Sandra Finley

Dec 062025
 

I watched  the video of  Frances Widdowson at the University of Victoria and her arrest.

And I watched the film that has been released,  that started with the CLAIMS in  Kamloops – –  over 200 deaths at the residential school.   For which there is still no evidence.   Over a million dollars from taxpayers was provided  to begin excavations in search of remains, a few years ago.    Excavating is yet to begin.   And the money is yet to be accounted for.

The phrase “Residential School Industry”  has been coined.  . . .   There is long-standing corruption at the CFIA and  finally,  because of  the dead ostriches, those responsible are being pulled to account – – hopefully.  There are battles in the courts across the country to hold the Judges and Prosecutors and their Courts to account over the covid mandates/attack on citizens.

Brett Wilson – – the guy who made the financial offer to UVIC.   He’s doing a thing that he does well – – Making a deal.   I’m not good at that.   Hmmm Brett (as in “Dragon’s Den”)   must be good at working on ideas that have  .  .  .  POTENTIAL!

SO: Brett Wilson wants to buy an apology from the University of Victoria  (that he can give to Frances, right?)   Just think – – Frances would not have to waste a lot of her life’s time and energy and money  inside a court house.   That’d be good. right?    And THEN . . .

Hey!  what if… ??

What if other people had some fun, too?  ALL the money could be used by the University – – to walk themselves backwards out of cancerous partnerships they have entered into!   The University could do what it wants to do.  Some serious navel-gazing would be good.  Have a read – – Wilson’s story.

https://www.yorkregion.com/life/health-wellness/w-brett-wilson-s-balanced-life/article_06902d35   -e98c-5082-9e13-7d176f45a694.html     

 

If Brett Wilson wants to cut a deal with the University,  good on him.    Life can be fun!    I want to see how this is going to play out!

P.S.  Linguistics – – if a society  does not have a word for something,  they can’t discuss it.   I speculate all the time, for fun.   I want to ask my oriental friend if she has such a lovely, wrinkle-free face because of her spiritual practices and beliefs?    It’s the same as  (I think I objectively observe that)  Mormon women have many fewer wrinkles – – is it because they worry much less?

RELATED:    MORAL INJURY

      • which some people would call  “Conscience”.
      • And which I would call “broken-down drunkenness”  as in men who have returned home from the killing fields.

This is a very good starting  discussion of MORAL INJURY:

2024-01-30 And Then Your Soul is Gone. Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal: MILITARY MORAL INJURY with Dr. Kelly Denton-Borhaug

Thank-you, Dr. Denton-Borhaug

= = = = = = = = = =

Wilson will donate the six-figure sum if the University of Victoria offers a public apology for its treatment of Widdowson, watch Premier Smith’s a year-end interview with True North, and more.

Dec 052025
 
:
40px;">The previous Selection  was – –
:
120px;">For Your Selection October 2025.     (https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32035)
– – – – – – – – – – – – –
:
center;">FOR YOUR SELECTION  
:
center;">NOVEMBER ,  2025
– – – – – – – – – –  – – – Thank goodness we have the voice and experience of Rodney Palmer.  He uses his experience to lay out our current Canadian situation with clarity. If you have any trouble getting on the Lavigne podcast (#1),  and you don’t know his work,   1A (Rodney’s NCI testimony) is powerful.
    :
    //sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32245" rel="bookmark"> 2025-11-28   Rodney Palmer, with thanks to Jason Lavigne.
:
80px;">1A     2023-05-06  NCI: Rodney Palmer, journalist, testimony. PROPAGANDA and Covid. The Corruption of Canada’s CBC: Covid-19 Reporting under the Trudeau Government
:
//druthers.ca/">2.    https://druthers.ca/
  • Dec 3,   The December issue is out.
EXCERPT  Druthers, p. 2,  FREEDOM WINS:
:
80px;">Alberta’s new “Jordan Peterson Law” aims to restrict professional regulatory bodies from disciplining their members for off-duty conduct.  Bill 13 – the Regulated Professions Neutrality Act –  safeguards free expression and stops regulators from policing personal views.
= = = = = = = = = =
:
40px;">3.    Disclosure:  I stereotype.   I don’t think I’m sinning!   Ha ha!
I will reject anyone who played a significant role on “Wall Street”  in the 07-08 meltdown.   Marc Carney was at Goldman Sachs for 13 years leading up to the meltdown and the excesses of the racketeers. There is no word to express my disgust for what was done to “Main Streets”, not only in America, but globally.  . . . communities that believed the bullshit generated by Wall Street.
As I understand things,  Carney returned to Canada as Governor of the Bank of Canada “just in time” to avoid the smear of “Wall Street (Goldman Sachs)” over “Main Street”.    Sub-prime mortgages . . . Bank bail-outs by tax-payers ..  . . .  I remember the award-winning documentary film (Matt Damon):
   INSIDE JOB. (2010)
Justin Trudeau has been in the wrong job, and should not still be on the Govt of Canada dole.   But nor do I think it’s fair to APPLAUD Marc Carney and simultaneously CRUCIFY  Trudeau.   Carney is a Globalist and has had a significant role in Canada’s ECONOMIC POLICIES over a lengthy period.
ALREADY,  by 2020,   Carney was ADVISING  Trudeau on :
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic">COVID-19 economic responses.
And (from Wikipedia) – – in September 2024, Officially –  Carney became a special adviser and chair of the Liberal task force on economic growth.:
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Carney#cite_note-94">[94][95]
Shortly after that appointment, it was revealed that Brookfield Asset Management had solicited the federal government for CA$10 billion in funds as part of $50 billion Canada-only asset fund.  . . .  Carney was the Chair of Brookfield – – just one of his various titles.  Brookfield was moved to the U.S. . .  .
Oh!  but hey!   Carney did not need to follow standard ethical disclosures mandatory for prime ministerial advisors because he was employed by the Liberal Party rather than the Prime Minister’s Office.:
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Carney#cite_note-96">[  
Continuing  with Economic Advisors  . . .  note the date of this first one which documents the relationship between Freeland and Summers and Dominic Barton (McKinsey).
:
40px;">4.   2017-05-25 Chrystia Freeland – Larry Summers – Dominic Barton connection. “Inclusive Capitalism Initiative” as “re-branding”.  Summers is bad news (corrupt),  Canadian financial matters, advisor to Liberals.     (There was more to the “re-branding” than I realized at the time.   Maybe it was the launch of DEI?)
Currently  we have Larry Summers and Jefferey Epstein exchanges, over which Summers is pathetic. It’s an opportunity to rid ourselves of some of the stench.   But have you seen anything on Canadian Media about the disclosure of Summers –  Epstein Files?   Basically, Summers has confessed.  He is wrapped up and ready for jail.   Both the U.S. and Canada are ridding themselves of foreign criminals, are they not?    Let’s go Canada!    AWARENESS is the way to get rid of these people.  Tell your MP about Summers.
:
“Larry Summers said Monday that he was stepping back from all public commitments amid fallout from the release of emails between him and the notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.”" href="https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32183" rel="bookmark">5.   2025-11-28 Larry Summers, economic advisor to Federal Liberals. On the American side of things: “Larry Summers stepping back from all public commitments amid fallout from emails between him and the notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.”
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=30973">6.   2025-02-17  Mark Carney, hopeful to be prime minister. All the Power he sees. Sedition.
 
