Sandra Finley

Jun 142019
 

Recommend:  listen to the video at this link.   The transcript is provided if you prefer.

https://www.democracynow.org/2019/6/14/ola_bini_ecuador_arrest_wikileaks_assange

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange appeared before a magistrates’ court in London Friday, saying his life was “effectively at stake” if the U.K. honors an extradition request from the United States, where he faces 17 counts of violating the Espionage Act. Meanwhile, a friend of Assange’s, Swedish programmer and data privacy activist Ola Bini, is still in prison in Ecuador, after being arrested April 11, the same day Assange was forcibly taken by British authorities from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, and has been jailed ever since without charges. We speak with Vijay Prashad, director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research and a friend of Ola Bini.

 

Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: In London, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange appeared before a magistrates’ court today, saying his life was “effectively at stake” if the U.K. honors an extradition request from the United States, where he faces 17 counts of espionage. Assange is the first journalist or publisher to be indicted under the World War I-era law.

While Assange’s case has dominated international headlines, far less attention has been paid to a friend of Julian Assange who’s been jailed in Ecuador since April 11th, the same day Assange was taken by force by British authorities from the Ecuadorean Embassy in London. Ola Bini is a Swedish programmer and data privacy activist who lives in Ecuador. He has not yet been charged with any crimes, has not been permitted to post bail for his release. The U.S. Justice Department has now said they want to question Ola Bini. Critics say Bini is being targeted because he knew and had visited Assange multiple times at the embassy in London, as well as for his own activism. This is a statement from his lawyers, Carlos Soria speaking last month.

CARLOS SORIA: [translated] This is an embarrassment. Our client is somebody who is innocent and who has contributed to the entire world the development of information privacy. And now, just because he is a friend to Julian Assange or because he travels, they put him in prison. There are no words for this, and we will denounce it both nationally and internationally. … We cannot allow Ecuador to look like this, like a state that persecutes people for the books they read, for the technology they use or for the simple reason of having a friend who is currently being reproached by the world. Before, Assange was appreciated for letting the world know the atrocities committed in other parts of the world.

AMY GOODMAN: Still with us is Vijay Prashad, the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. Earlier this week, he published a piece about Ola Bini in the Daily Hampshire Gazette titled “My friend is in a prison in Ecuador.”

Why is he there? Why was he picked up, Vijay Prashad? Why was Ola Bini picked up and jailed in Ecuador the same day Julian Assange was forcibly removed from the Ecuadorean Embassy and put in the Belmarsh Prison in London?

VIJAY PRASHAD: You know, Amy, this is a difficult story for me. I have known Ola Bini for many years. It is still perplexing to myself and to the friends of Ola of why he’s in prison, the El Inca prison in Quito, Ecuador. We don’t know why he’s in prison. There’s no charge against him. There has been some allegations made about his friendship to Julian Assange, but, you know, Amy, if that’s a crime, you and I should be in jail, as well. We have also met him. We have, you know, understood that meeting him is itself not a criminal activity.

Ola Bini is a programmer who spent most of his life trying to create tools to help human rights activists create a shield against surveillance by governments. People who are in the tech world might know the programs called the Tor Browser or Enigmail. These things were developed by Ola. He moved to Ecuador partly because he felt that with the government of Rafael Correa, it would be a good place to do the kind of work he was doing—precisely the opposite of what people are alleging of him, that he broke into this, that and the other government materials. In fact, the opposite: He would create shields to prevent governments from breaking into the kind of databases held by human rights defenders. You’ve got to remember that in the Snowden—Edward Snowden’s revelations, he said that the NSA had been routinely attacking the servers of human rights and other civil society organizations. It was precisely Ola’s mission in life to protect those organizations.

He was picked up on April 11th at Quito airport, while he was on his way to an advertised martial arts training course in Japan. He’s been held in prison for two months. There have been two hearings. No bail has been allowed. And no charge has been put forward. The prosecution in Ecuador has made it seem like a sinister thing that Ola has many computers and Zip drives and so on. You know, when I travel to places, I carry about 10 to 12 Zip drives. That’s because I keep a Zip drive for each story. It’s got nothing in it to seem to be something, you know, sinister or bizarre. These are things that software developers have. They tried to make him seem like a sinister character.

I was even told by another reporter that people were asking if Ola was the code cracker for Julian Assange, which he of course was not, and could not have been the code cracker at all when the materials passed on by Chelsea Manning came to the WikiLeaks organization. You know, that was one of the allegations that was floating around, not put on paper. Ola only met Julian when he was already in the Ecuadorean Embassy, long after the revelations of—very important, crucial revelations that came from Chelsea Manning, also now in prison.

I personally feel that the U.S. government, in trying to make a case against Julian Assange, has sort of swept up people that it thinks might have some evidence against Julian, for instance, having Chelsea Manning once more in prison, having Ola sit in a prison in Ecuador, squeezing them to see if they can either provide evidence against Julian—in Chelsea’s case, she has said she will not do so; in Ola’s case, he says, “I don’t have any evidence”—or that they will point the investigators in a direction to get Julian. I mean, we’ve got to understand that there is a vendetta by the American state against Julian Assange. That’s very clear. And I think there’s a lot of collateral damage around the world in the U.S. state’s attempt to put Julian either in prison for the full length of his life or near that.

AMY GOODMAN: I want to turn to Ola Bini speaking last month to CNN en Español, CNN in Spanish.

OLA BINI: They will find nothing, because I haven’t done anything. The only thing I’ve done is being the friend of Julian Assange. … The minister of the interior, María Paula Romo, goes on TV, the same day as I’m detained at the airport, and talks, five hours before my detention order is written—says on TV that I’m detained. That feels to me like the government is out to get me.

REPORTER: Why do you have the impression that Moreno hates you?

OLA BINI: I don’t say in my letter that he hates me. I wonder if he hates me, because subjecting me to something like this, this kind of process where I’m put in prison without any evidence, when I know that I’m innocent because I haven’t done anything, that feels personal to me.

AMY GOODMAN: That’s Ola Bini, again, speaking with CNN from jail. He was also asked by CNN about his relationship with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

OLA BINI: Just as me, he believes very strongly in the right to privacy. So, the first time I went, I actually went to talk to him about these kind of things. … I kept coming back because I like him, because he’s a friend of mine, and I kept coming back because more and more people abandoned him. … I felt that it was my responsibility to do it. But also, it was my pleasure as a friend.

