|
|
|
Ep. 45 How could Washington possibly send tens of billions more to sleazy oligarchs in Ukraine now that the whole enterprise has been revealed as a fruitless, corrupt and incredibly destructive disaster? Because that’s what they always do. pic.twitter.com/Cn6SMHcqcr
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) December 5, 2023
A whistleblower has recently come forward in Parliament with scathing allegations involving Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s $1 billion green slush fund, including a nexus of corruption and coordinated efforts to cover it up.
The cover-up indicated high-level conflicts of interest, taxpayer money squandering, gross mismanagement and evidence of a highly toxic work environment.
“Nearly 200 companies have received over $80 million, improperly funded by taxpayer dollars,” the whistleblower shares, citing claims backed by documents, transcripts and recordings.
One of those recordings is of the Chief Financial Officer of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, Doug McConnachie.
“There’s a lot of sloppiness and laziness,” he can be heard saying. “There is some outright incompetence and, you know, the situation is just kind of untenable at this point. I think the minister is going to flip out when he hears this stuff.”
The allegations involve Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC).
The executive team and board of directors had to be strategically addressed, according to the recording of McConnachie.
“The discussion will be the mechanisms for getting them out,” he said.
There were two members of the SDTC tasked with operating independently of the board, who were explicitly put in place to protect shareholders. That is, the Canadian public.
Kathleen Sendall and Ed Vandenberg failed in this duty.
All of this has caused conservative MP Michael Barrett to ask, “Who got rich?”
Will the Liberals finally be held accountable for their continued corruption and flagrant disregard for ethics? And where is the RCMP? Perhaps too preoccupied with diversity, tolerance and inclusivity training.
This is only the tip of yet another conflict of interest-riddled iceberg says MP Barrett, so stay tuned.
Lawyers on behalf of Chris Barber, Tamara Lich, and other Freedom Convoy participants argue that the $290 million class action against them is designed to silence their expression–expression the public had an interest in hearing [Image by Dave Chan/AFP via Getty Images]
OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre announces that lawyers representing Tamara Lich, Chris Barber and other defendants against a class-action lawsuit brought by Zexi Li and other Ottawa residents will be in court this Thursday, December 14, 2023. Tamara Lich and the other defendants have filed an application to dismiss Zexi Li’s $290 million class action as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)–a lawsuit designed to silence the expression of peaceful protesters.
In February 2022, Ottawa residents Zexi Li and Geoffrey Delaney, Happy Goat Coffee Company, and a local union commenced a $290 million class-action lawsuit against Chris Barber, Tamara Lich, and other Freedom Convoy participants, seeking damages against peaceful protesters for allegedly causing a nuisance. This lawsuit also seeks damages from citizens who donated to the peaceful protest.
Anti-SLAPP legislation serves to protect defendants against “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation” (SLAPP)–lawsuits designed to silence a defendant’s freedom of expression through threats of damages or costs. Anti-SLAPP motions are designed to end such lawsuits and are available to a defendant in any proceeding against them. Once an anti-SLAPP motion has been filed, the defendant must demonstrate that the proceeding against them arises from their expression that “relates to a matter of public interest.” If the defendant can demonstrate that their expression does relate to a matter of public interest, the plaintiff must then demonstrate that their lawsuit has “substantial merit” and that the defendant has no valid defence. A judge must then weigh the importance of the expression at stake against the importance of the plaintiff’s allegations of harm.
Lawyers in the Justice Centre network argue that the proceedings against Tamara Lich, Chris Barber and others do, in fact, arise from their expression. Donating to and participating in the Freedom Convoy amounted to an expression of support for the protest, and of disagreement with the Government of Canada’s response to Covid–matters of public interest. Further, lawyers argue that Zexi Li’s class-action lawsuit contains factual and legal weaknesses; it is not obvious that the proceeding against the defendants has “substantial merit.” Finally, lawyers argue that the defendants do have valid defences and that the value of the expression at issue outweighs the allegations of nuisance against them.
On Thursday, December 14, 2023, the parties will proceed to oral argument at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, arguing that the plaintiffs’ entire class-action lawsuit is, in fact, a SLAPP action disguised as a nuisance claim and that the lawsuit is merely intended to punish the defendants for participating in the 2022 Freedom Convoy protest. If successful, all or part of the class-action lawsuit will be dismissed.
