The Battles

Discussions by Sandra Finley
  • Home
  • About the Network
  • The Work We Do, Battles to protect the Commons
  • WHO are we? (the network)
  • How to use this blog
  • Lockheed Martin, War Economy, StatsCan, Charter Right Privacy, Trial
  • Arrest George Bush. Rule of Law essential to democracy.
  • Heavy metals in vaccinations, Mercury in dental amalgams
  • Why we flounder

Sandra Finley

2025-06-29 Neoliberalism’s Playbook: Control, Crisis and Compliance. Endgame Logic of Late Capitalism. by Colin Todhunter on Global Research

 Uncategorized  No Responses »
Jul 022025
 

Neoliberalism’s Playbook: Control, Crisis and Compliance. Endgame Logic of Late Capitalism. Colin Todhunter

By Colin Todhunter
Global Research, June 29, 2025
Region: USA
Theme: Global Economy, History, US NATO War Agenda

Neoliberalism’s playbook

Capitalism in the form of neoliberal globalisation since the 1980s has responded to these crises by expanding credit markets and increasing personal debt to maintain consumer demand as workers’ wages are squeezed or they are made unemployed.

Other strategies have also been deployed. These include financial and real estate speculation, stock buybacks, massive bailouts, public asset selloffs, regulatory ‘reform’  and subsidies using public money to sustain private capital and boosting militarism, which drives demand in many sectors of the economy (one reason why Germany and other European countries are following in the footsteps of the US by boosting their spending on militarism and creating bogeymen as a justification).

These financial manoeuvres are not isolated tactics but part of a broader neoliberal agenda that also involves deregulating international capital flows and exposure to global capital markets, resulting in the obsession of maintaining ‘market confidence’ to hedge against capital flight and surrendering economic sovereignty to finance capital. We also see the displacement of production in other countries in order to capture foreign markets.

This global expansion of neoliberal capitalism is a form of imperialism, where powerful corporations and financial interests impose structural adjustments and policies that undermine local economies, especially in the Global South. The capture of new markets abroad is essential for capital accumulation and offsetting potential declining profitability at home.

This imperial dynamic is particularly visible in the agricultural sector. For instance, the process involves the destruction of indigenous rural economies, the imposition of chemical-dependent industrial agriculture and transformation of food systems to benefit global agribusiness oligopolies. Think too of the profit-driven technofixes being rolled out by Big Tech and Big Ag: the ultimate commodification and corporate capture of knowledge, seeds, data and so on under the crisis narrative of impending Malthusian catastrophe.

And this alludes to the fact that capital seeks ideological cover for its financial ambitions. The climate emergency narrative is being used to legitimise new financially lucrative instruments such as carbon trading and green investments, schemes designed to absorb surplus wealth under the guise of environmentalism. This reflects a broader pattern where perceived (or manufactured) crises are exploited to create speculative markets and investment opportunities that maintain capital accumulation.

COVID and Ukraine

This logic reached a new intensity during the COVID event, which provided a stark and recent illustration of how the ongoing crisis of neoliberal capitalism is exploited and managed, serving as a critical phase in its evolution. This event and associated lockdowns amplified structural inequalities and reshaped the dynamics of capital and control.

COVID was used as a strategy of ‘creative destruction’, accelerating the destruction of millions of livelihoods globally and pushing small businesses towards bankruptcy. Rather than providing genuine aid to the public, COVID policies and massive government spending primarily benefited large corporations—boosting their margins while forcing smaller enterprises to the brink and consolidating corporate power.

At the same time, COVID was used to justify unprecedented restrictions on freedoms, increased surveillance and digital control mechanisms. More on this later.

Lockdowns helped reshape capitalist accumulation patterns by externally imposing economic shutdowns that monetary policy alone could not achieve. They created conditions for increased indebtedness for households, small businesses and (Global South) nations, corporate bailouts and the imposition of new forms of control, thereby managing the contradictions of capitalism through non-market means.

According to Prof. Fabio Vighi of Cardiff University, financial markets were already collapsing before lockdowns were imposed; lockdowns did not cause the market crash in early 2022 but were imposed because financial markets were failing. Lockdowns effectively turned off the engine of the economy—suspending business transactions and draining demand for credit—which allowed central banks, particularly the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, to flood financial markets with massive emergency monetary injections without triggering hyperinflation in the real economy. Looking at Europe, investigative journalist Michael Byrant says that €1.5 trillion was needed to deal with the financial crisis in Europe alone in 2020.

This strategy was designed to stabilise and restructure the financial architecture by halting the flow of economic activity temporarily, enabling a multi-trillion-dollar bailout of Big Finance and large corporations under the guise of COVID relief. A bailout that dwarfed anything seen during the 2008 financial crisis.

Lockdowns not only destroyed small businesses and accelerated corporate consolidation, but—unlike the 2008 bailouts—this process faced little opposition, as it was justified as a public health necessity.

While COVID marked one phase of crisis management, the subsequent war in Ukraine has further accelerated these dynamics. It has served to redirect flows of energy, finance and industrial capacity. The destruction of Europe’s energy ties with Russia—via sanctions, decoupling and sabotage—engineered a forced dependency on high-cost US liquefied natural gas, delivering record profits to American fossil fuel firms (in 2022 alone, US LNG exports to the EU more than doubled—from 22 to 56 billion cubic metres—making up over half of all US LNG exports).

As European industries faltered under the weight of inflation and energy instability, the US subordinated its allies through enforced dependency while securing new opportunities for accumulation at home. Dollar supremacy was reinforced, compliance internalised and capital relocated under the banner of war. In this scenario, Europe has become both a very junior partner and collateral damage with its economic sovereignty sacrificed on the altar of transatlantic profit realignment.

The State, Crisis and Control

This brings us to a broader understanding of the state’s role in maintaining the economic system. The state and ideology are crucial for maintaining capitalism’s economic base, with the state intervening through financial support and strategic market expansion. At the same time, ideology shapes public perception and legitimises actions by re-framing individual freedoms and exploiting crises like COVID and Ukraine to manage dissent and uphold elite power.

This ideological reconfiguration aligns with technological transformation. The rise of artificial intelligence and advanced automation technologies—such as robotics, driverless vehicles, 3D printing, drone technology and even ‘farmerless farms’—will reshape the traditional mass labour force that underpins capitalist economic activity: it is being profoundly transformed and, ultimately, significantly reduced.

Looking ahead, as economic activity is restructured through these technologies, the entire social infrastructure built to reproduce labour—mass education, welfare, healthcare—will be rendered increasingly unnecessary because fewer workers are needed to sustain production and services. This transformation alters labour’s classical role as a seller of labour power to capital, fundamentally changing the dynamics of the labour-capital relationship.

The question is: if labour is defined in terms of its relation to capital and is the condition for the existence of the working class, why bother with maintaining or reproducing labour?

In this context of social erosion, neoliberalism has already weakened trade unions, suppressed wages and increased inequality. And now the message is: get used to being poor or on the scrapheap, and dissent will not be tolerated.

From surveillance to subjugation  

The so-called ‘Great Reset anticipates a fundamental transformation of Western societies, resulting in permanent restrictions on liberties and mass surveillance.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has speculated about a future where people ‘rent’ rather than own goods (as seen in the widely circulated ‘you will own nothing and be happy’ video), raising concerns about the erosion of ownership rights under the rhetoric of a ‘green economy’, ‘sustainable consumption’ and ‘climate emergency’.

Climate alarmism and the mantra of sustainability are about promoting money-making schemes. Beyond this, these narratives also serve to cement social control.

Neoliberalism has run its course, resulting in the impoverishment of large sections of the population. But to dampen dissent and lower expectations, the levels of personal freedom we have been used to will not be tolerated. This means that the wider population will be subjected to the discipline of an emerging surveillance state.

To push back against any dissent, ordinary people are being told that they must sacrifice personal liberty in order to protect public health, societal security or the climate. Unlike in the old normal of consumer-oriented neoliberalism, an ideological shift is occurring whereby personal freedoms are increasingly depicted as being dangerous because they run counter to the collective good.

In the 1980s, to help legitimise the deregulation-privatisation neoliberal globalisation agenda, government and media instigated an ideological onslaught, driving home the primacy of ‘free enterprise’, individual rights and responsibility and emphasising a shift away from the role of the ‘nanny state’, trade unions and the collective in society.

We are currently seeing another ideological shift. As in the 1980s, this messaging is being driven by an economic impulse. This time, the collapsing neoliberal project.

The masses are being conditioned to get used to lower living standards and accept them. At the same time, to muddy the waters, the message is that lower living standards are the result of mass immigration or supply shocks that both the Ukraine conflict and ‘the virus’ have caused.

The net-zero carbon emissions agenda will help legitimise lower living standards (reducing your carbon footprint) while reinforcing the notion that our rights must be sacrificed for the greater good. You will own nothing, not because the rich and their neoliberal agenda made you poor, but because you will be instructed to stop being irresponsible and must act to protect the planet.

Decreased consumption (your poverty) will be sold as being good for the planet by coopting the concept of ‘degrowth’; something to be imposed on the masses while elites continue to accumulate. This contrasts with genuine ecological or socialist degrowth proposals that would target elite consumption and redistribute resources.

Meanwhile, the framework is in place to ensure that huge corporations and the super-rich continue to rake in near-record profits through militarism, an energy transition, a food transition, speculative finance schemes involving land, carbon trading, data monetisation, surveillance capital, pharmaceuticals, green bonds, commodities and agribusiness, real estate and climate risk derivatives.

And there is always money available for Ukraine and various destabilisations around the world to further ensure the bottom line of giant corporations.

India as Global Microcosm  

To illustrate global dynamics and the real-world impact of neoliberal policies, we can examine the case of India’s agricultural sector.

Structural adjustment programmes imposed by institutions like the IMF and World Bank or bilateral agreements with the US have forced countries like India to radically transform their agricultural sectors. Subsequent directives have demanded dismantling public support systems such as state-owned seed supply, subsidies and public agricultural institutions, while promoting export-oriented cash crops to earn foreign exchange.

This shift is part of a neoliberal agenda to further integrate agriculture into global capital markets, reduce the role of the public sector and open up the sector to foreign direct investment and multinational agribusiness corporations.

The outcome in India thus far has been devastating for millions of small-scale farmers and rural dwellers. Neoliberal reforms have led to spiralling input costs, dependency on proprietary seeds and agrochemicals and the erosion of traditional farming systems. This has resulted in widespread indebtedness, economic distress and a decline in the number of cultivators—millions have been pushed off the land, many driven to suicide, and hundreds of millions face jobless growth and rural displacement.

This restructuring facilitates the capture of agriculture by large agribusiness corporations and financial investors. These entities dominate global commodity trading and are increasingly consolidating control over seeds, inputs, logistics and retail. The public sector’s role is reduced to a facilitator of private capital, enabling the entrenchment of industrial, GMO-based commodity crop agriculture suited to corporate interests rather than local food security or ecological sustainability.

Contrast this with agroecology, a means to free farmers from dependency on manipulated commodity markets, unfair subsidies and food insecurity. Agroecology prioritises local food sovereignty, ecological sustainability and farmer knowledge, opposing the reductionist, industrial agriculture paradigm promoted by capitalist agribusiness.

In India, the policy of population displacement compels displaced rural workers to migrate to urban areas in search of precarious, low-paid employment or remain unemployed, swelling the ranks of a surplus labour force.

his reserve army of labour is not accidental but serves a strategic function within global capitalism. It helps suppress wages and weaken the bargaining power of workers and trade unions both in India and internationally. By maintaining a large pool of cheap and insecure labour, capital can discipline workers through competition and insecurity.

Moreover, many of these displaced Indian workers are absorbed into offshore factories and global supply chains, effectively acting as a tool to undermine labour rights and conditions in wealthier countries.

This analysis reflects the country’s incorporation into the global capitalist system, where rural displacement and labour ‘flexibility’ are central to maintaining capitalist dynamics.

There is a historical comparison to be made between the displacement of people from the land in England during the Industrial Revolution and the contemporary displacement of the peasantry in India under neoliberal capitalism. Just as the enclosure movement in England forcibly removed peasants from their land, pushing them into cities to become a labour force for emerging industrial capitalism, a similar process is unfolding in India today.

Benign Language  

This displacement is not simply a byproduct of ‘development’ but a deliberate process tied to capitalist accumulation and imperialist restructuring of agriculture, where local food systems and rural livelihoods are subordinated to corporate interests and global markets.

