Sandra Finley

May 202013
 

Who is smarter – a group of people or one smart person?

Surowiecki uses a collection of research papers to show that a group of people is smarter 

BUT! there are conditions under which that is true.

The posting  2013-03-19  10th Anniversary of the Invasion of Iraq raised the question of how it was that a group of intelligent people could make such a bad decision as to drop bombs on Iraq.

Two lines stuck out:

–        lack of diversity and independence of thought in decision-making, and

–        “The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting.”

Those statements reminded me of  The Wisdom of Crowds by James Surowiecki (2004).  Surowiecki’s work reinforces important principles of democracy learned through the ages, but which are now being forgotten (except by us, and we won’t let it happen!).

RELATED:

EXCERPTS from The Wisdom of Crowds:

“ . . . cognitive diversity is essential to good decision-making.  The positive case for diversity is that it expands a group’s set of possible solutions and allows the group to conceptualize problems in novel ways.

. . .  Homogenous groups, particularly small ones, are often victims of what the psychologist Irving Janis called “groupthink”.  After a detailed study of a series of American foreign-policy fiascos, including the Bay of Pigs invasion and the failure to anticipate Pearl Harbour, Janis argued that when the decision makers are too much alike – in worldview and mindset – they easily fall prey to groupthink.  Homogenous groups become cohesive more easily than diverse groups, and as they become more cohesive they also become more dependent on the group, more insulated from outside opinions, and therefore more convinced that the group’s judgment on important issues must be right.  These kinds of groups, Janis suggested, share an illusion of invulnerability, a willingness to rationalize away possible counterarguments to the group’s position, and a conviction that dissent is not useful.

“. . . Deliberation in a groupthink setting has the disturbing effect not of opening people’s minds but of closing them.  In that sense, Janis’ work suggests that the odds of a homogenous group of people reaching a good decision are slim at best.

 

“. . . Ultimately, diversity contributes not just by adding different perspectives to the group but also by making it easier for individuals to say what they really think.

(p 36 – 39)

 

“. . .  Instead of fostering the free exchange of conflicting views, consensus-driven groups – – especially when the members are familiar with each other –  tend to trade in the familiar and squelch provocative debate.  (p. 203)

 

(this last excerpt is related to bubbles in the financial markets, but is an elaboration of the point:

“. . . there were no differing attitudes.  Everyone thought the same because the group of people who were making decisions was too small and too prone to imitate each other.  It didn’t matter how individually intelligent the experts were.  By the end, they were too much alike to be smart.”

May 192013
 

Please let everyone know:

Saturday, May 25th 

around the World demonstrations against Monsanto (GMO’s) !

 

It’s shaping up to be a big event in my community, Saskatoon.  How about yours?  . . .    Click here if you don’t know.)

 

SELECT ONE SIMPLE ACTION that works for you

Join in the fun!:

 

 

Nation of Change

Thursday 9 May 2013

Clearly, an investigation of large-scale government corruption by this singularly destructive corporation is long overdue.   http://www.nationofchange.org/monsanto-has-taken-over-usda-1368111215

David Swanson, News Analysis:   The U.S. Department of Agriculture has been taken over by an outside organization. RootsAction has launched a campaign demanding a Congressional investigation. The organization is called Monsanto. Monsanto is, of course, the world’s largest biotech corporation. These are the people who brought us Roundup weed killer and the resulting superweeds and superbugs, along with growth hormones for cows, genetically engineered and patented seeds, PCBs, and Agent Orange — which Monsanto now wants us to use as herbicide on genetically engineered corn and soybeans.

  • KNOW the name.  I posted a very good article on Percy Schmeiser.  It includes a link to Amy Goodman’s interview of Percy on Democracy Now when he and his wife Louise received the Right Livelihood Award in 1997 for fighting to defend the rights of farmers and the future of seeds.   (Monsanto took Percy to court.  He’s 82 years old now, and still travelling the world to empower others to join in the fight.)

 

  • AND!  You’re lucky if you live in Saskatoon:   come on out,  Percy Schmeiser IN PERSON!, Wed, May 22nd, 6:30 pm Frances Morrison Library (downtown) 311-23rd Street East.   (If you’re on Facebook,  https://www.facebook.com/events/620811587948273/)

You’ll be delighted and inspired by Percy, and become informed – all at the same time!