Lawyer James Manson stated, “Zexi Li’s lawsuit engages the very purpose that ‘anti-SLAPP’ legislation was designed to address: an attempt to silence peaceful expression, and the right of defendants to participate in public debate.”
John Carpay, President of the Justice Centre, stated “The fundamental Charter freedoms of expression, association and peaceful assembly must be vigorously protected and defended, whether they are attacked directly by government or indirectly through a misguided civil action.”
(NOTE: My history with StatsCan began in 2003-04 when Quakers (a.k.a. Society of Friends) in Nova Scotia alerted Canadians to the plans for Lockheed Martin Corporation’s participation at StatsCan. It was also my introduction to “good” journalism turned bad through edits made by the publishers. (NYT in the particular example.) And Government officials who lied through their teeth under oath in a court of law.
A new Canadian government report reveals a 300% rise in “unspecified causes” of death from 2019-2022 as unknown causes climbed to the fifth leading cause of death in Canada. Some health experts said the stark increase should trigger an investigation into whether the deaths are linked to COVID-19 vaccines.
bronchitis, emphysema, asthma, diabetes, influenza and pneumonia, chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, Alzheimer’s and suicide as causes of death.
Statistics Canada, also known as StatCan, released the report on Nov. 27 in The Daily, the agency’s online news bulletin.
The report generated a slew of nearly identical headlines — provided by Canada’s national news service — in Canada’s leading newspapers along the lines of this one in the Toronto Sun: “Life expectancy for Canadians fell for third straight year in 2022, StatCan says,” followed by the subhead: “More people died of COVID-19 in 2022 than in any other year since the pandemic began, report says.”
Andre Picard, health columnist at The Globe and Mail in Toronto, Canada’s newspaper of record, called the life expectancy drop — to 81.3 years in 2022 from 82.3 years in 2019 — “a big deal.”
“It’s only the second time this sharp a drop has happened in Canada in the past century,” Picard said. “In fact, life expectancy has been climbing steadily for decades: 71 in 1960, 75 in 1980, 79 in 2000 and 82.3 in 2019.”
COVID-19 deaths in Canada decreased to 14,466 in 2021 from 16,313 in 2020, the report shows. Canada is on track for about 7,000 COVID-19 deaths in 2023, Picard said.
COVID-19 deaths can’t account for Canada’s 7.3 % increase in total deaths in 2022 compared with 2021 — or for the country’s 17% increase in total deaths over the historic norm of 2019, or the historic drop in life expectancy in Canada and worldwide, Picard said.
Like many mainstream journalists and public health officials in the U.S. examining the U.S. drop in life expectancy, Picard blamed chronic diseases, drug overdoses, opioid deaths, smoking, unhealthy diets and “indifference” for the decline in Canada. “There are virtually no mitigation measures like masking any more, and vaccination rates have fallen sharply,” he wrote.
But Drs. Pierre Kory and Peter McCullough told The Defender they believe the most important and startling fact contained in the report is the 300% increase from 2019 to 2022 in “unspecified causes” of death in Canada.
McCullough, a highly published cardiologist who developed a widely used early treatment protocol for COVID-19, said the dramatic rise in deaths from “unspecified causes” in Canada represents a seismic and disturbing shift in Western medicine.
“Prior to the pandemic, death in Western countries was well understood,” McCullough said, with 40% due to known cardiovascular, 40% due to terminal neoplastic disease (cancer) and 20% due to other known causes such as homicide, suicide, drug overdoses and accidents.”
He added:
“Since the roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccines, we have witnessed unprecedented deaths without antecedent disease. A large autopsy series published by Hulscher et al, found that 73.9% of the deaths after COVID-19 vaccination were due to problems caused by the shots.”
McCullough cited the hundreds of studies examining post-vaccine, spike-protein-related injuries and deaths and the millions of deaths and injuries reported by citizens in the U.S. and Europe to their governments following mRNA vaccination.
“All deaths should be categorized according to the doses and dates of COVID-19 vaccination,” McCullough said. “Unless proven otherwise, ‘unspecified death’ should be attributed to a fatal COVID-19 vaccine injury syndrome,” McCullough said.
Kory, the former University of Wisconsin professor of medicine and president of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, told The Defender the evidence is overwhelming that the COVID-19 mRNA shots caused more deaths and injuries across the Western world than any prior drug or vaccine in history.
