Is the irony lost on anyone that the Canadian Museum for Human Rights states it must abide by government health authorities orders regarding “physical distancing, mandatory masks and occupancy”? Will you have to show your papers next? What about “those people”?
“There is this idea that things are black and white, you have to wear a mask all the time or not, that you have to get vaccinated or not,” Ladapo said. “The spirit of Great Barrington is that we need to respect human rights, people have autonomy over their lives and that it is not OK, not virtuous, not right to take away those rights.”
“Florida will completely reject fear as a way of making policies in public health…. That’s been something that’s been a centerpiece of health policy in the United States ever since the beginning of the pandemic. And it’s over here. Expiration date, it’s done.”
“The risks and benefits of decisions haven’t been considered wholly and thoughtfully,” he added, because policymakers and the public have been operating from a position of fear.
“Public health is not one thing. Public health is not about a single item. It’s not [only] about how many cases of COVID there are in a location…. As all of you know, that’s how public health has been treated for the past year and a half. So that’s over. It’s not going to happen here.”
Vaccination, he said, “has been treated almost like a religion.”
And he denounced lockdowns, which he described (citing a study from the National Bureau of Economic Research) as both ineffectual and wrong.
Governor Ron DeSantis Announces Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo as Florida Surgeon General
On September 21, 2021, in News Releases, by Staff
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Today, Governor Ron DeSantis announced the appointment of Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD, as Florida Surgeon General and Secretary of the Florida Department of Health.
Dr. Ladapo was recently granted a professorship at the University of Florida (UF) College of Medicine. Prior to joining UF, he served as an associate professor at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) caring for hospitalized patients. A graduate of Wake Forest University, Dr. Ladapo also holds an MD from Harvard Medical School and a PhD in Health Policy from Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.
“I am pleased to announce that Dr. Joseph Ladapo will lead the Florida Department of Health as our state’s next Surgeon General,” said Governor Ron DeSantis. “Dr. Ladapo comes to us by way of the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA with a superb background. He has had both a remarkable academic and medical career with a strong emphasis in health policy research. Dr. Ladapo will bring great leadership to the Department of Health. I would also like to thank both Dr. Scott Rivkees and Dr. Shamarial Roberson for their hard work on behalf of all Floridians.”
“Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo is an excellent choice to serve as our next Surgeon General,” said Lieutenant Governor Jeanette Nuñez. “As a professor with two degrees from Harvard, Dr. Ladapo has the resume and mindset to effectively serve the people of Florida at the helm of our public health agency. Through his service to our state, we will continue Florida’s work to further our public health goals.”
“I am honored to have been chosen by Governor DeSantis to serve as Florida’s next Surgeon General,” said Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo. “We must make health policy decisions rooted in data and not in fear. From California, I have observed the different approaches taken by governors across the country and I have been impressed by Governor DeSantis’ leadership and determination to ensure that Floridians are afforded all opportunities to maintain their health and wellness, while preserving their freedoms as Americans. It is a privilege to join his team and serve the people of Florida.”
The Covid-19 pandemic has spurred a remarkable stream of scientific investigation, but that knowledge isn’t translating into better public policy. One example is a zealous pursuit of public mask wearing, a measure that has had, at best, a modest effect on viral transmission. Or take lockdowns, shown by research to increase deaths overall but nonetheless still considered an acceptable solution. This intellectual disconnect now extends to Covid-19 vaccine mandates. The policy is promoted as essential for stopping the spread of Covid-19, though the evidence suggests it won’t.
Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD, is a physician and health policy researcher whose primary research interests include assessing the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic technologies and reducing the population burden of cardiovascular disease. He is Associate Professor at the David Geffen School of Medicine and cares for hospitalized patients. Previously, he served as a faculty member in the Department of Population Health at NYU School of Medicine and as a Staff Fellow at the Food and Drug Administration.
Dr. Ladapo’s research program, funded by the NHLBI, NIMHD, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, focuses on (1) patient-centered approaches to improving the health of individuals evaluated for coronary artery disease, and (2) behavioral economic interventions to promote sustainable cardiovascular health, including among adults with HIV. He also leads the health economic and quality of life evaluation of multiple NIH-funded randomized trials focused on cardiovascular disease and tobacco cessation. His national honors include the Daniel Ford Award for health services and outcomes research, and he was also a regular columnist for the Harvard Focus during medical school and residency, where he discussed his experiences on the medical wards and perspectives on health policy issues.
Dr. Ladapo graduated from Wake Forest University and received his MD from Harvard Medical School and his PhD in Health Policy from Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. He completed his clinical training in internal medicine at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Dr. Payne’s submission to the Alberta College of Physicians & Surgeons (2021-09-15) is circulating in networks. There’s a problem: someone is circulating a “doctored” copy of his submission.
EXCERPT from Dr. Payne’s actual submission to the Collete:
. . . by forcing compliancebased on the current data, you would be stepping onthe bedrockprinciples of medical ethics –especially patient autonomy. The willingness to trample individual legal and moral rights in the name of perceived communal benefits, is notjustified by the current medical scienceand willcause predictable and unpredictableharms.
