Sandra Finley

Aug 242021
 

This is for friends who are worried about our current circumstances.

Don’t be.  You won’t be, if you know the strength of the  Challenges to the vaccine mandate

From the introduction to  2021-08-20 Mass Psychosis:

It is not famine, not earthquakes, not microbes, not cancer, but man himself that is man’s greatest danger to man, for the simple reason that there is no adequate protection against psychic epidemics, which are infinitely more devastating than the worst of natural catastrophes.   – Carl Jung

In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule. – Friedrich Nietzsche

A lie doesn’t become truth, wrong doesn’t become right and evil doesn’t become good just because it’s accepted by a majority.   — Booker T. Washington

I no longer know if I wish to drown myself in love, vodka or the sea. –  Franz Kafka

May your choices reflect your hopes, not your fears. ― Nelson Mandela

They fear love because it creates a world they can’t control. – George Orwell

Orwell has a pretty good handle on love.

Jesus told people to love your neighbour,  the same as you love yourself.

Human Touch:  A VERY simple example of a former politician using lies and the threat of the Law to keep people from talking with their neighbours (isolated).  Uncanny how some personalities know the vulnerability of the uninformed! :   Bruce Power siting of reactor, attempts to buy options on land in “Big Bend“ of the North Sask River

Human Touch:  Covid Isolation has had an unintended consequence.

Bonds among people were strengthened.  They loved their neighbours by looking out for them, and helping.  Maybe they recognized their own need and through that, the need of their neighbour.  But MAYBE it’s human instinct in a healthier personality!

Wild fires released and propelled human goodness, coming to the aid of those in dire straits.   Blind to differences, you see the humanity and you love.  We love the beauty in a soul or in the landscape or in the search for truth or in our creativity.  It is as though we are placed on the Planet to love;  it is our purpose.

We thrive, we are energized, we become creative, we find solutions to problems, in response to human touch, to loving.

We have so many resounding songs of resistance to tyranny.  They should be in a hymn book!

With Orwell as scribe; Jesus for example; Human Touch;
and our hearty voices united in song – – we will be saved!  Ha ha! with joy and laughter!
(How about:  “Les Miz”, a powerful call. “Do you hear the people sing?”)

 

George Orwell – – They fear love because it creates a world they can’t control.

 


George Orwell:  And I believe that totalitarianism, if not fought against, could triumph again.

He also said:

Perhaps one did not want to be loved so much as to be understood.

One can love a child, perhaps, more deeply than one can love another adult, but it is rash to assume that the child feels any love in return.

The main motive for nonattachment is a desire to escape from the pain of living, and above all from love, which, sexual or non-sexual, is hard work.

The essence of being human is that one does not seek perfection, that one is sometimes willing to commit sins for the sake of loyalty, that one does not push asceticism* to the point where it makes friendly intercourse impossible, and that one is prepared in the end to be defeated and broken up by life, which is the inevitable price of fastening one’s love upon other human individuals.

*asceticism
severe self-discipline and avoidance of all forms of indulgence, typically for religious reasons.
“acts of physical asceticism”
Religious retreat:  A hermitage can either be a place where a hermit lives in seclusion from the world, or a building or settlement where a person or a group of people live religiously in seclusion. Wikipedia

Continuing with Orwell’s wit and insights:

The best books… are those that tell you what you know already.   ― 1984

The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.

Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.   ― 1984

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.

Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.

Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious.  ― 1984

Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else.  ― 1984

Why is slavery a freedom?  (an interpretation of Orwell)

Freedom Is Slavery” because, according to the Party, the man who is independent is doomed to fail. By the same token, “Slavery Is Freedom,” because the man subjected to the collective will is free from danger and want* *.   In reference to:

From where Winston stood it was just possible to read, picked out on its white face in elegant lettering, the three slogans of the Party:

WAR IS PEACE

FREEDOM IS SLAVERY * *

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.

 

* *  In my view, the book I am Hutterite (2010),  a true-life story, grapples extremely well with creating a mind and emotional space within which to understand – –   “Slavery Is Freedom,” because the man subjected to the collective will is free from danger and want.

  In 1969, Ann-Marie Dornn’s parents did the unthinkable. They left a Hutterite colony near Portage la Prairie, Manitoba with seven children and little else, to start a new life. Overnight, the family was thrust into a society they did not understand and which knew little of their unique culture. The transition was overwhelming.

Desperate to be accepted, ten-year-old Ann-Marie is forced to deny her heritage in order to fit in with her peers. I Am Hutterite chronicles her quest to reinvent herself as she comes to terms with the painful circumstances that led her family to leave community life.

Rich with memorable characters and vivid descriptions, this ground-breaking narrative shines a light on intolerance, illuminating the simple truth that beneath every human exterior beats a heart longing for understanding and acceptance.  

 


You may be interested in    Orwell in Action, resistance to Vaccine Passports.

Aug 242021
 

There is confusion over whether we have a Law (Statute) that sets Fixed Election Dates in Canada.

With thanks to Democracy Watch (Canadian) for addressing the questions (appended).

In my view,  the 2021 Federal Election is illegal.  And egregiously, the media NOR the Political Parties NOR citizens speak up.  The Rule of Law in an Open Society is incredibly important.  See – –

re Election & The Rule of Law. Orwell’s Animal Farm &

Arendt’s “We didn’t INTEND..”, the Banality of Evil. (Fixed Election Dates)

 


APPENDED,  Democracy Watch,  https://democracywatch.ca/:

Democracy Watch is a national non-profit, non-partisan organization, and Canada’s leading citizen group advocating democratic reform, government accountability and corporate responsibility.

Democracy Watch is the most effective and successful national citizen advocacy group in Canada at winning systemic changes to key laws since it opened its doors in fall 1993 – it has won more than 180 changes to federal and provincial good government and corporate responsibility laws, many of which are world-leading.

NEWS   August 14, 2021 8:49 am

15,000+ sign petition calling on Governor General to say no to illegal, dishonest, unfair and dangerous snap election call by PM

UK Supreme Court set strong precedent ruling in 2019 that PM Boris Johnson’s prorogation of Parliament was illegal – snap election call illegal for similar reasons

GG was handpicked by Trudeau through secretive, partisan process – but will hopefully do her job properly and stop the PM’s abuse of power

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Saturday, August 14, 2021

OTTAWA – Today, Democracy Watch formally launched its petition on Change.org calling on new Governor General Mary Simon to say no to any snap election call by Prime Minister Trudeau before the next fixed election date. A snap election call would be illegal, dishonest, and unfair and dangerous for many voters. More than 15,000 voters have signed the petition in the past week.