“The answer as to why ‘unspecified causes’ are now a leading cause of death is plain and simple,” Kory said. “That cause is the one medical intervention that the world’s governments and media have championed since the start [of the pandemic]. … The mRNA platform technology is and has been a colossal failure in both efficacy and safety.”
Kory and journalist Mary Beth Pfeiffer on Tuesday published an opinion piece in The Hill calling on governments and public health officials to study and address the problem of a global historic rise in mortality thus far not recognized by officials and not reported by mainstream journalists.
On Dec. 13, the essay was trending as the first or second most popular story on The Hill’s website, which claims 32.5 million monthly unique visitors.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Robert Califf on Nov. 30 published an extraordinary thread of posts on X (formerly Twitter) calling for a society-wide “all hands on deck” approach to solve the problem of the “catastrophic” decline in U.S. life expectancy.
“JAMA Internal Medicine published earlier this month that our overall life expectancy has dropped to 76 years, and remarkably, that male life expectancy in the U.S. has dropped to 73 years,” Califf wrote.
But Kory said the FDA commissioner’s post, “which hit on smoking, diet, chronic illness and healthcare, ignored the obvious: People are dying in abnormally high numbers even now and long since COVID waned. Yet public health agencies and medical societies are silent.”
The FDA and mainstream media are ignoring the fact that life insurers have been “sounding the alarm over these unexpected or, ‘excess,’ deaths, which claimed 158,000 more Americans in the first nine months of 2023 than in the same period in 2019,” Kory wrote.
“That exceeds America’s combined losses from every war since Vietnam. Congress should urgently work with insurance experts to investigate this troubling trend.”
Amy Kelly, COO of DailyClout and the program director of the Pfizer Documents Analysis Project, said that for an autopsy to reach a proper diagnosis of an mRNA-vaccine-caused death, “histopathological examination of tissues from all over the body is necessary. Most of the time, even if an autopsy is performed, the histopathological examination of tissues is not.”
She cited an interview with Dr. Arne Burkhardt, who describes the types of testing the coroners must perform but seldom do.
Dr. Robert Chandler, a Los Angeles orthopedic surgeon who taught at the University of Southern California medical school, identified “entire new disease categories” he calls “CoVax Diseases” in his study of Pfizer’s 450,000 pages of COVID-19 vaccine documents, documents the FDA was forced to release via a court order, Kelly said.
“It makes sense that the unspecified causes of death have increased so much,” Kelly said. “When a patient dies with either multiple diseases all at one time or with a previously unseen disease state, both of which happen with ‘CoVax Diseases’ Dr. Chandler has identified, I would imagine many doctors and/or coroners don’t know how to categorize those causes of death. That would lead to ‘cause unknown’ categorization of deaths.”
According to Naomi Wolf, author of “Facing the Beast: Courage, Faith and Resistance in a New Dark Age,” “In the preindustrial world, people died mysteriously. But in the modern Western world, there are no mystery deaths. Every death has a death certificate which by law must identify a cause of death.”
“A minor rise in unattributed deaths is a problem that needs investigation,” Wolf said. “A major rise, such as you’ve identified, does not indicate a mass mystery to doctors and coroners, but rather it is evidence of a problem with state record-keeping — some bureaucratic malfeasance at a grand scale.”
TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre announces that the Ontario Civilian Police Commission will hear the appeal of Constable Michael Brisco today, who is challenging his conviction and penalty for donating to the Ottawa Freedom Convoy in early 2022. This case raises questions about the Charter’s protection for freedom of expression, the right of police officers to support political causes while off duty, and the privacy rights of all Canadians.
Constable Michael Brisco of the Windsor Police Service is a highly trained and respected police officer with no prior disciplinary record. He made a $50 donation to the peaceful Freedom Convoy protest through the GiveSendGo fundraising platform on February 8, 2022 – one day after an Ontario Superior Court Judge held that people could continue to engage in “peaceful, lawful and safe protest” in Ottawa so long as honking ceased. When making his donation, Constable Brisco did not identify himself as a police officer and did not contribute to the protest in his capacity as a police officer.
Days later, the GiveSendGo donor list was hacked. The Ontario Provincial Police Service acquired the list and forwarded a set of names to the Windsor Police Service, who discovered that Constable Brisco had donated to the protest.
The Windsor Police Service then chose to charge Constable Brisco for “discreditable conduct.”