 

·       It’s Time to March Against MONSANTO  

https://secure.nationofchange.org/monsanto-march

Last year, you joined us as we occupied biotech giant Monsanto headquarters across the country and in St. Louis at Monsanto’s home base. Later in the year, you helped us launch a public ad campaign also in St. Louis denouncing the company and its destructive and deadly practices. In August we funded a national television ad campaign on GMOs and Monsanto and in September we helped to make the GMO Free Midwest Occupy Monsanto Conference possible.

This month, we are taking the fight against this corporate killer to the next level.

NationofChange is raising $20,000 for a high-profile billboard ad campaign in Los Angeles, California to expose the crimes of MONSANTO and educate the public on how corporate greed is putting their families in danger.

Issues the campaign will focus on:

The recently-passed Monsanto Protection Act placing Monsanto beyond the reach of the Federal Government [1].

Monsanto’s multi-million dollar efforts to squash GMO labelling in California

The real science surrounding the negative health impact of GMO products

The catastrophic environmental effects Monsanto’s Roundup has wrought upon ecosystems

If you feel that Monsanto’s corruption, exploitation, and destruction have gone far enough, stand with us now . . .

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Saskatoon:  Saturday May 25, 12 noon, meet at Kinsmen Park (across from the Mendel Art Gallery).  The March will go across the Bridge to the University and return.

F/B: https://www.facebook.com/WeAreManySaskatoon#!/events/455489177862149/?fref=ts  

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Regina:   Saturday May 25, 1:00 pm.   Meet at the Leg Building.  F/B: https://www.facebook.com/events/583443078335565/

 

You may be interested in:

 

 

For Newcomers – To generate a list of “thumbnail sketches” of earlier work on GMO’s click on  Genetically Modified.    (To see a whole individual posting and to activate any links, you have to click on the thumbnail.)

May 192013
 

Uh, Canadians – – listen up.  No small thing.

 

Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife discusses the resignation of Prime Minister Harper’s chief of staff Nigel Wright.  (Sorry, there’s an ad to wait thru.)

http://www.ctvnews.ca/video?playlistId=1.1288213  

 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

RELATED, and also offensive to democracy:

 

Former CRTC commissioner hired at Sun News, May 17

http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/former-crtc-commissioner-hired-at-sun-news-1.1287087 

 

A commissioner at the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission has left his post after five years to join Sun News, as the broadcaster seeks “must carry” status.

 

Marc Patrone’s contract with the CRTC ended on March 18. He is now the Sun News Network’s director of news operations for Western Canada.

 

The Chronicle Herald reported Patrone’s new job Friday, and CTV confirmed the move.

 

Sun News vice-president Kory Teneycke sent an email to CTV News showing that the federal conflict of interest commissioner approved Patrone’s hiring.

 

In a letter, the commissioner’s office noted that Patrone’s dealings with Quebecor Media took place more than one year before his last day his last day at the CRTC and were not related to Sun News Network’s licencing interests. As a result, he was not violating his post-employment obligations under the Conflict of Interest Act, the letter said.

 

Sun Media is asking the CRTC to grant its news channel “mandatory carriage.” If approved, cable and satellite customers across Canada will be paying to have its news channel as part of their TV packages.

 

On Thursday, a well-placed source told CTV’s Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife that Sen. Mike Duffy approached a Conservative insider with connections to the CRTC three weeks ago to discuss Sun Media.

 

“You know people at the CRTC,” the insider quoted Duffy as saying. “This is an important decision on Sun Media. They have to play with the team and support Sun Media’s request.”

 

 

May 152013
 
By Dr. Vandana Shiva
Global Research
Monsanto’s talk of ‘technology’ tries to hide its real objectives of control over seed where genetic engineering is a means to control seed,

“Monsanto is an agricultural company.   We apply innovation and technology to help farmers around the world \produce more while conserving more.” 

“Producing more, Conserving more, Improving farmers lives.”

 

These are the promises Monsanto India’s website makes, alongside pictures of smiling, prosperous farmers from the state of Maharashtra. This is a desperate attempt by Monsanto and its PR machinery to delink the epidemic of farmers’ suicides in India from the company’s growing control over cotton seed supply — 95 per cent of India’s cotton seed is now controlled by Monsanto.

Control over seed is the first link in the food chain because seed is the source of life. When a corporation controls seed, it controls life, especially the life of farmers.

Monsanto’s concentrated control over the seed sector in India as well as across the world is very worrying. This is what connects farmers’ suicides in India to Monsanto vs Percy Schmeiser in Canada, to Monsanto vs Bowman in the US, and to farmers in Brazil suing Monsanto for $2.2 billion for unfair collection of royalty.

