Sandra Finley

Feb 062022
 

RE:  Ottawa starts digital surveillance of Freedom Convoy protesters, supporters‌ 

The video of the announcement is below. ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

‌Don’t worry  – – they’ve been doing surveillance in cooperation with the Americans for a very long time.

They didn’t stop just to accommodate the Freedom Convoy.  And then start up again.

The purpose of this Police announcement is to put the chill on anyone who openly supports the Convoy.  Which means:  put a chill on everyone who believes in human rights in Canada.

Canadian Constitutional Law says that I have sovereignty over my own body.  Constitutional Law is the highest law in the land.

Over the course of the last 20 years I have learned that citizens are very naïve if they think that the Government OR the Justice System will uphold the Constitutional ‌Rights of citizens.

The only people who will uphold those rights are citizens themselves.  And they must fight to hold onto those Rights.   I think you will see  – – the Police Statement video is ample evidence.‌ ‌ ‌

Hang on, and have no fear.  The true north strong and free.   Not quaking.​​​

Please share this email as far afield and soon!  Thanks!

UPDATE  SATIRIZED: The Ottawa Police announcement below is addressed in:

2022-02-05   Cops Turn On Cops Over Canadian Trucker Protest ·

https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=26636  

NEW SURVEILLANCE OPERATION

 

 

Ottawa Police announce digital surveillance of Freedom Convoy protesters, supporters, and donors

 

The Ottawa Police Service has announced a new operation where it is partnering with federal intelligence agencies to create “enhanced intelligence operations and investigations” that will target individuals who are taking part in and supporting the Canadian Truckers Freedom Convoy.

The Ottawa police said that it’s partnering with the US’s FBI and the Department of Homeland Security to investigate “online threats.”

Ottawa police the “enhanced investigation” will start with focusing on those who were involved in organizing the protest convoy and will use surveillance to “identify and target protestors who are funding/supporting/enabling unlawful and harmful activity by protesters.”

The police also said they are focusing on gathering “financial, digital, vehicle registration, driver identification, insurance status, and other related evidence that will be used in criminal prosecutions.”

Ottawa Police have also said they’re working with police agencies across Ontario, the RCMP, and Sûreté du Québec.

Watch the video here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NEW FREE SPEECH THREAT

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for reading,

 

Feb 062022
 

Video link below (Rumble);  ignore the parts you don’t like.  If the F word does you in,  don’t watch it.

The “Cops turn on cops” part is taken from:

2022-02-06 Ottawa starts digital surveillance of Freedom Convoy protesters, supporters

https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=26640

Points are scored using footage from Canadian Freedom rallies, and of Trucks in Ottawa.

Satirizing the role of Corporate media using CBS example:

(At 23 minute mark)  Starts with  “Shaq” (Shaquille O’Neal) correcting a CBS interviewer on what “Forced” means.

(A bit about Shaq is an aid to understanding:  Touted as the greatest basketball player ever.  In his retirement with an estimated $400 million in the bank, the former L.A Lakers player officially joined the state’s (Florida’s) reserve police force  and will work as a community officer with children. 

He’s an amazing man.  Some will know him for his rap music or film work.  O’Neal has a Master of Business Administration from Barry University in Florida  (2005) and later returned to do a doctorate degree in education (2012)

In 2016, he was sworn in as a sheriff’s deputy in Clayton County, Georgia. In 2019, O’Neal became an auxiliary deputy for the Broward County Sheriff’s Office in Florida.)

– – – – – – –

With thanks to Dianne:

Have you seen this from the Jimmy Dore Show?  I think that it has already been taken down from youtube but it is up here on Rumble.  Watch the part at about minute.  I don’t like the language that Jimmy uses but we can’t be choosy in where we get our information at this point.

The Jimmy Dore Show – Rumble

https://rumble.com › TheJimmyDoreShow

Cops Turn On Cops Over Canadian Trucker Protest ·

Feb 052022
 

Story at-a-glance:

  • At a virtual meeting held the first day of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Davos Agenda 2022, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel and colleagues, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, detailed their plans for “vaccine mania” to persist indefinitely.
  • Moderna is actively working with “Fauci’s team” to create a new shot for fall 2022. Moderna is also developing an Omicron-specific jab that they hope to release as early as March 2022.
  • Moderna is planning to combine multiple shots, such as a COVID-19 shot, a flu shot and a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) shot, into one injection — coming in 2023 — to help avoid “compliance issues.”
  • An agreement between Pfizer and BioNTech to develop the first mRNA shingles vaccine was reached in January 2022.
  • Additional shots are in development to target HIV, zika virus, Nipah virus, cancer, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus, influenza (mRNA) and more.

Many experts have sounded the alarm that the COVID-19 pandemic was all about the shot and a larger agenda to impose totalitarian control worldwide. Already, one shot has turned into two doses and a third booster.

A fourth booster is also being discussed, including by Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel, who said that the efficacy of the third shot is likely to decline over several months, necessitating another shot soon thereafter.

“I will be surprised when we get that data in the coming weeks that it’s holding nicely over time — I would expect that it’s not going to hold great,” Bancel said in an interview with Goldman Sachs.

Conveniently, Moderna is working on an Omicron-specific jab that they hope to release as early as March 2022 — and this is only the beginning.

