazing speakers on our panel! Please spread the word through your networks, tell your friends and family.  Chemicals just got personal.

For more information check out our Facebook page here: https://www.facebook.com/events/601194309939853/ or contact us at info@econet.sk.ca or (306)652-1275.

--  
SASKATCHEWAN ECO NETWORK  
535 8th Street East 
Saskatoon SK  S7H 0P9

Phone: 306-652-1275
info   AT   econet.sk.ca
http://econet.ca

Nov 242013
 

http://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/jack-knox-security-borders-on-absurd-in-pipeline-debate-1.708102

We shouldn’t be surprised that the RCMP and CSIS kept tabs on environmentalists and at least two Victoria politicians during this year’s Northern Gateway hearings. Given the tensions around the proposal, some security planning was needed.

Nor should we be surprised that our police and spy agencies meet regularly with energy companies. In the post-9/11 world, sharing intelligence to keep al-Qaeda at bay makes sense.

Somewhere, though, the line blurred. Emails released this week show a cosy relationship in which CSIS, a section of the RCMP, our pro-pipeline federal government, the National Energy Board and energy companies are inside the club, while those who oppose Enbridge’s proposal are treated like woolly headed radicals working against the national interest.

Which leads to the obvious question: If that’s what Ottawa thinks of British Columbians who worry about oil tankers doing an Exxon Valdez in the tricky inside waters of our coast, how seriously will it listen to them?

The emails came to light through an access to information filing initially reported in the online Vancouver Observer. They showed communications between the RCMP, CSIS, the National Energy Board and its security chief before and during the regulatory hearings into Enbridge’s proposal to pipe Alberta bitumen to a tanker terminal at Kitimat.

The messages talk of using social media and other sources to monitor everything from the Idle No More movement to the Victoria-based Dogwood Initiative to the annual all-native basketball tourney in Prince Rupert. One of the emails, a security summary prior to January’s hearings in Kelowna, refers to a gathering at which Elizabeth May — the Saanich-Gulf Islands MP and Green Party leader — and Victoria-Swan Lake MLA Rob Fleming were to speak.

Those revelations follow a series of stories in Britain’s Guardian newspaper, which reported that the Canadian government has an extensive spying program aimed at domestic environmental organizations. Since 2005, twice-a-year meetings involving energy companies, police, CSIS and other federal agencies have been convened to discuss threats to the energy sector, including challenges from green groups. The Guardian produced the agenda for one such meeting in May: sponsored by Natural Resources Canada, it was held at CSIS headquarters in Ottawa, with breakfast, lunch and coffee provided by Enbridge and a networking mixer paid for by Bruce Power and Brookfield Renewable Energy Partners.

It’s that last image that bothers Fleming, who says it’s one thing to take reasonable security measures, another to advertise “private soirees where they boast that intelligence will be shared over cocktails and hors d’oeuvres.”

“That to me is completely wrong.”

Fleming, the B.C. NDP’s point man on the Northern Gateway file, followed the hearings around the province last winter: Prince Rupert, Prince George, Victoria, Vancouver, Kelowna. “I saw the broadest possible cross-section of British Columbians that I could imagine.” No mad bombers, though.

Indeed, the emails make it clear that at no time was a specific threat to the Northern Gateway hearings detected.

Nevertheless, security arrangements bordered on the absurd when the regulatory road show came to the Delta Victoria Ocean Pointe for eight days in January. Hotel doors were guarded by a contingent of Victoria police officers working on overtime (the bill was ultimately paid by Enbridge, as the applicant was responsible for all costs related to the pipeline review). Members of the public could only watch online or on a big screen at the Ramada three kilometres away. Even the people scheduled to testify (they had to wait at least 15 months for the privilege) were herded into a holding room down the hall from the hearing room. Never mind that they looked less like wild-eyed anarchists than a United Church prayer circle, a bunch of grey-haired retirees in fleece vests and Gore-Tex.

That betrays a troubling mindset by a federal government that starts with the assumption that anyone who disagrees with the Northern Gateway plan is by definition a kook, a fringe character hiding behind a balaclava or one of those moustachioed Occupy Everything masks. Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver infamously ranted about “environmental and other radical groups” blocking pipeline proposals. The feds poured $8 million into a witch hunt targeting environmental charities that it blamed for bogging down the approval process. In Ottawa, green is the new black.

“I wonder if the intelligence service was also mobilized by the irresponsible and over-the-top rhetoric by Stephen Harper and some of his ministers who demonized anyone who questioned whether Enbridge was bad for our economic future,” Fleming says.

Note that no one in CSIS is offering to keep tabs on the oil companies and hold a briefing for the enviro groups.