After a six-day hearing before an Ontario Provincial Police Adjudicator, Constable Brisco was found guilty of discreditable conduct by a Tribunal on March 24, 2023. Two months later, on May 18, 2023, the Tribunal ordered that Constable Brisco should forfeit pay for 80 hours of work as a penalty.
With the support of the Justice Centre, on June 14, 2023, Constable Brisco filed a Notice of Appeal with Ontario Civilian Police Commission, challenging his conviction and the imposed penalty.
Counsel for Constable Brisco argue that the prosecution against him lacks sufficient evidence. The claim that the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa was an unlawful protest rested entirely on claims made in newspaper articles by various officials, including the Prime Minister and the Premier of Ontario. No credible video, photographic, or other evidence on this point was filed against Constable Brisco. Further, counsel for Constable Brisco argue that the evidence against him – a hacked list that ought to have remained private and confidential – was obtained illegally. Counting the donor list as evidence against Constable Brisco amounts to an abuse of process, counsel argue.
Brisco’s legal counsel further argue that his conviction and penalty rested on a claim that Mr. Brisco’s donation was a demonstration of support for the Ambassador Bridge blockade in Windsor, Ontario; Mr. Brisco argues that there is no evidence of a link between the Ottawa protest and the Windsor blockade, and he denied any support for the blockade during his hearing.
Finally, Constable Brisco argues that the Tribunal’s decisions to convict and discipline him fail to acknowledge or proportionately balance their impact on his Charter-protected right to freedom of expression. While a police officer’s right to free expression is limited during the performance of their duties as officers, Constable Brisco did not donate to the Freedom Convoy in his capacity as a police officer. He also expected the donation to be confidential, and he did not seek to advertise his giving. The expression of off-duty police officers is protected by the Charter to the same degree as the expression of any other citizen.
Darren Leung, one of the lawyers for Constable Brisco, stated, “Freedom of expression is a right that is guaranteed to all Canadians. Police officers are also entitled to express their political beliefs, so long as they do it without identifying themselves as police. Furthermore, it is an injustice that Constable Brisco was investigated on the basis of illegally obtained information. Instead of investigating who was responsible for the hack, the Windsor Police Service have dedicated their resources in prosecuting Constable Brisco.”
“Every Canadian, including police and also including doctors, nurses, teachers and other regulated professionals, has a right to donate to the cause of her or his choice, and to do so privately and confidentially. No Canadian should face disciplinary proceedings at the hands of her or his professional association for expressing support for a cause or movement,” stated John Carpay, President of the Justice Centre.
Repeal Bill 36, the Health Professions & Occupations Act. First class tyranny.
Do the health care providers in my community know what’s going on, that affects them:
I will deliver the following to as many local healthcare providers as I can. I want them and us to talk to the local MLA. There’s a self-interest . . . .
The Health Professions & Occupations Act does this, unbelievably:
1. All BC practitioners must now follow health guidelines set by political appointees for their
patients or risk penalties including loss of license to practice.
2. Non–compliance with Ministry therapeutic guidelines may result in fines up to $200,000 or
$500,000 (corporations) and incarceration up to 6 months or 2 years.1
3. Anonymous complaints to the Colleges can result in summary suspension of licensure to
practice before the complaint is investigated.2,3
4. Appointees chosen by politicians may now enter a healthcare practice, seize patient records
and restrict access to that facility without a warrant or court order.4
5. Refusal to accept all Ministry mandated vaccines and therapies will likely result in
delicensure.5
6. College advisory boards will now consist of government appointees only.6
7. All “self–regulatory” healthcare professions in BC will be governed entirely by politicians and
their agents, using appointees selected by the Ministry of Health.7
8. The Cabinet and the Minister of Health can adopt as law in BC any regulations, codes,
standards or rules enacted in foreign jurisdictions or international bodies.8
Bill 36 was one of the largest bills ever passed in British Columbia, consisting of 645 sections and 276 pages, . . . read more at The Canadian Society for Science & Ethics in Medicine https://www.cssem.org/about-us.