Global communications and business strategy company APCO Worldwide is a lobby agency with firm links to the Wall Street/corporate US establishment and facilitates its global agenda. Some years ago, following the 2008 financial crisis, APCO stated that India’s resilience in weathering the global downturn has made governments, policy makers, economists, corporate houses and fund managers believe that the country can play a significant role in the recovery of global capitalism.

Decoded, this means global capital moving into secure control of markets. Where agriculture is concerned, this hides behind emotive and seemingly altruistic rhetoric about ‘helping farmers’ and the need to ‘feed a burgeoning population’ (regardless of the fact this is exactly what India’s farmers have been doing). APCO talks about positioning international funds and facilitating corporations’ ability to exploit markets, sell products and secure profit.

And the state has been actively obliging. The plan is to displace the peasantry, create a land market and amalgamate landholdings to form larger farms that are more suited to international land investors and export-oriented industrial farming.

For instance, an MoU was entered into by the Indian government in April 2021 with Microsoft, allowing its local partner, CropData, to leverage a master database of farmers. CropData was to be granted access to a government database of 50 million farmers and their land records. As the database is developed, it will include farmers’ personal details, profiles of land held, production information and financial details.

The stated aim is to use digital technology to improve financing, inputs, cultivation and supply and distribution. The unstated aims are to impose a certain model of farming, promote profitable corporate technologies and products, encourage market (corporate) domination and create a land market by establishing a system of ‘conclusive titling’ of all land in the country so that ownership can be identified and land can then be bought or taken away.

Globally, the financialisation of farmland accelerated after the 2008 financial crisis. From 2008 to 2022, land prices nearly doubled throughout the world. Agricultural investment funds rose ten-fold between 2005 and 2018 and now regularly include farmland as a stand-alone asset class, with US investors having doubled their stakes in farmland since 2020.

Meanwhile, agricultural commodity traders are speculating on farmland through their own private equity subsidiaries, while new financial derivatives are allowing speculators to accrue land parcels and lease them back to struggling farmers, driving steep and sustained land price inflation.

As far as India is concerned, it is becoming a fully incorporated subsidiary of global capitalism. Displaced farmers and farm workers are pushed into urban sectors like construction, manufacturing and services, despite these sectors not generating enough jobs. This displacement facilitates the replacement of labour-intensive, family-run farms with large-scale, mechanised monoculture enterprises controlled by a few powerful transnational agribusiness corporations and financial institutions.

Moreover, India is being directed to rely increasingly on its foreign exchange reserves to buy food on the international market as it is forced to eradicate its buffer food stocks.

This process is driven by pressure from global agribusiness and finance capital, which seek to dismantle India’s public food procurement and distribution systems, including the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and the Public Distribution System (PDS). These state-backed mechanisms have historically ensured food security by maintaining strategic grain stocks and providing fair prices to farmers.

Eliminating these buffer stocks would mean that India would no longer physically hold and control its own food reserves. Instead, it would have to depend on volatile global markets to procure essential food supplies, using foreign currency reserves. This shift would make India vulnerable to price fluctuations, speculation by investment firms and manipulation by multinational corporations dominating global commodity markets.

The massive farmer protests in India were, in part, a resistance to these policies. Without buffer stocks, India would effectively be paying corporations such as Cargill to supply food, perhaps financed by borrowing on international markets.

They will try anything to fragment opposition and suppress movements for systemic change.

Resistance and Refusal  

That is not to say resistance is absent—far from it, especially in the realm of food and agriculture (discussed in my books on the global food system linked to at the end of this article).

\The fightback against emerging digital authoritarianism is already underway and takes many forms: rights groups are challenging mass surveillance laws and practices in the courts; campaigns are mobilising to block or roll back digital ID schemes, facial recognition and mass data retention.

Mass mobilisations against surveillance infrastructure are growing, as are acts of refusal in the form of non-compliance with digital ID requirements, opt-outs and public data obfuscation campaigns. There is also a burgeoning movement to build and promote peer-to-peer, federated or blockchain-based social networks and communication tools and to develop grassroots internet infrastructure that bypasses state and corporate control.

International solidarity is crucial, too, to expose and resist the export of surveillance technologies and the global harmonisation of repressive policies.

Meanwhile hundreds of millions endure poverty and many more face declining living standards and welfare cuts. At the same time, the super-rich have stashed an estimated $50 trillion in hidden accounts (as of 2020) and have only grown wealthier in recent years.

And here lies the crux of the matter—economic power. While resistance to the surveillance state and digital authoritarianism is vital, the deeper struggle is against the concentration of wealth and control in the hands of a global corporate and financial elite.

Across the world, workers, peasants and communities are organising through strikes, land occupations, agroecology, seed and food sovereignty movements, debt resistance and the fight to reclaim public goods. The task is to build movements capable not only of resisting but of transforming the structures of economic power that underpin the entire system.*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

Renowned author Colin Todhunter specialises in development, food and agriculture. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is the author of the following books:

Power Play: The Future of Food  

Sickening Profits: The Global Food System’s Poisoned Food and Toxic Wealth  

Food, Dispossession and Dependency. Resisting the New World Order 

 

 

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 5:45 PM

2025-07-02 Canada set up a $50M vaccine injury. Those harmed say it’s failing them. By Andrew McIntosh & Carolyn Jarvis Global News

 Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt)  No Responses »
Jul 022025
 

Mainstream Media reporting on vaccine injuries!

 

Dear Andrew McIntosh and Carolyn Jarvis,  Global News.

Email: andrew.mcintosh@corusent.com or carolyn.jarvis@globalnews.com 

cc:  Federal Health Minister (Liberal)   Marjorie Michel

 

I greatly appreciate your reporting on Vaccine injuries.    Today’s news:

Canada set up a $50M vaccine injury. Those harmed say it’s failing them.

  1.    Stephen MacDougall (died)
  2.    Becky Marie Campbell  (Three weeks after vaccination in April 2021, Campbell, a B.C. school teacher and mother of four, began to feel numbness in     her legs while driving down the highway. Soon, she was unable to walk and was subsequently hospitalized.
  3. Mike Becker of B.C., experienced severe pain, nausea, dizziness and huge blood clots in his right leg after receiving a vaccine in 2021. His right leg is now larger than the left.   He requires blood thinners.
  4. For 40 years, physicians and public health officials in Canada had been calling for a federal, no-fault government vaccine injury support program. All other G7 countries, except Canada, had one.  . . .   Dr. Kumanan Wilson had tried to persuade the federal government to launch a vaccine injury support program in Canada for years but was unsuccessful until the COVID-19 pandemic slammed the country.  
  5. Kimberly MacDougall of Peterborough, Ont., has never spoken publicly about her husband’s death until now. . . severe adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine.  MacDougall’s husband, Stephen, then 45, died from myopericarditis post-COVID vaccine, leaving her a young widow of two children, then 9 and 12.
  6. Dan Hartman, an Ontario father  who lost his 17-year-old son, Sean, in September 2021 (covid vaccine).
  7. Kayla Pollock  – she uses a wheelchair because of transverse myelitis, a condition that involves swelling of her spinal cord and the loss of lower body functions. Medical research has documented hundreds of cases of transverse myelitis following COVID vaccination.  As a result of her illness, Kayla is no longer able to work.
  8. Ross Wightman lives near Kelowna, was diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome after vaccination,  Guillain-Barré syndrome is a rare neurological disorder that has been linked to COVID-19 vaccinations. The condition causes sudden numbness and muscle weakness when the immune system attacks peripheral nerves.    No longer able to work.  His wife left her job to care for him and their two young children full-time.
  9. Shannon Dupont, of Manitoba, displays all the Vaccine Injury Support Program documents, emails and forms she’s gathered.   Her employer mandated that she be vaccinated.  But Dupont suffered a stroke, Bell’s palsy, lost half her field of vision in her left eye and dexterity in her hands. She developed an autoimmune disorder that gave her hives.   In September 2022, the provincial health authority recommended that Dupont receive no further COVID-19 vaccines. She can no longer work.

We all need to work together to stop these vaccinations.  You are welcome to draw on material I have pulled together on my blog.

I wish to alert you, Global News,  to the SIDS (Sudden Infant Death) cases associated with vaccines.

2023-10-11 Word takes off. International story. Canadian detective HELEN GRUS being disciplined for investigating link between infant deaths and mRNA vaccines. Includes the input from Serpico.

2024-06-26 Deluxe. Covid VISP REPORT #4. Feds compensate $14M to victims of the vaccine campaign. Tamara Ugolini.

 

2025-06-26 CDC Vaccine Advisers Vote to Stop Recommending Flu Shots That Contain Thimerosal (Mercury)

Thank-you for your contribution to journalism in Canada.

est wishes,

Sandra Finley

= = = = = = = = = = =

WATCH: A Global News investigation into the federal government’s Vaccine Injury Support Program reveals ill and injured people are left waiting months, sometimes years for help to arrive.

Kimberly MacDougall lay in a hospital bed beside her injured husband, Stephen, as his final moments came. She and their two kids held him as he took his last breath.

Stephen, 45, a service manager for a luxury automobile dealership, had been fighting to live for weeks in May 2021, but stopped struggling. She informed friends on social media that the man she loved, incredibly fit and with no prior health issues, wouldn’t make it.   . . .

Ross Wightman, a former pilot and realtor, social worker Shannon Dupont, and kindergarten assistant Kayla Pollock also suffered life-altering injuries after their vaccinations.   . . .

 

 

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 4:07 PM

census. open media, Candace Malcolm interviews John Carpay

 Corporatocracy or Democracy or Administrative State or WHAT?  No Responses »
Jul 022025
 

 

Census  + Open Media article

Bill C-2, online harms & more updates!

OpenMedia Monthly | June 2025

Digital Sovereignty: Why Canada Needs Control Over Our Data and Networks

With growing surveillance powers and foreign tech giants dominating our digital lives, Canada risks losing control over its data and infrastructure. Stronger privacy laws, data localization, and clear rules for cross-border data flows are essential to protect our rights and sovereignty. This article explains why digital autonomy isn’t optional — it’s critical for Canada’s future.

 

OpenMedia Calls on CRTC to Rein In Big Telecom’s Marketing Spin

Big Telecom rakes in billions yet claims it can’t afford clear, standardized labels showing real Internet speeds. This leaves Canadians confused and overpaying. At the CRTC hearing, OpenMedia demanded transparency, fairness, and accountability — because consumers deserve honest information, not marketing spin. Read how we’re fighting to put power back in the hands of Canadians.

 

 

What’s inspiring us right now!

  • Reading 📚: Confronting Canada’s Gatekeeper Crisis: a new discussion paper from the Canadian Anti-Monopoly Project on how to roll back Canada’s gatekeeper’s that control our economy.
  • Watching 🎥: How to Set up a Raspberry Pi: We’re nerding out on learning to set up our own tiny Linux device!
  • Listening 🎧: The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 234: “Solutions Aren’t Going to be Found Through Nostalgia”: Mark Musselman on the CRTC Hearings on Canadian Content Rules – how can we make them work?

Take action now!

 

Bill C-2 threatens our privacy, erodes our freedoms, and grants the government unchecked surveillance powers. Tell Mark Carney: surrendering to U.S. data demands isn’t leadership — it’s a betrayal of our values. Help stop this anti-rights, anti-privacy, anti-Canadian bill now!

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 3:00 PM

2025-07-02 Carney wants to spy on all canadians. Junonews.com/

 Surveillance  No Responses »
Jul 022025
 

 

https://www.junonews.com/p/carney-wants-to-spy-on-all-canadians

 

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 2:51 PM

2025-07-01 The Plot to Get RFK By James Lyons-Weiler, published on Dr. Malone’s substack.

 Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt)  No Responses »
Jul 012025
 

Again,  thanks to D.:

This shows a better gravity of the situation as well as a timeline of what is trying to be taken down!

From: Robert W Malone MD from “Who is Robert Malone” <rwmalonemd@substack.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2025

BIO  defined   (INSERT:   excerpt)

Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), whose membership includes Pfizer, Merck, Novavax, Vaxcyte, and hundreds of biotech firms that profit from regulatory insulation, has a mole. This article critiques the documented lobbying behavior of the trade group BIO, not the internal operations or clinical data of its member corporations.

When the nation’s leading pharmaceutical trade group convenes a closed-door strategy meeting and openly discusses the need to “go to The Hill and lobby that it is time for RFK Jr. to go,” the issue is no longer health policy—it is democratic integrity.