“Almost all MPs, including Prime Minister Trudeau, voted against holding an election now, and all opposition parties are against it, and surveys show a large majority of Canadians are against it, so hopefully the Governor General will do her job properly and uphold the democratic will of Parliament instead of giving in to Trudeau’s selfish, dictatorial demand for a snap election,” said Duff Conacher, Co-founder of Democracy Watch and Ph.D. student at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law. “The Governor General should reject any snap election call by Prime Minister Trudeau because it is illegal, dishonest and goes against the democratic will of Parliament, in the same way the British Supreme Court rejected the British PM’s shutting down of Parliament as an illegal abuse of power that went against the will of Parliament.”

The British Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that PM Boris Johnson’s decision to advise the Queen to shut down Parliament was unlawful as it “ha[d] the effect of frustrating or preventing, without reasonable justification, the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions as a legislature and as the body responsible for the supervision of the executive” (para. 50 of the ruling).

A snap election is similarly illegal because Canada’s election law has measures that fix the next election date for October 2023, four years after the last election, unless the government loses a confidence vote in Parliament.

As well, a snap election would violate the constitutional convention rule that has been created by the fixed election date law, and the Prime Minister and Parliament following the law for the past three elections. In 2011, the Conservative government led by PM Harper only called an election after losing a vote of confidence in Parliament. In 2015, PM Harper called an election on the fixed date, as did PM Trudeau in 2019.

A snap election will also be dishonest because anything Trudeau says about needing to call an election now will be false. A majority of MPs have voted in favour of everything the Trudeau Liberals have proposed since the last election, including the Liberal budget, so the opposition parties have shown they support the Liberals continuing to govern.

In addition, Prime Minister Trudeau and almost all MPs in the House of Commons, including all Liberals, voted in May against holding an election while COVID is still a danger, which it is. A recent poll showed only 26% of Canadians want an election this fall, and, just a few weeks ago, the PM also denied that he was going to call an election.

A snap election will be dangerous for many voters. A fourth wave of COVID-19 is expected across Canada this fall, more contagious than ever, as many people are still not fully vaccinated. Voters who are vulnerable to COVID-19 will, completely justifiably, feel hesitant about going to a polling station to vote.

Newfoundland and Labrador’s government called a snap election last winter – then a COVID outbreak happened, the election date was postponed twice, and voter turnout plunged to a record low as many voters were prevented from voting by the sudden new requirement to register for, receive, fill in and mail back their ballot on short deadlines.

Elections Canada has never run an election with mail-in ballots being the way a lot of voters vote, nor have any of the federal parties.

Whenever a snap election is called, it is unfair because voters have no time to plan and arrange their lives so they can run as a candidate, volunteer or participate in the election in other ways. That’s why Parliament decided to fix the federal election date in Canada’s election law. It makes the election more fair for everyone.

Because they are illegal, dishonest and unfair, Democracy Watch went to court to challenge the snap election calls last fall by the B.C. NDP Premier and the New Brunswick Progressive Conservative Premier, which both violated their provincial fixed election date laws.

PM Trudeau controlled the selection of Governor General Mary Simon (even more than PM Harper did in the past) by setting up a façade of an Advisory Panel that he appointed, co-chaired by his friend and Cabinet appointee Dominic LeBlanc.

Instead, to democratize the selection of the GG, and every other key federal position that upholds democratic good government rules, Trudeau should have used a fully independent committee to conduct a public, merit-based search for a shortlist of qualified candidates. A survey of 1,601 Canadians in February 2021 found that 91% of people surveyed, of all types and from all political parties, support having a committee of MPs choose the Governor General instead of the PM alone. More than 80% of Canadians also want public, written rules for a minority government like England, Australia and New Zealand have.

– 30 –

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Duff Conacher, Co-founder of Democracy Watch
Tel: (613) 241-5179
Cell: 416-546-3443
Email: info@democracywatch.ca

 

Aug 242021
 
ORWELL IN ACTION

Orwell was prescient.  Incredibly valuable to our times.

I listened again to the young people in:

2018-01-22 TimberWest and Professional Reliance, Great Bear Rainforest. EBM, corruption through de-regulation and Orwellian new speak.

And re-read or skimmed postings such as the following.  How wonderful it is that Canadians are finally getting the message!

2012-04-20 Frank Luntz teaches Conservatives how to say it. “Language gurus train politicians in the fine art of never-ending conversation that is devoid of substance and truth”. CBC Radio, Michael’s Essay: The Orwell Gospel.

 

2010-09-25 Statement to legislators. Contradiction in proposed legislation, simultaneous Mandatory and Voluntary. IMPORANT re George Orwell’s double think & newspeak

 

2021-08-20 Mass Psychosis

 

2020-09-22 re Election & The Rule of Law. Orwell’s Animal Farm. Arendt’s “We didn’t INTEND..”, the Banality of Evil. (Fixed Election Dates)

 

2019-03-13 The Ombudsman will fail. They have a problem with “Trust” but fail to identify that the problems are INHERENT in the system. “Extractive Sector Corporate Responsibility“. SNC Lavalin, and who comes next?  Orwell.  Jane Jacobs.

 

2019-03-09 The SNC Lavalin debacle: Why is it not asked . . .? Email to the CBC.

 

2019-03-03  John Pilger: ‘Defy the Thought Police’, Stand With Assange

 

2017-06-13 He says Canadians do not have a Charter Right to Privacy & Canadians just don’t care about democracy, CBC The Sunday Edition. And Orwell.

Aug 242021
 

John Horgan (2020 Provincial Election) and now Justin Trudeau (2021 Federal Election) teach important lessons to young people.

How the Real World works.

 

The Law applies to you and to me.

We will be fined or sent to jail for serious transgressions.

And maybe just for small ones.

 

If YOU (John Horgan or Justin Trudeau) get yourself elected

The Law?  . . . does not apply to you

Responsibility to lead by example?

Why?

Teach Democracy to the young?

Why?

It’s clear enough that People Forget.

George Orwell described it well in Animal Farm

Zombie citizens.  Meek media.

