Sandra Finley

Aug 172021
 

(The University mandates that the students be vaccinated;  administration, faculty and staff are not so mandated.  But that’s not the crux of the arguments.)

With thanks to CHD.

The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that Rutgers is working with Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson to study and develop their vaccines in on-going clinical trials, and will benefit financially if more people are required to take the shots.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) along with 18 students on Monday filed a lawsuit in federal court against Rutgers University, its board of governors, Rutgers President Jonathan Holloway and others over the university’s decision to mandate COVID vaccines for students attending school in the fall.

According to the complaint, the Rutgers vaccine requirement “is an affront to human dignity and personal freedom because it violates our basic right to control our bodies.”

The lawsuit states that in a free society, “all people have the right to decide their own medical treatment — especially to decide what to inject into their bodies. And every person has the right to make that decision voluntarily, free from coercion by anyone, and to be fully informed of the benefits and especially the risks of that decision.”

The lawsuit alleges Rutgers’ policy is a violation of the right to informed consent and the right to refuse unwanted medical treatments.

The complaint also alleges the policy is a breach of contract because in January 2021, the university assured students COVID vaccines would not be required in order to attend school. Just two months later, Rutgers flip-flopped and issued new requirements for taking the shot prior to attending classes.

According to the plaintiffs, Rutgers is working with all three manufacturers — Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson — to study and develop their vaccines in on-going clinical trials, and will benefit financially if more people are required to take the shots which, until fully licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), are defined by the FDA as experimental.

The Rutgers requirement also constitutes a denial of equal protection, as administration, faculty and staff are not required to take the vaccine. It also conflicts with federal and state law, as neither has enacted legislation requiring COVID vaccines for citizens.

“This mandate undermines our Constitution and Bill of Rights by denying students the freedom to make their own medical decisions,” said CHD President and General Counsel Mary Holland.

“No one should be forced or coerced into accepting any medical procedure against her wishes,” Holland said. “When the low risk to young adults from COVID and the known and unknown risks from the vaccines are taken into account, Rutgers’ actions recklessly endanger its students.”

As confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, young people are at minimal risk of long-term effects or death from COVID and have a 99.985% survival rate if infected with the virus.

However, the most recent COVID vaccination injury update from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) — one of the tracking systems of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — shows that between mid-December, 2020 and August 6, 2021, 559,040 adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 12,791 reports of deaths, many in young people ages 12 to 25.

In comparison, after approximately 50 total deaths following swine flu vaccination in 1976, that vaccine campaign was immediately aborted.

“The Rutgers mandate stems from the financial relationship the university has with the vaccine makers which is clearly a conflict of interest,” said New Jersey Attorney Julio Gomez, who represents the students.

“Unjustified fear and insatiable greed drive the vaccine industry, especially now, during the pandemic,” Gomez said. “This has created an opportunity for manufacturers to bring to market expensive, novel and patentable drugs, vaccines, biologics, treatments and medical devices that will reap huge profits.”

Rutgers student Peter Cordi, a plaintiff in the lawsuit, said it is “ incredibly unnerving” that his own school would play Russian Roulette with the lives of the students it claims to protect, “with greed and ties to Big Pharma being prioritized over our safety and free will.”

In addition to Gomez, plaintiffs are represented by New Jersey Attorney Susan Judge of Scotch Plains, with support from attorneys Mary Holland and Ray Flores, special counsel to CHD.

 

Aug 172021
 

2021-08-17     From Sandra Finley 

COMPLAINT TO LAW SOCIETY OF SASKATCHEWAN,  LAWYER TYLER DAHL, SASKATOON

COMPLICIT WITH USE OF JUSTICE SYSTEM TO COERCE, INTIMIDATE

BRINGS THE JUSTICE SYSTEM INTO YET GREATER DISREPUTE

 

Lawyer Tyler Dahl.   QB #500-2015;  Ashu Solo v. Sandra Finley.

Dahl knows I was representing myself by the time of Mediation on November 22, 2016.

The legal bills for defending myself against abusive charges and procedures had reached about $30,000 going into Mediation.  I was not one step closer to a Court of Law after years of Ashu Solo’s abusive behavior against myself and others.

In fact, the Law silenced me;  it is illegal to talk about what happens in Mediation.  The Plaintiff knows exactly how the Law works, and so does Tyler Dahl.

The last offer to settle I received was for $39,000.  Please see below;  I cautioned Tyler about the line between “settlement” and “extortion”.

Dahl recently corresponded with lawyer Sean Sinclair as though Sinclair was my counsel;  he did not tell the true state-of-affairs.  He knew absolutely that even before the Mediation I was representing myself.

Five adults in the November 2016 Mediation,  Tyler Dahl one of them, witnessed Ashu Solo lunging at me, calling me a fucking bitch.

Tim Nickel, Fifth Business Mediation,  was the Mediator. (He is still in the business.)

Mr. Nickel stopped the Mediation, escorted the co-Defendants & Counsel out with instructions to leave the building and vicinity, immediately.

The five witnesses:  Tyler Dahl, Mediator Tim Nickel, a co-defendant business owner, his lawyer,  and myself all witnessed Solo’s attempts to prevent me from speaking, followed by the lunge across the table and epithet of “fucking bitch”.

Solo knows it is illegal to disclose what is said and done in Mediation.  He knew there would be no repercussions from his attempt to put the fear of the Lord in me, to prevent me from speaking.   To me,  there is a compelling argument (below) to say that he uses the Justice system for illegal purposes; Dahl is party to it.

WHY THE CURRENT ACTIVITY BY DAHL, AFTER SILENCE SINCE 2016?

The date of the Mediation was November 22, 2016.

In Saskatchewan, The Limitations Act, SS 2004 (the “Act”) creates a general rule: a claimant must commence a proceeding within two years after a claim is discovered.

I am guessing there is a 5-year actionable time period for continuances?   5 years would be this November.

EXCERPTS, FINLEY TO DAHL, 2016

  • The rule-makers would not construct Rules that have no application.  . . . How is the Rule, procedurally, brought to bear?

5-3(1) The Court may modify or waive any right or power pursuant to a rule in this Part or make any order warranted in the circumstances if:

a person acts . . .  in a manner that is vexatious, evasive, abusive, oppressive, improper or tediously lengthy; 

  • I respect the intelligence of your client (Ashu Solo).  His actions on November 22 (Mediation) were effective.  Numerous times he has claimed knowledge of the law (I can provide those statements).  But you don’t actually need to be conversant with the intricacies to know that if you do what he did,  the Mediation would be drawn to a close, which is exactly what happened. 
  • My turn to speak was taken away because of actions specifically described in 5-3(1).   You will of course know that under the Constitution Act, Section 2,  I have the Right to express myself.   Where could that be more critical than in legal proceedings?
  • Why would the Plaintiff risk doing what he did when there were witnesses in the room? Do the cost-benefit-risk analysis.

The cost:  5 credible witnesses observe you (Ashu Solo) in action.

The benefit:  the defendant is prevented from being heard.

The risk:  little, because what is said and done in Mediation is inaccessible at Trial.

 

But again,  rule-makers do not construct Rules that have no application.   The (confidential) information must be sealed in a form satisfactory to the local registrar or a judge when filed,  .  .  .

 

Since my proposed  application has no hope of succeeding  – – (your words, thank-you)   – –   I have been reading more to understand an alternate way in which the intention of the Law and Rules can be achieved.

It is obviously not the intention that persons can use abusive, oppressive actions and knowledge of how the system works to silence the testimony of others.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

From another communication to Tyler: 

Search:   “Canada Law Extortion Abuse Justice System”.