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=31195">****     7.    2025-03-19 Mark Carney, PrimeMinister-Elect,  He, himself,  told us exactly who he is.  I’m an “elitist and a globalist” but “that’s exactly what we (Canadians)  need”    *********
:
40px;">He is deluded.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –  –
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32154" rel="bookmark">8.     2025-11-19 Censorship and court challenge by Shaun Rickard and his fellow litigant.
God bless these Canadians who are inventive, and VERY DETERMINED!
– – – – – – – –    Moving on:
You do not have ENOUGH information  about the Ostrich story!
Mainstream media did   AT LEAST ONE   news report (#3 below)  saying that the ostrich story is not true.   It is probable that there has been LOTS of interference with the TRUTH  because I heard it on a 5:
00   news cast on a Pattison Media  radio station.   Here are links to the story and the lie.
Ostriches, Katie Pasitney
9.  :
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32145" rel="bookmark">  2025-11-18 Katie Pasitney (ostriches) interviewed on the High-Wire, Del Bigtree. This link will work.
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32083">10.     2025-11-07 Ostriches – – all were shot dead last nite by CFIA order.
:
40px;">https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32083
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32095">11.    2025-11-12    5:00 Radio News tells its large audience that the CFIA actions  around the slaughter of ostriches is false. (a Jimmy Pattison radio station, FM 99.9 – – and all the other outlets of Pattison Media?)
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32130" rel="bookmark">12.   2025-11-  re censorship and ostriches (“This page doesn’t exist . . . but it DOES!)
:
80px;">https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32095
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –  –
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32090">13.     2025-11-07 Katie Pasitney re ostriches.     PLUS   Nadine Wellwood re Alberta Rising: A Principled Vision for a Sovereign Nation
:
80px;">https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32090
:
40px;">EXCERPT   Druthers (December issue).
:
80px;">Page 12,  The Absurdity Observer   (appears every month)
:
120px;">The first of “The Absurd”:   (the Ostriches)
:
120px;">Following a nearly year-long legal battle over an
apparent H5N1 avian flu outbreak, approximately 314 ostriches at Universal Ostrich Farms in Edgewood, British Columbia, were culled by “professional” marksmen on November 6 and 7, 2025, under the order of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). The CFIA claims they ordered the massacre as a precautionary measure to contain the spread of H5N1 avian influenza virus despite the fact that no birds had tested positive for, or showed symptoms of, the flu since late 2024.