Through patents on seed, Monsanto has become the “Life Lord” of our planet, collecting rents for life’s renewal from farmers, the original breeders.

Patents on seed are illegitimate because putting a toxic gene into a plant cell is not “creating” or “inventing” a plant. These are seeds of deception — the deception that Monsanto is the creator of seeds and life; the deception that while Monsanto sues farmers and traps them in debt, it pretends to be working for farmers’ welfare, and the deception that GMOs feed the world. GMOs are failing to control pests and weeds, and have instead led to the emergence of superpests and superweeds.

The entry of Monsanto in the Indian seed sector was made possible with a 1988 Seed Policy imposed by the World Bank, requiring the Government of India to deregulate the seed sector. Five things changed with Monsanto’s entry: First, Indian companies were locked into joint-ventures and licensing arrangements, and concentration over the seed sector increased. Second, seed which had been the farmers’ common resource became the “intellectual property” of Monsanto, for which it started collecting royalties, thus raising the costs of seed. Third, open pollinated cotton seeds were displaced by hybrids, including GMO hybrids. A renewable resource became a non-renewable, patented commodity. Fourth, cotton which had earlier been grown as a mixture with food crops now had to be grown as a monoculture, with higher vulnerability to pests, disease, drought and crop failure. Fifth, Monsanto started to subvert India’s regulatory processes and, in fact, started to use public resources to push its non-renewable hybrids and GMOs through so-called public-private partnerships (PPP).

 

In 1995, Monsanto introduced its Bt technology in India through a joint-venture with the Indian company Mahyco. In 1997-98, Monsanto started open field trials of its GMO Bt cotton illegally and announced that it would be selling the seeds commercially the following year. India has rules for regulating GMOs since 1989, under the Environment Protection Act. It is mandatory to get approval from the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee under the ministry of environment for GMO trials. The Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology sued Monsanto in the Supreme Court of India and Monsanto could not start the commercial sales of its Bt cotton seeds until 2002.

And, after the damning report of India’s parliamentary committee on Bt crops in August 2012, the panel of technical experts appointed by the Supreme Court recommended a 10-year moratorium on field trials of all GM food and termination of all ongoing trials of transgenic crops.

But it had changed Indian agriculture already.

Monsanto’s seed monopolies, the destruction of alternatives, the collection of superprofits in the form of royalties, and the increasing vulnerability of monocultures has created a context for debt, suicides and agrarian distress which is driving the farmers’ suicide epidemic in India. This systemic control has been intensified with Bt cotton. That is why most suicides are in the cotton belt.

 

An internal advisory by the agricultural ministry of India in January 2012 had this to say to the cotton-growing states in India — “Cotton farmers are in a deep crisis since shifting to Bt cotton. The spate of farmer suicides in 2011-12 has been particularly severe among Bt cotton farmers.”

The highest acreage of Bt cotton is in Maharashtra and this is also where the highest farmer suicides are. Suicides increased after Bt cotton was introduced — Monsanto’s royalty extraction, and the high costs of seed and chemicals have created a debt trap. According to Government of India data, nearly 75 per cent rural debt is due to purchase inputs. As Monsanto’s profits grow, farmers’ debt grows. It is in this systemic sense that Monsanto’s seeds are seeds of suicide.

The ultimate seeds of suicide is Monsanto’s patented technology to create sterile seeds. (Called “Terminator technology” by the media, sterile seed technology is a type of Gene Use Restriction Technology, GRUT, in which seed produced by a crop will not grow — crops will not produce viable offspring seeds or will produce viable seeds with specific genes switched off.) The Convention on Biological Diversity has banned its use, otherwise Monsanto would be collecting even higher profits from seed.

Monsanto’s talk of “technology” tries to hide its real objectives of ownership and control over seed where genetic engineering is just a means to control seed and the food system through patents and intellectual property rights.

A Monsanto representative admitted that they were “the patient’s diagnostician, and physician all in one” in writing the patents on life-forms, from micro-organisms to plants, in the TRIPS’ agreement of WTO. Stopping farmers from saving seeds and exercising their seed sovereignty was the main objective. Monsanto is now extending its patents to conventionally bred seed, as in the case of broccoli and capsicum, or the low gluten wheat it had pirated from India which we challenged as a biopiracy case in the European Patent office.