Oh well, Fleming says, at least Brazil can take comfort in the idea that Canada spies on its own citizens, too.

The panel reviewing the Northern Gateway proposal is to make its recommendation by the end of the year.

© Copyright 2013

 

Nov 242013
 

BELOW: is a back-up copy of the CBC News Report, Inside Canada’s top-secret billion-dollar spy palace. But I recommend you go to the URL. There’s a set of 8 photos. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/inside-canada-s-top-secret-billion-dollar-spy-palace-1.1930322?cmp=rss/

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Please take time for the associated ACTION ITEM:

2013-11-23  SIGN STATEMENT:  Protect our Privacy!  (IMPORTANT)

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

RELATED POSTING:  2013-10-07  Spy agency CSEC needs MPs’ oversight, ex-director says, CBC News

– – – – – – – – – – – – –  – – – – – – – – – –

CBC NEWS

Inside Canada’s top-secret billion-dollar spy palace

New intelligence headquarters has soaring atriums, grand staircases and filtered drinking fountains

The official cost of the top-secret intelligence headquarters is more than $880 million, making it the most expensive government building in Canada

 

By Greg Weston

While the Harper government is preaching government austerity, it is spending almost $1.2 billion on a new Ottawa headquarters for a little-known military spy agency.

It’s the most expensive Canadian government building ever constructed.

Under tight security, CBC obtained an exclusive tour of the top secret complex that most Canadians will otherwise never get to see, a development even National Defence apparently thinks is so grandiose that the department dubbed the project “Camelot” in official documents.

When completed next year, the facility in suburban Ottawa will house the roughly 2,000 employees of the Communications Security Establishment Canada, a federal agency that spies mainly on foreigners by hacking into their computers, reading their email and intercepting their phone calls.

CSEC officially estimates the complex will cost $880 million. But sources close to the project say it will be closer to $1.2 billion by the time all the associated costs are tallied.The new CSEC headquarters will have more floor space than the Air Canada Centre in Toronto, and its cost would build several big city hospitals.

The developer has also been contracted to maintain the building and provide other services for another roughly $3 billion over the next 30 years.

It is virtually impossible for the media or taxpayers to verify the specifics of how all that money is actually being spent — almost everything to do with the project has been declared a matter of national security and stamped “secret.”

The former head of CSEC makes no apologies for what he calls an “architectural wonder” at public expense.

In a rare and wide-ranging interview exclusively with CBC, former CSEC chief John Adams spoke at length about the agency and its new headquarters, a project he oversaw from its inception until his retirement last year.

“Did it have to be an architectural wonder? No it didn’t,” Adams says.

“But, you know, glass in this [CBC] building is the same price as glass in that [CSEC] building.

“That building is just going to look an awful lot better than this building.…That facility is going to be quite magnificent.”

Atriums and high-tech glass — but no fireplace

The centrepiece of the complex has been aptly described as a massive glass skyscraper lying on its side.

CSEC officials say it will be filled with mainly common spaces such as soaring atriums, a cafeteria, library and meeting areas.

Contrary to Adams’s contention that glass is glass, a construction executive familiar with the CSEC project says the exterior panes that cover the building are all custom cut and part of a special mounting system, all of which is “far more expensive” than anything on a conventional office building.

Experts say the security features of the CSEC project are a major reason the price tag is so high.

The glass exterior, for instance, like virtually everything else in the new headquarters, comes with special security features to prevent other spies from spying on CSEC.

Every piece of material going into the construction of the building has to be inspected for possible spy bugs; every vehicle entering the site has to be searched.

All of the nearly 5,000 workers involved in the project have been cleared by security.

The former CSEC chief said the new facility would include a grand fireplace in one of the common areas.

Adams said one of the challenges at CSEC is how to get spies hunched over computer terminals “to relax and get together to just chat. So what I wanted was an area that would attract people.”

“How do you get them to gather? You have things there that will draw people. Fire draws people. It’s got a fireplace. People say that it is ostentatious. It is not ostentatious. A, It is part of the heat; and B, it is gas; and C, people will walk to the fire. And guess what? They are going to meet people that they would not otherwise see.”

Three hours after this story was posted online, two senior officials from CSEC’s public relations department contacted CBC News to say there will be “no fireplaces in the facility.”

This is not the first time the plans for the new spy palace have been changed.

Plans for the facility to include a skating rink and hobby garden were dropped early in the development after their existence was reported in the media.

Those choosing to gather for gossip at the drinking fountain will be treated to filtered water.

‘Did they really look at the expenses?’

Gregory Thomas heads the Canadian Taxpayers’ Federation, a watchdog organization that tracks government waste.