AMY GOODMAN: So, Vijay Prashad, if you could comment further? Again, he’s speaking from jail to CNN. In the case of Julian Assange, we understand that Ecuador was handing over all of his electronic equipment, his hard drives, etc., to the British government. What’s happening with Ola Bini’s electronic equipment, his phones, his computers? Has the U.S. requested that equipment?

VIJAY PRASHAD: Well, the United States has been giving the Ecuadorean officials so-called, you know, expertise and help in breaking some of the barriers that Ola–you know, Ola is a very clever person. He has put all kinds of protections to his materials. These are basically off-the-shelf protections called OTR, Off the Record, and so on. So, the Americans initially said that they were going to just assist the Ecuadoreans. Now it seems that the U.S. government has asked for this material to be handed over to the United States directly.

I just want to say something about Ecuador. You know, Ola was asked in that interview if Lenín Moreno hates him. That’s the president of Ecuador. It’s very important to remember that shortly before the Ecuadorean government handed over Julian Assange to the British police, the International Monetary Fund provided Ecuador with a loan of $4.2 billion, and there was also a commercial package of about $6 billion, so a total of $10 billion was transferred to the Ecuadorean government by the auspices of the IMF. This happened just before Julian Assange was handed over to the British authorities, just before Ola was arrested. I mean, we’ve got to understand the position. When you look at these things in sequence, it looks like there must have been a deal. This big, huge package was given to the Ecuadoreans.

At the same time, you know, there’s been an enormous leak of private information from the phone and Gmail account of President Moreno. This information, called the I-N-A or INA Papers, shows direct corruption by Mr. Moreno, including an apartment in Madrid, Spain, and so on. He’s been deeply embarrassed by this and has been lashing out, saying that there are Russian hackers inside Ecuador. In fact, the first arrest of Ola at the airport, the piece of paper he was shown had a Russian name on it, and it was said that it’s a Russian person. When Ola said, “That’s not me. I’m not Russian,” they took the paper away, went back, made a new document with Ola’s name on it and saying he was Swedish, and picked him up.

So, there’s a very strange story here, Amy. We don’t know all the parts of it yet, but we need to put the IMF into the picture. I think we need to put the fact that there’s pressure from the United States on Ecuador now, first, of course, to hand over Julian Assange, and now to, you know, in a sense, do something—we don’t know what—to Ola Bini.

AMY GOODMAN: And very quickly, have you spoken to him in jail? What are the conditions like there?

VIJAY PRASHAD: The conditions are very difficult for Ola. Ola is a vegetarian. He has had a hard time there. And as he said very early into his arrest, that the conditions in Ecuador are bad for all prisoners, Ecuadorean and himself, who is a Swedish person living in Ecuador. He is a very decent and upstanding person. He refused to allow this to become merely about himself, saying the conditions for Ola Bini are bad; he said directly, they’re bad for everybody.

AMY GOODMAN: And Sweden—

VIJAY PRASHAD: But it’s been very difficult—

AMY GOODMAN: Is Sweden doing anything about getting him out?

VIJAY PRASHAD: The Swedish government called in the Ecuadorean ambassador, but Sweden has very little leverage on Ecuador. In fact, it doesn’t have an ambassador in Ecuador, just a counsel. We are hoping that pressure from the U.N. special rapporteur, David Kaye, who has called this an arbitrary detention, will have some impact on other European countries. Even the OAS special rapporteur has said that this is a very arbitrary, dangerous situation, should not be allowed. But, you know, the ability of these U.N. rapporteurs to move an agenda is very limited. And I’m afraid that the pressure from the United States government on Ecuador has basically invalidated the moral standing of European countries and even the United Nations.

AMY GOODMAN: Vijay Prashad, I want to thank you very much for being with us, director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. We will continue to follow Ola Bini’s case, as well as the case of Julian Assange, both picked up more than two months ago. Ola Bini remains imprisoned in Ecuador, and Julian Assange going through extradition hearings right now to the United States at the Belmarsh Prison in London.

Coming up, we look at Advocate, a new prize-winning documentary about the pioneering Israeli attorney Lea Tsemel, who spent five decades defending Palestinians who resist the Israeli occupation. Stay with us.

The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.
Jun 082019
 

I remember posting:

On Friday, November 2, 2018, a youth in Sudbury, Ontario was the first youth

in the Western Hemisphere to join Greta’s #FridaysForFuture #ClimateStrike.

I wanted Greta’s and Sophia’s actions to have meaning.   But I didn’t have a lot of confidence in North America.   I wondered if we’d hear their names again.

Last year, the first I knew of  Greta Thunberg and Sophia, an 11 year-old who set off the action in Canada:

2018-11-07   #FridaysForFuture #ClimateStrike Solidarity with our young people. SAVE THE DATE Friday, December 7, 2018 Climate Reality Canada, iMatter Canada and Citizens’ Climate Lobby Canada.

 

Seven months later – –  hard to believe.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

The First Time with Greta Thunberg  (Rolling Stone, March 6, 2019)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8g0zmDvxRw

2:50 minutes

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

School Strikes Special  – – March 15, 2019  (worth a scroll through – pictures)

https://act.350.org/mailings/view/67422?t=1&akid=67422%2E390946%2EbDipVu

Today is an historic day. As I write, 100,000s of children and students have already walked out of school to strike for the climate. And their global call to action is only just beginning — with incredible images and video from Australia, the Pacific, Asia, Europe and Africa already flowing in. . . .

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

The disarming case to act right now on climate change | Greta Thunberg  (TedTalk, Feb 13, 2019)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2QxFM9y0tY

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Greta is on the Asperger’s Spectrum.   In various communications she explains how the characteristics of Asperger’s have contributed to her ability to do what she’s done/does.   In one exchange, other students who are Asperger’s step forward.  It’s heart-warming to see what happens when they “come out of the closet” and connect.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

The Davos Video,  2.53 minutes

https://www.theguardian.com/science/video/2019/jan/25/i-want-you-to-panic-16-year-old-greta-thunberg-issues-climate-warning-at-davos-video 

At places like Davos people like to tell success stories.  But their financial success has come with an unthinkable price tag.   . . .

I want you to act as if the house was on fire, because it is.