Result:  Government of Canada, Department of Justice website:  A Handbook for Police and Crown Prosecutors on Criminal Harassment.    The  (last) Date modified is 2016-04-27,   http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/fv-vf/har/part1.html

 

Search page:  for the word “Extortion”.

It’s under 1.6.1      I view it in the context of: 

  • my email to you of November 28,   I propose that the Expedited procedures for claims under $100,000.00 set out in the “New Rules”, July 2013, would be appropriate)  and 
  • your reply of November 29, It is our position that it would be inappropriate for this matter to proceed expeditiously, for the following reasons:   
    1. This claim could easily exceed $100,000.00, . . .
  • My calculation of how you arrived at $100,000 is this:

There are 3 potential financial streams (for you):

  1. I pay to settle
  2. LFC pays to settle and
  3. lawyer expenses.

How would those be apportioned?   . . . It is documented that when the Plaintiff threatens different people that he will sue them,  he consistently says it will cost them (a number that is more than $20,000) in legal bills.

So:

  1. the lawyer expenses part of the pie is roughly $25,000.
  2. Which leaves approximately $75,000 to bring us to your figuring This claim could easily exceed $100,000.00,
  3. The obvious split is: Sandra will be forced to settle for $50,000 or more.  LFC will be forced to settle for $25,000 or more,  making up the $75,000

I presume you are aware of the history of Court awards in cases of Defamation, a few thousand dollars at most for ordinary citizens, if they are found to be guilty.

I don’t know when “settlement” becomes “extortion”,  but I do know that participation in extortion is a serious criminal offence.  The Handbook confirms it.   (A Handbook for Police and Crown Prosecutors on Criminal Harassment.)

I remain committed to my reply to you, November 29.   As I view it, it’s your call, and I have no desire to contest your decision which would only bring about more delay and expense.

 

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: November 29, 2016 6:00 PM
To: ‘Tyler Dahl’ <tdahl@cuelenaere.com>
Subject: RE: Solo v. Finley, QB 500 of 2015. NEXT STEP

Thanks for your reply Tyler. 

No problem.   We will proceed as you and your client wish – – to Questioning and pre-trial conference.

 

Nothing happened.  Until now.  

It’s not about Justice.  It’s about using the Justice System, with impunity,  as a tool of threat and coercion.

 

Complaint submitted by

Sandra Finley

2021-08-17

Aug 142021
 

The reputation of British justice now rests on the shoulders of the High Court in the life or death case of Julian Assange, writes John Pilger

I SAT in Court 4 in the Royal Courts of Justice in London on Wednesday with Stella Moris, Julian Assange’s partner. I have known Stella for as long as I have known Julian. She, too, is a voice of freedom, coming from a family that fought the fascism of Apartheid. On Wednesday, her name was uttered in court by a barrister and a judge, forgettable people were it not for the power of their endowed privilege.

The barrister, Clair Dobbin, is in the pay of the regime in Washington, first Trump’s and then Biden’s. She is the United States’s hired gun, or ‘silk’, as she would prefer. Her target is Julian Assange, who has committed no crime and has performed an historic public service by exposing the criminal actions and secrets on which governments, especially those claiming to be democracies, base their authority.

For those who may have forgotten, WikiLeaks, of which Assange is founder and publisher, exposed the secrets and lies that led to the invasion of Iraq, Syria and Yemen, the murderous role of the Pentagon in dozens of countries, the blueprint for the 20-year catastrophe in Afghanistan, the attempts by Washington to overthrow elected governments, such as Venezuela’s, the collusion between nominal political opponents (Bush and Obama) to stifle a torture investigation and the Central Intelligence Agency’s Vault 7 campaign that turned your mobile phone, even your television set, into a spy in your midst.

WikiLeaks released almost a million documents from Russia which allowed Russian citizens to stand up for their rights. It revealed the Australian government had colluded with the United States against its own citizen, Assange. It named those Australian politicians who have ‘informed’ for the US. It made the connection between the Clinton Foundation and the rise of jihadism in US-armed states in the Gulf.

 

Those who take us to war

THERE is more: WikiLeaks disclosed the US campaign to suppress wages in sweatshop countries like Haiti, India’s campaign of torture in Kashmir, the British government’s secret agreement to shield ‘US interests’ in its official Iraq inquiry and the British Foreign Office’s plan to create a fake ‘marine protection zone’ in the Indian Ocean to cheat the Chagos islanders out of their right of return.

In other words, WikiLeaks has given us real news about those who govern us and take us to war, not the preordained, repetitive spin that fills newspapers and television screens. This is real journalism; and for the crime of real journalism, Assange has spent most of the past decade in one form of incarceration or another, including Belmarsh prison, a horrific place.

Diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome, he is a gentle, intellectual visionary driven by his belief that a democracy is not a democracy unless it is transparent, and accountable.

On Wednesday, the United States sought the approval of Britain’s High Court to extend the terms of its appeal against a decision by a district judge, Vanessa Baraitser, in January to bar Assange’s extradition. Baraitser accepted the deeply disturbing evidence of a number of experts that Assange would be at great risk if he were incarcerated in the US’s infamous prison system.

Professor Michael Kopelman, a world authority on neuro-psychiatry, had said Assange would find a way to take his own life — the direct result of what professor Nils Melzer, the United Nations rapporteur on torture, described as the craven ‘mobbing’ of Assange by governments — and their media echoes.

Those of us who were in the Old Bailey last September to hear Kopelman’s evidence were shocked and moved. I sat with Julian’s father, John Shipton, whose head was in his hands. The court was also told about the discovery of a razor blade in Julian’s Belmarsh cell and that he had made desperate calls to the Samaritans and written notes and much else that filled us with more than sadness.

Watching the lead barrister acting for Washington, James Lewis — a man from a military background who deploys a cringingly theatrical ‘aha!’ formula with defence witnesses — reduce these facts to ‘malingering’ and smearing witnesses, especially Kopelman, we were heartened by Kopelman’s revealing response that Lewis’s abuse was ‘a bit rich’ as Lewis himself had sought to hire Kopelman’s expertise in another case.

 

No contradiction

LEWIS’S sidekick is Clair Dobbin, and Wednesday was her day. Completing the smearing of professor Kopelman was down to her. An American with some authority sat behind her in court.

Dobbin said Kopelman had ‘misled’ judge Baraister in September because he had not disclosed that Julian Assange and Stella Moris were partners, and their two young children, Gabriel and Max, were conceived during the period Assange had taken refuge in the Ecuadorean embassy in London.

The implication was that this somehow lessened Kopelman’s medical diagnosis: that Julian, locked up in solitary in Belmarsh prison and facing extradition to the US on bogus ‘espionage’ charges, had suffered severe psychotic depression and had planned, if he had not already attempted, to take his own life.

For her part, judge Baraitser saw no contradiction. The full nature of the relationship between Stella and Julian had been explained to her in March 2020, and professor Kopelman had made full reference to it in his report in August 2020. So the judge and the court knew all about it before the main extradition hearing last September. In her judgement in January, Baraitser said this:

‘[Professor Kopelman] assessed Mr Assange during the period May to December 2019 and was best placed to consider at first-hand his symptoms. He has taken great care to provide an informed account of Mr Assange’s background and psychiatric history. He has given close attention to the prison medical notes and provided a detailed summary annexed to his December report. He is an experienced clinician and he was well aware of the possibility of exaggeration and malingering. I had no reason to doubt his clinical opinion.’

She added that she had ‘not been misled’ by the exclusion in Kopelman’s first report of the Stella-Julian relationship and that she understood that Kopelman was protecting the privacy of Stella and her two young children.

In fact, as I know well, the family’s safety was under constant threat to the point when an embassy security guard confessed he had been told to steal one of the baby’s nappies so that a CIA-contracted company could analyse its DNA. There has been a stream of unpublicised threats against Stella and her children.

 

Based on a fraudster

FOR the United States and its legal hirelings in London, damaging the credibility of a renowned expert by suggesting he withheld this information was a way, they no doubt reckoned, to rescue their crumbling case against Assange. In June, the Icelandic newspaper Stundin reported that a key prosecution witness against Assange has admitted fabricating his evidence. The one ‘hacking’ charge the Americans hoped to bring against Assange if they could get their hands on him depended on this source and witness, Sigurdur Thordarson, an FBI informant.

Thordarson had worked as a volunteer for WikiLeaks in Iceland between 2010 and 2011. In 2011, as several criminal charges were brought against him, he contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation and offered to become an informant in return for immunity from all prosecution. It emerged that he was a convicted fraudster who embezzled $55,000 from WikiLeaks, and served two years in prison. In 2015, he was sentenced to three years for sex offences against teenage boys. The Washington Post described Thordarson’s credibility as the ‘core’ of the case against Assange.

On Wednesday, Lord Chief Justice Holroyde made no mention of this witness. His concern was that it was ‘arguable’ that judge Baraitser had attached too much weight to the evidence of professor Kopelman, a man revered in his field. He said it was ‘very unusual’ for an appeal court to have to reconsider evidence from an expert accepted by a lower court, but he agreed with Dobbin it was ‘misleading’ even though he accepted Kopelman’s ‘understandable human response’ to protect the privacy of Stella and the children.

If you can unravel the arcane logic of this, you have a better grasp than I who have sat through this case from the beginning. It is clear Kopelman misled nobody. Judge Baraitser — whose hostility to Assange personally was a presence in her court — said that she was not misled; it was not an issue; it did not matter. So why had Lord Chief Justice Holroyde spun the language with its weasel legalise and sent Julian back to his cell and its nightmares? There, he now waits for the High Court’s final decision in October — for Julian Assange, a life or death decision.

 

In the land of Magna Carta

AND why did Holroyde send Stella from the court trembling with anguish? Why is this case ‘unusual’? Why did he throw the gang of prosecutor-thugs at the department of justice in Washington — who got their big chance under Trump, having been rejected by Obama — a life raft as their rotting, corrupt case against a principled journalist sunk as surely as Titantic?

This does not necessarily mean that in October the full bench of the High Court will order Julian to be extradited. In the upper reaches of the masonry that is the British judiciary there are, I understand, still those who believe in real law and real justice from which the term ‘British justice’ takes its sanctified reputation in the land of the Magna Carta. It now rests on their ermined shoulders whether that history lives on or dies.

I sat with Stella in the court’s colonnade while she drafted words to say to the crowd of media and well-wishers outside in the sunshine. Clip-clopping along came Clair Dobbin, spruced, ponytail swinging, bearing her carton of files: a figure of certainty: she who said Julian Assange was ‘not so ill’ that he would consider suicide. How does she know?

Has Dobbin worked her way through the medieval maze at Belmarsh to sit with Julian in his yellow arm band, as professors Koppelman and Melzer have done, and Stella has done, and I have done? Never mind. The Americans have now ‘promised’ not to put him in a hellhole, just as they ‘promised’ not to torture Chelsea Manning, just as they promised….

And has she read the WikiLeaks’s leak of a Pentagon document dated March 15, 2009? This foretold the current war on journalism. US intelligence, it said, intended to destroy WikiLeaks’s and Julian Assange’s ‘centre of gravity’ with threats and ‘criminal prosecution’. Read all 32 pages and you are left in no doubt that silencing and criminalising independent journalism was the aim, smear the method.

I tried to catch Dobbin’s gaze, but she was on her way: job done.

Outside, Stella struggled to contain her emotion. This is one brave woman, as indeed her man is an exemplar of courage. ‘What has not been discussed today,’ said Stella, ‘is why I feared for my safety and the safety of our children and for Julian’s life. The constant threats and intimidation we endured for years, which has been terrorising us and has been terrorising Julian for 10 years. We have a right to live, we have a right to exist and we have a right for this nightmare to come to an end once and for all.’

 

Consortiumnews.com, August 12. John Pilger is an Australian-British journalist and filmmaker based in London.

Aug 132021
 

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: August 13, 2021
To: info  AT   gg.ca
Cc: Jody.Wilson-Raybould    AT   parl.gc.ca
Subject: Canadian Law: we have Fixed Election Dates

Dear Governor-General Mary Simon,

By Law, we have fixed election dates, and the criteria for calling a snap election do not exist.

 

I want you to know that many Canadians, myself one of them, will stand strong behind you

if you should determine to deny the Government authority for a Federal Election at this time.

 

As communicated to friends:

Rather than assuming that an Election is going ahead,  rationally speaking, it is better to assume that it will not proceed. 

Altho to be frank, I’m cynical that it can be stopped – – the Rule of Law means little in Canada. 

 

If Trudeau gets a stronger endorsement through an Election,  we dive deeper into “not-democracy”  with little resistance from citizens, IMHO.

We are doing what the Germans did for naziism/fascism;  we are following a freakishly-similar path.

We will effectively have no say over anything, let alone protection of values that are part of our being on this Planet.

 

I’m torn – – the call from Democracy Watch to oppose a Federal Election doesn’t appear to be gaining traction.  So why bother?

However, the arguments behind it are extremely important. 

 

If the facets of an open society are important, Laws have to be enforced. 

The Rule of Law means that NO ONE is ABOVE the Law,  most certainly not the Prime Minister and Cabinet. 

They are tasked with UPHOLDING the Laws of the Land.

 

The actions of the Government tell me that they are good at holding onto Power;  they are opportunistic.

The common good is under extreme threat when that’s the guiding interest.

 

For consideration,

Sandra Finley

 

 

Aug 092021
 

Police Resistance to un-constitutionality of covid regulations.  Canada

Note 1:  the link will take you off my blog to Druthers.  You can return!

Active Duty Police: “Together, we can win our freedoms back!”

Optimism!

  • The opposition is coming together in more and more ways and places.    I was handed a small newspaper  (Druthers, July 2021 edition)  in a brown paper bag at a farmers market.

The front page article (above)  is especially good.

(I just received notice that Canadian police are not the only ones – – significant positive actions in the San Francisco Police Dept too)

There are some other good, worthwhile articles in Druthers.  

It appears to be another vehicle that is taking off.  It looks to me as though the majority of the resisters, in this instance, are young people.

Jun 272021
 

Another reversal in thinking may be imminent. Some scientists have raised concerns that the safety risks of Covid-19 vaccines have been underestimated. But the politics of vaccination has relegated their concerns to the outskirts of scientific thinking—for now.

Historically, the safety of medications—including vaccines—is often not fully understood until they are deployed in large populations. Examples include rofecoxib (Vioxx), a pain reliever that increased the risk of heart attack and stroke; antidepressants that appeared to increase suicide attempts among young adults; and an influenza vaccine used in the 2009-10 swine flu epidemic that was suspected of causing febrile convulsions and narcolepsy in children. Evidence from the real world is valuable, as clinical trials often enroll patients who aren’t representative of the general population. We learn more about drug safety from real-world evidence and can adjust clinical recommendations to balance risk and benefits.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or Vaers, which is administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration, is a database that allows Americans to document adverse events that happen after receiving a vaccine. The FDA and CDC state that the database isn’t designed to determine whether the events were caused by a vaccine. This is true. But the data can nonetheless be evaluated, accounting for its strengths and weaknesses, and that is what the CDC and FDA say they do.

The Vaers data for Covid-19 vaccines show an interesting pattern. Among the 310 million Covid-19 vaccines given, several adverse events are reported at high rates in the days immediately after vaccination, and then fall precipitously afterward. Some of these adverse events might have occurred anyway. The pattern may be partly attributable to the tendency to report more events that happen soon after vaccination.

 

The database can’t say what would have happened in the absence of vaccination. Nonetheless, the large clustering of certain adverse events immediately after vaccination is concerning, and the silence around these potential signals of harm reflects the politics surrounding Covid-19 vaccines. Stigmatizing such concerns is bad for scientific integrity and could harm patients.

Four serious adverse events follow this arc, according to data taken directly from Vaers: low platelets (thrombocytopenia); noninfectious myocarditis, or heart inflammation, especially for those under 30; deep-vein thrombosis; and death. Vaers records 321 cases of myocarditis within five days of receiving a vaccination, falling to almost zero by 10 days. Prior research has shown that only a fraction of adverse events are reported, so the true number of cases is almost certainly higher. This tendency of underreporting is consistentent with our clinical experience.

Analyses to confirm or dismiss these findings should be performed using large data sets of health-insurance companies and healthcare organizations. The CDC and FDA are surely aware of these data patterns, yet neither agency has acknowledged the trend.

The implication is that the risks of a Covid-19 vaccine may outweigh the benefits for certain low-risk populations, such as children, young adults and people who have recovered from Covid-19. This is especially true in regions with low levels of community spread, since the likelihood of illness depends on exposure risk.

And while you would never know it from listening to public-health officials, not a single published study has demonstrated that patients with a prior infection benefit from Covid-19 vaccination. That this isn’t readily acknowledged by the CDC or Anthony Fauci is an indication of how deeply entangled pandemic politics is in science.

There are, however, signs of life for scientific honesty. In May, the Norwegian Medicines Agency reviewed case files for the first 100 reported deaths of nursing-home residents who received the Pfizer vaccine. The agency concluded that the vaccine “likely” contributed to the deaths of 10 of these residents through side effects such as fever and diarrhea, and “possibly” contributed to the deaths of an additional 26. But this type of honesty is rare. And it is rare for any vaccine to be linked to deaths, so this unusual development for mRNA vaccines merits further investigation.

The battle to recover scientific honesty will be an uphill one in the U.S. Anti-Trump politics in the spring of 2020 mushroomed into social-media censorship. News reporting often lacked intellectual curiosity about the appropriateness of public-health guidelines—or why a vocal minority of scientists strongly disagreed with prevailing opinions. Scientists have advocated for or against Covid-19 therapies while having financial relationships with product manufacturers and their foundation benefactors.

Public-health authorities are making a mistake and risking the public’s trust by not being forthcoming about the possibility of harm from certain vaccine side effects. There will be lasting consequences from mingling political partisanship and science during the management of a public-health crisis.

Dr. Ladapo is an associate professor of medicine at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine. Dr. Risch is a professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health.

Jun 222021
 

(Related to Mass Psychosis  https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=25442)

I wondered about this that you sent:  That which we do not bring to consciousness appears in our lives as fate……Jung

I found this: 

Carl Jung: Thirteen Quotations on the Shadow

We have met the enemy - by Ryan Ray - The War Room

The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.

Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14

Filling the conscious mind with ideal conceptions is a characteristic of Western theosophy, but not the confrontation with the shadow and the world of darkness. One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness conscious.

“The Philosophical Tree” (1945). In CW 13: Alchemical Studies. P.335

The change of character brought about by the uprush of collective forces is amazing. A gentle and reasonable being can be transformed into a maniac or a savage beast. One is always inclined to lay the blame on external circumstances, but nothing could explode in us if it had not been there. As a matter of fact, we are constantly living on the edge of a volcano, and there is, so far as we know, no way of protecting ourselves from a possible outburst that will destroy everybody within reach. It is certainly a good thing to preach reason and common sense, but what if you have a lunatic asylum for an audience or a crowd in a collective frenzy? There is not much difference between them because the madman and the mob are both moved by impersonal, overwhelming forces.

Psychology and Religion” (1938). In CW 11: Psychology and Religion: West and East. P.25

Whenever contents of the collective unconscious become activated, they have a disturbing effect on the conscious mind, and contusion ensues. If the activation is due to the collapse of the individual’s hopes and expectations, there is a danger that the collective unconscious may take the place of reality. This state would be pathological. If, on the other hand, the activation is the result of psychological processes in the unconscious of the people, the individual may feel threatened or at any rate disoriented, but the resultant state is not pathological, at least so far as the individual is concerned. Nevertheless, the mental state of the people as a whole might well be compared to a psychosis.

“The Psychological Foundation for the Belief in Spirits (1920). In CW 8: The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche. P.595

Unfortunately there can be no doubt that man is, on the whole, less good than he imagines himself or wants to be. Everyone carries a shadow, and the less it is embodied in the individual’s conscious life, the blacker and denser it is. If an inferiority is conscious, one always has a chance to correct it. Furthermore, it is constantly in contact with other interests, so that it is continually subjected to modifications. But if it is repressed and isolated from consciousness, it never gets corrected.

“Psychology and Religion” (1938). In CW 11: Psychology and Religion: West and East. P.131

We know that the wildest and most moving dramas are played not in the theatre but in the hearts of ordinary men and women who pass by without exciting attention, and who betray to the world nothing of the conflicts that rage within them except possibly by a nervous breakdown. What is so difficult for the layman to grasp is the fact that in most cases the patients themselves have no suspicion whatever of the internecine war raging in their unconscious. If we remember that there are many people who understand nothing at all about themselves, we shall be less surprised at the realization that there are also people who are utterly unaware of their actual conflicts.

“New Paths in Psychology” (1912). In CW 7: Two Essays on Analytical Psychology. P.425

It is a frightening thought that man also has a shadow side to him, consisting not just of little weaknesses- and foibles, but of a positively demonic dynamism. The individual seldom knows anything of this; to him, as an individual, it is incredible that he should ever in any circumstances go beyond himself. But let these harmless creatures form a mass, and there emerges a raging monster; and each individual is only one tiny cell in the monster’s body, so that for better or worse he must accompany it on its bloody rampages and even assist it to the utmost. Having a dark suspicion of these grim possibilities, man turns a blind eye to the shadow-side of human nature. Blindly he strives against the salutary dogma of original sin, which is yet so prodigiously true. Yes, he even hesitates to admit the conflict of which he is so painfully aware.

“On the Psychology of the Unconscious” (1912). In CW 7: Two Essays on Analytical Psychology. P.35

If you imagine someone who is brave enough to withdraw all his projections, then you get an individual who is conscious of a pretty thick shadow. Such a man has saddled himself with new problems and conflicts. He has become a serious problem to himself, as he is now unable to say that they do this or that, they are wrong, and they must be fought against… Such a man knows that whatever is wrong in the world is in himself, and if he only learns to deal with his own shadow he has done something real for the world. He has succeeded in shouldering at least an infinitesimal part of the gigantic, unsolved social problems of our day.

“Psychology and Religion” (1938). In CW 11: Psychology and Religion: West and East. P.140

Taking it in its deepest sense, the shadow is the invisible saurian tail that man still drags behind him. Carefully amputated, it becomes the healing serpent of the mysteries. Only monkeys parade with it.

The Integration of the Personality. (1939).

We carry our past with us, to wit, the primitive and inferior man with his desires and emotions, and it is only with an enormous effort that we can detach ourselves from this burden. If it comes to a neurosis, we invariably have to deal with a considerably intensified shadow. And if such a person wants to be cured it is necessary to find a way in which his conscious personality and his shadow can live together.

“Answer to Job” (1952). In CW 11: Psychology and Religion: West and East. P.1

The world is as it ever has been, but our consciousness undergoes peculiar changes. First, in remote times (which can still be observed among primitives living today), the main body of psychic life was apparently in human and in nonhuman Objects: it was projected, as we should say now. Consciousness can hardly exist in a state of complete projection. At most it would be a heap of emotions. Through the withdrawal of projections, conscious knowledge slowly developed. Science, curiously enough, began with the discovery of astronomical laws, and hence with the withdrawal, so to speak, of the most distant projections. This was the first stage in the despiritualization of the world. One step followed another: already in antiquity the gods were withdrawn from mountains and rivers, from trees and animals. Modern science has subtilized its projections to an almost unrecognizable degree, but our ordinary life still swarms with them. You can find them spread out in the newspapers, in books, rumours, and ordinary social gossip. All gaps in our actual knowledge are still filled out with projections. We are still so sure we know what other people think or what their true character is.

“Psychology and Religion” (1938) In CW II: Psychology and Religion: West and East. P. 140

No, the demons are not banished; that is a difficult task that still lies ahead. Now that the angel of history has abandoned the Germans, the demons will seek a new victim. And that won’t be difficult. Every man who loses his shadow, every nation that falls into self-righteousness, is their prey…. We should not forget that exactly the same fatal tendency to collectivization is present in the victorious nations as in the Germans, that they can just as suddenly become a victim of the demonic powers.

“The Postwar Psychic Problems of the Germans” (1945)

To confront a person with his shadow is to show him his own light. Once one has experienced a few times what it is like to stand judgingly between the opposites, one begins to understand what is meant by the self. Anyone who perceives his shadow and his light simultaneously sees himself from two sides and thus gets in the middle.

“Good and Evil in Analytical Psychology” (1959). In CW 10. Civilization in Transition. P.872

A man who is unconscious of himself acts in a blind, instinctive way and is in addition fooled by all the illusions that arise when he sees everything that he is not conscious of in himself coming to meet him from outside as projections upon his neighbour.

“The Philosophical Tree” (1945). In CW 13: Alchemical Studies. P.335

Jun 182021
 

FW from Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA)

Biometrics and Identity Management

It’s directed to a Canadian audience.

But, it’s the Canada-U.S. border.

The extrapolation for “the south side of the border” follows after.

/Sandra 

The CBSA is using covid- induced fear to put Surveillance of Canadians into the stratosphere.

A tender notice or Notice of Proposed Procurement (NPP) posted to the Public Services and Procurement Canada website on June 7   ~~~

I copied from the Government page:

Tender Notice – Notice of Proposed Procurement (NPP)

https://buyandsell.gc.ca/procurement-data/tender-notice/PW-21-00958775 

Publication date   2021/06/07

Biometrics and Identity Management (1000357607)

Description

The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) has an urgent need to secure the services of a global organization (the “Contractor”) with knowledge of and expertise in biometrics. The Agency requires this organization to assist with the immediate establishment of an Office of Biometrics and Identity Management and to work with the Agency in researching, planning for and rapidly developing a strategy and roadmap related to the use of Digital solutions enabled by supporting technologies in biometrics, in response to the COVID 19 situation and other operational priorities. The Contractor will bring knowledge, capabilities, and experience to support CBSA’s urgent need to establish a biometric strategy, biometric foundation and ultimately a Biometrics Authority (Centre of Excellence). Specifically, the “contractor” will assist the CBSA with the development of a comprehensive approach and plan to manage, evolve and adapt in using biometrics to deliver the mission of the agency while considering our interrelationship and joint ventures with other federal government departments and agencies and our international partners.

– – – – – –

Are you (burp n) nuts?!   (Not you personally.   All of us, collectively.)

I am not going to ask the Government for anything.

It’s better if we all just tell each other.

Be sure to connect with every immigrant and marginalized person you know.  They are the best ones to understand the significance of the CBSA Tender Notice.

From what I know of Surveillance States (Police States)  I don’t embrace them.  I thought you might like a say in the matter.

Cheers!    /Sandra Finley

FOR PEOPLE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BORDER:

I don’t think this is about CANADIAN BORDER SERVICES AGENCY    (CBSA).   Because, when you string together the developments over the years,  it isn’t “Canadian” – – not anymore than Canadian National Railway (CNR) is “Canadian”.  It isn’t.

 

RE your question:  How widespread is the knowledge of this among the Canadian public, thus far?  (as at 2021-06-14)

I do not know how many Canadians are aware.  Not many, I suspect.  HOWEVER, it is very “disgusting” for you (an American), directly – – – BECAUSE  developments over the past years tell me that it isn’t about the CANADIAN border.  It’s about the CANADA – U.S.  border.

Vaccine passport?   Put it in context to understand it.

What’s happening under the name of the CBSA ostensibly applies if you’re living in Canada. HOWEVER, it applies equally if you’re on the south side of the border.

There has been an effective “merger” of military, education (especially higher level), technology, business, agriculture, politics, vaccination . . . down to (now overtly)  the  Office of Biometrics and Identity Management – – –  a “Centre of Excellence” no less, as the tender states – – at the border between the Canada and the U.S.).

Don’t kid yourself – – – Canada would not be undertaking this on its own.  The U.S.  dramatically expanded their Biometrics funding some years ago.  The expanded centre is on the East Coast of the USA.   It was about the same time as they invested $2 billion into the centre in Utah for collection of everyone’s e-communications and  phone calls (digitized).

During the time I was on trial over the Census (Canada),  and  in conversation with persons in other countries fighting the same thing (in the U.K. for example)  it was quite obvious that  people in the U.S. were oblivious to the role of Lockheed Martin in your Census Bureau  (construction of ever-increasing detailed files on individual citizens;  GPS coordinates for all the buildings (homes and potential homes) were being built into your individual record at the U.S. Census Bureau).

I recall reading a transcript from a U.S. Govt Committee – it’s in my files somewhere – – a Committee tasked with oversight.  The Committee asks questions.  The answers from the Administration of the Census Bureau gave zero clue that Lockheed Martin played a large role in their operations.   BTW:  your censuses are every 10 years.  Ours are every 5 years.

You know the NSA is behind the collection of all your (and our) emails, texts, and phone calls (digitized).  And that Lockheed Martin is one of the prime surveillance contractors to the NSA.  Not the only one.

Raytheon’s tracking capability of your (but it includes Canadians) physical movements are astounding – – the ability to PREDICT with VARYING PROBABILITY where you will be on a given day of the week for example.   There’s a link on my blog to a promo video that Raytheon put out a few years ago, to demonstrate to potential buyers (clients anywhere in the world), just what Raytheon software is capable of.  It constructs from the data collected from cell phones, etc.  It IS truly astounding.)  

More people in Canada have become more clued in, over time.  The prosecutions of people for non-compliance with the Census data collection (increasingly more, and more personal) have been useful for building awareness of “what’s going on”.  The Canadian census happens to be in progress right now.

The data-gathering is not restricted to the Census.  It’s on-going relentlessly, year-round, every year through “Surveys”.  And other means.   Under threat of prosecution if you don’t hand over the personal information that they want.  What gets done on this side of the Border, eventually gets done on the other side.  And vice versa.  The introduction on one side is like a test introduction – – how can it be done more expeditiously next time, wherever “next time” happens to take place.  (Make the introductions more palatable, causing less upset among citizens)

In the first email I sent to you and others, I didn’t include any Context re the Border Services Notice of Tender.   The CBSA is hardly “Canadian”.  Nor is the military “Canadian”.   Not when you weave together news and other reports through the years since 2003 (recorded on this blog).    Things are “integrated” and “harmonized” for “interoperability” to the point where Canada has no or little remaining sovereignty.   We are blessed by an abundance of quislings.

You may be interested:  Linguistics are important.  Words and how they are used to mould our thinking.   If the meaning of words is not well understood in a society,  WHY is that?

2016-07-08   Democracy overtaken by Corporatocracy = coup d’état. Citizens fight to regain democracy = Revolution (insurgency).  Corporatocracy fights to hold on = counter insurgency.   

https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=16943   

Thanks for your ear, Paul.

I don’t mean to be overwhelming with big pessimism.

To me, the spreading of information is key.

There’s easily enough of us, to de-rail the Agenda.  It’s just that people have to know the situation.   They’ll find their own solutions in their own communities.  That’s where we grow our strength, working together to accomplish Good Works, whatever those may be – – different in different communities.  Conversations happen when you’re working side-by-side on a community project.

Sandra

Jun 052021
 

 Recommend:  Read this on the Tyee website, complete with the pictures.

I want to keep it for the purpose of making an analogy to what’s happening in Canada today in several different arenas.  Same thing.

A century ago, Dr. Peter Bryce demonstrated that residential schools were designed to kill. Canada’s government ignored him.

 Andrew Nikiforuk 2021-06-05  | TheTyee.ca

Tyee contributing editor Andrew Nikiforuk is an award-winning journalist whose books and articles focus on epidemics, the energy industry, nature and more.

(Photo)

Dr. Peter Henderson Bryce was appointed Canada’s first chief officer of medical health in 1904. He toured residential schools and exposed them as disease incubators and superspreaders.

You have probably never heard of Dr. Peter Henderson Bryce, but I can tell you this: he would not have been shocked or surprised by the discovery of a mass grave on the grounds of the Kamloops Indian Residential School last week.

He knew, like Faulkner, that the past is never dead. “It is not even past.”

For 15 years, Canada’s first chief officer of medical health repeatedly warned his superiors that the country’s disease-riddled residential schools had become glorified tuberculosis death camps. He courageously pressed for reforms.

But Bryce’s superiors didn’t listen. They didn’t want to know the truth, and made the physician’s job impossible as only bureaucrats can do.

And so, when Bryce left the government and was no longer oath-bound to secrecy, he wrote a 24-page exposé on the accelerated extinction of Indigenous people willfully being perpetrated in Canada’s residential schools. You can read it here.

Bryce titled his book The Story of a National Crime. The year was 1922.

Canada, a nation full of deep secrets and afflicted by selective memories, can no longer keep this “national crime” hidden anymore.

Nations can deny history, ignore history, minimize history, postpone history and even rewrite history.

But they can’t grow up without facing history for a simple reason. “Knowing the before lets you create a different after.”

The before started a century ago. Educated in Edinburgh, Toronto and Paris, the native of Mount Pleasant, Ontario took up the job of chief officer of medical health in 1904 for Immigration and Indian Affairs.

One of the first statistics that caught Bryce’s eye was this: First Nations reported very low levels of nervous disorders and alcoholism. But tuberculosis was eating their people alive.

The disease had a powerful colonial history. Prior to the eradication of the buffalo and the destruction of an entire ecosystem on the Canadian plains, tuberculosis was rare or non-existent. Although the fur trade had seeded the bacterium, it needed crowding, hunger and homelessness to erupt.

The federal government dutifully provided those conditions after the extermination of buffalo, the chief source of nutrition for many Indigenous peoples.

By withholding food rations, the government forced First Nations into signing treaties and herded 300 different nations into often inhospitable reserves where disease and the politics of starvation became their treaty companions.

As a result, TB began a terrible conquest of Indigenous peoples and helped, along with smallpox and other European microbes, to clear the plains for white settlement.

Cattle, the European replacement for buffalo, also carried a host of diseases including anthrax, brucellosis and bovine tuberculosis.

One infected cow, whether poached or purchased by the government, could infect 100 hungry and immunocompromised Indigenous people with the lung disease.

But the racist theory of the day held that Indigenous people were just weaker than Europeans or naturally inclined to get TB.

Bryce, an expert in the disease, didn’t believe the nonsense and proved it when the government asked him to inspect health conditions in residential schools in 1907.

The federal government set up the schools in 1883 as a colonial force to “assimilate” First Nations and turn them into farmers and fellow extractors of resources.

The schools were, pure and simple, a state-sanctioned tool to remove the culture and identity of subjugated people. The federal government wanted to do to First Nations what the British did to Highland Scots: dispossess them.

Bryce spent three months visiting 35 schools in Manitoba and the Northwest Territories (then including Saskatchewan and Alberta), all located in former buffalo country where people were now starving or undernourished. He found one indignity after another. The buildings were poorly-constructed firetraps with inadequate water supplies. Most had no infirmary. Or proper food supplies.

The schools’ poor ventilation combined with their prison-like atmosphere appalled Bryce. It was “almost as if the prime conditions for the outbreak of epidemics had been deliberately created.”

Bryce noted that the agents of colonialism, the teachers and church officials running the schools, were also reluctant to collection information on the fate of their pupils. He discovered why. In what is today Saskatchewan, of 31 students discharged from the notorious File Hills Indian Residential School in the previous 15 years, only nine had remained alive.

Bryce calculated that the residential schools acted as TB incubators and superspreaders. If children didn’t have TB before they arrived, they immediately contracted the disease in crowded dormitories where children weren’t even allowed to exercise.

And if they were too sick to occupy a desk, they were sent back to their communities, where they spread the disease in crowded reserve housing.

After questioning the principals of some of the schools, Bryce estimated that approximately one-quarter of all Indigenous children attending residential schools for the last 15 years had died from tuberculosis. He wrote that “of a total of 1,537 pupils reported upon, nearly 25 per cent are dead, of one school with an absolutely accurate statement, 69 per cent of ex-pupils are dead, and that everywhere the almost invariable cause of death given is tuberculosis.”

In other words, residential schools typically prepared Indigenous children not for life but death.

(Photo)

Superspreading conditions in crowded, poorly-ventilated Old Sun’s Alberta dormitory. Photo via General Synod Archives, Anglican Church of Canada.

Someone eventually leaked what became known as “the Bryce report” to the press where it produced this headline: “Schools Aid White Plague — Startling Death Rolls Revealed Among Indians — Absolute Inattention to the Bare Necessities of Health.”

But most Canadians did not know, care or understand.

Bryce ultimately recommended a dramatic prescription for Canada’s plague schools: supervised medical care (nurses and doctors), better nutrition and better ventilation. (Like COVID-19, tuberculosis is spread by aerosols.)

Bryce also thought the schools should be relocated closer to Indigenous communities. And he recommended that the government take over the schools outright and turn them into sanatoria where First Nations children would live instead of die.

Bryce was no opponent of the colonial order. It was merely that, as historian Adam J. Green notes, “Although assimilation would have certainly been the goal of Bryce’s Aboriginal policy, forced extinction was not.”

Yet neither the government nor churches were impressed by Bryce’s recommendations. They dithered and dallied and calculated the economic costs.

The government then performed the bare minimum “to remove the imputation that the department is careless of the interests of these children.” It set a few standards for diet and ventilation, banned tubercular students and increased the grant for the schools by a small amount. But the children still kept on dying.

Duncan Campbell Scott, the penny-pinching head of Indian Affairs, couldn’t see why the scandalous procession of Indigenous children from boarding schools to unmarked graves was so upsetting.

“When the peculiar conditions are taken into consideration, the department is doing as well as can be expected for the Indians, and to anything further would entail a very heavy expenditure, which, at present, I am not able to recommend.”

Bryce kept on fighting and compiling more statistics. In 1909, the official found more bleak conditions in Alberta. At one school more than 28 per cent of the children had perished, mostly from tuberculosis. Another study in Saskatchewan found 93 per cent of children in the Qu’appelle district were afflicted by TB.

Bryce could see no moral reason why the government could ever tolerate a TB “death rate” among First Nations two to three times higher “than that of an average Canadian community.”

But government didn’t care. By 1914, the Department of Indian Affairs had tired of Bryce’s statistics, and pointedly sidelined the chief medical officer.

Scott, then head of Indian Affairs, informed Bryce that his annual medical reports on TB and residential schools weren’t needed anymore. They cost too much, and the government didn’t really plan on doing anything with the information anyway.

And so the Canadian government, demonstrating a bent instinct for evasion and denial that persists to this very day, never asked Bryce to do any more work related to the Department of Indian Affairs.

Yet Bryce persisted. In a 1918 pamphlet that the government refused to publish, Bryce estimated that the Indigenous population, given the national birth rate, should have grown by 20,000 people between 1904 and 1917. Instead, it shrank by 1,600 — largely due to treatable diseases such as TB.

Irritated by Bryce’s conscience, the government refused to provide its health officer with any more mortality statistics on First Nations. A problem doesn’t exist if a government doesn’t record it.

(Photo)

Residential school students at the Roman Catholic cemetery at Fort George, Quebec. Photo via the Deschatelets Archives.

In 1921, the federal government passed a law that forced Bryce to retire from federal service after 15 years as chief officer of medical health.

But the physician’s heart could not keep silent. The following year he published The Story of a National Crime: An Appeal for Justice for the Indians of Canada. It sold for 35 cents a copy. The book named names and documented the ongoing neglect, complacency and inaction that Bryce witnessed for 15 years.

What bothered Bryce most was the government’s refusal to act, let alone acknowledge the problem: 15 years after his first report, TB still killed children in residential schools at the same alarming rates documented in 1907.

Bryce also decried the implicit racism in the government’s TB response, which disturbingly mirrors in so many ways the current government’s unequal response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Where’s the justice, asked Bryce, in a government that can only allocate $10,000 for the control and treatment of tuberculosis among 105,000 Indigenous people but provides more than $33,000 for the 100,000 white settlers of Ottawa just to handle the hospitalization of their TB victims?

How is it that the city of Hamilton could reduce TB by 75 per cent between 1904 and 1917, yet nothing had been done to keep TB from killing “a splendid race of warriors as the Blackfeet” in Alberta?

The “desire for power,” concluded Bryce, repeatedly over-rode “any higher consideration such as saving the lives of the Indians,” in Ottawa.

But little changed after the book’s publication. Health care for Indigenous people wouldn’t become a government priority for decades.

Until 1945, the minister of mines and resources remained officially responsible for the health of First Nations people, as though TB had become some perverse mineral.

In 1934, the doctor died while on a trip to the Caribbean.

Last year an article in the Canadian Medical Association Journal by Cindy Blackstock, a courageous advocate for Indigenous children, described Bryce as “the whistleblower on residential schools.”

An investigation into the legacy of residential schools and their survivors didn’t begin until a decade ago.

‘Neglected in Life, Dishonoured in Death’

In 2015 the Truth and Reconciliation Commission reported more than 3,000 confirmed deaths at the nation’s residential schools.

Government or church officials did not record the names of 32 per cent of the dead.

In half the cases, the government did not even disclose the cause of death.

In a quarter of cases, no gender was reported.

Most of the dead were never sent home for burial. Which brings us back to the mass grave in Kamloops.

Now you can’t say that you haven’t heard of Dr. Peter Henderson Bryce.

And now you can understand why he would not have been shocked or surprised by last week’s discovery.

He told the story of a national crime before our collective ears were willing to hear it.

May 302021
 
CONTENTS

1.    (Utah)  Lake Powell water level at a historic low.  From “TownLife”, Bullfrog Utah,   May 28, 2021.  For now, the water level continues to drop a little more than an inch a day.

2.  (Nevada)   Projections for Lake Mead show it dropping well below the lowest level on record, in the next 20 months.   NewsNow Las Vegas, April 30, 2021

3.   California faces another drought as lake beds turn to dust – a photo essay.  The Guardian newspaper, UK, May 30

= = = = = = = = =

COMMENT BEFORE THE CONTENTS

As we have addressed in the past:  with the falling water levels comes the loss of the hydro-electric capacity of the dams, along with everything else.

The two reservoirs I’ve used as a thermometer over the years:

  1. Hoover Dam’s Lake Mead near Las Vegas (Colorado River).  It used to be the largest man-made reservoir in the U.S.

I was wondering how they’re doing with the intake water pipe for Las Vegas.

It had a shrinking two feet to go before it would be above water, last I remember.  Then came the intention of Vegas Water Officials to unilaterally appropriate water from agricultural lands to their north.  The rural people went ballistic;  I believe that ended that plan and the hubris behind it!

ANSWER TO THE WATER INTAKE PIPE IN LAKE MEAD:  Scroll down to 2.  April 2021, from Las Vegas.  The concluding lines:

An $817 million project (completed in 2015) to construct a “third straw” to draw water from Lake Mead at the 860-foot level provides security. Two other “straws” take water at the 1,000-foot and 1,050-foot levels.

The last time Lake Mead reached full capacity was in 1983.

2.  Glen Canyon Dam’s Lake Powell (also on the Colorado River).  Second largest man-made water reservoir in the U.S.

= = = = = = = = =

 THE WARNINGS TO CANADIANS

The Americans take what they want.  There are quislings in Canada only too happy to collaborate.

2021-02-14 The New Canada Water Agency

2019-08 Water export, History: The determination to make water accessible for money-making goes back to the first trade deal with the U.S.

2015-03-22   Bill C-51 Understood in terms of water shortages in the U.S.A.

2011-09-22     Chasing Water: Colorado River running near empty, 12:25 minute video

 

= = = = = = = = =

1.    Lake Powell (Glen Canyon Dam) water level at a historic low

BULLFROG, Utah. — As of May 25, Lake Powell is 43.9 feet lower from a year ago. At 3559.89 feet, the lake is down 140.08 feet from full pool. The man-made reservoir is only receiving 39.4% of its average water inflow so far this year.

“It was so depressing,” said Tim of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, describing his last trip in Bullfrog. He has been coming to Glen Canyon since 1979.

Recent projections from the Bureau of Reclamation are pushing the Upper Colorado River Commission to develop a drought response plan. The commission is made up of officials from Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, New Mexico, and the federal government. The minimum probable projection for mid-2023 shows the water level reaching close to below the minimum power pool level of 3,490 feet. That is the minimum water level needed for Glen Canyon Dam to produce power generation.

A drought plan drafted in 2019 calls for water releases to Lake Powell if it falls below a critical threshold of 3,525 feet. The most probable estimate from the Bureau of Reclamation Water Operations (BOR) report shows it falling below that level as early as March next year. Reservoirs that would be called upon to fill Powell include Flaming Gorge, Blue Mesa, and Navajo.

“It was really a toilet bowl tank for Mead,” Tim said, referring to the creation of Powell. Lake Mead is dealing with its own issues at the moment, with current projections from BOR forecasting the Arizona reservoir hitting a Tier 2 water shortage in 2023.

The flow of the Colorado River, which feeds Lake Powell and Mead, is operated under a vast series of laws and regulations known widely as “the Law of the River.” The most important statute is the Colorado River Compact, which was signed nearly a century ago in 1922. We now know because of various tree ring studies that the estimates used to craft the compact were far too optimistic, the early 20th century saw some of the wettest years since the 1400s.

The legal right to use more than every gallon of the river is claimed by someone. Theoretical rights are known to lawyers as “paper water.” The drought in the western U.S. has contributed to a large disparity between these rights and the actual flow of the river. Since the early 1900s, water demand in the Colorado River basin has increased while water supply has decreased. Per the U.S. Drought Monitor, the majority of Utah is currently experiencing either an exceptional or extreme drought.

Statistics according to lakepowell.water-data.com. Courtesy of HighCharts.com

Don and Mary, a couple from Heber City, Utah, have come to Lake Powell since it was being filled in 1969. “It’s the lowest we’ve ever seen it,” Mary said. They recommend all boaters use either a depth finder or spotter, given that the water is consistently decreasing.

They don’t agree with the idea of the pipeline to Washington County. The Lake Powell pipeline project includes a 140-mile tap from Page, Arizona to the fast-growing St. George area.

“We devote way too much water to agriculture in Utah,” said Don. The couple was split on what should be done with Lake Powell. Don feels there should be a calculated median among all the southwestern reservoirs that states can compromise on. Mary leaned towards the argument of emptying the lake into Mead.

For now, the water level continues to drop a little more than an inch a day.

A Bullfrog resident, who wished to remain anonymous, said on the issue of the water levels, “Mother Nature always wins.”

= = = = = = = = =

2.    LAS VEGAS  – – WHAT’S HAPPENING WITH LAKE MEAD (HOOVER DAM)?   April 2021
NewsNow, Las Vegas
by:
In this July 28, 2014, file photo, lightning strikes over Lake Mead near Hoover Dam that impounds Colorado River water at the Lake Mead National Recreation Area in Arizona. (AP Photo/John Locher, File)

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Projections for Lake Mead show it dropping well below the lowest level on record in the next 20 months.

Bureau of Reclamation projections contained in a 24-month study indicate the lake could fall another 30 feet by November 2022.

Lake Mead is currently at 1,079.46 feet.

The agency monitors the lake level and makes decisions on how to allocate river water. Measurements and projections that are released in August will determine if a Level 1 shortage would be declared. That would trigger automatic cuts in water allocations.

Projections right now don’t look good.

Lake Mead is expected to drop to 1,071.57 feet in June, which would break the record of 1,071.6 feet, set in June of 1981. That’s about four feet below the level that would trigger a federal declaration of a water shortage.

The Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) has been proactive as the current 22-year drought has persisted, and the state has not been using its full allocation of river water as conservation saved water even as the valley continues to grow.

Officials say even if a shortage were declared, the water supply is still sufficient for now. SNWA says it has an eight-year supply of water saved.

If projections hold, that 1981 record could become a distant memory. The 24-month study shows Lake Mead at 1,049.4 feet in November of 2022.

An $817 million project (completed in 2015) to construct a “third straw” to draw water from Lake Mead at the 860-foot level provides security. Two other “straws” take water at the 1,000-foot and 1,050-foot levels.

Copyright 2021 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.2= = = = =

 

= = = = = =

3.    California faces another drought as lake beds turn to dust – a photo essay

Note:  Copy and paste the heading into a search engine.  Fast and easy.  The photos are important, but they won’t upload here.

This is a copy of the text only.

Water shortages and dry conditions are already affecting the state as the governor has declared an emergency in 41 of 58 counties

by Gabrielle Canon

Sun 30 May 2021

Verdant hillsides losing their hue, receding reservoirs with bathtub rings of newly exposed earth, crops withering in the fields.

These are the visions of California’s parched landscape as the state braces for another potentially devastating drought. Water shortages and exceptionally dry conditions are already beginning to hit home.

 

  • The San Gabriel reservoir lake bed is reduced to mud. Photographer: David McNew/Getty Images

The state is facing yet another hot, dry summer ahead, and the governor has declared a drought emergency in 41 of the state’s 58 counties. More than 37 million Californians reside in these drought areas, according to the US drought monitor.

“This is without precedent,” Newsom said at a news conference announcing the first two declarations in April, speaking from the bed of Lake Mendocino that had been reduced to arid, cracked clay. Not long ago, he would have been standing under 40ft of water. “Oftentimes we overstate the word historic, but this is indeed an historic moment.”

 

  • Governor Gavin Newsom holds a news conference in the parched basin of Lake Mendocino in Ukiah. Photographer: Kent Porter/Associated Press
  • A child walks across the parched bottom of Lake Mendocino. Photographer: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Many of the state’s reservoirs are at extremely low capacity and levels are expected to drop further in the coming months. Already, the state’s 154 major reservoirs are collectively at 71% of where they typically are on average. Federal climate analysts with the National Integrated Drought Information

System called the outlook for California’s reservoir levels recovery “grim” in their most recent report.

  • Water levels at Lake Oroville have dropped to 39% of capacity. Photographer: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
  • Houseboats in Lake Oroville are dwarfed by the exposed banks. Photographer: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

The dry conditions are expected to fuel another potentially devastating and record-breaking wildfire season. In 2020, roughly 4.1m acres were consumed by the flames, tens of thousands of buildings burned and 31 people lost their lives.

These conditions only began to develop in May of last year, according to federal monitoring systems. But now into a second consecutive dry year – characterized by a hot summer and little rainfall to replenish the dehydrated landscape through the winter months – by mid-May this year 93% of the south-west and California was in drought, with 38% of the region classified at the highest level.

“It really stands out how rapidly this drought has developed and intensified,” said Brian Fuchs, a climatologist, during a webinar this week hosted by the NIDIC.

Northern California’s reservoirs, which heavily depend on the rapidly disappearing mountain snowmelt, have been among the hardest hit. Lake Shasta and Lake Oroville, two of the largest, have fallen to 44% and 39% of their total capacity respectively. Inflow into Lake Shasta is even lower than it was in 2014.

  • Many farmers are preparing for an expected water shortage by removing water-dependent crops, such as almond trees like these in Snelling. Photographer: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
  • A sign in Buttonwillow, Kern county. Photographer: Frederic J Brown/AFP/Getty Images

To prepare for declining reserves, the California Department of Water Resources reduced farmers and growers to 5% of their expected water allocation in March. The move sparked an outcry from California’s agricultural belt, which is likely to be hit hard by the drought.

During the last drought, between 2014 and 2016, the agriculture industry lost roughly $3.8bn, and more than half a million acres couldn’t produce for lack of water. Farmers and ranchers have already begun to cull crops, fallow fields, and thin their herds in preparation.

Officials have also had to step in to help salmon raised in the state’s central valley region reach the Pacific Ocean, as waterways grow too shallow and warm for them to safely make the journey. Tens of millions of young fish will instead be trucked out to sites across the coast.

  • With rivers like the American River growing too warm and shallow for fish to reach the ocean, juvenile Chinook salmon will be transported by truck. Photographer: Nina Riggio/Reuters
  • Boat docks sit on dry land at Folsom Lake in El Dorado Hills. Photographer: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Drought has always played a part in California’s climate, and it’s not unusual for the region to see periods of dry years interspersed with wetter ones. But, rising temperatures are fueling deeper extremes and climate scientists believe the cycle will only intensify.

With only a short two-year reprieve since the state was declared drought-free – after the period between 2012 and 2015 became the driest four-year period recorded – the negative impact that dry conditions had across the state are still fresh in residents’ minds.

  • A park visitor runs on the dry Folsom Lake bottom in Granite Bay. Photographer: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
  • A resident fills a water tank with recycled water from a fill station in Oakley.

In an attempt to mitigate some of the expected impacts, Newsom has earmarked $5.1bn over four years for water infrastructure and drought response. The state is also hoping to apply key lessons learned through the last drought period, including establishing new standards of use for water, increasing efficiency requirements, and assessing and intervening when water systems fail. Still, as conditions worsen, the state will continue to call on residents to adapt.

“It’s time for Californians to pull together once again to save water,” said California Natural Resources Agency Secretary Wade Crowfoot in a statement issued with the emergency declaration. Encouraging shorter showers and limiting wasted water during every-day activities like dishwashing and teeth brushing, he added, “all of us need to find every opportunity to save water where we can”.

 

  • Marin county became the first county to impose mandatory water-use restrictions on 1 May. Photographer: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images