On my blog, somewhere:   a copy of the leaked document.   I’ll find it.

 

͏ By James Lyons-Weiler     ­͏     ­͏     ­

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

 

The Plot to Get RFK

BIO: “It is time to go to The Hill and lobby that it is time for RFK Jr to go.”

Robert W Malone MD, MS
Jul 1

 

READ IN APP

By James Lyons-Weiler

 

An apparent leaked minutes document suggests that a trade association held a meeting in April to undo the confirmation of Kennedy by the duly elected US Senate.

A PDF of that document is linked to the button below, and images of that PDF are also located at the end of this article (RWM):

VPSC Steering Committee Meeting

Caveat and Clarification

All references to individuals, statements, or actions attributed in the leaked minutes of the BIO Vaccine Policy Steering Committee (VPSC) meeting held on April 3, 2025, should be understood as excerpts from an internal document that has not been publicly authenticated by the named parties. These statements represent the content of the document as obtained and published, and do not constitute confirmed factual claims about the intent, conduct, or positions of any individual mentioned. The document reflects the internal framing and strategy of BIO and is presented here for the public to assess, interpret, and investigate. Readers are encouraged to seek independent confirmation, request public statements from the individuals involved, and draw conclusions based on full context and corroborating evidence. The document was received anonymously by whistleblowers and provided to Popular Rationalism for public analysis. Its provenance is under review.

On the eve before the US Senate reconvenes, a detailed secret trade-association memo plotting the removal of US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has leaked. It reads like a coup attempt against regulatory reform—and they are spending millions to make sure Kennedy is out of office by September.

It seems that the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), whose membership includes Pfizer, Merck, Novavax, Vaxcyte, and hundreds of biotech firms that profit from regulatory insulation, has a mole. This article critiques the documented lobbying behavior of the trade group BIO, not the internal operations or clinical data of its member corporations.

When the nation’s leading pharmaceutical trade group convenes a closed-door strategy meeting and openly discusses the need to “go to The Hill and lobby that it is time for RFK Jr. to go,” the issue is no longer health policy—it is democratic integrity.

According to the apparent leaked minutes, verified by the name of the creator of the file, on April 3, 2025, BIO held a “Vaccine Policy Steering Committee” (VPSC) meeting whose internal summary, soon to be publicly available thanks to whistleblowers, reveals a campaign of strategic deception, institutional capture, and psychological warfare and exposes a campaign of institutional deception, investor protection, and coordinated sabotage of the MAHA reform platform.

According to the leaked document, titled “BIO Vaccine Policy Steering Committee – April 3, 2025”, BIO has committed $2 million—half of its cash reserve—to counter what it calls the “threat” posed by Kennedy’s rise. But this is no ordinary PR push. It is a multi-pronged campaign designed to deceive the public, silence dissent, and preserve industry dominance through influence operations masquerading as science.

The Plot Exposed

The document opens with a blunt political calculation: Kennedy’s candidacy threatens investor confidence, regulatory predictability, and the long-term viability of the vaccine business. BIO leadership in the apparent leaked document states plainly: “It is time to go to The Hill and lobby that it is time for RFK Jr to go.”

To achieve this, according to the document, BIO intends to deploy surrogates across the political spectrum, co-opt conservative influencers, and bypass direct engagement with the Kennedy campaign altogether. Among the figures named as potential allies in this covert effort: Dr. Mehmet Oz, former Senator Richard Burr (former Senator NC; Advisor DLA Piper Health Policy Steering Committee), Senator Bill Cassidy (in a section of the document focused on strategic influencer engagement and legislative positioning), and the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). These individuals and institutions, the memo suggests, can provide a veneer of bipartisan legitimacy to BIO’s core aim: neutralize Kennedy without ever addressing the substance of his critique.

Follow the Money

The most revealing detail is that $2 million—precisely half of BIO’s entire $4 million reserve—has been allocated to vaccine communications, specifically a D.C.-area pilot campaign called “Why We Vaccinate.” The purpose is not education, but behavioral influence: to combine “inspire and frighten” tactics in order to manipulate public sentiment and legislative behavior.

Internal documents state clearly that the campaign’s goal is to appeal to the “movable middle” using emotionally charged messaging, capitalizing on fear messaging tied to national security, workforce resilience, and economic productivity.

Why such an aggressive push? Because, as Vaxcyte COO Jim Wassil apparently warned, “investors have stated they are leaving until the next data readout,” citing Kennedy’s “unpredictability” as a systemic disruption to the vaccine capital pipeline.

Given Kennedy’s demand for restored liability, long-term data, and placebo-controlled trials, BIO appears to view Kennedy’s proposals as a threat to the entire shortcut pipeline BIO built under EUA conditions.

BIO’s fear is not scientific opposition—it’s that Kennedy’s regulatory scrutiny may render their current profit model obsolete. “According to the document’s summary, one participant expressed concern that “Investors are sitting on the sidelines for the next 6–9 months.“ Capital has fled the vaccine sector, and Kennedy’s reform agenda is making it difficult for pharma executives to assure investors that the regulatory terrain remains exploitable.

As a reminder, these statements are drawn from the contents of an internal memo that has not been publicly confirmed by the named individuals. Interpretations remain provisional.

Hijacking Language

The VPSC meeting wasn’t just about funding. It was also about redefining language. BIO officials emphasized a shift in framing—from “protect,” “defend,” and “maintain” to “streamline,” “optimize,” and “enhance.”

But these are not reforms. They read as an attempt at narrative laundering operations. When BIO says “efficiency,” it means fewer safety requirements. When it says “resilience,” it means consumer obedience, not protection from harms from vaccines held to the Kennedy Bar. And when it says “transparency,” it means secretive PR-managed theater, not data disclosure.

This is rhetorical mimicry—a deliberate tactic to adopt the aesthetic of reform while preserving the machinery of capture. This differs from standard PR in that it aims to overwrite language itself: ‘transparency’ is redefined as brand polish; ‘efficiency’ as exemption from oversight—a deliberate attempt to steal the language of biomedical reform while ensuring that no structural reform ever occurs—and no one notices the difference.

Divide and Conquer

BIO’s strategic calculus is unmistakable: avoid confronting RFK, Jr. head-on and instead flood the surrounding narrative space with surrogate voices engineered to appear neutral, authoritative, and scientifically grounded.

The April 3 memo explicitly recommends targeting “Makary and Trump Insiders vs RFK, Jr.,” signaling an intention to bypass public debate in favor of internal triangulation. Within this framework, Dr. Mehmet Oz is floated as a potential “public health voice of reason within WH,” praised for his healthcare credentials and presumed credibility with conservative audiences.

While no specific action is proposed, the implication is clear—the document suggests BIO may aim to elevate Oz as a counterweight to Kennedy’s reform agenda by leveraging his media fluency and perceived scientific legitimacy to repackage industry talking points under the guise of responsible governance. This is not policy—it’s psychological misdirection through proxy, as the document implies.

The document also names AEI as a “trusted” conduit for pro-vaccine messaging, with Scott Gottlieb calling the MAHA movement a “cover for an anti-vaccine campaign.” It floats Dr. Oz as a possible public face of White House-aligned medical messaging. It outlines plans to use conservative constituents and influencers not to question BIO’s agenda, but to normalize it among skeptics.

Nowhere in the document is there any serious discussion of scientific debate. Nowhere is there a plan to confront Kennedy’s actual policy proposals—such as the Kennedy Bar, which calls for preclinical safety testing, raw data publication, long-term health tracking, and restoration of manufacturer liability. Instead, BIO’s plan is to erase Kennedy’s credibility through managed optics and surrogate deployment.

Fear of the Public

BIO’s own admissions reveal the true motive behind this campaign: fear. Not of disease, but of regulatory disruption. With RFK, Jr. and Commissioner Makary and team tightening standards, BIO executives are alarmed that predictable, post-market surveillance standards are expected to be enforced—and with them, the rapid market influence leverage built during Operation Warp Speed. Behind this campaign: fear. Not of disease, but of accountability.

Novavax, Merck, and Vaxcyte executives appear to express concern over ACIP’s new caution, the FDA’s slow-walking of approvals, and the crumbling of once-reliable regulatory shortcuts. With Kennedy and Commissioner Makary tightening the reins, BIO fears it can no longer exploit the revolving door between industry and agency.

One quote in particular encapsulates the panic: “They keep moving the goalposts on vaccines.”

This is simply not true. The goalposts aren’t moving. For the first time in decades, they are being reinstalled on the actual playing field of science, safety, and consent.

Why September Matters

Though the leaked memo from BIO’s Vaccine Policy Steering Committee never names September outright, its entire architecture reveals a timeline racing toward it. September marks a convergence point—political, narrative, and financial—where BIO knows it must have reshaped the battlefield or risk losing control of it entirely.

By then, Congress will be back in full session after its summer recess, and the fiscal year will near its end, placing vaccine policy, public health budgets, and FDA funding under the spotlight. Appropriations negotiations are not neutral in this climate—they are leverage points. If RFK, Jr. maintains or grows his influence through the summer, BIO faces the real possibility that reformist voices could restrict their easy funding pipelines, delay regulatory approvals, or demand hearings that expose industry-government entanglements.

September is also the reopening of the American schools – and the media mind. Fall marks the relaunch of political programming, the release of think tank policy reports, and the return of the elite opinion economy. BIO’s $2 million “Why We Vaccinate” campaign isn’t just a marketing push—it’s a narrative strike, timed to reassert emotional control over an audience emerging from summer’s distractions. They want to preempt Kennedy’s messaging before he dominates the fall discourse with facts, reform principles, and the moral clarity of a movement demanding consent.

Finally, September sets the tone for the next political cycle. Though national elections won’t be held until later, two House special elections will serve as bellwethers. Candidate filings, local endorsements, and policy positions will crystallize as donors and power brokers assess momentum. BIO knows it has a narrow window to discredit Kennedy before he becomes not just a candidate—but a coalition. That’s why the clock in the memo isn’t ticking toward November. It’s ticking toward September.

Global Implications

BIO’s apparent plot is not isolated. If the leak is genuine, and it appears so far to be, it aligns with other suppression architectures: ESG-based financial pressure on corporations to support mandates, WHO treaty harmonization that threatens sovereign health policy, and social media and AI systems that algorithmically suppress dissent.

  • ESG-driven pharma score systems that reward coercive health mandates
  • WHO treaty harmonization that threatens national sovereignty
  • AI-based censorship systems that erase dissenting medical viewpoints

The April 3 memo must be read not just as a domestic political act, but as a nodal maneuver in a transnational agenda to control the terms of health, science, and consent.

One AEI-aligned strategist even claimed that MAHA was a ‘cover for an anti-vaccine campaign’—a telling attempt to delegitimize not arguments, but their right to exist. Pro-science is now anti-vaccine, and it has been for some time.

This isn’t a war against misinformation. It’s a war against public transparency in science. BIO fears Kennedy not because he is wrong, but because he has exposed the scaffolding of a regime that substitutes marketing for medicine. He has publicly pledged reforms that, if enacted, could disrupt the financial and regulatory relationships this memo appears to protect by requiring the firms actually follow the rules.

The $2 million smear campaign is not a show of strength. It is a confession of institutional fragility—a desperate gambit to buy time before the public finally demands the truth.

This is not a referendum on Kennedy. It is a referendum on whether regulatory science will serve the people or the shareholders.

And this time, the people have the receipts.

This article was first published at Brownstone Institute and republished via a Creative Commons license.

The views expressed here are those of the author and may or may not represent Malone.news

Malone News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid

Thanks for reading Malone News! This post is public so feel free to share or crosspost it.

Share

Give a gift subscription

 

VPSC Steering Committee Meeting

You’re currently a free subscriber to Malone News. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

Like
Comment
Restack

© 2025 Robert W Malone, MD
Virginia
Unsubscribe

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 5:40 PM

2025-05-15 The mRNA Drug Industry Strikes Back, by Dr. Robert Malone.

 Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt)  No Responses »
Jul 012025
 

With thanks to D.

Morning Sandra

The below article came in today from Dr. Robert Malone.  This is the main reason that ostriches must die, and the thought of natural immunity must die with them. Anything and everything that might expose the hoax that we have lived through the last 5 years must be stopped!

Take a look at the below, and Dr. Malone hasn’t even touched their plan of “Total Control” yet!     D.

