RELATED:
1. 2023-11-29 B.C.: Bonnie Henry named as defendant in class-action lawsuit over her role in COVID-19 vaccine mandate which is this posting.
(2024-04-29: there are no further updates to report at this time about the Pastor Koopman case.)
This is a pretty powerful statement from the Okanagan Health Professionals, made in 2021.
5. 2024-04-29 Status of court case. BC, versus Bonnie Henry, by CSASPP, the Canadian Society for the Advancement of Science in Public Policy.
2023-11-29 B.C. Bonnie Henry named as defendant in class-action lawsuit over her role in COVID-19 vaccine mandates
NOTE: James Baldwin is the plaintiff in this class action, on behalf of public sector employees. Umar Sheikh from Victoria is the lawyer for the case. It’s confusing because there is another case that sounds the same – – #5 in the above list. I do not think that the two class action cases have been amalgamated, but I could be wrong.
UPDATE, Nov 15, 2024: The Baldwin class action has since merged with a separate class action claim by United Health Care Workers of BC. The two parties will present arguments over five days of hearings beginning April 7, 2025.
With thanks to Kelowna Now. By Iain Burns
A group representing unionized public service workers has announced a class-action lawsuit against the BC government over its COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
Representative plaintiff Jason Baldwin, who was fired by the Ministry of Finance due to the mandate, launched the suit today on behalf of affected BC Public Service workers.
As well as the provincial government, the suit lists Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry as a defendant.
The suit demands general damages for misfeasance in public office, aggravated damages and punitive damages.
It has been backed by the non-profit BCPS Employees for Freedom Society (BCPSEF), which describes itself as a “diverse group of public servants who stand together for medical privacy and bodily autonomy.”
.png)
Discussing the suit today, BCPSEF said the Province and Dr. Henry introduced a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for employees in November 2021 that “was contrary to public service employees’ Charter rights.”
That mandate violated the “medical privacy and bodily autonomy of 38,000 BC public servants with its coercive and unjustifiable proof of COVID-19 vaccination mandate,” the group added.
BCPSEF said the requirement for workers to be vaccinated led to “untold suffering and harm to public servants and public services.”
The suit claims Dr. Henry committed misfeasance because she had “no basis in fact to justify the information, data and advice she provided and upon which the Province relied to develop its employee vaccination policy.”
It also accuses her of “wilfully or recklessly ignor[ing] known potential risks of adverse events associated with the COVID-19 vaccination in providing advice to the Province.”
The lawsuit further claims that employees’ rights to freedom of association were violated by the Province and that “forced disclosure of private medical information violated common law and statutory privacy rights.”
Baldwin has retained the services of Umar Sheikh from Sheikh Law in Victoria.
The notice of civil claim can be read here.
The court must now determine if the suit meets the requirements for a class action.
If that determination is made, it will be certified as a class-action suit and can proceed.
Last month, a separate suit, also listing Dr. Henry and the Province as defendants, was filed by two plaintiffs representing fired healthcare workers.
Health professionals in the province are still required to be vaccinated against COVID-19 in order to work, a policy BC United leader Kevin Falcon said is part of a “crusade” by the NDP government.
= = = = = = = = = = =
In addition, co-plaintiff Jedediah Ferguson, who worked at Cumberland Regional Hospital laundry since June 2015, also received a leave of absence before Interior Health fired her.
According to court documents filed on October 13, the plaintiffs tabled the action “on behalf of members of the class consisting of all unionized healthcare workers in British Columbia who have been subject to the COVID-19 vaccination status information and preventative measures order.”
It asserts the Henry undermined their contractual employment agreements when she issued the public health order on October 14, 2021.
The plaintiffs claim she “acted with reckless indifference or willful blindness” by continuing to enforce the order.
According to the order, “vaccination is safe, very effective, and the single most important preventive measure for health professionals […] to protect patients, residents and clients, and the health and personal care workforce, from […] COVID-19.”
The suit counters that claim, suggesting the COVID vaccine monographs are ‘misleading,’ while referencing the risk of sustaining an adverse side-effect from the jab, including blood clots. The plaintiffs seek damages for the alleged contract breach, “misfeasance” in public office, and the suit’s certification.
The province had 21 days to respond from the action’s filing, with no response reported as of writing.