Writing on Substack, contributor Eugyppius explained:

“Moderna, just one of multiple pharmaceuticals eager to exploit our new vaccine mania, are expanding their manufacturing capacity to produce as many as 6 billion mRNA vaccine doses per year.”

The information came straight from the horse’s mouth, at a virtual meeting held the first day of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Davos Agenda 2022, at a session titled “COVID-19: What’s Next?

Along with Bancel, the meeting was attended by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Richard Hatchett, CEO of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, and professor Annelies Wilder-Smith from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who together detailed their plans for “vaccine mania” to persist indefinitely.

Combined shots planned to avoid ‘compliance issues’

During the discussion, Bancel states that Moderna is actively preparing for “what should the vaccine be in the fall of 2022, and what should it contain.” The company is “working with public health experts like Fauci’s team to figure this out. Because soon we’re going to have to decide what goes into the vaccine for fall of 2022,” he said (6.25).

Fauci’s NIAID is part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), which, some may be surprised to learn, actually owns half the patent for Moderna’s COVID-19 injection.

In fact, the NIH owns thousands of pharmaceutical patents, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention spends $4.9 billion a year out of its $12 billion budget buying and distributing vaccines.

“Tony Fauci was able to choose, to designate, four of his high-level employees who each get individual patent shares,” according to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in an interview with James Corbett. “They will collect $150,000 a year for life if the Moderna vaccine is approved, which it has been.” (8:31)

In addition to working closely with Fauci, Moderna is planning to combine multiple shots, such as a COVID-19 shot, a flu shot and a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) shot, into one injection — coming in 2023 — to help avoid “compliance issues.” Fauci said:

“The other piece we’re working on is for 2023, is how do we make it possible from a societal standpoint that people want to be vaccinated?

“And we’re going to do this by preparing combinations, we’re working on the flu vaccine, we’re working on an RSV vaccine, and our goal is to be able to have a single annual booster, so that we don’t have compliance issues, where people don’t want to get two to three shots a winter, but they get one dose, where they get a booster for corona, and a booster for flu and RSV, to make sure that people get their vaccine.”

When asked how soon this would occur, he continued (7:20):

“So the RSV program is now in Phase 3, the flu program is in Phase 2 and soon in Phase 3, I hope as soon as second quarter of this year. So the best case scenario would be the fall of 2023, as a best case scenario, I don’t think it would [be available] in every country, but we believe it’s possible to operate in some countries next year.”

Vaccines for at least 20 pathogens in the works

SARS-Cov-2 isn’t the only virus that Moderna and other pharmaceutical companies, along with health officials, are intent on targeting with more shots. Remember the zika virus, which Kennedy described as another pandemic fabricated for the purpose of selling pharmaceuticals and advancing totalitarian control? (34:10) There’s a vaccine on the way.

How about Nipah virus? Nipah virus, a zoonotic pathogen for which no treatments exist, is the inspiration for the film “Contagion.” The virus can only be experimented on in BSL-4 laboratories. As an aside, the National Bio and Agro-Defence Facility in Kansas will be the first biocontainment facility in the U.S. where research on Nipah (and Ebola) can be conducted on livestock.

In 2019, Nipah Malaysia was also among the deadly virus strains shipped from Canada’s National Microbiology Lab to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. If you haven’t heard of Nipah yet, you likely will soon — another vaccine is in the works for it. Bancel said (43.45):

“We’re working with Dr. Fauci’s team, we’re working with Richard [Hatchett], to work on many more pathogens … The entire scientific community has known for years that there’s at least around 20-ish pathogens that are a risk for which we need vaccines, you know we have zika vaccine in Phase 2 … we’re working on a Nipah vaccine, those are viruses that not everybody has heard of.

“Because we need to have the data. What dose, what construct from a genetic standpoint is required … so that if a new pathogen emerges from that family we can very quickly move into a Phase 3.”

More mRNA shots are coming

Many other vaccines are also under development, including a Phase 3 study looking at combining Pfizer’s COVID-19 injection with their Prevnar 20™ (pneumococcal 20-valent conjugate vaccine) for adults aged 65 and older.

In a related news release, Kathrin U. Jansen, Ph.D., senior vice president and head of vaccine research and development at Pfizer spoke about the importance of “raising awareness of the importance of adult” vaccinations, echoing Bancel in their desire to create combination shots so adults can get multiple vaccines at one doctor or pharmacy visit.

“As the COVID-19 vaccines and booster doses continue to be administered, we believe that health care providers have an opportunity to talk to their adult patients about other recommended vaccines in line with CDC guidance,” she said.

An agreement between Pfizer and BioNTech to develop the first mRNA shingles vaccine was also reached in January 2022. According to a Pfizer news release:

“While there are currently approved vaccines for shingles, there is an opportunity to develop an improved vaccine that potentially shows high efficacy and better tolerability, and is more efficient to produce globally, by utilizing mRNA technology.”

A Phase 1 study by Moderna for its mRNA Epstein-Barr virus shot is also underway. The first dose of the experimental shot was given to a study subject Jan. 5. In a news release, Moderna detailed their intent on rolling out additional mRNA vaccines against a number of additional viruses as well:

“The start of this Phase 1 study is a significant milestone as we continue to advance mRNA vaccines against latent viruses, which remain in the body for life after infection and can lead to chronic medical conditions. Moderna is committed to developing a portfolio of first-in-class vaccines against latent viruses for which there are no approved vaccines today, including vaccines against CMV [cytomegalovirus], EBV and HIV.