==++====+=======+++====++
Dr. Payne received feedback that “a modified version” of his submission to the Alberta College of Physicians & Surgeons is in circulation.
His reply, followed by a submission I made to The Justice Centre regarding the criminality of the modified version:
From: Eric Payne Sent: September 20, 2021 To: Sandra Finley Subject: Re: Your submission
Thanks for your email.
The letter (INSERT: to the College of Physicians & Surgeons) is posted at www.jccf.ca. (INSERT: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (Canadian).)
This version was certainly not meant to circulate widely, but I stand by the facts and science.
Everything stated is referenced and meticulously sourced. You can click and decide for yourself.
I’ve received 100s of emails these past few days and some indicated the letter had been modified.
Hence the decision to post.
Please find an official copy attached. (INSERT: the link at the top of this posting.)
Eric Payne
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
SENT (by Sandra): 2021-09-21
TO: Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
RE: (Dr. Eric Payne) Mandatory mRNA vaccine mandate for Alberta physicians, Sept 20th
You may know that there are 2 copies of Dr. Payne’s Submission circulating; I happened to receive both.
One is a tampered copy. I believe the tampering is of criminal nature.
It MIGHT be possible to trace it back to the originator. . . .
The “attachment” file names are different. So it’s two different documents, both purporting to be Dr. Payne’s submission:
Kennedy does a nice job of cutting through the wordsmithing. The footwork is in clear view:
2 Things Mainstream Media Didn’t Tell You About FDA’s Approval of Pfizer Vaccine
Buried in the fine print of Monday’s approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine are two critical facts that affect whether the vaccine can be mandated, and whether Pfizer can be held liable for injuries.
The press reported that vaccine mandates are now legal for military, healthcare workers, college students and employees in many industries. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has now required the vaccine for all teachers and school staff. The Pentagon is proceeding with its mandate for all military service members.
But there are several bizarre aspects to the FDA approval that will prove confusing to those not familiar with the pervasiveness of the FDA’s regulatory capture, or the depths of the agency’s cynicism.
First, the FDA acknowledges that while Pfizer has “insufficient stocks” of the newly licensed Comirnaty vaccine available, there is “a significant amount” of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine — produced under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) — still available for use.
The FDA decrees that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” (page 2, footnote 8) with the newly licensed Comirnaty product.
Second, the FDA pointed out that the licensed Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine and the existing, EUA Pfizer vaccine are “legally distinct,” but proclaims that their differences do not “impact safety or effectiveness.”
There is a huge real-world difference between products approved under EUA compared with those the FDA has fully licensed.
EUA products are experimental under U.S. law. Both the Nuremberg Code and federal regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines.
U.S. laws, however, permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.
EUA-approved COVID vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability. The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove willful misconduct, and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever succeeded.
The government has created an extremely stingy compensation program, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, to redress injuries from all EUA products. The program’s parsimonious administrators have compensated under 4% of petitioners to date — and not a single COVID vaccine injury — despite the fact that physicians, families and injured vaccine recipients have reported more than 600,000 COVID vaccine injuries.
At least for the moment, the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine has no liability shield. Vials of the branded product, which say “Comirnaty” on the label, are subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products.
When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices places a vaccine on the mandatory schedule, a childhood vaccine benefits from a generous retinue of liability protections.
But licensed adult vaccines, including the new Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. Just as with Ford’s exploding Pinto, or Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup, people injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages.
And because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards could be astronomical.
Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product.
Given this background, the FDA’s acknowledgement in its approval letter that there are insufficient stocks of the licensed Comirnaty, but an abundant supply of the EUA Pfizer BioNTech jab, exposes the “approval” as a cynical scheme to encourage businesses and schools to impose illegal jab mandates.
The FDA’s clear motivation is to enable Pfizer to quickly unload inventories of a vaccine that science and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System have exposed as unreasonably dangerous, and that the Delta variant has rendered obsolete.
They know they can’t win this argument on the science and that’s why they had to abolish the public process and independent oversight.
Americans, told that the Pfizer COVID vaccine is now licensed, will understandably assume COVID vaccine mandates are lawful. But only EUA-authorized vaccines, for which no one has any real liability, will be available during the next few weeks when many school mandate deadlines occur.
The FDA appears to be purposefully tricking American citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product.
While the media has trumpeted that the FDA has approved COVID vaccines, the FDA has not approved the Pfizer BioNTech vaccines, nor any COVID vaccines for the 12- to 15-year age group, nor any booster doses for anyone.
And the FDA has not licensed any Moderna vaccine, nor any vaccine from Johnson & Johnson — so the vast majority, if not all, of vaccines available in the U.S. remain unlicensed EUA products.
Here’s what you need to know when somebody orders you to get the vaccine: Ask to see the vial. If it says “Comirnaty,” it’s a licensed product.
If it says “Pfizer-BioNTech,” it’s an experimental product, and under 21 U.S. Code 360bbb, you have the right to refuse.