Maybe a few mumblings.

Excerpted from my blog:

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RULE OF LAW

The rule of law means that the law is above everyone and it applies to everyone. Whether governors or governed, rulers or ruled, no one is above the law, no one is exempted from the law, and no one can grant exemption to the application of the law.

The rules must apply to those who lay them down and to those who apply them – that is, to the government as well as the governed.  Nobody has the power to grant exceptions.

All persons, regardless of wealth, social status, or the political power wielded by them, are to be treated the same before the law.

We are in big trouble when the laws do not apply to those who govern.

Many of us do not appreciate the significance of  The Rule of Law.  We take it for granted.

We don’t stop to think what it would be like if we DO NOT HAVE the rule of law.

We don’t stop to think about WHAT UNDERMINES the rule of law? . . .  If people see that the law applies to them, but not to rich people, they grow to hold the law in disdain.

Unequal application of the law breaks down the rule of law.  The response then, of those who govern, is to invoke martial law, a police state, because people become unruly.

People usually comply with the law if they see that it is fair and equally applied.  You can have a measure of PEACE in the community if the Rule of Law is upheld.

People must, of course, KNOW WHAT THE LAW IS, if the rule of law is to be upheld.

We are in big trouble if we are ignorant, because then we are disempowered and at the mercy of people who are not to be trusted.

We do not have the luxury of being ignorant, and we do not have the luxury of being complacent.

– – – – –

A more complete package would include Hannah Arendt’s understanding of THE BANALITY OF EVIL.   No one “intended” the outcome.  It happens over time through the humdrum.  (Use the “search” button in upper right corner of this blog.  Enter “Arendt”.  Also important:  “Orwell”.)

“Banal” is an almost obsolete word.  It is in the process of being resurrected!  Along with knowledge of how Democracy works.

Banal – – so lacking in originality as to be obvious and boring.

See also:     Are Snap Elections legal in Canada? Are Fixed Election Dates enforceable?

/Sandra Finley

Aug 222021
 

THE WELL FIXER’S WARNING

The lesson that California never learns

By Mark Arax

AUGUST 17, 2021    (There are photos if you go to the link)

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/08/well-fixers-story-california-drought/619753/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=masthead-newsletter&utm_content=20210821&silverid=%25%25RECIPIENT_ID%25%25&utm_term=Subscriber%20Only%20Weekly%20Newsletter

 

The well fixer and I were standing at the edge of an almond orchard in the exhausted middle of California. It was late July, and so many wells on the farms of Madera County were coming up dry that he was running out of parts to fix them. In this latest round of western drought, desperate voices were calling him at six in the morning and again at midnight. They were puzzled why their pumps were coughing up sand, the water’s flow to their orchards now a trickle.

It occurred to him that these same farmers had endured at least five droughts since the mid-1970s and that drought, like the sun, was an eternal condition of California. But he also understood that their ability to shrug off nature—no one forgot the last drought faster than the farmer, Steinbeck wrote—was part of their genius. Their collective amnesia had allowed them to forge the most industrialized farm belt in the world. Whenever a new drought set down, they believed it was a force that could be conquered. build more dams, their signs along Highway 99 read, even though the dams on the San Joaquin River already numbered half a dozen. The well fixer understood their hidebound ways. He understood their stubbornness, and maybe even their delusion. Here at continent’s edge, nothing westward but the sea, we were all deluded.

Besides, he couldn’t turn them away. His company, Madera Pumps, was his livelihood; the city of Madera was his home. He farmed his own acres of almonds near the center of town. The voices on the line weren’t simply customers. Many were lifelong friends who were true family farmers. So he was patching up their irrigation systems the best he could to get them through a last drink before the nut harvest began in mid-August. At the same time, he knew that something fundamental had changed. If he was going to keep on planting wells, pursuing a culture of extraction that had defined California since the Gold Rush, he could no longer remain silent about its peril.

RECOMMENDED READING

The Economics of California’s Drought

MATT SCHIAVENZA

What Does California Owe Its Incarcerated Firefighters?

JAIME LOWE

Giants in the Face of Drought

THAYER WALKER AND BIOGRAPHIC

As he guided me out to the almond orchard in the colony of Fairmead on the county’s northern fringe, Matt Angell, the well fixer, a big man with kind eyes, wasn’t sure what role he had assumed. Was he a whistleblower? Was he a communitarian? When I suggested that he had the tone and tilt of an agrarian Cassandra, he paused for a second and said, “I like that.” We pulled into the orchard, row after row of perfectly spaced trees laced by the plastic hoses and emitters of drip irrigation. It looked to be one more almond orchard in the 2,350-square-mile vastness of almond orchards up and down California. He stepped out of his white heavy-duty truck and pointed to two wells in the ground. They told of the dilemma, the moral quandary, he was now facing.

The first well, 350 feet deep, had been dug decades earlier by a Midwestern corn farmer who had moved to the San Joaquin Valley to become a nut grower. This well had done yeoman’s work in keeping the drip lines running until the drought of 2012–16, a history-breaker. To make up for the scant flow of rivers, farmers across the valley had pumped so much water out of the earth that thousands of wells came up dry. This well surged and groaned, a death rattle, and finally succumbed in 2014, years after the farmer had.

Leah C. Stokes: How can we plan for the future in California?

His family, needing to grab a bigger share of the aquifer, dug the second well 1,100 feet deep and called on Angell to install a more powerful pump. He lowered its tentacles until he hit the ancient lake beneath the valley, a mother lode, and went home thinking that was the last of it.

Now it was seven years later, and he’d been summoned back to the almond orchard to figure out why the second well, barely broken in, was failing. He snaked his camera down the stretch of hole where he remembered the aquifer being. It wasn’t there. He went deeper, but the only flow he could find was pinched off. What little water the pump was drawing was so fouled with salts that the orchard was burning. If the well wasn’t fixed—it happened to be a $40,000 job—the trees would be as good as dead before the crop came in.

Angell could see what was all around him. The snow on the mountain had melted two months earlier than normal (whatever “normal” meant), and the San Joaquin River was running so low it had been turned into a series of ponds decorated with lilies. But nature alone didn’t explain what had gone wrong with this well and scores of others—ag wells, home wells, business wells, the junior-high and high-school wells—that were bringing up so much air.