“Our research team is working to bring even more vaccines against latent viruses to the clinic. We believe these vaccines could have a profound impact on quality of health for hundreds of millions of people around the world.”

Other mRNA shots also in development include:

  • An mRNA cancer vaccine for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
  • mRNA influenza shots, which are under development by several companies, including Pfizer, Moderna, Sanofi and Translate Bio.
  • An mRNA HIV vaccine, one of which is being studied by Moderna in collaboration with the NIH.
  • Various additional mRNA cancer vaccines, including one targeting advanced melanoma — being developed by BioNTech and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals — and several being developed by Moderna, targeting melanoma, NSCLC, colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer.

    Ramping up production for billions of doses

    In case there were any doubts that the powers that be intend to use injections as an increasingly integral part of your health care routine and daily life, Bancel described plans for billions of doses of shots to be manufactured in a matter of months. He said during the WEF session (43:45):

    “The other piece is manufacturing. If you look in 2020, we were able to ship 20 million doses to the U.S. government when the vaccine was authorized. That is not a lot.

    “But this year we’re going to have 2 to 3 billion doses of capacity in a six-month timeframe, which is what I believe it will take us to get authorization of a vaccine, if all the work has been done before … you could have 1.5 billion doses available in six months, and that’s just from Moderna. And you have other platforms, it could be a much bigger number …”

    With censorship now so pervasive, and Big Tech colluding with dictators and pharmaceutical companies to bury the harms occurring through these experimental vaccines — including death — it’s now more important than ever to let your voice be heard in support of medical freedom and opposition of government health officials intimidating, threatening and coercing citizens to violate their conscientiously-held beliefs.

    The ethical principle of informed consent to medical risk taking, which includes the legal right to make voluntary decisions about getting experimental injections, must be protected. For now, however, as Eugyppius explained:

    “The vaccinators are a great sword of Damocles over our heads. As I type this, they are scouring the earth for the novel pathogens their products require, and they, together with their bureaucratic and academic allies, will do their level best to call into being new pandemic scares and vaccination campaigns whenever possible — perhaps every flu season.”

    Originally published by Mercola.

    The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Feb 022022
 

From: Reclaim The Net
Subject: FB bans large US trucker convoy group

Deleting grass roots campaigns.

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

FB BEGINS BANNING CONVOY GROUPS

 

 

Facebook bans American trucker convoy group

 

Facebook has booted the rapidly growing “Convoy to DC 2022” group from its platform after it gained 137,000 members.

The group had been gaining tens of thousands of members per day and was calling on all truckers in the US to form a convoy to protest COVID-19 mandates. Organizers were planning to begin the convoy in California and end in Washington DC.

 

 

 

According to congressional candidate Tyler Lee, who was helping organizers of Convoy to DC 2022 and was planning to join the convoy, Facebook claimed that the group was banned for “repeatedly violating our policies around QAnon.”

However, Lee described Facebook’s actions as a “stunt” and added that this “is exactly why Americans are fed up.”

The QAnon policies that Facebook cited when banning Convoy to DC 2022 were blasted when they were first introduced with lawyers, journalists, and authors warning that they were arbitrary and gave Facebook an unchecked license to censor.

“Facebook just shut down our page,” Brian Brase, one of the organizers of Convoy to DC 2022 tweeted. “Apparently we don’t fit their agenda. People United is scary I guess. Convoy is still on.”

Facebook’s decision to boot the Convoy to DC 2022 group follows another convoy that’s protesting vaccine mandates, the “Freedom Convoy” in Canada, going viral on social media after mainstream media outlets downplayed the convoy and suggested that Russia was behind it.

This isn’t the first time Facebook has banned a rapidly growing grassroots protest movement that’s being shunned or disparaged by the mainstream media. Anti-critical race theory groups, anti-lockdown groups, groups supporting exceptions to COVID vaccine mandates, and more have also been booted from the platform as they gain traction and attract lots of new members.

In addition to banning specific groups, Facebook has introduced new censorship rules that make it harder for group members to see each other’s content.

 

WANTS MORE

 

 

The White House praises Spotify “misinformation” labels, demands more

 

The White House has again shown its support for online censorship by praising Spotify for adding content warning labels to The Joe Rogan Experience.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki even added that, “there’s more that can be done,” in a press conference this week.

The new Spotify labels will be based on many of the recent Big Tech labels where a label will be attached to a piece of content that goes against the ideas of government authorities.

“This disclaimer is a positive step but we want every platform to continue doing more to call out mis and disinformation while also uplifting accurate information,” Psaki said, when asked about the new Spotify label policy.
“Our view is it’s a good step,” Psaki added. “It’s a positive step, but there’s more that can be done.”

Psaki asked online platforms to do more to combat “misinformation.”
“That certainly includes Spotifly (sic)” she said, pronouncing the audio platform incorrectly.

Watch the video here.

 

SUPPORTING CIVIL LIBERTIES

 

 

Senator Rand Paul and Congressman Thomas Massie support D.C bar “closed” for not introducing vaccine passports

 

Senator Rand Paul and Congressman Thomas Massie have made a statement in support of civil liberties and against the use of domestic vaccine passports by turning up at Big Board in Washington D.C.