If it comes from Moderna or Johnson & Johnson (marketed as Janssen), you have the right to refuse.
The FDA is playing bait and switch with the American public — but we don’t have to play along. If it doesn’t say Comirnaty, you have not been offered an approved vaccine.
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
Children’s Health Defense Responds to Biden’s ‘Declaration of War Against Unvaccinated’
In a “deeply disturbing” speech last week, President Biden exhorted medical coercion of an experimental gene therapy for a virus with a 99% survival rate for a large portion of the population, and for which no one bears financial liability in cases where injuries or deaths occur.
President Biden’s speech last week was stunning. As the Associated Press aptly reported, the president pivoted from a war on the coronavirus to a war on the “unvaccinated.”
Coercing the “unvaccinated” was the president’s first and foremost point — the only way back to normal is through vaccination, testing and masks, he said.
But the president went much further — he vilified the unvaccinated. They are not “doing the right thing.” They are “keeping us from turning the corner.” They are “blocking public health.”
“The refusal [of the unvaccinated] has cost all of us,” Biden said.
Addressing the 80 million refusers, the president said, as if speaking to unruly children, “our patience is wearing thin.”
He went further still, empathizing with the anger and anxiety of those who’ve been vaccinated and thus presumably protected. He threatened, “We cannot let the unvaccinated undo this progress,” although he muddled the words in delivery.
Biden also took a potshot at dissenting doctors, suggesting they are “conspiracy theorists,” not “real doctors.” His comments echoed the calls of others, including the Federation of State Medical Boards, to take away the medical licenses of doctors who dare to raise questions about vaccine safety.
Furthermore, Biden misled the public on vaccine approval. He suggested that because the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine on Aug. 23, there’s nothing more for the unvaccinated to “wait for.”
However, the FDA has not licensed the Moderna, Johnson & Johnson (marketed as Janssen) and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines, and the licensed Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine is largely unavailable in the U.S.
The president’s speech announced the full weight of the federal government against those who lawfully reject an unwanted, experimental medical intervention. Worse still, he sought to enlist the vaccinated in this divisive and dangerous campaign.
No president should seek to demonize citizens exercising the fundamental human right to informed consent. No president should play doctor and demand 100% vaccination rates.
Medical decision-making must be individual and individualized, and occur in the context of the doctor-patient relationship. No medical intervention can be safe and effective for all, as the president suggested. Science does not support dividing people by vaccination status and discriminating on that basis, as the president purported — nor do law or ethics support damaging discrimination.
The president failed to respect the individual rights to informed consent. The Nuremberg Code, which the U.S. promulgated and has expanded over time, says it best: “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.”
Suggesting the “large majority of Americans” may demonize and marginalize a minority for rejecting experimental medicine is abhorrent.
But what did President Biden really mean when he talked about the “unvaccinated?” Are people who refuse COVID shots actually unvaccinated?
No. The vast majority have had many vaccines during their lifetimes: polio, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B, influenza and a battery of other ones. They simply have chosen not to take experimental COVID shots that have not yet finished phase 3 clinical trials (Moderna’s trials go to 2022, Pfizer’s until 2023) and that have blanket liability protection for manufacturers, healthcare providers and government officials.
They have decided it’s not right for them. Whether it’s because they object to all vaccination, or this one, whether it’s for scientific, religious or medical reasons, whether it’s because they’ve already been injured by a vaccine which puts them at increased risk, or whether they’ve acquired natural immunity because they’ve already had the virus, it’s their right.
Suggesting the government or the majority is entitled to marginalize the minority on COVID vaccination grounds is shocking.
Yet “unvaccinated” is likely to soon mean anyone who’s missing the latest booster dose. By late September, “unvaccinated” or “not fully vaccinated” likely will mean anyone who’s not had two or three doses of a COVID shot, depending on which brand the person took initially. Who knows how many more boosters are in store?
The president’s final blessing to those “on the front lines of this pandemic” and to “our troops” was particularly painful, because it is precisely these people with deep knowledge of the disease and the vaccines who are refusing the shots in large numbers, and who now are at risk of their livelihoods.
These people who put their lives on the line during the pandemic are being asked to lose everything if they exercise their right to refuse this medical treatment.
What can we do?
Understand that you are the unvaccinated, no matter how many vaccines you’ve had. The administration is looking for scapegoats because COVID is still here, and it’s likely to be here for awhile. The “unvaccinated” term is likely to be a moving target, perpetually ratcheting up what it means to be “fully vaccinated” and “unvaccinated.”
Get educated.Sign up for Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) The Defender. It’s free. Tell your friends.
Speak up! If you think mandatory medicine with experimental products is not a good idea, now is the time to speak out. Let your elected officials know, call the White House, go to your school board meetings. Remember Pastor Martin Niemöller’s poem, “First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out because I was not a communist.”
Act on your conscience. Consider participating in Walk Out Week starting today, Sept. 13. Stay away from medically coercive schools and jobs.