That is why we have started Fibres of Freedom in the heart of Monsanto’s Bt cotton/suicide belt in Vidharba. We have created community seed banks with indigenous seeds and helped farmers go organic. No GMO seeds, no debt, no suicides.

 

Vandana Shiva is a philosopher, environmental activist, and eco feminist.Shiva, currently based in Delhi, has authored more than 20 books and over 500 papers in leading scientific and technical journals.She was trained as a physicist and received her Ph.D. in physics from the University of Western Ontario, Canada. She was awarded the Right Livelihood Award in 1993. She is the founder of Navdanya http://www.navdanya.org

May 152013
 

http://www.kplu.org/post/idaho-company-seeks-introduce-genetically-engineered-potato

Idaho company seeks to introduce genetically-engineered potato

By Jessica Robinson

One of the country’s leading suppliers of French fries is asking the federal government to approve genetically modified potatoes. The USDA on Friday announced J.R. Simplot’s petition to produce what would be the only genetically-engineered potato on the market.

Simplot has branded them Innate potatoes. The company figured out how to use existing potato DNA to design a spud that’s less prone to dark spots. When cooked, it produces less acrylamide, a neurotoxin found in many foods. Studies on animals have indicated it may also cause cancer.

This wouldn’t be the first attempt to market a genetically-engineered potato. A spud developed by Monsanto in the 1990s was discontinued, partly because of pushback from McDonalds and its customers. Simplot is a long-time supplier of the McDonalds chain.

The Simplot Company declined to comment on where it plans to sell its genetically-engineered potato.

A policy analyst at the Center for Food Safety says Simplot hasn’t done enough research on the possible health effects of the potato. The analyst added unlike most other genetically-engineered crops like soybeans, canola, and cotton, potatoes are grown for direct human consumption.

The public comment period on Simplot’s petition runs through July 2.

May 152013
 

Andrew Weaver made history by winning a lone seat for the Green Party in the Vancouver Island riding of Oak Bay-Gordon Head. Weaver becomes the first Green representative ever elected to the provincial legislature.   . . .

 

Clark lost her Vancouver-Point Grey riding to New Democrat David Eby . . . Eby says two issues dominated the race in Vancouver-Point Grey.

The first is the environment, the issue of the increase in tanker traffic off the coast and the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline project … Christy Clark [is] ignoring that as an issue,” he said.

May 152013
 

1.   2013-05-10  Global network of hackers steals $45M from ATMs  

 

2.   I received a message from Facebook about Jim Harris’ photo of ME.  . . .  what in hell?  . . .   FACE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY obviously identified a picture of Christy Clark as Sandra Finley.   And it wasn’t Jim Harris’s photo.  It was a newspaper photo.

 

Michael   Maser (friends with Adriane   Carr) commented on Jim   Harris‘s photo   of you.
Michael wrote:   “The polling was probably accurate. What it never reveals is who is   actually going to vote. With voter turnout at very close to 50% it’s clear   that 1 in 2 people vote, and you have to ask why? I say it’s because most of   these people recognize in our immature, socially irresponsible FPTP electoral   system that their votes don’t count. And they’re right. The electoral system   needs to change, period. – Michael Maser, Gibsons BC”

 

May 152013
 

Can you help?   Do you know a family that has experienced breast or prostate (or other) cancer?

Please let them know about the March against Monsanto.   I guarantee, they will have fun at the March. And everyone will feel better, doing something to stop the poisoning.

It is known that breast cancer is higher in farming communities.

The top oncology radiologist in Canada told me 10 years ago that there was an emerging epidemic of cancer among farm men.

(And I will always remember the research of, and my conversations with Dr. Elizabeth Guillette about the effects of farm chemicals on the cognitive development, not to mention health of children.)

The effects are not restricted to rural families. The poisons are built into our food supply as the information circulated yesterday shows.

Today I am going to contact every organizer I can find of a

– Run for Breast Cancer or

– Awareness of Prostate Cancer

to tell them about the  Amazing mobilizations!   The  Whole World against Monsanto (GMO’s)  happening around the world the last Saturday in May (May 25th). (Saskatoon: 12 noon, meet at Kinsmen Park across from the Mendel Art Gallery.)

Together we can reach thousands of people.  It will be great if you can help.  It will make a big difference if each of us talks to only 3 others.

I have worked with others on GMO’s for 10 years.  There are many who have worked for much longer.

TODAY there is a whole movement that is cresting – – it is unlike anything I have seen in the past.

NOW is the time to drive as hard as we can.  For a week.