IMPORTANT— One of the most significant legal cases in the world right now:
https://x.com/TexasLindsay_/status/1780256842288881866
Landmark case in US starting May 1st. It has the potential to remove Pfizer’s immunity from lawsuits from those injured and the families of those killed by the Covid mRNAa gene therapy. Please read the thread as it has important information on why this is such an important case.
In this short video on “X”, Dr Malhotra outlines the topics addressed in his testimony.
THE TWO HOURS OF TESTIMONY by Dr Malhotra. You won’t be bored listening!
This link takes you to the posting on X: Scroll down. At the bottom click on the picture of Malhotra, to access the audio file.
The testimony is an AUDIO recording (the court would not allow filming). Dr Malhotra gives a paragraph in English followed by translation of the paragraph into Finnish (Helsinki District Court). There are a few silent places where the translator is conferring with the Doctor to confirm wording. It’s ok – – Keep listening! Dr Malhotra is a whistler-blower. His testimony is comprehensive and stunning.
If Elon Musk had not purchased Twitter (now “X”) you would not have the opportunity to be listening to this testimony now. Youtube censored the testimony, took it down.
Dan writes, and I concur: I don’t think the establishment can keep this covered up for much longer.
– – – – – – – – – – – –
With thanks to Dan for the documentation to substantiate Malhotra’s status on Youtube – they took down the Testimony.
https://x.com/DrAseemMalhotra/status/1779406700463653315
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=MPXjVFzs8dE&feature=youtu.be
On 2024-04-14 9:34 a.m.:
https://x.com/TiinaKeskimki/status/1779424128212009176
Here is the entire testimony. (No coverage by establishment media, at all.)
I don’t think the establishment can keep this covered up for much longer.
BREAKING NEWS – COURT RECORDINGS OF CASE: COVIDPASS TRIAL RELEASED
Yesterday, #ReformiStudio published the testimony of Expert Witness @DrAseemMalhotra’s before Helsinki District Court.
Shortly afterwards @YouTube censored the Dr. Malhorta’s courtroom testimony.
Yet another example of YouTube prohibiting free speech.
Thank you @elonmusk @X for promoting #citizenjournalism here!
@MikaVauhkala has sued the Finnish government @valtioneuvosto & @FazerGroup for the violations of #humanrights done with the Covidpass requirement.
The District court was reluctant, but investigative journalist @TiinaKeskimki quoted Finland’s Supreme court’s @korkein_oikeus ruling from -23 regarding audiorecordings and got the tape OUT FAST. Filming in courtroom was prohibited.
@MarinSanna, who currently works for #TonyBlair’s @InstituteGC, was PM of Finland when the discriminative Covidpass was launched.
The previous “For Your Selection” was March 2024.
The APRIL SELECTION Buckling down – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
I wish I could do this: Dr Malhotra captured everything that the April Selections express. You will see them reflected in his words.
2. 2024-04-11 RCMP Report to Federal Government Sees Democracy as a Threat. by John Carpay, JCCF
A very important article. The title might not tell you.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – –
3. The B.C. case of Dr. Charles Hoffe
(The letter includes links to related postings:
Breath-taking. The BC College Physicians & Surgeons Disciplinary Committee: rights to due process dismissed with two words: Judicial Notice.
1980] JUDICIAL NOTICE 477. That a matter is judicially noticed means merely that it is taken as true without the offering of evidence by the party who should ordinarily have done so.
Brilliant! Those trying the accused do not have to present evidence in support of their position! What the Government said is taken as true. No matter what expert witnesses the defendant has lined up in support of his argument, no matter what he himself has to say in his own defence, none of it gets heard! Judicial Notice means the case is already decided. Good-bye.
Good Tools (e.g. Judicial Notice) mis-used in the wrong hands.
Alas, the clerical staff at the College has only the on-line information to help them help you – the Public Notice from 2022.
Reminds me of going to the Court House in Lethbridge, AB on the appointed date, to observe the proceedings against Artur Pawlowski. I could not find information – – which Court Room to go to? Simple stuff. I went happily through Security, to the wicket inside and to the Bulletin Board. On the 3rd go-round, a fellow working on the Security line didn’t look at me, but said loud enough for me to hear: the hearing was re-scheduled. It’s next month.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
As you digest the situation of Dr. Hoffe, keep the HPOA in mind:
As you digest that, maybe for dessert try (below) (#13):
BILL C-63, the Online Harms Act. The worst assault on free speech in modern Canadian history
If it causes indigestion, meditate on (below) #17:|
Shawn is a lawyer whose life experience qualifies him perfectly for his position and work on the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI). BC’s Bill 36 effectively outlaws all but the Government’s support for Big Pharma’s drug model. That model will not tolerate alternatives.