Demonstrate. Show your support for health freedom at peaceful rallies across the country.
Don’t quit your job. If your workplace is mandating vaccination, explore lawful exemptions. If your exemption is denied, force your employer to go through the steps of terminating you. While unpleasant, termination is the only way you can preserve your rights. Lawyers across the country are already bringing lawsuits based on discrimination, the Americans with Disabilities Act, constitutional grounds and others. You may be able to receive back pay and reinstatement if lawsuits succeed. If you resign, you will not be able to vindicate any rights — your departure will be considered voluntary, even if it was not.
Vote your conscience. If you have the opportunity to vote in November, vote your conscience. If your elected officials are not honoring your most precious rights, vote them out!
Based on President Biden’s speech, the next few months may be challenging. Here’s what you can count on from CHD:
We will keep fighting in court against medical tyranny. We will continue lawsuits against the FDA’s faux licensure, against federal censorship and against mandates for vaccines, masks and testing. We will continue to fight for the right to religious and medical exemptions and the right to free and informed consent, unfettered by government diktats.
And foremost we will fight for our future, our children.
Please support our work in any way you can. Thank you.
A declaration of emergency to address the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency
Powers of the minister in an emergency, notably:
(f) control or prohibit travel . . .
(i) cause the evacuation and removal of persons . . .
(j) authorize the entry into any building without warrant . . .
Under Rules for the Order (page 2):
(a,b,c) all persons are required to comply with orders by the Minister of Health, by the Chief Medical health Officer, and by the Sask Public Safety Agency
(d) all employers and employees (in health sectors) are required to comply . . .
– – – – – – – – – – – – – –
I found this Minister’s Order quite shocking. So did lots of people in Saskatchewan.
Often, legislation is shared among Provinces. Heads-Up.
The emergency powers will rot your sox! Coming to you next, if you don’t already have them!
UPDATE, Sept 23:
There is now a facebook group Saskatchewan Citizens Against Mandatory Vaccinations; it already has over 9,700 members. https://m.facebook.com/groups/saskcamv/ (I could not find it by doing a search on Facebook.)
Great crowd – tons of information being shared, eg. by Take Action Canada & Vaccine Choice Canada.
Great placards.
A truly energizing, inspiring day, all around!
p.p.s. as I headed out of the Dundas Square area where I’d parked my car, saw a City TV news truck. Signalled to the guy to open his window. Asked him if he’d covered the amazing event up at Queen’s Park. He said no, but a colleague had. Then a guy w. a big camera came around the side of the vehicle & I said to the 2 of them “Sure hope you won’t be reporting there were 300 people there.” And drove off.
There were thousands of people there! I expect MSM will either report small #’s, or big #’s & that it was a rally for fascist, gun-toting Trump supporter types.
You know.
The usual.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
From: Dan
The recent media attention to Nicki Minaj seems to have mainstream media in a flap. Unusual for someone with such a monstrous following to speak against the narrative, and I guess that is why the Whitehouse wants her to drop by so they can discuss her ‘misinformation.’ https://twitter.com/annbauerwriter/status/1438566933620789258?s=08
I was wondering about the recent top FDA officials quitting and then sending a report to the Lancet around boosters. Seems Trudeau has ordered booster shots for Canada
From Pfizer: there’s the list of the vaccine shots and then this on booster shots:
In addition to providing booster vaccine doses, (no number provided) the agreement provides flexibility to procure Pfizer’s new COVID-19 vaccine adaptations, such as those to protect against mutations or variants of concern and vaccines developed for younger populations.
. . . and Biden announced as a foregone conclusion the boosters would be rolling out … but now the FDA is saying ‘not so fast’. https://brownstone.org/articles/the-meaning-of-the-fda-resignations/ So my cynical side feels like the FDA will approve regardless of the overwhelming recommendation against that from it’s own advisors. The endgame seems to already be part of the infrastructure and science no longer drives this.
And Ivermectin … that has been one of the most disgusting examples of dangerous censorship by big pharma and their big tech collaborators … India is all but deleted from the headlines now that Delta has come and gone. And the evidence that Ivermectin helped has gone unreported completely. It was good to see that mainstream was caught red handed spreading the lie about poison control centres dealing with a rash of IVM poisoning calls, and the story of the hospital that had so many IVM poisoning cases that people with gunshot wounds were being turned away. That wire story went all around the world instantly, in every mainstream media source. And since it has been proven to be a blatant lie, a few have added retractions … but the damage is done and I doubt very much the puny retraction is even being viewed since the story is now buried. Here is a decent recap … https://twitter.com/DrewHolden360/status/1434591443855753220?s=08 Hope full that the case against the WHO doctor moves forward.
All in all, with all the evidence to support freedom of choice, the dangers of the vaccine for young people and the fantastic immunity of those previously infected there seems to be no interest in halting this steam roller. Perhaps the passports were already preordained and science and reason is not of interest to those that control the narrative. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1436736209519263744.html
I have sent letters to my constituents outlining why I think that these passports are a bad idea … but probably all the people I sent them to are under orders from some greater power and likely they have no choice in what they are doing. (Other than stepping down or publicly going counter to their orders … but that might result in other problems for them.) Such a crazy clown show!