Greta Thunberg, a Swedish climate activist, has told world leaders: ‘I don’t want you to be hopeful, I want you to panic. I want you to feel the fear I feel every day and then I want you to act.’  In an impassioned warning to act now on climate change, Thunberg told her audience at Davos: ‘Either we choose to go on as a civilisation or we don’t’

 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

2019-05-23 Young people have led the climate strikes. Now we need adults to join us too, mark your calendar SEPT 20. The Guardian

A call for mass, global resistance on  September 20, 2019.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

ASIDE   (scroll down for the last items re Greta Thunberg)

I dropped the ball.

Three women single file on bikes

The first called out

Two shouted “louder”

I heard

Can’t believe

It’s all gone

Huge area

They cut them all down

Bull-dozed, bombed

Nature’s limbs and meat

Strewn and heaped

Big trees dead.

“Where?” got trapped in my mind

Tongue stopped

Muscles of the intuitive atrophied

Survival skills dulled

 

Reconnect, someone knows “where”?

Carbon sinks

The trees have to stay

Act like the house is on fire

Because it is

Homes to species

The trees have to stay

At places like Davos people like to tell success stories

But their financial success has come with an unthinkable price tag.

 

CTV Mother bear, two cubs destroyed

after attack in Powell River

Worst bear year because the berry crop dried up

Don’t say it was bulldozed

Cougar complaints are up across Vancouver Island

More of the animals are being shot dead.   Starving

Don’t say people like to tell success stories

But their financial success has come with an unthinkable price tag

Greta Thunberg and the children whisper

Pick up the ball Sandra

Re-activate survival skills

The trees have to stay

Act like the house is on fire

Because it is

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Greta Thunberg in the European Parliament committee on environment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oyw4Wo6Kng

1:00:33     Streamed live on Apr 16, 2019.   (Skip the first getting organized part.)

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

SMALL-TOWN B.C.

From:  Sheri
Sent: May 29, 2019

Subject: great video . . .Students, “GLOBAL STRIKE FOR CLIMATE,  May 24 2019, Parksville B.C.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiD04TRwebQ

(INSERT:  The local News article by a student leader was very good.  Sorry I can’t copy it.)

– – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Great, unbelievable, international momentum from a small beginning by Greta Thunberg.

Jun 082019
 
We can’t stave off global heating by ourselves.
Together, on 20 September, we can unleash mass resistance
School students protest against the climate crisis in Melbourne, May 2019

School students protest against the climate crisis in Melbourne, May 2019. Photograph: William West/AFP/Getty Images

Tomorrow, schoolchildren and students will be out on the streets again, in huge numbers, in 150 countries, at over 4,000 events, demanding that governments immediately provide a safe pathway to stay within 1.5C of global heating. We spent weeks and months preparing for this day. We spent uncountable hours organising and mobilising when we could have just hung out with our friends or studied for school.

We don’t feel like we have a choice: it’s been years of talking, countless negotiations, empty deals on climate change and fossil fuel companies being given free rides to drill beneath our soils and burn away our futures for their profit. Politicians have known about climate change for decades. They have willingly handed over their responsibility for our future to profiteers whose search for quick cash threatens our very existence.

We have learned that if we don’t start acting for our future, nobody else will make the first move. We are the ones we’ve been waiting for.

Once again our voices are being heard on the streets, but it is not just up to us. We feel a lot of adults haven’t quite understood that we young people won’t hold off the climate crisis ourselves. Sorry if this is inconvenient for you. But this is not a single-generation job. It’s humanity’s job. We young people can contribute to a larger fight and that can make a huge difference.

So this is our invitation. Starting on Friday 20 September we will kickstart a week of climate action with a worldwide strike for the climate. We’re asking adults to step up alongside us. There are many different plans under way in different parts of the world for adults to join together and step up and out of your comfort zone for our climate. Let’s all join together, with your neighbours, co-workers, friends, family and go out on to the streets to make your voices heard and make this a turning point in our history.

This is about crossing lines – it’s about rebelling wherever one can rebel. It’s not about saying “Yeah, what the kids do is great, if I was young I would have totally joined in.” It doesn’t help, but everyone can and must help.

During the French revolution mothers flooded the streets for their children. Today we children are fighting for ourselves, but so many of our parents are busy discussing whether our grades are good, or a new diet or what happened in the Game of Thrones finale – while the planet burns.

This moment has to happen. Last year’s UN intergovernmental panel on climate change’s special report on global warming was clear about the unprecedented dangers of going beyond 1.5C of global heating. Emissions must drop rapidly – so that by the time we are in our mid- and late-20s we are living in a completely transformed world.

But to change everything, we need everyone. It is time for all of us to unleash mass resistance – we have shown that collective action does work. We need to escalate the pressure to make sure that change happens, and we must escalate together.

So this is our chance – join us on climate strike this September. People have risen up before to demand action and make change; if we do so in numbers we have a chance. If we care, we must do more than say we do. We must act. This won’t be the last day we need to take to the streets, but it will be a new beginning. We’re counting on you.

Greta Thunberg, Kyra Gantois, Luisa Neubauer, Eslem Demirel, Vanessa Nakate, Noga Levy-Rappoport, Isra Hirsi, Zhang Tingwei, Angela Valenzuela, Martial Breton, Nurul Fitrah Marican, Asees Kandhari, Jessica Dewhurst, Alexandria Villasenor, Jonas Kampus, George Bond, Lena Bühler, Kallan Benson, Linus Dolder, Beth Irving, Zel Whiting, Marenthe Middelhoff, Lubna Wasim, Radhika Castle, Parvez Patel, Wu Chun-Hei, Anjali Pant, Tristan Vanoni, Luca Salis, Brian Wallang, Anisha George, Hiroto Inoue, Haven Coleman, Maddy Fernands, Bhavreen Malhotra Kandhari, Feliquan Charlemagne, Salomée Levy, Karla Stephan, Anya Sastry, Claudio Ramirez Betancourt, Vicente Gamboa Soto, Julia Weder, Lilly Platt, Balder Claassen, Kassel Hingee, Maria Astefanoaei and Pavol Mulinka are youth activists for Fridays for Future

Jun 082019
 

NOTE:   There is a good interview of David Lester and another member of the Collective,  CBC Radio  (https://www.cbc.ca/listen/live-radio/1-43-north-by-northwest) (June 8th).   (wait for it to be posted.)