He is not impressed: “Paying for a glass tower and glass atriums and luxury accommodations for government employees, I don’t think most Canadians would agree with that.”

Thomas points out it is the same Defence Department responsible for CSEC that bought the whole Nortel Networks campus, the biggest industrial complex in the country, for $208 million.

“It is standing vacant now. The question is: Did they really look at the expenses when they set out to buy a $1.2-billion building for 2,000 people?”

Most of the actual work spaces will be located in seven glass towers attached to the outside of the central structure.

But no one is going to be fighting for a corner office. There are none.

Adams says the spy biz is “collaborative work.” And to encourage that, there will be no offices — corner or otherwise — in the entire place: It will be all open concept.

“It is quite a building.”

Powerful data centre

The nerve centre of the agency is a separate concrete bunker the size of a football field, home to what is being touted as the most powerful super-computer in the country, along with its mammoth electrical power generators and cooling systems.

When fully operational, the data centre alone will apparently suck up enough electricity to light much of the nation’s capital.

Adams says a lack of electrical and computing power is the main reason the agency is having to move from its current location in south Ottawa, a cluster of buildings dating back to the 1960s, the main one previously occupied by the CBC.

He says the agency’s existing computers could only run at 60 per cent capacity without overloading the local power grid.

CSEC also needs about three times more computing power than it has, plus a full backup, Adams says. “There are more transactions at CSEC on a daily basis than all of our banks combined.”

The new facility will “maximize one of the most capable workforces in the country with some of the most fantastic equipment in the country.”

When Canada’s eavesdropping spooks aren’t at their desks, they will be able to enjoy the expansive grounds around the CSEC complex now being fully landscaped with lawns, gardens, trees, nature trails and a couple of duck ponds.

Finally, a large glass walkway will ultimately connect the new CSEC headquarters to its next-door neighbour, Canada’s better-known and more traditional spy agency, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, or CSIS.

By comparison with the current CSEC project, the CSIS headquarters complex houses more spooks at about a quarter of the price.

Thomas of the taxpayers’ federation said other public servants will be outraged.

“Federal government employees are coming home telling their families they don’t have a job anymore and at the same time we are constructing a billion-dollar house of glass for our spy agency.”

No one currently employed by CSEC would agree to be interviewed on the record.

 

Nov 232013
 

By JIM ROBBINS

ON the first of November, when Mexicans celebrate a holiday called the Day of the Dead, some also celebrate the millions of monarch butterflies that, without fail, fly to the mountainous fir forests of central Mexico on that day. They are believed to be souls of the dead, returned.

This year, for or the first time in memory, the monarch butterflies didn’t come, at least not on the Day of the Dead. They began to straggle in a week later than usual, in record-low numbers. Last year’s low of 60 million now seems great compared with the fewer than three million that have shown up so far this year. Some experts fear that the spectacular migration could be near collapse.

“It does not look good,” said Lincoln P. Brower, a monarch expert at Sweet Briar College.

It is only the latest bad news about the dramatic decline of insect populations.

Another insect in serious trouble is the wild bee, which has thousands of species. Nicotine-based pesticides called neonicotinoids are implicated in their decline, but even if they were no longer used, experts say, bees, monarchs and many other species of insect would still be in serious trouble.

That’s because of another major factor that has not been widely recognized: the precipitous loss of native vegetation across the United States.

“There’s no question that the loss of habitat is huge,” said Douglas Tallamy, a professor of entomology at the University of Delaware, who has long warned of the perils of disappearing insects. “We notice the monarch and bees because they are iconic insects,” he said. “But what do you think is happening to everything else?”

A big part of it is the way the United States farms. As the price of corn has soared in recent years, driven by federal subsidies for biofuels, farmers have expanded their fields. That has meant plowing every scrap of earth that can grow a corn plant, including millions of acres of land once reserved in a federal program for conservation purposes.

Another major cause is farming with Roundup, a herbicide that kills virtually all plants except crops that are genetically modified to survive it.

As a result, millions of acres of native plants, especially milkweed, an important source of nectar for many species, and vital for monarch butterfly larvae, have been wiped out. Onestudy showed that Iowa has lost almost 60 percent of its milkweed, and another found 90 percent was gone. “The agricultural landscape has been sterilized,” said Dr. Brower.

The loss of bugs is no small matter. Insects help stitch together the web of life with essential services, breaking plants down into organic matter, for example, and dispersing seeds. They are a prime source of food for birds. Critically, some 80 percent of our food crops are pollinated by insects, primarily the 4,000 or so species of the flying dust mops called bees. “All of them are in trouble,” said Marla Spivak, a professor of apiculture at the University of Minnesota.