I speak with people who think the ostrich story is NOT true.
Please help:
   it’s as easy as starting a conversation about the ostriches.  “Do you know about . . .”
:
40px;"> EXTREMELY IMPORTANT RIGHTS (issues) in the OSTRICH STORY.
It works.  If people everywhere had not been telling their neighbors,  THIS HOUSE OF COMMONS COMMITTEE would not have happened:
:
40px;">Nov 18th – I stumbled across a Parliamentary Standing Committee  on Agriculture and Agri-Food.
:
40px;">The CFIA  was hauled in front of the Committee to answer questions.  Towards the end,  some hard questions were asked.    The Committee Meeting was video taped, obviously.
:
40px;">Maybe the Liberals and the CFIA are starting to realize that they are not omnipotent.
:
40px;">Just  Keep On, Keeping on.    We’re pulling ahead!
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32169" rel="bookmark">14.    2025-11-21 Lab-grown and cloned meat in Canada. Update. Tamara Ugolini, Rebel News.
– – – – – – – – – – – – –    15.    2025-12-01    HPOA POSTINGS,  TYRANNY (B.C.  & CANADA)
:
40px;">“1984” was published in 1949  (the same year as I was born!)    George Orwell was prescient, or clairvoyant.
:
40px;">A read of “1984” is unpleasant.  Cod liver oil for good health doesn’t taste good either.
:
40px;">The Govt of Canada, and the Provincial Govt of B.C. preside over the rubble of structures that  need to be removed.   Our “Not-a-Democracy” needs to be bull-dozed and some parts re -built from the ground up.   (Canadians have been doing that, for a long time, actually.)
  • There is an excellent article in Druthers (Page 3  by Vincent Gircys) – – “Restoring Police Independence and the Rule of Law”,  part of   The Grus Justice Project
:
40px;">The Canadians who are raising hell over
  • the CFIA and
  • the HPOA
will recognize each other as fellow warriors.
:
80px;">16.   2024-01-10 Repeal Bill 36   the Health Professions & Occupations Act  (HPOA).  First class tyranny. (Civitas #1)
:
80px;">17.   2023-12-06 Bill 36 (B.C.) is the Health Professions & Occupations Act. First class tyranny. But we can stop it, by pitching in to help the Canadian Society for Science & Ethics in Medicine.    Just spread the word.
:
80px;">NOTE    Nov 22, 2025:  The link for  the Canadian Society for Science & Ethics in Medicine comes up as “Page Not Found” on my computer, but – –  only SOMETIMES.
:
80px;">Recommend:  Try again.
:
80px;">The surveillance and censorship algorithms are more technically sophisticated  than in days of yore.   (OR,  they are more unreliable, but truthfully,  I think it’s not incompetence,)
:
80px;">18.    2025-02-16  What is sedition? How are Charter Rights activated?
:
80px;">My Conclusion (learned through Lockheed Martin Corp’s role  in Canadian affairs, but applies generally):
:
80px;">The Government may rescind the rights of an individual.  However,
    :
    none;">
      :
      none;">
      1. The Statistics Act does not give the Government the authority to do that.  StatsCan cannot just DECLARE that this is so.
      2. In order to override the Charter Right of an individual, the Government has to pass the “Oakes Test“,  according to Canadian Constitutional Law.
:
80px;">If StatsCan wishes to take away Canadians’ Charter Right to Privacy of Personal Information, it has to make an application to the Court to do so, supplying the Court with the arguments to satisfy the Oakes Test.   It has not done that.   So the Charter Right stands.
:
80px;">19.   For Your Selection FEBRUARY, 2025  (re HPOA)
:
80px;">20.    2024-05-14 The WHO (World Health Organization). You should know this. Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse spells it out. The power consolidation for a global health dictatorship.  (Not under my watch!)
= = = = = = = = =
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32194" rel="bookmark">21.   2025-11-21 Court to decide if public universities must uphold freedom of expression and be liable for Charter infringements.   JCCF (Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms).
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32199" rel="bookmark">22.   2025-11-25  Covid Mandates/    The trial of Chris Barber, update.  JCCF
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32133" rel="bookmark">23.     2025-11-18 EU’s Weakened “Chat Control” Bill Still Poses Major Privacy and Surveillance Risks, Academics Warn.  With thanks to Reclaim The Net..     
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32133" rel="bookmark">24.   EU’s Weakened “Chat Control” Bill Still Poses Major Privacy and Surveillance Risks,
:
40px;"> We are in a transitional time when, if we don’t have strategies for neutralizing  “TREACHERIES”,  we  are not going to beat the tyrants.
25.       :
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32110">2025-11-15 CRYPTO-GRAM, November 15, 2025, Bruce Schneier          https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32110
:
40px;"> The November newsletter has a discussion on AI.
:
40px;"> I sent a thank-you to Bruce.  He is one of the stalwarts,  for years sending out information to help keep the public in the loop, if even just a little bit.
26.:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32105">   2025-11-14   Lavigne Show:  Silencing Detective Grus – Trailer for the film.    And guest: Donald Best
:
80px;">https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32105
– – – – – – – – – –  – – –
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32092">27    2025-11-07    Well done. Interview of Donna Laframboise, journalist. By Melanie Bennet on “Disrupted”.
:
40px;">https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32092
– – – – – – – – – –  – – – 
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32079">28.    2025-11-03 Two Brits, become Canadians,  launched a court case against Justin Trudeau and his crew – – you should know the story. It’s bloody important.
:
40px;">https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32079
– – – – – – – – – –  – – –
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32185" rel="bookmark">29.    2025-11-28     The Arrogance of the Covid Models
– – – – – – – – – –  – – –
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32073">30.    2025-10-26   Cartel Canada | W5’s Avery Haines investigates a Canadian meth pipeline
:
40px;">https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32073
– – – – – – – – – –  – – –
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32071">31.   2025-10-26   Something seems wrong or fishy here?  (Canada’s Meth Superlab exposed, near Kamloops.)
:
40px;">https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32071
– – – – – – – – – –  – – – 
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32068">32.   2025-10-26 World on Mute, book  by Lisa Miron
:
40px;">https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32068
– – – – – – – – – – – – –  —
Recommend:
   you might want to skim – –  (of course,  I only post IMPORTANT stuff!)
:
//sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32035">For Your Selection October 2025.     (https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=32035)
You will not have received October’s listings (only 3 people did). Good night!  /Sandra
Dec 042025
 

The film looks into the soul of human beings.

  •    it is a wonderful celebration of the human spirit

How could I imagine that Christmas-time is NOT  a time to be SENDING you a film about thalidomide?     The Thalidomiders sent me my Christmas present!   You may feel the same, by the end of the film.

I wish to convey my gratitude to those who contributed to the making of the film.    It is perfect.

Merry Christmas   ”And so, as Tiny Tim observed, God bless us, every one!”    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dec 042025
 

RODNEY PALMER  is a very important voice.

2023-05-06 NCI:  Rodney Palmer, journalist, testimony. PROPAGANDA and Covid. The Corruption of Canada’s CBC: Covid-19 Reporting under the Trudeau Government

He recently appeared on the Jason Lavigne podcast.    He is one of the best “explainers”.

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

 

 

Watch now

Tea & Coffee w/ Paula & Jay | Episode #74 | Rodney Palmer

Jason Lavigne
Nov 28

 

READ IN APP

Join Paula & Jay over Tea & Coffee as they talk about the news of the day, life, and whatever comes up. Special Guest: Rodney Palmer

Upgrade to paid

You’re currently a free subscriber to Jason Lavigne’s Substack. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

Like
Comment
Restack

© 2025 Jason Lavigne
P.O. Box 886, Breton, Alberta, Canada, T0C 0P0
Unsubscribe

Dec 012025
 

 

 

 

Subject: Next Evidentiary Video:  Military Moral Injury with Dr. Kelly Denton-Borhaug

The next evidentiary video episode of the Tribunal is a fascinating conversation with Dr. Kelly Denton-Borhaug, whose work began soon after the events of 9/11 with her investigation of what she came to call “U.S. war-culture.” In more recent years, Denton-Borhaug’s focus moved to “military moral injury.” This invisible epidemic (linked to the frighteningly high numbers of service member and veteran suicides) springs from the intolerable moral pain and suffering experienced by too many of the 1% fighting on the front lines of our war-culture.

Her book And Then Your Soul Is Gone: Moral Injury and U.S. War-culture explores military moral injury in detail. Moral injury not only impacts individuals; but also is deeply connected to the structural and cultural violence of war-culture that characterizes the United States.