 

BOOK LAUNCH  for “1919”, part of the celebrations, Miners Memorial Weekend

Cumberland B.C. Museum & Archives

Sunday, June 23,  11:00 AM

https://www.facebook.com/events/405553010273333/

= = = = = =  = = = = = =

(Scroll down to the companion comic book “Direct Action Gets the Goods“)

– – – – – – –

1919

Paperback /

In May and June 1919, more than 30,000 workers walked off the job in Winnipeg, Manitoba. They struck for a variety of reasons—higher wages, collective bargaining rights, and more power for working people. The strikers made national and international headlines, and they inspired workers to mount sympathy strikes in many other Canadian cities. Although the strike lasted for six weeks, it ultimately ended in defeat. The strike was violently crushed by police, in collusion with state officials and Winnipeg’s business elites.

One hundred years later, the Winnipeg General Strike remains one of the most significant events in Canadian history. This comic book revisits the strike to introduce new generations to its many lessons, including the power of class struggle and solidarity and the brutal tactics that governments and bosses use to crush workers’ movements. The Winnipeg General Strike is a stark reminder that the working class and the employing class have nothing in common, and the state is not afraid to bloody its hands to protect the interests of capital. In response, working people must rely on each other and work together to create a new, more just world in the shell of the old.

  • Paperback / softback, 120 pages
  • ISBN 9781771134200
  • Published January 2019

= = = = = = = =

Direct Action Gets the Goods
  • Paperback / softback
    $14.95

Art has always played a significant role in the history of the labour movement. Songs, stories, poems, pamphlets, and comics, have inspired workers to take action against greedy bosses and helped shape ideas of a more equal world. They also help fan the flames of discontent. Radical social change doesn’t come without radical art. It would be impossible to think about labour unrest without its iconic songs like “Solidarity Forever” or its cartoons like Ernest Riebe’s creation, Mr. Block.

In this vein, The Graphic History Collective has created an illustrated chronicle of the strike—the organized withdrawal of labour power—in Canada. For centuries, workers in Canada—Indigenous and non-Indigenous, union and non-union, men and women—have used the strike as a powerful tool, not just for better wages, but also for growing working-class power. This lively comic book will inspire new generations to learn more about labour and working-class history and the power of solidarity.

  • Paperback / softback, 64 pages
  • ISBN 9781771134170
  • Published January 2019
Jun 052019
 

THE LAST EMAIL SENT OUT:   For your selection, May 20, All Monsanto-Bayer Roundup.

FOR YOUR SELECTION, TODAY,  JUNE 10, Peer through the haze, what do you see ahead?

 

CLIMATE CHANGE

2019-05 A tribute to Greta Thunberg and all the kids who have joined her.  Action.

A set of postings – – an amazing kid, an amazing story.

If you only have time for a 2-minute video you will be rewarded.

PEACE versus WAR AND DESTRUCTION

When mainstream media is putting out good historical content and connecting it to today’s world,  I am happy!    Netflix uses celebrity musicians John Lennon and Johnny Cash.

2018   Two documentaries. War is over! if you want it – “Imagine” (conceptualizing) Lennon   & ReMastered: Tricky Dick & The Man in Black

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24600

– – – – – – –

The Graphic History Collective uses the Winnipeg Strike in 1919.

The history presented through graphics (think:  comic books) of the Winnipeg Strike and applied to today, seems too radical.

But look at the articles in this posting.  They cover a few topics but only a fraction of what people in many different places have been tackling for a long time.  Strikes, uprisings, don’t just happen.  They are the consequence of long festering.

Theatre will put contemporary language into the mouths of actors and clothe them to look like us in performances of classical drama.  . . .  I adjusted my thinking.  The Graphic History doesn’t look too radical!:

2019-01 1919 A Graphic History of the Winnipeg General Strike By Graphic History Collective and David Lester

http: //sandrafinley.ca/?p=24611

– – – – – – – – – – –

  . . .  Peer through the haze, what do you see ahead?

TAX HAVENS, OFFSHORING

Uplifting:  the knowledge that so many people are working on so many fronts,  AND,  they are working internationally.  (Same as with Greta Thunberg and the kids on climate change):

2019-05-30 Tax Fairness Weekly

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24585

– – – –  – – – –

And from the U.S.,  LEGISLATION!   With thanks to author Paul Rowan:

Make America Great Again by Cracking Down on Tax Havens

The U.S. has a lower rating on financial secrecy than even the Cayman Islands—and far too many politicians are benefitting.

EXCERPT:

The United States has earned a place alongside Switzerland and Panama as one of the world’s most lucrative tax havens and money laundering hotspots—a shameful situation that policymakers are finally trying to address. Several bipartisan bills are trekking through Congress that aim at halting money laundering, tax avoidance, and the use of anonymous shell companies for potentially nefarious purposes. One of the bills, the Corporate Transparency Act of 2019, has been in the works for more than a decade, and would require full disclosure of company owners’ true names and addresses to the Treasury Department.   . . .  

(Remind myself to look at Canadians for Tax Fairness to see if progress is being made in Canada.)

more:      (Link takes you off this blog.)

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/make-america-great-again-by-cracking-down-on-tax-havens/

– – – – – – – – – – –

JULIAN ASSANGE & CHELSEA MANNING,

most recent:

2019-06-04 Julian Assange Scores Legal Victory as Swedish Court Denies Detention Request, CNN

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24593

  Main stream media in support – New York Times, Washington Post, etc.

2019-05-23  ‘Frightening’: Charges Against Julian Assange Alarm Press Advocates,  from NY Times

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24516

– – – – – – – – – – –

2019-05-28 “Glenn Greenwald makes an important point, that as a First Amendment question, it does not matter whether Assange is a journalist.” An important understanding re “TO WHOM” does the First Amendment apply?

Washington Post article at source

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24554

– – – – – – – – – – –

2019-05-29 Julian Assange: What happened to the freedom of speech? from the Washington Times.

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24581

– – – – – – – – – – –

2019-05-27 Tide of Public Opinion is Turning in Assange’s Favor, Consortium News

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24551

– – – – – – – – – – –

2019-05-21 (Pre-empt): Battle breaks out for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s computers,  from AP

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24508

– – – – – – – – – – –

BAYER-MONSANTO ROUNDUP,  FOLLOW-UPS

Determination to stop the poisoning of the Planet.

I disparaged CBC, The Current‘s coverage of the issue.  That was Before seeing this new CBC VIDEO.

2019-04-26  The Monsanto papers: The Canadian Connection.  from Radio-Canada

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24526

– – – – – – – – – – –

And lo!  ABC News Australia put out an excellent video.   Note:  it is rare to see the role of CropLife mentioned;  it is a very large factor.   Good on ABC News Australia!