STATUS OF BILL 36, B.C. Health Professions & Occupations Act, as at Dec 7, 2023. (I phoned the Legislature AND I had a conversation at my MLA’s office to confirm):
The Act was passed a year ago. HOWEVER, not all the provisions have yet been translated into Regulations. There is time to drop into the office of MLA Adam Walker on 2nd Ave in Qualicum Beach. They want you to phone ahead and book an appointment. But the matter is urgent. I’d suggest that you jot a note and drop in. Time is short to get Bill 36 repealed. I have found the staff in Adam Walker’s office to be receptive. Just be normal and courteous. Ask questions – – like is this true? – – Or, as you wish. – – Have your friends go to the MLA’s office. He needs to know that WE ARE SERIOUS about getting the legislation repealed.
Doctors’ insights on case against Bonnie Henry’s two-year vaccine mandate for healthcare workers
Youtube coverage at the Legislature, Drea Humphrey from Rebel News. Hear what very reasonable Doctors have to say: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hh9p4u4fJhM&list=PL2HWRRSziC_FxsJ40Y3ZFiWPmSQxzjtxJ&index=7
The Canadian Society for Science & Ethics in Medicine https://www.cssem.org/about-us
A comprehensive source of information and resources for Bill 36. https://www.cssem.org/_files/ugd/80db6e_9ff1aa4a5b9d40339da613e48afa4dbb.pdf
There is a legal analysis of the Bill by Gail Davidson, etc.
The counsel for the group of doctors bringing the case against the two-year mandate for healthcare workers used public health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry’s contradictory statements to argue the case.
(Doc #2 in support) 2023-11-15 Doctors warn British Columbians about the province’s tyrannical health care act. I think You will want to see this. (Bill 36)
The take-away from the interviews: Few Doctors and other healthcare workers KNOW ABOUT THIS BILL, and what it does.
(Doc #4 in support) 2023-11-29 B.C.: Bonnie Henry named as defendant in class-action lawsuit over her role in COVID-19 vaccine mandate
(Doc #3 in support) ONTARIO COURT CASES AGAINST DOCTORS (Regulating and reporting is by Province. I found these reports, don’t have time to do more.)
RELATED: (2 of 2) Next Evidentiary Video: Col. Lawrence Wilkerson
I was condemned by a Board, without notice, and without an opportunity to respond to the charges.
It’s not how it works in this country.
No one of us can afford NOT to respond:
From: Sandra Finley
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023
Hi (name removed),
I expect to be able to present my side before I am condemned. I expect not to be tried in absentia.
The email I sent is below. PLEASE scroll down to the high-lighted text. Did anyone READ it? It’s an attack on the AMERICAN WEAPONS MANUFACTURERS, the American War Machine.
It’s about a War Crimes Tribunal. The DEFENDANTS are Weapons Manufacturers.
The Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal will hold accountable — through testimony of witnesses — U.S. Weapons manufacturers who knowingly produce and sell products which attack and kill non-combatants. These manufacturers may have committed Crimes Against Humanity as well as violated U.S. Federal criminal laws. The Tribunal will hear the evidence and render a verdict.
I see how (Persons) reacted as they did. However, I forwarded the email as a solace to them, to let them know that people around the world are trying to stop the killing.
The email is as much about Afghanistan, Iraq, the bombing of Syria, the bombing of Libya, – – the on-going wars that have bankrupted the Americans – – as it is about the Middle East.
The War Crimes Tribunal against the Weapons Manufacturers is an American-led action. (The American federal public debt is currently $33 TRILLION thanks to their war economy.) Lots of people in lots of countries pitch in to help the Americans stop the American role in creating the wars.
I thought it would be comforting for (Persons) to know that people in the world work hard to get at the ROOT CAUSES of the insanity. The email is a contribution to PEACE – – STOP the BLOODY KILLING.
I am condemned for forwarding an email that might bring solace? I have no right to speak?
There is NO DIALOGUE? What? Do people think that we have no responsibility for what happens in the world? May God or Allah or Yahweh or the Great Spirit help us all.
At the very bottom of this email I appended The Powerful Origin of Mother’s Day, 1870
Best wishes, Sandra
NOTE: the matter was resolved. And I hope that the tenets of Canadian democracy were instilled.
= = = = = = = = = =
From: Sandra Finley
Sent: November 8
Subject: FW: Thanks for registering for the Tribunal!
Hi (Persons),
You might like to know about this.
Sorry – – if I try to clean it up, everything is removed.
As you know, I don’t do zoom so I won’t be fully participating. But usually the material is available afterwards on the organization’s website. There are very good people involved.
I hope all is well with you and your family.
Sandra
From: Gail
Sent: November 8, 2023
To: Sandra Finley
Subject: Fwd: Thanks for registering for the Tribunal!
