Sandra Finley

Aug 012024
 
 NOTE:  this is a 2022 summer report.
EXCLUSIVE: Paramedics speak out about empty hospitals, probable vax injuries during COVID
Paramedics say they transferred few COVID-19 patients during the early stages of the pandemic — despite media claims that hospitals were overwhelmed — but since the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines they’ve seen a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and chronic infections.
“If I hadn’t heard about COVID all day, every day in the news, I don’t think I would have known that anything was any different,” said Greg McTague, a paramedic of 25 years from Penticton, B.C. “It seems clear to me at this point, the vaccines are causing a lot more harm than the actual virus.”
In response to an anonymous testimonial by an Atlanta, Georgia paramedic, who claimed to be seeing a huge increase in cardiac-related calls for vaccinated men aged 18-30, the Western Standard put out a call on Twitter to see if paramedics were experiencing something similar.
The Western Standard heard from more than a dozen healthcare workers, including six paramedics, three emergency dispatchers, two nurses, two firefighters, and an embalmer.
All said they’d begun seeing an increase in medical conditions, such as heart attacks, strokes, chronic infections, and women with menstrual issues, after the vaccines were rolled out. But they said a culture of silence in the healthcare industry, particularly among doctors, was preventing the issues from being openly discussed.
Many healthcare workers said they feared they would lose their jobs for speaking out. The Western Standard chose to showcase the stories of three paramedics, one of whom chose not to share her identity.

‘The vaccines are causing a lot more harm than the actual virus’

McTague said he wasn’t busy during the pandemic’s early stages. He claimed many people were so afraid of contracting COVID-19 they chose not to go the hospital, even if they were experiencing serious medical episodes.
“We weren’t being called for COVID-19. It was our usual medical calls and car accidents and stuff like that. But I don’t know anybody who actually had COVID that was serious enough to warrant a 911 call or a hospital visit.”
McTague also said every patient that was brought into the hospital was labeled as having COVID-19, no matter what their symptoms were.
“I think they might have even said explicitly ‘everybody’s COVID until proven otherwise,'” he said, adding that the media and politicians exaggerated the severity of COVID-19.
McTague said following the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, he began seeing “weird stuff that I had never seen before.” These included a woman in her 30s who suddenly went permanently blind, men under the age of 25 having heart attacks, and people having seizures for the first time later in life, which McTague said “usually happens when people are younger.”
“I saw a few people that went blind, but her in particular, she was pretty young and healthy. People don’t just suddenly go blind unless they get hit in the head or have a stroke. To just go blind, shortly after being vaccinated, I can’t imagine what else that would be,” McTague said.
Many of the people McTague saw with heart attacks and strokes, “didn’t have the textbook presentations or symptoms.”
“There was a guy in his 20s, who was a very fit, bodybuilder type. He woke up in the middle of the night screaming with chest pains. We couldn’t even assess him because he couldn’t talk to us. He was in so much pain and writhing around. I can’t prove to you what caused that, but he had been vaccinated,” McTague said.
McTague said because the majority of paramedics got vaccinated and “obviously felt an air of superiority,” they are more likely to “turn a blind eye” to injuries that could have been caused by vaccines.
“They just say, ‘it can’t be the vaccine, because that’s been proven safe and effective. So it’s got to be something else,'” McTague said.
“Then people like me, we see these calls differently. We look at a patient with those presentations, and we think, ‘we can’t prove it, but maybe it was the vaccine,’ and we are at least open-minded. Whereas the other people wouldn’t even consider it as a possibility. Because they also don’t want to admit they might have made a mistake.”
McTague ended up losing his job in October of 2021 for not getting vaccinated. He said besides wishing he had gotten a full pension, he doesn’t regret his decision. “I don’t miss that job at all. And the way things are now, I don’t think I could ever go back anyways,” he said.
McTague said he believes the COVID-19 vaccines have caused more damage than the virus itself. “I’m not saying that there is no COVID virus, I just don’t think it’s any more serious than the average seasonal flu. And what the politicians have done is beyond stupid.”
 
‘I’ve seen a lot of these cases in the last few weeks.’
Elliot Axelman, a paramedic of eight years from New Hampshire, and author of Corona-Fascism, also claimed to not have been busy during the initial months of the pandemic. He said it appeared many were too afraid of getting COVID-19 to come to hospitals.
Asked if he saw an increase in COVID-19 patients, Axelman said he “never noticed anything different among anyone, to be honest.”
“I remember this one guy, we were bringing him back to a nursing home, and he had beaten COVID. He was 85 years-old, with obesity, heart disease, diabetes, CHF, COPD, and other issues, and he’d had COVID and got over it. I thought, ‘he’s the ideal guy this disease is supposed to kill,'” Axelman said.
Axelman claimed hospitals in the U.S. over counting COVID-19 patients “by potentially tenfold.” He claimed the PCR tests were done at 45 cycles instead of the recommended 25, resulting in a higher number of false positives and they used an overly broad list of symptoms for COVID-19 that ended up including people with other illnesses.
Additionally, Axelman said for every COVID-19 positive patient a hospital admitted, they received around $13,000 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS). When a hospital would put a patient on a ventilator, the hospital would also received approximately $39,000 from the CMS.
While the fact-checking site Snopes acknowledged that hospitals receive money for patients admitted for COVID-19 and placed on ventilators, they said “the $13,000 and $39,000 figures appear to be based on generic industry estimates for admitting and treating patients with similar conditions.”
Axelman said he’s heard of an increase in cardiac-related calls in young men since the COVID-19 vaccine was rolled out. One case that stuck out to Axelman was a 17-year-old boy that came with chest pain and dizziness two days after his second shot. Axelman said the boy had elevated Troponin levels, which is a protein released into the blood after a heart attack.
“I was talking to the attending doctor in the ER. And she was freaked out,” Axleman said. “She was like, ‘I’ve seen a lot of these cases in the last few weeks.’ And I asked, ‘so young males with myocarditis after the second shot?’ And she’s like, ‘Yeah.'”
Axelman said while most cells in the human body can regenerate, brain and heart cells cannot. “When they die, they’re dead forever. And that’s the issue with heart failure. It’s always progressive. It never really gets better.”
Since the vaccine rollout, Axelman said he has also seen a huge increase in females with “weird” issues with their menstrual cycles. He’s heard of women experiencing heavy or irregular periods, and even cases where women who have already gone through menopause got their periods again.
The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development noted COVID-19 vaccines were occasionally associated with a “small, temporary menstrual change in women.” But Axelman said even minor menstrual cycle changes can have far-reaching implications for women’s fertility.
“You don’t need to be a genius to know that the same system that affects the period, is the one that impacts fertility and pregnancy,” he said.
‘They’re all so, so sick. It’s just this general decline in the population’
A paramedic of 18 years from Southern Ontario, who refused to divulge her full name because of fears she could lose her job, said the call volume for paramedics was reduced during the first months of the pandemic. “Everybody was so scared, they were all staying home. But we were not seeing people sick with COVID-19,” she said.
The paramedic said they were busier during that winter, but the call volume was still lower than previous years. “The only thing that was different than a normal flu season was that patients’ oxygen saturation would be lower. But we never saw any young people. These were all 80 year-old, bedridden people [who] were dying,” she said.
The paramedic said during the third wave of COVID-19, they kept hearing on the news that “Toronto hospitals were overwhelmed and they were using ambulances to transport people to surrounding hospitals.” But after they signed up for a hospital transfer shift, they would “sit there for 12 hours.”
“I did one transfer out of a Brampton hospital, but that was it. They eventually cancelled the program because nobody needed to be transferred out of the hospital,” they said. “But then I would go home and hear on the news that hospitals were overwhelmed, and yet I had just been to the ICU that day, and seen that the place was half empty. And I thought ‘what is going on here? Where are all the COVID patients?'”
The paramedic also claimed that screening for COVID-19 was extremely broad, and any patient with “nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, shivers, or shortness of breath” was labelled as COVID positive.
“And that’s considered to be everybody. So if you had a breathing problem because of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, you were considered COVID positive. I don’t know if that’s how it worked for the hospital numbers, but that’s how we would treat it when we were dispatched,” they said.
The paramedic said during the Omicron wave of last winter, when “everybody I knew got sick with COVID,” virtually nobody was sick enough to be transferred to hospitals.
“I would say I saw three people that maybe died in 2021, but they were all over 75 years-old and had all the comorbidities. Three people for a whole year. I work full-time in a busy service where I’m doing eight calls a shifts,” she said.
But the paramedic said since the vaccine was rolled out, they have seen a large increase in young people experiencing chest pain right after getting vaccinated. They have also seen an uptick in middle-aged people suffering from strokes, and an “enormous amount of people in their 50s and 60s with new-onset heart arrhythmias.”
“I have to do a very thorough history. They’ll tell me these problems started a month ago, and then a couple questions later they’ll say they got their fourth vaccine dose around that same time. I can’t tell you how many healthy, older people have gotten their third and four doses, and now they’ve got these new cardiac issues. It just seems really obvious to me. I don’t see unvaccinated people getting this sick.”
The paramedic also claimed to be seeing older people with chronic infections that “just keep getting worse and worse.”
“They tell me ‘I just keep getting worse. I don’t know what’s going on. I can’t get up anymore. I’m weak, I’m nauseated all the time, and I’ve got his chronic infection I can’t seem to recover from.'”
“I’ve been working for 18 years, and the majority of my patients now are in their last few weeks of life,” the paramedic said.
“They’re just dying. They’re all so, so sick. It’s just this general decline in the population.”
Jul 312024
 

RECOMMEND:

Kraychik makes a valuable contribution to public knowledge of what happened at COUTTS.

Below, through the URL for the MARCO UPDATE   there are other reports from the current Court Proceedings at Lethbridge, by Robert.

I recommend Robert’s suite of videos.  I was very happy to see, for example, Jaclyne Martin, the wife of Jerry Morin on the screen. It’s at this URL:

https://www.rebelnews.com/carbert_testifies_coutts_trial_rejects_rcmp_firearms_allegations

Early on in the Coutts debacle, I listened to an interview I will not forget – – Jaclyne Martin.  I blogged it, but it went AWOL;  I was never able to find it again.  At the time, I wrote:

There WAS an inserted youtube interview of  Jaclyne Martin, the wife of Jerry Morin who is one of “The Coutts 4”.   The story is another of those shockers that should get out.   Jaclyne Martin, well-spoken.  I wish I had a copy of the interview to post.

(2024-07-31)  Jaclyne’s trial is coming up;  I don’t know when.  I hope it comes PRIOR TO the sentencing of Carbert and Olienick.  The youtube interview of her is powerful.  The above URL (“carbert testifies”) is the first I have seen of her in a long time.  Her testimony at her trial will be devastating.  The circumstances of the charges brought against her are outrageous.  I suspect that the RCMP’s reputation is going to take another hosing.  You’d think that the Prosecution would withdraw the charges.

RELATED
EXCERPTS  (2023)

You may be interested in this article about the trial re the Coutts blockade and the 4 men who are on trial,

https://www.globalresearch.ca/freeland-designate-them-as-terrorists-seize-their-assets-impair-them-case-coutts-four/5827709

Included at the URL,  there WAS an inserted youtube interview of  Jaclyne Martin, the wife of Jerry Morin who is one of “The Coutts 4”.

The story is another of those shockers that should get out.   Jaclyne Martin, well-spoken.  I wish I had a copy of the interview to post.

= = = = = = =

(returned after a stop in Lethbridge for the Pawlowski sentencing – – which didn’t happen.)

A take away from Lethbridge experience:  Some people in the Justice System (Lethbridge, AB for example!) do not want to understand that trials are PUBLIC.  If they refuse to tell you the status of particular cases and refer you to “boards” where there is no record of the particular case,  the proceedings can’t be followed.   They are not accessible by the public, not even if you go in person!  It all seems so mis-guided, counter-productive and such stupid strategy on their part.  EXCEPT THAT what they do is DELIBERATE.  Unbelievable that this is Canada/

Thankfully “things are happening!”.   “The Coutts Four”  . . .  and the interview of the wife of one of them, Jaclyne Martin – – my God!   Bless her for refusing to settle and being able to maintain her courage and determination.

NOTE:   In November 2022 I went to Calgary, to a large gathering of concerned people, Rebel News was the organizer.  I went because I wanted to meet people in person, hear what they have to say.  So I can make my own evaluations.  Are they radical crazies?  . . .  uh unh.  No.  I met and talked with good people.  If Canada didn’t have these people, we’d really be up the creek, with not much hope of pulling back from the brink of tyrannical disaster.  I don’t endorse all that is said,  but I seldom do . . . no matter who’s doing the talking!

– – – – – – – –

EXCERPT FROM ARTICLE BELOW:

Freeland testified before the Commission studying the Trudeau government’s invocation of the modern-day version of the War Measures Act. In the course of her testimony, Freeland’s own notes were entered into the Commission’s evidentiary exhibits.

Freeland’s account of the advice she received from a high-ranking banking official included notes that the Deputy Prime Minister had jotted down. These notes described a strategy for discrediting and disassembling the Truckers movement. She had written,

“You need to designate the group as a terrorist group and seize their assets and impair them.”

From: Saskatchewan
Sent: August 22, 2023
Subject: Fw: Provincial Lawmakers are preparing for an RCMP-less Saskatchewan – TFIGlobal

https://tfiglobalnews.com/2023/08/17/provincial-lawmakers-are-preparing-for-an-rcmp-less-saskatchewan/

Listening to the Inquiry into Invocation of Emergencies Act helped solidify my long-held view that DE-centralization where possible & practical serves people better.

Centralization of the RCMP, to me, helped foster a police state.  ONE CENTRE;  ONE VIEW; AND little capability for ACCOUNTABILITY.    The powers-that-be slid incompetent people into top jobs.  The TOP ECHELONS were YES MEN & YES WOMEN . . . COURTIERS.  Common tactic of tyrants. . . .

Jaclyne Martin (she’s a skeet shooter) is being processed on Sept 19th  in Lethbridge, the last I heard (didn’t happen).  The “Coutts 4” have been held in jail for well over a year, denied bail.  I listened to an interview of Jaclyne Martin.   The abuse of the Justice system is God awful, IMHO.   Among worse things done,  Jaclyne has not been allowed to visit, she is not allowed to see her husband, for well over a year now.

This is all the doing of the RCMP and Prosecutors.  There’s no guarantee that local police would do better;  but they MIGHT understand the lay of the land better??!!

https://www.rebelnews.com/carbert_testifies_coutts_trial_rejects_rcmp_firearms_allegations

 

MARCO VAN HUIGENBOS  UPDATE.   Related Postings at bottom.

2024-07-23 Covid: Coutts Three sentencing – Marco Van Huigenbos refuses interview from probation officer.

https://www.rebelnews.com/coutts_three_van_huigenbos_refuses_interview_probation_officer

The first date of sentencing proceedings for the Coutts Three took place Monday at the Lethbridge courthouse.

Marco Van Huigenbos was found guilty in April by a jury, alongside Alex Van Herk and George Janzen, who make up the Coutts Three. They were involved in the controversial Coutts border blockade in February 2022.

Van Huigenbos is one of men convicted of mischief over $5,000 for his role in the Coutts border blockade. He did not have a pre-sentence report (PSR) prepared, given his refusal to be interviewed by a probation officer. The Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness of Canada describes PSRs as tools used by judges to determine sentencing for persons convicted of felonies.

 

 

Van Huigenbos told Rebel News he learned from Van Herk and George Janzen they were asked about their religious and political views by probation officers. He determined those questions violated his privacy rights.

Judges presiding over serious criminal cases, with a guilty verdict, often request a PSR. It assists the court in making a sentencing decision. What constitutes a PSR is defined in the Criminal Code of Canada. Application is left to the provinces and territories.

Preparing PSRs requires probation officers to interview offenders, family members, employers and other relevant persons. Officers also review police and correctional files to help the courts ascertain if the offender is willing to change. Thousands of PSRs are written each month; yet, little is known of their value and use by the courts.

 

 

Van Huigenbos told the publication he expects coercive pressure from the government to comply with the interview to create a PSR for Justice Keith Yamauchi’s consideration.

The three men are scheduled for their next sentencing hearing on August 26, with a final sentence expected to be issued in late September. The maximum sentence for mischief over $5,000 is ten year imprisonment.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

IN CASE YOU ARE NEW,   RELATED POSTINGS

2024-02-06 Marco van Huigenbos describes the situation: two of the Coutts 4 are now free, after 223 days in remand (jail) in Alberta.

2023-09-08 Ft MacLeod Councillor speaks on the plight of the Coutts 4, Marco Van Huigenbos

2024-02-09 Solitary Confinement, Alberta. My letter to Professor Doob.

2024-04-17 Coutts Three found guilty of mischief over $5,000 by jury, maintain moral position of protest The twelve jurors unanimously found all three men guilty. Robert Kraychik, Rebel News.

2024-03-28 Meet the Coutts Three: peaceful protesters could face up to a decade in jail for supporting convoy border blockade, Rebel News, Sydney Fizzard.

2024-02-09 This is the most accurate coverage I’ve read on this subject: Conspiracy Charges Dropped, Chris Lysak, Jerry Morin Released after Agreeing to Plea Deals

2024-02-08 Two of the Coutts Four released in a shocking twist in the case. The unravelling of the Coutts Four case. Troy Media, by Ray McGinnis.

024-04-12 RCMP officer appears to cry while testifying in Coutts Three trial. (Marco) By Robert Kraychik, Rebel News.

2024-03-28 Meet the Coutts Three: peaceful protesters could face up to a decade in jail for supporting convoy border blockade, Rebel News, Sydney Fizzard.

2023-05-06 NCI: Rodney Palmer, journalist, testimony. PROPAGANDA and Covid. The Corruption of Canada’s CBC: Covid-19 Reporting under the Trudeau Government

I believe that a major problem for Trials by Jury in Canada is that large numbers of people still follow mainstream media.  They hear the Government narrative which is propaganda.  They do not have a knowledge base that equips them to understand what’s going on.  They are in a poor position to evaluate guilt.   AND,  we don’t TALK about the questions – – community dialogue is kind of dead.

 

 

Jul 122024
 

Note – – related to fines levied in 2022.

Case 1:  Meththa Fernando, the nasal swab (a “PCR” test), guilty and fined $6,255.  Overturned on Appeal,  Yeeeay!

Nasal swab tests were an ‘unlawful requirement or demand,’ wrote Justice Paul Monahan in the ruling.

Freiheit’s view. “This case will be mostly relevant for anyone who pled guilty or paid a fine under Section 58 of the Quarantine Act, for refusing to submit to Trudeau’s hired PHAC officers when they demanded travellers force wires into their sinus cavities.”

Cases 2 and 3:   (scroll down to the video)   A couple, William O’Kane and Kim Greene, Canadians returning to Canada, entry at Pearson Airport,  4 fines levied against them, total amount, about $25,000.    Under appeal,  in process.

Ontario court rules PCR test for returning air travellers violated Quarantine Act
Image

An Ontario court has ruled the Trudeau government’s requirement of COVID-19 nasal swab tests was unlawful. Justice Paul Monahan’s decision was shared online by lawyer Daniel Freiheit.

In the ruling, Justice Monahan found demanding polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests was a violation of the Quarantine Act.

 

 

The case involved Meththa Fernando, a traveller returning to her home in Mississauga. Fernando, who was apparently vaccinated, was charged after arriving at Pearson International Airport on April 9, 2022, and rejecting a COVID-19 test after following a random selection by screening officers.

She was originally convicted for failure to comply with Section 58 of the Quarantine Act, receiving a fine of $5,000 along with additional charges bringing the total to $6,255.

Justice Monahan overturned the decision on appeal, citing Section 14 of the act, noting “the screening test cannot involve the insertion into the traveller’s body of any instrument or foreign body.”

“The prosecution raised the point that perhaps the insertion into the nasal cavity did not involve the entry into the body,” Justice Monahan wrote in the decision. “I disagree. The insertion of a nasal swab into the nasal cavity is most definitely an insertion into the body.”

Some on social media expressed sentiments that the decision was too little, too late.

“Not necessarily,” was Freiheit’s view. “This case will be mostly relevant for anyone who pled guilty or paid a fine under Section 58 of the Quarantine Act, for refusing to submit to Trudeau’s hired PHAC officers when they demanded travellers force wires into their sinus cavities.”

It remains to be seen how this decision will affect other travellers charged under the act.

“I do decide that the nasal swab test, which the screening officer in this case required or demanded Ms. Fernando submit to, was an unlawful requirement
or demand,” wrote Justice Monahan.

“Ms. Fernando’s refusal to comply with the requirement or demand was lawful on her part. Because the requirement or demand made of her by the screening officer was not lawful, Ms. Fernando should not have been found guilty by the Justice of the Peace.”

Jul 122024
 

Tamara Ugolini, Rebel News

The Canadian government continues to compensate victims of the Thalidomide ‘safe and effective’ disaster, which leads some to wonder: will the COVID-19 Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) persist for decades to come?

Thalidomide was a drug introduced to the Canadian market as “safe and effective” on April 1, 1961. The drug was used in its market of origin, Germany, and more than 40 other countries since 1958, and was available for a little over two years, as safe for pregnant women and effective at curbing morning sickness in the first trimester of pregnancy.

The government of Canada is said to have authorized the marketing of the drug based on the same information that the Americans did not find sufficient to prove safety.

In fact, in 1962 FDA reviewer Frances Kelsey was awarded the President’s Award for Distinguished Federal Civilian Service by President John F. Kennedy for her refusal to authorize thalidomide on the U.S. market. As a result of her unwavering commitment to safety, Thalidomide was never distributed for clinical use there.

By December 2, 1961, the drug had already been pulled from the German and British markets, after several doctors expressed concern that it was causing severe birth defects in babies born to mothers who had taken the anti-nausea sedative.

These are known as teratogenic effects that cause abnormal fetal development. In the case of thalidomide, it resulted in visible malformation of the limbs, missing arms and ears, deafness, defects in the face including deformities of the eyes and palate and malformations of the gastrointestinal system and heart.

Thalidomide also caused miscarriage, which means it’s unknown how many deaths it caused in totality, but it’s said that less than 40% of the babies affected by this disturbing tragedy survived into adulthood.

The government of Canada was well aware of these safety concerns about the possible teratogenic effects of thalidomide, but it wasn’t until March 2, 1962, that Canadian authorities decided to finally withdraw it from the market. Thalidomide was legally available in Canada for three full months after being withdrawn from Germany.

Canada’s health minister, J.W. Monteith, in 1963 acknowledged the duty of the government to support victims of thalidomide. While class actions and other litigation were pursued globally, here in Canada victims were forced to settle out of court with gag orders, resulting in vast differences in compensation amounts.

Since Canada brought thalidomide to market despite warnings, and then delayed its withdrawal, many argued the authorities had a moral duty to adequately compensate victims.

To do so, the government of Canada then introduced the Extraordinary Assistance Plan or EAP in 1991. It gave a one-time payment ranging between $56,000 and $83,000 to 109 thalidomide survivors who fulfilled the eligibility criteria.

Faced with debilitating disability and increased financial burden, the program pivoted after advocacy efforts by the group Right the Wrong, where the Thalidomide Survivors Contribution Program (TSCP) was developed in 2015, which further compensated survivors through annual pension and other settlement money.

Then, in 2019, the Canadian Thalidomide Survivors Support Program (CTSSP) was developed, which is ongoing automatic compensation for those left with the debilitating fallout of this once touted as a safe and effective drug. It provides annual payouts geared toward disability level of up to $100,000.

Sadly, it appears the government and Health Canada did not learn anything from this horrific tragedy or the fallout of it that continues to plague roughly 100 Canadians nearly 70 years later.

They shamelessly promoted — and continue to promote — novel, still in clinical trial modified RNA drugs referred to as vaccines as safe and effective, including for pregnant and breastfeeding women, based on misrepresented data and severely underrepresented clinical trials that were ongoing and then unblinded a mere two months into the experiment.

According to the last update by the government of Canada, COVID-19 vaccine “Adverse events have been reported by 58,712 people” up to and including January 5, 2024 — that’s the date when the agency stopped reporting. The government decided they “will no longer be updating this online report.”

How transparent.

Meanwhile, the pandemic-born Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) coincided with the rollout of these injections, which were authorized through an interim order that waived liability for the rushed-to-market products.

As of its last reporting date at the beginning of June, it has received 2,628 of those nearly 59, 000 adverse event claims, with only 183 of them approved by an elusive medical review board.

That’s if those suffering injuries can navigate the extensive paperwork, multi-level filtering and bloated bureaucracy to get their injury recognized and diagnosed.

This shows that there is the very real potential for vaccine injuries to mirror the thimerosal crisis. The last few years have shown that vaccine injuries are significantly underreportedmisdiagnosed, or misattributed.

The quiet extension of the VISP program in Budget 2024, with $19 million allocated in 2024/25 and $17 million in 2025/26 (of which more than half of funds are funnelled to consultants) suggests it might become a permanent fixture in the federal budget as the fallout continues.

Jul 112024
 
TORONTO: During the COVID pandemic and lockdown, the government used the opportunity to enact rights-infringing, overbroad laws. Legislators and bureaucrats zealously enforced these laws against Canadians in an effort to secure compliance and suppress peaceful protest. Fortunately, The Democracy Fund (TDF) and its team of lawyers and paralegals, with the support of generous donors, fought back.

Recently, TDF paralegal Jenna Little secured the withdrawal or stay of 109 tickets from across Ontario, involving multiple charges per ticket.  Often, the charges were withdrawn or stayed due to a lack of reasonable prospect of conviction, delay, non-appearance of the government’s witness at trial, or a decision taken by the Crown not to proceed.

Clients were charged under the Quarantine Act s.15 (failure to provide information to screening officer), s.58 (failure to complete ArriveCan, failure to arrange for quarantine), or s.66 (obstruct an officer). The fine for each charge was typically $5,000, with potential total fines for conviction on all charges reaching $681,250.

Commenting on the recent victory, Jenna Little said: “It’s gratifying to see our hard work pay off, and a relief to our clients who have endured years of legal uncertainty. But the government is still doggedly pursuing many clients for charges that should not have been brought in the first place and consume scarce judicial resources.”

Though many of these cases have been successfully resolved, many remain. Other tickets involve charges under s.7.0.11 (obstruct an officer) of the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, with penalties of up to 1 year in jail and a $100,000 fine. In rare cases, clients are also charged under s.10 of the Reopening Act (gather or fail to close premises). Fines under those statutes range from $125 to $19,000. Hundreds of clients are facing potential fines and jail time for peacefully protesting or objecting to government overreach during COVID lockdowns. With your support, TDF will provide these clients with legal representation and, hopefully, legal vindication.

You Make a Difference – Support Change Today

To support our work and help in the fight against unconstitutional laws, illegitimate mandates, and government overreach, please consider making a tax-deductible below.

DONATE NOW
Crown withdraws all charges against peaceful protester arrested, Tasered at Ottawa protest

The Democracy Fund (TDF) represented Mr. Dalton in discussions with the Crown and throughout numerous court appearances. Initially facing potential jail time, a consequence exacerbated by the manner in which he was handled by police, the Crown ultimately agreed to drop all charges following negotiations by TDF.

TDF lawyer Adam Blake-Gallipeau expressed satisfaction with the outcome, stating, “Mr. Dalton exercised his Charter rights to peacefully assemble and express his views on current issues. We are pleased with the resolution.”

Continue reading

 

 

Crown withdraws another ArriveCan ticket after TDF files legal challenge

Upon returning to Canada from the US in 2022 after a long stay abroad, our client was told by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) that he must complete the ArriveCan app and answer questions about his vaccination status.

He had his passport taken and was interrogated by a PHAC officer and police officer. It appeared that, though he was initially advised that he was not being detained, he was, in fact, subsequently detained. He was then charged with an offence under the Quarantine Act and issued a ticket for $6,255.

Continue reading

BC man acquitted of hosting illegal gathering

Honner, who represented Jordan, explained that there was no direct evidence that Jordan was the host of the event. While the trial judge was satisfied that Jordan lived at the residence in question and that an event was taking place, he was not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that Jordan was the host.

“A judge should not convict where the evidence is entirely circumstantial and other reasonable inferences can be drawn from the facts,” says Honner. “In this case, there were inferences available to the trial judge that were consistent with Jordan’s innocence, including the inference that someone else living at the residence hosted the event.”

Continue reading

Jul 092024
 

(Sandra speaking:  I attended.  This is an excellent presentation by  B.C. lawyer Umar Sheikh.)

Drea Humphrey reports:

There’s renewed hope for vaccine-injured Canadians to get justice from the Big Pharma manufacturers of the COVID shots.

During their forced and coercive rollout, we were all told the likes of Pfizer and Moderna had legal immunity and could not be sued if you were injured by their “safe and effective” injections.

But B.C. lawyer Umar Sheikh, had some good news during his recent speech at the We Unify Conference in Victoria.

You don’t want to miss what he had to say. Click here to watch.

Three lawsuits are already in the works.

That includes a $35.6 million lawsuit against BioNTtech in Germany, and Pfizer in the U.S. and Canada, on behalf of Dan Hartman, whose 17-year-old son, Sean Hartman, was found dead just 33 days after his Pfizer shot. (You can find the latest updates to that case and many others at www.NoMoreShots.ca.)

If you appreciate our critical reporting on this issue, the likes of which you won’t find in tax-funded mainstream media, please consider supporting our independent journalism with a donation. (Click here.)

Yours truly,

Drea Humphrey

P.S. At Rebel News, we continue to give a voice to the vaccine-injured and shine a light on the truth about these shots that was buried over the past four years. And we are the only news outlet calling for the immediate removal of these shots from the market. Help us do that by signing our petition at www.NoMoreShots.ca.

 

 

Jul 062024
 

I just noticed – – more articles on Western Standard about VACCINE INJURIES in Canada (in addition to those on Rebel News and on websites like the JCCF.).  Details I haven’t seen before. With thanks to Jen Hodgson.

US courts across the board rule against COVID mandates

Federal and district courts across the United States continue to rule in favour of plaintiffs disputing various COVID-19 mandates.

Defendants in the multitude of lawsuits include federal and state institutions, universities, hospitals, airlines and institutions such as the Mayo Clinic.

A federal jury on Monday found Tanja Benton, a former BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee employee who was fired for refusing to comply with the company’s vaccine mandate, was wrongfully dismissed and awarded a settlement of over $687,000. 

Benton “proved by a preponderance of the evidence” she refused the vaccine based on her “sincerely held religious belief,” the settlement, obtained by local broadcaster WTVC, states.

The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals , on June 28, confirmed employers that failed to accommodate requests for exemptions from its COVID-19 vaccination policy based on employees’ religious objections violate the law.

Najean Lucky, a non-denominational Christian, was denied employment as a manager for a medical provider because she wouldn’t take the vaccine on religious grounds, and the company would not provide an exemption, per the National Law Review. Lucky sued under Title VII and though her case was initially dismissed, it was reinstated and sent back to the lower courts.

The Mayo Clinic is facing heat for alleged religious bias in enforcing its COVID-19 vaccination policy, along with discriminating against an employee for free speech related issues surrounding the injections.

The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in May revived a lawsuit that was tossed out last year launched by five former employees alleging the Minnesota-based clinic unlawfully fired them for refusing the vaccine and PCR testing due to their Christian beliefs. The panel of three judges found the lawsuit was wrongly dismissed and the Mayo Clinic failed to acknowledge their objections as sincere.

“The district court erred by emphasizing that many Christians elect to receive the vaccine. Beliefs do not have to be uniform across all members of a religion or acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others,” wrote Judge Duane Benton in the ruling.

The clinic faces a separate pandemic-era lawsuit, launched by Dr. Michael Joyner, who was suspended from the clinic because he spoke to journalists in a personal capacity about his research, per The Fire. He “failed to communicate in accordance with prescribed messaging,” and was suspended. Minnesota Judge Kathy Wallace on Monday denied most of the clinic’s motion to dismiss Joyner’s lawsuit against the Mayo Clinic, CEO Dr. Gianrico Farrugia and Dr. Carlos Mantilla, per Post Bulletin. A trial by jury is scheduled in July 2025.

The 9th Circuit US Court of Appeal in San Francisco, CA in June sent a school vaccine mandate case back to the lower courts, having ruled in favour of plaintiffs’ claims the mRNA shot is a “medical treatment” and not a “traditional vaccine.”

The US District Court for Northern Texas in Fort Worth in February upheld a Navy Seals’ lawsuit over vaccine mandates, despite an earlier court ruling the case is moot, The Texan reported. Members can continue to pursue their case against the Navy for enforcing a COVID-19 vaccination mandate that violated their religious beliefs.

Though the mandate has been lifted, “discriminatory treatment of the class members …because of the mandate still linger,” wrote Judge Reed O’Connor in the court files.

United Airlines faces a $1 billion class action lawsuit for its vaccine mandate based on religious discrimination. A 5th Circuit Texas judge granted on June 21 a nationwide class action suit to more than 2,200 employees suspended without pay for not getting vaccinated, the Washington Examiner reported.

The case is among the largest religious discrimination class action lawsuits in history.

The Ninth Circuit court in the Eastern District of Washington last month ruled lower courts wrongfully dismissed a lawsuit on religious grounds. Judges found lower courts must recognize it was unlawful to dismiss firefighters who refused to comply with the vaccine mandate on religious grounds and then bring in from other districts firefighters who were under a vaccine exemption. It was a violation of those firefighters’ religious rights, the court decided, per Religious Liberty TV. 

On May 7, the 10th Circuit Court of Appealsfederal court ruled in favour of two employees and 17 students alleging the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus’ COVID-19 vaccination mandate was discriminatory on religious grounds, per the Epoch Times. The case was initially thrown out by a US district judge in 2022. The mandate “clearly violates the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause as interpreted by our precedents,” judges wrote in their recent decision.