From: Robert W Malone MD from “Who is Robert Malone” <rwmalonemd@substack.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2025    ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏    ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏       ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏      ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Upgrade to paid

The mRNA Drug Industry Strikes Back

A Case Study in How Regulatory Capture Happens

Robert W Malone MD, MS
May 15

 

READ IN APP

Know your enemy.

Today’s essay focuses on the emerging mRNA drug industry, the DC-based lobbying organization that has been formed to support it, push its agenda and interests, and the DC allies that it is cultivating. This industry is the result of massive US government spending, advocacy, subsidies (both financial and regulatory), and promotion through propaganda and censorship. This industry spans academia through small biotech to large Pharma, and of course, big finance and Wall Street. To date, it has been enormously profitable. Like an insatiable spoiled child, it wants still more goodies.

Quoting Secretary Kennedy (May 14, 2025) “When I was a kid, NIH was the premier gold standard scientific institution in the world. Over the years, it was captured by industry.”

By taking the time to understand the “Alliance for mRNA Medicines”, its agenda and interests, how it is being built, and watching as it develops and deploys its propaganda and influence campaign seeking to influence President Trump, as well congressional members, you will gain insight into how the Pharmaceutical Industry has captured NIH, CDC, and FDA. Consider this a case study.

Lately, it has become quite the trendy thing for a subset of MAHA influencers to promote the narrative that the Trump administration is not serious about addressing the widespread malfeasance and harms associated with the COVID genetic “vaccine” products, and in particular, the pseudo-mRNA-based products.

In stark contrast to this divisive and counterproductive narrative, the new mRNA Drug academic-industrial complex is using terms like “existential threat” (ergo, threat of death to the industry) consequent to the appointments of new HHS leadership. In other words, influencers on one side are complaining that not enough is being done fast enough, and on the other side, this new industry seems to be running around saying that the sky is falling.

“This is an existential threat,” according to AMM executive director Clay Alspach, a principal at Leavitt Partners, a health-care consulting firm in Washington DC

Leading the response to this perceived threat to the emerging mRNA drug industry is the new trade industry organization called the Alliance for mRNA Medicines (AAM), which was formed in November of 2023. This lobbying and advocacy organization is headed up by Registered Lobbyist and Foreign Agent Mr. Clay Alspach, a principal at Leavitt Partners, a health-care consulting firm based in Washington DC.

The following is from Mr. Alspach’s corporate bio:

clay.alspach@leavittpartners.com

Former chief health counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee.

Clay Alspach is a principal based in Washington, D.C. Clay specializes in health care policy and advocacy related to the Food and Drug Administration, health information technology, Medicare Parts B, C, and D, Medicaid, private health insurance, and the Affordable Care Act.

Prior to joining Leavitt Partners, Clay served as Chief Health Counsel for Chairman Fred Upton of the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee. During seven years with the committee, he managed, provided strategic direction, and served as the principal representative for the committee on all of its health care-related work. Clay spearheaded legislative initiatives that successfully reformed the SGR (MACRA), reauthorized FDA user fees (FDASIA), and established a national system for drug supply chain security (Drug Quality and Security Act). Clay also led the committee’s legislative accomplishments on biopreparedness and security, public and private medical research, controlled substance and DEA matters, and several other public health initiatives. Most recently, Clay led the committee’s work on the 21st Century Cures Act.

According to Legistorm, Clay Alspach, whose full name is Robert Clayton Alspach, has been registered as a lobbyist/foreign agent. In DC parlance, the term “hired gun” might be used to describe Mr. Alspach’s role in this endeavor.

In case you were wondering what companies and academic organizations consider themselves to belong to this new industry, below is the list, each hot-linked to further information. Notably absent are the University of Pennsylvania, Moderna and Pfizer. This lobbying organization currently employs at least 23 people.

  • Acuitas Therapeutics
  • Akron Biotech
  • Arcturus Therapeutics
  • Australian National University
  • BioNTech
  • CSL
  • Curapath
  • CureVac
  • Cytiva
  • Cytonus
  • Danaher
  • De Novo Biotherapeutics
  • Etherna
  • Ethris
  • Exothera
  • Ginkgo Bioworks
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Maravai LifeSciences
  • MaxCyte
  • Mayo Clinic
  • MJH Life Sciences
  • Nutcracker Therapeutics
  • Precision for Medicine
  • Providence Therapeutics
  • Quantoom Biosciences
  • Replicate
  • Sail Biomedicines
  • Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station
  • Vernal Biosciences
  • Verve Therapeutics
  • Why We Vax

A few weeks ago, I was contacted by a reporter from Nature (Elie Dolgin), who asked to speak to me about a new article he had been commissioned to write. With more than a bit of trepidation, I decided to talk to him. To my surprise and relief, my impression was that Mr. Dolgin was doing real journalism and was seeking some balance of opinion in his investigation.

This article was the result of his labors. Based on my prior experience many years ago working as head of business development for an early Bill and Melinda Gates-funded “non-profit” (Aeras Global TB Vaccine Foundation), I suspect that somehow the Alliance for mRNA Medicines provided support or incentive for Nature to publish this article.

Quoting from the Nature magazine news feature article, which you can read here:

The day after Donald Trump moved back into the White House in January, he celebrated a US$500-billion private-sector investment in artificial intelligence (AI) with a high-profile announcement in the Roosevelt Room. The new president looked on as technology billionaire Larry Ellison highlighted one of the initiative’s most transformative goals: using messenger RNA vaccines to transform cancer treatments.

By harnessing AI to analyse tumour genetics, Ellison explained, researchers could rapidly design personalized vaccines tailored to an individual’s cancer. “This is the promise of AI and the promise of the future,” he said.

Biotechnology executives were elated. Trump had, just five years earlier, propelled mRNA medicines into the spotlight through his signature effort to fast-track the development of a coronavirus vaccine. Now, just one day into his second term, he was once again elevating the technology to the national stage.

“Then the bottom fell out,” says Deborah Day Barbara, co-founder of the Alliance for mRNA Medicines (AMM), a trade group representing more than 75 companies and academic institutions that are advancing mRNA research, development and manufacturing.

A prominent vaccine critic who had vilified the mRNA-based COVID-19 jabs, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, was appointed to lead the country’s top health agency, and long-time champions of immunization science in the civil-service sector were shown the door. Research grants tied to HIV prevention and pandemic preparedness were abruptly cancelled, including many involving mRNA. And numerous other projects that were focused on mRNA vaccine technology were compiled into a list, potentially signalling their impending termination.

At the same time, legislators in several states have been pushing to ban or restrict the use of mRNA-based medicines for infectious diseases. None of these measures has become law, but the efforts threaten to destabilize the mRNA industry, creating uncertainty and potentially limiting patient access to emerging treatments.

The anti-mRNA sentiment — coupled with the sweeping shake-up of science funding across the United States — has sparked fears that this once-celebrated technology, widely seen as a major engine of next-generation vaccines and therapeutics, could soon find itself on the chopping block.

For AMM executive director Clay Alspach, a principal at Leavitt Partners, a health-care consulting firm in Washington DC, the message has been unmistakable: “This is an existential threat,” he says.

By mid-March, the AMM was holding regular conference calls to strategize. Members swapped intelligence, compared notes on delayed grants and tried to anticipate what might come next. Amid the uncertainty, a few questions loomed large: how far would the clampdown on mRNA go? Would it stop at COVID-19 jabs? Would it extend to all vaccines in development for influenza and other infectious threats? Or reach even into mRNA-based drug therapies in the works for cancer, autoimmune disorders, rare genetic diseases and more?

The initial meeting of the AAM has already been completed, and was held November 13–15, 2024 in Boston, MA. Notable keynote speakers included the two senior FDA personnel with direct regulatory responsibilities relating to this industry.

The second annual meeting is now scheduled for September 16-18, 2025
at the Coronado Island Marriott Resort and Spa, 1500 Orange Ave, Coronado, CA. You can find further information concerning this meeting here. Per AAM, the scope and structure will be as follows:

The Alliance for mRNA Medicines (AMM) brings together senior executives and top decision-makers in the mRNA industry to advance pioneering research into vaccines and therapies for patients.

The annual meeting, AMM ASCENT (Advancements in mRNA Science, Commercialiation, Education, and Novel Technologies), features one-on-one partnering opportunities for companies and investors, dedicated networking, keynotes and fireside chats featuring KOLs and industry visionaries, as well as engaging plenary and panel discussions among biotech, pharma, and academic leaders.

The AAM held lobbying meetings on Capitol Hill during September 2023. This AAM “sizzle reel” attached below documents that, at that time, they met with Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (FDA) Dr. Peter Marks, Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy, and Kentucky Congressman Brett Guthrie.

Readers of this substack are familiar with the vaccine-industry-friendly concessions extracted from HHS Secretary Kennedy during the Senate Confirmation process by Senator Cassidy, and with the central role that Dr. Peter Marks has played in expediting and defending the mRNA platform and COVID “vaccines”.

Brett Guthrie is the U.S. Representative for Kentucky’s 2nd congressional district. He has not held a specific policy position related to mRNA. However, he has been involved in discussions and legislation regarding healthcare and medical policies, including those that could affect healthcare providers and pharmaceutical companies involved in mRNA technology. For instance, he has been pushing for changes to Medicaid, which could impact the funding and availability of medical treatments and technologies, including mRNA-based therapies.

We should all be asking Senator Cassidy and Congressman Brett Guthrie whether their campaigns or affiliated political action committees have accepted any funding or support from the AAM. And specifically asking Senator Cassidy whether AAM lobbying influenced his actions during Secretary Kennedy’s confirmation process. The Senator’s contact information is linked above.

FDA Guidance for Industry Benefits the mRNA Drug Industry

During May 2024, the FDA issued a draft guidance for “Platform Technology Designation Program for Drug Development” which you can review here. The AAM sees this new regulatory position as a great opportunity for the mRNA drug development industry and has developed a summary of its analysis, which can be viewed here.

In a virtual meeting presentation focusing on the new FDA platform technology guidance, the Alliance for mRNA Medicines discussed the potential of mRNA product development, the benefits of platform technology, and the challenges associated with mRNA delivery. The panelists also discussed the implications of the FDA’s draft guidance on platform technology designation, the potential of using a platform technology for various applications, and the need for broader understanding of who could be the sponsor. The conversation ended with an invitation for further discussions and the announcement of the registration for the annual meeting of the Alliance for mRNA Medicines.

Sara Singleton, Managing Director of the Alliance for mRNA Medicines, welcomed attendees and outlined the agenda for the webinar. The speakers included Andrew from Replicate Bioscience, Alana Goldberg from Replicate, Dave Schmickel from CSL, Bearing, Yi Zhang from Arcturus Therapeutics, and Sean Semple from Acuitas Therapeutics. The webinar aimed to discuss the history of mRNA product development, the promise of mRNA as a platform, the FDA’s platform designation program, delivery technology, and AMM’s comments on the FDA’s draft guidance. The meeting also covered the implications for the future of product development and mRNA. Development of this guidance was required by the Congressional Pandemic Act of 2022. A transcript of this webinar, which includes insights into the current status of the industry and products in the pipeline is available at this link.

Top AAM Policy Lobbying Focus and Issues

Let’s take a look at the top policy issues and agendas that the AAM will be lobbying to address and advance.

AMM advisors plan to engage with governments, policymakers, regulators, and other stakeholders in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific to advocate for the following policies that AAM asserts will encourage innovation, define regulatory standards, support manufacturing, and promote access of mRNA medicines to patients.

The text cited below has been lightly edited to remove misspellings.

Regulatory framework for vaccines and therapeutics

To realize the promise of mRNA across its many potential applications, AMM believes regulators should develop a specific regulatory framework for mRNA Why? The areas in which the field needs clarity for mRNA development and manufacturing are different than the issues most pressing for small molecules and other biologics (including cell and gene medicine). The development of a specific framework for mRNA would provide certainty for the community as well as help FDA as it they consider issues from pre-clinical to post-approval.

This regulatory environment would enable continued flexibility and speed in development of mRNA vaccines and therapeutics around the world.

AMM is also promoting international harmonization and cooperation among regulatory authorities across the globe to propel mRNA technology forward in all its potential uses and to move smoothly between discovery, development and deployment stages.

Interpretation: Essentially, AMM is striving to establish a globalized, frictionless business model for mRNA development, enabling them to expand into a worldwide market for their products. They are using the regulatory process to achieve this goal.