Denton-Borhaug’s newest book in development, Light at the Tip of the Candle: A Moral and Spiritual Response to the Despair of Moral Injury, will tell the stories of a group of veterans who are living with the pain of moral injury, and will also explore how this individual suffering is profoundly connected to deeper veins of violence in U.S. war-culture.

The link for this video evidence is here: https://rumble.com/v49ttar-military-moral-injury-dr.-kelly-denton-borhaug.html

Please share this video link with friends and colleagues. Form discussion groups around all video evidence of the Tribunal.

Jeremy Kuzmarov of Covert Action Magazine continues to chronicle the Tribunal’s evidence in his new article exploring the Uruzgan massacre this Tribunal covered in a previous episode. It’s an excellent piece.

The link for previous video episodes of the Tribunal is here: https://rumble.com/user/merchantsofdeath

Encourage friends to sign up to receive future video segments of evidence here: https://actionnetwork.org/forms/sign-up-for-emails-from-the-merchants-of-death-war-crimes-tribunal?clear_id=true

In solidarity,

Brad Wolf, Kathy Kelly, and Nick Mottern
Organizers
Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal

The Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal will hold accountable — through testimony of witnesses — U.S. Weapons manufacturers who knowingly produce and sell products which attack and kill non-combatants. These manufacturers may have committed Crimes Against Humanity as well as violated U.S. Federal criminal laws. The Tribunal will hear the evidence and render a verdict.
Donate to support the Tribunal.

Should giant war-profiteering corporations decide what emails you don’t want to read? We don’t think so either. So, please stop our emails from going into “junk” or “spam” by “white listing,” marking as “safe,” or filtering to “never send to spam.”

 

2022-02-28 Covid protests, Vocabulary and Context. WE WILL DO BETTER . . .  NEXT TIME! say the Police. Linguistics. Definition of antifa.

My Grandfathers and Dad were, by the quirks of fate, prevented from going to war.  They were not directly exposed to the environment of killing.  In my family, there was no broken down drunkenness returned from the war.  Women and children are respected.

2018-03- Carol Van Strum, author of A Bitter Fog, awarded the David Brower Lifetime Achievement Award (herbicides, Monsanto’s Agent Orange).

A Bitter Fog is the true story of people fighting to protect their families and homes from Agent Orange and other poisons sprayed on them from the air. This book tells the story of ordinary people who defied profiteering corporations and indifferent government agencies. Meticulous research exposes deception and outright fraud by chemical companies to keep profiting from herbicides they knew were toxic and government complicity in covering up severe human health problems and environmental damage.

2016-12-21 Why I Kneeled Before Standing Rock Elders and Asked For Forgiveness, Yes! Magazine. (former Army Lt. Wesley Clark Jr., son of Gen. Wesley Clark, former Supreme Allied Commander of NATO.)

2014-10-22 Notes from Underground, the consequences of alienating people from their society (Dostoyevsky)

Dec 012025
 

We have so much, and so many great people, to be thankful for.

The  JCCF.    And all the people they continue to represent.

= = = = = = = = = = = =

RE:  the story of Chris Barber below.

This is not fair or just.    The Governments are TELLING US:   DO NOT SPEAK UP OR PROTEST.   WE WILL TOLERATE COMPLIANCE.    COMPLY,  “OR ELSE”.

The trial of Chris Barber  (Tamara Lich is covered separately)

R. v. Christopher Barber

A pandemic of fear met with resistance

In January and February 2022, thousands of Canadians travelled from all corners of the country to the nation’s capital to protest mandatory vaccination policies, which turned millions of Canadians into second-class citizens if they did not get injected with the Covid vaccine. 

In British Columbia, dissenting healthcare workers and firefighters were fired. In Nova Scotia, judges were pressured into getting injected and threatened with consequences for choosing not to do so. In Quebec, government officials threatened a tax on the unvaccinated. Across Canada, conscientious objectors were fired from their jobs, suspended from their university programs, and prevented from travelling. Cross-border Covid vaccine mandates particularly affected Canadian truckers.  

Canadian truckers and the Freedom Convoy protest 

The pressures being applied by governments across Canada to get citizens to bend to their will resulted in what became known as the Freedom Convoy protest. Truckers across the country drove to Ottawa to try to meet with federal politicians and air their grievances. The Justice Centre sent lawyers to the protest to advise protestors of their constitutional rights.  

Chris Barber and Tamara Lich arrested at Ottawa protest 

Chris Barber and Tamara Lich were arrested in Ottawa on February 17, 2022–one day before the brutal police crackdown on Freedom Convoy protestors – and after the federal government illegally invoked the Emergencies Act on February 14, 2022. 

This was the first time the Act had ever been invoked to clear the protest. Chris Barber and Tamara Lich were both criminally charged with mischief, intimidation, obstructing a highway, obstructing a police officer, and counselling others to commit the same offences. They have asserted they were peacefully exercising their Charter freedoms of expression, association, and peaceful assembly during the Freedom Convoy protest in Ottawa.  

Barber and Lich’s trial originally scheduled to last 16 days

The Justice Centre has been supporting the defence of Chris Barber. Mr. Barber, a trucker and trucking company owner from Swift Current, Saskatchewan, pleaded not guilty to all charges on April 23, 2023. Diane Magas, his defence counsel, has consistently argued that he acted peacefully and lawfully throughout his time in Ottawa. Note: the Justice Centre is also providing legal support in a separate action for Mr. Barber, Ms. Lich and Freedom Convoy members who are being sued by Ottawa residents for $290 million.  

The criminal trial began on September 5, 2023, and was originally scheduled to last 16 days. Nearly one year later, the trial of Mr. Barber and Ms. Lich is nearing 40 days of court time. 

“Crown prosecutors in Ontario claim that they do not have enough resources to prosecute people accused of sexual assault and other serious crimes. People accused of serious crimes are walking away without facing trial because of extreme delays, supposedly caused by the Crown lacking adequate resources. Yet the Crown has devoted massive amounts of its limited time and energy to prosecuting peaceful protesters who exercised their fundamental Charter freedoms,” stated John Carpay, President of the Justice Centre. 