Big Board is a bar and restaurant that had its liquor license revoked and was then ordered to shut down by the state after it refused to implement a divisive vaccine passport system.

 

 

Senate Paul, along with his aides, visited on Tuesday evening, not long after the state put a closure notice on the door.

“I’m proud of the owner for not submitting,” Paul said.

Congressman Massie praised the owner Eric Flannery for pushing back against the affront to civil liberties.

“I’m just a little old bar owner,” Flannery said. “I’ve been down here for ten years and I love everybody who comes.”

Flannery pushed back against having staff check medical passports at the door. “The government doesn’t send me a paycheck…I am not an agent of the government to do this,” Flannery said in a video from The Daily Signal. “If they want to come down and check people’s medical status, they’re more than welcome to.”

Flannery has been one of the most vocal opponents of vaccine passports in the D.C area.

Speaking to The Daily Signal, Senator Paul said, “If you came to me and you said you’re going to take my liberty ‘but I’m going to keep you from dying and I’m gonna keep you from the plague’ you might have an argument. You’d still be wrong.”

Senator Paul said that people can make their own decisions, adding, “Don’t go to the restaurant. If it’s really deadly, stay home.”

 

SPYING WITH IMPUNITY

 

 

NSA admits exploitable loophole that helps it spy on US citizens without a warrant

 

The National Security Agency (NSA) has internal and court-approved procedures that are supposed to prevent the surveillance of Americans and they’ve been laughable ever since they were introduced.

According to a report released this week by the Office of the Inspector General, the intelligence agency has not been strictly following those rules.

We obtained a copy of the report for you here.

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) allows intelligence agencies to gather foreigners’ communications, including emails and phone calls, without having to get warrants.

The law does prohibit the surveillance of Americans. But, it has a massive loophole that allows intelligence agencies to search for information on Americans if “a query is reasonably likely to return foreign intelligence information.”

This loophole is very easily exploited.

In the report, the Inspector General “revealed a number of concerns involving identifiers used as query terms against FISA Section 702 data.”

Investigators for the NSA’s office of the inspector general found out that queries in the database for search terms, or “selectors,” for Americans “did not always follow NSA procedural and policy requirements.”

Additionally, a tool that automatically blocks queries with US persons selectors did block some selectors.

Civil liberties and privacy activists insist that Section 702 should be amended to require intelligence agencies to get warrants before searching for any information on an American citizen. The groups argue that such surveillance on Americans is a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

 

Thanks for reading,

Reclaim The Net

You received this email because you subscribed to our list.

86-90 Paul Street
London
EC2A 4NE
United Kingdom

Feb 012022
 

(Joe Rogan has done very good interviews regarding covid.)

“Do you really think it’s a coincidence that days after Neil Young’s music was pulled off of Spotify he debuts a 4-month free trial to any person who wants to sign up for Amazon music — who has struggled to gain market share and has long-standing connections with all of the big money people in the game?”

Photo credit: Paul Mobley + Tore Sætre, CC BY-SA 4.0

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.

 

Joe Rogan in an Instagram video Monday addressed the growing controversy surrounding his podcast — “The Joe Rogan Experience” — telling fans he’s not interested in talking to people who have only one perspective. He also said he has a problem with the term “misinformation.”

Rogan’s statement came as the streaming platform Spotify on Sunday announced new rules designed to “combat” the spread of COVID “misinformation” on its platform.

The new rules came after a handful of musicians, including Neil Young, Bruce Springsteen’s guitarist Nils Lofgren and Joni Mitchell, pulled their music catalogs from Spotify, in an effort to force Spotify to choose between their music or Rogan’s podcast. Author Brené Brown also joined the protest, stating she won’t release new episodes of her Spotify-exclusive podcasts “until further notice.”

Spotify last week agreed to remove Young’s music.

“We have detailed content policies in place and we’ve removed over 20,000 podcast episodes related to covid-19 since the start of the pandemic,” a Spotify spokesperson told The Washington Post in a statement. “We regret Neil’s decision to remove his music from Spotify, but hope to welcome him back soon.”

Saagar Enjeti, Washington correspondent at The Hill, said there could be more going on behind the scenes. Investment firms who own the music catalogs — and who also have ties to pharmaceutical companies — may be calling the shots.

“The people speaking out may be doing so organically, but it also happens to coincide with the financial or oligarchic interests of some very, very rich people,” Enjeti said in a “Breaking Points” episode that took a “deep dive into the hedge funds behind the campaign by Neil Young and others to cancel Rogan and boost other music services such as Amazon music.”

Rogan, Spotify’s star podcaster, signed a $100 million deal in 2020, giving the streaming service exclusive rights to his show. The podcast, available only on Spotify, reached No. 1 globally last year, the company said last month.

What used to be misinformation, now accepted as fact

According to Rogan’s 10-minute video, his podcast was accused of “spreading dangerous misinformation,” citing specifically his interviews with Dr. Peter McCullough and one with Dr. Robert Malone.”

Rogan said:

“Dr. Peter McCullough is a cardiologist and he’s the most published physician in his field in history. Dr. Robert Malone owns nine patents on the creation of mRNA vaccine technology and is at least partly responsible for the creation of the technology that led to mRNA vaccines.

“Both these people are very highly credentialed, very intelligent, very accomplished people and they have an opinion that’s different than the mainstream narrative. I wanted to hear what their opinion is.