Eric Clapton discusses how the Pandemic has affected him and caused a loss of free speech and freedom of choice in the United Kingdom. He describes how he felt coerced. See mark 12:40. He explains what he sees as government-sponsored psychological propaganda that relies upon guilt, fear, and suffering.
GOD on COVID: Eric Clapton discusses his “Disastrous” Vaccine Experience. #Guitar Legend #EricClapton performed with the Yardbirds, John Mayall, Cream, Blind Faith, and Derek and the Dominos before embarking on a successful solo career. Here’s why he never thought he would play the instrument again after receiving the AstraZeneca Vaccine.
On September 10, 2021, journalist Siddhant Pandey reported that 75% of India’s nearly 35,000 new COVID cases arose from the tiny resort state of Kerala. Kerala, one of the world’s top travel destinations, is also one of the world’s worst COVID disasters.
Kerala’s failed pandemic policy has been going from bad to worse. For example, on July 29 Kerala represented half of India’s new cases, while on August 27, they had risen to two-thirds, and now they account for three-fourths.
Kerala has been a slow-motion train wreck. But, as we watch in horror as the locomotive jumps the track and carries the rest of the boxcars with it, we notice the other Indian states enjoy complete safety as their pandemic has ended. They chose a different strategy, one that did not lead them off a cliff.
“At least two Indian states have said they plan to dose their populations with the anti-parasitic drug Ivermectin to protect against severe COVID-19 infections as their hospitals are overrun with patients in critical condition. The move by the coastal state of Goa and northern state of Uttarakhand, come despite the World Health Organization and others warning against such measures.”
Today, Uttarakhand and Goa are free from their pandemic because of their bold choice to use Ivermectin, and today Kerala is a train wreck because of their choice to abandon it. Kerala, who chose to minimize their Ivermectin use in April 2021, deleted it from their protocol on August 5, 2021.
On September 10, 2021, Uttarakhand had just 20 new cases in a population of 11.4 million, or about two cases for every million people. They had ZERO new deaths. Goa had 45 cases and two deaths, while Kerala had 25,010 new cases and 177 new deaths.
Other Indian states also decided to go “all-in” on Ivermectin, and they did exceedingly well. So, on September 10, these are the numbers of the other Ivermectin-using Indian states.
This data was compiled by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering – the JHU CSSE.
On September 10, 2021, Uttar Pradesh, a population of 240 million, saw nine new cases, or about one for every 24 million people. One death. Delhi saw only 36 new cases and ZERO deaths. Bihar, a population of 127 million, saw 12 new cases, or one per 10 million population. ZERO deaths.
In stark contrast, we see Kerala, a population of 34 million people, with 25,010 new cases on September 10, or nearly one per thousand. Deaths are 177 out of the entire country’s total of 308. Thus, more than half of all of India’s September 10 COVID deaths occurred in Kerala.
This debacle occurred despite Kerala being among the most vaccinated states in all of India. The Chief Minister proudly reports that 93 percent of Kerala’s residents over 45 have one vaccination while 50 percent are fully vaccinated.
Like Kerala, the United Kingdom is “all-in” on vaccines and “all-out” against Ivermectin. Notice the remarkable similarity of the United Kingdom COVID graph when compared with Kerala’s.
There is a double rise in the graph of the Delta Surge. The United Kingdom, a country of 68 million, had 36,734 new cases on September 10. That works out to about one case per two thousand population. They could be Kerala’s twin in more ways than one. Similar cases per thousand, and similar policy against Ivermectin, only the United Kingdom has more vaccinations with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated.
It makes one wonder why both the UK and Kerala are failing so miserably despite high vaccination rates.
Dr. Peter McCullough explains why. He notes that the Delta variant is a heavily mutated version of the original SARS-CoV-2. Because the vaccines were designed and tested against the original virus, not the Delta variant, the vaccines perform poorly against the current strain. Cases in the UK and Kerala are all Delta; thus, their poor performance against Delta is no surprise.
In this interview with Dr. Al Johnson, Dr. McCullough reports that the studies show that within highly vaccinated countries like Iceland, Israel, and Singapore, up to 65% of hospitalized cases are fully vaccinated. Up to 75% of all breakthrough infections occur in the fully vaccinated. See mark 4:00.
Any review on this subject would be incomplete without mentioning the most influential peer-reviewed analyses. These were published independently by Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Tess Lawrie, and Dr. Andrew Hill, all highly credible experts in their fields. The data reflect massive and reproducible reductions in infections and deaths in COVID-19 using Ivermectin.
So, could the obvious be true? Perhaps Ivermectin has made the difference between Kerala and the rest of India. Maybe the lack of Ivermectin treatment is why the UK, the USA, and Kerala have failed to control their pandemics. Perhaps what you have heard from the WHO, the FDA, and the CDC is incorrect. And, perhaps against all the informational flooding propaganda, against President Biden’s vaccine mandate, maybe the truth of the matter is the obvious: the vaccines are failing while Ivermectin is working.