Do you wonder why all these court trials are on-going?
Nothing more than the would-be Tyrants desperate to hold onto power and control. (Normally there is no push-back because people cannot afford to defend themselves in court. The Government mis-calculated: they didn’t reckon on crowd-funding.
Do you wonder why people don’t know?
Now the conversation shifts. Collaborators. Courtiers. Include most of the established Press. The would-be tyrants need censorship and propaganda to keep their dirty secrets. How many Canadians know about Dr. Hoffe? or about the Coutts Protestors?
But I think we’re going to keep fighting for legitimate governance, peace and order, AND Item #1 above (Malhotra) puts us on 3rd base, running for home: 2024-04-14 Dr Aseem Malhotra, expert witness, court recording of his testimony in Helsinki District Court, Finland. It’s a wowser!
7. COUTTS trials are back in progress. The abuses of the justice system take my breath away. Marco Van Huigenbos, defendant in the current proceedings has stated the obvious – – there needs to be an Inquiry in Alberta.
The Government Prosecutors need to prove that three men, Marco Van Huigenbos, Alex Van Herk, and Gerhard Janzen, were the LEADERS of the Coutts Blockade.
In all, three police officers, one an RCMP Superintendent from Manitoba, were called to testify, to prove the Prosecution’s charges against the Defendants.
The second officer told the same thing – I didn’t post it. In other words, there were no “leaders”. The documentary Trucker Rebellion: The story of the Coutts Blockade, provides evidence. And then there is the third officer, a Superintendent . . .
Marco Van Huigenbos was interviewed at day’s end. I think he is rightfully discouraged.
Canadians are indebted to Sydney Fizzard and Kian Simone. They stayed with the “Coutts Blockade” throughout the ordeal (2022), filming and collecting data. They created the video found at the bottom of the posting. The film Trucker Rebellion: The story of the Coutts Blockade.
Where would we be without their documentary evidence? And without the reporting by Rebel News and citizen journalists of the on-going trials in Lethbridge, all related to Coutts. No wonder few people know the story. Unconscionable disregard by the CBC and others. Not just disregard. When they DO report, the content is far from the standards expected of professional journalists.
The Coutts Trials won’t come to an end anytime soon.
The Government, the Prosecutors, the RCMP, the “Justice System” are the ones on trial. The trials EXPOSE the rot AND the HEROES. Two RCMP officers who testified in Lethbridge Court this week past made the honor role, as far as I can tell: they told the truth. Bless them.
The jury will receive instruction this coming week and deliver the verdict for the “Coutts 3”.
The situation is grave for Marco Van Huigenbos, Alex Van Herk, and Gerhard Janzen.
I confess: When I thought about the proceedings against the Coutts 3, I burst out laughing. Sorry. The trials would be a comedy fit for the stage, EXCEPT FOR THE FACT that these 3 men face jail time AND they have families to feed. It has been a grueling time for all the people charged in relation to the Coutts Blockade in February 2022. I would like to find one list of all the individual people against whom charges were laid. One list with the outcomes.
I am humbled by what these men have stood up to, for our benefit. Please tell and share their stories as widely as you can. They are our heritage.
In case you didn’t see reports on February proceedings: 11. 2024-02-08 Two of the Coutts Four released in a shocking twist in the case. The unravelling of the Coutts Four case. Troy Media, by Ray McGinnis.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
13. ABOUT BILL C-63, the Online Harms Act. The worst assault on free speech in modern Canadian history
13. 2024-04-13 Druthers Bill C-63: I don’t want to spend LIFE in prison… please read
Bill C-63 could/would put the owner of Druthers in jail. He writes on his own behalf – – I wonder if he’s ever done that before? (Maybe it’s on my behalf, too! Ha ha!)
The mobilizations against the Online Harms Act (Bill C-63) are growing. Thank Goodness.
And bless John Carpay, the brains behind the JCCF (Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (Canadian)).
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – —
15. Covid Clots. Fibrin and what causes an “oversupply” of fibrin?
Edited and moved to April #2
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
OTHER POSTINGS:
24. Quotes from “The Committed”, 2021, by Viet Thanh Nguyen
25. 2024-04-09 A novel. Last Testament (2007) by Sam Bourne, about Israel and Palestine
/Sandra
Crown prosecutor Steven Johnston told Justice Keith Yamauchi, the judge presiding over the trial, that he and his team did not expect to introduce any other witnesses.
