‘The vaccines are causing a lot more harm than the actual virus’
RECOMMEND:
Kraychik makes a valuable contribution to public knowledge of what happened at COUTTS.
Below, through the URL for the MARCO UPDATE there are other reports from the current Court Proceedings at Lethbridge, by Robert.
I recommend Robert’s suite of videos. I was very happy to see, for example, Jaclyne Martin, the wife of Jerry Morin on the screen. It’s at this URL:
https://www.rebelnews.com/carbert_testifies_coutts_trial_rejects_rcmp_firearms_allegations
Early on in the Coutts debacle, I listened to an interview I will not forget – – Jaclyne Martin. I blogged it, but it went AWOL; I was never able to find it again. At the time, I wrote:
There WAS an inserted youtube interview of Jaclyne Martin, the wife of Jerry Morin who is one of “The Coutts 4”. The story is another of those shockers that should get out. Jaclyne Martin, well-spoken. I wish I had a copy of the interview to post.
(2024-07-31) Jaclyne’s trial is coming up; I don’t know when. I hope it comes PRIOR TO the sentencing of Carbert and Olienick. The youtube interview of her is powerful. The above URL (“carbert testifies”) is the first I have seen of her in a long time. Her testimony at her trial will be devastating. The circumstances of the charges brought against her are outrageous. I suspect that the RCMP’s reputation is going to take another hosing. You’d think that the Prosecution would withdraw the charges.
RELATED
-
-
-
-
- 2023-07-26 Jaclyne Martin, wife of Jerry Morin who is one of the “Coutts 4”, interviewed by Jason Lavigne. You would not like this to happen to you. NO basis for the charges.
- 2023-09-05 COUTTS, AB, Freedom Convoy, 7 Court cases in Lethbridge: Artur Pawlowski again; Marco Huigenbos; Prosecution of “Coutts 4” (in jail for well over a year without trial); Jaclyne Martin, wife of Jerry Morin. Morin is one of the “Coutts 4”. PLUS the case of Constable Helen Grus.
-
-
-
EXCERPTS (2023)
You may be interested in this article about the trial re the Coutts blockade and the 4 men who are on trial,
Included at the URL, there WAS an inserted youtube interview of Jaclyne Martin, the wife of Jerry Morin who is one of “The Coutts 4”.
The story is another of those shockers that should get out. Jaclyne Martin, well-spoken. I wish I had a copy of the interview to post.
= = = = = = =
(returned after a stop in Lethbridge for the Pawlowski sentencing – – which didn’t happen.)
A take away from Lethbridge experience: Some people in the Justice System (Lethbridge, AB for example!) do not want to understand that trials are PUBLIC. If they refuse to tell you the status of particular cases and refer you to “boards” where there is no record of the particular case, the proceedings can’t be followed. They are not accessible by the public, not even if you go in person! It all seems so mis-guided, counter-productive and such stupid strategy on their part. EXCEPT THAT what they do is DELIBERATE. Unbelievable that this is Canada/
Thankfully “things are happening!”. “The Coutts Four” . . . and the interview of the wife of one of them, Jaclyne Martin – – my God! Bless her for refusing to settle and being able to maintain her courage and determination.
NOTE: In November 2022 I went to Calgary, to a large gathering of concerned people, Rebel News was the organizer. I went because I wanted to meet people in person, hear what they have to say. So I can make my own evaluations. Are they radical crazies? . . . uh unh. No. I met and talked with good people. If Canada didn’t have these people, we’d really be up the creek, with not much hope of pulling back from the brink of tyrannical disaster. I don’t endorse all that is said, but I seldom do . . . no matter who’s doing the talking!
– – – – – – – –
EXCERPT FROM ARTICLE BELOW:
Freeland testified before the Commission studying the Trudeau government’s invocation of the modern-day version of the War Measures Act. In the course of her testimony, Freeland’s own notes were entered into the Commission’s evidentiary exhibits.
Freeland’s account of the advice she received from a high-ranking banking official included notes that the Deputy Prime Minister had jotted down. These notes described a strategy for discrediting and disassembling the Truckers movement. She had written,
“You need to designate the group as a terrorist group and seize their assets and impair them.”
From: Saskatchewan
Sent: August 22, 2023
Subject: Fw: Provincial Lawmakers are preparing for an RCMP-less Saskatchewan – TFIGlobal
Listening to the Inquiry into Invocation of Emergencies Act helped solidify my long-held view that DE-centralization where possible & practical serves people better.
Centralization of the RCMP, to me, helped foster a police state. ONE CENTRE; ONE VIEW; AND little capability for ACCOUNTABILITY. The powers-that-be slid incompetent people into top jobs. The TOP ECHELONS were YES MEN & YES WOMEN . . . COURTIERS. Common tactic of tyrants. . . .
Jaclyne Martin (she’s a skeet shooter) is being processed on Sept 19th in Lethbridge, the last I heard (didn’t happen). The “Coutts 4” have been held in jail for well over a year, denied bail. I listened to an interview of Jaclyne Martin. The abuse of the Justice system is God awful, IMHO. Among worse things done, Jaclyne has not been allowed to visit, she is not allowed to see her husband, for well over a year now.
This is all the doing of the RCMP and Prosecutors. There’s no guarantee that local police would do better; but they MIGHT understand the lay of the land better??!!
https://www.rebelnews.com/carbert_testifies_coutts_trial_rejects_rcmp_firearms_allegations
MARCO VAN HUIGENBOS UPDATE. Related Postings at bottom.
2024-07-23 Covid: Coutts Three sentencing – Marco Van Huigenbos refuses interview from probation officer.
https://www.rebelnews.com/coutts_three_van_huigenbos_refuses_interview_probation_officer
The first date of sentencing proceedings for the Coutts Three took place Monday at the Lethbridge courthouse.
Marco Van Huigenbos was found guilty in April by a jury, alongside Alex Van Herk and George Janzen, who make up the Coutts Three. They were involved in the controversial Coutts border blockade in February 2022.
Van Huigenbos is one of men convicted of mischief over $5,000 for his role in the Coutts border blockade. He did not have a pre-sentence report (PSR) prepared, given his refusal to be interviewed by a probation officer. The Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness of Canada describes PSRs as tools used by judges to determine sentencing for persons convicted of felonies.
Van Huigenbos told Rebel News he learned from Van Herk and George Janzen they were asked about their religious and political views by probation officers. He determined those questions violated his privacy rights.
Judges presiding over serious criminal cases, with a guilty verdict, often request a PSR. It assists the court in making a sentencing decision. What constitutes a PSR is defined in the Criminal Code of Canada. Application is left to the provinces and territories.
Preparing PSRs requires probation officers to interview offenders, family members, employers and other relevant persons. Officers also review police and correctional files to help the courts ascertain if the offender is willing to change. Thousands of PSRs are written each month; yet, little is known of their value and use by the courts.
Van Huigenbos told the publication he expects coercive pressure from the government to comply with the interview to create a PSR for Justice Keith Yamauchi’s consideration.
The three men are scheduled for their next sentencing hearing on August 26, with a final sentence expected to be issued in late September. The maximum sentence for mischief over $5,000 is ten year imprisonment.
– – – – – – – – – – – –
IN CASE YOU ARE NEW, RELATED POSTINGS
2023-09-08 Ft MacLeod Councillor speaks on the plight of the Coutts 4, Marco Van Huigenbos
2024-02-09 Solitary Confinement, Alberta. My letter to Professor Doob.
I believe that a major problem for Trials by Jury in Canada is that large numbers of people still follow mainstream media. They hear the Government narrative which is propaganda. They do not have a knowledge base that equips them to understand what’s going on. They are in a poor position to evaluate guilt. AND, we don’t TALK about the questions – – community dialogue is kind of dead.
Note – – related to fines levied in 2022.
Case 1: Meththa Fernando, the nasal swab (a “PCR” test), guilty and fined $6,255. Overturned on Appeal, Yeeeay!
Nasal swab tests were an ‘unlawful requirement or demand,’ wrote Justice Paul Monahan in the ruling.
Freiheit’s view. “This case will be mostly relevant for anyone who pled guilty or paid a fine under Section 58 of the Quarantine Act, for refusing to submit to Trudeau’s hired PHAC officers when they demanded travellers force wires into their sinus cavities.”
Cases 2 and 3: (scroll down to the video) A couple, William O’Kane and Kim Greene, Canadians returning to Canada, entry at Pearson Airport, 4 fines levied against them, total amount, about $25,000. Under appeal, in process.
An Ontario court has ruled the Trudeau government’s requirement of COVID-19 nasal swab tests was unlawful. Justice Paul Monahan’s decision was shared online by lawyer Daniel Freiheit.
In the ruling, Justice Monahan found demanding polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests was a violation of the Quarantine Act.
The case involved Meththa Fernando, a traveller returning to her home in Mississauga. Fernando, who was apparently vaccinated, was charged after arriving at Pearson International Airport on April 9, 2022, and rejecting a COVID-19 test after following a random selection by screening officers.
She was originally convicted for failure to comply with Section 58 of the Quarantine Act, receiving a fine of $5,000 along with additional charges bringing the total to $6,255.
Justice Monahan overturned the decision on appeal, citing Section 14 of the act, noting “the screening test cannot involve the insertion into the traveller’s body of any instrument or foreign body.”
“The prosecution raised the point that perhaps the insertion into the nasal cavity did not involve the entry into the body,” Justice Monahan wrote in the decision. “I disagree. The insertion of a nasal swab into the nasal cavity is most definitely an insertion into the body.”
Some on social media expressed sentiments that the decision was too little, too late.
“Not necessarily,” was Freiheit’s view. “This case will be mostly relevant for anyone who pled guilty or paid a fine under Section 58 of the Quarantine Act, for refusing to submit to Trudeau’s hired PHAC officers when they demanded travellers force wires into their sinus cavities.”
It remains to be seen how this decision will affect other travellers charged under the act.
“I do decide that the nasal swab test, which the screening officer in this case required or demanded Ms. Fernando submit to, was an unlawful requirement
or demand,” wrote Justice Monahan.
“Ms. Fernando’s refusal to comply with the requirement or demand was lawful on her part. Because the requirement or demand made of her by the screening officer was not lawful, Ms. Fernando should not have been found guilty by the Justice of the Peace.”
Tamara Ugolini, Rebel News
The Canadian government continues to compensate victims of the Thalidomide ‘safe and effective’ disaster, which leads some to wonder: will the COVID-19 Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) persist for decades to come?
Thalidomide was a drug introduced to the Canadian market as “safe and effective” on April 1, 1961. The drug was used in its market of origin, Germany, and more than 40 other countries since 1958, and was available for a little over two years, as safe for pregnant women and effective at curbing morning sickness in the first trimester of pregnancy.
The government of Canada is said to have authorized the marketing of the drug based on the same information that the Americans did not find sufficient to prove safety.
In fact, in 1962 FDA reviewer Frances Kelsey was awarded the President’s Award for Distinguished Federal Civilian Service by President John F. Kennedy for her refusal to authorize thalidomide on the U.S. market. As a result of her unwavering commitment to safety, Thalidomide was never distributed for clinical use there.
By December 2, 1961, the drug had already been pulled from the German and British markets, after several doctors expressed concern that it was causing severe birth defects in babies born to mothers who had taken the anti-nausea sedative.
These are known as teratogenic effects that cause abnormal fetal development. In the case of thalidomide, it resulted in visible malformation of the limbs, missing arms and ears, deafness, defects in the face including deformities of the eyes and palate and malformations of the gastrointestinal system and heart.
Thalidomide also caused miscarriage, which means it’s unknown how many deaths it caused in totality, but it’s said that less than 40% of the babies affected by this disturbing tragedy survived into adulthood.
The government of Canada was well aware of these safety concerns about the possible teratogenic effects of thalidomide, but it wasn’t until March 2, 1962, that Canadian authorities decided to finally withdraw it from the market. Thalidomide was legally available in Canada for three full months after being withdrawn from Germany.
Canada’s health minister, J.W. Monteith, in 1963 acknowledged the duty of the government to support victims of thalidomide. While class actions and other litigation were pursued globally, here in Canada victims were forced to settle out of court with gag orders, resulting in vast differences in compensation amounts.
Since Canada brought thalidomide to market despite warnings, and then delayed its withdrawal, many argued the authorities had a moral duty to adequately compensate victims.
To do so, the government of Canada then introduced the Extraordinary Assistance Plan or EAP in 1991. It gave a one-time payment ranging between $56,000 and $83,000 to 109 thalidomide survivors who fulfilled the eligibility criteria.
Faced with debilitating disability and increased financial burden, the program pivoted after advocacy efforts by the group Right the Wrong, where the Thalidomide Survivors Contribution Program (TSCP) was developed in 2015, which further compensated survivors through annual pension and other settlement money.
Then, in 2019, the Canadian Thalidomide Survivors Support Program (CTSSP) was developed, which is ongoing automatic compensation for those left with the debilitating fallout of this once touted as a safe and effective drug. It provides annual payouts geared toward disability level of up to $100,000.
Sadly, it appears the government and Health Canada did not learn anything from this horrific tragedy or the fallout of it that continues to plague roughly 100 Canadians nearly 70 years later.
They shamelessly promoted — and continue to promote — novel, still in clinical trial modified RNA drugs referred to as vaccines as safe and effective, including for pregnant and breastfeeding women, based on misrepresented data and severely underrepresented clinical trials that were ongoing and then unblinded a mere two months into the experiment.
According to the last update by the government of Canada, COVID-19 vaccine “Adverse events have been reported by 58,712 people” up to and including January 5, 2024 — that’s the date when the agency stopped reporting. The government decided they “will no longer be updating this online report.”
How transparent.
Meanwhile, the pandemic-born Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) coincided with the rollout of these injections, which were authorized through an interim order that waived liability for the rushed-to-market products.
As of its last reporting date at the beginning of June, it has received 2,628 of those nearly 59, 000 adverse event claims, with only 183 of them approved by an elusive medical review board.
That’s if those suffering injuries can navigate the extensive paperwork, multi-level filtering and bloated bureaucracy to get their injury recognized and diagnosed.
This shows that there is the very real potential for vaccine injuries to mirror the thimerosal crisis. The last few years have shown that vaccine injuries are significantly underreported, misdiagnosed, or misattributed.
The quiet extension of the VISP program in Budget 2024, with $19 million allocated in 2024/25 and $17 million in 2025/26 (of which more than half of funds are funnelled to consultants) suggests it might become a permanent fixture in the federal budget as the fallout continues.
A bolus is a single, large dose of medicine. For a person with diabetes, a bolus is a dose of insulin taken to handle a rise in blood glucose (a type of sugar), like the one that happens during eating. A bolus is given as a shot or through an insulin pump.
TORONTO: During the COVID pandemic and lockdown, the government used the opportunity to enact rights-infringing, overbroad laws. Legislators and bureaucrats zealously enforced these laws against Canadians in an effort to secure compliance and suppress peaceful protest. Fortunately, The Democracy Fund (TDF) and its team of lawyers and paralegals, with the support of generous donors, fought back.
Recently, TDF paralegal Jenna Little secured the withdrawal or stay of 109 tickets from across Ontario, involving multiple charges per ticket. Often, the charges were withdrawn or stayed due to a lack of reasonable prospect of conviction, delay, non-appearance of the government’s witness at trial, or a decision taken by the Crown not to proceed. Clients were charged under the Quarantine Act s.15 (failure to provide information to screening officer), s.58 (failure to complete ArriveCan, failure to arrange for quarantine), or s.66 (obstruct an officer). The fine for each charge was typically $5,000, with potential total fines for conviction on all charges reaching $681,250. Commenting on the recent victory, Jenna Little said: “It’s gratifying to see our hard work pay off, and a relief to our clients who have endured years of legal uncertainty. But the government is still doggedly pursuing many clients for charges that should not have been brought in the first place and consume scarce judicial resources.” Though many of these cases have been successfully resolved, many remain. Other tickets involve charges under s.7.0.11 (obstruct an officer) of the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, with penalties of up to 1 year in jail and a $100,000 fine. In rare cases, clients are also charged under s.10 of the Reopening Act (gather or fail to close premises). Fines under those statutes range from $125 to $19,000. Hundreds of clients are facing potential fines and jail time for peacefully protesting or objecting to government overreach during COVID lockdowns. With your support, TDF will provide these clients with legal representation and, hopefully, legal vindication. |
You Make a Difference – Support Change Today
To support our work and help in the fight against unconstitutional laws, illegitimate mandates, and government overreach, please consider making a tax-deductible below. |
|
|
|
|
|
(Sandra speaking: I attended. This is an excellent presentation by B.C. lawyer Umar Sheikh.)
Drea Humphrey reports:
There’s renewed hope for vaccine-injured Canadians to get justice from the Big Pharma manufacturers of the COVID shots.
During their forced and coercive rollout, we were all told the likes of Pfizer and Moderna had legal immunity and could not be sued if you were injured by their “safe and effective” injections.
But B.C. lawyer Umar Sheikh, had some good news during his recent speech at the We Unify Conference in Victoria.
You don’t want to miss what he had to say. Click here to watch.
Three lawsuits are already in the works.
That includes a $35.6 million lawsuit against BioNTtech in Germany, and Pfizer in the U.S. and Canada, on behalf of Dan Hartman, whose 17-year-old son, Sean Hartman, was found dead just 33 days after his Pfizer shot. (You can find the latest updates to that case and many others at www.NoMoreShots.ca.)
If you appreciate our critical reporting on this issue, the likes of which you won’t find in tax-funded mainstream media, please consider supporting our independent journalism with a donation. (Click here.)
Yours truly,
Drea Humphrey
P.S. At Rebel News, we continue to give a voice to the vaccine-injured and shine a light on the truth about these shots that was buried over the past four years. And we are the only news outlet calling for the immediate removal of these shots from the market. Help us do that by signing our petition at www.NoMoreShots.ca.
2024-07-06 US courts across the board rule against COVID mandates. By Jen Hodgson, Western Standard.
I just noticed – – more articles on Western Standard about VACCINE INJURIES in Canada (in addition to those on Rebel News and on websites like the JCCF.). Details I haven’t seen before. With thanks to Jen Hodgson.
US courts across the board rule against COVID mandates
Federal and district courts across the United States continue to rule in favour of plaintiffs disputing various COVID-19 mandates.
Defendants in the multitude of lawsuits include federal and state institutions, universities, hospitals, airlines and institutions such as the Mayo Clinic.
A federal jury on Monday found Tanja Benton, a former BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee employee who was fired for refusing to comply with the company’s vaccine mandate, was wrongfully dismissed and awarded a settlement of over $687,000.
Benton “proved by a preponderance of the evidence” she refused the vaccine based on her “sincerely held religious belief,” the settlement, obtained by local broadcaster WTVC, states.
The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals , on June 28, confirmed employers that failed to accommodate requests for exemptions from its COVID-19 vaccination policy based on employees’ religious objections violate the law.
Najean Lucky, a non-denominational Christian, was denied employment as a manager for a medical provider because she wouldn’t take the vaccine on religious grounds, and the company would not provide an exemption, per the National Law Review. Lucky sued under Title VII and though her case was initially dismissed, it was reinstated and sent back to the lower courts.
The Mayo Clinic is facing heat for alleged religious bias in enforcing its COVID-19 vaccination policy, along with discriminating against an employee for free speech related issues surrounding the injections.
The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in May revived a lawsuit that was tossed out last year launched by five former employees alleging the Minnesota-based clinic unlawfully fired them for refusing the vaccine and PCR testing due to their Christian beliefs. The panel of three judges found the lawsuit was wrongly dismissed and the Mayo Clinic failed to acknowledge their objections as sincere.
“The district court erred by emphasizing that many Christians elect to receive the vaccine. Beliefs do not have to be uniform across all members of a religion or acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others,” wrote Judge Duane Benton in the ruling.
The clinic faces a separate pandemic-era lawsuit, launched by Dr. Michael Joyner, who was suspended from the clinic because he spoke to journalists in a personal capacity about his research, per The Fire. He “failed to communicate in accordance with prescribed messaging,” and was suspended. Minnesota Judge Kathy Wallace on Monday denied most of the clinic’s motion to dismiss Joyner’s lawsuit against the Mayo Clinic, CEO Dr. Gianrico Farrugia and Dr. Carlos Mantilla, per Post Bulletin. A trial by jury is scheduled in July 2025.
The 9th Circuit US Court of Appeal in San Francisco, CA in June sent a school vaccine mandate case back to the lower courts, having ruled in favour of plaintiffs’ claims the mRNA shot is a “medical treatment” and not a “traditional vaccine.”
The US District Court for Northern Texas in Fort Worth in February upheld a Navy Seals’ lawsuit over vaccine mandates, despite an earlier court ruling the case is moot, The Texan reported. Members can continue to pursue their case against the Navy for enforcing a COVID-19 vaccination mandate that violated their religious beliefs.
Though the mandate has been lifted, “discriminatory treatment of the class members …because of the mandate still linger,” wrote Judge Reed O’Connor in the court files.
United Airlines faces a $1 billion class action lawsuit for its vaccine mandate based on religious discrimination. A 5th Circuit Texas judge granted on June 21 a nationwide class action suit to more than 2,200 employees suspended without pay for not getting vaccinated, the Washington Examiner reported.
The case is among the largest religious discrimination class action lawsuits in history.
The Ninth Circuit court in the Eastern District of Washington last month ruled lower courts wrongfully dismissed a lawsuit on religious grounds. Judges found lower courts must recognize it was unlawful to dismiss firefighters who refused to comply with the vaccine mandate on religious grounds and then bring in from other districts firefighters who were under a vaccine exemption. It was a violation of those firefighters’ religious rights, the court decided, per Religious Liberty TV.
On May 7, the 10th Circuit Court of Appealsfederal court ruled in favour of two employees and 17 students alleging the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus’ COVID-19 vaccination mandate was discriminatory on religious grounds, per the Epoch Times. The case was initially thrown out by a US district judge in 2022. The mandate “clearly violates the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause as interpreted by our precedents,” judges wrote in their recent decision.