Farm fields are not the only problem. Around the world people have replaced diverse natural habitat with the biological deserts that are roads, parking lots and bluegrass lawns. Meanwhile, the plants people choose for their yards are appealing for showy colors or shapes, not for their ecological role. Studies show that native oak trees in the mid-Atlantic states host as many as 537 species of caterpillars, which are important food for birds and other insects. Willows come in second with 456 species. Ginkgo, on the other hand, which is not native, supports three species, and zelkova, an exotic plant used to replace elm trees that died from disease, supports none. So the shelves are nearly bare for bugs and birds.

Native trees are not only grocery stores, but insect pharmacies as well. Trees and other plants have beneficial chemicals essential to the health of bugs. Some monarchs, when afflicted with parasites, seek out more toxic types of milkweed because they kill the parasites. Bees use medicinal resins from aspen and willow trees that are antifungal, antimicrobial and antiviral, to line their nests and to fight infection and diseases. “Bees scrape off the resins from the leaves, which is kind of awesome, stick them on their back legs and take them home,” said Dr. Spivak.

Besides pesticides and lack of habitat, the other big problem bees face is disease. But these problems are not separate. “Say you have a bee with viruses,” and they are run-down, Dr. Spivak said. “And they are in a food desert and have to fly a long distance, and when you find food it has complicated neurotoxins and the immune system just goes ‘uh-uh.’ Or they become disoriented and can’t find their way home. It’s too many stressors all at once.”

There are numerous organizations and individuals dedicated to rebuilding native plant communities one sterile lawn and farm field at a time. Dr. Tallamy, a longtime evangelizer for native plants, and the author of one of the movement’s manuals, “Bringing Nature Home,” says it’s a cause everyone with a garden or yard can serve. And he says support for it needs to develop quickly to slow down the worsening crisis in biodiversity.

When the Florida Department of Transportation last year mowed down roadside wildflowers where monarch butterflies fed on their epic migratory journey, “there was a huge outcry,” said Eleanor Dietrich, a wildflower activist in Florida. So much so, transportation officials created a new policy that left critical insect habitat un-mowed.

That means reversing the hegemony of chemically green lawns. “If you’ve got just lawn grass, you’ve got nothing,” said Mace Vaughan of the Xerces Society, a leading organization in insect conservation. “But as soon as you create a front yard wildflower meadow you go from an occasional honeybee to a lawn that might be full of 20 or 30 species of bees and butterflies and monarchs.”

First and foremost, said Dr. Tallamy, a home for bugs is a matter of food security. “If the bees were to truly disappear, we would lose 80 percent of the plants,” he said. “That is not an option. That’s a huge problem for mankind.”

<nyt_author_id>Jim Robbins is a frequent contributor to The New York Times and the author of “The Man Who Planted Trees.”

Nov 232013
 

Donald Sutherlandhttp://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-politics-hunger-games-catching-fire-20131123,0,4092143.story#axzz2lVTIdyuf

By Rebecca Keegan

(INSERT:  The remarks by Donald Sutherland are very good. I flagged them below.  /S)

Like any good dystopia, “The Hunger Games” depicts a frightening world that resonates with the anxieties of contemporary audiences — a futuristic version of North America blighted by income inequality, government overreach and sadistic entertainment.

With the release of the box-office juggernaut “Hunger Games: Catching Fire” this weekend, the debate over the political interpretations of author Suzanne Collins’ bestselling trilogy is heating up, with thinkers on the left and the right both seeing their views reflected in it.

The new movie, which is based on the second book in the series, finds its rugged heroine Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) and Peeta (Josh Hutcherson) back in their impoverished District 12 after winning the 74th Hunger Games, a fight to the death among children designed to intimidate a beleaguered public from dissenting.

As they’re about to depart for a victory tour, the despotic President Snow (Donald Sutherland) visits Katniss and explains that when she defied the rules of the Capitol so that she and Peeta could both survive the “Hunger Games,” she inspired rebellion and unrest.

When it comes to 2013 political interpretations, that rebellion might represent 99 percenters speaking up against the wealthy elite or Tea Partiers rising up against an oppressive government.

On the conservative website Big Hollywood, writer Christian Toto drew parallels between Snow’s fictional authoritarian government and the “age of Obama,” citing the NSA and IRS scandals and Obamacare, Democrats’ move in the Senate this week to abolish the filibuster and the Obama administration’s relationship with the press.

“Snow’s willingness to do whatever it takes to get his way certainly recalls this week’s ‘nuclear’ decision by Senate Democrats,” Toto wrote. “It’s also alarming to consider how Fire’s fearsome government manipulates the images broadcast to the huddled masses when the Obama administration is strong-arming the press to make sure its best side is constantly shown.”