Standards Development

With some of the most recognized innovators in mRNA, AMM will help overcome the obstacles to mRNA medicine development stemming from uncertainty about standards. We are convening our members and partnering with relevant organizations to develop, where needed, or improve upon standards for the field.

Interpretation: Regulatory standards benefit large corporations, as a strong regulatory environment captured by big business keeps the competition at bay.

Education (combating mRNA vaccine misinformation and explaining mRNA therapeutics)

AMM is playing a role in combating mRNA vaccine misinformation and demystifying the technology by explaining how mRNA works. We are educating policymakers, payers, and the public about the great potential of mRNA across many different applications so that as they move from bench to bedside, there is greater awareness of it.

Interpretation: This is all about getting the government, insurance companies, and hospitals to foot the bill for these new products.

Access

As more mRNA based therapies and vaccines are developed, AMM will lead the field in communicating to government and private sector payers on access issues to ensure patients receive the benefits of these products.

Interpretation: Again, this agenda is to find a way for governments, insurance companies, and hospitals to pay for these very expensive treatments.

Pandemic preparedness

The versatility and agility of mRNA technology combined with the high level of coordination between industry and regulators enabled development, approval and distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine in record time. Looking forward, AMM is pursing development of a framework that will enable rapid deployment of mRNA vaccines for new pathogens as need arise.

Interpretation: More lobbying efforts are underway to integrate this technology into existing pandemic response technologies through the lobbying process, which involves giving money to Congress members.

Industry Website

I am often asked why there has been so much pressure to rapidly advance the authorization of mRNA drugs and vaccines. My standard answer is that the pharmaceutical industry sees this as a whole new unexplored area of pharmacology that can be exploited in developing and marketing new drug and vaccine products.

In other words, this is a gold rush.

When I first conceived the idea of using RNA as a drug in 1988, as the sole author, I initially published this concept in a small trade magazine called Focus after a patent disclosure in 1989. The article is linked here.

Focus: Using RNA as a Drug

Vical, was the company that I then worked for in the early 1990s, and this company was once featured in the CIA-associated magazine “Wired” with the breathless headline that it would be the next Microsoft – due to the DNA and RNA technologies that I had pioneered. Under the direction of my old boss Dr. Philip Felgner, Vical turned away from mRNA as a platform and focused on lipid-based plasmid DNA delivery, spent well over a billion investor dollars, completely failed to bring any significant products to market, and went bankrupt. Felgner eventually landed a plum academic position at the University of California, Irvine.

Just for the record, I have never received any inquiries from this industry concerning my experience, observations and conclusions concerning the technology platform that I launched with my inventions and invention disclosures in the late 1980s while working on my PhD at the Salk Institute (pre-Vical).

But now this new industry hopes that the old “Wired” prophecy will finally come true. The truth is that they really don’t care if it is “safe and effective” as long as they all make a killing on the increased stock valuations and/or IPOs generated from the new bio-opportunities. And if the tech doesn’t turn out so well, then “pump and dump” is always an option. Either way, the biotech investors win.

If you wish to better understand how industry insiders see the issues and prospects that they believe are opening up to them, I recommend the following article authored by AMM staff member Deborah Day Barbara, and review the other articles at the “Advancing RNA” website.

Trouble in Pharmaceutical Paradise

Getting back to the Nature magazine news feature article quoted at the start of this essay, and which you can read here, despite all of the rosy projections, the fledgling mRNA drug industry is facing unexpected challenges. And these are the direct consequence of Peter Marks’ “Operation Warp Speed” (with a strong boost by biodefense spook Bob Kadlec and the notorious Dr. Anthony Fauci), which jammed the technology through product development, manufacturing and testing by bypassing almost all applicable regulatory hurdles and directly into the arms of much of the worlds adults, adolescents, children, and pregnant women with profound disregard for the consequences.

You might say that “the industry” is now being hoisted with its own petard. Returning to the Nature article, what jumps out is that there is neither acknowledgement nor even entertainment of the idea that the industry has destroyed its own credibility out of greed and its own mis- and disinformation about the technology and its risks.

Five years ago, the US government was spending billions of dollars to support the development, manufacturing and roll-out of mRNA vaccines, which played a major part in curbing the COVID-19 pandemic. Pharmaceutical companies were pouring in capital and building ambitious pipelines centred on mRNA. The technology was feted with a Nobel prize. Investor confidence was sky-high.

Now, in the span of just a few months, the mood across the industry has grown darker — chilled by a newly hostile political climate.

One contract manufacturer of mRNA products has seen a substantial decline in business as government-backed vaccine programmes have their funding pulled, according to a senior company executive. Another biotech executive says that his mRNA-focused company is considering relocating planned clinical trials for anti-viral vaccines to outside the United States — or scrapping them entirely, shifting the firm’s focus to less politically volatile therapeutic areas. “It’s all just a commercial and regulatory risk now,” he says.

Both executives requested anonymity to avoid drawing political attention to their companies — but their experiences reflect a broad upheaval that is now rippling through the industry. In a survey released this month by the AMM, nearly half of 106 senior biotech and pharma executives reported direct impacts from US policy shifts this year — including project downsizing, budget cuts, delayed investments, terminated partnerships, job losses, hiring freezes, and planned relocation of operations overseas.

Even the term ‘mRNA’ has become a political lightning rod; its charged connotations now influence scientific discourse and health policy far beyond the vaccine debate. “That paranoia has gotten wrapped into mRNA as a word,” says Jeff Coller, an RNA biologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, who is also involved in several small biotech firms.

Seeking to reframe the narrative, Coller and others are mobilizing around a strategic communications offensive, emphasizing mRNA’s potential not just in thwarting infectious threats but also in treating many of the same chronic conditions targeted by Kennedy’s ‘Make America Healthy Again’ initiative. The campaign to rehabilitate mRNA’s reputation starts at the top: with appeals to Trump’s legacy as a champion of medical innovation.

AMM leaders are preparing to publish a series of editorials that make the case that Trump’s decisive leadership during Operation Warp Speed — the 2020 programme that delivered COVID-19 vaccines in record time — marked the beginning of a new chapter in biotechnology and positioned the United States at the forefront of what many see as the fourth great wave of pharmaceutical innovation, after small-molecule drugs, biologics and cell and gene therapies.

Framing it as a chance for Trump to cement his place in medical history, they are urging the president to build on the foundation that he helped to lay. In particular, they pointed out that, by supporting mRNA-based cancer treatments, he could achieve a major unmet goal that was advanced by his predecessor Joe Biden, who had made “ending cancer as we know it” a signature priority. Trump “could be the president who is a true visionary on cancer”, says Coller, a leading academic voice at the AMM.

Such messaging just might resonate. Although Trump criticized the roll-out and mandates surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines in the period between his two terms, allies say he remains proud of the part he played in accelerating the technology’s development. “President Trump believes that Operation Warp Speed was a roaring success, and that the COVID mRNA vaccines were his great achievements,” says Robert Malone, a scientist involved in foundational mRNA research and a high-profile voice in conservative-leaning health-policy circles.

“But leading the charge against mRNA technology are individuals in the ‘medical freedom movement’ — Kennedy chief among them. They contend that COVID-19 vaccines were rushed through approval without adequate long-term testing, alleging that safety corners were cut in the name of speed, and that the risks of mRNA platforms continue to be deliberately downplayed.

At his confirmation hearing earlier this year, for example, Kennedy — who previously described an mRNA-based COVID-19 jab as the “deadliest vaccine ever made” — persisted in claiming that the vaccine was recommended for young children “without any scientific basis”, despite published clinical-trial evidence to the contrary.”

Public-health researchers and vaccine scientists emphasize that mRNA vaccines have consistently demonstrated robust safety and effectiveness in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes, supported by extensive data from rigorous clinical trials and real-world studies. Yet, with trust in institutions and in the biomedical establishment crumbling, some argue that pulling back from mRNA is the only responsible course of action — not because the science is flawed, but because the damage to public confidence is too deep.

“If mRNA has a chance to have impact in the future, there needs to be a restoration of public trust around it,” says David Mansdoerfer, a political consultant in Fort Worth, Texas, and a former senior HHS official in the first Trump administration. To that end, he, like many associated with Kennedy, would support federal regulators withdrawing approval for all COVID-19 vaccines that initially entered the market under emergency-use provisions — including the mRNA-based ones that later won full approval. Mansdoerfer advocates re-evaluating the jabs under a standard review process.

The problem of mRNA’s reputation isn’t just a communications challenge — it’s a systemic liability. “I fear the brand is damaged for most uses,” wrote Vinay Prasad, a haematologist–oncologist at the University of California, San Francisco, in a Substack post in March. A vocal critic of COVID-19 vaccine mandates under Biden, Prasad was selected this month to lead the division of the US Food and Drug Administration that oversees vaccines and other biological products.

The branding issue for mRNA is not just a problem in the United States either. An analysis of social-media data across 44 countries, published last year, found “widespread negative sentiment and a global lack of confidence in the safety, effectiveness and trustworthiness of mRNA vaccines and therapeutics”

For anyone interested in 2023, The Malone Institute compiled a list of nearly 800 peer-reviewed papers on the adverse events associated with the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. That list could now easily be tripled. So, Nature may choose to overlook the adverse events associated with this technology, but the rest of us know better.

Of course, the magazine “Nature” is fooling itself, and maybe fooling its readership, but it is not fooling the new Commissioner of the FDA, as we reported in a previous substack essay or any of us in MAHA.

Transcript of FDA Commissioner Dr. Makary:

“Look, I’d love to see the evidence to show that giving young, healthy children another Covid shot, you know, a sixth Covid booster, would help them. But that evidence does not exist. And so, we’re not just gonna rubber-stamp things at the FDA, and I don’t think you’re going to see a push at the CDC to be pushing Covid shots in young, healthy children.

That is something that’s being discussed right now.

I think you’re gonna see some announcement on that in the coming weeks, but I know they are trying to review all of the scientific data, and guess what? There’s no data. There are no good randomized control data that the current version, the latest formulation of the Covid shot is necessary for young, healthy children.

Other countries have already recommended against it. Other, leading countries in Europe have recommended against it for young, healthy children.

So, I think you’re gonna see this, and you’re gonna hear something forthcoming.”

FDA – Dr Makary on Real America’s Voice

Lately, we have heard a lot from the nattering nabobs of negativity within the MAHA base. Secretary Kennedy has betrayed them, they say. Marty Makary is not moving fast enough. On and on. The vaccine injured must be heard, acknowledged, and somehow made right- they shall not be denied!

But get real. Do people really think that Secretary Kennedy is going to abandon this issue because – well, why? “Because the pharmaceutical industry has co-opted him?” Not likely!

Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.

Matthew 26:52

The mRNA medicines industry exists because the United States Government, and in particular DARPA, DTRA, NIAID, USAID, and, in particular, Dr. Anthony Fauci, willed it into existence.

Now the worm has turned, and the carelessness, hubris, disregard for established regulatory and bioethical norms, and general sense of entitlement of the industry and its supporters have backfired, and champions have risen to defend the population from these entitled academics and biopharmaceutical industry types. The politics have shifted, and those who abused public trust are now running for cover.

As well they should. And who is it that they are most afraid of?

  • HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Junior.

Let that sink in for a moment.

And then, the next time you hear someone blathering on about how RFK jr. has betrayed them, gently invite them to relocate to Canada. Because he is on the front line, taking the heat, and 99.999% of those detractors are armchair quarterbacking, and the majority of those are hiding behind pseudonyms.

DC politics is a blood sport. Just ask the President. And patience is a virtue. I have faith in Secretary Kennedy and his team to get the job done. Maybe you could consider joining me in that?

Share

Malone News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid

Thanks for reading Malone News! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

You’re currently a free subscriber to Malone News. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

Like
Comment
Restack

© 2025 Robert W Malone, MD
Virginia

 

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 5:18 PM

2025-04-19 Lymphatic System / Lymph Treatment

 Health  No Responses »
Jun 272025
 

I answered “I had a lymph treatment just last week.”

The Dentist replied,  “What’s that?”