“I had them on and because of that those episodes, in particular, those episodes were labeled as being dangerous, they had dangerous misinformation in them.”

Rogan said the issue he has with the term “misinformation” is that “many of the things we thought of as misinformation just a short while ago are now accepted as fact.”

Rogan explained:

“For instance, eight months ago if you said if you get vaccinated you can still catch COVID and you can still spread COVID, you would be removed from social media. They would ban you from certain platforms. Now that’s accepted as fact.

“If you said, I don’t think cloth masks work, you would be banned on social media. Now that’s openly, repeatedly stated on CNN.

“If you said, I think it’s possible that COVID-19 came from a lab, you would be banned from many social media platforms. Now, that’s on the cover as Newsweek.”

Rogan said all of those theories that “at one point in time” were banned, were openly discussed by McCullough and Malone who were accused of spreading dangerous misinformation.

Rogan said he wanted to make the video because he feels “people have a distorted perception” of what he does.

“I’m not trying to promote misinformation,” Rogan said. “I’m not trying to be controversial. I’ve never tried to do anything with this podcast other than just talk to people and have interesting conversations.”

 

Are Amazon and Hedge Funds trying to cancel Rogan?

In a video posted Jan. 31 on YouTube, Enjeti said there is more than meets the eye when it comes to musicians like Young pulling their catalogs from Spotify.

“The original impetus for Neil Young’s demand was a letter he posted on social media saying Spotify could either have Neil Young or Joe Rogan, but that letter was almost immediately deleted after it was posted,” Enjeti said.

“Who is demanding this? Enjeti asked. “Is it Neil Young or is it the people who own his music?”

Enjeti explained:

“You see a recent trend in the music business it that iconic artists such a Neil Young sell their catalogs to big-money groups who then reap the profits in perpetuity. Young actually sold his catalog in Jan. 2021 to a company called Hipgnosis. Now Hipgnosis is a $1 billion company that recently announced an ownership agreement with Blackstone.”

Enjeti said Blackstone is focused on taking over single-family housing and turning America into a nation of renters, but it also has interests everywhere.

“Blackstone, BlackRock and these big private equity giants are ruthless in their pursuit of profits and they’re savvy political players who know how to play the game,” Enjeti said. “They have all sorts of ties to the pharmaceutical industry, including announcing the former CEO and chairman of Pfizer would be joining Blackstone as a senior advisor.”

“Do you really think it’s a coincidence that days after Neil Young’s music was pulled off of Spotify he debuts a 4-month free trial to any person who wants to sign up for Amazon music — who has struggled to gain market share and has long-standing connections with all of the big money people in the game?” Enjeti asked.

“Open your eyes to see possibilities you may not have imagined,” Enjeti said. “At first it was simple, just Neil Young taking a stand.”

Now a lot of people with big money and a big agenda who would just so happen to profit if Rogan went down are speaking out, Enjeti added. “Joni Mitchell has come out and said she is going to stand in solidarity with Neil Young.”

Mitchell on Sept. 13, 2021, struck a publishing deal with Reservoir Media, Inc. (RMI). The top 10 owners of RMI are large private equity and investment firms.

Lofgren, who on Jan. 30 announced he was joining fellow musicians Mitchell and Young in their Spotify boycott, also does not own his music catalog.

Lofgren’s catalog was purchased on Dec. 16, 2021, by Sony Entertainment. The top 10 owners of Sony Group Corp. are large investment firms.

Enjeti said:

“You give into the mob, you give them an inch, they will keep coming. Will Spotify really be able to withstand up to the pressure? Who knows? Principles are not going to save you in this instance. Only money will.”

Enjeti said people better hold on to their seats and “hope that Joe prevails on this one,” as he is up against more powerful interests than many realize.

New Spotify rules don’t define ‘misinformation’

As part of its new rules, Spotify said it would add a content advisory to any podcast episode discussing COVID amid accusations it was allowing misinformation to spread on its platform.

The advisory will direct listeners to a “dedicated COVID-19 Hub,” which is described as a “resource that provides easy access to data-driven facts, up-to-date information as shared by scientists, physicians, academics and public health authorities around the world, as well as links to trusted sources.”

Spotify said this is the first content advisory of its kind and will roll out in the next few days.

The streaming giant also announced it will begin testing ways to highlight its platform rules to raise awareness around “what’s acceptable” and to help creators understand their accountability for the content they post on the platform.

The statement did not say who determines what is and is not misinformation and what is considered a “trusted source.”

Rogan said he supports Spotify putting a disclaimer on controversial podcasts about COVID and encouraging listeners to speak to their physicians.

Feb 012022
 

Not so long ago I would have brushed off anything to do with Fox News.

Today,  I see Tucker Carlson (Fox News) as a contributor to the fight to take back our freedoms.  Not perfect, but certainly more effective than I can be!

As I see it, we have to break through the propaganda that feeds daily into living rooms through Mainstream Media (MSM)  if we are to regain the freedoms guaranteed by Canadian Constitutional Law.

We won’t get to “Strong and Free” if we can’t break the propaganda machines.

In my experience, emotionally & spiritually strong, healthy people can take some ribbing.  They are able to laugh at themselves.  Jelly-kneed they are not.

Breaking through the propaganda means breaking through our stereotypes, built up over years.  We have to be able to HEAR other voices.   There was a time when we could.