2018-10-08  Recommend: Australian video, The secret tactics Monsanto used to protect Roundup, its star product. Includes interviews of IARC, CropLife and Regulators. | ABC News (Australia)

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24510

– – – – – – – – – – –

In my view,  some basic knowledge of IARC is important to understanding the Roundup issue.  (IARC is not perfect;  it is not without scientists who flip-flop on issues, depending on the audience.)

2015-03 What is IARC? IARC 2015 “classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans” . . . and “strong” evidence for genotoxicity.

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24532

– – – – – – – – – – –

2019-05-24 Quebec woman seeks to file class action against makers of herbicide Roundup, Bayer-Monsanto. from CTV News

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24524

– – – – – – – – – – –

U.S. Right to Know has a Monsanto “Trial Tracker” – –  https://usrtk.org/monsanto-roundup-trial-tracker-index/)

– – – – – – – – – – –

In case you missed May 20,  this email was in response to flawed CBC coverage:

2019-05-17 Response to CBC, Roundup Court Awards: “Disclosure” in the trial process – – the documents that condemned Monsanto came from Monsanto itself.

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24450

– – – – – – – – – – –

Also from May 20:

2019-02-18 Email to some female Canadian Senators: Ag Colleges and Programs are TEACHING young people that it’s okay to poison the planet. Whereas it is wrong and not to be tolerated.  If for no other reason: Plummeting insect numbers ‘threaten collapse of nature’

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24484

– – – – – – – – – – –

BIG PHARMA – MERCK

I have too many family and friends with pre-teens in their families, not to pass this along:

2019-05-15 RFK, Jr.: Gardasil “The Science” Video and Other Facts

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24443

– – – – – – – – – – –

BANKSTERS
2018-12-05 Bonus pools at Canadian banks climb 6.5% in a ‘polarizing’ year, Bloomberg

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24448

The posting above is in follow-up to this one that reinforces memory of the huge indebtedness of Canadian Banks, notably the TD, to Tar Sands Corporations.

2019-04-28   How is it possible to talk about climate change in Canada, and not address corruption of our institutions, the petro-state, the deep state? Some corporate mapping. Billionaires, Tar sands, Mining, Banks and a University.

http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=24379 

– – – – – – – – – – –
Look through the haze and the jumble, what do you see ahead?   . . .   Greta Thunberg lays it out.  Either we do or we don’t take action.  We have to change.  Dramatically.  Mount the steeds!
Jun 052019
 

Netflix documentary “John & Yoko: Above Us Only Sky”  (2018),  1.5 hours long. 

 https://www.netflix.com/watch/81069255

(note:  a web search brings up a video that looks like the Netflix film.  It is shorter and not the same.)

The film is about the making of the “Imagine” album (release date Sept 1971;  Vietnam War ended Apr 1975).  But more than that.  It’s about CONCEPTUALIZING.

The documentary is a piecing together of footage taken at the time of the recording of Imagine.  With present-day interviews of the still-alive musicians and recording engineers, of Yoko Ono, of Julian Lennon.

The end of the film makes its relevance to the current climate in the U.S. clear.

I feel heartened when a company like Netflix offers “Imagine” to re-invigorate and move us.  In this time of need.

The song Imagine isn’t everything;  nonetheless,  here’s a youtube of it:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOgFZfRVaww;   the lyrics are appended,  Scroll down.

Background on Yoko Ono (through childhood photographs and brief interview) provided in the film is helpful.   Sorry!  I can only do words:

Yoko Ono was born in February 1933 in Japan.  In August, 1945 during World War II (1939-45), Americans dropped the world’s first deployed nuclear bomb over Hiroshima. The explosion wiped out 90 percent of the city and immediately killed 80,000 people; tens of thousands more would later die of radiation exposure. Three days later, another A-bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, killing an estimated 40,000 people.

So Yoko Ono was 12.5 years old when the bombs dropped.   She went from being a daughter in a wealthy banking family, to a family with nothing, not enough food to eat.   She found she could bring some comfort to her little brother by “imagining” that they were eating whatever he would most like (ice cream!).

Wikipedia:  Ono became an Japanese-American multimedia artist, singer, songwriter and peace activist.

The film connects Ono’s work to Lennon’s.   “Imagine” is about the power of conceptualizing.

In the last quarter of the film are the huge black-and-white billboards that carried the message of the “Imagine” album, in various languages in various countries.

From an interview in the film, roughly:

The New York billboard was in a prime location.  Huge.  Billboards all around selling something.  Full of color.  This stark, all white (black lettering) billboard, not selling anything.  

It was Yoko’s belief that people, if they wanted something strongly enough, could achieve it.   Happy Christmas (War is Over!).   Conceptual art.

WAR IS OVER!

IF YOU WANT IT

Happy Christmas from John and Yoko

= = = =  = = = = =  = = =

ReMastered: Tricky Dick & The Man in Black

The other Peace vs War documentary film that helped re-energize me:   https://www.netflix.com/ca/title/80191051

“Johnny Cash didn’t like the idea of being used.”
This documentary chronicles Johnny Cash’s 1970 visit to the White House, where Cash’s emerging ideals clashed with Richard Nixon’s policies.
Cash turned the tables on Nixon.  He did not perform the 2 songs that the President requested.  Instead, a new song,  “What is Truth?“.   Johnny Cash and his wife had been in Vietnam 3 weeks prior to the White House Concert.  Lyrics at the bottom, scroll down.
There’s a good trailer at https://www.netflix.com/ca/title/80191051
= = = = = = = = =
APPENDED,  LYRICS TO “IMAGINE”, JOHN LENNON, YOKO ONO
Imagine
[Verse 1]
Imagine there’s no heaven
It’s easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us, only sky
Imagine all the people living for today
Ah

Imagine there’s no countries
It isn’t hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people living life in peace
You

[Chorus]
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
I hope some day you’ll join us
And the world will live as one

[Verse 2]
Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people sharing all the world
You

[Chorus]
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
I hope some day you’ll join us
And the world will live as one