On the website GoLocalProv.com, Rhode Island Republican Travis Rowley echoed some of those views, seeing in Snow’s government a “highly imaginable tyranny. Soft, at first. Then, much more ruthless … Right up this Tea Partier’s alley.”

But Sutherland, who plays Snow, is a lifelong leftist who told Britain’s Guardian newspaper that he hopes the movies inspire young people to the kind of activism he took part in the in 1960s as a protester against the war in Vietnam.

“Hopefully they will see this film and the next film and the next film and then maybe organize,” Sutherland said. “Stand up. They might create a third party. They might change the electoral process, they might be able to take over the government, change the tax system.”

In an interview with the website Screen Rant, Sutherland said that the notion of a heroic character provoking civil unrest against an unjust government was part of what made him interested in taking a role in the “Hunger Games” in the first place.

He said the movie series “could be another Battle of Algiers,” a reference to the 1966 film about the organization of a guerrilla movement during that Algerian War that has been a source of inspiration for insurgent groups.

Jeffrey Wright, the actor who plays Beetee, a “Hunger Games” participant gifted in the use of electronics, said the genius of the series is in its varying possible interpretations.

“It’s welcoming of the entire political spectrum,” Wright told the website Hypable. “Some people look at these stories and take a 1% versus the 99% perspective, which can be read something as a left-leaning perspective. I think others look at this and they view it from a more right-leaning perspective as a condemnation of government. Others may look at is as a validation of a need for strong allegiance to the 2nd Amendment. So it’s nondiscriminatory, it’s nonpartisan.”

Nov 232013
 

All I needed to assess the need for this petition was the link to the CBC Report, from the Footnotes for the Petition:

Inside Canada’s top-secret billion-dollar spy palace, CBC News  (http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=11133)

 

This is very serious.   But we can fight it.

Please sign on, and alert your friends:

https://openmedia.ca/ourprivacy 

NEW: The government has just announced a shameful plan to use bullied kids as a front to ram through an unpopular online spying plan.1 Send a message to Justice Minister Peter MacKay now —>

Government dragnet collection of our sensitive private information is secretive, expensive, and out of control

  • SECRETIVE: The sensitive private data of law-abiding Canadians could be caught up in spying efforts by CSEC, an unaccountable and highly secretive government spy agency.2
  • EXPENSIVE: The government is about to spend $4-billion of our tax dollars to house new spying operations.3
  • OUT OF CONTROL: In recent years there have been over 3,000 breaches of sensitive citizen data, affecting approximately 725,000 of us.4

Online spying initiatives threaten to provide a range of authorities with access to your private data, at anytime, without a warrant.5

A broad-based Protect Our Privacy Coalition of citizens, experts, organizations, and businesses have come together to defend our right to privacy based on a common statement of principle.

Join us by signing on to this statement now

https://openmedia.ca/ourprivacy

Nov 232013
 

(Eve’s trial date is set for March, 2014.)

http://www.prpeak.com/articles/2013/10/08/news/doc52549d6ab8326766927680.txt

From:  Powell River Peak

By Chris Bolster  (email reporter at   prpeak.com )

A Lund resident is facing federal charges after telling Statistics Canada to count her out.

Yoga teacher Eve Stegenga is one of 54 Canadians being charged under the Statistics Act for not completing the 2011 mandatory short form Canadian census.

“I chose not to fill it out as an act of civil disobedience,” said Stegenga, who objected to having her personal information handled by a software subsidiary of the American weapons giant Lockheed Martin.

“I like to live with an aspect of integrity in my life, so when [the enumerator] came to my door, I said ‘No, because I know what the government is doing and I don’t approve.’”

doc52549d6ab8326766927680

What she knew was that in the late 1990s Lockheed Martin had branched out into information systems and developed optical recognition software to be used in scanning census forms. The company was first contracted on the 2000 United States census and then in the United Kingdom in 2001. According to media reports from 2011, the Canadian government paid Lockheed Martin $61 million for its software that would automate the 2006 Canadian census and then another $19.7 million for updates on the 2011 census.

“All the information that they need on the census they can get from my income taxes, which I file each year,” she added. “Why are we going to an American arms company to process our personal census information and laying off a bunch of Canadians?”

Stegenga said she was visited by census workers a couple of times and received a phone call from the census workers’ supervisors and a warning letter.

“I don’t know why they’re coming after me, but I feel it’s because I was really honest with them,” she said.

Stegenga said that at the time she did not realize that it was a criminal offence to not complete the short form, though census staff informed her that it was an offence.

In the letter she received from Statistics Canada she was told she “could possibly be charged.”

In the letter she received from Statistics Canada she was told she “could possibly be charged.”