Tucker Carlson does a good job in this video.   PARODY, humour!  It’s interesting how he can see through Canadian MSM coverage of the Trucker Convoy in Ottawa, but simultaneously (in my opinion) fall for airing what is surely planted spin – – that Justin Trudeau’s biological father is Fidel Castro.  Carlson unfortunately plucked the emotional string of association with “communist” in this otherwise important contribution.

It’s hard to believe, in comparison, how badly Canadians are served by MSM.

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6294695306001?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips   

Regarding the funny parody of “The Russians!  It’s the Russians who are the instigators!”

There is indeed a ridiculous attempt to roll out the weary, age-old fraud of creating a fearful foreign distraction for public engagement.  See the excerpt taken from:

2022-01-22 & 23 re World Wide Rallies, Canada Truckers Convoy to Ottawa, Victoria experience. Media NOT reporting.

https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=26485

EXCERPT: 

A fellow had stayed home yesterday while his wife went to Victoria.  (I travelled with his wife and cousin.)  He wanted to see how things were going.  He watched Chek News at 5:00 (yesterday, Saturday, 22nd).

Tell me this was not staged:

Yesterday was simultaneously a day of protest in support of the Ukraine vrs Russia, at the same location as the Mandates protest, the Freedom Rally  at the Legislature in Victoria.

Chek News interviewed some protestors, with the thousands of protesters in the background.

All the interviewees spoke to the Ukraine issue.  I was there; I didn’t observe even one person there for that issue.  I, of course, didn’t see all the 4 thousand people at the Rally.  But we circulated around, seeing a pretty good cross-section.

Doesn’t matter.  We are effective communicators ourselves.  This regime of propagandists is coming down.

Today I was disgusted to receive a fund-raising letter that used the very stupidities that Carlson high-lighted.   The name of the organization is removed.  “Katie” should be removed.  (My reply follows the letter received.)

RECEIVED:   WE CAN’T IGNORE THE RISE OF THE FAR RIGHT (The Trucker Convoy)

From: Katie Perfitt
Sent: January 31, 2022
To: Sandra Finley
Subject: We can’t ignore the rise of the far right.

Let’s build a movement big enough to stop them.

Sandra,

As of this morning the “Truckers for Freedom” occupation has entered its third day in Ottawa, choking off access to the downtown core and putting hate symbols on open display.1 Whether they were watching on the news from the other side of the country or from their front doors in downtown Ottawa, people across the country were disgusted by the harassment, vandalism and hate.

You probably know by now that members of Canada’s far-right movement organized the convoy, and the protest has attracted the sympathy of thousands more who are angry and disaffected by a system they know is rigged.2

In fact, the current convoy camped out on Parliament Hill looks remarkably similar to the Yellow Vest convoy that descended on Ottawa three years ago. Claiming to be in opposition to Trudeau’s carbon tax, it similarly became swept up by anti-immigrant and far-right sentiment.

Right wing politicians and their operators have been pouring fuel on working class frustration ever since. Instead of addressing the problems we face, they’ve successfully tapped into working people’s rage in order to further their visions of everything from fossil fuel expansion to privatization to white nationalist ideologies.   . . . 

– – – – – – – – – – – –

REPLY

Good grief, Katie!

You are bought into mainstream media (CBC for example).

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW  in many (most?  All?) western democracies says “MY BODY, MY CHOICE”.

When a government starts forced vaccinations they have stepped way over their boundary.

When it’s experimental vaccinations that have not been properly tested, being forced on children,  the government has become dangerous.

Do you have any idea how thoroughly CORRUPT and CORRUPTING big pharma is?  (how corrupt is BIG OIL & GAS, or the NUCLEAR INDUSTRY?)  Think you can trust them?

Do you think that MAYBE the new billionaires since the beginning of the “pandemic” in Pfizer alone,  might have some interest in forced vaccination of everyone?  With all that nice money collected from the Government (but we paid the money)?

Do you actually believe that the mainstream media is accurately reflecting what’s going on in the Freedom rallies?  What the Truckers convoy has ignited?

Truckers for Freedom is about the Rule of Law.

Do you have any idea about Constitutional Law and its significance?

Do you KNOW what the Nuremberg Trials were about?

Do you KNOW that “The doctors’ trials”, a subset of the Nuremberg Trials condemned doctors to death for their experiments on human beings.  Tenets of International Law, foundational for Canadian Laws,  PROHIBIT forced “medical” treatment.   We have a constitutional right to sovereignty over our own bodies.

There are many court cases that have been launched in Canada, AND in other countries, that challenge what is being done by Governments.   Already some back-pedalling has started.

The court cases will proceed nonetheless, and that means a whole lot of evidence will come into the public sphere,  evidence from scientists who are not on the payroll of Big Pharma, things you should know.  Propaganda isn’t a good basis for decision-making.

If YOU want to be vaccinated,  that’s 100% fine with the Freedom Convoy.  And their hundreds of thousands of supporters.

I am one of those supporters.  (Many of the freedom people are vaccinated – – by choice. They recognize the value of Constitutional Rights.   And many more people are beginning to recognize propaganda when they see and experience it.)

You will get yourself into trouble commenting on things you appear to know  little about.  The actions of the people you highlight have nothing to do with the Rallies.