As the aquifer gets over-tapped, wells in the San Joaquin Valley are running dry more frequently. (Jim McAuley for The Atlantic)

From the data on his devices, Angell calculated that the underground water table in Madera County, one of the most over-tapped in the West, had dropped an astounding 60 feet over late spring and summer. So many agricultural pumps were dipping their bowls into the same depleted resource that the aquifer was collapsing, a descent he had never witnessed. “I’m 62 years old. I’ve been doing this more than half my life, and I’ve never seen this. Not even close,” he said. “This is all brand new, and it’s shaken everything I believe in.”

When he took a closer look at the well’s steel casing, he could see six hairline fractures that started at the 280-foot level and ended at the 900-foot level. But what he encountered between those two depths confirmed a phenomenon sometimes found in clay soils but rarely in sandy loams such as this. The casing had been bent by a profound force; the steel was rippled like a crushed soda can. That force, he knew, was the downward pull of subsidence. As a consequence of too much water being sucked out of the aquifer, the earth itself was sinking, first by inches and then by feet, shearing off pumps, eating away at ditches, canals, and aqueduct, stealing gravity from California’s one-of-a-kind water-delivery system that counted on gravity to flow.

He finally got the well to work, but the output, 350 gallons a minute, was not even half of what it should have been. It might draw water for another year or two, but he couldn’t guarantee more. That’s how fast the aquifer was petering out. “Drought on top of drought. Climate change on top of drought. And our response is always the same,” Angell said. “Plant more almonds and pistachios. Plant more housing tracts on farmland. But the river isn’t the same. The aquifer isn’t the same.”

Across from the orchard sat the Galilee Missionary Baptist Church of Fairmead. During the worst of the previous drought, the community of old farmhands had suffered an especially cruel fate. Theirs had been a mighty story of Black families that had fled the South and Southwest in the 1930s and ’40s and followed the cotton trail to California, thinking it might hold a promise. What they found instead was a more prettified version of old Jim Crow. They had to fetch their drinking and bathing water in milk pails and oil drums from nearby cities that used restrictive real-estate codes to keep them from living in town. They built shacks with no plumbing, outhouses out back. They eventually dug their own wells, grew their own crops, built houses and a church, only to discover, in 2015, that the almond orchards now surrounding them had drunk up the aquifer’s shallower water. Their puny wells couldn’t compete with the wells that the ag giants dug deeper and deeper. The Black Okies found themselves fetching water the old way. Some of them left. Others died.

Read: The forgotten students of California’s drought

Migrant families from Mexico, for the most part, have replaced them. With the help of rural advocates for the poor and state funding, a new community well has been drilled a few hundred feet deeper, which should buy residents some time. But Fairmead’s story of dispossession can now be seen in other small country settlements across middle California, where the struggle for water against the creeping orchards carries on.

From one end of the valley to the other, 500,000 acres of new almond and pistachio trees have been added to the old trees over the past 10 years. This, in a period plagued by two of the worst droughts in California history or, grimmer yet, one epic drought interrupted by the record flood year of 2017. If the water-guzzling almonds demand less irrigation than the water-guzzling crops that feed the mega-dairies, the aggregate of their intensification is no less alarming. In Madera County, during this same scorched decade, the ground devoted to almonds has expanded by 60,000 acres. The trend makes selfish sense. Almonds ring up far more profits than the wine and raisin grapes they’re replacing. But it makes almost no communal sense. Almonds consume far more of everyone’s water.

An almond grove in distress near Madera, California, and a sample of water from an overdrawn well (Jim McAuley for The Atlantic)

Angell’s surveys of wells across the Madera sub-basin tell him that the underground water table that sustains 348,000 acres of cropland, cattle ground, and suburbia is bleeding out three feet of water from one harvest to the next. This amounts to 1 million acre-feet of overdraft each dry year. That’s water taken out of the earth and not returned by rain or snowmelt. That’s mining. All the houses and businesses of Los Angeles, by comparison, consume 580,000 acre-feet of water each year.

“I’ve been putting my camera down three wells a day,” he said. “I used to use the word unprecedented to describe what we’re doing to the land. Now I use the word biblical. I could keep my mouth shut and make a lot of money fixing wells between now and the time it all goes to hell. But I wouldn’t be able to look my son, who’s running our farm, in the eye.”

If the math of irrigation didn’t work before the arrival of climate change, it certainly doesn’t work now. Even in a wet year, the San Joaquin River provides nowhere near enough flow to sustain the sub-basin’s 235,000 irrigated acres. Three-fourths of the water must come from the ground. The fight over what remains of the aquifer now pits two camps of farmers against each other: those inside the irrigation district, who trace their fertile soil three generations back, and newcomers outside the district, whose orchards grow in poorer dirt and rely wholly on groundwater.

That some of the outsiders are institutional investors awash in easy money from hedge funds, pension funds, and the Mormon Church only adds to the rancor. They seem willfully oblivious to the plummeting water table. When they turn on their ag pumps at 5 p.m. on Fridays and run them until noon on Mondays, a “cone of depression” sucks water from farms inside the district. Meanwhile, real-estate developers are adding more subdivisions to a new town of 100,000 people rising atop the same spent aquifer.

“Every farmer I meet, I explain how far and fast the water table is dropping,” Angell said. “I tell them, ‘We’re going to get our asses handed to us.’ Some of them listen and mutter. Most of the others look at me like I’m crazy.”

A former almond orchard in Madera County, with trees pulled and their wood chipped (Jim McAuley for The Atlantic)

Whether it’s water, soil, climate, or crop, Californians believe they can keep on flouting the bounds. But drought reveals the lie of a place. The invention of the “Golden State” was an overreach from the get-go. That it relied on the genocide of the biggest flowering of Indigenous culture in North America should have been a first clue. The continent’s edge that the settlers bit off and called one state was 1,000 miles long with a dozen different states of nature inside it. The rain fell 140 inches on one end. It fell 12 inches on the other end. The other end happened to be where most of the people wanted to live. Our conceit was to believe that if we built the grandest water system ever, we could make that difference disappear. California proceeded with the federal Central Valley Project in the 1930s and the State Water Project in the 1960s and erected dams, canals, and a concrete river 444 miles long—we called it The Aqueduct—to move the rain to farms and faucets. We had engineered our way past drought and flood, if not earthquake and wildfire, or so we believed.