– – – – – – – – –

CONTENTS

  1.      THE COMPLETE HUMAN BODY    in pictures
  2.      LYMPH,  copied from the Index of COMPLETE HUMAN BODY
  3.      RIGOR OF (LYMPHATIC + CARDIOVASCULAR + IMMUNE SYSTEM + SPIRITUAL)
  4.      EQUATIONS
  5.      IMMUNE SYSTEM,  DETOXIFICATION,  AND POISONING
  6.      AN EQUATION IS A TEETER-TOTTER
  7.      GETTING RID OF POISONS,  INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
  8.      KEEPING THE POISONS,  INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
  9.       NEURAL PLASTICITY
  10.       INTELLIGENT DESIGN  IN THE HANDS OF NOT-INTELLIGENT

 

FOR MY DENTIST  – – THE LYMPH SYSTEM

  1.      THE COMPLETE HUMAN BODY    in picturesMY EXPERIENCE . . .The next week (after the lymph treatment)   I was waiting for an elderly friend in the chiropracter’s office.A large book “The Complete Human Body, The Definitive Visual Guide” by Prof Alice Roberts caught my eye.   (She is an artist, and more.)Wow!   This book could easily explain THE LYMPH SYSTEM  to the dentist.    I ran to the bookstore and ordered “3RD EDITION,  ENHANCED AND UPDATED  $60.  (The definitive guide to the development, form, function, and disorders of the human body.)“This book – – which is a bit like a user’s manual – – should be of interest to anyone young or old, who inhabits a human body.”

    It is a superb and exciting book.

  2.      LYMPH,  copied from the Index of COMPLETE HUMAN BODY

INDEX,  P. 525    (The Complete Human Body,  3rd Edition)

lymph   366 -367

lymph nodes  75,76, 366, 367

and adaptive immunity  370, 371

blood vessels  77

lymphatic circulation  366

lymphatic ducts  166, 167, 169, 366

lymphatic system  26

abdomen and pelvis   188-189

and adaptive immunity  370, 371

anatomy   74 – 77

in bone  46

head and neck  134 – 135

hip and thigh   272 – 277

in liver  381

physiology   366 – 367

shoulder and upper arm   226 – 227

spread of cancer   441

thorax    166 – 167

lymphatics   75, 77, 366

lymph0blasts   481

lymphocytes   75, 77

adaptive immunity   370 – 373

functions   367

generation of   367

lymphomas   481

lymphoid tissue   75, 77, 367

lymphomas     481

 

3.    RIGOR OF (LYMPHATIC + CARDIOVASCULAR + IMMUNE SYSTEM + SPIRITUAL)

 

 

4.      EQUATIONS

For me personally,  it is helpful to  understand in the form of EQUATIONS.

Call this the LEVEL 1 EQUATION.

BODY HEALTH   =      LYMPHATIC SYSTEM    +      CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM   +  IMMUNE SYSTEM

The equations can be expanded.

 

5.     IMMUNE SYSTEM,  DETOXIFICATION,  AND POISONING

BE CLEAR.  I am not saying that if you look after your LYMPHATICS + CARDIOVASCULAR +  SPIRITUAL (PURPOSE)  +  and don’t overload your IMMUNE SYSTEM,  you will be healthy.    Unfortunately,  the lords view us as ignorant and disposable:

2011-02-01      Aluminum and Vaccine Ingredients: What Do We Know? What Don’t We Know?

2020-06-10    If I am making a choice about a vaccine, I want to know this.

I am not a doctor.    I know how badly-corrupted some medical and other systems  are.   Ignoring the problems isn’t an answer.

I can make the following contributions to help us find solutions.

For more info on mercury, go to  “HEALTH” in the right-hand sidebar;  scroll down to    Mercury poisoning, dental amalgams. See also Vaccinations.

DETOXIFICATION   (liver especially)    (see p. 381,  bottom left)

The IMMUNE SYSTEM   is

          • INNATE IMMUNITY +  THE ADAPTIVE IMMUNE SYSTEM
      • BARRIER IMMUNITY – – is part of the body’s INNATE IMMUNITY    (p.368) “If barrier immunity is breached  (use a familiar example  – –   by mercury, or aluminum or other neuro-toxins . . …)     Neuro-toxins by-pass the blood-brain barrier.  They slowly poison.
      • BARRIER IMMUNITY – – the placental barrier
      • Our body is so amazing!   It is designed to PREVENT some poisons from getting to places where they can do great harm (like the brain).   Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we worked WITH our bodies!

On p.134  there’s a picture of a skull with the lymphatic system/circulation (head and neck)  in green.    What I see is OPENINGS – – eye sockets, nasal cavity,  and mouth/teeth.

If you KNOW the lymphatic system,  and the proximity of the brain to your FACE,  would you call it a  “DESIGN FLAW” to put poisons  (mercury, aluminum, and other)  in the eyes, nasal cavity,  and mouth/teeth?   How about if it’s your baby?

 

(P. 370)   “The adaptive immune system provides the body with the means to develop highly specific immune responses to particular pathogens encountered during its  life span.  Crucially, such responses may be quickly redeployed if a pathogen infects.”

P.  366 – 67   Lymphatic Circulation

MY EXPERIENCE    (My Mother kept very good records.)

  1.   Mercury amalgams starting in early childhood  (fillings in baby teeth and continuing into adulthood).
  2.   Vaccines – – mercury by injection.  (The preservative thimerasol in vaccines, early childhood)
  3.   Mercury in wetting and soaking solutions for contact lens, starting in high school (1967).
  4.   Joe Bourgault experience.  Grant Schoenroty also.  Mercury poisoning from dental amalgam.   Medical profession don’t diagnose it.  Both men thought they were going to die.  Removal of mercury amalgams and slow de-tox restored their health.
  5.   IAOMT  (International Academy of Oral Medicinet and Toxicology) .  Dave Warwick’s experience as a new young dentist in his home-town of Hanna, AB took him into mercury-free dentistry.  Decades later,  Dave agreed to do the “Mercury Jamboree” at the University of Saskatchewan.  I organized it;  Joe Bourgault and Grant Schoenroth both told their experiences, and so on.
  6.   My family members and I have mercury removed,  by a dentist who has been trained on handling the mercury.

MANY people suffer from mercury poisoning.  I think of Grassy Narrows, Ontario.   (https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/grassy-narrows).  There are lots of people like Joe and Grant.   Safe removal of the mercury fillings is a life-saver for some people.  Never should mercury (“dental amalgam”) be installed in teeth.  Dental colleges are complicit.  Mercury fillings are cheaper,  BUT ONLY in the short run.   The public purse pays for the longterm costs (cognitive and other disabilities and illnesses).

Slow accumulation and poisoning coincides with aging.  The wrong diagnosis is easily assigned.  The same as the wrong diagnosis was assigned to me when I was 3 years old.   Within a couple months of each other I had dental amalgams (silver mercury fillings) put in my teeth and vaccine with mercury injected.  My legs started aching.   Mercury poisoning was diagnosed as polio.

= = = = = = = = = = = =

  1.      AN EQUATION IS A TEETER-TOTTER
  2.      GETTING RID OF POISONS,  INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION   – – GETTING RID OF MERCURY

The Minamata Convention on Mercury is a UN treaty aimed at reducing mercury’s impact on human health and the environment. It addresses the entire lifecycle of mercury, including its supply, trade, use, emissions, and disposal. The convention seeks to phase out mercury-added products, control emissions from various industries, and promote international cooperation on mercury management. 

Here’s a more detailed look at the key aspects of the Minamata Convention:
Key Provisions:
  • Phasing out mercury-added products:

    The convention includes provisions to phase out or restrict the use of mercury in products like batteries, switches, lamps, and cosmetics. 

  • Controlling emissions:

    It aims to reduce mercury emissions from key industries such as coal combustion, waste incineration, and cement production. 

  • Managing mercury trade:

    The convention regulates the export and import of mercury and mercury-containing products. 

  • Addressing artisanal and small-scale gold mining:

    This sector is a major source of mercury pollution, and the convention includes measures to reduce mercury use in this area. 

  • Safe storage and disposal:

    The convention addresses the safe storage and disposal of mercury waste. 

  • International cooperation:

    It promotes international cooperation on mercury monitoring, research, and the development of safer alternatives. 

Historical Context:
  • The convention is named after Minamata Bay in Japan, where widespread mercury poisoning occurred in the mid-20th century.
  • The experience with Minamata disease highlighted the devastating effects of mercury pollution and the need for global action. 
Current Status:
  • The Minamata Convention entered into force in 2017. 
  • As of [June 2025], the convention has been ratified by 150 states. 
  • Parties are working to implement the convention’s provisions and achieve its goals.

 

  1.      KEEPING THE POISONS,  INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
  2.       NEURAL PLASTICITY
  3.       INTELLIGENT DESIGN  IN THE HANDS OF NOT-INTELLIGENT

In essence, the Minamata Convention represents a global effort to tackle the pervasive problem of mercury pollution and protect human health and the environment from its harmful effects.   (But it’s okay to use it in dental amalgams (“Silver fillings”) and still in some vaccinations.)

 

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 12:04 PM

2025-06-26 CDC Vaccine Advisers Vote to Stop Recommending Flu Shots That Contain Thimerosal (Mercury)

 Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt)  No Responses »
Jun 262025
 

 NOTE:  a concoction with “M-E-R” in the name has some form of MERCURY  in it (thiMERasol).

– – – – – – –

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, voted separately on thimerosal-containing flu shots for children, pregnant women and adults. All three recommendations passed with a 5-1 vote and one abstention. Thimerosal was removed from all routine childhood vaccines in 2001, but is still used in some flu shots, including those given to children and pregnant women.

by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
flu vaccine and word "thimerosal"
Download     00:00/10:18

In a series of votes today, the CDC’s new vaccine advisory committee voted to no longer recommend flu vaccines that contain thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative linked to neurodevelopmental disorders.

The votes, part of a two-day meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) that concluded today, took place after a presentation on the health risks of thimerosal by Lyn Redwood, a nurse practitioner with experience in pediatrics and family medicine.

Redwood, president emerita of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), presented as a private citizen. However, she will soon join the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in its vaccine safety office, multiple officials told CBS News.

Thimerosal is a preservative used in multidose vaccine vials to prevent the buildup of bacteria and fungi. It was removed from all routine childhood vaccines in 2001.

BEWARE – – manipulation of data

(INSERT, Sandra:  The vaccine pictured above is “multi-dose”.   (There are 10 doses in the bottle.)  See 7 paragraphs below  “Hooker said thimerosal “is still used in multidose vials of the flu shot, which have in the past comprised nearly half of all the flu shots given in the U.S., including those to pregnant women and infants down to age 6 months.”

Also note:  2025-03-02 COVID VACCINE LOTS IN CANADA  (B.C.) identified as source of Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI)

During her presentation, Redwood warned that mercury exposure “is a cumulative issue,” as the substance builds up in the body over time, including through repeated vaccination with shots containing the substance. She said it is “very feasible” to use alternative preservatives in single-dose vials.

ACIP voted separately on thimerosal-containing flu shots for children, pregnant women and adults. All three passed with a 5-1 vote and one abstention. The abstaining member, Vicky Pebsworth, Ph.D., a registered nurse, cited the vote’s wording, which did not make a distinction between recommending flu vaccines in general and recommending against multidose vials.

Dr. H. Cody Meissner, professor of pediatrics at Dartmouth’s Geisel School of Medicine, was the lone committee member to vote “no” for each of the three motions. “No study has ever indicated any harm from thimerosal,” he said.

In a separate vote, ACIP unanimously reaffirmed its recommendation for annual flu shots for all people 6 months and older who do not have contraindications.

In a statement following today’s votes, ACIP said, “We came to this meeting with no pre-determined ideas and will make judgements as if we are treating our own families. Unbiased scientific thinking is fundamental to the committee’s charge.”

Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer for CHD, called today’s outcome “a huge first step towards limiting toxic exposures especially to our most vulnerable individuals.”

Hooker said thimerosal “is still used in multidose vials of the flu shot, which have in the past comprised nearly half of all the flu shots given in the U.S., including those to pregnant women and infants down to age 6 months.”

According to CNN, most flu vaccines given in the U.S. come in single-dose vials that do not contain thimerosal, but around 4% come in multidose vials that do contain the preservative. Redwood cited data indicating that during the 2019-2020 flu season, over 60,000 pregnant women were vaccinated with multidose vials.

Today’s vote ‘20-plus years in the making’ — but concerns remain

Dr. Meryl Nass, who live-blogged today’s meeting for CHD.TV, wrote that the votes can be interpreted as a “yes for everyone getting a [flu] shot.”