“But I didn’t actually take that threat to be serious,” she said, adding that she felt it was just “intimidation” to pressure her to comply.

She believes there are a lot more than 54 people in the country who did not fill out the form.

A spokesperson from Statistics Canada said the agency would not comment on Stegenga’s case as it was currently before the courts.

“While the vast majority of Canadians promptly returned their completed 2011 census, a small number of individuals refused to comply,” said Gabrielle Beaudoin, director general of Statistics Canada’s communications division. “Charging any individual with failing to complete a census of population form is the last step in a lengthy process that ensures that the person has been given every opportunity to participate.”

Stegenga is scheduled for a court date today, Wednesday, October 9. If convicted, she could face, under the Statistics Act, a fine of up to $500, up to three months in jail or both.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
LATER COVERAGE:

2013-10-29  Census (Lockheed Martin) protestor enters not guilty plea.  Eve Stegenga, Powell River, BC

http://www.prpeak.com/articles/2013/10/29/news/doc52705b83ba25a141861993.txt

Court date to be set

by Chris Bolster

Eve Stegenga, yoga teacher and census refusenik, pleaded not guilty in court to federal charges stemming from her not filling out her Canadian census in 2011.

Stegenga is one of 54 Canadians who has been charged under the Statistics Act for not filling out the mandatory short-form census. In 2011, StatsCan received 13 million completed census forms, a 98 per cent response rate.

“I plead not guilty because this is a ludicrous charge,” said Stegenga.  She chose to not fill out the form as a protest against the federal government’s contract with a software subsidiary of Lockheed-Martin, the American weapons giant.When the census enumerator visited her Lund home, Stegenga told her that she wouldn’t complete the form and why.

Despite consulting a lawyer, Stegenga has chosen to represent herself in court and because of the nature of the charges is not entitled to legal aid representation, she said.

Gregory Reif, who is giving Stegenga legal counsel but not representing her, said that while census protestors like Audrey Tobias, an 89-year-old peace activist and WWII veteran, have made charter arguments in their defence, none have yet succeeded. Tobias was acquitted after the Crown prosecutor failed to prove her intentions beyond a reasonable doubt.

Stegenga was given until November 6 to file arraignment papers about the specifics of her case and how many witnesses she will call. Once those papers are filed a court date can be set.

Under the Statistics Act, if convicted, she could face a fine of up to $500, up to three months in jail or both.

 

Nov 232013
 

I received the email,

 Muslims @ Michigan State, based on an email written by a prof at the University.   The email – – scroll down to item #4.

The attempt behind the email has a Parallel:

  • Nazi manipulation to turn the Polish people into animals, to make them into an enemy, to make it possible for the Germans to invade Poland and kill and take.
  • Today, the War Machine Bullies in the West must have “enemies”  >>  we need Muslims to be bad people.  Or the Russians, or whoever.

The email (item #4) has the look of another hoax aimed at Muslims to stir up hate instead of dialogue  (maybe there isn’t a professor who sent the email?)  . . . . so I checked it out on Snopes (Urban Myths).

MY REPLY TO THE PERSON WHO SENT THE EMAIL TO ME:

Hi – – -,

People should receive the part of the Snopes report that was deleted by the originators of this.

I think the deletion is deliberate.  It changes the picture.

I have appended a couple of related items which I hope will be helpful.

/Sandra

(I forgot to say:  PLEASE!  understand the role of propaganda in bringing down democracy.  When the propaganda is circulated by us, ourselves, WE are the ones bringing down our own democracy! (Explanation,  item #3).)   Which is why I always take the time to respond to these hate-stirring emails.)

APPENDED

  1. THE PART THAT WAS DELETED FROM MUSLIMS @ MICHIGAN STATE
  2. FREE SPEECH EXCUSE IS LAME, PROF ABUSES POWER , by Andrew March, assistant professor
  3.  (Excerpt)   Ego – its role in putting democracy to rest.  (Hoax:  A German’s view on Islam)
  4. THE OFFENDING EMAIL  – – you might want to scroll down and read this first.

= = = = = = = = =

1.       THIS IS THE PART THAT WAS DELETED FROM “MUSLIMS @ MICHIGAN STATE”:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/wichman.asp

Origins: On 28 February 2006, Professor Indrek Wichman, a tenured professor of mechanical engineering at Michigan State University (MSU), sent the e-mail . . .. (insert:  item #4) to the Muslim Students’ Association of Michigan State University. The message was a response to the Muslim group’s having handed out free cocoa during a public awareness event about controversial cartoons that depicted the Prophet Muhammad as a terrorist. Wichman’s letter prompted the Muslim Students’ Association and twelve other student and advocacy groups to call upon the university to officially reprimand the professor.