Perhaps, we have made an error by not widely adopting Ivermectin in America against COVID-19. However, let us NOT transform this temporary error into the huge blunder of Kerala.
But is Ivermectin merely the tip of an even greater iceberg? Dr. Tess Lawrie, an evidence synthesis expert and WHO consultant, reminds us that choosing to take Ivermectin is “everyone’s right.”
And it is not just any legal right; it is one of the most fundamental human rights recognized throughout history; it is considered one of the sacred few God-given rights, the right to an individual’s liberty.
In 1776, Thomas Jefferson penned these words, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Regardless of how the FDA or NIH wishes to construct their policies, the government MAY NOT tell patients what their doctor can or cannot prescribe regarding FDA-approved repurposed drugs – whether for cancer, COVID-19, or scabies. Again, it is a matter of fundamental human Liberty.
That is the law, and it involves an individual’s essential human right to choose medical treatment. In addition, should an individual decide NOT to take the vaccine after a thorough medical review with their doctor, the government has no right to mandate or require it.
Eric Clapton discusses how the Pandemic has affected him and caused a loss of free speech and freedom of choice in the United Kingdom. He describes how he felt coerced. See mark 12:40. He explains what he sees as government-sponsored psychological propaganda that relies upon guilt, fear, and suffering. See m
Today pharmacies have been pressured NOT to fill valid Ivermectin prescriptions. While they will fill them for scabies, insurers have threatened pharmacists with loss of contracts and other sanctions if they do so for COVID.
Indeed, an individual’s sacred liberty, the right to receive and decline medical care is contained in the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution. The Declaration holds that all individuals possess God-given human rights, and among them include our fundamental rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. The 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution forbid the infringement of these human rights absent due process of law. A mandate by the CDC, FDA, or the President is NOT due process of law.
Government exists to serve the people and protect these fundamental human rights. As Jefferson put it, “Government exists for the interests of the governed, not for the governors.”
If a governor or president told you his patience is wearing thin because you are not surrendering a Liberty right, Jefferson and Kennedy would both advise you to replace that governor or president. Likewise, if a government agency does that, Jefferson and Kennedy would recommend reforming that agency.
In addition, such edicts MUST be challenged in the courts immediately. Control of overbearing government is the essence of Jefferson’s and the other Founder’s separation of powers. These built-in checks and balances were designed to prevent and challenge such abuses of power – those occasions when government acts against the people.
Indeed Robert Frances Kennedy, President Kennedy’s late brother, spoke about the duty of governments to preserve the individual’s liberty. He uttered the following words in his historic Ripple of Hope speech delivered in South Africa on June 6, 1966,
“At the heart of that western freedom and democracy is the belief that the individual man, the child of God, is the touchstone of value, and all society, all groups, and states exist for that person’s benefit. Therefore the enlargement of Liberty for individual human beings must be the supreme goal and the abiding practice of any western society.”
Senator Robert Kennedy was 40 years of age in 1966 and identified with the “younger generation.” He expounded on the meaning of Liberty in the context of human rights,
“The first element of this individual Liberty is the freedom of speech; the right to express and communicate ideas, to set oneself apart from the dumb beasts of field and forest; the right to recall governments to their duties and obligations…”
In his 1966 Ripple of Hope speech, Senator Kennedy warned of what could happen if the government ceased to protect these rights.
“Hand in hand with freedom of speech goes the power to be heard – to share in the decisions of government which shape men’s lives. Everything that makes man’s lives worthwhile – family, work, education, a place to rear one’s children and a place to rest one’s head – all this depends on the decisions of government; all can be swept away by a government which does not heed the demands of its people, and I mean all of its people.”
Kennedy warned that a government must be limited in its power to act against the people.
He explained this to the students at The University of Capetown, “These are the sacred rights of western society. These were the essential differences between us and Nazi Germany as they were between Athens and Persia. They are the essences of our differences with communism today. I am unalterably opposed to communism because it exalts the state over the individual and over the family and because its system contains a lack of freedom of speech, of protest, of religion, and of the press, which is characteristic of a totalitarian regime.”
Today, I have a difficult time recognizing America. Our leaders no longer stand for freedom, liberty, and human rights. Instead, they champion censorship, propaganda, and totalitarian dictates. As a result, we no longer have a free press.
When Senators and Congressmen attempt to stifle booksellers under the color of government authority, these are alarming signs that book banning is next.
This technique has been frequently used by the Chinese Communist Party, as described in the following Harvard article. As it turns out, this type of internet propaganda is now a weapon of choice that our American government is using against us.
I often wonder how different the world would have become had Robert Kennedy lived if he could have avoided the assassin’s bullet in 1968, which ended his run for president. Yet, in direct contradiction, members of his party today are against the very freedoms he supported, such as freedom of speech, freedom of medical choice, freedom of the press, and essential liberties – those principles that have successfully protected and guided and anchored our nation for centuries.