You may like to know:   people in the Freedom movement have an active on-line space.  In which pictures and videos that capture the disruptors you name – – –  taken by people in the crowd – – –  are being collected and analyzed in order to identify the persons responsible.  By now,  $6,500 has been donated (outside the Trucker GoFundMe)  as a reward to anyone who can identify the person(s) responsible for the actions.

Offended by your characterizations,

Sandra Finley

P.S.   I will send “Katie” the Tucker Carlson link.

Feb 012022
 
News
BMJ 2022; 376 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o269 (Published 01 February 2022) Cite this as: BMJ 2022;376:o269

The government has done a last minute U turn on its plan to make covid-19 vaccination mandatory for NHS staff in England.

Medical bodies welcomed the reversal on the plan, which they had warned would exacerbate chronic workforce shortages in the health service by causing thousands of staff to lose their jobs.12

Announcing the decision on 31 January,3 England’s health and social care secretary, Sajid Javid, said that the balance of opportunities and risks of the policy had shifted with the dominance of the omicron variant, with the population being as a whole better protected against the need for hospital admission, and with omicron being “intrinsically less severe” than delta.

“While vaccination remains our very best line of defence, I believe it is no longer proportionate to require vaccination as a condition of deployment by statute,” Javid told MPs.

The decision came just three days before the 3 February deadline given to unvaccinated staff who deal directly with patients to have had their first dose or risk losing their job. The government said that more than 127 000 NHS staff had come forward for a vaccine dose since it first consulted on the issue in September. But on 16 January 80 092 staff (5.4% of the total) still remained unvaccinated.

avid said the regulations would now be revoked, subject to public consultation and parliamentary approval. He will also remove vaccination as a condition of working in care homes, a policy that had been in place since last year and was estimated to have resulted in 40 000 staff leaving their posts in the sector.

Chaand Nagpaul, BMA council chair, said, “While the BMA fully supports the vaccination rollout, it is now clear that the impact of mandatory vaccination on NHS staffing levels at a time of acute workforce shortages and record waiting lists would have put the continuity of healthcare services at risk and therefore compromised patient care and safety. Therefore, today’s decision is the right one and is a more proportionate approach that takes into account the changing nature of covid-19.”

Andrew Goddard, president of the Royal College of Physicians, said, “We continue to strongly encourage all our members to take up the offer of covid-19 and flu vaccinations as the benefits to both them and their patients are clear, but we also believe it is important that this remains a free choice.

“Removing the need for mandatory vaccinations would reduce the risk to patient care that we will undoubtedly see if we lose more staff, and it will improve our ability to respond to urgent and emergency care pressures as well as the backlog created by covid.”

In a joint statement the chief executives of the NHS Confederation, Matthew Taylor, and NHS Providers, Chris Hopson, said, “NHS leaders are frustrated to have such a significant change in policy at the 11th hour, given all the hard and complex work that has gone into meeting the deadline set by the government. They recognise the reasons . . . but there will be concern at what this means for wider messaging about the importance of vaccination for the population as a whole.”

Rachel Harrison, national officer for the GMB union said, “The government’s U turn comes too late in the day for thousands of workers in our care homes who have already lost their jobs because of an unrealistic vaccination policy.”

Feb 012022
 

Hi MaryLou,

Thanks for sending a card.  I didn’t open it.

The Jacquie Lawson cards website has been re-designedMEANING  an investment of money.

If Lawson had a large data base of users, in today’s world that most likely means they have been bought up by a larger entity.

The software of that larger entity will likely be designed to harvest data from my computer.  To sell. 

An example of how it works is the recent Neil Young versus Joe Rogan spat on Spotify.   You can extrapolate to other areas of the internet.  The article appended explains.

In the Lawson cards case

the “Hint” might run along the line “It’s not about telling your friends that you love them.” !!

The concentration of money, power and control is NEVER a good idea, IMHO!   Nor is surveillance.  Unfortunately that is how our existing political-economic system works.

https://www.inquirer.com/business/why-did-spotify-choose-joe-rogan-over-neil-young-hint-its-not-music-company-20220129.html 

Business

Why did Spotify choose Joe Rogan over Neil Young? Hint: It’s not a music company.

The bottom line: Podcasts are more lucrative than music.

This combination photo shows Neil Young in Calabasas, Calif., on May 18, 2016, left, and UFC announcer and podcaster Joe Rogan before a UFC on FOX 5 event in Seattle on Dec. 7, 2012. Young fired off a public missive to his management on Monday, Jan. 24, 2022, demanding that they remove his music from the popular streaming service Spotify in protest over Rogan's popular podcast spreading misinformation about COVID-19. Soon his music was gone from Spotify. (AP Photo)
This combination photo shows Neil Young in Calabasas, Calif., on May 18, 2016, left, and UFC announcer and podcaster Joe Rogan before a UFC on FOX 5 event in Seattle on Dec. 7, 2012. Young fired off a public missive to his management on Monday, Jan. 24, 2022, demanding that they remove his music from the popular streaming service Spotify in protest over Rogan’s popular podcast spreading misinformation about COVID-19. Soon his music was gone from Spotify. (AP Photo)Read more/ AP

In one corner was Joe Rogan, the stand-up comedian and former Fear Factor host turned provocative podcaster.

In the other stood Neil Young, the multi-Grammy-winning rock legend with a lifelong passion for progressive causes.

The battle lasted two days, and Rogan won without making a peep.