Read: American aqueduct: The great California water saga

Angell grew up hearing the story of this agricultural miracle from his father, a civil engineer with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation who helped build the Central Valley Project. By the 1990s, holding a degree in agriculture from California Polytechnic State University, he was running his own irrigation business and developing vineyards for Freddie Franzia, the wine-grape grower who gifted the world the cheap red known as Two Buck Chuck.

A tech geek, Angell perfected a field-to-cellphone system that told a farmer, at any hour, the moisture content in the root zones of his trees. The precise applications of drip irrigation doubled almond yields to 4,000 pounds an acre. Suddenly, nut growers were buying Lamborghinis, second houses in Pebble Beach, and $10 million Cessna jets. When he took over his stepfather’s vineyard in the early 2000s, Angell planted 100 acres of almonds to go along with his 100 acres of wine grapes.

“I grew up believing that the agriculture here was something to admire, and it is,” he said. “But look at how we developed. At first, we were farming the alluvial plain, the best soil. It was flat, and you could easily utilize flood waters to recharge the aquifer. In the 1920s, the turbine pump got invented and allowed us to overdraft the aquifer and expand onto soils high in alkali. They required lots of water to push the salts down past the root zone. Then in the 1990s, we went all-in on drip. It was supposed to save water. But those plastic lines let us to grow onto rangeland and up hillsides—soils so inferior they should never have been farmed.”

It took 170 years, but California finally decided, in 2014, to regulate groundwater extraction. Problem is, the law won’t actually reduce pumping for another 20 years. By granting growers such a long reprieve, the state set in motion a consequence that’s less unintended than expected: more pumping. Farmers developing new acres are trying to establish their legal possession before no more water can be grabbed. The state and the county, which lean libertarian in such matters, have no will to stop the drilling.

Almond harvest near Madera (Jim McAuley for The Atlantic)

How far down the water has descended, how salty it’s become, isn’t something farmers like to advertise. Angell, with the support of his wife and his son and a Stanford graduate student who’s crunching the data, knows he’s taking a risk by going public. “Every well we work on, we’re measuring the standing water level. If I can get a farmer to listen, I tell him we can’t keep on doing this. It’s not going to last. Another dam won’t solve this. Another flood won’t solve this.”

He looked out to the horizon where orchards meet sky, where in the immense spread of California almonds stood his own trees and a well that in the last few days had begun to surge and groan. He could hear in its death rattle a whole community. “We’re on the brink of losing our way of life,” he said. The only solution he could muster—and it won’t go down easily—was for valley farmers, in the name of community, to figure out a way to retire 1 million acres of the 6 million farmed in the San Joaquin. A first step toward soundness. “Otherwise, we’re looking at a race to the bottom,” he said.

Mark Arax is a California-based journalist and the author of several books, most recently The Dreamt Land: Chasing Water and Dust Across California. His work has appeared in The New York Times and The California Sunday Magazine, among other publications.

Aug 222021
 

It is not famine, not earthquakes, not microbes, not cancer, but man himself that is man’s greatest danger to man, for the simple reason that there is no adequate protection against psychic epidemics, which are infinitely more devastating than the worst of natural catastrophes.   – Carl Jung

In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule. – Friedrich Nietzsche

A lie doesn’t become truth, wrong doesn’t become right and evil doesn’t become good just because it’s accepted by a majority.   — Booker T. Washington

I no longer know If I wish to drown myself in love, vodka or the sea. –  Franz Kafka

May your choices reflect your hopes, not your fears. ― Nelson Mandela

They fear love because it creates a world they can’t control. – George Orwell

(A few other wisdoms from Orwell are at https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=25457 )

 

Related to   https://sandrafinley.ca/blog/?p=25452   Carl Jung, the Shadow, projecting our darkness onto others.

A MASS PSYCHOSIS VIDEO

(Note:  “Skip the ads” – – I don’t know how to get to this video without triggering the ads./  Sandra)

Been thinking about you these past few days and hoping you are doing OK in this weird time. So much news lately that goes counter to the narrative, yet the boot comes down ever harder on our gullible Canadian (and global) society. Years ago I was deeply immersed in the study of Carl Jung and his teachings … so I found this video particularly poignant:

https://youtu.be/09maaUaRT4M

MASS PSYCHOSIS – How an Entire Population Becomes MENTALLY ILL

If you know of any parallel structures, let me know. Running out of hope unfortunately and wish I was in a more positive mood. But the ones awake need to stick together more than ever now.

Aug 222021
 

In reply to  Are vaccine mandates an issue for you?    (https://www.cbc.ca/radio/checkup/are-vaccine-mandates-a-voting-issue-for-you-1.6148710)

Mandatory Vaccination – –

I will not vote for fascists, rest assured.

And just as important, a point ignored by the Media and Political Parties – – the Rule of Law is essential to our form of governance.

Canadian Law was passed by Parliament: FIXED ELECTION DATES are mandated. The next one is in 2023. The criteria for a snap election DO NOT EXIST.  Not to mention, we had a Federal Election less than 2 years ago.

Should Canadians respect the outcome of an illegal, snap Election?

 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

I posted the above on their Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/CBCCrossCountryCheckup/

See also:   2021-08-13 To Governor-General Mary Simon. Canadian Law: we have fixed election dates. The criteria for calling a snap election do not exist.

 

Aug 182021
 

ON A LOGGING ROAD NEAR ADA-ITSX/FAIRY CREEK watershed, an RCMP police sergeant and a forest defender are holding hands, with tears in their eyes, having a deep conversation about civil liberties, and the price of democracy.

They each share the most intimate moment about their family histories.

Mist is a middle aged woman who feels that ruthless deforestation has turned her province into a tinderbox. She feels responsible, as an older person, to “do something.”

“The Sergeant” is an RCMP officer, whose job is to enforce a BC Supreme Court injunction against citizens interfering with active logging in TFL-46. The Sergeant wants to know why Mist is so determined to cross the police line and get arrested.