Final arguments include reference to DeCaire decision 

Lawyer Diane Magas was back in court with Mr. Barber the morning of Friday, September 13, 2024, to hear the Crown’s closing submissions. You can read the Crown’s final arguments here. The Final Submissions for Chris Barber are here. 

Ms. Magas said she will address the court referencing the R. v. DeCaire Appeal decision. She successfully defended Christine DeCaire when the Crown appealed Ms. DeCaire’s dismissal on charges of mischief for being at the Freedom Convoy protest. Ms. Magas hopes the court will use that decision as guidance when considering the current case. She will draw attention to paragraphs 30-31, where the Appeal Court noted the Crown still needed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person actually engaged in mischief, and that merely being in the vicinity of where someone else might be causing mischief was not enough to convict. 

A date for the verdict was set for March 12, 2025. That date was postponed until April 3, 2025. 

John Carpay says, “Thanks to the generosity of donors, the Justice Centre has provided criminal defence lawyers for Chris Barber, Tamara Lich and other Canadians who were criminally charged in February 2022 for having peacefully exercised their Charter freedoms of expression, association, and assembly during the peaceful Freedom Convoy protest in Ottawa. More than 30 months ago, they were charged with mischief, intimidation, obstructing a highway, obstructing a police officer, and counselling others to commit the same offences. We have secured favourable outcomes for many individuals who were wrongfully charged, including acquittals at trial, the dropping of charges, as well as negotiated agreements with the consent of clients.” 

Court finds Chris Barber guilty of mischief

We are disappointed that the Ontario Court of Justice found Chris Barber and Tamara Lich guilty of mischief for their involvement in the peaceful Freedom Convoy protest.

The decision, released on April 3, 2025, follows upon 45 days of hearings in a criminal trial stretching from September 2023 to September 2024.

Justice Heather Perkins-McVey delivered the decision in the Ontario Court of Justice at the Ottawa Courthouse.

Counsel will carefully review the decision and confer with Mr. Barber to determine any next steps.

Chris Barber asks Court to stay proceedings against him

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that Chris Barber has asked the Ontario Court of Justice for a stay of proceedings against him. He argues that the legal advice given to him by police officers, lawyers, and a Superior Court judge during the Freedom Convoy was erroneous and that, as a result, the Crown is not entitled to convict him.

On April 3, 2025, Justice Heather Perkins-McVey of the Ontario Court of Justice found Mr. Barber guilty of mischief and of counselling others to breach a court order. That decision followed upon a lengthy 45-day trial stretching from September 2023 to September 2024.

Diane Magas, Chris Barber’s lawyer, filed a Stay of Proceedings Application with the Court on April 16, 2025. In that Application, Mr. Barber and his legal team argue that he did, in fact, seek legal advice regarding his actions during the Freedom Convoy protest.

For example, he followed Ottawa Police Services directions on where to park trucks in downtown Ottawa. When an officer asked him to move his truck, “Big Red,” from downtown Ottawa, he moved it. On February 7 and 16, 2022, his lawyer at the time advised him that Justice Maclean of the Superior Court had confirmed that the protest could continue so long as it continued to be peaceful and safe.

In essence, Chris Barber and his legal team are now arguing that he followed all legal advice that was given to him in 2022, but that some of the legal advice he was given turned out to be erroneous.

Judge asked to set aside crown’s recommended sentence

Barber’s Application argues for a stay of proceedings against him on the grounds that “he sought advice from lawyers, police officers, and a Superior Court Judge on the legality of the protest he was involved in.”

This Application was filed one day after Chris Barber was informed that the Crown was pursuing a two-year prison sentence against him. In an April 15 Facebook post, Mr. Barber wrote, “My family got bad news today. The Crown prosecutor wants to lock Tamara Lich and me in prison for two years-for standing up for freedom. They also want to [seize] my truck, Big Red, and crush her like she’s just scrap metal or sell it at auction.”

If the Application is successful, Mr. Barber would not see prison time, nor would his truck be seized.

“Throughout the peaceful Freedom Convoy, Chris Barber did what any law-abiding Canadian would do: seeking out and acting upon the best legal advice available to him,” stated John Carpay, President of the Justice Centre. “Chris Barber consistently followed the legal advice that he received from police officers, lawyers, and a Superior Court judge.”

“To hold a well-meaning man behind bars for two years and to confiscate his property, as is now demanded by the Crown, would bring the administration of justice into disrepute,” Mr. Carpay continued. “Crown prosecutors are painting a portrait of a dangerous criminal, even while Chris Barber sought out and followed legal advice when participating in the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa in 2022. Chris worked within the law when peacefully exercising his Charter freedoms of expression, assembly and association.”

Stay of Proceedings hearing confirmed for Wednesday to Friday, May 21–23, 2025

Chris Barber’s Stay of Proceedings Application will be heard in person at the Ottawa courthouse from Wednesday to Friday, May 21–23, 2025, starting at 10:00 a.m. in Room 5 on May 21.

Members of the public are welcome to attend in person; virtual attendance is not available.

The court will consider whether to set aside the Crown’s request for a two-year prison sentence and the seizure of Mr. Barber’s truck, based on arguments that he acted in good faith by following official advice during the 2022 Freedom Convoy.

Chris Barber’s next court date is Monday, July 21, 2025

Chris Barber is scheduled for sentencing on July 21, 2025, unless his Stay of Proceedings Application is granted beforehand, which would halt the sentencing process and prevent jail time. If that Application is not granted, the next scheduled update will occur on July 21, 2025.

Chris Barber’s sentencing date moved to Wednesday, July 23, 2025

The Stay of Proceedings Application has been denied.  This means the upcoming hearing will focus on Chris Barber’s sentencing.

A series of Victim Impact Statements have been submitted to the court by the Crown. The sentencing hearing is now expected to be rescheduled for Wednesday, July 23, 2025.

The hearing is set to begin at 10:00 a.m. ET at the Ottawa courthouse.

Hearing on proposed forfeiture of Chris Barber’s truck scheduled on Friday, September 12, 2025

A hearing is scheduled for Friday, September 12, 2025, in Ottawa regarding the proposed forfeiture of Chris Barber’s 2004 Kenworth long-haul truck, known as Big Red.” The hearing is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. ET at the Ontario Court of Justice, 161 Elgin Street, Ottawa, in room 12.