Young started the scuffle when he posted a letter to his website Monday, addressed to his manager and an executive at his record label, demanding that his music catalog be removed from Spotify in response to “fake information about vaccines.”

Specifically, Young cited Joe Rogan — who hosts The Joe Rogan Experience podcast — and has suggested healthy, young people shouldn’t get vaccinated. After catching the coronavirus, Rogan also praised ivermectin, a medicine used to kill parasites in animals and humans that has no proven antiviral benefits. “I want you to let Spotify know immediately TODAY that I want all my music off their platform,” Young wrote. “They can have Rogan or Young. Not both.”

Two days later, without a word from Rogan, Spotify began the process of removing the famed rocker’s music, including his best-known hits such as “Heart of Gold,” “Harvest Moon,” and “Rockin’ in the Free World.”

The speed of Spotify’s decision to sideline Young was jarring. So why did the company do it?

The answer is simple: This isn’t a story about Rogan or Young. It’s about Spotify. And, despite public perception, Spotify isn’t a music company. It’s a tech company looking to maximize profits.

Spotify’s quest to dominate podcasts

The company hasn’t been shy about its aims. In 2019, Spotify announced it would spend up to $500 million to acquire companies “in the emerging podcast marketplace.”

That year it bought Gimlet Media, home of podcasts such as Reply All, Homecoming, and Where Should We Begin? With Esther Perel, for an estimated $230 million. It also spent more than $100 million on Anchor, a platform that lets users create and share their own podcasts.

The next year, Spotify spent nearly $200 million to acquire the Ringer and its suite of popular podcasts, such as Binge Mode, The Press Box, and its founder’s The Bill Simmons Podcast. And, of course, it reportedly spent more than $100 million to acquire exclusive rights to a single show: the extremely popular, rabble-rousing Joe Rogan Experience.

“I think it comes down to, just frankly, business,” said John Simson, director for the business and entertainment program at American University. “In the music side of things, [Spotify is] paying out roughly 70% of all the revenue that comes in. It goes right back out as royalties. They’re looking for other places where the revenue split isn’t that dramatic. … Podcasts were certainly their go-to.”

The plan seems to be working. Spotify reportedly overtook Apple Podcasts last year to become the largest podcast provider in the U.S.

Spotify’s strained relationship with musicians

As Spotify built its podcasting empire, it has been increasingly criticized by the musicians who use the platform. In December, rapper T-Pain tweeted a breakdown of how many streams it takes for a musician to make $1 on various services, pointing out that on Spotify it takes 315 while on Apple Music it’s 128.

Other big-name artists have also feuded with Spotify — Taylor Swift pulled her music from the platform until it met her demands — but none seemed to spark widespread change.

Young has received an outpouring of support from across the political and social spectrum: “I’m with #NeilYoung,” tweeted Geraldo Rivera.

It’s not that dropping Young won’t inflict any pain on Spotify. Most of his music is more than 18 months old, and older tunes have become popular during the pandemic.

So it should come as no surprise that the day after Spotify announced the removal of Young’s catalog, SiriusXM said it would revive Neil Young Radio, a channel dedicated to Young’s music and storytelling, for a brief stint.

.”

Young’s plea to other musicians

“I sincerely hope that other artists and record companies will move off the SPOTIFY platform and stop supporting SPOTIFY’s deadly misinformation about COVID,” Young wrote on his blog on Wednesday.

Whether anyone will follow remains to be seen. Many of the artists who could take up his battle cry — elder statesmen of rock with large enough catalogs to hurt the streaming service — no longer own their own music.

In the past few years, Bruce Springsteen, Bob Dylan, Paul Simon, Tina Turner, Stevie Nicks, the David Bowie estate, and many more have sold their entire catalogs for large sums. Younger artists, including John Legend and Ryan Tedder, have begun joining in.

In most of these cases, the artist sold both the publishing and the recording copyrights. That means, unless they have a special clause around how their music is used, they don’t have any power to dictate where their tunes appear. And Simson, the American University professor, said such clauses are rare. “The reason [these companies] are paying all that money is that these streaming services are driving up value” of those catalogs.

In his blog post, Young wrote that removing his music from Spotify will equate to “losing 60% of my world wide streaming income.”

So while other artists — particularly his contemporaries — rally around the legend, they’re probably not going to intervene.

Is losing one artist enough to force Spotify to change?

Then there’s the question of how much impact one artist can have. The numbers look staggering. The Weeknd, an extreme outlier, currently garners 86.6 million monthly listeners. Adele has 60 million. Drake has about 53.6 million monthly listeners. Taylor Swift has about 54 million.

If one or two of them pulled their music, how many of Spotify’s 172 million subscribers would actually delete their accounts? How many of its 381 million monthly users would stop listening?

“Spotify is probably counting on the inertia aspect. Once you’re on a particular streaming platform, you’re likely to stay there because you’ve got your playlists, you’re familiar with it,” Simson said.

Now consider that Rogan has an estimated 11 million listeners per episode. He usually posts four to five of them each week, and they frequently last longer than three hours.

Plus — and this is key — Rogan is exclusive to Spotify. Very few musical artists are. Neil Young’s albums are on Amazon, Apple, and several other services. Rogan’s library is only on Spotify. You don’t need Spotify to listen to Young, but you do need it to listen to Rogan.

Published 

Jan. 29, 2022