She replies, “My Jewish ancestry contains generations of survivors, who fought hard and took tremendous risks. If they didn’t have a tradition as justice fighters, I wouldn’t be here.”

https://content.invisioncic.com/r273204/monthly_2021_08/1900786230_mist-D6C6BDAC-BAD7-459A-9AA1-31D37A9ABA91_1_201_acopy.jpg.bb8dfe2ed11462bfce2397e864f3f3ce.jpg

Mist, on far left, with Lady Chainsaw, and members of the RCMP (RFS photo)

 

The Sergeant softens. “I came to Canada from a war-torn country, where members of my family were raped and murdered. All the ‘protest’ we were allowed was to go and light candles outside the door of the church.”

Mist and the Sergeant share a long, quiet moment together. Mist says: “I’m sorry, I’m deeply sorry—but how did that work out for you, just lighting candles? If I were to go Downtown and light a candle, and wait for the wheels of justice to turn, all of the ancient forests would be liquidated.”

“Understood,” says the Sergeant.

“How can I stand by and watch the insanity of clearcutting ancient old-growth forests in the midst of a climate emergency and biodiversity collapse? In Canada, we have the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. How can I not try to use them?”

“Understood. Understood.”

“Officer, the RCMP are complicit in the liquidation of the very last old growth watershed. Look me in the eye and tell me whether you don’t think protecting the last 3 percent is reasonable?”

“Yes, saving the last 3 percent is reasonable, but you’ve made your point. Why can’t you just protest outside the exclusion zone?”

Exclusion zone? Mist and the Sergeant are miles away from active logging, at an RCMP roadblock. The RCMP have been using an arbitrary series of “exclusion zone” checkpoints as a nuisance tactic to stop media, lawyers and citizens from witnessing the arrests of tree sitters and other blockaders.

The tactic has been incredibly successful, as it forces blockaders to hike many kilometres in to even approach active logging. Without the public there to support them or witness police action, camp after camp gets isolated and rolled up by the RCMP tactical squad, and hectare after hectare of old growth falls to the saws.

Normally, exclusion zones are a police privilege used to keep the public safe at disasters, and allow officers a safe place to operate. A reasonable exclusion zone in TFL-46 would be 10 metres back from Justice Verhoeven’s “50 metres from active logging”—not 10 kilometres.

For Mist, the whole legal process lost all credibility when the RCMP started using the zones to circumvent enforcing the injunction as laid out by Justice Verhoeven, which specifically stated that citizens have “rights of public access, and the right to participate in lawful protest”.

“Why don’t you make the whole Province an exclusion zone, except a one-foot square in my kitchen, for me to stand in with a cardboard placard?”

The Sergeant looks down. He knows the zones are unreasonable, but his boss will fire him if he doesn’t follow the instructions.

She takes a step forward, and takes his left hand in her right, and holds it for five minutes. The two of them stand there in silence, trying to find a dignified way forward.

Mist says, “I want you to know I am so so sorry about what happened to your family, and if I had been there, I would have stood in front of them to protect them.”

The Sergeant’s voice cracks, and he glances up and says: “Thank you.”

Their eyes hold each other. For a moment, it all seems to hang in the balance. He takes a stick, and draws a line in the dusty road. “Please, this is your last chance, will you go back, just behind this line. Please.”

Mist puts her arms out and says “Cuff me.” A moment later, she is locked in a paddy wagon for crossing an imaginary line. On what charge is she arrested? None. She will not be charged.

The defenders call this practice “catch and release.” The lawyers call it “unlawful arrest.” The RCMP know full well that a charge of breaking the injunction 10 kilometres from active logging will not hold up in court.

It might even get them held in contempt of court, but we will never find out, because catch and release also robs citizens of their legal right to appear before Justice Verhoeven, and tell him how the RCMP are making a mockery of his injunction.

https://content.invisioncic.com/r273204/monthly_2021_08/855010296_FNRCMP-C2537BF7-7D20-4F85-8793-A653B5A08BF7.jpeg.9e23d2ad28683554cceb78a3ad7f4cbe.jpeg

Indigenous protesters face down RCMP on logging road near Fairy Creek.

 

Canada needs a feedback loop, so judges can keep an eye on how their court orders are being enforced, but we don’t have a process for that. Instead, we have 500 forest defenders spending long, hot days in paddy wagons, talking about how they feel about all this.

Forest defenders feel that the laws of our country are being twisted and abused, not even for any public good, but so corporations can make obscene profits. They feel that the RCMP are acting like vigilantes. The consensus of the entire old-growth protection movement, is that “TFL-46 has become a police state.”

Are we trying to save the last old growth, or democracy?

 

WHILE MIST AND THE FOREST DEFENDERS continue to light their candles, the wheels of justice turn, ever so slowly. 150 arrests later, on July 20th, BC Supreme Court Justice Douglas Thompson rules that “The RCMP’s geographically extensive exclusion zones and checkpoints are not justified.

He clarifies that the RCMP may only arrest and remove people who actually violate the injunction by approaching within 50 metres of active logging, and states that “important civil liberties were being compromised by the RCMP’s enforcement actions.

But the trees keep falling, and the paddy wagons keep filling.

Between Mist’s arrest, and Judge Thompson’s statement, an area twice the size of Nanaimo is clearcut, and millions of tonnes of carbon are pumped into the atmosphere, that the forests of BC would have captured, had they been left standing.

Lytton sets the record for Canada’s hottest temperature, and burns to the ground. Seventy percent of the oysters off the Sunshine Coast cook in their shells. During the worst fire season in history, the forest defenders ask for a logging “cease fire,” and are refused.

Premier Horgan continues to hide behind a wall of silence. Greta Thunberg urges him to pass the recommendations of his own old-growth panel. No reply. BC’s world-renowned forest ecologist Dr Suzanne Simard offers to show him how to protect old growth and create jobs. No reply.

The exclusion zones are still being used, and the trees continue to fall.

 

AUGUST 9th ROLLS AROUND—the International Day of the World’s Indigenous Peoples. It’s also the one-year anniversary of the blockade, and forest defenders flock to Victoria to hear Pacheedaht Elder Bill Jones, Dr Suzanne Simard and many others speak. After a year of living in tents, the defenders want to connect with the 85 percent of British Columbians who agree with them. A hot bath would be nice too, maybe an ice cream, and a day off!

https://content.invisioncic.com/r273204/monthly_2021_08/IMG_6958.JPG.7b025fe7488c67c24e8580256ddd92f0.JPG

The rally/celebration at the Legislature on August 9, 2021 (photo by Leslie Campbell)

 

The RCMP use the opportunity of the small camp presence to drop SWAT teams at three camps, to destroy people’s property, and arrest citizens for, well, who knows? Perhaps camping without a permit?