However, Robert Francis Kennedy and Thomas Jefferson are not our only authoritative past voices on these current issues.
They would say that we must object to today’s attack on freedom and human rights – WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW – by an oppressive and corrupt government. We must object to censorship in all of its forms. After all, our nation has existed free for the past 245 years, an entire 22 generations, and we should not let it fall to communism on our watch.
Eric Clapton’s voice is representative of millions. He astutely observed that the assault on freedom is often lost on our youth who willingly submit to vaccine passports. Youth have always felt invincible, but they cared about freedom in 1966 – because the Holocaust and Hitler were still vivid memories – and because of the recent assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy in 1963.
Today losing freedom is not what most youths consider; they are far more fixated on police brutality or racial and gender inequality. Although these issues are essential, if we fall to a totalitarian regime through pandemic “emergency measures,” these concerns will be rendered moot as such a regime prohibits protest, free speech, and reform.
Therefore, our moral imperative must be that EXTREME VIGILANCE is required at this crucial inflection point in history. Now is not the time to lower one’s guard. On the contrary, with advanced surveillance technologies, recombinant genetic engineering, military vaccine-related mind-control technology, and ever more corrupt governments and scientists, now is the time to question everything and accept nothing without PROOF.
Watch this Pentagon briefing where the scientist reports, “By vaccinating them against this, we will eliminate this behavior.” See mark 00:55.
If we have learned nothing from the lessons of history, we should know that human nature is predictable and dark.
This is not to say people are inherently evil, and it is not to say our current leaders are. The truth is more complicated than black and white. People, even Hitler, will rationalize that what they are doing is morally correct. They believe they are protecting the larger population from a smaller suspect group. In the 1800s, that suspect group was black slaves. In the early 1900s, it became Jews, and then it became Japanese living in America during World War II.
Today the suspect group is the unvaccinated. We are told these people, the vaccine-hesitant, are objects of hate for preventing the nation from reaching herd immunity – which is patently false, as these emergency vaccines FAIL to prevent infection and transmission; therefore, getting to herd immunity through current vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 is a fiction. We are NOT going to reach herd immunity, according to Dr. John Campbell. See mark 1:22
Andrea Pitzer, author of One Long Night: A Global History of Concentration Camps, is quoted in The New Yorker:
“A concentration camp exists, she says, whenever a government holds groups of civilians outside the normal legal process, and nearly all nations have had them. They can be the most savage places on earth, but this isn’t an essential feature… When concentration camps are established, they are usually said to exist to protect the larger population from some suspect group, or to be part of a civilizing message, or to be a way to restrain some group of civilians from supporting hostile forces.”
In addition to the vaccine-hesitant being the suspect group, all who speak in opposition to the government’s Pandemic narrative are also suspect. They are marginalized as conspiracists, misinformation spreaders, or kooks. And somehow, this justifies totalitarian tactics by the state.
Eric Clapton explains how this message is given in the United Kingdom through billboards, advertisements, and various propaganda. He explains that fear is keeping people from speaking out or questioning authority. Fear of reprisal by the government is why many remain silent. See mark 16:30.
When this happens, it is not time to remain silent; it is precisely the moment to speak out. When we fear our government more than we treasure our human rights, the time has come to act.
We must reel our government(s) back in, which is exactly what is required when a government gets out of control, and resorts to censorship, propaganda, and totalitarian directives. Once we allow the government to get away with this, those precious liberties will be lost forever regardless of the excuse. In short, we owe it to those soldiers who fought before us in wars, and we owe it to our descendants, to all those generations who are to follow.
It is not far-fetched to envision our future generations who have lost the freedoms we enjoyed. We should anticipate future generations who serve the needs of a state-sponsored technology-driven and dystopian society ruled by fear. We MUST imagine future generations where the rights of liberty and freedom of speech are only a memory. It is only by confronting this horrific nightmare that we can muster the courage to prevent it.
The youth may not see this coming; however, we are the older and wiser generation(s); we represent the Eric Claptons of this world; we see the warning signs, and we alone have the experience and the responsibility to prevent this.
President Abraham Lincoln said it best on the Gettysburg Battlefield when he vowed to honor the sacrifice of brave soldiers,
“From these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”
We have allowed our government to restrict our mobility, and we have watched helplessly as the government colluded with social media in censorship and propaganda. While we have sadly allowed our government to intimidate us with vaccine mandates and medical care restrictions, it is not too late to correct these errors.
These are minor compared to what may yet come. There is still ample time if we all awaken. But we must act now if we are to avoid the worst mistake of our nation’s – indeed the world’s – history. We must now insist on preserving our sacred rights to Life, Liberty, and Freedom or risk losing them forever. We must ensure that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall never perish from the earth.
Link to Eric Clapton’s release, This Has Gotta to Stop
The Indian Bar Association (IBA) sued WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan on May 25, accusing her in a 71-point brief of causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin.
