Jul 112024
 
TORONTO: During the COVID pandemic and lockdown, the government used the opportunity to enact rights-infringing, overbroad laws. Legislators and bureaucrats zealously enforced these laws against Canadians in an effort to secure compliance and suppress peaceful protest. Fortunately, The Democracy Fund (TDF) and its team of lawyers and paralegals, with the support of generous donors, fought back.

Recently, TDF paralegal Jenna Little secured the withdrawal or stay of 109 tickets from across Ontario, involving multiple charges per ticket.  Often, the charges were withdrawn or stayed due to a lack of reasonable prospect of conviction, delay, non-appearance of the government’s witness at trial, or a decision taken by the Crown not to proceed.

Clients were charged under the Quarantine Act s.15 (failure to provide information to screening officer), s.58 (failure to complete ArriveCan, failure to arrange for quarantine), or s.66 (obstruct an officer). The fine for each charge was typically $5,000, with potential total fines for conviction on all charges reaching $681,250.

Commenting on the recent victory, Jenna Little said: “It’s gratifying to see our hard work pay off, and a relief to our clients who have endured years of legal uncertainty. But the government is still doggedly pursuing many clients for charges that should not have been brought in the first place and consume scarce judicial resources.”

Though many of these cases have been successfully resolved, many remain. Other tickets involve charges under s.7.0.11 (obstruct an officer) of the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, with penalties of up to 1 year in jail and a $100,000 fine. In rare cases, clients are also charged under s.10 of the Reopening Act (gather or fail to close premises). Fines under those statutes range from $125 to $19,000. Hundreds of clients are facing potential fines and jail time for peacefully protesting or objecting to government overreach during COVID lockdowns. With your support, TDF will provide these clients with legal representation and, hopefully, legal vindication.

You Make a Difference – Support Change Today

To support our work and help in the fight against unconstitutional laws, illegitimate mandates, and government overreach, please consider making a tax-deductible below.

DONATE NOW
Crown withdraws all charges against peaceful protester arrested, Tasered at Ottawa protest

The Democracy Fund (TDF) represented Mr. Dalton in discussions with the Crown and throughout numerous court appearances. Initially facing potential jail time, a consequence exacerbated by the manner in which he was handled by police, the Crown ultimately agreed to drop all charges following negotiations by TDF.

TDF lawyer Adam Blake-Gallipeau expressed satisfaction with the outcome, stating, “Mr. Dalton exercised his Charter rights to peacefully assemble and express his views on current issues. We are pleased with the resolution.”

Continue reading

 

 

Crown withdraws another ArriveCan ticket after TDF files legal challenge

Upon returning to Canada from the US in 2022 after a long stay abroad, our client was told by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) that he must complete the ArriveCan app and answer questions about his vaccination status.

He had his passport taken and was interrogated by a PHAC officer and police officer. It appeared that, though he was initially advised that he was not being detained, he was, in fact, subsequently detained. He was then charged with an offence under the Quarantine Act and issued a ticket for $6,255.

Continue reading

BC man acquitted of hosting illegal gathering

Honner, who represented Jordan, explained that there was no direct evidence that Jordan was the host of the event. While the trial judge was satisfied that Jordan lived at the residence in question and that an event was taking place, he was not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that Jordan was the host.

“A judge should not convict where the evidence is entirely circumstantial and other reasonable inferences can be drawn from the facts,” says Honner. “In this case, there were inferences available to the trial judge that were consistent with Jordan’s innocence, including the inference that someone else living at the residence hosted the event.”

Continue reading

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)