Beth Clay, executive director of the International Chiropractors Association and a former congressional senior staffer who led the last comprehensive inquiry into issues related to vaccine injury, applauded ACIP’s vote, saying, “It’s 20-plus years in the making.”

However, she expressed concerns about the wording of today’s motions.

“I appreciate the clarification and education Pebsworth provided about the verbiage of the motions,” Clay said, suggesting that a vote on recommending an annual flu vaccine should have been held separately from a vote on the recommendation that flu vaccines offered to the public should be thimerosal-free.

“How you ask a question matters,” Clay said.

ACIP makes vaccine-related recommendations to the CDC director, who has the discretion to accept or reject them.

Until March, the agency’s acting director was Susan Monarez, Ph.D. She stepped down that month after President Donald Trump nominated her for the permanent director’s position.

Last month, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reported that attorney Matthew Buzzelli is currently acting director, while Monarez awaits U.S. Senate confirmation hearings.

Clay said that following today’s ACIP vote, the CDC may require the Vaccines for Children Program, a taxpayer-funded program providing vaccines to underprivileged children, to remove multidose flu vaccines and allow only the single-dose shots that don’t contain thimerosal. She suggested that today’s votes should have clarified that.

Thimerosal levels in flu vaccines 250 times higher than EPA safety limit

In the days leading up to this week’s ACIP meeting, several media outlets and medical organizations criticized Kennedy’s decision to dismiss the committee’s 17 former members earlier this month and appoint eight new members in their place.

Earlier this week, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), chair of the U.S. Senate’s Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, called for the postponement of this week’s ACIP meeting, citing concerns that its new members are biased against vaccines.

After the final agenda for this week’s ACIP meeting was published earlier in the week, media criticism turned to the inclusion of Redwood’s presentation on thimerosal, with CNN reporting that experts “found the inclusion of the topic on the ACIP agenda puzzling.”

The Guardian cited Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center and an attending physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, who suggested there was no point in discussing thimerosal.

In a post on X Tuesday, Kennedy responded to a report by The Guardian last week characterizing thimerosal as safe, noting that thimerosal’s label advises against its use during pregnancy, and that thimerosal has “never been shown to be safe.”

Redwood’s presentation noted that thimerosal was first used as a vaccine preservative in the 1930s without any studies demonstrating its safety. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) later “grandfathered” thimerosal as an approved vaccine ingredient without performing adequate safety testing.

Redwood said thimerosal has a 49.6% concentration of mercury — the third most toxic element for humans — and that thimerosal levels in flu vaccines are 250 times higher than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) safety limit.

“Thimerosal can cross the placenta and blood-brain barriers and converts to inorganic mercury in the brain,” Redwood said, noting that infants, young children, older adults, pregnant women and fetuses are particularly vulnerable to its effects.

Redwood, RFK Jr. push back at media claims that thimerosal is proven safe

Redwood’s presentation — and Kennedy’s X post — also addressed the mainstream media’s narratives by citing several studies that have demonstrated thimerosal’s risks to human health.

This included a 2001 Institute of Medicine report finding that the link between thimerosal and the rise of neurological conditions in children, including autism, is “biologically plausible.” The report recommended the termination of all vaccines containing thimerosal.

Redwood cited a 2005 primate study funded by the National Institutes of Health, which found that ethyl mercury — the type of mercury in thimerosal — more rapidly converted to inorganic mercury in the brain, resulting in increasing concentrations of inorganic mercury and subsequent neuroinflammation.

Redwood also cited a 2014 study finding that the half-life — the time needed for the concentration of a substance to be reduced in half — of inorganic mercury in the human brain ranges from five to 27 years. A 2016 study suggested there “may never be a safe level of mercury exposure, especially for an unborn child.”

Redwood also noted evidence contradicting claims that thimerosal is effective as a vaccine preservative and disinfectant. She cited a 2004 incident at a Fluvirin vaccine manufacturing plant, which was forced to close after it became contaminated with Serratia marcescens, a bacterium, even though the Fluvirin vaccine contained thimerosal.

According to Redwood, peer-reviewed studies published as far back as 1948 questioned the safety of thimerosal.

Kennedy suggested that The Guardian “did not bother to cite any peer-reviewed study” to support its claim that thimerosal is safe. Instead, The Guardian relied on “a fact check website operated by the Pharma-funded American Academy of Pediatrics” that “likewise cites no peer-reviewed study to support this claim or its equally terse assertion that ‘Thimerosal has been removed from all routine childhood vaccines.’”

In 2014, Kennedy authored “Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak,” in which he argued that there is a “broad consensus among research scientists that thimerosal is a dangerous neurotoxin.”

This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

Please Donate Today

Thimerosal is cost-effective for vaccine manufacturers

Hooker agreed with Redwood and Kennedy’s conclusions. “Thimerosal is mercury, and mercury is, straight-up, a neurotoxin. This has been shown historically in thousands of publications.”

In 1998, growing concerns over thimerosal’s safety led the FDA to determine that thimerosal is “not generally recognized as safe and effective.” In 1990, California recognized thimerosal as a chemical known to cause cancer, birth defects or reproductive harm, under a state law known as Proposition 65.

According to Hooker, pharmaceutical companies continue to use thimerosal because it is cost-effective for them. He said:

“Thimerosal enables flu shot manufacturers to continue to manufacture multi-dose vials, which are cheaper per dose. It also has been used to quell the furor of countries overseas where many vaccines on the infant/child schedule still contain thimerosal.

“This is especially true in developing nations. They use the U.S. as an excuse for these companies to continue to peddle cheap and harmful vaccines overseas.”

Hooker called on public health agencies to enact “a complete ban of the use of thimerosal as a preservative for the manufacture and formulation of vaccines.”

Related articles in The Defender

  • RFK Jr. Slams The Guardian for False Claims About Thimerosal in Vaccines
  • Sen. Cassidy Calls for Delay of Vaccine Advisers Meeting, Criticizes RFK Jr.’s New Appointees
  • RFK Jr. Taps 8 New ACIP Members, Offit Concedes Most ‘Seem Reasonable’
  • RFK Jr.’s ‘Clean Sweep’ of CDC Vaccine Advisers Draws Mix of High Praise, Harsh Criticism
  • Childhood Vaccine Schedule Led to ‘Greatest Decline in Public Health in Human History’
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and host of “The Defender In-Depth” on CHD.TV.

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 5:28 PM

2025-06-24 Washington Post Reports on ‘Plan to Vaccinate All Americans, Despite RFK Jr.’

 Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt)  No Responses »
Jun 242025
 

Vaccine makers, pharmacists, professional medical societies and others opposed to recent changes in vaccine policy are banding together to create their own system for recommending and purchasing vaccines in a move designed to bypass government health agencies’ recommendations, The Washington Post reported.

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
washington post logo on cellphone and vaccines on a chess board
Download       00:00/07:10

Vaccine makers, pharmacists, professional medical societies and others opposed to recent changes in vaccine policy are banding together to create their own system for recommending and purchasing vaccines in a move designed to bypass government health agencies’ recommendations, The Washington Post reported.

Members of the new group, all of whom profit from the vaccine industry, along with some state health officials and a “new advocacy group,” are strategizing ways to preserve the vaccine status quo under U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The anonymous group, which hopes to create “a nongovernmental vaccine system” for vaccine recommendations and purchasing, according to the Post, is engaged in a series of discussions.

Topics include ordering vaccines directly from manufacturers and prioritizing recommendations from medical associations rather than from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which makes vaccine recommendations to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The move comes as Kennedy dismissed all of ACIP’s sitting committee members earlier this month due to concerns over conflicts of interest in the committee. He filled eight of the 17 committee seats a few days later.

Commenting on industry insiders’ efforts to create a new commission, research scientist James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., told The Defender:

“They want to create and lend authority to a corporation-backed, corporation-friendly committee to replace the one that was just disbanded. These moves would represent replacing the facade of regulating vaccines by a government agency with overt industry self-governance and regulation.”

The Post called the move by the unspecified group of actors “extraordinary,” but conceded that it “faces major challenges.”

For example, insurance companies typically don’t cover shots that aren’t recommended by ACIP. An ACIP recommendation is also the basis on which the federal Vaccines for Children Program pays for vaccines for minors whose families can’t afford them. That program covers vaccine costs for about half of U.S. children.

Also, in many states, pharmacists’ ability to prescribe or administer vaccines is tied to the adult and child immunization schedules recommended by ACIP. And state laws for school vaccine requirements, as well as requirements for healthcare workers, are typically tied to ACIP recommendations.

Another problem, according to the Post, is that “potential competing recommendations could sow confusion among doctors as well as patients if it becomes unclear which recommendations to follow.”

Lyons-Weiler said physicians should be wary of any recommendations coming from the nongovernmental group, especially because participating in federal programs while failing to comply with ACIP regulations could violate statutes.

“The dismissed ACIP committee members can form whatever opinion group they want, but physicians follow their recommendations over the rules and regulations of the HHS at their own peril,” he said.

In a recent article, Lyons-Weiler said calls to ignore recommendations from the new ACIP committee are largely circulated by the former ACIP members who were dismissed because of their ties to Big Pharma.

Former Merck consultant and dismissed ACIP member Dr. Helen Chu was quoted in a recent op-ed in MedPage Today as calling on physicians to “turn away” from ACIP’s vaccine recommendations. She received thousands of dollars from Merck in the year before her ACIP appointment.

Merck is the manufacturer of multiple major childhood vaccines, including the Gardasil HPV vaccine; the MMRII for measles, mumps and rubella; a chicken pox vaccine and several others.

“Undermining ACIP in favor of non-statutory organizations may represent a breach of federal compliance by physicians and healthcare institutions receiving federal funds,” Lyons-Weiler wrote. Chu should be well aware of that fact, he added.

Initiative pushes Pharma-linked medical associations to make recommendations

According to the Post, the group’s discussions are being facilitated by the “Vaccine Integrity Project,” a new initiative at the University of Minnesota, which includes “vaccine manufacturers, health insurers and medical associations.” The group is funded by iAlumbra, a nonprofit founded by Walmart heiress and billionaire philanthropist Christy Walton, known for her anti-Trump advocacy.

Former U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Margaret Hamburg and Dr. Harvey Fineberg, former president of the Institute of Medicine and current president of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, co-chair an eight-member steering committee leading the initiative.

In an op-ed published in STAT News, Hamburg and Fineberg said the project will use “the best available evidence” to “safeguard vaccine policy, information and utilization.”

When the group was launched, Michael Osterholm, Ph.D., a member of the COVID-19 Advisory Board under the Biden administration, said it was not intended to serve as a shadow or parallel version of the ACIP.

However, according to today’s report from the Post, that intention appears to have changed.

Dr. Anne Zink, member of the Vaccine Integrity Project, told the Post that having each state set its own recommendations is “not ideal” and that instead, the major medical associations should make recommendations.

Medical associations participating in the Vaccine Integrity Project talks include the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Physicians, the American Pharmacists Association, and the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, the Post reported.

In her op-ed, Chu also named the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) as a key group advising alternative vaccination policy.

Lyons-Weiler noted that AAP has received millions of dollars in grants from Merck, Sanofi and Pfizer, and that ACOG has endorsed products from its sponsors without conducting any independent review.

ACOG also took $11 million from the CDC to push the COVID-19 vaccines on pregnant women.at vaccine guidance is rigorous, independent, and truly in service to the health of the American people — not corporate interests.”

The Post reported that Nixon also called one of the new coalition’s leading organizations “a self-appointed echo chamber masquerading as oversight.”

Under Kennedy, the CDC has changed its guidance on COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women from recommended to “no guidance.”

One member of the Vaccine Integrity Project, Asa Hutchinson, former Republican governor of Arkansas, noted that beyond changes to COVID-19 vaccine recommendations, no other changes have been made to vaccine policy since Kennedy took office.

In the upcoming meeting this week, ACIP is set to vote on RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) immunization recommendations for pregnant mothers, babies and young children.

The committee will also vote on the mercury-containing flu vaccine, and will discuss but not vote on other vaccines, including COVID-19, chikungunya, anthrax and MMRV (measles, mumps, rubella, varicella).

Related articles in The Defender

  • Pharma-Friendly Public Health Officials Launch New Project to ‘Shore Up U.S. Vaccination Policy’
  • RFK Jr. Taps 8 New ACIP Members, Offit Concedes Most ‘Seem Reasonable’
  • RFK Jr.’s ‘Clean Sweep’ of CDC Vaccine Advisers Draws Mix of High Praise, Harsh Criticism
  • After Years of Silence, New CDC Vaccine Panel to Vote on Mercury in Flu Shots
Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., is a senior reporter for The Defender. She wrote and taught about capitalism and politics for 10 years in the writing program at Duke University. She holds a Ph.D. in human geography from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a master’s from the University of Texas at Austin.