Point 56 states, “That your misleading tweet on May 10, 2021, against the use of Ivermectin had the effect of the State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin from the protocol on May 11, 2021, just a day after the Tamil Nadu government had indicated the same for the treatment of COVID-19 patients.”
Advocate Dipali Ojha, lead attorney for the Indian Bar Association, threatened criminal prosecution against Dr. Swaminathan “for each death” caused by her acts of commission and omission. The brief accused Swaminathan of misconduct by using her position as a health authority to further the agenda of special interests to maintain an EUA for the lucrative vaccine industry.
Specific charges included the running of a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin and issuing statements in social and mainstream media to wrongfully influence the public against the use of Ivermectin despite the existence of large amounts of clinical data showing its profound effectiveness in both prevention and treatment of COVID-19.
In particular, the Indian Bar brief referenced the peer-reviewed publications and evidence compiled by the ten-member Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) group and the 65-member British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel headed by WHO consultant and meta-analysis expert Dr. Tess Lawrie.
The brief cited US Attorney Ralph C. Lorigo’s hospital cases in New York where court orders were required for dying COVID patients to receive the Ivermectin. In multiple instances of such comatose patients, following the court-ordered Ivermectin, the patients recovered. In addition, the Indian Bar Association cited previous articles published in this forum, The Desert Review.
Advocate Ojha accused the WHO and Dr. Swaminathan in Points 60 and 61 as having misled and misguided the Indian people throughout the pandemic from mask wear to exonerating China as to the virus’s origins.
“The world is gradually waking up to your absurd, arbitrary and fallacious approach in presenting concocted facts as ‘scientific approach.’ While the WHO flaunts itself like a ‘know it all,’ it is akin to the vain Emperor in new clothes while the entire world has realized by now, the Emperor has no clothes at all.”
The brief accused the WHO of being complicit in a vast disinformation campaign. Point 61 states, “The FLCCC and the BIRD have shown exemplary courage in building a formidable force to tackle the challenge of disinformation, resistance, and rebuke from pharma lobbies and powerful health interests like WHO, NIH, CDC, and regulators like the US FDA.”
Dr. Swaminathan was called out for her malfeasance in discrediting Ivermectin to preserve the EUA for the vaccine and pharmaceutical industry. Point 52 reads, “It seems you have deliberately opted for deaths of people to achieve your ulterior goals, and this is sufficient grounds for criminal prosecution against you.”
The Indian Bar Association posted an update on their website June 5, 2021, noting that Dr. Swaminathan had deleted her now-infamous tweet. They wrote, “However, deleting the tweet will not save Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and her associates from the criminal prosecution which is to be launched by the citizens with active support from the Indian Bar Association.”
In this update, Advocate Dipali Ojha clarified the nature of the planned action,
“The Indian Bar Association has warned action under section 302 etc. of the Indian Penal Code against Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and others, for murder of each person dying due to obstruction in treatment of COVID-19 patient effectively by Ivermectin. Punishment under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is death penalty or life imprisonment.”
He further wrote, “After receiving the said notice, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan went on the back foot and deleted her tweet. This has proved the hollowness of the WHO’s recommendation against Ivermectin for COVID-19. The dishonesty of WHO and the act of Dr. Soumya Swaminathan in deleting her contentious tweet was witnessed by citizens across the world, as the news got a wide coverage on social media. By deleting the tweet, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has proved her mala fide intentions.”
The entire world witnessed the effectiveness of Ivermectin against India’s deadly second surge as the locations that adopted it saw their outbreaks quickly extinguished in stark contrast to those states that did not.
Among the most prominent examples include the Ivermectin areas of Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Goa where cases dropped 98%, 97%, 94%, and 86%, respectively. By contrast, Tamil Nadu opted out of Ivermectin. As a result, their cases skyrocketed and rose to the highest in India. Tamil Nadu deaths increased ten-fold.
Tamil Nadu publicly relied upon Dr. Swaminathan’s advice in revoking their initial choice of Ivermectin the day after she recommended against it in her May 10 tweet on social media. As a direct result, Tamil Nadu experienced a surge in COVID death and sickness that continues to this day.
The Indian Bar Association dared to initiate a landmark court case against a Public Health Authority (PHA) to call out corruption and to save lives. As the courts in the United States proved to be the life-saving force to ensure a patient’s right to receive Ivermectin, a court in India is now doing the same.
Criminal prosecution of public health officials will send a powerful signal that disinformation campaigns resulting in death carry consequences. Perhaps this pathway will ultimately break the disinformation and censorship stranglehold around repurposed drug use to save lives. Maybe we will witness other countries following India’s example, both in medicine and in law.
Vandana Shiva (born 5 November 1952) is an Indian scholar, environmental activist, physicist, food sovereignty advocate, and anti-globalization author. Based in Delhi, Shiva has written more than 20 books. Shiva founded the Research Foundation for Science, Technology, and Natural Resource Policy (RFSTN), an organization devoted to developing sustainable methods of agriculture, in 1982. She has traveled the world spreading a powerful message of oneness and interconnectedness.