MSU officials have declined to issue a reprimand, saying Wichman’s comments constitute free speech. Terry Denbow, spokesman for MSU, said while Wichman’s views in no way represent the university’s views, they do not violate the university’s antidiscrimination policy. However, Denbow noted, Wichman “was cautioned that any additional commentary … could constitute the creation of a hostile environment, and that could … form the basis of a complaint” under the school’s antidiscrimination policy.

Wichman told the Detroit News the letter had been intended for a one particular person, not the entirety of the Muslim Students’ Association; he had believed the e-mail address he used was that one student’s inbox. However, students who lead the association said the e-mail address was part of the group’s official Web site.

The professor expressed in interviews that he had regrets about the e-mail: “I used strong language in a private communication that I would certainly not have used if this communication would have gone public. … For the record, I thought it was a private communication and it was written in haste. I think a very minor thing has been blown completely out of proportion. I wrote it in 60 seconds. It was not like I sat and pondered over this thing for days. It was like you talking one night to your wife or your kids.”

– – – – – – – – –

2.       FREE SPEECH EXCUSE IS LAME, PROF ABUSES POWER

By Andrew March
assistant professor

http://statenews.com/article/2006/05/free_speech_excuse_is_lame_prof_abuses_power

05/16/06 12:00am | Updated 08/28/09 6:22pm

Professor Indrek Wichman obviously does not get it. In his letter “Prof explains reasons for offensive e-mail,” (SN 4/28), he seeks to portray his infamous e-mail as a free speech matter. It is not, and portraying it as such is self-pitying and disingenuous.

If he was interested in airing his views on free speech, Islam and the Middle East, he should have written a public letter, such as to The State News. Instead, he wrote a private e-mail directed personally at students. And during this incident he has, in fact, appealed to the “privacy” of that e-mail as an excuse.

The crux of this matter is the faculty/student boundary. In his e-mail, he referred to himself as an MSU professor, and proceeded to write abusive, harassing comments to students, some of whom could potentially be in his classes.

For me, the core question is one of abuse of power and position and violating the responsibility professors have toward students.

To address students in the second person and as “dissatisfied, aggressive, brutal, and uncivilized slave-trading Moslems,” to tell, I presume, mostly U.S.-born Muslims that they are “free to leave” and to write that it is his hope to God that they return to where they came from is a clear act of aggression, abuse and hostility toward students.

That is the crux of the matter — not free speech, not terrorism, not Danish cartoons and not the Muslim Students’ Association protests.

Could a professor get away with writing a single e-mail of a sexual nature toward a student or group of students? No, and for good reason. That, for me, is the proper analogy.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =  

3.   Ego – its role in putting democracy to rest. (Hoax: A German’s view on Islam)

Earlier I posted this other email I received (A German’s view on Islam) – – the same issue as  MUSLIMS @ MICHIGAN STATE,  but portraying us as the “silent majority”.

EXCERPT:

MY REPLY TO A German’s view on Islam (changed my thinking)

. . . . . BUT HERE IS THE THING that becomes evident through A German’s view on Islam: 

By looking OUTSIDE, and assigning blame (creating enemies, The Muslim Fanatics), we unwittingly BECOME the ‘silent majority’ in our own country, who SHOULD have spoken up about our own situation, but didn’t. 

If people were not so busy shaking the stick and bombs at “others”, they might be able to see what is happening right here.

If democracy falls, it will be because of the blindness caused by ego. Ego wants “us” (our country) to be seen as “good” .   (We’re good.  The Muslims are bad.)   Ego also diverts us to other “ego identifications” – – possessions, social status, physical appearance, family history – we are so caught up in all that,  we don’t see the invaders coming.

We can’t even see the Corporate Force when it turns and is now directed at the soul of our own country.

A definition of “ego” is helpful:

The most common ego identifications have to do with possessions, the work you do, social status and recognition, knowledge and education, physical appearance, special abilities, relationships, person and family history, belief systems, and often nationalistic, racial, religious, and other collective identifications. …   / Eckhart Tolle

So in Ego .. Hoax: A German’s view on Islam  (and in this second example, Muslims at Michigan State):  it is not so much a ‘silent majority’, as a majority who are blinded to what is happening in their own country, through the role of ego with its nationalistic, racial, religious, . . . identifications.

Attack Muslims because they are Muslim? . . . but WHO is launching illegal wars? WHO is dropping bombs from drones? WHO is using radioactive, “depleted” uranium in (chemical) weapons? WHO is breaking the International Laws against torture?

If you want to stop what is happening, you have to JOIN WITH “the peaceful majority”, be they (quoting from the email)  Muslim, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Rwandans, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians.