Hello Sandra;
I am registered for this and thought you also might like to attend. gail
——– Forwarded Message ——–
| Date: | Wed, 08 Nov 2023 |
| From: | Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal |
|
= = = = = = = =
I find it too sad – – the origin of Mother’s Day is largely unknown:
THE ORIGINAL MOTHER’S DAY PROCLAMATION, 1870, BY JULIA WARD HOWE
In the aftermath of the American Civil War (1861-65):
“Arise then, women of this day! Arise all women who have hearts, whether your baptism be of water or of tears!
“Say firmly”: ‘We will not have questions decided by irrelevant agencies. Our husbands shall not come to us reeking of carnage for caresses and applause. Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn all that we have been able to teach them of charity, mercy, and patience. We women of one country will be too tender to those of another country to allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs. From the bosom of a devastated Earth a voice goes up with our own, it says “Disarm! Disarm!” The sword of murder is not the balance of justice. Blood does not wipe out dishonor, nor violence indicate possession.’
“As men have forsaken the plow and the anvil at the summons of war, let women now leave all that may be left of home for a great and earnest day of counsel. Let them meet first as women, to bewail and commemorate the dead.
Let them solemnly take counsel with each other as to the means whereby the great human family can live in peace.
“In the name of womanhood and humanity, I earnestly ask that a general congress of women without limit of nationality be appointed to promote the alliance of the different nationalities, the amicable settlement of international questions, the great and general interests of peace.”
By Julia Ward Howe.
(who went on to work internationally (in Africa and elsewhere) at uniting women, implementing the ideals of The Mothers Day Proclamation.
– so much hard work and accomplishment. And look! It’s submerged. Let’s re-float it!)
Sandra Finley
= = = = = = = =
These weapons manufacturers may have committed Crimes Against Humanity as well as violated U.S. Federal criminal laws. The Tribunal will hear the evidence and render a verdict.
Retired Col. Lawrence Wilkerson (U.S. Army) was Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell. In dramatic testimony, . . .
EXCERPT:
Col. Wilkerson’s testimony is explicit and among the most compelling this Tribunal has collected. The link to watch this video evidence is here: https://rumble.com/v3zfbx7-empire-of-war-interview-with-col.-lawrence-wilkerson.html
(Sandra speaking) The video is not for everyone. I tend to think strategically. I think it has to be circulated. It’s the best chance we have for stopping what’ s happening. I would say that Lawrence Wilkerson is a marked man because of his testimony. If he can do what he has done, I have to pass this along to as many people as I can. His testimony points to actions we can take. I choose action over fear.
From: Merchants of Death War Crimes
Sent: December 5, 2023
Subject: Evidentiary Video: Col. Lawrence Wilkerson
Hello,
This new video evidentiary episode of the Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal provides what may be the most dramatic and damning testimony ever given by a United States military official.
Retired Col. Lawrence Wilkerson (U.S. Army) was Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell. In dramatic testimony, Col. Wilkerson exposes the corruption of the Military Industrial Complex and how it has hijacked U.S. foreign policy to create Endless War, huge profits for weapons makers, and caused the United States to be far less safe and secure in the world.
Col. Wilkerson’s testimony is explicit and among the most compelling this Tribunal has collected. The link to watch this video evidence is here: https://rumble.com/v3zfbx7-empire-of-war-interview-with-col.-lawrence-wilkerson.html
Please share this video link with friends and colleagues. Form discussion groups around all video evidence of the Tribunal. The link for previous video episodes of the Tribunal is here: https://rumble.com/user/merchantsofdeath
Encourage friends to sign up to receive future video segments of evidence here: https://actionnetwork.org/forms/sign-up-for-emails-from-the-merchants-of-death-war-crimes-tribunal?clear_id=true
You can watch the meetup discussion of December 3 where nonviolent action items to take in your community were discussed as well as a review of the evidence. That recording can be found here: https://rumble.com/v3zjbam-action-and-evidence-meetup-december-3-2023.html. And here is the chat from the December 3 meetup.
Lastly, do not forget to place on your calendar the next meetup session of the Tribunal scheduled for Saturday, December 30 at 2:00pm Eastern Time to discuss the evidence and share thoughts about action plans. You can register for the meetup here: https://actionnetwork.org/events/december-30-meetup?clear_id=true
|