The officers read out Justice Verhoeven’s injunction as justification for their actions, although the BC Supreme Court has twice told them that what they are doing is unlawful.

A forest defender is shoved into the bushes, and then kicked to the ground. A witness asks, “Did you assess him for injury?” The RCMP reply, “He is a grown man, he just fell down.” The protester has a broken ankle. A volunteer medic gives him crutches and escorts him to safety.

https://content.invisioncic.com/r273204/monthly_2021_08/1372398573_helicampcopy.jpg.f56d80b60a82d726abfd4200c5729d57.jpg

Heli Camp after RCMP destroyed it Monday. RCMP raided HQ, River and Heli Camps simultaneously, using ATVs to drive up to Heli Camp. Three ATVs are seen parked at the right in the photo. RCMP destroyed the camp, including the kitchen structure, tents, etc. (photo courtesy of Rainforest Flying Squad)

 

The RCMP are targeting First Nations youth, as they always do, and many officers are wearing the “Thin Blue Line” insignia which the RCMP banned in 2020. Indigenous leader Rainbow Eyes, one of the 90 arrested on August 9th, says: “The Thin Blue Line badges they wear on their uniforms are a symbol of hate and the oppression of my people. I have zero percent trust in the RCMP in terms of my safety and the safety of my Indigenous brothers and sisters.”

https://content.invisioncic.com/r273204/monthly_2021_08/1309527177_rainboweyescopy2.jpg.c3cf90788a0fdf91fc7c005e75438e8d.jpg

Rainbow Eyes just before her first arrest in May 2021 (photo by Dawna Mueller)

 

She notes, “We are a nonviolent movement here to save ancient forests. Why are we subjected to RCMP who wear banned symbols of racism? Do they think they are above the laws they are employed to enforce?”

The RCMP are breaking into parked cars, and stealing cell phones and laptops. They use a bulldozer to take down the camp kitchen, and chainsaws to cut down trees with tree-sits in them. None of these activities were authorized by Justice Verhoeven.

And where are the media?

Due to the surprise nature of the 8 am raid on August 9th—and the illegal use of an exclusion zone—there are no media present.

Defenders in Victoria shorten the celebration and flood back to the forest, hiking around the illegal exclusion zones, to pick the wreckage of their vandalized tents out of the bush and start the cleanup.

If the RCMP won’t follow the explicit instructions of two BC Supreme Court judges, what are we to do? Our “first past the post” political system has failed us, and now, the only resort we have left, our justice system, has failed us too.

Ben Barclay has been defending forests by practicing ecoforestry for 40 years.

Aug 172021
 

(The University mandates that the students be vaccinated;  administration, faculty and staff are not so mandated.  But that’s not the crux of the arguments.)

With thanks to CHD.

The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that Rutgers is working with Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson to study and develop their vaccines in on-going clinical trials, and will benefit financially if more people are required to take the shots.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) along with 18 students on Monday filed a lawsuit in federal court against Rutgers University, its board of governors, Rutgers President Jonathan Holloway and others over the university’s decision to mandate COVID vaccines for students attending school in the fall.

According to the complaint, the Rutgers vaccine requirement “is an affront to human dignity and personal freedom because it violates our basic right to control our bodies.”

The lawsuit states that in a free society, “all people have the right to decide their own medical treatment — especially to decide what to inject into their bodies. And every person has the right to make that decision voluntarily, free from coercion by anyone, and to be fully informed of the benefits and especially the risks of that decision.”

The lawsuit alleges Rutgers’ policy is a violation of the right to informed consent and the right to refuse unwanted medical treatments.

The complaint also alleges the policy is a breach of contract because in January 2021, the university assured students COVID vaccines would not be required in order to attend school. Just two months later, Rutgers flip-flopped and issued new requirements for taking the shot prior to attending classes.

According to the plaintiffs, Rutgers is working with all three manufacturers — Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson — to study and develop their vaccines in on-going clinical trials, and will benefit financially if more people are required to take the shots which, until fully licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), are defined by the FDA as experimental.

The Rutgers requirement also constitutes a denial of equal protection, as administration, faculty and staff are not required to take the vaccine. It also conflicts with federal and state law, as neither has enacted legislation requiring COVID vaccines for citizens.

“This mandate undermines our Constitution and Bill of Rights by denying students the freedom to make their own medical decisions,” said CHD President and General Counsel Mary Holland.

“No one should be forced or coerced into accepting any medical procedure against her wishes,” Holland said. “When the low risk to young adults from COVID and the known and unknown risks from the vaccines are taken into account, Rutgers’ actions recklessly endanger its students.”

As confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, young people are at minimal risk of long-term effects or death from COVID and have a 99.985% survival rate if infected with the virus.

However, the most recent COVID vaccination injury update from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) — one of the tracking systems of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — shows that between mid-December, 2020 and August 6, 2021, 559,040 adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 12,791 reports of deaths, many in young people ages 12 to 25.

In comparison, after approximately 50 total deaths following swine flu vaccination in 1976, that vaccine campaign was immediately aborted.

“The Rutgers mandate stems from the financial relationship the university has with the vaccine makers which is clearly a conflict of interest,” said New Jersey Attorney Julio Gomez, who represents the students.

“Unjustified fear and insatiable greed drive the vaccine industry, especially now, during the pandemic,” Gomez said. “This has created an opportunity for manufacturers to bring to market expensive, novel and patentable drugs, vaccines, biologics, treatments and medical devices that will reap huge profits.”

Rutgers student Peter Cordi, a plaintiff in the lawsuit, said it is “ incredibly unnerving” that his own school would play Russian Roulette with the lives of the students it claims to protect, “with greed and ties to Big Pharma being prioritized over our safety and free will.”

In addition to Gomez, plaintiffs are represented by New Jersey Attorney Susan Judge of Scotch Plains, with support from attorneys Mary Holland and Ray Flores, special counsel to CHD.

 

Aug 172021
 

2021-08-17     From Sandra Finley 

COMPLAINT TO LAW SOCIETY OF SASKATCHEWAN,  LAWYER TYLER DAHL, SASKATOON

COMPLICIT WITH USE OF JUSTICE SYSTEM TO COERCE, INTIMIDATE

BRINGS THE JUSTICE SYSTEM INTO YET GREATER DISREPUTE

 

Lawyer Tyler Dahl.   QB #500-2015;  Ashu Solo v. Sandra Finley.