The thing that is CHANGED since WW2: it IS possible to join forces with peaceful Muslims. And create a critical mass that will stop the war-profiteering that will poison us all with chemical & nuclear weapons. If climate change doesn’t do us in, first.

 

With most people unbelief in one thing is founded on blind belief in another. –  Lichtenberg

 

The ego and its identification with nation, race and religion does not see the very thing that it accuses “the other” of being. The “terrorists” (or fanatics, or killers – – whatever you want to call them) are us, ourselves.  Doesn’t matter what country we live in.

As Pogo said, “I have seen the enemy and he is us.”

If you fail to recognize the role of our own “fanatics” we are going to find ourselves in a police state right here in Canada.  All the signs are there, and the machinery has been put in place, step-by-step. It is deliberate and progressing nicely.

By-The-Way: to rally support for arresting Cheney when he comes to Canada on Oct 31, I joined every Peace, including every Muslim peace group I could find on Facebook. (Justice is PREREQUISITE to peace.)

I searched on the word “peace”. Not one group came up that had the name “peace” and “Christian”. Not saying that there aren’t any – – just that none came up. I will look further.

/Sandra

P.S. Don’t get me wrong, I am not saying that terrorists do not exist in other countries and that a strategy is not required. John Ralston Saul spells it out better than I ever could. Please see

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

4.       THE OFFENDING EMAIL:  Muslims @ Michigan State

This is the email I received and responded to.  I believe that it, and other emails circulating in networks are designed to fuel hatred targeted at Muslims.

I am grateful to the tireless efforts of the Ecumenical groups in many North American cities that bring various religious denominations together, Muslim, Christian and other, to discover that we all share common values and objectives.  We are after all, all human beings.   Our ancestors are the same people.

The portion of the following report deleted from the mass email distributions is in Item #1.  I found it through curiousity that maybe the whole thing about Michigan State University and the professor’s email to the Muslim Student Association might have been a hoax.  It isn’t, but part of the full report, another point-of-view,  was deleted.   /S

Sent: November-23-13 10:18 PM
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Subject: Fw: Muslims @ Michigan State

About time someone stood up for our rights.

GO,  MICHIGAN STATE  !

Very interesting — the University is standing by their professor and not bowing down to special interest groups!

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/wichman.asp

Professor Wichman E-mail

Claim:   A Michigan professor sent an e-mail telling Muslim students to leave the country.

Status:   True.

The story begins at  Michigan State University with a mechanical engineering professor named Indred Wichman.

Wichman sent an e-mail to the Muslim Student’s Association.

The e-mail was in response to the students’ protest of the Danish cartoons that portrayed the Prophet Muhammad as a terrorist.

The group had complained the cartoons were ‘hate speech.’

============

Enter Professor Wichman.

==========================================

In his e-mail, he said the following:

===============================

Dear Muslim Association,

As a professor of Mechanical Engineering here at MSU I intend to protest your protest.

I am offended not by cartoons, but by more mundane things like beheadings of civilians, cowardly attacks on public buildings, suicide murders, murders of Catholic priests (the latest in Turkey), burnings of Christian churches, the continued persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt, the imposition of Sharia law on non-Muslims, the rapes of Scandinavian girls and women (called ‘whores’ in your culture), the murder of film directors in Holland, and the rioting and looting in Paris France.

This is what offends me, a soft-spoken person and academic, and many, many of my colleagues. I counsel you dissatisfied, aggressive, brutal, and uncivilized slave-trading Muslims to be very aware of this as you proceed with your infantile ‘protests.’

If you do not like the values of the West – see the First Amendment – you are free to leave. I hope for God’s sake that most of you choose that option.

Please return to your ancestral homelands and build them up yourselves instead of troubling Americans.

Cordially,

I. S. Wichman

Professor of Mechanical Engineering

=============================

As you can imagine,

The Muslim group at the university didn’t like this too well.

They’re demanding that Wichman be reprimanded, that the university impose mandatory diversity training for faculty,

And mandate a seminar on hate and discrimination for all freshmen.

Now, the local chapter of CAIR has jumped into the fray.

CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, apparently doesn’t believe that the good professor

Had the right to express his opinion.

==========

For its part, the university is standing its ground in support of Professor Wichman,

Saying the e-mail was private, and they don’t intend to publicly condemn his remarks.

============================================================

Send this to your friends, and ask them to do the same.

Tell them to keep passing it around until the whole country gets it.

We are in a war.

This political correctness crap is getting old and killing us.

==================

If you agree with this,  Please send it to all your friends,

If not, simply delete it.

GO, MICHIGAN STATE  !