Mr. Barber, a Saskatchewan trucker and a central figure in the peaceful 2022 Freedom Convoy, relies on this vehicle as his primary source of income. The truck is now at the centre of government forfeiture proceedings. The court will consider arguments from Mr. Barber’s family, who have filed an application as interested third parties seeking to prevent the loss of the vehicle. The court is also expected to hear evidence from Detective Lauren regarding the corporate title and ownership of the truck.

Lawyers funded by the Justice Centre will argue that the proposed forfeiture would cause significant financial harm to Mr. Barber and his family. The hearing on September 12 will address both the summary dismissal application and the ownership evidence before the court.

Legal response to forfeiture filed

On September 24, 2025, lawyers funded by the Justice Centre filed a legal response opposing the Crown’s attempt to seize “Big Red,” the 2004 Kenworth long-haul truck he owns and relies on for his family’s trucking business.

The Crown has applied to seize the truck as “offence-related property,” alleging it was used in connection to committing an offence.

But Mr. Barber’s legal team argues the Ottawa police themselves directed him where to park his truck on Wellington Street and later approved “slow rolls” of the vehicle as a form of protest. In fact, the truck was moved out of the downtown core at the request of police on February 8, 2022, and never returned.

Constitutional lawyer Diane Magas said, “This truck was never a tool of crime. It is a working truck, directed by police where to park and moved when they asked. Seizing the very vehicle that Chris and his family rely on to earn a living would devastate a legitimate Canadian business.”

Take an exclusive video tour of Mr. Barber’s truck “Big Red” and see the memories and family history it carries.

Chris Barber given no jail time

On Tuesday, October 7, 2025, Justice Heather Perkins-McVey of the Ontario Court of Justice sentenced Saskatchewan trucker and peaceful Freedom Convoy protester Chris Barber to an 18-month conditional sentence and 100 hours of community service, to be served in his community.

The Crown had sought an eight-year prison term for Mr. Barber, despite his entirely peaceful participation in the 2022 Freedom Convoy protest in Ottawa.

In delivering her decision, Justice Perkins-McVey remarked that Mr. Barber “came with the noblest of intent and did not advocate for violence,” and emphasized that the Freedom Convoy was a “non-violent protest, no property damage, no intent to harm critical infrastructure.” She also noted that Mr. Barber moved his own truck and encouraged others to do likewise, promoting calm and cooperation with police.

Constitutional lawyer Diane Magas, who represented Mr. Barber, stated that “The Court recognized Mr. Barber’s peaceful conduct and cooperation with police throughout the Freedom Convoy.”

Under the conditions of his sentence, Mr. Barber must remain on his property for the first 12 months except for employment or travel related to legal, medical, or dental appointments, or religious services.

Justice Centre President John Carpay reflected that “Chris Barber and Tamara Lich should not have been convicted of criminal mischief in the first place,” noting their noble cause and peaceful conduct. He further observed that “Rarely are protests of that magnitude so peaceful,” and that after enduring the longest mischief trial in Canadian history, Mr. Barber faced a sentence that “still goes too far,” sending a chilling message to Canadians who exercise their Charter freedoms. Mr. Carpay added that the sentence could have been much worse had generous donors not helped fund a strong legal defence.

Ms. Magas continues to represent Mr. Barber in a separate case opposing the Crown’s attempt to seize his 2004 Kenworth truck, “Big Red,” which remains his family’s primary source of income. Canadians wishing to support Mr. Barber’s legal defence can make a tax-deductible donation at www.jccf.ca.

Crown appeals Chris Barber acquittal and sentence following Freedom Convoy ruling

The Crown filed a formal appeal seeking to overturn Chris Barber’s acquittal on intimidation charges and to increase the sentence he received following the peaceful 2022 Freedom Convoy protest in Ottawa. The appeal asks the Ontario Court of Appeal to replace Mr. Barber’s 18-month conditional sentence with a harsher penalty and to either enter a conviction on the intimidation charge or order a new trial.

Mr. Barber, who had already announced his intention to challenge the outcome of his trial, has now filed his own appeal. He argues that the trial judge misapplied the law on mischief and failed to properly weigh his cooperation with law enforcement throughout the protest.

Mr. Barber said, “I travelled to Ottawa in good faith, followed the directions I was given, and cooperated fully with police at every step,” said Mr. Barber. “I did nothing unlawful, and I am appealing to clear my name and defend the right of Canadians to speak and protest peacefully.”

Constitutional lawyer Diane Magas stated, “Mr. Barber relied in good faith on police and court direction during the protest. The principles of fairness and justice require that citizens not be punished for following the advice of authorities. We look forward to presenting our arguments before the Court.”

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms has funded lawyers to defend Mr. Barber since 2022 and continues to support his ongoing legal efforts, including his appeal and the separate proceeding in which the Crown is seeking to seize his truck, “Big Red.”

Hearing held on forfeiture of “Big Red”

On Wednesday, November 26, 2025, the Ontario Court of Justice held a hearing in which the Crown is seeking to permanently seize “Big Red,” the 2004 Kenworth long-haul truck relied upon by peaceful Freedom Convoy protestor Chris Barber and his family trucking business.

Constitutional lawyer Diane Magas, who represents Mr. Barber, is opposing the forfeiture and emphasized that “The impact of the forfeiture of ‘Big Red’, which is an essential part of the operation of Mr. Barber’s trucking business and is relied upon by Mr. Barber, his family as well as employees, is not what Parliament had in mind when enacting those forfeiture provisions, especially considering the context of a political protest where the police told Mr. Barber where to park the truck and when Mr. Barber moved the truck after being asked to move it.”

The hearing addressed the Crown’s application to classify the truck as “offence-related property,” and the Court reviewed evidence associated with ownership and corporate title. The Court also considered a related application filed by Mr. Barber’s family, who are seeking to assert their rights as third parties to prevent the loss of the vehicle.

More information will be updated here when available.