The Coutts Three – Marco Van Huigenbos, Alex Van Herk, and George Janzen – are being charged with mischief over $5,000 by the government for their participation in the 2022 Coutts protest and blockade, a peaceful and civilly disobedient protest that intermittently obstructed traffic at the Coutts-Sweetgrass Canada-U.S. border crossing.
The protest took place concurrently with the Freedom Convoy of the same year, with both demonstrations broadly opposed to the governmentally-imposed edicts, mandates, and orders marketed as “public health” measures to reduce COVID-19 transmission.
Corbett’s emotional demonstration took place as he recalled what he described as a fearful moment experienced by a female RCMP colleague – who was typically assigned to desk duties – sent to the Coutts protest. He said the female officer was intimidated by a large tractor with a blade that was being driven near her. He seemingly cried as he spoke about her fearful communications over police radio at the time.
Corbett has been an RCMP officer for nearly three decades. Many courtroom observers who spoke with Rebel News described his emotional presentation as insincere and disingenuous. His role during the Coutts protest was largely managerial. While at Coutts for most of the demonstration, the three defendants had essentially no interactions with him. Van Huigenos and Van Herk told Rebel News they had seen him once across the approximately two-week protest.
Crown prosecutor Steven Johnston told Justice Keith Yamauchi, the judge presiding over the trial, that he and his team did not expect to introduce any other witnesses. Corbett’s testimony will continue on Friday. He is the prosecution’s fourth witness, following RCMP officers Mark Wielgosz and Greg Tulloch, who worked as police liaisons with the Coutts protesters.
All videos introduced as evidentiary exhibits in the trial, with one exception, were recorded by Rebel News and featured the Rebel News watermark. The Crown did not submit any evidence or exhibits captured by body cams used by police officers at Coutts. None of the three RCMP officer witnesses produced any body cam video or audio to supplement their testimonies. When questioned, they consulted notes – written or dictated – to refresh their memories.
The trial is tentatively scheduled until April 19.
|
Politicians never take away your rights and freedoms without offering a pretext. Throughout history, tyrants have always justified their human rights abuses by appealing to the “public interest,” the “common good,” or some grand goal or vision.
Goals used by tyrants include national security, building a workers’ paradise, fighting communism, fighting fascism, fighting a virus, fighting terrorism, or restoring a nation’s honour, dignity, and rightful place among competing nations.
As just one example, Prime Minister Trudeau justified his illegal use of force against peaceful protesters in Ottawa in 2022 by falsely claiming there was a national emergency. He also asserted that the victims of his government’s violence were dangerous, violent, racist, white-supremacist criminals who wanted to overthrow the federal government.
We should remember “the tyrant’s pretext” when considering a secret RCMP report that warns the federal government about potential civil unrest coming to Canada when Canadians realize just how bleak their future economic situations are.
The report warns of living standards declining even further due to “climate change” and a global recession, noting that many Canadians under 35 are unlikely to ever be able to buy a home.
The report warns of “paranoid populism” and claims that “authoritarian movements have been on the rise in many liberal-democratic nations,” with populists “capitalizing on the rise of political polarization and conspiracy theories” that allow them to “tailor their message to extremist movements.”
The report also warns of people now having too much access to data through social media and the internet, which will allow “private entities to develop the means to exercise undue influence over individuals and populations at an unprecedented level.”
The report states that “[l]aw enforcement should expect continuing social and political polarization fueled by misinformation campaigns and an increasing mistrust for all democratic institutions.”
Ironically, among the report’s more heavily redacted sections is one carrying the subtitle “erosion of trust.”
“The past seven years have seen marked social and political polarization in the Western world,” reads a partial first sentence, with the entire rest of the section deleted by government censors. The report’s final paragraph, titled “Next Steps,” is redacted entirely.
There is nothing wrong with a police agency presenting a report to government about likely future trends and problems. However, Canadians should be gravely concerned about some of the language used by senior RCMP officials to describe their take on reality. The report actually says a lot about the RCMP and about the government receiving this RCMP report.
The RCMP warns of “paranoid” populists who capitalize on “conspiracy theories.” I vividly recall reading one conspiracy theory that circulated in early 2020, claiming that lockdowns would continue for years (not just two weeks to flatten the curve) and that lockdowns would be replaced with mandatory vaccination policies. Those refusing to get injected with the new vaccine would lose their jobs and would become second-class citizens. Yes, how paranoid of people to think and say such things in early 2020.
Sometimes, the difference between a conspiracy theory and reality is six to twelve months. Another paranoid conspiracy theory from 2020 was that COVID-19 originated in a Wuhan lab. This kooky, fringe thesis was mocked and ridiculed until it was accepted by most as plausible or true.
