A bolus is a single, large dose of medicine. For a person with diabetes, a bolus is a dose of insulin taken to handle a rise in blood glucose (a type of sugar), like the one that happens during eating. A bolus is given as a shot or through an insulin pump.
| TORONTO: During the COVID pandemic and lockdown, the government used the opportunity to enact rights-infringing, overbroad laws. Legislators and bureaucrats zealously enforced these laws against Canadians in an effort to secure compliance and suppress peaceful protest. Fortunately, The Democracy Fund (TDF) and its team of lawyers and paralegals, with the support of generous donors, fought back.
Recently, TDF paralegal Jenna Little secured the withdrawal or stay of 109 tickets from across Ontario, involving multiple charges per ticket. Often, the charges were withdrawn or stayed due to a lack of reasonable prospect of conviction, delay, non-appearance of the government’s witness at trial, or a decision taken by the Crown not to proceed. Clients were charged under the Quarantine Act s.15 (failure to provide information to screening officer), s.58 (failure to complete ArriveCan, failure to arrange for quarantine), or s.66 (obstruct an officer). The fine for each charge was typically $5,000, with potential total fines for conviction on all charges reaching $681,250. Commenting on the recent victory, Jenna Little said: “It’s gratifying to see our hard work pay off, and a relief to our clients who have endured years of legal uncertainty. But the government is still doggedly pursuing many clients for charges that should not have been brought in the first place and consume scarce judicial resources.” Though many of these cases have been successfully resolved, many remain. Other tickets involve charges under s.7.0.11 (obstruct an officer) of the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, with penalties of up to 1 year in jail and a $100,000 fine. In rare cases, clients are also charged under s.10 of the Reopening Act (gather or fail to close premises). Fines under those statutes range from $125 to $19,000. Hundreds of clients are facing potential fines and jail time for peacefully protesting or objecting to government overreach during COVID lockdowns. With your support, TDF will provide these clients with legal representation and, hopefully, legal vindication. |
| You Make a Difference – Support Change Today
To support our work and help in the fight against unconstitutional laws, illegitimate mandates, and government overreach, please consider making a tax-deductible below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Sandra speaking: I attended. This is an excellent presentation by B.C. lawyer Umar Sheikh.)
Drea Humphrey reports:
There’s renewed hope for vaccine-injured Canadians to get justice from the Big Pharma manufacturers of the COVID shots.
During their forced and coercive rollout, we were all told the likes of Pfizer and Moderna had legal immunity and could not be sued if you were injured by their “safe and effective” injections.
But B.C. lawyer Umar Sheikh, had some good news during his recent speech at the We Unify Conference in Victoria.
You don’t want to miss what he had to say. Click here to watch.
Three lawsuits are already in the works.
That includes a $35.6 million lawsuit against BioNTtech in Germany, and Pfizer in the U.S. and Canada, on behalf of Dan Hartman, whose 17-year-old son, Sean Hartman, was found dead just 33 days after his Pfizer shot. (You can find the latest updates to that case and many others at www.NoMoreShots.ca.)
If you appreciate our critical reporting on this issue, the likes of which you won’t find in tax-funded mainstream media, please consider supporting our independent journalism with a donation. (Click here.)
Yours truly,
Drea Humphrey
P.S. At Rebel News, we continue to give a voice to the vaccine-injured and shine a light on the truth about these shots that was buried over the past four years. And we are the only news outlet calling for the immediate removal of these shots from the market. Help us do that by signing our petition at www.NoMoreShots.ca.
I just noticed – – more articles on Western Standard about VACCINE INJURIES in Canada (in addition to those on Rebel News and on websites like the JCCF.). Details I haven’t seen before. With thanks to Jen Hodgson.
Federal and district courts across the United States continue to rule in favour of plaintiffs disputing various COVID-19 mandates.
Defendants in the multitude of lawsuits include federal and state institutions, universities, hospitals, airlines and institutions such as the Mayo Clinic.
A federal jury on Monday found Tanja Benton, a former BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee employee who was fired for refusing to comply with the company’s vaccine mandate, was wrongfully dismissed and awarded a settlement of over $687,000.
Benton “proved by a preponderance of the evidence” she refused the vaccine based on her “sincerely held religious belief,” the settlement, obtained by local broadcaster WTVC, states.
The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals , on June 28, confirmed employers that failed to accommodate requests for exemptions from its COVID-19 vaccination policy based on employees’ religious objections violate the law.
Najean Lucky, a non-denominational Christian, was denied employment as a manager for a medical provider because she wouldn’t take the vaccine on religious grounds, and the company would not provide an exemption, per the National Law Review. Lucky sued under Title VII and though her case was initially dismissed, it was reinstated and sent back to the lower courts.
The Mayo Clinic is facing heat for alleged religious bias in enforcing its COVID-19 vaccination policy, along with discriminating against an employee for free speech related issues surrounding the injections.
The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in May revived a lawsuit that was tossed out last year launched by five former employees alleging the Minnesota-based clinic unlawfully fired them for refusing the vaccine and PCR testing due to their Christian beliefs. The panel of three judges found the lawsuit was wrongly dismissed and the Mayo Clinic failed to acknowledge their objections as sincere.
“The district court erred by emphasizing that many Christians elect to receive the vaccine. Beliefs do not have to be uniform across all members of a religion or acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others,” wrote Judge Duane Benton in the ruling.
The clinic faces a separate pandemic-era lawsuit, launched by Dr. Michael Joyner, who was suspended from the clinic because he spoke to journalists in a personal capacity about his research, per The Fire. He “failed to communicate in accordance with prescribed messaging,” and was suspended. Minnesota Judge Kathy Wallace on Monday denied most of the clinic’s motion to dismiss Joyner’s lawsuit against the Mayo Clinic, CEO Dr. Gianrico Farrugia and Dr. Carlos Mantilla, per Post Bulletin. A trial by jury is scheduled in July 2025.
The 9th Circuit US Court of Appeal in San Francisco, CA in June sent a school vaccine mandate case back to the lower courts, having ruled in favour of plaintiffs’ claims the mRNA shot is a “medical treatment” and not a “traditional vaccine.”
The US District Court for Northern Texas in Fort Worth in February upheld a Navy Seals’ lawsuit over vaccine mandates, despite an earlier court ruling the case is moot, The Texan reported. Members can continue to pursue their case against the Navy for enforcing a COVID-19 vaccination mandate that violated their religious beliefs.
Though the mandate has been lifted, “discriminatory treatment of the class members …because of the mandate still linger,” wrote Judge Reed O’Connor in the court files.
United Airlines faces a $1 billion class action lawsuit for its vaccine mandate based on religious discrimination. A 5th Circuit Texas judge granted on June 21 a nationwide class action suit to more than 2,200 employees suspended without pay for not getting vaccinated, the Washington Examiner reported.
The case is among the largest religious discrimination class action lawsuits in history.
The Ninth Circuit court in the Eastern District of Washington last month ruled lower courts wrongfully dismissed a lawsuit on religious grounds. Judges found lower courts must recognize it was unlawful to dismiss firefighters who refused to comply with the vaccine mandate on religious grounds and then bring in from other districts firefighters who were under a vaccine exemption. It was a violation of those firefighters’ religious rights, the court decided, per Religious Liberty TV.
On May 7, the 10th Circuit Court of Appealsfederal court ruled in favour of two employees and 17 students alleging the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus’ COVID-19 vaccination mandate was discriminatory on religious grounds, per the Epoch Times. The case was initially thrown out by a US district judge in 2022. The mandate “clearly violates the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause as interpreted by our precedents,” judges wrote in their recent decision.
Previous was 2024-06-14 For Your Selection, June 14
GOOD GRIEF! This SHOULD be a set of links, that’s all. I got carried away. Sorry!
Please go to the links for the meat!
2024-06-24 JULIAN ASSANGE IS FREE
Most of you know by now that Assange signed a plea deal, a piece of propaganda that allows him to get out of Belmarsh Prison (he’s not guilty but he pleads guilty – the public hears that “Assange is guilty.”). There is a price attached to freedom, when you’re a a political prisoner.
I was 14 years younger when the ordeal for Julian Assange began. I am annoyed by journalists who get away with pronouncing that Julian Assange was in Belmarsh Prison for 5 years. It’s true, but it is a perversion of the truth.
GOVT OF CANADA REPORTS
COVID VACCINE, INJURIES AND DEATHS
2024-06-26 Deluxe. Covid VISP (Vaccine Injury Support Program) REPORT #4. Feds compensate $14M to victims of the vaccine campaign. Journalist Tamara Ugolini.
My “Deluxe” includes “the Government’s” Reporting (contracted-out), PLUS Tamara’s news reports.
“Deaths” aren’t easy to find in the on-line Govt data. Get a load of this: Deaths are under the heading: “Safety signals identified and other safety updates“, just above Acknowledgements at the bottom. Click on DEATHS (meaning – – the “deaths” take you off the page – – Oh! I get it. VISP is a Support program! ONCE you’re dead, you don’t need it.) The missing data:
Up to and including January 5, 2024, a total of 488 reports with an outcome of death were reported following vaccination. Although these deaths occurred after being vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine, they are not necessarily related to the vaccine. . . . Go to the above link.
– – – – – – – – – –
The story of Dr. Patrick Brian Phillips – – in 2021, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario barred him from issuing exemptions for COVID-19 vaccines. It only got worse.
I pasted an UPDATE (CTV) into the posting. Dr. Phillips is young. He did not bow.
He lost his license to practise medicine and was fined $6,000. I sent a request to the CTV journalist; does he know where Dr. Phillips is now?
Add Dr. Charles Hoffe’s story from Lytton, BC.. Early on in covid, in innocence, he went to see Bonnie Henry (Chief Medical Health Officer BC) directly, about the problems. Bad move! He was fired, too.
2023-05-03 Dr Charles Hoffe, testimony at the NCI (National Citizen’s Inquiry).
– – – – – –
2022-01-26 Covid: Toronto Board of Health scrubs vaccine reaction story (death) from public archive. by Tamara Ugolini ↓ ↓
The story of Dan Hartman and his 17-year-old son (deceased) continues. By June 2024 and through Tamara’s reporting (next 2 postings), you come to know extraordinary Canadians.
– – – – –
EXCERPT (Journalist Drea Humphrey writing):
To help make sense of how and why a public health agency could release such a discrepancy, I also interview Lex Acker, a seasoned chartered financial analyst who specializes in detecting indicators of fraud in financial reports.
Acker explains what he believes the BCCDC did to manipulate the COVID vaccine injury data and why doing so strongly indicates they’ve intentionally deceived the public.
2024-06-19 Update: Helen Grus trial, w/ Bath-Shéba van den Berg & Dr. James Thorp ↓↓
Belongs under GOVT OF CANADA REPORTS (FAILURE TO REPORT) ON COVID VACCINE, INJURIES AND DEATHS.
The discussion with Canadian lawyer, Bath-Shéba van den Berg and American Doctor James Thorp is lengthy, but insightful, if you have the time. It’s an update on the Helen Grus case, about suppression of the link between covid vaccinations and SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome).
Earlier, the Detective Helen Grus story went viral, internationally. Shock waves continue to reverberate, and will continue. The story hasn’t reached its end. The link to background is included in the posting:
COVID LAWSUITS
I don’t think it’s possible to separate me from influences I’ve experienced in my lifetime. For example, my Father happened to be reading The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich at the end of the 1960’s, when I was a student. Millions of copies were sold in the world. I read Dad’s copy before leaving for a summer job. Fifty years later you cannot rid me of the influence of that book, even if I disregarded it for decades. Fragments are scattered in nooks and crannies of my body; bits respond unconsciously, to Lord-Knows-What cues.
(Wikipedia) “The book is based upon captured Nazi documents, the available diaries of propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, of General Franz Halder, and of the Italian Foreign Minister Galeazzo Ciano, evidence and testimony from the Nuremberg trials, British Foreign Office reports, and the author’s recollection of his six years in Germany (from 1934 to 1940) as a journalist, reporting on Nazi Germany for newspapers, the United Press International (UPI), and CBS Radio. The work was written and initially published in four parts, but a larger one-volume edition has become more common. . . .
SIMILARILY, I don’t think the “Coutts Defendant” Anthony Olienick, can be separated from the heritage of his Grandfather’s experiences and family remnants of War. Listen to the cross-examination of the RCMP logs. Olienick is on trial for conspiring to murder RCMP officers at Coutts. The evidence includes that Olienick lived 3 hours distant from Coutts, at the family farm, the place where they found what could be construed as weapons belonging to the Olienick family. There were “collections”. None of which Anthony Olienick took to Coutts ? ?
During the 1950’s, some Canadians actually built shelters against nuclear fall-out. My parents happened to be building a home. The root cellar is multi-purpose. Cement-walled. You descend a ladder from the basement. The well was drilled in the bottom of the chill root cellar, bomb shelter if needed.
Some people will not be sitting ducks. An assessment of potential danger dictates that preventive steps be taken in whatever sphere of life. “BE PREPARED” is the motto learned by all Girl Guides and Boy Scouts. Prepare beforehand to survive disintegration of the family or society, JUST IN CASE. Devout Mormons store a year’s food supply; they live in preparation for the possibility of lost income. Prudent. Rural people tend to have a different ethic than urban dwellers. A simple commodity like gas can be hard to come by after the sun goes down, unless you own your own supply.
Anthony Olienick is far from the only person I know who (I think from the cross-examination of evidence), has stock-piled some survival goods in his home. The media does not tell you the thousands of people who have left BC in uncertainty, but sufficiently concerned about the state of authoritarianism in Canada, to leave. Many doctors and healthcare workers are among the exodus.
Do I trust Provincial BC Premier Eby, his cabinet, and the bureaucracy (e.g. Bonnie Henry), any more than I trust the same actors at the Federal level of governance in Canada? No. . . . Will Anthony Olienick be convicted of conspiracy to murder RCMP officers? . . . Can the effects of the relentless, professional Progaganda be exorcised from the psyches of jurors who are tied to state media? Do they understand Free Speech and the right to autonomy over my own body? We will see.
Outstandingly hopeful news!
– – – – – – – – – –
Did you see this one coming?! Wow! I danced in cyber-space.
– – – – – – – – – –
I think this is the 2nd female undercover officer’s testimony. #1 involved tears and earlier testimony of a male supervisory officer involved tears, too.
– – – – – – – – – –
COVID
You may want to listen to her.
– – – – – – – – – –
PHILOSOPHY
2024-06-27 Speak Up: Why Canadians need to stop self-censoring, with Drea Humphrey
Further coverage is on the Lavigne Show: https://rumble.com/v54b1aa-coutts-trial-day-17-recap-june-28th.html
https://www.rebelnews.com/coutts_defendant_told_rcmp_you_guys_would_be_shooting_first_during_covid_protest
Video of a 2022 discussion between Anthony Olienick, one of the two remaining ‘Coutts 4’ defendants, and the RCMP shows Olienick telling the authorities any words of violence were merely contingency planning in case police attacked protesters.
“You guys would be shooting first,” Anthony Olienick said in an interview with the RCMP shortly after his arrest on February 14, 2022, in a video played for the jury in his and Chris Carbert’s trial during Wednesday’s proceedings in Lethbridge, Alberta.
Olienick and Carbert are charged with conspiracy to murder, with the Crown alleging the two men conspired to murder police officers during their time at the Coutts demonstration, which was peaceful and civilly disobedient protest against governmental decrees, edicts, and mandates issued as “public health” measures to reduce COVID-19 transmission.
The two men are also charged with unlawful possession of a weapon with a purpose dangerous to the public peace, and mischief causing damage over $5,000. Olienick is additionally charged with unlawful possession of an explosive device for a purpose dangerous to the public peace. The two defendants have pleaded not guilty to all the charges against them.
Jurors completed watching a video of Andy Olford, an RCMP officer, interviewing Olienick on the date of his arrest on Thursday. The Crown began playing the video as evidence on Monday, with jurors out of the courtroom on Tuesday as the prosecutors and defence lawyers sought to resolve other disputes.
Throughout the interview, Olienick repeated he had no intentions of initiating any violence with law enforcement.
He described himself as “a sheepdog” who would defend protesters in the event of police officers using violence against demonstrators, referencing instances of authoritarian suppression of peaceful assembly in historical and current states like Nazi Germany and China.
Olienick told Olford he would not use violence against police “unless you guys are shooting.”
“Why would I start that?” Olienick asked the interviewing RCMP officer rhetorically. He added “I’m [not] going to be the one to start.”
Olienick said he was considering the use of violence against police officer “if they decided to open up first on the people”. He also stated that “the authorities would have to do something so extreme” to provoke a violent response from him.
“If I saw cops shooting little kids,” Olienick considered, he would respond with force.
Olienick emphasized, “Nobody was going to jump the gun and start anything. … We were there to be the silent sheepdogs.”
This story was reported earlier. I posted source and related documents then:
June 25th, Journalist Drea Humphrey adds this powerful reporting on the story:
In today’s report, I walk you through insider discussions and health data that appear to expose the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC), which works hand-in-hand with Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry, for manipulating COVID-19 vaccine adverse event statistics to hide how dangerous COVID-19 injections really are.
Canadian immunologist and vaccinologist Dr. Byram Bridle recently released a damning summary of the shocking information he obtained from a 1,315-page report, which was contained within a response to an access to information request filed by a B.C. law firm.
“The public deserves to know how the B.C. Centre for Disease Control mishandled and hid important vaccine safety data,” Bridle wrote in his summary.
Internal BCCDC data charts of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) from December 20, 2020, until March 25, 2021, show the public health agency was aware COVID-19 vaccines caused 15.7-times (144) more serious AEFIs and 13.6-times (16) more hospitalizations than what historically occurred with flu shots.
Such statistics were never made available to the public, preventing them from making an informed decision about receiving COVID injections. Instead, email discussions among BCCDC staff show how data was “re-worked” before the public was given AEFI statistics claiming only 26 serious adverse reactions linked to COVID-19 vaccines had occurred.
To help make sense of how and why a public health agency could release such a discrepancy, I also interview Lex Acker, a seasoned chartered financial analyst who specializes in detecting indicators of fraud in financial reports.
Acker explains what he believes the BCCDC did to manipulate the COVID vaccine injury data and why doing so strongly indicates they’ve intentionally deceived the public.
Canadians have endured a lot in recent years. A global pandemic—or a global “psyop,” depending on who you ask—served as a catalyst for rising authoritarianism. It’s hard to recall a time when the nation was more divided.
So, where do we go from here?
Last weekend, I was invited to speak at the third annual Reclaiming Canada Conference. The event, which drew over 500 freedom-oriented patriots to the Victoria Conference Centre, aimed to unite people around ideas to further Canadian democracy while overcoming the disinformation and censorship that hinders it.
I chose to tackle the most dangerous form of censorship, which is not handed down to us by big tech or through Trudeau’s Online Harms Act plans. Instead, we inflict it upon ourselves.
So here is my talk on self-censorship and why you and me should choose to do something about it for the betterment of our nation. After all, free speech only works when the people use it.
