INSERT, Sandra: “Spaces” is a way to have live audio conversations on X. Anyone can join, listen, and speak in a Space on X for iOS and Android. I do not know if a Space is different from a “Live” on X. I don’t think so.
The Panel discussion on Aug 5th surpassed my expectations. It is “a best” source of information on “what happened” and is happening.
I do not wish to steal Jason Lavigne’s excellent work, just help put it into the hands of more people.
The PANELISTS were/are:
- Vincent Gircys @VGircys
- Alex Van Herk @alexvanherk, Coutts “leader” and friend of Chris Carbert
- Marco Van Huigenbos @marco_huigenbos, Coutts “leader” and friend of Chris Carbert
- Robert Kraychik @rkraychik
- Jon Villeneuve @rightblend
- Donald Best @DonaldBestCA, retired police officer, corruption and undercover units
- Pastor Shawn Hamm @ShawnHamm, faith leader and friend of Chris Carbert
- Katherin Beyak, lawyer for Chris Carbert
- T. J. Kennedy @tjkennedyphoto
- Shadoe Davis @ShadoeDavis
- Pastor Artur Pawlowski @ArturPawlowski1
- Bath-Shebia van den Berg, lawyer at Public Order Emergency Commission
You will find more and different recaps at: Jason Lavigne @JasonLavigneMP
A Lethbridge Jury found both Tony Olienick and Chris Carbert guilty of mischief. (And Not Guilty of Conspiracy to murder RCMP Officers.)
@alexvanherk and @marco_huigenbos
talk about their guilty mischief verdicts and decisions to not present any defence at trial. Full episode here
Coutts Trial – Final Recap Special August 5th x.com/i/broadcasts/1
= = = = = = =
Jason: You wanted the truth, it’s now time for the whole truth.
Jason Lavigne @JasonLavigneMP
COUTTS TRIAL COVERAGE Monday, August 5th, 4-8 PM MT (6-10 PM ET)
I will be hosting a packed, anything goes, panel all about the Trial and Pre-Trial of Chris Carbert and Tony Olienick. The Jury Publication Ban is lifted, and there are so many very important details I collected that the public was not allowed to know. Until now.
11:37 AM · Aug 3, 2024 21.4K Views
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
INSERT, Sandra – – I copied and pasted in the following from X, prior to the Panel Discussion:
This CBC article claims that Olienick said that he would slit officer’s throats. My understanding it was the undercover officer who claimed he said “they would slit their throats”. Did something come out during the trial about him saying that? Seems like an error from cbc.
Jason Lavigne You are correct, it was allegations by the Undercover Operatives and never proven or admitted.
Is it true? Are they free? Not Guilty?)
Not guilty of conspiracy to murder. Not free yet.
Is this going to be a Space on X?
Jason Lavigne 2h It will be a Live on X.
1h I’m curious that given NG (Not Guilty) in conspiracy to commit murder what evidence was presented to prove G (Guilty) on weapons for a dangerous purpose?
= = = = = = = = Now, from Kraychik:
Chris Carbert and Anthony Olienick are found not guilty of conspiracy to murder, guilty on the charge of unlawful possession of a firearm for a dangerous purpose, guilty of mischief over $5,000. Olienick was also found guilty of unlawful possession of an explosive device.
8:34 PM · Aug 2, 2024 219.5K Views
17h What compensation do they get for having 2.5 years of their lives that they can never get back stolen?
18h Thank you for reporting on this and keeping Canadians informed. It is time to ensure this never happens again.
18h I hope they appeal the 2 guilty verdicts
17h The charge for Tony was related to his business and shouldn’t have happened.
Regardless, thank God that some justice prevailed.
18h Replying to @GordMagill
Tony’s explosives charge was opportunistic on the part of the Crown; they were industrial explosives from a gravel quarry found 200km away. There was no intent in the charge, which is why they applied it – Crown knew they could get him on simple possession, and this was used as a
\18h Thanks Robert. Was hopeful for less, but could be worse. Now how long do we wait for sentencing? Hopeful for time served.
18h Fantastic news!
7h Praying for a successful appeal.
18h Trudeau holds 4 guys, 2 of them for 901 days and counting; for being a danger to society because of ‘conspiring to murder rcmp’; A charge that there are zero convictions of.
17h What a travesty this whole thing has been. Two and a have years in remand while actual criminals are on the street the same day they are arrested. Can they bring a civil suit against RCMP?
18h Damn! The EA (the Emergencies Act) fraud WILL BE EXPOSED. Great work boys.
18h People deserve your immediate apology for leading and flaming lies that not only negatively impacted the Coutts men but Canadians across the country
18h Are they released yet
18h Possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose carries with it a maximum sentence of 10 years in jail.
18h Does this mean that they will not be allowed into the US?
18h Are they going home
18h So thankful for those men to be going home.
13h 900 days, or about two and a half years, is right at the 30 month presumptive ceiling for reasonable time to trial established by the Supreme Court in the Jordan decision in 2016. The prosecution did this very deliberately and calculated the timeline well ahead of time.
Are they going to remand them until sentencing?
It’s two for one with time served.
(INSERT, Sandra: I expect that these and many more questions will be answered in Monday’s Panel Discussions.)