Let’s not forget Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s characterization of Canadians who opposed the COVID-19 vaccine as misogynists, racists, and science-deniers. Demonizing minorities does not necessarily lead to human rights violations, but human rights violations always start with demonizing minorities.
The RCMP worries about “political polarization” and “extremist movements.” Polarization is a normal part of every democracy: people disagree with each other about taxes, immigration, parental rights, health-care policies, and other political issues. Polarization only becomes a problem when one side (or both sides) use violence instead of the democratic process. When that happens, the problem is violence, not the polarization that arises from disagreement. A democracy makes it possible for citizens to consider minority political opinions that are deemed “extreme” by the establishment. Remember: not long ago it was an “extreme” position to favour same-sex marriage.
The RCMP believes that people have “too much access to data” through social media and the internet. Should citizens have only limited access to data? Does the RCMP want the government to censor social media and the internet? Should citizens receive only “reliable” data from “reliable” sources like Prime Minister Trudeau and the CBC?
The RCMP seems to be opposed to “private entities” that “develop the means to exercise undue influence over individuals and populations at an unprecedented level.” Only in a totalitarian state are private entities prohibited from exercising influence over people because the government controls every sphere and dimension of society. In a free society, individual citizens, as well as the groups they join and support, can and do influence each other. This is part of a healthy, functioning democracy.
The RCMP is concerned about “misinformation campaigns and an increasing mistrust for all democratic institutions.” Everybody is against misleading and false “misinformation.” At the same time, people also disagree vehemently as to what is, or is not, false or misleading. In a free and democratic society as envisioned by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, citizens debate and discuss what is true or false, and government does not determine on behalf of citizens whether something constitutes “misinformation.”
As for democratic institutions like Parliament and our courts, they earn our trust (or fail to earn it) based on their behaviour and conduct. If Canadians trust courts and Parliament less today than they did five years ago, this should provide Parliament and the courts with an opportunity to reflect as to why this might be and to determine ways to improve their performance.
The RCMP report suggests that future violations of our Charter rights and freedoms could be justified as part of the government’s efforts to protect Canadians from “paranoid populism,” “authoritarian movements,” “political polarization,” “conspiracy theories,” “extremism,” “misinformation campaigns” and “mistrust for democratic institutions.”
April 12, 2024
TO: The College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC / 300–669 Howe Street / Vancouver BC V6C 0B4 / 604-733-7758
FROM: Sandra Finley
CONCERNING: the erasure of due process for Dr. Charles Hoffe
Dear College of Physicians & Surgeons,
REQUEST: Please forward this letter to the Panel that will be trying Dr Hoffe on behalf of the Disciplinary Committee. Thank-you.
I expect DUE PROCESS in a supposed-to-be Democracy.
I’m sure you do, too.
Please see that Dr. Hoffe receives due process.
Thank-you kindly,
Sandra Finley (contact info)
P.S. NOTE: I will send an electronic copy of my letter for those who would prefer e-copies. /S 2024-04-12 My letter to BC College of Physicians
NOTE: I searched the BC College of Physicians & Surgeons’ website (https://www.cpsbc.ca/) on 2024-04-12, at 9:15 AM. I would like to know that my letter to the College refers to the most recent developments in the case. This Public Notification is from 2022. A search on 2024 and Hoffe produces nothing.
I phoned the College asking for help. This Public Notification sets the Hearing Date at the end of February, 2023. The woman who was on the phone could not help me further. The information “was on the website”. I quietly told her that I just wanted the information for the letter I am sending today to the College. I am very concerned that Dr. Hoffe’s right to DUE PROCESS has been taken away. We live in a wanna-be Democracy. Due Process is expected.
FROM THE COLLEGE’S WEBSITE:
The hearing of the citation issued for Dr. Charles Douglas Hoffe, a family physician practising in or around Lytton and Kamloops, BC, has been scheduled for February 13 to 17, 21 to 24, and 27, 2023. The hearing will proceed virtually, subject to further order of the Discipline Committee.
At the hearing, a panel of the Discipline Committee will inquire into Dr. Hoffe’s alleged misconduct, namely that, he contravened standards imposed under the Health Professions Act, including but not limited to the Canadian Medical Association’s Code of Ethics and Professionalism by publishing statements on social media and other digital platforms that were misleading, incorrect or inflammatory about vaccinations, treatments, and public measures relating to COVID-19.
Coutts three trial: rcmp officer agrees that strong disagreement existed among protesters – – in other words, The three men charged with being the “leaders” of the Coutts event, were not “organizers” of the event. There was no central organization. It happened because people heard about and supported the initiative, in solidarity with the people who went to Ottawa to protest.
Near the bottom of the page there’s a good video that follows what happened day-by-day.