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 5:05 PM

2025-06-24 For Your Selection June #4 2025

 For your selection (summary list recent postings), Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt)  No Responses »
Jun 242025
 

The Last Selection was:    For Your Selection JUNE #3 2025         

We are crossing a bridge analogous to the one crossed by humanity from

  • belief The Earth is Flat    to
  • belief  The Earth is Round  (spherical).

 

READ  this ONE POSTING  and KNOW

2017-11-02   How long does it take for a newborn’s liver to mature? What are the consequences of a damaged liver? Why do Americans and Canadians start the Hepatitis B vaccine on day 1 or 2 of birth?      https://sandrafinley.ca/?p=19952

About the liver.    This is so critical.  I do not understand.   Surely,  people in the medical profession would know this.

– – – – – – – – – –

2025-06-24 For Your Selection June #4 2025

– – – – – – – –

SHOW-DOWN

2025-06-24 Washington Post Reports on  Plan to Vaccinate All Americans, Despite RFK Jr.   Opposition is from Vaccine makers, pharmacists, professional . . .

– – – – – – – –

INSERT, June 6th.    With many thanks to Shirley:

Sent: June 24, 2025
To: ‘Sandra Finley’

Hi Sandra,

I read Suzanne Humphries book some time ago and really enjoyed it – I particularly liked historical research. In doing family research I sometimes get the death record for infants or young people of interest and I wonder how many died because of vaccines, but had listed convulsions or something like that as cause of death.

You might want to alert people to Roman’s substack as well  https://romanbystrianyk.substack.com/ . I didn’t see it listed but I may have missed it. People tend to forget about him but he actually had accumulated a lot of the historical information, if I remember correctly.

I was disappointed that the 10th anniversary edition did not improve on the graphs, but colour ones are on a website. In a recent interview Suzanne just came right out and said she was anti-vax. She wasn’t going to beat around the bush on that anymore. So nice to have someone of her caliber take a stand like that.

I went back and checked on Tamara Ugolini’s article on Dr David Martin and she has finally corrected it. Maybe she got more than one email about it – so that was good. I find Martin quite interesting to listen to. He did a testimony for the NCI. His message has remained the same.

I know you didn’t like the last article I sent written by Miri Finch. However, I thought it provided an interesting hypothesis and we will see if she is right or partly right. I didn’t expect you to post it because it was “way out there” for most people. I think it was when she mentioned the movie that was made about Andy Wakefield starring Hugh Bonneville that really got me thinking she was on to something. I like her articles in general. She is one of the very few people I read who talk about news items that may be staged or fake. You never have to believe people, but you can always examine their evidence and reasoning – there is often some quite good research involved. I started finding and vetting these people after the fake Trump assassination attempt – the one where the bullet “grazed” his ear. People actually believed that. I must say I am quite tired of all the lies and deception we are bombarded with all the time.

Thanks for the links you send out, I do appreciate them.         /Shirley    (end of Insert)

SANDRA SPEAKING:

I have now read Dr. Suzanne Humphries’ and Roman Bystrianyk’s  book:

  • “Dissolving Illusions”  (published in 2023)
  • Sub-title “Disease, Vaccines and the Forgotten History“
  • “Companion and Reference“
  • the 10th Anniversary copy of the original book (2013)

Not too long ago, lethal infections were feared in the Western world. Since that time, many countries have undergone a transformation from disease cesspools to much safer, healthier habitats. Starting in the mid-1800s, there was a steady drop in deaths from all infectious diseases, decreasing to relatively minor levels by the early 1900s. The history of that transformation involves famine, poverty, filth, lost cures, eugenicist doctrine, individual freedoms versus state might, protests and arrests over vaccine refusal, and much more.

Today, we are told that medical interventions increased our lifespan and single-handedly prevented masses of deaths. But is this really true?  Dissolving Illusions details facts and figures from long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources. Using myth-shattering graphs, this book shows that vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases.

If the medical profession could systematically misinterpret and ignore key historical information, the question must be asked, “What else is ignored and misinterpreted today?” 

Perhaps the best reason to know our history is so that the worst parts are never repeated.

Sandra speaking:

The information in “Dissolving Illusions”   is collected and ordered from various historical sources.   An essential question is  “What was going on in the society at the time of the various epidemics in various countries?”

  •  There’s a “TIME-LINE” of newspaper clippings and reports  that starts when vaccinations were known as innoculations.
  •   There’s a section of “Doctor’s Quotes”.   Who was saying what  at different times  along the Time-Line.
  •   There’s a section on “Vaccine Tragedies”
  •   A  Royal Commission on Vaccination (May 1880)
  •   Think what you may.

– – – – – – – – – – – – –

POSTINGS from my blog WITH DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES    (In reverse, back to 2014.  there’s more on the internet.)

Also,   Dr Humphries joined the CHD Bus (Polly Tommy)  starting in 2016.  The bus criss-crossed the U.S. collecting the stories of  vaccine-injured children and their families.   It was a huge amount of work and made a huge contribution to people’s understanding of the tragedies,  the inhumanities,  the lies,  and the cover-ups.

  • 2025-05-24 Vaccine Zealotry + Don’t Fear Disease. Dr Suzanne Humphries    https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=31556
  • 2025-06-11 Vaccines Pediatric Perspectives: Risking Everything (Dr Suzanne Humphries with Dr Paul Thomas)    https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=31728
  • 2014-10-14 Youtube, Excellent information, Dr. Suzanne Humphries. On vaccines, disease and health.   https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=20039

– – – – – – – – – – – – –

2025-06-05 Blowing the Lid Off SIDS, Dr. Pierre Cory with host Steve Kirsch

APPENDED LIST:   VACCINES  – – SOME POSTINGS FROM MY BLOG.

2020-06-10 If I am making a choice about a vaccine, I want to know this  (WHAT ARE THE INGREDIENTS OF VACCINES?.)     https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=25074

2025-04-09 8-Year-Old in West Texas Died From Hospital-acquired Pneumonia, Medical Records Show    https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=31342

2025-05-23 I’ve been waiting for years for this – – a film that tells the Simpsonwood story    https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=31536

2025-06-06 Simpsonwood. CHD   https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=31658

 

2025-06-09 RFK Jr. Removes All Members of CDC Vaccine Advisory Committee

2025-06-06 Their Babies Died Suddenly in Their Sleep. Police Are Charging the Parents With Felonies for Not Placing Infants on Their Backs. Brenda Baletti, CHD

2025-06-03 posted. Covid. U.S. Senator Ron Johnson on podcast of Bret Weinstein (DarkHorse)

2025-05-29 UPDATE: Includes the inspirational ‘Moms Across America’ Plus the Update on ‘Double Tragedy’: Twins’ Deaths Likely Caused by Vaccines, Not Parents. On May 1, Dallas and Tyson, fraternal 18-month-old twins, were found dead by their mother after receiving the Hepatitis A, flu and DTaP vaccines on April 23. Police are investigating the parents, but Dr. Pierre Kory, who reviewed the twins’ medical records, told CHD.TV that, unfortunately, vaccine-related sudden infant deaths are “as common as the day is long.” by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.

2025-06-18 New CDC Vaccine Panel to Vote on Mercury in Flu Shots. The committee will also vote on RSV vaccines for pregnant mothers, babies and young children at its meeting next week — Suzanne Burdick, CHD

 

 – – – – – – – – –    OTHER SELECTIONS  – – nothing to do with VACCINATIONS

2025-05-16 Documentary “Manufacturing the Threat”

2025-06-18 Reclaim the Net.

2025-06-09 Dr Phil interviews Tom Homan. Reveals What ICE Found in LA Crackdown.

Transitioning or Maturing into wisdom

The film “1971”

2025-06-17 The Corbett Report June 18

 

 Posted by Sandra Finley at 1:35 PM
 Older Entries

Facebook & Twitter

 

Postings by date

Categories

  • Change (44)
  • Climate (118)
  • Corporatocracy or Democracy or Administrative State or WHAT? (1,138)
    • Administrative State (12)
    • Bank of Canada vs Canada Infrastructure Bk, Banksters, Privatization & Trade Deals, COMER (42)
      • Index page, Banksters & Fraudsters (2)
    • Bill C-51 Anti-Terrorism, Secret Police (44)
    • Democracy requirements, deficits, solutions (16)
    • Freedom of Speech. (Remove some wrong postings from category) (529)
    • Non-Violent Resistance (31)
    • Occupy Movement (54)
    • Robocalls & Vote moving, Election Fraud (57)
      • Electronic voting (18)
    • Trade Deals, PPPs, Integration Canada-U.S. (81)
  • Culture and Ethics (130)
  • Economy / Political Economy (94)
    • Economic Indicators (19)
  • Empowerment (109)
  • Energy (230)
    • Nuclear (138)
      • Radioactive waste (33)
    • Oil & Gas (23)
  • Food (158)
    • Salmon & Fish (25)
  • For your selection (summary list recent postings) (63)
  • Genetically Modified (195)
  • GOVERNMENT (4)
  • Green Party (49)
  • Health (977)
    • Chemical poisoning (63)
      • March Against Bayer-Monsanto (53)
    • Detoxification after removal of mercury (3)
    • Epigenetics (11)
    • Fluoride (17)
    • Mercury poisoning, dental amalgams. See also Vaccinations. (107)
    • Tuberculosis (14)
    • Vaccinations (incl corruption of science & govt) (647)
  • Knowledge Base (382)
    • Censorship (13)
    • Copyright Law (1)
    • Freedom of Information, Privacy (7)
    • Media, public interest (10)
    • Perception, fallibility, Linguistics (17)
    • Propaganda (89)
      • Orwell (15)
    • Take back the University (230)
  • Leadership (16)
  • Peace or Violence (636)
    • George Bush war criminal (103)
    • Lockheed Martin, War Economy (includes Cdn Census & Trials) (378)
      • Drones (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles / UAVs) (34)
    • Resource depletion (water in USA) (32)
  • Personal (11)
  • PHILOSOPHY (3)
  • Rule of Law (355)
    • Anti-SLAPP & SLAPP, Corporate & Individual manipulation of Justice system (16)
    • Corruption (129)
    • Privacy of Personal Information; Charter Right; Surveillance; StatsCan Censuses & Surveys (120)
    • Surveillance (11)
  • Solidarity with the Warriors (302)
    • AVAAZ (16)
    • Baltasar Garzon (12)
    • Chris Hedges (18)
    • Daniel Ellsberg (13)
    • Edward Snowden, Glenn Greenwald, Ladar Levison (38)
    • First Nations activists (2)
    • Gordon Edwards (5)
    • John Perkins (13)
    • Julian Assange, Wikileaks, Chelsea (Bradley) Manning, Arjen Kamphuis (151)
    • Maude Barlow (1)
    • Robert F Kennedy Jr (37)
    • Rocco Galati (7)
    • The Yes Men (5)
  • Sustainability (131)
  • Technology (39)
  • Uncategorized (147)
  • Voting System (Proportional Representation vs Winner Take All/FPTP) (7)
  • Water (194)
    • Bottled, For-Profit Extraction, Export, Commodification (60)
      • Index (1)
      • Water Merville (Strathcona, Campbell River, Comox) (14)
    • Salish Sea (33)
      • Water Bowser BC Sewage Treatment Plant (14)
    • Water Hydro-electricity (1)
    • Water Quality (2)
  • Why we flounder or do not flounder (25)
  • X Ball (1)
  • X Ballantyne (18)
  • X1 The Story (2012-11) (1)
  • X10 Alphabetical Index (1)
  • X1A Listing of emails sent by A.S. 2012-04-01 to 2012-12-30) (53)
  • X1B Postings (42)
  • X1C Related Cyber-bullying, Anti-SLAPP (9)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Home
  • About the Network
  • The Work We Do, Battles to protect the Commons
  • WHO are we? (the network)
  • How to use this blog
  • Lockheed Martin, War Economy, StatsCan, Charter Right Privacy, Trial
  • Arrest George Bush. Rule of Law essential to democracy.
  • Heavy metals in vaccinations, Mercury in dental amalgams
  • Why we flounder
© 2015 The Battles Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha