Conversation


This is for my record.
https://publicorderemergencycommission.ca/files/exhibits/SAE.00000003.pdf?t=1668516367
(Suggest: go to the URL to view.)
Commission Counsel anticipate that Mr. Van Huigenbos will provide the following
evidence if he is called as a witness at the public hearings:
Background
• Mr. Van Huigenbos is originally from Holland. He has lived in Alberta since 1996.
• Mr. Van Huigenbos is a councilor on Fort Macleod’s town council. He became an
unofficial spokesperson for the Coutts protest.
Origins of the Protest: January 29 and 30, 2022
• The Coutts protest commenced as a slow roll convoy on January 29, 2022. Mr.
Van Huigenbos joined on that day.
• The slow roll convoy participants included individuals from different parts of
Alberta. They gathered in different communities, including Fort Mcleod, Vulcan
and Lethbridge, and then drove to Coutts because it is a main commercial border
point in Alberta.
• The slow roll convoy did not have designated leaders. The participants generally
understood, through some social media posts, that the plan was to converge on
the highway and drive down to Coutts. In Coutts, the convoy intended to turn
around and head back up to Milk River, but the size of it was not anticipated and
when they arrived in Coutts, they were unable to turn around due to traffic.
• The RCMP was on site when the slow roll convoy arrived.
• The slow roll became entrenched in Coutts in or around January 29 and 30,
meaning that the vehicles that participated in the slow roll parked on the side of
the highway and planned to stay.
• Three or four individuals became the unofficial spokespersons for the Coutts
protesters. Mr. Van Huigenbos was the main unofficial spokesperson.
• Once the slow roll became a traffic jam and the vehicles were entrenched, the
protesters self-regulated to ensure that the protest could continue peacefully. For
example, there was an unwritten code of conduct that ensured compliance with
traffic laws and prohibited other conduct, like public drinking.
Protest and Police Activity: January 31 to February 13, 2022
• On or around Monday, January 31, the RCMP began mobilizing in Coutts. Hotels
in Lethbridge were booked up by officers, sheriff buses began arriving, and many
officers started to gather north of Coutts.
• On or around Tuesday, February 1, the RCMP started enforcement efforts by
knocking on the windows of vehicles parked at the tail end or the northern point of
the Coutts protest, and asking the drivers to move their vehicles. They succeeded
in getting some vehicles to move. The RCMP also put up a blockade on the
2
highway to prevent the Coutts protest from growing. The RCMP wanted to prevent
individuals who had gathered in Milk River from joining the Coutts protesters.
• A second protest became entrenched in Milk River. This protest was much larger
than the Coutts protest, particularly during the weekends. It was also less
organized. There was no apparent leadership or structure. The Milk River
protesters and the Coutts protesters were two different groups.
• At one point on or around February 1, individuals broke through the RCMP
blockade. The RCMP responded by reinforcing the blockade with buses and
barricades.
• On or around the same day, the RCMP’s enforcement approach caused the
protest to escalate, and the protesters and RCMP officers had a stand-off, meaning
that the officers attempted enforcement while the protesters stood in a line some
distance away.
• The stand-off ended after the RCMP officers ceased their enforcement efforts and
there was a meeting at the Smugglers Saloon in Coutts between two Sergeants
from the Airdrie RCMP, Sergeants Tulloch and Switzer, and the protesters. There
were side discussions between the RCMP Sergeants and Mr. Van Huigenbos,
where they established a line of communication to ensure safety and prevent any
escalation on either side. Mr. Van Huigenbos was designated as the main point of
contact for the RCMP Sergeants.
• This line of communication was largely successful: protesters were able to
negotiate with the RCMP to organize the movement of trucks off the highway,
which opened lanes of the highway for traffic coming to and from the port of entry,
cattle, emergency and other vehicles. The protesters also ensured that emergency
vehicles had access to and from Coutts. However, there was one event that
occurred on or around February 12, where an accidental breakdown in
communication lead to the RCMP disabling and damaging three excavators that
the Coutts protesters had erected to fly flags.
The Protest Ends: February 14 and 15, 2022
• The Coutts protest remained peaceful. Negotiations with the RCMP continued until
February 13.
• At approximately 7:45 pm on February 13, the RCMP tactical unit arrived in and
around Smugglers Saloon due to what Mr. Van Huigenbos believes was an
incorrectly perceived risk assessment when some of the tractors and vehicles were
turned on to ensure they were still operational, and some were moved. The RCMP
executed search warrants at approximately 11:00 p.m. at a house in the Two of
Coutts. This operation continued into the early hours of February 14.
• On February 15, the Coutts protesters dispersed and the RCMP cleared out the
area.
3
Relationships with Other Protesters
• Mr. Van Huigenbos was not part of a bigger group or political/ideological
organization. He participated to protest against the COVID-19 public health
measures implemented by the Government of Alberta and the Federal
Government, which impacted his business and his family. He also participated to
protest against the lack of engagement by Government of Alberta officials with
their constituents throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
• The other spokespersons and participants were similarly not part of a bigger
group or political/ideological organization. They participated in the protest
because of the impact that the COVID-19 public health measures had on their
lives and livelihoods, and the lack of engagement by government officials.
• Many of the spokespersons and participants did not know each other prior to the
protest.
• The Coutts protesters had no connection with other protests occurring in Canada.
• The Coutts protest was not organized in tandem with or through any other protest
groups.
Funding and Donations
• Mr. Van Huigenbos was not actively involved in fundraising. The Coutts protesters
received mostly donations in the form of fuel and food. They also received some
monetary donations, potentially through crowdfunding and also through a donation
jar at the Smugglers Saloon, from Canadians who supported the Freedom convoy.
These donations were used for fuel and to rent the Smugglers Saloon.
Social Media
• The Coutts protesters communicated primarily in person and messaging apps,
such as Telegram and Whatsapp.
Engagement from the Government of Alberta
• Government of Alberta officials did not open lines of communication with the
protesters.
• The Coutts protest could have been dispersed if Government of Alberta officials
would have opened lines of communications and/or agreed to negotiate and sit
down with the spokespersons and participants.

Inquiry into Coutts court proceedings.
Lavigne was hosting a podcast with Coutts participant Marco Van Huigenbos and Alberta political commentator MartyUpNorth, when Carbert called Van Huigenbos to check in, as he regularly does.
Carbert stayed on the line for about 10 minutes discussing court proceedings and Premier Danielle Smith’s agreement to launch an inquiry after the court processes have been finalized.
Carbert has been in remand for 921 days from charges laid February 14, 2022 at the Alberta-Montana border blockade at Coutts, the same day Prime Minister Justin Trudeau unlawfully ordered the War Measures Act (Emergencies Act) to crackdown on peaceful COVID-19 mandates protestors.
He was charged with conspiracy to kill an RCMP officer, as was Anthony Olienick, who is also being held in remand. The court ruled Carbert and Olienick not guilty on August 2, but Crown prosecutors have since appealed the ruling and demanded a retrial.
The court ruled both are guilty on lesser charges, of mischief and possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose, and Olienick for possessing an explosive. Sentencing will be next week. The men confirmed Thursday evening Carbert and Olienick will appear in court August 26, 27, 29, 30.
On Monday, the judge will examine how the jury came up with their decision and the Crown and defence lawyers will have an opportunity to add their opinions. Tuesday is the decision on that, said Van Huigenbos. Thursday arguments for sentencing will be heard, and Friday is the sentencing.
It is unknown if Justice David Labrenz will issue a decision on Friday, or if he will defer his decision.
Later in Carbert’s appearance on the call, Lavigne mentioned the Coutts boys’ supporters asked Smith about launching an inquiry around “the crime-fraud envelope, the trials themselves, and the Crown prosecutions’ involvement in all that.”
The crime-fraud envelope refers to sealed documents that allegedly holds information that could be incriminating to the Crown. Very little information about the envelope has been made public.
Smith said she is open to an inquiry after all legal proceedings have been completed,” noted Van Huigenbos.
“I think once they find out a little bit more information — if they can ever get that envelope open —- I think most people will be surprised about the things that are happening in our judicial system and inside our federal policing agency,” said Carbert.
“I think there needs to be an inquiry, because I don’t want other people to go through this like I did, or Tony did, or the other two guys.”
PREVIOUS was: 2024-08-20 For Your Selection, August 20, 2024
NOTE: the links take you off “The Battles” site. To Return, use the back arrow (<), instead of closing the site you are on.
3. 2024-08-21 Our will to break-the-back of Corruption is on trial. Coutts and Ottawa
Sandra speaking: In order to get it distributed, I stopped watching Calley & Casey (it’s a couple hours). I’ll finish it later.
Aside: RFK Jr has just announced: 2024-08-23 RFK Jr. Suspends Presidential Campaign, Will Join Forces With Trump to ‘Save Millions of Children’
With thanks to Dan who writes:
Unfortunately, some people won’t watch Calley & Casey because of their socially engineered hatred of Tucker Carlson.
Nonetheless, for those of us that are able to focus on truth and not the truth bringer, this is one of the most enlightening interviews ever if you care about your health.
youtu.be
Calley & Casey Means: How Big Pharma Keeps You Sick, and the Dark Truth About Ozempic and the Pill
Casey Means was a Stanford-educated surgeon. Her brother Calley was a lobbyist for pharma and the food industry. Both quit their jobs in horror when they rea…
Children’s Health Defense founder Robert F. Kennedy Jr. today suspended his independent campaign for U.S. president but will remain on the ballot in most states. He said he will join forces with former President Donald Trump to work together on “existential issues” where the two are aligned.
Kennedy said that following discussions with former President Donald Trump, he has agreed to join forces with Trump in a unity party, which will allow the two to work together on “existential issues,” including ending the war on Ukraine, censorship and the childhood chronic disease epidemic.
“I believe I have a moral obligation to use this opportunity to save millions of children,” Kennedy said.
Kennedy, founder and chairman on leave from Children’s Health Defense — whose campaign defied the odds by gathering more than 1 million signatures in a drive to get on the ballot in all 50 states — said he will remain on the ballot except in a handful of battleground states.
Kennedy delivered a scathing rebuke to the Democratic Party and the DNC, which he said “dragged us into court, state after state after state” in a campaign of “legal warfare” to keep him off the ballot.
He promised that if Trump is elected, in addition to ending chronic disease in children, he will work with Trump to clean up corrupt agencies and the “corrupt food system.”
Kennedy said he reached out to the Harris campaign in an attempt to engage them on issues he believes are critical to the country’s future, but the campaign didn’t respond.
Calling it a difficult choice to join the Trump campaign Kennedy said, “I have the certainty that this is what I’m meant to do. … Ultimately the only thing that will save our country and our children is if we choose to love our kids more than we hate each other.”
Kennedy launched his campaign on April 20, 2023, with a nearly two-hour speech in Boston, during which he vowed to reduce chronic disease in children.
He reminded the audience of the obligation America’s leaders have to protect children — from toxic pesticides, from dangerous pharmaceuticals and from the “corrupt merger of state and corporate power” that robs future generations of their health and of their ability to achieve financial security.
On Oct. 9, 2023, Kennedy said he would no longer challenge President Joe Biden for the Democratic nomination for U.S. president, announcing that he instead would run for president as an independent.
He told a crowd in Philadelphia that most Americans are tired of divisive politics and that they agree more than they disagree when it comes to issues like the environment, education and the economy.
“We agree that we want a clean environment and wholesome communities for our kids,” Kennedy said.
He accused both parties of being beholden to corporate donors.
Watch Kennedy’s address to the media:
“The Coutts 2” (began as ‘The Coutts 4’).
The Prosecutor (Steven Johnston) is appealing the jury decision – – not guilty of Conspiracy to murder RCMP Officers.
The 2 men remain locked up (for 2.5 years now). The only improvement is that they are FINALLY being processed.
In Lethbridge Court of King’s Bench, Crown prosecutor Steven Johnston and defence lawyer Katherin Beyak agreed the sentencing hearing would begin Aug. 26. Four days are set aside. The first two days will involve a finding of facts heard in the case. After a one day break, it resumes Aug. 29.
Two of the co-accused (originally, the Coutts 4) were released on a plea deal, early February this year, 6 months ago. A plea deal places information beyond public reach. It’s a gag order.
Things happen for a reason. There’s a pattern that emerges as more information sees the light of day.
(If you assume I am saying this in reference to the men in the Coutts trials, you are wrong.)
Sometimes weird behavior is as simple as someone’s act of desperation.
Or, one desperate person “has the goods on” someone else.
The way the Mafia works. In the darkness, it’s hard to discern the alleyways.
Where is the top of the heap? Where did it start?
The Coutts 3, a different set of men: Alex Van Herk, Marco Van Huigenbos, and George Janzen await sentencing.
“. . . The sentencing has been complicated by the refusal of Van Huigenbos to be interviewed by a probation officer for the preparation of a pre-sentence report (PSR), which is used to inform judges’ decisions regarding sentencing. Van Huigenbos told Robert (Kraychik, Rebel Journalist) that the questions that Van Herk was asked in his PSR interview seemed too invasive, asking about political beliefs and religious practices. “He further told me that he has expectations that he will face more severe consequences — that’s his word — from the judge, given that his lack of compliance may be interpreted as intransigence.”
Opinion is divided on Marco’s position regarding the pre-sentence report (not submitting one). I (Sandra speaking) respect his position. He explains his views very well; he knows the inside stories. His actions have been informed, well thought out, even-handed, every step of the way, in spite of all. He is an intelligent and honourable man.
Every step of the way he has been motivated by the well-being of others – – getting money to the families of the Coutts 4, for example. Those working men were locked up, unable to provide for their families. He had the advantage of not being locked up. He spoke up, relentlessly.
I know Marco from listening to him on videos, and from one encounter in person. Early on in the Coutts debacle, with his own trial off in the distance, I tried to support him with a financial contribution. His contribution to the public good is invaluable. He would not accept my contribution; the Coutts 4 needed the money more than he and his family did. He requested, please contribute to help them.
So, think about it: Marco Van Huigenbos would view the prosecution of the Coutts 4 as foul play. . . . Right?
I searched the net and found “Unwarranted criminal prosecution”.
People argue Marco should do this. He should do that.
Yes, but. Lawyers are expensive – – justice is far from free OR fast. And you have to be able to counteract at least some of the propaganda, the “smearing”. Marco is a young man, with a young family; he resigned the position of Town Councillor (Feb ’24); he has a business to look after.
Canada is on trial, from top to bottom. Covid brought it to a head. Our will to break-the-back of Corruption is on trial. Marco’s next step is up to him. I support him. No second-guessing and no pressure.
A malicious prosecution occurs when a police officer or other government official causes criminal charges to be filed against a person when the official knows reasonable and probable cause is lacking and the charges are filed because of malice, personal animosity, bias, or some other reason outside the interests of justice. Malice in the form of improper purpose is the key to proving malicious prosecution. In such cases, the victim’s Charter “right to life, liberty and security of the person” has been violated.
Prosecutorial misconduct happens when in the course of their official duties a prosecutor violates a law or code of professional conduct. This can range from a decision to withhold exculpatory evidence from the defence to discriminating based on race when picking a jury. Victims of the misconduct can seek a new trial, to overturn convictions, a stay of proceedings, a Charter remedy, damages or other compensation.
With thanks to Western Standard:

Moscow will assist any foreigners who want to escape the neoliberal ideals being put forward in their countries and move to Russia, where traditional values reign supreme, according to a decree signed by President Vladimir Putin and reported by the Russian news agency TASS.
Under the document, such foreign nationals will have the right to apply for temporary residence in Russia “outside the quota approved by the Russian government and without providing documents confirming their knowledge of the Russian language, Russian history and basic laws.”
Applications may be based on the rejection of their countries’ policies “aimed at imposing destructive neoliberal ideals on people, which run counter to traditional Russian spiritual and moral values.”
The values are listed in the foundations of Russia’s state policy in this field, while the Russian government is expected to compile a list of countries imposing unhealthy attitudes on their citizens. The Foreign Ministry has been instructed to start issuing three-month visas to such applicants as early as in September.
In February, Putin supported the idea of Italian student Irene Cecchini that Russia should ease entry rules for those who share traditional cultural and family values. The head of state agreed that each case requires an individual approach.
Cecchini, a student at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO), proposed the idea in February, RT reports.
“This would be beneficial for Russia, because these people would bring new skills, they would be entrepreneurs,” whose input would also help increase the population and boost the economy, the student told Putin in Russian.
Cecchini suggested the term, “impatriation” be introduced to describe “moving to a permanent place of residence in Russia on the basis of cultural, traditional and family values.” The Italian, who has been studying at MGIMO for four years and learned Russian from scratch, complained to the president that her attempts to get a Russian passport had thus far been in vain.
Cecchini also said a dedicated agency should be set up to individually assist and provide services to non-nationals who wish to come live in Russia, plus an online campaign to tell the world such opportunities were available.
Putin seemed to welcome the premise during his appearance at the ‘Strong Ideas for a New Time’ forum in Moscow.
”It’s a good idea to focus on traditional moral values when welcoming people who want to live here,” Putin said.
A state policy “to preserve and strengthen traditional Russian spiritual and moral values” was approved by Putin in November 2022. According to the document, those values, among other things, embrace life, dignity, human rights and freedoms, patriotism, a strong family, the priority of the spiritual over the material, historical memory and the unity of Russia’s peoples.
”The destruction of the traditional family through the promotion of non-traditional sexual relationships” was singled out in that policy document as being among threats to the Russian way of life.
Marriage has been designated as a union between a man and a woman, in amendments to the Russian Constitution introduced in 2020.
The news comes as the Russian Foreign Ministry barred certain groups and people from the U.K.
“A number of British think tanks, consulting agencies and other such structures are seriously contributing to London’s hostile efforts,” the ministry said. “That is why, it has been decided to put representatives from a range of such structures on Russia’s stop-list and bar them from entering Russia.”
The list includes nine structures — Forward Strategy Limited, Institute for Statecraft, Media Diversity Institute, Toro Risk Solutions, Chatham House, Open Knowledge Foundation, Privacy International, Peace Child International, Aga Khan Foundation — and 32 of their employees.
“Work on the expansion of the Russian stop-list in response to London’s hostile policy will continue,” the ministry said.
With thanks to Dan who writes:
This is one of the best articles I’ve read so far on Monkey Pox. It is worth the ten minutes and gives a helicopter view of the current outbreak, both from a scientific assessment as well as an excellent description of the business model surrounding it. It is a great context to the reappearance in the media of the latest outbreak.
By David Bell August 18, 2024 Pharma, Public Health 7 minute read
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
The World Health Organization (WHO) acted as expected this week and declared Mpox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). So, a problem in a small number of African countries that has killed about the same number of people this year as die every four hours from tuberculosis has come to dominate international headlines. This is raising a lot of angst from some circles against the WHO.
While angst is warranted, it is mostly misdirected. The WHO and the IHR emergency committee they convened had little real power – they are simply following a script written by their sponsors. The African CDC, which declared an emergency a day earlier, is in a similar position. Mpox is a real disease and needs local and proportionate solutions. But the problem it is highlighting is much bigger than Mpox or the WHO, and understanding this is essential if we are to fix it.
Mpox, previously called Monkeypox, is caused by a virus thought to normally infect African rodents such as rats and squirrels. It fairly frequently passes to, and between, humans. In humans, its effects range from very mild illness to fever and muscle pains to severe illness with its characteristic skin rash, and sometimes death. Different variants, called ‘clades,’ produce slightly different symptoms. It is passed by close body contact including sexual activity, and the WHO declared a PHEIC two years ago for a clade that was mostly passed by men having sex with men.
The current outbreaks involve sexual transmission but also other close contact such as within households, expanding its potential for harm. Children are affected and suffer the most severe outcomes, perhaps due to issues of lower prior immunity and the effects of malnutrition and other illnesses.
The current PHEIC was mainly precipitated by the ongoing outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), though there are known outbreaks in nearby countries covering a number of clades. About 500 people have died from Mpox in DRC this year, over 80% of them under 15 years of age. In that same period, about 40,000 people in DRC, mostly children under 5 years, died from malaria. The malaria deaths were mainly due to lack of access to very basic commodities like diagnostic tests, antimalarial drugs, and insecticidal bed nets, as malaria control is chronically underfunded globally. Malaria is nearly always preventable or treatable if sufficiently resourced.
During this same period in which 500 people died from Mpox in DRC, hundreds of thousands also died in DRC and surrounding African countries from tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, and the impacts of malnutrition and unsafe water. Tuberculosis alone kills about 1.3 million people globally each year, which is a rate about 1,500 times higher than Mpox in 2024.
The population of DRC is also facing increasing instability characterized by mass rape and massacres, in part due to a scramble by warlords to service the appetite of richer countries for the components of batteries. These in turn are needed to support the Green Agenda of Europe and North America. This is the context in which the people of DRC and nearby populations, which obviously should be the primary decision-makers regarding the Mpox outbreak, currently live.
For the WHO and the international public health industry, Mpox presents a very different picture. They now work for a pandemic industrial complex, built by private and political interests on the ashes of international public health. Forty years ago, Mpox would have been viewed in context, proportional to the diseases that are shortening overall life expectancy and the poverty and civil disorder that allows them to continue. The media would barely have mentioned the disease, as they were basing much of their coverage on impact and attempting to offer independent analysis.
Now the public health industry is dependent on emergencies. They have spent the past 20 years building agencies such as CEPI, inaugurated at the 2017 World Economic Forum meeting and solely focused on developing vaccines for pandemic, and on expanding capacity to detect and distinguish ever more viruses and variants. This is supported by the recently passed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).
While improving nutrition, sanitation, and living conditions provided the path to longer lifespans in Western countries, such measures sit poorly with a colonial approach to world affairs in which the wealth and dominance of some countries are seen as being dependent on the continued poverty of others. This requires a paradigm in which decision-making is in the hands of distant bureaucratic and corporate masters. Public health has an unfortunate history of supporting this, with restriction of local decision-making and the pushing of commodities as key interventions.
Thus, we now have thousands of public health functionaries, from the WHO to research institutes to non-government organizations, commercial companies, and private foundations, primarily dedicated to finding targets for Pharma, purloining public funding, and then developing and selling the cure. The entire newly minted pandemic agenda, demonstrated successfully through the Covid-19 response, is based on this approach. Justification for the salaries involved requires detection of outbreaks, an exaggeration of their likely impact, and the institution of a commodity-heavy and usually vaccine-based response.
The sponsors of this entire process – countries with large Pharma industries, Pharma investors, and Pharma companies themselves – have established power through media and political sponsorship to ensure the approach works. Evidence of the intent of the model and the harms it is wreaking can be effectively hidden from public view by a subservient media and publishing industry. But in DRC, people who have long suffered the exploitation of war and the mineral extractors, who replaced a particularly brutal colonial regime, must now also deal with the wealth extractors of Pharma.
While Mpox is concentrated in Africa, the effects of corrupted public health are global. Bird flu will likely follow the same course as Mpox in the near future. The army of researchers paid to find more outbreaks will do so. While the risk from pandemics is not significantly different than decades ago, there is an industry dependent on making you think otherwise.
As the Covid-19 playbook showed, this is about money and power on a scale only matched by similar fascist regimes of the past. Current efforts across Western countries to denigrate the concept of free speech, to criminalize dissent, and to institute health passports to control movement are not new and are in no way disconnected from the inevitability of the WHO declaring the Mpox PHEIC. We are not in the world we knew twenty years ago.
Poverty and the external forces that benefit from war, and the diseases these enable, will continue to hammer the people of DRC. If a mass vaccination campaign is instituted, which is highly likely, financial and human resources will be diverted from far greater threats. This is why decision-making must now be centralized far from the communities affected. Local priorities will never match those that expansion of the pandemic industry depends on.
In the West, we must move on from blaming the WHO and address the reality unfolding around us. Censorship is being promoted by journalists, courts are serving political agendas, and the very concept of nationhood, on which democracy depends, is being demonized. A fascist agenda is openly promoted by corporate clubs such as the World Economic Forum and echoed by the international institutions set up after the Second World War specifically to oppose it. If we cannot see this and if we do not refuse to participate, then we will have only ourselves to blame. We are voting for these governments and accepting obvious fraud, and we can choose not to do so.
For the people of DRC, children will continue to tragically die from Mpox, from malaria, and from all the diseases that ensure return on investment for distant companies making pharmaceuticals and batteries. They can ignore the pleading of the servants of the White Men of Davos who will wish to inject them, but they cannot ignore their poverty or the disinterest in their opinions. As with Covid-19, they will now become poorer because Google, the Guardian, and the WHO were bought a long time back, and now serve others.
The one real hope is that we ignore lies and empty pronouncements, refusing to bow to unfounded fear. In public health and in society, censorship protects falsehoods and dictates reflect greed for power. Once we refuse to accept either, we can begin to address the problems at the WHO and the inequity it is promoting. Until that time, we will live in this increasingly vicious circus.
Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author.
David Bell, Senior Scholar at Brownstone Institute, is a public health physician and biotech consultant in global health. He is a former medical officer and scientist at the World Health Organization (WHO), Programme Head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, Switzerland, and Director of Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund in Bellevue, WA, USA.