= = = =  = = = =  = = = =

Johnny Cash – What is Truth – YouTube  and Lyrics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0KQWTBljjg
Lyrics
The old man turned off the radio
Said, “Where did all of the old songs go
Kids sure play funny music these days
They play it in the strangest ways”
Said, “it looks to me like they’ve all gone wild
It was peaceful back when I was a child”
Well, man, could it be that the girls and boys
Are trying to be heard above your noise?
And the lonely voice of youth cries “What is truth?”
A little boy of three sittin’ on the floor
Looks up and says, “Daddy, what is war?”
“son, that’s when people fight and die”
The little boy of three says “Daddy, why?”
A young man of seventeen in Sunday school
Being taught the golden rule
And by the time another year has gone around
It may be his turn to lay his life down
Can you blame the voice of youth for asking
“What is truth?”
A young man sittin’ on the witness stand
The man with the book says “Raise your hand”
“Repeat after me, I solemnly swear”
The man looked down at his long hair
And although the young man solemnly swore
Nobody seems to hear anymore
And it didn’t really matter if the truth was there
It was the cut of his clothes and the length of his hair
And the lonely voice of youth cries
“What is truth?”
The young girl dancing to the latest beat
Has found new ways to move her feet
The young man speaking in the city square
Is trying to tell somebody that he cares
Yeah, the ones that you’re calling wild
Are going to be the leaders in a little while
This old world’s wakin’ to a new born day
And I solemnly swear that it’ll be their way
You better help the voice of youth find
“What is truth/”
Songwriters: Johnny R. Cash
What Is Truth lyrics © Warner/Chappell Music, Inc, BMG Rights Management US, LLC
Jun 052019
 
I inserted two comments to point out subtle distortions that I think are important.  Can I still say it’s “reasonably balanced”?! /Sandra
A Swedish court has denied a request to extradite Assange to Sweden from the United Kingdom.

LONDON — Julian Assange won a major legal victory on Monday, when a Swedish court denied a request to detain the WikiLeaks founder over a sexual assault investigation dating back to 2010.

The ruling by the Uppsala District Court is a setback for prosecutors who were hoping to issue a European Arrest Warrant for Assange and request his extradition from the United Kingdom to Sweden.

The court agreed with prosecutors that Assange could pose a flight risk, but said detention would not be proportionate.

The Swedish rape investigation was the reason Assange spent almost seven years in self-imposed exile in London’s Ecuadorian Embassy. The WikiLeaks founder walked into the building in June 2012, shortly after losing a years-long extradition battle in the UK’s Supreme Court.

(INSERT:   Call it “survival mode” or call it “refugee status”.

Self-imposed exile” is inaccurate and misleading.

In August 2012, Assange was granted asylum by Ecuador due to fears of political persecution and possible extradition to the United States.[14]

Assange was 7 years in the Embassy to save his neck.)

 

He remained there until April this year, when his dramatic arrest prompted Swedish prosecutors to reopen the investigation last month.

Assange’s lawyer, Per E Samuelson, said Monday that his client denied the accusations and also argued that detention would be disproportionate. He added that Assange “has always wanted to cooperate” with the investigation.

The rape allegation was one of four sexual assault accusations that Assange faced after his visit to Sweden in August 2010. The case has never moved beyond the investigation stage and Assange has not been charged with any crimes in the country.

In August 2015, the statute of limitations on three of the four allegations lapsed. Under Swedish law, any charges related to the fourth allegation of rape must be made by August 2020.

(INSERT:  I added the emphasis on the following statement.)

The probe into the alleged rape was suspended in 2017 as a result of Assange’s continued residence in the embassy.

(I don’t think so.   Reference  APPENDED:  disclosures from 2013 and early 2018,  should be applied but seem to have been forgotten?   EXCERPT:

Cook reveals that Sweden actually wanted to drop the extradition case against Assange back in 2013. “Why was this not made public? Because Britain persuaded Sweden to pretend that they still wished to pursue the case” he said.

“According to a new, limited release of emails between officials, the Swedish director of public prosecutions, Marianne Ny, wrote to Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service on October 18, 2013, warning that Swedish law would not allow the case for extradition to be continued,” he wrote. Cook further said that the CPS destroyed most of the emails relating to this correspondence, contrary to CPS protocols, and that only fragments remain.

In 2016, a UN working group ruled that Assange was being arbitrarily detained by the governments of Sweden and UK, and that he was entitled to his freedom of movement, and to compensation. Both British and Swedish authorities disregarded the ruling,

On Monday the judge said that in order to finish the investigation, the prosecutors could issue a European Investigation Order, which would make it possible for them to interview Assange and conclude the inquiry.

The prosecutor said the investigation will continue but didn’t give any details about the next steps.

Since his arrest in April, Assange has been sentenced to nearly a year in a UK prison over bail violations stemming from when he first entered the Ecuadorian embassy.

He is also facing a US extradition request.

Assange was indicted in the United States on one count of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion. He was then charged with 17 counts under the Espionage Act for his role in receiving and publishing national defense information in concert with former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning

The Swedish court’s decision means the US will not have to compete with Sweden over which extradition request is given priority.

= = = = = = = =

APPENDED:  disclosures from 2013 and early 2018,  should be applied but seem to have been forgotten?

Two postings.  The title of the first one tells the story.  The EXCERPT from the second one is a summary.

  1. 2018-02-11 Sweden tried to drop Assange extradition in 2013, CPS emails show, The Guardian
  2. 2018-04-09 Punishment of Julian Assange is political, not legal Daily Mirror, UK

EXCERPT:

With Swedish prosecutors having last year formally dropped their investigation into rape allegations in Sweden, all that the UK authorities are left with to justify Assange’s arrest is the argument that he ‘skipped bail’ when he took refuge in the Ecuadorean embassy.  Now, recent revelations of email correspondence between Sweden’s prosecutors and Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) have added credence to the view that Assange’s plight has more to do with mala fide intentions of those who wish to see him punished, than any pursuit of justice. It appears that the last four years of Assange’s imprisonment in the embassy have been entirely unnecessary.  “In fact, they depended on a legal charade” wrote Jonathan Cook in Counterpunch in February.

““His only ‘crime’ is that of a true journalist — telling the world the truths that people have a right to know” 

Cook reveals that Sweden actually wanted to drop the extradition case against Assange back in 2013. “Why was this not made public? Because Britain persuaded Sweden to pretend that they still wished to pursue the case” he said.

“According to a new, limited release of emails between officials, the Swedish director of public prosecutions, Marianne Ny, wrote to Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service on October 18, 2013, warning that Swedish law would not allow the case for extradition to be continued,” he wrote. Cook further said that the CPS destroyed most of the emails relating to this correspondence, contrary to CPS protocols, and that only fragments remain.