Dahl knows I was representing myself by the time of Mediation on November 22, 2016.

The legal bills for defending myself against abusive charges and procedures had reached about $30,000 going into Mediation.  I was not one step closer to a Court of Law after years of Ashu Solo’s abusive behavior against myself and others.

In fact, the Law silenced me;  it is illegal to talk about what happens in Mediation.  The Plaintiff knows exactly how the Law works, and so does Tyler Dahl.

The last offer to settle I received was for $39,000.  Please see below;  I cautioned Tyler about the line between “settlement” and “extortion”.

Dahl recently corresponded with lawyer Sean Sinclair as though Sinclair was my counsel;  he did not tell the true state-of-affairs.  He knew absolutely that even before the Mediation I was representing myself.

Five adults in the November 2016 Mediation,  Tyler Dahl one of them, witnessed Ashu Solo lunging at me, calling me a fucking bitch.

Tim Nickel, Fifth Business Mediation,  was the Mediator. (He is still in the business.)

Mr. Nickel stopped the Mediation, escorted the co-Defendants & Counsel out with instructions to leave the building and vicinity, immediately.

The five witnesses:  Tyler Dahl, Mediator Tim Nickel, a co-defendant business owner, his lawyer,  and myself all witnessed Solo’s attempts to prevent me from speaking, followed by the lunge across the table and epithet of “fucking bitch”.

Solo knows it is illegal to disclose what is said and done in Mediation.  He knew there would be no repercussions from his attempt to put the fear of the Lord in me, to prevent me from speaking.   To me,  there is a compelling argument (below) to say that he uses the Justice system for illegal purposes; Dahl is party to it.

WHY THE CURRENT ACTIVITY BY DAHL, AFTER SILENCE SINCE 2016?

The date of the Mediation was November 22, 2016.

In Saskatchewan, The Limitations Act, SS 2004 (the “Act”) creates a general rule: a claimant must commence a proceeding within two years after a claim is discovered.

I am guessing there is a 5-year actionable time period for continuances?   5 years would be this November.

EXCERPTS, FINLEY TO DAHL, 2016

  • The rule-makers would not construct Rules that have no application.  . . . How is the Rule, procedurally, brought to bear?

5-3(1) The Court may modify or waive any right or power pursuant to a rule in this Part or make any order warranted in the circumstances if:

a person acts . . .  in a manner that is vexatious, evasive, abusive, oppressive, improper or tediously lengthy; 

  • I respect the intelligence of your client (Ashu Solo).  His actions on November 22 (Mediation) were effective.  Numerous times he has claimed knowledge of the law (I can provide those statements).  But you don’t actually need to be conversant with the intricacies to know that if you do what he did,  the Mediation would be drawn to a close, which is exactly what happened. 
  • My turn to speak was taken away because of actions specifically described in 5-3(1).   You will of course know that under the Constitution Act, Section 2,  I have the Right to express myself.   Where could that be more critical than in legal proceedings?
  • Why would the Plaintiff risk doing what he did when there were witnesses in the room? Do the cost-benefit-risk analysis.

The cost:  5 credible witnesses observe you (Ashu Solo) in action.

The benefit:  the defendant is prevented from being heard.

The risk:  little, because what is said and done in Mediation is inaccessible at Trial.

 

But again,  rule-makers do not construct Rules that have no application.   The (confidential) information must be sealed in a form satisfactory to the local registrar or a judge when filed,  .  .  .

 

Since my proposed  application has no hope of succeeding  – – (your words, thank-you)   – –   I have been reading more to understand an alternate way in which the intention of the Law and Rules can be achieved.

It is obviously not the intention that persons can use abusive, oppressive actions and knowledge of how the system works to silence the testimony of others.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

From another communication to Tyler: 

Search:   “Canada Law Extortion Abuse Justice System”.

Result:  Government of Canada, Department of Justice website:  A Handbook for Police and Crown Prosecutors on Criminal Harassment.    The  (last) Date modified is 2016-04-27,   http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/fv-vf/har/part1.html

 

Search page:  for the word “Extortion”.

It’s under 1.6.1      I view it in the context of: 

  • my email to you of November 28,   I propose that the Expedited procedures for claims under $100,000.00 set out in the “New Rules”, July 2013, would be appropriate)  and 
  • your reply of November 29, It is our position that it would be inappropriate for this matter to proceed expeditiously, for the following reasons:   
    1. This claim could easily exceed $100,000.00, . . .
  • My calculation of how you arrived at $100,000 is this:

There are 3 potential financial streams (for you):

  1. I pay to settle
  2. LFC pays to settle and
  3. lawyer expenses.

How would those be apportioned?   . . . It is documented that when the Plaintiff threatens different people that he will sue them,  he consistently says it will cost them (a number that is more than $20,000) in legal bills.

So:

  1. the lawyer expenses part of the pie is roughly $25,000.
  2. Which leaves approximately $75,000 to bring us to your figuring This claim could easily exceed $100,000.00,
  3. The obvious split is: Sandra will be forced to settle for $50,000 or more.  LFC will be forced to settle for $25,000 or more,  making up the $75,000

I presume you are aware of the history of Court awards in cases of Defamation, a few thousand dollars at most for ordinary citizens, if they are found to be guilty.

I don’t know when “settlement” becomes “extortion”,  but I do know that participation in extortion is a serious criminal offence.  The Handbook confirms it.   (A Handbook for Police and Crown Prosecutors on Criminal Harassment.)

I remain committed to my reply to you, November 29.   As I view it, it’s your call, and I have no desire to contest your decision which would only bring about more delay and expense.

 

From: Sandra Finley
Sent: November 29, 2016 6:00 PM
To: ‘Tyler Dahl’ <tdahl@cuelenaere.com>
Subject: RE: Solo v. Finley, QB 500 of 2015. NEXT STEP

Thanks for your reply Tyler. 

No problem.   We will proceed as you and your client wish – – to Questioning and pre-trial conference.

 

Nothing happened.  Until now.  

It’s not about Justice.  It’s about using the Justice System, with impunity,  as a tool of threat and coercion.

 

Complaint submitted by

Sandra Finley

2021-08-17