Dec 012025
 

God bless the JCCF for its vigilance:

Court to decide if public universities must uphold freedom of expression and be liable for Charter infringements

The Free Speech Club v. UBC

UBC campus sign (Courtesy of Jeff Whyte)

“Understanding Antifa Violence” event cancelled 

In 2019, student members of the Free Speech Club at the University of British Columbia (UBC) organized an event, “Understanding Antifa Violence,” at UBC’s Robson Square campus. The event was to feature journalist Andy Ngo, who was himself violently attacked by Antifa members during a 2019 Antifa protest in Portland, Oregon. One month after signing the event contract, UBC cancelled the event, citing concerns about the emotional and psychological safety and security of the campus community. UBC did not provide the Free Speech Club with any opportunity to address their concerns prior to issuing the cancellation.  

Demand letter issued to UBC over event cancellation and censorship  

In defence of freedom of expression, the Justice Centre issued a demand letter to the President of the University of British Columbia on December 31, 2019. The letter warned that the Justice Centre would pursue legal action if the event was not reinstated. On January 8, 2020, UBC Counsel Hubert Lai responded to the letter, asserting that the event would not be reinstated because Mr. Ngo has been the target of violence in the past” and because the risk to persons and property was too high.” 

 Free Speech Club sues UBC  

With help from the Justice Centre, members of the Free Speech Club sued UBC over its unreasonable decision and for violating its own commitment to academic freedom.     

The Supreme Court of Canada has determined that the Charter applies to government entities and to private entities delivering government programs. The question before the Supreme Court of British Columbia was whether provincial universities are government entities or are delivering a government program. In other words, are provincial universities constitutionally obligated to protect students’ freedom of expression?  

Are provincial universities government entities?

On June 4, 2024, the Court determined that provincial universities are not government entities and, when delivering post-secondary education, are not delivering a government program. And yet, the Province of British Columbia allotted nearly $7 billion in funding to provincial universities in its 2024 budget, describing provincial universities as “service delivery agents for the provision of services on behalf of the government.” 

As a result of this June 2024 court ruling, universities in British Columbia remain largely immune to the Charter. Lawyers provided by the Justice Centre argue that provincial universities are delivering a government program and that the Charter must apply to them. And, consequently, if the Charter applies to UBC, its cancellation of the 2019 Free Speech Club event would likely have violated the Charter 

UBC allowed to operate in a Constitutional black hole 

Lawyer Glenn Blackett stated, “It’s troubling that this massive government program, of such importance to our constitutional order, should be left to largely operate in a constitutional black hole. Wherever government is present, so too should our constitutional freedoms including the right to speak freely and search for truth.”  

Appeal launched against UBC and the Province of British Columbia

Lawyers provided by the Justice Centre have filed legal arguments in a court appeal against the University of British Columbia (UBC) and the Province of British Columbia.

This case hinges on two key questions: whether universities are bound by the Charter and required to uphold free expression, and whether the Province can be held responsible for Charter violations committed by UBC.

“It would be an unjust abuse of process to attempt to insulate a lower court decision from appeal,” said constitutional lawyer Mr. Blackett. “Appeal courts are in place to correct lower court mistakes. The lower court here obviously made several mistakes with significant Charter implications. Not only are we appealing the BC Supreme Court’s June 2024 decision, we are working hard to prevent that decision from being made ‘appeal-proofed.’”

Lawyers for the Free Speech Club have an appeal of the procedural issue scheduled for November 19, 2025, with the main appeal likely to be scheduled in early 2026.

First preliminary hearing on appeal

On Wednesday, November 19, 2025, lawyers funded by the Justice Centre appeared before the British Columbia Court of Appeal for a procedural hearing in a case addressing whether publicly funded universities must comply with the Charter. The hearing focused on the wording of the lower court’s order, which UBC and the Province are seeking to frame in a manner that could restrict a future appeal on constitutional grounds.

Court rejects UBC’s attempt to quash case

The question of whether the Charter applies to publicly funded universities remains very much alive after the BC Court of Appeal rejected the University of British Columbia’s attempt to quash a preliminary appeal.

As a result, lawyers for the UBC Free Speech Club were able to argue that a lower court’s order should not have been written in a way that “appeal-proofs” an earlier ruling that Charter claims against BC universities are hopeless.

The main appeal on the Charter issue is expected to be heard in spring 2026.

Nov 282025
 
  • The CURRENT story by Matt Taibbi below  is largely for Americans.
  • Larry Summers is the man, “deeply ashamed”  now writhing in the spider webs of Jeffrey Epstein.  Read it for yourself.

 

Summers has for years, had big friends in Canada in the Liberal Party.  He SHOULD be writhing in Canada, too,  Not just the U.S.  This posting from 2017  provides context for the Summers – Epstein file.

2017-05-25 Chrystia Freeland – Larry Summers – Dominic Barton connection. “Inclusive Capitalism Initiative” as “re-branding”.  Summers bad news (corrupt), Canadian financial matters, advisor to Liberals.

(Canada)   Advisory Committee on Economic Growth – –  that would be the Liberal “Committee” that connects these  (- – – -nincompoops).   

TO ALL  CANADIANS:    an update on the Liberals   – –  Larry Summers and corruption

Thank-you very much,  Matt Taibbi, for the recent information  below re Summers.    He’s been on my radar for a long time.   Bad News for Canada.

The Federal Liberal Govt (Canada)  brought Chrystia Freeland, Larry Summers and Dominic Barton up from the U.S. to help them  win the Election 10 years ago.

(Aside:  Marc Carney came just before them, as Governor of the Bank of Canada, after 13 years at Goldman Sachs.   He landed back in Canada at the peak of the Wallstreet vrs Main Street eye-opener in the U.S. and globally  (2007-08).   Larry Summers was advising Barack Obama, and to Obama’s shame – – the robber barons of Wall Street were rewarded.   I don’t think they’ve been prosecuted, to this day.  (Documentary film, Matt Damon, 2010).)

 

Back to Liberal Economic Policies:  I figured we Canadians were doomed:  Larry Summers = sleaze.   It didn’t take too much research to know.   (See the posting above.)  We did NOT need MORE corruption in Ottawa.

Thank-you:

From CNBC:    by Matt Taibbi

Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers said Monday that he was stepping back from all public commitments amid fallout from the release of emails between him and the notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

“I am deeply ashamed of my actions and recognize the pain they have caused. I take full responsibility for my misguided decision to continue communicating with Mr. Epstein,” Summers said in a statement obtained by CNBC.