In 2016, a UN working group ruled that Assange was being arbitrarily detained by the governments of Sweden and UK, and that he was entitled to his freedom of movement, and to compensation. Both British and Swedish authorities disregarded the ruling, with the British Foreign Secretary reported as saying it was “frankly ridiculous.”

May 312019
 

Canadians for Tax Fairness does important work.   As you’ll see in this weekly report, the problem of tax fairness is international.   People from around the world are working shoulder-to-shoulder – – we shall overcome.

I shake my head when I see progress in other countries;  Canada is lagging.  BUT!  forward the Tax Fairness Weekly to a couple of friends.  Activist ranks are definitely growing.

https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/civicrm/mailing/view?reset=1&id=474

 

OGP panel highlights need for open registries to crack down on money laundering
Left to right: Robin Hodess, left, Director of Governance and Transparency with The B Team, Sasha Caldera, beneficial ownership program manager with Canadians for Tax Fairness, and MP John Penrose, UK Prime Minister Champion on Anti-Corruption. The special panel on public beneficial ownership registries took place at the Open Government Partnership Summit in Ottawa this week. .

International corruption and the tools governments need to fight it were hot topics at the annual Open Government Partnership Summit this week. Representatives and stakeholders from more than 79 countries gathered in Ottawa to explore how governments can improve transparency and democracy. In many countries, especially Canada, criminals can easily hide behind anonymous companies. But a public registry that lists the real owners of those companies would go a long way in deterring illicit activity, according to experts at a panel hosted by Canadians for Tax Fairness, Transparency International Canada, and Publish What You Pay Canada.

Countries around the world are dealing with an infectious and escalating problem. Law enforcement officials in the US last week urged the Senate to shine a light on corruption with a public registry.

The summit comes at an especially critical time for Canada, which is facing a money laundering problem that is “far bigger than we think”, says Kevin Comeau in this week’s Financial Post op-ed.

BC has taken a big step with plans to create the first public registry in Canada. Pressure is building on other provinces and the federal government to do the same. Canadians for Tax Fairness has asked supporters to tell our Finance Ministers that it’s time to lift the veil on anonymous companies.

 

World’s worst tax havens ranked in new index
As officials from more than 100 countries gather at the OECD  this week to discuss international tax reform, the Tax Justice Network launched the Corporate Tax Haven Index — a ranking of the world’s worst offenders of tax avoidance. The British Virgin Islands, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands topped list, which also included notorious havens Switzerland and Luxembourg in the top 10.

The index of 64 regions was compiled using criteria such as how countries facilitate global tax avoidance and the scale of corporate activity. Canada was not included, but major OECD countries such as the US and Germany were. An article in the Guardian blasted the UK for being the biggest enabler of tax avoidance.

TJN plans to publish the index every two years and expand its scope to other geographic areas. The network already publishes a Financial Secrecy Index, which ranks countries according to lack of transparency and scale of offshore financial activities. In their last secrecy index, Canada placed 21st, just above the UK and Ireland.

 

Liberals float idea of soda tax, Conservatives not sweet on it
Some Liberal MPs are pushing for a tax on sugary drinks to be included in the party’s fall election platform. CBC News uncovered a list of Liberal platform priorities could include a soda tax pitched by Ajax, Ontario MP Mark Holland. The former Heart and Stroke executive suggests a 20 percent levy on sugary beverages would bring in $ 29.6-billion in revenues over 25 years — enough to fund a national healthy eating strategy in schools and deter health problems associated with high-sugar diets.

Sugar taxes have grabbed international headlines in recent years thanks to high-profile endorsements from health advocates like celebrity chef Jamie Oliver who successfully lobbied for a ‘Sugar Tax’ in the UK.

The UK’s Soft Drinks Industry Levy in 2018 forced manufacturers to pay between 18p to 24p per litre of drink depending on the grams of sugar. The government reported more than half of companies reduced sugar levels after the tax, which also raised £$154-million of revenue in the first seven months to fund healthy initiatives in schools.  Other countries such as France and Mexico have brought in similar taxes and some American cities including Seattle and Philadelphia have implemented a tax on distributors of sugary drinks.

Conservative leader Andrew Scheer was quick to attack the sugar levy proposal, claiming that another tax is not what voters want, a message the party has repeatedly used to criticize Canada’s carbon pricing plan. Sugar tax or not, expect taxes to figure prominently in all the major parties’ platforms this fall election. Scheer, who had previously campaigned on a promise to balance the budget after two years in office, recently rolled back that vow, saying it’ll take five years. A Globe editorial speculates this week Scheer’s back-tracking indicates the party is preparing to dole out a series of tax cut promises in the coming campaign.

 

Corporate tax cuts lifting CEO salaries to stratospheric levels
Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk topped the list of executives who received record compensation last year. Wikimedia Commons

CEO pay is skyrocketing at twice the rate of workers’ wages, a New York Times article reports this week. The newspaper’s annual listing of the 200 highest paid CEOs found record levels of compensation for executives despite only modest increases in average worker salaries. On the heels of a stronger economy and US President Trump’s corporate tax cuts, the median CEO was given a 6.3 percent raise of $1.1 million while the average worker only took home a 3.2 percent increase – an extra 84 cents per hour. Tesla’s Elon Musk ranked number one on the list with a $2.3 billion pay package that would take his income along with his Space X rockets to stratospheric levels. Executives from big companies such as Disney, Discovery, and T-Mobile were also high on the list, which included only eight women. The findings highlight a deepening wealth disparity and reveal how corporate tax cuts, such as the ones being rolled out in Alberta, only serve to make the rich richer. In an Edmonton Journal story this week, Canadian economists recently weighed in on the province’s so-called “job-creation tax cuts” and suggested the unproven link be taken with a grain of salt.

 

Canada’s corporate welfare handouts come under scrutiny
Pipe for the Trans Mountain expansion is stacked on the side of the road in Kamloops, B.C. Credit: Dave Eagles

A great piece last weekend on CBC the Sunday edition explored how much money corporations receive from the federal government through subsidies – and how little of that information is available to the public. Businesses pocket $129 billion a year in federal and provincial government subsidies through the form of tax expenditures and other spending programs. But as the broadcaster points out, Canada isn’t as generous in other areas, ranking low on the list of social spending by OECD nations in relation to GDP.