“While continuing to fulfill my teaching obligations, I will be stepping back from public commitments as one part of my broader effort,” said Summers, a former president of Harvard University…

Larry Summers is a rare perfect 10 on the celebrity-repugnance scale. He’s everything most normal people can’t stand about the current crop of “elites”: an arrogant Davos fixture whose toad face always looks pleased with his legacy of disastrous policy decisions, and who personifies his class’s habit of lavishing exalted academic titles on intellectual mediocrity.

Now he’s pioneered a new ritual, auto-cancelation. “I will be stepping back from public commitments” is cancel-culture seppuku, a way to give the mob a win before it gets going. That’s always a questionable tactic, but especially with the Jeffrey Epstein story, which is fast acquiring a familiar shape: a factually diffuse moral mania used as a disciplinary weapon by a media sector hungry for pelts.

The exchanges between Summers and Epstein are head-poundingly banal, like 99.9% of the documents in the just-released “trove” of Epstein-related documents. Summers is guilty of knowing Epstein and having pseudo-intellectual discussions with him about a mistress nicknamed “peril,” whom Summers feared might stray. Epstein compared the possibility to finding life on other planets, and tried to cheer Summers up by flattering the ex-Treasury Secretary’s fascination with Bayesian statistics:

Odds are limited to binary outcomes… since you are immobile. Do some homework… I concede your point on pessimism but would under bayesian rules. Feel comfortable. As humans are biased toward bad outcome avoidance… She is never ever going to find another Larry summers. Probability ZERO

It went on. “Send peril flowers,” Epstein advised. The two men briefly discussed whether Ehud Barak would be Prime Minister (this was July, 2019). Then Summers wrote, “At cape w mother brothers kids and nephews nieces. Bit of an Ibsen play.” Then it was “better than [sic] checov.” When the two pals from there plunged into a Google-aided discussion of Lady With Lapdog, I shut the computer off.

Congress voted yesterday to compel the Department of Justice to release in “searchable and downloadable format” all files related to Epstein within thirty days. The House vote was 427-1. Though Ro Khanna, Thomas Massie, and Mike Johnson all voiced concerns, only Louisiana Republican Clay Higgins actually voted no, saying that “this type of broad reveal of criminal investigative files, released to a rabid media, will absolutely result in innocent people being hurt.”

Predictably now Higgins is being teed up as a cancellation target, as social media fills with Meet the Lone Dickhead Who Voted Against Releasing the Epstein Filestype stories, each of which lists every maybe-naughty thing Higgins has ever done. This format, seen a lot in Russiagate with dissenters like Devin Nunes and Tulsi Gabbard, usually comes as prelude to a flood of Stubborn Ownthinker Faces Calls To Step Aside pieces, another fun part of the cancelation ritual.

For the record I’m very much in favor of releasing any Epstein files. The country deserves to know whatever there is to know about this mess, and if it exposes systemic wrongdoings, those need fixing. However, it’s extremely suspicious that a story that was deader than Epstein himself for years is suddenly the Most Important Thing now that Trump is back in the White House, especially since a lot of the techniques used to drive a media panic in the first Trump term are back. The fact that some of Trump’s top officials stoked public outrage about this subject en route to higher office does change the karmic equation this time, however.

Between Epstein’s beyond-suspicious death, multiple prosecutions for sex crimes, inexplicable $600 million fortune, and breathtaking Rolodex of powerful friends, there’s a lot to be curious about. But the public’s fascination with Epstein is based on the notion that he was not only operating an organized blackmail ring, but doing so on behalf of intelligence agencies, probably Israeli. That story simply isn’t there yet, and a lot of people who should know better, myself included, have assumed it is. It could be true, which is why releasing documents is a good idea. As of now, though, it’s closer to Russiagate, in which confirmable facts are overshadowed by a mountain range of inference:

 

Continue reading this post for free in the Substack app

Claim my free post

Or upgrade your subscription. Upgrade to paid

Like
Comment
Restack

© 2025 Matt Taibbi
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104

Nov 232025
 

1984” was published in 1949  (the same year as I was born!)    George Orwell was prescient, or clairvoyant.

The Govt of Canada, and the Provincial Govt of B.C. preside over the rubble of structures that  need to be removed.   UNdemocracy needs to be replaced.

A read of“1984” is unpleasant.    Cod liver oil for good health doesn’t taste good either.

 

2024-01-10 Repeal Bill 36   the Health Professions & Occupations Act  (HPOA).  First class tyranny. (Civitas #1)

2025-02-17 Mark Carney, hopeful to be prime minister. All the Power he sees. Sedition.

2025-03-19 Mark Carney, PrimeMinister-Elect, Tells us exactly who he is. I’m an “elitist and a globalist” but “that’s exactly what we (Canadians)  need”

 

2023-12-06 Bill 36 (B.C.) is the Health Professions & Occupations Act. First class tyranny. But we can stop it, by pitching in to help the Canadian Society for Science & Ethics in Medicine. Just spread the word.

UPDATE:   I don’t know The status of the Society:

Nov 22, 2025:  The link I have for  the Canadian Society for Science & Ethics in Medicine comes up as “Page Not Found” on my computer.

 

2025-02-16 What is sedition? How are Charter Rights activated?

My Conclusion:

The Government may rescind the rights of an individual.  However,

  1. The Statistics Act does not give the Government the authority to do that.  StatsCan cannot just declare that this is so.
  2. In order to override the Charter Right of an individual, the Government has to pass the “Oakes Test“.

If StatsCan wishes to take away Canadians’ Charter Right to Privacy of Personal Information, it would have to make an application to the Court to do so, supplying the Court with the arguments to satisfy the Oakes Test.   It has not done that.   So the Charter Right stands.

For Your Selection FEBRUARY, 2025

2024-05-14 The WHO. You should know this. Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse spells it out. The power consolidation for a global health dictatorship. (Not under my watch!)

NOTE TO SELF:   –  what is the status of  CDN SOCIETY FOR SCIENCE & ETHICS IN MEDICINE