When it comes to corporate welfare handouts, household names like Bombardier and General Motors may spring to mind, but Canada’s oil and gas sector is a major beneficiary and that’s not even including the government-purchased Trans Mountain pipeline. Alberta tops the list with $640-per person subsidies in the 2014-15 year, followed by Quebec. The data comes from research by John Lester at the University of Calgary School of Public Policy, who tells CBC that compiling the numbers was incredibly difficult due to the lack of accessible information. Earlier this year, The Energy Mix website provided some breakdowns of how much the federal government has spent on the oil and gas industry alone. An article in the Narwhal this week also explores how generous tax credits in BC have helped the mining sector.

C4TF supports an end to fossil fuel subsidies but the government also needs to take a broader look at all spending measures and determine who they truly benefit.

 

Recommended read
Bloomberg Businessweek has an excellent cover story and profile of economist Gabriel Zucman, the “detective” who scours data to find the ultra rich’s hidden money. Zucman, the author of “The Hidden Wealth of Nations” and a member of the Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation, has done groundbreaking research both uncovering how wealthy the superrich are estimating how much they are stowing offshore.

He and fellow economist Emmanuel Saez have also provided advice and support to U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on their progressive tax proposals. Saez and Zucman have a new book, “The Triumph of Injustice”, that will be published early next year about how the rich dodge taxes and how to make them pay.

 

Have a suggestion for a news item or event that you would like to see mentioned in next week’s review? Please get in touch: Erika.beauchesne@taxfairness.ca

 

Donate now to Canadians for Tax Fairness
May 302019
 

An important contribution to understanding the application of First Amendment rights (U.S.) in the Assange case.  With thanks to Andrew Napolitano and the Washington Times.

– – – – – – – –  – – —

  • Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is a regular contributor to The Washington Times. He is the author of nine books on the U.S. Constitution.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.  (Request sent May 30 for reprint permission / Sandra)

= = = = = = = =

By Andrew P. Napolitano – – Wednesday, May 29, 2019

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

“Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” — First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

When James Madison agreed be the scrivener at the Constitutional Convention during the summer of 1787, he could not have known that just three years later he’d be the chair of the House of Representatives committee whose task it was to draft the Bill of Rights.

In doing so, he insisted that the word “the” precede the phrase “freedom of speech” in what was to become the First Amendment, so as to reflect its pre-existence; meaning, the freedom of speech pre-existed the United States. Madison believed that the pre-political rights, which he enumerated in the Bill of Rights, are natural to our humanity and he articulated as much in the Ninth Amendment, and in his speeches in support of the ratification of what would become the first 10 amendments.

Madison knew that when he wrote “Congress shall make no law abridging … the freedom of speech, or of the press,” he and the ratifiers meant no law. As direct and unambiguous as those words are — the U.S. Constitution as amended is the supreme law of the land — Congress and the courts have not always been faithful to them.

Thus, at the height of the anti-immigrant hysteria whipped up by President Woodrow Wilson and his supporters, Congress enacted the Espionage Act of 1917, which punished speech deemed harmful to America’s war efforts. Wilson was determined to win World War I at the price of the suppression of ideas that he hated or feared.

The Espionage Act was used aggressively and successfully (from Wilson’s vantage point) during the war and in the immediate years following. Then, a series of Supreme Court decisions instructed that the Act is probably unconstitutional as its sole purpose and effect is to suppress speech. These opinions harkened back to Madison, who believed that the only moral and constitutional remedy for hateful or harmful or even seditious speech was not suppression and punishment but rather more speech.

That attitude prevailed generally in the legal and judicial communities and at the Department of Justice for a few generations — even during World War II — until now. Now, the Trump DOJ has indicted a non-American whose alleged crimes took place in Europe for numerous violations of the Espionage Act, and it has done so in direct defiance of a Supreme Court decision that ruled against this during the Nixon years.

The non-American is Julian Assange, a radical and unorthodox publisher of truthful information that often exposes the hypocrisy of government. His entity for exposure is WikiLeaks — the website known for receiving stolen data and for posting true and accurate copies of them.

It was Assange and WikiLeaks that published the infamous Democratic National Committee emails in October 2016, which contained the “dirt” on Hillary Clinton once offered by Russian agents to Trump campaign officials, and for which then-candidate Trump lavished public praise on WikiLeaks.

Yet, back in 2010, Assange arranged to receive and publish stolen copies of top secret military materials that revealed American military personnel in Afghanistan at their worst. It showed them knowingly killing innocent civilians — and doing so gleefully. The data that Assange revealed had been stolen for him by an Army private then named Bradley Manning. Manning was tried and convicted of the theft and was sentenced to 35 years in a military prison, much of it in solitary confinement. In January 2017, President Barack Obama commuted Manning’s sentence to time served.

If this sounds a bit like history repeating itself from the Nixon years, it is. In 1971, Daniel Ellsberg, a civilian employee of the Nixon Department of Defense, revealed that he had stolen thousands of pages of top secret materials showing that former President Lyndon B. Johnson and some of his generals had serially lied to the American public and to Congress about the Vietnam War.

When he delivered the stolen materials to The New York Times and to The Washington Post for publication, and the Nixon DOJ got wind of the delivery, it persuaded two federal judges to enjoin the publication of the documents.

In a landmark decision, known as the Pentagon Papers case, the Supreme Court ruled that a publisher may reveal whatever materials come into the publisher’s possession, no matter how they got there, so long as the materials are themselves material to the public interest.

Stated differently, the thief — Ellsberg then, Manning today — can be tried for theft, but the publisher is absolutely protected by the “no law” language of the First Amendment. Ellsberg was indicted and prosecuted, but the charges were dismissed by a federal judge whose conscience was shocked when he learned that FBI agents broke into the office of Ellsberg’s psychiatrist to get “dirt” on him.

Assange is also protected by the values underlining that “no law” language. The whole purpose of the First Amendment, numerous courts have written, is to promote and provoke open, wide, robust political debate about the policies of the government. That simply cannot be done when government operates in secret. Even when publishers tell the possessors of state secrets how to deliver them — as Times and Post reporters surely did to Ellsberg — they cannot be silenced or punished.

Why was Assange indicted? Government killers are a mob, and mobs love anonymity. Assange assaulted their love by ending that anonymity. When the government kills and rejoices and lies about it in our names, we have a right to know of its behavior. Democracies spy on us all, yet they persist in punishing, to the ends of the earth, those who dare to shine a light upon them. Tyrannies do the same.

  • Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is a regular contributor to The Washington Times. He is the author of nine books on the U.S. Constitution.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.